Slashdot Mirror


Enthusiast Opts For $2200 Laser Eye Surgery To Enhance Oculus Rift Experience

An anonymous reader writes After 30 years of wearing glasses, one man says that the Oculus Rift virtual reality headset has prompted him to get laser eye surgery. With farsightedness and astigmatism, he says, "Never thought much about the laser surgery until the Rift, that's for sure." He has an appointment to get the $2200 surgery on the 13th of this month. "For me it is clear, my eyeglasses are like an obstacle for optimal VR experience," he said. He hopes the surgery will remove his need for glasses, which can be uncomfortable inside of the Rift, if they fit at all, and cause several issues such as scratched lenses and lower field of view. Oculus plans to make the consumer version of the Oculus Rift (aka CV1) more friendly to glasses wearers, "...we have a lot of great ideas for supporting glasses in the consumer version [of the Rift] (especially since a huge portion of the Oculus team wears glasses everyday!)" they noted in their Kickstarter.

68 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Reality not sufficient, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    so... dude has lived his life with the inconvenience of glasses, and incomplete vision
    for a great amount of time. thought about the cost of surgery and said meh....

    then one day, not the forests, or the mountains... not the clouds in the sky.
    not beautiful women at the beach and not the smile of a newborn....

    but virtual reality.

    better fix my eyes to get the most out of vr.

    1. Re:Reality not sufficient, by Kjella · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Parent AC really doesn't belong at -1, I was thinking the same thing. I need to wear glasses or hard contacts and LASIK is out of the question, there's a ton of reasons I'd like to get rid of my glasses like to avoid them fogging up, going swimming, having them edge forward as I carry something and can't push them back, leaning over edges and so on. And hard contacts, well trust me nobody who doesn't have to wear them does for good reason. But virtual reality? That's the "killer feature" that tipped him over the edge? To me that's a bit of a WTF, really...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re: Reality not sufficient, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes it does. The guy can see with glasses. He can see all those things you mentioned. What he can't do is properly experience VR without this surgery so why not go for it? He really had no reason to do so before.

      Barring an unfortunate mistake this will improve his quality of life all around and if it allows him to get more enjoyment out of his gaming experience who are we to question his motives.

      I'm quite sure every person alive has done something in their lives with motives others would call silly or pointless

    3. Re: Reality not sufficient, by TitusGroan8856 · · Score: 1

      MIT recently announced screen technology that corrects for bad eyesight. I can't imagine it would be too long before Oculus included this rather than accommodate glasses wearing. I'm lucky that I'm short sighted and have had no problems seeing content on the VR glasses that I've tried so far without my glasses in the way.

    4. Re:Reality not sufficient, by xeno · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up. Wish I had points.

      I had my eyes zapped about 5 years ago, and even with some complications I'd do it again in a heartbeat.

      Why? I did it beause glasses were making me hesitant to play with my kids.

      As they grew older, I was always getting them knocked off in game play or horsing around, and then I found myself declining to play or playing soft or begging off.... Sport lenses were always a half-measure, and contacts are a maintenance timesink vs continual risks of infection. For a while I was interested in intracorneal rings (the only corrective eye surgery that is 99+% reversable) but there wasn't enough data and they were never really popular in the US. I had PRK instead of LASIK because my astigamtism's anomalies were near the surface (the "flap" would contain irregularities). The final thing that swayed me was that laser surgery (in my case) could be performed in about 10-15% of the corneal depth that is safe to treat. This meant plenty of safety margin for the initial treatment, plus I can have it re-corrected to better than 20/20 as necessary over multiple years without hitting safety limits -- basically I'll die many years before hitting any kind of limit on corneal correction. The PRK process is a much slower recovery than LASIK, and I had some complications that added a couple weeks to that, but I remember the first afternoon after getting the "bandage contacts" off and seeing with my fresh new 20/15 eyes... looking across Lake Washington at ripples in the water from canoe oars, and seeing the color and texture of the window trim on the Safeco building well over a mile away from my car on the 520 bridge. The world is absolutely fucking gorgeous again.

      But would I have done it specifically for gameplay? What?

      Jesus, dude, go outside and look at a tree.

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
    5. Re:Reality not sufficient, by ilizarovs · · Score: 1

      Irony is in the word -- "Virtual + Reality"..

    6. Re:Reality not sufficient, by niftydude · · Score: 1

      GP AC really did belong at -1. And you shouldn't have been modded up either.

      TFS states he has farsightedness, which means that he can already see all those things without glasses. Up until now, he would only have needed glasses to read - which apparently he was OK with, and so didn't think it was worth the surgery.

