Slashdot Mirror


China Bans iPad, MacBook Pro, Other Apple Products For Government Use

MojoKid (1002251) writes "China seems to be on a mission to isolate itself from the world, at least in terms of technology. After banning Windows 8 on government PCs and raiding several of Microsoft's offices in China as part of an anti-trust investigation, Chinese officials have now prohibited purchase of several Apple products for government use. The list of banned Apple products include the iPad, iPad Mini, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, and half a dozen other items, all of which were left off of a final government procurement list distributed in July. This is a potentially big hit to Apple, which generated around 16 percent of its $37.4 billion in revenue last quarter from China. Apple saw its iPad sales jump 51 percent and Mac sales boosted 39 percent in China."

78 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. Seriously can you blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Blame the NSA

    1. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not really. Apple products are domestic products in China.

    2. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Skarjak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good point. How can anyone trust hardware and software coming from the states? Although when it comes to software, I'm sure that the NSA's people will be quite busy with trying to find security holes into whatever the Chinese decide to go with.

    3. Re:Seriously can you blame them by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They aren't banning apple products; just not buying them for government work. It would be akin to federal/state/local governments saying that all government owned vehicles have to be made by a domestic supplier. (that does happen doesn't it?)

    4. Re:Seriously can you blame them by ewibble · · Score: 5, Informative

      sort of the US banning Chinese products from government http://techonomy.com/2013/04/h...

    5. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Times have changed
      Our politicians are getting worse
      They won't obey liberty and freedom
      They just want to litigate and sue!

      Should we blame the government?

      Or blame society?

      Or should we blame the images on TV?

      No, blame NSA!

      Blame NSA!

      (etc)

    6. Re:Seriously can you blame them by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      We need to put up rotating cylinder space stations ASAP, before the paranoid people start throwing rocks at each other down here, and stuff. Microsoft and Apple are not gonna stop putting spying things into their stuff, cuz, that's just how they are, they can't help themselves, and then you get things like the Chinese gov't going all out paranoid, and arming themselves. I wonder if they'd have Stanislav Petrov's sitting at their nuclear ICBM early detection and launch triggering system. Sometimes it's the guy on the bottom like Stanislav, who calls the shots for the whole chain of command above him, because whatever he says, they take it as 100% certain, and he's the only one who knows the innards of the detection system, and solar artifacts at sundown and whatnot, and knows if he tells the idiots up there that we've detected a nuclear attack on us, they are gonna start firing, so he took his chances, after all, you can always start firing after the first nuke hit is confirmed by telephone, unless the nukes are simultaneously launched to hit all your launching stations all at the same time, 100% of them, and then you have no time to wait because the first hit is the final hit and kill everything at once, not spread out in time. But it was very worth the risk. But when people get too paranoid, they could become very trigger happy. So if we have people living in space going about their business not giving a crap about people and countries down here pounding the shit out of each other with ICBM nukes, that would be a pawsitive thing, something to be happy about when everything else is going wrong. It all starts with lack of trust, and spyware built into the recovery CD you get directly from the computer manufacturer, then it just escalates from there.. sigh.. the way to deescalate it is to send a couple diplomats over, with a gift, like a carefully crafted Go board and set, and some baby elephant and mother and family donation to a Chinese zoo.. and some tigers...

    7. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      How can anyone trust hardware and software coming from the states?

      How? If and only if that software is open source from bottom to top, including being able to build and install it with an open source toolchain.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      ...you can't honestly call it "free trade" if one country's products are banned.

      Would that country be the Republic of Apple by any chance?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re:Seriously can you blame them by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Lots of nations ban all telco products from their secure buildings or block nations for bidding for backhaul, trunk lines for national security. Nations set real hard gov standards eg. consumer grade phone or device can be taken into a gov building or what select brand or version is fully cleared for their bureaucracy. No phone, only one brand of phone for "interoperability" or what meets min encryption standards. Nations have done that for decades. The wider population can still buy a expensive consumer grade phone and enjoy been see with it in park, city, cafe.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Apple, designed in Israel, for the NSA with a California packaging, since Oct, 2011.

      Hi Tim!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Like US free trade.

