Slashdot Mirror


NSA Shares Intel On Americans With Israel

An anonymous reader writes "The U.K.'s Guardian newspaper is reporting that the NSA shares the raw intel collected on Americans with Israel. From the article: 'Details of the intelligence-sharing agreement are laid out in a memorandum of understanding between the NSA and its Israeli counterpart that shows the U.S. government handed over intercepted communications likely to contain phone calls and emails of American citizens. The agreement places no legally binding limits on the use of the data by the Israelis. ... The deal was reached in principle in March 2009, according to the undated memorandum, which lays out the ground rules for the intelligence sharing. The five-page memorandum, termed an agreement between the U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies "pertaining to the protection of U.S. persons," repeatedly stresses the constitutional rights of Americans to privacy and the need for Israeli intelligence staff to respect these rights. But this is undermined by the disclosure that Israel is allowed to receive "raw Sigint" – signal intelligence. The memorandum says: "Raw Sigint includes, but is not limited to, unevaluated and unminimized transcripts, gists, facsimiles, telex, voice and Digital Network Intelligence metadata and content."'

328 comments

  1. Legal and NSA by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Informative

    are mutually exclusive

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Legal and NSA by kthreadd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The solution will unfortunately be to fix the legal.

    2. Re:Legal and NSA by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think it is time to 'clean house' in Washington.

      PLEASE....vote out whoevers currently in office, and vote in anyone that will at least make lip service that this type of thing will end.

      Personally, I'm less worried about a terrorist attack ending my life, than I am of my govt running roughshod over my privacy and my rights.

      The giving it willingly to foreign countries' intelligence agencies is just painful icing on the cake.

      Why is there not more of an uproar over this? Are US citizens that scared? Or do they just not give a fuck anymore for the rights that so many have died for over the years to protect for us....?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Legal and NSA by losfromla · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know but did you see the last episode of "Breaking Bad"?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    4. Re:Legal and NSA by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't vote out bureaucrats. They stay in place from administration to administration and really run things.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:Legal and NSA by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, we're just mostly trapped in a vicious cycle of debt that forces us to spend most of our time at jobs that treat us like serfs as well as instilling a fear that if we were to speak out and stand up for ourselves, our lives would be ruined by outside forces.

      Oh, then there's that whole extraordinary rendition/Gitmo stuff.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:Legal and NSA by intermodal · · Score: 2

      It's time to clean house, but there are a handful of clear allies to the American people in Washington. The real solution isn't to vote everyone out, the solution is to hold those in office accountable for their actions in office. Voting out Pelosi, Boehner, Reid, and whatever that guy serving as Senate Minority Leader's name is would be good. Voting out the guys who tried to defund the NSA's surveilance program would be counterproductive.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    7. Re:Legal and NSA by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      PLEASE....vote out whoevers currently in office, and vote in anyone that will at least make lip service that this type of thing will end.

      We did in 2008 over excesses of the financial sector and of the war on terror, and lip service is pretty much all we got on both counts.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    8. Re:Legal and NSA by ewibble · · Score: 1

      Both parties are the same, they are just their to give the appearance you have a choice. At least in china they are honest about it.

      There might be independents, but they are massively out advertised by the major parties. The rich don't want to have to buy out 3 parties, it is cheaper just to have 2.

      What are the chances of neither a democrat or a republican becoming the next president. Clearly there is only 2 main ways (Ok 1 way with minor differences) of running a country of 311 million could come up with.

    9. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      are mutually exclusive

      They're barely considered mutually exclusive of each other due to the fact that one has been made irrelevant.

      And in the case of the NSA, almost every single privacy law has most certainly been made irrelevant.

      And there's not a damn thing you can do about that. Nothing.

      Understand that government agencies who operate within classified guidelines do not have to say or do a damn thing that you really want them to do, so I fail to understand how any citizen really thinks they are going to effectively change how our intel community has been operating for decades when they practically have the legal right to lie to you, or will simply refuse to "confirm or deny" any wrongdoing.

      In fact, the only thing you can do about it is to do what they did. Make the data collection irrelevant by moving to another private form of electronic communication (good luck finding one you trust), or stop using the technology they're monitoring altogether (which anyone under the age of 30 would take a bullet to the head before giving up electronic communication permanently.)

    10. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now the Mossad knows I watch Midget Porn?

    11. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we need to do both. Start petitioning people you trust on to ballots and get them into offices, at the same time get the criminals put in jail.

      There is a very clear set of logic used by Socrates when he stated that a Political class could not be allowed in a Republic. Only Philosophers (by true definition according to Socrates, which includes above all honesty) should be allowed to hold public office.

      Posting AC for modding. s.petry

    12. Re:Legal and NSA by ron_ivi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can't vote out bureaucrats. They stay in place from administration to administration and really run things.

      You can't vote them out because they and their partners have acccess to all this sigint on their competitors. I imagine any politician who did vote to defund such agencies would be quickly be labeled as a threat to national security and re-educated.

    13. Re:Legal and NSA by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or bad things might happen. Suddenly a shared gmail account is made public, tax records come to light, etc. Everyone has something to hide.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    14. Re:Legal and NSA by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      You can't vote out bureaucrats. They stay in place from administration to administration and really run things.

      ... Things including, but not limited to, the elected government.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    15. Re:Legal and NSA by intermodal · · Score: 1

      OK, so I think we agree here in general.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    16. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in a vicious cycle of debt, you made some poor life choices.

    17. Re:Legal and NSA by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Except Wiener, at this point he pretty much has nothing to hide. May as well vote him in, he'll surely flip off at least one person who deserves it...

    18. Re:Legal and NSA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You can't vote out bureaucrats. They stay in place from administration to administration and really run things.

      But they can be fired by our elected officials, or have their agencies disbanded or de-funded, no?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The single greatest evil that mankind has ever unleashed upon the world was a corrupt government.

      It has happened before, and it can happen again.

      Eternal vigilance, and all that.

    20. Re:Legal and NSA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It's time to clean house, but there are a handful of clear allies to the American people in Washington. The real solution isn't to vote everyone out, the solution is to hold those in office accountable for their actions in office. Voting out Pelosi, Boehner, Reid, and whatever that guy serving as Senate Minority Leader's name is would be good. Voting out the guys who tried to defund the NSA's surveilance program would be counterproductive.

      I don't think that would work, it likely has to be all or nothing.

      If you do it your way...everyone will hem and haw over their current legislators, and think "Well my guy is ok"...and we're largely still stuck.

      Clean house....I suppose if the truly good ones run again or switch houses maybe, that would be palatable, but at this point, start from scratch I say.

      Being a federal politician was NOT supposed to be a career or lifetime job. It was supposed to be short service.

      Perhaps vote everyone out...new folks could vote in term limits, etc....and we go forward from there.

      Only other thing I can think of....is one guy I saw on TV recently (name elludes me right now), but he's calling for the states to start a constitutional amendment, doing this way to bypass starting it in congress which would never work....but one of the main ones, is passing severe term limits on congress-critters.

      That might help knock some of the lobby interest down too since they couldn't count on one person for decades at a time to bribe...err.....donate to.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:Legal and NSA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      We did in 2008 over excesses of the financial sector and of the war on terror, and lip service is pretty much all we got on both counts.

      That only clears out some of them...this needs to be done next 2-3 voting cycles to clear out ALL the old crony-ism crew.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Legal and NSA by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      You can vote for whichever EMPLOYEE of Raytheon, Goldman or Monsanto, for which you care.

      The US President an Executive? HA! Call him "Employee of the Year" for multi-national concerns - who currently migrating their primary interests from the US, while simultaneously using their Employees to police their global aspiration.

      No shit. Obama has no "Syria Plan". The Board of Directors hands him the script, and he dances. Same for the bitches in the rows on the Hill. I don't care if they are R or D or Martian. One party rule.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    23. Re:Legal and NSA by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I'm all for term limits, and if we implement them and limit to one term, I'm good with that. As it stands, I'm ok with a good guy serving a second term, given how hard it is to get good candidates on the ballot. I agree with your sentiment, I just think that given what we have to work with right now, we can't always argue it based on our ideal situation. I hope what you've described does become a reality within my lifetime, even if the odds are slim.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    24. Re:Legal and NSA by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Vote the wiener in? And then out! And in again!

    25. Re:Legal and NSA by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fake debt, false concern.

      To WHOM is this debt owed? By whom?

      It is a macroeconomic fiction, perpetrated to manage large-scale social control, and to impose hierarchies of Elite governance, through feudal taxation models.

      You don't possess US Citizenship. You rent it, through various Federal taxes, and lose it through non-compliance with the collectors. Your supposed "citizenship" entitles you to no actual meaningful role in policy or governance, and is a dubious merit. Think of it as being a "Trustee" in the pen.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    26. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did we get even one last round? I'm not optimistic about the next 1-2 cycles at this rate.

    27. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote for Wiener! He'll stand for something. He'll stand for anything with a pulse and boobs (moobs need not apply).

    28. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      PLEASE.... [...] vote in anyone that will at least make lip service that this type of thing will end.

      That worked so well for us with Obama. In 2007, before being elected president for the first time, he said he'd put an end to the "illegal wiretapping of American citizens." (see, for example, http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/08/us/politics/08obama-surveillance-history-video.html)

      What now?

    29. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lets put Edward Snowden on the next presidential ballot, the only guy I trust at the moment.

    30. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that you can petition to get people on ballots correct? It does not have to be a R or D provided by a bankster. Of course you need to educate as many people as possible in the process of getting people on ballots since media is owned by the same banksters.

    31. Re:Legal and NSA by flex941 · · Score: 1

      Freshly elected officials are to naive to fire bureaucrats in a really timely manner. You know, they still believe in the goodness of humanity. And that will destroy them in one and a half of a week.

    32. Re:Legal and NSA by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I was one of 9 people in my Congressional District to vote for Cynthia McKinney - under Green - vs. Barack Obama in 2008.

      So?

      Theory and practice are no longer related in any substantive manner.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    33. Re:Legal and NSA by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So... I can stop paying my bills and still keep all my stuff?

      Just fuckin' with ya - I get what you're saying, but I would submit that it would help more people understand what you mean if you were a bit less poetic.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    34. Re:Legal and NSA by forkazoo · · Score: 2

      The proposals I have seem for extreme term limits seem good at a glance, but none of them address the fact that it would in practice hand massive power to lobbyists. When everybody in the legislature is brand new, they can't be an expert on every issue that comes up. Thus when some nice guy who contributed to the campaign says, "Oh hey, I know all about water rights in the west," or flood insurance, or whatever it is, he's the one teaching the Congress however he wants about whatever he wants. You need some career bureaucrats to manage something as large as running the government, otherwise somebody will do it for you. We need really fundamental, far reaching reforms about how the US government does business to go along with term limits. It has to be done in concert with lobbying reform, campaign finance, and streamlining of federal responsibilities.

    35. Re:Legal and NSA by srichard25 · · Score: 1

      I believe most Americans are so sick of politics, that they aren't even paying attention anymore. As long as it isn't directly impacting their daily lives, they don't really care about it. In my opinion this NSA stuff is far worse that Watergate, yet no one is being fired or going to prison over it. I'm not sure what is needed to get people to wake up. Perhaps some breakthrough that actually impacts an average (non-terrorist) American in their normal life.

    36. Re:Legal and NSA by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Oh, then there's that whole extraordinary rendition/Gitmo stuff.

      Which probably accounts for well under 1,000 people total, ever, and next to no US citizens, if any.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    37. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably know about your dwarf tossing too.

