Slashdot Mirror


Vast Nazi Facility Uncovered In Austria; Purported A-Bomb Development Site

schwit1 (797399) writes "Suspiciously high radiation levels around the Austrian town of St. Georgen an der Gusen had long fueled theories that there was a buried bunker nearby where Nazis had tested nuclear weapons during WWII. Those suspicions came one step closer to being confirmed last week after the opening of a 75-acre underground complex was dug out from below the earth and granite used to seal off the entrance, the Times of Israel reports. The excavation team was led by Austrian filmmaker Andreas Sulzer, who says the site was "likely the biggest secret weapons production facility of the Third Reich" — a facility that probably relied on forced labor from the nearby Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp and may have even been the testing location for a nuclear bomb, the Daily Mirror reports. The weapons facility was believed to have been manned by SS General Hans Kammler and situated near the B8 Bergkristall factory, where the first working jet-powered fighter was created, International Business Times reports; Sulzer first got wind of the site after seeing references to it in an Austrian physicist's diary. The Washington Post cautions that while "the full scope of what occurred inside those reported chambers in the Austrian town of St. Georgen remains unclear and Sulzer’s conclusions are speculative, some analysts are already trumpeting the findings. ... The reported findings, if corroborated by further inquiry, could add fresh fodder to an ongoing debate over the Third Reich’s ultimately failed attempt to secure an atomic weapon."

292 comments

  1. Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Film-maker digs through granite, measures radiation, concludes there have been nuclear weapons. Right. It's not like granite is one of the most radioactive materials in the world.

    1. Re:Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not like there would be a drastic difference in radiation levels between ordinary granite, and a nuclear test site. They should be indistinguishable.

    2. Re:Non-scientist at work by crabel · · Score: 0

      Na, no measurements. The filmmaker heard some rumours that the Germans experimented with nuclear weapons too. And he dug a hole. End of story.

    3. Re:Non-scientist at work by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Film-maker digs through granite, measures radiation, concludes there have been nuclear weapons. Right.

      A 75 acre underground site would have involved thousands of workers. After the war, they would have had no reason to keep it secret. Yet we are supposed to believe that no one talked for 70 years?

    4. Re:Non-scientist at work by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a funny thing about secret facilities. Often, their locations are kept secret from even the people working in them. Of course those building it would have a clue but slave labor was often killed so a lot of those builders could have been dead before the end of the war.

      Now we do know that some people did talk about it. They just couldn't point to the location which makes sense if it was secret. So a handful of people at the end of the war probably knew the location and it is possible that they were killed during the end of the war or put on civilian clothing to pretend to be a foot soldier and not imprisoned or executed. Of course those people are not going to officially talk because we still go after Nazis for qar crimes. What we end up with is rumors like what was there for years.

      I can see it happening. But only because most the people involced died and people though it was nornal to happen.

    5. Re:Non-scientist at work by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Of course those people are not going to officially talk because we still go after Nazis for qar crimes.

      Yes, this is a problem. If we want to learn what happened, then we need to hand out immunity against further prosecutions for people who talk.

    6. Re:Non-scientist at work by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      If we want to learn what happened, then we need to hand out immunity against further prosecutions for people who talk.

      Lots and lots and lots of people were given immunity for talking. Werner von Braun was an early member of the Nazi party, a member of the SS, and was involved in the deaths of thousands of slave laborers and civilians. He was not only given immunity for his cooperation, but in 1975 was awarded a medal by the US government.

    7. Re:Non-scientist at work by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While I lived at RAF Gatow, Berlin (dad was in the RAF) during the 1980s, we used to play a heck of a lot in the extensive woods on base - we even played in and around the fairly large bunker on the edge of the airfield. Until, that is, someone discovered a second entrance to the bunker, and a second level - full of aircraft engines, parts, and about 200 tonnes of WW2 era high explosive in the form of rockets, bombs and other stuff. There were two chambers each about the size of a basket ball court.

      In the four years we were there, they discovered previously unknown cellars in three major buildings on base (including the Havel School), and a two mile long tunnel linking the airfield with the Havel river.

      All of this on an RAF airbase which covered only a few square miles, and had been active in allied hands since the end of WW2.

      There is plenty yet to be discovered in ex-Nazi occupied land, mark my words.

    8. Re:Non-scientist at work by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, your convoluted conspiracy theory involving thousands of people may be correct. Or some film maker may be doing some self-promotion. Gee, I wonder what William of Ockham would think?

      More evidence for theory #2: There has been no third party confirmation. There is no photo of the site. The photo accompanying the article is of a completely different underground bunker, in Bavaria.

    9. Re:Non-scientist at work by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Quite right. And in the end no one had any reason to talk. The facility had no real worth to anyone. No one could of traded its location for leniency, and one secret bunker out of hundreds would of been easily forgotten and overlooked even by the people who did know its location.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    10. Re:Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Film-maker digs through granite, measures radiation, concludes there have been nuclear weapons. Right.

      A 75 acre underground site would have involved thousands of workers. After the war, they would have had no reason to keep it secret. Yet we are supposed to believe that no one talked for 70 years?

      An awful lot of them probably died in the process... and 'dead men tell no tales'.

    11. Re:Non-scientist at work by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      The point was not whether the secret bunker was real or used for weapons research or not, it is that the common logic about how hard it would be to keep a secret on a scale so large would be limited by factors not present in modern days.

      Of course it might be most likely self promotion- even if it turns out to be a real nuclear test facility. But the idea that many people would know about and talk about it given enough time is severely limited to dead people and people wishing to avoid prison terms with a few exceptions who likely did talk about it which is why there are rumors to that effect. I'm also sure there is something wrong with that run on sentence but cannot put my finger on it.. sorry for the eyes bleeding when trying to read it.

    12. Re: Non-scientist at work by BellyJelly · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True. I have to say as a Brit visiting Huntsville in Alabama, it was a shock to find that they named the local exhibition centre after the designer of the V rockets that hit London during WW2.

    13. Re:Non-scientist at work by Lorens · · Score: 2

      After actually RTFA (at the Mirror), part of the facility was discovered and cannibalized by the Russians, but they missed a bit (a bit: 75 acres is 300 000 sqm, 3.27 million sqft...)

    14. Re:Non-scientist at work by Lorens · · Score: 2

      An awful lot of them probably died in the process... and 'dead men tell no tales'.

      TFA says 320000 imates from the local concentration camp, and the Russians did discover the plant... just not all of it.

    15. Re: Non-scientist at work by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's complicated. von Braun was the foremost rocket scientist of his time, and possibly of all time. Had there not been a war he probably would have continued to push rocket technology. Assuming he was just as nationalistic for his country as you are for yours, would you find it wrong to join professional associations that would allow you to pursue your career interests or to advance your military through your professional capabilities in support of your country against its foes? Remember, the Nazis didn't start killing Jews and other civilians en-masse right away, and my guess is that by the time Jewish slave labor was being applied to projects this technical he really didn't have a choice but to continue if he wanted to remain alive.

      It's very easy, in hind-sight, to judge people for decisions or actions they took when they didn't know what the outcome of that decision, or of combined decisions and outcomes several combinations later, would be. Did von Braun get off easy? Yes. Could he have been prosecuted for his participation in an entity that engaged in war crimes? Probably. Would he have had a defense much better than, "just following orders," or, "I would have been killed if I didn't continue," or such? Probably not. Had the Soviet Union not gotten their hands on their own slate of Nazi rocket scientists he probably would have been prosecuted rather than embraced, but once the decision was made to embrace him, that was that. He did go on to make the most historic and arguably significant human achievement possible.

      von Braun's legacy will always be complicated. His name will probably only be applied to celebrate things that are related to his field, as his name is forever tarnished by his Nazi past and unsuitable for celebration as any kind of hero outside of his field.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    16. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boo fucking hoo. You probably flew over in a jet plane using jet engines also used in WWII. They also used radar, cars, and electricity in WWII.

      Get over it.

    17. Re:Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "could of" "would of". Jesus, where the fuck do you people go to school that you learn this crap?

    18. Re:Non-scientist at work by budgenator · · Score: 4, Informative

      It took reading all of the articles, but finally it became clear they were talking about a facility of unknown size located under a perimeter of 75 acres of land rather than a facility of 75 acres under the ground.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    19. Re:Non-scientist at work by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      From what I gather, it's still somewhat common for people to find relics of the prohibition era (e.g. remains of speakeasies and distilleries) buried underground somewhere even today.

    20. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      True. I have to say as a Brit visiting Huntsville in Alabama, it was a shock to find that they named the local exhibition centre after the designer of the V rockets that hit London during WW2.

      And I was not shocked when I visited the United Kingdom and found that they had built a memorial to Lord Kitchener, a man that was responsible for the murder of tens of thousands of South African civilians through neglect born of incompetence, arrogance and mindless prejudice. It seems visiting South African Boers, it seems, regularly go there with the intention of urinating on the memorial. That may shock the sentiments of the average patriotic Briton but the Boers hated both Kitchener and his country with such passion that many of them fought with the Germans during WWI although these days most of them reserve their hatred for Kitchener in particular.

    21. Re:Non-scientist at work by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, we know the Nazi regime asembled ME 262s in an elaborate network of underground tunnels to avoid Allied bombers who late in the war were operating over Germany with near impunity. The tunnels were excavated and ME 262s assembled with Jewish slave labor under horrific conditions.

      If you were involved with such a thing you'd have plenty of reason to keep it secret.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    22. Re:Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They found a granite slab, retreating nazis, mostly slave labor from the camps; that might be a tomb.

    23. Re: Non-scientist at work by thrich81 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let me add to your excellent post -- having grown up in Huntsville during the 60's and the peak of von Braun's American fame (not infamy, yet), he serves as an almost perfect corner case for techies to consider as to how they would fit into their larger society to advance their technical dreams. von Braun did not ask to be born into what would become Nazi Germany and when he started working for the army there it was before the Nazi atrocities started. He wasn't particularly interested in weapons and by all accounts his goal was always space flight. The German army resources allowed him to pursue the development of the rockets he had been working on for years before, at that time Germany was not yet the horror it would become. By the time the really bad stuff started happening there -- the deadly slave labor, which his project was involved in, he was stuck -- continue the work or head to prison or execution, most likely the latter by that time in the war; he was arrested in 1944 and released only due to the intervention at the highest levels (Albert Speer, Minister of War Production). Those slave laborers (which he claims to not know the extent of) were doomed from the start; there is nothing he could have done for them. So, just what was he supposed to do? -- given that there was nothing he could have done to improve the lot of the populations under Nazi control? The fact that he was working on weapons aimed at the civil population of England could be problematic but by then the English and American bombers were incinerating German cities. He didn't have the option of just quitting and going away to work on something else. Given the same circumstances what would any of us techies had done? I don't know and I'm glad I will never have to find out. There is an excellent recent bio (2007) of von Braun by Michael Neufeld which tries to address the moral ambiguities of von Braun's life -- worth a read.

    24. Re: Non-scientist at work by thrich81 · · Score: 2

      So, as a Brit, have you ever visited Dresden? "In four raids between 13 and 15 February 1945, 722 heavy bombers of the British Royal Air Force (RAF) and 527 of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) dropped more than 3,900 tons of high-explosive bombs and incendiary devices on the city. The bombing and the resulting firestorm destroyed over 1,600 acres (6.5 km2) of the city centre. An estimated 22,700 to 25,000 people were killed." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

    25. Re: Non-scientist at work by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or you could look at it from a different angle: They named the local exhibition center after the designer of rockets that were so expensive that they saved many British lives by virtue of Germans not having the same worth of fighters and bombers and bombs.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    26. Re: Non-scientist at work by russotto · · Score: 1

      You Brits should appreciate that sort of thing; right outside Parliament not far from the Sovereign's Entrance you have a statue of a man who overthrew your government and beheaded your sovereign.

    27. Re:Non-scientist at work by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      If you had read the full article you would know that excavation at the site has been temporarily halted by Austrian authorities - I imagine due to concerns with the radiation or it being a historical site.

      Also from the article:
      "The existence of the facility was mentioned in the diaries of an Austrian physicist who worked for the Nazis, and Sulzer used ground-penetrating radar technology to pinpoint its location...
      'Declassified intelligence documents as well as testimony from witnesses helped excavators identify the concealed entrance,' The Times said."

      It seems that there were "longstanding claims that Nazi scientists experimented with nuclear weapons in the area" and that this discovery didn't rise out of nowhere. Hell, there were much weirder happenings than secret bunkers going on in WW2. I'm sure the guy wants to promote his film too, but that doesn't cancel out his legitimate discovery. This is like you sitting on a BBS in the 80s saying "Robert Ballard couldn't really have discovered the Titanic... he has cameras! He needs funds! The ship's been gone for 70 years!"

    28. Re:Non-scientist at work by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      So, no love for 'could have,' then?

      If you're going to be a grammar Nazi...

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    29. Re:Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands of workers from the nearby concentration camps... few of whom were given much information or even survived.

    30. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a little amusing that Ballard's discovery of the Titanic was compleyely accidental. Declassified papers recently revealed he was looking for a sunken submarine on behalf of US intelligence agencies, and seeking the resting place of the Titanic was just a plausible cover story (given their search area). They were apparently exceedingly surprised when, in their search for the submarine, they really did stumble across the Titanic. Truth is sometimes stranger than fiction.

