Slashdot Mirror


After a User Dies, Apple Warns Against Counterfeit Chargers

After a Chinese woman was earlier this month evidently electrocuted while talking on her iPhone while it was plugged in to charge, Apple is warning users to avoid counterfeit chargers. From CNet: "Last week, reports surfaced in China that suggested the woman, Ma Ailun, might have been using a third-party charger designed to look like the real thing. Although third-party chargers are not uncommon, they vary widely in terms of safety and quality. Earlier this year, safety consulting and certification company UL issued a warning that counterfeit Apple USB chargers were making the rounds and that consumers should be on the lookout for them due to their lower quality and possibly dangerous defects. The company posted the guidance on its site after a woman was allegedly electrocuted while answering a call on her iPhone."

457 comments

  1. Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whether or not the counterfeit charger was the cause, they have reinforced their image and promoted their chargers (as well as discouraging customers from buying their chargers elsewhere).

    1. Re:Smart move by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the "big lie". What is the charger for an Android phone? Oh right, a standard USB cable. What is the charger for an Apple product? Oh right, an electric chair waiting to happen. Compounded by the aluminum case. Hey isn't that the same aluminum case that makes an awful antenna?

      Apple: think deadly.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stinks of BS PR to me. "Might" have been using a 3rd party charger? Please... Get the facts first and then release the article. What if it turns out the charger was an official apple one? Huh? Then what?

    3. Re:Smart move by Stormthirst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I never understood why iPhone's adapter is a completely retarded pile of junk. What's wrong with the standard USB adapter like everyone else? Oh aside from them making a cock load of money from cables.

    4. Re:Smart move by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If the Counterfeit charger was the cause, it was made to look like an Apple charger. So the crook who made the dangerous product, probably stepped on a slew of other copyright and trademark infringement issues as well. Saying you should use Apple chargers isn't going to help much.

      You need a USB certified charger, purchased threw a reputable source. Not something that takes the AC from the wall and gets it to fit into a usb port. It should meet standard USB power output and type.

      Unless apple is making a USB charger that doesn't follow USB Specs. Than Apple really should get their butts sued because they are making a misleading product. If I can fit a USB plug in it. It should give me the same power as with any other usb plug.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Smart move by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the charger that plugs into your wall is IS a usb connection, the same type that comes with your android tablet, phone, camera whatever these days

      the problem is some dipshit designer makes knockoffs and does not adhere to basic common sense principals

      I am no apple fanboi, have no apple products, but your post serves no point other than to be a shit tosser when you clearly dont have the brains to comprehend that ANY SHITBALL EL CHEAPO CHARGER CAN DO THIS not just apple's

      so feel safe next time you charge up your precious chintek android using a wall wart you bought for 99 cents off of ebay

    6. Re:Smart move by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope.

      Both iPhones and Apples come with a little AC->USB charging brick and a cable. The difference with most Android phones is that the cable is a standard USB cable, not a 30-pin or lightning cable. But the brick is the dangerous part.

      Ken Shirriff did a couple excellent tear downs last year comparing the build of the Apple charger vs a cheap knockoff.

      You can have this exact same problem using a cheap knockoff with an Android phone so be careful!

    7. Re:Smart move by blueg3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not that I particularly like the cable, but some reasons are: It predates USB being a standard for charging devices. It used to need to support FireWire in addition to USB. It still supports running audio and video over the wire in a "raw" form (rather than as some USB data device), which is actually a fairly useful feature.

      Only the last of these is really useful any more. If that feature happens to be useful, the iPhone implementation is actually fairly good. Using Android phones as video sources tends to suck. A few phones have mini HDMI connections (note that the iPhone connector predates HDMI, too), but not many. A few have stupid proprietary HDMI + USB ports that at least are compatible with conventional USB-only cables. Some phones support screencasting or video sourcing through DLNA or proprietary solutions, but those require a network.

    8. Re:Smart move by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's dumb luck. People have been hit by lightning and survived. People have been electrocuted on the electric chair and have survived. Getting killed by a phone charger? (IF that's what actually happened, which I'm somewhat sceptical about.) She must have had a really bad day.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Smart move by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's the "big lie". What is the charger for an Android phone? Oh right, a standard USB cable. What is the charger for an Apple product?

      The Apple charger has a standard USB power port. Just like all Android chargers that plug into a power outlet.

      Here is Apple's standard USB charger. Note that it has a USB port.

      Here is a Galaxy S4 USB charger. Not that is has a USB port.

      Either charger can be used interchangeably to charge either phone.

    10. Re:Smart move by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      You can charge an iDevice from any USB source. An iPad might charge slowly from a low amp source, but it will charge. They're bolt standard USB devices in this respect.

      As you point out, the unlucky victim could well have been using an Android device or, heaven forbid, a Blackberry.

      Although it really does take a whole bunch of incompetence to make a USB charger that will actually present mains voltage to the device case.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Smart move by Type44Q · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's wrong with the standard USB adapter like everyone else? Oh aside from them making a cock load of money...

      What's wrong with the standard butt load or ass load like everyone else uses? Butts and asses generally hold larger loads than do cocks, thus serving as more effective terms for expressing the concept of an impressively large unit of volume (unless you were specifically referring to the cocks of large marine mammals?).

    12. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "purchased threw a reputable source"?

      Really?

    13. Re:Smart move by sdsucks · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the reminder of why I never read this place anymore - the idiocy. Think just for a minute, that the counterfeit charger included an AC-DC adaptor... Wow, that opens up a completely new aspect to you?

      Jesus fuck. The only thing stupider is that someone actually found your comment "interesting". Can't even imagine the fucking tool that is interested by that.

    14. Re:Smart move by twistedsymphony · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Didn't apple recently change their proprietary connector design around the release of the iPhone 5? and doesn't that new design remove support for raw audio/video through their proprietary port?

      The old iPhone connector was excusable for the reasons you've stated... the new one has no excuse to not conform to the new standard aside from Apple wanting to further bleed their customers of money.

    15. Re:Smart move by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      It's fun to mix it up once in a while.

    16. Re:Smart move by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      The whole "if it can fit, it should work" thing never works. Intel made a video adapter that looks identical to PCIe (although some ports can use PCIe as well, but not all). I've also had issues with some PCIe video cards not working with every motherboard with a PCIe port (most likely HP's crappy motherboards were to blame). USB-B will fit rather nicely in an Ethernet port, as if it belongs. PS/2 keyboard and mouse plugs are identical, but only interchangeable on some motherboards. My old Magellan GPS had a standard looking USB cable, but two of the pins were fused together; if it didn't detect the fused pins, it wouldn't charge properly. There's loads more examples of things that will fit, or in some cases are physically identical but still won't work.

    17. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Just for fun: Nobody, not even a single person or even animal, has ever been electrocuted and survived in any situation, ever.

    18. Re:Smart move by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the new "lightning" connector didn't pre-date the standard, nor does it support the analog data. It basically just makes you buy their prorietary cables. Yes, you can plug them in either way.

    19. Re:Smart move by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      What is the charger for an Android phone? Oh right, a standard USB cable. What is the charger for an Apple product?

      Half a standard USB cable, and the other half a denser connector. The cable isn't important, though. What matters is the adapter it plugs into, and that's what Apple is claiming.

      Long story short, Apple and other brand-name chargers produce fairly well-regulated power that's very unlikely to do things like short out or explode. Cheaper options use cheaper circuits that aren't as well-designed, sometimes with catastrophic consequences.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    20. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think they use to load those butts/asses in the first place?

    21. Re:Smart move by Stormthirst · · Score: 1, Informative

      I call bullshit on this. I have a Rio Carbon which was released in 2004 which uses a USB charger as standard.

    22. Re:Smart move by RaceProUK · · Score: 1
      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    23. Re:Smart move by Tough+Love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Apple charger has a standard USB power port.

      "Has a" is not the same as "is a". Even in a reality distortion zone.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    24. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new "lighting" connector is very solid and handy, contrary to micro USB.

    25. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      or, heaven forbid, a Blackberry.

      Come to think of it, that might be exactly what happened...

    26. Re:Smart move by bobbied · · Score: 1

      That's just shocking! Oh wait....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    27. Re:Smart move by Rosyna · · Score: 0

      It is a standard USB power port.

    28. Re:Smart move by rullywowr · · Score: 1

      I prefer "shitload" myself.

    29. Re:Smart move by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Actually, I stand corrected. It takes only ordinary incompetence to make a USB charger that will present mains voltage to the device case.

      Remember guys, size matters.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    30. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A butt load or an ass load just isn't enough for apple.

    31. Re:Smart move by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two things:

      1) the iPod was released in 2001
      2) USB charging as an industry-wide standard likely didn't happen until later than 2004 (though not 100% certain on this one).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    32. Re:Smart move by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Metric or Imperial?

      --
      No sig today...
    33. Re:Smart move by petman · · Score: 2

      The Apple charger does not have a standard USB power port. It is not wired correctly like a standard USB charger. If I plug in my Android phone to an Apple charger, it thinks that the charger is a USB host device, not an AC charger.

    34. Re:Smart move by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "purchased threw a reputable source"?

      Really?

      I've played that sentence through my screen reading software 3 times and it sounds fine to me.

    35. Re:Smart move by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      actually.. due to the plug design, it's slightly more probable to get electrocuted with an apple cable.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    36. Re:Smart move by solidraven · · Score: 0

      There is no reason not to use micro USB, and do you know why? There was a lot of thought put into the design. It's sturdy enough to avoid bending and so on, very small, provides good electrical connectivity, and it's considerably cheaper to manufacture. Side bonus is that it detaches from your phone if there's a sudden pull on it, if the connector was implemented correctly that is. There is nothing handy about their proprietary connector, other than making money that is.

    37. Re:Smart move by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The Apple charger has a standard USB power port."

      Wrong.

      http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs

      Read the v1.2 specification.

      Then check the voltages/resistances between D+ and D- of an Apple "dumb charger" for compliance to that specification.

      Or take my word for it: It will fail. Floating one pin at 2.0 volts and one at 2.8 with resistive voltage dividers is NOT compliant with that specification.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    38. Re:Smart move by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The point of the USB was to make the Bus Universal (and Serial). It isn't like some of the older technology that reused incompatible ports that fit into each other. The USB was designed to be if it fits it should work.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    39. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hands?

    40. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can plug them in either way.

      That is a pretty underrated feature actually.
        My Thinkpad has a circular connector that you can plug in either way while the connector to my HP only is symmetric in a way that only the two opposing angles work.
      I really like the old Thinkpad design, too bad that Lenovo vill screw that up.

    41. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. I stayed at a cheapo Hampton a few months ago, and not only did the room have three electrical sockets on the desk by the door, the lamp on the desk had two USB charging ports on the base.

    42. Re:Smart move by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Although it really does take a whole bunch of incompetence to make a USB charger that will actually present mains voltage to the device case.

      It takes incompetence in the US, but in China, saving money outweighs safety.

    43. Re:Smart move by omnichad · · Score: 3, Informative

      It became an officially mandated standard in the EU for cell phones in 2010.

    44. Re:Smart move by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      My wife's Android phone does that to every charger except the one it came with, leading me to believe it's the phone's detection that's wrong, not the charger.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    45. Re:Smart move by cosm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Incorrect. The difference is the iPhone has the best new...
      (*_*)
      ( *_*)>-o-o
      (o_o)
      ...killer app.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    46. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at tear downs of fake Apple chargers, the problem seems to be they're trying to mimic Apples tiny little white cube. Getting everything in there tight and safe is a hard engineering problem. Android chargers don't try and match Apple chic and tiny size. Cheap chargers still have crappy electronics, even Android ones, but at least they've got room for better isolation.

    47. Re:Smart move by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

      Only if the android phone has a metal case and routes incoming power into the case. Many phones would just give off a puff of smoke if fed AC, rather than frying the user. I mostly blame the maker of the 3rd party charger, but AC into your 30-pin or lightning connecter shouldn't electrify the phone's exterior. I thought this was a hoax at first because I could not believe power would be routed to the phone's exterior.

    48. Re:Smart move by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      With the android phone how do you know the OEM charger is any good in the first place?

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    49. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking morons with their fucking defenses. Nobody's complaining about the USB wall wart. People are complaining about the port on the phone, which sure as hell ain't USB, you fucking moron.

    50. Re:Smart move by cusco · · Score: 1

      Huh? I plug my Nexus 7 into my laptop with a USB cable that says 'Motorola' on it all the time. I move data onto and off of the device, and charge it with that. I'm not even sure where the original cable is any more, this one came with a phone headset.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    51. Re:Smart move by sribe · · Score: 2

      Just for fun: Nobody, not even a single person or even animal, has ever been electrocuted and survived in any situation, ever.

      If you're going to be pedantic, you should at least try to be correct. The definition of "electrocution" is "death or injury from electric shock", so yes indeed, many people have survived it. In fact, I would bet on hundreds of thousands per year. Myself, I've survived it multiple times...

    52. Re:Smart move by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Apple should have used the connector redesign opportunity to make something that was completely compatible with micro-USB rather than the Lightning connector.

      Prior to that redesign, it was the same design since the first-generation iPod.

    53. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But doesn't allow controls like Apple's cables do.

      So, yes there is a reason not to use USB.

    54. Re:Smart move by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      One device using it doesn't make it a "standard", and the iPhone cable is from 2001 (it debuted with the first-generation iPod).

    55. Re:Smart move by solidraven · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of difference in the cheap knockoff ones. Fact of the matter is that if they hire a bunch of Indian college graduates to do it, well... Then you get something very dangerous. The real problem is that they don't stick to the reference designs of the semiconductor manufacturers. I've built countless flyback SMPS that run off the mains directly without ever having one blow up or anything weird. You just have to follow the design guidelines and avoid fake components. The latter is far more difficult, especially in large quantities. Chinese manufacturers flood the market with poor quality transformers and electrolytic capacitors, and when you're trying to lower cost you can sometimes run into a batch of those without realising it. That's why you should always order directly from a manufacturer's official suppliers. I've encountered electrolytics that lose 30% of their capacity after a week of use, and transformers where they used what seemed like standard varnish to coat the wires. Another thing the cheap manufactures often cheat with are ferrites. It's easy enough to place a few in the circuit yourself if you find the noise annoying. But to label all Chinese knock-off supplies as crappy is far from true. I've encountered some very nice and reliable SMPS modules from Chinese battery manufacturers, and that at very low prices. You simply have to be careful and put some research into it.

    56. Re:Smart move by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Does that stop any other phone from having a wall charger? What the hell was the point of that comment?

    57. Re:Smart move by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      It's the "big lie". What is the charger for an Android phone? Oh right, a standard USB cable. What is the charger for an Apple product? Oh right, an electric chair waiting to happen. Compounded by the aluminum case. Hey isn't that the same aluminum case that makes an awful antenna?

      Apple: think deadly.

      Wow, why do I feel like I just criticized the church of scientology?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    58. Re:Smart move by solidraven · · Score: 1, Informative

      It isn't, the pull up resistor configuration is different than with most chargers.

    59. Re:Smart move by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stinks of BS PR to me. "Might" have been using a 3rd party charger? Please... Get the facts first and then release the article. What if it turns out the charger was an official apple one? Huh? Then what?

      It is also irrelevant. If the iPhone allows high current to pass through from the charging port to the user, the iPhone has a defective design.

    60. Re:Smart move by kh31d4r · · Score: 3, Funny

      In that case she was obviously holding it wrong.

    61. Re:Smart move by Guspaz · · Score: 0

      The lightning cable has advantages over micro USB (it's a lot easier to plug in, for one thing), and while not as cheap as micro USB, you can get Lightning cables at Monoprice start at twelve bucks: http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=112&cp_id=11213&cs_id=1083101&p_id=10375&seq=1&format=2

    62. Re:Smart move by sosume · · Score: 1

      Which Apple implemented using an optional adapter. A big finger to the EU consumer, like their pricing strategy.

    63. Re:Smart move by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      USB power only (charging) support was finalized in the late 90s, way before the iPod. You are correct about Firewire, although my ancient 3rd gen iPod doesn't even charge off USB (FW only).

      Several manufactures, including Samsung and HTC, include extra pins on their USB ports for analogue audio/video and HDMI. Ordinary USB cables still fit perfectly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    64. Re:Smart move by devjoe · · Score: 2

      If you read the older article linked within the article for this story you will see that the woman who was electrocuted was using an iPhone 4, not an iPhone 5 as was first reported. So this was indeed using the older connector.

    65. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still handles audio.

    66. Re:Smart move by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      I never understood why iPhone's adapter is a completely retarded pile of junk. What's wrong with the standard USB adapter like everyone else? Oh aside from them making a cock load of money from cables.

      http://www.qables.com/shop/images/pdf/ipodpinout.pdf

      The iPod/iPhone dock connector of old allowed controlling an iDevice with a completely analog signal. You could also get line level input and output just by connecting a pin. How do you do that with a USB connection without adding a USB host controller and the software to the host device (radios, car controls, etc).?

    67. Re:Smart move by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Fake AC Adapter is the least unlikely explanation. It only takes one idiot (and he doesn't have to be particularly idiotic), the others are incredibly unlikely, or take multiple idiots.

      First the incredibly unlikely. The iPhone 4 has been out for almost exactly three years (first units shipped July 24, 2010). By now there have to be a 100 million of the damn things floating around. If they were dangerous we'd have dozens and dozens of dead Apple fans. It's possible Apple re-designed their AC Adapters really recently, but if that were the case somebody involved in the story would have mentioned it.

