Slashdot Mirror


Report: YouTube Buying Twitch.tv For $1 Billion

Variety reports that Google's YouTube unit has reached a deal with Twitch.tv to buy the game-streaming service for $1 billion. From the article: "The deal, in an all-cash offer, is expected to be announced imminently, sources said. If completed the acquisition would be the most significant in the history of YouTube, which Google acquired in 2006 for $1.65 billion. ... YouTube is preparing for U.S. regulators to challenge the Twitch deal, according to sources. YouTube is far and away the No. 1 platform for Internet video, serving more than 6 billion hours of video per month to 1 billion users worldwide, and the company expects the Justice Department to take a hard look at whether buying Twitch raises anticompetitive issues in the online-video market."

142 comments

  1. So, my bet: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For mysterious reasons that will be 'explained' only by spokesweasels emitting word salad, this will become the Big Bad Scary antitrust issue of the day, while the rapid consolidation of physical network infrastructure (despite the radically higher barriers to entry) will quietly recede into the background.

    1. Re:So, my bet: by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      Why would regulators care at all about this deal? Twitch isn't a public company.

    2. Re:So, my bet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YouTube has a streaming service, but they don't lead in streaming as far as I know (there are restrictions to prevent anonymous people from showing potentially obscene videos).

    3. Re:So, my bet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YouTube has a streaming service, but they don't lead in streaming as far as I know (there are restrictions to prevent anonymous people from showing potentially obscene videos).

      Ok, I couldn't think of any other (streaming) video services than TwitchTV and Youtube, till your post, I forgot about the sex market which is huge.

    4. Re:So, my bet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Antitrust laws. Microsoft had trouble with them years back. The idea behind these laws is to promote competition between companies, so if a giant tries to buy their only competitor and become, effectively, a monopoly, the government can step in and block the deal.

    5. Re:So, my bet: by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      I'm slightly confused.... is Youtube buying Twitch or is Google's wholly owned subsidiary (Youtube) buying Twitch?

      The end result might be the same, but it seems to me that how the acquisition is reported should be relevant.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:So, my bet: by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      So... you don't understand the definition of 'wholly owned subsidiary' then?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:So, my bet: by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I would be surprised if this becomes an anti-trust issue. If it does, then it means Google hasn't been paying off their politicians, or those politicians are trying to shake Google down for more. But Google has been paying off the politicians, so no worries there.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:So, my bet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because Twitch already has a history of anticompetitive behavior. Using your market dominance to force streamers to sign exclusive deals isn't exactly legal.
      No-one really cares when Twitch does it but if YouTube keeps up the practice it is not unlikely that Daily-motion will ask EU to do something about it.

    9. Re:So, my bet: by rhodium_mir · · Score: 0

      Roman you beslubbering folly-fallen mumble-news. The destruction of individual property rights in these United States began with Brom and Bett v. Ashley. When government uses it's monopoly on violence to deprive individuals of their farm equipment it necessarily tramples human rights because government's mere existence is slavery.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    10. Re:So, my bet: by badzilla · · Score: 1

      I never understood why Verisign was allowed to buy Thawte, who were their only realistic competition.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    11. Re:So, my bet: by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      A "truly free market" is an anarchy, and the most powerful players will abuse their freedom to remove everyone else's freedom. Anarchy leads to feudalism. The only way that humanity has discovered to control the power of the powerful (and therefore to avoid feudalism) is to regulate it in a governmental structure.

    12. Re:So, my bet: by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure publicly traded has anything to do with it. I'm still not seeing the connection to anti- trust suit it's not like there is a shortage of user content streaming sites. From what I could tell twitch is actually focused on games and game reviews which is more of a nitch site than general user content streaming site. I've never even heard of twitch before now but I have heard of daily-motion, vimeo, metacafe, and veoh. I know there are more sites.

    13. Re:So, my bet: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarians are so cute. They're so angry, privileged and stupid. It's adorable!

    14. Re:So, my bet: by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      If your comments had any value then surely the free market would deal with the daily limit issue. Must be Nixon's fault somehow.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    15. Re:So, my bet: by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      More importantly, Twitch and Youtube currently offer mostly different services ... so this adds a new service to Google, it doesn't extend a current one.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  2. TwitchPlaysPokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bummer =/

    This channel has been suspended due to multiple copyright claims from Nintendo of America.

    1. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's ok, but next game is going to be full of "how is poky formed?"

    2. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by tepples · · Score: 2

      Nintendo is reportedly far more likely to claim videos in "advertise" mode than in "block" mode.