    31. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and as a brit, these days I'd be quite pleased to see the sovereign behead one particular man in parliament and overthrow the government.

    32. Re: Non-scientist at work by tennesseetallcharlie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are openings accessing a Nazi test facility in Oberammergau adjacent to the old kasern. They were off limits in 1970 when I entered them. I made the first exploration on foot. For the second I took a bicycle. The facility is a series of tunnels and chambrrs paved with macadam and lit by overhead lights. Some of the smaller rooms were still closed off with locked gates in 1970. The tunnels went all the way to a highway tunnel just South of Murnau on the road to Garmisch-Partenkirsch, 19 kilometers distant. The exits from these tunnels and old loading docks are now mostly sealed,but still visible in the road tunnel. At the time I explored them, they were alleged to be booby trapped. However, I am former EOD and ordnance and saw no trace of booby traps or any other obstacles or hazards. There is also an old explosives factory hidden under a former chocolate factory in Westphalia. So, yes, there are many old Nazi bunkers still to be fully explored.

    33. Re:Non-scientist at work by davester666 · · Score: 1

      He got the medal for donating to the Republican party...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    34. Re:Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 75 acre underground site would have involved thousands of workers. After the war, they would have had no reason to keep it secret. Yet we are supposed to believe that no one talked for 70 years?

      Providing, a) that they knew what they were doing and b) that they were not killed ASAP.

    35. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boers are a gigantic asshole of a people, and fully deserve any and all mistreatment they have or had received. Apartheid lost them every drop of sympathy they could have claimed.

    36. Re:Non-scientist at work by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I can't seem to find it now, but a few years ago there was a story here on Slashdot about a warehouse that had been found underneath either the Brooklyn Bridge or the Golden Gate Bridge (or another well known American bridge) which had been closed in the 1940s and left completely untouched, with boxes of stuff still in there. Quite a time capsule apparently.

    37. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anubis350 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll bite. Ballard's discovery wasn't "accidental". He'd been pushing a new way of searching for wrecks, which he wanted to use to find the Titanic. The Navy thought his work was perfect for looking for a lost sub. They funded him for a set number of days, using his well known desire to search for the Titanic as a cover, with the deal that he could look for the Titanic with his remaining time after (if) he found the sub - first he found the latter, then the former The only irony is that the Navy was initially concerned that the publicity in actually finding the Titanic would make people wonder why the Navy had bothered funding a search for a passenger liner, but the huge amount of acclaim meant that no one really ever dug deeper into the mission till more recent times.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    38. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anubis350 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yup, a fully stocked, sealed bomb shelter in the Brooklyn Bridge, NYTimes link here

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    39. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same goes for Bomber Harris - heralded as a war hero, he was responsible for countless civilian deaths as he carpet bombed vast swathes of heavily populated Germany. He did also manage to destroy a few bomb factories and such like, hence the hero status, but he's a long way from a clean-shaven, swashbuckling gent how somehow kills lots of faceless enemies whilst avoiding all the innocent civilians.

      Heros of any kind are a long way different to the ones you see in the movies.

    40. Re:Non-scientist at work by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If you had read the full article you would know that excavation at the site has been temporarily halted by Austrian authorities

      I see. So he found the site, yet, before he could reach into his pocket, pull out his cellphone, and snap a photo, he was dragged away by the authorities. The same thing happened to me when I tried to snap a photo of the Loch Ness Monster.

    41. Re: Non-scientist at work by Warbothong · · Score: 1

      A similar thing could be said of Konrad Zuse ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K... ), who's pioneering work on computers was funded by the Nazis. His opinion was that scientists must often choose between doing research with questionable motives, or not doing research.

    42. Re: Non-scientist at work by khallow · · Score: 1

      I have to say as a Brit visiting Huntsville in Alabama, it was a shock to find that they named the local exhibition centre after the designer of the V rockets that hit London during WW2.

      What gets me is why did they ever stop? I would have thought that urban renewal via explosive rocket would have been expensive enough that they'd have funded it forever.

    43. Re:Non-scientist at work by doccus · · Score: 1

      Well, dumping tons of heavy water in the lake (accidentally or sabotage) during the 40s could have been a clue too ;-)

    44. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the prisons didn't understand what they were digging? Maybe none of the site builders survived to tell? Hey, it was Nazi concentration camp after all where they were!

    45. Re:Non-scientist at work by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Nobody said anything about dragged away, that's your own strawman. It sounds like no one has actually entered the complex at this point. Any pictures of the site in its current state will look like a hole filled with rocks most likely. Even if those pictures have been released, the editor for this news article probably thought it would be more illustrative to show a bunker "like" the one being excavated. Not that the Times of Israel's editorial practices are relevant to the archaeological discovery in the first place... bravo on fitting a strawman and a red herring into two or three sentences.

    46. Re: Non-scientist at work by TWX · · Score: 1

      There's also an argument that chasing fantastic superweapons with high development costs and fairly low return on investment was bad economic deal for a country whose defacto borders were all battle fronts. Initial V-2 attacks were horribly inaccurate, and by the time a degree of accuracy was achieved the Germans were headed for defeat by boots on the ground and conventional bombing by aircraft. It makes one wonder if the vast sums of money spent developing the rockets would have been better applied to winter materiel development for their army or in the production of more armor units or the development of better automatic rifles, or even the construction of better fortifications or anti-aircraft weapons. Unfortunately for any nation's consideration, these kinds of things aren't sexy like something new, so they tend to be easy to ignore. Germany might have done better if they hadn't diverted so much money to things that were not terribly effective.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    47. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People were killed in a war? On the side that started it? How could this be allowed to happen?

    48. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazis did start killing people right away, since the late twenties: journos, unioneers, commies... by jan'33 they were killing a few people a day already. And the jew hatred was there from day 1 too. You may argue that joining the party was simply mandatory career wise but you can't deny the nazi evil. It was there for all to see from the beginning and many germans chose to fight it rather than joining it and paid with their lives, not their careers.

      BTW, a lot of people in the US and the UK saw nothing wrong at all with all of it until sept'39 so maybe we should not be too hard on von Braun...

    49. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neufeld's book is a smear piece, pure and simple. The far better and more even treatment is "Wernher von Braun, Crusader for Space", by Ernst
      Stuhlinger, and Frederick I. Ordway III.

      Von Brau was no more guilty of war crimes than the crew of the Enola Gay (and neither were they, if there is any doubt). I'd venture to say that countless people live today, and live better, because of what von Braun did for both the U.S. and humanity, and his real legacy will be the continued growth and ultimate preservation of the human race via space travel.

    50. Re: Non-scientist at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really the same conundrum everyone has who works for the government - or for any contracting company which works, at least in part, for the government...notably Google, Microsoft, and on down the line to nearly every major tech or construction company in the US. You start off working to protect "Land of the Free" and later on find out you help contribute to butchery in lands near and far and only then begin to suspect that you have been serving The Great Satan all along.

      Most of the evil in the world is done by proxy. Recreational coke users don't think they have blood on their hands, but they do.

    51. Re: Non-scientist at work by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      While around the same time, funding for Zuse's work was dismal and cut in the end while von Braun took on the opportunities available. In case of von Braun it was more a personal decision: either continue with the work he loved or quit and get sent to combat. Sure, he could have defected, but that would also have meant an end to his tests. Zuse tried to get more funding and material for his project, but the military leaders found no use for his computer. After the Z3 was destroyed in an allied bomb raid on Berlin he moved to various places and at the end of the war managed to salvage whatever computer parts he had left by making officials believe that the Z4 was part of a weapons system. Both were mainly interested in continuing their work. Zuse was a small light compared to the top ranked von Braun. I think von Braun would have had more opportunity to save prisoners from death than Zuse ever had. As to why von Braun did not do anything is something only he could have answered. For most Germans it was easier to just forget what happened after '45. My grandparents lived in Germany during that time and while my grandfather was quick to tell the story how he played dumb to not get sent to the front (he intentionally jammed his thumb in a grenade launcher during training and other things) my grandmother was telling us about the bomb raids and food shortage and how she had to take care of her three nephews because the parents died in a bomb raid. Did they ever mention deportations, burning synagogues, and Jewish businesses destroyed? No, not even when asked. And I didn't dare to ask them a lot about this topic. At that time many were complacent at first because living conditions improved for them, just to take a quick turn to making survival the only concern. Neither before the war nor during the war was politics and government actions something that most cared about or dared to speak out about as that meant immediate arrest and likely death. If the choice is between taking care of yourself and family or advocating for the rights of the oppressed many will opt for the self-serving way. Just look at today, how many speak out against the unconstitutional searches and arrests by the US intelligence agencies? The ones who did on a large scale were fired from their positions or in case of Snowden have to hide overseas. Instead the majority elected those back into power who passed most of the unconstitutional legislation. Looks as if it will take many more wrongful deaths and generations until we learn.

  2. Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they were truly the Master Race, they would have realized that banking is the way to go to control or destroy the World.

    Look it now. Merkel pretty much controls Europe - thanks to the Deutsche Bundesbank. And without a single shot fired. I think I'm gonna send my kids to Merkel Youth camp where they can grow up to be bankers, make billions for doing nothing other than rent seeking, fees, bonuses and commissions.

    STEM?! Pfft! That's just a fairy tale that's told to you peons to keep you in line.

    1. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by prefec2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First, Nazi is a noun not an acronym. Second, the Euro is controlled by the ECB where the Bundesbank has only one vote. It is led by an Italian. However, Merkel is a neoliberal politician fueled by a strategy based on demobilizing the opposition. Key is her phrase of "no alternatives". Her goal is similar to other neoliberals like Cameron to reduce state influnce as much as possible. If you feel conquered its by the world upper class.

    2. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by backslashdot · · Score: 2

      How do you control a financial system without the "M" in STEM?

    3. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      Her goal is similar to other neoliberals like Cameron to reduce state influnce[sic] as much as possible.

      Which probably explains why Merkel is moving at a breakneck pace to put a referendum on EU membership in front of German voters.
      Oh, wait: she isn't. Probably because she's kind of a statist tool, like the rest of the Eurocrats.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hire the naturals.

    5. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany has actually benefited enormously from the crisis in southern Europe. Merkel helped to engineer the collapse of Cyprus by forcing the haircut on Greek bonds. The Troika do the bidding of Germany. So who do you really think is running things in Europe? The economic crisis in southern Europe was WW3, and Germany won.

    6. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Look it now. Merkel pretty much controls Europe -

      Look at Angela Merkel now . . . she has Ph.D. in Physics, and a bad bowl-head haircut to boot! A German TV camera team caught her last year buying a jar of mustard in a supermarket in Berlin. The team was filming an advertisement, until one of the crew said. Hey, isn't that the Channcellor or something?"

      When was the last time you saw President Obama anywhere, without a half Marine Brigade protecting him . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by prefec2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I do not believe that she is only a puppet. She is doing her job too well. However, she is a friend of Friede Springer (a German news corporation) which has in its charter to be anti communist and to foster the bonds towards the US. Merkel has perfectly understood how to stay in power in a democracy when backed by media and other influential figures of the upper class/global elite. However, she is not a democrat of her own. She is also not interested in the idea of a united Europe. She is more interested in free trade, as this suits herself and her cast. She also only opposed Cameron when he was against open borders, as this would hinder free movement of the poor people and be anti-neoliberal.

      BTW: Cameron only promised a vote on EU membership, as straight conservatives in his party and UKIP required that from him. And in Germany votes on such topics are not expressed in the constitution, because when the constitution was written, allies and German politicians did not trust the population enough to give the people so much power.

    8. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, Nazi is a noun not an acronym.

      Actually, it's an acronym for NAtionale soZIalist, the political party.

      What, you didn't know the NAZIs were socialists?

      Yeah, about as socialist as the KKK....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you seriously blame Merkel for this? :>>>>>>>>

    10. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      it's not an acronym, it's a portmanteau like CalTech.

    11. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by prefec2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      While you are right about the origin of the name from "Nationalsozialisten" it is still a noun according to the German language standard (see http://www.duden.de/suchen/dud...). On a second note: They claimed to be socialists, but there was nothing social what they did. While they started many expensive building programs to bring people into jobs, this was a) already planned by previous governments and b) a "Keynes" like action to boost economy in an capitalistic way. They also cooperated with the heavy industry in Germany.

      A key feature of socialism (on paper) is that all humans are equal. As history has shown that does not work in a dictatorship. And it does not work with racism.

    12. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you really do not know the difference you need to keep your mouth shut and just listen to people who do for a long while. Even if you are stupid enough to try to equate the two (which is intelectual dishonesty at best), the differences would be real and huge.

    13. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As history has shown that does not work in a dictatorship.

      History has shown that Socialism does not work period. It does not matter the type of government.

    14. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      No, she is a neo-liberal. The state works for the bank to execute its austerity measures, but she does have to pacify the 'opposition' to keep things from getting too lopsided there also. They may have more than two parties, but they play it the same way as the Americans, The link between corporate and government is not so overt, but it actually is a stronger, strong enough to influence American policy

      'statist tool' - you're trolling again with that nonsense :-) The state exists to serve. That you believe the soap opera you see on TV is another matter entirely.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    15. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by geoskd · · Score: 1

      History has shown that Socialism does not work period. It does not matter the type of government.

      Actually, history has shown that socialism doesn't exist. By its very nature, Socialism requires a power vacuum, a situation that is highly unstable and temporary. It quickly gets replaced by something else (historically, a dictatorship).