      Second, a multiple idiots scenario. First an idiot at FoxConn screws up and manufactures a batch of AC Adapters with defective safety equipment. Second a bigger idiot at FoxConn decides to make little on the side by selling deadly AC Adapters cheap. Since Apple can;t continue to do business with people who endanger it's customers this guy is risking company to make a minuscule amount of money, which makes him quite possibly the biggest idiot in the history of human-kind.

      Third, the one-idiot scenario. One idiot makes shitty, unsafe AC Adapters. People aren't suicidal, so they don't buy them. He is stupid, so he doesn't think the problem is he sucks at his job, he thinks the problem is people don't trust him enough. So he slaps the Apple logo on the next batch. Given that China gave us counterfeit Apple Stors I;d be stunned if some fast-talking hustler hadn't decided to make cheap AC Adapters he could sell for genuine Apple prices to yokels.

      I won't die of shock if it turns out that it was not a counterfeit AC Adapter, because people can be incredibly stupid sometimes, but there's a reason the Chinese seem to be zeroing on that explanation:
      http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57594449-37/iphone-related-death-in-china-could-be-linked-to-fake-charger/

      As for the difficulty of finding the damn things, it really depends on a) how hard the Chinese look, and b) how good the counterfeiter is. If the Communist party decrees that every iPhone AC Adapter in the country will be taken to the County courthouse where an electrical engineer will test with his voltmeter, then they'll all be found within a matter of weeks. This is China, it is run by actual Totalitarians, if they decide to crush the dumbass who made this particular AC Adapter he will be crushed. Period. If the counterfeiters screwed up the font or something it's possible they won't need to do that to catch all the bad AC Adapters. Counterfeiting well enough that customers at a bazaar think it;s genuine until they get it home isn't hard, counterfeiting well enough so those customers can;t figure it out even after the local news anchor has told them where you screwed OTOH...

    68. Re:Smart move by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my Nexus 7 will use any micro USB cable I happen to have lying around. I think GP may have just had a bad cable and made an assumption that it was proprietary instead of just a bad cable.

    69. Re:Smart move by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The first-generation iPod did not use the 30-pin dock connector, the first few had a firewire port on them. The 30-pin dock connector was introduced several years later in 2003.

    70. Re:Smart move by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

      Weird. I used a standard cable and got nothing. I found a website that told me that you have to use the original cable, and that solved what I had thought was a driver problem on my PC. I must have had a bad cable, and then been mislead by someone else who believed you need the original. Thanks for the correction!

    71. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) the iPod was released in 2001

      True, but it didn't have USB until 2003.

    72. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have this exact same problem using a cheap knockoff with an Android phone so be careful!

      There's far less incentive to create a cheap/potentially fatal USB wall charger for an Android device because they are already use a commodity (low-cost) item: namely, a micro USB charger.

      When you're stuck paying the Apple tax for the charger because of its proprietary connector, there's more incentive to make cheap/fatal products because it's possible to undercut Apple's price and still make a handsome profit.

    73. Re:Smart move by Rosyna · · Score: 2

      standard USB power port as in the same kind everyone else used/uses. The spec you pointed to didn't exist until 2010. Apple's USB charger predates the Standard standard but does not predate other standard USB chargers. If you've had a standard USB charger before Oct, 2011, chances are great that it does not conform to the 1.2 spec either.

      ("standard" as in bog-standard not as in the 1.2 Battery charging Standard).

    74. Re:Smart move by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Let's be super-pedantic :)
      Does psychological injury count? As in "a good scare", followed by a fear of connecting stuff to power mains?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    75. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded up? I had my first iPod in 2001...

    76. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android chargers don't try and match Apple chic and tiny size.

      Really? My Android charger is tiny, just not gay.

    77. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, from reading that it appears that the Apple version is a reasonable middle ground between the reference design for the L6565 controller chip they use and a cheap charger.
      I would say that Ken gives Apples engineers a bit too much credit for the EMI protection since it feels like that might have been an issue considering that they are routing the secondary side switching current between the PCBs. Seems more like a necessary fix because of problems caused by size restriction.
      I wish that he had a bit more detailed information on the plastics. From what I can tell there is no mechanical boundary between the "sharp" edges of the USB connector and the buffer capacitors and/or the transformer.
      Is there anything that guarantees that there is not risk that sloppy assembly or vibrations connects the backside of the USB connector with either of those?
      The transformer can have a specified distance to the core but the capacitors are definitely not specified for that.

      I would probably avoid any charging brick of that size. There are just as cheap chargers of twice the mechanical size that are perfectly safe. I've seen even cheaper Ericsson chargers without any integrated circuits that still didn't have those safety problems. (But this was before the Sony Ericsson time.)

    78. Re:Smart move by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it existed in the spec, but it wasn't an industry standard for personal electronics to charge over USB at that time. (Mercifully, that time is past.)

      Yes, the fancy Android connections that are electrically compatible with USB are better. :-)

    79. Re:Smart move by sribe · · Score: 1

      Does psychological injury count? As in "a good scare", followed by a fear of connecting stuff to power mains?

      Well, yes or no, would depend entirely on whether you're talking to your psychologist, or you health insurer's claims department ;-)

    80. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you get the Micro-USB cable you tried to use that didn't work? Can it do data transfer from other devices besides the Nexus 7? Sometimes the cheap cables that you get from Wal-Mart or Target are cheap because they only have the power wires and not the data lines. This means that the cable is only useful with power bricks or charging from a USB port. Try to use these for data, and you're not getting anywhere. If you're paying less than $15 for a 6' cable, be wary.

    81. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flashbacks to identical 25-pin parallel and SCSI ports. *shudder*

    82. Re:Smart move by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      So, only about 20 times as expensive.

    83. Re:Smart move by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      One of the main differentiations of the 30-pin was it allowed for faster charging than USB allows. I think the 2.0 spec says no more than 500mA whereas the largest Apple charger could do 2A (mainly for the retina iPad). I think USB 3.0 ups it to 900mA but that is still less than Apple needs.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    84. Re:Smart move by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      It depends on the path the electricity takes.... Generally, if it crosses the heart or the brain, you're in a bad way (still survivable, but much less chance of surviving). If it doesn't cross either, you have a pretty good chance of surviving, though it may cook you pretty well on its way through.

    85. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! NO!
      She was holding wrong!!

    86. Re:Smart move by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      and transformers where they used what seemed like standard varnish to coat the wires

      Are you sure it wasn't shellac? Given that is is typically used as a very inexpensive finish it wouldn't surprise me if it was used in really low cost transformers instead of better materials given that it was used previously.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    87. Re:Smart move by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      The Nexus 7 case is curved and some micro usb connectors with extremely fat bodies will not fully insert into the device. Most do however work just fine.

    88. Re:Smart move by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      Standardized USB charging doesn't really exist, though. 500 mA on 5 volts is universal and of course it's slow (may even be questionable if you want to use a device and charge it at the same time). So you have myriads of proprietary implementations where the device and charger will negotiate to have more amps or volts or both.
      This can lead to a bad user experience, if you use a cable or charger that will only allow you low watts. That's the biggest rationale I can see for the Apple connector.

      There is a recent spec, USB Power Delivery, which will at last bring order to the mess and has multiple profiles like 10 watts, 36 watts, 60 watts, and 100 watts though that latter seems insane. Or USB 3 can be a band-aid, as it specifies 900 mA I think.

    89. Re:Smart move by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't have this problem, since I live in America where the 120V is extremely unlikely to kill me.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    90. Re:Smart move by icebike · · Score: 2

      Not that I particularly like the cable, but some reasons are: It predates USB being a standard for charging devices.

      Please tell me you didn't just write that!?!!

      USB has been a standard for ALL of its possible uses since it was introduced as a STANDARD, long before the iPhone or even the iPod.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    91. Re:Smart move by kiriath · · Score: 1

      I recently switched from an iPhone 5 to a Galaxy S4. The one thing I really miss is the Apple power adapter. I'd pay the money to have a few of them laying around because of their convenience.

      On the flipside, I am thinking about going inductive for charging on the S4... who even needs a cable? :)

    92. Re:Smart move by leighklotz · · Score: 2

      Voltage? Not 5V? I took a quick look through the USB Power Delivery docs and didn't see that.
      Wikipedia doesn't mention it either, though it does discuss the raising of the pre-negotiation current limit from 0.5A to 1.5A, and the max negotiated limit at 5A, which would be 25W.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#Power

      Do you have any links on the higher voltages?

      You probably already understand, but many do not, that you cannot push or provide current at 5V that the device doesn't want. If your device will draw only 500mA due to its internal design, attaching it to a 2A or 5A port won't do anything.

    93. Re:Smart move by Osgeld · · Score: 0

      yea 15-20 amps at 120v wont kill you

      please, do us all a favor, grab two forks and try that out

      dumbass

    94. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're not only going to lie about Lightning not supporting analog data but you're also going to lie about the costs involved? Typical Slashdot for ya.

    95. Re:Smart move by willoughby · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I have an old Nexus S running CM10 which I plug into an Apple charging cube & I've never seen that. The Apple charger is ~2 years old, I wonder if they've changed something.

    96. Re:Smart move by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      If I plug my S3 into my girlfriend's iPhone charger, it only charges at 500mA. If I plug it into my HP Touchpad's charger, it charges at 2amps. It's because the device talks to the charger, finds out what's the allowed maximum. If the device can't talk to the charger, it limits the current to 500mA which is the basic USB spec. Apple uses a different charger communication protocol to most other manufacturers. I even have a car charger that has two ports, one labelled "Apple" and the other labelled "Non Apple". Plug my S3 into the "Apple" port, it charges but extremely slowly, taking 8 hours to fully charge. Move the plug over to "Non Apple" it charges fast, under a hour. So yes, it's USB but it's a different spec internally.

    97. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhH!!!!!!!!!

      (damn lameness filter. "Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING." No shit! How else do I convey The Who?)

    98. Re: Smart move by nbritton · · Score: 1

      Apple: think deadly.

      Shhh, that's phase 3 of the NSA's plans...

    99. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      it's not the volts that kill you (I have taken 50,00 volts from a tesla coil), it's the amps.

    100. Re:Smart move by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Not always. Plug my partner's iPad into my HP Touchpad's 2 amps charger, it just flashes up something like "Charging not supported with this accessory" and flat out refuses to charge until I plug it into an Apple compatible charger. Plugging my S3 into the Touchpad charger works and it charges incredibly fast, going up to full in about a hour.

    101. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an MS degree in electrical engineering (not that it matters) and I have had a personal experience with a bad charger design (generic USB charger in this case with an Android phone).

      The issue is that it was not a floating ground design and it was not a three prong plug. In short, the ground being sent to the phone is one of the legs of the 120v line. In my case, I had the phones headphone out connected to a cable to run into a stereo receiver. The key here is that the ground line was exposed and it brushed against my skin while I was holding a properly grounded device. I got to feel what 120v feels like. Luckily for me, it was just brushing against my skin, and my connection to ground was not perfect.

      Anyway, I now have switched to three prong usb chargers, and I am glad Apple is making this a more publicly known issue.

    102. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was standing in 3/4 of an inch of water trying to disconnect a water heater. I got thrown 20 feet across the basement when I accidentally crossed the two poles of the 240 line with my screwdriver (not a damn fuse was left in the fusebox while I was performing this procedure btw...which means that the heater was tied directly to the trunk going to the pole...which explains the exploding transformer). I still live.

      And no...that was not fun. That. shit. HURT!

    103. Re:Smart move by mcguirez · · Score: 1

      IThe definition of "electrocution" is "death or injury from electric shock"

      Really? In English? I don't know where you getting your dictionary, but the several I referenced stated:

      Definition of ELECTROCUTE

      1: to execute (a criminal) by electricity
      2: to kill by electric shock

      Here's an example: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/electrocute

      Prefer a UK reference? http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/electrocute?q=electrocute

      Much as I hate to side with an AC, so far no one has recovered from an electrocution.

      --
      When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras
    104. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB was designed to be "if it fits it works", but not every device that has a plug/socket that fits a USB counterpart was designed with that goal in mind.

      The fatal flaw in the "If it fits it works" paradigm is that it assumes everyone else will also adhere to it (and if any one asshole get's lazy it all falls apart).

    105. Re:Smart move by icebike · · Score: 1

      Whether or not the counterfeit charger was the cause, they have reinforced their image and promoted their chargers (as well as discouraging customers from buying their chargers elsewhere).

      There are two things at work here, and (much as I'm not an Apple Fanboi) I don't think either one is Apple's fault.

      Its not clear that the fatal charger was Apple or non Apple, but in fact, it probably doesn't matter.

      In the China incident, the deceased climbed out of bath, to answer the phone. The phone was still plugged in, and therefore still hooked to the mains. They use 220Volt mains in China. Water running down the cord to the charger could have provided a current path.

      But even that would hot have been fatal, unless there was another connection, through the feet or hand, to ground.
      So touching a lamp, or a water faucet, or re-entering the bath with phone in hand could have provided that path.

      220 packs quite a punch, and a death grip probably ensued.

      At the same time, most wiring in china is not up to the code expectations we find in Europe and North America. GFCI/AFCI is largely unused in China in residential construction, and wasn't even in their electrical code until a couple years ago.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    106. Re: Smart move by nbritton · · Score: 1

      It is also irrelevant. If the iPhone allows high current to pass through from the charging port to the user, the iPhone has a defective design.

      In that case, the NSA obviously implemented this as a feature... ;-)

    107. Re:Smart move by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Wait, you are saying that you cant send commands over USB?????? REALLY????????

      --
      Good-bye
    108. Re:Smart move by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      The Nexus 7, like the Nook, has a 'special' charging USB cable that can carry more current. The plug-in part is slightly longer. When i use normal phone chargers on my Nexus 7 it takes a lot longer to charge.

      --
      Good-bye
    109. Re:Smart move by sribe · · Score: 1

      Really? In English? I don't know where you getting your dictionary, but the several I referenced stated...

      Interesting, first one I checked was "death or injury", but that was my local desktop widget, which claims to use the New Oxford American Dictionary. Their online version has an absolutely horrible user interface, so I'll spare you the trouble with a direct link.

      Merriam-Webster, as you say, is "death" only, as is an old old copy of the Webster's New Universal Unabridged.

      HELP! ANYBODY OUT THERE GOT A SUBSCRIPTION TO OED ONLINE AND WANT TO SETTLE THIS???

      ;-)

    110. Re:Smart move by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The spec has a section on charging only. It's even called "battery charging". It specifies how to tie the D+/D- lines together to request 1A if available. Go read the spec, it's right there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    111. Re:Smart move by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Based on feedback here, I now believe that is the case, and will spread the misinformation no further.

    112. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obvious that parent isn't trolling, but questioning the question :)

    113. Re:Smart move by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      The lightning end is easy to plug in, but so would MicroUSB since you're plugging it into a well-lit device near your face. The lightning to PC cable is just USB on the other end though, and that's the end that plugs into the poorly-lit back of the PC, and sometimes takes me three tries to get right because I don't want to force it. Apple solved a problem that didn't exist, but it would be nice if we could eventually move to an easy to plug in standard for back of the PC ports.

    114. Re:Smart move by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Nice. I put in some outlets with built in USB at home, and really like the convenience. I can charge 2 devices at the same time, plus two more with power adapters in the AC outlets. They were from ThinkGeek, but I expect they're available elsewhere too.

    115. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's silly. Phones are not designed to handle wall voltage.

    116. Re:Smart move by tehlinux · · Score: 1

      Wireless Qi. Standards are a beautiful thing.

      --
      Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    117. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because when a woman gets out of the shower and is wet, and is holding onto a device plugged directly into the wall, you can be certain that the electricity is going to travel down the safest, most protected path at all times.

    118. Re:Smart move by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with this about how Android is safer. I plugged my USB cable into the wall socket and now have lost all feeling in my hand.

    119. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      and doesn't that new design remove support for raw audio/video through their proprietary port?

      Digital vs analogue is usually seen as a technological improvement.

      The old iPhone connector was excusable for the reasons you've stated... the new one has no excuse to not conform to the new standard aside from Apple wanting to further bleed their customers of money.

      It's versatile enough to last the next decade. Which the USB 2.0 found on Android devices isn't.

    120. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Bullshit.

    121. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Micro-USB is USB 2.0. Which is OK for this year. But it's not going to be good enough for the next decade. USB 3.0 was annoucned 5 years ago, but that won't work with Micro-USB.

      Lightning is forward looking. Micro-USB isn't.

    122. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Slow charging was possible from the start of USB. Fast charging wasn't. Unless you broke the standard. Slow charging isn't good enough for today's smartphones.

    123. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      There's nothing optional about the USB on pre-iPhone 5 iPhones and iPods. The USB presents itself on the far side of the cable included with every device.

    124. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      USB power only (charging) support was finalized in the late 90s, way before the iPod.

      Only slow charging. The power available in the old USB standard is very modest, resulting in some devices being powered by using two USB cables in parallel.

      Fast charging became part of the standard years later, well into the iPod period.

    125. Re:Smart move by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Did you really?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    126. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also irrelevant. If the iPhone allows high current to pass through from the charging port to the user, the iPhone has a defective design.

      This is NOT insightful, this is stupid.

      1. People do not get electrocuted with 5V. Sorry. (not without major aids!)
      2. Any USB brick that can power a device, cannot put out enough current to do you much harm (again, without major help like wiring it into your heart or brain or something)
      3. If you (or if I) have read TFA, it may (or may not? who knows!) point out that

          A) for device to work, GND->+5V was in fact 5V
          B) to die from electrocution, the problem is that GND was in fact at 220VAC or whatever China's power is at.