    3. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Georules · · Score: 2

      You might be surprised. They seem to have very little understanding that streams and video content generated by fans is good for advertising.

    4. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would i buy the game after i see someone else play it terribly and it looks stupid?

    5. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as they are supporting integrated software with Mario Kart 8 to edit and upload gameplay highlight videos directly to Youtube, you might be the one that's surprised.

    6. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Jmc23 · · Score: 2

      Same reason you'd go out and play football, US football, baseball,basketball, etc... because it's fun to play even though boring to watch.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      You realize Twitch pulls streams for DMCA complains quite often right? The site lives because the content creators don't complain, when they do their games get pulled. Pretty much the only time it happens is people trying to stream beta or pre-release versions of games.

    8. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they will only pull DCMA on people that complain about the game or show it in a bad light.

    9. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Krojack · · Score: 1

      SQUARE ENIX is the same way. Their ToS over FF14 videos is pretty strict. They don't seem to be enforcing them right now but they could at any point.

      Do what Blizzard did and allow big flexibility with using videos and images. It helps get the game out there everywhere. Blizzard even had a set of rules on how you can use images for your own personal website for the game.

    10. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're on the wrong site.

    11. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Georules · · Score: 1

      I have bought far more games based on gameplay I watched a fan play on a stream or video than those I have just "heard of". This is the nearly same thing as seeing a game at a friend's house and then wanting it yourself. It's just that this is done on the internet now.

    12. Re:TwitchPlaysPokemon by Georules · · Score: 1

      I am surprised actually. I hope this is a sign that they will halt takedowns; like shutting down fan SSB Melee tournaments, youtubers, etc.

  3. wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    it seems like the only one not making a billion dollars these days is me...

    1. Re:wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can sleep soundly knowing that your money is flowing into these big corporations coffers so that they can blow it on $1B tech-bubble purchases and outrageously inflated CxO salaries.

      Let's call it "trickle up theory".

  4. Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    the amount of cash it costs to make live video is not cheap twitch is not really a money maker look at other game streaming sites they all went bottom up becouse of that reason.

    twich doesnt have a ton of users compared to youtube and the biggest streams usually dont do twitch advertising but get sponsorship deals.

    on the other hand google does have the servers available for it so if the rumour is true (which i doubt) it could be cheaper then expected to run the service

    1. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Twitch.tv however has a lot of profitable users. People actually subscribe and pay money on monthly basis, PER CHANNEL and portion of that goes to twitch.tv.

      Youtube on the other hand has a lot of users, but they are nowhere near as lucrative. It comes with twitch's role as a very specialized service.

    2. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well using numbers from 2013 when i was hanging a lot with streamers twitch pays per 1000 views of an ad between 3 to 5 dollar (depending on the ad shown and the viewer location and other factors) to the streamer most streamers run about 3 ads in a block and do it between 1 to 3 times per hour.

      sub buttons on the other hand is a one time fee per month of 4,99 of which you get 2,50

      ads are actually way more profitable then the sub button for the streamer and for twitch

      sub buttons are also pretty easy to get its almost to the point of create channel message twitch staff you want a sub button and once you filled in your paperwork and send it in it will appear within 2 weeks. subbing to a stream usually gives you nothing but vanity items like a special icon in front of your nickname in chat and the ability to chat when the channel gets put into sub only mode. All the other "benefits" are made by the streamer like sub only give-aways or other competitions and prices

      beeing a partner (ability to run ads) is more difficult you need a certain number of average viewers and a certain number of subscribers to your channel then its the same type of paperwork as the sub button.

      beeing a twitch partner also gives you benefits IF your channel is popular enough like having the ability to switch quality (mobile,low,medium,high, source) but what i heard is that twitch doesnt like to give out high quality options to low popularity partners which can cause problems with more growth of your twitch channel. I have heard horror stories where streamers that where partners only got the option to choose between source and low quality and if you stream very high quality source that leaves a portion of your viewers stuck with low quality as the only option without skipping frames.

      There is also a less discussed 3rd option which is called Twitch Turbo which costs the twitch user 8,99 per month gives nothing to the stream your watching, no advertisements and a icon. Most streamers hate the turbo users because they are pretty much paid ad blocking and taking revenue out of the pocket of the streamer. To the defence of those Turbo users they usually get turbo and also buy a subscription to their favourite channel(s).

