Slashdot Mirror


"Barbie: I Can Be a Computer Engineer" Pulled From Amazon

New submitter clcto writes Back in 2010, Computer Engineer Barbie was released. Now, with the attention brought to the Frozen themed programming game from Disney and Code.org, unwanted attention has been given to the surprisingly real book "Barbie: I Can Be a Computer Engineer". So much so, that Mattel has pulled the book from Amazon. The book shows Barbie attempting to write a computer game. However, instead of writing the code, she enlists two boys to write the code as she just does the design. She then proceeds to infect her computer and her sister's computer with a virus and must enlist the boys to fix that for her as well. In the end she takes all the credit, and proclaims "I guess I can be a computer engineer!" A blog post commenting on the book (as well as giving pictures of the book and its text) has been moved to Gizmodo due to high demand.

319 of 561 comments (clear)

  1. I know this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's unix!!!11

    1. Re:I know this! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To be fair to that scene, it actually takes a bit of awareness to realize that fucked up 3d UI was a filesystem wrapper.

      Like, "Oooooooooooooooh, there's /usr/, I get it now" was a perfectly reasonable reaction.

    2. Re:I know this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1, with that you just made the whole movie a lot better!

    3. Re:I know this! by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      FSN was pretty fun to toy around with.

      And being able to visualize the filetree helped people who were less abstraction-oriented and more practically oriented to understand the layout of the filesystem, from my experience in school.

    4. Re:I know this! by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      Your comment is more apropos than you probably realize, since the book cover shows Barbie's desk with a stuffed Linux penguin sitting on it. Maybe they thought including an easter egg for the real geek parents would help it sell?

    5. Re:I know this! by arth1 · · Score: 2

      To be fair to that scene, it actually takes a bit of awareness to realize that fucked up 3d UI was a filesystem wrapper.

      fsn (file system navigator) for IRIX was not universally known, but if the girl used IRIX at school, it is not unfeasible that she was familiar with it.

      (Most people knowing fsn would have used it to start a real shell, instead of continuing to use the slowest file system navigator in existence, just because it was pretty. But her role in the movie was to be a Barbie, so pretty counts.)

    6. Re:I know this! by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Heh, for one of the hack days at work I totally recreated that scene in minecraft... used the python plugin to attach switches to scripts, so we could turn services off and on and use glowstone to monitor health checks. Had a sheep dispenser hooked up to drop sheep into a glass-encased river every time user traffic hit the website.

      Also was working on some kind of pipeline deployment visualization involving minecarts, but it was difficult to restock the carts and load livestock reliably at the time.

    7. Re:I know this! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      The 3D filesystem viewer was real and shipped with IRIX. There's a Linux port now - it was open sourced a few years back.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:I know this! by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha ha! Yeah - but here's the thing - this isn't just a ding against women, but I've known quite a few men that couldn't code their way out of a paper bag that fancied themselves as computer or systems engineers.

      So the story just needs to be modified. That's all.

    9. Re:I know this! by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      Did it also include a 3D init system? Something tells me I'd prefer that to systemd...

    10. Re: I know this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, 3d graphics libraries are on the roadmap for systemd: it will then be called system3d and it will raytrace everything that used to be in inittab.

    11. Re:I know this! by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is also worth pointing out that the role of the boy and girl were reversed in the movie. In Crichton's book the boy was the Unix nerd and the girl was just a tomboy with no leet skillz.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    12. Re:I know this! by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2

      And this whole "I got two boys to code it for me" thing reminds me of the Winklevoss brothers in "The Social Network". You don't have to be a girl to be a tech-illiterate tech entreprenuer...

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    13. Re:I know this! by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      She seemed like more of a tomboy to me.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    14. Re:I know this! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Did it also include a 3D init system? Something tells me I'd prefer that to systemd...

      Sorry, system3d is two versions away.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:I know this! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Sorry, system3d is two versions away.

      I'm just not going to trust systemd as my init system until they've got 3 or 4 more versions under their belt. Let me know when they get to SystemV init.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    16. Re:I know this! by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      (Most people knowing fsn would have used it to start a real shell, instead of continuing to use the slowest file system navigator in existence, just because it was pretty. But her role in the movie was to be a Barbie, so pretty counts.)

      Her role in the movie was to be nerdy like her brother, so that she would have something to do to help out at the end. Unlike the book version of the kids, where the nerdy brother was both computer expert and dinosaur expert, while the sister whined the whole time and had no redeeming values.

    17. Re:I know this! by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      You're both right! She used nmap to find the IP, the sshnuke exploit, then ssh to gain access.
      screen capture.

      I was impressed that they would use a real exploit. They knew their audience.

    18. Re:I know this! by Larryish · · Score: 1

      This book makes women into project managers.

    19. Re: I know this! by Ororo · · Score: 1

      Design =/= project management. Not by a long shot.

    20. Re:I know this! by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      To be fair to that scene, it actually takes a bit of awareness to realize that fucked up 3d UI was a filesystem wrapper.

      And to be fair to the movie the fucked up 3d UI was actually a graphics demo made by SGI for IRIX. So it wasn't the usual Hollywood idea of how computers worked, but rather an engineers view of how computers could work. (Inspired by Hollywood not doubt). (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fsn)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    21. Re:I know this! by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      But her role in the movie was to be a Barbie, so pretty counts.

      did you see the movie? The girl is like 14, and she is the tomboy granddaughter of the old dude. barbie she is not.

    22. Re:I know this! by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I've known quite a few men that couldn't code their way out of a paper bag that fancied themselves as computer or systems engineers.

      they must be managers.

    23. Re:I know this! by Brenda-B · · Score: 1

      Yep!

  2. From Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This book sounds just like real life.

    1. Re:From Experience by funwithBSD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which means she is a Project Manager.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:From Experience by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Actually it does, seemingly. During my scholarship that happened quite a few times, we and friends helping computer-desperate girl friends... but I wonder what happened to non-geeky boys... They likely had the same problems, but were probably too proud to call for help (and, maybe, needed less attention...)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:From Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More like Barbie Business Analyst: "Hey guys, I don't know anything about business or technology, but if I invite 20 business people and programmers to a meeting, then I can type what they say into a horribly formatted Word document (that the programmers will fix for me later) and collect $125/hr".

    4. Re:From Experience by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      Actually, that's what I was thinking. Sounds like they are telling Barbie that she can be a manager rather than just a code monkey.

      Wait....that's actually a GOOD thing, right?

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    5. Re:From Experience by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Funny

      I found this to be highly offensive to computer engineers. The implication we're marketing...that other people do the real work... that we'd dare stick a USB key with an unknown history into our USB port...

      Actually that last one sets sex ed back about 30 years too.

    6. Re:From Experience by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Which is why it was a bad depiction of a computer engineer.
      Now the problem Computer Engineering isn't a spectator sport. While it is interesting the the worker, it isn't so much for the viewer. It is like watching someone put together a jigsaw puzzle.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:From Experience by FictionPimp · · Score: 2

      With the right color commentary I think we could have a entire youtube channel dedicated to putting together jigsaw puzzles.

    8. Re:From Experience by shadowrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With the right color commentary I think we could have a entire youtube channel dedicated to putting together jigsaw puzzles.

      1)get a hot chick to put together jugsaw puzzles on youtube.

      2)profit!

    9. Re:From Experience by Julia+Cameron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to Ada Lovelace.

      --
      Julia Cameron
      Oich ù agus hiùraibh éile
    10. Re:From Experience by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Try reading it. They are clearly saying that she is just a designer, so not even an actual engineer. She just does some drawings and then takes them to her male friends to build into a game.

      It really doesn't suggest girls can be managers, it suggests that the closest they will come to being engineers is picking up a crayon and then asking some men to do the actual engineering.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:From Experience by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Except that one could quite reasonably argue that designing a game well is much more difficult than programming what a designer hands you.

    12. Re:From Experience by jythie · · Score: 1

      Even when they did ask for help it generally was not attributed to their gender. So girls asking for help went into that little confirmation box that girls had trouble and boys asking for help just became people asking for help.

    13. Re:From Experience by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      "Hey guys, I don't know anything about computers or technology, but I just got a lead on $10 million in funding from the morons in Menlo Park, so can you get me something working by Friday for the dog and pony show?"

    14. Re:From Experience by rrohbeck · · Score: 2

      1)get a hot chick to put together jugsaw puzzles on youtube.

      I don't think you can have hardcore gore horror on Youtube.

    15. Re:From Experience by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      Why not stick in an unidentified USB key? It's not as if we're using MS Windows, or we've got anything on the computer that's not backed up in case of disaster.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    16. Re:From Experience by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, she isn't alive. There ARE female programmers this age too. But they are damn rare.
      By the way, there is nothing wrong with designers, writers, etc. They do a lot of important work a game programmer wouldn't be able to do.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    17. Re:From Experience by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I got good grades in school, was never geeky, and I did flirt with a shy nerdy girl because I wanted her to help me get caught up on classes after spending a few weeks in the hospital... and then pretended to still need her help after I had caught back up before I finally asked her out.

      I'm guessing that would be what the non-geeky boys do.

    18. Re:From Experience by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I did that today.

      Ok, I went one step better. I convinced the programmers to write up everything for me.

    19. Re:From Experience by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      ROTFL When I was between jobs I almost got involved with a guy like this. He was putting together a "team" to expand his business, he had a client, he had some basic specs, and another guy more senior than me, as in actually a developer rather than a sysadmin who could write some code (me).

      Anyway, the guy who has setup a site like this before goes over the whole thing, soup to nuts, describes what we will need, that this is several weeks of work, and he should really be looking to charge around 10k for the work they were asking for.

      A few days later, our "leader" comes back, says he pitched the job for 3k so we could get it under our belt, and "come on, you guys can bang it out in a couple of weekends". Oh and he thought, as the guy who is really doing all the work finding the clients and schmoozing them, he thinks his cut on these ventures should be 50%

      Our little fledgling web development group never did have another meeting after that.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    20. Re:From Experience by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 3, Informative

      If that's how you (and judging from your +5 Insightful rating, at least 5 others here) view the role of business analyst, my company must be using the term wrong. Where I work, BAs are an indispensable part of the design process; they don't get into that job until they know not only the product but the business needs of our users extremely well. A developer who changes a UI, report format, or so much as a calculation without first consulting with a BA doesn't last long. The BAs know every single one of the five bazillion federal regulations and industry standards so we developers don't have to worry our pretty little heads about it. We just write our code so it does all the number-crunchy things they tell us it needs to do.

      Accounting is hard. Let's go shopping!

    21. Re:From Experience by Skarjak · · Score: 1

      I'd say you're describing the ideal BA, which might be a rare breed...

    22. Re:From Experience by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      So a startup CEO then.

    23. Re:From Experience by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Someone who wants to be offended can find reason to with anything.

      • Barbie's a manager who employs male engineers: "This teaches girls that women need men to do their work for them!"
      • Barbie's an engineer working for a male manager: "This teaches girls that women will always be subservient to men!"
      • Barbie's a member of an all-female engineering team: "This teaches girls that women can't work on an equal footing with men!"
      • Barbie's a member of a racially, culturally, ethnically, and genderally diverse autonomous collective who share all the tasks equally: "This teaches girls that women can only be generalists and never excel in any particular area! Oh, and socialism!"

      It sounds to me like the group who should *really* be offended are the computer engineers for being so badly misrepresented. Oh, and Barbie fans because it makes Barbie (not women in general, just this particular woman) look like a freaking idiot. (Going on the descriptions here; of course I haven't read the book. Who needs actual facts when we're surrounded by all this juicy hearsay and speculation?)

      And yes, "genderally" is a perfectly cromulent word.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    24. Re:From Experience by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      Er, what? She doesn't employ anybody. She has a class project, gets a couple of boys to do her work for her, and takes the credit. There's nothing about this that is flattering for Barbie or women.

      If you're going to say that people who want to be offended will be, you should at least not create a straw-man of peoples' actual complaints.

    25. Re:From Experience by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how rare they are, the book title makes it clear that it's supposed to be about them.

    26. Re:From Experience by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Oh I got another gig as a sysadmin and eventually transitioned to Dev-ops.

      His plan actually did eventually pay off, not so much on that client per se but over time he stuck with trying to build a company and now does have what sounds like a decently successful web design company....basically doing the same, except with an actual bit of a team under him (mostly inexperienced kids)

      He says words like "SEO" a lot and really, is still pretty full of shit and, while I get along with the guy on a personal level, I know he is still nobody I want to work with professionally. He tempts me occasionally but,

      He certainly makes a bit more than I do, but, he puts in a ton of hours slinging that bullshit; and still makes me feel like hes trying to sell me a car half the time.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    27. Re:From Experience by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      In real life, if Barbie became a game developer, she'd never afford the dream house and would receive rape and death threats (not to mention the inevitable doxxing) for daring to express an opinion on social media.

      Maybe the book was just trying to protect girls from the Gators.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    28. Re:From Experience by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      BA is PA. The BAs here take meeting minutes, and ask for clarifications where needed. For the additional job of "asking dumb questions", they are paid 5x what a PA is paid. They don't know anything about anything, and if they do accidentally learn something, play dumb.

    29. Re:From Experience by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Er, what? She doesn't employ anybody. She has a class project, gets a couple of boys to do her work for her, and takes the credit

      So she employs them AND is able to pay them zero. Barbie is a business genius.

    30. Re: From Experience by Ororo · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you haven't met a competent project manager.

    31. Re:From Experience by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

      It could be unintentional, but I laughed at "jugsaw" anyway

    32. Re:From Experience by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      This was not the case with my friends in school. I would say that the number of guys and girls who asked me to help them with their computer problems was fairly even.
      What did supprise me though is how many people in computer science had to have help with simple computer problems like viruses and basic hardware issues. There were a lot more guys that asked for help on assignments, but that likely has a lot to do with the severe lack of girls in my computer science classes.

    33. Re:From Experience by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      That might be a meaningful reply if the book was, "Barbie: I Can Be a Manager". It isn't, so you're just pulling bullshit rationalizations out of thin air to justify some rather disgusting sexism.

    34. Re:From Experience by Brenda-B · · Score: 1

      It is just sad.

    35. Re:From Experience by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      That is the trouble with IT in general. There is no guaranteed level of professionalism that comes with any title. System Analyst, Business Analyst, Network Engineer, Software Engineer.... none of those guarantee any sort of particular set of knowledge or skills. Widely varied business to business.

    36. Re:From Experience by joaosantos · · Score: 1

      I have backups, I don't worry about disaster I worry about something like BadUSB giving me an extra backup in Russia.

  3. LOL ... w00t? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Who does Mattel have in charge of Barbie these days?

    Because whoever it is, has stepped in it so many times it's not even funny.