      In the nutshell, it is NOT possible for the iPhone to protect you from floating ground! This is why people should insist that ALL their devices are grounded - have 3 prongs. 1 for AC. 1 for ground return. 1 for actual ground. And then you connect the actual ground to the USB cable case and the device case. So if there is a fuckup with internal circuits in the power brick, it may kill your iPhone, but it will not kill you. Without proper wiring, the reverse may just happen where the iPhone is fine, but the user will die.

      PS. TFA is POS and worthless. And Apple's charger doesn't have 3 prongs either - so *I* would not call it safe either. If you want safe charging, charge from regular computer. At least that power supply has 3 prongs and will not kill you.

    127. Re:Smart move by r2kordmaa · · Score: 1

      Not bullshit, apple plug is extremely compact ac adapter. And if you have a chinese knockoff that doesnt have half the safety features it should the compactness and closeness of the components makes it more dangerous. Chinese have made copies of every other cellphone charger for decades and you really dont hear of people getting electrocuted by them - because these designs are not packed as tightly and therefore saving on quality and safety is not as dangerous.

    128. Re:Smart move by fnj · · Score: 1

      And if in turn _you_ are going to be pedantic, then let _me_ be pedantic by pointing out you are are wrong.

      Electrocution, source 1:
      1. to kill by electricity.
      2. to execute (a criminal) by electricity, as in an electric chair.
      Origin: 1885–90, Americanism; electro- + (exe)cute

      Electrocution, source 2:
      1: to execute (a criminal) by electricity
      2: to kill by electric shock
      — electrocution noun
      Origin of ELECTROCUTE
      electr- + -cute (as in execute)
      First Known Use: 1889

      Yes, the word has been dumbed down by some stupid dictionaries due to dumb people using it wrong so frequently. The derivation should be your CLUE to what the real meaning is.

      Clue: you have never been electrocuted.

    129. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FireWire is not an excuse, it was also Apple's deviation.

    130. Re:Smart move by solidraven · · Score: 2

      You clearly don't design electronics. Why use a new system that will add a considerable cost to your product if the old, well spread, reliable standard is available?

    131. Re:Smart move by oji-sama · · Score: 2

      Those are limits for ports with data transfer, for charging ports the values are higher. (And USB cable spec says 1.5A if I remember correctly)

      --
      It is what it is.
    132. Re:Smart move by solidraven · · Score: 1

      Possibly, it's hard to tell based on sight. But it at least smelled like varnish, and the paper layers in between were coated in the same product. Either way it's a sign of crappy quality, especially considering you can buy spools of coil wire for next to nothing these days.

    133. Re:Smart move by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      USB is a standard that has grown over time both through additions to the core standard and through the introduction of side standards such as "on the go", "battery charging, power delivery " etc. According to the revision history in version 1.1 of the battery charging specification) the first version of the "battery charging" standard was released in 2007.

      You could build a device that charged over USB before the "battery charging" standard but there was no official way to do a dumb charger (you could in theory build a charger with a full USB host in it but I don't think anyone did). USB devices are not supposed to draw any significant power pre-enumeration and there was no standard way to indicate a dumb charging port. So vendors who wanted to charge over USB did one of two things, either they made their devices ignore the USB power rules and just charge whenever they saw 5V or they invented vendor specific ways of indicating a dumb charging port.

      Then the USB battery charging spec came along and standardised how to indicate a dumb charging port, how to indicate a downstream port with extra power available for charging etc.

      More recently there has been another new spec "USB power delivery" which allows delivery of much higher ammounts of power (enough to power/charge a laptop) down a "USB" connection but afaict it's rarely used..

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    134. Re:Smart move by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Heard about fuses and breakers? They protect against overvoltage, and you also put them on circuits where you don't expect high voltage, in case something goes wrong and an external device feeds you high voltage. If I feed 220V into the 18V port of my laptop, it will stop working, because the circuit breaker fries. But it won't feed the 220V on and fry me.
      To not add this protection is criminal neglect, and I cannot see how they possibly could get TUV and UL certification

    135. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "purchased threw a reputable source"?

      Really?

      I've played that sentence through my screen reading software 3 times and it sounds fine to me.

      reputable sources can be heavy so lift with your legs not your back!

    136. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Not quite true.

      Absolutely true. That's a different connector.

    137. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple times?

      You're doing something very, very wrong regardless of your goal

    138. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      For the same reason we don't still use RS232 and Centronics. Time moves on. Old standards no longer do what we need of them.

      Android devices will have to move on to a different connector for USB 3.0. Just as Apple has had to move on to a different connector.

      The stupid thing is Android fanboys criticising Apple for moving on from a connector that's been used for the last decade.

      There's an argument to be made between Apple's new proprietary connector and USB 3.0. But arguing for the current micro-USB (USB 2.0) as an option is blatantly short sighted.

    139. Re:Smart move by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      The Nexus 7, like the Nook, has a 'special' charging USB cable that can carry more current. The plug-in part is slightly longer. When i use normal phone chargers on my Nexus 7 it takes a lot longer to charge.

      The tip of the cable being slightly longer is to accommodate the curve on the edge of the N7. A cable being able to carry more current makes no difference if the power source is the same (ie. a USB port on your PC).

    140. Re:Smart move by Stalks · · Score: 1

      FUD. I have a micro USB3 portable SSD which is backwards compatible to any of the MicroUSB2 cables I have around.

      https://www.google.com/search?q=micro+usb3

      The only real-life difference with lightning is "doesn't matter which way I plug it in". The rest is just great technical sheet data.

    141. Re:Smart move by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Per connector it is 500mA, however multiple connectors like a Y type connector can be used to double the power.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    142. Re:Smart move by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I just want to point out that computers are now starting to come with higher amp USB ports (plain USB 3.0 and also special ports designated high current) My Asus motherboards each have single AI Charger ports that provide at least 1A, the new Asus notebooks will even charge stuff while the laptop is off.

      --
      Good-bye
    143. Re:Smart move by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The charger is about as standard as you can get for the iPhone. It will charge (nearly) any device, and it will charge any device. My very old Motorola RAZR was the one thing a "standard" charger would not always work with in my experience.

      Likewise, any USB charger will charge an iPhone. iPads are a little different; my wall outlet receptacle/dual USB chargers can only charge an iPad on one port, but I think it is an issue with the 10W charging more than anything.

    144. Re:Smart move by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      35mA is all it takes to electrocute someone... Limiting current to less than charging current might be problematic...

      If you put 220V on the data pins of any phone you are likely to get a jolt.

    145. Re:Smart move by Proteus · · Score: 1

      The *cable* carries 5VDC at 1A (or almost 2A for an iPad). The electrocution hazard for 5V devices is entirely in the switching power-supply... the part that takes your wall voltage and drops it to 5VDC. Poorly designing that part can lead to too much power on the cable, etc.

      But if you use a decently-designed power supply, even the world's crappiest cable isn't going to be problematic.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    146. Re:Smart move by bbcisdabomb · · Score: 1

      Though not all USB chargers are the same. I have a charger that came with a previous phone that won't charge my Galaxy Nexus, probably because it's only 600mA.

      --
      Please put some pants on before you post again.
    147. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. Last USB 3.0 device I bought came with a micro-USB connector and cable.

    148. Re:Smart move by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I could read that Asus TF700 can do up to 15V/1.2A. I guess the vast majority of consumers stay at 5V, though.
      Of course this is totally illegal (in specs and computer parlance) and restricted to one product or family of products.
      It also seems like it's a proprietary connector that still accept USB cables so perhaps it's not quite USB at all. Out of specs stuff and unusual cabling/connectors make it harder to know what we're talking of, a "HDMI on USB" connector is not so different.

      AmiMoJo corrected me about "charging port" specification (and well you, as well), I think I was wrong. I'm under the impression that you may have a 2A device, a 2A charger and they could fail to handshake and end up at 500 mA at worst, or something like 1A or 1.5A. Or maybe that would happen with some old stuff, older than the spec.

    149. Re:Smart move by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      "Dedicated Charging Port Output Current Min 0.5A, Max 1.5A" according to Battery Charging Specification, Revision 1.1 from 2009. Has not been lowered since. More recently, from 2012 there's the new spec that allows for more power, but uses new cables (if I remember correctly).

      --
      It is what it is.
    150. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Apple chargers are roughly the same size as my non-Apple USB chargers. In fact, my Samsung GS4 charger looks smaller than the new iPod charger. Do you have evidence of your claim, or just making up shit to make Apple look bad? Because reality seems to prove you wrong. My cite? Reality.

    151. Re:Smart move by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia says the charging spec is from 2007. Which is an eternity ago, I have trouble realizing that 2007 was six years ago lol. As you mentioned the late 90s, I thought you were talking about simply providing reliable 500 mA on 5V. Lowest power mode is 100 mA max draw (a completely dumb device, like a tiny lamp or fan can use that on any port I guess). I mixed things up.

    152. Re:Smart move by msauve · · Score: 1

      You're implying that a poorly designed USB charger couldn't let common mode powerline voltage through. You're mistaken.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    153. Re:Smart move by msauve · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in the bathtub when you answer your phone which is at powerline voltage due to a defective charger.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    154. Re:Smart move by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is useful. My gym just moved and when they opened had all new cardio machines (Precor P80). The machines have touchscreens with built in TV tuners, and also have an iPod/iPhone dock. I've only seen the dock used to charge phones, and occasionally play music. It can however be used for video as well, though I've never seen anyone else use it for that. So rather than watch Judge Judy or whatever's on at 5:00, I can load my downloaded or streaming TV shows onto my iPod Touch (4g) and watch it while I bike. Now with iPhone 5 those are all obsolete. I also bought a pair of bluetooth headphones since the cable was getting in the way. LG tone 700. The 730 "is better" but has issues with iOS 6.

      I also use CopyTrans Manager so I don't have to use the disaster known as "iTunes" to load mp4 files into the video library.

      Too bad Apple couldn't do something like base their connector around a micro-USB connector, so you could use standard cable for basic charging and data, and a fancier dock connection for video out, accessories, etc. Similar to how MicroUSB for USB 3.0 is based around a standard MicroUSB connector

      It's also a bitch what they did with their new connector. With my iPod I bought a bunch of ipod cables at the dollar store, so I can have one at work, one in my suitcase, one in the car, where the new connector has to have Apple authorized ($$) chipped cables.

    155. Re:Smart move by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that the problem does exist. My iPhone is still using the dock connector, and it's pretty common for me to try to put it in the wrong way (gotta look for the hard to see icon on the plug that is normally hidden by your thumb to know which way to plug it in). Not having to care which way the plug goes in would be helpful. MicroUSB are even worse, because they don't have that thing, and I'm always plugging those things in the wrong way (or more often, stopping to visually match up the right direction based on the shape of the tiny plug).

      As for the USB end, that's still a problem, true (although USB really ought to have been designed to go in either way), but there's not much we can do about that, since it has to work with the generic ports found on PCs. Few people would frequently plug/unplug the cord from the back of their PC anyhow, since laptops have ports on the sides these days, and pretty much all computers have front-mounted USB ports.

    156. Re: Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys totally missed the point. There is nothing unique about the USB CABLE. The charger itself is actually a complicated thing http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html

      The counterfeits are hardly anymore than a voltage transformer connected directly to the USB port pins.

      HP and Samsung make USB chargers that also work fine. Everyone else (LG,Motorola,Huawei,etc) cut corners, and not always the same ones. They all get their chargers from China, and in some cases only differ by the housing.

    157. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I still have MP3 players which predate the iPhone by years and use USB for charging.

      Your post is typical apologist, revisionist Apple shit.

    158. Re:Smart move by serbanp · · Score: 2

      There is a recent spec, USB Power Delivery, which will at last bring order to the mess and has multiple profiles like 10 watts, 36 watts, 60 watts, and 100 watts though that latter seems insane.

      If you think that the USB Power Delivery spec is anything but a pile of spaghetti hardware, you have not read or worked with it. To support all these power levels you first need a handshaking procedure for the host and slave to agree what are both capable of, then oversized DC/DC converters at both ends. Overall, that's much more expensive to implement than more sane alternatives.

    159. Re:Smart move by solidraven · · Score: 2

      You know what's funnier? That Apple's special connectors all go to a USB socket anyway...

      And both of those (RS232 and IEEE1284) are still in use in industrial and lab settings, no reason to ditch a system that works reliably. IEEE1284 was called obsolete by the late 90s, yet IEEE bothered to update the standard anyway in 2000 simply because it was still useful. RS232 is still commonly used at hardware level, you're simply not aware of it. A lot of bluetooth devices transmit data to an integrated bluetooth IC as if it were RS232 communications. And so on... In fact a more rampant case of ancient bus usage in modern equipment is IEEE488 (GPIB / HPIB), it simply won't die. Many have tried, even more have failed at replacing it. It ain't going nowhere simply because the T&M industry realises that GPIB has a few advantages. It's a very simple bus architecture, rugged connectors, reliable (even under high EM noise as you might encounter in an electronics lab), and it can chain and stack several devices easily. The only thing that has come somewhat close is Firewire, but that one has several other problems (complicated implementation, bus management issues, etc.). Don't always think newer is better.

    160. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is still backward compatible with USB 2 and 1...

    161. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, GFCI/RCD would have prevented the death. Maybe people will start using them more. I just buy GFCI breakers for every breaker in the house. No reason not to, they don't fail that often, and for not too much more, every circuit is protected if someone dashes to another room to answer a phone while wet and flips a light switch or turns off a radio while dripping wet.

    162. Re:Smart move by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      "purchased threw a reputable source"?

      Really?

      I've played that sentence through my screen reading software 3 times and it sounds fine to me.

      But I trust your screen reading software as far as I can through it.

    163. Re:Smart move by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      A customer had an issue with our product which runs on +24VDC. We specify a fully isolated supply that is UL, CSA and other certifications that costs around $40 - $60 depending on the maximum current it will safely supply.

      They'd bought their own supply. I asked them to send me one so I could test it and they did. It had a rectifier diode and a resistor divider in it. They had high enough wattage they didn't fail and the plastic was designed to not melt from the heat. That's it. It did tend to make the system somewhat psychotic since it wildly fluctuated and there was no safety isolation. It had all the spiffy labels on it saying it was approved. It was made in China.

      Test the chicom crap you buy if it's going in something that can kill people.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    164. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The path is from the plug -> adapter -> phone -> body -> ground. The cell phone adapter is supposed to use spacing and a transformer (magnetically coupled device) to deliver power that is isolated from the AC so the adapter has to provide the protection, not the phone.

      Show me an isolated cell phone. One with no metal contacts or connectors. Your wall plug could have a GFI circuit built in to disconnect when there's a fault but here in Canada you will only find one of those in the bathroom. This is an extra layer of protection for your hair dryer, electric toothbrush or electric razor in an area where there is water that might bypass the devices built in protection or safety design.

      If it was an Apple adapter then it could have been a manufacturing defect but I doubt it. Since they are VDE/UL/CSA approved then the manufacturer, not Apple by the way, will test 100% of these to withstand 1.5kV isolation if not more. It could be a latent component defect of the EMI cap but they are special caps that also need to meet VDE / UL / CSA standards.

      It could have been an Apple designed adapter for sure but I would bet money that it wasn't. A cheap adapter is what people go for without knowing the difference. They are made with cheap components, they are not safety certified which costs money to certify by the way and they are not designed with safety in mind by experienced electrical engineers. They are imitated, not cloned. There is also the issue of fake components. Even a properly designed adapter may be manufactured with fake components to make it cheaper.

      It costs money to make sure the design is safe and the complete supply and manufacturing chain is not cutting corners. It is not a defective phone design.

    165. Re:Smart move by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      This could be a fun connector to use once the patent runs out. I even have it on a small Philips stereo but I can't use it because legal threats prevent compatible media players being made.
      It has a serial port, though. That doesn't seem "completely analog" to me.

      How do you get sound input/output and control with USB instead? Seems doable to me, if you reverse the roles. The iPod-like device would be the host, and the radio or car the device. USB covers audio and input already, so the radio or car would only have to pretend it's a sound card, and a keyboard or mouse or joystick. Have it include or emulate a USB hub. The radio can even give storage and networking to the iPod-like, I guess.

      Maybe missing in that scheme : the device has to charge the host! It's covered by "PD aware" USB.

    166. Re:Smart move by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It predates USB being a standard for charging devices. It used to need to support FireWire in addition to USB.

      That makes sense for the iPhone 3/4 connector.

      It's totally not an excuse for the iPhone 5 lightning adapter.... although, it does have the advantage that you can plug in the spade in either orientation, and it just works: with USB, you have to look at the adapter and make sure the orientation is correct.

    167. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm, no fuses and breakers will not protect you from electrocuting yourself. Fuses and breakers also do NOT respond to high voltage. They respond to high CURRENT. The "floating ground" the parent refers to is the following situation: the phone sees 5 volts DC, you, as a well grounded person, see two inputs, one at 220 V and the other at 215. Coming from those sources a hundred mA or so will leak through your body, and if you are grounded in the right spot you'll get enough current across your heart to stop it. There are two ways to prevent this, one is make sure everything has all exposed conductive surfaces grounded to earth (the third prong), the other is to use GFCI like on your bathroom outlets, which will disable the circuit when it detects leakage current that could be lethal.

    168. Re:Smart move by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

      electrocution, n.
      Etymology: electro- comb. form + -cution (in execution n.). Compare electrocute v.
      orig. U.S.

