Slashdot Mirror


A Fresh Take On Fake Meat

JMarshall writes: Impossible Foods, a Silicon Valley food start-up started by a Stanford professor who quit his job, just raised $108 million to pursue a plant-based burger that truly tastes like meat. This ACS article explains how Impossible Foods and other startups and researchers are tackling the tricky chemical and engineering challenge of making fake meat that tastes real. "Meat flavors and aromas come from thousands of volatile small molecules released by muscle and fat cell destruction. Flavor precursors start with an animal’s diet, which influences the molecular composition of its cells. After slaughter, enzymes in an animal’s muscle cells begin breaking down biomolecules into simpler amino acids, sugars, and fatty acids. This means some flavor molecules develop even as the meat ages during its trip to the store. Other flavor and aroma components emerge from reactions between sugars, amino acids, or fatty acids as the meat is cooked."

317 comments

  1. I found another unicorn! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In short, they're reinventing the Tofu burger.

    1. Re:I found another unicorn! by tchdab1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are people who are concerned about what they eat going to embrace a chemical s**t storm just because it's meatless?

    2. Re:I found another unicorn! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's for people who want the THIS IS HEALTHY label on the box, who aren't going to check the ingredient list to verify that its healthy, and think what they're eating is healthy. IAfter all, the label can't be wrong.

    3. Re:I found another unicorn! by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, Almond 'Milk' drinkers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what do these people think they're going to do with the millions of cows with no natural habitat?

    5. Re:I found another unicorn! by Your.Master · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They will if they are the sort who abstain from meat due to ethical considerations (the "fish are friends, not food" crowd). Your chemic shitstorm isn't alive so there's no ethical debate about eating them.

      Also normal people who don't give two shits will eat it. I eat normal meat but if this tasted like real meat, and wasn't substantially less healthy or more costly, I'd eat it for sure.

      If it comes even close in price I can see restaurants choosing it because then they don't have to have separate vegetarian and vegan menu options.

    6. Re:I found another unicorn! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Coconut "milk".

    7. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So what do these people think they're going to do with the millions of cows with no natural habitat?

      Eat them but not breed any more?

    8. Re:I found another unicorn! by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      If they're avoiding meat for ethical reasons, sure. If they're doing it for health reasons, probably not.

    9. Re:I found another unicorn! by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Informative

      to be fair, there are some of us who simply dont like the taste of cow milk, (me) and almond "milk" is a nice option

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re:I found another unicorn! by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      I only like cow's milk when it's steamed in my capuccinos. Weird, huh? I don't drink milk otherwise. My favorite ersatz milk was Oat Dreams, which I can't get anymore in Montreal.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    11. Re:I found another unicorn! by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Are people who are concerned about what they eat going to embrace a chemical s**t storm just because it's meatless?

      I'm sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but everything you eat -- and drink -- is a chemical shitstorm.

      "Foods. Chemistry." That's like saying "Oceans. Water." No, wait. It's actually like saying "Oceans. Chemistry." :)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    12. Re:I found another unicorn! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      There are some people that are vegan but also conflate that with non-GMO, or chakras, or some other fucked up shit. I'm vegan, so my only concern is "is this made from animals?"

      If not, it goes in my belly.

      The answer to your next question is "because I like burgers, but meat is made from factory-farmed tortured animals. The standards for slaughterhouses and human consumption are so low that you're actually eating literal shit, and probably pus from a cow's tumour. Yes, really. Plus, factory farming is the biggest environmental fuckup we've got going. (51% of the water in CA is given to animal agriculture.) You can eat a burger, yes, with cheese and bacon, and have it be vegan. Also beer, which is often, but not always, vegan."

      The answer to your next statement is, "no, you don't. 99% of meat consumed is factory farmed. I'll tell you a story about my friend who told me that he only eats meat raised by his uncle, who is a hunter, and all their meat is organic, certified, farm-fresh. While he was telling me this story, he was pulling out a pack of store-bought, frozen chicken tosquitos and putting them in the toaster-oven.

      "When you go out to dinner, when you stop at the drive-through, you get what they have. When you get milk at the coffee shop, it's factory milk."

      I think that covers most of the follow-ups, but for the bingo card:
      I live on an island already, and water is of greater survival concern than food.
      No, I get all my vitamins and minerals from plants. Yes, I take vitamins, as do most people. Yes, they're vegan.
      Protein is made by your DNA, not by consuming animals, and yes I lift.
      That study has been debunked by new information. Try reading a news aggregate site or something.
      No, I make exceptions for medicine, including vaccines*. It's about doing the least harm, not theoretical purity.

      *not the flu vaccine, I'm "sensitive" to one of the antibiotics, and "sensitive" in the medical sense means I pass out for two days, waking only to vomit. The last time I took it I lost 8 pounds overnight.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    13. Re:I found another unicorn! by bughunter · · Score: 2

      Lots of people do it for Religious reasons, for instance, Adventists.

      I once dated an Adventist girl who lived in Loma Linda, CA, which has a very high population of Adventists. I was amazed when I first walked into her local grocery store - there was aisle after aisle after aisle of stuff pretending to be meat.

      It was bizarre.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    14. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your chemic shitstorm isn't alive so there's no ethical debate about eating them.

      On the other hand, to a large extent, most meat isn't alive when you eat it, and given the chemical recycling that happens, the chemicals in the plant may have been alive at some point. It's just a small matter of how recently the chemicals were part of warm and fuzzy animal.

      The ethical consideration is a perception on how an animal was treated before it dies (it will of course eventually die at some point, if nothing else by natural causes), and if they think they are somehow avoiding complicity in the demand for such a product.

    15. Re:I found another unicorn! by jcr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pretty much. I'm just glad that this isn't a tax-funded boondoggle. Let the tree-hugging hippies waste their own money on this shit.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:I found another unicorn! by fisted · · Score: 1

      No shit, sherlock.

    17. Re:I found another unicorn! by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      So, what exactly in my post are you objecting to, or denigrating?