    3. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      About Turbo, directly from Twitch:
      " Pays broadcasters for invisible ads "

    4. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by GeorgieBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      A couple things:

      - As someone else mentioned, Twitch Turbo users simply removes adds for the viewer, but does NOT affect the channel operator's ad revenue. Users get the "Turbo" icon in chat
      - Channel subscribers get access to subscriber emotes in chat (usable across all of Twitch) in addition to the subscriber icon for that channel, and sub-only chat (if applicable - generally only streamers that have very high simultaneous viewers enable this, to keep chat usable for subscribers).
      - "Transcodes", i.e. quality options of low/medium/high in addition to "Source", can become available when a channel reaches a certain threshold of simultaneous viewers. While having partnership can mean the streamer always has them, it is NOT required for transcodes to become available.

    5. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because, you know, the left never lies, defrauds, or prevaricates..

    6. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by vitaflo · · Score: 1

      As a friend who has over 1 million subscribers on Youtube and streams 20 hours per week on Twitch told me:

      "Youtube is like Hollywoood, Twitch is Indie film."

      Like you I would have guessed the opposite, but Youtube is much more lucrative for the content creator when your subscriber base is high.

    7. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Twitch picked up a lot of users recently though.

      Between the PS4 and Xbone, both of which can stream and upload to twitch, that's probably at least a million content producers out there. And that doesn't include all the content producers twitch had to band for non-gaming-related content.

      What will likely happen is a lot of that migrates to YouTube - so all those PS4 sex shows that were on twitch will just be on YouTube instead (since the PS4 doesn't, at least I don't think, support YouTube yet for content producers. You can watch YouTube videos, but you can't record with the PS4 and upload to YouTube. Though maybe the last update solved that).

      And gamers will seek gamer content - if you're on the PS4 or Xbone, switching to YouTube to figure out how to defeat that boss is par for the course. In other words, there's a guaranteed audience looking for guaranteed content.

      Hell, I'd like to watch twitch, but the 30 second beer commercials every 30 seconds got tiresome fast. (Especially for crap mass-produced American beer, and I don't drink, so it was wasted advertising money).

    8. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The caveat is pretty hilarious though. "When subscriber base is high".

      How many people can claim a high subscriber base? The entire point of Twitch is that it lets you monetize niche content that won't attract millions.

    9. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      (since the PS4 doesn't, at least I don't think, support YouTube yet for content producers. You can watch YouTube videos, but you can't record with the PS4 and upload to YouTube. Though maybe the last update solved that).

      The PS4 doesn't support direct upload to youtube directly on the PS4....yet. You can, thanks to that 1.70 update, save to the hard drive, transfer the file to USB storage, then attach that to a PC for youtube upload.

    10. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Well, on the upside, at lest Google has deep enough pockets to afford to pay Comcast/Time-Warner to stream Twitch at a decent rate. Pretty soon the only video most of us will be able to see without constant buffering will be Netflix, YouTube/Twitch, and maybe Amazon and Hulu.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    11. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Isn't Twitch the official streaming app for the XboxOne? (Isn't there something there with PS4 too?)

      I bet the deals that allowed those service hooks to happen helped lock-in some positive margin on those users.

    12. Re:Twitch is not exactly a money maker by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      There is also a less discussed 3rd option which is called Twitch Turbo which costs the twitch user 8,99 per month gives nothing to the stream your watching, no advertisements and a icon. Most streamers hate the turbo users because they are pretty much paid ad blocking and taking revenue out of the pocket of the streamer. To the defence of those Turbo users they usually get turbo and also buy a subscription to their favourite channel(s).

      You have no idea how Turbo works.

      Turbo gives 100% fill rate for ads. That is, every time a broadcaster's channel would play an ad, Twitch pays the broadcaster as if the Turbo user had seen an ad. 100% fill rate is essentially unheard of otherwise simply because there aren't enough ads in every region for every quarter.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
  5. What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought only Microsoft and Apple bought companies for their technology? Google is doing it AGAIN?!?!
     
    Where'z teh innovations!?!?!?!!1111?!

    1. Re:What happened? by GNious · · Score: 1

      Don't worry - they'll innovate this right into YouTube and G+!

      (assuming the rumor of this deal is true, and it goes through)

  6. Twitch could use the help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just not from Google. I hope this deal gets shot down.

    1. Re:Twitch could use the help by Bengie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, maybe Comcast or Verizon instead.

  7. This could ROCK! by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 2

    Checkbox: Automatically convert your archived videos to Youtube.com videos permanently?

    1. Re:This could ROCK! by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Wish they would, even in the mobile app you cannot watch archived material; if it's not live you can't see.

    2. Re:This could ROCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a bully :(

  8. All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Sarusa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since by YouTube's standards, everything on Twitch is a 'copyright violation' (streaming footage of a video game and completely ignoring that most of it is Fair Use with added content) I really have to wonder how they intend to deal with the corporate trolls who are now going to descend on Twitch like the vultures they are.

