Slashdot Mirror
The Town That Banned Wi-Fi
An anonymous reader sends a story from The Guardian about Green Bank, West Virginia, a small town housing the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. There are other telescopes nearby, too. Because the telescopes are so sensitive, stray electromagnetic signals are strictly regulated in the surrounding area, which is called the National Radio Quiet Zone. But the town is running into a problem: its population was around 120 when this began, and by now about 40 people have moved there because they want to get away from radio waves and Wi-Fi signals and other types of electromagnetic radiation.
There have been reports of tensions in the town: tales of threats and abuse unfitting to a sleepy mountain village. And it is all the stranger when you consider that no serious scientific study has been able to establish that electrosensitivity exists. ... Where the locals might have been happy to tolerate one or two of the sensitives, the mass migration was beyond the pale. ... People would walk towards [one woman] with concealed electronics, in an effort to provoke a reaction. A meeting she and her husband organised to help educate the others about electrosensitivity descended into a slanging match.
A thunderstorm must torture these people terribly.
So, they have to hide from the Sun during the day like a vampire also?
Oliver.
A slight pedantic correction - there are actually other studies that have radio quite zones, for example
http://www.ska.gov.au/Observatory/Pages/RadioQuietZone.aspx
Actually, this reminds me of a joke:
What's the difference between a Pizza and a Jew?
The Pizza doesn't scream when you stuff it into the oven.
no serious scientific study has been able to establish that electrosensitivity exists
How come nobody had the common courtesy of a "simple" double blind experiment?
* People who believe in electrosensitivity are paranoid wackos.
* Paranoid wackos tend to create problems and start fights.
* Profit!
Isn't this an acceptable solution? Give them space where they can have their way. Radiosensitivity is a harmless crazy. It's not like the United States of America lack space. Every year many thousands of tech freaks gather in a desert to live out their dream of a high tech tribal life. Isn't there room for other loonies too?
I too would be pissed if these assholes came to my hometown with their bullshit and started telling everyone how to live.
There is a real problem with studies related to things like this. A few people claim to have some problem - electrosensitivity in this case - which they may or may not have. Then a whole load of other people hear about it, and all claim to have it as well, most simply because they have had some minor random problem, and latch onto it as a reason. In effect the whole thing snowballs. Now, there may actually be a very few people who do genuinely have the problem, but when you come to do the studies, you sample a large number of people. You do the statistics. You do not conclude that there is no link - studies like these cannot show that there is *no* link. You conclude - correctly - that there is no statistically significant link. But there still might (or might not) be a real problem for a very few people.
It's rather sad that a British newspaper is needed to write news stories about an American town.
From TFA: "Sweden is one of the few places to recognise electrosensitivity as a disability and the government will help sufferers insulate their homes."
I suppose they can also apply for full disability and a pension because they cannot work in any modern environment.
Ummm.. 40 people.
in The Washingtonian probably inspired the Guardian's article.
Best Slashdot Co
I would like to test their sesitivity to microwaves. Have them stop by my kitchen. $20 paid after 5min of exposure.
I bet this is a movie promotion starting Patrick Swayze's ghost.
The FCC ban was created in 1958. The town didn't ban this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Just another day in Paradise
Seriously.
Your town is 120 people.
FORTY more people move there - people who will pay taxes, join the Lions Club, and mow their lawns. Most communities would be delighted to see that sort of growth.
As long as they didn't come to create some sort of armageddon death cult, WHO GIVES A SHIT WHY THEY MOVED THERE?
Are they interfering with your life?
No?
Then shut the hell up and mind your own business.
-Styopa
This summary seems to have been written to pick on these people. If they don't want wireless technology in their town, what is the harm in letting them ban it? We wouldn't expect the Amish to accept it either.
In fact, they almost seem to be a small religion that is lacking a charismatic leader. There are plenty of religious movements in this country that are based on nonsense that have more acceptance than this because they have convincing leaders.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
In an effort to make Green Bank more navigable, Schou made some requests of local businesses. A Dollar Store was opening, but its fluorescent and halogen lights would be intolerable. She asked that they were changed. “They wouldn’t do it. And without the light it gets very dark in there, so they’re not willing to turn off the power.” She took to eating her meals in the senior citizens’ centre, where a gap in the lighting gave her some peace. But walking to collect her food entailed exposure to problem bulbs, so she would ask others to wait on her.
Things came to a head. A town meeting was called. “She became very demanding, asking other people to turn their lights off or replace their bulbs,” said Stewart. “It was too much. And Schou was encouraging other sensitives to move here, and this is not a town with many jobs or houses to begin with.”
Where the locals might have been happy to tolerate one or two of the sensitives, the mass migration was beyond the pale. Another sensitive who moved to Green Bank was reported to have flown into a rage at the library, denouncing the “dumb hillbillies”. “People tell me to stop encouraging others to move here, and to stop bringing them into stores,” Schou confirms. “The hostility continues.” People would walk towards Schou with concealed electronics, in an effort to provoke a reaction. A meeting she and her husband organised to help educate the others about electrosensivity descended into a slanging match. Schou, who has called herself a “technological leper,” said the ill will went further: “I had a visitor staying, a fellow refugee, and the air was let out of our car tyres overnight.”
