Slashdot Mirror


Dubai's Climate-Controlled Dome City Is a Dystopia Waiting To Happen

Daniel_Stuckey writes: Dubai is building "the world's first climate-controlled city" — it's a 4.3 mile pedestrian mall that will be covered with a retractable dome to provide its shoppers with air conditioning in the summer heat. The Mall of the World, as it's called, will become the sort of spectacular, over-the-top attraction Dubai is known for. Shortly after, it will probably become an equally spectacular real-world dystopia.

By sectioning off a 3-million-square-foot portion of the city with an air conditioned dome, Dubai is dropping one of the most tangible partitions between the haves and the have nots of the modern era—the 100 hotels and apartment complexes inside the attraction will be cool, comfortable, and nestled into a entertainment-filled, if macabre, consumer paradise."

265 comments

  1. Humph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone sounds jealous...

    1. Re:Humph by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Uhuh - all the buildings and cars have aircon already. This will make little difference in practice.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Humph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone sounds jealous...

      The word you're clumsily groping for is "envious".

    3. Re:Humph by Grega711 · · Score: 1

      Mall of America in Bloomington, MN, USA is around 1KM by 1/2 KM or around 400,000 sq meters, all covered and climate controlled. It includes 500+ stores, 7 nightclubs, 14 movie theatres, amusement rides for children, ice skating (?), and it employs around 12,000 people. It opened in 1992, and so far, doesn't seem to have become "dystopian" or caused the kinds of problems forecast in these comments for a similar mall in Dubai. Maybe everybody needs to take a deep breath and think this one through a little more?

  2. Overreaction by qbast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is just a big mall with AC, not beginning of Mad Max. Calm down.

    1. Re:Overreaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You say that but that's exactly it's intention. To seperate the rich from the slaves.

    2. Re:Overreaction by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You say that but that's exactly it's intention. To seperate the rich from the slaves.

      And this is a new thing? Cities everywhere tend to do this.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Overreaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another way to separate the rich from the slaves is through education. Judging from your post, it appears you're sliding towards the second group.

    4. Re:Overreaction by longk · · Score: 1

      Doubtful. Slaves usually outnumber the rich in these places, if only to tend to their every need.

    5. Re:Overreaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the truly stupid are often the ones that claim they are the most "educated". Like you. And the rich dont need education, as many MANY rich dickheads have long proved anyway. But I doubt you are part of the rich to begin with

      You are a slave. You are not as educated as you think you are.

    6. Re:Overreaction by rcht148 · · Score: 1

      How so?
      In our cities today, this is already true. There are areas where prices are very high and poorer people can't afford to buy houses there. The same thing would apply for this 'dome city' too.

      The article says "may be free to wander through by day, but they will surely find no residence there"; just like our current divide of richer areas vs poorer areas.

      Then the article says "It won't be long before there will be those who will be desperate to get inside; and it means an authority will be established to decide who can, and who can't."
      Why do you need that? Free market economy will control the prices of housing in the dome just like our current housing rates as per school district lines or proximity to other valuable services.

      I don't see how this is any different from our current rich/poor housing divide.

    7. Re:Overreaction by gweilo8888 · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Will it be gated, and entrants checked for their bank balance before entering? Then it's not a partition. And as for "dystopia", the submitter should probably check the definition of the word. It would hardly seem relevant to this creation.

    8. Re:Overreaction by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      More in some places and less in others, though. And this seems like one of the extreme cases.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Overreaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's all fun and games until Tina Turner shows up.

    10. Re:Overreaction by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this is any different from our current rich/poor housing divide.

      Clearly, it's the part about the dome... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

    11. Re:Overreaction by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      When I was in Africa, the 2 malls I visited had 2 guards at every entrance with AK47's that did exactly that. We walked through as At one entrance a guard was a 60yr (I'm guessing) old african with grey/white hair, a velvet purple suit that looked like it was as old as he was, it had faded white fuzz in certain areas, he wore silver aviator sun glasses and his AK47 had an aged, glossy nickel silver finish. He stood motionless as we walked past. It was one of the most surreal sights I've ever laid eyes on. Sometimes I wonder what that guys story was... I bet it was amazing, good or bad.

      Anyways, so yea, I wouldn't be surprised if they did check you for some sort of ID that guaranteed you could afford to be there.

    12. Re:Overreaction by akpak · · Score: 1

      I mean, how is it any different (other than probably bigger) than City Center in Las Vegas?

    13. Re:Overreaction by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Considering all the other stuff Dubai has built, how does this mall rate more than a passing mention?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:Overreaction by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      They don't do that in any of the other malls in the UAE, so I don't know why you'd think they'd do it for this one.

  3. Isn't all of Dubai an issue? by Kenja · · Score: 2

    It's just a mater of time before the desert swallows the place...

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Isn't all of Dubai an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a matter of time before all life on earth dies, so why bother doing anything? Dubai is an attempt to build a source of income (party city for rich foreigners) so that the country doesn't go down the tubes when the oil runs out. It probably won't work, but that's the goal.

    2. Re:Isn't all of Dubai an issue? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Assuming you have the means why the hell would you want to go there from all other places? Security? Isolation from the rest of the (poor world)?

    3. Re:Isn't all of Dubai an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long until some terrorist lets some biological or chemical weapon loose in that air conditioned environment? I'm guessing after about 3-4 years.

    4. Re:Isn't all of Dubai an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the sea. It isn't exactly high elevation terrain around the southern Persian Gulf.

    5. Re:Isn't all of Dubai an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where would you find a terrorist in that part of the world?

  4. Life on Mars? by Prien715 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Being the largest climate controlled dome of its kind, perhaps the engineering "lessons learned" could be applicable to creating a self-sustaining space colony -- one of the chief challenges being climate control. ..or else, I've just been playing too much Kerbal Space Program and reading too much Heinlein;)

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:Life on Mars? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That's... actually a really good point. Let's hope the lessons are shared.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Life on Mars? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No one will EVER live in a permanent space colony. Sorry.

      This fantasy was promoted in an age where achieving terrestrial dominance through orbital trajectory of warheads was under intense and competitive development. It did its job.

      Rockwell rode on the tail-end of this era, for the final boondoggle of the US Shuttle Program, in the 1970's. You won't see anything like that again.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are looking at things realistically. Every technology starts out as a playtoy of the rich. If the author's thinking was kept to, we'd all be living in mud huts.

    4. Re:Life on Mars? by khallow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Earth is already a permanent space colony.

    5. Re:Life on Mars? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      I'm a techno-optimist but I agree with you. The rate things are going, it isn't going to make much sense to have people living in space colonies. I can't think of any good reason to do it other than the coolness factor. Unfortunately a lot of people are emotionally invested in this idea and will fight logic tooth and nail to promote their fantasies.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    6. Re:Life on Mars? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Oh I believe you underestimate the stupidity of the electorate and the congressional love of pork.

      Figures for NASA's SLS costs

      http://www.thespacereview.com/...

      They are putting the costs at a potential 5 billion/launch before any development overruns.

      This is to get us to Mars. Brilliant like we have done so much with the Moon in half century since we went all out to get there.
       

    7. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh dude, a modern adobe hut isnt that bad, you can get them with power cable tv and indoor plumbing.

    8. Re:Life on Mars? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      And the space mining is going to be done completely by robots? We don't have that level of AI.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Life on Mars? by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one will EVER live in a permanent space colony. Sorry.

      While I share your pessimistic outlook for the foreseeable future, forever is a really long time. Are you willing to say that absolutely nobody will be living in a permanent space colony in 100 years? 500 years? 10,000 years? If so, what makes you so certain?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Life on Mars? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 2

      We don't? We already have AI that can autonomously land on other bodies and extract material. In fact we've had it for 4 decades. See: almost any planetary lander/rover ever. It seems the barrier to mining is more up-front cost and on-site materials processing than AI.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    11. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A great mind agrees with you. "Spaceship Earth", Bucky Fuller.

    12. Re:Life on Mars? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      "Ever" - rhetorical device. Not a statement of actual infinite temporal determination. :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    13. Re:Life on Mars? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Earth is already a permanent space colony.

      Yeah.

      And just LOOK at how THAT turned out!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    14. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if all you want is a random teaspoon of surface dust from the Moon at literally astronomical cost, you're set!

    15. Re:Life on Mars? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What? It can't even repair its own pierced wheel! How is it going to repair complex mining equipment?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one will find a new element between nitrogen and oxygen. EVER.

      How about that? That's the same level of certain.

    17. Re:Life on Mars? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any good reason to do it other than the coolness factor.

      I think the implicit assumption is one of: we're going to completely fsck up this planet and have to leave, something else is going to threaten to fsck up this planet (and we'll have to leave), or we're going to outgrow and want to be elsewhere.

      Do I think it likely we could pull it off (or even have the resources)? That I'm skeptical of.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    18. Re:Life on Mars? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      No one will EVER live in a permanent space colony. Sorry.

      This fantasy was promoted in an age where achieving terrestrial dominance through orbital trajectory of warheads was under intense and competitive development. It did its job.

      Rockwell rode on the tail-end of this era, for the final boondoggle of the US Shuttle Program, in the 1970's. You won't see anything like that again.

