Slashdot Mirror


Should We Eat Invasive Species?

The Washington Post's Energy & Environment section raises today the question of whether the best way to control certain invasive species is to eat them. The biggest success story on this front in the U.S. has been the lionfish; it destroys the habitat of some other fish in the areas where it's been introduced, but it turns out to be a palatable food fish, too. Its population has gone down since the start of a concerted effort to encourage it as a food, rather than just a nuisance. The article touches on invasive species of fish and crustaceans, but also land animals and plants. I know that garlic mustard (widespread in eastern U.S. forests) is tasty, and so are the blackberries all over Seattle.

290 comments

  1. On that note by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:On that note by goombah99 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      tasty corn fattened bacon flavored apes.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:On that note by TrekkieGod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

      I assure you that they try. All the time.

      We're not at the top of the food chain because the other species are nice to us. Or because we're nice, for that matter.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    3. Re:On that note by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

      At a population level, the reverse might actually be true:

      One of the few tactics that any species large enough to gun down faster than it can reproduce, or touchy enough that you can just set its habitat on fire, can embrace to survive, and even thrive, is to be docile and tasty. Humans go crazy for that, and promptly allocate massive amounts of effort, and delicious calories, to encouraging your population to increase dramatically. Sure, then they put a captive-bolt stunner into your brain and chop you up for parts; but being a darwinian winner isn't about quality of life...

    4. Re:On that note by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      I vote the submitter of this article starts by eating some Cane Toad eggs.

    5. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

      Homo sapiens is pretty tough prey. We're tough enough catch and kill on an individual basis, on a group basis it becomes virtually impossible, even if you take away our technology.

      The only predators that can kill humans in comparative safety are ambush predators (salt water crocodiles) and predators more adapted to their environment than we are (sharks). The former are probably the biggest man eaters on the planet and the latter don't regard us as optimal prey, because we're not energy dense enough for them (insert obese American joke here) when compared to their preferred prey.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Plenty of species have benefited from humans without becoming primary sources of food for them. Easy example: Cats and Dogs. Other examples: Squirrels, pigeons, and rats.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:On that note by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

      We are NOT on top of the foodchain. The housecat is. They have us trained to bring them food.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re:On that note by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Bring it. I have charcoal and hunger as my superpower. I am more than just a bloodmouth carnist and my stomach is a mass grave.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    9. Re:On that note by JMJimmy · · Score: 0

      And we die by poisonous snakes, spiders, scorpions, jellyfish, plants; disease carriers like rats, cockroaches, etc; And just about anything that we poke/prod/otherwise mistreat that has large claws/horns/etc or that is just large enough to pummel us to death like apes, elephants, and even kangaroos.

      Humans die easily in the wild, it's our technology that keeps us safe.

    10. Re:On that note by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Other example: my roommate.

    11. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe...Not in China though :D

    12. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some have. Mostly single cell parasites like malaria.

    13. Re:On that note by tyme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shakrai wrote:

      Plenty of species have benefited from humans without becoming primary sources of food for them. Easy example: Cats and Dogs. Other examples: Squirrels, pigeons, and rats.

      Except that cats, dogs, squirrels, pigeons, and rats have all been (or are) on the menu.

      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
    14. Re:On that note by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      I like my invasive species with garlic mustard widespread in Eastern U.S. forests

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    15. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's just sick that you let your food boss you around. Around here, we only feed the cat enough to make it fat enough to eat. You are one dumb human if you let some lower species train and command you.

    16. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're almost there, you can beat a monkey to death with a wooden mallet and eat its brains for about 10 grand, yes I'm serious.

    17. Re:On that note by davester666 · · Score: 2

      OMG...people are bacon flavored! Yum. Time to go shopping.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    18. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, a bunch of zombies walking around staring at the tiny screens in their hands while wearing earbuds. Real tough prey there.

      The only way humans would survive is IF you took their tech away!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    19. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Edit: Humans not raised in the wild die easily in the wild.

    20. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except that you ignored the key word in GP's post: primary.

    21. Re:On that note by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only predators that can kill humans in comparative safety are ambush predators (salt water crocodiles) and predators more adapted to their environment than we are (sharks).

      You're forgetting mosquitoes (and other insects). When you calculate the biomass of the things, the number of humans killed or injured by insects and the ecological footprint of them, they win.

      "Please -- not green ..."

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    22. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your cat is the one spaying you, your cat's above you. Till then nope.

      Pets may have some privileges but they certainly don't have that much power or the responsibilities/liabilities that go with it.

      One day the wealthy and powerful posthumans might keep humans around as pets. That might actually be the "less evil option", since they may not need humans around at all.

    23. Re:On that note by climb_no_fear · · Score: 1

      Have you ever eaten squirrel? Stringy, gamy as hell and hardly any real meat to speak of.

    24. Re: On that note by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Salt? I've cut bacon strips off a hog I killed, and it tasted like... bacon does.

      Not sure what you are referring to.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    25. Re:On that note by HiThere · · Score: 2

      You just picked the wrong animal, otherwise you are correct. At the top of the food chain is the microbe. Just like at the bottom.

      Remember, you have more microbe cells in your body than human cells.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    26. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      The sad thing about the 'flavour' of bacon, is that most USians are refering to the taste of the preservative, but they don't know that.

      No, they aren't. If your theory were correct, any mass-produced hot dog with the same preservatives would taste as good as bacon. But they don't.

      The predominant flavors (other than the salty flavor of nitrates or nitrites) are smoke, and the bacon itself.

    27. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Remember, you have more microbe cells in your body than human cells.

      I've seen that repeated many times, but I have never seen any actual figures or evidence to support it.

      I doubt that very much. In order for it to be true, the average "microbe" would have to be incredibly smaller than the average human cell. Otherwise there would be no room for them all. After all, the colon is internal, and the surface of your skin does not actually add up to very much volume.

    28. Re:On that note by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clearly you've never had your cat in your lap at the onset of a sudden summer thunderstorm...

    29. Re:On that note by evilviper · · Score: 3

      Homo sapiens is pretty tough prey.

      That's completely wrong, and any expert will say so. Without our technology and herd mentality, humans are VERY EASY prey.

      We have very low strength for our body mass. Compare us to chimps, cats, etc., and we're weaklings. We don't have any biological weapons to aide in our defense, either. We don't have long, hard and sharp claws, and our jaws aren't powerful enough, nor properly designed to make our teeth practical defensive weapons.

      Humans make difficult prey because of technology. We're well-fed, far away from wilderness, spending the overwhelming majority of our time inside defensive structures, out-of reach of predators, and when we are vulnerable, we have high tech items like knives, keys, or sharpened sticks which make very good defensive weapons. Our herd instinct means an injured individual will get immediate help rather than being food. And furthermore, we've eradicated the overwhelming majority of large predators that could, possibly predate upon us.

      You go out, naked, into the wilderness of Alaska, and see how you do up against the first grizzly bear or a pack of wolves you come across...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    30. Re:On that note by warrax_666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here: http://www.ted.com/talks/bonni...

      Not being an expert in the field, I cannot vouch for its accuracy.

      --
      HAND.
    31. Re:On that note by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's more cells but not more mass, iirc.

      and what the fuck does that matter anyways when the microbes exist to make the body work and the body allows them to exist not the other way around(usually, unless you get some nasty disease).

      (quick googling, on average you have ~1kilo of microbes, or 1% of bodymass)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    32. Re:On that note by dcollins117 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you ever eaten squirrel? Stringy, gamy as hell and hardly any real meat to speak of.

      ... and the portions are so small.

    33. Re: On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Did you use salt as in NaCl? Or 'a' salt, as in pink salt, which gives US bacon it's distinctive taste?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    34. Re:On that note by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to honey-glazed, Africanized bees.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    35. Re:On that note by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Let's hope the rest of the earth's species don't adopt this plan to control the invasive naked apes.

      They're not in communication with each other, and a minor human effort will knock out any 'cells' of species members who attempt that plan

    36. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, we can't kill these things faster than they reproduce. We've tried.

    37. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No...you soak the legs in salt water in the fridge for 24 hrs...change the water once..fry like chicken...really good.

    38. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Give a USian a piece of Bacon without the additives and it's viewed as bad bacon. Nitrates only taste salty to people with very poor taste buds.

      Since I'm a "USian", I have to disagree. My favorite bacon is smoked with no preservatives.

    39. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Just for the sake of accuracy. I'm not calling BS, I just said I doubt it. The scale seems off.

    40. Re:On that note by qwak23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So without our defining characteristics, we're easy prey? Of course! Our intellect and its products (technology, shared learning, etc) are exactly what make us tough prey. Throwing someone into the wilderness of Alaska naked is not a realistic proposition, aside from the fact that our bodies aren't adapted to the cold (again, clothing is technology, and part of who we are), it's akin to taking away a snakes fangs and throwing them back into the wild.

      Some animals are born with physical defenses, some animals are born with the mental capacity to build physical defenses. The former are limited to the environments where their physical characteristics give them some advantage, the latter can put themselves in virtually any environment. Sure, some individuals would fare worse than others, but we wouldn't have spread to every corner of the planet without that ability.

    41. Re:On that note by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back there. And WTF is a 'USian'?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    42. Re:On that note by tyme · · Score: 2

      Jane Q. Public wrote:

      In order for it to be true, the average "microbe" would have to be incredibly smaller than the average human cell

      Indeed: human skin cell = 30 um, red blood cell = 8 um, human X chromosome = 7 um, yeast cell = 3x4 um, mitochondria body = 4x0.8 um, E. coli bacterium = 4x0.6 um. (taken from this page found via a rudimentary Google search, zoom down to the micrometer range)

      Human cells are pretty large, on average, and microbial cells are much smaller.

      That doesn't make the cited factoid any more meaningful, but it is certainly not worthy of doubt based purely on the numbers (that is to say, there are certainly more atoms of calcium in your body than there are human cells, but does that mean that you are, in fact, a lump of chalk?).

      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
    43. Re:On that note by evilviper · · Score: 1

      So without our defining characteristics, we're easy prey?

      The industrial revolution is not a "defining characteristic" of homo sapiens.

      Thousands of years ago, we were pretty easy prey. Obviously we did just well enough that we could reproduce faster than we were killed, in some areas.

      Today, we've reformed enough of our world that we're not often vulnerable as we used to be... Many predators are gone, and we don't live in the wilderness. Economics of the industrial revolution has made it so that we can afford to be difficult prey... with lights, knives, guns, etc., but most of us still aren't very capable of defending ourselves.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    44. Re:On that note by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Not even tribes in Brazil are without technology - they use bows, blow darts, poisons, etc. cavemen used axes, spears, made clothing, etc.