      Iran? Syria? Ukraine? Let the MARKET solve that! Supporting sanctions is like French-kissing Karl Marx!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Skarjak · · Score: 1

      Yes, I should have added "proprietary" in there. Although we should still be vigilant even with open source, it's very realistic I think that they might be trying to subtly add vulnerabilities to open source software.

    13. Re:Seriously can you blame them by AaronW · · Score: 1

      Having seen plenty of code from Asia, I'll take code from the United States any day. The worst code I have ever dealt with all came from China and Taiwan. The worst code I saw came from this Chinese company: http://www.zdnet.com/hack-in-t...

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    14. Re:Seriously can you blame them by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Apple have all their stuff made in China? So it's just the software you're afraid of then. Still the saying is 'don't trust American companies!'

    15. Re: Seriously can you blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you're going to troll can you at least try? The point is to piss people off, not make them feel sorry for you.

    16. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Dantoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      The US should respond instantly by banning the purchase of Huawei hardware for use in government installations. That will teach them a lesson they won't forget fast!

    17. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    18. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      HUAWEI

    19. Re:Seriously can you blame them by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The NSA uses hardware bugs, so going fully open source on software and firmware won't help.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The NSA uses hardware bugs, so going fully open source on software and firmware won't help.

      That's a rather black and white claim. Which hardware bugs did you have in mind exactly, and what makes you think an open software stack won't help flush them out?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    21. Re:Seriously can you blame them by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was all one-sided. I just said it isn't free trade.

      I don't necessarily have a problem with tariffs or bans or the like, if the relevant party has a legitimate reason. What I object to is pretending that it's "free trade" when it's not. China subsidizes a large amount of its industry, in order to undercut American manufacturing. That's about the farthest thing from free trade their is.

      Are there subsidies and the like on the American side? Sure. No honest person would deny it. But the scale is so vastly different it's ridiculous.

    22. Re:Seriously can you blame them by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Blame the NSA

      No, blame the cash management finance department. China does not want local currency leaving the country. Stop the bleeding.

      If Apple and Google had headquarters in China, we might have seen a different decision taken.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    23. Re: Seriously can you blame them by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Me Bloomberg, me make up story. http://www.cnet.com/news/apple...

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  2. we will just use an knock off made at the same fat by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    we will just use an knock off made at the same factory as your own stuff.

  3. This is the price you pay... by Meditato · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...for cooperating with the Machiavellian pro-war, pro-surveillance, pro-torture old boy's club in the federal bureaucracy.

    1. Re:This is the price you pay... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Totally true -- but it's probably less than the price they'd pay for not co-operating.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:This is the price you pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      are you referring to China?

    3. Re:This is the price you pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Who? China or US?

  4. "Isolating" by choosing open source? by Skarjak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Up to now, they've been banning proprietary products for the benefit of more open ones. I know that we like to show China as a country with isolationist tendencies, but I'm not sure the glove fits on this one. I don't think choosing not to get screwed by Microsoft or Apple is such a bad thing.

    1. Re:"Isolating" by choosing open source? by armanox · · Score: 2

      I also remember them moving away from Intel-based stuff in general, in favor of MIPS that they can design and build everything themselves.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    2. Re:"Isolating" by choosing open source? by erikkemperman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Presumably they are choosing not to get screwed by NSA, through proxies such as Apple and MS. But otherwise I agree entirely.

      I wish headlines such as

      China seems to be on a mission to isolate itself from the world, at least in terms of technology.

      Would more often be accompanied by its root cause, something along the lines of

      America seems to be on a mission to antagonize the rest of the world, not least in terms of technology.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    3. Re:"Isolating" by choosing open source? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      When the government pushes particular products, the education is forced to follow suit and industry then complies. So not isolationist at all but setting the pace. This will end up proving problematic for both M$ and Apple as it spreads throughout the China supply and procurement channel and inevitably influences the export channel. M$ has lots of other directions to go in but Apple is a marketing company pushing an overpriced fashion fad, this sort of thing can have a real impact on that 'marketing cache' that illusion that dramatically props up their profit margins.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:"Isolating" by choosing open source? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Not sure how much it makes sense to ban Apple, then, as opposed to Microsoft, considering that at least a portion of Apple products are open source

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:"Isolating" by choosing open source? by armanox · · Score: 1

      I hope not. The Longsoon's are about the only desktop MIPS processor still around - and I remember seeing they were having a set of updates to the lineup. There is no reason they couldn't be brought up to speed.

