Slashdot Mirror


J.J. Abrams On "Star Wars" Cast's Racial and Sexual Diversity

Yesterday at Comic-Con, director J.J. Abrams held forth on the racial and sexual diversity of the actors portraying the characters of the Star Wars franchise. From CNET's article: For Star Wars, it's a complex debate. The franchise has included prominent and strong female characters, like Princess Leia, as well as central characters played by black actors, such as Cloud City administrator Lando Calrissian, played by Billy Dee Williams, and Jedi Mace Windu, played by Samuel L. Jackson. On the other hand, Jar Jar Binks, a computer-generated alien in 1999's "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace," drew fire from some critics, who said he called to mind demeaning black film characters such as those played by Stepin Fetchit in the 1930s. (Not to mention other cultural stereotypes that pop up in Episodes I, II, and III.)

504 comments

  1. Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have never heard of anyone who thought Jar Jar Binks reminded them of black characterisations. Nor has that ever occurred to me. Seriously how long is the bow they are stretching?

    Jar Jar Binks made me sick to the stomach because of how he represented the complete destruction of something I loved with a character that I wanted to die in many many horrible and painful ways.

    1. Re:Never heard that one before by Gadget27 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Agreed, Jar Jar was awful, but anyone trying to make this into any kind of race issue should be tied and quartered. Really, nothing better to think about? Fuck them.

    2. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Watch again, he's obviously a (bad) Jamaican stereotype. That said, that's not the reason I disliked him either.

    3. Re:Never heard that one before by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He is Atepin Fetchit

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    4. Re:Never heard that one before by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      err Stepin

      and seriously it's 2015 time to be able to edit these things

    5. Re:Never heard that one before by smoothnorman · · Score: 1

      given your statement, I think you might be younger than George Lucas, or me. Because I hear nothing but that characterization of jar-jar binks. *and* the Shylock interpretation of Watto.

    6. Re:Never heard that one before by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I have never heard of anyone who thought Jar Jar Binks reminded them of black characterizations./quoteI find that very hard to believe.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Never heard that one before by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jar Jar's speech sounds a lot like Jamaican patois to me. Whether that is racist or not is another story, but Jar Jar's general behavior; stupid, lazy, and addled, do conjure up the way blacks were portrayed in literature and films for a rather long time. I don't think Lucas is a racist, and I've long given him the benefit of the doubt that Jar Jar was yet another iteration of the whole Ewok concept, cute funny talking things that can be made into toys that say things like "E-chooda!", because in Lucas's mind, the kids love them.

      The problem with Lucas's theory is that, at least the kids of my generation (what I'd call the Star Wars generation, who were 5-10 years old when the first film came out), we had no interest in any silly characters. The most desirable action figures were Darth Vader (because he was bad ass and could crush peoples' throats with his mind), Chewbacca, Han Solo and Obiwan, because they were the fighters who kicked ass.

      I was eleven or twelve years old when Return of the Jedi came out, and I found the Ewok scenes to range from fucking insipid to, in the final battle scenes, be utterly improbable.

      But I don't think Jar Jar was any more intentionally racist than the Ewoks (who, so far as I can tell, were heavily modeled on African bush people). It's just that Lucas has so little capability to portray nuance that you end up with broad caricatures that you have to forgive some for confusing with rather well known racist imagery.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Never heard that one before by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      Yes, Jar Jar had a vaguely Jamaican accent, but his antics brought to mind the worst of Jerry Lewis, Jim Carey, Lucille Ball or any number of physical comedians, who in my recollection were mostly white. But then, I am too young to have been exposed to any of the black-face BS that the article refers to.

      I always found the self-debasing form of 'comedy' to be profoundly embarrassing, and decidedly un-funny. The Star Wars arc was smeared with the use of such techniques. I suppose that if they same techniques were used to debase people along racial lines, then Star Wars deserves a few dings for that as well.

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    9. Re:Never heard that one before by myowntrueself · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed, Jar Jar was awful, but anyone trying to make this into any kind of race issue should be tied and quartered. Really, nothing better to think about? Fuck them.

      Can Jar Jar please be transsexual?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    10. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whether that is racist or not is another story, but Jar Jar's general behavior; stupid, lazy, and addled, do conjure up the way blacks were portrayed in literature and films for a rather long time.

      That doesn't mean blacks actually behave that way, or that non blacks can't behave that way. This is a completely non-human fictional character that's being compared to a fictional racist behaviour. It makes no sense. Blacks were chained up and forced to serve, does that also mean Princess Leias golden bikini slave scene demean black people?

    11. Re: Never heard that one before by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      When you couple it with the mock Jamaican patois, it's not exactly an impossible correlation to make. I don't personally agree that Lucas wrote in a racist character, but I can certainly see why some people would see it.

      Frankly, the character is so awful and out of place that accusations of racism only add an additional layer on top. Obviously Lucas thought so himself, as Jar Jar's screen time is greatly diminished in the last two prequels, and his most significant contribution to the third film was to be the asshole who stabbed the Republic in the back. I often wonder if that was Lucas's way of demonstrating mea culpa.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:Never heard that one before by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I have never heard of anyone who thought Jar Jar Binks reminded them of black characterisations. ... Seriously how long is the bow they are stretching?

      Watch the South Park movie some time.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:Never heard that one before by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      also the japanese syndicate people. those were pretty blatant.

      All in all, a really tasteless set of movies.

    14. Re:Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      im 30 and ive never heard that comparison before

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    15. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you see jar jar as a black stereo type, maybe you are a racist who sees black people as annoying assholes who can't speak properly?

    16. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who acknowledge that a stereotype exists are the *real* racists.

    17. Re: Never heard that one before by Noah+Haders · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're intentionally missing the point. there's a cultural history found in movies, tv and books that portray black people as subservient and uneducated stereotypes. This portrayal reinfoced class and racial structures of the day that served to keep black people "in their place". Long tradition of this. summary mentions stepin fetchet. uncle remus. blackface comedy. jar jar is a direct decendent of this line of humor. either you're being purposefully obtuse, or maybe you're from iceland or something and completely unexposed to american culture and history.

    18. Re:Never heard that one before by smoothnorman · · Score: 1

      perhaps we should take solace in this occasional blissful ignorance of past evils (even when they're cavorted about under our noses)

    19. Re:Never heard that one before by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      Im a whole generation younger than Lucas and my god I saw it the instant he came on screen, that abomination might as well been wearing blackface and saying yes massa you no want me to sing for yas sir?

    20. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, you're just a kid. You wouldn't understand due to lack of experience.

    21. Re:Never heard that one before by epyT-R · · Score: 0

      Like other institutions with left wing fifth columns, Hollywood will do whatever it takes to drag 'diversity' into everything they do, whether it applies or not. It's about 'making the personal political.'

      Jar jar binks isn't racist. It's just fucking stupid and impossibly annoying.

    22. Re:Never heard that one before by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

      Jar Jar's speech sounds a lot like Jamaican patois to me. Whether that is racist or not is another story, but Jar Jar's general behavior; stupid, lazy, and addled, do conjure up the way Pot Smokers were portrayed in literature and films for a rather long time.

      Fixed it for you.

      Has anyone ever noticed that the black stereotypes are also the stereotypes applied to pot smokers?

    23. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would explain a lot.

    24. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The world is too full of people who seem to professionally find offense at things. I never especially thought Jamaican or any particular human ethnicity with Jar Jar because, well, he's not human and doesn't especially look human.

      The reasons to be offended by Jar Jar have nothing to do with that, but damn there are reasons...

    25. Re:Never heard that one before by russotto · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Jar-Jar was definitely based on Jamaican stereotypes. But there's disagreement over whether Watto was Shylock or an Arab stereotype; I tend to think the latter.

    26. Re:Never heard that one before by NicBenjamin · · Score: 5, Informative

      You would have been 14 or 15 when Episode I came out. Of course you don't remember what us slightly older people meant when we said it sucked. You were busy watching the podracing scene.

      One of the major criticisms of Jar-Jar back then was they thought he was speaking with a Jamaican accent. It's so universal that everybody my age or older (and I'm only 34) knows precisely what the phrase "Jar-Jar racist" means. The flying dude with the nose was also widely considered to be a reference to either Jews or Arabs. And I believe there was at least one other group of aliens Lucas put in there that had everyone going "What the fuck George Lucas?"

    27. Re:Never heard that one before by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      As a European, I haven't ever thought of it that way, nor have I ever met anyone who would have.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    28. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought he sounded even remotely black or Jamaican. He spoke some kind of made-up pidgin English. Annoying: definitely. Racist: nope.

    29. Re: Never heard that one before by sir1real · · Score: 1

      This isn't directed squarely at you, but isn't it kind of racist to make the correlation in the first place? It's interesting to note that Qui-Gon had some harsh words for Jar Jar. Was he being a "species-ist?" Star Wars contains countless different sentient species. Does political correctness demand that they all be treated as equally intelligent, capable, and upstanding citizens of the galaxy? Some things to think about...

    30. Re:Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh no i saw the movie the day it came out and i thought it was a waste of 5 bucks (matinee)

      its fantasy... i dont to this day think about real life when watching fantasy. those who do IMO are wasting their time because whats the point of fantasy if you are going to do nothing but complain about how its close to X, if you squint real hard and spin around 3 times, it could be taken as racist

      these people need to get lives

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    31. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't Reddit or Hacker News. This is Slashdot. We don't do comment editing here. You only get one shot, so don't screw up. Preview before you submit!

    32. Re: Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      but... hes not human, and hes not black....

      only if you are looking to find something offensive can you make that leap

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    33. Re:Never heard that one before by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      Jar Jar Binks rolling, ungrammatical voice sounded like a caricature of a beach living, laid back, ganja smoking Jamaican. And yes, the parody was so horrible that it made me think of the remnants of the last of hte "blackface" shows and minstrel performances from when I was very young.

                                    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/fil...

    34. Re:Never heard that one before by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jar Jar's speech sounds a lot like Jamaican patois to me. Whether that is racist or not is another story, but Jar Jar's general behavior; stupid, lazy, and addled, do conjure up the way Pot Smokers were portrayed in literature and films for a rather long time.

      Fixed it for you.

      Has anyone ever noticed that the black stereotypes are also the stereotypes applied to pot smokers?

      Dude, don't go down this rabbit hole. There is a black stereotype that matches every single bad thing you could say about people. More then you can count. They range from perfect servant (who should be trusted with your beautiful daughter), to rapist who can only be stopped by vigilante justice (who should be trusted with your beautiful daughter, but only after Dylan Roof has shot him in the head).

      The bad black Jamaican stereotype is related to weed, but if Lucas had wanted to make a bunch of weed jokes he didn't have to give the dude an accent. And if he had to pick an accent he could have used almost anything but Jamaica. Make it British, and not cockney, make it fucking Received Pronunciation. That contrast would be hilarious. Dude talks like the queen, acts like your buddy from High School who can't quite function in society. What we have with Jar-Jar is just a sad mix of annoying and anti-Jamaican racism.

    35. Re:Never heard that one before by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      You thought this because to you (and Lucas) no racism was implied or intended. It was just a silly accent.

      But the fact is, it's an exaggerated Jamaican accent. The haggling greedy fly is mideastern, etc. They didn't go and make Klingon for these races, they just took something in the real wold and modified it a little to get their point across.

      It's clearly not meant to be offensive but like... really, they couldn't do any better than that?

    36. Re:Never heard that one before by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just want to know how "ganjadude" was still available to a 30-year-old with a user id pushing 1 million.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    37. Re:Never heard that one before by cfalcon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, it's a real world accent on a ludicrous creature, and we see at least three of those types of things in the prequels. Why use a real world accent at all?

    38. Re:Never heard that one before by McGruber · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have never heard of anyone who thought Jar Jar Binks reminded them of black characterisations. Nor has that ever occurred to me.

      The racist nature of the Jar Jar character was a big story back in 1999, when the movie came out. Here's an opinion piece from the late Baltimore Sun columnist Gregory Kane, that was published back then: Seeing racism in Jar Jar is seeing phantom menace, June 5, 1999

    39. Re:Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 1, Troll

      because humans can only make so many sounds, eventually some will sound like other native tongues?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    40. Re:Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      i was shocked as well. ive been reading here since 99 or 2000 but never bothered to create an acct until... well whenever i finally did

      there are obscure sites i go to where i cant use my name because its already taken but it was good here???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    41. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't directed squarely at you, but isn't it kind of racist to make the correlation in the first place?

      Samuel L. Jackson certainly thought so back in 2002:
      http://www.ew.com/article/2002/05/29/samuel-l-jackson-defends-george-lucas

      Now, Jedi Samuel L. Jackson, Jar Jar’s costar in the last two ”Star Wars” movies, stands up in his defense, saying that critics inferred a racial stereotype only because a black actor, Ahmed Best, did the Gungan’s voice. (Yeah, well, that and the Jamaican-sounding patois, the dreadlock-like flaps on his head, the shuffling gait.). ”I thought it was pretty stupid,” Jackson told the Associated Press, referring to the controversy. ”The fact that Ahmed was doing that character may have sent people to that place. But people want to find things, or they want to assign things to everything. And that’s not always necessary.”

      And Jackson is right because Jackson is a black actor and MightyMartian isn't.

    42. Re:Never heard that one before by Morpeth · · Score: 1

      Seriously? How could you miss the "I'm an uneducated Jamaican" accent -- it was so overt I was absolutely amazed I was seeing it on the screen.

      Anecdotal, but opposite to you, EVERYONE I know who saw it immediately thought is was a bad, cheesy Jamaican accent.

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    43. Re: Never heard that one before by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, no... he's not black. George Lucas simply cast a Caribbean-descended (Barbados and St. Thomas) voice actor to give him a Jamaican-flavored accent. To the most ridiculous character in the movie, who's behavior just happens to strongly resemble the blackface minstrel characters.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    44. Re:Never heard that one before by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      He's blatantly a jewish stereotype. Greedy, yiddish accent, huge hook nose, and in later movies they even give him a round black hat and beard.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    45. Re: Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      what do we want???

      do we want diversity??? or do we want to whitewash everything (pun intended)

      im really getting confused on what im supposed to be outraged over these days it changes so often now.

      next you will tell me if they cast a white man to do the voice that would be racist somehow!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    46. Re:Never heard that one before by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The "diversity" produces a jarring note in the films which distracts from the story. I would have had no problem if every character in all the Star Wars films were British, Mexican, Japanese, Congolese or Eskimo. As soon as a contrasting ethnicity is introduced, it does 2 bad things: it drags in pre-existing stereotypes, and it tars that ethnicity with the bad actions of the character. Nothing good comes of it.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    47. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't directed squarely at you, but isn't it kind of racist to make the correlation in the first place?

      No, it's pattern matching.

      Racism requires a judgment.

      Does political correctness demand that they all be treated as equally intelligent, capable, and upstanding citizens of the galaxy?

      Intelligence requires recognizing that respect and dignity are good ways to treat other beings, even animals.

    48. Re:Never heard that one before by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Jar Jar was awful, but anyone trying to make this into any kind of race issue should be tied and quartered. Really, nothing better to think about? Fuck them.

      Can Jar Jar please be transsexual?

      Why do you think they are not?

    49. Re: Never heard that one before by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hear you, and if it was just Jar-Jar I would probably write it off. But the Jewish/Arab caricature in Watto and the Japanese caricature in the Trade Federation just makes it hard to ignore.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    50. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, well - good anecdote. Mine is a counter-anecdote. He didn't seem black at all, he just seemed like a retard. They make retards from all races. But, since he was some sort of an alien, he may not even have been a retard - he speaks English a lot better than I speak whatever_the_hell_his_native_tongue_is. He's meant as the plucky comic relief. Very funny, betcha betcha.

    51. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Girls like ewoks.

    52. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blacks were chained up and forced to serve, does that also mean Princess Leias golden bikini slave scene demean black people?

      No the people who still whine about that would see a white person being enslaved as some form of justice.

    53. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Might be my cultural background. I don't think I have ever met a Jamaican so my only exposure to the accent is on tv...

    54. Re:Never heard that one before by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Seriously? How could you miss the "I'm an uneducated Jamaican" accent -- it was so overt I was absolutely amazed I was seeing it on the screen.

      Anecdotal, but opposite to you, EVERYONE I know who saw it immediately thought is was a bad, cheesy Jamaican accent.

      And as we all know, there are not white people in Jamaica, so a green and brown alien creature with a Jamaican accent must be some kind of racial stereotype.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    55. Re:Never heard that one before by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Yup. It sticks out like a sore thumb. It's obvious the change was made long after the story was written and edited. It's really bad when the whole story is butchered in the process (making Thor a woman for ex, or replacing Wolverine with X-23).

    56. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

    57. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      The black face is an interesting comment. In Australia we had a variety show called "hey hey it's saturday" it's crap but it had a revival 2 years ago and they got back in the most popular act they had. This act was a bunch of guys pretending to be the jackson 5.

      Harry Connick JR was on the judging panel and he completely flipped out because of how awfully racist it was and it was disgusting. The performers, the crowd and the host were caught totally by surprise. The issue, the performers had put on black makeup to be the Jackson 5 and hence this was seen as black face racist comedy. The reason though the audience, host and performers had no idea why Harry had flipped out is we never had the black faced comedy here in Aus and most people of younger generations have never heard of it. So they weren't being racist, but if they had been American with American cultural heritage there is no way you would do black face without knowing the racist context.

    58. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Comes of not being an American I think. Having not personally met an Jamaican I didn't even realise that it sounded like that accent.....

    59. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eskimo? Did you just fucking say ESKIMO?!

      It's Inuit you fucking racist asshole!

    60. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Well I'm 37. I think the difference is that in Australia I don't have the same cultural background as you do. To give you an idea I just googled Shylock because I didn't know what it meant..... Having found the wikipedia article it still means nothing to me as the total exposure I have to Jewish culture is via the TV.

      Where I live I have almost no interaction with people from the Americas be they North, South or Caribbean, however I have huge interactions with South East Asian, Indian, Middle Eastern and European cultures.

      Some one else below said Jar-Jar racist. It's a term I hadn't heard until now.

    61. Re:Never heard that one before by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0

      unfortunately I think this is a case of blind denial and deliberate obtuseness, which often in history leads to the rebirth of that which is being denied.

    62. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      Jar-Jar Racist is a term that I have never heard before. And I'm 37, so old enough to have come across it.

      Here is a review from our most left leaning publication that would have pointed it out if it was noticed by them. http://www.abc.net.au/news/201...

    63. Re:Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the funny thing, is that im not even a star wars fan.

      Im just sick and tired of EVERYTHING being offensive to some group of people

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    64. Re: Never heard that one before by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I think it's more so Lucas being lazy and just wanting the aliens to sound different than the main characters. In the original series we would have just had some random buzz or hiss (or Wookie howl) where the meaning was mostly clear based on the scene or how the character was acting, but Lucas is a hack and we get lazy caricatures.

    65. Re:Never heard that one before by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      > because in Lucas's mind, the kids love them.

      More likely, the parents and grandparents, who are the ones buying the toys, think that the kids will love them.

    66. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because you are a cunt.

      Shutup. I hate you.

      5 minutes later, let me edit this comment

      I am harassed for bring a homosexual.

      Shutup. I hate you.

      Now you are a homophobe. The internet win again.

      You are know why reddit is a shit hole of trolls and feminists. It is easy to look like victim and bully peoples. 2015 and still using reddit. lol.

    67. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      The thing is I never ever picked up on it.

      I also just went and straw polled my wife to see if I was being completely oblivious, and her response was 'huh, really? But he was the best part of the movie!"

    68. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackface isn't inherently racist. (There's just nothing inherently racist about putting on a mask to look like someone else - it's how you act while pretending to be someone else that matters.) Just like a swastika isn't inherently antisemitic. In both cases they are signs or symbols that were explicitly linked to discriminatory thoughts and actions. Then, later, people choose to use the symbols alone, so that they can imply racism to people they want to offend (or just get their rocks off doing something naughty) but claim that it isn't how they meant to use the symbol if they're called on it. Hmm, also sounds like a recent controversy in South Carolina.

      And of course, occasionally you find stories of people who didn't actually know that something had connotations like that. Usually they're 15 and they get pulled to the side and a good talking to that night, and then they either never do it again or do it on purpose the next time. Rarely are they adults and this on live TV. /

    69. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, it was the first thing I said when me and my best friend walked out of Episode 1 all those years ago. "I didn't know that Star Wars needed a Minstrel." And this was when I was a 15 year old backwater hick teen.

    70. Re:Never heard that one before by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      no man, come on. you're being dumb on purpose. stereotypes of pot smokers would be like bill and ted, beavis and butthead, spicolli from ridgemont high, dude where's my car. jar jar is obviously none of these things.

    71. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 34 and I found Jar Jar indistinguishable from crap like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    72. Re: Never heard that one before by Kobun · · Score: 1

      Misclicked the moderation button. Posting to remove it.

    73. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just the accent and nose, but lines like this: "Mind tricks don't work on me--only money!"

    74. Re:Never heard that one before by dbIII · · Score: 1

      To rub salt in the wound he is a deliberate ripoff visually and in mannerisms of "Snarf" by the fantasy artist Larry Elmore made far too stupid to be able to breath. Lucas must have thought he was just ripping off someone from a nobody that did a strip in Dragon magazine instead of someone that has illustrated the covers of hundreds of novels. At the time Elmore was a bit annoyed that he didn't even get a mention.

    75. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work with an engineer from Jamaica, and when I think of Jar Jar, my coworker is not in the top 500 people that I am reminded of. And while I know many people, to be fair, he's the only one that I personally know from Jamaica.

    76. Re:Never heard that one before by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Agreed, Jar Jar was awful, but anyone trying to make this into any kind of race issue should be tied and quartered. Really, nothing better to think about? Fuck them.

      Can Jar Jar please be transsexual?

      Why do you think they are not?

      George Lucas wouldn't have had that much imagination.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    77. Re: Never heard that one before by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The cartoon characters filling the role in the 30's to 60's weren't all human either.
      It's deliberate "black and white minstrels" all the way even if you are too young to have ever seen that stuff, Lucas isn't, and he put it in.

    78. Re: Never heard that one before by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      It is easy to look like victim and bully peoples [sic]

      You just quote the parent in your reply and presto problem solved.

    79. Re:Never heard that one before by dbIII · · Score: 1

      making Thor a woman for ex

      As an aside, the original legends did that when Thor and Loki wanted to fool a few giants. It's a trap!

    80. Re:Never heard that one before by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to Lucas himself, the neimoidians were speaking with a transylvanian accent. Jar Jar was speaking in an accent Ahmed Best could do. Lucas felt it would make aliens seem more alien if they had accents, and actors only know how to do human language accents so he picked some of those. In retrospect it was a stupid decision, but it wasn't intended racistly.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    81. Re:Never heard that one before by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes it was pretty well along the lines of kids who know nothing about WWII running though a synagogue with a swastika flag - incredibly offensive but not meant to be.
      The performers got it second hand via the British "minstrel show" of years back which was a watered down copy of the American blackface stuff that Harry Connick JR knew about.

    82. Re:Never heard that one before by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

      Shylock is a character in one of Shakespere's plays. Not "Jewish culture" but the (very early 17th century) "European culture" with which you claim to be so familiar.

      Was this the Wikipedia article you say you read?

    83. Re:Never heard that one before by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      That last group was the trade federation who were a bad Japanese stereotype.

      Along similar lines, I saw Mr. Magoo was on Hulu and decided to introduce my boys to the wonderful antics of that nearly-blind and completely senile old man. I was a bit surprised when the first episode had a stereotypical Chinese servant of Magoo's. The guy had squinty eyes, giant buck teeth (that made Bugs Bunny's look normal) and pronounced "Boss" as "Bloss". My boys are young enough that the stereotyping went over their heads and they just enjoyed Magoo having a "day at the beach/amusement park" at a construction site.

      After the show was over, I used the opportunity to point out the stereotype and explained that this type of thing was considered appropriate when the show was made, but wouldn't be anywhere close to appropriate nowadays. We can still enjoy the show as a reflection of the time period it was made in while rejecting the stereotypes it presents. In the case of the Star Wars prequel stereotypes, though, Lucas should have known better.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    84. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I found that out after I posted, I had skimmed the article at that stage and didn't realise it was his name rather than a collective term. I wasn't aware that he was the source of "pound of flesh" saying either.

      I never said I was across all their cultures though. I said I interact with them on a regular basis.

    85. Re:Never heard that one before by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And why didn't Lucas do what he did for aliens in the original trilogy: Either make them speak some alien language with subtitles, or give them some not-easily-identified accent? Jabba didn't speak like an Italian guy - he spoke in Huttese. Greedo spoke in his own tongue. Chewbacca had his growls that Han and C3P-O translated. Aliens that spoke English (Yoda, Ackbar, etc) did so without any obvious dialect. You didn't have Ackbar shouting "It's a trap!" with a French accent. Yoda didn't speak with a stereotypical Indian accent. The original Star Wars trilogy did alien-speak right, why couldn't the prequels? (Not saying that this would have fixed all of the prequels' problems. Their issues go far deeper than offensive alien accents. Still, it would have been one less thing to cringe at.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    86. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They have a right to be offended. Just don't let that impede your right to not give a fuck that they are offended.

    87. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never said that! You lie. You are racist prick. Now watch my personal army add up comment until the 'consensus' emerge that you should be banned from the site.

    88. Re: Never heard that one before by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Just consider the real world, there are a large variety of personalities out there. Jarjar is a stupid personality, but we all need something to dislike. In episode 4 to 6 it wad C3PO that was uncool but it didn't end up as widespread net hate because the net didn't exist.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    89. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. Black face is the issues surrounding it is much much more geographically local than WWII. Slavery is something that is touched upon by education systems in Australia but I doubt to anywhere near the degree it would be in the US. In general American history is only lightly touched upon, the whole civil rights movement, Martin Luther King etc were only given a couple of lessons.

      In comparison WWII involved a far greater number of people and a far greater number of countries. Lots of countries have some kind of reminder of WWII and what happened. As such its cultural impact is order of magnitudes greater. So I guess I don't see it in the same category.

    90. Re: Never heard that one before by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      First of all, I have only asserted that it is understandable why some would see it as a racial stereotype. I have also said I doubt Lucas intended it as such. It's very likely coincidence, to my mind.

      And I fail to see how a black actor saying "this isn't a problem" automatically makes it not a problem.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    91. Re:Never heard that one before by Hussman32 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know if Star Wars needs diversity, but Episode I was rude.

      It seemed to me that Watto the Slave Owner on Tatooine was a Jewish stereotype (look at his nose and listen to the accent), the Trade Federation were Japanese stereotypes (look at the eyes and accent), and Jar Jar was a Jamaican stereotype.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    92. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jar Jar Binks made me sick to the stomach because of how he represented the complete destruction of something I loved with a character that I wanted to die in many many horrible and painful ways.

      Get help. Seriously. If you have this kind of emotional response to a fucking movie, you are either eight years old or have serious psychological issues.

    93. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that argument mean no stereotypes exist, because there is always someone who fits them not from the intended group? There is plenty of bits and pieces of overlap between some of the southern black stereotypes with some poor whites. But an established racial stereotype has less to do with real, exclusive characteristics of a group, and more to do with repeated, fictional narrative.

    94. Re:Never heard that one before by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      You obviously missed the point where he said:

      i saw the movie the day it came out and i thought it was a waste of 5 bucks

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    95. Re:Never heard that one before by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      If you're European then you can ignore all of this American cultural baggage and enjoy classic star wars moments like when he steps in poop. Epic!

    96. Re:Never heard that one before by Iconoclysm · · Score: 2

      The character was mostly a creation of the actor playing him...a black man from the Bronx. If there's a way that can be made racist, someone will find it.

    97. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never heard of anyone who thought Jar Jar Binks reminded them of black characterisations. Nor has that ever occurred to me. Seriously how long is the bow they are stretching?

      I take it you were a little kid when the movie came out. (Hard to believe, cuz it seems not that long ago, but anyway...) Lucas got a TON of criticism that Jar Jar was portrayed in an offensive and stereotyped way that was reminiscent of old 1930s films.

      Anyway for you to say "where the hell did THAT criticism come from" kinda suggests you weren't paying much attention when the movie came out, and if you were an adult when it did-- it wasn't too much of a jump to go "hey, uh.. wait a sec..."

    98. Re:Never heard that one before by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Doing a google image search for Snarf, I don't see the problem. Other than having a long snout and long ears, the two are nothing alike. Snarf speaks proper english, JarJar spoke a Gungan dialect of bad english. Snarf stands and walks like a human, JarJar stands and walks like a marionette (very loose-jointed). Even the snout and ears are done in completely different styles, so only their size is similar. And overall Snarf is shorter than those around him, while JarJar was quite tall.

      I think Larry Elmore saw more in JarJar that wasn't there.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    99. Re: Never heard that one before by Iconoclysm · · Score: 1

      It might surprise you to know he's the creation of a black man then? If he wasn't computer generated, nobody would have any problem with a black man acting in that manner.

    100. Re:Never heard that one before by chipschap · · Score: 1

      You probably know that Mr. Magoo as a show has been found offensive in that it makes fun of people that have poor eyesight. Today, I think just about anything offends someone in the LTBO crowd (looking to be offended).

      I have terrible eyesight and I find Mr. Magoo hilarious. I'm actually able to laugh at myself instead of having a chip on my shoulder.

    101. Re: Never heard that one before by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Saying "It's Inuit" is like saying all Native Americans are Sioux.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    102. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but Jar Jar's general behavior; stupid, lazy, and addled, do conjure up the way blacks were portrayed in literature and films for a rather long time.

      So you are saying that films shouldn't portray any characters, of any race, as stupid, lazy, and addled, because that was once a blacks were sometimes portrayed in literature and films, and someone might conclude that although a character is not actually black he might be a substitute for a black character and then the movie would be racist?

      Talk about bizarre logic.

    103. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. Black face is the issues surrounding it is much much more geographically local than WWII. Slavery is something that is touched upon by education systems in Australia but I doubt to anywhere near the degree it would be in the US.

      But of course! After all, it's not like Australia has dark skinned minorities, or unequal treatment or depictions of them! Oh noes!

      Neither does Europe, of course!

    104. Re:Never heard that one before by BoberFett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the bad guys were always white men with British accents. Oh noes.

    105. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Aliens that spoke English (Yoda, Ackbar, etc) did so without any obvious dialect.

      And they all appeared too white, too male and too heterosexual. That is the problem, you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. There is no way to satisfied these SJW and the only appropriate awenser is to offend them in the most horrible way so they get PTSD from twitter and hide away from society for rest of their life.

    106. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing bad in stereotypes because stereotypes are actually accurate.

    107. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > do conjure up the way blacks were portrayed in literature and films for a rather long time

      are you so clueless you think it has nothing to do with real life? Seriously?

    108. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Was there somewhere I said that it didn't? The black face issues are specific to the African American experience. The issues that happened in Australia around Aboriginals are not the same and the racism directed towards them takes different forms. Painting your face black doesn't mean anything in Australia, using your finger to squash your nose flat does. Does doing that in the US cause major issues?

    109. Re:Never heard that one before by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      jamaican creole is overwhelmingly spoken by black people + couple of backpacker hippies.

      only thing missing was jar jar smoking a big 'ol fat joint, really. even his ears are meant to flow around like rastas and he goes around as if he was high all the time.

      watch some grittier travel shows sometime..

      note: this is not why episode 1 sucks though or why the jar jar character sucks.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    110. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF the flying dude with the nose reminded you of a jew or an arab? Kikes and ragheads don't fly. They fall nicely however.

    111. Re:Never heard that one before by quenda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Watch again, he's obviously a (bad) Jamaican stereotype.

      Not obvious to me. If anything, I thought he was vaguely Italian, maybe because I meet a lot more Italians than Jamaicans.
      But really, he is just meant to sounds foreign to the others.

      The worst negative stereotype in American cinema is the villains all having English accents.

    112. Re:Never heard that one before by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      You have two choices.

      1. Don't listen, don't read, don't comment on these stories. Problem solved.

      2. Try to silence people's free speech because you disagree with it. Don't expect much sympathy or support.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    113. Re:Never heard that one before by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      the whole Ewok concept, cute funny talking things that can be made into toys that say things like "E-chooda!", because in Lucas's mind, the kids love them.

      Intresting coincidence: That's exactly the same what Joghurt says about "Spaceballs - the flame thrower"

      --
      bickerdyke
    114. Re: Never heard that one before by bickerdyke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're intentionally missing the point. there's a cultural history found in movies, tv and books that portray black people as subservient and uneducated stereotypes. This portrayal reinfoced class and racial structures of the day that served to keep black people "in their place". Long tradition of this. summary mentions stepin fetchet. uncle remus. blackface comedy. jar jar is a direct decendent of this line of humor. either you're being purposefully obtuse, or maybe you're from iceland or something and completely unexposed to american culture and history.

      So, if you see a subservient and uneducated non-human character on screen, that makes you think of black people?

      Interesting. But with such a mindest, I wouldn't complain about other peoples "racism".

      --
      bickerdyke
    115. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just Jar Jar. The king of his people is made out to be some african tribe chief. He's another racial caricature.
      And just about any alien that gets some text in the prequels is some sort of racial caricature.

    116. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's definitely black. Go watch the movie again. Jar Jar is of some underwater race who have a king that is a caricature of an african chief. And they made him the dumbest, fattest, most easily manipulated character of the movie. Jar Jars people are the most primitive, tribal race in the pequels and guess what, they are portrayed by african (or jamaican) voices. It's kind of sickening to see how many racial stereotypes there are in those movies. Lot's of references to colonial architecture as well.

    117. Re:Never heard that one before by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Aliens that spoke English (Yoda, Ackbar, etc) did so without any obvious dialect.

      And they all appeared too white, too male and too heterosexual.

      Yoda and Ackbar were white? And displaying their sexuality onscreen?

      Wow, I must have been hammered when I was watching those movies...

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    118. Re:Never heard that one before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'm Romanian, and I lived in Transylvania for 7 years, I even got some Transylvanian accent. Trust me, the Nemoidians do NOT have a Transylvanian accent.
      I didn't think they had a Japanese accent either.
      in fact, I didn't think any characters had a specific accent, nor did I care.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    119. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never heard of anyone who thought Jar Jar Binks reminded them of black characterisations. Nor has that ever occurred to me. Seriously how long is the bow they are stretching?

      Jar Jar Binks made me sick to the stomach because of how he represented the complete destruction of something I loved with a character that I wanted to die in many many horrible and painful ways.

      So he made you feel the same way you do about Niggers

    120. Re:Never heard that one before by Rei · · Score: 2

      I think whether people were offended really comes down to their level of familiarity with the minstrel show portrayal of african-americans. Because Jar-Jar was a classic example, every last bloody detail except being an alien (and even at that they made sure to style him with a big bottom and lips). Actually, they went even further than a typical minstrel show, adding in your standard "spear chucker" stuff as well. If a person has little familiarity with that past presentation, then I can see why they wouldn't find the Jar-Jar performance offensive. It's not about a character being intelligent or not.

      Then again, we have a candy here called Sambó, so....

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    121. Re:Never heard that one before by Rei · · Score: 1

      Really? The only thing they left out was the menorah.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    122. Re:Never heard that one before by Rei · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the US but live in Iceland, and there are indeed cultural differences along these lines, for places that don't have the historical baggage of certain forms of racism. I've seen Mammút go on stage several times in blackface, people couldn't understand why asian immigrants got mad at the "Tong Monitor" sketch where a standup commedian taped his eyes into a slant, there's a candy here called Sambó, etc. There's very little history of racial diversity here, it's a modern thing for the most part, and so people don't come from a background context of people using these sorts of stereotypes in association with a culture of bigotry and discrimination. People "hear" that some people get offended by this sort of stuff, but without the context, most have trouble understanding it.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    123. Re:Never heard that one before by Rei · · Score: 1

      Interspecies even - for example, Loki was the mother of Sleipnir ;)

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    124. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. It does not, BTW, imply that every person belonging to the group being stereotyped conforms to the stereotype - that is a frequently used strawman. It's just means that in the reference frame of the stereotyping group, most or the most significant part of the stereotyped group has the qualities associated with the stereotype. If the two groups are sufficiently exposed to each other, this is usually true.

    125. Re: Never heard that one before by Rei · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I hate this "correction" when people think they're being smart by correcting "eskimo" with "inuit". Try calling a Yupik eskimo an "Inuit" and see how they take it.

      --
      The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems.
    126. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're the racists: they see Jar Jar and think of something they don't like... just saying...

    127. Re:Never heard that one before by dead_cthulhu · · Score: 1

      Good job, and I mean that in all sincerity. As much as in my meat-world life that I joke about hating kids, I think that in many ways, they're better than most of us adults in that they basically just want to learn, play, and create. I have come to the conclusion that basically only children and the elderly are just honest about their thoughts and feelings. I was helping a friend clean out her flat when her kid stared at me and said "you're crazy". My only response is "yeah, but I'm not the bad kind of crazy, so get off the iPad and grab a sponge".

    128. Re:Never heard that one before by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Doing a google image search for Snarf, I don't see the problem ... Snarf speaks proper english

      Proper English? Try reading the text that goes with it in the strips. Jar-jar is a dumbed down and more annoying Snarf.

      I think Larry Elmore saw more in JarJar that wasn't there

      I saw it too which is why I hit the net at the time to see what Elmore thought of his character being ripped off - "didn't even get a mention" is what I remember. Now it's buried somewhere under a million google items with those keywords, but just read the strip to see the very blatant ripoff.

    129. Re:Never heard that one before by dbIII · · Score: 1

      How did I forget that one?
      Slight spoiler, but the anime (and book) of "Sword Art Online" did a good version of Thor as a woman (NPC in a game quest) based loosely on the wedding myth. One of the very manly male characters is of course very taken by how cute the disguised Thor is.

    130. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about Race and Sexual Orientation now.
      If you don't support indiscriminate butt fucking, then you are a lessor human being.

      Is this what scares you? That because you, as a heterosexual male, have the right to stick your dick into any random vagina, that homosexual males must inherit the right to stick their dick into any random colon? Here's news, then: just because society "accepts" gays, doesn't mean you have to be one.

    131. Re:Never heard that one before by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually that was a bit of a thing back then, getting some media attention in the UK. Many Hollywood films cast British actors as the bad guys around that time, but eventually got bored of it. To be honest the portrayal of British people in Hollywood films has always been quite bad... Not always negative, often just not very well done.

      Anyway, in Star Wars there was only one major British bad guy, and they didn't go out of their way to add negative stereotypical features (which I guess would be bad teeth or a strong accent or something).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    132. Re: Never heard that one before by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In Star Trek there are lots of non-human races that are commentaries on the human race, e.g. the Romulans being based on Roman culture. The Klingons were originally a mixture of oriental stereotypes and the space version of Russia, providing a war-like and brutal counterpart for the peaceful and enlightened Federation.

      Special effects have improved a lot since then, but when you give a character many human traits that mimic existing negative stereotypes... Well, it's not surprising that people recognize them. Jar Jar is not the only character like that either, it appears to be a pattern in that movie.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    133. Re:Never heard that one before by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      actors only know how to do human language accents

      Did you ever see Star Trek: The Next Generation? Marina Sirtis, the actress who played Troi, did a non-human accent for the character. There are characters in Game of Thrones who have entirely fictional accents too. It's definitely possible.

      Sadly it's not something that is done very often. I wish they had used it in the LotR films, for example.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    134. Re:Never heard that one before by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Why use a real world accent at all?

      Well, I see I'm going to have to let you in on a a dirty little secret of Star Wars.

      Specifically, it wasn't made a long time ago in a galaxy far, far, away. It was made right here on Earth (Terra, Dirt, whichever name you prefer), and the actors were all natives of Earth/Terra/Dirt.

      Yep, every one of them was human. Even the weird looking ones.

      Unfortunately, that really limited the ability of the producers to pick inoffensive accents. They just didn't have anyone who spoke a non-terrestrial accent available for use, and all the terrestrial accents were already in use by SOMEBODY.

      At least they didn't try to do NAZIs in space...

      Oh, wait, never mind, they did that too, what with the stormtroopers and the feldgrau uniforms on some of the bad guys....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    135. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the variation on 'yessa massa' slave speak was what really made it seem racist.

      If you've never heard of anyone that picked up on the latent racism in the staw wars movies, I'd recommend getting out more and making some new friends.

      Don't fret, it's ok, racism is a part of human nature. Us versus them is hard wired into us and as a result *we are all racist*. It's about how we reconcile that part of the psyche with what we know to be right. There are many aspects of human nature (i.e. violence) that are enemies to decency and we all (should) fight them every day to be decent and honorable members of society.

    136. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the real world, son.

    137. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      except:

      black accent - idiot
      jew accent - slimy businessman
      japanese accent - ruthless technocrats

    138. Re: Never heard that one before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So... that makes Mace Windu... what exactly?
      Powerful, wise, educated, good-aligned black person. But yeah, lets ignore Mace Windu and focus on jar Jar, who's not black, not human but hey, his accent "might" resemble something.
      Jeez. This is beyond ridiculous.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    139. Re:Never heard that one before by tburkhol · · Score: 2

      its fantasy... i dont to this day think about real life when watching fantasy.

      Then you are uniquely incapable of appreciating metaphor. You see, many writers build their stories around symbolism in order to convey a message that may not be explicitly stated. This makes those stories richer and more meaningful for an audience not simply waiting for the next explosion. Aesop's fables are an extreme where the moral is explicitly stated by fantasty talking animals at the end. These metaphors depend on fictional or fantasy elements within the story bearing recognizable similarity to real world people or structures, and stereotypical caricatures are a millenia-old mechanism for that. Star Wars, Wizard of Oz, The Tempest or Adam and Eve: if you can't see that these stories say more than what is on screen, then you are missing the fucking point.

      those who do IMO are wasting their time because whats the point of fantasy if you are going to do nothing but complain about how its close to X, if you squint real hard and spin around 3 times, it could be taken as racist

      It's an effect of sensitization. If you wake up every day and someone calls you a lazy moke, you get much better at recognizing subtle comments. It's the reason it's ok for Peyton Manning to slap Marvin Harrison on the ass, but not ok to slap cheerleaders. Stereotypes, like the one about autistic computer geeks unable to recognize metaphor, are propagated by repetition.

    140. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it is perfectly fine to typecast, generalize and discriminate against white males! Especially if they're British or generally from a western(ised) country.

    141. Re: Never heard that one before by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I am an American who has been alive for a while. At no time did I think "black person" when I saw Jar Jar for the first time.

      What that implies is either that the effect intended was not a negative racial stereotype or that racism is effectively dead for mainstream America.

      You choose. Either way, the hate-fest ends here.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    142. Re:Never heard that one before by jafiwam · · Score: 2

      And why didn't Lucas do what he did for aliens in the original trilogy: Either make them speak some alien language with subtitles, or give them some not-easily-identified accent? Jabba didn't speak like an Italian guy - he spoke in Huttese. Greedo spoke in his own tongue. Chewbacca had his growls that Han and C3P-O translated. Aliens that spoke English (Yoda, Ackbar, etc) did so without any obvious dialect. You didn't have Ackbar shouting "It's a trap!" with a French accent. Yoda didn't speak with a stereotypical Indian accent. The original Star Wars trilogy did alien-speak right, why couldn't the prequels? (Not saying that this would have fixed all of the prequels' problems. Their issues go far deeper than offensive alien accents. Still, it would have been one less thing to cringe at.)

      The target audience of the newer movies is a lot younger.

      The folks that buy toys and games and collector cups and all that.

      Do you think Star Wars (a new hope) was targeted toward kids originally? It wasn't, but it turned out to have tremendous appeal to kids. One they couldn't count on reproducing.

      So they had to put in some slapstick comedy to keep the interest (or so they thought), they couldn't use other languages and count on the audience reading subtitles fast (because they aren't that good at reading), and they had to put in obvious game leading sequences like the robot factory and the pod race to kick off the video games.

      Those awful aspects of the newer movies were put there because Lucas thought he could make more money with them there. Why risk being accused of racism by doing racist stuff? What we are seeing is incidental changes as the result of making the movies more marketable to KIDS because kids will spend more MONEY on the stupid shit.

    143. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Yoda always the verb at the end puts. (Which I thought sort of cool was.)

    144. Re:Never heard that one before by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Caitlyn Binks?

    145. Re: Never heard that one before by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      But that's Star Trek TOS you're talking about.

      First of all, old SF stuff tell us more about the time they were written in than about the actual future. And with Star Trek, We're talking about about Space race and cold war here.References and stereotypes from those subjects are kind at least understandable, like Stepin Fetchit movies (heard the first time of him today) told us about the actual racism in his time.

      But episode one is a piece from the late 90s. If a cartoon character is shown with some possibly racist traits, this is simply sloppiness. Laziness to invent some actual accent, unthoughtfullness of noticing it how the characterizatzon and accent match a stereotype (it probably would have been noted if the role was casted with an actual black actor instead of blue-greyish a computer animation) and general cluelessnes of pushing that lazy, clumsy nuisance into the viewers field of vision at all.

      OK, now back to Star Trek and why it can't be compared: The stereotypes in ST aren't (usually...) not Stereotypes used as a lazy way to make easy characterizations (see: James Bond: blonde guy with german accent --> evil, eyepatch: evil or a fake italian accent to depict some guy as 'funny') They're rather allegorys. Yes, Romulans are space russians, but if you want to tell about an utopia about all space races living happily federated together, you need someone to symbolize the warmongering people that has to be coped with, too.

      And please note while the Romulans symbolize Cold war russia, it was poor Chekov who had all the stereotypical russian stuff!

      And while Star Wars did their happy Science Fiction Fairy Tale, ST actually went onto the subject of racism (Let that be your last battlefield) - in al allegorical way with all stereotypical dead weight removed. So if someone in ST is symbolizing someone back here on earth, it can be done that it is on purpose.

      And still my final point stands: If seeing a non-human character with some negative traits triggers some black/white stereotypes, it tells a lot about how deeply rooted these prejudices are within the recipient. (...maybe: too..)

      But as a conclusion, I'd like to say the the whole Jar Jar character is SO annoying, and as a whole is a result of bad and uninspired writing, that perceived racist stereotype don't make the top ten on my list of reasons to wish him some unpleasant veneral diseases.

      --
      bickerdyke
    146. Re:Never heard that one before by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And why were all the aliens speaking Galactic Basic anyway? I could see in the senate, but on their homeworlds and in their own ships?

    147. Re:Never heard that one before by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Seriously?
      Were you not even born yet when the movie came out?
      Or are you somehow commenting without having ever seen the movie?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    148. Re:Never heard that one before by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      In fairness to George Lucas the kids really liked Jar Jar it was just us who had been the kids the first time around who thought he was a pile of shit

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    149. Re: Never heard that one before by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I don't think he was being malevolent. I just think Lucas is not that good and fell on stereotypes he was familiar with, not even aware of what was wrong with them. Space villain? Ming the Merciless from Flash Gordon! Goofy comedic character? Blackface minstrels! Greedy slave-owning merchant? Shylock in Merchant of Venice!

      I might have the direct influences wrong, but I'm pretty sure he just lifted ideas from past films without considering (or even being aware of) the ramifications of his choices.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    150. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but we love that.

      Srsly, part of white privilege is being able to enjoy worn-out racial stereotypes.

    151. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a big difference between a white British actor talking with a British accent while playing a white guy, and a computer generated caricature exhibiting the most negative stereotypes of an ethnicity.

    152. Re:Never heard that one before by dywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh BS. On all counts.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    153. Re:Never heard that one before by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Then we must conclude that you led a very sheltered life.
      Or were willfully blind to it.
      Given your past comments, I'm going with the latter.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    154. Re: Never heard that one before by dywolf · · Score: 1

      If Leia had been made the comedic relief of the movie, whose sole purpose was to constantly portray negative stereotypes that made her the butt of jokes, the way Jar Jar was, then yes.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    155. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jar Jar Binks is just a bad character. It has nothing to do with race. More people that have nothing better to do than complain about racial inequality.

    156. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't hurt if the gungun with the most face time was more capable. If the bad stereotype was a background character amidst a group of normal acting gunguns it would be more palatable. And yes, if you use a Jamaican accent, people will immediately think Jamaican (black). And they did. Which is why they drew offense.

    157. Re:Never heard that one before by Person147 · · Score: 1
      I liked the way Anakin transformed from being a "good" guy with an American accent to a "bad" guy (Darth Vader) with a British accent. Are the film makers trying to say something there?

      You say it was a bit of a thing back then, but if you look at Disney bad guys, they are almost always voiced with British accents. Disney are training American children that anyone with a British accent is a bad person and not to be trusted. Even in Batman The Dark Knight Rises, as soon as Miranda Tate opened her mouth and spoke with a British accent, I knew she was a bad guy. Same with most films still, unless they are the main character.

      If it was a black person as the bad guy as often it is a British person, there would be protests on the streets.

    158. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 49. Never heard the term "Jar Jar Racist" and it was never his Jamaican accent that made people upset except for those that want and have to find racial undertones in everything.

    159. Re:Never heard that one before by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      People looking to be offended will be always find what they're looking for, no matter how sensitive you try to be.

      If the original trilogy came out today, people would be complaining that C3PO is a gay stereotype, Nien Nunb is a slur against asians, Jabba is offensive to fat people, and jawas are implying that little people are selfish.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    160. Re:Never heard that one before by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the main problem happens when people (movie directors, studio execs, marketing, etc) decides that "gearing X towards kids" means "adding lots of bodily humor, inserting slapstick everywhere, and dumbing everything down." There have been a lot of very successful "kids" movies that don't pander to kids and are quite watchable by adults.

      A recent one that comes to mind is Inside Out. Disney/Pixar could have easily made the imaginary friend character (Bing Bong) a Jar-Jar Binks-esque disaster. They could have inserted tons of scenes of the emotions slamming into things. They could have had Anger release gas every time he got furious. They did none of this. Instead, they made a movie that my 8 year old loved, my 11 year old loved, my wife loved, and I (pushing 40) loved. They didn't assume that Kid = Only Appreciates Crude/Low Brow Humor.

      I'm not saying there isn't a place for crude humor. Sometimes it works just fine. However, shoehorning that stuff into a movie because "this will appeal to kids" is a recipe for disaster.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    161. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the curse of social media and internet.
      Where media outlets can always find someone outraged about something. Yawn.

    162. Re:Never heard that one before by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You thought Darth Vader had a British accent?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    163. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, have had it up to here with Hollywood's tendency to cast white men in the role of serial murderers. We really need more sexual and ethnic diversity in these roles.

    164. Re:Never heard that one before by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Except that as a British person, I'm kind of relaxed about the whole thing. British actors can do 'bad guy' very effectively, and the challenge for the US lead is usually trying to match the performance.

      Maybe it helps that the same British actors also play the 'good guy' in British films, and some US ones.

      I just like a lot of British actors. I like a lot of American ones too, and a couple of Australians. And a French one.

    165. Re: Never heard that one before by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that answers a question I never even thought to ask. Very nicely put.

    166. Re: Never heard that one before by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Leia's bikini slave scene inspired a whole generation.

      Anyway, anybody whining about slavery on racial grounds is a racist cunt - people of all races have enslaved people of all races, and pretending otherwise is ignorance and/or racism.

    167. Re: Never heard that one before by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      what???? yes, if the character had been played by a live-action black man, yes, people would have had big-time problems.

    168. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if that's sarcasm or not. I thought it was thinly characterization of a certain North American black stereotype as well. Even Jar Jar's gait was very reminiscent of the gait of the characters in the Fat Albert cartoon of the 80's. To take it a step further, despite being an animal of aquatic origin, the Lego Star Wars games feature Jar Jar as the character that could jump the highest. Chew on that for a while.

    169. Re:Never heard that one before by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, Jar Jar had a vaguely Jamaican accent, but his antics brought to mind the worst of Jerry Lewis, Jim Carey, Lucille Ball or any number of physical comedians, who in my recollection were mostly white.

      For some reason, Jar Jar Binks reminded me of someone else.

    170. Re:Never heard that one before by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It was a pretty common response at the time Episode I was released. I can understand how you might not notice, but it was something that struck a lot of people, and not just people who were looking for racism.

      I don't think it's intentional, or that anyone at the time thought it was intentional. It's just sort of weird. I remember watching it for the same time, and being like, "WTF? How did Lucas accidentally create something so seemingly racist, and nobody noticed or called him out on it?" In my mind, it really stood out as weirdly racist. You have an alien with big lips and an broad, flat nose speaking in a Jamaican accent, acting like a lazy bumbling fool similar to old racist comedies.

      Again, it doesn't seem like there's a particular racist intent, but it's just odd. Like imagine Lucas had made a point of having Yoda voiced in such a way as to make him sound like an inner-city black guy, and then have him absolutely love fried chicken and watermelon. Even if you want to argue that it's not that offensive, it'd just be a really odd choice.

    171. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is also a very kind and innocent creature that ends up being given great responsibility. To keep with your supposed stereotype he would need to be dangerous and untrustworthy.

      You can draw lines of comparison between any character and others they supposedly represent when you go looking for comparisons to make.

    172. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone told you the solution to your SJW problems were to not listen or read about them, how would you take that? On top of that your post essentially tells the GP that they should not express their opinion. Well maybe you should not express your either?

      You need to work on your logic, if you want to claim something is racist/sexist without any evidence to support your claim, you do not get to berate others who just happen to disagree with you.

    173. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Jar Jar was absolutely a minstrel, and that is the perfect word for the performance of that character. I'm disappointed in /. that the word "minstrel" appears in neither the summary comment nor the initial comments. Had to come all the way down here to see someone speaking the truth.

      Not Jamaican. Just straight up minstrel. At least it was a mostly-computer-generated character and not a guy in a suit. Without all the CG effects, it's just some asshole in blackface.

    174. Re:Never heard that one before by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I don't know if Star Wars needs diversity, but Episode I was rude.

      It seemed to me that Watto the Slave Owner on Tatooine was a Jewish stereotype (look at his nose and listen to the accent), the Trade Federation were Japanese stereotypes (look at the eyes and accent), and Jar Jar was a Jamaican stereotype.

      Or the little nomadic desert traders with beady little eyes, always trying to rip you off. What were they called? Jews? Sorry, Jawas?

      Or the warlike Sandpeople?

      Quagmire: (giving his child up for adoption) You're not gonna give her to the Sandpeople, are you?
      Adoption Lady: You mean like in Star Wars?
      Quagmire: No, no. No.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    175. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, black people are lazy, stupid, criminals who only eat fried chicken and watermelon all the time? Because I hear that shit all the time and so it must be true, right?

      Stereotypes are not incorrect in and of themselves, but there are a lot of bad stereotypes, like those listed above. You can't simply say that because some stereotypes are true therefore none of them are false or damaging.

      The above stereotypes are repeated by every racist piece of shit in the U.S. on nearly a daily basis. They teach their kids about black people using that litany. But it's not harmful, right?

      "Stay away from those [blacks] because they'll rape you." That's a favorite.

      Somebody's got to be doing the raping, right?

    176. Re:Never heard that one before by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Unfortunately, that really limited the ability of the producers to pick inoffensive accents

      Didn't stop them with Yoda.

      Also, I guess someone should have mentioned that to the guys who did the Vulcan accent and speech mannerisms, the Klingon accent and speech mannerisms, and frankly almost every Star Trek race gets a speech pattern that is both distinct and not just a copy of something from Earth.

      Also, there's a pretty big difference between "we chose an accent" and "we fitted a greedy merchant fly with a hat and a huge nose... you'll NEVER guess what accent he ended up with!"

      Anyway, no, it being filmed in the real world didn't stop anyone from doing anything they wanted. This is obviously what they wanted, and it truly is a bit silly.

    177. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must mean Russian, or A-rab.

      Nobody takes British-sounding villains seriously, unless they are in a Bond film.

    178. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are asking, could they do better? Did you even watch the movie? Most of the movie, in pretty much every aspect, needed better.

    179. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens that spoke English (Yoda, Ackbar, etc) did so without any obvious dialect.

      And they all appeared too white, too male and too heterosexual.

      Yoda and Ackbar were white? And displaying their sexuality onscreen?

      Wow, I must have been hammered when I was watching those movies...

      There is a heavy misogynistic subtext in all those characters. Maybe you need to educate yourself about feminism theories and gender science. Invisible oppression is the worst.

    180. Re:Never heard that one before by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      The worst negative stereotype in American cinema is the villains all having English accents.

      I noticed from the trailer release this weekend that the actress playing the main heroine in the next flick has an English accent. I don't know if she'll be putting on an American accent for her character though.

      Of course as an American I'd kind of grown fond of that nit of the Star Wars universe, so I'm not sure I'd like to see it go. It was an easy way to clue the audience in ahead of time on a character's alignment. Kind of like how you could tell bad guys instantly in old black-and-white silent cowboy movies by whether they had a black or white hat on.

      It does make me wonder how they handle that on non-English dubs. Do they find the local imperialist accent for that country and use it for imperials, or do they just skip that nuance?

    181. Re:Never heard that one before by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Jar Jar's speech sounds a lot like Jamaican patois to me. Whether that is racist or not is another story, but Jar Jar's general behavior; stupid, lazy, and addled, do conjure up the way blacks were portrayed

      I don't believe Jar-Jar was ever portrayed as lazy. Clumsy yes, but not lazy.

    182. Re:Never heard that one before by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Comes of not being an American I think. Having not personally met an Jamaican I didn't even realise that it sounded like that accent.....

      It doesn't. Seriously. Its like nobody has heard a fucking Jamaican accent, but some people think they know what a jamaican sounds like and have declared Jar-Jar a racist character based on only their imagination. What we actually see here is there isa group of racist people that see an annoying computer generated thing on the screen and have stereotyped it.

      Here is a real Jamaican, Peter Tosh giving a fairly long speech. Jar-Jar and the rest of his race sound nothing at all like this. Zero similarity.

      Jar-Jar was annoying. End of story. Progressive racists wanna see racism everywhere. End of that story too.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    183. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm not up to date on my stereotypes, but "sub-aquatic technologically and agriculturally advanced warriors who hate Jar Jar as much as the rest of us" doesn't sound particularly "Jamaican" in the big picture. I though the Jamaican stereotype was "care free to the point of lazyness and suvinving on subsistance fishing and tourism".

      Keep in mind Jar Jar was exiled for being a complete dipshit, but his verbal mannerisms were shared by all Gungans, a society which had a transport capable of traversing the planet's core and the weapons necessary to fight a Droid Army juts lying around.

    184. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about Jay and Silent bob or Cheech and Chong?

    185. Re:Never heard that one before by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      FYI, I know that the Ewoks at least spoke Tagalog (Filipino), so it is entirely possible that the other species were speaking other obscure languages.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    186. Re:Never heard that one before by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      It seemed to me that Watto the Slave Owner on Tatooine was a Jewish stereotype (look at his nose and listen to the accent)

      I thought he was supposed to be an Italian stereotype?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    187. Re:Never heard that one before by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

      And the bad guys were always white men with British accents. Oh noes.

      "Why do we all speak in British accents if we're from space and there is no Britain?" - Thumb Wars

      --
      "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
    188. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should. Racist stereotypes after a time require fuel from the Streissand effect. Don't point out that pointy noses and skeevy merchant is a racial stereotype for Jews, and when you see a big nosed alien being a skeevy merchant, you won't associate those things with Jews when you see it. It's a sad irony that after a point, trying to stop the stereotype, keeps the stereotype alive.

    189. Re:Never heard that one before by dacaldar · · Score: 1

      +1. He was clearly talking like an Italian mechanic "small business owner". (I am half Italian)

    190. Re: Never heard that one before by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      [i] Hey dipshit. You just quote the parent in your reply and presto problem solved. I mean, Jesus christ. What clueless idiot hasn't figure that out yet? Asshole.[/i] Did I get that right?

    191. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's making you "support" anal sex? Stop being a fag and let gay people do what they want.

    192. Re:Never heard that one before by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Who cares?

    193. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm A big fan of don't attribute to malice that could be caused to ignorance, but Mr. Lucas held onto that franchise from what I can tell out of financial interest and had a couple of years to do it correctly. I am not sure that Disney's track history is all that great as far as being culturally sensitive other than banning movies the find more embarrassing than profitable. Stereotypes in movies can be attributed mostly into hateful, insensitive shorthand by the negligent, and really great satire. Boarder line criminally negligent to the people that invested in the movie in my opinion.Pay for a linguist to teach an actor a few things and don't get slammed as the modern Zip Coon. probably worth it in the long term. Hell If I was that actor, I would have paid for the lessons myself.

    194. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really your place to decide what other cultures and ethnicities are offended by. You wouldn't know why it's offensive, because you're not them. Your opinion ACTUALLY doesn't even matter in this case, unless you're black.

    195. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there had been more positive, or neutral portrayals of black people in Episode I (as there were for white people), the Jar Jar thing wouldn't even have been noticeable.

      Oh hey, that's what the article is about, more black characters who aren't a stereotype! Weird!

    196. Re:Never heard that one before by werepants · · Score: 1

      People getting offended at every little thing = Predictable and Annoying.

      People getting angry because people are offended = More predictable and more annoying.

      Journalists like to create controversy because it makes them seem enlightened and it draws readers. By getting worked up about it whether you agree or disagree about the offense you just play into their plan. So instead, stop giving a shit. It is a work of fiction.

    197. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the post you replied to? Bad-guys were also the trade federation and Watto...

    198. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the problem is, many times that offense goes beyond one's own thoughts and feelings. As soon as people start acting on that offense, and it becomes public, then it is open to criticism, just like religion or any other belief. You believe you are offended. Are you really, or is there a deep seated hatred driving you? Or something else driving you? As soon as you make a public comment like "Jar Jar Binks reminds me of some random black guy from the 1930's", then the public has the right to criticize your public comment. No belief or feeling should go unchallenged merely because it is held by a person.

    199. Re:Never heard that one before by drkoemans · · Score: 1

      FYI, I know that the Ewoks at least spoke Tagalog (Filipino), so it is entirely possible that the other species were speaking other obscure languages.

      And thus the beginning of the downhill slide.

    200. Re:Never heard that one before by drkoemans · · Score: 1

      I'm Romanian, and I lived in Transylvania for 7 years, I even got some Transylvanian accent. Trust me, the Nemoidians do NOT have a Transylvanian accent. I didn't think they had a Japanese accent either. in fact, I didn't think any characters had a specific accent, nor did I care.

      Agreed, but it did seem to me that they had the stereotype of a dubbed japanese accent but you'd probably have to be familiar with the north american localized content for imported films to know that. Of course, George Lucas would have been...

    201. Re: Never heard that one before by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Farscape had recurring characters that were clearly based on native americans, with some controversy re their portrayal. This seems like a like slippery slope, dual demands for actor diversity while not being seen as portraying badly.

    202. Re:Never heard that one before by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      or give my opinion as well, and not be bothered by other people sharing theirs. you know thats an option as well. works out good for me, ive learned a thing or 2 that way

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    203. Re:Never heard that one before by Vastad · · Score: 1

      The Trade Federation struck me more as camp over-the-top Han Dynasty China parody complete with funny hats and an implied affection for "red tape warfare" and wealth.

      A parody of Imperial Japan, I feel, would have been more...bushido warrior or something.

    204. Re:Never heard that one before by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You know, the whole Fat Albert cartoon was conceived by Bill Cosby, who while a terrible role model the anti molestation movement, certainly was/is black.

    205. Re: Never heard that one before by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      This will get better with time. George Lucas, and the other people of his generation involved in making films, are products of their time. They made films based on films they had seen earlier. Certainly Star Wars is nowhere near as blatantly offensive as the films that influenced it, and the next generation of filmmakers will produce films even further detached from the older stereotypes.

      A few years ago I saw "The Nutcracker" with my daughter. One of the main characters (the little girl, Clara or Marie) was played by a black ballerina. This is a fairly major sign of change - in the recent past, people would have been hung up on the fact that it is very unlikely that Dr. Stahlbaum would have a mixed race family in early 19th century Prussia. Naturally, it is also unlikely that an enchanted nutcracker would fight a mouse army, but I digress...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    206. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actress who voiced him used her natural accent. You're the racist for being offended by a natural accent. Not Star Wars.

    207. Re:Never heard that one before by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention Nien Nunb, as I have a Filipino friend whose newborn baby had that same sorta look.
      I never mentioned it, but I did laugh inside at it.
      I was secretly hoping he'd have another kid and name him lando.

    208. Re:Never heard that one before by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      > Unfortunately, that really limited the ability of the producers to pick inoffensive accents

      Didn't stop them with Yoda.

      Originally, Yoda had a very heavy and identifiable muppet accent.

    209. Re:Never heard that one before by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Agreed, he sounds only vaguely like a *real* Jamaican accent. However, he sounds very much like a *stereotypical* Jamaican accent.

      You may as well say that styling a character on traditional blackface comedy isn't racist, because blackface comedy wasn't actually a reflection of real black people. No, it wasn't - that's the entire reason it's so racist. If you're actually accurately representing a subclass of people then the potential for racism is limited - you may laugh at the otherness a bit, but it's by grossly exaggerating the differences into an insulting caricature that you create something deeply offensive. And once that caricature is established in the culture as a stereotype, a non-verbal insult, simply removing the most obvious reference to its racial roots doesn't eliminate the racism. The caricature stands on its own, invoking the mentality that created it to all who recognize it.

      And incidentally, I seem to recall a number of prominent native Jamaican media personalities complaining about Jar Jar at the time - and frankly, if there's anyone fit to recognize a racist caricature, I'd say it's the targets - people who have lived their lives on the receiving end of those thinly-veiled insults. Perhaps they may be over-sensitive, but that same sensitivity also highlights in glaring relief the commoditized racism that people who have never been targeted may overlook entirely. (I grew up in a heavily Hispanic community, and to this day being called "white boy" or "gringo" will raise my hackles, even in the most friendly of contexts - and I have the benefit of being on the "winning" side of racial conflict, so the name really only brands me as "other", not "lesser")

      The thing is, you don't have to intend for a racist slur to be insulting for it to be so - the insult has been baked into the slur by decades of abuse. Just as saying "red" invokes a mental impression of a certain color to anyone with color vision, so saying "nigger" invokes a mental impression of a judgment of subhuman worth to anyone familiar with the words recent history. And invoking a racist caricature does the same to anyone who has been sensitized to that caricature, even if it's done by a nonhuman CG character.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    210. Re: Never heard that one before by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it's not quite that simple. I'm not going to take any position on whether Jar Jar was or was not racist, much less whether he was *intentionally* racist, which can be a completely different thing. Just bare with me for a moment:

      Consider blackface comedy - if you've never seen any, go watch a few samples on youtube or somewhere, I'm sure you can find some atrocious examples, even though the stereotype was long fading by the time film became common. Or just think of the worst racial stereotype you can bring to mind.

      Now ask yourself two questions - hopefully you'll come to substantially the same conclusions so that my argument makes sense:
      Does the portrayal accurately represent black people? No, certainly not - that's a large part of why it's so insulting.
      Does the portrayal present a semi-coherent and deeply insulting stereotype of black people? Most assuredly yes.

      Now for the complicated question: if you saw a white guy in some comedy club playing a bumpkin by adopting that same behavioral stereotype, without any reference to black people, would it be racist?

      Now, if you had never seen blackface your answer would probably be no - he's just some dude acting like a lazy idiot for laughs. Maybe it's insulting to lazy idiots, but hey, they're fair game, right? But consider how your feelings might change if you had grown up being the target of that caricature. If you had seen those costumes and mannerisms used to belittle yourself and your entire race for decade after decade. Would the fact that the guy wasn't actually wearing black makeup really make you feel okay about the act? Or would you just see a guy doing blackface without the makeup, with all the racial slurs embedded in that caricaturization?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    211. Re: Never heard that one before by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Not just because they're subservient and uneducated, no. But if they draw heavily on the mannerisms and stereotypes of a *particular* racial caricature - traits that were firmly established as racist shorthand long before the nonhuman character was created? Yeah, I think there'd be a strong argument to be made that you were invoking the entirety of that caricature by reference, no matter what color or shape the character was.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    212. Re:Never heard that one before by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Originally, Yoda had a very heavy and identifiable muppet accent.

      Yes, and it's good they changed that, or they would likely have offended the muppets, who are often stereotyped as being small green wrinkled men.

      I think you've made my point for me: it's possible and standard to come up with fictional accents without having to simply copy real world accents, especially on movies with actual budgets.

    213. Re:Never heard that one before by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      You're Australian. You people find specifically invent vaguely insulting ethnic terms and then use then to refers to yourselves (are you a Pom, a Wop, or other, Mr Harlequin80?). You also don't have a large West Indian minority, so the Jamaican accent angle not occur to you.

      OTOH, in the states:
      http://www.slate.com/articles/...
      http://articles.baltimoresun.c...
      http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/Mov...

      You'll note that even over here it was not uncontroversial to call Jar-Jar racist, but if you were paying attention to pop culture in the US in '99 you would have had a position on this.

    214. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a heavy misogynistic subtext in all those characters. Maybe you need to educate yourself about feminism theories and gender science. Invisible oppression is the worst.

      I call Poe's Law.

    215. Re:Never heard that one before by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      oh no i saw the movie the day it came out and i thought it was a waste of 5 bucks (matinee)

        its fantasy... i dont to this day think about real life when watching fantasy. those who do IMO are wasting their time because whats the point of fantasy if you are going to do nothing but complain about how its close to X, if you squint real hard and spin around 3 times, it could be taken as racist

        these people need to get lives

      Most fantasy is actually a lot more interesting if you relate it to the real world. The entire reason Star Trek, for example, has a rep as a more adult/thinking man's type Space Opera is that a significant proportion of their episodes aren't Cool Shit IN SPACE!, but are commentaries on the real world.

      Even some of the stuff that doesn't have a reputation of being intellectual gains a whole new dimension if you you relate it to the real world. The Wheel of Time series, for example, has it's share of cool for cool's sake, but it's also got a lot of real exploration of gender roles. If you're just reading for the cool shit's sake you're not getting nearly as much out of the text as you would if you paid attention to all the weird ways he shakes up the gender roles.

    216. Re:Never heard that one before by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Didn't sound like any damn Romanians I've ever heard. Hungarians either, and a significant chunk of that province is ethnic Hungarian Szekely.

      I have read that it was supposed to be the generic "Vampire" accent, but watching the few Nemoidian scenes that are on Youtube it sounds a lot more North Asian. In particular they're not differentiating clearly between "R" and "L," which is a characteristic of Japanese speakers because Japanese has no "R" sound.

      I couldn't easily find a scene where they say something with a "v" in it to see if they're also mixing up their "V" and "W," which is pretty much the only consistant thing about Vampire accents.

    217. Re:Never heard that one before by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      In theory it shouldn't be any harder then doing a different human language accent. In some ways it'll be easier, because if you screw up nobody's gonna right on the fan board "She's got a pretty good Midlands accent, but slips between East and West."

      In practice it's really difficult because you it's hard to find people to practice with, so the only Betezed who uses the accent is Marina and by the time the films rolled around she'd forgotten the damn thing because she hadn't used it for years.

    218. Re: Never heard that one before by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      First of all, old SF stuff tell us more about the time they were written in than about the actual future. And with Star Trek, We're talking about about Space race and cold war here.References and stereotypes from those subjects are kind at least understandable, like Stepin Fetchit movies (heard the first time of him today) told us about the actual racism in his time.

      I think this statement is dead on. I would broaden it to say that all creative works say a lot about the time and context in which they were produced. Stepin Fetchet, amos & andy, and similar works say a lot about race relations at that time.

      If a cartoon character is shown with some possibly racist traits, this is simply sloppiness. Laziness to invent some actual accent, unthoughtfullness of noticing it how the characterizatzon and accent match a stereotype (it probably would have been noted if the role was casted with an actual black actor instead of blue-greyish a computer animation) and general cluelessnes of pushing that lazy, clumsy nuisance into the viewers field of vision at all.

      absolutely true. As you said, it's easier to fall back on stereotypes than invent something new. Jar-Jar could have been something unique and new, but Lucas was lazy and cribbed shorthand from cinematic history instead.

      the issue at hand is he chose to fall back on these old characterizations that were created for the biases of the day. The old attitudes about race are now considered inappropriate, and I believe rightly so. most people would agree that these characterizations belong where they are, in the past.

      The fact that Lucas dug these up for his shuck-and-jive jar jar character reflects not only laziness but a boneheaded indifference to the context and historical baggage of the references he was using. It's this indifference that (many) people are reacting to. He should have known better.

    219. Re:Never heard that one before by kmoser · · Score: 1

      The Empire high command all wore outfits reminiscent of Nazis. Hell, even their soldiers were called "stormtroopers". This is clear, blatant, anti-German bias!

    220. Re:Never heard that one before by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Doing a google image search for Snarf, I don't see the problem ... Snarf speaks proper english

      Proper English? Try reading the text that goes with it in the strips. Jar-jar is a dumbed down and more annoying Snarf.

      I just read through a few pages of Snarf, and don't see him speaking like JarJar. Other than a few common 'alternative pronunciations' just as "dat" for "that", he is using complete sentences, refers to himself as "I", and generally talking as well as any of the other characters he's with. Also his actions and movements are normal, rather than clumsy like with JarJar.

      I think Larry Elmore saw more in JarJar that wasn't there

      I saw it too which is why I hit the net at the time to see what Elmore thought of his character being ripped off - "didn't even get a mention" is what I remember. Now it's buried somewhere under a million google items with those keywords, but just read the strip to see the very blatant ripoff.

      Sorry, I just don't see it beyond a passing similarty.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    221. Re:Never heard that one before by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      True. We do come up with names for ethnic items. Personally I'm born here but my father is a Pam as is my wife. My best mate is a Kiwi. I think in another post I talked about wog food. Not sure what Wop means but it sounds like something I have heard before.

    222. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also, picture Jabba as white, heterosexual male? Hahaha. He looked more like ... erm ... an alien. Maybe male, but maybe gay or bisexual or sexless or sex #7 of their 10 sexed species.

    223. Re:Never heard that one before by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Other than a few common 'alternative pronunciations' just as "dat" for "that", he is using complete sentences

      Hence my comment above "Jar-jar is a dumbed down and more annoying Snarf" instead of what you seem to think I wrote, perhaps something about it having to be a photocopy to be a ripoff. I really don't get why you are pushing so hard about an expression of an opinion, based on a bit more than your brief glance, while apparently not noticing much about the opinion apart from a few key words.

    224. Re:Never heard that one before by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Apparently "Wop" is the US version, and it only refers to Italians. I meant Wog.

      One of the perils of remembering things you read on Wikipedia is that they all tend to run together at some point.

    225. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's some high quality crack youre smoking, huh?

    226. Re:Never heard that one before by siliconsmiley · · Score: 1

      It was part of canon. The Empire was racist, sexist and species-est. The upper ranks of the power structure were all white, human males.

    227. Re: Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone else pointed out, the Trade Federation were Transylvanian Dracula accents, not Japanese. You are the one that is injecting racism into that. You are the racist.

    228. Re: Never heard that one before by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Let's say you are right about the accent. How about Jar-Jar and Watto?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    229. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      autists tend to avoid alcohol & drugs because they are usually obsessive compulsive and can't stand not being fully in control. they also enjoy making themselves sound superior for having never touched either.

    230. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My $0.02

      Inside Out is a thinly veiled rip-off of Herman's Head, a 25 year old comedy brought to you by Fox. One of the first appearances of cast members Yeardly Smith and Hank Azaria who would go on to multi-year careers on the Simpsons.

      The biggest tragedy in this little scenario is that Herman's Head was never made available for purchase on VHS/DVD (are you listening Fox execs ? )

    231. Re:Never heard that one before by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Die in a fire, SJW arsehole.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    232. Re:Never heard that one before by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      instead of having a chip on my shoulder.

      That kind of bullshit, anti-social and profoundly racist attitude will get you precisely nowhere in today's world.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    233. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you see jar jar as a black stereo type, maybe you are a racist who sees black people as annoying assholes who can't speak properly?

      Or perhaps just someone who recognises the differences between different cultures without spouting provably-bullshit claims like 'all cultures are equal'. Tell that to the poor women in devout Muslim societies why don't ya?

      As for black people being annoying assholes who can't speak properly.. well, the former is a given, the latter is proven by black people every day when they're interviewed for their 'opinion' on television and radio news.

      Nowm'asayin?

    234. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EEEEEeeeeek a rayciss! There ain't NUTTHIN' so bad as a RAYCISS, them kiiiidie-fiddlers ain't nuttin' compayred to them RAYCISS!

      Now, where ma gibs at?

    235. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      general behavior; stupid, lazy, and addled, do conjure up the way blacks were portrayed in literature and films for a rather long time.

      ...and the way blacks seem to want to be considered collectively in the year 2015 as well, if their behaviour is anything to go by.

      What's that, you got a problem with what I say? Check yo' YT privilege, yo.

    236. Re:Never heard that one before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we have with Jar-Jar is just a sad mix of annoying and anti-Jamaican racism.

      Thank Christ you SJWs are everywhere now, ready to save us from our own excesses, able to spot RAYCISS comments through ten feet of lead at a hundred paces. Funny how everything looks RAYCISS when that's all you're looking for, isn't it cunt?

    237. Re:Never heard that one before by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Just because some people are finding ridiculous reasons to get offended doesn't mean that some offensive things aren't very real and glaring.

      For an example of a ridiculous reason, go see the "controversy" about the actor selected to play Oberyn Martell in Game of Thrones. A bunch of people with nothing better to do decided that it is "whitewashing", because the books describe Dornishmen as "swarthy", which they meant to be black or at least thoroughly dark-skinned; and because the actor in question is only first-generation Latin American (his parents were from Spain), which is "too white". When the author of the books himself noted that "swarthy" was really meant to approximate stereotypical Southern European olive-skinned appearance, as in Italian or, well, Spanish, that same bunch of people blamed the author for "whitewashing his own books", because apparently they know better than him what he actually had in mind by "swarthy" (and, in any case, even if he didn't, then he should damn well have). Now that, yes, is ridiculous.

      But most of the examples that are presented in TFA sound like valid manifestations of racism to me. Especially the caricature Jew.

  2. Don't forget by koan · · Score: 1

    Watto, pretty clear which group he represents.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  3. The solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do what many HR departments do - hire all African American Women.

    1. Re:The solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      African American Lesbian Veterans

      Cover the bases

  4. Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Getting extremely tired of this overanalytical pussification of society. Time for the rude assholes to take charge again and kick these SJWs to the curb.

    1. Re:Who gives a fuck by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because being an anti-social prick is so very superior. If it's gone too far in one direction, it's because it started too far in the other. It's time for the PCers and rude assholes to take a seriously needed chill pill. Being civil is what decent people do, and spurning hysterical people, whether because they are overly sensitive, or overly sensitive to overly sensitive people, is what decent people should do.

      Grow up. Racial stereotypes, like farting in public, is just plain bad behavior, and it isn't "pussification" to call out incidents of either.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Who gives a fuck by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      That's an almost word-for-word quote from Hermann Göring. I trust this was intentional?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People who use victimhood as a means to exert power over others. That's who gives a fuck.

    4. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Navel gazing about cast ratios isn't going to make people to respect one another. It's just grievance mongering and if the Star War franchise wants to indulge all the little hates you've been trained with that's fine, but the audience walk away. I know I'm not paying to be lectured to.

    5. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Grow up. Racial stereotypes, like farting in public, is just plain bad behavior, and it isn't "pussification" to call out incidents of either.

      That's a new one on me. Which race is known for farting in public? Whoever they are, I agree. They should be called out.

    6. Re: Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Indian bi female girlfriend disagrees with you, FWIW

    7. Re:Who gives a fuck by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Today I leared 'exert power' is another way of saying 'attain equality'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Who gives a fuck by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      political correctness is pretty much the definition of anti social, being that you are literally trying to change the way society talks and thinks

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    9. Re:Who gives a fuck by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      i find the word "cis" offensive. please refer to me as "normal" anything else is offensive.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re:Who gives a fuck by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      No. In other words, we are rational people that do not need the state or anyone else to police our thoughts for compliance with particular ideologies and their assumptive positions. This new age 'social justice' stuff reeks of cultish brainwashing.

    11. Re:Who gives a fuck by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's obviously a mistake. That girls don't fart in public is actually a sexist stereotype.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    12. Re:Who gives a fuck by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      it really is no different than what ISIS is doing over seas destroying monuments and ideas of those who disagree with them

      the only difference is that our bad guys use the media to do their dirty work while isis just cuts off heads

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    13. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today I leared 'exert power' is another way of saying 'attain equality'.

      But what do YOU mean by 'attain equality?' Equality of outcome? Equality of number of recently made mobile devices owned by every family? Equality of income taxes paid per dollar earned (careful - that one's a trick!)? Equality of expectations when it comes to interactions with other people? Please be specific.

    14. Re:Who gives a fuck by cfalcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who has to make up a word for "someone who doesn't want to change their sex (with surgery/hormones and/or gender presentation (with behavior/dress/etc)" is pretty clearly demonstrating a rather fucked up brand of intolerance themselves.

    15. Re:Who gives a fuck by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      pretty much sums it up right there

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    16. Re:Who gives a fuck by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Today I leared 'exert power' is another way of saying 'attain equality'.

      If "attain equality" means attacking, doxing, harassing, throwing death threats and getting people fired from their jobs because they have a different viewpoint or because they make a joke you don't like. I don't want anything to do with them, and that is how the fast majority of SJW's are.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    17. Re:Who gives a fuck by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Because being an anti-social prick is so very superior.

      No because enough already. PC mush heads are making BFDs out of nothing. They are straining as hard as they can to find something victimizing in every innocent thing people do. And it really is insanely annoying, and people get along less, not more.

    18. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

      BTW, your comment was an almost word-for-word quote of Himmler.

    19. Re:Who gives a fuck by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You lot use the term 'SJW' to describe waaaay more people than those you listed in your post.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    20. Re:Who gives a fuck by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      Respect.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    21. Re:Who gives a fuck by WaffleMonster · · Score: 0

      Because being an anti-social prick is so very superior

      Ignoring/tolerating people who say or do things you don't like is so very superior.

      Being civil is what decent people do, and spurning hysterical people, whether because they are overly sensitive, or overly sensitive to overly sensitive people, is what decent people should do.

      This is an oxymoron.

      Grow up. Racial stereotypes, like farting in public, is just plain bad behavior, and it isn't "pussification" to call out incidents of either.

      "Grow up" is a good response to anyone publically engaged in calling someone out for farting in public.

    22. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, lots of people do those things, but why is it "OK" when SJWs do them?

    23. Re:Who gives a fuck by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Got something specific in mind?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    24. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      white cis het male

      The moment you start using words like that to debase someone it's a sign that the rest of what you have to say can simply be ignored. It's like starting a sentence with "libtard" or "rethuglican", etc.

    25. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could also say "attain higher status", without earning it and regardless of merit or character.

    26. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does "equality" have to do with whining about characters in lame space stories? Why should your victimhood-based bleating weigh any heavier than any other complainer who has "really important" opinions on how the next Star Wars story should be told? Write a fan fiction if you want to be equal -- that's what non-victimhood-based second-guessers are invited to do.

      It's "exert power" because you think you can demand special treatment for your opinions.

    27. Re:Who gives a fuck by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      That'd be disingenuous since you're leaving out the crucial detail that their 'merit' or 'character' is being negatively rated for frivolous reasons.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    28. Re:Who gives a fuck by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It's "exert power" because you think you can demand special treatment for your opinions.

      What special ability are you talking about, here?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    29. Re:Who gives a fuck by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      because in order to 'attain equality', you have to fight people who insist on maintaining a position of superiority. so yes, 'exert power' is the perfect phrase.

    30. Re:Who gives a fuck by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      +1. i'm shocked by the willful ignorance on display in these comments by people who I have considered my peers.

    31. Re:Who gives a fuck by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you "leared" wrong

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    32. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7reSQd3uiA

      Look at that cast of all female performers. So beautiful, much artful.

      I will take my entertainment whit less female, less feminism and less social justice. Thanks.

    33. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it makes it easier to identify the bad guys.

    34. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't realize He was a fan of the words pussification, assholes, SJW, and curb (considering where he lived lacked them).

    35. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not bowing down to SJW bullshit is not being anti-social. If anything, accepting their demands unquestioningly is.
      If there are few black characters they whine. If there are black characters and they are anything short of perfect SJWs whine too. Maybe it's time they shut the fuck up and make their own Star Wars. Maybe something like (T)Raumschiff Surprise, but with transwhateverthefuck instead of fags.

    36. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the irony of dismissing the point for cosmetic reasons is lost on you.

    37. Re:Who gives a fuck by Tranzistors · · Score: 3

      Let me guess, you are offended if someone calls you “straight” instead of “normal”. Or white.

    38. Re:Who gives a fuck by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And what about the not-so-innocent things people do?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    39. Re:Who gives a fuck by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You know, having a bigot lecture people on tolerance is rather amusing, like having a piece of shit trying to sell a bottle of perfume.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    40. Re:Who gives a fuck by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You're right. We should all pretend the rude ignoramuses around us aren't rude ignoramuses. Social pressure should never be applied, and people should simply keep their heads down when someone is being vile and outrageous.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    41. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats. Mission accomplished. Now that "respect" is attained, why not stop with the the constant demands directed toward other people and produce something yourself?

      You know who people tend to respect a lot? Generous people. Kind people. People who are quick to help others and slow to ask for something in return. Fair minded people -- people who give others the benefit of the doubt. Creative people. Productive people. People who are problem solvers. People who try to bring us together. Humble people. Optimists.

      You know who people tend to disrespect? Takers. People who want something for nothing. Entitled people. People who cast blame and promote grievance and division. People who are quick to criticize and slow to praise. Haters. Drama people. Failures. Arrogant people. And, most of all, people who are disrespectful themselves.

      For more respect -- more than the very low base level anyone gets for being a person -- be more respectable.

    42. Re:Who gives a fuck by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Respectable people didn't get respect. When you understand that you'll start to understand the problem of labelling people 'SJW'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    43. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't answer. If you mention anything specific, they'll say you're guilty of "harassment" of the specific person you mention.

    44. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whining about things that happened to other people in other places in the distant past isn't respectable. Trying to divide people with blame and grievance about an unchangable history isn't respectable.

      Can the SJWar end without going back in time and changing history?

    45. Re:Who gives a fuck by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. They can't possibly still be your peers, because they have a different outlook on one issue. Now that you realize they don't all think exactly like you, they are ignorant racists and sexists.

      Why don't you make that your signature? Then everyone will know where they stand with you.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    46. Re:Who gives a fuck by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      And what about the not-so-innocent things people do?

      Then the political correctness group will take issue with the *wording* rather than what was said. There is no limit to the nasty things one can say while using only polite, politically correct words and phrases.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    47. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, don't be ridiculous. Those are not remotely the same thing.

      Homosexual / Heterosexual / Bisexual are useful terms. I'm not even sure you could call heterosexual "normal", because while it's the majority, there's plenty of evidence that there's an almost certainly populated spectrum on that.

      Races, meanwhile... are you just fucking trolling? First, if you asked an alien to draw a human, he'd draw an Asian. But, there's no meaningful definition for "normal" when it comes to races, as each people on the Earth are the result of selection for than environment over the relatively brief course of time that they had to adapt to that area before we hit the modern era.

      Identifying as a different gender than the sex you were born as, is most definitely not a normal state of affairs. It's great that our society is smart enough to help these people with acceptance instead of shunning, surgery instead of random mental flavor-of-the-year drugs, and that we have the technology to let them communicate in an effective and safe manner- but don't kid yourself that this is some adaptation or whatever.

      Ask yourself this: as science progresses, you'll probably see someone actually figure out why some brains do what they do. *What if* someone figures out that transmen have such-and-such at some developmental stage, and transwoman have yadda-yadda at that stage? What will that do, when you have two options to address this case, one where you wait for the kid to grow up, hate his body, and mull modification with drugs and surgery, and another where they just fix the state that causes the thing in the first place (no quotes around fix in this hypothetical, because in this case it would legitimately be a developmental anomaly)? This has a good chance of becoming reality before we get to the "choose-a-gender" level of technology described in science fiction, after all. It's no guarantee that this hypothetical is true- it could NOT be any kind of developmental anomaly- but if you (or anyone else) is reading this and raging, remember that it COULD be this, and by fighting that possible fact, you are demonstrating a massive prejudice- that reality and science MUST be found in accordance with your preexisting belief system.

    48. Re:Who gives a fuck by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has to make up a word for "someone who doesn't want to change their sex (with surgery/hormones and/or gender presentation (with behavior/dress/etc)" is pretty clearly demonstrating a rather fucked up brand of intolerance themselves.

      I think that needs some further explanation. Exactly how does "cis" class as intolerance? It doesn't imply anything, it's just shorthand with no negative connotations.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    49. Re:Who gives a fuck by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Try watching Judgement at Nuremburg sometime, rather than Triumph of the Will.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    50. Re:Who gives a fuck by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Once again I don't know what's worse: that someone would be stupid enough to write what you just wrote, or that other idiots would actually mod it up.
      Not discriminating is now considered a weakness, as is trying to stop it, and working for a more equal society.

      Really this is just an extension of the stupid alpha male nonsense some people feel compelled to act out by being uncaring unsympathetic and antisocial jerks to those around them, who think being a man means being an arsehole.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    51. Re:Who gives a fuck by dywolf · · Score: 1

      No, they're racists because they exhibit racist behaviors.
      Just like we know you're a troll because of the things you say.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    52. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If your biggest problem with racism and the dialog surrounding it is that it is insanely annoying, you're lucky. You are probably also part of the problem. If you don't have to consider race relations nearly every day, people of your race are probably doing the oppression, not being oppressed.

      When my coworker with a better degree from a more prestigious institution, who possesses more reasoned speech and better people skills but happens to be of a different racial background than I is many times more likely to be stopped and questioned than I am, that's a big fucking problem. When he is insulted because some group of ignorant yahoos wants to "celebrate their heritage", a heritage that largely existed because of the violent, race-based slavery of my coworker's ancestors, and who's "right" to celebrate that heritage was reinforced by violence under that same banner... yeah, that's a big fucking problem. People of his kind used to be killed for being "uppity" by people who thought that it was a good idea to keep "mush heads" in their place.

      A friend of my mom's son-in-law is an African American neurosurgeon. Often he gets home from work late, because he can't dictate the schedule, the surgery does. Often when he gets home late, he wants to unwind by taking a stroll in his adopted home town. But, since that lovely home town doesn't have many African Americans, he routinely ends up face down, spread eagle on the pavement while the local police try to "Protect and Serve" and clearly, an African American is a threat to that law-abiding small town/ So, once a month or so, he gets searched, and questioned why he's in that area, where did he get the keys to such a nice car, where did that expensive watch come from, etc etc, because clearly an African American male can't come by such trappings honestly. Every month. But to you, this is all merely internet chatter that's oh, so annoying.

      Grow the fuck up.

    53. Re:Who gives a fuck by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      obvously, minorities would get much more respect if only they stayed in their place

    54. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obviously a mistake. That girls don't fart in public is actually a sexist stereotype.

      But but but, I thought that girls don't fart at all!

    55. Re:Who gives a fuck by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      If a Christian says that you are non-Christian or not a Christian, that's one thing. If he calls you a "heathen", that's maybe got some more implications,right? If the Muslim says you aren't a Muslim, or follower of Islam, that's one thing, but if he says "infidel", that means something else, right?

    56. Re:Who gives a fuck by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      No, they're racists because they exhibit racist behaviors.
      Just like we know you're a troll because of the things you say.

      I'm a troll because I point out hypocrisy in what people say? Or their complete intolerance for opposing viewpoints? People know when I make trolling posts, and this isn't one of them.

      And his point was not that "OMG, These people are all racists!!!". His point was "I thought these people were the same as me, based on prior posts we have all made on other topics. Now I see there is one aspect of one issue (i.e. an alien in a science fiction movie) where we don't have the groupthink I thought we had. I pity these ignorant former compatriots."

      Based on this one topic, he completely disavows "people who I have considered my peers."

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    57. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay. Nevermind anything about people being good to each other to get respect. Internet snark is the best we can ask for -- being good to your neighbors is too much to ask for, because ... well, only good people try to be good.

    58. Re:Who gives a fuck by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      But "cis" is just shorthand for "not transgender", it doesn't have any similarity to words like "heathen" or "infidel". There are no negative connotations.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    59. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The others have a perfectly fine denotation. How long does it take it to go from denotation to fucked up connotation?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Not very fucking long apparently.

    60. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refer to myself as straight, I would appreciate you would use the correct terminology to refer to me. Also please use male pronouns as I am male, and identify as such. I have been this way since before the birth of the term "cis" and I find "cis" to be offensive as it sounds like sissy.

      If you fail to conform to my wishes then your are clearly a bigot.

    61. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look solely at the latin etymology you might think that there is no negative connotation. In common parlance, however, the term was coined specifically for use as a slur and part of a campaign of death threats against non-trans people:

      http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/...

    62. Re: Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cis" is ALWAYS hate speech. Go to hell you fucking bigot.

    63. Re:Who gives a fuck by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no... it was a joke.....

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    64. Re:Who gives a fuck by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      You're right. We should all pretend the rude ignoramuses around us aren't rude ignoramuses.

      No, it is pointless to pretend something that isn't so.

      Social pressure should never be applied, and people should simply keep their heads down when someone is being vile and outrageous.

      God wouldn't that be something to respect some dumbass enough to just ignore them. That would be amazing.

      The problem is that you were the one who used the words "spurning hysterical people" you don't win an argument or friends or convey tolerance or respect for others by "spurning" people no matter what you think of their ideas. This isn't a civil course of action it is acting like a child which is why the jist of your argument is an oxymoron.

      Shouting down people you disagree with isn't being civil and does not make you look cool no matter what nonsense they are peddling. There are more effective ways to communicate that don't involve "spurning".

    65. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, you sound uppity.

    66. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I can't be "normal" then you can't be "queer".

    67. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >farting in public, is just plain bad behavior

      This just idea just needs to die. Gas is painful to hold in and there's no reason to do so other than to please people who have invented an idea that a natural bodily function is rude. I've stopped worrying about it in places where it's not likely to impact my ability to earn a living. No, I won't fart in the bosses office, but, no, I'm not going to hold it in while I'm at the grocery store. It's not that I think that it's not ok to fart in the bosses, office, it's simply that if he's not cool with it, it could have negative repercussions.

      >it isn't "pussification" to call out incidents of either.

      But it is rude to comment on other people's bodily functions, or perhaps your parents didn't teach you that?

    68. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you think the verb "normalize" was invented by bigots just to infuriate you?

    69. Re:Who gives a fuck by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      You got a +4 for *this* comment?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    70. Re:Who gives a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas is painful to hold in and there's no reason to do so other than to please people who have invented an idea that a natural bodily function is rude

      So is holding in your shit, but I'm guessing you don't shit in a chamberpot at your desk.

      Same reason - the smell is offensive. It's just good manners to excuse yourself to the bathroom so you don't offend other people's noses. The manners are a social convention; the foul odor is not.

  5. Boycott it for tolerance by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless there's a short-haired lesbian wookie I'm boycotting. We need to stand strong for tolerance.

    1. Re:Boycott it for tolerance by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      And C3PO has to have a sex change - er, excuse me, gender reassignment surgery.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:Boycott it for tolerance by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      But without Joan Rivers, who would play the female C3PO?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Boycott it for tolerance by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I loled.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Boycott it for tolerance by dysmal · · Score: 1

      But without Joan Rivers, who would play the female C3PO?

      Caitlyn Jenner. That'll solve all of the politically incorrect issues.

    5. Re:Boycott it for tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are 3P0 and R2 the Bert and Ernie of Star Wars?

    6. Re:Boycott it for tolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does the lesbian have to have short hair? That's just playing into the stereotype.

  6. Young Anakin by tgibson · · Score: 5, Funny

    from Episode I is clearly mocking every horrible child stereotype. It is because of these kinds of caricatures that birth rates have been dropping.

    1. Re:Young Anakin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mocking

      You spelt "embodying" wrong.

  7. Star Wars VII: Revenge of SuperShadow by Guy+From+V · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I once was a big Star Wars fan, then I took a these just suck now to the knee.

  8. J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let us recall his previous shitty TV shows and movies:

    • Lost
    • Fringe
    • Mission Impossible 3
    • Super 8
    • Need I go on?

    What do these all have in common? Yes... pushing the viewer's buttons, setting up interesting premises, promising to reveal answers to unexplained events, but never delivering on those promises (Lost, ugh) and leaving us viewers hanging. In general, Abrams' material is nothing but a thinly veiled vehicle for pushing advertisements designed to entice people to tune in for the next episode, with a complete absence of any actual substance or meaning.

    Fringe was especially horrible. Every time the protagonists got in trouble, Dr. Walter Bishop would pull something out of his "from a project he worked on the 70s" and mumble a lot, and things would sort of just drag on.

    So... thanks but no thanks, Mr. Abrams. Please eat a bowl of warm shit, and retire from Hollywood.

    1. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes how dare he push the medium with interesting things just to let some dimwitted chode down at the end

    2. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "push the medium"

      Care to elaborate?

      From what I have seen, Abrams pushes complete shit, that is devoid of anything of substance. Sure, it excites shallow minds enough that they want to watch the next episode to perpetually "see what happens next" but that is about it.

    3. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Or his movies.

      I spent probably the last half-hour of his most recent Star Trek movie going "shit, that was a perfect ending, let's see the credits" every five minutes. And then the fight scene would go on some more.

      On the other hand, with these movies he's probably got a story arc already mapped out, and most of the appeal of Star Wars is poorly drawn yet compelling characters involved in endless extremely cool action sequences. So this could easily work.

    4. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      He did the Star Trek reboots... those are kind of fun.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      Star Wars is unashamedly a space opera. It doesn't have to be high culture, it just has to be grand, sweeping, and theatrical.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    6. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      In the same way that an ocular migraine is fun, I suppose.

      One should not he cast a white English guy as an Indian supervillain, mind you.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1
      .

      The Star Trek reboots explain best why he should bneer get another job. The first was fine as an homage/on-off. But Star Trek has a huge and complex universe, and he just demolishes any continuity. But most importantly, he leaves the franchise with no where to go.

      Look, the fucking Fast & Furious movies are strong right now. But there hasn't been another star trek movie because the first used up 100% of the interesting material available.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You forgot Star Trek. The second one in particular was obviously a show-reel for getting the Star Wars gig. Watching both is like being interrogated by persons unknown, with a bright light in your face while you desperately try to keep track of what is going on.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even go as far as call it space opera. It's a matine swash buckler in space.

    10. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by swb · · Score: 1

      Abrams speciality seems to be stringing along an oblique big idea forever. Fringe was occasionally interesting, but the whole parallel universe thing got strung out for so long I just lost interest after two seasons. I'm glad I never got into Lost.

    11. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Vulcan wasn't actually destroyed... it was all just a bad dream.

      Or so I keep telling myself.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    12. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There was a second, and they are currently making a third.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Actually, my least favorite casting choice was Simon Pegg as Scotty. I love Simon Pegg, and still laughed at him in Star Trek... I just think he was misplaced. No one says Khan has to be Indian. He was Mexican the first time.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of fun in a "WTF wheres the sci-fi? This is just a lame action movie" kinda way.

      Sure.

    15. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      He did the Star Trek reboots... those are kind of fun.

      Star Trek: Lens Flair

      The only decent big-screen sci-fi director/producer//writers that are left seems to be Joss Whedon and James Gunn.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    16. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with Fringe? I thought that show had some pretty crazy material in it.

    17. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      OK, so you prefer superhero movies. To me, the Avengers or Guardians of the Galaxy movies were also fun - but similarly not liable to become classics. I think you'd have to give Christopher Nolan some props, too. He does both superhero and sci-fi.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do these all have in common?

      Making lots of money, having lots on fans, being widely popular..gee I don't know.

    19. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "kind of fun" you mean terrible, nonsensical, poorly acted series of events chained together with convenient coincidences and edited together by someone with ADHD? And, in the case of Into Darkness, a ripoff of previous material with the details altered into a much less compelling mess.

    20. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, I mean I enjoyed watching it. You didn't, and that's OK too.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by norminator · · Score: 1

      Re: Lost (which I actually really liked, right to the very end, except for parts of seasons 2 & 3):

      As I understand it, Abrams was really only involved with Lost at the very beginning. He took over development of the pilot from the guy who originally came up with the concept and added in the initial round of supernatural stuff. But it was Cuse and Lindelof that kept it going and added in everything after that, so you can blame them if you don't like the answers (or lack of answers).

      Personally, I like the way the show dealt with most of the mysteries. I think having layer upon layer of mystery, with no sign of reaching the bottom made it more interesting. I think some of the attempts at resolving some of those mysteries actually detracted from the show (e.g., the broken statue, the whispers, etc.). Those aspects felt more like the midi-chlorians explanation from Phantom Menace. We don't need more of that crap.

      I didn't watch Fringe, I don't remember disliking MI3, but I really liked Super 8, since it felt like the closest thing in recent memory to a Goonies-style adventure style movie with kids. I notice you didn't mention Cloverfield... I thought that one was alright, but not amazing or anything. I also enjoyed the Star Trek reboots, but I was never a big Trek fan... if I would have been I probably would have hated them.

    22. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Yes, there was a second. But they've been "making" the third for long enough that it's iffy if it will ever get done.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    23. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Yes, there was a second.

      Was there? I remember seeing a big-budget 3D fan-edit of Wrath of Khan...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    24. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Yes, there was a second.

      Was there? I remember seeing a big-budget 3D fan-edit of Wrath of Khan...

      Nonsense. You think a fan would have let that "We used some similar words to the Wrath of Khan, so it's totally okay" movie go out?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    25. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yes, superhero movies like Serenity.... oh wait...

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    26. Re:J.J. Abrams is a fucking idiot by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Serenity/Firefly were good, too. The TV show is even rewatch-worthy.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  9. if JJB was a white redneck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    would that calm things down? can we just all make fun of white people now?

    look how shitty the cast is for GB3, now we should do the same for another Star Wars movie. The entire cast should consist of fat, gay, lesbian women, one lonely gay man left alone with his light sabre, a jjb like white redneck, some people in wheelchairs, a few retarded people, some fat people, and the rest a mix of various races.

    oh, and burning of the dukes of hazzard flag, followed by a dozen men of mixed races (but not white) taking turns having sex with a white, female jabba the hut with an elastic anus.

    1. Re:if JJB was a white redneck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear

  10. If you hire people based on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    their gender, race, religion, or sexual preference, then you are breaking the law.

  11. WHO gives a FUCK what YOU THINK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. "Complex debate" my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither Calrissian nor Windu are anything more than minor characters. Number of lead characters who are black? Chinese? Indian? Hispanic? Heck, green skin gets better representation than anything else that's not (non-Hispanic) white.

    As for women, the franchise made sharp retrograde progress between Leia (some strength, although still very much second fiddle to the men) and Amidala (total doormat).

    1. Re:"Complex debate" my ass by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I've always had problems with SF stories that featured alien diversity along the lines of holocene Earth human diversity. I mean, virtually everyone being humanoid is bad enough, but having white Vulcans and black Vulcans with exactly the same differences felt already almost cringe-worthy. Riiiight, because on completely different planets, you'd end up with exactly the same negroid and mongoloid offshoots in the alien population. As if that made any sense. Bless Enterprise for albino Andorians...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:"Complex debate" my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek at least puts a lot of effort into making compelling creatures, but the "these guys can also be black" is more recent, and ludicrous. Having a black Vulcan never made a lick of sense for that reason. Even the hair is just black dude hair. The Vulcans were meant to be a people, so they all had similar features, similar straight black hair, etc. If they did have subgroups like on Earth, wouldn't they have green skin or someshit? It's not like they have white Klingons serving aside the dark skinned ones, etc.

    3. Re:"Complex debate" my ass by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      to be fair, lando was the most badass character in all of the ep 4-6. I'm pretty sure his wallet is embossed with 'bad muthafucka". Windu was a real tool, though.

    4. Re:"Complex debate" my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > to be fair, lando was the most badass character in all of the ep 4-6

      "Fuck Lando Calrissian, Uncle Tom nigga!"

    5. Re:"Complex debate" my ass by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      It's not like they have white Klingons serving aside the dark skinned ones, etc.

      They do not discuss this with outsiders. (see "Trials_and_Tribble-ations")

      --
      bickerdyke
  13. Re:I Celebrate Diversity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey don't be hating on nigga Binks, you racist.

  14. trans-hispanic-muslim by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    is that white enough for you?

    1. Re: trans-hispanic-muslim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you ever noticed when a white jew does something good, it's marketed like "yay jews! Be thankful for jews!"

      But when a white jew does something bad/hateful/greedy it's marketed like "fucking white people!"

    2. Re: trans-hispanic-muslim by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 0

      No, I hadn't noticed. Please provide some examples.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re: trans-hispanic-muslim by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      The Flamebait mod does nothing to alter the fact that I am still waiting for some examples.

      It does, however, tend to make me believe that you've none to offer.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  15. Star Wars 5,000 - produced by BET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's do this, BET! Let's make an all black Star Wars movie! We'll even use the lens flare to blind the crackers!

  16. White Male = Homer Simpson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the treatment of straight white men in media has been horrendous for decades. Incompetent, moronic dad has been the go-to formula for comedy for the family sitcom for as long as I can remember. Domestic violence against men (of any color) in media is as acceptable now as the reverse was in the fifties. If you didn't notice, maybe you're the one with a problem?

       

    1. Re:White Male = Homer Simpson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it involves abusive sex and faking rape and kidnapping. That makes it the chick flick of the year! Seriously, not kidding, I had 3 distinct groups of hard-core feminist acauantances trying to drag me to this flick, including my wife, who also brought our daughter. Led to one of the worst fights we ever had.

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:White Male = Homer Simpson by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Unless it involves abusive sex and faking rape and kidnapping.

      You left out murder. That is one seriously fucked up movie.

      Congratulations girls, you have your very own psychotic anti-heroes now, just like the guys.

      It's nothing to be proud of...

  17. Re:I Celebrate Diversity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what was all that one in a million talk?

  18. And no one cares by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    The least concerning thing about starwars is the racial diversity. The most concerning thing is them fucking it up again like they did last time.

    Would the phantom menace have been better if they were all minorities? Nope.

    Does not fucking matter. Further, it is in space and half of the fucking characters are aliens or robots... so... who gives a shit.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:And no one cares by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      someone cares. but not the important ones.

    2. Re:And no one cares by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      I suspect Abrams is less likely to fuck it up then Lucas.

      His Star Trek films have pissed me the fuck off, but that's because they'd be great Star Wars films. Highly dramatic action sequences, great visuals, better acting then either franchise had the first go around, lots of references to shit that's happened before, etc. As Star Trek they were annoying because he doesn't seem to get the details of what makes references to past work cool (ie: Khan is supposed to be so alpha-male sexy that straight guys would have trouble refusing him a blow-job; Benedict Cumberbatch could possibly play that guy, but he did not).

      It's likely he'll get a great team of actors and actresses, get them to have chemistry in half an hour, spend another 15 establishing that if they don't do something amazing THE UNIVERSE WILL DIE, include roughly 25 minutes of references to past films and/or cool world-building in that 45, and then give you an hour of incredibly cool action.

    3. Re:And no one cares by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      We'll see... he could reboot the whole universe and have actors from past films make appearances through visions and shit.

      I think if he did to starwars what he did to startrek... you'd understand why the trekies didn't like it.

      You don't reboot some franchises. You just don't.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    4. Re: And no one cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't think getting rid of Jar Jar would have been an improvement?

    5. Re:And no one cares by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Well, they reboot all the comic book stories every time there's a new actor or director. Why not Star Trek?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re:And no one cares by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Why not starwars then. Reshoot the original trilogy.

      And while we're at it we can totally change the story to something totally different.

      he fucking blew up Vulcan.... that's fucking unacceptable. That's one of the core worlds of the federation. That's like just killing the Klingons off for no reason. What the actual fuck?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  19. Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by steamraven · · Score: 1

    Abrams took a historically progressive series and gutted its diversity. Changing khan to a white man and neither film come close to passing the bechdel test. It's sad how horribly he treated the core tenants of Star Trek. What make you think he will do anything different in Star Wars. He make films to sell to the masses.

    1. Re:Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      Well considering the original Khan was played by a white dude as well (Ricardo Monteban's parents are spanish), there's nothing new there.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    2. Re:Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      He won't do anything different to Star Wars. But it will work because it's Star Wars.

      He doesn't have to be in the movement to get why Boba Fett is cool, he just has to know that a dude in that armor with that last name will make fans very happy in between action scenes. Then he has to deliver on a) cool world-building, b) cool scenes, and c) over-dramatic everything.

      Perfect for the guy who cut his teeth giving Sydney Bristow new family members every season on Alias because the "Which Dad is hers?" story-line was fascinating.

      OTOH, Khan as a lone terrorist played as a cool un-charismatic character? Bullshit, no matter what color the actor is. Time travel that creates an alternate timeline? Heresy, and the movies aren't good enough to justify it. The Federation putting one of their 12 Constitution-class cruisers in the hands of a Midshipman who has technically not graduated college yet because a tiny-little Commander told a Captain that would be a very good idea? Ridiculous.

    3. Re:Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      whats wrong with changing him to white? seems everyone is changing the race of characters these days and one changes to white and its all of a sudden an issue??

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      The Federation putting one of their 12 Constitution-class cruisers in the hands of a Midshipman who has technically not graduated college yet because a tiny-little Commander told a Captain that would be a very good idea? Ridiculous.

      I'm fairly sure Hollywood is physically incapable of portraying a military that operates normally and competently, sci fi or otherwise.

      I'd like to see something from Jerry Pournelle reach the big screen. Unfortunately, what's in production right now is based on Janissaries, which is an entertaining book, but a pretty exhaustive cliché these days. I wish they had chosen something from the CoDominion instead. The Sauron Supermen story arc has its own clichés, but it's also got some solid writing.

      I guess we'll see what they do with Janissaries. If my thesis is correct, it will be terrible. I don't know if I dare to hope or not.

    5. Re:Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Khan was genetically engineered to be superior - of course he was white! LOL

    6. Re:Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      Khan was played by a Mexican in the original series. I get what you're saying, but if we're going to talk about "correctness", let's talk about how correct the original was in the first place.

      And why does anyone care if a film passes the Bechdel test? It was written as a joke and is about an arbitrary a standard as how much swearing is in a movie.

      And people keep forgetting that any classic series is a reflection of the time in which it's created. That's why reboots are markedly different from the original and don't often capture the original spirit...because the people doing the rebooting don't know what it's like to have the spirit that created it. Not that I agree with reboots in general, but original fans should understand that reboots really aren't made for them (the minority) but for, as you say, the masses.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    7. Re:Diversity in abram's Star Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The standard argument is that since Khan was genetically engineered, there's no particular reason he should look Indian, white, Hispanic or any other ethnic subgroup you choose. He could have been green and purple and it would have fit with the story and any actor just fine.

  20. Abrams and diversity in Star Trek??? by superdave80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...given his track record of helping build a diverse cast as director of the "Star Trek" reboot films

    Uh, was Abrams really going to have white people play Sulu and Uhura? And the only other major female character I remember were the green chick in her underwear and the blond chick in her underwear, so Abrams didn't exactly help along the fairer sex in his films. I think the writer had no clue about the history of Star Trek.

    1. Re:Abrams and diversity in Star Trek??? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Both Star Trek films failed the Bechdel test too. Sure, it's not a perfect measure, more a rule of thumb, but in both films the women are just there are eye candy or to add to male character's development.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Abrams and diversity in Star Trek??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see who played Kahn? It's *less* diverse now than it was in the 60s!

    3. Re:Abrams and diversity in Star Trek??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, was Abrams really going to have white people play Sulu and Uhura?

      Uhura maybe, since she's actually blonde and Sulu is actually black.

  21. Star Trek? by mariox19 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who noticed a similarity between the Ferengi and the stereotypical portrayal of Jews, from the middle ages on? Apparently, the answer is no. All you need to do is google "Jews Ferengi" and it's pretty clear that I'm not alone in noticing this.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    1. Re:Star Trek? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      The trope is "Jews in Space" I believe, and yea. Like a middle-ages racist cartoon or something.

    2. Re:Star Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jews in Space? I always thought they were American.

    3. Re:Star Trek? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you know, after watching history of the world pt 1, i was really looking forward to jews in space.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:Star Trek? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I was looking forward to Hitler on ice.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:Star Trek? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      ganjadude occasionally redeems himself. This is one of those times. :D

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  22. Re:I Celebrate Diversity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a hangman's noose made out of his tongue?

  23. Media continously baiting public with nonsense by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When people compare Jar Jar to Black peeps they are not really being serious.. it is all a faux argument intended to stoke controversy and whore attention for fame and profit. No matter how repetitive and stupid it becomes people still fall for it over and over again. I am outraged by *** please give me another 15 minutes.

    1. Re:Media continously baiting public with nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who gets the 15 minutes?

      How about an even more obvious examples...the racist robots from Transformers. Sure on some level they're giant robot cars, but obviously they're intended as black stereotypes.

  24. Bust this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Those movies are about how the white man keeps the brother man down, even in a galaxy far, far away. Check this shit: You got cracker farm boy Luke Skywalker, Nazi poster boy, blond hair, blue eyes. And then you got Darth Vader, the blackest brother in the galaxy, Nubian god!

    1. Re:Bust this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bite. What's a Nubian?

    2. Re:Bust this: by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And then the reveal... The Nubian god is the Teutonic wet dream's father.

      You were saying...?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Bust this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jedi's the most insulting installment! Because Vader's beautiful black visage is sullied when he pulls off his mask to reveal a feeble, crusty, old white man! They tryin' to tell us that deep inside we all wants to be white!

  25. USA white bread break it down by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Ewoks: Latino. short and talk fast. JJ Binks: Island Man. choose island. female: all alike which doesn't matter. old white man: EVIL. c'mon and try.

    1. Re:USA white bread break it down by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The Ewoks spoke Tagalog, so it is more likely to call them Filipino, but I guess that doesn't fit how they act/look.

      http://www.pinoyexchange.com/f...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  26. Pandering by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The cast's "Racial and Sexual Diversity" is more important than having a plot, hiring good actors, making a good movie.

    The funny thing is that people that bitch about such things aren't even the target audience for this kind of media. They aren't going to go see the movie anyhow, they are just going to post to tumblr and youtube about how "fair or unfair" it is and ignore it's content.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Pandering by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The cast's "Racial and Sexual Diversity" is more important than having a plot

      It was part of the plot showing how "big" the setting was, just as it was used in Trek to get the point across that the Federation was bigger than China, the USA and Russia combined. See also the Cantina scene for species diversity.

    2. Re:Pandering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cast's "Racial and Sexual Diversity" is more important than having a plot, hiring good actors, making a good movie.

      The funny thing is that people that bitch about such things aren't even the target audience for this kind of media. They aren't going to go see the movie anyhow, they are just going to post to tumblr and youtube about how "fair or unfair" it is and ignore it's content.

      Why can't they be the target audience?

      Why does the target audience have to be limited to white males whose balls haven't dropped yet?

      And content? The Star Wars movies have had negative content since at least the 2nd half of Jedi. So why would you expect the new movies to be any better?

      Really, Lucas made billions by Directing exactly one good movie.

    3. Re:Pandering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how you "know" whether or not some demographics are going to see the new trilogy. You might as well say "My Little Pony is for little girls, so we don't have to care about what any other age group or gender thinks about it."

      Oh, you say, but you were just talking about "SJWs" or something like that. Maybe you honestly think that most people would bitch about media they don't consume themselves, maybe because of complaints about rap lyrics or similar controversies, but trust me: it IS possible for women and minorities to be interested in SF and Star Wars, and in sufficient numbers to actually be worth listening to.

      Seriously.

    4. Re:Pandering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when you move in the direction of Soviet political art, that is what you get. And the more this mob gets, the worse it will become.

    5. Re:Pandering by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The cast's "Racial and Sexual Diversity" is more important than having a plot, hiring good actors, making a good movie.

      Where did that come from? It's not in TFA, it's not based on any quote I can find.

      All I see is some praise for someone making an effort not to suck. There is no victim here, no movie ruined. Where are you getting this stuff from?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Pandering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... given how the Empire was supposedly very xenophobic (according to the now-defunct Extended Universe), and the progressive pro-alien Rebel Alliance was mostly made up of ... white males (episodes IV and V), only to finally get several aliens in episode VI I'd say we're long overdue for some diversity.

    7. Re:Pandering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're triggering me!!!

  27. Is Slashdot reloading the page on a timer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Slashdot reloading the page on a timer? I kept a page open, and suddenly, it scrolls back to the top. Is the page reloading? If so, I'm getting more and more disenchanted with Slashdot.

    1. Re:Is Slashdot reloading the page on a timer? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      ive been having that same issue all day

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Is Slashdot reloading the page on a timer? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      It only took you six months or so to notice?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  28. Re:Star Wars fans are such dweebs. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Quite to the contrary, Chewbacca is first mate and copilot, he's technically adept and loyal. Your "stupid" claim is demonstrably false; your "annoying" claim reflects badly on you, not the character.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  29. You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't give a rat's rear end about how diverse the cast is. I predict it will inevitably fail to capture the charm of the first 2 or 3 films from 30+ years ago because the whole genre has been done to death and no longer excites the imagination. Abrams has shown an ability to rehash Lucas at his worst, and the result is a CGI-laden soap opera with a succession of pop sci-fi conventions and magical plot devices. No, I don't care too much about how the original cast has been pulled out of retirement to sit on their big wrinkled asses and deliver a few exposition lines while their hot young counterparts advance the thin or nonsensically convoluted plot. But most of all in this identity politics obsessed present, I couldn't care less about how diverse the cast is. Generations of people seem to be so PC-addled now that they don't know what diversity is until some publicist who hasn't seen the film yet makes a pronouncement yea or nay.. It's another $12 ticket of bullshit and years of merchandizing ever after. Whoop.

  30. Maybe by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Maybe in the made up universe in which Star Wars exists, there isn't a great deal of racial and sexual diversity.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  31. Droids? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For me, one of the most interesting (yet seemingly ignored) cultural component is the droids.

    In the Star Wars universe, Droids like Artoo and Threepio and, presumably, millions of others, are self-aware and intelligent. They appear to feel physical pain and have emotions like happiness, fear and sadness.

    Yet as near as I can see in the canon, droids have no rights whatsoever. They can be bought and sold, ordered to their death, kidnapped by Jawas, melted, sent to the spice mine of Kessel or smashed into who knows what.

    ...and don't me started on restraining bolts.

    1. Re:Droids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And gay.

    2. Re:Droids? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      In the Star Wars universe, Droids like Artoo and Threepio and, presumably, millions of others, are self-aware and intelligent. They appear to feel physical pain and have emotions like happiness, fear and sadness.

      Yet as near as I can see in the canon, droids have no rights whatsoever.

      There are at least two storylines that I know of in the SWTOR MMO that involve droids revolting against their biological oppressors. One's a quest area on Nar Shada (Hutt planet), and the other is a Flashpoint instance.

    3. Re:Droids? by phorm · · Score: 1

      "We don't serve their kind here"

      Indeed, earlier on in the first movie, it's apparent that droids aren't particularly welcome in many places of the Star Wars universe, even in places which are otherwise "a hive of scum and villainy" like Mos Eisley

    4. Re:Droids? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly simple. They're slaves. Many other narratives that occupy the same class of universe - which normally means people running around with swords accompanied by wizards - also feature slaves. There's no overt or even sub-textual racism here, R2 and 3PO are pretty diverse just by themselves, to say nothing of the other driods that appear in the background.

      Just as most, if not all (Game of Thrones notwithstanding) swords-n-sorcery epics do not concern themselves with the emancipation of slaves, neither does Star Wars. I don't think it's any the lesser for it.

      Looking slightly further, perhaps the thesis is that 'artificial life is no life at all', and the droid's apparent emotions are just programmed responses designed to make the robots easier for humans to work with.

      These questions we may one day face ourselves.

    5. Re:Droids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The droids in SW aren't supposed to be self-aware and emotional, droids are supposed to be high tech puppets or slaves if you will. The canon is that all droids are supposed to get a full data wipe on a regular basis otherwise their logic systems begin "corrupting". The consequence of this corruption is that they develop emotions and and their logic can start to "degrade" ala Hal 9000 or G0-T0. In the case of C3-PO and R2-D2, they didn't get this regular wipe and they also did not negatively degrade as part of the corruption. R2-D2 notably got wiser as he continued to collect data and experience over time.

  32. Why is this even of any interest? by mikein08 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot - stop publishing nonsense like this. It's irrelevant to anything.

    1. Re:Why is this even of any interest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off.

  33. Re:Oh, FFS people... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

    this movie came out in 1999 (the first clinton era) and people were talking about jar-jar then. it's pretty blatant and outrageous.

  34. Well... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    At least he THOUGHT he could crush people's throats with his mind.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  35. Really not caring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering there hasn't been a good Star Wars Movie since Empire; I'm not overly optimistic, nor am I enthused about it.

    But Lucas not being involved is definitely a plus. Also throwing out the Expanded universe was also a plus. When they moved away from this:

    The Force is what gives a Jedi his power. It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds the galaxy together.

    And introduced the Ysalamiri, yeah fuck them and the bantha they rode in on.

    But Lucas was not to be out done, oh no. He introduced the midichlorians and made things even worse.

    Then again, I shouldn't be annoyed about Kenbi being full of shit about the nature of the force since he was full of shit about everything else.

  36. Re:Star Wars fans are such dweebs. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that Chewbacca is portrayed in a positive light most times. Right down to his strength. You don't "let the Wookie win" because otherwise he'll throw a fit, trip over his legs, and end up on the floor. Pit Chewbacca against a few Stormtroopers and Chewy will come out ahead. Put Chewbacca on the problem and he'll work out how to fix it.

    Contrast this with Jar-Jar whose main attributes seem to be "gets in the way", "gets into trouble that others need to get him out of", and "is generally helpless unless his clumsiness inadvertently results in his enemy's defeat." About the only way Jar-Jar would take out a group of Stormtroopers would be by repeatedly tripping into them until they were all knocked out. His only purpose to the plot seems to be to get in the way of and annoy the other characters.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  37. And here I thought JJB was just "gay" . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . as in the South Park usage of the term.

  38. enough of this BS by prof_robinson · · Score: 1

    There are no blacks or whites or even males or females in Star Wars...they're ALIENS. Those categories are completely irrelevant to a FICTIONAL universe populated with FICTIONAL aliens who have ZERO in common with any race or gender from Earth. Period. Anything else is not sci-fi, it's just leftist politics.

    1. Re:enough of this BS by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Those categories are completely irrelevant to a FICTIONAL universe populated with FICTIONAL aliens who have ZERO in common with any race or gender from Earth. Period. Anything else is not sci-fi, it's just leftist politics.

      Except that those fictional characters created by a real human, to be used as entertainment by other real humans
      Of course it's just fiction, so kiddy porn should be fine too, as long as it's fictional....

    2. Re:enough of this BS by gsslay · · Score: 1

      They're just ALIENS portrayed by humans, scripted by humans and watched by humans. But ZERO in common with humans. Yup. And the fact they resemble lazy, clichéd stereotypes used by Hollywood for decades is pure co-incidence.

      You clearly have no idea what sci-fi is, particularly space opera, which is what Star Wars is essentially.

    3. Re:enough of this BS by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Right. They just happen to have an assortment of features that totally coincidentally adds up to a very recognizable racist stereotype from Earth.

    4. Re:enough of this BS by prof_robinson · · Score: 1

      You still don't get it. The only reason there are racist stereotypes are because of Earth histories, Earth ideologies, and Earth racism. Even if you create an alien that has black skin, it doesn't make him "black" in any racial sense of the word. Just like if you make an alien that has different eyes, they aren't asian. YOU are the one bringing racial baggage to a freakin movie about imaginary aliens. To make people like you happy, we would have to sterilize every single aspect of the aliens we create in fiction. If we make them all blue, would that be better for your delicate sensibilities? No, it wouldn't...because then you would move away from their bodies, to their actions, to their "social class" - it never ends. As long as you continue to look for racism, you will always find it...and continue to drag all of society down your rabbit hole.

    5. Re:enough of this BS by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You still don't get it, either. The existence of those stereotypes is well known to the authors. They have a choice of coming up with truly alien aliens, or at least mixing traits up such that they don't reflect any known stereotype. When they do quite obviously pick traits such that they add to a very distinct and recognizable existing stereotype, they cannot blame the audience for reacting accordingly.

      (And, of course, reusing an existing accent is something that is inherently an Earth thing. The moment you bring that into the picture, there's no dodging the bullet of dragging the associated stereotypes.)

    6. Re:enough of this BS by prof_robinson · · Score: 1

      Just like you have the choice to ignore your prejudices and just enjoy good writing. But you can't do that, can you? that's sad.

    7. Re:enough of this BS by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Episode 1? Good writing? Seriously?

      This is the single most ridiculous thing you've said in this thread so far, and you've said plenty of ridiculous things already.

  39. Re:I Celebrate Diversity... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Spoiler Alert: That crashed Star Destroyer from the Star Wars trailer? It crashed on top of Jar-Jar. Many Imperials died to save us from the menace of Binks.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  40. Why does Star Wars still use Kung Fu fighting? by vision33r · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of seeing Star Wars being made into futuristic Kung Fu movie. Why can't they just let people fight naturally like how a real skilled swordsman would use a light saber. None of this acrobatic martial arts shit.

    1. Re:Why does Star Wars still use Kung Fu fighting? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting decades for this fascination with aerial kung fu to die a natural death. It's just stupid and ruins the flow of any movie trying to be serious. Well-worn fight scenes and chase scenes are the worst part of modern movie making, someone needs to inject some originality into this space.

    2. Re:Why does Star Wars still use Kung Fu fighting? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Why does Star Wars still use Kung Fu fighting?

      Man, those cats were fast as lightning.

    3. Re:Why does Star Wars still use Kung Fu fighting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a little bit frightening.

  41. That wasn't the featured point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If you look at the released video from Comic Con in SD, the video makes far more of a point about respect for realism of the sets, which IS one of the more concerning things about the prequels.

    Don't know what Slashdot chose to cover a minor side point, expect to draw in trolls.

    From all of the material I've seen, it looks like JJA has more respect for fans and source material than Lucas did in the prequels.

    I have better than average hopes for the new movie...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That wasn't the featured point by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      We have a lot of progressive idiots that like to make everything into a gender/race issue.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:That wasn't the featured point by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      We have a lot of progressive idiots that like to make everything into a gender/race issue.

      Indeed. This seems to be the direction Western society is moving in. Self-castration as punishment for the collective sins of all of us horribly, violently entitled white males and self-immolation as atonement for failing to respect the religious idiocies of women-hating bronze-age nomadic tribal life.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  42. Re:Star Wars fans are such dweebs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Rwwwwwwwrrrrrrrrrrrrahhhhag!" - Chris Maple

  43. stop with all the nonsense by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    I really wish all this racism and sexism debates would just stop. These days it's almost impossible to find any review of any movie that doesn't only deal with these topics, and only very few actually concentrate on whether the movie was any good from an artistic point of view. Most of the time I don't care if directors add or remove or change certain characters to fit the crowds newfound interest in recist and sexist topics, but only to the point where it still keeps the point of the movie and reflects the intentions of the writers. I find all these idiotically overcompensated angry and pointless rants and quarrels about gender and race bias issues (which, most of the time, seem simply made up) a real turnoff, driving me not to even try to read movie reviews for almost a year now. It seems that nowadays we've reached a point, where whatever the movie's topic and whaveter the cast, however good or bad it is, the only thing you can read about is whether there have been enough female and/or minority and/or etc characters in it. Well, I don't give a flying f*, until the movie is good, and I give the same amount of f* to all the idiotic opinion pieces about feminism, masculism, chauvinism, racism, sexism, whateverism.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:stop with all the nonsense by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's starting to creep into TV shows as well. Penny Dreadful, an otherwise reasonably competent show, has the characters spewing feminist screeds - "if men didn't control women with corsets, women would rule the wold" - no, a "feature" of corsets was the fact that women wearing them could afford servants to do the manual labour, they were status symbols. A bit like how pale skin was considered more beautiful at the time because it showed you didn't have to work outside all day long.

      Then we have the painful efforts in shows like Flint, where the most notorious pirate in literature comes out as gay; it felt as though the entire show was leading up to that, all that was missing was the triumphal choir in the background. Contrast this with say the Game of Thrones series, where guys are sucking dick left and right but nobody cares - it's not the point of the show, just window dressing, neither good nor bad, just there.

      What pisses me off most about these thinly veiled propaganda pieces is that they detract from the interest, beauty and genuine wonder of the rest of the production, they stick out like a sore thumb, they jar and disrupt immersion. Masterful works such as Salem have plenty of empowered women and whatnot without ever having to spout Dworkinisms.

      I dunno, maybe I'm just hypersensitive to it what with the SJW plague doing the rounds these days.

    2. Re:stop with all the nonsense by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Then we have the painful efforts in shows like FlintIf you mean Black Sails, the complete lack of interest on the characters face while getting ridden by Mrs. Barlowe was kind of a dead giveaway. The plot point was less he's gay, Hooray! But how a British sea captain could have his life turned up side down and become the fiercest pirate of the Caribbean. As for GOT spoiler alert some people care about gay dudes sucking dick left and right.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    3. Re:stop with all the nonsense by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      If you mean Black Sails

      Yes, that's the one.

      the complete lack of interest on the characters face while getting ridden by Mrs. Barlowe was kind of a dead giveaway.

      There are plenty of women I'd be hard pressed to raise a moan for.

      The plot point was less he's gay, Hooray! But how a British sea captain could have his life turned up side down and become the fiercest pirate of the Caribbean.

      That's what I thought I was getting, it didn't come across that way to me however. As I said maybe I've just turned hypersensitive, it's a sad commentary either way.

      As for GOT spoiler alert some people care about gay dudes sucking dick left and right.

      Fewer, I think, than you might imagine.

  44. Get a grip by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get a grip. It's a movie. It's fantasy. It's not reality.

    Sheesh.

    The FUD spewed by the "discrimination" crowd is just mind-boggling sometimes.

    WTF would it take to satisfy you all? Vader cross-dressing in his apartment?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Get a grip by nopenopenope · · Score: 1

      Completely agree with mod. How is this event relevant? Some comic convention hero jumps on the racism bandwagon for a popular seeries, it ends up front page here. Us nerds need better news. What we have here is old and busted. PC pansies thought it was racist when it came out, how has anything remarkable changed or been added to that makes this conversation move valuable?

    2. Re:Get a grip by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      WTF would it take to satisfy you all? Vader cross-dressing in his apartment?

      And now my mind's eye just put Vader into The Silence of the Lambs as Buffalo Bill dancing in front of the mirror.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:Get a grip by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I agree with you there- trying to read anything culturally significant into a bunch of poorly made children's movies is pointless.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  45. And yet tehre were ewoks spin off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a lot of kids of that epoch, which might have been somewhat younger than you, have bitten the ewoks train of toy hook and sinker alike.

  46. Are there any... women here? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The franchise has included prominent and strong female characters, like Princess Leia

    And...? You make it sound like that's just the start of a long list, so let's hear the rest of it.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Are there any... women here? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      The franchise has included prominent and strong female characters, like Princess Leia

      And...? You make it sound like that's just the start of a long list, so let's hear the rest of it.

      Padme, Mon Mothma, Asoka (cartoon but still part of the franchise-numerous lead women there like Duchess Satine of Mandalore) just to name a few off the top of my head.

    2. Re:Are there any... women here? by drkoemans · · Score: 1

      The franchise has included prominent and strong female characters, like Princess Leia

      And...? You make it sound like that's just the start of a long list, so let's hear the rest of it.

      How about Boushh the bounty hunter?

    3. Re:Are there any... women here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queen / Senator Amidala.
      Senator / Rebel Leader Mon Mothma

    4. Re:Are there any... women here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were numerous female high council Jedi from the old Star Wars republic. There were also numerous female Sith leaders from the age before the Rule of Two doctrine.

  47. J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by kheldan · · Score: 2

    Quite frankly he's totally fucking up everything he touches that isn't television. Don't get me wrong: The TV shows he's responsible for are pretty damned good. But his movies make me want to stab him in the eye with a very large knife. I don't consider his 'Star Trek' movies to be legit, they're 'Star Trek themed movies' at best (at least that's the only way I could even begin to stand them), and quite frankly I'm not going to pay a single penny to see any of his 'Star Wars themed movies', and I don't recommend anyone else does, either.

    Posted as Anonymous Coward because I'm certain there are enough JJA fanbois out there that will flame me to the point of being subatomic particles, regardless of being flat-out wrong, and I just don't need to put up with that sort of bullshit.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Posted as Anonymous Coward because I'm certain there are enough JJA fanbois out there that will flame me to the point of being subatomic particles, regardless of being flat-out wrong

      Yes, because your opinion is not the objective truth. Want to complain about JJA? Well, go ahead, if you want. But you're not right or wrong.

      and I just don't need to put up with that sort of bullshit.

      What makes you think we want to put up with your bullshit?

      Everyone has different opinions. Grow up and accept that instead of viewing everyone whose opinion differs from yours as an inferior. You might just find you get along better in life for it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Posted as kheldan...

      TFTFY. (Ooops!)

      BTW, I also despise JJ Abrams, his abject cluelessness, and his anti-Midas touch that turns cool things into shit. And I don't care who knows it.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by kheldan · · Score: 1
      This is what I get for posting when I'm tired.. I make the mistake of forgetting to check a check-box.

      No matter.

      Gee, you sure got angry fast over someone's opinion on the internet, now didn't you? You must be one of the aforementioned JJA fanbois, and as such IDGAF what you think anyway.

      Grow up and accept that instead of viewing everyone whose opinion differs from yours as an inferior. You might just find you get along better in life for it.

      How about YOU grow up and stop taking things said by random people on the internet, whom you'll never meet in person, like it's a personal attack on you, then lash out like a 12 year old? You might just find you get along better in life for it. [/mocking]

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    4. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by Pherdnut · · Score: 1

      I've only run into Abrahms Star Trek haters on SlashDot. You guys are like ultra-nerds. Normally I would mean that as a compliment. Those were damned good movies in spite of kicking things off with time travel (a Trek kludge new writers seriously need to consider avoiding). In spite of this, they were fun to watch and I fail to see how they were such a horrendous departure from the spirit of the original movies. He even managed to update the styles of the series while maintaining a connection to the original look. Kirk's still Kirk. Spock's a slightly less emotionally neutered version out of the gate but still provides the grounding influence Kirk needs. Bones is amazing and his first appearance almost had me pissing myself laughing. Scottie's great. And they still don't know what to do with the Asian character other than give him an occasional fight scene by way of apology. What's changed, really?

      I mean cripes, he even went so far as to branch off his own parallel universe where so we can imagine the unaltered events of the original series still play out somewhere.

    5. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I take issue with the way you present your opinion because you seem to think it's the indisputable truth.

      You must be one of the aforementioned JJA fanbois

      Nope.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by kheldan · · Score: 1

      As I said, they're 'Star Trek-themed movies', but they're not 'Star Trek movies', not really. They're too different. To be fair: If I'd never, ever seen anything else Star Trek my entire life, then I'd think they were OK action-adventure-scifi movies. But as you pointed out, he's got a penchant for time-travel, which any experienced science fiction author will tell you to avoid like the plague. Otherwise they just kind of feel like it's Star Trek: 90210, if you know what I mean. Also, I raged at one thing from the first JJA ST movie: "Fire everything!", indeed! To reiterate: Love his TV shows, but I'd rather he not make movies. Now, on the other hand, if Joss Whedon had made a Star Trek movie, that might've gone better.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    7. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by Pherdnut · · Score: 1

      Abrahms has a penchant for time travel? How many Star Trek movies, entire series and specific episodes hinge on time travel? Only transporter/replicator/holodeck accidents post ToS come nearly as close to being an overused plot device. Star Trek in general has a time travel problem. I've been around since '75. Plenty of sci-fi and Trek under my belt. And don't get me wrong. I love Dr. Who. But if you're going to use time travel that often, it needs to be about time travel and not an inability to find writers who can't bring a plot to resolution without emitting super-particles at the problem or making the conflict about time travel.

      And don't forget. Much of the original cast was 90210 back in the day. How much trouble does Kirk get in over women? How often is there a perfectly sensible solution to a problem that he turns around and tackles less efficiently with pure bravado? How often does a major conflict start with a crew member getting seduced? It was a pretty steamy show for the time.

    8. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Everything you're saying is true, but so is what I'm saying, too, and so far pretty much everything that JJA produced has time travel in it, TV and movies.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:J. J. Abrahms needs to stop making movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Anonymous Coward", dear kheldan (1460303)?...

      Be honest with your masochistic feelings :D

      AC

  48. It's the distant future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And humans are reproducing with anything having the opposite genitalia, regardless of skin pigmentation, creed, or species.

    Totally unrealistic that a white guy would have a Sikh name, amirite?

    It would've been amusing to see a brown-skinned, Turban'd actor playing Khan and blowing shit up though. I mean, the ensuing Social Justice Crusade would've been amusing. And cringe-worthy, but still amusing in its own fashion.

  49. I bet you'd rather live in an all white country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you wouldn't have to constantly be harrassed by bitter, angry, resentful non-whites, who CHOSE to force themselves into your living space. After all, Africans still have all of Africa to live in, but they don't want to live there, around their own kind. Ditto for Indians, Chinese, and all the other third worlders who live in white countries, and are slowly genociding white people out of existence.

  50. Analogy by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Yes and no. Black face is the issues surrounding it is much much more geographically local than WWII

    It was an analogy and the only important parts were "kids who know nothing about" and "incredibly offensive but not meant to be".
    There is no point going off on a tangent.

    1. Re:Analogy by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The point is that it's not incredibly offensive to any people in the culture where it is performed (including people that the other culture, the one that finds it incredibly offensive, would expect to be offended on account of it being directed at them).

      It's actually pretty broad - a lot of what people call "black" stereotypes in US are really African-American stereotypes, and are firmly rooted in the late colonial, slavery and Jim Crow period. A lot of the associated offensive vocabulary is, too - for example, in most other languages, the word "Negro" (or its direct equivalent) is still used and is not considered offensive in any way, shape or form. Of late, due to American cultural domination, some of these stereotypes have, unfortunately, been spreading elsewhere, but it's still a very glaring distinction that virtually any immigrant will spot right away.

      Of course, none of this is relevant for SW, since we're talking about the product of American culture here, and the people who made it were well aware of all these racist stereotypes (and furthermore, some of those stereotypes are not local, such as the ones about Jews).

  51. the racism of thinking every thing is racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you randomly trow the dice to a black man and it comes 1 and the white one gets 6, Its Not Racism.

    Jar jar was created to be a lesser caracter. Many steriotypes show ppl as lesser.
    The steriotypes are the problem, not jar jar.

    Starwars has 1000 examples against racism. You guna let 1 in favor to win?

    If yes then yiu are the racist

  52. Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, a character not having a firm grasp of English, because he's, you know, an alien, automatically means racism against blacks?

    Since when?

  53. The Blank Slate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This obsession with having culture reflect "diversity" comes from the idea that humans are blank slates and that our behavior and opinions are all determined by culture. Alter the map, and the territory will change too. Thats the idea.

    All this pandering to feminists and sjws achieves is weaker stories. The imitation game being the prime example

  54. the cast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, knowing whether the person in the wookie suit is male, female, trans, L or G may be a good point of fan interest or arguments,
    but not really a government or EEO issue. Doesn't matter.
    Discrimination? Against JAr-Jar? GOOD!
    Bias against the Sith? GREAT!
    Wanting a wookie rug in front of the fireplace? OK, but you have to kill your own....

    PC and TOO DAMN MANY LAWYERS, SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS and IDJITS into everyones' business!
    Get a grip - Or one will be supplied.

  55. Re:I Celebrate Diversity... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    I thought Vader took care of that for us.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  56. George Carlin wants his lame bit back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He never really intended it to be the cornerstone of someones entire political world-view.

  57. STOP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop trying to destroy movies with your stupid racial/gender political agenda! Articles like this make me sick, having to tailor the cast to what politicians want.

  58. Didn't see this posted yet by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Hooper: Always some white boy gotta invoke the holy trilogy. Bust this: Those movies are about how the white man keeps the brother man down, even in a galaxy far, far away. Check this shit: You got cracker farm boy Luke Skywalker, Nazi poster boy, blond hair, blue eyes. And then you got Darth Vader, the blackest brother in the galaxy, Nubian god!
    Banky Edwards: What's a Nubian?
    Hooper: Shut the fuck up! Now... Vader, he's a spiritual brother, y'know, down with the force and all that good shit. Then this cracker, Skywalker, gets his hands on a light saber and the boy decides he's gonna run the fuckin' universe; gets a whole clan of whites together. And they go and bust up Vader's hood, the Death Star. Now what the fuck do you call that?
    Banky Edwards: Intergalactic civil war?
    Hooper: Gentrification! They gon' drive out the black element to make the galaxy quote, unquote, safe for white folks. And Jedi's the most insulting installment! Because Vader's beautiful black visage is sullied when he pulls off his mask to reveal a feeble, crusty, old white man! They tryin' to tell us that deep inside we all wants to be white!
    Banky Edwards: Well, isn't that true?
    [Hooper pulls out his gun, shoots Banky]

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  59. Sweet Transsexual? by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

    Mild mannered public servant on Coruscant by day, greatest evil come to the known galaxy by night - plaguing the galaxy with bastard half-gungan spawn and doing much more damage than the Empire could have ever hoped to achieve!

    --
    "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  60. Seriously? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

    J.J. Abrams On "Star Wars" Cast's Racial and Sexual Diversity

    Rolls eyes. I'm sure that's just my privilege talking.

  61. Re:Oh, FFS people... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    If we showed LGBT in the right percentage, they would never appear on the screen.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  62. surrounding yourself with yes men by drkoemans · · Score: 1

    I don't think anyone seriously believes Lucas is a racist. He was strangled by his own hubris and surrounded by yes men that should have said "hey, maybe this reads as a little offensive?" I saw a bit of a documentary and even Lucas seems to question the fact that he gets no push back from anyone. That is how we ended up with these turds (I-II-III). To that end the prequels are equal opportunity offenders and I think we can all agree there is something in there for everyone to DIS-like, we don't have to focus on racism/stereotyping alone.

  63. Re:I Celebrate Diversity... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...modded to Troll -1. I suggested lynching a Gungan, and all the Gungan rights activists pounced on me.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  64. Just stop. by kuzb · · Score: 1

    There is absolutely no need to touch on the topic of cultural/gender diversity in a film made for fun, unless you're going to go the Kevin Smith route (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ) and satirize the hell out of it.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  65. Re:Star Wars fans are such dweebs. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but Mr. Maple's comments are still closer to +5 that most AC remarks ;-)

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  66. fix it by paul+mafinga · · Score: 1

    Just cast the movie with all black, lesbian, handicapable, midgets, in wheelchairs.

    It's reparations, and a lot of people would gleefully wait days in line to see it.