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    16. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Gruturo · · Score: 1

      Oh you mean This?

      sorry for the crappy source but that document is quite real.

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
    17. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you missed the national part. Less workers of the world, more for the ein Volk, but socialistic. Hitler needed the companies but had no compunctions about bringing them under the service of the ein Reich, ein Volk.

    18. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Deadstick · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's an acronym for NAtionale soZIalist, the political party.

      Actually, it's a contraction, German style.

      German has a lot of compound words, which means it has a lot of long words, which means it needs a better system of contractions than we have in English. We remove one letter or a contiguous string and replace it with an apostrophe; Germans remove letters from any number of places in the word and don't bother with the apostrophe.

      Examples you might have heard at the movies: Kaleun = Kapitanleutnant; Uffz = Unteroffizier; Stalag = Stammlager

    19. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, the National-Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) was a socialist party.

      I suggest watching the whole thing some time: The Soviet Story

      Liberal Fascism

      Benito Mussolini was a socialist and earned the title “Il Duce” as the leader of the socialists in Italy. When he founded the fascist party, its program called for implementing a minimum wage, expropriating property from landowners, repealing titles of nobility, creating state-run secular schools and imposing a progressive tax rate. Mussolini took socialism and turned it in a more populist and militaristic direction, but remained a modernizing, secular man of the left.

      The Nazis too were socialists, “enemies, deadly enemies, of today’s capitalist economic system,” in the words of the party’s ideologist Gregor Strasser. The party’s platform sounded a lot like that of the Italian fascists. The Nazis wanted to chase conventional Christianity from public life and overturn tradition, replacing them with an all-powerful state. Both Hitler and Mussolini were revolutionaries, bitterly opposed to “reactionary” forces in their societies.

      Leftists become incandescent when reminded of the socialist roots of Nazism

      On 16 June 1941, as Hitler readied his forces for Operation Barbarossa, Josef Goebbels looked forward to the new order that the Nazis would impose on a conquered Russia. There would be no come-back, he wrote, for capitalists nor priests nor Tsars. Rather, in the place of debased, Jewish Bolshevism, the Wehrmacht would deliver “der echte Sozialismus”: real socialism.

      Goebbels never doubted that he was a socialist. He understood Nazism to be a better and more plausible form of socialism than that propagated by Lenin. Instead of spreading itself across different nations, it would operate within the unit of the Volk.

      So total is the cultural victory of the modern Left that the merely to recount this fact is jarring. But few at the time would have found it especially contentious. As George Watson put it in The Lost Literature of Socialism:

      It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too.

      . . . . Hitler told Hermann Rauschning, a Prussian who briefly worked for the Nazis before rejecting them and fleeing the country, that he had admired much of the thinking of the revolutionaries he had known as a young man; but he felt that they had been talkers, not doers. “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun,” he boasted, adding that “the whole of National Socialism” was “based on Marx”.

      Marx’s error, Hitler believed, had been to foster class war instead of national unity – to set workers against industrialists instead of conscripting both groups into a corporatist order. His aim, he told his economic adviser, Otto Wagener, was to “convert the German Volk to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists” – by which he meant the bankers and factory owners who could, he thought, serve socialism better by generating revenue for the state. “What Marxism, Leninism and Stalinism failed to accomplish,” he told Wagener, “we shall be in a position to achieve.”

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    20. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Duden it is a "Kurzwort":
      http://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Nazi

    21. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They DID realize that. UNION BANK - George Bush's GRANDFATHER, funding the Nazis until the "trading with the enemy act" shut his punk ass down.

      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

    22. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      are you willfully ignorant? many countries are socialist. One could just as well say the periodic econonomic collapses in capitalist systems through history shows capitalism doesn't work period. Get your head out of the kool-aide bowl, boy, none of man's systems are perfectly successful in a all cases.

    23. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Evtim · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you say that the joke is not true?

      Merkel goes to Greece after the financial collapse. At the border:
      - Name?
      - Angela
      - Family name?
      - Merkel
      - Occupation?
      - Not yet!

      Seriously though, I agree with you and we should have "witty" mod at /. for when the truth is spelled in a funny, witty manner. However, it seems that if you want to be the world's top financial force you also need the largest military force...just in case ;)

    24. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bush, or Hitler?

      Eh, what's the difference.

      Hitler won an election. *rimshot*

    25. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There has never been a socialist government.

      Right, because they don't work.

      Dictatorships at least can be formed and operated in the short term.

    26. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      My dual-citizen wife confirms you point on zero referenda.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    27. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Third+Position · · Score: 1

      Socialism implies equality, equality implies equal for all, no ruling class.

      Given that equality is likewise a myth, one suspects that political systems premised on it's existence are doomed to failure.

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    28. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she has Ph.D. in Physics

      Chemistry, not physics. "Physical chemistry" to be exact (with a thesis on quantum chemistry), but that is a discipline pretty much exclusively sorted under chemistry at institutions around the world. But sure, we also have: Purity :-) .

    29. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the happiest and richest countries in the world are in northern europe, and they are a solid stable mixture of capitalism and socialism

      it is true that pure socialist, or pure capitalist countries, are terrible societies

      the best is a mix, the middle, not an extreme

      social safety nets remove the unjust and abusive extremes of pure capitalism

      nevermind that pure capitalism isn't a meritocracy at all, it's a static class of structure of a few ultrarich and a sea of miserable poor

      capitalism is just a tool, not a religion. the idea is to put capitalism to work, and have government structures that mitigate the injustices and imbalances that capitalism inevitably creates

      to worship the idea of capitalism as some sort of perfect utopia is naive, ignorant, and just dumb, really. it reveals a lack of education and a heavy indoctrination into a dimwitted propaganda without any critical thought

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    30. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banks make up the numbers anyway, it's not math, it's fortune telling.

    31. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 2

      When was the last time you saw President Obama anywhere, without a half Marine Brigade protecting him . . . ?

      What's your point? How many assassinations, or attempted assassinations, have recent leaders of Germany experienced?

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    32. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course Obama hasn't been seen buying mustard. You can tell he's a ketchup man.

    33. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? How many assassinations, or attempted assassinations, have recent leaders of Germany experienced?

      Um... you mean after WWII?

      (Also, when you use the phrase "attempted assassinations", you just want to win the argument without numbers... obviously no one knows the real number of attempts, maybe not even the security services.)

    34. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... have recent leaders of Germany experienced?

      President Clinton easily walked down a city street, and did it without demanding a 5 hours-long lock-down. So I don't know if the attitude of the US elite has changed, or the attitude of the malcontents. Given the massive militarization of all branches of the US government, it's at least an element of both.

    35. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1, Troll

      nevermind that pure capitalism isn't a meritocracy at all, it's a static class of structure of a few ultrarich and a sea of miserable poor

      Interesting how one has to strain credulity in order to say anything particularly bad about "pure capitalism", but "pure socialism" leaves its failures in plain view. My view on this is that a capitalist society is a very dynamic one. It may as you assert tend to social stratefication, but you are ignore tremendous wealth transfers from rich to poor (such as employment, charity, costly displays of social status, etc) that act to alleviate this disparity.

      to worship the idea of capitalism as some sort of perfect utopia is naive, ignorant, and just dumb, really. it reveals a lack of education and a heavy indoctrination into a dimwitted propaganda without any critical thought

      Yes, so "capitalism worshippers" are doubleplus ungood? I guess nobody ought to be one then!

    36. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, it is true you conservatives really can't take a joke.
      I guess political correctness is something we all have in common, yah?

    37. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really do not know the difference you need to keep your mouth shut and just listen to people who do for a long while. Even if you are stupid enough to try to equate the two (which is intelectual dishonesty at best), the differences would be real and huge.

      I am sure Bush must look like a snow white angle when seen from a US/UK perspective. But while Hitler's atrocities are way worse than those committed by Bush, the two of them do look a lot more similar when seen from an Iraqi perspective.

    38. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      That would be a great idea if it was reality. In reality, socialists don't desire to benefit from capitalism, they want to eradicate it and return the entire population to utter poverty as it was in the 20th century. Talk about a lack of critical thought! It's as if critical thought is only a weapon that is only meant to be used against the enemies of socialism. Two legs good, four legs better.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    39. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Informative

      No they completely do not- unless you are going to limit your statement to not looking like they came from Iraq. Bush never imprisoned people and killed them because of their Race or Religion in attempts to cleanse the earth of them. Bush never invaded countries and forced their populations into labor camps to further the war efforts. Bush never Euthanized people deemed not worthy. Bush never forced sterilized people who were borderline not worthy. Bush never killed his political enemies.

      About the only things they had in common was that they were both white and leaders of a country. If that is what makes you think they are similar, from any perspective, the vast majority of the developed world looks like Hitler and Nazi Germany. A completely dishonest and fabricated statement from any perspective you wish to push out. That is why there is Godwin's law.

    40. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strain credulity...

      So it is not credible to point out how capitalism allows events like the GFC or any of the other hundreds of examples where money has been leveraged to unfairly bend society for the purposes of those with money.

      You sir are either a troll or a sock puppet (which is impressive since you are a 6 digit UID)

    41. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you saw President Obama anywhere, without a half Marine Brigade protecting him . . . ?

      What's your point? How many assassinations, or attempted assassinations, have recent leaders of Germany experienced?

      Doesn't that further the point that the Germans are doing something right (if no one is trying to kill their leader)?

    42. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, for all your claims to impartiality your bias shines bright as fucking hell.

    43. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there is that whole unprovoked war of aggression thing.
      Just sayin.

    44. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by radtea · · Score: 0

      many countries are socialist.

      False. Many countries are social democrat, but no country outside of a tiny number of failed states like Cuba are socialist.

      Socialism, as an economic system, is defined by public ownership of the means of production and nothing else. German fascism was "socialist-like" by this definition because corporations were under government control and direction to an extent that was indistinguishable from ownership (the right of use and disposal).

      It has become common in recent years to bandy about "socialism" to describe any social democratic system, but this is a debasement of the term and results in a profoundly confused debate, because social democracy is at best a very distant cousin to socialism. Social democracies have thriving private sectors that are heavily regulated but free to pursue business opportunities, capital expansion, etc, within fairly broad constraints.

      In a socialist economy, there is no private sector, at least above the cottage-industry scale.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    45. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2

      to worship the idea of capitalism as some sort of perfect utopia is naive, ignorant, and just dumb, really. it reveals a lack of education and a heavy indoctrination into a dimwitted propaganda without any critical thought

      Yes, so "capitalism worshippers" are doubleplus ungood? I guess nobody ought to be one then!

      How on earth did you reach that conclusion? His entire post made the argument that the societies with the highest happiness index are the ones that compromise between capitalism (newspeak: Goodthink [From your point of view]) and socialism (newspeak: Crimethink [From your point of view]). The nordic countries he cited, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Iceland occupy half of the top ten lists in the 2014 world happiness report. The much more capitalist USA, many of whose inhabitants seem to consider the Nordic countries to be failed communist states, occupies place 17. If anybody here is guilty of political correctness group think (newspeak: bellyfeel) it's you.

    46. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 3, Informative

      many countries are socialist.

      False. Many countries are social democrat, but no country outside of a tiny number of failed states like Cuba are socialist.

      I don't think that most US Americans are capable of understanding the very substantial difference between the two. To to about half the US population anything to the left of the Republican/Tea party is communism. It cracks me up whenever somebody on Fox News calls Obama or the Clintons 'socialists' or even 'communists' which is even funnier than the 'socialist' label. Both the Clintons and Obama are pretty much in the pocket of Wall Street which is anathema to any real socialist. It is however entirely thinkable in the case of social democrats. A good example is Tony Blair, he led a social democrat party but still had no compunctions about crawling into the wallet of Ruper Murdoch and the City bankers.

    47. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by NoMaster · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's an acronym for NAtionale soZIalist, the political party.

      Actually, it's a contraction, German style.

      Actually, it's neither; it's the first two syllables of "Nationalsozialistische" (i.e. 'Na-tzi-o-naal...'), with more than a bit of Austro-Bavarian baggage attached...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    48. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Funny

      What unprovoked war of aggression? Iraq was far from unprovoked and it wouldn't even qualify as a war of aggression seeing how the main charge for entering into the war was the failure to meet the terms of the armistice that ended hostilities when Iraq invade Kuwait in a war of aggression.

      Please, lets not ignore reality here.

    49. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Look it now. Merkel pretty much controls Europe -

      Look at Angela Merkel now . . . she has Ph.D. in Physics, and a bad bowl-head haircut to boot! A German TV camera team caught her last year buying a jar of mustard in a supermarket in Berlin. The team was filming an advertisement, until one of the crew said. Hey, isn't that the Channcellor or something?"

      When was the last time you saw President Obama anywhere, without a half Marine Brigade protecting him . . . ?

      On a trip to Iceland years ago I once shared a hot tub with a bunch of locals (which seems to be a favourite Icelandic activity) one of whom turned out to be the president of the country. He was unaccompanied, no aides, no staff, no body guards, no snipers on rooftops no drones packing hellfire missiles hovering above. His driver just dropped him off at the local bathing facility and then used the down time to have the presidential Mercedes changed to summer tires. We had a pleasant conversation about geothermal energy and fisheries management. It was quite surreal because I have experienced a number of state visits including one by the Queen of Denmark, the president of France, the Chancellor of Germany, a Soviet general secretary, a Saudi Arab crown prince, the prime minister of the UK and the President of the USA to name a few. They all had some level of security but it was never really overbearing although the Saudis were pretty paranoid but even the Brits were relatively diplomatic. The only time I felt like I was living under martial law imposed by a foreign invader was during the visit by the US president.

