Slashdot Mirror


California Elementary Schools To Test Anti-Piracy Curriculum

New submitter newbie_fantod writes "Ignoring the fact that the surest way to get a child to do something is to tell them not to, the RIAA and MPAA have developed an anti-piracy curriculum for kindergarten through grade 6. The pilot project is scheduled for testing in California schools later this year." Mitch Stoltz, an EFF attorney, isn't impressed: “It suggests, falsely, that ideas are property and that building on others’ ideas always requires permission,” Stoltz says. “The overriding message of this curriculum is that students’ time should be consumed not in creating but in worrying about their impact on corporate profits.”

238 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Indoctrination and Propoganda by killfixx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's worked for years with every other product...

    Get them while they're young and you'll have a "___________" (insert appropriate noun here) for life... Customer, slave, zealot, etc...

    The only problem is that government is allowing corporations to push their agenda in the classroom... It wasn't enough to have it at the beginning of every one of their Disney movies --you know, the ones that kids watch ad infinitum, now they're allowed to spread their FUD in the schools, too! Yay!

    How long before we see "Lunch! Sponsored by McDonald's", etc...

    That's not the only issue at play here...

    The backers for this program (RIAA/MPAA) are all wealthy, so their kids will never see these things in school. They'll be free from the propaganda and allowed to be creative and free. But, not the common man, because he can't afford freedom...

    Hrmm... I wonder if that's how this is supposed to work... Freedom for those that can afford it...

    Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia...

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    1. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 4, Funny

      So do the Sony Youth get a special knife?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    2. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "It's worked for years with every other product..."

      Not always. DARE, despite being only incrementally less popular than apple pie and jesus, consistently turns in effectiveness numbers somewhere between 'useless' and 'teaches impressionable children about cool drugs that they should try' whenever some killjoy stops taking its effectiveness on faith and tries studying it.

    3. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only problem is that government is allowing corporations to push their agenda in the classroom...

      Well, it's not the only problem: I distinctly remember as an elementary school student getting "lessons" about how awesome the latest war effort was, and being required to sing patriotic songs, and of course the reciting of the Pledge of Allegience which requires students to profess a belief in God. Oh, and watching "Channel 1 News", which was sometimes informative but often not and supported by commercials.

      Basically, the problem is that it's easier to dupe kids than it is adults, so there are lots of organizations who are positively salivating at the prospect.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia..."

      Only if you pay the licensing fee for Star Trek-eque utopian futures to CBS Paramount...

    5. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by internerdj · · Score: 2

      "Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia..." Monsanto will own all the patents for replicator recipes for food. Feeding your family will require a monthly licensing fee.

    6. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by kenshin33 · · Score: 1

      they don't make : they fund, "own", sell and buy.

    7. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      DARE... It's a great program... Just poorly marketed...

      What? I think you got it backwards. The marketing must be great, because it's still in use all over. But it is a terribly ineffective program, as has been shown repeatedly.

    8. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If there were a push for Islamic religious indoctrination in school, the humanists of the world (which I proudly consider myself one of) would be just as against it. So please, take your persecution complex back to church where you can pretend to be more Christ-like while screwing the poor and pushing your religious agenda on the rest of us. Your freedom of religion is no more important than my freedom from religion.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    9. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by jythie · · Score: 2

      One of the ironies is that the bulk of the 'religious indoctrination in school' complaints that make it into the court system come from christians unhappy that their children are being pushed by some other christian sect, either in specific wording or beliefs about how worship is handled.

    10. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by johanw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia..."

      The USA seems to me more en route to a Babylon 5 police state under president Clark.

    11. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      Ah, but those aren't "real" Christians. Only me and my sect have the real truth, therefore only my particular flavor of Christianity should be taught. Everything else is pure heresy. I'm pretty sure the historical Jesus would be aghast at all of the atrocities and hatred committed in his honor.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    12. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "and Deep Space 9 was the first to actually show the economics of its main cast"

      They only showed that for Quark and a couple of non-main characters.

      You must be thinking of Babylon 5, where economics actually played a role in the plot of the series.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How long before we see "Lunch! Sponsored by McDonald's", etc...

      You are way behind the times, my friend. 10 years ago my friend went ballastic because his Kindergartner came home talking about how much she liked Pizza Hut. Having never been to Pizza Hut, he was curious what she was talking about. Turns out that Pizza Hut donated a bunch of Pizza Hut themed supplies to the Kindergarten in return for getting to spend the day leading the kids in various songs and play about how great Pizza Hut is. That shit has been going on for a decade. You should check out what your public schools are doing to grovel for money.

    14. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no problem with people believing in God. I have all sorts of problems with government-funded schools demanding that students say they believe in God.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    15. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by paiute · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia...

      Only after the Eugenics Wars.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    16. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The USA seems to me more en route to a Babylon 5 police state under president Clark.

      The Trek universe ain't all sweetness and light, or else we'd never have heard the words "Rape Gangs". They had a lot of chaos before they got to the shiny happy mythical future.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by armanox · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure the historical Jesus would be aghast at all of the atrocities and hatred committed in his honor.

      As a Catholic, I am quite sure he would too.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    18. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Fair enough... I wasn't thinking of DARE... It's a great program...

      Hell yea it is; without DARE, I might have never known about any of those cool-ass drugs I did in college!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    19. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only me and my sect

      My sect and I.

      That's right, I'm gonna derail a religious debate with Grammar-Nazi-ism! Take that, cur!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    20. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Damastus+the+WizLiz · · Score: 1

      Do remember that in that fictional universe it took another world war and an actual alien contact to drive humans together enough to bring about that "utopia"

      --
      I often have trouble remembering which way is out of bed in the morning.
    21. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Damastus+the+WizLiz · · Score: 2

      That they have to grovel for money in the first place is sad enough.

      --
      I often have trouble remembering which way is out of bed in the morning.
    22. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      a little over 10 years ago when the company I was working for was replacing computers and server at a prosperous school distirct, the High School Cafeteria had a mini-Pizza Hut, a Mini-McDonalds, AND a mini-Subway in it....

    23. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Actually it's a very effective program. It is unfortunate however the effect is teaching kids more about drug use than prevention.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    24. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      You win this time, prescriptive grammar!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    25. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by somersault · · Score: 1

      A lot of it had to do with clean and efficient energy via warp drives too. Combine warp drives and replicators, and it just becomes a matter of acquiring the raw elements that you need to create food, etc.

      We're probably going to have something similar on a smaller scale when 3D printers become more advanced.. people able to print out their own car parts cheaply at a local printer, etc.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    26. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      There can be no more coercive of an authority than a culture that has genetically or chemically engineered its citizens to not require a coercive authority.

    27. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Beginning?

      Google 'E Z Jackster.'

    28. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Sique · · Score: 2

      Luckily those clauses are invalid in the countries I live.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    29. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, he's right. DARE has an effect. The effect may be the *opposite* of what is intended, but the effect is consistent, measurable, *and* statistically significant. In that way, DARE is very similar to 'abstinence only sex education'.

      captcha: testify

    30. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by nedwidek · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia...

      I've given up on wondering. The kleptocracy always takes over.

      At this point I only wonder when they'll manage to pull off our own extinction level event.

      --
      Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
    31. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia...

      Forget that - I watched a DS9 a couple nights ago that pushed the idea that somebody was morally wrong for having used somebody else's idea without permission. My idea of utopia is we would be free of such wrong ideas.

    32. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by zugmeister · · Score: 2

      "And there will be enough food for everyone" that can afford to buy it.
      FTFY
      Give the Monsantos of the world enough leeway and it may become difficult to legally grow your own. There are already cases of farmers being sued (successfully) by Monsanto because GM seed contaminated their non-GM seed and the farmer didn't have licensing.

    33. Re: Indoctrination and Propoganda by matthijs.goense · · Score: 1

      Great idea! Now there will be nobody who wants to work for an industry that makes a profit by stealing somebody else's idea and selling it as their own.

    34. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by PRMan · · Score: 1

      How long before we see "Lunch! Sponsored by McDonald's", etc...

      Where have you been? We already have cafeterias selling food from Taco Bell, Subway and Domino's: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB901574891620347000.html

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    35. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      From that standpoint, the line between indoctrination and education may well be as fuzzy as the line between a cult and an upstanding religion. The difference in this case is that while I (probably) want my child to be a productive and successful member of society, any outside organizations (governmental, business or religious) will likely have an agenda of much narrower scope and of benefit to those organizations rather than the child.

    36. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      DARE originated when I was in junior high. The kids that went to the DARE meetings to get the T-Shirts were the kids doing the drugs. They wanted the shirts to wear while smoking. DARE has never stopped a single kid from doing drugs and as the OP said was used by the kids doing drugs as a way to find new cool drugs to try.

    37. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Give the Monsantos of the world enough leeway and it may become difficult to legally grow your own. There are already cases of farmers being sued (successfully) by Monsanto because GM seed contaminated their non-GM seed and the farmer didn't have licensing.

      Windup Girl, by Bacigalupi (and several other stories set in the same world)

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    38. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      only problem is government

      FTFY.

      Our government is not working because it is now being based on Group Politics, not individual rights.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    39. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2

      I think DARE might be an indication of why this program might just backfire.