      Ever is a long time bub. If shit goes as pear shaped as scientists are predicting here... Rich people will be glamoring to get out. They've already bought up most of the islands, when those run out the new rich people will need somewhere to go to get away from the rest of us.

    19. Re:Life on Mars? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      On our current trajectory, it will only happen if your dystopian overlords want it to happen.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    20. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a techno-optimist but I agree with you. The rate things are going, it isn't going to make much sense to have people living in space colonies. I can't think of any good reason to do it other than the coolness factor. Unfortunately a lot of people are emotionally invested in this idea and will fight logic tooth and nail to promote their fantasies.

      I was about to say the same thing about domed cities in the desert. They're also pretty cool, and being built for no reason other than that the rulers of Dubai think they're cool.

      I no longer think we'll see space colonies in our lifetimes, but I do think that as long as we manage not to destroy ourselves, some culture will decide it's something cool enough to try. I take comfort in knowing that if the idea actually works, in a thousand years it won't matter if it was American, European, Russian, Chinese, or Dubai.

    21. Re:Life on Mars? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Yeah. But they are really good at spectacular failure, and undermining long-term success prospects through want for cooperation... :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    22. Re:Life on Mars? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to? Build them out of cheap, expendable, easily-replaceable parts. Which you can do, because the entire premise of asteroid mining is that it will make the cost of building and deploying space equipment dead cheap (otherwise why do it in the first place?)

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    23. Re:Life on Mars? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head. The problem isn't AI. The problem is that scaling it up to industrial levels is hard. And the absolute WORST way of solving that problem is making manned mining ships, raising the complexity, cost, and risk by 100x.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    24. Re:Life on Mars? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      But how do you bootstrap a complex, spaceborne, self-sustaining infrastructure for making those parts in the first place? There's this critical period of time before launching the first rocket of this project and the system becoming fully operational and capable of producing and assembling its own parts where if anything goes wrong, it won't be able to fix itself because it won't have reached that stage yet. That's simple logic. And look at how complex this whole thing is on Earth - material mining, ore smelting and refining, polymer manufacture, machining, semiconductor fabrication, assembly, testing, road transport and delivery, servicing and parts replacement on site etc. Now transfer all this to space, and fully automated...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    25. Re:Life on Mars? by itzly · · Score: 1

      When you talk about "we" have to leave the earth, I assume you are talking about a handful of lucky few. We're not going to save the billions of sick and dirt poor bastards, right ?

    26. Re:Life on Mars? by itzly · · Score: 1

      The problem is that when shit goes pear shaped, the last thing that is on people's minds is to aggressively develop a far-reaching space program. They'll be more concerned with tonight's dinner.

    27. Re:Life on Mars? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it starts to look really, really expensive, and thus less and less likely. Face it: colonizing space is the dream of the future, and it always will be.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    28. Re:Life on Mars? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      You bootstrap it by not trying to transfer all of this to space at once. Start with just a simple plan that takes small asteroids and brings them (or chunks of them) over to Earth orbit for processing. Stuff that's hard to build (like computers) are usually lightweight. Send them up from Earth in bulk.

      But all of this is beside the point. That asteroid mining is difficult I completely concede. But how would sticking humans into the equations fix anything at all? Any gain in repair ability would be at the expense of a huge amount of additional complexity and risk in keeping the humans alive and functioning.

      It's worth pointing out that all existing practical proposals for Mars colonization that I've seen involve sending hard-to-manufacture supplies (basically anything other than structural materials) to the colonies for at least a century afterwards. If that's what you're going to do then why not just cut humans out of the equation.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    29. Re:Life on Mars? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Except that if the result becomes net-positive, then it won't matter how initially expensive it's going to be. It will be an investment as any.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    30. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the space mining is going to be done completely by robots? We don't have that level of AI.

      We don't have space mining, either. What is your point, exactly? That what doesn't exist now will never exist?

    31. Re:Life on Mars? by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but life on mars would be hard, not easy, not very attractive to those who seek luxury.

    32. Re:Life on Mars? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      When you talk about "we" have to leave the earth, I assume you are talking about a handful of lucky few. We're not going to save the billions of sick and dirt poor bastards, right ?

      That is one of the many reasons I'm skeptical.

      Because I can't imagine most people are going to lift a finger to help build the escape module for a bunch of rich assholes. :-P

      I was merely listing the reasons why "we" might seriously be considering leaving Earth. I do not actually expect it to happen.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    33. Re:Life on Mars? by schlachter · · Score: 1

      hmmm...more like long term space colony. not permanent.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    34. Re:Life on Mars? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Redundancy.

    35. Re:Life on Mars? by khallow · · Score: 2

      How long term? More than a few decades, I hope. It's where I keep my stuff.

    36. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Permanent. Ha!

      Talk to me in 1000 years.

    37. Re:Life on Mars? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The fermi paradox, plus the lack of reason to establish a colony in this solar system combined with the difficulty of leaving this solar system. It would be much, much easier to have colonies on the bottom of the ocean than to have them on the moon or Mars (and of course, Venus is brutal).

      I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see much reason for hope.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    38. Re:Life on Mars? by ZenMonk · · Score: 1

      Because I can't imagine most people are going to lift a finger to help build the escape module for a bunch of rich assholes. :-P

      Not a problem, you just offer anyone who works on the project a ticket to ride when it's done. It doesn't even have to be every one, you could make it a lottery where some portion of the workforce (and their families), randomly selected at the end, gets to go. Trust me, you would have no shortage of labor for the project.

    39. Re:Life on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one will EVER live in a permanent space colony. Sorry.

      This fantasy was promoted in an age where achieving terrestrial dominance through orbital trajectory of warheads was under intense and competitive development. It did its job.

      Rockwell rode on the tail-end of this era, for the final boondoggle of the US Shuttle Program, in the 1970's. You won't see anything like that again.

      Ever is a long time bub. If shit goes as pear shaped as scientists are predicting here... Rich people will be glamoring to get out. They've already bought up most of the islands, when those run out the new rich people will need somewhere to go to get away from the rest of us.

      Is "glamoring" like "voguing"....will the rich have to mime and dance their way off-planet?

  5. Re:Bling Bling Motherfucker by qbast · · Score: 1

    They can afford it while the only thing you can afford is cheap insults.

  6. Hmm... by Shoten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm missing the part where something in Dubai is waiting to be a dystopia...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Hmm... by mjwx · · Score: 2

      I'm missing the part where something in Dubai is waiting to be a dystopia...

      What do you mean "waiting to be". For most of the Indian and Filipino "guest workers" it already is.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Hmm... by phizi0n · · Score: 1

      I'm missing the part where something in Dubai is waiting to be a dystopia...

      What do you mean "waiting to be".

      For most of the Indian and Filipino "guest workers" it already is.

      That is kind of the point. The article is titled "Dubai's Climate-Controlled Dome City Is a Dystopia Waiting To Happen" and Shoten is saying that everything about Dubai already is one.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, it will be one on the day it opens. However, the dome city does not exist so it's hard to call it a Dystopia.

  7. Idea! Let's bomb them and take their oil AND ma!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good to me. All in favor say Ay!

    What's Gaza got to do with it? Just a second-hand strip of land.

  8. would make a good TV program by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    but needs UFO aliens, not Arabs.

    1. Re:would make a good TV program by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      but needs UFO aliens, not Arabs.

      I think it's already been done.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:would make a good TV program by Talderas · · Score: 1

      UFO Arabs or Arab aliens?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  9. Video game promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, they're really going all out for that next Bioshock.

  10. Global warming is only the start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will happen when eventually, inevitably, the oil and gas of the UAE starts to dwindle, the economy correspondingly does the same, and the energy supply to keep the whole thing cool becomes prohibitively expensive? The whole thing runs on massive, cheap oil and gas.

    Even if global warming wasn't a factor, it would still be a dystopia waiting to happen. There's no way that thing is remotely close to sustainable. It's a big binge party before all the pizza and beer is gone.

    1. Re:Global warming is only the start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing that has happened to the United States? How is the UAE celebrating prosperity via expansion of frivolous construction projects any different than the on-going decline of Las Vegas Nevada?

    2. Re:Global warming is only the start by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

      Oil a'int fossil in origin. The Russians know that, and have capitalized magnificently on technologies that exploit this. This is actually the REAL story behind the Donetsk basin.

      False scarcity is a wealth creator and a method of social control. UAE will be destroyed not by petrochemical scarcity, but by its comparative plenitude.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Global warming is only the start by tsqr · · Score: 2

      What will happen when eventually, inevitably, the oil and gas of the UAE starts to dwindle, the economy correspondingly does the same, and the energy supply to keep the whole thing cool becomes prohibitively expensive?

      Here's some information for you. Oil and gas are a minor (and decreasing) part of the economy. Not sure about pizza and beer, though.

    4. Re:Global warming is only the start by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      It isn't?

      It's not a product of the anaerobic decomposition of millions of years worth of dead plankton, algae, and any other carbon-based microbiota that lived in ancient seas?

    5. Re:Global warming is only the start by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Nope. Ongoing, current bacteriological process.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:Global warming is only the start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If that were the case then Russia and many other countries would be drilling into old continental shields and other vast areas of geology where having a biogenic source would be unlikely, and they would be successful at it. That isn't happening. Russia has large areas of pretty conventional oil and gas. There's nothing especially exotic about it with the exception of some large areas of gas hydrate permafrost due to the cold climate in Sibera, and a couple of fields hosted in weathered and naturally fractured granitic or metamorphic basement rocks that are still accounted for by ordinary biogenic processes.