    50. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While the NSDAP (acronym for "National Socialist German Workers Party") started of with some elements they had "borrowed" from socialists the ideology changed soon to the absolute opposite. Some of the early members, like the Gregor Strasser you mentioned, stuck to some of those ideas, but they lost all influence. And Strasser is a good example: he was killed in the "night of the long knieves" in 1934 once Hitler felt he was in a position strong enough to get rid of former allies that didn't follow the new party line and completely sold out to the establishment which he, rhetorically, had opposed in former years. Not a whiff of "socialism", except in the party's name, remained - but it never had been anything but propaganda anyway to attract popular support. If you read "Mein Kampf", which Hitler wrote back in 1924 (nearly 10 years before coming into power), you will have to look very hard to find anything that resembles "socialist" ideas. Unfortumately, no-one seems to have read that book back then - but it's hard to blame people for that, it's such an unpallatable piece of shit...

    51. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Mainstream definition of socialism prevails over your nonsense: China is socialist and seems to be doing well, Viet Nam is socialist and doing well. Cuba doing better every year, by the way, keep an eye on them.

      Note I don't even like socialism, I prefer something from other end of spectrum

    52. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, Nazi is a noun not an acronym..

      Thank you very much for your altruistic and kind hearted education initiative. Your contribution to the common good is surely deserving of a medal for the advancement of civilisation, world peace, and Grammar Nazism.

      The world needs more people like you, selflessly serving the greater good and helping your fellow human beings rise from the filthy bacteria ridden gutter of bad grammar.

      Thank you for your service, you kind good sir. I bow down to your superiority over us uneducated peons..

    53. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is to show how utterly fucked up your gun culture and firearm worship, racism, right wing crazies, and all the other things that fucks your country up is. Your president cant go anywhere without enough firepower to invade Fiji protecting him.

      The Chancellor of Germany can just pop down to the supermarket to get a jar of mustard if she so pleases.

    54. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Iraq was far from unprovoked

      Then why were all the reasons we invaded lies?

    55. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Germany doesn't allow dual-citizens (as a matter of course, rare exceptions are granted, with strongly documented reasons). So what are her citizenships? In context, the implication is US/German, but that's banned by Germany.

    56. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      History has also shown that libertarianism doesn't work, but that doesn't stop people from trying.

    57. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      You're incorrect.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    58. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by HBI · · Score: 1

      No he didn't. The closest he came to a majority was 37% in any kind of election we might consider free. And in this case, free meant brownshirted thugs hectoring people on the street and administering beatings.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    59. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Remind me, where was it they found the stash of WMDs in Iraq and how large was it?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    60. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Please, lets not ignore reality here.

      You'll have to forgive me, your reality seems to be practically unmoored.

    61. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

      Then go edit Wikipedia.

    62. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last Pres that wandered around without Secret Service protection and so forth, was Lincoln.
      I'll let you figure out why assuming you aren't a total retard. Hint: how prevalent are handguns in Germany?

    63. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      That's a sporting try you made, but it ultimately fails. There are too many inconvenient facts standing in your way, not to mention the National Socialist (Nazi) - International Socialists (Soviet Communists) cooperation in numerous area prior to the German invasion (which preempted a Soviet invasion), not to mention elements of the French Left going to Hitler early on.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    64. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      That is a lie.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    65. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, Nazi is a noun not an acronym.

      The word "Nazi" is derived from a contraction of the name of the Nazi party,
      which is : Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei.

      Nationalsozialistische ( National Socialist ) was shortened to Nazi.

    66. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      Before I comment on WMDs in Iraq I will remind you that there were something like 20 causes of action against Iraq, many of which were clear cut and indisputable. Others were also confirmed after the invasion, such as finding Iraq's banned long range missiles, and unfilled chemical warheads for those missiles. There have been hundreds of mass graves found in Iraq which amply testify to the many crimes against humanity committed by the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein, not to mention his wars and acts of aggression against many of his neighbors.

      As to the WMDs, approximately 5,000 chemical and biological weapons were found, and the allowable number was zero (0).

      Iraq's WMD: The Shameless New York Times Moves the Goalposts

      Now comes the 10,000-word, eight-part story in The New York Times. The front-page story, called "The Secret Casualties Of Iraq's Abandoned Chemical Weapons," says WMD were in Iraq: "In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act."

      Moreover, the soldiers were told to keep quiet about the WMD:

      "Troops and officers were instructed to be silent or give deceptive accounts of what they had found. ?'Nothing of significance' is what I was ordered to say,' said Jarrod Lampier, a recently retired Army major who was present for the largest chemical weapons discovery of the war: more than 2,400 nerve-agent rockets unearthed in 2006 at a former Republican Guard compound.

      Some of those weapons were still being held in a major Iraqi military base overrun by ISIS.

      I hope that helps.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    67. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      It's not clear that you have a reasonable claim to judge impartiality if you can't follow that.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    68. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really do not know the difference you need to keep your mouth shut and just listen to people who do for a long while. Even if you are stupid enough to try to equate the two (which is intelectual dishonesty at best), the differences would be real and huge.

      Hitler was a great statesman who could have made the world a better place given the chance, whereas Bush is just a stupid lying son of a Texas
      oil man who also worked in the CIA and used those connections to further his oil business.

      By the way your user name is an excellent example of truth in advertising.

    69. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They had no WMD program. They had no ties to al Qaeda. They never tried to buy Yellow Cake. All the reasons give were lies. Yes, Saddam dodged UN inspectors. If it was proven he didn't have WMDs then he'd have a revolt. Sure, some revisionists can claim that the UN violations was the reason for the invasion, but in the US at the time, the reasons given were solely "ties to al Qaeda" and "WMDs". No other reasons were mentioned explicitly by Bush. The implication was that Saddam was somehow responsible for 9/11.

      The actual reason for the invasion was revenge. Bush Jr blamed Saddam for Bush Sr losing a second term. It didn't go any deeper than that, other than Cheney knew the war would make billions for his buddies, so nobody had a reason to say no.

    70. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not clear that you have a reasonable claim to judge impartiality if you can't follow that.

      We all laugh at you and your posts.

      You'd be better off commenting on Fox News -- at least there you'd
      find a willing audience of idiots who are stupid enough to believe your lies.

    71. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      The actual reason for the invasion was revenge.
      And that's where you lose 100% credibility. Any asshat that concludes the Iraq war to be some sort of daddy revenge is not worthy to be taken seriously. Because none of it's based on anything but pure hatred of the left.

      Ok, so that out of the way. Honestly, the Iraq war was many things; competency entirely questionable. For one, the final straw was Saddam breaking UN resolution 1441 (from countless preceding resolutions). Second, Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi was an informant known as "Curveball" that stated he had direct knowledge of a bio-weapons program as part of the WDM operation in Iraq. Turns out to be bogus intel cause the guy just wanted a green card. Bush fed into it without proper vetting. Meaning, he heard what he wanted to hear. Lastly, it gave us a foothold in the region for logistical reasons. Bush knew this would be a decade+ long theater of war in the ME, hence the reasoning. Though it came a political cost as most American's became fetigued at giving a damn what the hell goes on over there. Given the cost, can't blame them.

      Long after the main Iraq war, caches of WMD (bombs specially) buried underground were found. Though without an active military force, at best they would be used in the creation of IEDs. That's assuming many knew where to find them, let alone take the time to dig them back out.

      As for the UN? Well, member states were corrupted in the Oil for Food program. Effectively, the entire endeavor was one giant clusterfuck. Still in in fact. It still remains to whether or not killing Saddam was the right thing to do in terms of upsetting this applecart.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    72. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      They claimed to be socialists, but there was nothing social what they did.

      What the fuck dude? The Nazis implemented lots of social programs: Free train privileges. Free dental. Free medical (Mengele was a real advocate here). Free showers. A very spirited jobs program (Schindler dampened the spirit a bit but oh well). Free funerary services. Social services abounded under the Nazis during World War 2.

      And the Jews complain. Pshaw. Nobody is ever satisfied.

      (too soon?)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    73. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      So it is not credible to point out how capitalism allows events like the GFC or any of the other hundreds of examples where money has been leveraged to unfairly bend society for the purposes of those with money.

      Quite true. Because socialism, the other end of this particular scale, also allowed those events.

    74. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      How on earth did you reach that conclusion?

      I quote the previous poster's statements exactly so I could answer your question before you asked it. The previous poster wrote about much more than just Scandinavian societies with high, possibly relevant happiness indices.

    75. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? How many assassinations, or attempted assassinations, have recent leaders of Germany experienced?

      You made his point for him... it just goes to show that Germany's current leader has no threats.

    76. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      G20 in Brisbane a few months ago. Obama brought about 10 planes with him, flew in via a helicopter from a military airbase escorted by 3 Ospreys which completely screwed traffic on the ICB when they landed due to the dust they kicked up. He parked half the navy off the coast of Australia and had additional planes and support at both Sydney and Coolongatta airports. I never once saw him when he wasn't surrounded by countless secret service agents. Better yet, he brought his own fake Obama in with his own fake motorcade, with his own fake Beast.

      Merkel flew in on a plane, landed at the normal airport, had a tiny security detail, was escorted to the G20 secure zone by 3 police motorbikes. Later that night I ran into her at Caxton Street in a pub outside the secure zone. From what I could see she was escorted by 1 security guard and not at all afraid to chat and have selfies with anyone she ran into who recognised her.

      This is the most powerful Woman in the world.

    77. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It is amazing how much some leaders just don't freak out. The Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard, used to go jogging every day along the same track. He had 2 or 3 security guards with him. One day he was stopped by a person who wanted to meet him and give him a hug, which he did and which everyone was okay with.

      That person had a a massive screwdriver in his hand. The security guards didn't even take it off him. The media freaked out about it though, and then the Chaser Brothers (political satire duo) decided to also hug the prime minister a week later.... carrying a huge axe.

      Not every leader thinks they are going to get assassinated every second.

    78. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 1

      Hint: how prevalent are handguns in Germany?

      It would depend on the lander or even the landkreis... it's roughly 30 guns per 100 persons averaged over Germany, in my landkreis it's just below 90 handguns per 100 persons (5 years old statistic). That's just privately owned handguns... if you throw in the hunting weapons and service weapons, there's probably more weapons than people.

    79. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Some of those weapons were still being held in a major Iraqi military base overrun by ISIS.

      I hope that helps.

      No it doesn't, because 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs and 2,400 nerve agent rockets were well below the quantity claimed by Bush and Blair by a couple of orders of magnitude.

      And there were significant numbers of sites in Iraq which were known about, inspected and sealed by the UN inspectors prior to the invasion.

      Troops were told to keep quiet about finds because those finds were part of a monumental fuck up by the coalition forces in that they were originally UN sealed sites which had been left unattended for months after the invasion - better to keep quiet about the stuff that should be there but wasn't because you failed to secure the site, than to claim it as a "find" when everyone knew about it before anyway.

    80. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you any arguments? All you posted was a link to some sensationalist video with no information not already known for at least half a century, and the "article" you cited isn't more than uninformed clap-trap, to express it kindly. Just because someone calls himself a "socialist" does not mean he is one. Neither Nazi Germany nor the Soviet Union can be called "socialist" in any meaningful sense, whatever their propaganda may have claimed (or do you believe that the DPRK is democratic or a republic?). And just as Hitler killed his former friends who had retained some pseudo-socialist ideas (and might have spoiled his wedding night with the capitalists and the military), Stalin, the moment he was sure of his powers, did exactly the same. Ever heard of the "Great Purge"? And Stalin also had no qualms sending back German socialists, who had flewn to the Soviet Union, directly into the hands of the Gestapo. If you want a real socialist from that time look for people like George Orwell (he went to Spain during the civil war, fighting for the republic, and had to flee the country before the Stalinists could manage to kill him - exterminating socialists had a much higher priority for them than fighting Franco's fascist hordes). Stalin and Hitler (and their co-perpetrators) were just absolutely ruthless bastards and had no love for each other (or anyone at all), they only smiled at each other for some time with knives behind their backs, ready to stab the other at the nearest opportune moment.

    81. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Your post is essentially misdirection. Strasser wasn't the only member of the Nazi party that favored socialism. I seem recall that both Goebbels and Eichmann survived the Night of the Long Knives (A bit of an understatement.) for example. The National Socialists were not simply engaged in rhetoric but enacted a variety of policies consistent with socialism. I can understand the desperate attempt to claim that the National Socialists weren't really socialists in any way since some people conflate the concepts of socialism and goodness and the Nazis were certainly not good.

      Hitler's Handouts - Inside the Nazis' welfare state

      Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as “quasi-siblings,” explaining in his memoirs that he “inclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.” As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated “our socialism,” reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany “alone [has] the best social welfare measures.” ....

      .... To “achieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,” he [Aly] writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent “polemics against landlords,” subsidies to German farmers as protection “against the vagaries of weather and the world market,” and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as “effortless income.”