      Honestly, has DARE even succeeded in any of its goals? The younger generations just seem to use drugs even more. I remember as a teenager it was generally just cool to do things just because you were told not to. So you're told not to pirate, and not pirating would be the goodie goodie thing to do...so, lets pirate!

      One of those videos is full of shit though; it paints a narrative of somebody's mom being laid off because too many people pirated her game. To the best of my knowledge, nobody has ever been laid off due to piracy, especially game developers. It's always because of other issues like their title sucks or its release was botched (came out way late and over budget, buggy as hell, etc.)

      That's Hollywood for you though. Got to admit they're pretty effective at what they do, I mean they practically own the current president, and they already have a sneaky little plan to get their way on SOPA.

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/04/06/chris-dodd-confident-obama-administration-working-on-next-sopa/
      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/19/exclusive-hollywood-lobbyist-threatens-to-cut-off-obama-2012-money-over-anti/

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    40. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Humans are not capable of forming societies without conflict at large scales, we need a coercive authority to resolve those conflicts.

      Not everyone is going to be willing to give up their fundamental humanity to be engineered to be more complacent, those that do not will be forced or culled.

      The dream of a anarchistic utopia where everyone is equal and there is no coercive authority is impossible, and I don't just mean technically, even if you could change people then coercion by authority would be involved.

    41. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yes, but they take it away after 6 months and replace it with a spoon.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    42. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by nbauman · · Score: 2

      DARE is a very effective program.

      Its purpose is to give police officers overtime pay, for doing the easiest thing in the world, giving nonsensical lectures to kids who would rather be listening to a cop than doing real schoolwork.

      The only easier way for a cop to make money is to sit on his ass behind a computer and pretend to be a precocious 12-year-old girl on chat.

    43. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by nbauman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, it's not the only problem: I distinctly remember as an elementary school student getting "lessons" about how awesome the latest war effort was, and being required to sing patriotic songs, and of course the reciting of the Pledge of Allegience which requires students to profess a belief in God.

      I was in high school when they inserted "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. I refused to say it, and my home room teacher had a shit fit. (Stupid nationalistic gym teacher.)

      I haven't said it since.

      And I won't say it until we really do have liberty and justice for all -- which isn't the direction we're going in right now.

    44. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by nbauman · · Score: 3, Funny

      So do the Sony Youth get a special knife?

      If they turn in their parents.

    45. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I have to turn a part of what you said upside down, because you hint at where I'll take it.

      The only problem is that government is allowing corporations to push their agenda in the classroom.

      Do you really truly believe this? I believe this is a Government agenda which we have seen growing for 50+ years with the removal of the classical education system and it's replacement with the communist industrial education system. Yes folks, this really happened.

      Here is where you hint at the same meaning.

      They'll be free from the propaganda and allowed to be creative and free. But, not the common man, because he can't afford freedom.

      The wealthiest pushing these agendas don't use public schools. It's not just the execs at the MPAA and RIAA. This is the Kennedy, Rockefeller, the Bush, the Rothschild, etc.., families. The same people that own the banks, and are ramming their agenda down our Government to you and I.

      The same people that are immune to taxes, immune to criminal investigation and prosecution, etc...

      So to answer your last question, the answer is "no". There are shitbags in society, and shitbags will always be in society. Just like there are nice people in society and will always be nice people in society. The shitbags tend to step on everyone up until the point where society has to revolt against their control. Happened over and over through out history. We are nearing that point again, but it won't be the last time we see it. Human nature and psychology ensure that this pattern repeats.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    46. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      When I think of this "Utopia", I usually contemplate the fact that Dr. Bashir's parents had to flee off world in order to get his son's learning disability treated. There is clearly still an underclass and people interested in fleeing for various reasons.

      Those Maquis are out on the Cardassian frontier for a reason.

      Chances are, they're very much like the browncoats from Serenity.

      We all know what Kirk thought of "Utopia".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    47. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      There's no Amish community as large as the smallest modern farm community you can conceive of. Your ideals really haven't been put to the test if you haven't seen them scale to the size towns we had in ancient Babylon.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    48. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder if there'll ever be a Star Trek-esque Utopia...

      Unlikely at best...now a Blade Runner-esque Dystopia, that seems quite likely given who's actually in charge these days.

    49. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Without DARE I wouldn't have known to try the harder drugs after one joint failed to turn me into a burned out loser and multiple rapist. After all, if they lied about weed, maybe they lied about the other ones too...

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    50. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Right there with you.

      I went from Catholic to atheist humanist back to Catholic and my beliefs and moral code hardly changed.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    51. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Our schools have slowly been becoming training centers for workers for a few decades now. Ie, chop out arts and sports because no one needs that in a cubicle, and instead focus on reading and math to the exclusion of everything else. Meanwhile accept "generous" donations of computers and electronic devices from companies hoping to get a generation of loyal users. Note that the top countries in the world in terms of pre-college education do not spend money on these computing devices and instead actually try to teach.

      So getting Hollywood into the picture is discouraging but it's just one more step in the same directions schools are already going.

    52. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by ralphaostrander · · Score: 1

      America has truly fallen it was seized by corporations. And all descension was severely dealt with. Occupy. RIP America.

    53. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The "under god" part was added relatively recently to the pledge, and the pledge itself is not that old really (120 years or so). It doesn't require a prefssion of believe in god at all, it just has the "under god". Just skip that part or mumble it or say "underdog". The pledge has also been changed 4 times since it was first introduced, so it can be changed again. And nothing about the pledge is really official, just a lot of school systems that are too worried about being seen as disloyal if they don't require its use (or worse, they might be called "liberal" which is even worse than being disloyal).

    54. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Did they bring the big glass-lined suitcase filled with different kinds of drugs, what their names were, and how the effected you to your class? That was always my favorite part; the big crack spoon in the middle was hilarious.

      Full disclosure: I grew up in an extremely rural community, where cocaine was practically unheard of, let alone in crack form. Meth, on the other hand...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    55. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      How long before we see "Lunch! Sponsored by McDonald's", etc...

      Back in 1992, I remember that Pizza Hut started selling personal pizzas in my school. They were terrible, but better than the school lunches, so there was always a huge line.

    56. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by ultranova · · Score: 2

      One of the ironies is that the bulk of the 'religious indoctrination in school' complaints that make it into the court system come from christians unhappy that their children are being pushed by some other christian sect, either in specific wording or beliefs about how worship is handled.

      Nothing ironic about that, it's how the whole "freedom of religion" thing got started.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    57. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      You Have Got To Be Kidding Me?!?!?!?!!?

      There are no words to describe how outrageously evil, ridiculous, humorous and telling of the society that allows this sort of travesty is.

      The USA has truly lost its way...

    58. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The Original Series had some glimpses of the slave classes that no one likes to talk about in polite company (and Deep Space 9 was the first to actually show the economics of its main cast).

      They only showed that for Quark and a couple of non-main characters.

      In DS9. In TOS, there were dilithium miners who obviously weren't keen on being dilithium miners. Only the people in starfleet seemed to be blissfully happy, and they were only that happy if they were on a starship (or retired). Kirk might believe in the UFP Utopia, but that's because he has a literal rainbow of groupies every episode to distract him (and he's on a five year mission away from the UFP).

    59. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And that was just a decade (fictional time) before TNG, so several decades after TOS' time period.

    60. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

      Many here do not understand what created the US rust belt in the first place. The proportion of asses in chairs as compared to those actually shoveling the shit. Our education system is predicated upon putting the "educated ass" in the chair after graduation. This is because by and large those who are rich are lazy and they spawn lazy offspring who think that sitting in a chair and directing things is actually doing work.

      These new titan of business are a bunch of idiots who actually believe that ideas are worth more than the implementation of ideas and to this end have subverted the concepts of patents and copyright. The fools actually believe that the ideas are worth more than the product and therefore have devalued labour and physical work to such an extent that they are crippling the entire economy.

      China is following suit and creating a bunch of tiny tyrants. When the Western economy of cheap trinkets collapses because the workers who buy them have to chose between trinkets and food, then the over abundance of asses in chairs will face the very said same devaluation of their work. We have those who have recently horded gold and moved all their movable wealth off shore to tax havens. The asses in chairs created by or current economic system of "intellectual property being more valuable than actual goods" will sink us. And the same thing will happen in China as millions will lose work because of the overvaluation of "intellectual property". There was wisdom in the rhetorical statement "is a worker not worth his salt?" Obviously the truth of this statement eludes those who only see ideas as having value, we are in for a very rough ride this time around because of the latest round of little tyrants devaluing labour. The insanity of what is happening to public schools and how these idiots can manipulate things to the point of injecting falsehoods into education is pathetic and symptomatic of why our economy will not recover this time around. The little tyrants won't let it and they do not even realize the damage they are doing.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    61. Re: Indoctrination and Propoganda by techprophet · · Score: 1

      DARE should have been "Drugs and Alcohol are Really Expensive". While high price begets its own cool factor, it's at least something a broke student can relate to.

    62. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      Yeah, D.A.R.E. worked like a charm, didn't it. The scare tactics teach kids more about how to keep from getting busted than they instill good values, especially since as usual they'll oversell it and when the kids figure out they fudged the truth any guilt they might have had goes right out the window.