      Just curious.

      I wasn't the one who described one food as a "chemical shitstorm" with the implication that other foods aren't also "chemical shitstorms." That was tachdab1

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    18. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are three people in my family who are allergic to cow's milk--yes, actually diagnosed by a real MD.
      Almond milk is very important to us. Me, I still drink regular skim.

    19. Re:I found another unicorn! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Since when does a tofu burger "taste real"?

    20. Re: I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what?

      We don't care. ... and the majority of us (meat-eaters) never will.

      Find a better argument.

    21. Re:I found another unicorn! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      They *obviously* meant "artificial", or "processed", of which some people have illogical paranoia.

    22. Re:I found another unicorn! by pubwvj · · Score: 2

      The problem is it will turn out to be bad for you. Factory produced problems.

      Me, I'll stick with pasture raised, naturally grown meats. They are a nicely integrated part of our vegetable and fruit farming too. It's a system that works. Permaculture.

    23. Re:I found another unicorn! by mjwx · · Score: 2

      They will if they are the sort who abstain from meat due to ethical considerations (the "fish are friends, not food" crowd). Your chemic shitstorm isn't alive so there's no ethical debate about eating them.

      The probelm is that the "fish are friends" crowd are also the "chemicals are bad m'kay" crowd. They eat organic, fair trade, ethically cultivated, save the whales vegan because everything else is factory farmed, chemical laden, horse meat infected rubbish that give them the cancers and the autisms. They also like to ignore the fact their organic cucumber is just a normal cucumber that has had the price jacked up on it.

      Put simply, they have an irrational fear of non-descript chemicals (not anything specific, its just the word "chemical") but there wont be an ethical debate from this crowd because they never let a little hypocrisy get in the way (or a lot of it either)

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    24. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the label can't be wrong."

      I agree regulations isn't the end all be all.

    25. Re:I found another unicorn! by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Lots of people do it for Religious reasons, for instance, Adventists."

      The kind of Pharisees... Why don't they eat meat? Why do they think it tastes good?

      "when I first walked into her local grocery store - there was aisle after aisle after aisle of stuff pretending to be meat."

      So they want to stay by the letter of the law but they don't mind treasoning its spirit (they must think their god is stupid, too). The very definition of Pharisee.

    26. Re:I found another unicorn! by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But it doesn't have to taste like meat. That part is pointless I feel. If they don't want to eat meat than that's fine. Veggie burgers are good too (not the tofu junk) and even meat eaters like them. It's just that the need to make faux meat seems strange to me. It's not like they're coming off of a lifetime of heroin and need something like methodone to keep themselves clean.

      I know when I visit the veggie line for lunch the worst things they have are the meat substitutes, like seitan or tempeh.

    27. Re: I found another unicorn! by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Think of it this way -- the more almond milk he buys, the more real milk for you.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    28. Re:I found another unicorn! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      When we were trying to diagnose a digestive problem, (which turned out not to be lactose intolerance, but might have been) I was drinking rice milk for awhile. It wasn't bad.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    29. Re:I found another unicorn! by HeadSoft · · Score: 0

      I love meat! I love vegetables! But I prefer them to be derived from natural processes. Nobody can tell me with any certainty that some artificial fertilizer or hormone or genetic modification won't prove to be very bad for me in the long run.

      None of us would be surprised if tomorrow morning a study proves some new chemical or genetic modification process to cause cancer, or worse! Maybe more of the cancer or heart disease seen today are attributable to that than anyone has (yet) noticed. Maybe some kind of superbug will evolve under the conditions created so artificially.

      Now, mother nature's way (even with natural selection, human influenced breeding, etc.) won't gum up nature's finely tuned clockworks as quickly or unpredictably as "mostly random" guesses by "mostly ignorant of what they're REALLY doing in such a complex system" scientists. It's a field of science they're only barely scratching the surface of. It would be like randomly injecting bytes into a huge executable and running it to see if it works. Even with the help of an ML monitor, debugger (roughly equivalent to methods current GMO technology offers) you KNOW as well as I do that it would be nearly impossible to predict the outcome, or even notice the potential for a "fatal crash" in the unknown future.

      I also grew up as a rancher and farmer, and we all know how those guys suffered due to the likes of Monsanto and others' GMO seeds pushing others out of the market, but making it impossible to plant their own the next year. Most families I used to know who had been farming and ranching since the 1800s have been pushed out of business now. But you can't tell me we have lower demand for the food they used to produce. The land isn't even used for farming in most cases, just wasted.

      Sure, some of these things save starving people's lives, but so could almost rotten food. I'm more content spending a little more for food I can trust, and keeping the *real* farmers and ranchers in business. Thank you very much.

    30. Re: I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do care, enough to reply anyways. So it's nobodies business what you drink but your business what someone else drinks? Maybe all that milk is making your brain slow.

    31. Re:I found another unicorn! by afidel · · Score: 1

      That brings up a good point, I bet if they perfect their recipe it will make WAY more money as an additive to make tasteless low fat factory farmed meat taste like meat did before the industrialization of farming and the low fat craze.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    32. Re:I found another unicorn! by Your.Master · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're being unfair and unnecessarily polarizing. Just because you've met people who have both beliefs doesn't mean they always go together. People aren't always either right about everything or wrong about everything.

      I'm not convinced there's any correlation at all, though there could be. As anecdotal evidence, at the time of writing there are four responses to my post. Two of them are explicitly meat eaters who are making the "chemicals are bad" argument and both precluding any possibility they are wrong. Clearly none of them are vegans.

      I've also met lots of vegetarians and vegans, and literally none of them have irrational fears of chemicals in foods (they have rational fears of things that actually cause food poisoning and such). The only time I've seen those two beliefs together are in stereotypes.

      In fact, the person I know who is most irrational about food is almost a complete carnivore. He's all-in on his keto diet. He lost like 150 lbs when he switched to basically only ever eating sausages, and from that he's drawn the conclusion that a co-worker of ours could cure her Multiple Sclerosis by cutting the grains and veggies out of her diet. Second place goes to a vegetarian who was pretty convinced that ancient humans never hunted for meat.