      Aly demonstrates convincingly that Nazi “domestic policies were remarkably friendly toward the German lower classes, soaking the wealthy and redistributing the burdens of wartime.” And with fresh memories of Weimer inflation, “transferring the tax burden to corporations earned the leadership in Berlin considerable political capital, as the government keenly registered.”

      For instance, at the outset of war Nazi economists established a “wartime tax of 50 percent on all wages” that applied only to the wealthiest Germans. In the end, Aly writes, “only 4 percent of the population paid the full 50 percent surcharge.”

      Putting the Socialism Back Into National Socialism:

      The idea that Nazism was an extreme form of "capitalism" and Hitler primarily a tool serving the interests of "big business" is a longstanding myth that even now retains a measure of popularity in some quarters. This, despite the fact that the full name of the Nazi Party was the National Socialist German Workers' Party, and that Nazi political strategy was explicitly based on combining the appeal of socialism with that of nationalism (thus the choice of name). Once in power, the Nazis even went so far as to institute a Four Year Plan for running the German economy, modeled in large part on the Soviet Union's Five Year Plans.

      I. The Socialist Elements of Nazism.

      Two recent books further explain the socialist elements of Nazi economic policy, and will hopefully put the final nails in the coffin of the myth that the Nazis were "capitalists" or free marketeers. In The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, historian Adam Tooze describes the statist nature of Nazi economic policy in great detail, and concludes that the Nazis imposed greater government control over the economy than any other noncommunist regime in modern history. (pp. 658-60). Tooze notes that, even before the outbreak of World War II, government military spending accounted for some 20% of the GDP, while much of the rest of the economy came under government control as a result of the Four Year Plan and other similar measures.

      In Hitler's Beneficiaries: : Plunder,

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    82. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need to address that rather than putting your leaders on a pedestal separated from the normal person...

    83. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were socialst; but their socialism was only for germans/aryans. "Work for everybody" was one their ways to get votes. (Paid) work is usually something unemployed masses really like.

      More racist than the KKK too of course.

    84. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, she probably had a guard or two with her, but the European approach is different. Americans like to bring visible security guards; it makes a person seem important but also creates distance. Europeans like their guards to blend in - in this case they would seem to be nearby shoppers. You don't get the distance to everybody - but the guards are present in the unlikely case that something happens.

    85. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      It's roughly 30 guns per 100 persons averaged over Germany, in my landkreis it's just below 90 handguns per 100 persons (5 years old statistic)..

      Well, you know, a brilliant American thinker, Jared Diamond, wrote a book with the title of the three three things that a civilization need to survive: Guns, Germans and Steel

      You can buy guns and steel in most American supermarkets . . . . the Germans are the tough one to get in the Beenie Baby set!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    86. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      On a trip to Iceland years ago I once shared a hot tub with a bunch of locals (which seems to be a favourite Icelandic activity) one of whom turned out to be the president of the country.

      What an awesome Slashdotter challenge! Have you gotten nude with a international political leader?

      We want to hear about it here!

      Have you seen Vladimir Putin's Grand Poutine?

      Maybe a quickie with North Korea's Kim Chee? Tell your stories here!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    87. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To worship the idea of statism reveals a lack of education.

      Capitalism is what made the USA the greatest productive environment in the 1800s.

      Socialism is force. Capitalism is trading.

    88. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was never any kool-aid at Jonestown. It was a CIA murder-op.

      http://youtu.be/pIkJkeDPK5Y

    89. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strong links between Bush family and Nazi's. "How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power": http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

    90. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      The german version of 'NeoCon'.

      Wow, that's open to a few interpretations.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    91. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Right. #2 applies.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    92. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 2

      Iraq did not attack the United States or present even a remote threat to the United States.

      They tried to develop nuclear weapons and they invaded a US ally. That's two right there. Just because they weren't capable of doing those things in 2003, doesn't mean that they would have stayed in that state forever after.

    93. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      First, Nazi is a noun not an acronym. Second, the Euro is controlled by the ECB where the Bundesbank has only one vote. It is led by an Italian. However, Merkel is a neoliberal politician fueled by a strategy based on demobilizing the opposition. Key is her phrase of "no alternatives". Her goal is similar to other neoliberals like Cameron to reduce state influnce as much as possible. If you feel conquered its by the world upper class.

      I find people who hold such views are "demobilized" by their own stupidity rather than being held back by their betters. Make enough stupid decisions and you'll paint yourself into a corner. That's what demobilization really is.

    94. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      That's funny I was pretty sure the capitalists we currently live under were just friendlier fascists. If I want to cause trouble at dinner parties I usually just start off with "you know, Nazis really won the war in the end..." and then I duck out for a cigarette.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    95. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to see your reaction, and the reaction of the press, if someone made an Obama-Hitler joke before the GP.

      "What's the difference between Obama and Hitler?" "Hitler could appreciate art!" Ha ha ha.

    96. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia is egregiously incorrect on this part, otherwise 2/3 of my employees are illegal!

    97. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You say that like an employer has some responsibility for this, or some reason to know. I'm a dual-citizen (not german) and my employer doesn't know. They just know I'm legal to work.

    98. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find people who hold such views are "demobilized" by their own stupidity rather than being held back by their betters.

      I find the opposite. I find that people who hold such views are usually well ahead of the pack. They fall into two categories

      1) They're so well off that they they could individually afford to pay more taxes, but unfortunately for you they also really believe in the whole social contract thing, so they want everybody else to pitch in too.

      2) They belong to the political class who profit off of promoting such views. They make good money off of donations from group 1 and taxing everybody else.

      Make enough stupid decisions and you'll paint yourself into a corner. That's what demobilization really is.

      Sure, but the ones who made stupid decisions aren't those holding GP's views. It's the people who didn't hold those views - the hard working middle class - who are getting squeezed from both sides.

    99. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good old cold fjord, serving up a heaping helping of right wing authoritarian propaganda, as usual :) You don't have school today, I see.

    100. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      "When was the last time you saw President Obama anywhere, without a half Marine Brigade protecting him . . . ?"

      Yeah, because nobody wants to kill Obama, and everybody really wants badly to kill Merkel.

      I can't even express how stupid your comment is, or the people that upvoted it.

    101. Re:Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      One can see David Cameron jog around the Mall and St James park with usually about 2 or so bodyguards every now and then . I presume they are armed but there is no attempt to seal the area or any interference with the other people around..

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    102. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What to do when a national is developing nucelear weapons in disagreement with the ban is supposed to be handled by the united nations.

      On September 16, 2004 Secretary-General of the United Nations Kofi Annan, speaking on the invasion, said, "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN Charter. From our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal."

    103. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the US has stationed nuclear weapons in a large variety of countries with the expressed intent that they be used by that countries in a future war. They have been and are probably still training the forces of those countries in the use of nuclear weapons.

    104. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You need some cites for that.

      First, if we read the Iraq war resolution the claims seem to be "continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations"

      Troops were told to keep quiet about finds because those finds were part of a monumental fuck up by the coalition forces in that they were originally UN sealed sites which had been left unattended for months after the invasion

      This specifically needs a cite. As far as I'm aware of, all of the known stockpile sites which did not have the WMDs destroyed were actively targeted for bombing during the initial invasion. It's not like the UN seal sites were secret or anything.

      I know you need to keep the narrative alive in order to prevent discovery of your world view being fabricated but you should be able to find some authoritative sources you can share.

    105. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't think that Goebbels is a very reliable source, given that he was the "Comical Ali" of his time... And Eichmann was basically a small light when it comes to Nazi ideology, he basically was just a tool.

      If the Nazis had any half-way coherent ideology at all it was a kind of neo-feudalism, where they (of course) made up the upper level of society. To get to that position they needed popular suppport as well as the patronage from the ruling classes. So they promised everything to everyone and, of course, had no qualms about breaking those promises whenever it suited them and they felt they could get away with it. They neither cared about the "masses" nor about their industrialist friends (some of them may have realized a bit late that their investment wasn't as clever as they had thought).

      Fact is that the NSDAP got huge financial support by major industrialists, long before they came into power (and those guys wouldn't have touched anything with a hint of a smell of "socialism" with a ten-feet pole). Fact is also that the Nazis installed some wellfare measures (didn't need much in those times of economic hardship with millions being unemployed) to gain and keep popular support. Of course, they couldn't satisfy all sides for very long, so they would have been forced to start a war even if they hadn't wanted one anyway. In order to stay in power they had to rob someone to keep the rest in line. They started with the jews and then ramped up the operation, plundering more and more of the neighbouring countries. And, as usual, the rich got most of the loot and the masses got some crumbs. Economically it was kind of a snowball system - doomed to come down like a ton of bricks from the very start.

      And don't assume that laws meant anything to the Nazis. A wartime taxation law for sure had enough loopholes to drive a truck through. And if that still wasn't enough then Hitler and his cronies were, per definition, above the law. You'd just have to give some contribution to e.g. Himmler's "Freundeskreis Reichsfuehrer SS", supply Goebels with a new whore or pamper the fat guy and such minor issues would vanish without a trace or questions asked.. Or, as Goering allegedly said (concerning Erich Milch, who was said to have a jewish father): "I decide who's a jew" - and the man rose to the rank of field marshall.

      I have no idea how anyone can come up with the idea of calling that "socialist". Socialism is all about a caring, democratic and sustainable society with enough measures to keep sociopaths from running wild. Not a trace of that can be found in the Nazi ideology - they were a bunch of suicidal maniacs, dreaming (if they dreamt at all) of some imaginary children-story past where they were the princes - with a Cinderella to fuck thrown in. It's as if you call someone who tortures, kills and robs your next door neighbour and gives you a dime from the loot a "socialist". If you insist on using the word like that then discussions are useless - if you play humpty-dumpty and try to make words mean what you want them to mean communication becomes rather pointless.

    106. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by romons · · Score: 1

      The chemical weapons found were supplied by the US during the Iran Iraq war. Only a dimwit would confuse the ability to create these weapons with finding a small number of expired weapons. Even Bush wasn't that stupid. If Bush thought they would exonerate his crime (invading a sovereign country before any aggressive move on the part of the invaded, against all international law), he would have quickly publicized any weapons found.

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
    107. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the happiest and richest countries in the world are in northern europe, and they are a solid stable mixture of capitalism and socialism

      That's not even remotely true. Socialism, by definition, requires public ownership of the means of production. No country in Europe has that on any meaningful scale. What the countries in Northern Europe have is a well funded welfare system, supported by high taxes.

      If you study economic history, you'll find that formal welfare systems have been around for a long time, long before the term socialism was ever invented! Rome had bread and circuses. England had the Poor Laws since the late 1500's.

      Informal systems for community members to support one another -- which is really what welfare is --have probably been part of human communities for thousands of years, long before Karl Marx was born. Even something like a barn-raising, where everybody in a community gets together to help a new family put up a building, could be considered a form of informal welfare.

      None of these welfare systems required public ownership of the means of production.

      The difference today is that certain small Northern European countries -- blessed with strong industry, with access to valuable natural resources such as North Sea Oil, with an educated population capable of efficiently exploiting those resources, with modern financial systems to fund industrial operations, and with larger neighbors to draw upon in various ways -- simply run their welfare systems better than anybody else ever has. These are not socialist states.

      Aside: a case can be made that these systems are also heavily supported by mooching off other -- larger -- nations expenditures in things like research and development, and could not otherwise exist in anything resembling their current form. For example, the USA government and USA based companies pay for a lot of the research that gives these countries things like medical imaging equipment for their health care systems. Research flows both ways, of course, but not in equal amounts.

    108. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how anyone can come up with the idea of calling that "socialist". Socialism is all about a caring, democratic and sustainable society with enough measures to keep sociopaths from running wild. Not a trace of that can be found in the Nazi ideology - they were a bunch of suicidal maniacs, dreaming (if they dreamt at all) of some imaginary children-story past where they were the princes - with a Cinderella to fuck thrown in. It's as if you call someone who tortures, kills and robs your next door neighbour and gives you a dime from the loot a "socialist".

      Your paragraph above reveals a huge stumbling block in discussion. You are making "socialism" do double duty. In your usage it isn't a question of economic arrangements and social safety nets, but it has to double for nice, caring, sustainable, and so on. That is the real reason you find it difficult to acknowledge the socialist roots and policies of the National Socialists - they weren't nice and you can't imagine socialists are that aren't nice. Good = socialism, and socialism = good. Unfortuantely the socialists of the Marxist Communist persuasion have provided an enormous example of socialism that isn't good, caring, and all the rest. The Communists managed to kill 100,000,000 people in the last 100 years and yet it is farsical to try to claim that they weren't socialists. In fact while they were establishing state ownership and controlof the practically all of the economy they were also enacting class warfare, exterminating the class enemy, just as Marx and Engels wrote. But if you bother to watch the Soviet Story, or do some research, you'll know that Marx and Engels advanced the idea of exterminating both classes and races. The Communists (international socialists) destroyed by class, the National Socialists (Nazis) destroyed by race.

       

      If you insist on using the word like that then discussions are useless - if you play humpty-dumpty and try to make words mean what you want them to mean communication becomes rather pointless.

      Then we will probably be at an impass until you stop trying to make the word "socialist" to double, or triple duty. You can't reasonably refuse to call certain groups of socialists socialist just becuase you don't think they were nice enough to merit your overloaded use of the word socialist even though they enacted socialist policies.