    Are they being punked from inside? Or are people actually thinking this shit is a good idea?

    Absolutely mind boggling.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Exitar · · Score: 2

      Probably the same guy in charge of the new Fantastic Four movie.

    2. Re:LOL ... w00t? by msauve · · Score: 1

      They hired the marketing VP from RealDoll.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A cavalcade of white dudes, of course. http://corporate.mattel.com/ab...

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    4. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Someone who should be fired, not for being misogynistic, but simply for being stupid enough to not understand what he/she was doing.

      I'd rather work somewhere where everybody is a misogynistic drooling pig than with people stupid enough to read that crap before sending it to print and not having the elementary intellectual capacity to think "when this shit hits the interwebz we'll be interred in so much crap we'll be able to host the World Shit Skiing Championship."

    5. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Alrescha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "A cavalcade of white dudes, of course."

      Two wrongs don't make a right.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    6. Re:LOL ... w00t? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Obviously they're targeting Slashdot's front page for attention. It worked, didn't it?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re: LOL ... w00t? by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the internet.

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    8. Re:LOL ... w00t? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Someone who should be fired, not for being misogynistic, but simply for being stupid enough to not understand what he/she was doing.

      We cannot really accuse the woman who wrote this booklet of misogynism.
      Of being of the same, ehrm, intelligence level as Barbie, no doubt. But not misogynism.
      A little bit of sexism in how boys are portrayed, perhaps.

    9. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I don't think they're punking anything.

      They are identifying empowering roles that could portray Barbie in a good light. Vetinarian, Doctor, Computer Engineer, etc. All the roles which are in demand, desirable, and have decent appeal to some set of the population. (I've been asked so many times how someone "gets" into my field, but as soon as you start off with the truth, that it is a lot of work, they drift away).

      Then, they send these roles to their team of artists and storywriters who must do the minimal amount of research to put together the template driven "Barbie storyline". This typically means no understanding of the role she's in, strong emphasis on tieing in other characters, good dialog, a gatitous fun scene, and Barbie getting recogonized for her actions.

      In the computer engineer role, obviously they misunderstood the role so badly that she gets recogonized for something they thought was admirable, when in reality (again you must learn the field to know) she's getting recogonized favorably for creating problems. To the educated eye, she's incompentent and the entire field would be better off without computer engineers of her skill.

      90% of the time they don't botch the template-filling story creation this badly, but the heavy reliance of story patterns typically lead to Barbie stories that give you the impression it's all a big dress-up game. Barbie hardly does anything different, no matter what role she's portraying. I should know, I have a six year old daughter. 90% of the stories are innane, but at least the friends and "support networking" that she does has a positive message that is sometimes missed in other cartoons.

    10. Re:LOL ... w00t? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Barbie is based on a doll who is based on a cartoon about a prostitute. She's a whore turned housewife. So she's actually an abusive stereotype to a number of groups and subgroups...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:LOL ... w00t? by auld_wyrm · · Score: 1

      The hat will come separately and cost extra

    12. Re: LOL ... w00t? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Your first "fact", that there are only two biological sentences, is not actually true. Intersex is a real biological thing and is entirely separate from political movements and debates about essentialism vs. culturally-defined roles. It's relatively rare, but that's not really the point.

      Interestingly, the AC's political movement may be in part responsible for changing the language to prefer the plural over just using male pronouns. But I agree it's unlikely to "fix" English's grammar to fit anything but a strict binary mapping of genders.

    13. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      omg they have a dick dickson, and he looks like a total dick.

    14. Re:LOL ... w00t? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or does Alan Kaye on that page have an enormous torso and a tiny little head?

    15. Re:LOL ... w00t? by CauseBy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's sexist and racist? The post makes a statement of fact that Mattell is lead by exclusively white people and 11 out of 12 are men. The way I use that word, statements of fact cannot be racist, only opinions can be racist.

    16. Re:LOL ... w00t? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Barbie is based on a doll who is based on a cartoon about a prostitute. She's a whore turned housewife. So she's actually an abusive stereotype to a number of groups and subgroups...

      That's a terrible thing to say about Barbie.

      Before she became a computer engineer, she worked at McDonalds. And drove a brand-new pink corvette. And lived in a Malibu beach house. And I'm sure she was paying her way through the IT program in college. All on her salary from McDonalds.

    17. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Alrescha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tragically, I am forced into the disgrace of responding to my own post: "Two wrongs don't make a right.".

      For the ironically-challenged, I found it somewhat funny/sad that in a thread nominally about stereotypes and the inappropriateness of judging people by their race, gender, et al, someone would refer to the wrongdoers specifically by their *race and gender*.

      A.

      (note to the angry responders: sorry, I have little time for the 'professionally offended', who assume the worst and then get all hot and bothered over their own error)

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    18. Re:LOL ... w00t? by jythie · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. It is far from a no-win situation, it is simply not a situation where Mattel is immune to criticism. Though given how much backlash there is against feminism and companies failing to 'think of the menz!', perhaps it really is no-win since the anti-SJW crowd gets bent out of shape pretty much any time some group other than them might have their concerns taken seriously.

    19. Re: LOL ... w00t? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, the AC's political movement may be in part responsible for changing the language to prefer the plural over just using male pronouns.

      Interestingly, every pronoun ever used must have an antecedent. That means "noun that it is referring to, either explicitly or implicitly". Those things you call "male pronouns" aren't -- the gender depends on the antecedent. If "he" is used to replace a male noun ("The man who fixed the car ... he ...") then it assumes a masculine gender. However, if the noun is gender non-specific ("A mechanic ... he ...") the pronoun is neuter. It forces neither masculine nor feminine upon the antecedent, because "he" has both possible meanings. "She", however, is gender specific, always. It forces a gender upon any non-specific noun it replaces. "The mechanic ... she ..." is referring exclusively to a female mechanic.

      The use of "he/she" in the context "The mechanic ... he/she ..." is, in essence, saying "the human mechanic or the female mechanic ...", which means that "female" is not considered to be a member of the class "human". People who use "he/she" either aren't aware that they are insulting women by doing that, or don't care.

      I can't tell you the time I've had to waste rereading something when some author exhibits his stupidity by using "she" instead of "he" (possibly to make a statement of his ignorance about pronoun gender by protesting his belief in the exclusively masculine meaning of "he"). I have to go back to see if I missed some part of the text where the antecedent was identified as female, or to determine if the author has a sexist bias ("A teacher ... she ..." implies that only women are teachers), or finally if the author is the aforementioned idiot. When you're reading a story and you see something like "I paid the shopkeeper for the candy bar and she gave me my change .." you have to wonder if the shopkeeper being a woman has some significance to the story or not. Why was the author specific about it?

      Replacing singular pronouns with plurals because you don't understand the meaning of the singular pronouns just shows the world that you don't understand the difference between singular and plural AND the meaning of the word "he". A two-fer display.

    20. Re:LOL ... w00t? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      good dialog,

      Well, they totally failed on that count.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    21. Re:LOL ... w00t? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Barbie getting recogonized for her actions

      Whatever this is, both Google and various dictionaries refuse to discuss it, so I have to ask... what the heck do they put into kid's books these days ?!?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    22. Re:LOL ... w00t? by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      Well because you asked so nicely,

      go fuck yourself.

    23. Re: LOL ... w00t? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, the use of "he" as a gender-unspecified pronoun does not work at all well. At best, it is ambiguous. In contrast to "mechanic...he", how many times have you seen "nurse...he"? For that matter, how about "mother...he"? If you can't use "he" to refer to a role that's almost certainly female (not quite certain; a mother could get a sex-change operation), then it's not a very good gender-neutral pronoun, is it?

      The fact that you can't read contemporary writing reflects a lot more on you than on the writing. Not just contemporary, by the way, since people have used "they" as singular gender-unspecified pronoun for quite a long time now.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    24. Re:LOL ... w00t? by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      There is a vast difference between: "Barbie the Software Engineer who draws pictures of dogs and fucks up computers then takes credit." and "Barbie the Software Engineer codes a video game with help from friends."

      I don't get what your tangent about her being an CEO is about. If they had her doodling all day and skipping meetings as Barbie CEO there would be just as much outcry over the bad job Mattel did with their product.

    25. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      This is remarkably similar to the Lisa Lionheart episode of The Simpsons, specifically the scene where the one female executive is seen heading into the board room full of white dudes (who begin catcalling as she closes the door with her tush). There's even one woman on that corporate list!

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    26. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Who stole that bike? A black dude, of course.

      I doubt anyone would be so "it's just a statement of fact" about that statement.

    27. Re: LOL ... w00t? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Actually, the use of "he" as a gender-unspecified pronoun does not work at all well. At best, it is ambiguous. In contrast to "mechanic...he", how many times have you seen "nurse...he"?

      That's because the author assumes that nurses must be female, which is the author's issue to deal with. Being "ambiguous" is an important property because it allows the author to leave the gender of irrelevant actors as irrelevant. In the shopkeeper example, if it isn't important that the gender of the shopkeeper be known, why make it an issue by specifying it is a she?

      In fact, one of the short stories I enjoyed the most recently didn't nail down the gender of the protagonist until halfway through, and it made me realize the assumptions I had been making that weren't correct and shouldn't have made. That was a good author, in my opinion.

      For that matter, how about "mother...he"?

      Well, now you've just used an inherently gender-specific noun with the wrong gender pronoun.

      If you can't use "he" to refer to a role that's almost certainly female (not quite certain; a mother could get a sex-change operation), then it's not a very good gender-neutral pronoun, is it?

      "Nurse" is a non-specific noun. "Mother" is much more specific, but true, a female mother could have a sex change and become a male mother. In fact, saying "mother ... he ..." says that's what has happened. You have a male mother. Otherwise you'd say "mother ... she ...". In this example, you don't want the genderless pronoun.

      The fact that you can't read contemporary writing reflects a lot more on you than on the writing.

      Where did you get the idea I cannot read contemporary writing? It's writing where the author has chosen to display ignorance of the language that causes problems. Any author who displays ignorance of the language he's using to craft his work causes awake readers problems.

      Not just contemporary, by the way, since people have used "they" as singular gender-unspecified pronoun for quite a long time now.

      Seeing "they" where it should be "he" or "she" isn't a serious problem, and I automatically assume that the author doesn't know his plural from a hole in the ground. ("They" always has been genderless.) I certainly don't wonder if there was something I missed about "the shopkeeper" when I later see him referred to as "they", because the singular and plural for "shopkeeper" are different. The author has a clear way of specifying a plural "shopkeeper" and did not, thus he is not. But when "the shopkeeper" is later "she", I do wonder why the specificity was necessary and did I miss something that would have announced it earlier. By using the specific gender pronoun "she", it is as if the author is creating a red herring in the plot-- something the author is saying is important to know that turns out not to be important at all because the character never appears again. That's the sign of a bad author. But using "she" everyplace that "he" should be used is the sign of an ignorant, arrogant author who wants to teach people a lesson about his incorrect belief in the sexism of language in a context where it is not relevant.

    28. Re: LOL ... w00t? by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      completely OT:

      folks are trying.... it's very cumbersome

    29. Re:LOL ... w00t? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Fun! Someone has too high of an opinion of himself.
      Good trolling.

    30. Re: LOL ... w00t? by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you the time I've had to waste rereading something when some author exhibits his stupidity...

      Or her stupidity...

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    31. Re: LOL ... w00t? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that you're being a strict prescriptivist here, to the point of pedantry. The gender-indeterminate "he" is one of those rules that, as far as I can tell, people have never been really comfortable with. As I said, "they" has been used for a long time. I've seen "it" used to refer to children, and I consider that worse. I'm a bit of a prescriptivist myself, but there's history behind the use of "they" as singular personal gender-indeterminate pronoun.

      You seem to be demonstrating some ignorance of the language yourself, if you have no feeling that "he" just might be a false generic, or if you find a common writing style confusing.

      In fiction, characters have gender (this is assumed even when the author does not let us know what it is), and there is no need for a generic. When talking about a specific person, we again do not need a generic. The only reason we'd need a generic is when it really doesn't matter, so there's no reason to be confused.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    32. Re: LOL ... w00t? by aestrivex · · Score: 1

      In languages such as Spanish where gender is an important feature of the language and considerable syntax is devoted to dealing with it, yes, what you say is correct. In English, it isn't. At least certainly not in the colloquial english spoken natively in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Singapore. Maybe some English professor somewhere has a revolutionary theory that all of these native speakers who don't use masculine pronouns in a gender-neutral way are wrong, but I see no reason why I should care about such a person.

  4. So close, so far by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have come so far since feminism began, but then stuff like this still happens... How could anyone, in 2014, have thought this was acceptable?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:So close, so far by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guarantee you, by the time the day is through, 2/3s of the posts here will say something along the lines of "What's the problem with the book? It's just like real life!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:So close, so far by rs79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Barbie is a manager. Coding is for suckers.

      Perspective.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:So close, so far by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      We have come so far since feminism began, but then stuff like this still happens... How could anyone, in 2014, have thought this was acceptable?

      I would imagine at least half of slashdot's readers, to judge from the general level of misogyny displayed here.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:So close, so far by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That is true, the closest thing I have to a manager at my current job (the CEO of the company) can't code worth shit and gets viruses (virii?) all the damn time.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    5. Re:So close, so far by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depressingly I think you might be right. I used to think it was people not being aware rather than being actual misogynists, but if you look at the posts on any equality in work story or any GamerGate related story at least half of them will be people trying to sabotage any progress by denying the problem or bogging everyone down in semantics.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:So close, so far by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know. It sounds hilarious to me. I don't understand how anyone can take the book seriously.

      In fact, this is a valuable learning tool for your child. It's a great introduction to satire, context, and critical thinking. Barbie is a complete and total twatwaddle bimbo; she's an idiot, probably a rich idiot (we never hear about that), who apparently gets to do whatever the fuck she wants. Obviously, if you took a rich valley girl and got the idea in her head to be a computer engineer, THIS IS WHAT WOULD ACTUALLY HAPPEN.

      In context, it's not Barbie being women; it's Barbie being Barbie, and this is a valuable lesson for your child. The fact that Barbie has so many roles--Barbie as a mother, Barbie on vacation, Barbie as a computer engineer, Barbie as an astronaut, Barbie as a black chick, Barbie on ice, Baker Babe Barbie--allows us to readily frame Barbie as both a character and a representation of fantastic ideals not directly tied to reality. It also arms us with the valuable tool of meaningful assessment: sometimes you meet a woman who has the vast intellect of a Barbie doll, and that's a thing you can use to effectively delineate her from other women.

    7. Re:So close, so far by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know people with young daughters (like, under 5).

      Dora tells little girls they can do anything they want to, and grow up to do cool things. Barbie teaches women to be stereotypes, dumb blondes, and how to fake your way through life.