    33. Re:I found another unicorn! by hey! · · Score: 1

      Depends on what exactly the nature of their concern is.

      I find the vegetarian arguments about the health dangers of meat in general to be specious; but I do find the arguments about the environmental and animal welfare impacts of concentrated animal feeding operations compelling. It makes me look at grass fed beef and pasture raised pork from local family farms and think, maybe paying more per pound for meat and eating a little less of it wouldn't be so bad.

      If this veggie meat stuff is any good and if it costs roughly the same price as supermarket meat, I can easily see myself replacing half my CAFO fattened meat with it, and the other half with locally sourced meat.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    34. Re:I found another unicorn! by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      Um, a flu vaccine doesn't have antibiotics.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
    35. Re:I found another unicorn! by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Are people who are concerned about what they eat going to embrace a chemical s**t storm just because it's meatless?

      Probably not.

      However, the companies described in the article are not developing a "chemical s**tstorm". Rather, they are developing food preparation processes that make plant materials taste more like meat.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    36. Re:I found another unicorn! by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Everything is chemicals. If it tastes like meat, it probably is chemically similar to meat.

    37. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Producing plant food costs a lot less energy than producing animal food. Switching to eating plants (and insects) might one day not be a "hip" thing to do, but a necessity. It's a good thing that someone works on the taste of it for us, meat eaters.

    38. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a good overlap between the "ethical" vegetarians and the "healthy" ones, but I'm sure you can find modern hipsters who care about animal suffering but are not particularly afraid of chemicals. You can certainly also find traditional hunters who have no problem with eating animals but despise any industrial food.
       

    39. Re:I found another unicorn! by fpoling · · Score: 1

      I am not sure about it. A lot of taste comes from texture and it could be very well that some pure mechanical trick during production could close taste gap rather cheaply. For example, a blind tasting at family gathering reveled that relatives could distinguish between cheap sosidges coming from animals (like 20% of meat) and expensive veggy ones. It was the texture that tricked them, not some chemical addictives (there were none).

    40. Re:I found another unicorn! by marsu_k · · Score: 2

      Milk allergy != lactose intolerance. The former can potentially be fatal, the latter gives you gas.

    41. Re:I found another unicorn! by Maritz · · Score: 2

      Everything you eat, and everything you are, is 'chemicals'. Don't fall for the naturalistic fallacy. The animals we eat aren't even 'natural'.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    42. Re:I found another unicorn! by DrXym · · Score: 1

      And it's demand for almond products that in no small part explain why California is suffering a severe drought and water shortage.

    43. Re:I found another unicorn! by Maritz · · Score: 1

      So in your mind, one day suddenly everyone is eating fake meat, and there are millions of cows around that no-one wants to eat? That's probably not quite how it would go, now, is it?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    44. Re:I found another unicorn! by awol · · Score: 1

      (51% of the water in CA is given to animal agriculture.)

      Are you sure? That number seems well out of whack from my understanding of how water is used in most agricultural water systems. First you probably mean that as a percentage of the water consumed because it is unlikely that more than 50% of the water in California is consumed, most of it will be used to manage the system itself (checking facts.... yep... http://www.scpr.org/news/2015/...). So once you correct for that detail and turn to agriculture, fixed plantings and cropping are metered and use giga litres per annum but livestock water is such an insignificant amount that it's not even metered (as long as the pipe is small enough). Perhaps in the US (and the big valley in particular) feed is a big part of that cropping.... rudimentary googling suggests it is nearer to 25% than 50% and that includes alfalfa or nearer to 10% if you are measuring irrigated pastures. It's a bit different where I am from since we don't usually irrigate pasture except for dairy use.

      I wholeheartedly disagree with almost everything you say, but if you are going to run the argument you may as well use facts a little closer to the reality. Who knows your argument might even hold water for some folk under those condition, if you will excuse the pun.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    45. Re:I found another unicorn! by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Jesus would have banned fish on Fridays in Lent too if Peter wasn't a fisherman. Or maybe he banned meat on Fridays to increase Peter's business?

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    46. Re: I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprise! The chemical excretion storm is in fact the world we live in and it's going on inside us as well as the plants and animals we eat. Most people are afraid of molecules in general but have no idea what the molecules does at a cellular level. So is there a difference if we get the same molecules from meat or as an additive in some plant based meat lookalike? There are a few good reasons to make aa veggie product for meat eaters, for example that meat production produced more greenhouse gases than all transportation in earth (cars, boats, airplanes etc). This was the case even nine years ago... http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?newsID=20772#.Vh-RfXnarqA

    47. Re:I found another unicorn! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      If it's "healthy" it's not close enough to real meat.

      I'd be interested in something if it's healthy for the pigs, cows, &Co., but if "healthy" non-meat meat is what you want, there are several products that have been out for years that are passable (but only passable) substitutes.

    48. Re:I found another unicorn! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      The problem is it will turn out to be bad for you. Factory produced problems.

      Yes, but that's what most people are eating anyway. Factory-farmed meat stuffed full of noxious chemicals and raised under stressful conditions. After that, vats of chemicals could only be a step up.

    49. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's for some vegetarians, but perhaps mainly for meat-eaters who for one reason or another need to eat something that isn't meat.

    50. Re:I found another unicorn! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Lots of people do it for Religious reasons, for instance, Adventists.