    38. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not "that scared." Nor is it that we don't care. This story was reported in the Guardian. As far as I know, it has not been reprinted in the US, certainly not in my local paper, nor with any prominence in the national press I try to keep up on.
      I don't think it's somehow Not News or Not Relevant. I think it's intentionally kept quiet for fear that we might actually react.

      Of course, "voting them out" is not easy, because they long ago gerrymandered most of the districts -- this is a bad habit of both parties -- , so that a shift of 10% of the voters will have no effect in changing the result.

    39. Re:Legal and NSA by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Wooncha love to see the NSA applying for asylum for leaking our secrets? Fuckheads.....

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    40. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd call the Merry Maids, but D.C. is such a ghetto shit-hole, the roaches will eventually win.

      Just quit voting Republican or Democrat. It is a vote for the same old shit. If you don't want the same old shit, don't vote the same way. I won't say who to vote FOR. That's your business. My business is to point out what a complete fuck up you are if you use ANY reason to vote Republican or Democrat ever again outside local and state levels. It would really be best if you still can't bring yourself to vote outside Republican or Democrat, to just go ahead and kill yourself for the good of mankind and future of the U. S. In the likelihood that you are spineless self absorbed wad of snot , at least have your reproductive organs removed and quit pissing in the gene pool.

      In the case of your complaint of government invading privacy, revolt would mean invading the privacy of government officials. Go over to their house, drink their beer, eat their steak, talk their wives into being your bitch and knock them up. Make the officials watch. Cuck them and send their tax returns to the Nat'l Enquirer.
      Bend them over and invade their privacy. Film it, post it.

      Why is there not more uproar? Well, get off the farm sometime and go to town and see the talkies!

    41. Re:Legal and NSA by flyneye · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love it, a completely frank leader.
      Weiner for president. (as long as he runs independent of the Repubmocrats)
      Put on a campaign shirt and show them your Weiner.
      Fly high the finger of foreign policy. Put Weiner in to relieve the stress.
      Hell, he's gonna be single now, so he won't be distracted from his stiff agenda.
      No one bats an eye at a single Weiner doing his job. A stable Weiner is ABOVE the nuts,with a powerful head.
      Women voters agree he ejaculates potent politics and they swell with pride for accepting Weiner.
      So please, open up and let Weiner in.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    42. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US citizenship is a franchise granted by Congress upon which it may lay and collect excises, fees and imposts. Why is it that a 501(c)3 entity cannot exercise political speech? It is that political speech is also a franchise granted by Congress upon which...Mere lawful presence beyond a whatever visa is issued is also a franchise granted by Congress unpon which... This is why illegal aliens desire to remain illegal. It's not an immigration issue, it is a TAX issue. Perhaps the IRS should enforce immigration law. No, that would be effective and violate the cardinal rule of politics.

      KudyardRipling said this all the time and he got downmodded to Niraka for telling such absolute(ly offensive) truth.

    43. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still can vote third party. The next president will probably be a dempublican. But if next election third parties start getting support, they will start getting more funding. You need only 5% of the votes to be in the debates in the next election cycle. Voting for third party, if people start doing so, can begin the wheels moving, and maybe 2 or 3 cycles down the line we'll start seeing third parties with a shot at winning.

    44. Re:Legal and NSA by dindi · · Score: 1

      Interesting you bring this up. In my country (where I am from and where I live) people hate their government with a passion.

      Still, they keep electing the same group of psychopaths who are not scientists, yet they make decisions on scientific issues, they are not doctors, yet they decide over health regulations. They are not good for anything and they are paid by corporations.

      People see it more and more. The donations from companies and the lobbying is obvious, yet.. still the same set of rules and the same set of people get there... they get paid by the industrial complexes that serve no human interest. They only server company profit interests.

      Time to put together a decent party in every country and elect them in... make rules that if they accept a cent from anyone it is a bribe and they can be hung by the neck until dead.... not less..

      Is this like a pipe dream, or what you suggest actually something considerable at all to go through with?

    45. Re:Legal and NSA by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      Fired? Many of these people should be in prison.

    46. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey but they are changing , it only took them a a few hundred years to learn you can put a black man in the chair and it makes no difference to the system. Give it anothe r 20 years and they may even figure out you can even gasp do the same with a woman.

    47. Re:Legal and NSA by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      But they all wake up standing for the Queen..

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    48. Re:Legal and NSA by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The words are crystal clear. You are a ward of the state. Of course I believe it's self inflicted, and we can break free... Final scene in Brazil comes to mind...

      Heh, poetic:
      Well I know it wasn't you who held me down
      Heaven knows it wasn't you who set me free
      So often times it happens that we live our lives in chains
      And we never even know we have the key

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    49. Re:Legal and NSA by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, I couldvote for a third party, but what if, as a result, a repocrat wins?

      But the Libertarian party approached that point, and the major news media conspired to silence them. (was it ABC? Or Fox fair'n'balanced that publicly told the party leadership, if your candidate won the presidency we wouldn't report it.?)

      The democratic portion of our society is dead. And apparently the NSA shares 'information' with Israel, whose MI is famous for their assassinations.
       

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    50. Re:Legal and NSA by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think we already have the answer available in Obama's recent speech about Syria. We won't put troops on the ground in the NSA building. We'll just authorize strategic bombing to destroy the illegally obtained data. Of course, the NSA currently denies having the illegally obtained data, but perhaps Russia can come in and broker a deal to come in and collect and destroy the data--and then the NSA can admit to having said data. We will have to have confirmation of the data being actually destroyed. And if the diplomacy breaks down, we'll just carry on with the bombing. Just please ignore that going in and destroying the chemical weapons^W^Willegal data may take months or years to do successfully, yet we think we can just drop a few bombs and solve the problem. Oh, and please don't cry to me about the "collateral damage".

      PS - If you think the above sounds absurd, well, that's the story with Syria too.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    51. Re:Legal and NSA by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Not in the US system. Political appointees are changed with each and every change of administration, so party based. What is going on here is a straight up run at inside information of US politicians to ensure they tow the Israeli line even behind the scenes. This to ensure an aggressive political attack specifically targeted at them as soon as they try to go public about a foreign government having such control over the US government and the US government repeatedly acting in Israel's interest against US interests. What a joke, NSA rules to Israel, please delete the information about US politicians and administration officials, what the fuck?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    52. Re:Legal and NSA by notanalien_justgreen · · Score: 1

      I just can't believe that republicans aren't calling for impeachment. They seem to attack Obama on literally everything. There was even an article blaming him for Katrina (which happened under Bush). I don't understand why they're so silent on this.

    53. Re:Legal and NSA by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      it only took them a a few hundred years to learn you can put a black man in the chair...

      Silly AC - Texas has been putting lots of black men in the chair for a long time now..

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    54. Re:Legal and NSA by davester666 · · Score: 1

      this IS how the NSA is fixing the problem.

      they are "washing" the data through Israel

      out goes "dirty, illegal" data that the NSA has on Americans
      in comes "clean, legal" data from Mossad, which the NSA can use however it wants, and they don't even need to kick a FISA judge in the nuts to do it.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    55. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a US citizen, but have you seen the media coverage in that country? There is no uproar because people indeed getting brainwashed by the media and think Snowden is a traitor and the NSA only does its job. In Europe the media also does a good job at keeping the masses in check but not as thorough as you see in in the USA.

      Being currently in China it is incredible to think about the fact that you get a non-biased picture from over here... strange times we live in.

    56. Re:Legal and NSA by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      The problem is that we can't agree on who the true allies are. For example, I don't think any politician is an "ally" if they think it's a great idea to do things that history indicates will damage society -- which is primarily the choices that emulate, value, and assist sociopathic corporations instead of a collection of individuals living under an agreed-upon rules to share the burdens & sacrifices to improve quality of life for as many people as possible.

      At this point, my idea of a true "ally" in the political world would be somebody that actually consults history, results of policies in other countries, and scientific studies to figure out policy, even if what they discover directly contradicts our judgmental Puritan society's *beliefs* about what works. Based on the research I've done, it'd result in pissing off just about every group in our nation at least once, but if it led to a truly good quality of life, it'd be more than worth it.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    57. Re:Legal and NSA by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The proposals I have seem for extreme term limits seem good at a glance, but none of them address the fact that it would in practice hand massive power to lobbyists.

      This is complete crap.
      There are plenty of scientific, educational, and non-corporate-affiliated public advocacy groups/individuals that are more than happy to provide unbiased information and balanced solutions.

      The reasons are many and varied as to why those groups or individuals don't get to provide much input...
      But those people exist and could easily help us shape sane public policy.

      Hell, the election of Senator Warren is a prime example.
      The Chamber of Commerce called her the greatest "threat to free enterprise" and
      she only ran for office because entrenched banking interests prevented her from heading the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

      Before all this, she was an academic and consumer advocate.
      Now she's the terror of the Senate banking committee and 3 of 5 subcommittees.

      Government can be fixed. Banking can be fixed. The Debt can be fixed. The NSA can be fixed.
      But the fixers must be willing to expend enormous political capital to overturn existing power structures.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    58. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has something to hide.

      That only means that everyone is compromised. It isn't wise to make someone who is compromised to leader of a nation.
      Perhaps we can't afford to let politicians in high positions have privacy. A person without secrets can't be blackmailed.

    59. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your post is sadly true but funny. I'm not sure if you got what i mean and just making a witty reply. I meant the one that is in the Oval office and isn't wired into the mains.

    60. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #Disclaimer: Imperfect english.

      You will not be able to vote out the 2 parties running the US because of the 1-turn presidential election. Indeed, when reasonable people vote for a 3rd candidate in your presidential election, the most unreasonable of the 2 others win. This is why people will always vote for the lesser of these 2 evils, and will *systematically* not vote them out.

      Like China has a 1-party system, the US has a 2-party system, which is only marginally more democratic.

    61. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, most of this was happening during the previous administration as well and the Republicans are even more in bed with Israel and the military industrial complex than the Democrats.

    62. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "The Liberty Amendments" written by Mark Levin.

    63. Re:Legal and NSA by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Seconded. The solution probably does not lie at the federal legislative level.

      But it's still important to have quality people in those positions instead of whatever we have now.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    64. Re:Legal and NSA by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I think we share a broader, more general view but probably differ in the execution.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    65. Re:Legal and NSA by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I've been chided by... less well spoken people... for talking in ways that go over their heads; the sad part in those circumstances is not only do they lack a single clue as to what you're speaking about, but they will inevitably get pissed off at you (and, as an extension, whatever cause you're touting) for speaking in a manner they fail to understand.

      TL;DR version - Don't use so many big words when speaking to the proles; it scares the living bejeesus out of them.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    66. Re:Legal and NSA by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Perhaps vote everyone out...new folks could vote in term limits, etc....and we go forward from there.

      If you can vote everyone out, why do you need term limits?

      Oh, and go visit Mexico, then come back and tell us how well term limits work. See, it's not about the individual politician. The institutional party still rules regardless.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    67. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fix it via legal. It doesn't matter who started it. Any sitting President who does not strike it down should be impeached for high crimes and/or misdemeanors. Perpetuating wanton violations of the constitution by the federal government should fall into the high crimes category. For what higher law is there?

    68. Re:Legal and NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That vicious cycle is driven by personal choices. It's not always comfortable to live within your means. (or well under)

    69. Re:Legal and NSA by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      victims of propaganda i believe, not scared, just plain confused

  2. that's not good. by stewsters · · Score: 1

    I feel very betrayed.

    1. Re:that's not good. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I feel very betrayed.

      This message alone means they will not likely be rolling out the red carpet for you in Tel Aviv.

      spend your next vacation in scenic lebanon!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:that's not good. by spacefight · · Score: 2

      OT: Lebanon is indeed quite scenic - Beirut is still worth a visit after all those years of turmoil.