      Now that the oculus rift has come along, wearing glasses in that thing are annoying in that and he's opted for surgery. Makes sense to me.

      Your experience as a shortsighted person bears very little relevance to his experience as a farsighted person.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    7. Re:Reality not sufficient, by YoungHack · · Score: 1

      This is right. I'm far sighted, and it is completely different than being near sighted. You can see mountains, you can drive. You can see everything not close in crystal clear fidelity.

      For close up work, like reading or sewing or electronics you wear glasses. Most of those activities are fairly static, and glasses are generally no problem (though I find my glasses want to fall off while sewing). I don't have much experience with VR, but I suspect the experience could be completely different.

    8. Re:Reality not sufficient, by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      Parent AC really doesn't belong at -1, I ...

      Here is a copy-paste of the GP's score window:

      Starting Score: 0 points
      Moderation +5
      60% Insightful
      20% Informative
      10% Funny
      Extra 'Insightful' Modifier 0 (Edit)
      Total Score: 5

      Which is to say, parent AC was never at -1. Which is to say, stop abusing /. moderation to blow your own horn. And (more importantly) stop telling porky pies.

    9. Re:Reality not sufficient, by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Absolutely true. Some people get it so they can play sports like tennis or go scuba diving. Some do it for vanity reasons. Some just for convenience. VR is as good as any other reason.

    10. Re:Reality not sufficient, by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't understand his problem.

      All the reasons you listed to 'fix my eyes' by which, you mean surgery, are covered with little to no inconvenience by wearing glasses.

      Wearing glasses isn't a big deal to him (or most people) for any of the things you listed.

      You can view mountains fine with glasses. You can view forests fine with glasses. You can love your child with glasses with little to no issues.

      Try wearing goggles with glasses and you'll understand the difference.

      But hey, you should totally assume you understand this guys point of view because its different than yours.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:Reality not sufficient, by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      VR may not have been the reason, but one of many - and the one that tipped the scales for him.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:Reality not sufficient, by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Interesting... I'd like to pick your brain as I have astygmatism myself and am considering asking about laser correction.

      Did you ever find the degree of... well, vision inaccuracy to fluctuate day to day? Some days one eye is worse off than another, some days all is better than normal. The glasses still help when it's all wierd, but not as much (which tells me the angle is the same but the degree is worse).

      I'm afraid that if I get it corrected, the stable state won't be what is corrected for.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Reality not sufficient, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, chief. Far-sightedness is not an immediate "I can see all of the things not directly in front of my face" scenario. For some, sure, all they need is reading glasses. For many? Yeah, you're wearing glasses for life, as even surgery hasn't caught up with it yet (for more than you'd think, sadly) depending on your prescription.

    14. Re:Reality not sufficient, by hubie · · Score: 1

      Which, to me, really makes this whole thing a non-story.

  2. Seriously? by bluegutang · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why not contact lenses?

    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too invasive.
      Too much risk of harming the eye.
      Better off to go with surgery.

    2. Re: Seriously? by MikeJones8766 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, they can. I have astigmatisms in both eyes and wear contacts with no problems.

    3. Re: Seriously? by guises · · Score: 2

      This isn't true. Contacts have come a long way, you can even get soft contacts now which will work with an astigmatism. Talk to your optometrist - I used to think that I wouldn't be able to wear contacts without pain, but for me at least that also has changed.

    4. Re:Seriously? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Why not contact lenses?

      Because the surgery is a better solution. It just takes an hour or so, and then you are done. How many hours over your life do you spend dealing with contacts? I had LASIK 15 years ago. It cost me about $5000 back then, but it was worth every penny.

    5. Re:Seriously? by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      You want risk free? Lock yourself in a padded room and make sure to eat nothing but what you get through a feeding tube to make sure you don't choke.

    6. Re:Seriously? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      After the surgery, aren't you supposed to keep your eyes covered for a full 24 hours? I mean, certainly you don't just walk out, hop in the car, and go home, right?

      When I did it, they would not let patients drive themselves home. I had a friend pick me up. After I got home, I took a sleeping pill and snoozed. When I woke up, I uncovered my eyes, and they were fine. I had to wear goggles for a couple days, so I didn't absent mindedly reach up and rub my eyes. But there was no pain, only a tiny bit of itchiness, and I was able to go to work the next day.

    7. Re: Seriously? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Yes they can

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    8. Re:Seriously? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you wash your hands before putting them in...