        1. Execution by means of a powerful electric current; an instance of this

        2. Death or injury caused by electric shock.

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    169. Re:Smart move by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      any USB charger will charge an iPhone

      With a dongle. That's pathetic.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    170. Re:Smart move by green1 · · Score: 1

      Both my Samsung Galaxy Note 2, and my wife's Samsung Galaxy S4 come with micro-usb connectors and 2A chargers...

    171. Re:Smart move by green1 · · Score: 1

      Somehow other manufacturers get around this limitation of USB. Samsung includes a 2A USB charger and a micro-usb cable with all their latest phones.

    172. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original Apple 30 pin "Dock Connector" combined multiple functions into a single connector via discrete pin connections. Various devices have supported Firewire 400 and USB 2.0 data and power connectivity, analog and digital "line level" audio output (independent of the device's volume setting), analog audio input, composite, component and native HDMI video output, as well as SD card and USB host interfaces. All through a connector unchanged for a decade. People also forget that, when the original 30 pin connector came out in 2003, everyone used proprietary connectors on their USB cables and devices. Apple implemented battery charging via USB several years before the standardized implementation existed. By the time such standardization (based around Micro-USB) did exist, Apple had several years worth of product in the field with the old connector to maintain compatibility with.

      The Lightning connector, while also proprietary, is functionally and technically superior to Micro USB. It has greater durability than Micro USB (or the 30 pin connector) and unlike both it is reversible. Like the 30 pin connector, it allows a multitude of functionality beyond simple USB connectivity. A multitude of third-party cables are available.

    173. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The charging component of the USB spec wasn't promulgated until 2007. The 30 pin "dock" connector was introduced on the 3rd generation iPod in May 2003. Previous iPod's had used a standard 6 pin Firewire cable and connector.

    174. Re: Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was still a USB charger. Why is anyone talking about the dock connector or cables here, the problem is a knock off USB charger dressed up like a name brand one, and well... Not UL tested.

    175. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the China incident, the deceased climbed out of bath, to answer the phone. The phone was still plugged in, and therefore still hooked to the mains. They use 220Volt mains in China. Water running down the cord to the charger could have provided a current path.

      No, it could not have. Not unless they've invented sticky water in China. You know, the kind which sticks to cords so well and flows so little that it could form a continuous, unbroken path along the outside of a cable. No beading up, no dripping off. Great stuff, that sticky water.

    176. Re: Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is anyone remotely surprised the dock connector end remained unchanged... They can change out the PC/power adaptor end and not make all the 3rd party dock connector devices useless.

    177. Re:Smart move by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      No no, controls. Where the device manufacturer controls who is blessed to make peripherals for it!

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    178. Re:Smart move by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      He's referring to the industry standard which dictates cell phones charge using a standard Micro-USB cable. Apple complied with this by releasing a Micro-USB to Lightning/30-pin Dock Connector adapter, which basically defeated the purpose of the standard (to allow any phone to be charged with any cable, and reduce the frequency of having to dig through your drawer for the one charger you need through your 15 Nokia chargers).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    179. Re:Smart move by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Or, you can order some knockoff Lightning cables from DealExtreme for $2 with free shipping.

      Yay China.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    180. Re: Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that most Android phones have plastic housings, they are probably safer in this regard. The extra layer of insulation makes it extremely unlikely that you will come into contact with metal that is shorted to mains.

      Not that this is something I worry about much, but I'm glad to have a plastic cover on my iPhone 4S.

    181. Re: Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be just like "hanged" and "stoned"?

      You could assume death, but saying "... to death" is a common clarification. You could survive any of these and they'd still be accurate descriptions.

    182. Re: Smart move by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Did the charger catch fire? I thought it was the iPhone.

    183. Re:Smart move by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Standardized USB charging doesn't really exist, though.

      Apart from this standard, that is.

    184. Re:Smart move by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      Phones chargers don't follow the USB spec for power. My phone and tablet chargers are 1 and 2 A respectively.

    185. Re:Smart move by Maritz · · Score: 1

      So to summarise; Apple good, Android bad. Got ya. By the way are you saying the legacy iPhone connector was analogue..?!

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    186. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really like Apple. It makes you a bit predictable to be honest.

    187. Re:Smart move by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      got a picture of the screwdriver?

    188. Re: Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a really retarded comment.

    189. Re:Smart move by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Fuses and circuit breakers protect against overcurrent, not overvoltage. You want a MOV or similar device.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    190. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So to summarise; Apple good, Android bad. Got ya. By the way are you saying the legacy iPhone connector was analogue..?!

      Both. It's a 30 pin connector. Amongst them are line in and line out for audio, and both composite and s-video. Those are all analogue. Then there are digital signals for USB and Firewire. Those are digital.

      Android not bad. Just not as good.

    191. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GASP ANOTHER iFAN?!?!? SAY IT ISN'T SO?

      For some reason using an adapter on an idevice is "fairly good", but using an adapter on Android phones "tend to suck".

      Why would I care about running audio/video in "raw form" when a 3.5mm headphone jack and a USB connection (even $5 FM Transmitters support USB Mass storage)? For audiophiles, I think they'd want the actual data->sound conversion to happen as late as possible to reduce the number of transitions (which generally reduce analog audio quality slightly). For non-audiophiles, the playback device now has access to the ID3 tag or filename because it's sending straight up non-DRM'd MP3 files.

      I think the term you're looking for is MHL, which is supported by several large companies and is practically an industry standard. Some newer TVs just require a standard microusb cable and bam, you're laughing. Older ones require a $10-20 adapter. Just because there's an option for DLNA doesn't mean you're forced to use it. LOL

    192. Re:Smart move by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Somehow other manufacturers get around this limitation of USB.

      There's no somehow to it. The USB standard for fast charging came in 2007 and was updated in 2010. This was long after the Apple 30 Pin dock connector which dates back to 2003.

      Apple was fast charging years before any Android was.

    193. Re: Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bs - ours got a little kinked and made our usb charger go wonky and actually killed my laptop's power supply when I connected the ipod 5 to the laptop (I didn't believe it at first too). other (unkinked) cable works fine. so if you haven't already, reinforce it with some heat shrink tubing

    194. Re:Smart move by hedwards · · Score: 2

      I disagree, by going its own way, Apple has managed to require people to buy special hardware and or cables to do the connections. Whereas the micro-USB cable that I use for my Nexus One will work with pretty much all the other Android devices out there. Not to mention with my Nook and other things which support the micro-USB connection.

      Which means that when I go on vacation I only need one cable to charge those devices rather than one per device. There's a reason why the EU opted to standardize around a single connector, it means that we don't need a bazillion charge cables when we're only going to be using a couple at a time.

    195. Re:Smart move by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's not true. My NJB3 used mini-USB and Firewire for data and because of the voltage requirements it used a normal charging adapter.

      What's more, most of the units that were non-standard were ones that came out before mini-USB was formalized. My Rio 500 was one of them that predated the finalized spec.

      So, it's rather disingenuous to say that a device that was released in 2003, 3 years after the mini-USB spec was finalized, couldn't have used a standard cable. They could just as easily have broken out the non-USB stuff into a separate port and permitted people to use whatever cable they liked. With the added bonus of having some redundancy if one of the jacks became damaged.

    196. Re:Smart move by solidraven · · Score: 1

      Which controls? I can easily multiplex any number of control channels over the USB cable.

    197. Re:Smart move by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

      Exactly! How else is Apple going to make people think that Apple's shit don't stink and make butt loads of money? I recently sold all my Apple stock while it was still fairly high. This just reinforces the wisdom of my decision.

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    198. Re:Smart move by pla · · Score: 1

      Not that I particularly like the cable, but some reasons are: It predates USB being a standard for charging devices.

      Well golly, that excuses Apple products more than a decade old. And everything since then?

    199. Re:Smart move by pla · · Score: 1

      so feel safe next time you charge up your precious chintek android using a wall wart you bought for 99 cents off of ebay

      Wow, racist and hipster douche at the same time.

      I haven't seen that combo before - Kudos!

    200. Re:Smart move by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      This could be a fun connector to use once the patent runs out. I even have it on a small Philips stereo but I can't use it because legal threats prevent compatible media players being made.
      It has a serial port, though. That doesn't seem "completely analog" to me.

      The 30 pin dock connector is not completely analog. You can get audio in and out and video out and send signals to go to next/previous playlist/song and turn it on and off via analog signals.

      There is also a digital interface for more sophisticated hosts to retrieve a list of playlist/songs etc. And of course for connecting to a computer.

      The iPod-like device would be the host, and the radio or car the device. USB covers audio and input already, so the radio or car would only have to pretend it's a sound card, and a keyboard or mouse or joystick. Have it include or emulate a USB hub. The radio can even give storage and networking to the iPod-like, I guess.

      That still requires electronics and software -- compared to just sending the right electrical pulse via the pins.

      I had a $15 cassette adapter back in 2007 that connected via the dock connector instead of the headphone jack. It had a few advantages:

      -- When you ejected the cassette or the car stopped, the iPod immediately turned off.
      --You could hold down the fast forward/rewind button on the cassette player and it would ff/rew the song on the iPod.
      --You could press the ff/rew button on the cassette player quickly and go to the next/previous song.
      --line level sound out for a (theoretically) clearer sound.

      That being said, I can't in anyway defend the new all digital Lightning connector.

    201. Re:Smart move by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      chintek is a real company dumbass

      http://www.chintekce.com/
      http://www.chin-tek.com/index-en.html

      and no I am far from hipster, maybe you missed the part where I said I own no apple products

    202. Re:Smart move by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Everything up until the Lightning redesign has been the exact same connector. (Which, despite it being evil and proprietary, is better than USB and comes with the device. It just sucks if you need a second one.)

    203. Re:Smart move by tom+arnall · · Score: 1

      the statement is prima facie a lie. apple implies in it that their charger is safe, but, if this is the truth, they wd have had the charger tested by a third party and published the results with the rest of the statement. come to think of it, maybe they did have it tested ;o)

    204. Re:Smart move by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It's not at all uncommon in electronic devices to have the "ground" of electronics connected to the case or at least to touchable metal parts. If that "ground" becomes live due to a power supply fault then you have a live case.

      Depending on power supply design the "ground" of the electronics may or may not be intentionally connected to mains ground. Generally in desktop PC power supplies it is connected while in laptop, phone and AV equipment supplies it generally isn't.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    205. Re:Smart move by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If you have a phone from apple, samsung, htc, lenovo or another major global brand i'd think it's reasonable to assume the OEM charger is safe. It's not worth the risk of lawsuits and reputational damage for those companies to skimp on specifications and inspections to ensure that product from subcontractors meets those specifications. Sure they may have their HQ in the east but they have significant buisness assets in the west that can be targetted and they also have a reputation to think about.

      The producers of the counterfiets and the sellers selling direct from china to gullible customers, market traders etc have no reputation to protect. So they can violate safety standards with impunity.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    206. Re:Smart move by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Heard about fuses and breakers?

      "fuses and breakers" normally only protect against overcurrent and maybe overvoltage BETWEEN conductors of the power supply. They can't protect against dangerous voltages between BOTH sides of the power supply and mains ground.

      They could use an isolating power converter (and in the case of a USB charge port a USB isolator) inside the device but they aren't going to take the cost and efficiency hit of that when they've already put the required isolation measures in the power supply.

      I cannot see how they possibly could get TUV and UL certification

      Because the power supply is considered the safety isolation barrier.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    207. Re:Smart move by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      It became an officially mandated standard in the EU for cell phones in 2010.

      Sure. Which was not only completely voluntary, it also ran out end of last year, and has not been renewed. Mostly because the manufacturers don't think that (Micro-)USB is a good charging standard.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    208. Re:Smart move by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Standardized USB charging doesn't really exist, though.

      Apart from this standard, that is.

      ... that is only a few months old, with no working hardware expected until next year.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    209. Re:Smart move by jrumney · · Score: 1

      It also mentions the Battery Charging Specification (which does not have its own page, only PDFs on the usb.org site), which has been around for over 6 years.
      This is the standard that most (if not all) Android phones are following.

    210. Re:Smart move by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Small correction. Apple does not have customers, they have "acolytes".

    211. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) Apple always does things a little differently, it's called differentiating themselves
      b) they also like to make money

  2. Huh. by Entropius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are lots of "third-party" Android chargers out there -- ordinary MicroUSB things. If "counterfeit" (i.e. non-Samsung, or whatever) chargers were a problem, wouldn't this happen all the time with Androids?

    Sounds like Apple is just taking advantage of the opportunity to scare people into paying the Apple Tax.

    1. Re:Huh. by alen · · Score: 0

      the apple chargers don't just charge. the pins are dynamically assigned, you can connect them into the iphone or ipad any way you want. and they transfer data, unlike the android microUSB ones

    2. Re:Huh. by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean that I can't transfer data with my USB cable?

      What kind of Apple fanboy retard are you?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Huh. by wzinc · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can buy non-Apple chargers, but they meet Apple's spec:

      http://www.belkin.com/us/Device/iPhone/d/IPHONE?q=::categoryPath:/Web/WSPWR

      Apple is asking people not to buy counterfeit or unauthorized ones that don't meet the specs.

    4. Re:Huh. by alen · · Score: 1

      connect your android phone to the USB in your car and try to play pandora or spotify. i can do it with my iphone, but with my android phones i can only play songs off the internal flash or SD card

    5. Re:Huh. by alen · · Score: 1

      my iphone will connect to my car's USB, i can stream pandora or spotify through the car's stereo and google maps or apple maps will cut into the music and announce the next turn

    6. Re:Huh. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible that given they're not using USB charging (albeit they're using something that can be indirectly charged by USB), that it's easier to build a "charger" that doesn't do so safely.

      Essentially what we see here, yet again, is evidence that proprietary crap is a bad idea, and Apple shouldn't be doing it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Huh. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think something was lost in translation. It's not the third-party chargers that we would normally buy, it's the ultra cheap inferiorly made chargers that pass themselves off as an Apple product that is the problem.

      The best advice for any country and any make of phone is that when looking for a replacement charger that plugs into your home's AC be sure to choose a charger that is certified for safety (e.g. UL, CE, MEPS, RCM, C-Tick. I guess the closest Chinese equivalent are CCC, CCIB, CCEE).

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    8. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happened multiple times, last week a SAMSUNG Galaxy exploded on a girl's pant pocket. The device's battery was non original

    9. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And it does the same thing over Bluetooth. The cable has nothing to do with it. It's just that the UI on your car (mine, too) was designed around iPhone.

    10. Re:Huh. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      its a one in a who knows shot, but yes this happens all the time, it usually just kills the charger, or your battery, not you

      I had one not too long ago that converted itself to a smoke machine almost instantly, another where you could hear it click, and when measured was putting out 19 volts AC

      just avoid them if they are stupid cheap, its not worth the money

    11. Re:Huh. by alen · · Score: 1

      bluetooth would have cost me $2000

      i know someone with a Lexus RX and galaxy s3. and getting it to play music over bluetooth was such a PITA, not worth the trouble

    12. Re:Huh. by robmv · · Score: 1

      I don't need cables to do that, I stream audio using standard Bluetooth to my car stereo and I only plug the charger if a need it to be charged. For a quick 30 minutes ride on the car, I am sure I can live without charging it

    13. Re:Huh. by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      you leave a cable dangling from your cars usb how quaint. Android uses bluetooth same thing just without the wire. Phones paired with the stereo and switches between using the stereo for hands free and usual mobile mode as i get in and out my car. Amazing isn't it? well not really bog standard feature of android.
           

    14. Re:Huh. by deusx · · Score: 1

      Umm... I play Pandora & Spotify all the time in my car from my Android phone. Navigation cuts into the music with directions, too.

    15. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the apple chargers don't just charge. the pins are dynamically assigned, you can connect them into the iphone or ipad any way you want. and they transfer data, unlike the android microUSB ones

      No, no, please, do go on about how micro USB doesn't transfer data. I'll just listen as I transfer files to my Android phone via this micro USB cable.

    16. Re:Huh. by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      My Android is old and was low-end even when it was new. And yet it still transfers data over USB just fine (and the USB cable is much sturdier than most of the Apple ones I've seen).

    17. Re:Huh. by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      It's not just cell phone chargers. I bought a couple of replacement power adapters for my Thinkpad from East Asia via eBay. Horrible construction, barely performed their advertised function, and surprisingly never caught fire.

    18. Re:Huh. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      bluetooth would have cost me $2000

      i know someone with a Lexus RX and galaxy s3. and getting it to play music over bluetooth was such a PITA, not worth the trouble

      Funny, my wife's Jetta has no issue at all playing music from either of our Android phones, nor the Nexus 7 I got her for her birthday, via Bluetooth.

      Maybe Lexus just sucks at Bluetooth... another possibility would be that whoever was trying to set up the Bluetooth connection on the RX had no idea what they were doing.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    19. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some chargers are made by a company that puts their own name on the charger, and carefully designs and tests the charger to make sure it complies with the safety standards. This is fine. (E.g. Belkin does this, and Apple even sells their chargers).

      Some chargers are made by con artists that hide their own identity, put the Apple name on the charger, carefully put all the logos on so it looks like it complies with the safety standards, and then put in the cheapest possible charging circuit without caring about how dangerous it is. These are "counterfeit" because they have the Apple name there and/or they're sold as Apple products, but they're not really Apple products. They're also freaking dangerous.

    20. Re:Huh. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      choose a charger that is certified for safety (e.g. UL, CE, MEPS, RCM, C-Tick. I guess the closest Chinese equivalent are CCC, CCIB, CCEE).