At best, she is a nuisance demanding everyone accommodate her invisible disability that she has zero evidence for. At worst, it sounds like she might be trying to literally take over the town by creating a solid electro-senstive voting block.
As for the townsfolk harrassing her, well we once again have only her word on that. And after almost a year seeing unverified and outright known to be false accusations of harrassment trumpeted in the media--the Guardian itself being one of the (very) guilty outlets--yeah, I'm gonna need some substantial evidence before I believe a word of that either.
Even if they are nuts, these folks have a right to find a place where they can feel comfortable,
but they don't have a right to dierupt the lives of other folks already there.
They could go find a valley in the zone without folks and do their own thing.
As a concentrated group in the town, they have the means and opportunity to figure out how to do the science to prove their claims.
If the problem is as they say it is, they should be working towards that goal.
If not for the respect of others, then to better understand their own condition.
If they don't feel the responsibility to prove that things are as they say, then they should not have the right to expect others to bend to their needs.
The fact that they don't do this leads me to the nuts conclusion.
DISCLAIMER: The folks I have seen with this condition seem to adjust the rules in ways which are convinient to them.
On the other hand, if there is a real things here, I would like to know about it.
Eerie Indiana.
They should rename from Green Bank to Ludditown.
Vis1ons9 going If you have and has instead Lubrication. You
anyone else wonder if the electrosensitivity "movement" has been funded by cable/ISP companies?
A synonym for electrosensitivity is hypochondriac.
I hope they're also eating multi-grain GMO-free food with no artificial colors.
Bwahahahaha, my evil plan... "Release the brainwashed electro-sensitive zombies!", all but invisible to the NSA, no known modern technology can track them...
The Quiet Zone protects the telescopes of the NRAO facility, and the antennas and receivers of the U.S. Navy's Information Operations Command (NIOC) at Sugar Grove. The NIOC has long been the location of electronic intelligence-gathering systems, and is today said to be a key station in the ECHELON system operated by the National Security Agency (NSA)
Let see how long they can stand the onslaught of pseudo-science arguments until they cave and abandon post.
And of course, radio astronomers and similar folks who *work* at Green Bank probably are more educated about RF emissions and their health effects, so they find the "quiet zone pilgrims" even more annoying.
It's like when people ask me (I'm an RF engineer, and I've done a lot of RF exposure dose analysis) to help them fight that dangerous cell tower, and I used to try to patiently explain that
a) the exposure you are getting from the WiFi in your house and your cellphone are higher than you get from the cell site
b) you're way below the levels with any documented effects
c) don't sleep with your phone on the pillow (ALARA principle)
But that's like convincing a missionary that there is no god. Not worth the time. So now it's "you know, I think I'm busy then"
When you have an influx of people who are delusional, then conflict is to be expected.
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
* DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that! No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
Can science prove that I can feel a drop of moonlight on my hand, shining ?
Can science show why I can sense the aura of fruits, trees, animals, humans, with my hands or with a simple rod ? Or are you saying that I can't, while I have obviously done that. I can teach anyone in an hour, unless they have their minds shut down.
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
* DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that! No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
After we installed a Wifi relay in the lobby, the idi^H^Hperson manning the entrance started taking sick days after sick days, claiming the wifi was making her sick.
I would personally fire such a person. Someone that stupid is going to be a detriment to the company at some point.
Then we activated it and placed a piece of black tape on the LEDs, told her 'Fine, we won't be using it then', and all was fine.
You are much kinder than I would be. I hope this person had many other wonderful qualities to offset her lack of critical reasoning ability.
Will the hypochondria never end?
There have been a handful of people who've come into my place of work, looked up at our lights and have said, "I'm so glad that you have incandescent lighting. Fluorescent lights really bother my EM sensitivity" or something to that effect. All of our lights are CFL (but look like incandescent).
I don't respond to AC's.
Seriously, I've *never* heard that expression. Is it people trying to invent new slang?
1% of the energy it takes to kill you is "far less"?
8 watts to kill, spread over the two square meters of the body nets us the ICNIRP standard that all cell phone companies go by.
Whereas BioInitiative, and other similar organizations recommend a level 10 million times lower.
Personally, I'm not comfortable with 1% of the kill dosage.
Brain-dead mods, do your thing.
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER, or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You must be involved with 1 of those above, especially since you can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
Just go Purge Day on them. Declare a day where they shut down the research antennas and declare all radio fair game. Then glue some plastic soup bowls to the ends of toy guns and chase the whackjobs out of town with "radio death rays".
I silenced you on "alleged flaws" easily here http://it.slashdot.org/comment... point by point vs. your b.s. ... who's the butthurt one? Not I... I don't EVADE honest simple questions like you either!
+
YOU KEEP EVADING SIMPLE QUESTIONS DIRECTED TO YOU (where you are SHOWN TO AGREE WITH MY POINTS ON HOSTS TOO no less) HERE -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
(Sarcasm - "Gosh, why's THAT?" dave420 -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )
APK
P.S.=> You're bogus motives are exposed in that LAST link, webmaster/advertiser... apk
Militaries have been working on microwave weapons for decades...
See subject: Answer questions dave420 http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
or
* Are you just butthurt over being exposed in your TRUE MOTIVES as a webmaster or advertiser here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ?