    3. Re:that's not good. by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Not good at all.

    4. Re:that's not good. by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it makes you feel any better, the Israeli government pinky-promised that they wouldn't use it for anything bad. And that's a PINKY promise, mister!

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    5. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel very betrayed.

      This message alone means they will not likely be rolling out the red carpet for you in Tel Aviv.

      spend your next vacation in scenic lebanon!

      Not a problem. Given that I don't have unlimited time & money to travel, that's one of the last places I'd bother to go anyway. There's enough interesting stuff to see in north america to last me a lifetime. Enough in the whole world to last dozens of lifetimes. Most of them are more interesting then Tel Aviv. If any city or country wants to deny my visit, I won't be heartbroken over it. Plenty to do in other places.

    6. Re:that's not good. by losfromla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what's this got to do with anti-Semitism? Or, is it ok to give intel on American Citizens to other countries as long as the other countries are Israel?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    7. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck your anti-Semitism. Jews are as American as you are. Or do you think you would be better off if Hitler had gassed them all?

      Obviously you are mentally impaired.

      There is a difference between American Jews and the country of
      Israel.

    8. Re:that's not good. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it makes you feel any better, the Israeli government pinky-promised that they wouldn't use it for anything bad. And that's a PINKY promise, mister!

      Right; I mean, it's not like Mossad has a reputation for being disreputable or anything...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all Jews are as American, even if they live in a different country, have different citizenships and don't even speak English.

    10. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT: Lebanon is indeed quite scenic - Beirut is still worth a visit after all those years of turmoil.

      Just make sure you don't have an Isreali stamp on your passports kids or your trip may be cut short.

    11. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pray I don't alter the deal any further.

    12. Re:that's not good. by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it makes you feel any better, the Israeli government pinky-promised that they wouldn't use it for anything bad. And that's a PINKY promise, mister!

      Right; I mean, it's not like Mossad has a reputation for being disreputable or anything...

      And, one should keep in mind that Israel is basically the 51st state so It's not as if the NSA is sharing this data with foreigners.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    13. Re:that's not good. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      If it makes you feel any better, the Israeli government pinky-promised that they wouldn't use it for anything bad. And that's a PINKY promise, mister!

      Right; I mean, it's not like Mossad has a reputation for being disreputable or anything...

      And, one should keep in mind that Israel is basically the 51st state so It's not as if the NSA is sharing this data with foreigners.

      As I stated elsewhere in the thread, Israel is treated more like a 4th branch of government than another state.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    14. Re:that's not good. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Right; I mean, it's not like Mossad has a reputation for being disreputable or anything...

      Compared to who?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    15. Re:that's not good. by isorox · · Score: 1

      OT: Lebanon is indeed quite scenic - Beirut is still worth a visit after all those years of turmoil.

      Just make sure you don't have an Isreali stamp on your passports kids or your trip may be cut short.

      Israel have stopped stamping passports at TLV since Jan 2013. I still got stamped at Erez, not sure about other land borders.

    16. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right wing antisemitism is the ultimate no-no, even though its origins was from National SOCIALISM, alas lying labels. Left wing antisemitism always gets a pass.

      Look at all those world powers that tried to mess with the Jews. History. As for the typical self-hating American Jew who goes about saying: Shema Yisrael [ Democrat Party | Collectivism | Statism ] Eloheynu [ Democrat Party | Collectivism | Statism ] Echad, these are ones whose "woildview" is causing trouble. Sabra Orthopunk Gush Katif [said with cheek-pinching endearment] is more my style.

    17. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's antisemitism because you're focusing on Israel when in fact this information is shared with 5-6 other countries mentioned in the article. Equal standards for everyone. As soon as you start making unfair comments because it happens to be Israel then we've got a problem.

    18. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly our 51st state is a make-or-break swing state, because presidential candidates seem to care a lot more about it than the state I live in, where we've voted the same way since civil rights.

    19. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, way up there, WHOOSH!

    20. Re:that's not good. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel any better, the Israeli government pinky-promised that they wouldn't use it for anything bad.

      I hear they have a booming tech industry over there. No, wait, we're supposed to be afraid of the Chinese somehow, possibly, maybe, remotely, doing corporate espionage.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:that's not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans have it backwards, it seems that they think there is some Israeli puppet master running the US, when in fact, its the US, pulling Israel's strings constantly. look around the world, the US has its hands in every government, or topples the ones it doesn't. It's hilarious how the United Sheeps of America fear 8 million people, many of which aren't even Jewish, in some embattled mid eastern country, that is the size of new jersey, and surround by people who want to destroy it.
      Quit blaming Jews for everything... It's your f'ing problem you let the US government take over EVERYTHING including your privacy.
      By the way, I'm American, I just moved to Israel in 2009, couldn't get away from the recession though.

    22. Re:that's not good. by Hypotensive · · Score: 2

      one should keep in mind that Israel is basically the 51st state

      Don't tell David Cameron, he will be insanely jealous.

    23. Re:that's not good. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel any better, the Israeli government pinky-promised that they wouldn't use it for anything bad. And that's a PINKY promise, mister!

      Right; I mean, it's not like Mossad has a reputation for being disreputable or anything...

      And, one should keep in mind that Israel is basically the 51st state so It's not as if the NSA is sharing this data with foreigners.

      48th state actually, as Alaska and Hawii were added after 1948

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    24. Re:that's not good. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Right; I mean, it's not like Mossad has a reputation for being disreputable or anything...

      Compared to who?

      Why does everything have to be a competition? Can't a person point something out without the conversation devolving into a dick-measuring contest?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    25. Re:that's not good. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      It's antisemitism because you're focusing on Israel when in fact this information is shared with 5-6 other countries mentioned in the article. Equal standards for everyone. As soon as you start making unfair comments because it happens to be Israel then we've got a problem.

      You must be new here.

      This is /. Most readers don't get beyond the summary. The summary only mentions Israel, so why should most readers assume that there are other countries that aren't mentioned in the summary?

      If anybody's being antisemitic here, it's not the GP, it's Dice and the editors, but I think that's even a stretch.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  3. typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    say no to zionism

  4. What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, Americans? What do you care? What do you have to hide!?
     
    It's a complex answer. And what inwardly frustrates many who have not unlocked the question is the basic presumption which exists in the question.
     
    I leave this to be discussed.
     
    captcha: oppress

    1. Re:What do you have to hide? by Xicor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it isnt that we have something to hide. the reason we are all upset is that the NSA is spying on people illegally without any repercussions at all. it isnt any of the NSA's damned business what we are doing, and therefore they should not be able to obtain ANY data on ANYONE without a warrant from a judge in a NON SECRET court. there is no such thing as a secret organization that DOESNT abuse their secrecy. as long as the doings of the NSA continue behind closed doors, there will never be any real control over them and they will continue to abuse their power. why should the NSA be able to get away with spying on citizens illegally, but google gets huge fines for just using unsecured networks to transmit data for street view. sure, they are both illegal, but which one is worse, honestly?

    2. Re:What do you have to hide? by kthreadd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "Americans" didn't make this happen. The American government did. You should ask them.

    3. Re:What do you have to hide? by Applekid · · Score: 2

      it isnt that we have something to hide. the reason we are all upset is that the NSA is spying on people illegally without any repercussions at all.

      Isn't that what our government says every time they propose a new invasive search? "If you're not doing anything illegal, you have nothing to hide."

      Of course, I suppose that's why it's No Such Agency.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    4. Re:What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much. Shame is a joke in this day and age. By that token, we assume we have data on Israel already right? Like tit for tat? The lack of THAT is far more disconcerting than personal exposure.

      aggrieve?

    5. Re:What do you have to hide? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      You know I was wondering why, after I posted a pro-Palestinian editorial, I started getting all those magnetic car bombs. I figured it was just the neighborhood kids. But I'm beginning to suspect something more nefarious at work.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    6. Re: What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a question of "I have something to hide" but one of "I don't know what information about Myself I want hidden" coupled with the fact the spying is often illegal/unconstitutional and collected in such a way as to make Everyone at risk both collectively AND individually.

    7. Re:What do you have to hide? by PPH · · Score: 1

      What do you have to hide!?

      Posted AC.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Americans" didn't make this happen. The American government did. You should ask them.

      Same diff. The *vast* majority of Americans vote for one of the two parties engaged in this sort of behavior at the national level. All Americans, except those from Maine or Vermont, or who consistently vote for third-party candidates, bear responsibility as citizens. Ultimately, all Americans bear responsibility for the actions of their government.

    9. Re:What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the american people DID make this happen.

      They voted in the government. They stood by while several wars were started for no justifiable reasons. They stood by while their privacy was taken from them. They stood by while vast amounts of money were given to the banks and wall street. They stood by while human rights were erroded to the point where torture and imprisionment/execution without trial is acceptable.

      Where are the "brave and the free"? Apparently the majority of americans just eat and watch TV.

    10. Re:What do you have to hide? by kthreadd · · Score: 2

      You can't be held responsible for something that was done in top secret without you knowing about it.

    11. Re:What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad there is no "ironic" rating for posts, as this comes from an anonymous coward. s.petry (spending mod points)

    12. Re:What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The *vast* majority of Americans don't vote. Much less vote for one of the two parties.

    13. Re:What do you have to hide? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      It's a very interesting benefit of being a politician in a democracy. Apparently you can do all the bad shit you want and the people who elect you will get the blame.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    14. Re:What do you have to hide? by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

      And so they should if they keep electing the same old crooks.

    15. Re:What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron, politicians (at the least the type that you are referring to) do not exist in a democracy. The US has a representative republic.

    16. Re:What do you have to hide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was endowed by my creator with certain inalienable rights. one of these is privacy. I have nothing to hide. however, if I give up this right, then I undercut whatever might have been in the minds of the nations founders.

      I am not smarter than them. I concede that they may have considered things I have not.

      and therefore, I will nor give up these rights without a fight, legal or otherwise.

      if you are nit American, maybe you were not so endowed. and so you do not understand.

    17. Re:What do you have to hide? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's actually a representative democracy. Republic simply means a country governed by an elected or non-dynastic leader, which is not mutually exclusive with democracy.

  5. In other words... by shaitand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is no different than our methods for torturing suspected terrorists by routing them to nations which are willing to do the dirty work for us. The NSA has determined they can tap all the calls and gather all the data but not search it without a warrant from the secret rubber stamp court. But all the data can (is?) passed to the Isreali's who can query it without even that oversight. Naturally, the NSA can ask them to do it a favor and query said data on their behalf without any warrant.

    1. Re:In other words... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      It kinda figures... but why pick Israel of all allies? Israel should have plenty of work to do themselves before bothering with NSA lists, and if the story breaks out like it just did, those theorizing that the USA is Israel's pet would have a field day. I'd have asked some Commonwealth country instead.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:In other words... by rsborg · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is no different than our methods for torturing suspected terrorists by routing them to nations which are willing to do the dirty work for us. The NSA has determined they can tap all the calls and gather all the data but not search it without a warrant from the secret rubber stamp court. But all the data can (is?) passed to the Isreali's who can query it without even that oversight. Naturally, the NSA can ask them to do it a favor and query said data on their behalf without any warrant.

      I thought we only did this information sharing (ie, cross-spying) with the UK. Israel makes a lot of sense given the close ties (most of US congress is under the thumb of one of the various lobbying groups and think-tanks that are influential in the Israeli security state as well - e.g.; AEI, AIPAC, Brookings institute, etc) [1].