      I'm Jewish and like keeping Kosher in my house. Kosher meat is insanely expensive, though, so we're mostly vegetarian at home. We do use some fake meat products mainly to supplement meals (fake burger crumbles in pasta sauce along with veggies) or as quick meals (quickly heat a frozen veggie burger when we have little time). The latter is essentially the vegetarian equivalent of getting a burger at McDonald's. It's quick, relatively inexpensive, and edible, but you're under no illusion that it's the best thing for you. (Mostly, we replace the "big hunk of meat" on our plates with Quinoa, lots of different vegetables, beans, and other healthy foods.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    51. Re:I found another unicorn! by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      And I was responding to the illogic of the poster. So, your criticism of my response was based on...?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    52. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think your meat isn't a chemical ****storm? What do you think all the debate about antibiotics and hormones in your food are about? None of that debate is about vegetable matter. As far as the chemicals and GMO concerns about veggies goes, do you think that is any different for you considering that the regulation of these issues in the matter of stock feed is doubtlessly much more lax than what you pick up when you're buying the vegetables direct?

    53. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who don't know anything about "tofu" burgers.

    54. Re:I found another unicorn! by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      I've also met lots of vegetarians and vegans, and literally none of them have irrational fears of chemicals in foods

      I know a lot of vegetarians and vegans and almost ALL consider "chemicals" to be bad. MSG bad. Bad. Bad. "What is MSG" you may ask? dunno but it's bad, Bad. BAD.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    55. Re:I found another unicorn! by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Nobody can tell me with any certainty that some artificial fertilizer or hormone or genetic modification won't prove to be very bad for me in the long run.

      Burning meat is said to be carcinogenic.

      Burning anything release arsenic. Which is used in rat poison. Therefore when cooking any food you're eating rat poison. So the only way not to get cancer from your food is to only ingest 100% pure unicorn farts.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    56. Re:I found another unicorn! by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1
      Totally agree, why does it always have to be fake meat? I generally don't like foods with "fake" in the name.

      I do like that they are trying to make a new vegetarian protein source though. Lentils can get pretty tired.

    57. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never cracked open a real coconut? There is most certainly a milky liquid inside.

      Almonds... not so much.

    58. Re:I found another unicorn! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I am kind of the latter. When I am home, I know everything I eat for the most part. There's no moral or ethical thing in it for me. I just prefer it and the taste. I'll eat anything but I prefer to grow, hunt, or fish for my food. I've learned a number of ways to preserve food. I like it. These days store purchased food taste different to me, even vegetables.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    59. Re:I found another unicorn! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Nobody can tell you, with any certainty, that you won't be hit in the head with a coconut tomorrow.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    60. Re:I found another unicorn! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Check the ingredients. Antibiotics are used in the manufacturing.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    61. Re:I found another unicorn! by martas · · Score: 1

      Uh, maybe they're trying to recreate meat because meat tastes really good? Sure, veggie burgers might be "good too", but that doesn't mean they're *as* good. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a typical meat-eater who wouldn't normally prefer the taste of meat to whatever they have at the veggie line.

    62. Re:I found another unicorn! by martas · · Score: 1
    63. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that seeking to make a meat substitute is a strange endeavor. I'm writing to point out that tempeh is a traditional fermented product from Indonesia, not a 'meat substitute' in the sense of trying to recreate the experience of eating meat. Of course, some use it that way. I don't know the history of seitan, but its use among vegetarian monks suggests it may have always been used as a meat substitute.

    64. Re:I found another unicorn! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I was explaining exactly why your response saying everything has chemicals MAKES NO SENSE to those who have that stupid "unnatural" aversion. They are not scientists.

    65. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a lot of the people who prefer or only eat organic veggies do so because there are very specific chemicals that are regularly used on non-organic veggies that have been empirically shown to be hazardous to human health.

      Unless there is a proven process step somewhere between the time the veggie is picked and the time it's consumed where the concentration of these specific, known-harmful chemicals is reduced to a level lower than breathing air or drinking tap water, it stands to reason that there's actually some practical use to going organic.

      And, no, giving your veggies a little wash under the faucet won't do anything. Certain pesticides are able to osmose through the skin or rhind of the vegetable/fruit into the interior, yet most skins and rhinds are resistant to water. So you're cleaning the outside but the harmful chemical is inside.

      The reality is a lot more complicated than you make it seem. In reality, there are certain chemicals that do, in fact, trivially wash off, or are completely harmless even if they are consumed. But then there are other chemicals that are toxic and are not removed (at all, or thoroughly enough) before being delivered to the consumer. It also depends heavily on the exact produce being grown, and sometimes where (pests or threats to the produce may be specific to a certain region, so the chemical used to fight it isn't even necessary in certain parts of the world).

      On top of that, there are plenty of "conventional" farms that use no pesticides at all, or use other types of pest control that do not present any danger to humans consuming the produce, and they simply haven't taken the time and effort to get certified as organic. They behave as organic, but don't market as such. That's part and parcel with having a population of farmers that's as diverse as any other human population.

      Not all conventionally grown produce is harmful, and not all organic produce would slowly (or quickly) kill you if it were instead grown traditionally. But there are definitely certain types of produce where certain types of toxic chemicals are applied to them and then sold to consumers with significant amounts of those toxic chemicals still in the product. This is what organic consumers are trying to get away from.

      Now, sure, if your local grocery store discloses the farm where they got all their produce, you could certainly spend the time to drive out to each conventional farm and ask them what methods they use for pest control, and a list of all the pesticides they use, and do your own research to determine if those pesticides can penetrate the skin/rhind/etc of the produce you're buying. In this way, you could manually "vet" any given traditional produce as being safe, organic label or no.

      To be completely on the safe side, you'd have to do the same for organic produce, though. Organic stuff could possibly be grown in a way that it meets whatever criteria the organic certifier placed on them, yet somehow still contains significant amounts of some toxic material, whether pesticide or just something nasty in the soil.

      Lacking that kind of patience and time, though, most people who have a choice between "more than likely safe" and "possibly safe, possibly unsafe" will opt for the former. In this case, the former happens to be the organic label, and the latter happens to be everything else.

      Why would you opt for the latter, except out of ignorance or some kind of machoist "my body is strong, I can take it" kind of mentality?

    66. Re:I found another unicorn! by xrobertcmx · · Score: 1

      Quorn, it isn't bad.

    67. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The existing products are not "healthy", they're heavily processed food-like products filled with an endocrine disruptor (soy).