      And how exactly do you do that? The certification logos on the charger are going to be worthless; the counterfeiter will just put those on right along with the Apple logo.

    21. Re:Huh. by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Android will do that as well. If you mount it as a USB device, it won't, as the storage is available to teh charging device (like your stereo) as a data source, something Apple does not do as they do not support USB storage modes.

    22. Re:Huh. by danomac · · Score: 1

      I had the opposite experience; I've had an iPhone, but my current phone is a Galaxy S3. Using bluetooth, I paired my S3 to my stereo and hit play in the media player and it worked. Tried it with my iPhone multiple times, and while both the iPhone and the stereo said it was connected, the iPhone played through its internal speaker.

      I googled this problem and I was not the only one that had this problem.

    23. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That works just fine in my car with an Android device, not my fault you are a retard.

    24. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Them there are some hot grits indeed.

    25. Re:Huh. by WammaJammaDingDong · · Score: 2

      If they're counterfeiting the charger to begin with, why wouldn't they just counterfeit the certification stamp as well?

    26. Re:Huh. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I guess this where common sense should take over. If the price for a "apple" product is too good to be true then it probably isn't a true apple product.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    27. Re:Huh. by sunking2 · · Score: 2

      How does a manufacturing error in an Apple knockoff have anything to do with Android chargers? If in fact true, Apple is doing what they should be doing in telling people there are potentially dangerous products out there. Anything that plugs into a 110/220V outlet has the potential to kill you. You are going on faith that it won't.

    28. Re:Huh. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      bluetooth would have cost me $2000

      i know someone with a Lexus RX and galaxy s3. and getting it to play music over bluetooth was such a PITA, not worth the trouble

      Funny, my wife's Jetta has no issue at all playing music from either of our Android phones, nor the Nexus 7 I got her for her birthday, via Bluetooth.

      Maybe Lexus just sucks at Bluetooth... another possibility would be that whoever was trying to set up the Bluetooth connection on the RX had no idea what they were doing.

      My VW had no problem with my Android 4.1 device, but after I upgraded to 4.2 I've had many problems. Most times I need to turn Bluetooth off and back on again to get it to connect, sometimes I need to reboot the phone. I have fewer problems with the Sony stereo in my other car, but I still have to turn bluetooth on/off about half the time to get it to connect. And some days, my phone battery runs down in half a day with the top power using being "Bluetooth Share".

      I'm hoping that 4.3 with its updated Bluetooth stack makes it more reliable.

    29. Re:Huh. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2

      True. As I told Chris above, sometimes you have to use common sense.

      If in doubt, buy your accessories from reputable sources.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    30. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I once got some shitty "Cycle Robot"-branded Acer laptop chargers that only worked for 30 minutes, before unceremoniously dying (and probably destroying the PSUs of the laptops that they were tested with)...

    31. Re:Huh. by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      That's odd. My Bluetooth Pandora receiver only cost about $250. It also allows me to leave an iDevice inside the receiver in a tray if I want to use Pandora via USB with my iPod, rather than the Bluetooth Pandora from my Android devices.

    32. Re:Huh. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but to Apple charges manufacturers who want to make compatible hardware capable of charging at full speed. The spec is not public. Anyone can make a USB charger using publicly documented specifications.

      Of course the specs being public do not guarantee quality, but at least you can get a reasonable quality charger at a reasonable price. With Apple you basically have a choice of expensive but good or crap.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Huh. by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      There are lots of "third-party" Android chargers out there -- ordinary MicroUSB things. If "counterfeit" (i.e. non-Samsung, or whatever) chargers were a problem, wouldn't this happen all the time with Androids?

      It does on the ultra cheap chargers - the usual symptom is you can't use the touchscreen while it's plugged in.

      In fact, the quality of fake Apple chargers is shockingly bad (pun intended) - the outsides look damn real as well.

      This guy tears apart a few $10 chargers he was given, very Apple-like adapters.

      Ken Shirriff has taken apart and analyzed many power supplies. Here's a writeup on a fake charger and a writeup on the real thing. The real one stuffs a lot of protection, uses higher quality parts, and keeps to clearance and creepage distances.

      And he goes through a dozen other chargers to show that the good stuff is quite good (Apple's not the best - the Samsung cube charger is better), but the fake stuff is downright shoddy.

      And think of it this way - a few of those fake chargers have the USB port a couple of millimeters away from the AC - it doesn't take much for the AC line voltage to jump the gap, especially on a more humid day.

      General consensus seems to be to stick to name brand real stuff.

    34. Re:Huh. by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      If "counterfeit" (i.e. non-Samsung, or whatever) chargers were a problem, wouldn't this happen all the time with Androids?

      I'm more inclined to believe that in China when you buy a cheap no-name or a knock-off it's created under absolutely no oversight, and made as cheaply as possible.

      I don't think they're saying "3rd party chargers approved by UL will explode", I think they're saying "cheap garbage is a really bad idea".

      Sounds like Apple is just taking advantage of the opportunity to scare people into paying the Apple Tax.

      Or, people in China will sell you something which is dangerous and not give a damn.

      A 3rd party charger you buy in North America is likely to have been reviewed and tested. A 3rd party charger you buy in China could be anything, up to an including an empty shell which doesn't do anything.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    35. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we weren't talking about Apple products in the first place. We were talking about generic chargers that should logically be cheaper (specially considering apple prices things like a clothing brand).

    36. Re:Huh. by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Essentially what we see here, yet again, is evidence that proprietary crap is a bad idea, and Apple shouldn't be doing it.

      No, what we have is evidence that Slashdotters don't read the articles, and don't understand that in China you can buy a cheap knock off of pretty much anything which hasn't been tested by anybody.

      If you build a cheap ass piece of electronics and don't care about safety or performance, it could be a fire hazard.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    37. Re:Huh. by solidraven · · Score: 1

      You do realise those labels mean nothing right? I can manufacture something today and put a CE label on it without ever testing it. Unless you're designing a big dangerous machine or a high power transmitter you really don't need to bother too much with the entire test procedure, especially not if you're a knock off Chinese manufacturer. You sell your stuff online, so the importer is the user, hence he/she is responsible according to EU law. You simply declare it to be conform and slap a CE logo on it. That's one of the main cost differences between electronics manufactured by reliable companies and those designed by knock-offs. The EMC testing alone generally requires a couple of EEs who know what they're doing, considering the cost of employing an EE who knows what he's doing runs up quickly. Especially RF experts willingly charge very high wages. And the equipment doesn't come cheap either. A faraday cage, good LISNs, probes, spectrum analysers, ... We're talking about investments of 250 000 euro or more to buy this stuff yourself. And letting somebody else do it isn't much cheaper in the long run.

    38. Re:Huh. by alen · · Score: 0

      Nokia was first working on bluetooth in the late 1990's. how quaint

    39. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia was first working on bluetooth in the late 1990's. how quaint

      Psst... hey, buddy, a small hint: When you're trolling like you are now, you need to at least try to stay semi-relevant, else it gets obvious.

    40. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in China you can buy a cheap knock off of pretty much anything which hasn't been tested by anybody.

      But isn't that what the Tea Party and the Libertarians want?

      Cut out all those pesky regulations and safety laws, and let the market sort it out by people simply not buying products which kill them?

      That's essentially what China has now, and what some people seem to consider as an ideal situation.

    41. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is obvious which are fakes if your a native english speaker. The crap ones all have misspellings and such any idiot should be able to identify them.

    42. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      choose a charger that is certified for safety (e.g. UL, CE, MEPS, RCM, C-Tick. I guess the closest Chinese equivalent are CCC, CCIB, CCEE).

      And how exactly do you do that? The certification logos on the charger are going to be worthless; the counterfeiter will just put those on right along with the Apple logo.

      Simple. Don't buy products that you know are overpriced because of the brand. The profit margins for reasonably priced quality products aren't big enough for the counterfeiter to risk it.

    43. Re:Huh. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Actually I see no evidence whatsoever that anyone doesn't understand that in China you can buy a cheap knock off of pretty much anything that hasn't been tested by anybody. Perhaps you could point at comments (you misreplied to mine, but as I specifically pointed to the fact that it's easier to produce crap that doesn't work within spec as a factor here, we have to assume that was a mistake on your part because literacy) that underscore your thesis that nobody understands that in China, or anywhere else, it's easy to obtain cheap dangerous knock-offfs.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    44. Re:Huh. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't just specifications. Counterfeit chargers (as most counterfeit devices) have poor quality standards. As the poster pointed out it could have been a counterfeit charger for any device that fried someone.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    45. Re:Huh. by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Well, I believe you said essentially "Proprietary bad, mmkay, Apple shouldn't do that". (And in case you'd like to claim you didn't "Essentially what we see here, yet again, is evidence that proprietary crap is a bad idea, and Apple shouldn't be doing it." is what I quoted)

      Since Apple is using bog-standard USB sources to charge their phones (you can take the fat end and feed it from any standard USB connection, it's only the end that goes into the phone which differs) ... this has nothing at all to do with anything proprietary, it's about people making crappy USB wall chargers which are dangerous and short out.

      we have to assume that was a mistake on your part because literacy

      And then I shall attribute your response as an issue of being an asshole and we'll call it even.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    46. Re:Huh. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      i know someone with a Lexus RX and galaxy s3. and getting it to play music over bluetooth was such a PITA, not worth the trouble

      Possibly a question of user incompetence maybe?

      I have a 2011 Subaru Impreza and an HTC One V, and no problem with that at all. I paired the phone to the car's bluetooth anyway, for use as a phone. The default setting for bluetooth pairing is to allow audio playback over bluetooth... All I have to do is switch the stereo to the Bluetooth input, and press play on the phone.

      Works quite nicely when I pair it with google Navigate on the phone... the phone will lower the volume of the music to give a voice instruction, which comes through the car's stereo speakers.

      Given that the HTC One V has the same version of Android on it as the S3, I'd be very surprised if the S3 was any harder to get working than my phone. While I've never bothered with programming Bluetooth on a Lexus stereo, they have the same supplier for their stereos as Subaru does (Clarion), so it should be pretty much the same, though possibly with a different UI. Just press the "talk" button on the steering wheel, say "Setup", and follow the prompts....

    47. Re:Huh. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Then just stick to reputable brands and buy from reputable dealers.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    48. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you leave a cable dangling from your cars usb how quaint. Android uses bluetooth same thing just without the wire. Phones paired with the stereo and switches between using the stereo for hands free and usual mobile mode as i get in and out my car. Amazing isn't it? well not really bog standard feature of android.

         

      Um... same with any bluetooth capable device really. If anything it's more totable that your car has bluetooth than that you phone can connect to it.

    49. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article was talking about chargers that are being passed off as Apple branded chargers, not the generic third-party chargers.

    50. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a bunch of android chargers that scare the shit out of me, with the noises they make when plugged in and most of them can barely charge anything. it's only a matter of time.

    51. Re:Huh. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Interesting; the only issue I've hit so far is that I can't use one device (Nexus 7) for media and another (Droid X) for phone, but I think that's pretty much a universal limitation.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    52. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please excuse my ignorance; this is an honest question I ask: What is an Android charger? I thought Android was the operating system in use on a couple of devices produced by competing hardware companies. Is there a charger-policy in place imposed upon all devices running the Android OS put in place by Google?

      --Ignorant AC

    53. Re:Huh. by solidraven · · Score: 1

      Even reputable brands often just buy something cheap and relabel it... You just have to check review sites and look a bit into the product to be sure.

    54. Re:Huh. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Customer reviews are the main reason I like online shopping.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    55. Re:Huh. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Just looking for certification marks is not enough. A supplier who is prepared to ignore safety standards is probablly also prepared to fraudulantly apply certification marks.

      If you wanted hundreds of chargers you might add a handful of extra to each batch and then subject them to destructive inspection and testing. If you wanted even larger quantities you might even send your own staff to inspect the factory. But none of that is really practical if you just want one charger for your own use.

      About the best you can do is to stick to vendors who have a large presense in your country and therefore have a lot to lose if they get caught shipping dangerous products. Even then it's no gaurantee

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    56. Re:Huh. by Proteus · · Score: 1

      The only non-standard part of Apple's charging scheme is the shape of the connector. The AC->DC adapter part is a standard switching power supply, the request on the USB end of the charging cable is compatible with USB Power standards, and so on.

      The really proprietary parts of Apple's cable are the bits associated with the data interface (digital audio, control systems, accessory systems, etc.); which is frustrating, but not really surprising at this point considering the 30-pin connector they replaced has been around for a decade.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    57. Re:Huh. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      In the construction industry, there has been a big problem with counterfeit circuit breakers making it onto job sites. Many are just switches, and some barely that. Purchasing through reputable suppliers only goes so far when you have a deep supply chain. It has been improved largely by Customs Enforcement as trademark abuse.

      After taking apart a few power supplies myself I begin to wonder if I should always buy an extra to take apart and examine. Some of them are pretty scary.

    58. Re:Huh. by Entropius · · Score: 1

      What it was was a thing typed in haste that I figured folks would understand -- you're right in that there is no uniform standard for charging Android devices. But most of them use those ubiquitous MicroUSB cables, and that's what I meant.

    59. Re:Huh. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Anything that plugs into a 110/220V outlet has the potential to kill you. You are going on faith that it won't.

      I plugged myself into 110V once. Beware!

    60. Re:Huh. by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Plenty of car radios with bluetooth these days, just not factory fitted and they are not really what you'd call expensive, cheaper than the fine for using your phone without a hands free kit. (real reason i use bluetooth)

      to be fair the parent to my original post was being unbearably smug about a feature which isn't really all that :)

      As far as smartphones go bluetooth gps and a decent modem that you can connect too and a phone that people hear you and you hear them is pretty much all the spec you need.

      The rest is just marketing madness

    61. Re:Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but to Apple charges manufacturers who want to make compatible hardware capable of charging at full speed. The spec is not public. Anyone can make a USB charger using publicly documented specifications.

      Any minimally competent engineer can design a USB charger capable of charging iPads and iPhones at full speed without paying a dime to Apple. As in, if you're not capable of "reverse engineering" a couple resistor dividers (or just googling the info, which is out there) in a few minutes, you probably ought not to be designing power supplies.

    62. Re:Huh. by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      Of course they are. This woman's death is a golden opportunity they most assuredly won't let slip by.

  3. Not buying it by afidel · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm not buying it, how could you possibly screwup a USB charger to the point where it would be lethal? I mean the cables aren't generally thick enough to carry enough 220V current to kill someone before they melt and 5.5V DC certainly isn't going to kill someone.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Not buying it by Ark42 · · Score: 2

      A single AAA battery can be lethal, if you connect each end with something sharp directly inside your veins on each arm, bridging the 1.5v DC (or less) circuit across your heart.

    2. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those wires can easily carry 1A which at 220V is more than enough to kill you. The exposed metal bits of a device are often connected to a shield ground, and if that "ground" is actually at 220V line potential then it would be easy to kill someone.

    3. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like one side of the AC line was connected to the phone ground. There would be no current flow unless connected to earth ground, as it might be through a person.

    4. Re:Not buying it by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative

      No one is being killed by the 5v on the USB bus. The problem is the counterfeit chargers are often poorly designed and can fail in a way that shorts the USB cable to the AC power.

      There was an excellent teardown & analysis of a cheap charger last year that pointed out serious safety issues.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    5. Re:Not buying it by johnw · · Score: 2

      The cable certainly is thick enough for a lethal current at 220V, provided it's applied in the right place. It's easy to conceive of a badly made charger which produces 5.5V between two of its conductors, but at 220V from earth, due to poor isolation. Then all the victim needs to do is earth another part of his or her body and away you go.

    6. Re:Not buying it by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take a look at a teardown of a fake charger and you'll understand why it can be lethal. The creepage distances in particular are atrocious.

    7. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is bliss, it seems.

      It's not the voltage, it's the current that matters. And where the current flows is also important. It's commonly reported that 30 mA AC is a lethal current. If there is inadequate (or no) isolation on the power supply and the woman was touching some grounded metal device, it's completely conceivable that a lethal current could flow from the 220 V power mains through an improperly designed charger through her body to ground.

    8. Re:Not buying it by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not buying it, how could you possibly screwup a USB charger to the point where it would be lethal? I mean the cables aren't generally thick enough to carry enough 220V current to kill someone before they melt and 5.5V DC certainly isn't going to kill someone.

      It only takes 100mA - 200mA of current to kill someone, and every USB cable is designed to carry at least 500mA since the USB spec says that USB hosts can supply up to 500mA of current (and many plug-in chargers exceed that). So it's certainly feasible that a USB cable can carry enough current to kill someone. It's not the voltage the determines the size of the conductor, it's the current.

      The USB cable wires may not have sufficient insulation to protect against 220VAC (peak voltage is higher, around 310V if I remember correctly), but that's the point -- 220VAC is not supposed to be supplied to a USB device. But even if it's not certified for the voltage it seems that the individual conductor insulation combined with the plastic outer sleeve of the USB cable would seem to provide at least enough isolation, I think most plastics used for insulation have around 500 - 1000V/mil (1/1000th of an inch) of breakdown voltage.

      I'm surprised that a phone doesn't have at least 220VAC of isolation between the USB power and the phone case. Is this typical in phones?

    9. Re:Not buying it by Shompol · · Score: 1

      Copper (steel?) wires do not melt easily. If current @ 220V flows through your skull the brain is guaranteed to melt much sooner. Do not count on wires to be a life-saving insulator!
      According to a US NAVY story about and electrician who pierced his skin with a volmeter, 5.5V can kill you, but it is more likely that the charger shorted 220 to the metal antennae bezel.