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    9. Re:Seriously? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      They typically do one eye at a time, wait for it to fully heal and then do the other. This is specifically so that you have vision from at least one eye at all times, and so that even with worst possible complications, you'll still have one eye worth of vision.

    10. Re:Seriously? by zarthrag · · Score: 1

      I keep a few packs of disposable contacts around just for use with the Rift. Lasik is not a (practical/suggested) option for me - though I did get some (more) motivation to get evaluated because of VR.

      I'm thinking there will soon be a cottage industry of corrective prescription eye-cups for VR, until you can simply enter your prescription into your avatar details :-D

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    11. Re:Seriously? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Not all problems can be corrected with contacts. It wasn't until the last 15 years that contacts could correct one of my issues.

      Not all people can deal with contacts. It took me a number of YEARS to finally get to the point where I can put my contacts in and remove them at the speed and with the little effort that pretty much everyone else that wears them does.

      Like wise, my primary vision issue, non-binocular vision, can not be corrected with surgery, well, not LASIK surgery anyway, but glasses don't fix that particular aspect either.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re: Seriously? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Must be nice. I have the same in both eyes, and the lenses would never sit still. Tilt my head for any reason, they would spin to align with gravity, making things worse. If I blinked, they would shift and take a (short, but noticeable) moment to move back. Looking near the extremes of my eyes would shift them (presumably pressure from my eyelids) also making things worse.

      Basically they worked great for looking straight ahead with a perfectly level head. Anything else and they would make my vision worse.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re: Seriously? by X0563511 · · Score: 1
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:Seriously? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You want risk free? Lock yourself in a padded room and make sure to eat nothing but what you get through a feeding tube to make sure you don't choke.

      LASIK is an option. Wearing glasses or contacts is another option. Both come with drawbacks - such as risks - and benefits. A rational decision is based on balancing these against each other. Having the option for corrective surgery be risk-free would be very much preferable, since it would increase its expected utility and thus make it the best option in more cases, as well as increasing the total expected utility of the entire situation.

      I wonder what is giving birth to posts like yours. Is it some weird cultural meme, or are increasing numbers of Slashdotters simply hitting middle-age crises and overcompensating?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    15. Re: Seriously? by pepty · · Score: 1

      Hang on. They gave you different prescriptions/lenses for right and left, correct? I wear contacts, but only one corrects for astigmatism. I only wear them if I'm surfing or otherwise in the water, and they're great - unless I accidentally swap them right for left, which makes life immediately unpleasant. The rest of the time I just wear glasses.

    16. Re:Seriously? by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      I've merely pointed out that there is nothing that is absolutely without risk. The approach that one should take is properly measuring those risks, then deciding. Not trying to stir up fear.

    17. Re:Seriously? by quenda · · Score: 2

      So why not install suitable corrective lenses in the VR headset, as is commonly done for scuba-diving masks?

  3. Processing in the game by lorinc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't it completly overkill? I mean, the games can adjust their rendering so as to compensate the visual defects of the player. You just enter your needed correction in a parameter box et voilà. Thet clearly doesn't seem overly complicated to do.

    1. Re:Processing in the game by grumbel5969 · · Score: 3, Informative

      While there are some fancy light field displays that might be able to adjust for vision defects in software, those are still years after. However the Oculus Rift has swappable lenses, so it shouldn't be to hard to design some lenses that correct whatever vision defect you might have. The consumer version will probably have some adjustable optics to correct for vision issues, at least thats how the first wave of consumer VR headsets back in 1995 worked.

    2. Re:Processing in the game by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      And binoculars, for that matter.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  4. Re:How about contact lenses? by craigminah · · Score: 1

    Toric contact lenses fix astigmatism...been around a while: http://www.allaboutvision.com/...

  5. Best $4400 I've ever spent in my life by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    I underwent LASIK 14 years ago and I recommend it to everyone. If the OC is what convinced him to do it, great. He should have done it years ago.

    1. Re:Best $4400 I've ever spent in my life by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's only a good idea for the under 30 crowd and the farsighted. Otherwise you don't get much bang for the buck once presbyopia sets in down the line (which it will).

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Best $4400 I've ever spent in my life by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Except in my case there wasn't room for the lens (which I would need) so it's more the situation that it wasn't considered now but could be once my natural lens is worse than the manufactured one would be.

      Then again maybe it's not LASIK at all any longer then.

    3. Re:Best $4400 I've ever spent in my life by xeno · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm.... No. Bzzzzt.