    68. Re:I found another unicorn! by Pebby · · Score: 1

      I agree - it's not fair to generalize, and you find people are unique too quickly and not such a crowd one might think. Just to feed (har) your anecdote some more: I am 10+ year vegetarian, I generally avoid processed foods (but, I mean, cheese is 'processed' so it's dumb to make a blanket statement like that), but I have no opinion on 'the right diet' for anyone but myself. I know what makes me feel good when I eat it, so I eat it. I don't eat meat for moral and taste reasons, and I'm happy to explain if you ask... but, that's me. I don't care if you eat a hamburger in front of me or cook a steak at my house, so long as I don't have to eat it. Live your way.

      Also, the 'no GMO' and 'buy organic' crowds, if there are such things, can be easily misinterpreted. Some people don't like the food monopoly. Some people don't like Monsanto. That all might come out as 'chemicals are bad' in some context, but there may actually be some other thoughts besides that conclusion.

      As for people whining about this product, remember the old joke 'how do you know someone's a vegan? they'll tell you.' No one is making you eat it.. let's let individuals decide.

    69. Re: I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So not caring is now a point of debate? Hard to defeat but has no basis in logic either. Slave owners and the Nazis had more logic on their side.

    70. Re:I found another unicorn! by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      I always thought that fake meat was more about saving resources.

      Supplying meat eater is a huge waste of energy when compared to plants. Fake Meat would allow more people to continue their bad habits of wasting more food than they eat.

    71. Re:I found another unicorn! by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      So we'll continue as now. A majority eating pablum and a significantly large part of the population prefers real food. Niche farming is growing. Again.

    72. Re:I found another unicorn! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Pablum would also be a step up. But never under-estimate the determination of people to make strange choices. After all, they'll pay a premium for coffee that comes out a cat's anus, so in addition to the pablum-eaters and "real food" eaters, we can expect there to be people willing to buy into real meat that doesn't resent it when you harvest it.

    73. Re:I found another unicorn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seitan and Tempeh are not meat substitutes, they're alternative sources for the protein bulk in your meal.

      I've never eaten meat, but from what I've heard it's pretty tasty. Meat Substitues are for people who want that taste/texture of meat without the downsides (usually the ethical, environmental or health impacts - the latter getting harder to avoid when you're not just eating "food" - including tempeh and seitan or any other source of protein).

    74. Re:I found another unicorn! by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      The thing vegetarian dishes always lack is the texture of meat. Heavily spiced foods overwhelm the flavor of meat most of the time anyways. But you really notice the texture difference.

      But the taste of various meat substitutes is important if you want any significant portion of the planet eating less meat. Roasted/smoked meat has a flavor that most people won't give up.

  2. dare I say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soylent Green?

    1. Re:dare I say... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      Spoiler Alert: it's People.

  3. dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a vegetarian because I don't like meat. It's so frustrating to have a veggie burger like a Boca burger that tastes way too much like meat. I want to have something else, or I would eat a real burger. There's a lot of non-meat protein that tastes good. Why the fixation on making it taste like beef?

    1. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Simple.

      A lot of us like the taste of meat, but wouldn't mind a friendly substitute, especially if it were cheaper.

    2. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because catering to the minority of a minority isn't really a giant money maker?

    3. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by DRJlaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a vegetarian because I don't like meat. It's so frustrating to have a veggie burger like a Boca burger that tastes way too much like meat. I want to have something else, or I would eat a real burger. There's a lot of non-meat protein that tastes good. Why the fixation on making it taste like beef?

      Because it's a veggie burger, not a veggie patty. They are expressly trying to simulate meat, because there are also people like me who quite like meat and quite dislike vegetables. I might move to a veggie burger but sure as hell am not going to move to a vegemite patty, a bean patty, or 90% of whatever ground-vegetable-matter-in-puck-form you're after.

      Don't complain that a thing called a "burger" is trying to simulate a "real burger." Complain that they aren't making something some other thing that tastes way too much like a vegetable.

    4. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Why are you eating a veggie "burger" if you don't care for anything that resembles meat? Just slap some tofu on a bun or jam some spinach in there or something.

      Do you actually have a craving for vegetarian matter processed and formed into a hamburger shape?

    5. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Cheaper is about the only justification I could see for it. As the FDA has been getting more and more of a clue lately, it's basically been found that red meat isn't actually bad for you after all. The original belief in that (as well as the belief that meat causes high cholesterol) originated from some poorly done studies in the early 60's and late 70's.

    6. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me, I like meat and vegetables. Its pretentious vegetarians and vegans I dislike.

    7. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's also "I don't want to kill animals for the sake of my dinner". Meat in moderation isn't bad for you, but there are plenty of other reasons why a lot of us don't eat it.

    8. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had one. What do they taste like?

    9. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because these are delicious.

      Don't forget to check the nutrition info for the Morningstar Farms links, though! They're not all that healthy.

    10. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Chas · · Score: 2

      Then don't kill animals for you dinner.

      Do what billions of people do.

      Pay someone ELSE to kill animals for your dinner.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    11. Re: dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like chicken.

    12. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      What's the actual union of people who don't want to kill animals for dinner but are also pissed off that their dinner then doesn't taste like animals? It seems like those people are just impossible to please. Yes, your dinner doesn't taste like meat. That's what you signed on for there, buddy!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    13. Re: dont want it to taste like meat by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      You're just not using enough garlic. They should taste like garlic chicken.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    14. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      There is also the health aspect. While meat manufacturers seem to think it is too hard to keep feces and other crap out of their meat, they would probably have to deliberately add it into plant made stuff, A think that I doubt they would do.

    15. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by slew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The original belief in that (as well as the belief that meat causes high cholesterol) originated from some poorly done studies in the early 60's and late 70's.