      [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_lobby_in_the_United_States

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    3. Re:In other words... by Mitreya · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It kinda figures... but why pick Israel of all allies?

      I am guessing it is because there is no evidence (or it has not yet been released) of NSA handing over data to other allies. It is quite likely that everyone who asks nicely will get our data.

    4. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? It has already been released that the NSA was working with the UK and Germany directly. Israel is just another stick in the fire at this point.

      Spending mod points so posting AC. s.petry

    5. Re:In other words... by shaitand · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We provide most of the Israeli arms. Their jets, missiles, guns, etc are largely supplied by the US. The United States gave Israel nuclear arms technology, an unprecedented move on the part of the US indicating they have the highest level of trust with the United States.

      You don't need to draw on any racist conspiracy theory to be aware that there is a huge Christian/Jewish political base in the United States. Additionally, there are a large number of wealthy Jewish families entrenched in the top tiers of US privatized banking system including most of the Federal Reserve board. That is a massive hammer of political and financial power that pretty much guarantees the US will never be in bed with any nation as tightly as Israel.

      None of this is a secret, it is a big part of why the US is now such a big target for Muslim terrorist groups. The US hasn't been fighting these groups directly but has been supplying arms, funds, technology, to prop up Israel against Muslim nations and in more recent times the "war on terror" has given the excuse for more direct involvement.

      This part is speculation, the above is well known, on the record, and not denied. If there is a magical wave of dissent suddenly springing out of nowhere in the past few years in the Muslim nations where the US has been taking interest and action I would be completely shocked. Recent events and unrest in Saudi Aradia, Egypt, Syria, etc definitely have the smell of the CIA with it's hands untied playing a lot of the same games it's already admitted to playing using other nations against the USSR in the cold war.

      Also, there is data sharing with common wealth nations exposed in other memos already leaked just not on this level. There could be similar sharing programs with them that aren't part of this particular set of leaked information.

    6. Re:In other words... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The UK gets it, and GCHQ reciprocates. Presumably Israel has access to data collected by GCHQ and given to the NSA as well, so can access data on UK citizens.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:In other words... by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that USA is Israel's government's pet, more like Israel's government's bitch or beaten wife; but, like in families, this sick relationship is bad and damaging for the couple.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    8. Re:In other words... by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Informative

      It kinda figures... but why pick Israel of all allies? Israel should have plenty of work to do themselves before bothering with NSA lists, and if the story breaks out like it just did, those theorizing that the USA is Israel's pet would have a field day. I'd have asked some Commonwealth country instead.

      We're already working with all the other major English-speaking countries in the Five Eyes program. Also Germany.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    9. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Additionally, there are a large number of wealthy Jewish families entrenched in the top tiers of US privatized banking system including most of the Federal Reserve board.

      Got a cite for that claim? I would love to read something that's a little more credible than realjewnews (the zionist war for world domination) or Alex Jones.
      A quick few searches turns up nothing real.
      Timothy Geither had a German immigrant father and a mother who is a mayflower descendant (unlikely Jewish parentage but nothing definite) according to wiki.
      Jamie Dimon's parents are Greek Orthodox according to wiki. and he married a Jewish wife. Did he convert? does that count? is he guilty by association.

      come on Cough up some sources for that claim, convince us, or fuck off.

    10. Re:In other words... by guanxi · · Score: 1, Informative

      You don't need to draw on any racist conspiracy theory ...

      Yes, you do.

      Here's another racist theory: It's not Jews or Christians or Muslims that are the problem, it's racists and bigots. Get rid of the latter, of every ethnicity, and many of our problems would go away.

    11. Re:In other words... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I don't recall alleging that it was a crime to be a banker or Jewish or to marry someone who is Jewish. That is all you.

      I don't recall saying there is anything wrong with people who are Jewish being in any position. Or singling out Jewish vs Christian. Both religious and racial leanings have especial interest in backing Israel for reasons that have little to do with the actual tangible interests of the United States.

    12. Re:In other words... by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Yes, you do."

      Really? Do tell, what conspiracy is required? Since when is conspiring needed for people to advance their own ideological goals?

      An atheist/agnostic who doesn't see a merit in advancing any particular line of genetic decent has precisely what reason to support the massive aid given to Israel rather than advocate staying neutral with regard to what is essential a dispute about race and/or religion in the area. So, if it is not religion and desire to advance a particular line of decent driving the political push to support Israel and arm them with nuclear weapons... what is it?

      Regardless of the source of the push, the fact that the US armed Israel with nuclear technology and spit in the face of all anti-proliferation stances clearly indicates political pressure to support Israel. So my overall point stands.

    13. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it's a bigot move to call out a bigot, don't you know? Call out a Christian for opposing gay marriage, and you're an anti-Christian bigot.

    14. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be going to the wrong synagogue... how do I get in on this vast Jewish non-conspiracy?

    15. Re:In other words... by msobkow · · Score: 1

      And now you understand what "bi-lateral security agreement" really means.

      It's getting your "partners" to do the dirty work that you're not allowed to.

      Canada's CSEC and CSIS work with the US NSA and the other US three letter agencies, trading info back and forth. The end result is that we provide them intel on Americans under our surveillance, and they provide us with intel on Canadians under surveillance. Neither is supposed to be able to surveil those in question, but it gets done through loopholes and cracks.

      Add in GCHQ in the UK, the Israelis, the Germans, the Australians, the New Zealanders, and all the rest, and you soon realize this is a global nest of vipers out to "do the right thing", and the potential for abuse by any of the parties involved is absolutely astronomically high, because they already consider themselves to be above the laws of their respective nations.

      There is nothing scarier to me than a true flag-waving "patriot" with systems access, because that is just another word for fascist.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    16. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you've ever heard of Satmars or Neturey Karta, you'd know that "love of Israel" is not a universal amongst Jews.

    17. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just asked for evidence for your above quoted claim.

      got any?

    18. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [cue loud record scratching sound] Anti-Christian bigotry is called ENLIGHTENMENT, You Insensitive Clod®!

    19. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you probably lapsed on your elders of zion membership dues.

    20. Re:In other words... by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      More like spoiled offspring. The clueless rich parents giving their kids whatever they want and endlessly getting them out of trouble is a far more appropriate metaphor. Calling the USA Israel's "pet" or "bitch" give far too much power/credit to Israel. To hear them tell it, without the US as an ally they'd be overrun by the Arab Hordes in no time flat. Without big daddy USA's riches, weapons and what have you where would Israel be then?

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    21. Re:In other words... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Wasn't this the whole basis of the Echelon program?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure the CIA would these days want to help overthrow dictatorial regimes that are friendly with the United States and replace them with uneasy coalitions that include radical muslim elements cf. Shah of Iran and a certain Ayatollah.

    23. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea you definetely do. You think if Israel or Jews in some fictional "puppet master" position in the US didn't exist, the Muslims will like us and not try to kill us? Okay, you are a bigot, and you're scapegoating Jews. Go back to the middle ages where you belong. You know, where it was the Jews fault the Christians wouldn't remove rat waste from their food infected with the plague before eating it? Why didn't that many Jews die then? Because rat waste isn't kosher to eat!

      http://www.theonion.com/articles/ratshitcovered-physicians-baffled-by-spread-of-bla,2876/

    24. Re:In other words... by Not+a+Nihilist · · Score: 1

      About 35% of billionaires in the US are Jewish, although Jews are only 2% of the population.

      http://racehist.blogspot.com/2010/09/2010-forbes-400-by-ethnic-origins.html http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/07/forbes-400-by-ethnicity.html

      Globally speaking, about 11% of all billionaires are Jewish, almost all of them living in the US or Israel.

      "Of the world's 1,426 billionaires ranked by "Forbes", 165 are Jews, who have an aggregate fortune of $812 billion, substantially more than last year. "

      http://www.jpost.com/Business/Business-Features/Forbes-ranking-The-worlds-richest-Jews-310104

      http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000837031

      http://mondoweiss.net/2013/04/forbes-jewish-billionaires.html

      Both chairmen of the Federal Reserve since 1987 have been Jewish (Greenspan and Bernanke) and both the people Obama is considering to replace Bernanke are Jewish (Summers and Yellen). So we will likely go 30+ years with only Jewish Federal Reserve chairs.

    25. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel is #2 at this time in spying against the USA. China is number one. Take bets on who spies on who for what? With friends like Israel, who needs enemies?

    26. Re:In other words... by KeensMustard · · Score: 1
      The OP is drawing attention to the dangers of hating on whole populations people because of some real or imagined difference between those groups and yourself, when in fact the situation is almost always more nuanced and if everybody, including atheists, came to a point of acceptance that other people believe things that contradict their own beliefs and that's just the way it is, then the problems that underpin many conflicts will be shaken. Dehumanisation is the enemy, not humans. Religious hatred is religious hatred, even if you genuinely have no belief (agnostics) or genuinely believe you don't (atheists).

      In the case of Israel, for instance, some followers of judaism support Israel - some do not. Likewise, some jews who do not follow judaism support Isreal, some do not.

      Likewise - some Christians support Israel, some do not. And some Muslim hate Israel, some couldn't care less - Malaysian and Indonesian Muslims being the most obvious example.

    27. Re:In other words... by lissnup · · Score: 1

      ... but why pick Israel of all allies?

      Maybe because the US and its partners in this data gathering project (Canada, UK, Australia etc) have outsourced the data analysis to Israel. Could help explain the UK export licence for Israel that was recently reported :

      "£7,765,450,000 of the £7.8bn worth of equipment exported to Israel is covered by just one licence approval - for equipment employing cryptography and software for equipment employing cryptography."

    28. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's nice but,
      this isn't about how many Jewish billionaires there are.
      it's not about Jews being over represented in the financial sector. (as if there's a quota)

      it's about the baseless claim that there are
      "a large number of wealthy Jewish families entrenched in the top tiers of US privatized banking system including most of the Federal Reserve board."

      Two Jewish chairmen is all you can boil this down to. what about that "Large Number of Families?"
      if it's so large it should be easy to prove, but you can't. all i get are dodges, straw men, anything to distract from the fact that the poster HAS NO EVIDENCE for his contention.

      What about that part about "Most of the Federal Reserve board" I'm still waiting on a shred of proof of this statement. and all i get 2 Jewish chairmen?
      2 who didn't even serve at the same time, that's some serious backpedaling. Doesn't sound remotely like "MOST" of the board does it?

      You should reflect on your failures to provide any proof of these libels.
      Oh, wait let me guess you can't find any evidence because Jews also control all the media?

    29. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the US destroyed one of their nuisances and is in the process of destroying another one and talking about destroying the third nuisance - sure as hell is America the bitch and Israel the pimp. If America weren't, had nuked Mecca and Saddam were alive.

    30. Re:In other words... by Not+a+Nihilist · · Score: 1

      Currently three of the seven members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors are Jewish, including both the Chair and Vice-Chair: Bernanke, Yellen, and Stein.

      Six of the last eleven appointments have been Jewish (Bernanke, Kohn, Kroszner, Mishkin, Yellen, and Stein.)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Board_of_Governors

      I encourage you to do the math and see what the probability is of 2% of the population getting 54% of the Fed appointments. (it's 0.00000003 )

      http://www.vassarstats.net/textbook/ch5apx.html

    31. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less that half is not "Most of the members". that was One of the claims i called BS on. You confirmed it.
      But really, I mean wow some of them ARE Jewish...
      More than 2% holy crap! because everything MUST be demographically equal, otherwise it's a conspiracy.
      Since Jews are a much larger proportion of the Educated population (Jews typically value higher education) and no one without an education will ever be appointed to a position like that, perhaps your simplistic math is based on faulty premises? and wouldn't it be an injustice to skip over the best qualified because he shares a religion with someone else? is there a quota? did smart economics educated Jews over fill their quota? maybe they should be disallowed from attending Harvard, you know just to balance the numbers?

      anything on "the large number of "entrenched" families""? claim? can we safely write that one off as a conspiracy theory?

      I never doubted some of these guys are jewish i knew that all along. and in fact i disliked most policies of Bernanke and Greenspan.
      but if a slight "over representation" of a minority is cause for... what again? conspiracy theories? regarding Israel? and the NSA somehow? Really? Does being Jewish mean you're an Israeli agent? are we conjoining the dual loyalty libel with the jews control the banks meme? Does this mean Israel controls the central bank because couple of extra dudes are on the Fed bank board are Jewish?
      whats the non-conspiracy theory take here? "over representation" by Jews is dangerous? wrong?

    32. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's generally known that the Israelis got most of their nuclear technology from their South African brethren. Currently, a great deal of the fuss is that in the US, concerned agencies such as the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and various groups under the control of the Pentagon don't always make a distinction between gathering intelligence overseas, military action overseas, gathering intelligence inside the borders of the US, and police action inside the US borders. You might think that the FBI would be confined to the United States, and you'd be wrong. If at one time the Central Intelligence Agency were directed to serve as a central clearinghouse for intelligence, its task has become confused, and it is now some sort of lumbering giant which is reasonably efficient only at CYAmanship. It is surely not for intelligence of any reliable nature.

    33. Re:In other words... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      These days I think we like to go with "democracies" that owe complete loyalty to the United States. Later when it's declassified it looks better. Also it opens up the door for us to get involved officially and send major military support through the front door.

      CIA budget is peanuts compared with all that war on terror money.

  6. Another submission. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here is my submission:

    NSA is sharing personal data of americans and corporations with Israel. The secret deal places no legal limits on the use of data and only official US government communications are protected by the expectation of israeli agents removing such data as soon as it's identified. NSA insists that it complies with the rules governing privacy. There is now maybe less wonder that UNIT 8200 is driving the tech boom in Israel as they get to handle all the raw intelligence and insider information.

  7. Marketing the American citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this is similar to what companies do with their data on you?

    1. Re: Marketing the American citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except companies cannot use that data as an excuse to kill.

    2. Re:Marketing the American citizen. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So this is similar to what companies do with their data on you?

      Similar, with the exception that companies like Google don't have the power or authority to take away my freedom, either through incarceration or violence.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re: Marketing the American citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death by advertising!

    4. Re: Marketing the American citizen. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I'll take Death By Snu-Snu instead, if you please.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  8. General Petraeus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Made comments critical of Israel, next thing you know his Gmail documenting a fling with what's-her-name is brought out. Coincidence? I think not!

  9. I wonder why nobody don' like me ..... by ErnyCowan · · Score: 1

    And do they also share corresponding information with the Egyptian, Jordanian, Saudi or Lebanese government agencies?

  10. How close is this to treason? by AtariEric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The NSA is *spying* on us, and aiding a foreign country with the data. Seriously, what separates this from treason? The fact that they're not betraying the government, just the people?

    --
    Don't trust any concentration of power.
    1. Re:How close is this to treason? by stox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is only treason when someone who is not in power does it.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    2. Re:How close is this to treason? by LMariachi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Jonathan Pollard got life in prison for passing classified data to Israel.

    3. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are also spying on local business and giving the insider information to foreign intelligence agencies. Why do you think the israeli military intelligence unit is driving the israeli tech boom?

    4. Re:How close is this to treason? by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, what separates this from treason?

      We are not at war against Isreal.

      Unethical, yes. Unconstitutional, probably. Heinous, certainly. Treason, no.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:How close is this to treason? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Just two months ago I would have dismissed this as whackjob conspiracy theory. BUt my trust has been uttery destroyed.

      Defund the NSA. Fire everyone, sell the buildings off, make an end of it. If the congress won't act, maybe a constitutional amendment? Would the courts act? Are there any checks and balances left?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:How close is this to treason? by Bartles · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it's only treason when Bush, or some other generic Republican does it.

    7. Re:How close is this to treason? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jonathan Pollard says hello.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really understood the world you would know that there has been no such thing in US politics as Democrat or Republican since the 60s. Shitbags that have been put on ballots are all from the same team, and it's not your team or America's team.

      I'll suggest you start with this, but there are numerous other references. When done reading, pass the book to a friend for their enlightenment. The book is free for many e-readers so you have no excuse not to read it.

    9. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, his crime was passing classified military secrets to Israel, not US government sanctioned raw data on American citizens not working for the government.

    10. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the clause that says they must delete any data if it's identified as an important government official.

    11. Re:How close is this to treason? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Jonathan Pollard says, "I wasn't convicted of, or even charged with, treason."

    12. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What planet are you living on? Liberals have been accused of being traitors/America haters/etc for years just because they don't want to spend trillions of dollars to kill random brown people on the other side of the planet

    13. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can add more to the theory. Most powerful lobby is Jewish lobby. Most of them have close relations with Israels officials (like Romney was the best Netaniahu's friend). There are no reasons to think than Israels government does not "help" them in return using this information provided by NSA. It isn't just metadata, it comes with the content. It would be interesting to find out if the lobby was behind this sharing agreement.

    14. Re:How close is this to treason? by Animats · · Score: 2

      That's a good point. While the US and the UK have had a formal agreement on intelligence sharing since WWII (the UKUSA agreement), they're allies of the US, with a mutual defense treaty (under NATO) with the US.

      Israel is not formally an ally of the US. While the US provides "security assistance" to Israel, there's no mutual defense treaty. There was an "exchange of diplomatic notes on mutual defense assistance" in 1952, and there's the Camp David agreement (US, Egypt, Israel) from 1979 which ended the wars between Israel and Egypt. Other assistance from the US is on an ad-hoc basis, and it's mostly money, not troops.

      This is significant. When some parties in Israel were talking about bombing Iran, and expecting the US to help, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff told Israel that the US would not become involved. Not Congress, not the President, the head of the JCS. No treaty, no support without orders from higher.

    15. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raw data is not classified. Think about what the word 'classified' actually means, then you'll understand.

    16. Re:How close is this to treason? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      The NSA is *spying* on us, and aiding a foreign country with the data. Seriously, what separates this from treason?

      Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution is what separates this from treason.

      Learn it, love it, live it.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    17. Re:How close is this to treason? by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Go ask the NSA for a copy of the raw data they’ve collected. Let us know how that goes.

    18. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering Israelis have engaged in industrial and financial crimes against the US, kidnapped US citizens and even fired on and killed US military personel - it is Treason.

      Oh, wait, their invisible sky fairy that they can't tell you the name of says they're supposed to rule the world and that unbelievers don't have souls and are just animals.....

      I guess that makes it OK then....

    19. Re:How close is this to treason? by Ardipithecus · · Score: 1

      We sleep better knowing that if Martians attack the Israelis will help (us).

    20. Re:How close is this to treason? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Israel is not formally an ally of the US

      Depends what you mean by ally. Some sort of technical definition, or the everyday one, which is basically a friend. Most US "charity" goes to Israel, they veto everything negative about Israel at the UN etc, have endless defence/tech/it/spying related arrangements with them. I'm not sure what it is to not be an ally in that context, nor how meaningful it is. Israel doesn't have a closer ally.

    21. Re:How close is this to treason? by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have said, "it's only treasonous or racist when Bush, or some other generic Republican does it."

    22. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, because Bush and his father (and other generic Republicans) have been doing it. NSA spying is nothing new unless you're just woefully unaware of history. It is well documented to go back to the 70's.

    23. Re:How close is this to treason? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Well, his crime was passing classified military secrets to Israel, not US government sanctioned raw data on American citizens not working for the government.

      it wasn't checked if they work for gov... just raw data.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    24. Re:How close is this to treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. That is why the rightwingers were howling for impeaching him when it was being done.

      Get your head out of your ass, you navelgazing cunt. Bush had the unanimous groveling support of the media and anyone who thought different was a dirty hippie and a communist.

    25. Re:How close is this to treason? by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      what a line!

  11. Scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we're giving the unfiltered take to a country known to run intelligence operations against the US? Do you really think the Isrealis are not going to use this to put together dossiers on every major leader in America? For that matter, what's to stop the US from getting info under Prism, that then gets passed on to Isreal with the Isrealis then passing it on to regional government opposed to the Arab Spring? So basically, Google is helping get Democratic activists shot. Way to not be evil guys.,

    1. Re:Scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google was founded by Russian Jews, did you really expect them to be loyal to America? Why would they be?

    2. Re:Scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read Schmitt's book. They (google) aim for being part of world government.

      Wear the TOR condom at all times.

  12. Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They made them pinky promise not to abuse that info. NO ONE breaks a pinky promise.

  13. Excellent news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, it will not appear in any news outlet whatsoever.

    If it appears in one, it will be surrounded by articles of snooki, why all arabs are evil, remembering the holocaust and the weekly column on why YOU are to blame for it.

  14. Ahh, yes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the "Do it for us, please, because we are not allowed to!". Works with torture and people have speculated that intelligence services also buy fingerprints from foreign countries that require them to be taken from visitors. Why it wouldn't work with spying your own people as well? All legal, all good.

  15. ISA by guazzelli · · Score: 0

    Israel States of America

  16. Good scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good for the Israelis. They must be doing something right.

  17. Re:thats ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You have it backwards. The US Capitol is moving out of London to Jerusalem.

  18. "rights of Americans to privacy" . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Right" . . . ? It's more like a "notion" now.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re: "rights of Americans to privacy" . . . ? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      It's more like...a guideline.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  19. sounds like it negates their mandate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds pretty treasonous, should they be banned from doing this, or just banned?

  20. It is treason by Phoenix666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the NSA, White House, Congress, and Judiciary (ie. FISA courts) are doing is un-Constitutional, meaning you can't get more illegal and deserving of maximum penalty than that. Murder is terrible and wrong, but it does not rise to the level of undermining the basis for our very society and the social contract that binds people to government and vice versa. With murder, one person dies; with undermining our system of government you get chaos, civil war, deprivation, demise of the rule of law, and masses of men, women, and children dying. Which is worse?

    So what we're looking at right now, folks, and I mean all of us on the political Right and Left, is an entire government that has colluded to violate the Constitution, that is, the social contract that separates our country and society from Malthusian consequences. There can be no penalty harsh enough to punish them for what they have done. If we do not, as a People, levy that punishment on them now, immediately, then we deserve the misery of the slavery that meek acquiescence consigns us to.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:It is treason by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

      So, what is your plan? Maybe use the internet to organize an effective resistance against the government? That might work except for the problem that the government is aware of everything you do on the internet and has the power to stop your plan before it gets going. You can organize protests - and those will be allowed to continue as long as the don't pose a threat to the power structure.

      You can personally try to use violence to stop the government, but you will lose. If enough people did this or took other illegal actions the situation would just become more oppressive.

      If one of the major parties took a stand against this it would get my vote, but neither party does so. I could make a protest vote for a 3rd party, but that won't change the outcome of the elections. It would be very interesting to see if a large ground-swell of votes for a third party could happen.

      I think the only hope of improving things is through the legal system. Maybe donating money to the ACLU and similar organizations is the most effective strategy.

      OTOH being part of an evil empire sounds sort of appealing. If we get to build lost of cool stuff, I'm in.

    2. Re:It is treason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only choice is to submit and become evil, really? Medication man, get it and take it.

    3. Re:It is treason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans talk so much about their constitution yet all the news I hear about is that it's violated on a daily basis. Sounds as bad as the corrupt governments north of you that are just bigging to show how dirty they really are. At least now we know that all elections in every country are rigged whether it's Russia, Kenya, or Canada. Head down and keep quiet peasants; nothing to see here.

    4. Re:It is treason by 101percent · · Score: 1

      we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor Oh wait; NSA I didn't mean that. Let's all just be Facebook friends.

    5. Re:It is treason by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      the Constitution, that is, the social contract that separates our country and society from Malthusian consequences

      That Constitution has either enabled the current situation or has been powerless to prevent it. I'm leading more towards Jefferson's distrust of it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  21. Telex? by aviators99 · · Score: 1

    How much negotiating did Israel have to do to get our Telexes included in this?

  22. pretty hypercritical, ain't it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...considering the US was blocking CheckPoint (an Israeli company) from acquiring SourceFire back in 2005--ostensibly for national security reasons.

    1. Re:pretty hypercritical, ain't it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using CheckPoint is no different from hiring israeli spies to do your security.

  23. Re:I'll get added to their list! by DarkOx · · Score: 2

    I don't share your sentiment but along those lines; if I were given a time machine set to take me back to 1939, and one bullet. I'd use the bullet on Allen Dulles not Adolf Hitler.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  24. gists? by Chacharoo · · Score: 1

    They're sharing gists? What's a gist?

    1. Re:gists? by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 1

      Basically it's a synonym for "summary", meaning that a conversation or communication is summarized by someone (in this case likely the intelligence agencies) and this summary is called the gist.

      The term gets used occasionally in conversation, as in: "Did you get the gist of his long, rambling speech?", or "I'm in a hurry, just tell me the gist of the story."

    2. Re:gists? by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I certainly didn't get the gist of that either.

    3. Re:gists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gist suggests it's little. But I take a gist (from a trusted source and good intelligence agent) anyway over raw data it's that valuable. The "gist" can be anything from 2 sentences to 2 000 sentences or more.

  25. Re:thats ok by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    Yeah, except none of the *other* 51 states get to tell the rest what to do. Who do you think is egging on this whole "We MUST strike Syria!" mess? It sure as shit isn't the American People.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  26. Let's pick on Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Israel is only one of a handful of countries (australia, new zealand, canada, and the uk) that receive this information. Makes you wonder why the article chooses to focus on Israel and ignore those other countries...

    1. Re:Let's pick on Israel by aviators99 · · Score: 2

      That's not what it says. It says that we have agreements to protect the privacy of those other countries. It doesn't say anything about sharing information with them

    2. Re:Let's pick on Israel by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 4, Insightful

      None of those other countries suck us dry, make us look bad on the world stage for backing them, or have a huge lobby to influence our government.

    3. Re:Let's pick on Israel by isorox · · Score: 1

      None of those other countries suck us dry, make us look bad on the world stage for backing them, or have a huge lobby to influence our government.

      Sorry, but Australia has barbecues on the beach. They make us all look bad.

  27. Gen. Alexander, fellow Syracusan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're from the SAME hometown as myself, only minutes apart, but you are disappointing me man... wtf!

    ---

    NSA analysts 'wilfully violated' surveillance systems, agency admits:

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/24/nsa-analysts-abused-surveillance-systems

    ---

    * THAT was what "took the cake" for me, finally!

    Sir, you MAY be out to do "the right thing" & oddly enough? I suspect you are that kind of person - I honestly do!

    HOWEVER: Imo @ least - You're INCORRECTLY 'projecting' YOUR VALUES onto those in your peers, AND subordinates - assuming they too are like you claim to be! THAT is where you are going wrong!

    (That is NOT going to "hold true" in all cases - heck, I suspect honestly not in many of them!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I've been saying this to all the folks here since day #1 when this mess came out, even to my representatives in gov't. via the ACLU: "Absolute Power, Corrupts Absolutely" & THAT is the "big flaw" in what you've created! That article link above only proved it all the more, for me (wish I was wrong).

    The more I see of this shit, the more ill I become, this especially - I mean, wtf do Jews in Israel have to have ANYTHING from us internally, about US (U.S. Citizenry) for? apk

    1. Re:Gen. Alexander, fellow Syracusan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot man, it is going to take the NSA weeks to decipher that message.

  28. Welcome to america... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN: "The NSA is snooping on billions of innocent foreigners..."

    Public: Meh. It's for the war agains TEEEEEEEEERRRRRORISTS.

    CNN "... and accidentally on some red blooded american cititzens..."

    Public: WAHHHHHHHHHHH?????? SCANDAL, BROTHERS, TO THE ARMS!!!!

  29. sharing both ways is a fair deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My country shares almost every bit of digital data with the USA, and in return we get absolutely nothing.
    Maybe our prime minister gets a "I talked with Obama" t-shirt for "negotiating" this wonderful deal. (He probably would sell us out for a picture of him shaking hands with Obama.)

    1. Re:sharing both ways is a fair deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does YOUR country run Hollywood, the U.S. finance and banking industry, and several major U.S. cities?

      Good point.

  30. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah. We're pretty much the only nation on the planet that hasn't tried to corral and exterminate them. Must be that we're mere pawns in their global conspiracy.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  31. Re:I'll get added to their list! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    If you think that going back to 1939 would help, you are simply ignorant of the relevant history.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  32. Karma by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somewhat everyone in US tought that the wrong thing was the NSA could be watching their private phone calls and mails, while it was ok that fully spied in everyone else in the world. Now it should be ok that Israel can access all information from US people and companies, if they don't spy on their own citizens they wouldn't be breaking theirr laws.

  33. Re:I'll get added to their list! by Agent0013 · · Score: 0

    I would agree with Allen Dulles being a good target. And my vitriol is really just an angry outburst. I have no problem with the people. I do have a problem with the State and their government. I also have a huge problem with the American support of everything that Israel does no matter how blatantly cruel, illegal, or evil. I cannot fathom why we are in bed so closely with them. Although when you think about how evil we have become I guess we are actually pretty good bedfellows. The next world war will find that America and Israel, along with who knows what other countries has taken on the role of the Axis, and the Allies (good guys) will be someone else. Probably Germany just to go for the full roll reversal!

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  34. Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Persons by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My reading of this MOA is very different... The MOA is repeatedly clarifying that U.S. Person information is not to be SENT by the NSA (The NSA's Responsibility to ensure it is not in the data is clearly spelled out in the MOA, if it wasn't already explicit elsewhere). It ALSO indicates that IF Israel's ISNU find's U.S. Person data they must report the finding to the NSA and destroy the information.

    The MOA does not give any indication when or why raw SIGINT data would be sent to ISNU, and while it is clear that the NSA does share raw intel, it is also clear that there are cases where the raw data is "Minimized" by the NSA to remove U.S. Person information. The MOA does not guarantee ISNU any access to NSA data -- which data we share is obviously going to be controlled by other agreements and laws.

    So a) we share intel with Israel ... I'm pretty sure everyone should have assumed this, and b) we have documented safeguards to restrict that data to intel on NON-U.S. Persons. Really, read the memorandum, that's all it does... every page is devoted to protecting data on U.S. Citizens.

    How is this a bad thing? This document is obviously showing intent to avoid domestic spying. Good! If you want to argue that the NSA is not following its own guidelines, or failing to protect U.S. data, this is not good evidence of that.

  35. 2009=Obama's Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So once again, Obama is measurably worse in respecting the constitutional rights of Americans than Bush43 ever was.

  36. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doy, Syria is another goddamn proxy war between powers, just as Vietnam was.

    I predict we'll either be at war with Iran in a year or otherwise mired in someone else's civil war AGAIN.

    At least in the 60s you had "domino theory" and the evils of communism, the bogeyman being trotted out this time is chemical weapon use HAH

  37. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah. We're pretty much the only nation on the planet that hasn't tried to corral and exterminate them.

    That's only believable if A) you live an utterly sheltered life, where the only world history you learn about comes from Liberty University, or B) you're completely bat-shit insane.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  38. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot about Poland (tm).

  39. Because they probably know some dirty secrets of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... every member of congress. And they got them maybe directly from the NSA data.

  40. To see who rules over you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simply find you who cannot criticize.

    1. Re:To see who rules over you... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Yes, dear.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  41. Well, at least the NSA can atone for it soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yom Kippur is coming up.

  42. Meanwhile ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... Jonathan Pollard is sitting in his cell saying, "Guys? WTF?!"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Meanwhile ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly Pollard also sold secrets to South Africa, and shopped them around. But regardless, his purpose is to sit in jail so the U.S. government can pretend like it cares about the security and scope of its intelligence relationship with Israel.

  43. Checks and balances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some people who subscribes to this opinion that we can effect change by voting. Considering the circumstances - please explain how we can vote so this does not happen...or perhaps we all voted for it?

  44. Re:thats ok by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    Maybe that would be better. As it is, Israel offers absolutely nothing to this ``alliance'' other than a dumping ground for money that we apparently don't need and technology that needs to be sold to China. No one asks what, say, Alabama brings to the Union; they simply are. If we annex Israel then we'll actually have a reason to care about them.

  45. Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA is forwarding details of this thread to the JIDF.

    How do you say "-1 Troll" in Hebrew?

  46. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor Americans serving the ZOG.

    You should know better, this place is infested with ZOGlings.

  47. Re:thats ok by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Just think of Israel as the 4th branch of government.

    FTFY.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  48. Re:Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Person by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

    b) we have documented safeguards to restrict that data to intel on NON-U.S. Persons.

    Funny thing, we have another set of documented safeguards, I think the fourth would the salient safeguard. Time and time again we've seen documentation showing the NSA has violated that safeguard, so why would I take it on trust that they would follow some internal memorandum. That they share intel with Israel would be understood. What is not acceptable is when there are indications they share more then they are allowed by our own laws which are in place to "protect data on U.S. Citizens".

    --
    Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
  49. It's called globalization. by boorack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As globalization is (mostly) perceived in business and financial spheres (big corporations becoming supranational), lots of other aspects are moving along with this process, including bad ones: spying and security apparatus becoming global, tax enforcement becoming global, propaganda apparatus is becoming global (eg. news media in Poland producing basically the same crap and lies as US media about latest Syria debacle). Opression apparatus is also becoming global. Nation states are becoming obsolete, surpassed by moneyed interests. Politicians all around the world are propably blackmailed by NSA/GCHQ/8200 aparatchics who in turn are taking orders from big business bozos. This is why we see such fiascos as latest Obama &Kerry blunder. Not Obama nor Kerry are so stupid to make such suicidal mistakes - someone is firmly holding them by the balls. Exceptions to this rule (that is, not taking orders from NSA boys) are mercilessly pounded in our "objective" media (Putin being prime example) and their countries attacked from various angles and often outright invaded (see Libya, now Syria).

    Dark times ahead, folks. With democratic processes basically defunct - at least as defined in traditional terms of national states, truly global backlash and exposing those fucks like Snowden or Greenwald are the our only hope of reversing our quick slide to (new) dark ages. This is serious, folks. It's not about principles (as our media whores try to convince us), it's about survival. It's about ordinary people NOT being crushed by multinationals and NOT becoming serfs in neo-feudal age. We need a thousand Greenwalds and two thousands Snowdens.

    1. Re:It's called globalization. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so stupid and everything you wrote is so misguided and pathetic, that I would have easier time explaining things to a dog than to you. You're worthless, and without a chance of ever being redeemed. Honestly, I don't even consider organisms like you, human.

      So, basically, what you're saying is he hit the nail on the head and you're too upset about it (because you're aligned with the Dark Side), to respond with anything other than vitriol.

      Good job. Keep on deteriorating. We'll not get in your way.

    2. Re:It's called globalization. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter who holds McCains Wahabist balls, this guy deserves applause !

      If you disagree, get your circumcision and a Burqa, fucking idiot.

  50. Re:Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that if your reading of the MOA is very different, you can be sure that the NSA's reading is completely different from either. Rules and guidelines need to not hold any ambiguity, otherwise they will be abused.

  51. Re:Israel is not jewland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel is a democratic theocracy. Jews who equate that horrible nation with their religion are massive fools.

  52. Biggest load of crock. by Tim12s · · Score: 1

    Read the agreement. Perfectly construed agreement - if someone read IV.B.2 you'd understand that whoever wrote the agreement fully understood the intention of the shared agreement. They are probably sharing radar traffic and cable traffic within the region. To extrapolate that to the entire globe is somewhat ludicrous and is someone trying really hard to be stupid.

  53. Still waiting for US Govt to clarify 'acts of war' by X.25 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    US said they consider cyber-attacks to be an act of war, so I am wondering when will US Government clarify who gave them authorization to declare war on so many countries, including 'allies'.

    Because what NSA has been doing for years were acts of war, according to US Government.

  54. Re:Because they probably know some dirty secrets o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably, here is two paragraphs from the article. One has to ask how they make sure israelis destroy the government data and don't keep it for malicious use?

    Notably, a much stricter rule was set for US government communications found in the raw intelligence. The Israelis were required to "destroy upon recognition" any communication "that is either to or from an official of the US government". Such communications included those of "officials of the executive branch (including the White House, cabinet departments, and independent agencies), the US House of Representatives and Senate (member and staff) and the US federal court system (including, but not limited to, the supreme court)".

    It is not clear whether any communications involving members of US Congress or the federal courts have been included in the raw data provided by the NSA, nor is it clear how or why the NSA would be in possession of such communications. In 2009, however, the New York Times reported on "the agency's attempt to wiretap a member of Congress, without court approval, on an overseas trip".

  55. Re:Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    Seems clear to me, but plenty of other people seem to be uncertain. I guess we should just be angry that the people who wrote these words didn't think of cellphones, email and Facebook when they did.

  56. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Oh, there's an explanation, but it smacks of tinfoil hattery, so it gets ignored.

    Go look up '13 satanic bloodlines' or '13 bloodlines of the illuminati' and you'll see what I mean.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  57. I'm just curious... by PortHaven · · Score: 0

    I'm fairly pro-Israel. But it seems to me that .gov is accusing .snowden of being a traitor for sharing classified information. And yet, would not sharing that same information with a foreign power be a far more grievous example of treason?

    I'm just confused?

    Dear NSA, since you're reading this, can you explain it for us.

    1. Re:I'm just curious... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Oops, I'm sorry, I said I pro-Israel and got Modded down. I should explain.

      People who stand in front of their children armed with rifles makes far more sense than those who stand behind their children armed with rifles. I can understand one who says we are protecting our families and children by killing. I cannot understand one who claims to protect their family and children by using them as bombs. Does not compute.

      So I can relate much more to Israel's stance. That, and far far far far far more arabs are being killed by their own in the likes of Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, etc, etc. Than Israel ever has...

  58. Re:Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Person by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    Your non-hysterical interpretation will not be the one that people take away from this.

  59. I don't know yet, and I don't want to find out. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, Americans? What do you care? What do you have to hide!?

    I don't know yet. Personally, I don't want to find out after the fact that there was something I would have wanted hidden. Maybe I'm doing nothing wrong by today's standards, but who knows how we'll think about ourselves 10, 20, or 40 years from now?

    Think of how many older people you know/knew who lived through the days when racism was still openly practiced and encouraged. Think of people who have mellowed their views about homosexuality only in the past decade. Think of how people used to smoke in their homes around their children. Or how they used to spank children that misbehaved. Or let them ride in the back of a truck with no seat belt. Or let them run around naked and even take pictures of it.

    If you grew up in a rural area, you probably remember someone having hunting rifles on a gun rack in the back of their truck at school or maybe you even carried a pocketknife to school. Maybe you used to be the kind of geek that wore a trenchcoat before Columbine killed that fashion off.

    So who knows what innocent thing I'm doing today that will be disapproved of later? Maybe it'll just be embarrassing. Maybe it'll be blackmail worthy. Maybe it'll even be grounds for suspecting me as some kind of future or current criminal. I mean, how many Muslims in America thought their social networks would be under heavy scrutiny before 9/11?

    We shouldn't have to live in perpetual fear of the future or of the judgment of our peers. We need a personal space in which to unwind and to develop our thoughts before they're ready to take before public scrutiny. We need privacy to become ourselves and not just an empty reflection of what others expect from us.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:I don't know yet, and I don't want to find out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, all of those things are still common in much of the United States, by geographical area.

      When I visit my dad's small town in Alabama, I see gun racks on half the trucks, open-carry guns all over the place (as in, nobody does a double take if the guy walking into Wal-mart is strapping a semi-automatic), and kids ride in the bed of the truck and the dog in the passenger seat. Also, for a 2 mile stretch through town people actually drive like 15mph, which is fscking maddening if you just came from a city.

      This is also a town where neither drug addicts nor pushers carry guns, because the Sheriff has no compunction about shooting first and asking questions later. OTOH, if you're a mixed-race couple you're gonna have trouble, and while homosexuals have always existed somewhat openly in the South, you're still expected to pretend like you're not gay if you're asked directly, because the system of sexual moors is premised on a foundation of plausible deniability--which is how the army of whorish men & women manage to walk into church every Sunday like they didn't sleep with half the town the night before.

    2. Re:I don't know yet, and I don't want to find out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember wearing a trench coat to school. Inside it was no less than two pocket knives, one with a serrated blade and one with a smooth blade. I also wore chains, three of them, each slightly larger and longer than the previous. It was around my junior year when the Columbine incident occurred and all of a sudden these people that were indifferent towards me became hostile to the point of attempting to attack me in the boys locker room (thankfully I knew how to defend myself without resorting to a fist fight).

  60. Welcome to RealPolitik by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

    Israel has nukes. While their development was internal to Isreael, it was allowed by Europe and the USA.

    If Israel has to nuke an Arab country to keep them from distrupting your precious oil supply, nobody will nuke the USA. Retaliation, nuclear, chemical or otherwise, will fall on Israel. In exchange for the USA's continued support, Israel takes that risk.

    So they get perks. Unofficial, unknown, unspoken perks for keeping the uneasy peace in the Middle East and the oil flowing. One of these is information - and yes, some in the tech field are getting screwed by this arrangment.

    As an entertaining aside, you can bet that when Arab oil is no longer a significant factor in the world energy picture, Israel will be left to twist in the wind while the region tears itself apart. When that happens, expect a flood of Israeli immigrants.

    Cheers!

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Welcome to RealPolitik by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> As an entertaining aside, you can bet that when Arab oil is no longer a significant factor in the world energy picture, Israel will be left to twist in the wind

      I don't believe that. There are A LOT of very rich Jews in the US, especially places with a loud voice like Hollywood. Say it with me... "Special Interest Group"

    2. Re:Welcome to RealPolitik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contaminating oil supply chain? Not a good idea.

    3. Re:Welcome to RealPolitik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Israeli nukes were not developed in Israel. The development was done about 10,000km south of Israel.

    4. Re:Welcome to RealPolitik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Our government (Israel) has also, among many other nations, sold out the US a long time ago. Why all the focus on Israel anyway? Not like UK or Germany doesn't have spy agencies linked to the NSA. The NSA is a global effort of spying. Stop drawing imaginary lines between us Americans, and them, the Israeli's. We are all enslaved by the same overlords, who aren't Jewish by the way.

    5. Re:Welcome to RealPolitik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muha. Israel runs the US, Google, Facebook, whatnot. Check out the leading politicos/figures.

  61. Enough!! by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    I want some fucking heads to roll damnit!!

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    1. Re:Enough!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, accountability in the US govt....what a quaint idea.

      Whats next, bringing back honor and chivalry?

      lol....

  62. Re:All I'm gonna say is this .... by St.Creed · · Score: 1

    The reason why Israel is supported is pretty obvious: it's a stable and well guarded military base in a globally sensitive region. It's also a testbed for new tactics to use against unruly populations (handy if the Occupy movement ever gets out of hand) and for new military hardware - no(t many) questions asked.

    All in all the military/industrial complex is getting your money's worth out of supporting Israel.

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  63. Trusting Isreal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During the Cold War, Isreal gave the Soviet Union intelligence it collected on the US. And we still trust them?

    1. Re:Trusting Isreal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you have a citation for that? Otherwise I'm calling BS on that one, unless there is a lot more to the story that you aren't telling.

  64. You mind my business, I mind yours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that each spy agency is only allowed to spy on foreigners. The obvious workaround is for each spy agency to exchange information and outsource the spying to another country.

  65. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by St.Creed · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, I see what you mean: the old "communists and jews eating our babies" conspiracy again - aka the Blood libel. It's not an explanation, it's a rambling collection of bullshit that traces right back to the Tsarist Ochrana and even darker times before that.

    --
    Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  66. It's funny but it's not by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I for one welcome our Zionist overlords.

    1. Re:It's funny but it's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, go fuk yourself. Zionism means to go home, not take over the world. Dip$hit.

  67. Re:Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Person by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Right, I'm sure we can trust the NSA to work diligently to make sure no data on US citizens is accidentally sent over, and I'm sure ISNU will report that immediately. That's obviously their primary concern here, and we can trust them to stick to the law.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  68. Oh god no.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    The reason why Israel is supported is pretty obvious: it's a stable and well guarded military base in a globally sensitive region. It's also a testbed for new tactics to use against unruly populations (handy if the Occupy movement ever gets out of hand) and for new military hardware - no(t many) questions asked.

    All in all the military/industrial complex is getting your money's worth out of supporting Israel.

    I am so sad.

    I don't know what to say anymore.

    Rational discourse regarding Israel is not possible.

  69. It's like Animal Farm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. For US citizens, Israel is to redact. For US politicians, they need to destroy on recognition.

  70. I must have had it backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the way that it worked was Israeli monitoring devices were placed on our networks with the information gathered and then sold to NSA. The reason for that was so that the NSA could say "We don't capture data on American networks".

  71. CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    US America? EPIC FAIL!

    Systemic - therefore non-recoverable. It's all downhill from here, and has been since about '72-'78. Now, it's "all over, 'cept the shouting".

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Funny

      Call for a vote of no confidence and then vote in a strong leader who can take control of the bureaucracy and create a grand army of the republic?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      You invent the Napoleon, whilst I sup on Bon-bon...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I know I used your post to make a snicker... But? Bravo!

      What they say, about those who don't remember history, and whatnot. You do rather well. :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Heh. I was referencing Chancellor Palpatine in Phantom Menace but Napolean is good too!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Lieberman will fit the bill.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Palpatine is entirely too compentent to refer to anyone in a government I'm familiar with.

    7. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It's all downhill from here, and has been since about '72-'78.

      '63

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      It's all downhill from here, and has been since about '72-'78.

      '63

      1950 (McCarthyism) ....

    9. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It's all downhill from here, and has been since about '72-'78.

      '63

      1950 (McCarthyism) ....

      13,000,000,000BC (Big Bang)

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    10. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Yeah. JFK left the November that brought me in...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa! Dude! You mean that in your previous life, you were....? That's fuckin' heavy man!

    12. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! What was Marylin like in the sack?