      FWIW, I'd buy one of their laptops if they were sold stateside (instead, I'll just keep playing with my old SGI equipment).

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  5. Huwaei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It isn't really that interesting when you consider the snowden leaks and our turn about with huwaei and zte in regards to US government infrastructure.

  6. Somebody wants some thing by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Once they get it, all will be forgotten

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  7. Nonsense by xfizik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "China seems to be on a mission to isolate itself from the world, at least in terms of technology."
    Why would they want to isolate themselves from the world? They may be looking to increase security (with the whole NSA mess, I wouldn't blame them) or trying to cut a better deal with Apple. There may be other rational reasons too.

    1. Re:Nonsense by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. The US refused to purchase equipment from Chinese technology companies because of security concerns. Now the tables have turned and we mock them for being isolationists?

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
    2. Re:Nonsense by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I expect you're right... but actions like this could very well cause companies like Apple and Microsoft to start exploring other manufacturing options away from Foxconn.

      I know the camera makers and har drive manufacturers already have a significant presence in Thailand, so I can't imagine it would take much more than a willingness to invest sufficient capital in order to move iPhone manufacturing there.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Nonsense by mspohr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple and Microsoft (and most other corporations) pick manufacturing locations based on price and quality. They choose China because it offers the lowest cost and good quality. They aren't going to pick up and move (even if they could find another capable manufacturer) for political reasons.
      China is taking this step not to isolate themselves from the world but to isolate themselves from the NSA.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    4. Re:Nonsense by xfizik · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that could be another rational reason, not isolationism. Btw, Russia also stopped buying Apple products for government use not so long ago.

    5. Re:Nonsense by antdude · · Score: 1

      China is just copying USA like they always do. ;) [grin]

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Nonsense by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Carrying around, buying or installing another nations signals intelligence equipment is what most nations try to avoid.
      Recall GODSURGE, IRONCHEF, IRATEMONKEY, SOMBERKNAVE, VALIDATOR, OLYMPUS, COTTONMOUTH via ANT.
      http://cryptome.org/2014/01/ns...
      If you like a phone like device you have COTTONMOUTH, CANDYWIRE with some DROPOUTJEEP, TOTEGHOSTLY.
      Its not just the hardware as shipped or altered during shipment. Staff turn off a cell phone at a site and then turn it on 'outside' again - even that is interesting.
      Other nations understood this risk over years and have the political understanding to push domestic production. A hall with 100's of local whitebox units vs the small. fast, well coded, expensive import.
      With your own nations tech you understand the cpu, the motherboard, all cards, the code. With an import you risk a closed source blob on your motherboard as shipped or added.
      Local skills and jobs get a boost, tech funding flows. Might even be an export product range.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Nonsense by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Don't forget CEILINGCAT.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  8. Fatal flaw: China can't adapt by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    China has always been controlled from the center. In past eras, China has had technological and exploration advantages over the West that were wiped out by intrusion and isolation commanded from China's locus of concentrated power - whether via emperors, or the current regime.

    Long run (maybe, even near-long-term) this does not bode well for China's prospects, because when one is sealed off from outside ideas and innovation, one will ultimately fall behind and adapt only in suboptimal ways. What results is a waste of social and intellectual capital.

    1. Re:Fatal flaw: China can't adapt by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Long run (maybe, even near-long-term) this does not bode well for China's prospects, because when one is sealed off from outside ideas and innovation, one will ultimately fall behind and adapt only in suboptimal ways. What results is a waste of social and intellectual capital.

      China is only refusing to buy some foreign products. There is no policy of isolation. I imagine there will still be a great deal of reverse engineering and other data gathering activities (interpret that how you wish). So, the idea is to negatively impact competitors financially while at the same time benefiting from their innovations.

    2. Re:Fatal flaw: China can't adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      you have no idea of what you are talking about. Refusing to use Apple or Microsoft product for Government use has nothing to do with isolation.