    10. Re:Not buying it by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      I'm not buying it, how could you possibly screwup a USB charger to the point where it would be lethal? I mean the cables aren't generally thick enough to carry enough 220V current to kill someone before they melt and 5.5V DC certainly isn't going to kill someone.

      I suspect it wasn't the connecting cable where the fire occurred, but the small box that plugs into the electrical outlet. This box presumably contains components to convert AC to DC power, and if it was made very cheaply and in disregard of safety standards, it could easily cause a fire.

    11. Re:Not buying it by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      Current shmurrent. She died because she wasn't holding it right.

    12. Re:Not buying it by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      simple, they did not put in route features on the ac part of the board, these are grooves milled into the PCB so that high voltage wont flash over to other parts of the board. They also put their traces way too close so you might have 0.254mm isolating AC from DC

      and it only takes a few 10's of millamps to kill you, and these cables are more than capible of handling 500 -1000 millamps ... usually the low voltage doesnt have enough punch to break the resistance of your skin, but 220 sure as fuck does

      one hand on a hot line, other on ground, your toast

    13. Re:Not buying it by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Although we don't have detailed reports, there isn't anything on the newswires to indicate that the victim was trying to defibrillate herself with the charger.

      Perhaps she was channeling an old episode of McGyver?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    14. Re:Not buying it by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I'm not buying it, how could you possibly screwup a USB charger to the point where it would be lethal? I mean the cables aren't generally thick enough to carry enough 220V current to kill someone before they melt and 5.5V DC certainly isn't going to kill someone.

      Well, having it designed by someone like you should make it a killer.

      http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html

      According to reports, a woman in China was tragically electrocuted using her iPhone while it was charging. This seems technically plausible to me if she were using a cheap or counterfeit charger like I describe below. There's 340 volts DC inside the charger, which is enough to kill. In a cheap charger, there can be less than a millimeter separating this voltage from the output, a fraction of the recommended safe distance. These charger sometimes short out (picture), which could send lethal voltage through the USB cable. If the user closes the circuit by standing on a damp floor or touching a grounded metal surface, electrocution is a possibility. If moisture condenses in the charger (e.g. in a humid bathroom), shorting becomes even more likely. Genuine Apple chargers (and other brand-name chargers) follow strict safety regulations (teardown) so I would be surprised if this electrocution happened with a name-brand charger. Since counterfeits look just like real chargers, I'll wait for an expert to determine if a genuine Apple charger was involved or not. I've read suggestions that the house wiring might have been to blame, but since chargers are typically ungrounded I don't see how faulty house wiring would play a role. I should point out that since there are few details at this point, this is all speculation; it's possible the phone and charger weren't involved at all.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    15. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of teardowns of cheap chargers on youtube It's practically a meme at this point.

      Many of them are shockingly awful and have very dangerous designs. Not adequately isolating the mains lines from the output voltage can easily lead to killing someone. They almost all have completely inadequate performance characteristics on the output. Noise, ripple, voltage drop that produces nowhere near 5 volts at any significant load.

      Official, legit ones are usually very good. Apple and Blackberry are noted to have particularly well built and well designed chargers.

    16. Re:Not buying it by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      A fake one could be made any number of ways that could be potentially dangerous, If it's made with an autotransformer, it would be possible to have the "hot" side of the AC line connected directly to one or the other output contact. A slightly more sophisticated system has the AC line isolated only by a single capacitor, if the capacitor shorts or becomes leaky, some fraction of line voltage appears on the output. Many old tube radios were made with similar design, and if you touch any metal including the mounting screws holding it in the case, it can shock you, and if well-grounded, kill you. Millions of them were made this way, only a few people were ever hurt/killed.

            If it's a "chopper" style power supply, a failure could put anything up to 311 volts on the output.

              The wire is plenty adequate to pass lethal current, that's as little as 20 ma. Whether it is actually fatal depends on how well-grounded you are when you touch it.

    17. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not really relevant. Most people don't have sharp things directly inside their veins on each arm while talking on their phone AFAICT. ANYTHING can be lethal, but context is important.

    18. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, your brain cooks not melt. Second of all, death by electrocution is mostly from cardiac distress from having the current disrupt your heart's normal muscular movements.

      But you are right, wires are not fuses.

    19. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's this drivel again. Voltage and current are not independent. It's like saying that it isn't the height of the fall that kills you, but rather the speed at impact. Thanks, Einstein, but you know what determines the speed at impact (c.f. current)? That's right: height of fall (respectively voltage). The "amount of current the device is designed to carry" is at the design voltage. Which is a nonlethal voltage. USB 5V will not hurt. It's like being afraid of a 9V battery. The problem is, as you correctly noticed, line voltage somehow getting onto into the USB connection. 8/10 (2 points off for the first paragraph).

    20. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Holy shit. This is the dumbest, most ignorant post I've read all day. And from a 4 digit UID. You will really do anything to badmouth apple, won't you?

      Apple chargers are generally considered to be the best available for that type of device. The people that take these things apart and examine their designs for fun all agree that the apple devices are the best they've ever seen. (Small, USB chargers for smart phones and tablets) The designed aren't "overly complex" they're just not cheap pieces of garbage.

      But don't take my word for it. There are hundreds of videos on you tube, by electrical engineers, that say exactly what I'm telling you right now.

    21. Re:Not buying it by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Um.. Easy. If you "Plug into the wall" and then don't do the right things in your power supply design, then it is possible to put full AC voltage on things the customer might touch. This is even more true for modern "switching" supply designs which don't make use of a transformer to step down the voltage. It would be extremely easy to connect the phone's "ground" (i.e. the case) to an input power lead and kill a customer who tries to handle the charging phone while otherwise grounded (In the tub, Bare feet in a puddle, touching some plumbing fixture etc.) . Such faults would not keep the charger from working.

      A further complicating factor is that your charger made for the US market, may also work (with the proper adapters) in other places. This means that a specific design may be totally safe in the US, but be a death trap elsewhere, or be totally safe overseas but totally unsafe in North America.

      Because of this, it's usually best to play it safe and use only power adapters designed and sold by companies in your own country. The cheap knockoffs you can get on E-Bay can be dangerous, and you would not know it until it was too late.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    22. Re:Not buying it by sribe · · Score: 1

      But even if it's not certified for the voltage it seems that the individual conductor insulation combined with the plastic outer sleeve of the USB cable would seem to provide at least enough isolation...

      The OP's point was even stupider than you gave him credit for. 1) Your heart would be stopped before the insulation melted. 2) Uninsulated wires are perfectly capable of carrying lethal current.

    23. Re:Not buying it by bobbied · · Score: 1

      No, the truth is that it is exceptionally easy, when trying to be cheap, to not engineer the proper safety into your power supply design and manufacturing process. If a hot lead from the power plug finds itself connected to the device ground (i.e. the case) then any grounded person that touches the phone will be in trouble. So this is not a function of Apple's design.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    24. Re:Not buying it by hawguy · · Score: 1

      It's this drivel again. Voltage and current are not independent. It's like saying that it isn't the height of the fall that kills you, but rather the speed at impact. Thanks, Einstein, but you know what determines the speed at impact (c.f. current)? That's right: height of fall (respectively voltage). The "amount of current the device is designed to carry" is at the design voltage. Which is a nonlethal voltage. USB 5V will not hurt. It's like being afraid of a 9V battery. The problem is, as you correctly noticed, line voltage somehow getting onto into the USB connection. 8/10 (2 points off for the first paragraph).

      Which part is drivel? The USB cable will happily carry enough current to kill you, and 220VAC is enough voltage to kill you (since people have died from 110VAC electrocution) so if your charger is designed poorly and exposes you to the 220VAC mains voltage, it can easily kill you. You could power a 100W 220VAC lightbulb (less than 500mA) with a USB cable if you wanted to (well probably....subject to breakdown voltage of the conductors).

      So tell me again which part you didn't understand? My point was that a USB cable can easily carry a lethal amount of current, since the conductors are sized appropriately to carry that much current (which has nothing to do with the voltage they are designed to carry - that's determined by the insulation of the wires). You'd use the same size conductors to carry 500mA at 220VAC as you would to carry 500mA at 5VDC.

      Speed and height seem like awfully poor metaphors for current and voltage... what would resistance be in this case? Frictional forces in the air? How do you account for terminal velocity in that speed and height metaphor? I like the pressure and volume of water flowing through a hose metaphor myself.

    25. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wires don't need to melt, the insulation around them will and cause a short. The insulation around USB wires isn't designed for anything about 35V with 0.5A draw. Hook it up to the mains and it'll trip a fuse and leave a burn mark wherever it was placed.

      5.5V will only kill with sufficient A also being supplied, and on a conductor that isn't going evaporate as soon as the juice is applied. A volt meter will not kill any one, or anything, it's a receptive circuit. What you may be thinking of is an ancient style electrical tester used by people working on big engines, these can be operate as meters, and also pump out a huge current for a short burst when the zapper is used. These haven't been used since the 70s. DMMs replaced that kind of thing decades ago.

    26. Re:Not buying it by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      At least this one makes some attempt, if incompetent, to isolate the AC. Some years ago I bought a battery charger (from a shabby convenience store while traveling) that had exactly 3 components: a capacitor in series with the AC, a rectifier diode, and a zener.

    27. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

      Even as ionic as blood is, I doubt that hooking each end of a AAA battery into the vein in each arm would kill you. In fact, I suspect that even hooking one directly across the nervous system or heart's AV pace node would not be lethal in most cases. Most likely the charge carriers would diffuse across such a large volume that you wouldn't feel a thing (the current density would be too low.) Also, neurons have step potentials - you still need to overcome millivolt action potentials in the neurons, and going through that many neurons you still need more than 1.5V.

    28. Re:Not buying it by YumYumClownMonkey · · Score: 1

      It's absolutely possible to screw up that badly. All you'd need to do to electrocute someone through a USB charger would be short the wires that go from mains power to the 5V lead. And that's really easy to accomplish by accident if you're using a linear voltage regulator (wasteful - which means lots of HEAT) and you're not getting the required clearances between your high-voltage and low-voltage traces. Heat melts the solder, which shorts the connection, which gives you the shock. It doesn't matter in the slightest that "the cables aren't generally thick enough to carry enough 220V current". For one thing, there ain't no such thing as 220V current. 220V is voltage. Current is measured in amps. Secondly, the rating on the cable simply means they'll get hot and melt. But if the phone was on the woman's ear the moment the short occurred, there's plenty of time to electrocute her before the cables degraded. Shortly thereafter I'm sure the charging cable got hot and melted, breaking the circuit. Which would have been cold comfort to the woman's corpse.

    29. Re:Not buying it by YumYumClownMonkey · · Score: 1

      This is what the teardown of a genuine Apple charger looks like. http://www.righto.com/2012/05/apple-iphone-charger-teardown-quality.html Say what you will about Apple - They made a really really nice product here. It ain't easy engineering 110VAC to 5VDC in 2 cubic inches...

    30. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, your brain cooks not melt.

      Huh- but Darth Vader, from Planet Vulcan threatened to...

      Wait a second...

    31. Re:Not buying it by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Essentially all of the "universal" chargers (those designed to work worldwide on anything from 110 to 240 V) are indeed switching regulators and it's all too easy to have a failure that puts full line voltage on the output. Save a little money on the otherwise massive redundancy used to make them relatively safe, and boom, hot on the output stage.

            As an aside, these type of wall warts are notorious generators of RF interference which in addition to merely noisy reception on AM radio, can play hob with many other devices. I was having all sorts of trouble with my digital voltmeter, which I eventually traced to a cell phone charger.

    32. Re:Not buying it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Voltage matters. The voltage needs to be high enough to overcome the natural resistance of your skin, otherwise, the current won't make it up to 200mA.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    33. Re:Not buying it by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I mean the cables aren't generally thick enough to carry enough 220V current to kill someone before they melt

      BS it only takes relatively tiny ammounts of current (iirc tens to hundreds of milliamps depending on route through the body) to kill someone, far less than the currents used to charge a phone (~1A). The insulation may or may not hold out at 240V (I bet in most cases it would) but it doesn't really matter since the most plausable electrocution scenario is not current flowing down one charger wire and back through the other, it's current flowing through one charger wire, then through the persons body, then through some other return path (grounded metalwork of some sort).

      So if the isolation barriers inside the charger (transformer, RFI suppression capacitors, general layout of stuff in the case) fail then it is very plausable to get an electric shock. Properly designed chargers are very carefully designed to minimise this risk. Counterfiets and cheap tat not so much.

      5.5V DC certainly isn't going to kill someone.

      Mostly true. The skin resistance is too high to let a dangerous current flow at such low voltages. With sub-skin electrodes though even voltages normally regarded as safe can become leathal.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    34. Re:Not buying it by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      This is even more true for modern "switching" supply designs which don't make use of a transformer to step down the voltage.

      Actually they do. While you can design switchers without a transformer they provide basically no isolation at all and afaict are not used in mains power supply applications. Your typical switched mode mains power supply uses a high frequency transformer both as the reactive component in the switcher and an isolation device.

      Still there are cetainly more components crossing the "safety boundary" than in a traditional transformer based power supply. If any of those components are skimped on you have a potentially dangerous device.

      This means that a specific design may be totally safe in the US, but be a death trap elsewhere, or be totally safe overseas but totally unsafe in North America.

      I don't really buy your argument there.

      In the case of phone chargers, their mains connections are generally ungrounded (supposedly class 2 though the knockoffs certainly don't meet class 2 requirements) and unpolarised anyway so there is little the supply system can do to make them less safe. In the case of larger power supplies that are class 1 then you need to make sure there is a good ground but agin that applies wherever the power supply was originally sold. They still sell class 1 appliances in places that don't have proper grounding :(

      The biggest issue is probablly that sometimes people fail to use the proper adaptor and hence that doesn't actually connect the earth even though one is available and required by the appliance.

      I guess the higher voltage in some parts of the world may make a bit of a difference but I doubt it's significant overall with PSUs sold by a reputable vendor as universal voltage input.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    35. Re:Not buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one hand on a hot line, other on ground, your toast...

      ... is cooked

    36. Re:Not buying it by bobbied · · Score: 1

      This is even more true for modern "switching" supply designs which don't make use of a transformer to step down the voltage.

      Actually they do. While you can design switchers without a transformer they provide basically no isolation at all and afaict are not used in mains power supply applications. Your typical switched mode mains power supply uses a high frequency transformer both as the reactive component in the switcher and an isolation device.

      Still there are cetainly more components crossing the "safety boundary" than in a traditional transformer based power supply. If any of those components are skimped on you have a potentially dangerous device.

      My point was that the mains isolation afforded by a step down transformer is no longer a given fact. In fact, it's unlikely. Large inductors are expensive, inefficient and heavy so they do not get used. Gone is the standard "wall wart" transformer and the safety it provided. I am aware of how some switchers work and know that there are high frequency transformers in some designs, but as you indicate, they no longer isolate the device from the power connections.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    37. Re:Not buying it by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Apple chargers are nothing special. Much of what Apple does is nothing special.

      Your attempt to help perpetuate the mindless hype is not convincing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  4. I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by ninjagin · · Score: 1

    ... and while it does a good job of charging, it does have a "sparking" habit whenever I plug it in to a wall outlet. Honestly, if this was truly a concern for Apple, they should make their chargers cheaper, or license aftermarket production to the spec of originals. I saved a bundle (about 50%) by going with a Chinese knock-off.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    1. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by alen · · Score: 1

      how much is that in real dollars? $10? $15?

      and risking to damage a computer that costs over $1000

    2. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by earlzdotnet · · Score: 1

      Cheap chargers are fine... unless they fail in some way. A lot of the extra cost goes to higher quality components (such as double insulated transformers instead of single), so that failure is much less likely, and if it does fail then it's not going to shock you. Also, cheap knock offs use don't use a full-wave bridge rectifier usually, so your charger will give the device a very noisey DC waveform, which may mess up the charging components or cause device malfunction (such as people complaining with off-brand chargers that the touch screen messes up)

      I'm sure Apple make a good margin off their chargers, but you can only reduce the cost so much before you have to reduce quality and safety as well

    3. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by mlts · · Score: 1

      I bought a MicroUSB to Lightning adapter that worked OK with my iPhone... but sparked like crazy with my iPad, so I ditched it for a cable.

      However, for current to be lethal, either the DC voltage was stepped up (which might have fried the phone before the user), or the charger just passed 240VAC directly to the phone. There may be other things which can pop up.

      So far, I've had good luck with third party chargers. I have a 20 amp-hour battery which can be used to charge a tablet and such when I'm camping, and don't want to fire up a generator or the car's engine.

      I wouldn't say that Apple makes the only safe chargers out there, otherwise there would be piles of dead Android users and lots of litigation due to that.

    4. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, penny-wise, pound-foolish.

    5. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      I have a real one, and it does the same thing. In fact all of them I have had (including the old flying saucer style from the TiBook era) do that. It's the inrush current, not a defect.

           

    6. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      You continue to use something that sparks when you plug it in?

      I'd check to ensure that your various insurance policies are adequate and paid up.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      No, all you have to do is look for the UL / CE / CCIB / whatever competent safety regulator is valid in your part of the world. Assuming they didn't just silkscreen the logos on for profit, the charger should be safe, if not effective and long lasting.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      pfft, I'm not spending the 3 - 10 times markup for a brand name charger. there are plenty of asian companies that make serviceable chargers for major laptops, cell phones, etc. that cost $2 to $20. I've saved hundreds of dollars and the things have been working fine for two or more years.