APK
P.S.=> Answer = Yes... lol, you were just (& you're MAKING me just HAVE to say it, as per usual, vs. easily EXPOSED TROLLS like YOU) "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" to "FLUSH OUT" of the brush as to your motives in trolling/stalking/harassing me - what's the matter dave420? Can't take what YOU DISH OUT? apk
They could have just opted for "science" and the incredibly cheap $50 Whole House Plug Neutralizer and neutralize those bad boy EMFs :)
http://www.amazon.com/Aulterra...
A small town doesn't like outsiders moving in.
That's hardly news. My experience has been the small the town, the meaner the people. Sure, if you're one of them, Great! You might even be the local weirdo/nerd. But stand against the status-quo and the true nastiness & intolerance shows through.
Can science prove that I can feel a drop of moonlight on my hand, shining ?
Can science show why I can sense the aura of fruits, trees, animals, humans, with my hands or with a simple rod ? Or are you saying that I can't, while I have obviously done that. I can teach anyone in an hour, unless they have their minds shut down.
No you haven't obviously done that. you're simply claiming that you have obviously done that; learn the difference.
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork & YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED as to your "true motives" in that last link above!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
A friend of mine works in the disability insurance area. He described n attempt to accommodate people claiming multiple chemical sensitivity. One solution tried (and finally abandoned) was to build an apartment complex to very strict standards, eliminating volatile chemicals, paints, etc. And to institute rules against residents bringing in perfumes, soaps, and an entire range of chemicals. All of this instead of seeking out individual residences suitably isolated from neighbors and typical background chemical traces.
The residence rapidly devolved into screaming matches between the afflicted. With each sufferer accusing their neighbors of faking their sensitivity while insisting that only theirs was legitimate. It turns out that they all know subconsciously that its root cause is psychological. And so they project their behavior onto the surrounding patients.
Have gnu, will travel.
America, the profoundly uneducated.
He got his gas bill.
Take pictures of those who claim to be electrosensitive, compile a database of those people and their families, then refuse to serve those assholes in the stores, in the markets, in the restaurants, at the gas pumps. Tell them that if they ever set one pinky toe in any of their establishments that they'll be arrested for trespassing. Make it impossible for them to get any of their necessities. See how long they'll enjoy life in that town when it's all turned against them.
"People would walk towards [one woman] with concealed electronics, in an effort to provoke a reaction."
And there was no reaction. Therefore the claimed illness is total bullshit.
Live in a cave if you want, believe bullshit if you want, make nutty claims if you want -- and meanwhile, the rest of us will laugh at you and make fun of your stupidity by doing things like standing near you with concealed electronics. That's freedom.
Next question, please. This one is answered.
Were talking about a town in West Virginia of 160 people, and I'm sure they have plenty of moonshine. So there is only one question: Who is the town sober-person?
The long-time residents should mount large, scary-looking antennas on their homes and in their yards--receive-only, or not even wired in. Since EM sensitivity appears to be a psychosomatic illness, those afflicted will become uncomfortable and leave.
I'm a computer technician and I bathe is Wifi signals all day long, but fluorescent lighting does bother me. I can understand how someone might attribute the lights bothering them to the evil magnetic fields. The problem is that those lights cycle at 60hz and bother my eyes. They have glasses for that sort of thing.
The other option is to just not go into the store with the bad lighting, instead of bitching and moaning about it.
We can call it a "concentration camp"...
Can adblock do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond malicious ads: See 2-10 next)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stop communication to C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stop communication to C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stop communication to C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phishing
10.) Protect vs. bandwidth caps
11.) Get you past a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up websurfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on ANY webbound app (think stand-alone email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily texteditor controlled data for the above
16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage
* ANSWER ="NO" to each above on AdBlock doing it as well or at all!
APK
P.S.=> AdBlock does FAR less than hosts do & FAR less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
AdBlock's 4++gb & 100% CPU usage flooring inefficiency -> https://blog.mozilla.org/nneth... + ClarityRay defeats it + it 'souled-out' & is crippled by default paid off to not do its job http://techcrunch.com/2013/07/... & ABP too http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
AdBlock adds complexity/room for breakdown/exploit + from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
AdBlock's SLOWER than hosts: http://superuser.com/questions...
For the BEST hosts file?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork & YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED as to your "true motives" in that last link above!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
The quote from the article says:
There are literally thousands of studies that have confirmed that electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) exists. The intra-cellular mechanism has been discovered independently by different research teams composed of credited scientists in the field at major well-regarded universities in different parts of the globe.
But of course, a study about something that does not exist can not be "serious", now can it?
Here are the search terms to google for: Voltage-Gated Calcium Canals (VGCC), NO-ONOO cycle.
There are a couple of very good videos about it on Youtube, by professor Martin Pall. I very much recommend them, especially how he debunks earlier studies that had claimed that electrosensitivity wouldn't exist.
BTW, 40 people are nothing. The associations for people with electrohypersensitive disorders have thousands of members that would love to move to a town like Green Bank.
"We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
It's like a social science experiment.
I have done work with the NRAO at Green Bank (I was technical lead on one of the 20 meter telescopes) and the vast majority of the people who live in Green Bank work for the NRAO (or are part of the family of someone who does). There are, in other words, a lot more PhDs than in most small country towns (even though it looks like a small country town). These are people who are used to having evidence to back up their beliefs.
Now, you take this set of people and add in a bunch of people with (shall we say) poorly evidenced medical ideas, and there is no surprise there is friction.
Complete and unmitigated BULLSHIT, that is....
Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork & YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED as to your "true motives" in that last link above!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
See subject: "eat your words" vs. what I put up vs. quoting you:
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759) Homepage
Oh, really? Ok:
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT", omniweasel? LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... and here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... lol, @ U, "omniweasel"... apk
See subject: On a quote of you giving me guff on hosts:
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759) Homepage
Oh, really? Ok:
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT", omniweasel? LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... and here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... lol, @ U, "omniweasel"... apk
Can ab+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stops C&C communique
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stops C&C communique
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stops C&C communique
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phish
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get you past a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily controlled data
16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage
* ANSWER ="NO" to each above on ab+ doing it + hosts = already on every device natively.
APK
P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency -> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).
+
ClarityRay defeats it detecting it by dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods to do so!
+
Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ab+ adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
What's better?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/... ... apk
Brand-specific frequencies?
"I don't mind WiFi signals usually, but that 2.4GHz coming off Netgear routers really gets to me. And don't get me started on the 4G (700MHz) signals coming from my AT&T Android phone; that's why I have to use an iPhone on the US Cellular network!"
Yeah, I can see people believing that.
Hell, I can even imagine wireless providers /marketing/ to people like that. "Use our new HEALTHY-4G network, designed from the ground up for EM-sensitive users! Sure it costs twice as much, but isn't being able to use a phone without worrying worth the price?". The wireless providers could make a mint. It would be like marketing "organic" food, except without actually having to do anything. They may need to recruit the advertisers who work for Monster Cables first, though.
Electromagnetic Radiation can't hurt you and anyone who says they are sensitive to it are liars. To prove it I will stand in front of this 1600W radio transmitter and it can't hurt me. I will also put my hand in this microwave oven and it won't get hot. This spectrum analyzer is reporting that there are emanations in the area and it is lying because your body is not made of materials that have a potential to resonate in the presence of EMR. People are different from the constituent matter they are built out of and don't have the capacity raise the electrons in your atoms to higher energy states when exposed to certain frequencies. Sun exposure can not burn your skin. Stupid people. You can't even see most of the electomagnetic emissions.
What I post's nonsense? See subject & you quoted:
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
My points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them! You don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motives" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork & YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED as to your "true motives" in that last link above!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
A meeting she and her husband organised to help educate the others about electrosensitivity descended into a slanging match.
I don't know that "Slanging" is, but I doubt they had a meeting marked by heavy cocaine use as Urban Dictionary says.
See subject & "READ ALL ABOUT IT" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
*:)
(You don't seem to be answering the main question there after you shot your piehole off only to have to eat your puke afterwards... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Tell us, omniwuss: HOW DID IT TASTE "eating your words" FLAVORED w/ your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH "ramming them down" spiced with the BITTER taste of SELF-DEFEAT? - well? Silence is golden & says it all, lol - "odd" you "went silent" after your tirade there to me first, eh? NOT, lmao... apk
See subject & -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
*:)
(You don't seem to be answering the main question there after you shot your piehole off only to have to eat your puke afterwards... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Tell us, omniwuss: HOW DID IT TASTE "eating your words" FLAVORED w/ your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH "ramming them down" spiced with the BITTER taste of SELF-DEFEAT? - well? Silence is golden & says it all, lol - "odd" you "went silent" after your tirade there to me first, eh? NOT, lmao... apk
See subject & -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
*:)
(You don't seem to be answering the main question there after you shot your piehole off only to have to eat your puke afterwards... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Tell us, omniwuss: HOW DID IT TASTE "eating your words" FLAVORED w/ your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH "ramming them down" spiced with the BITTER taste of SELF-DEFEAT? - well? Silence is golden & says it all, lol - "odd" you "went silent" after your tirade there to me first, eh? NOT, lmao... apk
See subject & -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
*:)
(You don't seem to be answering the main question there after you shot your piehole off only to have to eat your puke afterwards... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Tell us, omniwuss: HOW DID IT TASTE "eating your words" FLAVORED w/ your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH "ramming them down" spiced with the BITTER taste of SELF-DEFEAT? - well? Silence is golden & says it all, lol - "odd" you "went silent" after your tirade there to me first, eh? NOT, lmao... apk
See subject & you "ate your words" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
*:)
ANYONE CAN SINCE HOSTS ARE NATIVE TO THEIR OS & IN KERNELMODE (vs. usermode like most DNS server programs that have more moving parts, security exploits galore, + eat more resources, & same with browser addons being even worse) , & MOST ROUTERS CAN'T DO IT WELL DUE TO LACK OF RAM, stupid...
(You don't seem to be answering the main question there after you shot your piehole off only to have to eat your puke afterwards... lol!)
DID YOU LIKE "EATING YOUR WORDS" HERE, YET AGAIN?
BY THE WAY: Router exploits, anyone? Oh, tell us THOSE don't happen too, bigshot...
R O T F L M A O @ how EASY it is to outsmart you cretins... lol!
APK
P.S.=> Tell us, omniwuss: HOW DID IT TASTE "eating your words" FLAVORED w/ your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH "ramming them down" spiced with the BITTER taste of SELF-DEFEAT? - well? Silence is golden & says it all, lol - "odd" you "went silent" after your tirade there to me first, eh? NOT, lmao... apk
How's it TASTE "eating your words", omnichad? See here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* :)
(A smoky flavor, perhaps? LMAO - you burnt yourself, so THAT might make some sense... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Of course, there's ALWAYS that "bitter taste of SELF-DEFEAT" in the mix too (lol) along with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH "ramming it down", spiced with the taste of you having to eat your puke, lol... apk
See subject - IMPOSSIBLE, lol: U always DO vs. myself -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* :)
(Kind of tough to deny, isn't it, when it's YOUR OWN MESS you have to suck up, eh?)
APK
P.S.=> Besides - you started it with me then too, no questions asked... & now your BUTTHURT ASS is clearly projecting about "having a vendetta" here & shows itself to be just that - projecting your OWN "special level" of STUPID giving away your own "modus operandi", right here, easily -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
QUESTION:
Is your FAVORITE COLOR 'transparent'? Has to be - you're "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" to SEE right thru as to your motives, omniWEASEL... lol! apk
I personally prefer the crazy that is radio-sensitivity over the delusion of God anyday.
You don't see the radio-sensitive killing people over their delusions, or saying your kids should become radio-sensitive, or declaring that their form of radio-sensitivity is the one true form and all other forms are heresy.
And better yet, we can actually PROVE that they are delusional, and don't have to rely on putting the burden of proof on their side of their claims.
So if you gave me a choice of being radio-sensitive vs. being religious, I'll take radio-sensitive for 300.
See subject & this link (& efficiency is where hosts rule) http://slashdot.org/comments.p... since you have hosts already natively in kernelmode.
I combine hosts with REMOTE DNS actually (OpenDNS since they're Kaminsky flaw patched + filter vs. threats) 1st of all.
Secondly: Hosts cached into RAM locally (how I do it, no usermode context switch overhead mind you, via diskcache kernelmode subsystem in combination with the IP stack itself) IS FASTEST + SAFEST & MOST RELIABLE!
By placing your verified by reverse dns ping FAVORITE SITES INTO HOSTS "hardcoded" @ the TOP of hosts!
That equates to approximately 3++ million remote indexed DNS seeks by the way, do the math.
My program APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit does that by the way -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
It does that, for where you spend MOST TIME online no less (your fav. sites)...
It's faster than remote DNS query by FAR, as well as safer (avoiding DNS exploits like the Kaminsky flaw, which 99.999% of ISP DNS are not patched vs.) + makes you more reliably online (vs. downed DNS which happens QUITE A LOT).
Lastly: It gets you past DNSBL's you MAY not like, & DNS ADMINS SHOULD LOVE IT, as this technique lightens their server loads too: BONUS!
APK
P.S.=> You must be either a GLUTTON for self-punishment, or you like the taste of PUKE... As, R O T F L M A O, you had to "eat your words" in the 1st link above... hahahaha!
See subject, "drink it in & digest it", since it's the truth & yet? YOU KEEP DOING IT! apk
See subject, nuff said (RAM on most != enough for large deny lists).
APK
P.S.=> NOT unless you want to spend some POTENTIALLY SERIOUS CASH for things like CISCO routers, or others, that MOST FOLKS DO NOT HAVE THAT KIND OF RAM on their ISP modems for instance, as far as router blocklists: BUT?
YES, they DO have a native to their OS run in kernelmode speed hosts file though!
My program makes it EASY TO POPULATE IT for security, anonymity & RELIABILITY + SPEED (especially vs. remote DNS) & more efficiently BY FAR vs. "almost all ads blocked" & the like!
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
... akp
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork & YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED as to your "true motives" in that last link above!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
omnichad: "Eating your words" != GOOD nutrition -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* That's right, & YOU ONLY DID THAT TO YOURSELF, stupid!
(Resorting to ad hominem attacks directed my way too? Illogic "logic" FAIL on your part vs. myself, as always... grow a BRAIN, puh-leese - you NEED one fool!)
APK
P.S.=> You're right - I can't attack intelligence, but then again? YOU CONSTANTLY SHOW US YOU HAVE NONE @ ALL whatsoever, lol... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute FACT on HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more, with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(Which is more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO THAT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use them!
OBVIOUSLY, you don't & you're just a "ne'er-do-well" troll, OR you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer that!
No, instead as per your usual, you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & their "so-called 'solutions' are INFERIOR TO MINE on TONS of levels, OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing their stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork & YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED as to your "true motives" in that last link above!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue, guaranteed... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you here:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course you're not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points of fact in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more with less, vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + other overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity online!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
I bother you? Use 'em!
OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll, & you have "other motivations" (see next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or ARE YOU A MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer it!
No, instead as per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie!
(You can't EVER "get the best of me" & you know it, witness the above - & your "so-called 'solutions' = INFERIOR TO HOSTS on TONS of levels OR YOU'D USE THEM, merely evidencing stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork + your REFUSAL to use 'em despite your statements & YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED in your "true motives" in that last link!)
APK
P.S.=> SEE Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore from him will ensue... apk
See subject & this: "Eating your words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* EATING YOUR WORDS != GOOD NUTRITION, omniweasel!
APK
P.S.=> You don't seem to want to ANSWER on how they tasted either? Like puke?? They ought to... lol! apk
See subject & this: "Eating your words" http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* EATING YOUR WORDS != GOOD NUTRITION, omniweasel!
(You don't seem to want to ANSWER on how they tasted either? Like puke?? They ought to... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: Vs. yourself? I *do* feel as if I have been discriminating vs. a cretin - see above, it's proof, & YOUR OWN WORDS quoted showing your *special kind* of utter stupidity... lol! apk
See subject: Hosts vs. AlmostAllAdsBlocked+ http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & guess what stupid?
YOU STARTED IT - I merely utterly FINISHED IT & YOU WITH IT, due to your stupidity!
* :)
(Is your "FoAmiNg-@-TeH-MouTh" illogical ad hominem attacks directed my way FAILING TOTALLY helping YOU any, vs. the above? No... lmao!)
Lastly:
Is it MY FAULT you're STUPID ENOUGH to be a "registered 'luser'" sheep that's EASILY TRACKED for re-trolling, moron?
NO!
It's yours, dolt... you lose for being so stupid yet again, lol! Remember - YOU STARTED IT, & I easily shut you the FUCK up... easily.
APK
P.S.=> You FAIL, fool - as always vs. "yours truly" (the "Lord of HOSTS" so-to-speak)... apk
See subject: I never said otherwise fool!
APK
P.S.=> You dumbshits are unbelievable, effetely & VAINLY *trying* to "put words in my mouth" I never ONCE stated... man, unbelievable & by "unidentifiable ac posts" no less! Puh-leese, grow up & give up - you CANNOT beat "the LORD of HOSTS" so-to-speak, here - certainly NOT with bs like that! apk
See subject & this http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* WELL?
(R O T F L M A O!)
You seem "rather reluctant" to answer the question in the subject omniFOOL... why's that? LOL!
APK
P.S.=> You are just MAKING me HAVE to say it, you know that, don't you? Here 'tis:
THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" vs. a dolt like omnidouche, like it is every SINGLE time he tries it, lol... apk
Read here (where I swept the floor with omnitroll) http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as it adds onto where I SHOT YOU TO PIECES TOO, moron! See below... lmao!
APK
P.S.=> It explains a LOT, & *any FOOL* can mess with a router of ANY kind but to do a COMPLETE thorough blocklist on a typical home users' router (vs. say a CISCO)? IMPOSSIBLE!
There's just not enough RAM & costs are huge, per my other post to you here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
("Read 'em & WEEP" - yes, that's my KNOWING you're just an ac troll "playing games" - Well, I *still* had to SHOOT YOUR DUMB ASS DOWN FOR IT too, stupid...) apk
See subject: A douche with zero to show for himself posting as unidentifiable ac? Yea, "ok".
"Whatever an expert like you has to say MUST be 'right'" (not).
(The day ANY of you morons can do better is the day you get to tell me "how it is"... wannabe 'experts' (not)).
APK
P.S.=> I just LOVE it when fools that haven't got a pot to piss in themselves *try* to tell me "how it all works", lol... unbelievable! apk
See subject: Keep doing a "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" from this http://slashdot.org/comments.p... you pitiful little douchebag zero... lol!
APK
P.S.=> What's it like being a POT PUFFING CLOWN, Dave420? Oh, we know - it shows in being a "ne'er-do-well" FOOL like yourself! apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer it!
As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie!
---
(You can't EVER "get the best of me": You know it! Witness above - your "so-called 'solutions' = INFERIOR TO HOSTS on TONS of levels OR You'd USE 'EM - Evidencing stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork + your REFUSAL to use 'em despite your statements & YOU'VE BEEN EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link!)
APK
P.S.=> See Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer it!
As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie!
---
(You can't EVER "get the best of me": You know it! Witness above - your "so-called 'solutions' = INFERIOR TO HOSTS on TONS of levels OR You'd USE 'EM - Evidencing stupidity in & of itself via inferior designwork + your REFUSAL to use 'em despite your statements & YOU'VE BEEN EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link!)
APK
P.S.=> See Dave420 SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk
You have a bunch of scientists in the same place with a bunch of people who are making an irrational claim. How could any of the scientist resist the opportunity to experiment on these people to validate that their claims are irrational.
Nope, I'm not dave420. Not everyone who thinks you're a twat is dave420. Here's a hint - it's most people who read your posts.
I don't really expect you to believe that I'm not dave420 even though my posting style is different. You'll make your own mind up, reality be damned.
Either you're a troll or you need help. I really think you need help.
I said you you know more about the subject (ad blocking etc, just in case you try to twist my words), because you've looked into it. I have not.
You're pushing a solution for it. I am not.
You're interested in the subject. Guess what? I am not.
Let me spell it out: I don't fucking care about the technical details. I've never argued about it with you, and since I know nothing nearly nothing about the subject I'm not about to start now.
I posted in the misguided belief that you might (1% chance maybe) not realise how you come across. I freely admit, I was wrong. There is something wrong with you.
I tried. It was a mistake. I will learn and move on. I suggest you do the same, but I find it very unlikely.
Again, posting as AC because I don't need a crazy stalker.
So now I am stupid because I point out your trolling? Keep it up APK, doesn't bother me any, and just demonstrates the mental disorder to everyone.
You didn't easily shut me up, as I have a registered account with good karma, I cannot be shut up. Have fun trying though.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
First of all I should mention that I am a resident of Green Bank WV and the people mentioned in the article are known to me. Including Diane Schou.
Just wanted to say that while the cause of their symptoms can be argued about endlessly the symptoms they have are real and they can be debilitating. The whole issue is no joke to them and as was said by Charlie Meckna, "Do you think I want this?, No!"
I don't think any of them are trying to pull a fast one or indulging in attention seeking behaviour. The ones I have met are just plain folks.
UNIX: 'cuz you can tattoo it on your knuckles!
So, does the town distribute a tinfoil hat to every man, woman, child and dog that live there?
TV-MA - the Beginning: "Ward, don't you think you were a little hard on the Beaver last night?"
See subject: Your illogical ad hominem attacks fails vs http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Fact is?
You SHUT YOURSELF UP for me right after that - no reply from you there, was there??
Nope... how could there be? See next below!
---
FACTS:
Your SOULED-OUT "so-called 'solution'" is WEAK & INEFFICIENT vs. hosts by not doing it's 1 JOB IT HAD RIGHT ANYMORE
&
Adblock variants DON'T DO A FRACTION OF WHAT HOSTS CAN for added speed, security, reliability, or anonymity
+
AdBlock+ is VERY INEFFICIENT SHOWN IN THAT LINK ABOVE WITH VERIFIABLE CONCRETE PROOF THEREOF with added messagepassing overheads operating in slower USERMODE too vs. hosts!
APK
P.S.=> NO questions asked - "argue with the numbers" & facts shown in that link from reputable sources (they're logical, your name tossing isn't)... apk
Hello ac dave420! U don't like facts dusting you http://slashdot.org/comments.p... via your OWN WORDS QUOTED contradicting yourself... lol!
APK
P.S.=> Dave420, when you blow it as badly as you did?
CLUE/New News/NewsFlash:
I don't NEED any help - you're the BEST HELP I COULD *EVER* HAVE quoted contradicting yourself AGREEING WITH MY POINTS in favor of hosts files giving users more for less in added speed, security, reliability & anonymity
You helped me bigtime, lol... apk
Why don't you entertain for a moment the idea that I might not be Dave. Got that?
Right. I'm not going to post using my /. nick. I've made that clear.
How can I convince you that I'm someone else? Can you even accept that possibility?
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)
Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
&
MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?
LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
&
Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
LMAO @ U, "omniloser"... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer it!
As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!
APK
P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer it!
As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!
APK
P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer it!
As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!
APK
P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)
Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
&
MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?
LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
&
Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
LMAO @ U, "omniloser" = dave420 sockpuppet, obviously... apk
"I just reply to you when I see you spamming Slashdot with your nonsense"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
Why'd you agree w/ my points on hosts then? Quoting you:
"I'm not denying all those things" - by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday September 17, 2014 @11:39AM (#47927435) FROM -> http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
Of course not: It's impossible to dispute HOSTS FILES superiority to other methods!
Since my points in favor of hosts SINGLE FILE native kernelmode faster part show hosts doing more w/ less vs. so-called 'competitors' many part messagepassing + cpu/ram use overheads laden slower usermode FAR MORE COMPLEX 'solutions' doing less than hosts do for more security, speed, reliability, + anonymity!
I make creating a superior more efficient solution EASIER!
(That's more than a mere trolling stalking harassing "ne'er-do-well" like yourself could *EVER* manage).
---
"I'm simply pointing out that it takes an AdBlocker to block your spamming"- by dave420 (699308) on Friday June 19, 2015 @10:31AM (#49945047)
I bother you? Then WHY DON'T YOU DO IT & use 'em? Answer that!
(You stalk/harass me instead!)
OBVIOUSLY you don't & you're a "ne'er-do-well" troll & you have "other motivations" (next):
---
* QUESTION:
DO YOU WORK FOR AN ADVERTISING FIRM, or ARE YOU A WEBMASTER/WEBCODER http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , or a MALWARE MAKER, or ARE YOU AFFILIATED WITH 1 OF MY COMPETITORS?
Answer it!
As per your usual you'll avoid every question, or lie & You've been EXPOSED in your "motives" in the last link just above, lol!
APK
P.S.=> See Dave420 the "pot puffing clown" SQUIRM - evasions galore will ensue (as well as effete downmods via sockpuppets to *try* vainly "hide it" -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p... )... apk
Can ab+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stops C&C communique
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stops C&C communique
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stops C&C communique
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phish
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get you past a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily controlled data
16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage
* ANSWER ="NO" to each above on ab+ doing it + hosts = already on every device natively.
APK
P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency -> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).
+
ClarityRay defeats it detecting it by dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods to do so!
+
Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ab+ adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
What's better?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
... apk
See subject & LMAO @ U, boy -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* Gonna go "cry in your cereal" now, boy?