      FWIW, there are many contradictory studies made in this area that correlate read-meat consumption with higher mortality. Earlier studies that blamed cholesterol and fat in meat were poor studies, but there are more modern studies that illustrate correlation. Some studies blame gut bacteria that converts Carnitine into TMAO. Some blame the nitrates in processed meat. Some studies show an increased link with certain cancers. Some studies blame poor dental hygiene causing a general inflammation response leading to heart disease.

      We may not know the truth yet in this matter, except there is some correlation (but if there is actually causation is a bit of a mystery still).

    16. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      I love the taste of meat, but I have to limit my intake of it because of gout. I appreciate the efforts to make veggie burgers taste more like real meat. Some of them are quite good already. I just wish they were a bit cheaper.

    17. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually veggies are more likely to have feces in them, a LOT more. Namely because they're often grown with cow shit, especially organic ones which are exclusively grown with cow shit or worm shit as synthetic fertilizer can't be used. This has actually lead to a lot of e. coli and salmonella outbreaks.

      In fact, the leading cause of food poising is from plant matter, not meat:

      http://www.medicalnewstoday.co...

      Even taking the cow shit out of the equation entirely, if you actually read the FDA guidelines on allowable contaminants in vegetables, they can include insect body parts, insect shit, insect eggs, and even whole larva.

      So yeah if you want to argue that meat is bad, you're seriously barking up the wrong tree here.

    18. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      citations, bitch.

    19. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      FWIW, there are many contradictory studies made in this area that correlate read-meat consumption with higher mortality.

      I haven't seen any that indicate this except for two, one of which was The China Study, which has been debunked pretty well. In fact it's widely suspected that the The China Study was released in book form so that it wouldn't be subject to peer review, but we don't know for sure. What we do known is that somebody actually gathered the author's raw data and found that he cherry picked it to make it favor his ideology:

      http://rawfoodsos.com/2010/07/...

      In fact if you look over the data, you might notice that there's a county that he pulled data from that consumes meat twice as much as the typical American, and you know what? It happened to be one among those counties with the lowest mortality rates. The author of the book responded to the criticism I linked there, and his refutation effectively amounted to "I'm a scientist, so that means I'm right here."

      You might also want to look at this as well:

      http://www.cholesterol-and-hea...

      There was also a Princeton study that just asked people what they ate, (a really terrible way to understand nutrition, by the way) and they found the meat eaters had a higher incidents of all kinds of issues like heart disease and other whatnots. The problem is they made a huge mistake in gathering their data: They made about zero attempt to create a control. The meat eating group also had much more smokers, much more drinkers, much more drug users, people with poor exercise habits, etc. The vegetarian group had less of these problems simply because they were following some kind of diet, which is beneficial regardless of whether or not it includes meat.

      In addition to all of the above, google the Inuit Paradox. Essentially the Inuit consumed mostly meat (somewhere north of 90% of their diet was meat) and, aside from deaths from war, accidents, virulent/bacterial disease, and other non-nutrition related natural causes, they actually lived longer than Europeans of that era. Some people suggested it was due to them as a people being adapted to that, until a few scientists tried that diet upon themselves, and they had no health problems associated with it. In fact, they didn't even get scurvy.

      Now, all of this isn't to say that eating meat is healthier, rather it does say that eating meat isn't unhealthy, even if your diet is mostly meat (in the case of the inuit, over 90%.)

    20. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually veggies are more likely to have feces in them, a LOT more.

      citations, bitch.

      Namely because they're often grown with cow shit, especially organic ones which are exclusively grown with cow shit or worm shit as synthetic fertilizer can't be used.

      citations, bitch.

      This has actually lead to a lot of e. coli and salmonella outbreaks.

      In fact, the leading cause of food poising is from plant matter, not meat:

      http://www.medicalnewstoday.co...

      Read your own cite, you fucking dumbass:

      Close to half of all reported illnesses were caused by "produce".

      Sorry, your reference doesn't back up your claim. But, please continue with your moronic blather...

      Even taking the cow shit out of the equation entirely, if you actually read the FDA guidelines on allowable contaminants in vegetables, they can include insect body parts, insect shit, insect eggs, and even whole larva.

      citations, bitch. and while you're at it, show how the FDA "guidelines" favor vegetables over meat. because that's what you're implying.

      I guess you figure that most readers here won't scratch the surface of your ridiculous claims. Protip: you're not the only one with an internet connection and too much time on their hands. From now on, you better make sure your bullshit is backed, you fucking idiotic dolt.

    21. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This is fine, but why would people in the category who think killing animals for meat is wrong want to have fake meat substitute? It's a bit like a reformed cannibal pining for the same tasty noshes his mother used to serve.

    22. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Veggie burgers aren't bad, speaking as a meat eater. At least the ones I like don't bother to pretend to be meat, they're not processed soy extract or things like that, they're oats and other grains pressed into a patty. I've had the fake hotdogs which are nasty pieces of dreck with an aftertaste that keeps going all day long, but the veggie burgers are nothing like that. I've even had both beef and veggie burgers at the same barbecue.

    23. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your a doosh

    24. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "had a higher incidents"

      Dude. Stop it.

    25. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "gout"? Who the fuck has gout these days?

    26. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Because they used to eat meat and they miss the taste.
      2. Because they want other people to stop eating meat, but they won't mainly because they like the taste.

    27. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Here's a few more links for you:

      http://www.realclearscience.co...

      http://www.fda.gov/Food/Guidan...

      Notice for example that Spinach is permitted up to 1mg of mammalian excrement (read: cow shit) per pound as per fda regulations. Tomatoes are permitted up to ten fly eggs per 500 grams, or five fly eggs and one maggot, or two maggots. Wheat is permitted up to 9mg of rat shit per kilogram. Ground oregano (a common additive in salads and salad dressings) can have up to 1250 insect fragments per 10 grams, in addition to 5 rodent hairs per 10 grams.