      If you've been reading up on Thomas Gold's ideas and hoping that will draw out the supply, those ideas have been specifically tested (e.g., the Siljan Ring in Sweden, which was a profound economic failure), and they are nonsense in terms of any economic significance. If it worked, companies woud be getting rich off those ideas, but they aren't.

      It's also hard to explain how the increasing challenge of getting enough oil and gas is a result of a "false" scarcity if companies are resorting to exploration in remote places and marginal deposits that are far more expensive to produce. Why would they be drilling in 2000m+ water depths and spending $100 million+ on a single oil well in the deep offshore if they could get the same stuff for 10x cheaper on land? Why would they be spending more money to do a hydraulically fractured well to enhance poor-quality reservoir rocks if there was plenty of conventional reservoir that would flow oil easily? Why would they bother to develop expensive tar sands if there was plenty of cheap conventional oil?

      Hint: because the cheap stuff is already tapped or depleted. It's not exactly "scarce", beause there's still plenty out there to find, but it's getting harder to do (discovery rates have declined since the 1960s) and more expensive as a result.

    7. Re:Global warming is only the start by DamnOregonian · · Score: 2

      Well sure, that's the anaerobic decomposition portion of the equation.

      However, do you think those little microbes are pulling carbon from the rock?

      Of course the production of any and all fossil fuels is ongoing. The problem is the time scales needed to produce an appreciable amount of them, and the geological structures required to facilitate the wholesale conversion into an extractable hydrocarbon.

      In summary, and correct me if I'm wrong (with real citations, please), things die. These dead things leave carbon in the ground. Heat, pressure, and in some cases bacterial processes convert said carbon into hydrocarbons. If the geology is right, you'll get a big concentration of these. How is the fuel not fossil? What evidence that a significant amount of hydrocarbons with a recent origin have been extracted from a well? (Why did they just start eating that organic carbon that was fixed into the ground hundreds of millions of years ago?)

    8. Re:Global warming is only the start by dbIII · · Score: 2

      It's also hard to explain how the increasing challenge of getting enough oil and gas is a result of a "false" scarcity

      Here's the trick, the people who say there is plenty of stuff are throwing coal, shale, tar and anything else they can think of into the mix and pretend it's the same as easy to extract liquid oil. Another common trick is to pretend that all that unsurveyed land in Iran, the arctic, wherever has huge oil basins when we do not know one way or another. There's plenty of fossil fuels. Oil we can get out of the ground - not so much. The only reason I have the job I have is that the more computing power you have the easier it is to find the stuff from survey data.

  11. Slaves of Dubai by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone sounds jealous...

    Someone is well-informed.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMh-vlQwrmU

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Slaves of Dubai by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Someone sounds jealous...

      Someone is well-informed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMh-vlQwrmU

      Which has nothing to do with a dome, and everything to do with Dubai... The reaction to the dome is unfounded panic. Dubai will separate the people because Dubai separates the people. Dome, or no dome.

    2. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

      sounds like a republican capitalist paradise. we should import a couple of the Dubai leaders to put the US poor to work. finally.

      Grim emphasis on the "final".

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Slaves of Dubai by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      sounds like a republican capitalist paradise. we should import a couple of the Dubai leaders to put the US poor to work. finally.

      Right ... because it's Republicans who want to concentrate people in cities. Got it.

    4. Re:Slaves of Dubai by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      sure beats the 'people's paradise' that is north korea

    5. Re:Slaves of Dubai by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus this ignores the upside. I'd expect several staff per wealthy occupant of the dome, and so many poor enjoy the nice environment for each rich person. For Dubai, that's a step forward.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Highrise Apartment Complexes on Mass Transit Corridors.

      It's been a utopian dream for decades. Look at the plans for cities like Minneapolis/St. Paul.

    7. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. The people they don't like. That way the rural areas are so much purer, the air is cleaner, and the schools better.

    8. Re:Slaves of Dubai by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Why? Do you think it's better to be worked to death in the heat?

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re:Slaves of Dubai by red+crab · · Score: 2

      How was this modded as Insightful? There's some difference, a lot of it in fact, in driving a Porsche for someone else and actually owning and driving it. This is a step backward in economic equality, but its like that in most of the parts of the world now these days, not just Dubai, so no use whining about it.

    10. Re:Slaves of Dubai by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      As long as Pauly Shore doesn't get locked in.

    11. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not have said it better. Some people will argue kidnapping negroes from their land, separating them from their family and friends, and forcing them to live in and work in the other side of the ocean, is morally questionable. But they ignore all the benefits the negro gets from slavery. He gets to be civilized, travel, learn hard work, meet new people he can serve. And you know who pays for all this? We do. Other than the work, goods, trade, and profit, there are no benefit for us. We do this solely to benefit these poor creatures. And they like it so much it isn't unheard of that some negro goes mad with happiness and tries to escape this beautiful paradise.

      For Dubai, that's a step forward.

      A step done with expensive shoes on the people's throats.

    12. Re:Slaves of Dubai by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      I'm sure many unemployed black people would like being slaves for rich folk again, since they'd get to serve in the kinds of houses they couldn't afford. </sarcasm>

    13. Re:Slaves of Dubai by lgw · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea of the rich-poor gap in Dubai? Sure, there's a difference between driving a Porsche for someone else and actually owning it. But there's a vastly greater difference between a Porsche for someone else and starving. WTF? How can you think this is bad for all the newly employed?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Slaves of Dubai by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slaves? WTF? Are you so blind to the conditions in much of the world that you think offering a job to someone is bad? Are you insane? These are the best jobs most of the poor in Dubai are likely to have offered in their lives.

      It's not right for the first world, so better the jobs don't exist at all? Seriously, I can't imagine how you think this is bad. These jobs are vastly better than early industrial revolution American jobs, let alone no job at all in a place with no real social safety net.

      Sheltered suburban enclave American middle class are something else. No sense of perspective at all.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Plus this ignores the upside. I'd expect several staff per wealthy occupant of the dome, and so many poor enjoy the nice environment for each rich person.

      Yes, just what every indentured aspires to be, a house nigger.
      Such a wonderful thing these rich people. So kind, so beneficent!

    16. Re: Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the real dystopia comes when the retractable dome doesn't open anymore and the bulk of the oil runs out. I predict our grandchildren will be watching 'escape from Dubai, a documentary ' on HoloMax....

    17. Re:Slaves of Dubai by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

      Sure. The people they don't like. That way the rural areas are so much purer, the air is cleaner, and the schools better.

      Oh, I see. Are we talking about the "Republican" enclaves like Martha's Vineyard, the Kennedy Compound ...

    18. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Newly employed? Previously, the wealthy had to pay 10 servants each to stand around them waving fans all day as they walked down the street. Now all those people are out of work thanks to climate control.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    19. Re:Slaves of Dubai by geirlk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slaves yes.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

      http://www.vice.com/vice-news/...

      The fact that it's a tough world out there doesn't excuse Dubai or UAE in general from acting like asshat clowns. They have the economy to take care of their foreign workers, but choose to screw them over. That's really not OK.

    20. Re:Slaves of Dubai by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      That's the one's who survive. Hundreds die and thousands are injured. Dubai is a stain upon the earth a clear measure of what is in store for the majority of workers if they allow it to happen.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    21. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with denying reality is that you can't even get the jokes.

    22. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can work for me for a pittance that I barely notice, with no worker protections or rights Or you can starve in the streets"

      Yeah, that sounds pretty much like slavery.

    23. Re:Slaves of Dubai by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

      sounds like a republican capitalist paradise. we should import a couple of the Dubai leaders to put the US poor to work. finally.

      Right ... because it's Republicans who want to concentrate people in cities. Got it.

      No...it must be because the poor in Dubai get paid well and have good lives compared to the poor Americans.
      http://www.theguardian.com/wor...
      http://www.nbcnews.com/id/2480... /ironyoff

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    24. Re: Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and rape victims get really good sex and even orgasm in many cases.

      You know what they don't get? The option to say "no" and have their voice matter. Like humans.

    25. Re:Slaves of Dubai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's certainly exploitation but it most definitely is not "slavery".

    26. Re:Slaves of Dubai by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Literally slaves yeah. As in, show up with the contract you signed. Boss rips it up in front of your face. Takes your passport. Forces you to live in a labor camp with 45 other people, sharing one toilet. Pays you 1/2 to 1/3 what you originally contracted for. Beatings if you talk to reporters or try to get out, etc..

    27. Re:Slaves of Dubai by lgw · · Score: 1

      So lets say that's your unavoidable future. Do you want air conditioning in the desert, or no? Let's say you'll spend the next 5 years cleaning toilets - do you prefer they be the kind where you can flush the toilet paper, or the kind where you make the used toilet paper the maid's problem?

      Incremental improvements remain better than no improvements. Do you know much about working and living conditions during the American industrial revolution? Living in 7-story walk-ups, heavy industry with child labor and no thought to safety at all, company stores, etc? And still people flocked to those jobs because it was better than rural America for most. It gets better, one increment at a time.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  12. Re:Bling Bling Motherfucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    and when the oil runs out they will have a nice place to park their camels.