      So, for birthday gifts, we give chemistry lab play sets, National Geographic books on space and dinosaurs, and actual educational stuff.

      It's fun to see a four year old excited about a book on space.

      If Barbie can't be a good role model after 50 years or so, just don't buy it.

      There's so many good toys out there for kids that unless the child is asking for Barbie, you can skip it altogether.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:So close, so far by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like Barbie: I can be a Manager. Looks like Barbie finally managed to break the glass ceiling. Yay equality?

    9. Re:So close, so far by sinij · · Score: 2

      While you are entitled to your own self-loathing, but please count me out of your bogus statistics.

    10. Re:So close, so far by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 1

      Probably the same people that think the most appropriate toy, for GIRLS, is a large-breasted supermodel. In retrospect, they should have marketed Barbie as a toy for 12-year old boys to play with and sold "realistic anatomy" kits before the availability of the internet in every American household.

    11. Re:So close, so far by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      All of my favorite toys growing up were some kind of educational toy, with the notable exception of video game systems. The only real reason to get a kid a cheap piece of plastic or noisemaker is if you hate fun.

      I think you were making the right choice, even if Barbie was a more realistic doll that didn't have it's whole... history.

    12. Re:So close, so far by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2

      So, for birthday gifts, we give chemistry lab play sets, National Geographic books on space and dinosaurs, and actual educational stuff.

      Where do you find actual chemistry sets with actual chemicals in them that can actually make interesting things? I have been trying to find something like I had as a kid for 10 years - with no luck. 1/2 the time the "Chemistry" sets don't actually have any chemicals in them, the other 1/2 they are all salts, sugars, and simple things that you can't make turn colors and explode (What is the fun of chemistry without a few explosions and fire?)

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    13. Re:So close, so far by guises · · Score: 1

      Or just the first part: "What's the problem with this book?"

      The blog post reads an awful lot of shit into some pretty banal dialogue. Try reading just the images taken from the book and skip the inflammatory commentary that the blog adds: Barbie is the lead designer on a game that she's making with two other students (teamwork!). When something goes wrong with her computer, the three of them work on it together in order to solve the problem faster (cooperation!). The three members of her team are herself, a white guy, and a black guy (diversity! both gender and racial). Barbie and her team do so well that her teacher, an obviously capable woman, gives them extra credit.

      Seriously, this whole bruhaha is a bunch of horseshit. There exists real discrimination out there, crying wolf like this causes a lot more harm than good.

    14. Re:So close, so far by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      We have come so far since feminism began, but then stuff like this still happens... How could anyone, in 2014, have thought this was acceptable?

      I can't help but feel like this whole thing is getting horribly blown out of proportion, more than likely due to a SJW invasion (does it have some absurd hash tag yet?)

      I haven't read the book, but based on TFA:

      • It looks like they decided to put Barbie in a design position with other people doing the actual computer programming. This is not unusual in the real world.
      • The roles of designers and developers are in some many polar opposites. Is it that hard to believe that the female brain might often be better at aesthetics, usability, gameplay, and what the target audience (which, based on "cute puppies and colored blocks", sounds predisposed towards younger girls) thinks would be fun? And perhaps the male brain is better at abstract logic and systems interaction? I'm not saying everyone falls into those buckets, just that it's common. And from what I've seen on the job, this is not unusual in the real world.
      • The two programmers Barbie enlists happen to be male. Since a large majority of software developers in the world are male (especially in school), this is not that unusual.
      • The side-story about the computer virus is absurd, but it just sounds like it was written by someone who doesn't know anything about computers or viruses, other than what they hear on the evening news ("A new lethal computer virus is sweeping the globe, deleting files and murdering kittens! Film at 11." The portrayal of computer maladies in fiction is pretty bad in general, so this is also not that unusual.
      • Finally, this is Barbie FFS. Anyone who buys into that franchise and expects cutting-edge challenge of social norms is just self-deluded (might explain the attraction to SJWs...).

      All in all, it looks like a cutesy little story written by someone who knows almost nothing about computers, probably has no interest in computers themselves, and subconciously wrote the story around their personal experiences of (1) most computer geeks are male, (2) computer viruses are scary, and (3) "it's Barbie, so who's going to really give a damn?"

      This kind of stuff just isn't worth the heartache and venom people are throwing at it. Take a breath, put it in perspective, and move on.

      (Besides, what people should be up in arms over is the picture of Tux on the front cover! A virus taking over Linux? Inconceivable! :)

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    15. Re:So close, so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This book sucks, but so does the modern feminism coming from the left. Look either we are all equals or some of us need special treatment. It can't be both.

      We also can't be expected to all share an opinion. Gamergate is a great example of the problem. A woman who we have recorded footage of her saying she does not like games, complains about the treatment of women in games and sets off a huge firestorm.

      So she does not like art, but expects the artists and creators to conform to her opinion about how they should portray women in gems among other things. That is a bunch of BS right there. She isn't really a gamer her opinions should NOT matter to people who are or who are creators of games.

    16. Re:So close, so far by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Holy hell, Slashdot.

      #commentlisting li {
          list-style: none outside none;
          margin: 0 0;
      }

      Well that's just beautiful. Take the effort to add bullets and instead get a massive wall of text. Thanks.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    17. Re:So close, so far by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's exactly how it's written. A pillow fighting manager who runs to her male friends when any actual work needs doing. As portrayed she can draw, and that's about it.

      Also, some people like coding. Money isn't everything.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:So close, so far by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I worked for a American company that was bought out by a French competitor when the "I Love You" virus broke out. All the American workers got multiple emails from the French management team saying that they loved us. That didn't kill the mail server. The Symantec AV scanner on the mail server sent out an email notification whenever a virus-infected got removed. That killed the mail server. The French management team never understood why we hated them.

    19. Re:So close, so far by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yea, honestly the lesson I would want a child to take away from this book is that life isn't fair. Barbie is a bimbo she hasn't got to neurons to rub together but she is pretty and charismatic, she will be able find other people like boys in this book to sponge off and carry her anywhere she wants to go.

      This isn't a gender thing either. Pretty boys gave the same advantage although it might show up a little later in life. I have worked lots of places and seen one male manager who is near totally incompetent leading a vastly less successful and productive team than his counter part and their team get selected for promotion to some role like director or CIO/CTO over and over again. Why because that guy was taller and better looking and maybe if he possessed any skills at all its knowing how to tell others what they want to hear.

      People need to understand that they may come up against the Barbies and Kens out there and depending on the situation it might not be a fair fight. They might need to recognize they are Barbie or Ken and learn to lever that too.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    20. Re:So close, so far by dywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's already most of the posts here, and it's only been an hour.

      Godwin Feminist Corollary: As an online discussion about sexism continues, the probability of a woman who speaks out being called a feminazi approaches one.

      Moff's Law: As comments continue in a discussion of pop culture in relation to feminism, the probability of someone saying 'why do you have to analyze it? it's just a movie/cartoon/book!' approaches one.

      And perhaps the best one, Lewis's Law: Comments on any article about feminism justify feminism.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    21. Re:So close, so far by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Organized lists are oldschool man. Get with the times! Now it's all rounded corner boxes with drop shadows!

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    22. Re:So close, so far by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mention the "left": Check
      Massive "but": Check

      That's two, not bad. No-one is asking for special treatment to make women "more" than men, just to restore the balance, which by practically every metric shows that women are at a disadvantage in society, and especially the workplace, and double-especially in IT. We (feminists) want everyone to be equal, as we are equal, and that means highlighting these oft-overlooked degrading behaviours and circumstances which conspire to keep this gender difference around,

      Have whatever opinion you want, but if it comes down to judging someone based on their gender, you will be called out on it. Loud and frequently. It doesn't matter if you are a gamer or a doctor or a deep-sea diver - if you spot misogyny or misandry or racism or any pathetic behaviour, bring attention to it.

      Rosa Parks was not a bus driver, so I guess by your logic she should have shut up and moved to the back, right?

      Even if "the woman" said gamers were werewolf pedophiles from Mars, the backlash from the community demonstrated that what she said was true. People targeted other women who spoke out for simply being women or for simply calling attention to the sexism which has been brewing in the gamer world since its inception.

      Not understanding the issues, as you so clearly don't (judging by your first complaint), isn't helping you discuss them, and won't help you figure out that misogyny is alive and well, and a danger to us all.

    23. Re:So close, so far by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In fact, this is a valuable learning tool for your child. It's a great introduction to satire, context, and critical thinking.

      Unfortunately, children old enough to be into Barbie dolls don't think that way. They take things literally and assume books and adults tell them the truth most of the time. They assume the way that the world is portrayed in books and films and TV is the way the world actually is, and copy it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:So close, so far by spiritplumber · · Score: 2

      https://www.kickstarter.com/pr... I think that they have some left.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    25. Re:So close, so far by Pablew+Nopl · · Score: 1

      They take things literally and assume books and adults tell them the truth most of the time.

      I certainly assumed no such thing when I was a young child. I didn't assume that movies, fantasy books, video games, etc. told me the truth. Not at any age.

      Perhaps I am the exception to some ill-defined rule, but I really haven't noticed such a thing.

    26. Re:So close, so far by mi · · Score: 2

      I have a daughter like that myself.

      Barbie teaches women to be stereotypes, dumb blondes, and how to fake your way through life.

      She does not "teach" anybody to be like that — she just shows, such people exist. From what few Barbie-books I've seen (we seem to prefer the Berenstain Bears here, and Dora the Explorer is as boring as most government-sponsored things tend to be), I can not conclude, the books portray the character as the (or even a) role-model. In other words, whatever she is doing is not meant for the girls to emulate necessarily...

      Some will, no doubt, and there is no helping that — some people think orcs of Mordor are cool... For another example, the adorable Vinnie the Pooh is not a good role model either.

      unless the child is asking for Barbie, you can skip it altogether.

      True that, yes...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    27. Re:So close, so far by praxis · · Score: 1

      I think gstoddart meant "There's so much good toys out there for kinds that unless the child is asking for Barbie, you can skip it altogether", which is what he or she wrote. The implication there is that if the child asks for Barbie, you can't skip it. You seemed to imply that he or she would do all sorts of horrible things to the child and that seems unfair based on what we know of him or her.

    28. Re:So close, so far by praxis · · Score: 2

      While you are entitled to your own self-loathing, but please count me out of your bogus statistics.

      He did. He said half. He never said which half belong to. You can claim his 50% is wrong, but it's clearly a SWAG and he stated so. I don't understand how you can be offended here. If someone told me 50% of men are jerks to women, I'm not going to be offended unless they said 50% of men are jerks to women and I am a man so I must be a jerk to women, but no such claim was made here.

    29. Re:So close, so far by hawk · · Score: 2

      I'm certainly not going to go read a Barbie book (I've had enough after four daughters!).

      But it's easy to make a tilted description to feed a story like this.

      I once saw a listing for the Wizard of Oz as something to the effect of "A white girl goes to a foreign land, kills the first person she meets, and sets off to kill again." . . .

      hawk

    30. Re:So close, so far by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Where do you find actual chemistry sets with actual chemicals in them that can actually make interesting things?

      This wasn't the classic chemistry set with a bunch of things in it.

      This was a really cool one by a company I don't remember for younger kids. It came with safety glasses, plastic beakers and measuring cups and a few things for mixing and measuring ... and a cool little book which gave them some really basic chemistry (like baking soda and vinegar volcanoes) which could be done at home by young kids.

      We weren't looking for explosions and the like. :-P

      But, nonetheless, it wasn't some "make cookies play set", it was an actual bit of hands on demonstrations of everyday science.

      We thought it was pretty awesome, and she seemed to agree.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    31. Re:So close, so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You want equality? When may men have the right to bodily integrity? Or are you suggesting women should enjoy living with mutilated genitals as well for equality?

      I do not think you want equality. I think you want something good, but you first have to be honest about what you're requesting.

      Furthermore, why is it that a womyn-born-womyn is responsible for the mess in TFS?

      Are you going to tell a womyn-born-womyn to knock off her sexism, or is your strategy going to be to hold all of us assigned the male gender at birth accountable because you're the One Good Man?

      It doesn't matter if you are a gamer or a doctor or a deep-sea diver - if you spot misogyny or misandry or racism or any pathetic behaviour, bring attention to it.

      Allow me to quote myself:

      You want equality? When may men have the right to bodily integrity? Or are you suggesting women should enjoy living with mutilated genitals as well for equality?

      I have suffered every symptom associated with female genital mutilation. I will never have children. I'm supposed to accept that I'm just collateral damage in the fight against cervical cancer.

      Why do so many of you hold double-standards?

      Even if "the woman" said gamers were werewolf pedophiles from Mars, the backlash from the community demonstrated that what she said was true. People targeted other women who spoke out for simply being women or for simply calling attention to the sexism which has been brewing in the gamer world since its inception.

      Right. Because I was assigned the male gender at birth and I happen to play a few games, I'm an evil misogynist.

      You know, once when I was playing Diablo 3 (yes, I know, that was my original error, hurr durr) I had to turn the main chat off because somebody who claimed to be a woman (probably cisgendered) and a Blizzard employee wouldn't shut up about her sex life. I have never had these problems with men (trans or cis) or trans women. My gamertag is clearly female. I have yet to receive a single threat.

      But, since I was assigned the male gender at birth, I have no voice. Either I'm one of those evil gamers who just hate all women and can't get laid, or I'm a pinko communist socialist feminist because I'm trans. And still an evil gamer who hates women because she dates men and is clearly sexually frustrated because she's never gotten in bed with a cisgendered woman!

      tl;dr equality: you keep using that word but I do not think it means what you think it means.

    32. Re:So close, so far by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Dora the Explorer is as boring as most government-sponsored things tend to be

      I actually find Dora more maddening than boring. I know her asking kids to help her is supposed to be engaging the young audience but it comes off as Dora being an idiot.

      Dora (standing with a bridge in the background): "Help me find the bridge. Do you see the bridge? You do? Where? Where is the bridge? Is it to my left? Is it to my right? Is it above me? Is it below me? Where is the bridge?" (By this point, the kids are usually screaming at the TV that Dora should just shut up and look behind her.)

      I'm so glad my boys have grown out of their Dora phase.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    33. Re:So close, so far by Bengie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The best female programmer that I've know, and I thought she was quite good, was a programmer for almost a decade, then quit to become a stay-at-home-mom, but then became a pseudo-part-time programmer who does remote work for a company, since she can do that from home. She's still salaried, but gets paid a lot less.

      Take it how you want, but I don't know any male programmers who quit to be a stay-at-home-dad with a pay hit. Doing this would probably be grounds for divorce for most wives and losing custody of your children, for a man. I assume this kind of stuff can affect the average.