      And for the record, yes, there were industrialists that backed Hitler, much to their later regret. They thought they had a deal and could control Hitler, but it ended up being a deal with the devil and that devil had the upper hand that grew ever more powerful. Ultimately the Nazi state controlled the industrialists.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    109. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The chemical weapons found were supplied by the US during the Iran Iraq war.

      That is completely false. The US never supplied any chemical weapons to Iraq. Iraq manufactured its own chemical weapons in programs developed with Egypt, and IIRC Syria.

      Only a dimwit would confuse the ability to create these weapons with finding a small number of expired weapons.

      Saddam was not allowed to retain any of those weapons and was frustrating inspections, and that violated his obligations.

      If Bush thought they would exonerate his crime (invading a sovereign country before any aggressive move on the part of the invaded, against all international law),

      President Bush didn't violate international law. Iraq regularly violated its cease fire agreement by firing upon coalition aircraft and other actions. Those are commonly known as acts of war. And that is before you get to Saddams many crimes against humanity, acts of aggression, and violation of UN Security Council resolutions.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    110. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      What to do when a national is developing nucelear weapons in disagreement with the ban is supposed to be handled by the united nations.

      Unless, of course, it gets handled by someone else who cares more about the subject and has more power to project. Just because the UN exists doesn't mean that member states magically lose all self-interest or instinct for survival.

      "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN Charter. From our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal."

      So what? "Our view" and the "charter point of view" aren't the official views of the UN.

    111. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the ones who made stupid decisions aren't those holding GP's views

      Anyone eating that dog food is going to have a tough time in life. Rule number one for drug dealers: don't use your own product.

    112. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      yes. i said that a society that balances between socialism and capitalism is best, and that purely capitalist or socialist countries are worst. do you agree?

      i am not defending socialism nor attacking capitalism, i am calling them both wrong, and the balance in between the best kind of society

      see if you can think about that point clearly, and not devolve the conversation by smearing me as a lover of socialism and/ or hater of capitalism, since i am neither, and to go with that approach, like in your other comment, simply means you completely don't understand my point

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    113. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you have no idea what you are talking about

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    114. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      capitalism creates imbalances and injustices in society that, if not corrected, leads to revolution. the idea is to siphon off and mitigate capitalism's abuses with social safety nets so that the society is stable and productive

      do you believe capitalism has no downside? if you do, you're ignorant of simple history

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    115. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      the usa has social security. that's socialism. socialism is merely the concept of providing for the common good. it's not a complete either/ or, black or white. it's shades of grey, certain sectors of society that suffer under capitalism provided for. not the entire society. you can have nuance, details. if you think that socialism is a complete black or white thing you are only revealing your own perceptual shortcomings on the topic. simply study how the nordic countries work. a good mix of capitalism and socialism. educate yourself, then form an opinion

      do you want the usa to do away with social security? let old people die in the street? pure capitalism is ok with that social darwinistic cruelty. which is why we will never have pure capitalism, people will not tolerate the abuse

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    116. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      yes. i said that a society that balances between socialism and capitalism is best, and that purely capitalist or socialist countries are worst. do you agree?

      No. Greece also balances socialism and capitalism, but in a crappy way. My view is that a competently run society of any sort is going to trump an incompetently run society. The huge difference is that there are mechanisms in place in capitalist societies to encourage and reward competence via competitive markets and such that don't exist in more socialism-oriented societies.

      What's going to keep the Scandinavian countries competent rather than ending up like Greece? What will keep the US incompetent, if we allow competition and failure, and reduce the power of the bureaucrats?

    117. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      "what about greece..."

      what about greece? who the fuck cares about greece? how does bringing up greece prove or discredit anything? it's a different country. it doesn't disprove anything about the scandinavian successes. does greece disprove democracy? it's a democracy that failed. does it disprove rule of law? it has rule of law and it failed. do you see the weakness in your lame whataboutism? one example of a problem with complex inputs does not automatically jump to your desired for conclusion. without considering all of the other problems ANOTHER situation has, different than the situation we are actually talking about

      the scandinavian countries prove socialism and capitalism work together, and have the highest happiness and richness. "what about greece..." ok, tell us all of the reason why greece failed. be intellectually honest. give us all of those reasons, all of the complex inputs. the corruption. the weak banking sector. the low tax collection rate. the disconnect with popular opinion. etc.

      go ahead. give us the real story. not just the one cherry picked reason that is not the whole story. that's how you make propaganda: half truths. i guess you're good at that

      the most hilarious part is that this weak whataboutism was a solid SOVIET propaganda tactic

      you think like what you hate

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W...

      Whataboutism is a nickname coined by the Western political historians for the tactic allegedly used by the Soviet Union in its dealings with the Western world during the Cold War. When criticisms were leveled at the Soviet Union, the response would be "What about..." followed by the naming of a criticizable event in the Western world.[1][2] It represents a case of tu quoque or the appeal to hypocrisy, a logical fallacy which attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position, without directly refuting or disproving the opponent's initial argument.

      you would have made a good soviet, you have the same weak mentality

      "what about greece..."

      what a joke

      changing the subject is an intellectually dishonest way of conceding a point. so, in your cowardly way, i'm glad you concede that scandinavian countries work, since you can't criticize them directly and have to resort to weak whataboutism

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    118. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      what about greece? who the fuck cares about greece? how does bringing up greece prove or discredit anything?

      It is an obvious counterexample to the assertion that a mix of capitalism and socialism is automatically better. That why it matters and why you should care.

    119. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      not just the one cherry picked reason that is not the whole story

      Spain and Portugal. There's a couple more "cherry picked" examples.

    120. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you didn't read a single thing i wrote, did you?

      read paragraph 2 and 3

      good luck on your intellectual growth, you need it

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    121. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      more whataboutism, more examples of DIFFERENT countries

      try refuting what doesn't work about the scandinavian countries specifically

      you can't. so you change the subject. that says a lot about your failed position

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    122. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by romons · · Score: 1

      If Bush thought they would exonerate his crime (invading a sovereign country before any aggressive move on the part of the invaded, against all international law),

      President Bush didn't violate international law. Iraq regularly violated its cease fire agreement by firing upon coalition aircraft and other actions. Those are commonly known as acts of war. And that is before you get to Saddams many crimes against humanity, acts of aggression, and violation of UN Security Council resolutions.

      The ONLY reason any country may attack another, under international law, is to prevent an imminent threat of attack. There was no such threat against the U.S., despite lies by the Bush administration about nuclear programs, which were actively being denied by UN inspectors at the time. Their lies were the justification for attack. Since those statements have been proven to be lies, and the people making those statements have been shown to know, at the time, that they were false, they should be in jail. Their attack on Iraq was a trillion dollar war crime.

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
    123. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      read paragraph 2 and 3

      cts, sorry, but I did and I want that one minute of my life back. Whatever you were trying to say there was completely irrelevant to the discussion.

      The whole point of counterexamples is not to mock the great intellect and wisdom which you wield, but to challenge it. Here is a case, a rather glaring case, where you are wrong. Confront it and triumph over it.

      The point of Greece and the countries like it, is that they too are a mix of capitalism and socialism, but a mix which doesn't work well.

      the corruption. the weak banking sector. the low tax collection rate. the disconnect with popular opinion

      What mechanism keeps the Scandinavian countries from becoming similarly afflicted? Just because they're doing well now doesn't mean that they'll be doing well a couple of decades from now.

    124. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      cts, sorry, but I did and I want that one minute of my life back. Whatever you were trying to say there was completely irrelevant to the discussion.

      i stopped reading there

      you're a hopeless moron

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    125. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ok, TL;DR version. Greece is a counterexample. Understand the counterexample rather than complaining that I'm cherrypicking (which is what a counterexample is by definition).

    126. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Of the Nordic countries only Norway was access to significant oil reserves.

    127. Re: Hitler and the NAZIs were so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if she was born to one American parents and one German parent. It's allowed then, as long as the parents were either born with both parents being American/German or were born on American/German soil.

  3. Plot twist: There were still Nazi's inside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .....just waiting for orders.

    1. Re:Plot twist: There were still Nazi's inside.... by plopez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nazi zombies?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Plot twist: There were still Nazi's inside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if there are nazi zombies, because iron sky 2 has not been released yet, but it probably is the entry to the underground world where the nazis live.

    3. Re:Plot twist: There were still Nazi's inside.... by Oil_Tan · · Score: 0
    4. Re: Plot twist: There were still Nazi's inside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you can see iron sky on YouTube.

    5. Re: Plot twist: There were still Nazi's inside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iron sky 2 is not released yet.

    6. Re:Plot twist: There were still Nazi's inside.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps an army of them, a nazi zombie army if you will.

  4. Re: Nazi era Atomic by 12_West · · Score: 1

    Probably a fascinating find no matter what it turns out to actually have been used for! The topic brings me recall of a long held fantasy wish I held from boyhood until the first decades of my adulthood, that I could somehow find a forgotten WW2 or similar asset and find a vintage transmitter or other "cool stuff".A young and unsophisticated fantasy of course. Anything of the sort found today would likely claimed by the powers that be and some of it hopefully wind up in a museum. Happy New Year fellow slashdotters!

  5. Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by mailuefterl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of these claims seem to be overblown.
    If you take a look at the Manhattan Project, you get an idea what efforts in research and production (i.e. uranium enrichment) were required.
    The Nazis never had a programm that came anywhere near these dimensions.
    All they had was a handfull of phsysicists (most of the best had emmigrated to the US anyway) and a small research reactor.
    So while there was some nuclear research, there never was a atomic bomb or anything close to it in Germany.

    And the tunnels? The whole 3rd Reich and it's occupied territories were tunneled mostly for the purpose of weapons production.

    1. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they should be looking in Brazil?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Piripipiu · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

    3. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The whole 3rd Reich and occupied territories were tunneled..." is vastly exaggerated. See the overview map provided with this rather well-informed article, which will now need to be updated with the newly found complex in Austria.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    4. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of these claims seem to be overblown.
      If you take a look at the Manhattan Project, you get an idea what efforts in research and production (i.e. uranium enrichment) were required.
      The Nazis never had a programm that came anywhere near these dimensions.

      Of course it didn't. As opposed to the US nuclear program the German nuclear program had an active resistance sabotaging it.
      Operation Swallow and Gunnerside are only a small part of it, the German scientist had a good idea of what to do but couldn't get the resources needed.

    5. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      You can start with this, then google for "nazis in brazil" to find all sorts of interesting stuff.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by PPH · · Score: 2

      There are two branches in nuclear research: weapons and power.

      Early on in the Nazis' research, Werner Heisenberg miscalculated* the critical mass necessary to produce a workable bomb, placing it at around one ton. Largely as a result of this, research on weapons production was halted. Hwever, it is entirely possible that research on power poduction continued on. Who really cares how heavy a fixed reactor core is?

      *Or he mislead the Nazis for political or moral reasons.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re: Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are only polish. In the late 80's, stationed near Mon's. At the airbase I was at had flodded tunnels under the field for fuel delivery, and personnel transport. I'm sure there were many more.

    8. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      There are many branches in nuclear research: weapons, power, medicine, nuclear chemistry, particle diffraction, etc.

    9. Re: Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Atlantic coast of Norway is lousy with leftover Nazi bunkers and tunnels, too - but that's mostly smaller things, like ammunition storage and ways to deliver said ammunition to AA/cannon sites without getting bombed (or snowed in, I guess).

    10. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Mods, what the hell is wrong with you? Why should someone be modded down for simply indicating they don't understand something?

      Nice job of perpetuating the immaturity and hostility of the classroom.. as an adult. Thanks for your contribution.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    11. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Who really cares how heavy a fixed reactor core is?

      I thought it was less about the weight per se and more a function of the sheer volume of Uranium that would be needed for even one bomb?

      By way of comparison, British Tallboy and Grand Slam bombs were multi-ton beasts themselves, if I'm not mistaken.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    12. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 1

      There are many branches in nuclear research: weapons, power, medicine, nuclear chemistry, particle diffraction, etc.

      Most of them depend, in practice, on having a working nuclear reactor.

    13. Re:Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 1

      There are two branches in nuclear research: weapons and power.

      Early on in the Nazis' research, Werner Heisenberg miscalculated* the critical mass necessary to produce a workable bomb, placing it at around one ton. Largely as a result of this, research on weapons production was halted. Hwever, it is entirely possible that research on power poduction continued on. Who really cares how heavy a fixed reactor core is?

      *Or he mislead the Nazis for political or moral reasons.

      Jeremy Bernstein makes a good argument that the Nazi scientists were unaware of the true value of the critical mass, let alone other important but less basic issues such as the significance of prompt vs. delayed neutrons, until they learned, while being detained in Farm Hall, of the bombing of Hiroshima (Hitler's Uranium Club: The Secret Recordings at Farm Hall, ISBN 978-0387950891). These recordings of their conversations among themselves indicate initial astonishment and incredulity, but after several hours (days?) of work, Heisenberg was able to present to the group an analysis of how it could be done. Bernstein argues that that Heisenberg's initial back-of-envelope calculation for the critical mass, based on the mean free path of neutrons in uranium, was never questioned. While they may or may not have found this useful in discouraging Nazi hopes of an atom bomb, it seems unlikely that they were aware it was wrong.

      They also incorrectly measured the neutron absorption cross-section of graphite (IIRC due to contamination by boron) and ruled it out as a moderator, making themselves dependent on vulnerable heavy water supplies from occupied Norway.

      According to Thomas Powers' book, 'Heisenberg's War: The Secret History Of The German Bomb' (written before the Farm Hall transcripts were released), creating a power reactor was indeed their assigned task, but the Third Reich had more pressing priorities, so it was never funded in the way the V weapons were. If they had tried to build a reactor on the basis of Heisenberg's assumption, they would probably either have irradiated themselves out of existence, or found the errors in their theory. Either way, it does not seem likely that they would have been in a position to be so astonished by Hiroshima as they evidently were, if they had made much progress in that direction.

  6. I actually live here by vikingpower · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And St. Georgen-an-der-Gusen is about a good hour's drive away. I'll certainly visit the place once it is opened up for the public. It is quite amazing what lengths the Nazis went to in order to shelter their weapons production from Allied bombing. Just outside the town I now live in, the Nazis dug out an existing cave complex, which had been a gypsum mine up to WO II, until the volume was large enough to facilitate a complete HE162 jet fighter production line.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:I actually live here by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Wow!
      Get a Geiger counter... Who knows what will happen when they start poking at things.
      I wish there were more pictures...

    2. Re:I actually live here by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I just realized the pictures they do have are of other facilities... there aren't any pictures at all.

      Get down there with your phone man!

    3. Re:I actually live here by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      Sounds like an idea. It would, however, entail to break the law by getting into the complex in this place. ( Pic featured in this Wikipedia article, in German. ), as well as, literally, walking over a certain public feeling of decency, as this place is a memorial to so many victims from nearby concentration camp Mauthausen, who were forced to work an die here.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    4. Re:I actually live here by seyyah · · Score: 1

      Hey I live here too ... It's a good 10 hour flight and then a 20-minute drive from Linz airport.

    5. Re:I actually live here by mysidia · · Score: 1

      In other words... the article is a dramatization, also known as clickbait.

    6. Re: I actually live here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who had that kind of respect, you're the perfect person to do it. You'll be careful not to disturb the property anymore than necessary to document it pictorially and for public benefit. The site will only continue to decay and, likely, continue to be defaced by hoodlums.

    7. Re:I actually live here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty well know throughout Europe that the entirety of Austria is still a "vast Nazi facility" even today.

  7. No Wolfenstein comments yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huh

  8. Amazing by plopez · · Score: 1, Troll

    Posted about an hour ago and no sign of Godwin's Law yet. Another sure sign that Slashdot's standards are slipping.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Amazing by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      How on earth would you Godwin this? Comparing the Nazis to the Nazis is a bit redundant.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Amazing by plopez · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the creativity of your average slashdotter ;)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Amazing by plopez · · Score: 0

      Moderated 'troll'. Either my humor is too subtle or it was a really bad joke.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:Amazing by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      How on earth would you Godwin this? Comparing the Nazis to the Nazis is a bit redundant.

      That's just the kind of thing Hitler would have said!

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    5. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Either my humor is too subtle or it was a really bad joke.

      That's just the kind of thing Hitler would have said!

  9. I live in Austria, first thing I hear about this by crabel · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just searched for St. Georgen: The current top story in local newspapers is: A lumberman was hit by a bouncing branch. Of course, that Nazi story can be found too, but it doesn't get a lot of attention. Nobody cares because there is simply no story. That filmmaker just dug a hole and found a staircase. That's all. Well, that's not a 100% correct: They also found an army helmet, an army bike and several warning signs. Not really surprising, since it was a well known nazi base. But hey, maybe the staircase will indeed lead to a super-secret 75-acre nuclear testing underground complex dug by 320.000 inmates that died from it. Or maybe these numbers are simply completely bogus too. The actual number of victims in KZ Gusen (I + II + III) was 44.600, that includes children and people that died from exhaustion after they were freed).

  10. Castle Wolfenstein by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's where BJ Blazkowicz busted out of, with my help.
     

  11. Filmmaker trying to drum up excitement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Austria is getting Geraldo'd.

    1. Re:Filmmaker trying to drum up excitement? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps this is where Al Capone really built his secret vault!

      No one suspects the Cosa Nostra!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Filmmaker trying to drum up excitement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, a chance for Geraldo Rivera to save face!

    3. Re:Filmmaker trying to drum up excitement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herr Aldo Riechera?

    4. Re:Filmmaker trying to drum up excitement? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, they had to stop digging because the local authorities mysteriously started insisting the excavators apply for some new permits. Those responsible for the safekeeping of the vault with the Holy grail and the Ark of the Covenant, etc are already in the process of using one of the secret secondary backdoors out of the facility to move all the valuables to one of the backup storage vaults.

      By the time they resume digging, there will be an empty chamber for them to find.

    5. Re:Filmmaker trying to drum up excitement? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      That belongs in a museum!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  12. Re:I live in Austria, first thing I hear about thi by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are wrongly informed, did not search deeply enough, or maybe simply don't read German ? A team of Austrian archeologists is preparing to start digging, as soon as the weather allows it, i.e. as soon as precipitation and hydrology levels are so low as to let them work without danger of being suddenly flooded. Here in Austria, this would typically be from the end of April to the beginning of November.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  13. Re:I live in Austria, first thing I hear about thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nobody cares because there is simply no story. That filmmaker just dug a hole and found a staircase. That's all.

    TFA says that digging has stopped because the local authorities wanted new permits, but should resume next month. Maybe they'll find something interesting, maybe they won't, but there's one way to find out.

  14. Re:I live in Austria, first thing I hear about thi by crabel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course I can read German. Sure, there is probably something there, some tunnels, a storage area maybe, but a secret/unknown "75-acre underground complex"? Those articles are totally exaggerated. There is no evidence at all for anything. Currently it's just rumors.

  15. Beware ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radioactive nazi zombies are quite hard to kill.

    1. Re:Beware ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a bit more worried about Hitler on a T-rex

    2. Re:Beware ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... as shown here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmilvm3KIgw

  16. Does Godwin's Law apply.... by BluPhenix316 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If TFA is about Nazis?

    1. Re:Does Godwin's Law apply.... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      No.

  17. Nazis are still the ultimate bad guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still finding secret stuff that these guys did? Scary. ISIS has nothing on them.

  18. Bah! Already seen in the Captain America movies by mtm10 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the original Hydra base.

  19. POW Sabotage! by C+R+Johnson · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing a story about POWs who substitued regular water for a shipment of heavy water and thus delayed the German program.

    Lucky for for all of us they were guarded by a blithering Sargent who would willingly ignore their shenanigans!

    --
    The alternative to limited government is unlimited government.
    1. Re:POW Sabotage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know nothing|

  20. Re:I live in Austria, first thing I hear about thi by stiebing.ja · · Score: 2

    dug by 320.000 inmates that died from it. Or maybe these numbers are simply completely bogus too. The actual number of victims in KZ Gusen (I + II + III) was 44.600

    regarding the 44.600 you seem to forget, that KZ Gusen has been a part of KZ Mauthausen-Gusen, where the number of 320.000 murdered imprisoners has been taking of, like TFA also states.

    --
    I lag
  21. irony and karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the linked articles may be only highly speculative hype, Germany did have a nuclear program during WWII. What is also certain is that Hitler refused to allocate that program sufficient resources due to his disdain of what he called "Jew science."

  22. Bigger Nazi base on the moon: Iron Sky by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...
    "Iron Sky is a 2012 Finnish-Australian-German[4] comic science fiction action film directed by Timo Vuorensola and written by Johanna Sinisalo and Michael Kalesniko.[5][6] It tells the story of a group of Nazi Germans who, having been defeated in 1945, fled to the Moon where they built a space fleet to return in 2018 and conquer Earth."

    We have only three years left to get ready!!! :-)

    Seriously though, the Nazis show what can happen when soulless bureaucracy gets out of control... And modern schooling was invented in Prussia and made possible the Nazi war effort built on people unquestionably following horrific orders...
    http://johntaylorgatto.wordpre...
    "I'll bring this down to earth. Try to see that an intricately subordinated industrial/commercial system has only limited use for hundreds of millions of self-reliant, resourceful readers and critical thinkers. In an egalitarian, entrepreneurially based economy of confederated families like the one the Amish have or the Mondragon folk in the Basque region of Spain, any number of self-reliant people can be accommodated usefully, but not in a concentrated command-type economy like our own. Where on earth would they fit? ... Before you can reach a point of effectiveness in defending your own children or your principles against the assault of blind social machinery, you have to stop conspiring against yourself by attempting to negotiate with a set of abstract principles and rules which, by its nature, cannot respond. Under all its disguises, that is what institutional schooling is, an abstraction which has escaped its handlers. Nobody can reform it. First you have to realize that human values are the stuff of madness to a system; in systems-logic the schools we have are already the schools the system needs; the only way they could be much improved is to have kids eat, sleep, live, and die there. Schools got the way they were at the start of the twentieth century as part of a vast, intensely engineered social revolution in which all major institutions were overhauled to work together in harmonious managerial efficiency. ... A huge price had to be paid for business and government efficiency, a price we still pay in the quality of our existence. ... Part of what kids gave up was the prospect of being able to read very well, a historic part of the American genius. Instead, school had to train them for their role in the new overarching social system. But spare yourself the agony of thinking of this as a conspiracy. It was and is a fully rational transaction, the very epitome of rationalization engendered by a group of honorable men, all honorable men -- but with decisive help from ordinary citizens, from almost all of us as we gradually lost touch with the fact that being followers instead of leaders, becoming consumers in place of producers, rendered us incompletely human. It was a naturally occurring conspiracy, one which required no criminal genius. The real conspirators were ourselves. When we sold our liberty for the promise of automatic security, we became like children in a conspiracy against growing up, sad children who conspire against their own children, consigning them over and over to the denaturing vats of compulsory state factory schooling."

    And:
    http://www.press.uchicago.edu/...
    "What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security."

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:Bigger Nazi base on the moon: Iron Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. "modern schooling was invented in Prussia and made possible the Nazi war effort built on people unquestionably following horrific orders..."

      No. People don't follow orders because of "modern schooling". They follow orders because the are sheep. Most people are happy to follow orders, and that probably includes you.

      Atrocities have nothing to do with schools. Look at crusades, or burning of Carthage by ancient Rome.. Or anything in between.

      2. "That's why Hitler couldn't stop and glory comfortably in his role as victor after France's 1940 surrender"

      Again, 100% wrong. Read Hitler's terrible ravings in his book. And there you will find that he didn't care to invade France and related areas because he viewed those people as almost equals. But the land to the east, that was the destiny. Hitler didn't want to be at war with Britain or France. That only happened because he invaded Poland. Hitler believed that he could patch things up with the west after dealing with Russia and completing his "plan".

      So please, get your facts straight. Hitler's policies were that of hatred towards Jews, Poles and slaves in general. He wanted to exterminate the Jews and enslave and sterilize the poles/slaves and treat them as sub-humans slaves.

      Everything you quote is just bullshit and excuses. What tools Hitler used to achieve his aims have nothing to do with the existence of said tools.

  23. Re:I live in Austria, first thing I hear about thi by crabel · · Score: 2

    While that number is not reasonable by itself and far to high ("only" 200.000 people were deported to Mauthausen and its subcamps), even if it were correct, not all of those prisoners were vitims of slave labour digging a huge underground complex. I guess someone looked into WP and simply took the highest number it could find.

  24. Some comfort by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Even though we have this distrubing news of a missed WMD program in Austria that lay hidden for 70 years under occupation and democratic governments, we still have the assurance of "top men" that we known all and found everything in Iraq. Yes indeed, ... "top men" .... some even post here.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Some comfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, reality must be so painful for you. I recommend you up your meds. Otherwise you'll just spend your life hoping and wishing for the worst so that you can feel good about yourself.

    2. Re:Some comfort by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Look, there's one one of those "top men" now! By the way, thanks for the laugh. You're kind of "funny," even if it isn't "ha ha" funny.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Some comfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a song that describes you, Little Fjord :

      ""Destroyer"

      Met a girl called Lola and I took her back to my place
      Feelin' guilty, feelin' scared, hidden cameras everywhere
      Stop! Hold on. Stay in control

      Girl, I want you here with me
      But I'm really not as cool as I'd like to be
      'Cause there's a red, under my bed
      And there's a little yellow man in my head
      And there's a true blue inside of me
      That keeps stoppin' me, touchin' ya, watchin' ya, lovin' ya

      Paranoia, the destroyer.
      Paranoia, the destroyer.

      Well I fell asleep, then I woke feelin' kinda' queer
      Lola looked at me and said, "ooh you look so weird."
      She said, "man, there's really something wrong with you.
      One day you're gonna' self-destruct.
      You're up, you're down, I can't work you out
      You get a good thing goin' then you blow yourself out."

      Silly boy ya' self-destroyer. Silly boy ya' self-destroyer

      Silly boy you got so much to live for
      So much to aim for, so much to try for
      You blowing it all with paranoia
      You're so insecure you self-destroyer

      (And it goes like this, here it goes)
      Paranoia, the destroyer
      (Here it goes again)
      Paranoia, the destroyer

      Doctor, Doctor help me please, I know you'll understand
      There's a time device inside of me, I'm a self-destructin' man
      There's a red, under my bed
      And there's a little green man in my head
      And he said, "you're not goin' crazy, you're just a bit sad
      'Cause there's a man in ya, gnawin' ya, tearin' ya into two."