(You ought to for being STUPID enough to use OR SUGGEST a blatantly INFERIOR solution! See below... it's fact & truth!)
APK
P.S.=> FACT: "AlmostALLAdsBlocked+" is INFERIOR vs. hosts - hugely so!
AB+ doesn't even DO what it's supposed to fully anymore being BRIBED http://finance.yahoo.com/news/... not to!
AB+ doesn't do a FRACTION of what hosts do for more speed, security, reliability, + anonymity online!
AB+ EATS 128mb of RAM (vs. hosts @ 11 *maybe* tops via my program with CURRENT data, the important kind vs. current threats + ads) http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...
AB+ adds messagepassing overheads!
AB+ operates in SLOWER usermode (vs. hosts in PnP kernelmode)
AB+ creates huge CPU consumption!
I use what you already have that works & does more with LESS, no less - you by way of comparison? Pile on "MoAr" that doesn't do as nearly as much & what it's supposed to do, massively inefficiently no less (see above)? It NO LONGER DOES!
AFTER ALL THAT?
AB+ = "better", Coren22?? LMAO - NO f'ing way!
If you say it is, you are *TRULY* stupid & I'd reply saying "argue with the numbers" & facts above, from reputable sources & analysis proving my points for me... apk
See subject & LMAO @ U, boy -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
* Gonna go "cry in your cereal" now, boy?
(You ought to for being STUPID enough to use OR SUGGEST a blatantly INFERIOR solution! See below... it's fact & truth!)
APK
P.S.=> FACT: "AlmostALLAdsBlocked+" is INFERIOR vs. hosts - hugely so!
AB+ doesn't even DO what it's supposed to fully anymore being BRIBED http://finance.yahoo.com/news/... not to!
AB+ doesn't do a FRACTION of what hosts do for more speed, security, reliability, + anonymity online!
AB+ EATS 128mb of RAM (vs. hosts @ 11 *maybe* tops via my program with CURRENT data, the important kind vs. current threats + ads) http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...
AB+ adds messagepassing overheads!
AB+ operates in SLOWER usermode (vs. hosts in PnP kernelmode)
AB+ creates huge CPU consumption!
I use what you already have that works & does more with LESS, no less - you by way of comparison? Pile on "MoAr" that doesn't do as nearly as much & what it's supposed to do, massively inefficiently no less (see above)? It NO LONGER DOES!
AFTER ALL THAT?
AB+ = "better", Coren22?? LMAO - NO f'ing way!
If you say it is, you are *TRULY* stupid & I'd reply saying "argue with the numbers" & facts above, from reputable sources & analysis proving my points for me... apk
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)
Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
&
MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?
LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
&
Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
LMAO @ U, "omniloser"... apk
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)
Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
&
MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?
LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
&
Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
LMAO @ U, "omniloser"... apk
Can ab+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stops C&C communique
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stops C&C communique
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stops C&C communique
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phish
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get you past a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily controlled data
16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage
* ANSWER ="NO" to each above on ab+ doing it + hosts = already on every device natively.
APK
P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency -> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).
+
ClarityRay defeats it detecting it by dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods to do so!
+
Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ab+ adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
What's better?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
... apk
Can ab+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stops C&C communique
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stops C&C communique
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stops C&C communique
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phish
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get you past a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily controlled data
16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage
* ANSWER ="NO" to each above on ab+ doing it + hosts = already on every device natively.
APK
P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency -> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).
+
ClarityRay defeats it detecting it by dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods to do so!
+
Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ab+ adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
What's better?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
... apk
Can ab+ do 16 things hosts do for speed, security, & reliability:
1.) Protect vs. malicious sites/servers (beyond ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets + stops C&C communique
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnets + stops C&C communique
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets + stops C&C communique
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (adds reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam
9.) Protect vs. phish
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get you past a dnsbl
12.) Keep you off dns request logs
13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded fav. sites
14.) Work on anything webbound (ie email programs) multiplatform.
15.) Give you easily controlled data
16.) Do all that & block ads (better than addons) more efficiently in cpu cycles + memory usage
* ANSWER ="NO" to each above on ab+ doing it + hosts = already on every device natively.
APK
P.S.=> Ab+ does less than hosts & less efficiently - hosts do MORE w/ less + Hosts start w/ the IP stack before REDUNDANT inefficient addons BEGIN to operate (as 1st resolver queried):
Ab+'s 128mb memory inefficiency -> http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte... (hosts consume 3-11mb using my program initially).
+
ClarityRay defeats it detecting it by dumping addons in use in a browser via native browser methods to do so!
+
Ab+'s paid to not do its job http://finance.yahoo.com/news/...
Ab+ adds complexity from a slower mode of operations (usermode = more messagepassing overheads vs. hosts in kernelmode).
What's better?
APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-2 32/64-bit -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...
MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
... apk
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)
Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
&
MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?
LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
&
Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
LMAO @ U, "omniloser"... apk
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)
Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
&
MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?
LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
&
Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
LMAO @ U, "omniloser"... apk
"Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)
Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...
&
MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...
&
It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
+
In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...
---
Tells us, omniweasel:
* HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?
LMAO...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
&
Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...
LMAO @ U, "omniloser"... apk