    34. Re:So close, so far by BergZ · · Score: 1

      "Look either we are all equals or some of us need special treatment. It can't be both."

      I think you have the word "equal" confused with "identical" (it is a common mistake).
      Two things can be different but still equal.

      Even special treatment does not preclude the possibility of two types of things being equal: So long as both groups require some sort of special treatment then they can still be equal.

      --
      Warning: This sig is not thread safe. For more information see Slashdot's sig policy.
    35. Re:So close, so far by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Wait... so when I was growing up and playing with He-Man figures, I *shouldn't* have lifted a sword high in the air and shouted "By the Power of Greyskull" as a workout routine? No wonder that never worked right. (And don't even get me started on trying to get a jungle cat as a pet.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    36. Re:So close, so far by geoskd · · Score: 1

      No-one is asking for special treatment to make women "more" than men, just to restore the balance, which by practically every metric shows that women are at a disadvantage in society, and especially the workplace, and double-especially in IT. We (feminists) want everyone to be equal, as we are equal, and that means highlighting these oft-overlooked degrading behaviours and circumstances which conspire to keep this gender difference around,

      The fundamental problem is that equality will not be good enough to make women equal. I understand that sounds pretty self-conflicting, so let me explain.

      The world works around a few basic principles that apply to almost all situations. The first of those is evolution and survival of the fittest. The root of this is that any action that gives an individual an advantage will ultimately be selectively bred for. It has made humans aggressive, and our societies have similarly evolved to favor aggressive people. Men, by historical chance happen to be the more aggressive half of the species.

      Women end up taking a back seat (statistically speaking) because they are not as aggressive. We can change society to help address this imbalance, and make up for the existing discrepancy, by artificially selecting against aggression, but this may in fact be a fools errand. If the selective advantage of aggressive behavior is too great, attempting to eliminate that advantage, could potentially end up destroying society. If you breed out aggression, there is a strong possibility that you also breed out the single trait which makes us nearly unstoppable: Our drive to challenge and thoroughly destroy any competitive or existential threat. Those that have not bred out this trait then come in and mop us up, as our own species represents our greatest rivals.

      At the end of the day, it looks as though we are making these societal changes to weed out and breed out aggression, but it is important to note that these changes in our society are being met with a certain degree of backlash from various religious groups, and also seems to be coinciding with an apparent decline in many facets of American society. The two are likely unrelated, but we have to consider the possibility that there is a causal relationship between the reduction in aggression and the decline of our high standard of living.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    37. Re:So close, so far by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Two things can be different but still equal.

      No, two things can be different but still equivalent.

      The difference is subtle but real.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    38. Re:So close, so far by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you, by the time the day is through, 2/3s of the posts here will say something along the lines of "What's the problem with the book? It's just like real life!"

      That's the problem with Generalizations... they are generally true. The problem with the human brain is, we take what is generally true and assume that it is always true.

    39. Re:So close, so far by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Where do you find actual chemistry sets with actual chemicals in them that can actually make interesting things?

      At junk/antique stores. Those made in the 1960s and earlier, generally haven't been crippled for safety.

      The set I had came with both lead strips, acids and a burner.

    40. Re:So close, so far by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Barbie is in decline world-wide.

      For nearly 70 years, Barbie has ruled the dollhouse. But Mattel’s star may now be a relic of the past. Mattel shares sank slightly on Thursday morning after the company announced a net loss of $11.2 million and shrinking sales – $946 million, down 5% compared last year. The company’s biggest problem was its declining Barbie sales. Worldwide gross sales for the brand were down 14%.

      ... and ...

      The sharp decline was especially disappointing as Barbie is still Mattel’s biggest single brand, generating $1.15 billion in 2013 sales, according to Needham & Co. analyst Sean McGowan.

      Barbie’s North American sales have now fallen for eight straight quarters, and worldwide sales have dropped in eight of the past 10 quarters, according to McGowan.

      Barbie’s popularity slide has come at a time of shifting demographics.

      "Barbie is sort of stuck with its own fame as a blond girl, which just doesn’t resonate with girls anymore," said Matthew Hudak, an analyst in toys and games at research firm Euromonitor.

      Mattel has tried to address the issue with Barbies from different ethnic backgrounds, but it’s difficult to change consumer perception of the doll, he said.

      "Barbie is just going to continue to be hard to relate to. It doesn’t look like it’s in for a fun ride the next few years," Hudak said.

      Barbie also has been hurt by the marketing to girls of toys that were once geared only toward boys, such as Hasbro’s Nerf Rebelle, a feminine spin on the classic Nerf foam-dart shooter.

      "Maybe Mattel should be more conscious of gender neutrality?" said Jamie Gutfreund, chief marketing officer at Noise and The Intelligence Group, adding the majority of young parents it surveyed are okay with boys playing with dolls.

      While over a billion in sales is nothing to sneeze at, the fact that it's declining despite attempts to enlarge and diversify the market is significant. Mattel is now marketling Barbies to the parents, not the kids - kids just aren't asking for them any more. They want an iPod, an iPad, a Nerf gun, a Smartphone ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    41. Re:So close, so far by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the book is pretty much like real life - the only difference is that the boss in the story is more likely to be male too...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    42. Re:So close, so far by Holi · · Score: 1

      >probably a rich idiot (we never hear about that)

      What do you mean, She's got a Corvette, what looks to be a Mini Cooper, and a Jeep, and 3 homes (a Dream House in Malibu, a Beach House, and a Vacation House).

      Please the girl is loaded.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    43. Re:So close, so far by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is insane, but if it looks like special treatment it usually is. Denying our own senses takes us away from reality, it prevents us from recognize something that actually is unfair when we see it. We spend all our time solving imaginary problems rather than addressing real ones.

      There is this huge push to get girls into STEM, encourage them to do science and math etc; because what apparently they can't be expected form their own ambitions and desires in the presence of all the societal messaging.

      Yet on flip side we don't see a big push to encourage boys not to enlist in the armed forces. Nope despite all the glorification war in movies (almost always shown be fought by men) GI Joe, video games where you play soldier clearly marketed almost exclusive to men and boys, men are still expected to think for themselves. The idea of encouraging our girls to go into this high risk line of work is given lip-service at most.

      Oh sure there has been lots of news about women in the military but you don't see the recruiters chasing the girls down the side walk outside the local high school.

      Lets face it if it was really about getting rid of gender stereotypes we would stop calling attention to gender stereotypes. Rather than going oh look "SHE is a successful software developer" we would start saying oh look "Jane is a successful software developer" We should put the emphasis on Jane and not her sex. We would not "find female mathematician" to speak to the girls in the class about math, we would find the best mathematician willing to talk about their work to class of students regardless of their gender to do it.

      Kids are not stupid, showing Barbie "can be a computer engineer too" or having a chapter in the computer science text about "women in the field' or something does not play as "see girls can do computers" it plays as "see you won't be the only freak out there, girls can do computers but its still kinda weird"

      Finally we need to stop framing thinks as women's issues that are not. Early voting for example. Pelosi tried to push the idea the women for some reason are unique in the obstacles they face getting to the polls, because I don't men apparently don't have events in their daily lives that make it hard to abandon their usual routines on a particular Tuesday, nope that's girls. Then we see how she treats a female fellow democrat that might happen to vote in away she does not agree with, the instance she seeks the right to vote by proxy. Hint she is denied.

      So either women don't need special consideration for voting or the do which is it? Oh that right the answer is obvious they don't or if they do the need it no more and no less than any male. Still Nancy was perfectly willing to portray her gender as needing special accommodate when it was politically useful but she knows perfectly well the need is imagined, and discards the idea when its not politically useful.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    44. Re:So close, so far by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure, but the book isn't called Barbie Is A Manager.

    45. Re:So close, so far by guises · · Score: 1

      When does Barbie do needlepoint (or the equivalent) in this story? She's the lead designer for the game, that's inevitably the most desired position when it comes to game development. The blog author seems to suggest that they won't be happy unless Barbie either does everything herself or only teams up with women.

      Also, and this is the only reason I'm responding to your comment, SNAKE EYES DOESN'T TALK. What is wrong with you and the world that you would use that as an example?

    46. Re:So close, so far by Bengie · · Score: 1

      If you breed out aggression

      Who needs competition anyway? Why go to the moon, why be the best at anything? Just getting by is perfectly fine. Until a meteor destroys the Earth. Sounds more like lazy people wanting to get carried by those they look down upon.

    47. Re:So close, so far by careysub · · Score: 2

      Where do you find actual chemistry sets with actual chemicals in them that can actually make interesting things? I have been trying to find something like I had as a kid for 10 years - with no luck. ...

      Thames and Kosmos. Their Chem 5000 set is the real deal, at least equal to, and probably better than, the ChemCraft sets of yore that I loved as a kid.

      About five years ago I was casting about for a chemistry set for my daughter, and heard about Thames and Kosmos. Unfortunately at that particular moment they were retooling their offerings, and none were available - but they are back on the market, better than ever.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    48. Re:So close, so far by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I recently paid a visit to my sweet friend Helen Jane and was excited to find this book at her house.

      She was excited to find a Barbie book at her friend place ? and she's excited because it could inspire her daughter ?

      No, she was excited because that would likely be ammunition for another sexism rant.

    49. Re:So close, so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When does Barbie do needlepoint (or the equivalent) in this story?

      At every point where - as a "COMPUTER ENGINEER," she states that she can't actually write the game, that's for the boys to do. And after trashing her own computer and her sister's computer, she sits back and just lets the boys do it, because "it's faster if we help."

      The point is - the book is about Barbie being a computer engineer. And then at every point where computers are involved, she tosses her hands up helplessly and waits for the boys to solve the problem for her.

      If "GI Joe" was a cartoon about watching Duke and Tracker sit around lifting weights and looking pretty while two random girls actually went out and romped ass on COBRA, you'd probably think that's a little bizarre too.

    50. Re:So close, so far by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      I guarantee you, by the time the day is through, 2/3s of the posts here will say something along the lines of "What's the problem with the book? It's just like real life!"

      Well, if you replaced Barbie with Zuckerberg...

    51. Re:So close, so far by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Or.... not.

    52. Re:So close, so far by Pablew+Nopl · · Score: 1

      You want equality? When may men have the right to bodily integrity? Or are you suggesting women should enjoy living with mutilated genitals as well for equality?

      How do you know he isn't against male genital mutilation?

    53. Re:So close, so far by Pablew+Nopl · · Score: 1

      Even if "the woman" said gamers were werewolf pedophiles from Mars, the backlash from the community demonstrated that what she said was true.

      Now that's simply a non sequitur. The fact that some people said some things you think are misogynistic does not make them a majority, so *backlash alone* does not prove what she said was true.

      Unless you have some reliable scientific evidence and scientific consensus showing that most gamers engaged in such behavior, I simply have no reason to take what you said there seriously.

    54. Re:So close, so far by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that a lot of commentators, probably 50% again, assume that anything a feminist says is a direct, personal attack on them. I'll happily include sinij in that 50% because his is a textbook example of this reaction.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    55. Re:So close, so far by xevioso · · Score: 1

      I've got it! A Nerf Barbie with a smartphone gun! I'll make billions!

    56. Re:So close, so far by guises · · Score: 1

      I have no idea, TFA article only shows two pages of that: one where Barbie asks one of her teammates, Steven, to pull files off of Skipper's hard drive, and another where Steven reports back that he was successful. The post doesn't show any pages where they're working on Barbie's computer (which also has a virus) or on cleaning Skipper's computer. These pages either don't exist or were omitted from the post for not supporting the blogger's story.

      I did do a cursory search for the book online, since it would be nice to see the full text of the book rather than just what the blogger is willing to show, but unsurprisingly I wasn't able to turn up anything. We're talking about an incredibly trite children's book after all, one of a billion.

    57. Re:So close, so far by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Where do you find actual chemistry sets with actual chemicals in them that can actually make interesting things?

      At junk/antique stores. Those made in the 1960s and earlier, generally haven't been crippled for safety.

      In the 21st Century Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, only terrorists study chemistry. So they can make bombs to destroy our Freedoms.

      Besides, the liability lawyers wouldn't let us have them even if the Feds would.

    58. Re:So close, so far by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      There is a world of space between telling people what they want to hear and " telling people your view of the truth bluntly". If you are qualified to offer an opinion and one has actually been sought you should offer your actual opinion, that is how you add value. If it differs from that of others you do so diplomatically.

      For instance, lets say someone says, "I think we could deliver that in six weeks" and you know they forgot about issue $X. You don't reply "Well you forgot about issue $X so I don't think that will work."

      You allow them to save a little face, and you say something like: "Sounds a little tight, I think you have underestimated how long $X could take, because we know it can fragile and will need extra QA testing attention"

      They can cop to having for got all about X or not, you haven't completely shot their idea down but if they are a decent thinking person they correct the course. You know "a little tight" means "way the fuck off" and they do to but others might not need to known and you have not rubbed it in the face in even if its just between the two of you.

      Just being some yes man does not do anyone any good though and those people usually only rise as far as the bottom rungs of the decision makers because eventually folks realize they just agree with everyone all the time and don't really offer anything.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    59. Re:So close, so far by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Another intellectual triumph for AC! Congratulations!

    60. Re:So close, so far by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You could say the same about all the old ways of thinking:
      - Gay haters
      - Race haters
      - MS haters

      It will all die with the passing of generations.

    61. Re:So close, so far by guises · · Score: 1

      I'll grant that the book does seem to confuse a bit what engineering means, especially since Barbie in this doesn't seem to be any older than high school (she refers to her instructor as "teacher" rather than professor, "Ms Smith"). I've never heard high school students referred to as engineers. So the last line is a little off, you're right.

      None the less, the idea that Barbie giving orders to a couple of code monkeys would be degrading to Barbie is just bizarre. Very few people look at the person who's in charge and probably better paid and think to themselves, "Well that person must be an idiot."

    62. Re:So close, so far by jythie · · Score: 1

      I actually got into an argument with a coworker about that, with him claiming that it matched his experience with female coworkers and students, 'especially attractive ones'. One irony that I did not feel like pointing out is all the claims he was making about 'women' developers and how they skirt work, need constant help, expect others to hand hold, etc etc, were all complaints I have about his work and he is probably about a week from being fired for it.

    63. Re:So close, so far by guises · · Score: 1

      she states that she can't actually write the game, that's for the boys to do

      This doesn't happen. Read the page scans in TFA, like I suggested, rather than regurgitating the commentary. She says that she's only creating the design ideas (at the time that Skipper asks this question) and that she'll need Steven and Brian's help to turn it into a real game. That's teamwork, not helplessness.

      And of course "it's faster if we help." What do you want Barbie to be here, an anti-social loner? Living in her parents' basement and doing everything by herself is supposed to be better? She's working in a team and her teammates offered to help. At no point in any of the pages shown in TFA does Barbie just sit back and "lets the boys do it."