      Silly boy ya' self-destroyer.
      Paranoia, the destroyer

      Self-destroyer, wreck your health
      Destroy friends, destroy yourself
      The time device of self-destruction
      Light the fuse and start eruption

      (Yea, it goes like this, here it goes)
      Paranoia, the destroyer
      (Here's to paranoia)
      Paranoia, the destroyer
      (Hey hey, here it goes)
      Paranoia, the destroyer"

    4. Re:Some comfort by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      If you think that is so, then I would say you aren't very observant.

      But where you respond with poetry, I'll respond with prose.

      Iraq's WMD: The Shameless New York Times Moves the Goalposts

      Now comes the 10,000-word, eight-part story in The New York Times. The front-page story, called "The Secret Casualties Of Iraq's Abandoned Chemical Weapons," says WMD were in Iraq: "In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act."

      Moreover, the soldiers were told to keep quiet about the WMD:

      "Troops and officers were instructed to be silent or give deceptive accounts of what they had found. ?'Nothing of significance' is what I was ordered to say,' said Jarrod Lampier, a recently retired Army major who was present for the largest chemical weapons discovery of the war: more than 2,400 nerve-agent rockets unearthed in 2006 at a former Republican Guard compound.

      "Jarrod L. Taylor, a former Army sergeant on hand for the destruction of mustard shells that burned two soldiers in his infantry company, joked of 'wounds that never happened' from 'that stuff that didn't exist.' The public, he said, was misled for a decade. 'I love it when I hear, 'Oh there weren't any chemical weapons in Iraq,' he said. 'There were plenty.'"

      Cheers, and on a wild guess I'll recommend that maybe you should cut down on your "recreational" use of controlled substances

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Some comfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Top Men" sounds like a Viagra ad to me

    6. Re:Some comfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refer to you to the source of a cultural reference you may have missed.

  25. Austria has kind of a weird relationship with past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not surprised it wasn't in the paper and prominently featured. It would only cause difficulties for people of a certain age who would rather not bring such things up and who deep down inside think that there was an overall benefit.

    Same is true of things in the US, although not to the same degree, although I'm sure that if you took comparable small areas (Austria isn't that big, comparable to a single US state), you'd find places (e.g. the deep south) where a significant fraction of the population feels that they got a raw deal with the Emancipation Proclamation and the subsequent "war of northern aggression" or "war between the states" (the popular formulation in the 60s and 70s when I was a youth)

  26. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Hitler did nothing wrong

    His bomb didn't work.

  27. Man by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

    "The state exists to serve man."
    FTFY

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Man by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I'll have the rump roast, you can have the 'oysters'

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Man by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Not his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  28. Re:Austria has kind of a weird relationship with p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oy vey! It's another Holocaust I tell you! A Holocaust!

  29. Could? by epine · · Score: 1

    The reported findings, if corroborated by further inquiry, could add fresh fodder to an ongoing debate over the Third Reich's ultimately failed attempt to secure an atomic weapon.

    If, could, fodder, ultimately, failed, secure. Every one of these words as cast is a pablum-brained Orwellian nightmare.

    The German Jesus nut was supremacy in all things. After setbacks in The Battle of Britain and Moscow/Stalingrad, the Germans found themselves in a situation where they needed to tighten their belts (both militarily and technologically) and settle for supremacy in merely the most essential things.

    It was this belt-tightening challenge they bungled like crazy. Belt-tightening somehow wasn't in the German lexicon.

    There was a scold Fuehrer who lived in a shoe
    with so many children, he couldn't kick through;
    He gave them some broth without any bread,
    Then stripped 'em unsoundly to hiss boot instead.

    Well, it was a try anyway, but it does capture the main idea.

  30. You are wrongly misinformed too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews did WTC and 9/11 was an inside job.

  31. Outpost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just leave this right here.

  32. Kammler and Nukes by Ektanoor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Kammler can be linked to every fantastic and most absurd idea on nazi secret projects. However there is a caveat - till now I have never seen his name in any document that can be surely sourced to any atomic project nazis may have had. None, zero, nada, nechego...

    The most striking fact that Kammler had nothing to do with nukes is how real nazi nuked scientists tried to survive the last days of the Third Reich. Most interesting was how Heisenberg managed to find food and other essential things for his family - he got help from an old acquaintance working at one of Kammler's key labs! For that, he came to town on a bycicle and the acquaintance was shocked by his shabby looks. So Heisenberg was a lost soul at the end of the war.

    Nukes and Kammler, until someone proves the contrary, don't cope. However, this does not mean someone may still find some mega-leftovers of Kammler's Underground Empire. For the sake of what? Well he surely was an early participant of "Amerika Bomber" project, still in a very classical form. He also was the V-2/A-4 boss and there are tons of questions on how deep was his knowledge and participation of such projects like the A-10. He once worked at Luftwaffe and seemed to have been in good relations with Goering, so he could know about such wonders as the Silbervogel. And, at the end he was the last boss of the nazi jet projects (which was the reason why von Braun suddenly stopped at Oberammergau, with this guy breathing at his back). While war demanded some humbleness, it was usual to see many nazi projects exploding into mega-machines. I wouldn't be shocked to see the last of the last of Kammler's projects, the Messerschmidt P.1101, having a megabrother nearby. Or maybe it was just for the P.1101 itself! Once tested, they had to be produced somewhere, in large numbers, in very, very large numbers.

    So the huge, nearly empty bunkers. Maybe for one of these bloated conceptions of World Domination. And nukes were just speculation, still without any proof of concept. At the end of the War, nazis still thought that the key to victory was the Very Big, Surely Bad and Really Ugly.

  33. I think by SwabianEngineer · · Score: 1

    ...you Americans should consume fewer cheap Hollywood movies. Do you have any PROOF of your fantasies ?

    1. Re:I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof is nothing a little advanced interrogation can't produce.

  34. 75 acres... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone pointed out: 75 acres. 75. Now Oak Ridge Tennessee was 10,000 acres. Hanford Washington was 586 square miles. There were also large cyclotron facilities at the University of Chicago, and at the large Livermore Radiation Laboratory operated by the University of California. There was also research work done at Princeton and in New Mexico. With everything running, the US had enough material for three bombs in 1945 (the trinity test site, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki. Hoechst fertilizer company was tasked with concentrating uranium hexaflouride prior to cyclotrons refining it. 75 acres is a start, but not an end.

  35. Those sites aren't news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... these sites were described extensively in decades past, in books that aren't allowed for print in many countries anymore, for being "Nazi apologists", for daring to tell what really happened and not the zionist history revisionism we have today.

    The story should instead be, what was already there, that took them 6 decades to clean and/or move to another place, before releasing them to the press?

  36. Yawn. Radium. by ironduke-particle · · Score: 1

    Not secret. Just forgotten and unimportant and not a priority.

    Why underground? As has has been pointed out elsewhere, during the Great War Adolf was an infantryman on the Western Front, who associated safety with being in a bunker underground. So the Nazis wasted much effort constructing vast underground complexes in which to do all sorts of things.

    Let's assume there are elevated radiation levels at this site, which is 75 acres. Compared to many industrial sites, that's big; compared to the Hanford estate, or Windscale, or Chelyabinsk 65, or Oak Ridge, or ... it's tiny. Probably not a bomb project, then. What else nuclear-related might Adolf's minions have been up to?

    How about: processing pitchblende to recover interesting metals? Such as ...
    [1] Uranium. Principal metal to be had from pitchblende. The oxide can be used to make fancy yellow glass. If you're one of Adolf's minions, it's a waste product.
    [2] Polonium. Also a waste product.
    [3] Radium. Which can be used to make luminous paint for instrument dials, for use in eg aeroplanes. It's not like the Nazis built any aeroplanes, is it?

  37. Re: Hitler and the Nazi's were so stupid. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's an acronym for NAtionale soZIalist, the political party.

    Wrong again. it's a contraction of a single German word (because compound words are common in Germanic languages), Nazi is the short form of Nationalsozialismus. Ergo it is a contraction and should be capitalised as a proper noun because it's full version is a proper noun.

    What, you didn't know the NAZIs were socialists?

    Thats because they aren't. The key part of " Nationalsozialismus" is nationalism, not socialism. Nazism is an extreme right wing form of government committed to a single party state and diametrically opposed to communism and Marxism.

    One of the first jobs of the Sturmabteilung or SA was to beat up Bolshevik supporters around Munich in the 1920s. By the 1930's when the SA were disbanded and merged into the SS (after the night of the long kinves) there were no Bolseviks left in Germany due to the SA's actions.

    You need to learn about the Nazis before commenting about the Nazis.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  38. Tunnels everywhere, A-bombs nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of these claims seem to be overblown.
    If you take a look at the Manhattan Project, you get an idea what efforts in research and production (i.e. uranium enrichment) were required.

    Well, enrichenment is not really needed. A CANDU-style reactor works fine with natural uranium, and can produce plutonium (for bombs) which is easily separated out chemically. This way, no large-scale enrichenment program - but instead, a need for lots of heavy water. Plutonium is not so nice to work with, but they used slaves for unpleasant work anyway.

    They should test the isotope mix of the radioactive site. That will show if it was merely industrial pollution from uranium mining, remains of fuel that has seen use in reactors, or the remains of a bomb test. The latter is not likely. If the nazis made even one working bomb, London or Stalingrad or Moscow would have a ground zero.

  39. Is it just me? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Or does 'failed attempt to secure an atomic weapon' and 'failed to develop an atomic weapon' mean two completely different things?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  40. Re:I live in Austria, first thing I hear about thi by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    maybe the staircase will indeed lead to a super-secret 75-acre nuclear testing underground complex

    Let's assume there is. Either:
    1) it's still there and Allied intelligence never heard anything about it
    2) it was there but it got cleaned up after VE-Day by Axis powers (or their Chitauri masters) and Allied intelligence never heard about it.
    2a) by detonating the bomb they were working on inside (makes for a better story).
    3) Allied intelligence knew about it and covered it up (also a good story).

    Or it's not there. Mostly likely explanation sells few newspapers.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  41. Making a bomb without Scientists? by Optali · · Score: 1

    All is nice and very cool, but the US "investigators" forget a few facts:

    A) Europe is not a dark place hidden in the dark jungles of Africa: We are at least as devolped as any of the most developed places in the USA, yes, Austria too.

    B) We know our history pretty well, and it happens that the Nazis, as good Germans, wrote down every single thing that they did in minute detail. Hell, we even have the time tables of the trains carrying people to Auschwitz! This "secret" complex is far from secret, and it even has it's very own Wikipedia page:
    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...
    (In German).

    C) The Germans did an excellent job in getting rid of ANY scientist that could have been able to build a basic _reactor_. The only person in Germany that had an idea about fission was Otto Hahn, and he was completely ignored by the military and would have otherwise extremely reluctant to participate as he was involved in helping Germans of jewish religion to escape the country. And for the less agile of mind: No Fission = No U238 / No PU239 = NO Friggin' BOMB.

    D) Despite it's "German" Name, Oppenheimer, the father of the A-Bomb' is as USian as a bucket full of burgers, born in NYC (which is NOT a part of Austria, AFAIK)

    E) The only reason that Germany still exists today and is not a radioactive crater is that the Allies knew they had no bomb, else they would have called in the Little Boy and the Fat Man to pay my adoptive country a visit (for the slower of mind: That were the names of the two A-Bombs used to nuke the fuck out of Hiroshima and Nagasaki)

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  42. A-10? by Optali · · Score: 1

    And why the hell would hey have bothered about hte Amerika Bomber if they had A-10s??

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...

    Fucking hell, that's a gun with wings!!!
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...

    Tell me that your Second Amendment allows stuff like this and I will swim all the way to your country and sell my balls to get the nationality.

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  43. Re: Hitler and the Nazi's were so stupid. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    is nationalism

    Finally. The thread is so hung up with socialism that they've ignored Nationalism!
    Now there is nothing wrong with Nationalism and more countries should move towards its goals. You can have right or left wing Nationalism. Nationalism can exist in all the political continuum. It can go far as xenophobia or as welcoming as global, but you can still celebrate nationalism no matter what.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  44. von Braun's ethics by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    In May 1945, von Braun had to decide whether to surrender to the U.S. or the USSR. This is how he described the decision:

    We knew that we had created a new means of warfare, and the question as to what nation, to what victorious nation we were willing to entrust this brainchild of ours was a moral decision more than anything else. We wanted to see the world spared another conflict such as Germany had just been through, and we felt that only by surrendering such a weapon to people who are guided by the Bible could such an assurance to the world be best secured.

    Draw your own conclusion about his ethical compass.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  45. Nazis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a race against evil. If it is captured by the Nazis the armies of darkness will march all over the face of the earth.

    Nazis - I hate those guys!

    Nazis! Why did it have to be Nazis?

  46. Re: Uhm WMD -were- found in Iraq. Get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WMD were found in Iraq according to the New York Times..... The NYT is hardly a right-wing supporter so one suspects they're telling the truth here

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/100000003173431.mobile.html?_r=1

    Not to mention that, according to Saddam's Number Two Man, many were moved to Syria - one tens to believe that if anyone knows what was going on, he did

    http://www.nysun.com/foreign/iraqs-wmd-secreted-in-syria-sada-says/26514/