  13. Surveillance City Made to Order by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

    "macabre, consumer paradise" or monitored controlled populace?

    1. Re:Surveillance City Made to Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! It's a floor wax AND a dessert topping! But wait! There's more! You also get Filipino boys without having to go to that icky jungle, eww! with all those yucky bugs!

  14. Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... disaster waiting to happen

    The place is in the middle of a fucking desert, and it is fully air-conditioned

    Do you know how much power the building needs just to keep it in operational ?

    It is an ecological disaster in the making, and even I, someone who doesn't really care about the environment also know something is really totally fucked up regarding that kind of concept

    1. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, one giant building requires a lot less energy to cool than an equal volume of multiple tiny buildings, because the big building has much less surface area / volume and thus transfers heat more slowly.

    2. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      But one large dome probably contains 100 times the volume of the individual buildings it encapsulates.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Power isn't a problem. It's surrounded by desert. Lots of empty space and sunlight. Solar power can keep it cool. Thermal sinks could be chilled during the day to take care of the reduced cooling needs at night.

    4. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you look at the pictures, it's mostly enclosed walkways connecting all the buildings.
      It's easier to cool a building if you're not pissing your cold air out the doors.

    5. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Volume and mass do not matter as much as surface area. This is an ecological win. The enclosed area will also mean less evaporation, so more green spaces and more efficient use of fresh water supplies. This is a win, at least in theory.

    6. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by unrtst · · Score: 2

      But one large dome probably contains 100 times the volume of the individual buildings it encapsulates.

      As far as I can tell, it's not one large dome. I looks pretty well thought out. There is one largish dome in the complex, but it's the park part, and who knows if they'll even get to that.

    7. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      well thought out? I mean they can build there what the fuck they want - it is t heir money. Still why people live in such places and what is the purpose of this exercise is not clear to me. However I can think of building there a huge set of nuclear plants so that inevitable accidents affect limited space - that would make sense.

    8. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by umghhh · · Score: 2

      I saw a documentary about solar panels in west Africa where main problem seemed to be cleaning those f. panels from dust. Guest what substance was used to remove the dust off the panels' surface.... To give you a hint - it is a drinkable liquid and there is not enough of it on a desert.

    9. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Vokda?

    10. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you buy gasoline, it was probably your money they used.

    11. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not gonna argue one bit, Go get your Green buddies get some card board signs fly to dubai and go chanting in front of the shiek/sultans/prime ministers office, see how far it gets you, or go back to college and take up another cause to whine to the world about.

    12. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where the dystopia comes in... there might not be enough water, but slaves with brushes would probably do well enough.

    13. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by TheGavster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The extra ironic part is that by selling you the gasoline to burn, they contribute to the slow heating and eventual flooding of a city that is basically on an island at sea level ...

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    14. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      It would be ok if they used solar to power the AC.

    15. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Nuclear plants need large supplies of water for cooling.

    16. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by TWX · · Score: 2

      I'm fully expecting an economic collapse to hit Dubai eventually, and this air conditioned paradise will turn into a blast-furnace hellhole.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    17. Re: Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dubai is on the Persian gulf. So what is your point?

    18. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Ideally to power something like that, they'd really need to a giant massive solar power plant somewhere in the middle of a large desert, and maybe some energy storage based on pumped water.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    19. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Does it need to be fresh water? There's plenty of sea water around Dubai.

    20. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      To simplify things a bit, visualize a light bulb. It needs power to remain illuminated. That power can come from a large bank of solar cells...

      Hmmm.... Out in the open air the light doesn't do much. But I suppose if you enclose the light, it could have some impact on darkness, and the big array of solar panels can be positioned over the enclosure.

      What's wrong with this picture, though.

    21. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Still why people live in such places

      Because that's where they're allowed to live. You think some European country with a nice, mild climate is willing to give up a large fraction of its territory so that the entire population of the UAE can relocate their country there?

    22. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by mikael · · Score: 1

      You could say the same about the difference between shopping malls and individual shop units. With housing, terraced homes are more energy efficient than detached homes since the common walls are usually at the same temperature compared to the outside.

      Imagine you divided the space up into cubes, each the side of a shop. Each side of a cube can be outside air, insulated wall, uninsulated wall, open space. Suppose you have 1000 units. With individual stores, that's 5000 sides that need to be insulating. If you have one shopping mall, with shops side-by-side, there are only 500 sides that need insulating. Even with the extra floor space for plazas, staircases, that's still no more than a few hundred rooftops.

      It's no different from an office block. Some modern designs actually have separate frameworks for the exterior walls and the floors, so you have a greenhouse architecture where each can be modified without affecting the other. It's just a dome but with flatter sides.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    23. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Think of the mold and mildew

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    24. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Humidity is very low in the air in that place now. With a bit of outside air circulating under a dome it should stay relatively low.

    25. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The California Duster? It works on my car.

    26. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read the news from Europe these days, they seem to be doing exactly that.

    27. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is not really a problem as they sit next to the ocean.

    28. Re: Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They pump millions of litres of water into the air just to keep the place cool. Look it up.

    29. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Dear idiot,

      This is a discussion forum, not a thesis submission. The poster was talking about building nuclear plants in deserts where there is no abundant water. This leaves a coastline of salt water. Salt water is corrosive, and while it is possible to use it as part of the cooling system, it's really not ideal. Perhaps you should work on your reading comprehension before you call people names.

    30. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you buy gasoline, it was probably your money they used.

      No, it is their money that they used. Once you traded your money for gasoline, it's no longer your money. If you don't like that then don't make the trade, nobody is forcing you to do so.

      --

      Enigma

    31. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Yes it does need fresh water. Salt remains behind when you use salt water and causes quite a few issues.

    32. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      This is an ecological win

      I'm not sure it means what you think it means.
      The real "ecological win" would be to acknowledge that Dubai is in a friggin desert, and shouldn't be used as home for more than a few thousand people.

    33. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can this be an ecological win in *any* theory when you are burning fossil fuels to make this happen?

    34. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dubai, as with most locations directly bordering the gulf, is quite humid.

    35. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet, so I can buy drugs again, without having to worry about it financing terrorism, since it's no longer my money..

    36. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Informative? It's clear that the GP meant that by buying gasoline you are funding this effort.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It'll make great post-apocalyptic architecture.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    38. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "economic collapse"?!
      I have no idea what you're talking about.
      Why, Dubai's economy is so healthy that people just leave their Ferraris sitting on the street when they get bored with them.
      Dubai's a fucking economic miracle, the laws of gravity (or karma) do not apply.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    39. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by tragedy · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily as bad as you make it out to be. Let's say that you have a hemispherical dome covering 4.3 square miles, which I think is what the summary is trying to say. That's a diameter of 3766 meters and an interior volume of about 14 billion m^3, which is something like 17.15 billion kg of air. It's around 1000 joules per degree celcius for each kilogram. So, if you start with a very nasty 45 degrees celcius and get it down to a comfortable 20 degrees celcius, that's 428 terajoules. Obviously Air conditioning is not perfectly efficient. We'll assume an EER rating of 13 for the air conditioning, which may actually be a bit low for a huge commercial system. That's about 38%, so it would take 1.121 Petajoules. Let's say we're powering by gasoline. There's around 120 megajoules per gallon of gas, which translates to around 24 megajoules of electricity per gallon at 20% efficiency. So, that's around 46.7 million gallons of gasoline. Gas is around $2 a gallon in Dubai, so that's around $93.5 million. That's not very much compared to the initial construction costs of such a structure.
      That's just the initial cooling, of course, there's still the matter of keeping it cool afterwards. With such a large structure, heat transfer from the outside is almost negligible with proper design. It's a huge number compared to a regular home, but it's very small relative the the massive volume. Then there's the heat generated inside. A typical human puts out around 100 watts of heat just by being alive, then there's all the lighting, cooking, and every other use of power. Guessing a kilowatt of heat generated per person wouldn't be too far off. From the numbers I've found, I'm estimating that they're expecting an upper limit of about 4 million people continuously (180 million visitors per year, guessing they will stay for a week, plus some permanent residents), so that's 4 gigawatts of cooling, or 126 petajoules per year. Going by our previous figures, that's around $10.5 billion dollars per year. That seems like a huge sum of money, but that's only $58 per visitor if they have 180 million per year (and it obviously scales down somewhat if they have fewer visitors).
      These numbers are all rough, of course, and use naive assumptions about the shape of the dome, energy consumption, design efficiency, source of power etc. Obviously powering by gasoline would be crazy from an ecological standpoint, but there's an abundance of solar power available there, and the gasoline cost is just a stand-in. The numbers I gave are skewed towards the worst-case scenario, and they're still reasonable. There's nothing impossible going on there. There may be plenty that can go wrong with such a project, but making out the air conditioning in to a near-apocalyptic problem is a bit hyperbolic.

    40. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      well, good thing they will have a dome to protect them!

      and maybe people will finally stop talking about Atlantis.

    41. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except this is cleaning water. It doesn't necessarily have to be fit for human consumption. It just has to be suitable for cleaning.