    64. Re:So close, so far by jythie · · Score: 1

      That is something I wish people would keep in mind more often. There is this idea that misogyny is some big explicit evil that people choose to have sexist attitudes and are generally terrible people when, most of the time, it is just a product of not thinking outside one's own perspective or examining gender based assumptions.. leading to people who are generally good people having some sexist attitudes purely through never having really sat down and examining them. Though it could be argued that how one reacts when their problematic attitudes are pointed out can kinda invalidate them being 'good'.

    65. Re:So close, so far by jythie · · Score: 1

      The person is under the assumption that women simply endure sex in order to get what they want and should (or do) use that power to control people, with 'people' being men of course, since only men can actually do things.

    66. Re:So close, so far by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      Alternative interpretation of what happened: the people involved didn't actually know what a software engineer does. Because I read that book as offensive to software engineers of all genders, not just women.

    67. Re:So close, so far by jythie · · Score: 1

      Are you going to tell a womyn-born-womyn to knock off her sexism, or is your strategy going to be to hold all of us assigned the male gender at birth accountable because you're the One Good Man?

      Ahm, "womyn-born-womyn" is a common adversary of third wave feminism and such communities are frequently called out for being sexist.

      Right. Because I was assigned the male gender at birth and I happen to play a few games, I'm an evil misogynist.

      No, people are perfectly capable of being judged based off their words and actions. The only people I see claiming this 'all men are evil misogynists' are people claiming that feminists are saying that. Outside a few fringe whackjobs left over from radfem, I pretty much never see this coming from the community, even second wave feminists have backed off that stuff over the years.

      Either I'm one of those evil gamers who just hate all women and can't get laid, or I'm a pinko communist socialist feminist because I'm trans. And still an evil gamer who hates women because she dates men and is clearly sexually frustrated because she's never gotten in bed with a cisgendered woman!

      There are lots of people out there, there are jerks with a variety of opinions and for anything there will be someone out there attacking it. I have no doubt you have heard both, as I have I (I am also trans), but once the rage subsides one can look around to see who is not being horrible and find lots of good people. Creating strawmen does not make the world seem any better.

    68. Re:So close, so far by jythie · · Score: 1

      The place where this breaks down is that the question of how much aggression is genetic vs social, the old nature vs nurture debate. While it can be argued males tend to be larger and stronger, actual aggression seems to be influenced more as a social construct from early age. Aggression in males and females is treated differently in terms of role models and people's feedback, with positive and negative effects being drastically different.

      This changes the scope of the issue rather significantly since social norms and parenting are a lot easier to change then genetics.

    69. Re:So close, so far by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Vinnie the Pooh

      That's Winnie's cousin who instead of hailing from the 100 Acre Wood is from the Isle a' Dogs in London innit mate

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    70. Re:So close, so far by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      No-one is asking for special treatment

      Every third-wave feminist is, along with most SJWs.

      which by practically every metric shows that women are at a disadvantage in society

      They have every advantage in family law. There are colleges where men are just assumed guilty of any charge of sexual assault, and cannot even question their accusers in the adjudication process. There's no wage gap for those under about 35 if you adjust for hours worked. Sure, there are certainly still areas like "competitive power lifting" where women are at a disadvantage, but so what?

      We (feminists) want everyone to be equal,

      Clearly you don't. You say this a lot, some of you (others wear shirts saying "I bathe in male tears"), but then go on to claim that women need special treatment in one way or another.

      Equality in society means equality of opportunity: the same rules apply to all, the same social services are available to all, blind to sex and race. It does not mean equality of outcome. Different individuals make different choices, and have different skills and abilities, and the very nature of liberty is that your success in life is influenced by all of that.

      Everyone has the right to walk their own path to happiness. You don't get to define "success" for another, you can only measure it against what people chose to pursue in life. You also can't guarantee that people will succeed even there: some people pick a stupid path to their goal.

      Even if "the woman" said gamers were werewolf pedophiles from Mars, the backlash from the community demonstrated that what she said was true

      Ah, so it's the victim's fault then? 8 Gaming sites/magazines simultaneously published articles attacking "gamers", which is to say, their readers. It's not a leap to deduce that something is rotten in the state of gaming journalism.

      The core issue here seems to actually be semantics, oddly enough. People have legitimate complaints about the culture of the tiny corner of gaming that includes CoD and similar games, and call those people "gamers". But anyone who plays Candycrush or WoW or that PvZ shooter or whatever 20+ hours a week is every bit as much a "hardcore gamer", and the overall population was incensed by the offensive stereotyping. Funny how that works.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    71. Re:So close, so far by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that makes it ok then?
      No, it doesn't.
      And that's the GP's point: It's wrong, regardless of whether its reflective or not of the present reality.
      It's wrong because it helps perpeatuate that mentality, that cycle.
      Being "just life real life" is not an excuse and is irrelevent.

      And the point of that article you linked is precisely about the systemic biases that create a self-perpetuating perception (once again, from your own link, that you apparently, once again, didnt read before using it to "support" your position):

      There are many gender challenges that we face on this planet, centuries of tradition and religious beliefs prove to make biases, and repression, difficult to change. But, getting more women to like numbers, science and engineering, really is an imaginable shift, and one that can be accomplished in short order. Girls can code, they can add without apple illustrations and they can change the world, one invention at a time. Let's remember to tell them that.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    72. Re:So close, so far by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      viruses (virii?)

      "Viruses" is correct. The Latin word "virus" has no Latin plural form, so we pluralize using English grammar rules. Viruses.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    73. Re:So close, so far by mi · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that makes it ok then?

      I didn't say so.

      No, it doesn't.

      Strawman much?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    74. Re:So close, so far by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      You want equality? When may men have the right to bodily integrity? Or are you suggesting women should enjoy living with mutilated genitals as well for equality?

      For the record, just about any feminist I've heard give an opinion on the subject has been against male circumcision as well.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    75. Re:So close, so far by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Moff's Law fulfilled.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    76. Re:So close, so far by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      OMFG, Kosmos still exists? I had several of those about 40 years ago. But then I also had their electronics sets so that's where I ended up.

    77. Re:So close, so far by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Who needs competition anyway? Why go to the moon, why be the best at anything?

      Indeed. It would be much easier to fling our nuclear shit at the Soviets like good screeching monkies, rather than impress the world with our feats of engineering.

      Just out of curiosity, do you actually know what aggression means?

      Sounds more like lazy people wanting to get carried by those they look down upon.

      And this sounds like someone's having delusions of grandieur.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    78. Re:So close, so far by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      This comes off as really pathetic sounding :/

    79. Re:So close, so far by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      So your advice is...

      do nothing because why bother?

    80. Re:So close, so far by Kielistic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe stop misusing the word "misogyny" to make things seem scarier than they are then? If you used the word correctly maybe people wouldn't be misinterpreting what you "mean" so often.

    81. Re:So close, so far by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Society has low professional expectations for women, and pays them according to those expectations

      Hang on. Someone working pseudo-part time (whatever the fuck that means) remotely is paid less than someone working fulltime in the office, and you're blaming that on gender?

      Just fuck off with your ill informed misinformation, bigoted perspective, flawed belief that men get paid more for equal work and pretence getting to stay at home with the children is a "battle" for women.

      It's bigoted cunts like you that perpetuate the current disparities in employment. I'd fucking love to be working part time on a partial wage, supported by someone working my current hours earning my current wage.

      Trust me, I know several women that would have to work more for less pay to match. But that's fine, apparently it's because expectations are less on them. I don't give a flying fuck, I expect them to deliver more value than me to reflect their higher pay.

    82. Re:So close, so far by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Women end up taking a back seat (statistically speaking) because they are not as aggressive.

      Explain the pay discrepancy between unmarried women with no children, and unmarried men with no children of the same age?

      Note : the women earn more. Are you telling us they're more aggressive, or are you just full of shit?

    83. Re:So close, so far by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I find that curious. My manager couldn't do my job - he's happy to admit it, his background doesn't give him the skills or experience for it, he's shown no desire to learn it and he just can't do it.

      What he can do, exceedingly well, is his job. I really like that, I consider it a great attribute, it means I can learn new and interesting skills from him and it means I can delegate shit I can't be arsed with to him too.

      I'm much happier than if he could only do my job.

    84. Re:So close, so far by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And perhaps the best one, Lewis's Law: Comments on any article about feminism justify feminism.

      Apparently, Lewis is/was a feminist. In the rational universe, we call that "begging the question."

    85. Re:So close, so far by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Though back in my day we didn't have the Internet or easymode, and I was much too sane to call a $3.99/minute ($294,829,482/second in today's money) "tip" line.

      Back in the day before the day, the tipline was free, except for LD charges.

      Other than that, I have pretty much the same history, I just couldn't pass up the "get off my lawn" moment. ;)

    86. Re:So close, so far by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Make her watch Clerks and learn a far superior way to get her nails done.

    87. Re:So close, so far by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As far as genital mutilation goes, it's unfortunately fairly common. In many societies, it's standard to cut off a girl's clitoris, which strikes me as a bigger deal than a man's foreskin. "Female circumcision" isn't intended to stop women from reproducing, the only reason I can see being to remove pleasure. I assure you that a circumcised male can enjoy sex a lot. In addition, there are potential small health benefits for male circumcision, and none for female genital mutilation (quite the opposite, in fact). This doesn't mean I'm in favor of either, and my son retains his foreskin.

      As far as every symptom associated with female genital mutilation, have you had infected labia? Excessively painful and injurious sex the first time?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    88. Re:So close, so far by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's just mistitled. Barbie gets the boys to do the work and take the credit. She doesn't know what to do about a virus. The book needs to be titled "I can be a software manager" and then it'll be fine.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    89. Re:So close, so far by mi · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, comrade — I first read about the little bear in Russian, where the writing is phonetic and the distinction between "w" and "v" makes no sense...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    90. Re:So close, so far by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      it isn't a historical quirk, it is biological, and generally males are more aggressive in almost all mammals, except when protecting children.

    91. Re:So close, so far by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      no it doesn't. It isn't a question of nature vs nurture except for people who wear blinders. In almost all mammals, and all apes, males are far more aggressive.

      In case you didn't know, aggression is strongly linked to testosterone levels. There are some women who have testosterone levels that could begin to compare to the average male, but that is no where even close to the average. There are good actual academic studies of this.

    92. Re:So close, so far by jythie · · Score: 1

      A few decades ago perhaps, but by today not so much. Examples have been found for where ape aggression vanishes (and maintains across generation) when the social context changes. The 'nature' crowd has slowly been fading since maybe the 70s or 80s and increasingly are 'pop' science.

    93. Re:So close, so far by hoeferbe · · Score: 1
      AmiMoJo (196126) wrote:

      How could anyone, in 2014, have thought this was acceptable?

      Not to detract from your justified indignation, but I at least take hope in this "11/19 3:09pm" update posted to the bottom of TFA:

      Barbie issued the following apology on its Facebook page:
      The Barbie I Can Be A Computer Engineer book was published in 2010. Since that time we have reworked our Barbie books. The portrayal of Barbie in this specific story doesn't reflect the Brand's vision for what Barbie stands for. We believe girls should be empowered to understand that anything is possible and believe they live in a world without limits. We apologize that this book didn't reflect that belief. All Barbie titles moving forward will be written to inspire girls imaginations and portray an empowered Barbie character.

    94. Re:So close, so far by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What people disagree on what equality means (equality of opportunity vs equality of outcome for example).

      But a systematic inequality of outcome suggests that the opportunity was not really equal. Every particular roll of dice is random, but if I keep getting all 1's and you all 6's, I'm going to take a good long look at that dice.

      Of course even a system governed by a honest dice kinda sucks. Maybe we should try going for a point-based build instead?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    95. Re:So close, so far by guises · · Score: 1

      She's a freaking high school student, what are you expecting here? No one's going to hire her anyway, just for being too young.

      Once again, the only thing that the book says Barbie can't do is complete the entire game by herself. It doesn't say that she can't code, it only says that she isn't coding right then, it doesn't say that she can't fix her computer, it only says that fixing her computer will go faster if she and her teammates work together. And even if it did, even if there existed a problem that Barbie couldn't solve, I submit that this wouldn't be the fucking end of the world. She's not some kind of wizard, I don't understand why it's weak to ask for help once in a while.

      If the complaint was that this was an inaccurate portrayal of what it means to be a computer engineer then I'd be right there with you. Game designers are not necessarily engineers, and high school students aren't engineers anyway. So fine, I'll grant that this isn't a very good book since that is supposed to be the point. But that is not what people are up in arms over here.

    96. Re:So close, so far by guises · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think I got to wrapped up in finding something that we could agree over. I want to correct myself: I would not be right there with you, even over this far lessor "outrage." The furthest that I can go honestly is to say that among the excerpts that the blog author has chosen to show us, I don't see Barbie doing any engineering. I would never even consider protesting something like this when all I've got to go on are a few scans chosen by an obviously heavily slanted author.

      Of course, I'm not going to protest "Barbie inaccurately portrays one of her multitudes of professions" anyway...

    97. Re:So close, so far by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      To both you and the poster directly before you, I say this:

      If I just say "viruses", some dumb chump chimes in to tell me it's "virii". In attempting to avoid that exchange, it seems I've brought the attention of two even dumber chumps.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    98. Re:So close, so far by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Well, it is pretty much like real life, but I'm not sure we want to be teaching kids "this is the crap you can expect fom life" rather than inspiring them to do more.

      I did take a slight exception to this though:

      But Steven and Brian are also everything frustrating about the tech industry. Steven and Brian represent the tech industry assumption that only men make meaningful contributions.

      As far as I can tell from the story, Steven and Brian did nothing wrong at all - clueless Barbie fucks things up and then asks them to fix it, which they do. This bit of the story would probably be pretty similar if you replace Barbie with any clueless person (male or female) who's just infected a bunch of computers with a virus. What were they supposed to do in this situation?

    99. Re:So close, so far by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Ah fair enough. I'm not normally one for grammar-nazism and related things, but it just put me in mind of Vinnie Jones and people of his ilk. The juxtaposition of that and Winnie the Pooh was an entertaining mental image :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    100. Re:So close, so far by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      You even fail at Russian.

      Russian spelling is not phonetic, there are often significant differences between what is said and what is written.
      Belarussian is strictly phonetic, Czech is almost phonetic (there are some exceptions due to vocal shifts: like "u" with krouzek and with carka, "i" and "y" being the same phoneme). Russian is not.