      Meanwhile there are no allowed defects for meat, other than the meat product is allowed to be 65% of some other substance, aka fillers, such as cornstarch, or the "pink slime". While that's bad IMO from a food quality perspective, it isn't unhealthy. Unlike with plants, meat is easy to avoid contaminants because the slaughter and processing occurs in a very clean environment. I know because I once did routine IT work at a food distributor that had a meat plant. I've seen how clean the environment has to be if they want to comply with FDA regulations and ISO standards. It's just not possible to achieve that for veggies however as they inevitably have to be grown and harvested outside.

      Have a nice day.

    28. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      It seems like those people are just impossible to please. Yes, your dinner doesn't taste like meat. That's what you signed on for there, buddy!

      Of course, the point of the article is that several companies are well on their way to making it possible to please those people. Science!

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    29. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I'm vegan and I like the taste of many kinds of meat.

    30. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by fpoling · · Score: 1

      There is such things as taste craving. It is very real and a lot of people gave up on veganism just of that. Personally I still avoid even looking at cheese section in supermarkets after being vegan for 6 years for ethical reasons. Fortunately latest vegan cheese taste the same, so that became easier.

    31. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why are you eating a veggie "burger"

      In my case because it's more convenient in that form than needing to get a knife and fork. However I also eat meat.
      A funny thing is a major burger chain here had a vege burger containing rennet - so animals had to die to make the vege burgers. They tasted pretty good. Not as good as falafel, but better than the chicken burgers at the major burger chain. The replacements (without rennet) are not bad either but while high in fibre the fat content does not really make them a healthy option. Something fried is probably where the hamburger experience comes in - fry that tofu and put some sweet chilli on it and that's burger material just as the vege patties or falafel in a kebab come in.

    32. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by dbIII · · Score: 1

      As some arctic explorers found in some pretty horrible ways that extra 10% really mattered.
      (A little bit about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...)

    33. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      What's the actual union of people who don't want to kill animals for dinner but are also pissed off that their dinner then doesn't taste like animals? It seems like those people are just impossible to please. Yes, your dinner doesn't taste like meat. That's what you signed on for there, buddy!

      I think the union is pretty small. I've been a vegetarian for 35 years. I hate the meat substitutes that taste like meat. I don't want to think I'm eating meat.

    34. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Tofu can be great if prepared correctly. It absorbs flavors like a sponge so use it with garlic, onions, sauces, etc and you'll wind up with a great dish. It can also be nasty if prepared incorrectly. I went to one restaurant that sliced the tofu, put it on a plate, drizzled sauce over it, and served it. Horrid. Then again, if someone did that to a steak (placed it raw on a plate with sauce drizzled over it), I'd suspect that wouldn't taste good either.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    35. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by KGIII · · Score: 1

      As an avid meat eater who has eaten those meat substitutes, don't worry -- they don't taste like meat.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    36. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think happens to the potato or grain plant when we harvest it?
      If you don't want to kill for your dinner you're basically limited to fruits and nuts, I'm not sure a diet meeting all your nutrional needs is possible with just fruit.

    37. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I don't see any details about diet there, other than a few mentions of struggling to find food, and a brief mention of how they would eat any remotely edible part of a seal, including rotten flippers. (Though I only scanned through it.)

      Anyways some Inuit ate 100% meat, and didn't seem to have any difficulty. Two people ate 100% meat for an entire year and didn't have any ill effects:

      http://inhumanexperiment.blogs...

    38. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would imagine that if you had a meat substitute that tasted/felt/smelt/etc... just like meat a decent chunk of the population would switch over if it were cheaper.

      I personally like beef too much to give up eating it altogether, but if a substitute was available, I'd certainly buy that instead. Unlike some others, I'd be willing to pay more for it too (as it is I'm already paying the premium that grass fed and free-range beef comes with).

    39. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      What do you eat? I have started getting gout and it is maddening. Just about everything I like is high in purines, and I can't find any good alternatives. Fish, Beans, Mushrooms, everything I can think of.

      I started donating blood which has eliminated flareups...for now!

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    40. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Sorry to link to so much text when the only bits that matter are items like:

      "A worrying illness began to affect many of the party, the general symptoms were swelling of the legs, ankles and other body parts, accompanied by acute lethargy"

      "The mystery illness which affected most of the Wrangel Island party and accelerated the deaths of Malloch and Mamen was later diagnosed as a form of nephritis brought about by eating faulty pemmican. Stefansson explained this by saying that "our pemmican makers has failed us through supplying us with a product deficient in fat.""

      Books on the expedition had a lot more about it but the problem was not getting as varied a diet as the three Inuit who were with the expedition. Among other things those Inuit ate seal blubber and they remained healthy. Muscle tissue and pemmican was not enough to produce a healthy diet - so by varied I just mean eating different bits of animal. Those Inuit you mentioned only eat 100% meat if you call bone, blubber etc meat, but some are definitely 100% carnivores and live out healthy lives.

    41. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      For no allowable defects, chicken seems to have a large amount of e-coli contamination. Over 90% in some cases.

    42. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      "A worrying illness began to affect many of the party, the general symptoms were swelling of the legs, ankles and other body parts, accompanied by acute lethargy"

      My first thought was nephrotic syndrome before even reading the second sentence. However I didn't know that could come about from not getting enough lipids in one's diet. That would make sense in this situation though because if you don't consume enough lipids, your liver will convert carbohydrates to make up for it. However the diet there would include protein and lipids, but very little carbohydrates; at least, not enough for your liver to be able to replace the fat. They would have to have been eating just the muscle tissue and not the fat tissue for that to happen, which is typical among westerners.

    43. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's probably part of why the little Inuit girl with the group died about ten years back while the many of the other expeditioners died a century ago. She ate her blubber etc.
      One of the dairies from the expedition did have a lot of complaints about a lack of carbohydrate (oats etc) but a different word was used starting with f that I can't recall.
      There's some recent speculation that Mawson's group in the Antarctic were in a similar situation because the vitamin A poisoning from dog liver theory no longer makes sense - observed concentrations are orders of magnitude too low. The ice the bodies were buried in drifted out to sea a few years ago so it will probably have to be speculation, but anyway the understanding of diet has changed a bit from back then.