      Presbyopia eventually affects virtually everyone by age 40-50, but that just means that you become slightly more farsighted as the natural lens becomes less flexible. Corrective surgery still removes all astigmatic defects, corrects the focal distance to a normal range, reduces eyestrain by normalizing the two eyes, along with other minor benefits. Old people getting laser correction just means "only" having perfect vision past 0.5-1 meter or so.

      Now that I'm old (near death by hipster standards, or so I'm told) and need reading glasses for close work, do I regret getting laser correction? Am I not getting "bang for the buck" as I read highway signs a quarter mile ahead? Do I feel sad as I look at the moon and pick out crater edges wiith my naked eyes?

      No. Not one single teensy bit. I am happy to age this way; much happier than all other options.

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
    4. Re:Best $4400 I've ever spent in my life by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I got lasik and my doctor kept saying, over and over and over again, "you will still need reading glasses eventually, just like anybody else!" I guess he was worried I'd come after him or something.

      But for running and skiing, and especially for motorcycle riding (wind, dust and grit) it is SO much better than glasses or contacts (which I never could really get comfortable with). And I can use $10 Walmart sunglasses again.

    5. Re:Best $4400 I've ever spent in my life by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not a good idea for the under 30 crowd because often at that age their eyes are still changing and if they get surgery it may well need re-doing a decade later. It's only worth it once your vision has settled down, typically around the mid 30s to mid 40s.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Re:custom lens? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    would it be hard to switch the lens in the rift with custom one that correct eyes problem?

    Depends on how they are mounted. Plus I can't imagine it would be cheap. You would need custom lenses cut from scratch that take both the Rx and the normal cut of the stock rift lenses into account as well as possibly adjusting the prescription for the shorter than normal (for regular glasses at least) focal distance.

    Now Oculus could possibly build something into the final consumer version that allows for adding an prescription lens to the system, and setup a retail service to make the lenses with proper adjustments for this particular use. Or they could find a away to allow for better fit of the device for people wearing glasses. But until then, I'd say his options are pretty limited.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  7. Re:LASIK for looking at something close? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Unless the OR is pain waiting to happen for users with ordinary vision I'd imagine that the optics are designed to provide a comfortable apparent distance from the screen for viewers with ordinary eyesight. This would mean that a nearsighted user would still be attempting to focus on something that appears further away than close-in vision is suitable for.

    Somebody comfortable at closer distances would likely require slightly less correction from the internal optics, since their comfortable apparent distance is shorter; but if the optics aren't designed that way that doesn't help them very much.

  8. just the old movie BrainStorm by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    some will sacrifice reality for virtuality.

    1. Re:just the old movie BrainStorm by GrBear · · Score: 1

      Reality is overrated.

  9. Re:Am I not getting it? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    The focal distance of the Rift's lenses are set at infinity. In effect, when you're wearing the rift, the focal target is a great distance away.

  10. Re:Am I not getting it? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    It has fixed focal length? Did they forget to consult with optics engineers? No one in the design group owns a telescope or a pair of binoculars?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  11. Have the helmet do it by John+Marter · · Score: 1

    Would it be possible to put an eye test into the helmet and have it adjust the optics to give the wearer apparently perfect vision? Or is that just too sci-fi?

  12. better subject line for story by LordKronos · · Score: 1

    man gets lasik, news at 11

  13. Not good for acute night vision. by SteveAstro · · Score: 1

    One of the problems of Lasik is the size of the corrected pupil is often not as large as that of your fully dark adapted pupil, and, as an amateur astronomer, it leaves artefacts in your field of view that are objectionable.

  14. that's by Twelfth+Harmonic · · Score: 1

    f*cked up

  15. Why does the connection matter? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Why does the connection matter? I opted for glasses when I found I could no longer hit the side of a barn with a rifle, but that was the trigger event that showed me that my eyesight was crap and not the entire reason to do something about my eyes.
    I'm sure it's a similar situation in this case. Someone doing something to push the limits of their vision found that their vision was limited.

  16. $2200 is pretty cheap! by matresstester · · Score: 1

    It was going for $5000 about ten years ago. I think that he would have been a happier person if he did even at that cost 10 years ago.

  17. News just in, Guy wants 20/20 vision! by danknight48 · · Score: 1

    - Guy has bad eyesight
    - Wants them fixed to standard 20/20, using laser surgery.
    This is news?

    This story would be more interesting if he corrected his eyes to "short sighted", this would improve the experience. He'd then be able to see alot more detail at close range, using his Oculus rift.