      Writing that the distinction between "w" and "v" makes no sense is also wrong. The right answer is that Russian simply lacks the [w] phoneme (labio-velar approximant) and uses either "v" or "u" in transcriptions of foreign texts. Polish and Belarussian both have this phoneme, although the origin of it is the dark L sound, that is why it is written as L with as stroke in Polish and probably wouldn't make sense in front of an "i". Belarus on the other hand uses an u with a breve, that might actually work.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    101. Re:So close, so far by Xest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interestingly the UK's official statistic authority (which is pretty good and impartial by the way - it's never been afraid to reprimand the government of the time or opposition for misusing it's stats) has just this last week released it's latest research into the gender paygap:

      http://www.independent.co.uk/n...

      It shows that not only is the gender paygap not an issue on average for women up to the age of 40, but it actually goes in their favour.

      It is only past the point where many start to pull ahead because they are less likely to opt to stay at home and sacrifice their career for childcare duties that the paygap moves back in favour of men. Effectively the overall paygap only exists because when people tend to get the highest salaries (when they have the most experience) many women have opted not to pursue that path.

      Of course, we should examine why women as disproportionately opting to be the parent that stays at home to perform childcare duties, there's merit in that. But it does seem to imply there's no real bias against women in the workplace, because all things being equal, when children are much less a part of the equation on average, women actually do better salarywise than men in the UK.

    102. Re:So close, so far by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Can you point out some of the special treatment that feminists are asking for, with a citation of them asking for it? I think you are making this shit up because every mainstream feminist I have read or listened to is just interested in equality.

      Quality of opportunity is exactly what we all want. Try to help more women into IT not by favouring them, but by simply removing barriers to them even applying and letting the best candidate win.

      You are just trying to pain men as victims of feminazis, which is bullshit. The only people who are offended are the ones being called out for defending the indefensible, everyone else understands that equality is a worthy goal and attacks on anyone are not acceptable.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    103. Re:So close, so far by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      No-one is pushing girls into STEM, they are simply trying to remove the barriers in place for girls who have a natural interest in those subjects.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    104. Re:So close, so far by DeKO · · Score: 1
    105. Re:So close, so far by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

    106. Re:So close, so far by lgw · · Score: 1

      Can you point out some of the special treatment that feminists are asking for, with a citation of them asking for it? I think you are making this shit up because every mainstream feminist I have read or listened to is just interested in equality.

      Oh, you've missed the calls to fix the income inequality gap by just taxing men an extra 25% and giving it to women? You've missed the continuous refrain of every SJW ever that what offends women is all-important, but what offends just men is irrelevant? You've missed the suggestion that the best plan is to just kill 95% of men and jail the rest on an island somewhere so they can't cause any harm to real people? I see that kind of shit all the time.

      But this says it all, really. (That's Jessica Valenti, of course, but the attitude expressed is common enough.)

      Quality of opportunity is exactly what we all want. Try to help more women into IT not by favouring them, but by simply removing barriers to them even applying and letting the best candidate win.

      Any evidence that there's actually a problem once women graduate? (Women being dissuaded from technical interests in middle and high school is a real and studied problem, of course.) All the companies I've worked for actually did favor women in the recruiting (but not interview) process. I've done plenty of "new college grad" interview days that the field of candidates that were flown in were 40-50% female, which sure as heck isn't the ratio of grads. We interview everyone the same of course, but every place I've been for the past decade has made a special effort to try to recruit women at the start of the process.

      The only people who are offended are the ones being called out for defending the indefensible

      Sure, by your definition accusations by a feminist have no possible defense, I guess? OTOH, painting the vast and diverse world of "gamers" with a stereotype that's only relevant to the few games that are predominately teenage boys is bigoted and unfair. (If your argument is "14-year-olds are rude and should behave better", you're preaching to the quire, also they should get off my lawn!)

      attacks on anyone are not acceptable

      ... they say, and then go on to vigorously attack "gamers", starting a culture war that won't soon end.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    107. Re:So close, so far by jbssm · · Score: 1

      No, you just equality of opportunities in the area you feel you are behind.

      You don't ask for general equality of opportunist since you would loose way too much privileges. Why don't you campaign for equality of treatment in military conscription, sports (why do you have your own leagues?), parenting rights, maternity leave, etc? That would show woman are actually interested in equality of treatment, cause otherwise we get the sensation they are just trying to accumulate as much privileges as possible.

      P.S.: The book is still dumb though.

    108. Re:So close, so far by starbird56 · · Score: 1

      Try Edmond Scientifics: http://www.scientificsonline.c...

    109. Re:So close, so far by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Let me make sure that I understand this correctly. You wrote, "viruses (virii?)", I answered your question, and now you are calling me a dumb chump.

      Well, I guess now I have seen it all. Have a pleasant day.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    110. Re:So close, so far by dywolf · · Score: 1

      again: not a troll post.
      equal rights is not special rights, by very definition.
      special rights would be something like not having to pay taxes, like corporations, really rich folks, and churches.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    111. Re:So close, so far by praxis · · Score: 1

      I was not trying to be pedantic. In fact, the ratio itself is not relevant. If someone says X% of a population does Y but I don't do Y then why should I be offended, they weren't calling me out for doing Y.

    112. Re:So close, so far by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      In my negotiation class, we covered how important it is to not crush people with their own stupidity.

    113. Re:So close, so far by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You think children can't learn? That's cute.

      I hate kids because they're stupid. They're in a phase where they can learn rapidly, due to not being able to survive if they don't learn rapidly. 10-year-old boys used to drive farm trucks and handle animal husbandry; today, we think these tasks are beyond the physiological capability of a child's brain. While they *are* stupid, that can be fixed pretty readily.

      It's easy to teach a first grader that X is not Y, even when X and Y look exactly the same. We mostly use this to teach small children that all adults unfamiliar to them are evil people who want to molest them, while all adults familiar to them are infallible and trustworthy--least that's what we taught kids when I was 6 years old.

    114. Re:So close, so far by u38cg · · Score: 1

      There are colleges where men are just assumed guilty of any charge of sexual assault, and cannot even question their accusers in the adjudication process

      I might have more of a problem with that if it didn't lead, on average, to more cases getting decided correctly.

      Equality of outcome, equality of opportunity. Neither is perfect. Enjoy your male tears.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  5. *Spoiler alert* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the final chapter, Barbie sleeps with several game reviewers to make sure her game gets good reviews and publicity on various gaming websites.

    1. Re:*Spoiler alert* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then in the next book Ken and his SJW friends try to destroy the lives of anyone who point's it out.

    2. Re:*Spoiler alert* by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

      and then deals with sexist gamers threatening her livelihood and life for being a feminist game developer. too early?

    3. Re:*Spoiler alert* by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Did they threaten her livelihood because she is a feminist or was it because she was corrupt?

      That might sound like trolling but I actually didn't follow gamergate closely so I really don't know the answer. To me it seemed like "A person cheated at business, and the community around that business called out the cheater". Does the community call out all feminist game developers, or only the cheaters? If it's the former, then why did I only hear about it when the cheater cheated?

    4. Re:*Spoiler alert* by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      The fact this anonymous comment has been modded 5, funny is pretty embarrassing to every mod who gave it points.

    5. Re:*Spoiler alert* by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      A little of column A, a little of column B. The Sarkeesian ordeal and backlash there is a good example of showing how much hatred and vitriol was out there for simply having an idea, or having a kick starter heavily exceed expectations. Sure, there's a lot of BS in her videos and either she has no idea what she's talking about - or she's being intellectually dishonest about the topics there. But the amount of hate spewed before that first video was made is a good indicator of how well feminism fits in with hardcore gamers.

      But back to gamergate; it's basically one big case of "You're not technically wrong, outraged gamers. You're just assholes." Even if she did sleep with some people for favorable reviews (sorry, previews), then whoop de doo. It was for a game about depression, and it was a text-based game, and it was free. That excludes about 99.999% gamers from any interest right there. And it wasn't even for a review, it was more of an "honorable mention" in a site with a list of a bunch of other free games.

      So yeah, it's not so much just "A person cheated at business, and the community around that business called out the cheater". It's that collectively, the gaming community gave way too many shits about the whole thing. Which is why it was so easy to label this as misogyny by the other side, and why they attempted to quell the whole thing. As if gaming journalism was already some holy sacred cow that was now tainted because of the ordeal (Kane and Lynch, anyone?). A great quote from the Colbert-Sarkeesian interview was something like "no... but it's about gaming journalism! This is important! Could you imagine if Hollywood journalism had no ethics?"

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    6. Re:*Spoiler alert* by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      The fiction gets even worse! Game reviewers are typicalle die-hard gamers, known for not having sex -let alone with other people.

    7. Re:*Spoiler alert* by guises · · Score: 1

      This is definitely one of the better summaries of Gamergate that I've read. For the last thing though - in the grand scheme of things gaming journalism may be nothing but entertainment news. However, integrity is literally their entire product. An investigative journalist sells their research: what they've discovered about an important issue, or that hard-to-get interview. A gaming journalist sells their opinion, it has no value whatsoever if their integrity has been compromised.

  6. Well, to be fair... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Informative

    This Barbie actually does sound like some computer "engineers" I've known.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Well, to be fair... by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      This Barbie actually does sound like some computer "engineers" I've known.

      Does that mean we need a "Police Officer Ken" book where he shoots an unarmed teen of color because that sounds like some police officers we know?

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    2. Re:Well, to be fair... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      What is a computer "engineer", anyway? An autopilot for a train?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:Well, to be fair... by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      There was an insanely pretty and tall woman with long blond hair in some of my MSCS courses. Way out of my league...

    4. Re:Well, to be fair... by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      Cross between EE and CS. Someone who has been trained to understand both hardware and software. Fairly common in embedded design.

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    5. Re:Well, to be fair... by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      This Barbie actually does sound like some computer "engineers" I've known.

      Do the typical kid mods of ripping all the hair off and smashing the doll down a bit, and it could be "Computer Engineer Wally", from Dilbert.

    6. Re:Well, to be fair... by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, yes! Do we know anyone who's good at drawing? Hell, doesn't have to be good, just good enough.

    7. Re:Well, to be fair... by jbssm · · Score: 1

      Why not a "police officer barbie" book where she shoots an unarmed teen of color? It's empowering.

  7. I prefer this rewrite by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.themarysue.com/barb... is much better done. If only that had been the actual book!

    1. Re:I prefer this rewrite by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      So, she replaced one set of unfortunate characters that shouldn't be used as role models with another set of unfortunate characters that shouldn't be used as role models. The new book's subtitle looks like it should read "Don't become a computer engineer because you'll have to put up with this crap for the rest of your life".

    2. Re:I prefer this rewrite by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Well, at least it'd be realistic. Although the comment about "boys can like pink" was a bit over the top -- things like that go over better when they're not pointed out. I read it and thought: "Is there something wrong with liking pink?"

      Now what we need is a "Neckbeard Barbie" -- but I don't think Mattel would ever go there.

  8. What should have happened by korbulon · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Is that American Barbie outsourced the job to Indian Barbie (http://www.amazon.com/Barbie-P8228-INDIAN-BARBIE/dp/B002PEQKHG) at a quarter of the pay and pocketed the rest as profit.

    That's the American way.

    1. Re:What should have happened by korbulon · · Score: 1

      (yeah I screwed up the link but fuck Slashdot's antiquarian no-editing of messages policy. Jesus, it's almost 2015.)

    2. Re:What should have happened by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Eh, I find edited comments annoying, just post your corrections in a child post, like you almost did.

      Also, brilliant props to the mod who modded "Laidoff tech worker Barbie" with "Redundant" flag.

  9. Re:OMG! by Adriax · · Score: 1

    A boss?

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  10. Who wrote it? by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    Is there an author attributed?

    1. Re:Who wrote it? by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      Written by a women. Susan Marenco. What a surprise. Move along - nothing to see.

  11. Why pull it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is a completely accurate depiction of the real world. I have met exactly three women whose developer skills are good enough to garner respect. They just aren't out there.

    Barbie's career track is as a scrum master or some other fluffy bullshit.

    1. Re:Why pull it? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Maybe if little girls read a book about Barbie happily being a developer instead of breaking computers and outsourcing coding work to cute boys, there would be more women with good developer skills?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  12. If it was IT Manager Barbie by j-b0y · · Score: 1

    with Ken, Preventer of IT Services, then it would be pretty realistic and quite gender-unspecific.

    --
    Please remain calm, there is no reason to pani... wait, where are you all going?
  13. Re:OMG! by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    No, he meant a CIO

  14. Re:OMG! by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

    no, he means a CEO :)

  15. virus eradication and the ability to write code by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    I see male software engineers infect their own laptops with viruses and malware and then have to enlist the support of the help desk department to clean it off for them. I don't see how this point is relevant to the ability to write code. Unless, I suppose, if your job is to write malware and viruses.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:virus eradication and the ability to write code by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      The difference is, most of the coders kind of know how to approach virus removal - it's just a lot easier to ask Help Desk to do it since they've probably got a machine dedicated to it (we called ours "Benchy the Nurse Box" - it had multiple malware removal programs on it and the only other thing it did besides nuke viruses was play the radio.)

      Although the message about not sharing USBs between sick machines is a good one in this book. MANY professionals haven't figured that one out yet.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:virus eradication and the ability to write code by savuporo · · Score: 1

      Author Susan Marenco has been caught up in the swirling controversy. She spoke with ABC News, saying her assignment for the project was to write about Barbie as a "designer." It's not necessarily uncommon in the industry to have game designers working on the look, flow and story of a game while programmers handle the coding side.

      That is clearly misogyny and cis scum right there.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    3. Re:virus eradication and the ability to write code by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Then it should have been called "I can be a software designer!" and not "I can be a computer engineer!"

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  16. holy crap by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Despite that book being completely true to life, I'm not one to jump all over something and call it sexist but that sounds incredibly sexist. Most feminist feminazis make exaggerating their full time job but that book sounds almost purposely sexist.

    1. Re:holy crap by Scottingham · · Score: 1

      "Despite that book being completely true to life"

      Sweeping generalizations like that and using the world Feminazis doesn't really undo your attempt at analysis of the book.

      Slightly rephrased: "I'm not racist, but god damn I hate $racial_slur. That said, that Arizona sheriff sounds almost purposely racist."

    2. Re:holy crap by godrik · · Score: 1

      What makes it even worse is that Barbie is meant to be an image of a women that girl want to achieve.

    3. Re:holy crap by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      How are you able to see that this book might be sexist and then use "feminazi" as if it's a real word used by kids who aren't angry 4chan posters?

    4. Re:holy crap by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      No.

      I'm not going to meet someone half-way if half-way means legitimizing shit like "feminazi". This is false-equivalence and I'm pretty certain you are slashmydots posting anonymously.