    I imagine that will involve giving most of the money currently going to the content creators to the copyright asserters. The RIAA model.

    1. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then another Twitch will rise in its place.

    2. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by MikeJones8766 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And then another Twitch will rise in its place.

      Just like the other youtube...o wait.

    3. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like another youtube is rising in its place?

    4. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is already another Twitch called Hitbox.

    5. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Less buffering, faster and a better UI.

    6. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then another Twitch will rise in its place.

      Just like the other youtube...o wait.

      "Everything in the world is a moisture barrier," or something equally nonsensical.

      Copyright infringement can be *anything.*

    7. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      "All right guys you're about to get to watch us charge in! GET READY TO ROCK" *This stream brought to you by applewood meats, enjoy this 3 minute commercial*

    8. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      many of the games you see on twitch are endorsed by the publishers, some even have built in twitch streaming in game so at the very least they will retain a huge user base just in those games without any worry. I also suspect most game developers wouldn't attach twitch because that would alienate them more than normal copywrite trolling does

    9. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other youtube is Twitch you idiot, why do you think they are buying them?

    10. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were multiple "other Twitch" running alongside it earlier. They all died and Twitch now owns practically the whole Western streaming market.

    11. Re: All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by Teranolist · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what you're talking about, right?

    12. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Same way they deal with the corporate trolls that are presumably all over their existing gaming channels on YouTube. I subscribe to five or six different Minecraft channels, two KSP channels, I've watched several GTA V playthroughs online, all on YouTube, all legit, all generating ad revenue.

    13. Re:All of Twitch is a 'Copyright Violation' by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      They do use flash though, which sucks. I've never understood why these new services use obsolete technology like this.

  9. Embrace. Extend. by Snufu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Extinguish.

    1. Re:Embrace. Extend. by ruir · · Score: 1

      This whole affair reeks. Besides a big break on the fiscal taxes, does this affair has any practical effects?

    2. Re:Embrace. Extend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's becoming SOP for Google and its many drones. And people still want an Android monoculture with this taken into consideration?

    3. Re:Embrace. Extend. by swillden · · Score: 1

      Extinguish.

      Why would Google extinguish it?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  10. What does this mean for justin.tv? by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know Twitch TV and Justin TV are closely linked. I think in fact that Twitch is an offshoot of JTV and the user accounts are shared. Is YouTube buying JTV as well, will JTV go on independently, or will JTV be shut down?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:What does this mean for justin.tv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is from February:

      Twitch today announced that Twitch Interactive, Inc. is replacing Justin.tv, Inc. as the company’s corporate umbrella name. Justin.tv will remain as a mature product of Twitch Interactive. The name change comes off of Twitch's continued growth, seeing now more than one million monthly active broadcasters and averaging 13 billion minutes watched per month.

      So I guess it's in the pack.

  11. This could ROCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah! Lolz! Videoz! They can have my harddrivez if I can watch videoz! Woot! I'm a teenager and I don't vote because... Videoz!

  12. In a related story. . . by kimvette · · Score: 0

    In related news, it appears Yahoo still has cash reserves to spend on more failures.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:In a related story. . . by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      YouTube != Yahoo

    2. Re:In a related story. . . by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      google owns youtube genius

  13. Anticompetitive when its free? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    How can it be anticompetitive when its a free service?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Anticompetitive when its free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scintillating logic!

      You should have been on Microsoft's legal team team during the IE anti-trust trail.

    2. Re:Anticompetitive when its free? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Your second sentence seems to contradict the first. Microsoft never made any money from Internet Explorer. Making money has nothing to do with monopolistic practice, in fact monopolistic practices lose money all the time in order to maintain a lock on a more lucrative market. It's pretty much the definition. If someone's losing money (e.g. manufacturing consoles at a loss) then they are doing it in order to gain market share (possibly to acquire or maintain a monopoly) in something else (e.g. console games).

  14. Should the competition be... by ChanceCallahan · · Score: 1

    Twitching in fear?

  15. TwitchTV could use a tech infusion by k8to · · Score: 1

    Maybe google can find a way to make the video streaming less awful. They can hardly make it worse!

    --
    -josh
    1. Re:TwitchTV could use a tech infusion by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Maybe google can find a way to make the video streaming less awful. They can hardly make it worse!

      They will just have the automated copyright system flag everything and mass DMCA the lot. But look at the up side: No more buffering or stream delays!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  16. Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by InsultsByThePound · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back when I was a kid the last millenium (80-90s), a billion as a lot of money. It was a domain that only Bill Gates and a handful of other chosen few were allowed to occupy. Now every damn internet start up is getting a billion each at least, often in the double digits.

    Shit with absolutely no real world business prospects to justify the price they command. Are we in Internet bubble 2.0?

    1. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it helps you put into perspective what $1 billion is, the bribes expected to be paid to the government "regulators" will probably only amount to $250,000. Which is a rounding error in the entire deal package.

      America: even our corruption is done as cheaply as possible.

    2. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're not part of the billion dollar club, then you're just a poor millionaire. Make less then that you say? You don't even fucking exist and not worth mentioning anyways.

      The rich are at war with each-other, and the rest of us are just casualties in statistics.

      Good morning gentleman! Have a biscuit on me.

      ~Anonymous.

    3. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 2

      Maybe it really isn't shit today and the US currency has actually devalued this much? Compare it to the Euro (which also devaluated), the price of crude oil, the Japanese Yuen, the Chinese Renmibi, the price of iron ore, the price of gold and a few others to see for yourself. You'll find that you may be right in both cases. Yes, the US dollar has devaluated quite a lot and yes, the prices paid for "strategic acquisitions" are way inflated. A few will get rich because of this and a lot of shareholders will lose on the stock market once the share price will go down once the hype is over. Whether it is smart to own stock or dollars now and when or if to sell is up to you, but I'm not investing in those companies or the US dollar myself at the moment.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    4. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      Shit with absolutely no real world business prospects to justify the price they command. Are we in Internet bubble 2.0?

      Twitch is currently profitable and has very real business prospects. They are actually competing quite well for viewers with TV, and that's pretty damned impressive for a site that streams people playing video games. For the young male demographic, Twitch outperforms quite a few of the larger cable TV stations in prime time and they are growing fast. They have very real business prospects, as long as something doesn't happen to derail them. The problem right now is that they are a victim of their own success and they need capital to grow. I think that's why they are shopping themselves around. Which is great! Except I'm afraid of two things: 1) whoever buys them will screw them up (Google does not have a good track record in this regard) and 2) it will draw more attention from big media and we will start to see copyright issues erode their success. I mean, just look at late last year for a perfect example of what can go wrong. Youtube almost destroyed their gaming channels with changes to their automated copyright system. Sega and Nintendo have also been bizarrely hostile to the community on Youtube as well.

      Considering some of the other crazy deals lately (What's App for $19 Billion for example) Google picking up Twitch for $1 billion would be a steal.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Twitch.tv are pretty big. They can get 50-100k live viewers on dota 2 streams, which are typically hours long. That has to be worth something.

      Or League of Legends. That game can pull in over a million live viewers at times. Hell the "finals" last year pulled in over 32 million. Most TV broadcasts outside the Super Bowl can't pull that off.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    6. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Warma · · Score: 1

      Million live views for a game stream sounds incredibly inflated. I'd like to see a bit of proof.
      I understand that LoL probably has around 50 million players, but it would still mean, that one in fifty players would have watched that stream. This is a lot, at least when I compare to other big tournaments (Starcraft, MtG, etc.) and the amounts of people they pull in to watch their streams.

    7. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Shit with absolutely no real world business prospects to justify the price they command. Are we in Internet bubble 2.0?

      Video advertising is big money, which is why so many websites are scrambling to get video content lately. Twitch.tv, with an audience that actually watches commercials, absolutely could be making money, might possibly even be profitable already.

      Really, sometime go check how much it costs per impression for a video ad.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Zelucifer · · Score: 2

      They actually hit 8.5 million concurrent viewers in late 2013 for the LoL World Champions in late 2013. 32 million total viewers. They have 26 million players a day, 67 million a month.

      --
      The corner of a round room
    9. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Warma · · Score: 2

      That is incredible. After learning that, I actually had to check what kind of prizes they are dealing out...
      and now I can't even begin to fathom how much money Riot is making.

    10. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually hit 8.5 million concurrent viewers in late 2013 for the LoL World Champions in late 2013. 32 million total viewers. They have 26 million players a day, 67 million a month.

      Well, that is nice. The problem is that once you start looking at Twitch viewer numbers it things start to look unreasonable.
      To me it looks like they are just applying a multiplier on the viewer numbers. That is nice since it doesn't skew where the target audience is.
      The thing is that I live in a fairly small country (There are cities in the US with a larger population number.) but the interest in competitive game is pretty large.
      That means when you apply a multiplier globally everything looks fine until you realize that the number of viewers exceeds the possible target audience.

    11. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Back when I was a kid the last millenium (80-90s), a billion as a lot of money.