    45. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Human cells are pretty large, on average, and microbial cells are much smaller.

      Thanks. I really wasn't interested enough to look it up, but this is very informative.

    46. Re:On that note by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      I would argue that on an individual basis, the industrial revolution made us easier prey when placed in an environment outside our normal social centers (for those of us in industrialized countries anyway). We could even go as far back as the dawn of agriculture and urbanization, the technologies that enabled us to live in isolation from the rest of nature have made individuals easier prey when forced to leave the comforts of our population centers. We've been making clothing and weapons far longer than a 150-200 years since the industrial revolution and far longer than the 10000-12000 years since the oldest known agricultural revolution.
      We breed and mature relatively slowly compared to most other species, to reproduce faster than we are killed requires us to be able to defend ourselves against potential predators over a long period of time. Our brains enabled that.

      These revolutions have enabled many individuals to isolate themselves from potential predators, as those individuals do not have to learn the skills to deal with them, they would be at a disadvantage if forced to. That doesn't mean those individuals couldn't adapt themselves whether by seeking training before being placed into such a situation or by utilizing their own intellect to figure out a solution. Not everyone would be successful, but many would, and those that survived would pass on that experience to others (another advantage humans have over most other species, we can share knowledge).

    47. Re:On that note by David_W · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And squirrel gravy is awesome. Haven't had it in like 25 years though... :(

    48. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think hippos are the big man killers in those areas.

    49. Re:On that note by Lotana · · Score: 2

      And WTF is a 'USian'?

      I am surprised you haven't heard of this term or confused in its usage. It is quite recent, fairly widespread and obvious. But just in case:

      USian (Some spell it "US'ian") refers to people from the United States. Its origin is people from other North and South American countries taking offense to being grouped together with the culture/actions of the USA. Quite fascinating how politics shape spoken language!

      It should be clear when you look at the work: US + ian. US stands for "United States" and "ian" is a common post-fix on english words reffering to population groups (eg. Asian, European, etc).

    50. Re:On that note by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 0

      Give a USian a piece of Bacon without the additives and it's viewed as bad bacon. Nitrates only taste salty to people with very poor taste buds.

      Since I'm a "USian", I have to disagree. My favorite bacon is smoked with no preservatives.

      I'm willing to believe you, but unless you cut the meat yourself, you can't really be positive about that statement. There are a lot of loopholes in the ways people can present food. Would salt be considered a preservative or a "added flavor".

      --
      Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    51. Re:On that note by gmhowell · · Score: 0

      Ah, got it. Fake word meant to generate butthurt and draw flames. Thanks.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    52. Re:On that note by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. Hence it is especially popular online.

      Funny thing is that I have a Canadian friend that used it in a conversation. But given that guy's general political stances: It is an outlier.

    53. Re:On that note by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      There are other means of control for example blackberries http://www.csiro.au/Outcomes/S.... Of course the current Australian government under the Abbott of Greed and Corruption, consider this a bad idea as there is no profit in it, along with Monsanto as herbicides are far more profitable 'er' better. So they are cutting the funding of the CSIRO in favour of expanding the ministry sport and the Australian Sports advertising Institute http://www.ausport.gov.au/ais as they are more reliable than CSIRO scientists when it comes to hand shaking vote gaining public appearances. So are right wing politicians edible or not and what can they be fed to (the fucking embarrassment of being Australian at this time).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    54. Re:On that note by Kittenman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you ever eaten squirrel? Stringy, gamy as hell and hardly any real meat to speak of.

      ... and the portions are so small.

      caution: may contain nuts

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    55. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      But everybody knows you're special and not just some plain jane ;)

      You even frequently have coherent thoughts!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    56. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to believe you, but unless you cut the meat yourself, you can't really be positive about that statement.

      True. I am not the person who cut the meat. But since I knew the person who did, I think the chances are pretty fair.

      Not all "USians" live in NYC, or buy all their meat at the supermarket.

    57. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 2
      Is that what you tell the natives when they try to get you to stop calling them Indians?

      Nobody wants to generate 'butthurt' and 'draw flames'. However, there are millions of Americans that do not want to be associated with the USA in any way.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    58. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't know very many Canadians!!!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    59. Re:On that note by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      lol - it was a joke, Cane Toad eggs are lethal to humans.

    60. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, may I point out that taking away our technology and social skills is a particularly silly proposition, since modern humans can not easily survive in even semi-tropical climates without fire for cooking & heating.

    61. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds just like what that other invasive sub species called an American would test like but you would have to add bitter tasting as well from all the whining it does in its life due to first world problems,

    62. Re:On that note by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Human cells are pretty large, on average, and microbial cells are much smaller.

      Thanks. I really wasn't interested enough to look it up, but this is very informative.

      And yet, despite your choice to remain ignorant, you nevertheless had to express your skepticism...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    63. Re:On that note by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Homo sapiens is pretty tough prey.

      That's completely wrong, and any expert will say so. Without our technology and herd mentality, humans are VERY EASY prey.

      We have very low strength for our body mass. Compare us to chimps, cats, etc., and we're weaklings. We don't have any biological weapons to aide in our defense, either. We don't have long, hard and sharp claws, and our jaws aren't powerful enough, nor properly designed to make our teeth practical defensive weapons.

      Humans make difficult prey because of technology. We're well-fed, far away from wilderness, spending the overwhelming majority of our time inside defensive structures, out-of reach of predators, and when we are vulnerable, we have high tech items like knives, keys, or sharpened sticks which make very good defensive weapons. Our herd instinct means an injured individual will get immediate help rather than being food. And furthermore, we've eradicated the overwhelming majority of large predators that could, possibly predate upon us.

      You go out, naked, into the wilderness of Alaska, and see how you do up against the first grizzly bear or a pack of wolves you come across...

      Are we assuming that he does or doesn't have time to learn the surrounding terrain? You don't need technology to use the environment against your opponent, but you do need familiarity. If you succeed in surviving long enough to develop that familiarity, you can use it to overcome bears and wolves.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    64. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol - it was a joke, Cane Toad eggs are lethal to humans.

      So are pufferfish, We found ways.

    65. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eating Mexican just took a turn for the worse.

    66. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I gather the rest hardly ever call themselves Americans.

      The Canadians call themselves Canadians (maybe even Canucks). The Brazilians call themselves Brazilians or Brasileiros. Similar for the Mexicans and the rest.

      The Spanish or Portuguese speaking nonUSA people might group themselves under "Americano".

      But in the real world it's mainly the Americans who call themselves Americans.

    67. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why we have begun to become complacent. If we were forced to evolve beyond that then maybe things would get interesting.

    68. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grasses are the superior lifeforms. They've trained all the other lifeforms to maintain them.

    69. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Stop looking in the mirror!! There isn't an ounce of angry in what I said. I like things to be precise and to correct baseless thoughts.

      I'm probably one of the happiest people around, why, I don't even require other people around for me to smile. You on the other hand see everything through a cynical sarcastic viewpoint.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    70. Re:On that note by unhandyandy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of jellyfish, they're becoming a worldwide menace. ( See Stung! http://www.barnesandnoble.com/... ) Unfortunately they seem not to taste very good. Maybe another commercial use could be found? Party balloons?

    71. Re:On that note by ihtoit · · Score: 2

      salt's a preservative.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    72. Re:On that note by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      that's not entirely accurate anyway. My primary source of meat protein is wild rabbit.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    73. Re:On that note by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      we have a pretty dangerous bite. Not so much in bite pressure or dentistry, more so in the flora which inhabit our foodholes. Leaving out the fluoride toothpaste which wouldn't be available when civilisation falls, we would all soon make komodo dragons' breath smell positively divine. Anyone like to take a guess at how komodos kill their prey? It's not through the immediate lethality of their bite (they have pissweak jaws), it's the bacterial soup in their mouths - they'll follow prey, once bit, for over a week until it drops through blood poisoning, then it's neck deep in guts and gore.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    74. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever eaten squirrel? Stringy, gamy as hell and hardly any real meat to speak of.

      ... and the portions are so small.

      Actually, I have, annually for many years, and I still miss it. As with any food, it's all in the cooking. Pennsylvania-style squirrel pot-pie. YUM! Yeah, you have to watch out for the bird-shot, but it's like bones in fish.

    75. Re:On that note by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      And yet, despite your choice to remain ignorant, you nevertheless had to express your skepticism...

      Despite what I clearly labeled as doubt based on a guess, nevertheless there was a logical basis for that guess.

      Which is still a lot better than random asshole ad-hominem. Did you really think this was somehow adding to the discussion?

    76. Re:On that note by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      internal? the human body can be described as a torus with the alimentary canal being the hole, therefore external to the real human body.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    77. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly did ShieldW0lf's observation qualify as a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of the claim or argument? Which claim or argument was he rejecting? What irrelevant fact about the author was he using as a basis to reject this unspecified claim or argument?

    78. Re:On that note by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It'll be ok angry dude.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    79. Re:On that note by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      It always is sarcastic idiot :)

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    80. Re:On that note by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      And any stinkbugs the cold snap didn't take care of.

    81. Re:On that note by Mars729 · · Score: 1

      We are at the top of the food chain because 50,000 years ago we were the first animals with the ability to accumulate knowledge. Not to mention fossil fuels in the last couple hundred years that provides each individual with thousands perhaps millions times more energy than food alone can provide. The rest of nature didn't stand a chance.

    82. Re:On that note by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      And politicians aren't lethal to humans ;D???

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    83. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      And we die by poisonous snakes, spiders, scorpions, jellyfish, plants; disease carriers like rats, cockroaches, etc; And just about anything that we poke/prod/otherwise mistreat that has large claws/horns/etc or that is just large enough to pummel us to death like apes, elephants, and even kangaroos.

      They don't prey on us, which was my whole point. Lions get bitten by venomous snakes too, but the snakes aren't preying on them. It's a defensive measure, same as when a snake bites a human.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    84. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      We have very low strength for our body mass. Compare us to chimps, cats, etc., and we're weaklings.

      That's irrelevant. We have two things they don't: opposable digits and the human brain.

      You go out, naked, into the wilderness of Alaska, and see how you do up against the first grizzly bear or a pack of wolves you come across...

      Why would I do that when I could go there with ten of my friends, the proper gear, and a collection of ranged weaponry? Seriously, this statement is stupid. You might as well say that my cat gets her ass kicked if I send her out into the wild after being declawed and detoothed.

      Take away modern technology and humans still win. I can make a spear with a decent sized stick and a sharp rock. I can communicate tactics and strategy with my friends/family members. The grizzly still loses. The only difference between the spear and a .30-06 is the likelihood of the grizzly taking one or more humans out with him. At the end of the day he still loses. So does the wolf pack if they're stupid enough to take on a group of humans, which they usually aren't, but that's besides the point.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    85. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Mosquitoes aren't predators, they're effectively parasites. That's a key difference. They don't really kill us anyhow, they're carriers for diseases that can occasionally kill us and invariably make our lives miserable. You can survive a mosquito bite and malaria. You aren't terribly likely to survive a predatory encounter with a salt water croc, nor is he likely to survive a predatory encounter with a group of pissed off humans.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    86. Re:On that note by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      They don't prey on us because we've used technology/fire/etc to prey on them for thousands of years. Natural selection at work, the ones that attack us get killed so the ones that are fearful/wary of us propagate. We're not particularly strong or nimble - brains and endurance are about the only things that recommend us as a species.

    87. Re:On that note by Druegan · · Score: 1

      Take a couple, marinade em, grind with a measure of pork fat, fry. Enjoy deliciousness. lol

      Also makes some awesome gravy.

    88. Re:On that note by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That's irrelevant. We have two things they don't: opposable digits and the human brain.

      You don't think CHIMPS have opposable digits? And they'll have a human brain, too, a few seconds after they attack you.

      I can make a spear with a decent sized stick and a sharp rock.

      And if you wield it with ALL your might, you could potentially slightly annoy a grizzly bear. You are utterly delusional if you think you'd be able to kill a very large predator with a spear.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    89. Re:On that note by azav · · Score: 1

      I'm cool with that. Sitting here fully clothed at the moment.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    90. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant. Alone in the wild? Sure.

      But naturally we're not alone in the wild. We're tribal. With cooperation and our brains taking on any other fauna is trivial. We hunted countless large land animals to extinction with literally nothing more than sticks and stones.

      What you see in the wild now are species that adapted to survive us. Not the other way around.

    91. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what you tell the natives when they try to get you to stop calling them Indians?

      Nobody wants to generate 'butthurt' and 'draw flames'. However, there are millions of Americans that do not want to be associated with the USA in any way.

      Not gonna try digging up the cite, but I'm sure I read about a survey regarding "Indian", "Native American", "American Indian', "Amerindian", and so on. Most tribal members preferred "Indian". I firmly believe that is most polite to call people as they call themselves, so if one doesn't know an individual's preference, "Indian" is the best choice. (I tend to use "Native American", the PC brainwashing has gotten to me.) Maybe they like the fact that "Indian" points out how the brilliant navigator Christopher Columbus had no fucking clue where he was.

    92. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, then they put a captive-bolt stunner into your brain and chop you up for parts; but being a darwinian winner isn't about quality of life...

      Hmm, brings a new meaning to the phrase "Darwin Award".

    93. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, despite your choice to remain ignorant, you nevertheless had to express your skepticism...

      Despite what I clearly labeled as doubt based on a guess, nevertheless there was a logical basis for that guess.

      Not so much. "Since there are more non-human cells in humans' bodies than there are human cells, I guess the non-human cells must be — on average — substantially smaller than the humans' cells."

      That's a logical guess.

      Weakly attempting to debunk a widely-known and established fact using logic steeped in ignorance doesn't seem particularly "logical" to me.

    94. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [I]nternal? [T]he human body can be described as a torus with the alimentary canal being the hole, therefore external to the real human body.

      Maybe that's why the filth like to eat doughnuts; eating innocent doughnuts gives them practice for eating innocent-people-minding-their-own-business for breakfast — or at the very least, chewin' 'em out: "I'm gonna eat this particular individual doughnut a new doughnut-hole."

    95. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] captive-bolt stunner [...]

      Do captive bolts really "stun" those whose heads they're used on? If a captive bolt were used on a human, would a doctor diagnose that person as "stunned?" When Captain Kirk (et al.) set their fazers to "stun," do the fazers simply cave-in their targets' skulls?

    96. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever eaten squirrel? Stringy, gamy as hell and hardly any real meat to speak of.

      ... and the portions are so small.

      Actually, I have, annually for many years, and I still miss it. As with any food, it's all in the cooking. Pennsylvania-style squirrel pot-pie. YUM! Yeah, you have to watch out for the bird-shot, but it's like bones in fish.

      Bird shot? When I lived in the god-forsaken boonies. I used .22LR to keep my mom's garden and bird feeders squirrel-free. CCI Stingers (high-velocity hollow-point) exploded half of their bodies, but regular ball ammunition left them fully intact. Using bird shot sounds like more trouble than it's worth, even if you set the table with tweezers.

    97. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herp derp. Neologism meant to differentiate people in/from the US from Americans that aren't in/from the US. Thanks; I don't know how to use a dictionary, you see.

      FTFY. (English doesn't have "fake words," provided those words are commonly used; English dictionaries are descriptive not prescriptive.

      BTW, if a mere word inflames your hemorrhoids and thus causing your butt to hurt, perhaps you should consult a proctologist.

      Sincerely yours,
      A USian

    98. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      And they'll have a human brain, too, a few seconds after they attack you.

      They'll be lying on the ground bleeding out from a bullet hole a few seconds after they decide to attack me.

      You are utterly delusional if you think you'd be able to kill a very large predator with a spear.

      And you have a talent for selective reading, because I also said "I can communicate tactics and strategy with my friends/family members". You think a grizzly can defeat a coordinated group of homo sapiens equipped even with primitive weapons (never mind modern ones)?

      Brains and endurance defeat brawn. We're the smartest species on the planet and rank in the top 10 (maybe even top 5) for endurance. The combination is unstoppable.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    99. Re:On that note by airdweller · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Most snakes don't prey on humans, b/c killing humans is a waste of poison - they can't eat us (with the exception of the tiny number of those large enough to do that).

    100. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll be ok angry dude.

      "Dude?" Like, cowabunga... Homework's a drag --- when's surf up?

    101. Re:On that note by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      BTW, if a mere word inflames your hemorrhoids and thus causing your butt to hurt, perhaps you should consult a proctologist.

      So if an African American objects to being called a 'nigger', an Asian Indian to being called a 'wog', a Hispanic to being called a 'spic', etc. you think they should all consult a protologist? All of these terms are or were in far greater usage than 'USian'.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    102. Re:On that note by evilviper · · Score: 1

      They'll be lying on the ground bleeding out from a bullet hole a few seconds after they decide to attack me.

      Actually, MOST guns aren't large enough to kill a grizzly. But besides that, guns are very modern technology, and you specifically mentioned making "spears" and said:

      "Take away modern technology and humans still win."

      Problem is, they don't.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    103. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Actually, MOST guns aren't large enough to kill a grizzly.

      I see you're as knowledgeable about firearms as you are about reading. A .30-06 is plenty of gun for a grizzly, with proper shot placement, no extreme wildcat caliber required. Shotgun slugs are effective too, maybe more so than a rifle. Practically every deer hunter in North America has a .30-06 and/or 12 gauge, we're not talking about rare guns here. My choice would be the .30-06 for bear hunting and the 12 gauge for self-defense in bear country, but to each their own.

      and you specifically mentioned making "spears" and said:

      I also said that humans work in groups, but you've clearly decided to ignore that part of my statement. Grizzly vs. coordinated group of humans = dead grizzly.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    104. Re:On that note by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I also said that humans work in groups

      Not relevant to the topic. Not realistic at all. Not located with your "spear" remark. Runs contrary to you continuing to fall-back to "guns". And just another cop-out and back peddle from your previous statements.

      Grizzly vs. coordinated group of humans = dead grizzly.

      No, just an injured grizzly that is going to be eating quite well...Unless you've got a very big group of people... Then you'll eventually be able to kill it, but not until it decimates the first couple waves.

      A .30-06 is plenty of gun for a grizzly, with proper shot placement

      You're just demonstrating sheer ignorance. It won't stop one unless you get a damn lucky shot off. It's easy to aim for vitals when you're stalking prey, but ridiculously difficult when a bear suddenly charges at you from a hidden position in a nearby tree line. It's completely unrealistic, and just another demonstration of how ignorant and delusional you are.

      I've wasted enough time on your fevered fantasies. Goodbye.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    105. Re:On that note by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You're just demonstrating sheer ignorance. It won't stop one unless you get a damn lucky shot off. It's easy to aim for vitals when you're stalking prey, but ridiculously difficult when a bear suddenly charges at you from a hidden position in a nearby tree line.

      You continue to demonstrating an impressive selective reading ability. "My choice would be the .30-06 for bear hunting and the 12 gauge for self-defense in bear country, but to each their own." The guides that took us through the Kodiak Peninsula all carried 12 gauges, with slugs or alternating buckshot/slugs. I'll trust their experience more than some random idiot loser that casually dismisses a .30-06 as though it's some sort of water pistol.

      but not until it decimates the first couple waves.

      Decimates the first couple waves? Do you understand anything about animals? It's going to do its utmost to run away, because even a minor injury in the animal kingdom may spell death if it gets infected. They don't stand their ground and fight unless cornered, and if you think any animal can "decimate" a coordinated group of humans equipped with even primitive weapons you're delusional.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    106. Re:On that note by Red4man · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't know very many Canadians!!!

      Which means just one thing: He's very lucky.

      Canaduh sucks.

      --
      Sock Puppets: damn_registrars=pudge_confirmer=jimmy_slimmy=raiigunner=cml4524=a_klavan=red4men=ronpaulisanidiot
    107. Re:On that note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only predators that can kill humans in comparative safety are ambush predators

      Or micro-organisms. They just love it when we bunch up together in small areas.

  2. blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    every year seattlites eat all the blackberries they can pick. The only thing that cut that down was when people began spraying them. But you cold not possibly get more people eating them, and that didn't dent the population in 50 years. On the otherhand no thinks of them as invasive in the sense they were not natural to live there. the pacifc northwest is berry country. Just a thorny nuisance you have to keep cut back when it encroaches walkways not unlike choking vines on trees.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  3. Invasive feral cats by dbarron · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for recipes....anyone ? :)

    1. Re:Invasive feral cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure your local chinese takeout has a few

    2. Re:Invasive feral cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for recipes....anyone ? :)

      Just put the [thing] in a pot for a while. Add salt to taste.

      Cooking is soooooooo easy.

    3. Re:Invasive feral cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Feed them to the pigs, eat the pigs.

    4. Re:Invasive feral cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australians have come up with a novel solution to the millions of feral cats roaming the outback – eat them.
      The felines are the descendants of domestic pets and kill millions of small native animals each year.

      A recent Alice Springs contest featured wild cat casserole. The meat is said to taste like a cross between rabbit and, perhaps inevitably, chicken.

      But wildlife campaigners have expressed their dismay that Australia’s wild cat now finds itself on the nation’s menus.

      Feral cats are one of the most serious threats to Australia’s native fauna.

      They eat almost anything that moves, including small marsupials, lizards, birds and spiders.

      The woman behind the controversial cat stew recipe has said Australians could do their bit to help the environment by tucking into more feral pests, including pigeons and camels.

      But it was a recipe for feline casserole that impressed some of the judges at an outback food competition in Alice Springs.

      Preparing this unusual stew seems simple enough.

      The meat should be diced and fried until it is brown. Then lemon grass is to be added along with salt and pepper and three cups of quandong, which is a sweet desert fruit.

      It is recommended that the dish be left to simmer for five hours before being garnished with bush plums and mistletoe berries.

      Marinated moggie was not to everyone’s taste. One of the competition judges found the meat impossibly tough and had to politely excuse herself and spit it out in a backroom.

      Wild cats are considered good eating by some Aborigines, who roast the animals on an open fire.

      i have eaten cat and racoon and both are good as hell

    5. Re:Invasive feral cats by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Feed them to the pigs, eat the pigs.

      I wonder if that would work for cane toads?

      My guess would be either the pigs would be poisoned by the cane toads or their meat would become poisonous.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    6. Re:Invasive feral cats by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I'm waiting for recipes....anyone ? :)

      A cat can be substituted for possum in any recipe. You can sample a wide variety of possum and other varmint dishes at West Virginia's annual Road Kill Cookoff. You can check Wikipedia for a summary of laws and regulations concerning collecting and consuming road kill in other states.

    7. Re:Invasive feral cats by IonOtter · · Score: 2

      The crows have figured out how to deal with cane toads.

      They started out by eating them alive, through the mouth, but figured out gutting them was easier.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    8. Re:Invasive feral cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They eat almost anything that moves, including small marsupials, lizards, birds and spiders.

      That's exactly why cats cannot cause an extinction on a continent: since cats are opportunistic hunters, they will hunt whatever they find. As the number of specimen of an edangered species goes to 0, so will the number of them killed by cats who will settle for now easier to find prey. Only specialized hunters that only hunt a few species will go out of their way to find the last few remaining specimen.

    9. Re:Invasive feral cats by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      It is recommended that the dish be left to simmer for five hours before being garnished with bush plums and mistletoe berries.

      And here is the one line answer on how to eat pretty much anything: boil the crap out of it until you render it to component molecules. Sprinkle something less offensive over it.

      Ice cream for desert.

      What's not to like?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Invasive feral cats by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The crows have figured out how to deal with cane toads.

      Crows / Magpies / Ravens are lazy SOBs. They aren't going to solve the problem for you. As long as other meals are easier to get than toads, they will leave the toads alone. Their huge numbers and availability when other food is scare may make them a nice alternative food source, but don't think they're going to bring the numbers down to manageable levels, as long as they've got other food available.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Invasive feral cats by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      And here is the one line answer on how to eat pretty much anything: boil the crap out of it until you render it to component molecules.

      Poke sallet (not salad!). Nettles. Tapioca.

      All things that can ruin your day eaten raw, but are fairly popular when processed.

  4. Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make their parts 'magical', like rhino horn and tiger penis.

    1. Re:Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what would the Burmese python have (invasive and something of an apex pedator in the glades of South Florida?

    2. Re:Or.. by timothy · · Score: 1

      Could it make magic boots, purses, and car trim? I don't know whether python skin is suitable for that, but I know some snakeskin is.

      I know some varieties of snake are quite tasty; perhaps python soup with pearls of barley could be served at a programming convention ...

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  5. Ailens by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    lets hope they dont follow that rule when we branch out, after we have used up the earth's resources.

    ( yes i know, that technically in time the earth will recycle everything we dont take with us, but we wont have that sort of time to wait )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Ailens by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      we aren't using up any resource even in the short term. Helium? most of it just vented from natural gas wells, never collected. just a nat gas engineering problem. Potassium and phosphorous? 2.5% and 0.1% of lithosphere, just an chemical engineeing problem.

    2. Re:Ailens by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Who said short term? I didn't.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Ailens by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      we won't run out in the long term either. Impossible.

  6. Kudzu by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I have trouble clearing Himalayan Blackberries because of folks that seem to think they can't get enough fruit from the massive patch on the other side of the fence. Fools.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:Kudzu by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I have trouble clearing Himalayan Blackberries because of folks that seem to think they can't get enough fruit from the massive patch on the other side of the fence. Fools.

      M9A1-7. Just be sure to practice looking innocent before using.

    2. Re:Kudzu by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Kudzu is very tasty. You must not be cooking it right. Use only the tender young leaves and remember to put some fat in the pot when you boil them.

      The nice thing is that tomorrow you'll have a brand new batch of tender young leaves to eat.

    3. Re:Kudzu by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Thermite. Lower profile. Sterilizes the ground.

      As a bonus, it's a good test to see if your local SWAT team is awake.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Kudzu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a purpose to fencing fruits: avoiding diseases carried by wildlife (foxes, carrying echinococcosis for instance) shitting on your food.

  7. Kudzu for Energy by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Somebody should get working on using the biomass of Kudzu as an energy source. When something just won't go away, figure out a use from chopping it down.

    1. Re:Kudzu for Energy by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      Kudzu is edible.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    2. Re:Kudzu for Energy by overshoot · · Score: 2

      Never mind energy [1] -- goats love it. They can actually snarf it down faster than it grows (which is a trick, let me tell you, in the Gulf States.)

      Kudzu-fed goat milk cheese is perfectly good stuff, or you can just let them feed their kids. Which not long afterward become cabritos. Nom!

      [1] Long-term sustainability issue here unless you return the non-fuel sludge to the area to restore minerals. Not so much of a problem with goats excreting all over place.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    3. Re:Kudzu for Energy by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the kudzu wikipedia article has number of uses..

      like eating(starch), soil improvement etc.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Kudzu for Energy by Noishkel · · Score: 1

      Very true. But the problem is that it's kind of a bastard to harvest and a lot of it grew on bad terrain. Crack those issues and then you'd have a plan.

  8. Don't see why not. by blackicye · · Score: 2

    If they're palatable and economically harvestable, they're prime candidates for om nom nom nom.

    The Chinese have a saying that roughly translates to: "If it swims, crawls or flies and its backbone faces the Sun, it's edible."

    Lots of invertebrates and crustaceans that don't meet that criteria also still make it to the table. Heh.

    1. Re:Don't see why not. by CRCulver · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Could you cite that this is an actual Chinese saying? I have only heard this kind of quotation repeated as a racial slur by Westerners. The Duke of Edinburgh, for instances, has been reported by several sources to have once said "If it has four legs and is not a chair, has wings and is not an aeroplane, or swims and is not a submarine, the Cantonese will eat it."

    2. Re:Don't see why not. by Atomic+Fro · · Score: 1

      I've worked with a few Chinese. When we've gotten comfortable with each other enough to be non-pc they've said

      When westerners discover a new animal, they look at it in amazement and want to make it their pet. When Chinese discover a new animal, we try to think of the best way to cook it.

      --

      ==================
      Hippie Logger Jock
      ==================
    3. Re:Don't see why not. by aevan · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a Cantonese saying "Anything that walks, swims, crawls, or flies, with its back to heaven is edible.", used in South China. It backdates to the 1800s. It's been referenced in some cookbooks (e.g. "The Chinese Kitchen" by Eileen Yin-Fei Lo), and is known/used by some Chinese, and not others.

      Cue supposition based on some searching: the area traded heavily with the West during that time. Take the exotic delicacies and dishes concocted by chefs, add in a language/culture barrier,good old prejudice, and the loss of context in repetition...I can easily imagine it's a Western generalisation/mild slur that got repeated and adopted and over time became adopted as a regional motto of sorts (i.e. isn't 'known' in the Mandarin areas, just the Cantonese south).

      Could be waaay off though.

    4. Re:Don't see why not. by sexconker · · Score: 2

      But could you cite a single species that falsifies the statement?

    5. Re:Don't see why not. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to think of what is excluded by that, but I can only come up with flounder, which is quite edible.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Don't see why not. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      British have a long history of landing on newly discovered islands, figuring out what could be eaten, and then doing so until there wasn't any left. So depending on which Duke of Edinburgh you're talking about, he either didn't mean it as a slur, was a giant hypocrite, or was ignorant of his own history.

    7. Re:Don't see why not. by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      Poison dart frog. Definitely not edible!

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    8. Re:Don't see why not. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Humans as long as they stand upright.

      So watch your back ;).

      --
    9. Re:Don't see why not. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Definitely edible. They don't produce toxins on their own - they depend on a specific diet of bugs to get the chemicals they need to produce the toxins. In captivity they lose their toxicity. Beyond that, being toxic or venomous doesn't deter them - they just let it sit out a bit then throw it in a bottle of booze and call it medicine.

  9. I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not in the wild but cultivated.

    The cow, the chicken, the pig... these animals have no natural habitat anymore really... yet are in no danger of dying of. Neither for that matter is the domesticated dog or the house cat or the gold fish.

    All small endangered animals can be bred as pets or food. By all means, protect their habitat in the wild but that is no guarantee that they will survive as a species. Maintain them as pets or food in our society though and they'll live as long as we continue to do that.

    As for large animals... encourage farmers to take care of a couple. Seriously, a cattle rancher could take in a few rhinos. Have a special pen for them. Make the whole thing tax deductible until there's some way to recoup the cost. These people breed BILLIONS of animals in captivity. We could do the same with rhinos, elephants, etc.

    Right now one of the things hurting these species is that its very hard to legally own them.

    An animal that belongs to no one will not be protected. We've seen this in Africa where the wild animals are prey for poachers. However, if you give the animals to the local villages and make the animal's survival the villager's responsibility they suddenly stop getting eaten or killed for their ivory.

    This is the solution.

    Anything else will likely harm these species more, waste time, waste money, and accomplish very little.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by overshoot · · Score: 1

      The cow, the chicken, the pig... these animals have no natural habitat anymore really

      I'll grant you chickens. As for the other two -- you've obviously never visited Texas.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    2. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS SO MUCH.

      I have no idea why other animals aren't being bred like mad, and specifically to also add some variety to our plate.
      It is less of a problem in quite a few countries, but in so many places in the west, there are the all too common meats like turkey, chicken, beef, pork and such, but nothing really exotic.

      An odd couple of animals and some initial help to get it kickstarted and it could really improve numbers of so many species.
      Keep tax deductions on it until it grows to secondary groups through trade, maybe even a 3rd generation, bam, enjoy your considerably larger numbers of species AND a new food source.
      Some animals aren't farmed for very specific reasons, such as them being too hard to farm, but the biggest reason was they weren't efficient to farm, which was only a legacy reason because it was a problem back in the stupid ages when we never had technology to help, plentiful food sources to feed and ways to keep things healthy. These are mostly non-issues now, other than another average day managing the finances.
      It COULD be done very easily these days. It is entirely feasible to farm so many species out there that were abandoned for the easy ones.

      Endangered, lesser endangered species and generally desirable species could all go in to this, in that order of course.

    3. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      We've already done it to great success with the buffalo. They are commercially bred, butchered, and sold around the US. We have a few herds around the country that are each individually able to sustain the species indefinitely.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    4. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've already done it to great success with the buffalo. They are commercially bred, butchered, and sold around the US. We have a few herds around the country that are each individually able to sustain the species indefinitely.

      Are you refering to the Bison? I haven't seen many buffalo in America.

    5. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. It doesn't really help from a conservation standpoint though. Cows, chickens and pigs are not the same animals they were when humans first started domesticating them. Farming animals changes the selection pressures on them in the direction of fat, and happy. You can't reintroduce a domesticated animal back into it's habitat and expect it to fit in the way it used to.

      From an ecological standpoint a domesticated animal is essentially extinct. The reason we care about endangered species (aside from the emotional aspect anyway... that you could fix by having pet elephants) is that they fill a function in their enviroment. An ecosystem is like a Jenga tower; take away enough species (or even just one important one) and the system collapses (with bad results for everyone who depends on that system directly or indirectly). The second a species isn't fufilling it's ecological role anymore (which happens when you convert them to a walking hamburger factory), there's not a lot of point to preserving it (unless you like hamburger).

      A good example is with the ornamental fish trade. Most pet fish are commercially raised on farms in high densities using artifical breeding programs. After only a few generations farmed fish are smaller, more docile and poorer parents (for species that take care of their young) than wild fish. There are a number of very popular aquarium fish that are endangered or extinct in the wild; but you never hear anybody in conservation seriously suggesting that captive fish could be released to boost wild stocks. Because of domestication, hybridization and the potential for the introdution of exotic diseases, captive fish are considered useless for conservation purposes.

    6. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cows, not indigenous to the American continent, were brought from Europe. When the Spaniards tried to conquer what today is Argentina, they were repeatedly repelled by the local population — So, after a few years, herds of wild cows found their habitat in the fertile pampa and mesopotamian areas.

      After the Spaniards re-colonized most of the region, cattle production was put in the hands of the Jesuit "Misiones" (you might remember the movie "The Mission"). The land was split in "vaquerías", and work for the locals was to hunt cows.

      Of course, the time when the cows were a plague in Argentina are long gone. But there are some few wild cow herds surviving in North Argentina, mainly in the Chaco region. One herd was found quite recently, with the right genetic makeup to recognize the type of cows common in Spain in the 1500s.

    7. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      As for large animals... encourage farmers to take care of a couple. Seriously, a cattle rancher could take in a few rhinos. Have a special pen for them. Make the whole thing tax deductible until there's some way to recoup the cost. These people breed BILLIONS of animals in captivity. We could do the same with rhinos, elephants, etc.

      This is happening with a lot of wild animals, no tax deductions necessary.

      South African farmers have realized that large animals are huge tourist draws (both for hunters and people who want to see them). There is a full auction market going on, with some groups breeding them and some buying them. Recently a Cape Buffalo stud sold for $2.6 million. Large animal breeding has caught on with a number of species.

      Myself, I want to get some flamingos.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As to domestication changing the species, yes but the species would survive. Furthermore, if you were so interested in maintaining a legacy strain you could literally select for known original phenotypes thus maintaining the species more exactly as it was found then nature would itself.

      No problem is insolvable.

      As to the jenga tower, there are SOME species that act in that way however most do not.

      For example, is the ferry shrimp found in muddy ditches in California essential to the california ecosystem? Obviously not. They could all go extinct tomorrow without so much as a ripple in our ecosystem.

      Species go extinct all the time and always have and frequently there are little if any ecological consequence because there is enormous redundancy in our ecosystem.

      There are exceptions but those exceptions are the exception.

      An example of just such a species would be the American wolf which did serve a vital role in maintaining the populations of native herd animals.

      The result of removing the wolf is that these herds do not maintain their scale naturally anymore.

      The fix was to allow hunting permits thus human hunters replace the wolf's role in the ecosystem. Sadly, those hunters have a different sensibility then the wolves. The wolves selected the small, the weak, the sick... and thus helped to keep the herds stronger by selecting effectively for the large, the strong, and the healthy.

      Human hunters tend to target animals that look impressive. Thus striking down many times the large, the strong, and the healthy contrary to what the wolves struck down. That is an issue and we should look into that. But it isn't insolvable.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    9. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Precisely. A book that theorized on the issue was the Phillip K Dick book "do androids dream of electronic sheep" in which most species were maintained by human beings as a kind of social obligation. It was a mark of social status to own and care for an animal. And through that they maintained many animals that otherwise would have gone extinct.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "buffalo" you eat and that is bred commercially is actually a hybrid with domestic cattle and does nothing to sustain the species.

    11. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Actually they're only hybrids in the sense that most bison have some cattle in their lineage... which is something made so common because they're effectively just different breeds of the same species. If you can interbreed with another creature and produce fertile offspring then you're basically the same species already.

      The real thing you want to preserve in bison are their unique phenotypes. Hybrids are typically only detected via a dna analysis that looks as mitochondrial dna... which is something we do with humans when we want to trace races or find associations between various people. That is one of the ways we know humans originated in Africa.

      Point being, the Bison is actually quite safe.

      Its very difficult to qualify a conservation strategy if you don't find that acceptable. They cannot have their open ranges back. That is gone. So how do they survive in the human era? This is as good as it gets.

      For other endangered species, this is also their best option. Adopting other strategies will not work, will waste time, will waste money... will do nothing to help.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    12. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Most animals that we haven't domesticated are very difficult to domesticate. Many don't breed well in captivity, require specialized diets, etc. Even something as simple as zebras having a knack for avoiding lassos meant they were never ridden or used as beasts of burden, except in special, limited, usually ceremonial circumstances.

    13. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Let people do it... outright encourage the practice and see what happens. You'll get a larger breeding population of exotic pets.

      Large animals will be kept in rural areas where they can afford to give such an animal that much space.

      The smaller animals might just find their way into homes. Doubtless they'll have issues. But it isn't only the animals that need to be trained. You also have to train the owners to take care of the animals. Some animals like cats are very easy to take care of... give them food and leave them alone. Their natural instinct to bury their waste tends to auto potty train them so its an easy thing. Other species will have to accommodated differently.

      What these species need is a lot of resources to replace what they've lost. They need a habitat and their old one is GONE.

      So they need to find other accommodations or die.

      Choose.

      Adapt or die.

      I offer an adaptation. Choose it... choose another... or they die.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    14. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem is insolvable.

      Actually, if your really knew your computational models, you'd know (and be able to prove) that some problems are insolvable.

      If it's so for computers, it is probably doubly so for Biology.

    15. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Actually no, because in the case of those insolvable problems the real problem is the parameters of the problem which itself needs to be adjusted.

      Now obviously if you're going to be an aspy asshat there are problems that cannot be solved. if you're in a cardboard box on the surface of the sun... you're probably dead... there isn't anything I can do for you.

      That said, to the extent we can save species, bringing them into our lives and homes and businesses... incorporating them into the human ecosystem... it will give them a powerful chance at lasting survival.

      The species that are endangered are either sensitive or needy. Those are species we could help directly. The species that aren't endangered are generally pretty hearty and adaptable. Those can live on nature preserves without having to be mothered. The fragile ones... we either help them or accept their extinction.

      Pick one.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    16. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never seen a wild pig? Must not leave the city much.

    17. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by wakawakka · · Score: 1

      One way to preserve elephants in a semi-natural habitat became a business model: http://business.financialpost....

    18. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      ok, so remove the ferry shrimp, and what do you have?

      In six months, you're knee deep in a toxic sludge, is what you have.

      They move and convert nutrients. They're food for something else. What else is hurt by their removal? Waders, for one. Flamingoes, as an example, feed exclusively on shrimp. Remove the shrimp from their habitat, every flamingo will starve to death. Which is why salt lakes and marshes are important for brine shrimp and for flamingoes.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    19. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      "Do you like our owl?"
      "It's artificial?"
      "Of course. Do you think I would be working here if I could afford a real one?"

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    20. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I think I noted elsewhere that there are wild pigs. That's not the point however... the point is that any species that becomes part of the human ecosystem gains the benefit of our resource and intelligence base.

      We have a limited set of species that we have domesticated but there is no reason why we couldn't expand that radically. Yes, the different species would have their own quirks. However, farmers and pet owners would have years and years to figure those out and adapt. What is more, companies would start making products for those species. So if they have special needs... they would be met.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    21. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Wrong. They are not the only species that does that. Furthermore, they are endangered because they're not actually that common which means they don't actually process that much of anything.

      So no.

      Look, if you want to prepetuate the myth that every single species is utterly indespensible and the whole ecosystem would collapse without them then you run into a big logical problem...

      Species have gone extinct for millions of years and yet the ecosystem didn't collapse. Why? Here is where you try to claim that the ecosystem did collapse it was just a long time ago and its recovered since. Well, the issue with that little theory is that species never stopped going extinct and so if your theory was valid... and its not... then the ecosystem never would recover.

      So please... put the crystal rubbing bullshit away. I have no patience for it. If you actually want to save some of these species rather then jerk off then my suggestion here would save species. Their habitats in many cases are gone.

      Gone. Over. No more.

      So... you can either let them die rummaging through garbage or you can let them into your home and give them a chance.

      This could be the future:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    22. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You bring the animals into human society. Make them a social status symbol... I have something rare... I have something expensive... I have something exotic. And that demand supplies the breeders with money... and so long as the breeders are paid the species will not die.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    23. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      what else do flamingo eat, Mister Attenborough?

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    24. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      first link on google...

      http://www.ehow.com/facts_5206...

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    25. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Maintain them as pets or food in our society though and they'll live as long as we continue to do that.

      There isn't any value to having an endangered species in a zoo or farm. The entire point of protecting species is to maintain their role in the ecosystem. Natural species die off is one thing, but the rapidity with which humans can disturb ecosystems makes it necessary to protect them when we can.

      Removing a species from an environment can often have unintended consequences. Oftentimes for the worse.

      http://www.fastcoexist.com/1681518/this-man-shot-40000-elephants-before-he-figured-out-that-herds-of-cows-can-save-the-planet
      http://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savory_how_to_green_the_world_s_deserts_and_reverse_climate_change

    26. Re:I'd go farther. Eat endangered species by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      If that were true then we'd only protect animals that have a role in the ecosystem. Many are so irrelevant to the ecosystem as to be unworthy of protection by this logic.

      The california ferry shrimp for example is impossible to justify for protection under this logic.

      The environmental protection people were shutting down construction sites because there were tire ruts that contained water and that water MIGHT contain ferry shrimp.

      Justify that on ecological preservation terms.

      It is obviously impossible.

      Look, part of the problem here is that there are bad actors on both sides of this issue that make people distrust each other.

      On the one hand you have companies and individuals that act irresponsibly and damage the ecosystem for their own greed and profit.

      On the other hand you have lobbying groups, advocacy groups, rogue governmental agencies, and various nuts that pervert or exceed environmental rules out of a misguided sense that they're protecting the environment when really they're undermining the credibility of the protection agencies.

      The EPA for example should not be a controversial organization. And yet it is very much so because they do things like try to force a guy in Montana to drain his duck pond.

      The california ferry shrimp point is something I personally experienced because the EPA was giving my family a hard time when we were trying to build a warehouse on a bit of industrial property. Appreciate, this was land that had been used for warehouses for generations. We tore down the old warehouse and were trying to build a new one top of the same location.

      The EPA said there might be ferry shrimp living in the water that had filled tire ruts on the construction site.

      I kid you not.

      So I'm a little dubious of this sort of thing and you would be as well if you had seen that as well.

      My point is that neither side is entirely composed of rational or moral or ethical people. There are bad actors on BOTH sides and you must remain skeptical to avoid being suckered.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  10. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    They are the Africanized Bees of the Rubus World. -The nastiest thorns, crowding out the friendlier native species, but the fruits are larger and more numerous.
    Better than Hedera by far, but not really welcome in a balanced environment.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  11. Every species was an invasive species at one time. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

    So in that sense this is the most elegant natural solution.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  12. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a solution to this problem: goats. Turn all that thorny nuisance into yummy meat and cheese.

  13. The problem is by publiclurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can eat all of the blackberries you can get to and the plant is still there.

    1. Re:The problem is by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You can eat all of the blackberries you can get to and the plant is still there.

      Yeah, I'm not sure how the submitter thought that eating blackberries somehow hurts the plant is comes from.

      Himalaya blackberries... Because even Luther Burbank made mistakes.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  14. Nutria by spudnic · · Score: 4, Informative

    They tried this a couple of decades ago in South Louisiana with the nutria. It turns out people weren't waiting in line to eat real life ROUSes. (Rodents Of Unusual Size)

    Now the state offers a $5 bounty per nutria tail turned in.

    --
    load "linux",8,1
    1. Re:Nutria by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

      Now the state offers a $5 bounty per nutria tail turned in.

      Great thanks has nutria recipe on that site to feed hungry family. We wait so long to find first from 404 page and then Slashdot people are quiet not help us. Many goods to you.

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    2. Re:Nutria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just send those to China and you guys would make a lot of money.

  15. Driving a species to extinction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can keep the harvest local relatively, you can replentish this as a source of food and nutrition. Introducing these invasive species to a global market, you will destroy the source.

  16. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given that 'being eaten' is the plan for plants that go to considerable metabolic expense to produce attractive fruits or berries, those probably aren't good candidates for this strategy. (Admittedly, humans probably excrete more of the seeds into the water treatment plant than birds do, so they probably aren't the ideal customer; but fruits are still the deliberately expendable seed carriers, not life-critical components.)

  17. at one time... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 1

    ...every species was an "invasive" species to the established ones in the particular eco-system.

    sure..of course eat them...uhh that's how things work on mudball Earth.

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
  18. Eat The Rich by bmenglish · · Score: 1

    I think they're as invasive as species come. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Eat The Rich by styrotech · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. Try this one instead:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  19. Re:Himalayan Blackberries by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Plus five insightful. Mechanical control is difficult but effective, The canes grow, then the next year they fruit, and the next year they die. It makes a hell of a mess, and gets harder to clear as time goes by, burying, then killing anything else in the area. Like Kudzu. Spraying Glyphosate is an ugly, but popular option. I favor the Flamethrower.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  20. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    50 years?

    just wait another 50 years and it's a staple of the eco habitat in seattle and you'll be fined for poisoning them.

    thats what I wonder about the lionfish population, if they eat them to almost extinct in the area.. and it takes 10 years to do so, will greenpeace tell you to quit eating them?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  21. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by IonOtter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Blackberries can be controlled, you just have to invest a little time. Basically? When you pick, tie a small ribbon on the branch you got it from. At the end of the growing season, cut out anything with a ribbon on it, because that vine will never produce fruit again, it will only become a "stringer", which spreads to produce more vines.

    This way, the plant can be controlled and kept to one area. But again, you have to invest time, which not many people have a lot of these days.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  22. Learn from the felines. by berchca · · Score: 1

    This is certainly how my cat handles invasive species...

    1. Re:Learn from the felines. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      In that setting your cat IS one of the invasive species.

    2. Re:Learn from the felines. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      And I wish people would start eating them around here. Where I live, they have become a pest animal. Dirty, disgusting, and beeding out of control. Unfortunatly, instead of people eating them, 'Crazy Cat Lady' has become mainstream.

  23. Difficult. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Eating blackberries won't dent the proliferation, especially not if you poop in the forest.

    Apparently bears do it too, but nobody ever saw them doing it.

    1. Re:Difficult. by russotto · · Score: 1

      Eating blackberries won't dent the proliferation, especially not if you poop in the forest.

      Apparently bears do it too, but nobody ever saw them doing it.

      Lots of people have; generally their bodies have been found a few feet from a pile of bear crap.

    2. Re:Difficult. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Brings to mind this classic:

      The Alaska Department of Fish and Game, recently issued this bulletin:

      In light of the rising frequency of human/grizzly bear conflicts, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game is advising hikers, hunters, and fishermen to take extra precautions and keep alert of bears while in the field.

      "We advise outdoorsmen to wear noisy little bells on their clothing so as not to startle bears that aren't expecting them. We also advise outdoorsmen to carry pepper spray with them in case of an encounter with a bear.

      It is also a good idea to watch out for fresh signs of bear activity. Outdoorsmen should recognize the difference between black bear and grizzly bear manure:

      Black bear manure is smaller and contains lots of berries and squirrel fur.

      Grizzly bear manure has little bells in it and smells like pepper."

    3. Re:Difficult. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      owie! I just headbutted my desk through laughing so hard!

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  24. Japanese Knotweed f'rinstance... by jpellino · · Score: 2

    The typical muni approach is to mow it down - this actually promotes spread.
    Knotweed produces an amazing mono-floral honey. It compares to buckwheat honey and black sage honey.
    It gets a PR spin as "bamboo honey".
    Haven't had it as a veggie yet, but it gets some good reviews.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  25. Isn't that why the invasive species was introduced by joeflies · · Score: 1

    now I don't have a complete case history for all invasive species but I do recall reading that in one case the fish that was introduced was from the local population wanting to eat a fish that was non-native and otherwise unavailable, so they imported the live fish into the local region

  26. Garlic Mustard, much beyond the east by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    That weed is at least as far west as the central plains states, and it is spreading quickly. Unless we can train some indigenous critters to start eating it our forests are in danger from what it does to the soil. Even though it is rather tasty we can't possibly eradicate it ourselves just by pulling and/or eating it.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Garlic Mustard, much beyond the east by bikeforever · · Score: 2

      Eric Boerman of Michigan State University appears to be looking for novel protein based methods for controlling the invasive species Garlic Mustard: (this is from MSU's website describing life sciences poster presentations) COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTION OF NOVEL INHIBITORS FOR MYROSINASE Eric Boerman Category: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Section 1 Poster: 33 Location: Lake Huron Room, 9:30 AM-11:30 AM Mentor(s): Leslie Kuhn (Biochemistry and Molecular Biology) Myrosinase is an enzyme found in certain plant and microbe species that is a key component of the biosynthesis pathway of isothiocyanates - allelotoxins that suppress soil microbes that mutualistically benefit many plant species. This system is found in multiple economically-damaging invasive species in North America, such as Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata), which is the focus of this study. Because the invading plants do not require symbiotic soil microbes, they gain a selectionary advantage over native species. The goal of this project is to find novel inhibitors for myrosinase which can hopefully be used to control the spread of garlic mustard and other species. This will be done by computational analysis of ligand binding in myrosinase's active site. The structure of myrosinase is well-documented, and by looking at the manner in which known ligands bind to the active site we hope to determine catalytically-active amino residues within myrosinase. Once the important features within the active site are known, a library of molecules similar in structure to known substrates and cofactors will be assessed for their ability to bind to myrosinase's active site. This will be done computationally so that the list of candidates can be quickly narrowed. Promising candidates will then be tested in vivo to determine their quality as inhibitors of myrosinase.

  27. Kudzu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there's Kudzu where I live. It's not very tasty.

    It was introduced here in the South East for erosion control by the farmers.

    Unfortunately, it chokes off trees and other indigenous plants.

    And then there are the asshats who buy exotic creatures like pythons and release them into the wild when they get too big.

  28. Re:Every species was an invasive species at one ti by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    The difference being that natural selection is a slow process. What people are doing is causing a much faster change in the ecosystem by moving species around to places they did not evolve in. What we are doing is not a natural process.

  29. Hell, no! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    I'm not intent on eating members of the species Arion vulgaris any time soon.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  30. Of course we should by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

    I live in South Florida. Lionfish is available with just a short drive down to the keys. It has a good taste and even better, no guilt whatsoever. I think it's just natural that we should eat them. BTW, Florida lobster down this way (they call them crawfish up in the Northeast :/ ) were once so plentiful that it was given to prisoners. If it's edible, someone will find a way to eat them.

  31. Too bad about kudzu.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few parts of kudzu are edible, but the *taste* is like sucking spinach flavored snot.

    1. Re:Too bad about kudzu.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few parts of kudzu are edible, but the *taste* is like sucking spinach flavored snot.

      I always hope someone will figure out how to economically convert kudzu to ethanol.

  32. Yes, but ... by Rainsoaked · · Score: 1

    Only if they are edible.

  33. Xenophobic? by tomk12 · · Score: 1

    Is it only me who thinks that all this talk about "invasive species" is fundamentally xenophobic and recist?

  34. Re:Himalayan Blackberries by wezelboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I loathe the Himalayan Blackberry. The berries, while large and numerous, are bland. They store a lot of energy in their roots quickly, so once they get a foothold, they send out shoots everywhere- especially after you cut them back.

    Goats are the best remedy. I had a single goat clear an acre of 8-10' tall bramble in a span of a few months. For good. They eat new shoots as soon as they appear until the blackberry roots have expended all their stored energy.

    If you don't have a goat, then you must remain vigilant. I have a zero tolerance policy towards blackberries. If I see one on my property, it dies.

  35. How about evangelical Christians? by AndyKron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can we eat evangelical Christians? They're pretty invasive.

    1. Re:How about evangelical Christians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romans tried that. Didn't work.

    2. Re:How about evangelical Christians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you haven't been to Malaysia, Libya, Sudan, U.A.E.....

  36. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by owlstead · · Score: 1

    You don't need to eat them all. Just turn them into jam and distribute. I'll happily eat the jam.

  37. Oh, wow! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    You mean, treating environmental issues pragmatically instead of as a new religion works better? Who knew?

  38. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

    Why you gotta waste time with a ribbon and coming back later?

    Pick the berries then chop the shit down immediately right then and there.

  39. Feral pig is excellent, but takes getting used to. by hey! · · Score: 2

    Here in Boston we don't have a feral pig problem, but we do have gourmet butcher shops that sell game and exotic meat. I've tried feral pig and it's good, but intense -- intense enough that I wasn't sure I liked it at first. The best way I can describe it is "extremely piggy".

    I'll explain. Imagine on one hand a cooked chicken breast. Imagine on the other hand a regular, commercial pork chop. There's a clear difference between the two, but it's ... subtle. Now imagine a place far beyond the other hand, where the difference is as subtle as being whacked in the face with a shovel. In an era where pork is marketed as "the other whtie meat" the distinctive flavor of pork has been toned down to the point where nobody will be offended, but feral pig is unabashedly swine-y. Not everyone will like it. By *I* do.

    According to the article feral pigs reproduce so successfully in many places that it would be impossible to put a dent in the populations through hunting, but I choose to call that "sustainable". Trying to eat these animals into oblivion (if you can stomach them) is an environmental "can't lose", especially if you count the environmental cost of industrial scale hog farming. I'm very happy to pay some guy from Texas to remove the problem from his ranch and send it up here so I can put it on my plate.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  40. Just wait a few hundred years by lowkster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honey bees are an invasive species. They were brought to the Americas in the 1600's. Now people are panicking about colony collapse and trying to save this invasive species. I thought that is how nature works, life seeks out new and better environments to grow in. Does it matter if a bee is blown across the ocean by a hurricane or carried over by a Spaniard? Or if a mussel makes to the great lakes on the bottom of a tanker or on a piece of drift wood?

  41. Give Me More by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Florida has a lovely python population and they can be eaten or made into boots. We have tilapia in abundance. We have the the snake head fish from the orient as well as peacock and rainbow bass and also some species of piranha. I welcome all of these invaders. We also have armadillos and iguanas both of which also are good eating. All in all i want more. I wish the jumping silver carp as well as the big head carp would invade Florida big time. Poison toads are killing a few pets but other that and one nasty, African snail that can actually eat the plaster off your exterior walls i tend to love the exotics. They are fun to catch and some get really large. And we don't even want to get into the good things that Kudzu vine can do if properly used. We have invasive bamboos which are also wonderful. Some items seen to be a curse tend to become valued. The dreaded zebra mussel in the Great Lakes has become a great food source for sturgeon and the water is cleaner for having them. Lampreys were cursed and considered an emergency and now people cook and eat lampreys. Frankly i think the fight against most invasive species simply creates jobs for public employees.

    1. Re:Give Me More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Frankly i think the fight against most invasive species simply creates jobs for public employees.

      Tell that to Guam

    2. Re:Give Me More by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly i think the fight against most invasive species simply creates jobs for public employees.

      That's easy to think because it's easy to forget about the species that we used to have, but don't any longer.I'm old, so I do remember the species we used to have back in the 60s. but are long gone, like the rock crab, which is way better eating than the tiny Asian shore crab that displaced it.

      Another thing to remember is that Florida is a very big state, so if you simply list all the edible invasive animals, it seems like a cornucopia. But if you look at the situation in habitat by habitat, the situation looks different.The problem these things is that they don't have native predators -- they overwhelm the resources within a habitat. That means you lose everything else in that habitat that was dependent, directly or indirectly, on resources consumed by the exotic. That includes many desirable native species.

      Take Tilapia. Of course the're edible, they're a popular aquaculture fish, but they're not *great* eating. They're like tofu: it's all about what you cook them *with*. When they take over a body of water, they displace native fish that are actually *better* eating. So instead of a nice bass, you end up catching a mediocre white fish you can buy cheaper than bait at the supermarket anyway.

      Or Asian carp. They are indeed edible, in fact good if you know how to prepare them, but they also displace many, many desirable native gamefish: bass, crappie, catfish, trout and salmon, all of which are superb eating. For a whole list of edible animals you might not be aware of, you get one in their place. That's a raw deal.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Give Me More by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      The other problem with eating the meat of invasive species is that many of them are very high on the food chain and thus contain tons of mercury

  42. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That sounds pretty complicated. I would just install a Blackberry Enterprise Server, and that would easily control all my blackberries.

  43. Won't work everywhere by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    The majority of invasive species in Minnesota (other than fish) are pretty much inedible, because they were brought here by accident (emerald ash borer) or as decoration (eurasian water milfoil, buckthorn, etc), and were never intended to be a food source

    1. Re:Won't work everywhere by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      In Northern Minnesota, the whitetail deer is an invasive species. They displaced the native caribou.

  44. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blackberries can be controlled

    Indeed! In our back yard, they are losing the battle against the ivy and bamboo! :)

  45. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Indeed! In our back yard, they are losing the battle against the ivy and bamboo! :)

    Sheesh. There are spots in my yard where the three coexist quite happily.

    In my younger more naive days, I made the mistake of planting Hedera Helix (English Ivy) - that is one very nasty plant.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  46. magic tentacles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then what would the Burmese python have

    The obvious answer is magic tentacles. I haven't yet come up with a marketing angle though.

  47. Seal meat anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Canada, we have an over-crowded seal population eating way too many cod fish, and the rest of the world is trying to get us to stop hunting them.

    http://www.sealharvest.ca/site/?page_id=16

  48. blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blackberry is expensive fruit in many other countries, for eg., Middle East. In fact, one can make a business out of this.

  49. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck with that. -the voice of experience

  50. Wrong-headed... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    1. Invasive species cost money to get rid-of.
    2. People pay quite a bit of money for good-tasting food.

    Making invasive species valuable can make-up the shortfall for governments being unwilling to spend the requisite amount of money needed to deal with them, but it doesn't NEED to be "food".

    Figure out how to make cane toad carcasses into fashionable ash trays, or kudzu into motor vehicle components, or anything else people are willing to PAY FOR, and you'll solve the problem. A better solution would be for governments to stop doing a half-assed job, and just spend the amount of money needed, to deplete the invasive species.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Wrong-headed... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives in prime cane toad territory here in QLD I can say that even if you could sell cane toads a $100 each, it wouldn't make a dent in the population, there are just too many of them.

    2. Re:Wrong-headed... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      there are just too many of them.

      With proper incentives, humans are superb at hunting species to extinction... I know full well how many cane toads there are in your area, and a few thousand humans designing ways to capture or kill them around-the-clock, would drastically reduce their numbers in a few years. More aggressive methods after that, would threaten the species.

      Cane toads are not as numerous as, nor as prolific reproducers, as several of the species of ocean fish humans have trolled to endangered status. It can be done, when heavily supported by greed. Give me $100 each, and I'll drop everything, and make a good start of it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  51. Feral pig is excellent, but takes getting used to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem with feral pig is tape worm and other type of infections and contagions.

  52. Give Me More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fyi, armadillo blood can cause leprosy, it is scientifically proved, so take care.

    snake head fish is great by the way.

  53. Humans are an invasive species. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, that would be cannibalism.

    Though it may be accepted in some cutlers, I figure that cannibalism would exempt humans from being eaten, though they are an invasive species.

  54. Re:Feral pig is excellent, but takes getting used by hey! · · Score: 1

    Cook it to the old FDA internal temperature recommendation. Problem solved.

    Tapeworm eggs can also be killed by freezing to -4F for 24 hours. My local butcher carries game and it's always deep frozen, probably for this very reason.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  55. Mm.. blackberries by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    They are used as a natural border since it is a thorny viney mess. But during late July and August you can pluck it for blackberries. They are very delicious and can be used in a number of yummy things. But they are hard to kill and will take over if you don't stop it early. Some places you have to burn it to get rid of it because it keeps coming back.

  56. Happy planet for all = kill 50% of human pop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy planet Earth for all = kill 50% of human population!

    1. Re:Happy planet for all = kill 50% of human pop... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Who let the feminists in?

  57. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by slugstone · · Score: 0

    Blackberries can be controlled

    Indeed! In our back yard, they are losing the battle against the ivy and bamboo! :)

    Are you sure that your bamboo is not knot-weed? Knot-weed is not a bamboo but another invasive species.

  58. Lionfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I take a trip to the Keys I'll grab a nice Lionfish meal at a local restaurant. It really is a delicious fish as well as being an invasive species. I like to think I'm helping the ecology of Florida every time I have dinner there.

  59. It will grow back from the roots. by publiclurker · · Score: 0

    One way to take care of them is to paint the cut end with concentrated brush killer. The stuff you normally mix with water and spray to kill these pests. It kills the vines and, since you aren't spraying indiscriminately, doesn't hurt the surrounding plants.

  60. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    Yup. Knotweed is fairly common in the area, but there's none in my back yard.

  61. Not all are edible though... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 2
    The first two invasive species that I can think of, off the top of my head are kudzu and zebra mussels.

    Kudzu : AKA "the devils ivy" and "the vine that ate The South" I used to work in the landscaping business and have actually sold this stuff as an indoor decorative plant. I'm pretty sure that people taking it home and putting it in their yard instead is why we're seeing it up in Canada now. Out of curiosity, I've actually tasted kudzu leaves and it's not something I'd ever want in a salad or stewed greens. (but other people enjoy the taste of say grape leaves, so that doesn't completely rule it out.) There are apparently uses for the starch derived from the roots, but I have no experience with that. The damned stuff grows faster than goats can eat it, which is saying a lot. It grows so fast that in ideal conditions you can SEE it growing, you'd almost swear it was capable of following you. I think the best use isn't as food, but as biomass stock. The problem with using it as biomass is that it exhausts the soil pretty quickly.

    zebra mussels. As far as I know, in the areas infested by them, the mussels are not edible because of the various nasty things they filter out of the water and sequester in their tissues. I don't think ANY Great Lakes shellfish would be edible for that reason. It used to be you couldn't eat any fish caught in the Great Lakes, especially the lower lakes, because of industrial nasties like mercury and dioxin accumulation. I seem to recall that white fleshed fish species are safe now, as an occasional menu item only. Filter feeders from the Great Lakes, especially if eaten regularly like we'd have to do to keep them under control, is probably still a Bad Idea (TM Animaniacs)

    Overall; my concern is that deciding to eat the invasive species is tantamount to an admission of defeat. It's certainly a step towards learning to simply accept that they are part of the local food chain. I am not an ecology and conservation expert by any means, but I think with at least some of the invasive species we may still have a shot at eradicating them if necessary. (if Monsanto or Dupont manage to come up with a kudzu specific herbicide that degrades elegantly/cleanly they'll make a mint down in the southern US)

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:Not all are edible though... by tyme · · Score: 2

      morethanapapercert wrote:

      my concern is that deciding to eat the invasive species is tantamount to an admission of defeat.

      While I don't think that we should accept the status quo of irresponsibly introducing invasive species to our local environments, I think it's a wonderful idea to try eating our way out of the problems we've already created. For example, the Northern Snakehead is a recent and particular problem in my region (Washington D.C. Metropolitan area) and, coincidentally, is quite tasty. If we could manage to fish them to extinction it would be all for the best, and should be encouraged. Of course this may not work for many invasive species (some reproduce too rapidly to be effectively controlled by human predation, others might not be edible or palatable), so this sort of solution should be considered only as a second (or lower) tier option.

      --
      just a ghost in the machine.
    2. Re:Not all are edible though... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The question to me is, are zebra mussles good enough at collection mercury that they could be used as a collection method for cleaning up mercury in the lakes?

    3. Re:Not all are edible though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overall; my concern is that deciding to eat the invasive species is tantamount to an admission of defeat.

      Don't think of it as admitting defeat. Just think of it as intelligent application of unsustainable agricultural practice.

  62. This is what the Everglades needs... by Tangential · · Score: 2

    We need to stimulate a big demand for wild pythons and boas in South Florida. If they became a locavore food, then dealing with their invasion in South Florida would become much easier.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  63. The most pernicious invasive species? by smhsmh · · Score: 2

    Without doubt the most significant, consequential, and pernicious invasive species on most parts of the planet -- I hear there are colonies now even on Antarctica -- is homo sapiens. But it would not be wise to start eating them.

  64. Stray dogs and cats? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    I kind of want to shoot the stray dogs that run through my yard, but I don't think I want to eat them.

    1. Re:Stray dogs and cats? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We don't have a stray dog problem here. I do hear coyotes out there singing most evenings, and sometimes even in the morning. I don't think that's a coincidence.

  65. Wineberries! by Spugglefink · · Score: 2

    Wineberries (Rubus phoenicolasius) are considered an invasive, noxious species to be destroyed on sight. But why would you want to destroy something so very delicious and tasty? I have some growing on my property that drove all my fancy named cultivars to extinction, and good riddance. These berries are better tasting anyway, and the seeds were free from heaven above, or at least a bird's cloaca from above. Bird shit never tasted so good.

  66. Re:Feral pig is excellent, but takes getting used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem with feral pig is tape worm and other type of infections and contagions.

    Believe it or not, but Science andcooking have managed to evolve in the last 2000 years.

    Of course, feel free to keep to the old ways, but just realize that a lot of those guidelines are now dangerous by not adapting to shifting issues.

  67. Just wait a few hundred years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drift wood? up the Saint Lawrence seaway, over Niagara Falls? After crossing the salty ocean from freaking China?

    Hurricane? you're going to get enough queens across the Atlantic in a hurricane?

    This is retarded. There's a reason these animals haven't crossed in the millions of years before humans.

  68. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    [blackberries] are losing the battle against the ivy and bamboo! :)

    Down here in the south, we've got honeysuckle and kudzu. I could send you some of those (Take my wife -- please!) and you could then sponsor the VFW (Vegetarian Wrestling Foundations') ---

    Fight of the Plants!

    You could leave admission free as a loss-leader, then charge for refreshments, housing, and other long term care items, including, no reason at all, Roundup and machetes.

    Warn your guests not to stand or sit in any one place for too long though, or they might become a bit more "One with Nature" than they were expecting.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  69. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I can't spell. VWF there; sorry.

    (Guess I'll have to turn in my membership card now. I didn't like fighting with vegetables anyway -- they usually won.)

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  70. Um.. YES. by Rick+in+China · · Score: 1

    In addition, should we eat non-invasive species? Um... YES.

  71. lolwut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, illegal immigration is good but invasive species are bad? They're just hardworking life forms doing the jobs native life forms won't do!

  72. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goats are not a solution to this problem, whilst the goat can eat the thorns...it pretty much has to be the only thing left on the menu. Goats will consume easier food first, and thorny balckberry doesn't make it into the easy group.

  73. Invading species...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cannibalism, huh?

  74. "Here in Boston we don't have a feral pig problem" by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Some Boston residents would disagree, especially when the Habs were in town.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  75. Re:Feral pig is excellent, but takes getting used by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    Problem with feral pig is tape worm and other type of infections and contagions.

    No. The problem is access to hunting lands. "Oh, you want to hunt on my private ranch? That'll be 2k!" There is very little public land in Texas to hunt on. Also, who in their right mind would would let a bunch of people hunt? (Not sure, we do it all the time up here in dah Nort, but not with pig hunting.)

    So the issue becomes rancher pays a few professionals to get rid of pest pigs. Then turns around and lets one or two parties hunt. But overall, the pigs are left alone.

    COULD we eat more of them? Sure, but it's cheaper and easier by far to plop down yet another pig farm.

  76. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No duh.

  77. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by dmatos · · Score: 1

    Probably not. The native habitat for lionfish is the Indo-Pacific oceans. They are not threatened in those locations. They are invasive in the Caribbean especially.

    In the Caribbean, they have no natural predators. Additionally, they are voracious eaters, and scarf up hundreds of immature reef fish each day. The quantity of native reef fish has dropped precipitously in the Caribbean due to invasive lionfish. Being able to _actually_ eliminate them from the Caribbean would be a fantastic coup, and allow the reefs to regenerate back to something of their former glory.

    As a side note, though, how many people actually pay attention to what the extremists in Greenpeace tell them to do? Have you stopped driving your car? Eating beef? Shut down your nuclear power plants?

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  78. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by captainpanic · · Score: 1

    Berries are meant to be eaten. Why else would a plant put yummy sweet stuff around its seeds? You're actually helping the plant to thrive if you pick the berries (especially if you drop a few here and there while picking, or otherwise spread the seeds around).

    If you want it gone, pull it out at the roots, and only then pick the berries.

  79. Beware of the Cobra Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when companies start to breed the invasive species?

  80. Already do by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    In England, I hunt and eat grey squirrel (invasive from North America - check), rabbit (invasive from Eastern Europe (introduced by the Romans) - check), canada goose (invasive from North America - check), and when I come across them, ring-necked parakeets (check it out - feral invasive!) make for a tasty stick snack.

    The rabbits and the geese are relatively large animals, being that they'll provide for two, sometimes three or more meals each, which is kinda handy. Three rabbit and half a dozen squirrel (a quiet weekend's kill) feeds me for a week.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  81. Re:Himalayan Blackberries by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    mechanical control is the only way to control blackberries. I've seen vines blast across ground obliterated by a Roundup treatment as if it were virgin laid potting compost. My method involves liberal application of machete followed by incineration. Leaves me with a lovely fertile ash which gets turned back into the soil. Cow parsley gets the same treatment, that stuff is evil (not to mention highly toxic to humans and aggressive in growth/spread), incineration is the ONLY way to dispose of that.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  82. Re:blackberries in seattle? I'm Shocked. Shocked by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    ok, hands up anyone who ever listened to a word Greenpeace had to say, considering their ships drink fuel oil pumped probably from the same wellheads they try to blockade with their fucking boats?

    Thought as much.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  83. Kudzu Salad? by servant · · Score: 1

    How about chocolate covered Fire Ants or Killer Bees?

    --
    ... "When you pry the source from my cold dead hands."
  84. "rabbit" stew by CmdrTamale · · Score: 1

    There is an old recipe for rabbit stew that begins --

    First, decide if what you have is a "rabbit"...

    I believe this has worked for chicken and goat.
    I doubt the rumors about mackerel and prawns.
    --
    MY FACE MY FACE oh god no NO NOOOO NT stop the angles are not real ZALG IS TO THE PONY HE COMES

  85. Re:Himalayan Blackberries by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    I loathe the Himalayan Blackberry. The berries, while large and numerous, are bland. They store a lot of energy in their roots quickly, so once they get a foothold, they send out shoots everywhere- especially after you cut them back.

    Aye -- and the canes grow and branch quickly. I used to own close to 20ac and battled them constantly. They tend to grow in a fountain shape, which when sufficiently large makes it difficult to get at the base for cutting. The canes also branch and intertwine, which coupled with the nasty-ass thorns makes control a battle at any scale. I had a commercial front-mower with a 72" deck and got reasonably good at death from a thousand cuts -- I'd hook a clump around the spindle on the deck's front wheels, then back up to lay it out flat (a move I learned from snakes), then run over it with the deck and repeat. I still have scars on my arms from the inevitable thorn attacks, and never found anything that would stop them. There are evergreen blackberries too, the ones with lacy / dissected leaves, but they seem less aggressive. There's also actually a delicious native, the dewberry, but it's small and much better behaved, so it can't compete.

    Goats are the best remedy. I had a single goat clear an acre of 8-10' tall bramble in a span of a few months. For good. They eat new shoots as soon as they appear until the blackberry roots have expended all their stored energy.

    Agreed, it is astounding to watch goats go after this preferred yet armored delicacy, especially since they have no upper teeth. I still don't know how a Nubian can stand on its spindly hind legs to reach up.

    If you don't have a goat, then you must remain vigilant. I have a zero tolerance policy towards blackberries. If I see one on my property, it dies.

    I hadn't the time/energy/$ to be that extreme about blackberries there, but I sure was about the @#$@#$@# japanese knotweed. Dumbass previous owner planted it because he thought it was friggin' bamboo. Blackberries are nasty, but knotweed, that shit is just plain the devil incarnate, and nearly impossible to kill short of nuking the site from orbit.

  86. Seattle Rent a Ruminant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In and near Seattle there is a company (www.rentaruminant.com) that will rent you a goat and someone to watch it if you want, so you can clear blackberries even without owning a goat.