      Dubai has access to plenty of water.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    42. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      dubai doesn't have much oil. sigh.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    43. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all Nuclear plants need water for cooling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor). or for regulating the rods. What would work best in a desert environment with little water would be a gas like Helium as the mediator, and a small supply of water or some other liquid to run the turbine, that is not contaminated with radioactive material.

      or because this is a fairly sunny place solar could be used.

    44. Re:Not about jealousy, but ... by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Dubai is extremely humid. You are completely incorrect.

  15. it will probably become an equally spectacular ... by Kekke · · Score: 1

    ? pffttt
    Nobody heard of dystopia called Earth ?

  16. Opportunity by mister_playboy · · Score: 0

    Any Borderlands 2 players?

    I suddenly realize that Dubai may have been the inspiration for the not-yet-built city of Opportunity.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  17. World's largest mall: Occupying 8 million sq ft by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A big shopping center - sounds like hell on earth! I just can't understand the obsession with shopping, once you have your clothes & stuff just leave and do something interesting.

    1. Re:World's largest mall: Occupying 8 million sq ft by idontgno · · Score: 2

      What if looking at more clothes and stuff is interesting?

      Your complaint boils down to "What's wrong with these people? They're completely unlike ME!"

      Yeah, I'm not nuts about rampant consumerism, and shopping is not entertainment to me, but I acknowledge that I'm not typical.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:World's largest mall: Occupying 8 million sq ft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't like shopping in the west, but I love it in Japan. The problem isn't shopping itself, it's that most western retailers are doing it wrong.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:World's largest mall: Occupying 8 million sq ft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The older I get the more I hate shopping. Hell, I hate shopping for things I like video games, computers, project supplies, etc. In store or Online. I just hate having to figure out what I need and who I should order it from. Should I buy a good quality pricey item or just some junk that the reviews say works. Hell, I let my mom and dad order me new clothes online to my door not theirs.* My dad has a good fashion sense, though, he send me list with what to wear with what. Women at bar actually tell me how great it is to see a man who knows how to dress. Hahahaha.

      * I try to just re-up and order the same clothes when they get worn, usually, I can get some good close out deals if they weren't already close-out the first time.

    4. Re:World's largest mall: Occupying 8 million sq ft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not enough hentai mangas, figures and Dakimakuras available in western retail stores?

  18. It'll be like... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Las Vegas with a dome over it? Meh... Sounds like a Stephen King novel.

    1. Re:It'll be like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a reality television show of sorts could be made there. At random times, the military could aerosol bomb the surroundings to spice up the shoot.

    2. Re:It'll be like... by antdude · · Score: 1

      And the crappy CBS show it is based on.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:It'll be like... by Matheus · · Score: 1

      "And the crappy CBS show that was based on it."

      There... fixed that for you.

    4. Re:It'll be like... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Um, thanks. English isn't my strong area. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. Asimov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Caves of Steel.

  20. Re:Bling Bling Motherfucker by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    and when the oil runs out they will have a nice place to park their camels.

    Or, they can install the solar everyone else is spending a fortune developing in the plentiful sunlight they have.

  21. Overboard Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly a gigantic rant of, "if the poor people can't have something, than neither should the rich!"

    It could have, say, POINTED OUT HOW DUBAI IS ALREADY A DYSTOPIAN FUTURE COUNTRY, or maybe talked about how domed cities could save huge amounts of energy in the future, but no, if everyone can't have something, then no one can.

  22. Re:Bling Bling Motherfucker by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or, they can install the solar everyone else is spending a fortune developing in the plentiful sunlight they have.

    I think that they'll find that selling solar power is far less profitable than selling oil.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  23. Yes, how 'macabre'! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? So the fact that rich people exist, and can afford to habituate certain areas of a country, is 'macabre'? I suppose rich people driving nicer cars than poor people is 'macabre'? WTF?

  24. "Dystopia"? How about clickbait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Experimenting with tech such as a domed city should be welcomed, but calling it a dystopia is emotional clickbait and nothing more.

    Dear geeks:
    Early adopters are why you can afford your modern PC, phone and other electronic necessities not to mention countless other technologies and consumer goods.

    Someone with deep pockets has to fund the R&D, and Dubai is doing that in this case. The Persian Gulf is a bad place to live so adaptive tech is in order.

  25. load of rubbish by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    You could say the same about any nice high rise apartment building or home in any hot city in any hot country. my home has AC too, other people in my state don't.

    I went to school for 19 years to have job so I could afford nice things like HVAC. other people, didn't.

    1. Re:load of rubbish by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but who the f wants to live in a place like that?

      It has great appeal to statists, because they want to crowd the entire population into highrise apartments along mass transit corridors... but I like having a yard (not a manicured one, there are enough people at work nuts about crabgrass and shit like that.) We have what is essentially a 100 year old yard. It has a fairy ring in it (a fairly ancient ring of mushrooms) and rabbits and there are coyotes singing in the distance out across the pasture in the evening and sometimes the morning... And the scree of the red-tailed hawk (plus all his singing food.)

      If you live in an area where AC is mandatory and cannot be overcome with proper architecture (earth sheltering, big shaded porches, fans, etc.) then you're living in a place not viable and should relocate. Not because 'I say so' but because economics should be telling you that. The days when we can subsidize kentucky bluegrass lawns in suburban tracts in any environment anywhere are over.

    2. Re:load of rubbish by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I know UAE is a desert, but there are animals in the desert and a big smegging dome will have a real impact on insects, birds, lizards and other animals (and plants). The worst part (to me) is that they will be putting English style gardens with non-native plants under glass (similar to what is done in parts of California). It's such a misuse of resources compared to allowing the natural wonder that already exists there (beautiful cacti, palm trees, etc) to flourish.

      Of course suburbia leads to sprawl, traffic problems, fuel overconsumption, and it's not exactly possible where population density is high, so possibly some kind of halfway point in between suburban sprawl and dense-domed cities is the best compromise. A city planned for to create livability alongside population density, but also sustainable and with access to nature, community gardens and/or solar panels rooftops, pedestrian and bicycle friendly. If only I could get a wealthy shiekh to build one within 5 miles of my workplace ....

    3. Re:load of rubbish by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you are funny, how about most the USA where heat in the winter is mandatory? not viable?

    4. Re:load of rubbish by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      If you live in an area where AC is mandatory and cannot be overcome with proper architecture (earth sheltering, big shaded porches, fans, etc.) then you're living in a place not viable and should relocate. Not because 'I say so' but because economics should be telling you that.

      Nonsense. The economics only says that you should relocate if the cost of relocating (including giving up local opportunities like employment and access to natural resources and infrastructure) is less than the cost of the mandatory A/C. It's perfectly reasonable to stay in an area which requires A/C (or heating, or both depending on the season) if the cost of climate control is offset by other benefits.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  26. Asimov predicted it! by am+2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's what happened to Trantor in Asimov's Foundation series:

    Trantor is depicted as the capital of the first Galactic Empire. Its land surface [...] was, with the exception of the Imperial Palace, entirely enclosed in artificial domes.

    And so it begins...

    1. Re:Asimov predicted it! by pcardoso · · Score: 1

      Not only Trantor, but Earth itself as in The Caves of Steel.

      Similar concept appears in Clarke's The City and the Stars.

    2. Re:Asimov predicted it! by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The Earth moved underground, while Trantor built domes aboveground. However, the end result is pretty similar, and he also stated the same reasons for doing so (which pretty much matches what they're saying about this project).

  27. Re: Bling Bling Motherfucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dubai has very little oil. Less than 2% of the economy is oil and gas.

  28. Fetishising nature + this is after all a desert! by Raisey-raison · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Someone sounds jealous...

    Jealousy and other issues as well. The Vice article seems to have strong opinions as to what sort of conditions other people may live in. It just states that it is dystopian without much evidence. And as to the poor in Dubai, they are already richer than many of their compatriots back home (many are immigrant workers) and given time and further economic development they no doubt will get richer themselves. The United Arab Emirates are the one most forward thinking areas in the Middle East. They are slowly going through what the West did in the reformation and enlightenment. Of course it will take time but I am sure they will be much more progressive societies in 300 years.

    Then there is the issue that some people simply fetishise nature and assume that everything 'natural' must be beautiful. It simply is not the case. Most 'natural' places are ugly. The ones that we photograph are the elegant and interesting ones. A lot of the time those people who enjoy extreme temperatures and who are in excellent shape imagine that rest of humanity has the same take on their surroundings. It's so easy to forget that without keeping out the heat or cold many people would be miserable - particular in an extremely hot desert which is where Dubai is located. The heat is simply oppressive. And of course by allowing this dome, it means people can venture out of their homes and get more exercise - something that is otherwise not possible.

    I can imagine that some people would say that humans should not be living there to begin with. To which I answer: someone gave birth to them and once there here on planet earth they have to live somewhere. And most people living in the middle east don't have much choice as to where to live particularly if they don’t want to live in absolute poverty. (So unless you want to stop Bangladeshi and Pakistani mothers from getting pregnant and /or prevent men there from impregnating them, you really cannot complain. I am always amazed at people who are shocked when they hear others moralize about women giving birth when they are very poor. They pontificate about every women having the 'right' to have children. Often these same people then later complain about the environmental consequences of such children when they reach adulthood.)