      Its a wise move and any country who doesnt lick the a$$ of the US should do the same ASAP

    3. Re:Fatal flaw: China can't adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nice talking, only problem is it doesn't mean a thing. It is the US that is increasingly alienating everyone else in the globe, while still burying the heads in the sand and pretending they run the show. You are the ones that should worry about isolation, and better start to worry about that FAST.

    4. Re:Fatal flaw: China can't adapt by jandersen · · Score: 1

      China has always been controlled from the center. In past eras, China has had technological and exploration advantages over the West that were wiped out by intrusion and isolation commanded from China's locus of concentrated power - whether via emperors, or the current regime.

      Long run (maybe, even near-long-term) this does not bode well for China's prospects, because when one is sealed off from outside ideas and innovation, one will ultimately fall behind and adapt only in suboptimal ways. What results is a waste of social and intellectual capital.

      Yes, the good old myths that I used to read about in the 70s, 80s, 90s, ... - and which have been promoted ever since the days of the British Empire. It's a load of nonsense, basically; racism dressed up with cheap self-flattery: 'Us in the West are much better because of "freedom" or "democracy" or whatever'.

      History shows us that China, like all other, great civilisations go through periods of progress and stagnation. Right now they are progressing at a staggering pace, while we are beginning to lag behind. And I can't see where you get the idea from that China is 'sealed off from outside ideas', when the truth is that China is investing hugely in education, science and technology, both in China and overseas. Also, I believe I have seen many times over the last couple of years, that people on this very forum keep complaining that new gadgets come out in China before you can get them in the US. In short, they are way ahead of us at the moment, and we should stop pissing in the wind and get ourselves moving, preferably in a forward direction.

      Personally, I think we should be more confident in our own ability to take part in cooperation with China and other of the ascending nations. The future is likely to hold much more international cooperation and much less nationalism. Well, one can hope.

    5. Re:Fatal flaw: China can't adapt by AnOnyxMouseCoward · · Score: 1

      Thank you for realizing the corruption problem. I'm pretty sure governmental workers don't have a need for a "work iPad", and it's pretty awkward doing the maintenance/change management when you have a fleet of PCs and then this department gets a bunch of Macs.

      Also I thought that on Slashdot we blame Apple for making expensive crap anyway, at which point not buying them would be wise buying policies for a government... ;)

  9. Is it a big hit to Apple's bottom line? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since this only affects government purchases, we'd have to know whether a significant part of last quarter's Chinese sales involved government entities purchasing these products.

    I'd expect government sales - especially to China - aren't a huge part of Apple's business.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Is it a big hit to Apple's bottom line? by thieh · · Score: 1

      Imagine you can't bring apple devices into your local government-operated buildings like library or DMV. That will be enough to make the hit huge because nobody wants to have that kind of inconvenience. Yet in a place where human rights is restricted, that is a totally forseeable development.

    2. Re:Is it a big hit to Apple's bottom line? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Imagine you can't bring apple devices into your local government-operated buildings like library or DMV.

      All you can do is imagine that since it's not what China did. They banned government procurement of those devices.

      Since when have Chinese been great followers of government rules anyway?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. Ripe for Linux in china...or new ChinaOS by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    So lets get this right...China are investigating Microsoft for antitrust, and outright banning of Apple. Time is right and MIPS64 is looking ever so attractive.

    1. Re:Ripe for Linux in china...or new ChinaOS by nightsky30 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean the Chinese will start pirating Linux next?

      The only way to get them to use Linux is to tell them it costs something.

      Illegally connect and use RedHat repos?

    2. Re:Ripe for Linux in china...or new ChinaOS by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      So lets get this right...China are investigating Microsoft for antitrust, and outright banning of Apple. Time is right and MIPS64 is looking ever so attractive.

      You got that wrong. Some Apple products cannot be purchased for government use. All the Chinese people are free to buy iPhones, iPads and Macs for their own private use, or for business use. Just not inside the government. Well, the German government is said to be looking at mechanical typewriters for some purposes...

  11. *Door opens* by nightsky30 · · Score: 1

    Good news everyone...

  12. Re:I am jealous by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    Authoritarianism has its perks.

  13. In other news... by mpthompson · · Score: 1

    ...productivity in Chinese government offices rise sharply.

    1. Re:In other news... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Good thing they aren't Ruby devs working out of coffee shops. This move would cripple them.

  14. Isolate? ... No .. by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    "China seems to be on a mission to isolate itself from the world, at least in terms of technology."

    They didn't say that. They said they don't want GUBMINT to use APPLE stuff. That doesn't shut down China's entire technology capability.

    There are other people in China.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  15. Fatal flaw: China can't adapt by misosoup7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China has always been controlled from the center. In past eras, China has had technological and exploration advantages over the West that were wiped out by intrusion and isolation commanded from China's locus of concentrated power - whether via emperors, or the current regime.

    Long run (maybe, even near-long-term) this does not bode well for China's prospects, because when one is sealed off from outside ideas and innovation, one will ultimately fall behind and adapt only in suboptimal ways. What results is a waste of social and intellectual capital.

    That makes no sense. China just banned its government from using Apple products, not Apple products in general. It hasn't sealed itself from outside ideas and innovations at all. Chinese citizens can still buy iPads and iPhones so Chinese smartphone manufactures still has to compete.

    Another reason why this may have happened that most people probably wouldn't think about is that this might be a move to fight corruption. iPads and iPhones have been vastly popular as "gifts" within the government. Banning the government from purchasing them as gifts would help to fight some of the corruption problem they're having.

  16. Article is false and misleading by MikeMo · · Score: 4, Informative

    China has not banned any Apple products. Some were not included in the "green" catalog because Apple failed to submit data.

    1. Re:Article is false and misleading by Wingsy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is Slashdot. A false and misleading article is as good as the truth.

      --
      If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    2. Re:Article is false and misleading by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. A false and misleading article is as good as the truth.

      As good as, HUH it's better.
      more clicks.

  17. Why? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

    I mean, isn't all of Apples shit made in China anyway? That would be like the US government banning GM cars.

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    1. Re:Why? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      That would be like the US government banning GM cars.

      The efficiency and reliability of the US Government fleet would increase whilst costs reduce?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  18. Well if they go all Microsoft by itsphilip · · Score: 1

    It should be way easier for the US to conduct electronic espionage

  19. Re:Hacking? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    While I'm inclined to believe that Apple's products are unlikely to be secure against the level of hacking that a state actor could afford to level, your assertion makes the assumption that China doesn't want to be able to hack the computers of government employees....

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  20. I'm sure government purchases are a small fraction by msobkow · · Score: 1

    I'm sure government purchases are a small fraction of the total purchased by the general public.

    There are many government agencies around the world which haven't approved Apple, Microsoft, Blackberry, or other particular products for their purchase lists. Government purchases are just a nice feather in the cap for most companies. They really could care less, other than some people amongst the general public who think government purchase approval is some sort of "security approval" for a device.

    They want the mass market. And that has not been cut off by China by any means.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  21. Self-awareness by marxmarv · · Score: 2

    is anti-American. Stop that.

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  22. Desktop is what you make it of by marxmarv · · Score: 1

    *shrug* Samsung Electronics has some tempting little eight-ARMed chips that would feel great on a Mini-ITX motherboard. Still not FOSS, but if that's really important to you, there's lowRISC (Berkeley RISC-V including development toolchain and Linux image) and just now Parallax's Propeller for your I/O needs...

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
    1. Re:Desktop is what you make it of by armanox · · Score: 1

      The FOSS thing isn't quite so important to me - I just like MIPS a lot more then I like ARM.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  23. they are made in china by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    foxcon assembles these in china

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  24. The xiaomi story hasn't even scrolled off the page by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Xiaomi top seller in China

    I'm not saying it's 100% Xiaomi, but I'm sure it's somewhat related. Not even "hey we need to have Xiaomi #1" as much as "we need to have local tech #1".

  25. "China seems to be on a mission to isolate itself by messymerry · · Score: 1

    "China seems to be on a mission to isolate itself from the NSA, at least in terms of technology. FTFY ;-)

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
  26. Re:You may have been asleep for the past 20 years by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Android is a linux distribution put together by Google, with Google extensions and optimizations. Not sure with that has to do with the argument that Microsoft is less open source than Apple and was not "banned" from government procurement, therefore the motivation for China's action is probably not open sourc-y-ness.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!