      $1 Billion USD in 1988, would be $2 Billion today (2014). Not an astronomical difference... Those poor, poor $500 millionaires would be billionaires now. Big damn whoop.

      Now every damn internet start up is getting a billion each

      No, only an extremely select few, and those are the ones you hear about in big stories like this one. Lots of successful startups get bought for far less, and most of it goes to pay off debts, leaving relatively modest profits for the investors.

      Besides, there's a world of difference between INDIVIDUALS who have $1 Billion dollars in assets, and a BUSINESS having that amount... There were plenty of Billion-dollar corporations in the 1980s.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's the Japanese Yen and Chinese Yuan.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      I remember when ONE MILLION DOLLARS was a lot of money.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    14. Re:Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we in Internet bubble 2.0?

      Yes.

  17. pure entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I haven't laughed so hard since Apple bought Beats.

    1. Re:pure entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple buying Beats was actually a brilliant move which is why Tim Cook is CEO of Apple and not you.

    2. Re:pure entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well fuck yeah. AC says it's true so it is! Let's not post any kind of information to support a ludicrous claim. Nah, we'll take your word for it. Did you ever stop to think that Tim Cook is CEO BECAUSE THE OTHER ONE FUCKING DIED and he was the best guy they could promote on short notice?

  18. Why is twitch popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can certainly understand the appeal of watching game replays and "let's plays" - heck I watch them myself. But why is live playing popular? In particular, why is it sufficiently popular that it's worth $1B in Google change?

    It's kinda amazing Google feels Twitch is worth $1B at all (assuming the report is true). Are people so depressed with life that they must obsess with games to the point where a games-related company can be valued that much? No wonder we're so far behind on actually important tech - all the money's going to gaming. And I say this as an occasional gamer.

    1. Re:Why is twitch popular? by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hell, I don't even get why people watch athletics on tv. Talk about dull. I'd rather play the damn sports casually than just watch it on tv.

    2. Re:Why is twitch popular? by DMJC · · Score: 2

      THIS. E-sports is the next big media spectacle. It's like the Olympics, for people who can't enjoy sports but who enjoy watching gaming.

    3. Re:Why is twitch popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching a video game replay has to be the most boring thing ever.
      I would rather watch golf or fishing (which is saying something as those are extremely boring too).
      Seriously, I don't understand why people enjoy watching other people doing activities that they can do themself.
      I would much rather play a game of baseball than watch it. I understand certain sports like
      cage fighting where you might rather watch it than participate but why do people watch video
      game replays when they can just play the game themself?

    4. Re:Why is twitch popular? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I can certainly understand the appeal of watching game replays and "let's plays" - heck I watch them myself. But why is live playing popular?

      That's what I've been wondering about myself. Twitch.tv - integration in games is seemingly a growing trend, yet I've never had even the slightest of urges to broadcast my gaming-sessions, let alone sit there with a finger up my ass watching as someone else plays. Where the fuck is the fun in that?

      And I say this as an occasional gamer.

      I say the above as a pretty much addicted/hardcore gamer.

    5. Re: Why is twitch popular? by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      I watch zisteau's inferno mines (and others) recently. Practically, i learn new techniques, ideas, etc.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    6. Re:Why is twitch popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People watch pro sports because it's easier than trying to play the game WELL.
      People watch others play video games because it's easier than trying to play the game WELL.
      People watch porn because it's easier than trying to get laid WELL.

      Who do you think the next takeover targets are going to be? It will be something that appeals to the couch potato and to get money from them because the couch potato will rationalize its easier to PAY than to actually DO.

    7. Re:Why is twitch popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People watch it for the personalties or banter between streamers.
      Pro tournaments can be fun to watch sometimes. Depending on who is casting they really understand the audience and it isn't always presented in the same style as a super serious 'sports' show.

      People also like to watch and learn, see interesting things that they can try and copy or weird tactics that really only work under certain conditions. Its also nice to see some of the best players in the world thrown off by special tactics.

    8. Re:Why is twitch popular? by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I kind of wondered the same thing until I started watching. I originally went there to look at actual game play footage for a game I was thinking of picking up. In the process I found a few streamers who I actually enjoyed watching. They were funny, interactive with their viewers, and pretty good gamers to boot. Now I go back pretty much every day to watch while I work or surf. It's replaced some TV and podcasts as my "background noise".

      Keep in mind most of the smaller streamers (and those tend to be the more entertaining to watch) are not e-sports try-hards. Their play is more casual. I tried a few of the bigger streams but yet, just watching someone team grind to keep their K/D is boring as watching golf.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    9. Re:Why is twitch popular? by Zedrick · · Score: 2

      Well, (for me) it's like an interesting talkshow. I watch Quickybaby play World of tanks, partly because I like that game and can learn a few things watching someone really good play it, but also because he talks about all kinds of things. It's just like watching kevinpollakschatshow, but framed around a game instead of Hollywood.

      OTOH there's a lot of people on twitch playing the game and saying nothing, that I don't understand. Boring.

    10. Re:Why is twitch popular? by mlk · · Score: 1

      I watch PA replays every now and again for the same reason I watch fencing.
      As I enjoy it and I get to see where I am going wrong.

      I don't watch football (Association, Rugby or America) as I find it dull, I can't relate to it in away way.
      I'll have a kick about as it is socializing rather than "football".

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    11. Re:Why is twitch popular? by mechanicalturk · · Score: 1

      Moreover, in watching others play well, you can often gain insights into how you can play better yourself.

    12. Re:Why is twitch popular? by dissy · · Score: 1

      I can't answer for anyone else why exactly video game streams are currently the top grossing form of entertainment in the US *period* - but the fact is they are.

      Grand theft auto 5 alone pulled in more money this year than any given form of entertainment. That includes movies, TV, books, you name it.

      The various styles of game recordings (walk throughs, lets plays, streams, etc) taken as a whole compete quite well against other established forms of entertainment as well.

      Asking if people are so depressed they resort to (games|tv|movies|books|education|workaholics|.*) seems a stupid question, and one you already know the answer to since you do the exact same thing yourself when bored. Why are YOU so depressed with life you do the things you do in your down time?

      I see no problem with gaming taking off like it is, and it is far from wasted in "the real world."
      Gaming is currently only one or two notches below porn at pushing the edge of technology right now, and with the current state of tech research I can honestly say it is welcome.

    13. Re:Why is twitch popular? by dissy · · Score: 1

      I can't answer for anyone else why exactly video game streams are currently the top grossing form of entertainment in the US *period* - but the fact is they are.

      Err, that was supposed to be just "video games" not "video game streams" there.

      The streaming aspect is just a subset of the whole video game industry. There is still plenty of pie for that to be a nice slice of, but it's far from the top taken alone.

      (Thanks slashdot for not letting me post a correction for for-ever after the original post! Will beta at least accept more than one hit per hour?)

  19. Another one bites the dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /Buzz "DCMA takedowns.... DCMA takedowns everywhere!"

    1. Re:Another one bites the dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's DMCA.

    2. Re:Another one bites the dust by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Not really. How close are we now to digital copyrights lasting a millennium?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  20. Anticompetitive when its free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they guarantee that neither they, nor any company that owns them or is associated will ever make any money from the service, then I don't think it's anti-competitive. What has the price of the service got to do with anything by the way?

  21. Wow a fucking billion dollars aint shit today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Twitch.tv are pretty big. They can get 50-100k live viewers on dota 2 streams, which are typically hours long. That has to be worth something.

  22. Seems insignificant by maliqua · · Score: 4, Funny

    right next to that 48.5 billion article doesn't it

  23. Good for Twitch users by Jezisheck · · Score: 2

    Maybe it will start to work correctly at last.

  24. Inflation by aepervius · · Score: 1

    With a 2-3% inflation you get a doubling of price every 23 to 35 years. So 1 billion today is equivalent to 350 million $ in 1980 and 550 million dollar in 1990. So not so "big" anymore.... I used this by the way : http://www.bls.gov/data/inflat... very useful to compare money amounts.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  25. Publicly traded does not matter by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why would regulators care at all about this deal? Twitch isn't a public company.

    Whether a company is traded publicly or not is irrelevant to anti-trust concerns. The only thing that being a publicly traded company means is that the stock is traded on an exchange. That's all. Many large companies are not publicly traded and anti-trust regulators are concerned with whether the merger will adversely affect consumers and competition in the market. Whether the stock is traded on a stock exchange is completely unimportant to the analysis.

  26. Not free: pay by watching ads. Only 1 TV network? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If CNN bought Fox News, MSNBC, and ABC would there be less competition in TV news? Of course. I don't see how payment or lack of payment has anything to do with whether or not two companies are competing .

    That said, people DO effectively pay for YouTube and Twitch. You pay in the form of ads watched. Google converts those ad views to cash just as surely as they'd convert credit card numbers to cash if you paid by credit card.

    Does Twitch really compete with YouTube? Probably not, but that's because Twitch is a speciality boutique and YouTube is a mass merchandiser. I don't think the form of payment has much to do with it.

  27. Distinctions without differences by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I'm slightly confused.... is Youtube buying Twitch or is Google's wholly owned subsidiary (Youtube) buying Twitch?

    It's a distinction without a difference. YouTube is a wholly owned subsidiary of Google. It would be equally accurate to say YouTube is buying Twitch, Google's subsidiary YouTube is buying Twitch, or Google is buying Twitch. In the end equation they all mean the same thing for all practical purposes. There are some subtle accounting ramifications regarding whether YouTube or Google actually is the the buying entity but nothing you or I will care about in the slightest.

  28. The actual meaning of exchange rates by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Maybe it really isn't shit today and the US currency has actually devalued this much?

    I think you may be confused about what currency devaluation means relative to other currencies. The mere fact that a dollar buys fewer Euros than it used to is only bad if you are trying import goods. If you are exporting goods (and we do a lot of that) then it means your products are more competitive. The Chinese have intentionally kept their currency relatively "weak" compared to the dollar in large part because it makes their exports less expensive compared with the competition. Japanese car companies have been doing fairly well lately in large part because the Yen has depreciated significantly against other major currencies.

    A "weak" currency is only a bad thing if you are trying to reduce exports and increase imports. If you want to reduce the trade gap with China then you WANT a somewhat weaker dollar and a stronger yuan. If you want US companies to be able to sell their products overseas then you WANT a weaker dollar.

    the prices paid for "strategic acquisitions" are way inflated

    I would certainly argue that some of the acquisitions I've seen lately (looking at you Facebook) are WAY too expensive. Facebook buying WhatsApp for $19 billion makes zero economic sense that I can discern. I don't know enough about Twitch to properly evaluate this acquisition but the valuation to a casual observation seems a bit rich for a website that hasn't been in existence even 3 years yet. Google certainly has the money and their track record isn't bad but if I were a shareholder I'd seriously wonder how careful Google was being with cash.

    1. Re:The actual meaning of exchange rates by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      That's a very shortsighted view and brought to you by the same people who tell you that inflation is a good thing as they help themselves to the wealth you earned.

  29. Google/YouTube? This can only mean one thing... by thevirtualcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Google+ account is required to comment on this DMCA takedown notice.

  30. FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the company expects the Justice Department to take a hard look at whether buying Twitch raises anticompetitive issues in the online-video market

    So when is the DoJ going to "take a hard look" at the FCC's new fast-lane policy for "raising anticompetitive issues in the online-video market"?

    If the FCC's new rules existed since the internet's inception, there would have been no Youtube or TwitchTV.

  31. Prove me (and Nobel laureates) wrong by sjbe · · Score: 1

    That's a very shortsighted view and brought to you by the same people who tell you that inflation is a good thing as they help themselves to the wealth you earned.

    If you think it is shortsighted, prove where my logic is wrong. Show how weakening currencies do not actually aid exports and strengthening currencies do not aid imports. When you do that, publish some peer reviewed papers and collect your Nobel Prize. (because if you actually can prove that you will win one)

    Furthermore, nobody says "inflation is a good thing". Ideally we would want neither inflation nor deflation but that is impossible to ensure for a lot of reasons including because human populations do not remain constant even if you hold the money supply fixed. We know from experience that a lot of inflation or deflation is very bad. We also know from experience that the effects of a little inflation is not as bad as the effects of a little deflation. So we try our best to ensure there is a modest amount of inflation, somewhere between 0%-5%. If you think I'm wrong, prove it, publish it, and collect your second Nobel Prize.

    1. Re:Prove me (and Nobel laureates) wrong by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      You sell more shit but your shit gets less money. Try telling Amazon they should sell their $100 gift cards for $90 cause they'll sell more.

      The best thing for businesses is a *stable* currency that allows them to plan for future sales, purchases and growth.

      The government is the inventor of pissing on your shoes and telling you it's raining.

  32. RIP TWITCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no doubt Google will fuck the shit out of Twitch if this happens just like they have done with Youtube

  33. Re:Not free: pay by watching ads. Only 1 TV networ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well maybe YOU are paying for youtube and twitch through ads. The smarter examples of our species, such as myself, don't ever have to see an ad. At all. Ever.

  34. Re:cheap shoes for sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. I haven't seen true chink spam on here in ages. I'm used to the old school /. tradition of GNAA, APK, hot grits and goatse. But fucking shoes???? Well now you've got my attention. Please tell me more!

    Oh and APK can fuck his own goatse-resembling ass with his goddamned HOSTS file!

  35. Better streaming tools coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they'll develop their own xplit type of tool, with all the bells and whistles included, and give it away.