  29. Dear Soulskill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please STFU and quit posting your socialist nonsense under the guise of "technological" articles.

  30. Reaching for symbolism - and failing by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    I too have seen Elysium. (OK i haven't. but this author is describing the plot.)
    Global warming is measured using terms like "degree" and "decade" (degree, as in singular)

    Dubai is ridiculously hot already. The Filipino and Indian laborers are already mistreated and underpaid. They already outnumber Emirati's by 3 to 1 (or more?). If they aren't rioting in the streets yet, a few measly degrees warmer in the coming decades won't do it either.

    If this retarded gimmick manages to stand up long enough for one of the hottest areas on the earth to become practically Venusian, That will be an achievement rivaling the pyramids. But it won't. Dubai's economy will eventually tank, once their neighbors oil runs out, and and the real estate market collapses again. THEN the laborers and migrants will riot. But the dome will have fuck-all impact over that.

    1. Re:Reaching for symbolism - and failing by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Global warming is measured using terms like "degree" and "decade" (degree, as in singular)

      You are missing the point, people won't burst into flames because of AGW. However the Arab spring was preceded by the worst drought in the the history of the fertile crescent (the birthplace of agriculture). People didn't suddenly log on to facebook and find out they were living under tyrants. There were food riots in Cairo and other major cities BEFORE the uprisings, almost 10% of Syria's total population just walked away from their farms and went looking for work in the cities.

      Go and find out why that one guy set himself on fire in the public square, and why it resonated across the Arab world. Don't believe the "hunger for freedom" bullshit, these people were hungry for bread.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Reaching for symbolism - and failing by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      a few measly degrees warmer in the coming decades won't do it either

      man, you really don't understand climate change.

    3. Re:Reaching for symbolism - and failing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... preceded by the worst drought in the the history of the fertile crescent

      Neither does the previous poster.

    4. Re:Reaching for symbolism - and failing by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It's complex. There's a whole scripture, and a priesthood to interpret it for us.

    5. Re:Reaching for symbolism - and failing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The terms you were looking for were Research and Scientists.

      The same as everything else.

      PS. Do you ever go to the doctor? Ever take medication of any kind?
      Since their shit is just as nebulous, and directly kills people (rather than warns you of potentially harmful effects in the future) you'd think you wouldn't believe their crazy talk shit.

    6. Re:Reaching for symbolism - and failing by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Right, and the conditions which sparked the Arab spring are what will cause the have-nots to tear the place apart. But the role this stupid little dome will play? little to none I'd wager. If it's being interpreted as a symbol of income inequality in Dubai, then fine. But look at the skyline of the city, every single one of those ostentatious skyscrapers was built on the backs of the have-nots.

      Those have-nots will tear the place apart if they ever get a political voice, and the inequality in income and standard of living continues the way it is.

    7. Re:Reaching for symbolism - and failing by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I think you have read too much of Karl Marx's twaddle.

      Income inequality is what gives poor people a way of buying food - they work for the rich! Take it away, and no one works for anyone. If you are not self-sufficient, you die.

      I know here on /. people like to say "Under capitalism, man exploits man, while under communism, its the other way round". Its not true. Under communism, everyone has nothing, not much happens and it gradually gets worse.

      People dont risk death because their e-neighbour has a Hummer and they have a Ford Fiesta. They risk death because the alternative is a slower and more painful death of their entire family Whether by war, famine, of mafia inspired shootouts, its esactly the same reasoning.

      I expect Dubai to go up in flames any time soon, but I doubt the dome will make a difference to when or how.

      "Je suis Marxist, avec tendence Groucho!"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  31. Dystopia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure the author knows what this word means...

  32. Dubai has bigger problems by ADRA · · Score: 3

    Dubai a city with a significantly challenging future and it has little to do with a dome. It's the center of little, its propelled by wildy deep pockets vs. social need, and wealth centers in the middle east are already distributing their investments to other regions. Forget the fact that once the oil's gone the wealth remaining in the region will leach away as there's so few people (though it'll take a very long time). UAE: 9mil, Yeman: 23mil, Oman: 4mil, Saudi Arabia: 30 mil. They have huge gulfs of weath distribution, and generally horrible climates. Why would people go to Dubai if it wasn't a spectacle or a huge weath gaining opportunity? My advice: Bilk Dubai for all its worth now, because in 50 years it'll be a distant memory of largesse gone awry by modern standards.

    --
    Bye!
    1. Re:Dubai has bigger problems by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      My advice: Bilk Dubai for all its worth now, because in 50 years it'll be a distant memory of largesse gone awry by modern standards.

      Interesting. Kind of like Mono Lake, just a zillion tines larger.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Dubai has bigger problems by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Parts of the UAE, the Emirate of Dubai specifically are already out of oil.

      Hence the fact they're trying to diversify like mad, they're trying to become the financial centre of the region in the same way as New York or London.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Dubai has bigger problems by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      A lot of people forget that the other great cities had their founding in geographical advantages that are no longer essential to their operation. The harbors around New York are still viable, but they are no longer the main focus of the city. It's the fact that a critical mass was established to foster social/cultural/economic centers which once established, became self-supporting. Festering, one might even say.

    4. Re:Dubai has bigger problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Especially when they're rolling in so much money, I really don't understand why they aren't pouring money into researching better desalination technology. If a system could be developed to desalinate on a large scale, all of the Middle East and Africa could be transformed into a lush tropical paradise. It'd take billions and billions of dollars, but guess who actually happens to have billions and billions of dollars and a vested interest in ensuring their countries remain viable?

    5. Re:Dubai has bigger problems by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Forget the fact that once the oil's gone the wealth remaining in the region will leach away as there's so few people (though it'll take a very long time).

      Dubai and the other Emirates are acutely aware of the limits to their oil reserves.
      They've been very busy turning their States into financial and trade hubs for the Arabian Peninsula,
      with plenty of free trade zones (no taxes on corporate income) in order to draw in international corporations.

      My advice: Bilk Dubai for all its worth now, because in 50 years it'll be a distant memory of largesse gone awry by modern standards.

      Your advice is wrong.
      Abu Dhabi is the 800 lb gorilla in the UAE and has the 2nd largest sovereign wealth fund in the world.
      As long as Dubai's royal family goes along with Abu Dhabi's Sheikh, Dubai can keep borrowing money until the end of time.
      /The last time Dubai needed cash, they had to reform some laws as a condition set by Abu Dhabi.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Dubai has bigger problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dubai and the other Emirates are acutely aware of the limits to their oil reserves.
      They've been very busy turning their States into financial and trade hubs for the Arabian Peninsula,

      The trouble is that the main thing they trade is oil and oil-related services. The presence of oil related trade drives the demand for associated financial services and luxury goods, but very much in the way that the NYSE drives trade in martinis and steaks on Wall Street. Oil dries up, oil traders move to Singapore, London or Bermuda, and all UAE is left with are people who can't afford their own products. You don't think any of the staff actually eat at Bobby Van's, do you?

    7. Re:Dubai has bigger problems by coofercat · · Score: 2

      The real problem is the people in Dubai don't like the Flintstones. Thankfully the people in Abu Dhabi do.

  33. Re:Bling Bling Motherfucker by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Oh, I think it's most certainly going to be profitable, but to whom are they going to sell it? North Africans, OTOH, have Europe right across the pond...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  34. Re: Bling Bling Motherfucker by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    They have their very own property bubble, though. Although I'm not sure that is a good thing...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  35. I know someone who works on this kind of stuff by Dripdry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know someone who works on this kind of stuff.
    He works on theme parks, recently getting hired (within his company) to fix mistakes and problems with them, in Dubai and the surrounding area. His take is repeatedly that they don't know how to do quality-control there. Their projects SOUND amazing, but they skimp on the essentials and end up with disastrous results much of the time. He believes this is a mess waiting to happen, given the area's track record, but isn't involved in the project.

    --
    -
    1. Re:I know someone who works on this kind of stuff by macshit · · Score: 1

      The other problem is that all this development seems like an insane urban-planning clusterf*ck... the rulers who are bankrolling it all want a glitzy showpiece to puff up their egos, and basically spend their lives traveling between high-end luxury malls, 60th floor corporate boardrooms, and enormous homes, in fleets of air-conditioned Mercedes SUVs. So they're designing a city optimized for those things. The result seems to be someplace that looks impressive in very long shots of the night-time skyline featured in inflight magazines, but which doesn't really work very well as an actual city (with, you know, people, not all of whom are necessarily ultra-wealthy)...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    2. Re:I know someone who works on this kind of stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other problem is that all this development seems like an insane urban-planning clusterf*ck...

      You mean, like no proper sewer system? That would be one of the clusterfucks that Dubai seems to ignore. I guess as long as cheap Indian labour comes in and cleans up their shit, they are happy to ignore it...

      http://boingboing.net/2011/11/...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      In 2013 it was reported that the Jebel Ali plant receive 70% of sewage through the city's sewage network, while the remaining 30% comes from sewage trucks.

      So, at top of Wikipedia it seems like it was fixed, but reading closer, 30% from sewage trucks. So not fixed at all!

  36. LOGAN'S RUN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Run, runner!" That's what I thought of in that film on reading this along with the term dystopian (especially since I see this posted a lot here "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!")

  37. Wow, it's Logan's Run by valley · · Score: 2

    A domed city with a shopping mall inside? How long til they implant the palm-flower and exterminate anyone over 30? Obligatory link for those who don't know Logan's Run: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Wow, it's Logan's Run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just watched. That movie was amazing(ly awful|ly hilarious). The Ice Cave scene was a nice bonus for sticking with it. So much boobs. And flimsy chiffon. +1 Internets to you, my good sir.

  38. Coolness factor is enough by doug141 · · Score: 1

    TV is full of people doing something without "any good reason to do it other than the coolness factor." That phrase might describe the whole entertainment sector of the economy.

    1. Re:Coolness factor is enough by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the problem is that once the coolness factor wears off, they stop doing it. It's not sustainable.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    2. Re:Coolness factor is enough by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      In other words, it only works as an illusion, a fantasy.

      Nobody is going to want to live there 24/7 where they can't change the channel and/or go upstairs to see how mom is doing.

  39. I suggest they build a complete sphere, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because they will need it eventually, http://flood.firetree.net/?ll=24.6999,54.6438&zoom=8&m=9

  40. "Great minds think alike" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... & thanks for the link (IF it's the whole film that is, since it's a great sci-fi classic about a dystopian future type scenario).

  41. Micro-Weather by Jorkapp · · Score: 1

    Given the size of the dome, I'd be interested to see if any micro weather systems happen inside, or what the plans are to mitigate environmental effects.

    Its not unheard of for weather to form in large open structures. Take for instance Hangar One at Moffett Airfield: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangar_One_%28Mountain_View,_California%29) or the Goodyear Airdock (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodyear_Airdock) Though not climate controlled, these have fog (and apparently, rain) due to the massive size.

    --
    Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
  42. And how is this different? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    And how is this different from many other urban areas, it sounds exactly like any other mall. The fact that they're building it bigger and more centralized doesn't change the fact that there are many such climate controlled shopping centers in most other cities, more than a few located only a stones throw from the "bad side" of town where their poorly paid workforce lives.

  43. Perspective by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    It's easy to complain about how awful malls are until you have to walk around outside when it's 105F out, or when it's -5F with two feet of snow on the ground.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  44. No problem by istartedi · · Score: 2

    The AC system expels hot air through a small thermal exhaust port, about 2m wide. In order to access it, we'll have to drive really fast down Main St.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  45. all this AC and no tits by citizenr · · Score: 2

    or weed, or free speech. In fact you better hide those elbows and knees, or you can be stoned on the street. Did I mention proffered neck line is a turtle neck?
    If you are lucky police will be called instead of immediate stoning/being beaten with sticks. Official punishment for dress code violations is 1 month in the slammer.

    Dubai - perfect sausage fest vacation destination.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  46. Re:Fetishising nature + this is after all a desert by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you say would have more merit if there was free choice for these Bangladeshi people to come and go. Why have their passports been confiscated? Why is there not a viable means (steerage in low cost cargo ships) for them to return home if they wish? The arrangement as it stands amounts to what is called 'Indentured Servitute' which is a fancy name for slavery.

    Extra points, though, for trying to turn the issue into something 'dirty and sexual' by using the term fetishise. Tell your masters to give you an extra bonus for your effort, because you've written some excellent propaganda.

  47. here in boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ONe of the largest concentration of shopping malls is Route 9 in Framingham, about 10 miles due west of Boston
    Some developer built a luxury condo building next to the mall and advertised it as being next to the mall, allowing the residents luxury shopping lifestyle
    so, repulsive developments are here in the USofA to

  48. By that definition by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    The Shanghai Tower has them beat in terms of being the first.

    --
    I come here for the love
  49. This is Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our first step towards colonizing other planets.

  50. Near 100 y.o. "prophecy" by Circlotron · · Score: 2

    The social setup has some similarities to Fritz Lang's Metropolis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

  51. Non-story by pipatron · · Score: 1

    What an incredible non-story that was.

    1. 1. Dubai is hot and has a lot of immigrant workers.
    2. 2. Dubai builds a new shopping mall with a roof.
    3. 3. ???
    4. 4. Dystopia
    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  52. Jealousy talking by iamacat · · Score: 2

    Everyone will be free to visit - like Manhattan or San Francisco or countless other desirable places in the world. Most will not be able to afford to live there - again like all of these places. Cost of housing will probably subsidize construction that couldn't sustain itself just on visitors. By all signs, they are trying to keep out desert heat and not their own people. If I lived in this kind of climate, I would love a place to cool down for a couple of hours. I think people just feel jealous that we don't make this kind of projects in United States.

  53. ...i saw this film about some people - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - who lived in a dome in a beautiful field next to a river of foam...i fell asleep before it was over: i must have dreamt of the end...they'd be young forever as long as they stayed in the dome, but barbarians came and set fire to their home, exposed the dome dwellers to the outside: they must have known it was the end...all of their wealth couldn't save them, all died inside the flames, destined to make that same old mistake; god that's such a shame...the barbarians picked through the ashes of the dome, then went on their way, yeah, continued to roam, but a curse was laid upon them: they must have known it was the end...all of their strength couldn't save them, all died inside the flood, destined to make that same old mistake, the way of all flesh and blood... ...i saw this film about some people who lived in a dome...

    Send "Dome" Ringtone

  54. Floating city? by RevWaldo · · Score: 2

    A domed city isn't really that impressive when you compare it to what they could be building.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

    .

  55. At least read as far as sentence number 2 by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Talk about a short attention span. Also evaporative cooling - "look it up", especially on which side of the system the water goes.

  56. Kuwait's dream in the 60's by raju · · Score: 1

    Kuwait had a similar dream in the 60's. Flush with oil money and the increasing air-conditioning of households, someone came up with the idea that it would be easier to aircondition the whole city instead. They wanted to build a dome that would enclose the entire city and make the hot summer months bearable. Fortunately, that just fizzled out.

  57. Re:Fetishising nature + this is after all a desert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What you say would have more merit if there was free choice for these Bangladeshi people to come and go.
    > Why have their passports been confiscated?

    Don't you know? They freely chose to let their passports be confiscated!

  58. The carbombing will be awesome by gelfling · · Score: 1

    You won't even have to go outside. Allahu Truqbomb!

  59. Dubai is a Disneyland. Only bigger. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Just like most of the Emirates, Dubai is a Disneyland. Only bigger.

    Seriously, I don't know what crack these bedus are smoking, but there are more books translated into spanish each year than into any language of the emirates in the past 100 years. These people base huge chunks of their view of the world on an ancient facist monotheistic religion, live in societies that by social structure resemble the grimmest of dark ages, sharia law and all, and all they have is truckloads of money from selling their oil and no real idea what to do with it other than squander obscene amounts of resources to build a huge disneyland out in the desert. The amounts of water wasted alone are beyond imagination.

    I'd have no problem with building a high-tech nation within a few years, if I'd actually be seeing some real progress, but I don't. I'm seriously sceptical of Dubai and its likes gaining critical mass and actually building sustainable societies

    The prince of Dubai would be well advised to use all that money of his of building universities, implementing basic human rights and getting a modern society going and perhaps building a modern armed force to defend it. Since it doesn't look that way, I'm not placing my bets to high on this whole Dubai thing.

    I wouldn't be suprised if this all collapses within 20 years and we have a bunch of impressive ruins but nothing more.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Dubai is a Disneyland. Only bigger. by Rich.Miller.6 · · Score: 1

      I'd have no problem with building a high-tech nation within a few years, if I'd actually be seeing some real progress, but I don't. I'm seriously sceptical of Dubai and its likes gaining critical mass and actually building sustainable societies

      The prince of Dubai would be well advised to use all that money of his of building universities, implementing basic human rights and getting a modern society going and perhaps building a modern armed force to defend it. Since it doesn't look that way, I'm not placing my bets to high on this whole Dubai thing.

      Eh? Dubai's leadership has been doing exactly the things you say you would like to see. Well, except militarizing their economy - and this is arguably a good thing. Progress since independence from the British in 1971 has been astounding: when the British left in 1971, illiteracy was >70%, life expectancy a bit over 50 years, and there were no universities. Illiteracy is now 7.5%, life expectancy is 76.7 years, and Dubai has between 50 and 60 colleges and universities. Oil revenues now contribute less than 7% of GDP, and the country has become a huge international financial and transshipping center. Development of luxury (and non-luxury) skyscrapers, hotels, and vast artificial islands, etc., is almost unbelievable. There are about 25 free trade "innovation zones", where the government is working to get critical masses of private companies - they are in fact highly capitalistic - to work together to create the same magic that we saw in the US in Silicon Valley and the Route 128 areas. The government is one of the most stable in the region, and it is showing remarkable and sustained insight in how to drive progress. Plus there is a lot of tolerance for Western ideas - in fact, Western civil law is used in the innovation zones, not Sharia law. There are, I am sure, things to criticize about Dubai, just as there are about many other countries. But they are getting far more things right, and in a big way, than most other places. The best reason to visit is that it will blow away your preconceptions; I recommend this highly.

    2. Re:Dubai is a Disneyland. Only bigger. by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      Well said. For more information, see: Las Vegas.

  60. time to KICK ASS for the human race by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Faux-socialist misanthropes are WINNING.

    Time to beat them down.

    Because modern technology has made them "civilized" and "comfortable" and soo "enlightened".

    It starts when they are children. They are the bullies who would kick or trip others for fun, but do not because they are afraid. The more fortunate among them actually did these things and got an ass whoopin' -- and at least in the context of person-to-person relations, (perhaps) learned the greatest lesson -- that restraint of bully impulses saves you from retaliation, but also even a tiny bit of polite respect gets you further still.

    But as emerging adults they learned that the human race as a whole, has no staunch defenders. You can trash the human race as a whole, in as stupid or skillful a manner as you wish, and as long as you are speaking about people in general, your opinions and remarks go unchallenged.

    And sadly, they do not. Among others who also get off on this people-hating trend, you are a celebrity in this useless and ultimately dangerous sport. Those who disagree are held back by social conditioning that, in striving for a conflict free world, encourages you to disengage from confrontation.

    In order for our species to succeed it is NOT ENOUGH to teach politeness and respect.

    You have to teach children to draw a line, their own personal line.

    And you MUST teach your children that is their duty to kick ass, LOUDLY, when someone crosses that line.

    People all over are teaching their children that when someone crosses a line, it is okay to re-draw the line.

    Meanwhile, the most ugly sentiments get the most traction.

    Which is why assholes like the one who wrote TA feel free to take something he did not think of himself, something that would ennoble the human species with the simply inspiring, breathtaking act of its construction -- sitting in his electricity powered climate controlled room, he will proceed to take a shit on the idea and try to smear it all over the rest of us.

    Okay it is painfully obvious what he is against. Maybe, it all sounds so vaguely political. That 'thing'. What is he FOR?? He does not think it worthwhile to elaborate on what his real 'plan' for those resources are, he'll leave it to you. He can't be bothered. He's done.

    What you read in TA is a symptom of a really dangerous problem.

    Someone who respects and stands up for the whole human needs to kick his ass. Verbally and en masse, of course.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  61. Re:Fetishising nature + this is after all a desert by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Honest question: is it possible for people to have opinions that don't agree with yours? Or is everything that disagrees with you propaganda? Is calling it propaganda a way to relieve yourself of the burden of giving serious consideration to other viewpoints, and perhaps changing your mind once in a while?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  62. modpoints by electrosoccertux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have modpoints but I'm still waiting for some of you fucktards to figure out you're talking about a 50 year old reactor design

    and post instead about, you know, a modern design, or even a, gasp, non weaponizeable design, that has a self limiting reaction and doesn't need water to cool it.

    apparently nobody has any idea, and your liberal/green propqganda lies are going to propagate for yet another generation of idiocrats because no one stands in your way to correct you for me to mod up

    1. Re:modpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could you shed some light on a better design?
      yes our technology for nuclear has not really advanced that much since its inception. but if you are going to say there are better ones out please elaborate on what tat might be so that we could have a sensible conversation.

      Also some of us might be interested in learning about these new reactors as this is a /.

    2. Re:modpoints by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      you can google for them as much I'm not an expert but TWRs are one, the LFTR we had during research in the 40s was regularly shut down passively and started back up-- the "off" is a solidified salt plug that melts if the blow loses power that's keeping it cooled/chilled/melted; and Pebble Bed reactors use neutron cross section broadening to slow the reaction the hotter they get. The later ones have expensive waste reprocessing (hey, good for the economy), the LFTR and TWR can eat our existing 70k tons stored in Yucca mountain, and their waste only need be stored for 300 years, not 10,000.

      France has been 95% nuclear for 20 years now or so.
      Even the AP1000's are just GenII+ designs, not truly modern age because, we won't approve newer, safer reactor designs because Nuclear Is Unsafe. Green and Liberals of all people should be hardcore for nuclear. It requires excessive government regulation, costs a lot to set up (but is worth it), and would let us easily halve if not quarter our carbon emissions from Coal plants. It doesn't matter how much cap/tax we do, it's going to be a drop in the bucket compared to China. Thankfully, at least they're buiding LFTR to look into.

    3. Re:modpoints by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      sorry, cooled/chilled/solidified, shut off blower it melts.

    4. Re:modpoints by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      'latter' (as in, PBRs) not 'later'

  63. It looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the arcology in Appleseed.

    We only have to worry when they start selling Landmates and producing Bioroids to populate it.

    1. Re:It looks like... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      This reminded me of the domes in Ergo Proxy.

      Will this one be called "Mosque?"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  64. drowning's for poor people... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    OMG, global warmening!

    Good thing they're going to enclose the important parts under an environmentally controlled dome then. Truly these guys are planning ahead.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  65. if he's so smart, why's he dead? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    +1 for Guinea Pig B reference! One of the world's most successful failures.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  66. Any Gibson fans here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why hasn't anyone called this the Sprawl (as in Neuromancer) yet?

  67. Fuck dystopia by mveloso · · Score: 0

    These days, whenever someone tries to build something nice people are all "what about the poor?"

    Well, what about the poor? Are the poor going on those Moon or Mars missions that /. readers love to think about? No. Are the poor gaming on i7s in their mom's basement while posting on Facebook? Are the poor worrying about how to spend their bitcoins?

    Fuck worrying about the poor. They don't worry about you. Most of the poor would steal all your stuff and pawn it.

  68. Any other reasons? by kryliss · · Score: 1

    Is there any other proof needed that we do not need to be paying the oil industries any sort of subsidies and that we are paying too much for gas?

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  69. What dome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see a dome. http // www.technovelgy.com/graphics/content09/houstondome.jpg is a domed city. Geez, they can't get anything right....

    And, of course, smaller domes means that you can create smaller disasters... and then there's the question of how they control their HVAC....

                    mark, in an office in a govenement building that's either freezing or roasting at least 30%-40% of the time.

  70. Re:Bling Bling Motherfucker by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    They aren't spending all of their oil money to gear themselves up to be a power producer and distributor. They are positioning themselves to be a financial center and tourist destination. If that fails then they have nothing to show for their oil wealth except a shiny city built on top of sand.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  71. Just the dome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the dome? I thought that entire country was a dystopia?

  72. Attraction? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    the sort of spectacular, over-the-top attraction Dubai is known for.

    "Spectacular", yes. "Over-the-top", certainly.

    "Attraction?"

    It's in fucking Dubai. That in itself makes it as attractive as a dose of syphilis.

    (OK,I'll admit to having had to work in that area - there are a few nice people in the working classes, but most of the locals and ex-pats are a bunch of bastards.)

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  73. Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your gasoline dollars at work.

  74. Ignorance and Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted this on Engadget on an article about the World Mall in Dubai.

    I'm typing this from Dubai. Most of the people posting here know nothing about Dubai. Indians make up the largest population of expats and now make up 30% (google it) of the entire country's population. When talking about Dubai alone, it's closer to 45% with the other majority of expats being Pakistanis and Bangladeshis who in total make up close to 80% of the city's population.

    Now before you get into a racist and extremely cliched rant about how those South Asians are indentured servants/slaves forced into labor camps to build glass palaces for the oil wealthy robber baron overlords, let me illuminate your close minded mentality for a few seconds.

    Everyone living in this city for the last few decades knows that Dubai has little to no oil reserves worth mentioning. Dubai's economy was built by these South Asian expats due to their engagement in trade. Dubai is still the Middle East and Africa's trading hub and centre catering to over 2 billion people in the region. Most major businesses in the region are owned by citizens of the above mentioned South Asian nations. At 1 point the worlds largest exporter of Textiles was an Indian entrepreneur based in Dubai. Indians alone own 50% of the worlds tallest tower Burj Khalifa. Multi billion dollar companies are run by the South Asian community here who have spent their entire lives making Dubai their homes. They in turn have employed much of the community in this country. A majority of these expats own or work at these businesses throughout the country rather than as slave laborers as per your entirely western centric view of the world.

    Regarding the stories you have read about forced workers being exploited in Dubai, those are cases that have received a lot of media attention and they do exist but they are very rare and whose perpetrators have also been dealt with harshly by the judicial system. Dubai police is one of the finest in the world (look this up also) and the laws are are enforced to the extreme. Minimum wage laws exists, worker hour laws exist, and mandatory pension and health care are now in force, for every single salaried employee in the country. All these workers get paid more than 3 to 4 times what they would normally get paid in their respective countries, and nobody even the Sheikh himself can keep anyone in this country against their will. A simple visit to any police station by any of these employees due to worker abuse and the employer is looking at years of litigation, fines and bad PR and the employee receiving his or her due compensation and allowed to go home or find another job in the country.

    Dubai was built on trade, and has now evolved into a one of the world's largest tourist and shopping destination thanks in part to the visionary airlines run by the rulers, Emirates Airlines. With the way the city has expanded it's no wonder millions of people come here to spend billions of dollars every year and it's the ruler's far sighted vision that has allowed this to become a reality.

    Wake up from behind your Western Tinted glasses and look around some time and don't just take everything you read on the internet as gospel. Dubai has a bright future and and the nay sayers, either came to the country and failed or are simply jealous.

    SIDE NOTE: I'm not saying the country or city are perfect, but when an article about a massive achievement is posted and I see ignorant, racist rants in response, I feel I need to chime in and bring some balance to the conversation.