    5. Re:holy crap by manwargi · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the term existed before 4chan did.

    6. Re:holy crap by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      Oh sorry, let's be fair to those that compare social equity with Hitler, :-)

  17. Hack This Barbie... by Kiyyik · · Score: 1
    If you haven't seen this yet, you can er, "help" fix the book by adding your own captions here.

    Great fun for while you're waiting on the build server.

  18. Re:Math is hard by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2

    Misogyny is so much easier, we'll just go with that instead.

    I always hated this particular hatred of "Math is hard"... Math is hard - I always tell my daughter that. Not telling girls that math is hard because we are afraid they won't like it isn't going to help them. They are going to struggle with it like all of the boys - not understand why it is hard for them and fear that it is because they are a girl. I always tell my daughter math is hard - she has to struggle with it like everyone else, but in the end that is what she will need to get the good jobs when she is older. And yes - she is actually very good in Math as an honor student in pre-calc as a sophomore.

    Get off your high horse saying that is is Misogyny telling a girl that math is hard... If it isn't you aren't doing it right, take the next class up until it is.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  19. Re:Slash Jezebel by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait, but what about STARVING AFRICAN CHILDREN, why worry about privileged white women in first-world countries when CHILDREN ARE STARVING?!?! What kind of monster are you?! I expect you to dedicate all your attention to issues that I care about! NOW!

  20. Barbie Remix by k6mfw · · Score: 3, Interesting
    http://caseyfiesler.com/2014/1...

    And the problem isn’t even that Barbie isn’t a “real” computer scientist because she isn’t coding. (I am one of those mostly-non-coding computer scientists myself, though now I’m tempted to make a game about robot puppies shooting lasers anyway.) The problem is the assumption that she is a designer, not a coder, and the coders are boys. (There are also problems with nonsense explanations for computer viruses, taking credit for other people’s work, and inexplicable pillow fights.) I happen to study remix, so one of my first thoughts upon seeing this was: someone is obviously going to remix this. I figured, why wait? I also have at my disposal my roommate Miranda Parker, a student of Mark Guzdial, who studies computing education and broadening participation in STEM. So with her input, I rewrote the book with a slightly different spin. (I also kept her as a “computer engineer” even though she’s really more of a computer scientist, software developer, etc.) I hope you like this new narrative better, too!

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:Barbie Remix by Cederic · · Score: 1

      inexplicable pillow fights

      I refute the suggestion that any pillow fight is inexplicable.

      There are people. Pillows are present. Pillow fights are a logical outcome.
      The alternative is that there are pillows. People are present. Pillow fights are almost obligatory.

  21. Re:"Engineer" by captjc · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about, Half, if not more than half of CEs are programming. Sure, not game programming (as in the book) but still programming.

    I'm a CE and I spend most of my time programming everything from Robots, PLCs, HMIs, Motors, FPGAs and Vision systems, to the communication that glues them all together. I still need to have a knowledge of electronics and electrical design, but still a good portion of my work is (usually low-level) programming.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  22. Oh no! by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Oh no! An anorexic harlot from nazi Germany has failed us as a role model. Again.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  23. Re:Math is hard by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Advanced maths is hard, but most school level stuff really isn't. Arithmetic, basic algebra, basic statistics, a bit of trig... Almost all children should be able to master those, learning disabilities aside.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  24. Re:Slash Jezebel by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    STARVING?

    Innocent animals are DYING every day! What kind of monster are you that you'd rather deal with what people eat?

    So if your mother was having a heart attack and you were hungry you'd first call for a pizza and only then help her!?

    You should die in a fire fueled by your own selfishness.

  25. Outrage not done right by sinij · · Score: 1

    If timothy wanted to properly generate outrage on /., then Barbie would have said "I love systemd" when you pull her string, and article would be authored by Bennett.

    1. Re:Outrage not done right by Tridus · · Score: 1

      She also would have hired two guys to write slashdot 2.0.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  26. The one woman is the Barbie brand manager by alispguru · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jean McKenzie has been Executive Vice President of Mattel since September 2012. She was named President of American Girl Jan. 1, 2013. Prior to re-joining Mattel in 2011 as Senior Vice President-Marketing, she was President and CEO of Gateway Learning Corporation and Senior Vice President for The Walt Disney Company. From 1989-1998, Ms. McKenzie served in various executive positions at Mattel working on the Barbie brand, most recently as Executive Vice President and GM of Worldwide Barbie for Mattel.

    Not sure if this makes the screw-up better or worse...

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:The one woman is the Barbie brand manager by Minupla · · Score: 2

      Well since the publication date was 2010, I'm not sure we can blame Jean for this one.

      I'm very happy that my daughter gets angry and pissed off whenever anyone suggests something is a boy toy or a girl toy tho. (Drive thru at McD's is rough!)

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  27. Wow, it's 1953 again! by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of posts already claiming that this is what happens in real life. Has anyone stopped to think that the reason for this is because girls are encouraged from day one to behave that way? It is true that women gravitate towards the project manager, training and business analyst jobs. But I have worked with many people of both genders, and the ability levels are pretty evenly split. There are plenty of helpless, clueless guys too, and they tend to bolt up the ladder quickly into management where they don't have to do the technical work anymore. I think women generally like PM or BA jobs for the simple reason that they get to interact with humans who actually care about something other than computers, video games and software development. (You couldn't pay me enough to be a project manager, going around begging people for work while not being able to control them and still being responsible for the project.) But, I also think that with the right encouragement early on, and without the hostile work environment that some IT outfits provide, there's nothing stopping women from doing great software work. The requirements are the same -- critical thinking, logic and an ability to deal with occasional intense levels of frustration. If girls aren't poisoned with things like this early on in their schooling, they have the same opportunity to develop these skills as boys do.

    I'm just really surprised that this book made it through focus groups, internal meetings at Mattel, etc. and people still thought it was a good idea. That leads me to believe people are even more clueless than I thought.

    I've got both a young son and a young daughter, and the age at which they start pushing the pink crap on the girls is astoundingly low. My daughter doesn't really play with dolls too much, and certainly doesn't own a Barbie. My wife grew up in a household where both parents were academics, and it shows. They didn't let her get sucked into this trap, and we're going to do our best to do the same. The thing I'm worried about is the peer pressure from dumbass female classmates once she gets to school. I'm amazed that in 2014 women are still being encouraged to take on traditional roles, and that sexism is somehow still OK. We've got a couple more years, so I think all we can do is just encourage them to like learning. It appears to be working for our son -- we limit TV and computer time, and actually take the time to explain things he has questions about in terms he can understand. I'll find out in 15 years or so if I did a good job or not....

  28. "Acceptable"? WTF? by mi · · Score: 1

    How could anyone, in 2014, have thought this was acceptable?

    "Acceptable"? Was the First Amendment declared null and void, while I was sleeping? What do you mean by "acceptable", mister thought-policeman?

    If burning American flag, calling for killing of the sitting President, or publicly defecating on a police car is acceptable, having a book with a hare-brained bimbo as one of the characters certainly is too.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:"Acceptable"? WTF? by Ionized · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How could anyone, in 2014, have thought this was acceptable?

      "Acceptable"? Was the First Amendment declared null and void, while I was sleeping? What do you mean by "acceptable", mister thought-policeman?

      If burning American flag, calling for killing of the sitting President, or publicly defecating on a police car is acceptable, having a book with a hare-brained bimbo as one of the characters certainly is too.

      none of those things are acceptable either. 'legal' and 'acceptable' are not the same thing.

      this is very clearly unacceptable. it was legal, but it was fucking terrible, and should be called out as such.

      mattel has the right to produce terrible products, and everyone else has the right to mock and berate them for doing so. free speech runs both ways.

    2. Re:"Acceptable"? WTF? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The first amendment says that the government can't stop you from saying things they don't like. Free speech in general says that someone in a position of power can't stop you from saying things that they don't like. No matter how much free speech you have, the rest of society is still free to think you're an idiot when you open your mouth...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:"Acceptable"? WTF? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "acceptable", mister thought-policeman?

      To me it means that you don't dislike the thing. You are either neutral towards it or you like it. Let's check the dictionary to see how that comports with the official definition. Let's see, the first definition is "able to be agreed on; suitable". Hmm, this book isn't something people are "agreeing" to. Let's look at the examples:

      adequate, satisfactory, pleasing, welcome

      Okay, yeah, that's what it means to me: pleasing, welcome. Is this book pleasing and welcome? Not to me, that's why it isn't acceptable.

      The second definition is weaker, relating "acceptable" to "tolerable". Tolerance is something you give to a thing that specifically when you DON'T like it. By that secondary definition, I find this book acceptable, because I tolerate it. I do not wish to imprison the author of the book nor deny the author civil rights. That's not normally how I use the word "acceptable" though.

      What does "acceptable" mean to you? Does it mean the primary #1 definition, or more like the secondary #2 definition?

    4. Re:"Acceptable"? WTF? by mi · · Score: 1

      What does "acceptable" mean to you?

      To me? No, not to me — I was referring to the meaning OP attached to the word. When Illiberals declare something "unacceptable", their next move is to try to make it illegal...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    5. Re:"Acceptable"? WTF? by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      How could anyone, in 2014, have thought this was acceptable?

      "Acceptable"? Was the First Amendment declared null and void, while I was sleeping? What do you mean by "acceptable", mister thought-policeman?

      If burning American flag, calling for killing of the sitting President, or publicly defecating on a police car is acceptable, having a book with a hare-brained bimbo as one of the characters certainly is too.

      Exactly. You, and Barb, and Mattel are free to say unacceptable things all day long. You are free to try to place those utterings on any media you can find, but you are most certainly not guaranteed the right to use someone else's media for that purpose. You are also not protected from having your utterings labeled as "unacceptable", racist, misogynist, "of Satan", or any other term. Get over it.

    6. Re:"Acceptable"? WTF? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      Nope...nope, I don't see anything in there about private corporations being free from the wrath of citizens over discriminatory actions or products.

      You can say anything you want (which they did, with that book).
      And others can say anything they want in response (which people did, with their outrage).
      And in response to that outrage, they pulled the product.

      Nothing about that chain of events in any way raises any First Amendment issues.

      And how many times must your ignorance be called out in a single day?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  29. I Tried To Skeptic The Review by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I saw this yesterday and tried, so hard, to be the skeptic poking holes in a feminist's overreaction -- and failed. This thing is just awful. The best I could come up with was, "Well, there are valuable people on software development teams who do design. I value them immensely, because I can't do it."

    Well, sure, and maybe they should also put out a book titled, "I can be a game designer." But that's not the title, and (I can tell you from personal experience) women make fine software engineers. Some great, some awful, most somewhere in between -- just like guys. If they want to make a book with a title about Barbie being a software engineer, they should just tell that story.

  30. Torso Barbie by coolmoose25 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In my house, computer engineer Barbie would have ended up just like all the other Barbies in the house... naked, legless, armless, and often headless in the bathtub. We affectionately called them all "Torso Barbie"

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
    1. Re:Torso Barbie by magarity · · Score: 1

      At that point, rename them "Bobby"

    2. Re:Torso Barbie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that he isn't talking about dolls.

    3. Re:Torso Barbie by Snufu · · Score: 1

      naked, legless, armless, and often headless in the bathtub. We affectionately called them all "Torso Barbie"

      Maybe the game she was designing was "Barbie. The Dark Descent."

  31. What a bunch of bullshit by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    I skimmed the blog post but nothing jumped out as being offensive. Girl and boy took turns having difficulties. BFD.

    1. Re:What a bunch of bullshit by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      I skimmed your post but nothing jumped out as being informed. Clueless commentator having difficulties reading. BFD.

  32. !Easy Hard by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Math, at the age where Barbie hits her prime demographic, is no harder than reading, history, singing, or being physically fit. There are exceptions where certain things really are hard to some people with disabilities (both mental and physical), but for the vast majority its not hard - it just takes practice and study/work.

    Saying "Math is hard" elevates it and offers an excuse as to why you aren't doing well at it. If you don't read, you'll never be a good reader. If you never do physical activity, you'll never be in good cardiovascular shape. If you don't study history, you shouldn't expect to be able to recall historical facts and make logical connections between events. Playing piano will not work out well for you if you never practice. In that sense, all those things are "hard" - but only "hard" as compared to, say, watching a movie or drinking a slurpee.

    Misogyny is presenting a girl as an incompetent fool, incapable of doing the very things which the presentation aims to promote. Apparently, writing even the most basic story book an staying true to the subject is hard as well.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  33. Ah The Irony by tgeek · · Score: 1

    Be honest now - how many of the people commenting here are actually people who would've been boob-tranced into helping poor little Barbie finish her project? (I'm raising my hand!)

    1. Re:Ah The Irony by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with the fact that the book is sexist at worst and pretty ignorant at best?

      I mean I guess you like boobs but uh

    2. Re:Ah The Irony by tgeek · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, I do like boobs . . . a LOT. But the point I'm making (or failing to make) is how many people here who are decrying the book are actually real life nerds helping perpetuate the stereotypes (either the Barbie-type-who-needs-help or the nerds slipping and sliding in their own drool to help out the hot chick in the department)

    3. Re:Ah The Irony by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      A good-looking fantasy woman with big boobs? Might as well be the Slashdot mascot.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Ah The Irony by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      The fact that you think nerds "slip and slide in their own drool to help the hot chick" is really strange, as if you aren't allowed to have moral outrage at the presentation of women in the tech industry while at the same time "liking boobs... a LOT".

  34. Re:"Engineer" by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Depends on where you're from. Game designers aren't, generally "computer engineers"

    When I was in school, there were different tracks for Computer Science (programming, IT management) and for Computer Engineering (a sub-discipline for Electrical engineering), involving the design of computer hardware at the chip and sub-chip level. Computer engineers were generally at/near the top of the intellectual heap, joining the aerospace engineers looking down at all the other engineering disciplines.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  35. Re:Math is hard by Pablew+Nopl · · Score: 1

    Almost all children should be able to master those

    Mastering them would include having a full, deep understanding of why it all works. That means no nonsense like mindlessly memorizing formulas or proof, and it means more than just being able to use them to solve problems.

    I'm not entirely sure almost all children are capable of that.

  36. Fix a thumbdrive virus by doing WHAT??? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    The suggestion in the book that it would be appropriate to plug a known-virus-infected USB thumbdrive into another computer in order to fix it seems totally crazy to me. Even if the second computer does have better security there's no guarantee the virus isn't a new one that hasn't made it into virus checker recognition databases yet...

    1. Re:Fix a thumbdrive virus by doing WHAT??? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      The suggestion in the book that it would be appropriate to plug a known-virus-infected USB thumbdrive into another computer in order to fix it seems totally crazy to me. Even if the second computer does have better security there's no guarantee the virus isn't a new one that hasn't made it into virus checker recognition databases yet...