    1. Re:News just in, Guy wants 20/20 vision! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      In other news, guy who can afford $350 toy can also afford a medical procedure to enhance every facet of his life.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  18. Re:custom lens? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    They are inexpensive twist to lock things. Three notches. Friction fit. Not designed for constant replacement. Would likely get sloppy.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  19. It sounds a little crazy but I get it. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I've always had eyes on the border of needing glasses. I could get by without glasses pretty fine, I just sat half a foot closer to the PC and bought giant monitors / TV's - I could see fairly well, just not perfect.

    I picked up a 30" 2560x1600 monitor about 3 years back and I just wasn't able to appreciate it. I could read it but only sitting pretty damn close due to the pixel size. 1920x1200 was fine but, I shouldn't need to do that./
    Finally caved in and got some glasses at 34 years old - made a great difference.
    (Actually once I saw the difference glasses made, I really wished we all had far far better vision, something like 20/5 would be quite nice)

  20. Don't underestimate the lifelong risks of surgery by Nerdorable · · Score: 2

    I have severe myopia, so anything more than a few feet from me is a blur unless I am wearing my glasses or contacts. I'm an avid gamer (Partnered on Twitch.tv) and I used to be an active equestrian. My lifestyle lead many people to recommend LASIK or PRK surgery, but the risks turned me off from both. LASIK creates an eye flap that can be dislocated, torn, etc., which can permanently damage your eye. This flap is not created with PRK, although there are similar risks associated with that surgery. Our eyes have protective layers for a reason and permanently shaving these off with surgery creates a lifelong risk. One of my friends practices jiu jitsu and he's suffered some major injuries while sparring because of LASIK. One girl that I rode with also supposedly had "successful" surgery, but she became extremely sensitive to light and had to wear sunglasses while riding, which defeated the purpose of getting the surgery. She also had trouble seeing at night and would complain about halos or glare with light. Nearly all of the people that I know who have had either surgery have to carry eyedrops. I'd rather put on glasses or put in contacts that deal with any of the risks associated with these surgeries.

  21. Stupid title and article. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It might as well have said "People that can afford rift can also afford laser surgery."

    As someone who had a $3000 laser surgery done recently. I suggest everyone that qualifies (not all conditions can be fixed) and can afford it to get it. It really is the best money I have ever spent in my life.

    I am an amateur astronomer, so one could say about me: "Man buys $3000 laser surgery to enhance $2000 telescope experience." Am I a dope because I spent more on my eyes than my telescope? I get a hell of a lot more use out of my eyes than the scope. Every waking moment vs. that once a month it is actually clear and dark out.

    It also enhances my exercising experience, my playing hockey experience, my driving experience, and my swimming experience. I think it helps me not get headaches when staring at a computer screen for hours at a time at work. (though that last one is highly subjective, the rest are true)

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Stupid title and article. by hubie · · Score: 1

      However, it would make a good Onion article if the title started out with "Area Man . . . " :)

  22. Why not just wear those night time contacts by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    that change the shape of your eye, that makes way more sense, and is way less risky and expensive...

  23. Don't forget by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    to get the Zune tattoo while you're at it.

  24. Re:Am I not getting it? by spectrumlogic · · Score: 1

    Good question...seems like in an iteration coming soon it would be a slam dunk to include adjustments for different corrective prescriptions in the rift itself...obviates surgery and the like. What about the couple of million people (US) with hemianopsia (bilateral blindness in both eyes - right or left). I hope to see the rift as a near cure for this...projecting the full image to the appropriate axon region...might even be individually customizable.

  25. Re:Don't underestimate the lifelong risks of surge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had LASIK, two years ago, after >35 years of wearing glasses.

    Yes, I needed eyedrops. And sunglasses. For several weeks afterwards.

    But not now. I still have sunglasses, and wear them sometimes - but that's in no way, nohow, anything like as intrusive as having to wear glasses just to see an arm's length away. I haven't had to worry about eyedrops since a couple of months after the surgery.

    If you don't want to get surgery, then don't. It's not compulsory. But don't scare yourself off with phoney stories and false comparisons.

  26. wwa by csrracinghack · · Score: 1

    wow great informations !

  27. Wow! Me too!! by djnforce9 · · Score: 1

    This story is REALLY uncanny because I am about the do the same thing only in my case, it's not just for the Oculus but everything in general. For example, I like 3D movies a lot but it's a pain either choosing between blurred vision or wearing TWO sets of glasses on my face obscuring the quality of the image in the process. Also, certain headphones are a royal pain to wear as they push the arms of the glasses into my cheek which can get rather painful after a while. Just $2200 though? Mine will be more than that but I guess it depends on where this person is getting it done and how bad their eyes are.