    9. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      At least $40.

      I can find Apple charges from OtherWorld for $55, but suggested retail on all Apple laptop chargers is $80.

    10. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      I would trust a charger from almost any company that puts it name on said charger. It might not be the exact specs that are perfect for my electronics, but it won't kill me. If it did that there's be litigation, and publicity, and the company would go kaput.

      The problem with a fake Samsung, or Apple, or whatever charger is that it's probably from somebody who doesn't know how to make a safe charger (or they'd make their money under-cutting Apple/Samsung/etc. in their own name), and it's definitely from somebody who doesn't care whether the charger is safe because the cops aren't supposed to be able to figure out who actually made the damn thing.

    11. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      No, all you have to do is look for the UL / CE / CCIB / whatever competent safety regulator is valid in your part of the world.

      Which assumes you have a competent safety regulator.

      I've never gotten the impression that China does -- in fact, I get the opposite impression. Either there is no system in place, or it's so ineffective as to achieve the same effect as not having one.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      ... and while it does a good job of charging, it does have a "sparking" habit whenever I plug it in to a wall outlet ... I saved a bundle (about 50%) by going with a Chinese knock-off.

      If it burns down your house, what have you saved? Because if your insurance company ever finds out you kept using something which tended to spark, you are completely on your own.

      Honestly, if this was truly a concern for Apple, they should make their chargers cheaper

      Do you really think Apple (or any company) should lower their prices to compete with cheap crap not made to any standard?

      That makes no sense at all. I can slap wheels on a cardboard box and call it a car ... that doesn't mean BMW should lower their prices.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that Apple makes the only safe chargers out there, otherwise there would be piles of dead Android users and lots of litigation due to that.

      I'll note that the quote is 'avoid counterfeit chargers', not 'second/third party chargers'. So I should be suspicious of a Apple charger that's being sold for 1/4 of list price, but buying a 'Rosewill' with ETL and UL certifications should still be good.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    14. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by Animats · · Score: 1

      I have a real one, and it does the same thing. In fact all of them I have had (including the old flying saucer style from the TiBook era) do that. It's the inrush current, not a defect.

      That's a defect. There's supposed to be an inrush current limiter.

    15. Re:I have a non-apple charger for my MacBook... by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      The problem is that most of the counterfeit charger makers DO silkscreen the logos on for profit.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  5. I've been zapped... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using my official iPad charger charing my iPhone 4S while using the apple noise blocking headphones. Maybe the charger should be grounded.....

  6. Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by intermodal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I finally dumped my iPhone 3G, it was because it kept shocking me every time it rang. I don't know about the iPhone 5, but I think blaming the charger might be a little simplistic given that experience.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      I suspect your problem is a point others have brought up in this thread: the aluminum case. If you live/work in a carpeted area, you can build up substantial static charge on yourself. Your phone rings, you're grounded against a fairly large, high conductivity object, and the natural conclusion is the ringing is what caused the zap.

    2. Re:Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      shocking and cooking you are two totally different things

    3. Re:Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by intermodal · · Score: 2

      Yes, I agree, I'm simply saying that the idea of it being entirely the charger is less than convincing.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    4. Re:Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by intermodal · · Score: 1

      not in this particular case. This included simply ringing in my pocket.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    5. Re:Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Did the iPhone 3G have an aluminum body? I thought it was plastic and glass.

    6. Re:Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      where else is it going to get ahold of mains voltage enough to kill you

      a little zip from a internal boost regulator may be annoying but its not going to drop your ass

    7. Re:Not impossible with some legitimate chargers. by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I don't have it in front of me, but I seem to recall a metal border to it. Can't say I paid that much attention to the body, the screen was all I really gave any attention to.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  7. On first glance at the headline... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 0

    I was expecting a story about credit card fraud. Not that this is any better...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  8. Counterfeit Charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I accidentally read counterfeit charges and though Apple wanted to prevent people from filing lawsuits or something.

  9. Re:How? by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Informative

    No one is going to die by having 5volts applied to their face.

    But they do die from having 220 volts applied to their face.

    The issue is that the counterfeit chargers short and deliver the mains directly to the head. It doesn't matter what electronic device is involved. hell, doesn't matter if any electronic device is connected to the end of the other side of the USB cable when the circuit is completed.

  10. It isn't 5v, it's 340v! by plsuh · · Score: 3, Informative

    See the commentary at the top of the page from this link:

    http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html

    --Paul

  11. Faulty charger and metal casing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A faulty charger can add the mains voltage to the USB voltage. A connected device will still charge.
    With an Android device you will not notice it as the device has a plastic casing. With an Apple device you have a metal casing connected to the USB connector. Grab this with wet hands and you get electrocuted.

    So saving a few bucks on the charger is definitely not the way to go. There are Youtube videos showing how el-cheapo charger ignore any safety standards.

    1. Re:Faulty charger and metal casing... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. Apple's "You're holding it wrong" defense.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  12. "vary widely in terms of safety and quality" by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    Especially in China.

  13. Wait a minute... by holophrastic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you saying that China has counterfeit electronics? And that they don't meet safety standards? This simply must be a joke.

  14. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand how your comment is modded insightful.

    Think about the size of these chargers, the AC/DC components are not far apart at all. In a cheap, POS charger it would not be inconceivable for something to crack, break, shift, or otherwise create a short between the AC input to the DC output...running direct to the phone. So yes, I'm pretty sure you could die with 110/240V directly to your face.

  15. Re:How? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    It's possible by having the charger fail in such a way that it's not 5 volts any more -- or that the 5-volt pair is at a substantial voltage relative to earth ground.

  16. This is possible, and I have experienced it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an MS degree in electrical engineering (not that it matters) and I have had a personal experience with a bad charger design (generic USB charger in this case with an Android phone).

    The issue is that it was not a floating ground design and it was not a three prong plug. In short, the ground being sent to the phone is one of the legs of the 120v line. In my case, I had the phones headphone out connected to a cable to run into a stereo receiver. The key here is that the ground line was exposed and it brushed against my skin while I was holding a properly grounded device. I got to feel what 120v feels like. Luckily for me, it was just brushing against my skin, and my connection to ground was not perfect.

    Anyway, I now have switched to three prong usb chargers, and I am glad Apple is making this a more publicly known issue.

  17. Android phones are plastic by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Most Android phones are plastic, a material which doesn't conduct electricity very well.

    1. Re:Android phones are plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most is not all. So, what is your point.

  18. Made in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes the charger was counterfeit, it was actually made in USA.

  19. Genuine Apple parts never go wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remember the explding batteries a while back?

  20. Re:How? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    But a cheap USB cable is not going to carry 220v very far. The cable will likely burnup first.

  21. Devilish marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They profit from everything: "Do not buy third party accessories, they'll kill you; buy ours and you won't die."

  22. Re:How? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the USB cable catch fire first?

  23. Re:Nice deflection! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you have a bridge to crawl back under? The Google fanboy trolls have become way worse than the Apple ones were 3-5 years ago...

  24. The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by EXTomar · · Score: 1

    Relying on vague memory of EE classes of 15 years ago: A badly built power transformer wouldn't shock someone with the transform voltage but the direct line. Poorly constructed circuits short from melting stuff contacting metal they shouldn't. If the circuit shorts and there are no GFI or fuses or other safety features, the power lines instead of being 12V DC or 5V DC or whatever are now 120V AC.

    Safety features like fuses and GFI cost money where if one is seeking to make a fast buck on knock offs throwing out a few of them will make it even more profitable.

    1. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Sure, but how long is a USB cable going to carry that before burning up?

      My thought was a total failure like that would just end up turning the USB cable into a fuse.

      Also they would be 220V, since this is China.

    2. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Sure, but how long is a USB cable going to carry that before burning up?

      Ages, since carrying voltage is free.

      The low voltage and high voltage side are completely isolated. Now imagine that something craps up and the low voltage side ends up at 220V. This will bring the entire phone up to 220V relative to ground but all will still be OK, since the internals of the phone see only the difference. Given it's 220 and 220+5, the phone still sees the 5V charging voltage.

      When you touch it though, you make a path to ground. The USB cable will last plenty long enough to kill you at that point.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by EXTomar · · Score: 1

      Quick Physics: The reason why AC is great at power distribution is because energy can be delivered at long distances without loss through heat. There would be no "burning up" for a USB cable connected to a faulty power transformer...until someone picks up a device and shorts to ground.

      The wiring in your house is just ordinary metal and it carries 120V AC without heating up where there is nothing magical about a USB cable connected to a shorting power transformer either.

    4. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      My wiring in my house is much thicker and not normally shorted to ground.

    5. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wiring in your house needs to carry as much as 15 amps to appliances like your microwave, so it's going to be pretty thick.

      It'll take substantially fewer amps to kill you, though, and the crappy 28ga wire in a cellphone charger will take longer to fail than your heart.

      Look, feel free to test it at home if you don't believe us, just write a script to post the video to youtube automatically just in case you don't make it.

    6. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I don't think I will be testing this, I was not aware the amperage could be so low and kill a person. Shocking information.

    7. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      probably long enough to electrocute you. I have put 110V and 220V through some very fine wires before and they don't blow immediately but started glowing and then went and that was with very low resistance. Considering that the human body has substantially higher resistance you could probably put 220V through a USB cable at 1-2 amps indefinitely and not have it melt.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    8. Re:The Quick EE Version (Re:How?) by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      You can kill someone with 300mA DC judiciously applied. You wouldn't even heat up 24AWG with that little current.

  25. Maybe make certification cheaper, easier by swb · · Score: 1

    To me this is one of those forehead slappers. If you want to minimize cheap knockoffs, make your certification process cheaper and more straightforward.

    Obviously Apple is going the other way, trying to use technology/encryption to force vendors into their certification and licensing process with the idea that they can control this market and make money off it, too.

    Of course this has failed, and knock-offs are starting to proliferate, and it's hard to know if what Apple really cares about is the rare and unlikely chance of serious shock or if it wants to curtail products from unlicensed vendors.

    1. Re:Maybe make certification cheaper, easier by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you really think that counterfeiters would suddenly go legit if the process was easier? Counterfeiters will fake anything they think will make money. For goodness sake, they counterfeited toothpaste. They don't care if their fakes are functional or safe as long as they pass a cursory inspection to the real thing.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:Maybe make certification cheaper, easier by swb · · Score: 1

      Of course I don't think they would all suddenly go legit.

      But counterfeiting depends on pricing goods artificially higher than the market price for an item of similar utility. Apple restricts the accessory market with an expensive and costly certification process, thereby artificially raising the price of the accessories beyond the market price for equivalent goods.

      If the process was cheaper (which implies easier), there would be a lower price and consumers would be less tempted by low-priced knockoffs.

      The same is true of handbags, watches and any other thing that get counterfeited. If a real Louis Vuitton handbag cost only $10 more than a normal leather handbag, nobody would counterfeit them because everyone would buy the real thing.

      Making accessories easier rather than harder doesn't stop counterfeiters, but it undermines their incentive to counterfeit.

    3. Re:Maybe make certification cheaper, easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello. I am here to inform you that you are being stupid on the internet. Apple has no certification program for iPhone chargers. For other accessories, ones which involve the transfer of data in either digital or analog form, yes. For chargers, no. They make no money certifying USB chargers, and the sum total of the super complicated method they use to detect a compatible USB charger is the values of four resistors connected to the two USB data pins.

    4. Re:Maybe make certification cheaper, easier by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      But counterfeiting depends on pricing goods artificially higher than the market price for an item of similar utility. Apple restricts the accessory market with an expensive and costly certification process, thereby artificially raising the price of the accessories beyond the market price for equivalent goods.

      What world do you live in? Any USB charger can charge an iPhone albeit not all will charge as fast as one by Apple. If you really have to get an Apple blessed third party charger, you can get one for under $10.

      If the process was cheaper (which implies easier), there would be a lower price and consumers would be less tempted by low-priced knockoffs.

      You seem to forget that counterfeiters counterfeit everything from toothpaste to batteries as long as they can make money. The fake doesn't have work well or be safe. There will always be the temptation.

      The same is true of handbags, watches and any other thing that get counterfeited. If a real Louis Vuitton handbag cost only $10 more than a normal leather handbag, nobody would counterfeit them because everyone would buy the real thing.

      You forget that any USB charger will work on an iPhone. That defeats your argument. The cable that Apple uses is proprietary but that too is cheap to get.

      Making accessories easier rather than harder doesn't stop counterfeiters, but it undermines their incentive to counterfeit.

      Um. Counterfeit toothpaste. Counterfeit batteries.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  26. bull by rccorkum · · Score: 1

    its a step down transformer and a voltage regulator. 5vdc and 1 amp. 1 amp is what killed not a non branded charger. I mean yes stuff needs to be safe and up to code but what a bunch of tripe that article is spouting.

    1. Re:bull by sribe · · Score: 2

      its a step down transformer and a voltage regulator. 5vdc and 1 amp. 1 amp is what killed not a non branded charger. I mean yes stuff needs to be safe and up to code but what a bunch of tripe that article is spouting.

      No, 5 volts is not enough. It is indeed the amps that kill you, but it's the amps that flow through your body. At 5 volts, 0 amps will flow from these chargers, because the resistance of "you" is too high.

    2. Re:bull by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      also capacitors in there....but 5 volts can't push 1 amp through you. Voltage sufficient to push 18 milliamps or more through the chest can kill, but you'll need more than five volts

    3. Re:bull by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Unless you lick the thing, have particularly sweaty hands, an open wound, or something else to bypass skin resistance.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    4. Re:bull by sribe · · Score: 1

      Unless you lick the thing, have particularly sweaty hands, an open wound, or something else to bypass skin resistance.

      Resistance varies widely, that's true, but 5V is still not enough; it's not only your skin that has resistance, although skin provides the majority of resistance, some is provided by the stuff inside--still talking of course externally applied, not leads implanted into your heart ;-)

      As an extremely rough guideline, in industrial safety standards, 42.4V is widely considered the threshold between potentially (haha) lethal and not, and UL/ECMA etc regulations are based on that (that's DC I think, with the AC cutoff being 60V). But there is also a documented case of a death from contact with 42V, and so one could assume the possibility of death from even lower voltages if one is freakishly unlucky. Still, 24V is getting into the "really safe" zone, and there's no way in hell you're going to be killed by 5V. (Again, externally applied. A normal heart runs on close to 1V signals...)

    5. Re:bull by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Right you are. Internal resistance is between 300 and 1000 ohms. By Ohm's law,d 1k Ohm load on a 5v source will draw 5mA, and a 300 Ohm load will draw 16.67mA. Nowhere near enough to cause death. Stopping the heart takes about 100mA, and causing the heart to enter ventricular fibrillation requires 500-1000mA. Higher currents will again stop the heart. A stopped heart is actually easier to treat than fibrillation, since CPR can keep it going. Assuming a low internal resistance across the heart about 30v DC is required for sufficient current to stop the heart. So if you take 6+ USB chargers, wire them in series, and THEN touch the outputs to salty wet skin you might die.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  27. iSpin by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is what's known as "spin" in non-apple ecosystems. I know Apple would never lie to you though, so let's just call it "iSpin"

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  28. Re:How? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    You will be electrocuted before the cable fails. It's likely that only a single leg of the 220V outlet will be forwarded to the phone therefore we are really talking about 110V. You holding the other end of the cable completes the circuit to ground. You will probably die or have serious injury before the load that you introduced melts the cable.

    I wouldn't count on the cable acting as a fuse.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  29. Re:How? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Makes little difference if you burnup firstist.

    100-220 V at 60 Hz can be lethal fairly quickly. You don''t need a hell of a lot of amperage, so a thin wire can handle it briefly.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  30. Designed that Way by tuppe666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The new "lighting" connector is very solid and handy, contrary to micro USB.

    Its designed that way for obvious reasons.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#Mini_and_Micro_connectors
    "The Micro plug design is rated for at least 10,000 connect-disconnect cycles—significantly more than the Mini plug design.[38] It is also designed to reduce the mechanical wear on the device; instead the easier-to-replace cable is designed to bear the mechanical wear of connection and disconnection"

    1. Re:Designed that Way by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lightning is also symmetric. I can't figure out why they didn't poka yoke USB-Micro. Every single USB standard is just slightly different but not easily apparent in the dark which way is up.

      USB-A, USB-B, Mini-A & B, Micro A & B. Would it have been impossible to make it completely symmetric and eliminated 90% of the problems I have with USB?

    2. Re:Designed that Way by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      In other words, Lightning exists in our own spacetime.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    3. Re:Designed that Way by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      This! I HATE plugging in my damn phone charger under any conditions short of operating room spotlights.

    4. Re:Designed that Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the symmetry of lightning comes from an authentication chip in the middle that also determines orientation, the wiring isn't acutally symmetric.

    5. Re:Designed that Way by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      #firstworldproblems

    6. Re:Designed that Way by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The MicroUSB connector may be able to handle the cycles, but the PCB connectors seem to fail regularly. The connector itself is reasonably solid compared to lightning, but using it as a dock connector is ill advised.

      Lightning connectors add the benefit of symmetry to the equation and also gives a more robust/flexible data link.

    7. Re:Designed that Way by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Poka yoke is about not being able to physically insert a cable the wrong way around. Every USB plug standard has this covered by non-symmetric connector design.

    8. Re:Designed that Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can most certainly tell the direction of USB cables and ports in the dark. How do you think blind people use them? All you have to do is use your hands...

    9. Re:Designed that Way by njnnja · · Score: 1

      I think you mean 50% of the problems you have with USB. Or is it 45%?

    10. Re:Designed that Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had any trouble with that. You just can't cram it in with reckless disregard for the integrity of the unit. Even with a symmetric design, you still want to insert and remove the cable somewhat gingerly so that it lasts for the duration of its expected life.

    11. Re:Designed that Way by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "The Micro plug design is rated for at least 10,000 connect-disconnect cycles"

      Really? If you're not careful it's pretty easy to wreck a connector on a mobile phone or get it to the state where you have to wriggle it around before it works (Various instances seen.)

      There's a definite need for a universal standard but microUSB is too fragile.

  31. Pay us by Reliable+Windmill · · Score: 1

    So... take the advice from us here at Apple, and pay us $79 for a $5 charger.

    --
    Signature intentionally left blank.
  32. 3, 2, 1... by sribe · · Score: 2

    Cue the Apple haters claiming that Apple engaged in a conspiracy to manufacture and distribute lethally-flawed apparently-counterfeit chargers in order to destroy the market for 3rd-party chargers and lock up all the profits...

    1. Re:3, 2, 1... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      no, it's Microsoft trying to get back market share. /me adjusts tinfoil jockstrap protecting the all-important little head

    2. Re:3, 2, 1... by sribe · · Score: 1

      no, it's Microsoft trying to get back market share. /me adjusts tinfoil jockstrap protecting the all-important little head

      Just don't short that jockstrap to a cheap charger ;-)

  33. Re:How? by Rosyna · · Score: 1

    No. the cables aren't built so cheaply that they would melt enough to break a circuit when a little heat is created. That's what fuses are for and USB cables aren't fuses.

  34. My problem with this is... by zethreal · · Score: 1

    I've had several iDevices and have to say that apple branded cables suck. I've had to replace every apple branded cable with a generic because the sheath is thin & there's no support near the connectors, so the sheath cracks and wires are exposed. ( I've had 2 iPods and currently have an iPad ) I had the apple branded cable for less than 6 months and wires were visible at the connector... I've had the same iPod and cheap chinese cable from a no-name chinese company for well over 3 years now. It gets the same abuse that it did before & isn't even starting to show age. The new "lightning" connector doesn't seem to be as bad, but only because of the design of the connector as a whole. I wouldn't be too surprised if it was an apple cable...

  35. Re:How? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't carry the current until the current has somewhere to flow. Namely, through you. Sure, the cable will melt in a matter of seconds, but that's a few seconds of electric shock, which is plenty.

  36. Re:How? by andydread · · Score: 1

    I would think that metal cased phones only exasperate the issue of allowing that voltage to get to the person holding that phone in a most efficent manner too.

  37. Re:How? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    The issue is that the counterfeit chargers short and deliver the mains directly to the head. It doesn't matter what electronic device is involved. hell, doesn't matter if any electronic device is connected to the end of the other side of the USB cable when the circuit is completed.

    In the case of the woman who died, it was reported that her iPhone was still fine. So it seems 220 Volt was delivered only to her, and not to the phone at all (I doubt an iPhone or any other phone would survive being hit by 220 Volt).

  38. Cheap adapter AND APPLE's fault by Vapula · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The cheap adapter may have sent big voltage to the phone connecteor... But IT'S THE APPLE DESIGN that bring that voltage outside the phone...

    If the two leads of the charger are (relative to ground) 220V and (220+5)V, the phone should charge just fine and the user would still be fine...
    If the charger send a rogue voltage (like 0V and 220V), the phone internals should get fried... but the user should still be fine...

    But some retard thought it'd be cool to use the metal frame of the phone as an antenna... This lead to the "antenna-gate" with people losing their phone signal when holding the phone the wrong way, but that part is more funny than other. But this also mean that any invalid voltage sent to the phone connector may also reach that metallic frame and the user... With the sad consequences that you've seen here !!!

    When you see electrical recommendation for electric appliances, you see that the box of an electric device should be grounded or completely insulated... Apple failed that basic recommendation... and THEY are responsible for that part.

    Any phone charger can go rogue... this is even true for Apple's "official" chargers (even if risks are lower).

    1. Re:Cheap adapter AND APPLE's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. If you're going to have a metal enclosure, you need to have a safety ground to prevent this exact situation. You'd think they could have assigned one to one of their 30 pins.

    2. Re:Cheap adapter AND APPLE's fault by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up. If you're going to have a metal enclosure, you need to have a safety ground to prevent this exact situation. You'd think they could have assigned one to one of their 30 pins.

      I've never run across a USB power adapter that has a ground pin. In some countries (i.e. Japan), many power outlets don't have a third ground pin (grounded outlets are becoming more common, but are far from the norm) so even if you wanted to ground the phone chassis, most people couldn't plug in an adapter with a ground pin. That's why USB power adapters are supposed to be "Class II double insulated". But of course, this cheap knockoff was apparently not insulated correctly.

      Even if there were a ground pin in the iphone connector, if it's not accompanied by an appropriately sized fuse in every power adapter (or perhaps in every cable), it may offer no protection at all if the ground wire or pin burns out because the outlet is supplying 10A of current that vaporizes the small diameter USB ground wire before the conductor that's inappropriately sending 220VAC to the phone burns out, so the conductor with the dangerous voltage continues to supply that voltage. And even if Apple power adapters or cables had that fuse, cheap knockoffs probably would not.

      The reason the ground pin protects you with normal appliances is because if there's a short to ground in the appliance, the cord you plug into the wall can carry enough current to trip the breaker, but that's not true with a USB cable.

    3. Re:Cheap adapter AND APPLE's fault by Vapula · · Score: 1

      That's why there is the second option : a fully-insulated enclosure (like you have in nearly all the phones... or is it all the phones except apple's ?)

      In Belgium, we have another thing that makes things secure : the whole electrical installation in houses has to go through a 300mA differential switch (and lines to water rooms an additionnal 30mA) which means that if there is a leak to the ground, the whole circuit will shut down.

      You can't be sure that every computer USB socket, every wall-mounted USB-socket, every "public phone charge booth" and so on will be secure... so, common sense would be to be sure that the phone is secure.

  39. Typical corporate blame shifting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might be inclined to say "Apple can't be held responsible for counterfeit chargers," but I disagree. Even my hairdryer has an automatic shutoff in case of a short. You'd think they could build this very, very basic safety feature into a device you hold up to your brain, especially since Apple is well aware that consumers are regularly conned into buying sub-par counterfeit parts.

  40. Re:How? by sribe · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the USB cable catch fire first?

    No, of course not. By the time you've run enough current to melt/ignite the insulation, you've run enough current to kill. It's not as though the insulation melts as the first electron passes by.

    And, oh, by the way, since you seem to be unaware, an uninsulated cable can deliver enough current to kill you, even one covered in flaming insulation ;-)

    Now if you're talking about the conductor melting instead of just the insulation, oh good lord, of course that does not happen before dangerous current has flowed. Good grief.

  41. Re:How? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    No

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  42. Counterfeit items in China? by JeanCroix · · Score: 2

    I am shocked!

    1. Re:Counterfeit items in China? by kiriath · · Score: 1

      This is wrong on so many levels.

  43. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what fuses are for and USB cables aren't fuses.

    They are if you pass enough current through them. You just aren't trying hard enough.

  44. Die! by Fuzi719 · · Score: 1

    That's one way to force the use of proprietary hardware. Such a benevolent company. Use Official Apple Product or DIE!

  45. Re:Nice deflection! by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

    It's not just Apple suggesting a counterfeit:
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57594449-37/iphone-related-death-in-china-could-be-linked-to-fake-charger/

    Granted, a guy listed as "phone expert" on Chinese media isn't exactly conclusive, but given that China actually had fake Apple stores for awhile I would not be surprised if some idiot who didn't know what he was doing made deadly chargers and slapped an Apple logo on them.

    OTOH iPhone 4 has been out for three years. And it didn't kill anyone until Ma Ailun.

  46. Why wait for death? by dismorphic · · Score: 1

    "After a User Dies, Apple Warns Against Counterfeit Chargers" Why would I be careful with counterfit charges only after I, a user, die?

    1. Re:Why wait for death? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      wow, I didn't know the woman died, as the news blurb plain doesn't say it! I failed to read the headline somehow, and didn't read TFA of course.

  47. Crap switching power supplies by Animats · · Score: 1

    Crap switching power supplies from China are a huge problem. You not only have to look for a UL logo, but check the logo in the UL database. UL even has special rules for China about where the UL stickers come from.

    Tests of computer power supplies have shown that the UL-certified ones will consistently deliver their rated current. That makes sense, because that's how UL tests them. Others, loaded up to their rated load, overheat, shut down, burn out, or in a few cases, catch fire. The really bad ones lack key safety components, like a fuse.

    I bought some laptop-type switching power supplies on Amazon which showed a UL logo in the picture, but the delivered power supply looked different and lacked a UL logo. I raised hell with Amazon over that, and they kicked that seller off.

  48. And don't answer phone while in the tub by Geste · · Score: 1

    No one is being killed by the 5v on the USB bus. The problem is the counterfeit chargers are often poorly designed and can fail in a way that shorts the USB cable to the AC power.

    Righto. And it would seem there must have been something else contributing, path-to-ground-wise.

  49. These are switchmode supplies, not linear.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Informative

    , and they contain a bit more than a simple transformer and regulator.

    They take the AC line voltage, rectify it to high voltage DC, chop the DC up into high frequency pulses with a MOSFET, step the pulsed voltage down with a specially designed transformer, then rectify the output to low voltage DC. A sample of the output DC is then fed back to the primary side circuitry to achieve closed loop regulation.

    Because the primary side of the system is at line potential, the insulation in the switching transformer (and the optocoupler used in the feedback loop) is all that prevents the output side from presenting a shock hazard with respect to earth ground. The quality of construction of many of the Chinese knockoff chargers is downright terrible, and I could easily believe that an insulation breakdown. Dave Jones "EEVBlog" did a teardown of one of these a while back. Scary stuff if you know what you are looking at:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi-b9k-0KfE

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  50. iOS 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iOS 7 (which I'm using as a developer) has this interesting feature whereby it warns you if you're not using an "Apple Certified" accessory. IT did this for my cheap charging cable - popping up a warning as soon as I plugged it in. I'm very curious about how this actually works.

    1. Re:iOS 7 by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      yeah. My generic drugstore checkout car counter won't even register a blink on the Iphone's led.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  51. Current vs voltage by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    It's current that kills you, not voltage, and it doesn't take much. Even a cheap USB cable will transfer more than enough power to kill you if you're unlucky.

    If it's thick enough for 500mA(minimum USB standard), it's enough to kill you, as it only takes 100-200mA. Matter of fact, it says that 100-200mA is actually more dangerous than above 200mA if the victim can get prompt attention.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  52. Re:Solution: Use standard charger by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    the part that plugs into the wall is mostly USB, with notable quirks so they can support high amperage modes.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  53. Another comic take on USB plugs by PapayaSF · · Score: 0
    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
  54. Re:Solution: Use standard charger by TuringCheck · · Score: 1

    Better: don't buy at all.
    I have an excess of Nokia, Samsung and HTC chargers, all compatible. I just pick the nearest one..

  55. but.... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    it isn't actually clear if it WAS a counterfit charger.... Apple wants you to believe it is, but maybe it isn't...

  56. Teardown comparison of fake, real Apple chargers by mpaque · · Score: 2

    Pardon me for interrupting the usual /. dialogue with something relevant to the original topic, but Ken Shirriff did a couple of teardowns a year ago that point out exactly why the counterfeit chargers are Not Safe. The safety issues revolve around poor isolation practices between the line and USB sides of some USB chargers.

    Major items include
    1) lack of "double insulated" construction in the internal transformer.
    2) parts placement of line and USB side components on a single circuit board such that paths may be readily formed between line and USB sides from moisture, construction errors, or component failure.
    3) inadequate margins between line side and USB side in overall layout of the charger internal components.

    http://www.righto.com/2012/05/apple-iphone-charger-teardown-quality.html

    http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html

  57. Isolated case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that in any electronic device, the case was insulated from the electronic and therefore the power source. The electronic would fry anyway in a mater of milliseconds, stopping the current from flowing in the process. Anyway, 220V most of the time is not fatal unless you're very unlucky. I read somewhere that she was taking a bath while answering her phone.

  58. Murder case by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

    Maybe Siri just didn't like her?

  59. Re:Solution: Use standard charger by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    What? Any USB charger will charge an iPhone/iPad just not as fast as one made for the it. The 30 pin cable is the only thing that is proprietary and even then you can get them cheaply. The problem here is that someone made a counterfeit one which was shoddy and killed someone.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  60. A little wider by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Anyone looking to buy anything should avoid China. There, that's much more realistic.

  61. Re:How? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    First? Remember, no current is flowing until the circuit is completed. The amount of current required to flash-ignite the charging wire is quite high compared to the amount necessary to cook human nervous tissue. Even if the wire burned through its insulation almost immediately, it could already be too late.

    Also, remember that USB cables actually have moderately high current tolerances. Carrying any meaningful amount of power at 5V requires a relatively high amperage rating. 1A at 220V is quite a lot of power when applied to the human body, and that's merely what these charging cables are expected to carry in normal operation. In practice, they can probably manage several times that without anything worse than becoming a bit warm will occur. At 2.3A, that's over half a kilowatt (minus minor resistive losses in the wire, which will heat it but probably not melt/ignite it) being delivered to the head...

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  62. Availability not Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too have a non Apple charger for my Powerbook. Not because of price, but because when the Apple one failed, EBay notwithstanding, there was no way to replace it.

    The only advice the "Geniuses" at the Apple Store could give me was "Hur hur, that's like so old Grampa. Get a new laptop".

    *sigh* Young people.

  63. Mod parent up by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    This is a solid explanation of how the phone could be safely plugged in, but very dangerous once it's brought to your head. A cable with a resistance of 0.1 Ohms carrying a current of 1 Amp will experience a voltage drop of 0.1V, which means it will dissipate 0.1 Watts (I * dV) - a meager amount that the wire can maintain indefinitely (and indeed, is designed to). This happens regardless of whether the wire is carrying 5V or 225V; all that matters is the voltage drop *along* the wire (and the current on the wire, which is partially a function of that voltage drop).

    Now, if you shorted the wire itself (rather than shorting the mains to one side of the wire), then (under normal circumstances) your wire is now dropping the full 5V that is the difference between its positive and ground terminals. To get a voltage drop of 5V with only 0.1 Ohms of resistance, you need 50 Amps (dV = I * R -> dV/R = I). 50A current times 5V potential drop is 250 Watts of dissipated heat, which would destroy your wire if the USB port could supply anywhere near that much current. The numbers for 220V are even more frightening (P = dV^2/R, so that would be 484000W). But, that won't happen unless the wire is shorted to itself. If the wire (at 220V) is instead connected to ground through a human being (with a resistance between that person's head and ground of, say, 49.9 Ohms) then you've got (220)^2 / 50, which is a mere 0.2% of the number given above. That's still about a kilowatt, enough to kill you very quickly.

    As for the wire, it's now carrying 4.4A (220V/50 Ohm), but it still only has 0.1 Ohm of resistance and is therefore dissipating a mere 1.936W across a voltage drop of .44V. That's many times its normal dissipation, but still it might not even be enough to melt the plastic coating.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  64. Electricity is Scary! Let's Go Shopping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (For thick rubber gloves and rubber soled shoes)

  65. Re:How? by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Nope. You can run as many volts as you like over a thin cable; it's amps that would cause it to heat up and fail.

  66. Re:How? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    Every USB power brick i've seen has a floating output. That is in normal operation neither side of the output is connected to "mains ground".

    So it's quite feasible in a failure scenario for one side of the output to be connected to mains live while the two sides of the output remain at 5V relative to each other. The phone would probablly be fine with this, someone holding the phone not so much.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  67. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you do not need a lot of power to kill someone with >100V.
    Even a cheap cable will deliver the milli-amps required before dying.

  68. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can put a large voltage on a copper wire the size of a human hair. 1mA of current could kill you. At 220V, 1mA is only 220mW. That "heat" isn't even going to be dissipated in the wire so trust me, the cable won't feel a thing.

  69. Why don't Apple products isolate user from USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell doesn't Apple isolate the USB cable from the user? Then nobody would get hurt if they applied 220V to a USB cable as long as they didn't stick the open end into their mouth.

  70. Cover material by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    It greatly contributes to the danger that iPhone's cover material is aluminum rather than plastic.

  71. Re:Solution: Use standard charger by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    I came here to say exactly this. Apple is the one who ensured that the only manufacturers selling chargers for their products were those with no accountability.
    If they did not use absurd proprietary designs, then most consumers would buy chargers from companies which have such qualifications as "an address" and "a name".

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  72. HDMI + USB is NOT proprietary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called MHL and it's an industry standard. It's also implemented in many phones now, though nobody knows its existence even through their phones may already have had it for 1 or 2 years.

    I bought the cable and it's very impressive. Full HD transfer, though not without one or two seconds of delay.

  73. Nah... by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

    Or maybe not charge a ridiculous amount of money for a proprietary charger so people wouldn't be forced into buying a much less expensive 3rd party one? Nah... why do that?

  74. Counterfeit chargers by TJNoffy · · Score: 1

    FWIW, the shoddy quality of knock-off chargers is well-documented. Bottom line: stay away from them.

    http://www.righto.com/2012/10/a-dozen-usb-chargers-in-lab-apple-is.html

  75. Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't buy a phone made of metal, lol.