      Yeah, but you forgot an important detail... The suggestion was not just to plug it in to another computer, but to plug it into another computer that isn't yours. In case it does becomes infected, you just sneak away, and pretend that nothing happened...

      But only if you're a boy. If you're a girl, you just keep sitting next to it and weep...

  37. what more proof do you need? by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

    the software industry is the way it is because of shit like this. companies and media is at the source of the problem.

    this is one industry that you'd think would be an equal playing field (ie. physical strength nor testosterone needed) and we have to drive them out with these stereotypes. sad really.

  38. Barbie I can be a Computer Engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am a retired Computer Engineer, I was in the the field starting in May of 1980, Graduated from Clark College in 1981 with a Computer Science Degree, worked in the field for over 33 years. I was the girl that was good in Math, Science, English, sometimes being the top student in the class and the only female. Yes the filed was dominated by men back in the 1980's and early 1990's, but female are catching up, and will maybe someday be ahead of the males in the field. If you take any 5th grade class the males and females preform equally well in areas of Math and Science, it society that changes females to pursue other areas of expertise. I attended a Women in Science Seminar in 1979 at Clarke College, "why be the Nurse, be the Doctor", 'Why be the Dental Assistant be the Dentist", 'Why be the Vet assistant, be the Veterinarian", career after career. The time I started in the field, I was again in job like in school the only female, I performed my job and very well may I add, my husband was transferred and I applied for a position at a Bank in Des Moines, IA, and before they would interview me they gave me 2 tests, one for details, more like a postal test, and a Math Test. They scored both tests and told me they were not surprised by the results of the detail test but the Math test results, 100% surprised them, please I majored in Computer Science and Math, I started College to be a Math teacher. I didn’t want to work there I felt I would contently be tested on my abilities. My first job, the boss was male, dark hair, dark eyes, so was my co-worker, they hired another male, same dark hair, dark eyes, dark complexion, I was blonde, dark eyes and female. Our boss had a mustache, not until the new male employee started did the original coworker grow a mustache as did the new male coworker. I for year would hear, women this women that, and the fashion was three piece pants suits for women, man tailored, I would were those pant suits, and a tie, or a scarf pulled into a tie shape. Well the mustache did it, I tried to grow one, without success, so I bought one, and in order to get to the coffee pot, the boss had to pass my desk, I had my head down working on a program, he comment” I see you are wearing a tie", I looked up and had the mustache on my face, he said, "I think we need to talk", we did and I was told I didn’t had to dress like an male, dye my hair, and throw the mustache away. I told him time and time again the computer does not know if the Computer Engineer is a male or female. Barbie is such an influence on little girls, some good some, bad, I believe she is more for girls that want to be models, not average beauty and shaped females, I was a size "0", Blonde, pretty and bright, good at Math and Science. I would love to see a more natural shaped doll one that promotes talent and abilities not impossible body shape, hair, and beauty. I have 2 daughters, 3 step daughter, daughter-in-laws, 7 granddaughters, 7 step granddaughters, and a great granddaughter, my grandmother graduated at the age of 17 of Alleghany College, where she then taught, Math, English, French and German. Women can have a career in anything they choose to be and should be encouraged to do so, from the time they are little all through their lives. The same should be for men, careers should not be gender based.

  39. So she's a boss! Empowered! by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Plus she's creating JOBS!

  40. Re:bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I want to take every single Mother who bought her daughter a Barbie and have a few rounds at her face with a mallet. Not a cartoon one. A very real one that will smash her face in and leave her bloody.

    I like how you gloss over the role of men in the raising of their own children. Of course it's only women buying this stuff, we should beat them until they're bloody for raising our daughters so poorly. And then teach those daughters not to ever misstep, or they'll get beaten bloody too.

    Misogyny? Sexism? Naaaaahhhhh.... not you.

  41. Unfair gender stereotypes by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I'm offended that boys are being stereotyped as too stupid to realize that Barbie is just using them! Wait, I bet I was supposed to be offended that Barbie using her natural talents and as a result achieving her objectives, was using the wrong talent. Cause she'd be smarter to do it all 100% by herself, so the book portrays her as stupid, right?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  42. Susan Marenco by FranklinWebber · · Score: 1

    She has her own web site:

    Susan Marenco

    (presumably built by a boy after she contributed some design ideas).
    Note that on the linked page she lists "Barbie ICB A Computer Engineer" _first_,
    which suggests she still hasn't seen the memo about how bad it is.

  43. Re: OMG! by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Waay back in the day when my wife was a grad student at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution by an odd fluke the sysadmins and programmers of the Vax/VMS systems they used for scientific data processing were women. Possibly their inability to grow beards disqualified them from Unix jobs. Anyhow, the nickname for them was "data dollies".

    Of course there was a long, long history of women in scientific computing. The mom of one of my high school friends graduated from Wellsley during WW2 and worked programming the Harvard Mark 1 -- which meant (although I didn't realize it at the time) she must have worked with Grace Hopper. And of course there were the female code breakers of Bletchley Park. There were a lot of opportunities for smart women to do innovative things in WW2 while many of their equally brainy male counterparts were being fed into the war effort like scraps into a meatgrinder.

    Anyhow, I don't think "data dolly" was meant to be as patronizing it sounds to us today. It was a cultural anachronism, like the drinking and smoking on the TV show Mad Men, which appears to us gauche but strangely fascinating. The common assumption back then was that even an intelligent, highly trained woman would quit her job when she got married to raise some man's children. My generation was the first to view automatically assuming that as patronizing. This new attitude was in its day called "radical feminism" -- which was a not too subtle way of associating us with Communists. But of course insensitivity is a two way street. A lot of older women felt insulted by the implication that they'd thrown their lives away.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  44. Huh? by Enry · · Score: 1

    "Barbie: I Can Be a Computer Engineer"

    Well that's not too bad...I mean I want to get my daughter interested in this stuff too and...

    instead of writing the code, she enlists two boys to write the code as she just does the design.

    Huh, well, design is an important part of computer engineering, and...

    She then proceeds to infect her computer and her sister's computer with a virus and must enlist the boys to fix that for her as well.

    Ah, well..

    In the end she takes all the credit, and proclaims "I guess I can be a computer engineer!"

    sigh

  45. Re:"Engineer" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    As a computer engineer, I can assure you that all branches of engineering look down on all other branches.

    Until a liberal arts major says something, then we all come together to tell him/her to just get us our fries and shut-up.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  46. Re:Math is hard by xevioso · · Score: 1

    No, math was hard. To this day I remember swearing up and down to my mother, despite her showing me on a calculator that 50 + 50 = 100, that it actually was 110. I also had great difficulty with subtraction.

  47. Re:Math is hard by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    Advanced maths is hard

    You know, Barbie said the same thing!

  48. Perception dominated the ... by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    Perception dominated the knee jerk reaction.

    In my experience modern computers and operating systems
    are beyond any one person knowing all the answers.

    I recall working with an astoundingly clever and smart network type
    that was tasked with tuning the lowest nasty bits of the network
    stack. However he had no experience in setting a machine up
    and installing a base system and adding initial users so he could
    test what he was doing.

    Same is true for a lady hardware designer. A true wizard at termination
    of very high speed transmission lines and world class in coding VHDL
    to eliminate random TTL logic on a board... Again the random decisions
    made for setting up a user could not be deduced from raw logic....

    The toy company should have had an ethnic and gender mixed help desk.
    But that does not give the foolish critics a free ride.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  49. Malibu Stacy has a new hat by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    I almost wish that Amazon didn't pull the thing, just to give a poke at the damn complainers. It could only help sales. The thing is a pretty good reflection of the kind of society behind it. Oh, wait.. Now I get it. It had to be pulled because it reveals too much.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  50. From a Disney writer? by calzplace · · Score: 1

    Does anyone find it a bit shady that the author of this hater blog post is a writer from Disney? The same company that brought us some wonderfully in-depth characters like Sofia the First and Hannah Montana!

    All of this just sounds like a well constructed branding war, and the feminazis just fell right into the role of pawn.

  51. Most importantly: rewrite the book how you want by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    Someone made a web thing so you can erase the old text and put in your own. I did one. I think it significantly improves on the original page.

    https://computer-engineer-barb...

  52. The author is this character. by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

    So, I looked up the author of this particular book, and it appears she lives in San Francisco, and used to work for Microsoft doing exactly the type of work (software product design) that Barbie was doing in the book. I suspect the author wrote a book called "Barbie: I can be a Software Designer" but that the editor, being clueless about job titles in the software industry, decided to change the name to something more marketable. After all, authors aren't the ones who name their books, the marketing team/editors do.

    --


    The Generation
    I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
  53. Re:"Engineer" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    There are no liberal arts majors with ';similar achievement'. Stopped reading there.

    I love how liberal arts majors want to claim scientists. Sorry, no. Hint: if you believe that all things are socially constructed you are not a scientist.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  54. Apology by geantvert · · Score: 1

    There is this wondeful sentence in the "Barbie" apology at the end of Pamela Ribon's Blog:

    > We believe girls should be empowered to understand that anything is possible and believe they live in a world without limits.

    That sentence leaves me almost speechless. Welcome to faryland!

  55. Re:Wow by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    When are they going to pull the books from Amazon that have any subjects where a man is a pedophile, or a rapist?

    Of course not. Those are approved stereotypes.

  56. Re:Math is hard by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Sufficiently advanced maths is hard for anybody. It's a great leveller: Everybody eventually bumps into a maths problem that they find hard.

  57. Re: OMG! by hey! · · Score: 1

    And the generations since then have been suffering from this idea that raising the young of the species is less important than filing TPS reports.

    You know men can raise children too. And some of us chose to put our careers on hold to spend more time with our kids. I did. When my oldest got to high school I decided to put my career on hiatus to spend the remaining years I could with them. Before that I workng 50-60 hour weeks and spending about 1/3 of my time traveling, and though my flexible schedule allowed me to stay involved with my kids when they were younger, my window of opportunity to spend a *lot* of time with them was closing. Quantity time *is* quality time. It communicates your priorities like nothing else.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  58. Gizmondo? by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean Gawker Media? Why are we giving these scum any attention whatsoever?

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  59. Re:Slash Jezebel by sinij · · Score: 1

    In a certain sense, a person is welcome to devote their life to stamp collecting

    Or devote some of their life to reading technical news on a technical news site. Glad we agree.

  60. Barbie was actually both real and responsible by izzo+nizzo · · Score: 1

    I read the book via the Gizmodo blog post. I understood the critiques that they leveled at each page. At the same time I felt that a lot of the plot twists were open to interpretation. The most basic example is that her collaborators were boys. Is she supposed to only work with women? Of course not.

    The virus and its aftermath are another example where they felt it was showing how inept she was but I felt otherwise. People get viruses. She did a good job at figuring out how it was spreading and acting quickly to repair all of the hard drives that had been exposed. In real life, most of the time, when you have something like that to resolve, are you going to ask a man for help? Sure, most of the time you are. This is a good lesson to teach Barbie's readers. Do it right away. Don't be "ashamed about who got the virus". This shame is only on the part of Gizmodo. Barbie didn't overreact.

    The last point I'll touch on is when Barbie began her project as a designer but then ended up claiming "I guess I am an engineer". This could be painful for professionals, both men and women, to digest. However, for many young women, computer engineering is reasonably intimidating - for some reason they often think of it as something that is hard for them. Perhaps awkward sexual attitudes from male programmers are part of the struggle. Perhaps everyone is a little awkward. But for Barbie's readers, they get a little shot in the arm of "I can do this". It doesn't matter if she had to write a lot of code on the preceding page of the book. What matters is that she is encouraging people to think that they can do that if they choose to!

    I'm not saying the book couldn't have been better. But I felt that the attention to details in the plot was good. Always having her thumb drive, for example - that's a great habit! Designing something before you start coding - sure! The programming team could have been half men and half women, yes. Of course. Barbie could have saved the day by doing research instead of asking for help (although that's not really good advice when you get a virus). There may also be things that I missed that will end up amounting to poor role modeling for young women. But on the whole I think there's some good stuff in here and I hope that it doesn't all get lost in the backlash.

  61. Re:OMG! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I mean a double D.

    A Developer, Developer?

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  62. Barbie's still saying.... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    "Math class is tough!"

    I love Barbie.

  63. Good. This book is shite. by fluffynuts · · Score: 1

    It was enough to read a few pages from this book and realise what a pile of crud it is. And how it blatantly discourages girls from being all they can be and actually pursuing careers in comp sci, or indeed, just plain thinking for themselves.

    Then I had to read the first few responses which were all like "this is how it is". No! This is how it's been in the past, and that's the LAST FUCKING THING WE WANT TO TEACH GIRLS!.

    Fact: girls can code just as well as boys, given the same platforms and understandings. Fact: gender doesn't determine your ability to solve problems and translate those solutions into an intermediatary language which a machine can act upon. Fact: a lot of geek guys don't like these facts because then they have to realise that they aren't inherintly better than all the girls out there.

    Girls are taught to be second-class citizens and that needs to stop. If a girl wants to pursue a career in X, then that's great. If she wants to be a stay-at-home mother, that's also great (and a super-noble calling which, as a guy, I would be very hard-pressed to compete with, especially considering existing gender-based pressures). The point is that, after actually reading some of this book, I'm GLAD that it's been pulled and saddened that the rest of the geek community isn't united in solidarity against this kind of trash.

    I'm not an super-sensitive person (indeed, I believe a lot of people need to suck it the fuck up), but this book, really, is derogatory. Go read some of it. Barbie is made out to be an airhead who couldn't possibly succeed in life without some male assistance. I call complete bollocks.

  64. "v" vs. "w" in Russian by mi · · Score: 1

    You even fail at Russian

    That may be, because I'm actually from Ukraine... But, more likely than not I did not "fail at Russian" — you are just being overly pedantic.

    Russian spelling is not phonetic, there are often significant differences between what is said and what is written.

    There are some exceptions, yes, but there far fewer of them, than in English. That was my point.

    Writing that the distinction between "w" and "v" makes no sense is also wrong. The right answer is that Russian simply lacks the [w] phoneme (labio-velar approximant)

    "Vinnie" (as in "Cousin") and "Winnie" (the Pooh) sound exactly the same to all native Russian and Ukrainian speakers (and readers) and both names are transcribed exactly the same.

    uses either "v" or "u" in transcriptions of foreign texts

    You'd have had a point, if we were talking about names like "Watson" or "Welles" — which are, indeed, written differently in different editions of "Sherlock Holmes" and "War of the Worlds" respectively. But "Vinnie" vs. "Winnie" — no. These two would always be written with (a Cyrillic equivalent of) "v".

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:"v" vs. "w" in Russian by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Except that mi writes bullshit, Russians are perfectly able to hear the difference between [v] and [w]. They don't have the [w] phoneme, that is all.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap