Slashdot Mirror


In Paris, Terrorists Kill 2 More, Take At Least 7 Hostages

As reported by The Daily Beast, news on the ongoing terror attack (or attacks) in Paris. Chérif and Saïd Kouachi, who are accused of slaughtering 12 in an attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine, have been cornered by hundreds of security officials close to Charles de Gaulle Airport, north of Paris. Officials say they believe the heavily armed brothers are holding one hostage. Twenty miles south, in the east of the city, at least one gunman is believed to have taken six hostages at a Jewish store. Police suspect that the third gunman is the same man who shot and killed a policewoman on Thursday morning before escaping in a bulletproof vest. Update: 01/09 17:44 GMT by T : And now all three of the gunmen involved in today's hostage taking are dead. Watch this space for updates. Update: 01/09 17:15 GMT by T : CNN's story features a stream of updates (and an autoplaying video ad to beware), as does The Telegraph. Latest news is that brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi have been killed by police, but it's unclear whether the same is true of the third hostage-taker.

84 of 490 comments (clear)

  1. Bar fucking barians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The moderate Muslims need to more loudly denouce this shit.

    Or the assumption will be they agree with the acts of barbarity done in the name of their god.

    1. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Yunzil · · Score: 3, Informative

      They denounce it all the time. For some reason it almost never gets reported in the press.

    2. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They denounce it all the time. For some reason it almost never gets reported in the press.

      BULLSHIT.

      Majorities of Muslims in Egypt and Pakistan support the death penalty for leaving Islam

      Violence and murder in response to insults and slights against Islam is widely and strongly supported by Muslims.

      Period.

    3. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK, here's a recent article about a US lawyer who has friends in ISIS and was negotiating with them for the release of a hostage, the American aid worker Peter Kassig who was ultimately murdered by ISIS. The terms of the proposed hostage release:

      If consummated, the negotiations in which Cohen was involved would have included an agreement by ISIS to halt all kidnappings and beheadings of civilians; in exchange for this, Maqdisi and Abu Qatada, another widely respected jihadist theologian, would have agreed to cease and desist their scathing public denunciations of ISIS.

      Citation:

      http://forward.com/articles/211631/stanley-cohens-radical-detour-on-the-way-to-prison/?p=all

      So yeah, there are some influential Muslims who speak out, but you know, they can get murdered also for doing so. How many non-Muslim people do you know who will open themselves up to terrorist attack to speak out against injustice?

      Courage is in short supply in this world no matter the religious affiliation, ethnic group, skin color, etc.

    4. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's usually half-assed. Like here's our local muslim leader

      The chairman of the Muslim community in Trondheim deplore terrorism in Paris, but calls while stricter rules for what the media can publish.
      (...)
      Chilwan believes it is asking for trouble when the media continues to publish images that Charlie Hebdo does.
      - This has happened before in Denmark. We know that the consequences are dramatic. Why you should always pour fuel on the fire, ask Chilwan.
      Chilwan calls therefore stricter rules in the media for what can be published.
      - To adopt a law for this is too strong. But I think the ethical rules of the press must be defined in a better manner, where one agrees some ethical and moral values so that no one feels offended. It would be better for society, says Chilwan.

      Lots of victim-blaming for provoking muslims, clear references that terror should be expected, calls for self-censorship and so on. Fuck him. Fuck all muslims that think like him. And they're not extremists and outcasts in the muslim comunity, they're leaders of mainstream organizations. Journalists and most of society just refuses to acknowledge that the "moderate" muslims are actually fringe radicals that don't have much popular support.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 5, Informative
    6. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Norway's Christians didn't have to apologise for Anders Breivik, and it's the same for Muslims now.

      That's comparing apples and oranges, Breivik for the most part killed Norwegian Christians belonging to a political youth party that he felt was "selling out" the country. Of the list of his 77 victims there's 11 with names I'd generally consider foreign leaving 66 that probably were ethnically Norwegian, from statistics around 80% would be nominally Christians. I say nominally because many belong to the state church without being very religious at all, but they wouldn't have any other religious affiliation. His action was more like the Muslim-on-Muslim slaughter in Pakistan, killing our own "fallen" over ideology.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All he (and other xtian morons) want is to blame all muslims for the actions of some, but with the option of NOT blaming all christians for the actions of some.

      Hence the "Why don't they speak up?" meme.

      How many xtians do you hear decrying WBC? None. How about the killings of gay men in Africa by christians? Silent on that too.

      Thing is, if you ASK them, they'll decry it, but they don't (And should not) feel the need to keep banging on about how they don't like that. They DO expect (and should not) Muslims to do so, though.

    8. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Click the link fucktard:

      The correct figures, based on the 2013 Pew Research Center report, are 88% of Muslims in Egypt and 62% of Muslims in Pakistan favor the death penalty for people who leave the Muslim religion.

      Yeah those moderates sure are speaking out against the barbarism. *rolls eyes*

    9. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many non-Muslim people do you know who will open themselves up to terrorist attack to speak out against injustice?

      I can point to twelve pretty quickly.

    10. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

      Well, there's speculation that at least one of the twelve was himself Muslim (based on his name, "Ahmed Merabet"):

      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/08/ahmed-merabet-mourned-charlie-hebdo-paris-attack

      My point remains: courage is to be found throughout humankind, as is tyranny unfortunately.

    11. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Breivik was also arrested and prosecuted by Norwegian Christians, and anyone who would express sympathy or support for him would be denounced and shunned.

      Of course there are crazies in the western world as well. Christians who bomb abortion clinics. But these people are a much, much smaller percentage of the populace, and the vast, vast majority of the populace not only condemns their actions, but would speak out against anybody advocating for such violence, and would report to the authorities anyone they suspected of planning violence. And then western (amongst them Christian) authorities would arrest and prosecute them and western (amongst them Christian) juries would convict them.

      Islamic terrorism must be stopped. But we in the west can't do it. We're not in the mosques in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and wherever else the terrorists are indoctrinated and radicalized. We're not the terrorists' neighbors and family members. But the muslims who say "we don't support this!" are. It's going on in your mosques, it's going on in your families and your neighborhoods. It's not enough to say "we don't support it." You have to have a collective political will to ferret it out and put a stop to it.

      If somebody at my church were inciting people to violence, ya know what I'd do? I'd report it. And the media would shine a big light on the crazy things coming out of that church and people would talk about how awful what they were saying is, and if you were a member of that church people would think you were crazy and push you out of their lives. And if I thought somebody in my community was planning violence, you know what I'd do? I'd call the cops. They'd investigate and arrest the guy for attempted whatever. And we'd splash him on the news and everybody would say how great it was that I turned him in and what a great job the cops did stopping this guy. Because that's our culture.

      It isn't enough for the peaceful muslims to say "we don't support this." They need to work to change their culture to actively stop it.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    12. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      he is correct in noting that the center of mass in muslim ideology shrugs it's shoulders at things like charlie hebdo. you could go to cairo, kartachi, riyadh, etc., and easily find people who blame the cartoonists, if not an outright majority

      that matters

      yeah, there's liberal muslims who understand free speech, that speech offensive to you doesn't justify murder. but there is simply far too little of them in this world. partly because any liberal muslim who does speak out in muslim lands in favor of progress towards tolerance, simply gets murdered

      people in the west have to come to grips with the fact that there are simply a lot of muslims who are comfortable with what happened at charlie hebdo. and that's a real and huge problem

      this doesn't mean we treat muslims badly in the west, as some pea brained western assholes want. that's actually what people in al qaeda and ISIS want: if the west responds violently, it further radicalizes more muslims to their fold. al qaeda and ISIS want to antagonize western morons to respond with violence. that helps them recruit

      but what it does mean is that certain cotton headed western liberals, and i consider myself a western liberal (but not a cotton headed one) need to shut fuck up and stop saying "it's because they're poor," "it's because they are excluded," "it's because we hurt their feelings so it's our fault"

      apologists are disgusting. no one mass murders because they feel slighted by you, and it's YOUR fault they did that?

      so what to do we do? we crack down on imams and any loudmouths who preach hate. there is nothing about the concept of free speech that says those who want to violently destroy free speech deserve free speech protections

      intolerance of intolerance is not the same as intolerance itself

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

      Michael Walzer asks "Should we tolerate the intolerant?". He notes that most minority religious groups who are the beneficiaries of tolerance are themselves intolerant, at least in some respects. In a tolerant regime, such people may learn to tolerate, or at least to behave "as if they possessed this virtue".[1] Philosopher Karl Popper asserted, in The Open Society and Its Enemies Vol. 1, that we are warranted in refusing to tolerate intolerance. Philosopher John Rawls concludes in A Theory of Justice that a just society must tolerate the intolerant, for otherwise, the society would then itself be intolerant, and thus unjust. However, Rawls also insists, like Popper, that society has a reasonable right of self-preservation that supersedes the principle of tolerance: "While an intolerant sect does not itself have title to complain of intolerance, its freedom should be restricted only when the tolerant sincerely and with reason believe that their own security and that of the institutions of liberty are in danger."[2]

      just like banning nazi ideology in germany does not violate free speech principals because nazism symbolizes the end of free speech principals, the west must get comfortable shutting down, shutting up, jailing and deporting imams and assorted douchebags who preach hate and jihad

      this does not violate principals of western liberty. you don't get the protections of liberty at the same time you preach for the violent destruction of liberty. it's not logical coherent. so western apologists who think their violence is our fault need to shut the fuck up: you're wrong. this is larger than a simple grievance about not getting a fucking job. this is an organized ideology of hate, as potent and dangerous as nazism

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    13. Re:Bar fucking barians ... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

      Doesn't this boil down to "people advocate their own way of life"? It's hardly surprising that people who have spent much or all of their lives under sharia law are basing their beliefs and opinions on that law. Just think about all the Americans who uncritically assume that freedom of speech is universally good and all the Germans who uncritically assume that suppressing national socialism trumps unrestricted freedom of speech. Turkey is a good example as great pains were taken to make Turkey a secular state. (Turkey is still rather quirky in many regards but religious nuts they're not.)

      Also, your first numbers are about what those Muslims who believe sharia should be the law of the land have to say about leaving Islam. We're already talking about people who want a theocracy and their opinion on the specific case of someone leaving their religion. If we look at other numbers we see a different picture. Firstly, if we take the number of people who ask for sharia in the first place into consideration we see that the results are very regional with South Asia being the most sharia-friendly.

      Even in places like Pakistan where most Muslims would like more sharia in their lives the vast majority still support religious freedom (pg. 63). As a matter of fact, the most intolerant country, Egypt, still has 77% in favor. Also note that virtually everywhere people are quite concerned about Muslim extremist groups (pg. 68) and that the only people who can muster even lukewarm approval of suicide bombings are those in very unstable regions like Palestine and Afghanistan.

      If anything, the Pew study tells me that it's not a religious problem but a regional and social one. The most extreme opinions come from regions that are either politically unstable, have been dominated by extremists for decades or are Pakistan. (I don't know much about Pakistani culture so I can't tell what colors their opinions.) Also, the great Islamic crusade to convert everyone in the world is a myth. Broadly claiming that Muslims everywhere behave like telegenic extremists in particularly extremist countries is like claiming that the entire USA are like the Bible Belt and that the Westboro Baptist Church is representative of popular opinion in the States.

      We have to figure out a way for everyone to get along. Painting an entire religion with broad strokes in a situation where religion is a politically charged topic is counterproductive, especially when all you have in favor of this is media coverage of extremists putting on a show for the media.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  2. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by MrKevvy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because nerds are (generally) supportive of nonviolence and tolerance for unpopular ideas to promote intellectual and creative freedom, and these mindless idiot fundamentalist thugs are the enemy of that and will destroy it if they can. Is it clearer now?

    --
    -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
  3. why? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2

    "Watch this space for updates."

    If only there were places on the web one could go to watch live streaming coverage of event such as this, or liveblogs. Or a service where small messages containing updates could be broadcast to other users, searchable by special keywords called "hashtags"....

    1. Re:why? by Iniamyen · · Score: 4, Funny

      That stuff isn't always fact-checked or verified. What you get with /. is the second-to-none integrity of the information that's provided.

    2. Re:why? by neminem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Second-to-none, as in it's the literally the second option in terms of integrity, with "none" as the better option? :p

  4. Finished in the mean time by chthon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Both brothers are dead and their hostage is freed

    1. Re:Finished in the mean time by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

      From what I'm gathering, it had a rather strong resemblance to the end of the Blues Brothers.

  5. Re:The religion of peace by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

    another shining example of diversity and multiculturalism.

  6. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    before escaping in a bulletproof vest.

    because it's rather impressive that one of the terrorists made a makeshift vehicle using only a bulletproof vest.

  7. Re:Click Bait? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

    Slashdot has been posting political stories that have nothing to do with technology for well over a decade. Also the "news for nerds" subtitle was long since removed from the title of the site.

  8. They're dead, Tim by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reported a few minutes ago, all three terrorists are dead.

    1. Re:They're dead, Tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And look, they managed to do it without closing Paris down for a day. Maybe Boston could learn something from France about dealing with Muslim terrorists.

  9. Re:Yay, religion of peace! by pitchpipe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It is the religion of 'peace'. They just define 'peace' a little differently.

    Go out, and spread the religion by any peaceful means necessary. If your friend won't accept Allah, peacefully flog him in the streets. If someone insults Allah, peacefully remove his head. If a group refuses to convert to Islam, very peacefully bring your guns and bombs and peacefully kill as many of them as you can. If possible, obtain a peaceful nuclear weapon, and detonate it peacefully in their cities. They will be at peace. We bring them PEACE in the name of Allah!

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
  10. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by geekmux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because nerds are (generally) supportive of nonviolence and tolerance for unpopular ideas to promote intellectual and creative freedom, and these mindless idiot fundamentalist thugs are the enemy of that and will destroy it if they can. Is it clearer now?

    Looking back upon Slashdot history (you know, back when it was News for Nerds), I'd say it's about as clear as fucking mud.

    That line you attempt to draw between relevance (Freedom of Speech issue) and Slashdot is practically anorexic, and I can get my usual OMGWTF News from a million other sites online that are in charge of the OMGWTF reporting.

    Wanna talk Slashdot with this? How about MI5's move to become an even Bigger Brother with surveillance laws. THAT would be a relevant sub-topic to discuss here, not death tolls and weapons calibers.

    In summary, look at the Slashdot of yesteryear before claiming relevance today. No wonder people bitch about how far we've fallen.

  11. Re:Restrictive Gun laws by operagost · · Score: 2

    Doesn't matter, does it? Every time there is some mass shooting in the US, someone says it's because the gun laws aren't strict enough even though they rarely obtained the weapon legally.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  12. Swift Karma by Tolkienite · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm glad karma took the quick route for once. For islamic fundamentalists to die in a kosher store and in a printing press after attacking a magazine. Can't beat that.

  13. Re:Not Click Bait by boristdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is directly related to a story about people who want to censor certain information.

    Freedom of speech is as important to geeks as it is to journalists. We design, build and maintain the code and the hardware that journalists use to put out the stories to the public. Back in the print days most people didn't give a crap about what was printed in one country, or even in the next town over. Now we, the computer nerds of the world, have enabled a huge revolution in communication that is affecting entire countries, societies and religions. And we keep creating new ways to share information every day. Control of information, censorship, freedom of speech and the press are hugely intertwined with our nerd lives and livelihoods.

    Remember when anti-free-speech advocates tried to censor music lyrics? I do. Remember when they tried to ban many video games? I do. Remember wen they started shooting people who published satirical cartoons? Computer nerds like us are all about moving bits of information around. We thrive on information, data and ideas. It's what we're all about. And these shootings are a direct result of people trying to restrict the free exchange of ideas, which is the foundation of modern society.

    Any computer nerd, in fact anyone who appreciates their modern life, should want to know about anyone who is threatening the free flow of information.

  14. Oh it gets better by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard some standard issue left wing apologist halfwit on the radio here this morning in the UK trot out the usual "it was society's fault" rubbish. Yeah, because everyone with a fucking grievance grabs an AK-47 and shoots up a magazine don't they love?

    Just what the hell does it take to knock some common sense into these bloody liberals??

    1. Re:Oh it gets better by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because everyone with a fucking grievance grabs an AK-47 and shoots up a magazine don't they love?

      Just what the hell does it take to knock some common sense into these bloody liberals??

      Irony: right-wingers complaining about left-wingers painting them as violent lunatics and then threatening them with violence.

      Of course, in the interest of literal correctness, you didn't threaten to shoot them up with an AK-47. So it's grazing irony, not center-of-mass double-tap irony.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Oh it gets better by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I read your post, are you saying that he threatened violence because he used the words "knock some sense," or "bloody?"

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Oh it gets better by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, because everyone with a fucking grievance grabs an AK-47 and shoots up a magazine don't they love?

      Just what the hell does it take to knock some common sense into these bloody liberals??

      Irony: right-wingers complaining about left-wingers painting them as violent lunatics and then threatening them with violence.

      Of course, in the interest of literal correctness, you didn't threaten to shoot them up with an AK-47. So it's grazing irony, not center-of-mass double-tap irony.

      Yeah, the AK-47 is a communist gun and it yet has become one of the most popular firearms of the American right wing. At the last count 2nd. amendment loving American civilians were buying as many AK47s as the Russian military and police combined. Irony abounds....

    4. Re:Oh it gets better by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      No, "irony" is a pretentious sounding lefty doing his best to sound intellectually superior to other people while simultaneously failing to recognize the perfectly reasonable use of a common idiom. The "knock" in this case is the attack by Islamists on a paragon of lefty publishing.

      Blah blah blah lefty, blah blah Liberal blah blah

      Seriously you neocons fucked up big time, putting us into the longest wars in US history. Winning hearts and minds?" Seriously? These people hate us, and you neocon crypto-fascists were just telling yourselves your mutual masturbation tales of winning hearts and minds while your companies were sucking off the public teat, the largest wellfare project ever made. All the time, blaming every problem on the mythical liberals.

      My kind of war would last about 20 minutes from start to finish. Fight to win, or stay at home.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  15. Re:Time to leave the muslim faith. by MadCow42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Christianity is not much better, if you actually read the bible. Thankfully most churches ignore the parts of the bible that promote exactly the same actions that we criticize "radical Muslims" for... but then again, most Muslims also ignore those parts of the Koran. The difference is that there seem to be fewer "radical Christians" that interpret the bible literally, otherwise we'd be getting it from both sides.

    However, if there were more radical Christians, maybe people would realize that Islam isn't the issue... it's religion as a whole that's the problem.

    Check out Deuteronomy 20 some day, before you reply.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  16. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    Because nerds are (generally) supportive of nonviolence and tolerance for unpopular ideas to promote intellectual and creative freedom, and these mindless idiot fundamentalist thugs are the enemy of that and will destroy it if they can. Is it clearer now?

    Looking back upon Slashdot history (you know, back when it was News for Nerds), I'd say it's about as clear as fucking mud.

    You're forgetting the rest: News for nerds, stuff that matters. This is stuff that matters. As another example Osama Bin Laden Reported Dead, Body In US Hands got 1,855 comments, the most for any story I've submitted. Stuff that matters is subjective, but obviously a lot of people thought this mattered.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  17. Re:Click Bait? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    And look who clicked.

    The only thing more pathetic than clickbait are the fucktards who immediately turn up to shout "Clickbait!"

    At any rate, this is a serious issue because these sorts of terrorists takes inevitably lead to governments making laws and policies that adversely affect our liberties.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  18. Re:Latest news :D by JeffAtl · · Score: 2

    That's actually not good news. They were much more valuable alive.

  19. Re:Why didn't they take them alive? by JeffAtl · · Score: 2

    Actually, the reason to take them alive would be to gather information about their network.

  20. Re:The religion of peace by andydread · · Score: 5, Insightful

    well there was the abortion clining bombing from a few years back. not to mention the naacp bombing from earlier this week. All religion is garbage. They all have their fundamentalists.

  21. Re:The religion of peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This was the deadliest massacre in Europe since the mass shootings in Norway in 2011.

    You know, the ones by a Christian extremist, from the religion of peace and tolerance.

    Queue up people claiming that he was just fucked in the head, not Christian, but don't understand the same argument applies to the fuck-ups in France.

  22. Please, kill 'em and bury 'em with pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Send a message to their 7th-century brethren:

    "You do this, you rot in hell for all eternity."

    Wanna be a murderous religious whack job? We'll use that against you.

    Maybe - just maybe - doing things like that will drag Islam into the 21st century.

  23. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by MrKevvy · · Score: 2

    In summary, look at the Slashdot of yesteryear before claiming relevance today.

    I guess you missed my UID.

    --
    -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
  24. Re:The religion of peace by halivar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hell, if it's actually funny, we'll laugh along. I live in the Bible Belt, and no one I knows is offended by God telling King Arthur to stop grovelling. "It's like those miserable psalms. They're so depressing. Now knock it off." It's hilarious. Imagine Mohammed saying something like that on Arab TV. People would die, and not the laughing sort.

  25. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    whoosh

    That's one fast vest!

  26. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by loufoque · · Score: 2

    France does not even have true freedom of speech.

  27. Re:Yay, religion of peace! by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Conservatives did try to murder the NEA [arts.gov] over that!

    Actually, I believe they tried to stop the government from forcing people to pay for having such art made. Some people saw the creation of Piss Christ as being outside the role of the federal government. Crazy, I know.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  28. Re:The religion of peace by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 4, Informative

    More from the religion of peace and tolerance.

    Queue up people bringing up the Holy Crusades and other things that took place a good 300 years ago

    You have selective memory, why bring up the crusades when all one has to do is bring up the Bosnian war and the Kosovo wars. There were a whole lot of people involved in the Pogroms against the Bosnian moslems who claimed they were doing it among other things to defend Christianity.

  29. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot: Hall of Fame

    Most Active Stories
    5687 Kerry Concedes Election To Bush by timothy
    4183 Strike on Iraq by CmdrTaco
    3709 Barack Obama Wins US Presidency by CmdrTaco
    3468 Six Bomb Blasts Around Central London by Zonk
    3451 Equal Time For Creationism by Zonk
    3360 Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    3315 The Pseudoscience of Intelligent Design by Hemos
    3314 Saddam Hussein Arrested by CmdrTaco
    3265 Fahrenheit 9/11 Discussion by CmdrTaco
    3212 What's Keeping You On Windows? by Cliff

    Complaining about the irrelevance of stories is a time honored tradition here, along with grammar nazis and tired memes.

  30. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by Shakrai · · Score: 2

    You can't dismiss it as trolling, I've seen numerous anti-Muslim comments receive up-mods these last few days. And speaking of trolling:

    Europe maintains their civilization quite well without having to have every citizen feel they have to be armed to the teeth. Even comparing death toll to death toll, what happened in France is less than the amount of people eating lead in an hour in Chicago

    Nice anti-American slam you've got there. As if gun control/RKBA has anything at all to do with the issue at hand.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  31. Re:Why didn't they take them alive? by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why were they not taken out with some kind of sleep darts instead of lead bullets?

    Because "sleep darts" don't work in real life like they do in bad movies. These guys are holding hostages at gunpoint and swearing they're going to go down shooting. The cops didn't want another Sidney, where the crazy Islamist wackadoo had time (it only takes a moment, right?) to kill a hostage before being incapacitated.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  32. Re:obamas fault by dywolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nice try.
    But when taken in context of the entire speech, its not what you try to twist it into.
    The speech was condemning all of the hatred and bigotry.

    The relevent section of the speech:

    It is time to leave the call of violence and the politics of division behind. On so many issues, we face a choice between the promise of the future, or the prisons of the past. And we cannot afford to get it wrong. We must seize this moment. And America stands ready to work with all who are willing to embrace a better future.

    The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt — it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted, "Muslims, Christians, we are one." The future must not belong to those who bully women — it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons.

    The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country's resources — it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.

    The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

    Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims and Shiite pilgrims. It's time to heed the words of Gandhi: "Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit." Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, that's the vision we will support.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-...

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  33. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by Shakrai · · Score: 2

    Please, tell me what other site I can get Slashdot comments from?

    reddit

    *duck*

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  34. Re:The religion of peace by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    It's not about religion. The entire middle-east region is still stuck in the middle-ages (kings, feudal-loyalties, torture, little-respect for human life, no freedom of speech, etc). In terms of worldview, they're very backwards, to the point they think it's ok to kill people for disagreeing with you.

    Ghaddafi would have still oppressed his people if he were Christian, Assad would be no less cruel if he were atheist or christian; neither of those is the reason for his cruelty.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  35. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looking back upon Slashdot history (you know, back when it was News for Nerds ),

    Way back then, it used to be Nudes for Nerds

    You must be Nude here . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  36. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by ADRA · · Score: 2

    Slashdot posted 911, so how exactly is this any different? Oh, because most slashdotters are American, it automatically becomes relevant, whereas when it happens to someone else, "how the fuck is this for nerds"? The truth is, big news specifically regarding military and terrorism usually gets a passing article link through Slashdot, and if you're really that hard done by for it, just skip the post.

    --
    Bye!
  37. Re:Restrictive Gun laws by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    Meh, everyone is aware that there are illegal guns, they're used in bank robberies and jewelry store heists and such. But for the average petty thief, robber or burglar they're not worth the cost/risk and apart from hunters during hunting season the risk of running into an armed person is basically zero. And the ones who go postal tend to stab the first one or two persons to death before they can get away, they don't rack up 10+ deaths with a gun. And yes there are less accidental lethal stabbings than gun accidents.

    Unless I'm mistaken there were already two "friendly" guns here, the lifeguard and the police officer shot in the street. It doesn't do much against people in body armor with rifles who have the choice of venue and timing, element of surprise and will kill mercilessly. There'll always be soft targets, you can't protect everyone, all the time against an armed assault. Following the "everyone has guns brings peace" should mean there was hardly any gang violence at all, since the other side has guns too you wouldn't attack them right? Right? Doesn't work that way.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  38. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Complaining about the irrelevance of stories is a time honored tradition here, along with grammar nazis and tired memes.

    That should be grammar Nazis.

  39. Re:The religion of peace by GungaDan · · Score: 2

    "Assad would be no less cruel if he were atheist or christian"

    Religion does not factor into Assad's cruelty - he's a DENTIST!

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  40. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by hibiki_r · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot will really be in trouble if Natalie Portman ever goes into politics.

  41. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

    whoosh

    That's one fast vest!

    It must be a hybrid

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  42. What I'd expect now from the muslim world by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The LEAST I now expect is for the relevant Muslim leaders to condemn that shit. To declare a fatwa that such behavior is un-Islam and that it is against Islam teachings.

    Anything less is at the very least acceptance if not support for this behavior. And that should be enough to discuss forbidding a cult that accepts or supports what we in the western world consider the foundation of being able to live together.

    And when we're done with that, let's take a closer look at that Westboro Baptist Church and whether we can get rid of those loonies too while we're at it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:What I'd expect now from the muslim world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This, please. Also, can we all take a moment for the muslim cop who died defending a magazine that routinely satirised his religion? I'm pretty sure he is now close to Allah while the fundamentalists burn.

    2. Re:What I'd expect now from the muslim world by Rinikusu · · Score: 2

      Like this guy? http://www.npr.org/2014/09/25/...
      Or these guys? http://rt.com/uk/184112-britis...
      http://www.theguardian.com/wor... (and holy shit that's the Saudis)

      Or maybe you'd like to say "If only the Muslims would fight ISIS and the fundamentalists!"
      I mean, who do you think the YPK is made up of? Or Hezbollah (which, oddly enough is an ally in the fight against ISIS and their ilk)?

      The fact is, there are MANY MANY MANY Muslims who are sick of this shit, just like non-Muslims. And they speak out against their backwards, inbred rednecks. The media is loathe to report this side of the story (see the Fergeson protests.. the media only concentrated on the trouble makers, not the hundreds/thousands who protested without managing to rob stores and burn shit down). All it takes is a cursory look around and you realize that money is to be made by sensationalism, and you've been had.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  43. Re:Besides the blantant bloodshed... by t_ban · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jeez, I'd really like to meet this Cmdrtaco guy who carried out the strike on Iraq, arrested Saddam Hussein and won the presidency for Obama!

    --
    First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -Gandhi
  44. Re:Restrictive Gun laws by kqs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You sure about that? A few minutes with Google implies that Texas has more gun deaths per capita than New York, which seems to completely contradict your point. Actually, I see more pro-gun states in the top 10 than anti-gun states.

    Actually, the strongest indicator (in my completely unscientific glance) is poverty, not gun laws. But hey, you can keep on blaming minorities, cities, and gun-control. And I suspect you will.

    Kevin

  45. Know for years by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 4, Interesting

    isn't it hilarious how MI-5 says these attacks show why they need even more super powers... yet forget the fact they had these guys on watch lists for years. I mean, even Santa checks the list twice, right?

  46. Re:The religion of peace by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually a great example of how NOT to deal with immigration. Or cultural differences altogether.

    We're currently seemingly trying our best to ensure that we'll get as many religiously motivated attacks as possible. First, before the whole shit, we ignored them. They were convenient slave laborers, but little more. We let them come into the country and give them the menial jobs that we don't want. We let them toil for pennies and if they as much as complained, we laughed at them, if we not outright ignored them. We used them as the footrest and did our best to ensure they were kept down under the thumb.

    Then they fucking exploded. Quite literally so. They went "boom motherfucker" and blew up our shit. And now suddenly we notice them, and we invite their "religious leaders" to ethic talks and want to know their point of view, we take them seriously and now suddenly we want to understand their point and we seek the dialogue with them.

    Is it me or is that about as wrong a message as we can possibly send? "We ignore you if you want to talk with us, but if you shoot at us, we come groveling for peace".

    Really?

    That's how you get your voice heard in our civilized world today? Hey, I can adapt. Occupy Wall Street? Hope that they'll talk if we show them how we don't agree with the shit they dump on us? Forget that petty crap, grab your guns and blow shit up if you want to be taken seriously!

    Not that I condone that in any way. But I do get the impression that this is the message here.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  47. Re:Yay, religion of peace! by Deadstick · · Score: 2

    The Last Temptation, on the other hand...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  48. Re:Time to leave the muslim faith. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    There are plenty of radical Christians who interpret the bible literally, including the nasty parts. There are just fewer (by no means none) who care to die for their convictions.

    Christianity is older than Islam. It had some pretty nasty times, then it mellowed. It seems to be getting more violent again though.

  49. The leader of Egypt did, a week ago by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Egypt's president called for a religious revolution against extremism.

    Now we'll see if others start echoing this...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  50. Re:Why didn't they take them alive? by Eloking · · Score: 2

    True, but the areas that would deliver fastest results -- near the subclavian artery, jugular, femoral artery, etc. -- are typically not protected by armor.

    So....you're suggesting that we should try to precisely hit those zone without second chance of a potentially moving target with tranquilizer dart at what, 100 meter?

    And tranquilizer dart aren't exactly a "sniper-accuracy" type of munition either. Those can't be shoot at +1000 kmh.

    --
    Elok
  51. Re:Time to leave the muslim faith. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nonsense. I've had leaders of at least three major Christian sects tell me that the bible is the literal word of god, written down by divinely inspired men. Including the pornographic poem in the middle of it.

    Great. Now I have to go read the bible.

    Or at least the middle of it.

  52. Re:Why didn't they take them alive? by jopsen · · Score: 2

    Actually, the reason to take them alive would be to gather information about their network.

    Assuming there is one... Granted assault rifles and bullet proof vests aren't easy to come by (in Europe). This still isn't at a level of sophistication that indicates the support of a larger organization.

    One question that is left on my mind is how much did French intelligence know up front; did they know about the assault rifles...
    Not that I would expect them to catch every terrorist and stop every crazy person; that is not realistic.

  53. Re:The religion of peace by itzly · · Score: 2

    Then they fucking exploded.

    No, the ones that explode are generally 2nd generation kids that never had an honest job in their life.

  54. The violence came from ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... the rejection of being a part of a civilized society

    Look, no matter if we are talking about the ancient Jewish texts (the Torah) or the Christian texts (the New Testaments) or the Islamic texts (the Koran) they all contain verses which are really despicable

    The difference is that many Moslems today are still preferring to stick with and practice those despicable texts from their Koran, rather than choosing to live like civilized human beings with civilized mindset ; Whilst most of the Jews and the Christians have opted to become civilized

    Even among many of those so-called 'moderate Moslems', they too secretly harbor the same sentiment that the Moslems are 'more superior" than the infidels; That the only useful value of the infidels is to become slaves for them, the superior Moslems

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  55. Re:Why didn't they take them alive? by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

    I know! Aren't all cops anesthesiologists who know the exact amount of non-existent anesthetic to administer through their perfectly placed tranq darts such that it will instantly send the bad guys into sleepytimeland without killing them or merely making them drowsy yet obviously threatened and desperate to take action before they're unconscious?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  56. Re:Yay, religion of peace! by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

    Religion and Peace are like polar opposites when you look at the grand picture throughout history.

    Do you have a reading comprehension issue? We are talking about ISLAM, not other religions which do not go around killing people for being offended.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  57. Re:Why didn't they take them alive? by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    Ok, so you're about to enter the room against 2 dudes that spent a while in Africa getting trained by battle hardened terrorists. They have body armor and 7.62×39mm rounds that easily pierce most body armor on the planet. Here's your dart gun... GO!

  58. Here's some recent Protestant terrorism by KamikazeSquid · · Score: 2

    People do commit violence and terrorist acts in the name of Jesus Christ. The KKK is a notable example of this.

    Here are just a few recent examples of terrorist acts committed by Christians for religious reasons that I was able to find with very little research:

    Sabra and Shatila massacre

    Maronite Christian militias perpetrated the Karantina and Tel al-Zaatar massacres of Palestinians and Lebanese Muslims during Lebanon's 1975–1990 civil war. The 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre, which targeted unarmed Palestinian refugees for rape and murder, was considered to be genocide by the United Nations General Assembly.[44] A British photographer present during the incident said that "People who committed the acts of murder that I saw that day were wearing [crucifixes] and were calling themselves Christians."[45] After the end of the civil war, Christian militias refused to disband, concentrating in the Israeli-occupied south of the country, where they terrorized Muslim and Druze villages and forcefully recruited men and boys from those communities into their groups.[46]

    Utøya Island killings

    In July 2011, Anders Behring Breivik was arrested and charged with terrorism after a car bombing in Oslo and a mass shooting on Utøya island that killed 77 people. Hours prior to the events, Breivik released a 1,500-page manifesto detailing his beliefs that immigrants were undermining Norway's traditional Christian values, and identifying himself as a "Christian crusader" while describing himself as not very religious.[73][74] Although initial news reports described him as a Christian fundamentalist,[75][76] subsequent analyses of his motivations have noted that he did not only display Christian terrorist inclinations, but also had non-religious, right-wing beliefs.[77][78] Mark Juergensmeyer and John Mark Reynolds have stated that the events were Christian terrorism,[79][80] whereas Brad Hirschfield has rejected the Christian terrorist label.[81]

    Lord's Resistance Army

    The Lord's Resistance Army, a cult and guerrilla army, was engaged in an armed rebellion against the Ugandan government in 2005. It has been accused of using child soldiers and of committing numerous crimes against humanity; including massacres, abductions, mutilation, torture, rape, and using forced child labourers as soldiers, porters, and sex slaves.[82] A quasi-religious movement that mixes some aspects of Christian beliefs with its own brand of spiritualism,[83][84] it is led by Joseph Kony, who proclaims himself the spokesperson of God and a spirit medium, primarily of the "Holy Spirit" which the Acholi believe can represent itself in many manifestations.[85][85][86][87] LRA fighters wear rosary beads and recite passages from the Bible before battle.[83][88][89][90][91][92]

    Christian Identity and anti-abortion killings

    After 1981, members of groups such as the Army of God began attacking abortion clinics and doctors across the United States.[93][94][95] A number of terrorist attacks were attributed by Bruce Hoffman to individuals and groups with ties to the Christian Identity and Christian Patriot movements, including the Lambs of Christ.[96] A group called Concerned Christians was deported from Israel on suspicion of planning to attack holy sites in Jerusalem at the end of 1999; they believed that their deaths would "lead them to heaven".[97][98]

    The motive for anti-abortionist Scott Roeder murdering Wichita doctor George Tiller on 31 May 2009 was the belief that abortion is not only immoral, but also a form of murder under "God's law", irrespective of "man's law" in any country, and that this belief went "hand in hand" with his religious beliefs.[99][100] The group supporting Roeder proclaimed that any force is "legitimate to protect the life of an unborn child", and called on all Christians to "rise up" and "take action" against threats to Christianity and to unborn life.[101] Eric Robert Rud

  59. Re:The religion of peace by porjo · · Score: 2

    Queue up people claiming that he was just f**** in the head, not Christian

    First cab off the rank. Anders Breivik did not identify himself as a Christian in the sense that he was a follower of Christ but merely a 'cultural Christian'. His motivation was to protect 'Christian Europe', not to protect Christianity or Jesus. In fact he was quite scathing of religion in general saying "Religion is a crutch for many weak people and many embrace religion for self serving reasons as a source for drawing mental strength". [1]

    It's still too early to say for sure, but I'd be willing to bet that the guys who carried out the recent attacks in France are doing so because they believed it is the 'will of Allah', the prophet 'commands it' etc etc.

    A second important distinction is that Anders Breivik, even if he wanted to, could not justify his actions based on what Jesus or his disciples taught. Islamic extremists can and do quote directly from the words of Mohammad to justified their violent actions.

    [1] http://www.ibtimes.com/anders-...