    63. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by stephenmac7 · · Score: 1

      Yet somehow, this "corporate propoganda" is happening in California, the number one anti-capitalist, anti-corporation state. Somehow, this doesn't fit. Maybe, just maybe, it's the government who's really pushing this agenda. The RIAA and MPAA obviously have an agenda here too, but if the great liberal Californian government is the one implementing it...

      --
      "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." -- Judge Gideon J. Tucker
    64. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      We are so fucked =/

    65. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You're talking about Deep Space Nine. The Next Generation was much more utopian.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    66. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but people have really rewritten that over the years. Since new groups are in power, they tend to gloss over the time period when various Christian groups were using local state power to persecute other Christian groups, and how much of the original 'freedom of religion' concept came out of various delegates looking at how their sect was treated in other states. This history has been nearly erased by current dominate religious groups....

    67. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Qwade79 · · Score: 1

      Only me and my sect

      My sect and I.

      That's right, I'm gonna derail a religious debate with Grammar-Nazi-ism! Take that, cur!

      Damned sects maniac ...

    68. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by lexa1979 · · Score: 2

      There is no spoon !

    69. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the extra features like a corkscrew, bottle opener, magnifying glass etc can all be removed by Sony at any time.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    70. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The history of the Pledge of Allegience is quite interesting, really:
      - For starters, instead of a hand over your heart, originally you were supposed to raise your arm up, like this. They starting changing that in 1941 for some reason.
      - In one of the few bits of codified sexism still on the books, men are supposed to remove their hats, unless they are uniformed military personnel, in which case they are supposed to stand at attention and salute.
      - The original version just said "I pledge allegiance to my Flag" - they changed that in 1923 to prevent those immigrants from thinking they were supposed to be loyal to their former countries.
      - In the 1940's, there was a brief period in which the courts allowed schools to require children to say it, regardless of their religious beliefs. Jehovah's Witnesses in particular had a big problem with that, because they considered it idolatry.
      - In 1954, they added "under God", specifically for religious reasons, with its supporters cheering the fact that schoolchildren across America would be proclaiming their monotheism. In 2010, this was upheld because the majority claimed it was of a "ceremonial and patriotic nature".

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    71. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by Petfish · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the historical Jesus would be aghast .......

      Historical Jesus? Which Jesus would that be? [Citation Needed]

    72. Re:Indoctrination and Propoganda by graphius · · Score: 1

      ^^ This^^

  2. School == Copying by RichMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We learn by copying. Write what you see on the board. Repeat after me. Read the book aloud ....

    Overlaying an "anti-piracy" theme is just going to be confusing and counter to the whole process.

    1. Re:School == Copying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The rich opted out long ago. The middle class is beginning to opt out as well. I wonder when the poor will be the only ones in the education system and how long after that it is deemed unnecessary by Republicans.

    2. Re:School == Copying by JWW · · Score: 2

      The "new" kindergarten.

      Remember, kids, its good to share, unless we punish you for it.

    3. Re:School == Copying by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Science is about copying. Civilization is about copying. Human culture, and maybe even what is being human is about copying. We would never be where we are if a lot of people weren't standing on the shoulders of giants. Denying copying is worse than asking to reinvent the wheel each time, is forbidding to invent or use it because someone else have the exclusive rights over a basic, common sense idea.

      If you want to define intellectual property stealing, is taking exclusivity over an idea, not letting anyone to have it, no matter how common sense, how easy is to get there (i.e. adding "on internet", "on mobile" or "on computer" to common activities to patent it) or how indepently other people get it.

      And doing that in the current scenario where the US government is blatantly copying whatever US citizens and the rest of the people of the entire planet do, write, and create is to consider people retards and saying it aloud.

    4. Re:School == Copying by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed. The whole idea of IP defies basic notions of cultural inheritance and evolution. I get that it might be useful for a limited time, but any extended period of time begins to subvert the very processes that lead to innovation.

      But this is what you get when you let sociopaths run the economy. The kinds of people who reaches the upper tiers of governance and corporate power are the kinds of people we should be locking away.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:School == Copying by idontgno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Science is about copying.

      "If I have seen further it is by paying my proper license fees to stand on the shoulders of giants."

      -- Sir Isaac Newton, according to next year's California standard textbooks about science

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:School == Copying by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      Aren't you told to write what's seen on the board? I think that's the author giving you explicit permission to copy it.

      Counter to your examples, try copying your fellow student's test, paper, etc.

      Similarly, schoolbook authors (well, publishers), know and accept that their books will be copied to an extent (excerpts photocopied, parts recited, etc.) but would still frown on you running the whole thing through OCR and dropping the PDF onto the world.

      While I think 'piracy education' is a waste of time if it's just the 'piracy is bad, mkay' approach - I think it's a perfectly good topic in education if discussing pros and cons and how that may apply to the students themselves. Let them decide for themselves whether they're pro/con copyright/distribution rights/piracy, and let them explain why. Same as with discussion of laws, religion, etc. in sociology(?) class.

    7. Re:School == Copying by MrNemesis · · Score: 2

      I don't really see what the problem with that is - all it'll mean is that everything you learn from copying something will mean we need a system in place to automatically make royalty payments to the people you copied it from. All you need do is when you create a New Work, Learning Concept (TM) or Factoid Slam (TM) is register it with the Education Attribution Corporation and we'll leverage our multi-source bottom-line scoping architect to provide our top-down talent-nurturing stakeholders with enough pre-prepared interdependencies to fully institutionalise and monetise high-quality, consumer-empowering selective knowledge transfers, entailing growing a streamlined, leading and financially re-aligned investor confidence paradigm.

      Of course, since nothing is created in a vacuum, as prime stakeholder of over 83% of all Amelioration Reimbursement Diversification Cogitators, the Education Attribution Corporation will take a 60% cut of all provided input. Those found to be illegally harbouring unlicensed intellectual property of Education Attribution Corporation will be temporarily granted access to neurosurgical frontal cortex reassignment therapy so as to ensure no unjust exploitation of unfettered unrecompensed proficiency.

      This post brought to you by Carl's Junior.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    8. Re:School == Copying by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Sharing is car^H^H^H^H evil.

    9. Re:School == Copying by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Could California just slide into the ocean and disappear already?

    10. Re:School == Copying by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The poor have been so drained by the predation of the wealthy that they have no blood left to sate the appetites of the plutocrats, now their eye turns towards the middle class, and you too will be made poor and then bled.

    11. Re:School == Copying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that sounds reasonable to you. But, you must understand, this isn't about anyone making their own decisions. The whole goal here is to prevent critical thought, not encourage it.

    12. Re:School == Copying by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      They don't? That's sad - I think I got those kinds of subjects starting at what would be the 5th grade. Not at a particular deep level, of course, but that built up over years.

    13. Re:School == Copying by Sique · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it would have been: "As I am licensed by the Bertrand of Chartres Heritage Trust to quote him, I hereby declare that if I have seen further it is by paying my proper license fees to stand on the shoulders of giants."

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    14. Re:School == Copying by RichMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes you are told to write what you see on the board. But did the teacher copy that from somewhere. Did they have a performance license is it transferable?

      If asked to read from a book does the student have to get a performance license first or enquire about the existence of such? Does the teacher have a performance license to read from a book. Does the school have a license to play the recording of the national anthem in the morning?
      When passed a test the student should refuse to do anything until the teacher either asserts that the creation of the test was original work and that the copy thus produced was allowed or provide a certified copy of licensing agreement allowing the reproduction of question from the book onto the test.

      And you expect grade school kids to catch onto this? Some of them will talk to parents and latch on to things do stuff like the above and drive the whole process to a standstill. Are you going to have the teachers say "we don't worry about that in the class room", if word of that gets out the parent calls the school and reports the teacher.

    15. Re:School == Copying by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      In the various U.S. states that I grew up in, we generally had a "social science" class, which was kind of a mixture of geography, sociology, and anthropology.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    16. Re:School == Copying by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Could California just slide into the ocean and disappear already?

      That would be great! It's a much shorter drive to Albuquerque for me, and I'd love to swim in the Pacific.

    17. Re:School == Copying by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Schools purchase curriculum. Heard about the Common CORE controversy? That's a curriculum.

      Teachers use the lesson plans and questions while teaching. So, yes, they have a performance license.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    18. Re:School == Copying by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      That particular plan has been copyrighted by one Lex Luthor.

    19. Re:School == Copying by RichMan · · Score: 2

      But what they are teaching is safe IP. So on everything presented I am required to ask
      a) where did you get this, did you have the rights to access that
      b) provide ownership rights traceable back to the original author and sworn statements that the original author did not copy it from someone one
      I can't just assume because of the setting that it is ok. I can't just assume that their simple statement that it is ok is enough. I need authenticated documents on everything. I can't assume that what they presented yesterday applies to today.

      The whole system is stupid.

    20. Re:School == Copying by suutar · · Score: 1

      unfortunately I see it being easy to spin this as "sharing your stuff with others is good. Taking from others without their permission is bad." without acknowledging the difference between borrowing an idea and borrowing a physical object.

    21. Re:School == Copying by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      "Don't Download This Song" seems apropos.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGM8PT1eAvY

    22. Re:School == Copying by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      What definition of 'Middle Class' are you using in which they can afford private education???

    23. Re:School == Copying by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Then what's taking him so long? ;)
      I've seen no reports of Superman on the news to stop him

    24. Re:School == Copying by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      I hear time travel is involved, so YMMV.

    25. Re:School == Copying by graphius · · Score: 1

      There should be a "sad but true" mod...

  3. Fuck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Industry trade groups have no fucking business writing curriculum for children.

    These assholes are of the impression the own everything, and that all of our laws and rights are subject to their approval.

    Whatever idiot in the education system decided that indoctrinating children to the viewpoint of corporations should fired.

    I can almost bet this will have things which are an incorrect interpretation of the law as it exists, and is nothing more than corporate propaganda.

    This is the problem with America, whatever a company wants is considered right and good -- even when it's bullshit.

    1. Re:Fuck ... by gtall · · Score: 1

      You could use Texas as a another entity that should be keep far away from anything "education" seeing as most their legislators and certainly their governor have never met a scientific theory they liked. Word is they'll be gunning for the theory of gravity next, all that relativity is likely to warp the moral compass of their kids.

    2. Re:Fuck ... by odigity · · Score: 1

      "Industry trade groups have no fucking business writing curriculum for children."

      Neither does the government. Now that the government controls the schools (a recent development), there's no way to stop this from happening, since you have no practical influence over the actions of your own government.

      Thanks, progressives.

    3. Re:Fuck ... by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Schools are free to not use it, not pay for it. No one is putting a gun to their head.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:Fuck ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They have no business writing regulatory legislation either but they manage to do it...

      Currently, these are proposals still under development, they haven't entered any schools yet. So you have a chance to fight back.

  4. What idiot is allowing this by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most family's are forced to send there child to public schools by there circumstances. What idiot is letting a private organization force propaganda on them DARE was bad enough.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:What idiot is allowing this by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most family's are forced to send there child to public schools by there circumstances.

      And some people fail to take advantage of even that standard of education, failing at basic grammar.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:What idiot is allowing this by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1
      Helloooo??? It's in California, home of the movie industry? How do you suppose this change came about?


      And, as long as we're talking about schooling,

      Most family's are forced to send there child to public schools by there circumstances

      That's "families" plural, not "family's" possessive, and "their", as in 'belonging to them', not "there", 'a place other than here'.

    3. Re:What idiot is allowing this by intermodal · · Score: 3, Funny

      In High School, most of the people I saw wearing DARE T-shirts were stoned out of their gourds.

      That said, if there was any doubt that schools have vastly strayed from the job of educating, here's proof.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    4. Re:What idiot is allowing this by internerdj · · Score: 1

      We let it happen all over the country with all sorts of issues. If it is important to the parents or the politicians then it will get in, at least briefly. The question is: Are the parents informed enough to challenge it?

    5. Re:What idiot is allowing this by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      That's "families" plural, not "family's" possessive, and "their", as in 'belonging to them', not "there", 'a place other than here'.

      Please do not copy advice from the Chicago Manual of Style without proper permission!

    6. Re:What idiot is allowing this by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      It's not a copy, it's a derivative work!

    7. Re:What idiot is allowing this by alexo · · Score: 1

      Most family's are forced to send there child to public schools by there circumstances.

      I sympathize.

    8. Re:What idiot is allowing this by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      It's not a copy, it's a derivative work!

      Prove it in court, bitch.

      -- the MAFIAA

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:What idiot is allowing this by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Please don't use the Chicago manual of style for anything. Oxford is so much better.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    10. Re:What idiot is allowing this by fermion · · Score: 1
      You don't know the half of it. When I was a kid we had to look at these graphic movies in which kids were shown to degrade and eventually die due to drug use. These were urban school in areas with a significant crime rate and drug use, even to this day. The film was shown in all elementary schools, although we were a selective school.

      It was more traumatic than you could possible imagine, close to a snuff film. I don't think it really effected the drug use of anyone, given the arrest rates. Kids who abuse drugs will tend to do so no matter what, or because, the programs. These best way to keep kids off drugs is to stop the culture of drugs, in which they see ads on TV every day showing how drugs are necessary for a good life, but then making those drugs unavailable.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    11. Re:What idiot is allowing this by lw54 · · Score: 1

      My biggest concern is the opportunity cost where teaching this is taking time away from everything else.

    12. Re:What idiot is allowing this by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      It's not a copy, it's a derivative work!

      In which case, either Newton's or Leibnitz' lawyers want a word with you...

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    13. Re:What idiot is allowing this by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with drugs exactly?
      Is alcohol also bad? What about caffeine? For a great many drugs it appears the only problem with them is that possession can get you arrested. The solution then is to make them legal and educate people about responsible use.

    14. Re:What idiot is allowing this by sycodon · · Score: 1

      That idiot would be the person who voted for the idiot(s) that made the decision.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    15. Re:What idiot is allowing this by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I share that concern...about over half of what class time is spent on.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    16. Re:What idiot is allowing this by psithurism · · Score: 1

      DARE was bad enough

      Considering how well that worked out, I can't imagine this initiative will fare much better.

      I'm pretty sure how this will work: kids at school will be performing skits, writing their congressmen, and promising that they'll never be bad like those awful pirates. Then going home to bit-torrent themselves some free copies of their favorite TV shows and music.

  5. Is this a joke? by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is it really the case that you have companies and special interest groups creating the curriculum for your children?
    How do you, as parents stand for this? You do know that you can go to the school board and freak out right? I think step 1 would be to organize a district wide freakout on the school board. Step 2, private school.

    1. Re:Is this a joke? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do know that you can go to the school board and freak out right? I think step 1 would be to organize a district wide freakout on the school board. Step 2, private school.

      Which I should think would have about the same effect as telling your elected representative your displeasure ... the people who pay them huge money in campaign donations get their ear, and the rest of us can go pound sand.

      The *AAs likely made some donations contingent on having their views on copyright be required in school. And they will skew the facts the way they always do on the topic of copyright, so the kids will be getting lied to.

      And, I'm betting the vast majority of parents can't afford to send their children to private school.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here in MD a man was just arrested for freaking out at the school board, who had structured their meeting so that only questions they approved would be answered. Good luck with your freak out.

    3. Re:Is this a joke? by jythie · · Score: 1

      Schools increasingly depend on corporate sponsorship to stay afloat since parents have been complaining about property taxes for decades.

    4. Re:Is this a joke? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      How do you, as parents stand for this? You do know that you can go to the school board and freak out right? I think step 1 would be to organize a district wide freakout on the school board. Step 2, private school.

      People can't afford to send their kids to private school, they're busy both working full-time just to meet ends already. And people are divided, unless all the parents bitch at once nobody cares.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Is this a joke? by imidan · · Score: 1

      I guess my response would be to talk to my kids' teachers, find out if they intend on using this curriculum, keeping my kids out of school on those days when it is covered, and drafting a letter to the teacher, the principal, and the school board. I don't believe that blatant corporate propaganda has any place in education. My kids and I can stay home "sick" on the days when this happens.

    6. Re:Is this a joke? by sjames · · Score: 1

      If you're going to get arrested anyway, throw feces and urine on them. It's what they deserve.

    7. Re:Is this a joke? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I can only speak for my local schools, but the school board tends to be pretty responsive. A pissed-off parent with a reasonable point often gets change, and always has the board members reaching for their Tylenol*.

      * This posting is not endorsed by the Tylenol corporation, which makes no representation as to the accuracy of this post. All reading, discussion, and thought about Tylenol products which may be offensive to anyone or which breaches Tylenol's internal trade-secret free-speech-zone guidelines is strictly prohibited. Copyright 1984, all rights reserved.

    8. Re:Is this a joke? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I was from a small town so maybe this anectdote wouldn't work elsewhere. But when I was in high school we had two mothers get sick of the school board and they ran for it themselves and won. At which point the previously passive board stopped rubberstamping everything the superintendent proposed and there was a distinct overall improvement.

    9. Re:Is this a joke? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, that's cool; I do think it's a small-town-specific story. And we've discussed some stories here where obscene amounts of money have been spent in small-town politics, ISTR even regarding the school board in one case, but no link so I may be misremembering. The thing is, how many parents have enough time and energy for that today?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. How do I get in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So, with me being a private entity with an agenda, how do I get my ideas to be taught at school?

    Is there finally hope that we can teach the toddlers to not use emacs?

    1. Re:How do I get in? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is there finally hope that we can teach the toddlers to not use emacs?

      "Little Mogambo will go to bed tonight with EMACS. There's no cure, but there is hope, through research. Send your generous donation to..."

    2. Re:How do I get in? by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Every toddler should be able to do something useful with their letters like use vi.

    3. Re:How do I get in? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Accepting donations here?

  7. I got an idea... by GrimShady · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe they should teach them other stuff like math, science and reading before consuming resources protecting the income of Justin Beiber. Just sayin...

    1. Re:I got an idea... by imidan · · Score: 1

      I think you have a point. With all of the standardized testing and other requirements, we often hear teachers complaining that there isn't enough time in the school year to cover everything they're supposed to cover. Why would we pile on these propaganda "lessons" that seem to offer negative educational benefit, when we don't have enough time to teach the important lessons?

  8. Corporations and Government by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    working together. There's a word for that.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:Corporations and Government by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Corporations and Government working together. There's a word for that.

      'Merika!

    2. Re:Corporations and Government by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      'MERICA?

    3. Re:Corporations and Government by rsborg · · Score: 1

      working together. There's a word for that.

      I think Benito Mussolini said it best.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  9. How about anti-plagiarism education? by barlevg · · Score: 2

    The real problem with "kids these days" is that the internet has made it easier than ever to copy someone else's work and pawn it off as one's own. Of course, it's also become easier to Google a few sentences of a kid's paper and find that they cribbed it from a website, but even so, this is a pervasive problem. So if you're educating children that taking other people's intellectual property is wrong, how about starting with academic dishonesty and plagiarism?

    1. Re:How about anti-plagiarism education? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      . . .until you run into firms that do this, like "TurnItIn.com". That immediately claims all submitted papers as THEIR intellectual property. . . .

    2. Re:How about anti-plagiarism education? by barlevg · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they don't dispute that the students own their own papers. They just claim that their further sale of the submissions constitutes "fair use."

      To me the horrible thing about TurnItIn is that they run this site as well.

  10. What about getting it into Church as well? by Aguazul2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe it would be better to pay religions to convince the faithful that they will be tortured in Hell for copying things. Religions have a lot more experience with this kind of thing. I mean, WWJD? Would he download that torrent? Really? (Ignoring the incident with the money changer's tables for a moment.)

    1. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WWJD? Make copies of fish and bread and feed everyone. Duh.

    2. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by johanw · · Score: 1

      Sounds like scientology to me...

    3. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 2
      Have you seen the copyright warning in Revelations 22:19?

      And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll.

    4. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like scientology to me...

      Scientology is a mystery religion; this kind of thing was actually quite common in the ancient world, where the specific beliefs of a cult were often restricted to a small group of initiates. (How many of these groups were started by Hubbard-style scam artists? We don't know, but I'm guessing the number was nonzero.) For instance, modern scholars know comparatively little about Mithraism, since the religion was limited to initiates (mostly army veterans) and what little was written down was kept secret and lost when the original copies crumbled. (Ancient texts today are almost all copies of copies, except for a handful preserved by chance in desert climates.) And Mithraism is one of the best-known of the mystery religions; about some others nothing at all can be said.

      Of course, it's a lot harder to keep a religion secret in the Information Age than it was in the late Roman Empire.

      Christianity (and Islam) specifically rejected this notion of religion. From the start they went out of their way to tell everyone, in great detail, exactly what the faith consisted of. (And to argue over it when they disagreed on the details.)

    5. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      That's CC-BY-ND.

    6. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by Anon,+Not+Coward+D · · Score: 1

      ^^^ THIS!

      --
      Sometimes it's better not having signature
    7. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha. C'mon people. This needs a +5 Funny!

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    8. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      You mean "Thou shalt not steal"?

      Or, for the atheists, "don't swipe other people's shit".

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    9. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by Aguazul2 · · Score: 1

      You mean "Thou shalt not steal"?

      Or, for the atheists, "don't swipe other people's shit".

      I suppose if you're being literal, then I would be stealing by watching a trailer for a movie as well? As I am taking a copy of the images in my memory, and yet I don't own them? Or is stealing only when someone else loses something? I don't think religious texts are any better as a basis for deciding what is fair or not fair in this situation.

      When I started campaigning against the record industry's use of corrupted CDs (copy-protected / copy-controlled), I believed I knew what was fair, but when the people on the other side (RIAA/etc) are not in any way interested in fairness, just greed -- then really how can we possibly reach a fair solution? It doesn't exist. They pump the public with advertising to create desire for the product and then push the price as high as it will bear. The collateral damage are the people left with desire but no cash to pay, who are just left to suffer. They don't care about them. But when their dam got a bit leaky, then the whole pump the market thing didn't work so well. So now they corrupt the product and make it into a rootkit, that sounds fair to them, screw everyone else, that's what they do. I don't know how they got anything but what they deserved, and I have zero patience for any complaint from that industry now. If they install a desire in someone through advertising, and the victim resolves that manufactured internal pressure by downloading a file, that just means the old trick doesn't work any more. Their manipulation of people is backfiring. Maybe they need to try something a bit more respectful to be respected in turn. Then maybe things could be different. I'm sure you can find something in the scriptures about "Respect is something you earn".

    10. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      I will never understand that thinking that says someone who expends time, money and effort in creating something is not entitled to control that something and to try to earn a profit from it.

      Boggles the mind.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    11. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by Aguazul2 · · Score: 1

      They are not just paying to have something created and then controlling it to make a profit. They are also attempting to distort the whole world to fit their business model. Should we all allow a Sony rootkit to run on our machines just so that they can protect their property and business model? If they were unchecked there would be no internet. Instead there would be some tightly controlled cable-TV like service which does 1% of what the internet does. There would be no innovation, most of what we know now online would not exist. Is that the kind of world you want to live in? That is what they would create if given half a chance. I do not want to live in your world. Given the choice, I would keep the internet and drop the big media industries and all their 'content'. There is plenty of interest in a world without them.

      Also there are other business models than theirs -- for example here in South America, musicians make money by playing gigs. The music is copied freely on bootleg CDs and online. But people are accustomed to having live music at all major events (weddings, celebrations), and paying for it -- it would be an embarrassment not to have a band (or two). So musicians earn a living, but there is no mega-corp creaming a fat percentage off the top and trying to pass laws to stop movement of information.

      Have you never looked at how this industry works? A musicians 'advance' is nothing of the sort. Rather it is a loan, which the music company aims to spend completely on producing the music and promoting it. The musician sees none of it. When the music starts earning, the musician's profit must pay off all of this loan before he/she sees anything. They are nothing but a bunch of parasites on both musicians and the public. Some musicians work around the edges of the system and avoid the worst of it, though, but it would be no big loss if this all went away completely.

      That you support it suggests that you are badly misinformed -- either that or you are actually working for this industry, in which case I am wasting my time replying.

    12. Re:What about getting it into Church as well? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      I support people not stealing shit.

      If what you describe in SA is legal, so be it; I have no problem then. But here, it's not. If I write a tune and self publish, don't fucking steal it.

      And the industry issues you point out are between the musicians and the industry. You stealing stuff doesn't do anything to help.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  11. Obama by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    Well, yea but, how can we make this Obama's fault?

    1. Re:Obama by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well, yea but, how can we make this Obama's fault?

      Um, ok, I'll bite.

      But really, it's more widespread than that. Were it entirely an Obama problem, we'd only have to live with it for a few more years. For people who actually believe that, I have a shiny new bridge to sell them.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Obama by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      He's the president. The buck stops there.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  12. It's actions like these by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    That make me feel dirty when I actually give money to these big media companies by going out to the theater and paying for content. I shouldn't be sitting in a movie worrying about how the $10 I just paid is going to be spent repressing me.

    1. Re:It's actions like these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You should feel dirty. Stop doing it.

  13. This is nuts! by zyzzyxx · · Score: 1

    I think whoever is allowing this to happen has his/her pockets stashed with RIAA/MPAA fund. This is indoctrination in the most evil sense. I want to ask the executives of RIAA and MPAA who are pushing for this to come forward and given an affidavit that they never copied anything ever in their life. The next thing they will come up with is "You cannot dress like James Bond" because that look is a someone else's idea. We all learn by imitating, this is the easiest and most basic form of learning. I thought California was a state of smart people, but I guess it is now inhabitated by dumb asses.

  14. WTF? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

    How can it possibly be justified to use scarce instructional time on this industry propaganda? California public schools have enough trouble teaching the stuff that society expects and needs them to teach, and they're seriously considering this garbage?

  15. Don't Copy That Floppy by wiredlogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Don't Copy That Floppy campaign has been a marvelous success. Floppy disk piracy is now down 100%. Cali can expect similar success with their initiative.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:Don't Copy That Floppy by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Urrrrgh. So close. Darn you for getting there first.

    2. Re:Don't Copy That Floppy by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I know you're being funny, but personally, I think that copying has gotten a little bit out of hand. It was one thing when we copied floppies from friends. At least they had a copy, or they knew someone who had a copy who they got it from originally. But now, with technologies like BitTorrent, a single person can have a copy of a game, movie or music album, and from that one copy, can effectively transmit it to the entire world. Basically, everyone downloads from a single source. That would have been pretty much impossible in the days of the sneaker net. My uncle had hundreds of copied VHS tapes back in early 90s, but he was also one of Jumbo Video's best customers. Now, I know people with just as many movies, but they haven't spent a single cent that has gone to the movie industry. They simply just pirate everything, from a guy who may have possibly bought a copy (or rented), and then that copy got seeded out to millions of people. That kind of copying just isn't sustainable.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Don't Copy That Floppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They probably haven't actually watched them all either.

      I stopped copying when I got netflix. Too much effort.

    4. Re:Don't Copy That Floppy by AlphaWoIf_HK · · Score: 1

      The problem is nonexistent, and "copying" has not gotten out of hand.

      --
      Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
    5. Re:Don't Copy That Floppy by sjames · · Score: 1

      To be fair, just running off copies was seen as bad form. You needed to at least rip the protection out and preferably graffiti your handle onto the start screen somewhere if you had any class.

    6. Re:Don't Copy That Floppy by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Except that studies show that "pirates" actually spend far *more* money on legal media:

      http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121126/00590921141/dear-riaa-pirates-buy-more-full-stop-deal-with-it.shtml

  16. "To care is not to share" by linebackn · · Score: 1

    The RIAA and MPAA message to children:

    "To care is not to share"

    The message I hope this sends to children is that possessing music or movies, even if legally bought, is potentially dangerous and to be avoided.

    Lets move towards a world that is devoid of song and stories, and forget the fact these were a part of the fabric of humanity for thousands of years.

  17. Re:first questions in the pre-test are... by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you own an eye patch? yes or no
    Do you own a little raft with an outboard motor and an RPG?
    Do you believe the letter "R" is also a word?

    If you answered yes to any of the above, we found our violator.

    Your test makes no sense. So kids with a lazy eye in tiny boats, carrying a copy of D&D are rapists?

  18. The Bieber Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > “Justin Bieber got started singing other people’s songs, without permission, on YouTube. If he had been subjected to this curriculum, he would have been told that what he did was ‘bad, ‘stealing,’ and could have landed him in jail,” says Stoltz.

    I think I speak for everyone when I say that I fail to find the problem in this outcome.

  19. consider the tastes of kids K through 6 by themushroom · · Score: 1

    There will be less piracy of Barney videos and KidzBop disks, but this isn't going to affect Justin Bieber's work much. It's after grade 6 that people start watching and listening to stuff the RIAA and MPAA are annoyed people want to consume without paying for!!

  20. This isn't new by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 1

    Lots of big corporations fund initiatives in schools to get students on board with their agenda. A lot of high schools require a "personal finance" type of class where you get a pretend monthly salary and have to budget like an "adult". The fucked up part is that the program is sponsored by Comcast, ATT, and other big companies and you are required to budget for cable, land line, cell phone, internet, new car, ect... So we're letting big corporations convince high schoolers that being an adult means buying a bunch of shit that you really don't need anymore. You can bet they aren't teaching that you don't need to buy cable or a land line (especially if you cant afford it), you can drive a used car, you can split internet usually with people that live in your apartment building.

    This has been going on for a long time and no one gives a fuck about it. They aren't going to start giving a fuck about it now.

  21. Huh. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    that building on others’ ideas always requires permission

    Well shit, I guess all those games I played on the playground as a child were bad, i never once asked for permission to use them or add new rules.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  22. Re:California by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

    Idealism's got nothing to do with it. "Content creation" (and support) is one of California's largest employers.

  23. Remind me again why schools are funded by taxes? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Remind me again why schools are funded by taxes?

    If they are going to be teaching propaganda instead of teaching them what they're supposed to be teaching them, I think I'd rather have them teaching creationism.

  24. wow by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    It's like they're trying to fail. I guess the same people who choose to stick with a business model that clearly doesn't work anymore, don't have the judgement to create effective deterrents either.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  25. I see a weird parallel in academia by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    with beginning grad students. In papers, they often feel like they have to cite every . last . factual . assertion . and . word . that . they . use, to the point of having paragraphs with 20 citations in them, unreadable. But they're so terrified of "plagiarism" and heard that lecture so many times at the beginning of so many classes that it's hard to talk them out of citing Pythagorus or some writing about him when using the Pythagorean theorem, Perskyi when using the word "television," and so on. Exhausting.

    As an analog to this, they often hesitate to say anything new (i.e. anything they can't find a citation for). It's as though they feel like only institutions and the famous have license to make new things in the world, and then be cited. It recalls for me the similar divide between creators/consumers, with a hard territorial border in between the two camps, that RIAA/MPAA/BSA et. al. have tried to inculcate into the cultural consciousness.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:I see a weird parallel in academia by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      with beginning grad students. In papers, they often feel like they have to cite every . last . factual . assertion . and . word . that . they . use, to the point of having paragraphs with 20 citations in them, unreadable. But they're so terrified of "plagiarism" and heard that lecture so many times at the beginning of so many classes that it's hard to talk them out of citing Pythagorus or some writing about him when using the Pythagorean theorem, Perskyi when using the word "television," and so on. Exhausting.

      As an analog to this, they often hesitate to say anything new (i.e. anything they can't find a citation for). It's as though they feel like only institutions and the famous have license to make new things in the world, and then be cited. It recalls for me the similar divide between creators/consumers, with a hard territorial border in between the two camps, that RIAA/MPAA/BSA et. al. have tried to inculcate into the cultural consciousness.

      This is one of the reasons why I found academic career so off-putting, the idea that research is mainly about citing others, and you can't express anything new by yourself. On the other hand, I haven't thought about this in the anti-piracy context; in research, it's a good idea to check what others have done, precisely so that you don't have to reinvent the wheel - because said wheel is generally freely available scientific knowledge.

      However, today you have more and more "scientific" knowledge behind closed doors because of the way the research was sponsored. Of course, businesses are free to conduct their own research if they want to keep quiet, and it's the universities that are supposedly open. But when you have university research groups sponsored by businesses for their own gain, you get into this weird half-open, half-scientific state. And the really open research is somewhere out there, on and offline, done by hobbyists with few credentials but a much healthier attitude towards science.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  26. Hopefuly parents will have courage by DarkOx · · Score: 2

    Hopefully parents will have the courage to let even their youngest children in on the fact that not everything Teacher says is true. She may even lie.

    Most Americans have WAY to much respect for authority and to strong a faith in government. This might be a good instructive moment.

    Tell the child look your teacher is telling you mommy is a criminal who should be in jail; do thing that's true? Well keep that in mind when the man on TV behind the podium says things about someone like 'snowden' it may or may not be true; so always draw your own conclusions.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Hopefuly parents will have courage by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The sentiments aren't new. For example, here's an excerpt from What Did You Learn in School Today? by hippie-songwriter Tom Paxton:

      What did you learn in school today,
      Dear little child of mine?
      What did you learn in school today,
      Dear little child of mine?

      I learned our government must be strong,
      It's always right and never wrong.
      Our leaders are the finest men,
      So we elect them again and again.
      That's what I learned in school today.
      That's what I learned in school.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  27. Profoundly Immoral and Malevolent by Multipleg · · Score: 1

    How broken does a society have to be to allow corporate interests to determine curriculum? In so many ways the US leads the world in notions of making knowledge available to the public. Try getting the rights to include an image of a painting held in a British museum for an educational documentary, then try getting the rights to one held in a US museum. Is the cultural empire the last leg of US superiority? What happens when we start dancing to pop music from another country and a foreign country exceeds Hollywood in terms of Box Office (China wants to in 5 years)? I can't help think the *AAs and the US govt have a larger agenda than mere downloading of film and music.

  28. Re:first questions in the pre-test are... by paiute · · Score: 1

    Therapists.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  29. Morality lessons in school? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Morality should be taught at home. Leave the three Rs to schools.

    1. Re:Morality lessons in school? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      It's not just morality, it's the law.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  30. Fascism is not Libertarianism by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    In a Libertarian system, there would be no mandatory public schools. You would have the choice of any number of private schools. Don't like the tuition or curriculum? Place your kids in another school. Yes - an oversimplification, but no Libertarians that I know would have Government force anyone into any public school system.

    What you are describing is Fascism. It's a mix of Corporate and Government rule - the worst of all worlds.

    1. Re:Fascism is not Libertarianism by PPH · · Score: 1

      And in a Libertarian system, the MPAA and RIAA and their dark overlords would be on their own to defend their IP. There would be no specific anti-copying legislation (DMCA) and they'd have to stand in line behind the guy reporting the stolen bicycle to file every suit.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Fascism is not Libertarianism by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it looks like we're headed towards no public schools (at least here in NY) and not in a way that is even remotely good. After a round of developmentally inappropriate testing pushed by big businesses (and the politicians they contribute to) to "evaluate" teachers, they found that only 30% of kids passed. So the Governor suggested using the "death penalty" against public schools that didn't pass.

      The only schools that would be left? Private schools and charter schools. The former are fine, but the latter are run by corporations which treat the school like a business. They take public funds but are exempt from the testing and can refuse any student they want to for any reason. (For example, if the student would need special services and so would constitute a "financial burden".) So the governor would turn our state into a system where kids were either taught by businesses or had to pay to get into an expensive private school. If you aren't rich and have a child who requires special services, too bad. (Maybe they'll keep one underfunded public school open to house these kids and so they can point to it as being so horrible and proof that the charter schools are so wonderful.)

      Whatever your opinion of government-run public schools is, surely a business-run public school has got to be worse!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Fascism is not Libertarianism by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      You are injecting an artificial difference that does not logically exist, between a "for profit school", and a "private school."

      Private schools are for profit schools that are selective in which students they will accept.

      For profit schools are for profit schools that are selective in which students they will accept.

      Sounds to me like you are barking up the wrong tree. The issue isn't that the schools are driven with a profit motive, the issue is that you take exception to the school's ability to refuse admission.

      This is a perfectly justified concern, because when no public schools (that have to accept anyone and everyone from a given district) exist anymore, then logically, there will be a resulting demographic of children who are systematically excluded from the "for profit only" school landscapes.

      On the other hand, this is also an unsatisfied demand in the market. That means creating a school that specializes in these "undesirable" pupils would have an assured revinue stream.

      At that point, the complaint changes; all the kids are going to school, but at least one demographic has few if any options, and the one school that specializes in the undesirable kids is essentially a monopoly, and can charge an absurd price, and get away with it.

      True libertarians don't want to acknowledge this last situation, because it clearly paints a portrait of where government regulation is necessary. This is because government regulation of just about anything is considered offensive to diehard libertarians.

      I don't mind the death of public school systems, and the rise of privatized ones in their place, as long as there is regulation forbidding outright castigation of groups of pupils based on any set of criteria. Eg, the schools have to admit any and all students, and the cost burden between a special needs student and a normal tuition paid student has a government assistance program that the school can make use of, paid for by tax money, but with riggorous oversight to punish and discourage abuse.

      But there I go being a moderate centrist again.

  31. RJ Reynolds School of Marketing by imatter · · Score: 1

    We just didn't get to smoke in school.

  32. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hi I have a very simple solution. If this is implemented in my child's school, I will simply keep him home on the days that this "curriculum" is taught. AFAIK public schools need attendance for funding. All you parents out there, we can vote with empty classrooms. Problem solved!

  33. Big companies by Reliable+Windmill · · Score: 1

    Let's leave the creation of content to the big music and movie companies. They only want to dictate our consumption and the development of culture, for our own benefit. Maybe eventually we'll leave all science and innovation to big companies as well, finally freeing the general population from the burden of creativity and thinking. How could this possibly be bad?

    --
    Signature intentionally left blank.
  34. Different message than before by twinvega · · Score: 1

    What ever happened to sharing is caring?

  35. Teddy by chthon · · Score: 1

    "I always do what Teddy says"

  36. Just say no! by swm · · Score: 1

    I think they need a short, pithy slogan to really push their message home.
    One that is tried and true; that has worked well in the past.
    Wait...wait...it's coming to me...ah!

    Just say no.

  37. The Teachers by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If any teacher in the California public school system has even an ounce of self-respect, they will refuse to teach such skewed bullshit to their students.

    Skewed how, you might ask? from TFA:

    [The Internet Keep Safe Coalition's] president, Marsali Hancock, says fair use is not a part of the teaching material because K-6 graders don’t have the ability to grasp it.

    That's not teaching.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  38. The right to read.... by jonr · · Score: 1
  39. Love your educational priorities! by drstevep · · Score: 2
    Ladies and gentlemen of the school board, let's play that ever-fun game, Set Your Priorities!

    And what are our choices for this year? Where should we be spending our time and money? Pick carefully, the ones you want will be included in the curriculum and the ones you don't want won't be taught!
    • Science
    • Library
    • Music
    • Physical well-being
    • How to be good copyright-following citizens
    • How your corporate sponsor creates a great product

    And the winner is....

  40. Why not? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not let the RIAA and MPAA write curriculum? Thanks to Common Core and Race to the Top, we are already paying big businesses such as Pearson tons of money to write curriculum that teachers aren't allowed to veer from. Then we pay these companies more to administer tons of non-developmentally-appropriate tests which parents and teachers are forbidden from seeing. Then, when the kids inevitably fail (in New York, only 30% of kids passed the tests... many of these kids were straight A students who were now considered failures), these companies "helpfully" have textbooks, teacher seminars, extra help sessions for students, instruction for administrators, etc all designed to improve the students' scores on the tests the companies wrote. And all available for a price, of course.

    Don't even get me started on our education commissioner who was looking into taking legal action against parents who refused to let their kids take these tests.

    Then there's the fact that charter schools are being pushed hard. These are schools which take public school funds, but are run by businesses, don't need to take any of the tests, don't require their teachers to have any sort of training in education, can pick and choose which students are allowed in. (Bad grades? You're out. Need special services? You're out.) Politicians seem to love charter schools so much and push them whenever they can. Governor Andrew Cuomo has already suggested using the "death penalty" for public schools that don't pass the overly hard tests. Of course, you can guess what he would replace them with. (No comments from him on what would happen to the kids that the charter schools refused to serve. Would a K-12 education become only for the select few that businesses decide can have it?)

    I have a fifth grader and first grader who are dealing with all of this now so, yes, I might be a bit bitter.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:Why not? by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      Then there's the fact that charter schools are being pushed hard. These are schools which take public school funds, but are run by businesses, don't need to take any of the tests, don't require their teachers to have any sort of training in education, can pick and choose which students are allowed in. (Bad grades? You're out. Need special services? You're out.) Politicians seem to love charter schools so much and push them whenever they can.

      I'm not 100% certain of what New York does for its charters but in most parts of the country, charters are either "first come, first serve" with waiting list and/or they use a random lottery drawing. In general, US special education law prohibits them from discriminating against students with learning or physical disabilities. New York City's famous "Harlem Success" charters use lotteries and actually report higher numbers of special education students than many of the surrounding schools.

      I'm also not sure I'd say charters are popular with politicians. School board elections are, of course, highly political. Most run-of-the-mill voters are only vaguely aware of school board elections so voters generally tune out of school board elections and education policy. The special interest groups who do pay attention to school board races are teachers' unions. Big labor pumps in tremendous amounts of funding for school board candidates favorable to their cause and unions naturally hate charters since charters are generally non-union.

      Governor Andrew Cuomo has already suggested using the "death penalty" for public schools that don't pass the overly hard tests. Of course, you can guess what he would replace them with.

      And the alternative is? What do you propose? Should we simply throw more money at the problem? I would also point out that these "overly hard test" are still generally lighter than what colleges want.

  41. Oh, this brings me back. by Goat+of+Death · · Score: 1

    While I didn't have an entire curriculum dedicated to anti-piracy, I did have to take CompSci as a graduation requirement from my high school. One of our assignments consisted of writing a children's book on the evils of hacking and piracy. Naturally, I took the opportunity to make a complete mockery of the assignment. Mr Peepers and the MegaVirus was the result. Highlights included an over the top evil mastermind wearing an adamantium mask, a virus causing a computer to get so hot it exploded, and impalation on a mounted unicorn head. Oh good times.

  42. Standard Tactical Omission: by DiscountBorg(TM) · · Score: 1

    The RIAA was silent on the standard industry practice of directly ripping off the hard work and experimentation of underground alternative rock and electronic artists without so much an iota of credit.

    (one of countless examples: http://flavorwire.com/newswire/is-kehas-stage-show-ripping-off-the-residents)

    --
    "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
  43. Re:Remind me again why schools are funded by taxes by imidan · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess one of the problems is that in a lot of states, schools are getting a decreasing share of tax dollars. The legislature of the State of Idaho is almost comically opposed to education, K-12 and higher, despite our constitution having included specific language requiring the state to fund public education. The school districts actually had to sue the state, in a case that went all the way to the state supreme court, to force the state to continue to pay for critical maintenance of school buildings (things like making sure the roof doesn't collapse).

    I guess what I'm getting at is that if we don't want corporate funding of schools (and the corporate influence on curricula that inevitably comes with), then we should be adequately funding schools with tax dollars. Perhaps by diverting some money from prisons (which is where a lot of the education money has gone in Idaho).

  44. Did you finish your english homework? by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    No miss, I wrote to the shakespeare estate asking for permission to do a paper on romeo and juliet but their lawyers haven't gotten back to me yet.

  45. When will the high-fructose corn syrup suppliers.. by mr3xcellent · · Score: 1

    get to develop their own curriculum for our kids?

  46. Extending curriculum development by augahyde · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea! I mean, let companies help dictate the curriculum for our kids. We can get Monsanto to handle one on agriculture! How about Walmart on the effects of employee rights and unions?

  47. How about just punishing wrong-doing? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    How about just punishing wrong-doing? When I was a kid, some guys threw a football at a hornet's nest on school grounds. There was the predictable result of everybody running. I got 3 in my jacket, and one of them stung me before I could shake it out. These guys got in trouble eventually.

    There was no call for "hornet's nest education".

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:How about just punishing wrong-doing? by barlevg · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, the parents would sue the school for allowing there to be a hornet's nest on school grounds.

  48. RIAA/MPAA by perles · · Score: 1

    In USA RIAA/MPAA owns you.

  49. First teach it to teachers by earlzdotnet · · Score: 1

    The hilarious irony of this is how many teachers are committing "piracy". My math teacher had an old out of print workbook that he would make copies of(single pages, not the whole thing) and hand out to the class as homework because the workbook had better problems than our current text book. My choir teacher made copies of music clearly marked with "DO NOT COPY" because it was out of print and there was no way to get a legal copy of it anymore. My English teacher copied an excerpt of a story out of one of her old text books that are no longer used and handed it out to the class.

    So yea... this is an extremely stupid idea

  50. Re:Remind me again why schools are funded by taxes by Arker · · Score: 1

    "Remind me again why schools are funded by taxes?"

    Because this gives them an effective monopoly to better ensure that the children of the poor and middle class are indoctrinated in corporate-statism early and thoroughly.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  51. Re:Copyrights brainwashing NOT ENOUGH? by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Would you shoplift a book from the book store? Why not?

    It's the same IP, just stored on a different medium.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  52. Homo Corporaticus by rysiek · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget this little gem: Facebook is trying to get into classrooms as an educational tool. Not only will the childre learn from a RIAA-approved curriculum, they will use only corporate, closed walled gardens as their learning and social platform. They will not know a world outside corporate control. For decades here in the Central Europe there was a special name for the perfect Soviet citizen: Homo Sovieticus. Not only does the corporatocracy in the United States (and the rest of the world, increasingly) create a Homo Corporaticus, it creates it in the image of the Eastern counterpart. Oh, it would be so funny had it not been so sad.

  53. It doesn't surprise me by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    I worked for California schools for 4 years as a technical consultant. It hurts me deeply to say, especially since my first son is just starting Kindergarten, that these schools really are going to go with whatever is recommended to them at the highest corporate/political level. I helped bring LTSP and thus Linux to thousands of elementary school kids over this period as a pilot (and after successful pilot, transition from aging Windows PCs in media/computer labs) in 7 schools. It felt so amazing for me to have the honor of exposing this many children to open source software. But, after the acting technoogy director retired, a new one stepped in and quickly pulled the plug on the whole setup, reverting back to Windows.

    It's the same at deeply rooted non-profits for kids. I worked for Boys & Girls Clubs in California, doing the same thing - in addition to LTSP, though, we also had Linux on the back-end fileserver and firewall. It was a great setup. Then, we heard that Microsoft suddenly (and unexpectedly) had given them a grant for new PCs, on the condition that Windows was the only OS installed, and they essentially weren't allowed to "tinker" with them.

    The RIAA and MPAA are very large and rich corporations. They have that much money to throw at conditioning young children that software is something that comes with many restrictions and cannot be shared freely, modified or "tinkered" with. Schools will go along with it as long as there's a benefit for them. The moral standing of the people at the top of the education system's pyramid aren't exactly the best, from what I've experienced, and I'm sure many of them have very close ties with other "industry" executives. Scratch my back, I'll scratch yours. Makes me think of "National Lampoon's Senior Trip". Ha!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  54. all in all.. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    All in all it's just another brick in the wall

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  55. First Step: Pirate the curriculum. by moxley · · Score: 1

    First Step: Pirate the curriculum.
    Step 2: Post to internet, create memes
    Step 3: Ridicule curriculum to the point that it's worthless.
    Step 4: Profit?

  56. Re:Try again... by nbauman · · Score: 2

    the U.S. was created very explicitly with the premise that [1] there is a God [2] that this God gave freedom and dignity to each individual (therefore the individual matters)

    Boy, did you get your history wrong. Did they teach the First Amendment where you went to school?

    and [3] those individuals LEND limited power to government .

    Which is it, Christ or Ayn Rand? Can't have both.

  57. Why are we blaming the RIAA/MPAA? by Monsuco · · Score: 2

    The fact that a couple of antiquated cartels are trying to cling desperately to their obsolete business model isn't surprising. The only thing that is surprising is that the State of California is cooperating. If the MPAA / RIAA want to spread an anti-piracy message to children, let them buy advertising time on Nickelodeon, Disney & Cartoon Network. I don't really have a problem with their message, I just see no reason for the state to spend its resources to spread it.

  58. Re:first questions in the pre-test are... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Tobias: No, no, it’s pronounced a-nal-ra-pist.
    Buster: It wasn’t really the pronunciation that bothered me.

  59. So WHO'S GONNA PAY FOR IT? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Where's the funding coming from? Are my kids going to be getting "just say no" lectures when they should be having art or music class instead?

  60. We don't need corporate proselytizing in classes.. by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

    We need media literacy as a core skill taught in all levels of education. "Who is bringing this message to you?" "What do they want you to believe or do after receiving this message?" "How do the parties responsible for bringing you this message benefit if you accept its message?" "Who disagrees with this message, and what do they have to say about it?"

    "Intellectual property" as a moral right that never expires wasn't put into the Constitution. It was created by lobbyists, robber-barons, and corporations. Copyright that lasts forever is illegal, so the goal is "forever minus one day" which is effectively the same thing but looks better in the courts. It's time to tell the RIAA and MPAA companies that enough is enough, and to curb their power to turn participatory culture into mere consumerism by putting an end to never-ending copyright terms. Cut it off at five years - no extensions - and be done with it.

    Copyright law was originally written to enrich the public domain, not impoverish it. Now, all it does is the latter.

  61. Re:Copyrights brainwashing NOT ENOUGH? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    Are you advocating that people should be arrested and charged with shoplifting if they go into a bookstore, read a chapter of a book, and put it back deciding they don't like it? After all, they get the same IP and they didn't pay for it...

  62. Re:I am one of those students by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    Holy crap! At PSU (graduated 2012) we only got the plagiarism talk in writing-intensive classes, and while I don't remember the exact rules there was no instant-fail of the course unless you were caught multiple times. You'd instantly fail the assignment if they had direct proof you plagiarized a significant potion of it. Otherwise they'd maybe write a note that you need to cite your sources and take a couple points off.

  63. Hey Kids! by zappa420 · · Score: 1

    "Hey Kids... Everybody having a greeeaaatttt day???? Raise your hands if you've seen Mom or Dad ever use a program called Utorrent. It looks like this," "Hey Johnny, you've done fantastic today, so fantastic that you've won a free game!!!! Just plug his free usb stick into your Moms computer and hit Next and Ok and you'll get to play this great new free game!"

  64. Re:Both of you are wrong. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    The taxes pay for SOME of what's needed, but the schools are under funded. That means they are NOT being funded by taxes, they're being *partially* funded by taxation.

    So if it's part taxes, why is it that part of the curriculum being set by commercial interests and private industry a diatribe against paying taxes for it? If you don't like the propaganda from private industry PAY MORE FOR YOUR SCHOOLS.

    I'd be happy to pay more for schools. Let's take the funding out of the money that''s going to systemic corruption and non-cash-balance public pensions, rather than being some evil organizations bitch.

  65. How many geeks does it take to justify stealling? by SQLGeezer · · Score: 1

    We had anti-piracy education when I was a kid. It went like this: "Stealing is wrong. Don't do it. There will be bad consequences if you do, and good consequences if you don't." Our society creates technology to make taking something you didn't buy or create easy and at the same time relegate personal ethics to the trash can. But, really, this is great commentary. Absolutely hilarious. And while you're at it, get off my friggin lawn.

  66. Homeschool by CodeHxr · · Score: 1

    This has to be one of the best reasons for yanking kids out of school and turning to homeschooling that I've ever heard! (Barring specific medical conditions, etc.)

  67. Re:We don't need corporate proselytizing in classe by CodeHxr · · Score: 1

    It's time to tell the RIAA and MPAA companies that enough is enough, and to curb their power to turn participatory culture into mere consumerism by putting an end to never-ending copyright terms.

    I'm all for this. How do we do it? Especially if they're even half as entwined with the government as the tin foils suggest...

  68. Re:We don't need corporate proselytizing in classe by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

    I don't think you enter tinfoil land by acknowledging how law is written in this country, and by whom. Industry lobbyists frequently come to Congress with exactly the legislation they want already written.

    I presume that since this issue is (briefly) referenced in the Constitution, it would probably require a Constitutional Amendment to alter in any meaningful way that isn't continued extension:

    Article I, Section 8, Clause 8

    To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

    I discussed this a bit in a blog post, SOPA, the Open Act, and Copyright: A Five Year Plan and flesh it out there a bit more than I do here. The Amendment process is probably the only way this can ever happen because it's the only method that doesn't count on Congress doing the morally defensible thing.

  69. Think of the children! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    No, seriously.

    Schools are free to not use it, not pay for it. No one is putting a gun to their head.

    So then, are the kids in those schools similarly free to not use it, and not be subjected to it?

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Think of the children! by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? The administration is there to make that decision for the kids. Yes, kids in schools have these decisions made for them. That's why they are in school.

      You are free to run for the school board or attend the meetings and make your objections known. You can start an information campaign in the community. You can try to get the School Board members recalled. And who do you think creates the curriculum? Former and current educational professionals.

      You have to give up this knee jerk, "business is bad' bullshit.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  70. Not at all a conflict of interest! by bitterblackale · · Score: 1

    Because the Motion Picture Association of America are totally unbiased when it comes to interpretation of intellectual property law.

  71. Re:Copyrights brainwashing NOT ENOUGH? by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Bad analogy.

    Copying the movie or tune is the same as stealing the book.

    Standing the bookstore and reading the book is a pretty classless thing to do, but it's not stealing. Listening to a tune on the radio is actually part of the marketing plan as they believe you will want to buy it for yourself. Same with watching a movie. You can take it with you in your head, but you can't show it to someone else.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  72. Re:Copyrights brainwashing NOT ENOUGH? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    Who said anything about showing it to someone else? I was talking about possession, not distribution.

  73. Re:Copyrights brainwashing NOT ENOUGH? by sycodon · · Score: 1

    For all but a few people, watching or hearing is a far cry from possession. Maybe for the Rain Man.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.