    13. Re:CAN WE ALL AGREE NOW? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Neurotically trying to please.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  72. Spying on American citizens for foreign power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spying on American citizens is outside the NSA's charter and violates the constitution. Spying on American citizens for a foreign power seems like treason.

  73. Israel?! What next, Canada?! France?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, if the The enemy of my enemy is my friend was ever truer...

  74. Coming next week; Isreal shares with.... by tekrat · · Score: 3

    Isreal shares with Russia, Germany, Romania and China.

    And anyone else with money.
    In fact *everyone* has your information EXCEPT YOU.

    Land of the free (snicker)
    I think it's time for torches and pitchforks, we the people are being royally screwed by our amoral treasonous government.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  75. Re:Still waiting for US Govt to clarify 'acts of w by iroll · · Score: 1

    An act of war is not a declaration of war, nor does it imply or require a declaration of war.

    --
    Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
  76. experts in arabic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one possible factor, apart from omg-jooz-own-amerika, is that if you want experts in arabic, urdu, persian etc language and culture, Israel has a surplus of them, with the plus that they are probably quite commited to the cause.

  77. Why isnt this on the front pg of any US newspaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's buried in the tech section of the Washington Post, there's no trace of this on the NY Times...

  78. Were you asleep during the Arab/Israeli Wars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In every full-scale war between Israeli forces and the best armies of the Arab world, Israeli kicked their asses decisively. If the Arab nations attack Israel,they know they'll get their ass handed to them again by a modern army that is qualitatively better than its adversaries in training, equipment, and doctrine.

  79. Voting is a waste of time by tobiah · · Score: 1

    At least in the Federal elections. So is protesting. State nullification via the tenth ammendment is an effective response to Federal overreach. see "marijuana" and "national speed-limit"

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  80. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I see what you mean: the old "communists and jews eating our babies" conspiracy again - aka the Blood libel. It's not an explanation, it's a rambling collection of bullshit that traces right back to the Tsarist Ochrana and even darker times before that.

    Sounds like something someone who doesn't know how to read between the lines would say.

    Yea, 'jews eating babies' is a bit far fetched. A long standing dynasty of self-appointed, old-blood Royals running the show from behind a dark curtain, not so much. Shit, we can't even get details on what goes on behind closed doors during a G20 summit.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  81. "ReVeRsE PsyChoLoGy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ".egassem taht rehpiced ot skeew ASN eht ekat ot gniog si ti ,nam toohS" - by Anonymous Coward ANOTHER "ne'er-do-well" /. OFF-TOPIC TROLL on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @04:11PM (#44822823)

    "???"

    Ahem: Could we get a translation of that off-topic "troll-speak/trolllanguage" of yours, please?

    ---

    * Clue/New NEWS/NewsFlash, Mr. Troll: It wasn't meant to be some encrypted message, & it's not, so - get your "Hooked on Phonics" lessons out + study them, again (you need it, due to your blatant illiteracy)...

    APK

    P.S.=> "ReVeRsE-PsYcHoLoGy", for trolls - Courtesy of this code by "yours truly" (in less than 1 second flat):

    ---

    #TrollTalkComReversePsychologyKiller.py (Ver #2 by APK)

    def reverse(s):
        try:
            trollstring = ""
            for apksays in s:
                trollstring = apksays + trollstring
        except:
            print("error/abend in reverse function")
        return trollstring

    s = ""
    print reverse(s)

    try:
      s = "Insert whatever 'trollspeak/trolllanguage' gibberish occurs here..."
      s = reverse(s)
      print(s)
    except Exception as e:
      print(e)

    ---

    ... apk

  82. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. We're pretty much the only nation on the planet that hasn't tried to corral and exterminate them.

    "Pretty much the only nation on earth that hasn't..." Holy fuck, what are you smoking? The vast (really vast, super vast, statistically vast, VAST, I SAY) number of countries in the world did not fry jews. Let's look at it another way - The vast (really vast...etc., etc.) number of PEOPLE in the world did not fry jews.

    Are you a whiney jew or what? 'Cause that's just the thing they want the whole world to think. And feel a bit quilty about. Forever.

  83. REVOLTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS IS REVOLTING !!! the data of american citizens handed over to foreign, sometimes hostile country IS A SCANDAL OF EPIC PROPORTIONS...

  84. Google's street view vehicles didn't use wifi by tokiko · · Score: 1

    Google only indexed unsecured wifi hotspots, they didn't send any data through them. Street view vehicles take terabytes worth of pictures that all have to be organized and processed (blur license plates, etc) in bulk later. Sending that much data through even the fastest of wifi hotspots would just be infeasible.

  85. So Alexander and Clapper are Traitors After All? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on Dept. of Justice, pull your heads out and do your jobs.

  86. God by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    That's what God wants. It says it in the Bible that Jews are His Chosen People. We can believe the Bible because Jews wrote it and who can doubt God's Chosen People but those who are working for Satan or Nazis?

  87. Kind of a knee jerk post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but fuck America and also fuck Israel.

  88. The Comprehensive Answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you have to hide!?

    Thank-you for the discussion opener.

    When I try to boil it down to a short response, I come up with:

    "I have my whole life to hide! -From lunatics who might persecute me because of their crazy beliefs."

    There are all kinds of things which are or which are verging on becoming criminal activities according to the law which I might want to do or discuss doing anyway, including:

    -Sexual freedom beyond the missionary position with the opposite sex
    -Home schooling
    -Organic farming
    -Growing food on your land
    -Growing/using Marijuana
    -File sharing
    -Photocopying a book
    -Performing "Happy Birthday"
    -Avoiding vaccination
    -Buying a pressure cooker
    -Making your own fireworks/firearms
    -Having friends who are Muslim
    -BEING Muslim
    -Ignoring building codes when renovating
    -Building a house not connected to the power grid
    -Getting an abortion
    -THINKING about getting an abortion
    -Playing violent video games
    -Smoking/Growing tobacco
    -Owning Cuban cigars
    -Growing/Using alternative medicines
    -Raising chickens
    -Sharing unpasteurized milk/milk products
    -Sharing food with the homeless
    -Being homeless
    -Disabling the black box in your car
    -Not recycling
    -Not believing in AGW
    -Criticizing Israel
    -Owning a gun
    -Owning a green laser pointer
    -Renting out a room in your house
    -Social activism
    -Staying out past Curfew
    -Not wearing a seatbelt
    -Having a bon fire in your backyard
    -Selling things without a business license
    -Making your own alcoholic beverages
    -Photography/Videography (of public sites, police, corporate buildings, etc.).
    And as the Republicans learned after targeted IRS audits,
    -Being a Republican.

    And finally...

    -Any number of stupid, embarrassing things I did when I was a teenager that I'd rather not have some spook use as leverage when I'm at a critical juncture in my career. (Anybody who hasn't done something stupid or embarrassing when they were a teenager is in the extreme minority and is likely to be a bitter and boring person today who is apt to ask questions like, "What do you have to hide?" because they are angry with everybody else for not being cowardly losers like themselves.)

    That's a very short list, and even if I decide to talk openly about exploring even one or two of them, I would certainly not want the fact recorded forever by some government agency. Who knows who will be in power tomorrow? Who knows what else will be added to that list? (Seriously, who foresaw the pressure cooker thing?)

    On a slightly different theme, "I have my whole life to hide! -From corporations who want to target me."

    Such examples include:

    -Artificially raising prices or limiting choices based on my zip code
    -Artificially raising prices or limiting choices based on my prior preferences
    -Artificially raising prices or limiting choices based on need/usage cycles
    -Calling me at home
    -Knowing the names and ages of my kids, where they go to school and what their medical histories are so they can be specifically marketed at
    -Identifying and Targeting activists
    -Identifying and Targeting addicts
    -Identifying and Targeting the infirm
    -Identifying and Targeting preferred competing services
    -Identifying and Targeting cheap alternatives, (like spring water, DIY resources, farm markets, herbal medicines).

    Again, that's the short and simple list.

    Knowledge is Power, and the people who have the knowledge are dicks who are exactly the sort of people to use it to hurt/limit/manipulate you.

    We live in a day and age where private prisons make profit from every incarceration.

  89. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please take your racism elsewhere.

  90. Are you a whiney jew or what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this just keeps getting better
    please continue...

  91. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by mdielmann · · Score: 2

    Yeah. We're pretty much the only nation on the planet that hasn't tried to corral and exterminate them. Must be that we're mere pawns in their global conspiracy.

    No, you're just one of the countries that turned away Jewish refugees from Germany before the concentration camps were opened. Don't be too offended - my country did the same. I'm ashamed, as well.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  92. Not alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is certainly no worse than the intelligence sharing and inter-operability arrangements between the 'five eyes' of the Anglosphere. Of course, as a member of this club, I don't care that much about the ancient blood feuds of the Middle East - provided these conflicts don't spill over into my reality, and the energy continues to flow.

  93. Jonathan Pollard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is partly true. Check Wikipedia, the source of all, often accurate information. According to one source, he passed classifed information to South Africa, attempted to sell classified data to Pakistan, and stole classified data on China which his wife used in her business. He even gave classified data to, gasp!, Australia!

  94. Second source your story by gelfling · · Score: 1

    One would necessarily have to squint a bit at the Guardian regarding any story having to do with Israel. The Guardian is publicly and proudly the most anti Israeli newspaper printed in English today and, they have often been caught in a lie and making up stories before.

  95. NSA="No Strings Attached" by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    NSA="No Strings Attached"
    I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly how they get around needing a warrant to peruse the data.

  96. Re:Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... documented safeguards to restrict that data to intel on NON-U.S. Persons.

    Non-US persons account for 96% of the world's population. Maybe look at it from the perspective of one of those people?

  97. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by dave420 · · Score: 1

    The fact you're clearly insane makes me feel better about disagreeing with your positions in other threads. Thanks for that.

  98. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by dave420 · · Score: 1

    You are not your country, nor are you your country's government. You are not the people of your country in the past, present, or future. You are you. You have no logical reason to be ashamed of the actions of others, but to be merely disappointed with any culture or society which fosters those actions and the beliefs which drive them. By the same token you should not feel pride in the actions of those of your country, in the past or present, as you are not them and played no part. That is the only logically sustainable outlook to have when thinking of one's own relation to their country or, indeed, the countries of others. Everything else is, at one level or another, at best hypocritical and at worst illogical, though usually an unhealthy mix of the two. Patriotism and nationalism are powerful tools for the weak, but in the hands of the strong they are deadly weapons which tend to ensure they are used as such.

  99. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    The fact that you're such a brainless pot-smoker that you felt compelled to stick "420" in your handle makes me feel better about ignoring pretty much everything you say.

    Go eat some more Doritos, burnout.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  100. Re:Once again we see who actually runs our country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I wonder if the original post wasn't an NSA plant. After the information comes out, NSA just posts it in places like Slashdot, waits for the anti-semitic rants to start and then says that everyone who opposes this is anti-semitic.

  101. Re:Zionist Occupied Government by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    And in general, I agree. Especially about things that happened before I was born or my parents were old enough to do anything about them. But the other half of having a healthy sense of nationalism is doing what you can to move your country in the direction you want it to go. That's why I've written letters to politicians, and feel a certain amount of shame to belong to a group, no matter how big it was, that would do such a thing. I don't stay up at night because of it, but I want to keep these actions alive in my thoughts, so I can beware of having some group I'm a part of do something that horrible again.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  102. Re:Read the MOA, it's about protecting U.S. Person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If i weren't afraid of logging in and modding this up, I would. The things that happen behind closed-doors are NOTHING like what the media is saying.