    44. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I should add that the "Stefansson explained this" doesn't mean it was true because the man was an infamous liar who deliberately left his subordinates to die on the Karluk, but it still sounds likely.
      That expedition was pretty well the textbook example of how not to run a polar expedition. It is interesting to read about though.

    45. Re:dont want it to taste like meat by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      http://www.cowspiracy.com/facts/

      "Animal agriculture is responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, more than the combined exhaust from all transportation. "

      Then the acres of rain forest burned ever year to make room for cows.
      A pound of beef requires 1 gallon of oil to produce.
      Etc..

      Lots of reasons.

  4. Cows are fake by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Ommmm

    1. Re:Cows are fake by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1
      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  5. Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our bodies evolved over millions of years to eat meat. The fact that your senses crave the smells, taste, and texture of meat means... your body wants meat. Now, we all know that you should eat it in moderation because of the problems of overeating. But meat in reasonable portions is naturally good for you.

    All of this biochemical engineering to come up with a meat substitute is reminiscent of all the chemical companies trying to come up with artificial sweeteners. The end result is probably as bad for you or worse than the original.

    Eat your meat. That way you can have your pudding.

    1. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people lack an enzyme to properly digest meat protein.

    2. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on the professor I guess... Could be just to cash in on the vegetarian / vegan / health market like everybody else seems to be doing. Could also be a 'think of the future' thing. Meat produced from grazing animals (e.g.: beef) is pretty inefficient to raise for our tables. As the worlds population grows we might need to start thinking about alternatives to satiate our bellies. In the future you have an alternative to that beef flavored partially refined locust protein burger everybody has been talking about if the professor is successful :)

    3. Re:Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 2

      Well, there is that. And that's probably 1% of the non-meat-eaters out there or less. But I'm sure a significant number of them are self diagnosed with that problem so a survey would show substantially more people indicating they have it when they really don't.

    4. Re:Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing he's doing it just to cash in on the fad.

    5. Re:Why not eat meat? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      How about fake vegetables made from meat? We can convert those vegans!

    6. Re:Why not eat meat? by oxbow+lake · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Meat consumption today is problematic for two main reasons:

      1. The current medical literature shows significantly lower incidence of diseases such as cancer and ischemic heart disease in populations eating a vegetarian diet. Beyond personal benefit, increasing public health is beneficial for any society that has any kind of publicly funded healthcare system.

      2. Particularly in the United States, the mainstream agricultural system is unsustainable, environmentally damaging, and increasingly a threat to public health in terms of infectious disease and antibiotic resistance.

      Additionally, as consumers many people find the disconnect between consumption of meat (buying the wrapped piece of meat in the supermarket) and the raising/slaughter of livestock morally disconcerting, even if they don't take fundamental issue with killing animals for food.

      I was going to provide citations, but I'm too lazy and you can probably use PubMed as well as I can. Anyway my point is that eating meat might not actually be entirely good for you, and that the way meat is produced in the US is unfortunate.

    7. Re:Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      Why would you take something as glorious as meat and turn it into something lesser like a vegetable?

      Do you hate bacon or something evil like that?

    8. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amazon.com/China-Study-Comprehensive-Nutrition-Implications/dp/1932100660/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1444858054&sr=8-1&keywords=the+china+study

      Ready it and you'll see some reasons why some people don't eat meat. Granted, I do agree with your points about coming up with a meat substitute.

    9. Re:Why not eat meat? by ohnocitizen · · Score: 5, Informative
      There's a few reasons, and people might find all or just some of them convincing.

      I eat (and enjoy) meat myself, but if there's a way to get that texture and flavor (texture is the most important part, I think) in a healthier and more sustainable way - I'd love to see it happen so long as the final result is actually more efficient to produce and healthier to eat. As you say, many artificial foods have ended up being worse than what they were meant to replace.

    10. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that evolution doesn't give a shit about you after you've hit an age where you would historically no longer be reproducing, possibly because of early death. Nowadays, we're living longer than we were living and our bodies weren't designed to deal with meat consumption this often and/or for this long, but it does seem much more capable of handling plant based foods.

    11. Re:Why not eat meat? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      bacon=life

    12. Re:Why not eat meat? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Our bodies evolved over millions of years to crave the smell, taste, and texture of COOKED meat? Not sure where our ancestors found that in the wild...
      I subscribe to an evolutionary theory of nutrition, which says that we do best if we eat what our ancestors ate for tens of thousands of years. We were designed to eat meat, but because we didn't have refrigeration, we didn't eat meat very often. Gorging on red meat a couple times a month should be fine; eating it for every meal, not so much.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    13. Re: Why not eat meat? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speak for yourself please. My body doesn't crave meat and i don't particularly like the taste of many meats, especially beef. I would take good cheese or nice rye bread or vegetables over meat any day. But meat is often cheaper, otherwise i'd probably eat meat once a week or so.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    14. Re:Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Our ancestors were using fire to cook meat long before recorded history.

    15. Re:Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      Drug addicts only crave the drugs after they're hooked. Humans crave meat whether they've had any or not. Though they're capable of suppressing those cravings given enough deliberate conditioning.

    16. Re: Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 2

      I'm sure some people can condition themselves to suppress their cravings. And if you want to live that way, go right ahead. But eating meat is an instinct inherited through evolution.

    17. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      medical literature shows significantly lower incidence of diseases such as cancer and ischemic heart disease in populations eating a vegetarian diet

      Correlation is not causation. Those populations either have much poorer healthcare and die of other things, go undiagnosed, or they're young health nuts who don't have many unhealthy symptoms like smoking, lack of exercise, and overweight.

    18. Re:Why not eat meat? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The roughly one billion people on the planet who intentionally don't eat meat because of cultural/religious reasons seem not to know that their body craves for it.
      Why not writing a book about the 'craving for meat' and sell it to them, lets say for $10 per volume? You should be a multi millionaire even a billionaire in no time!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re:Why not eat meat? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Our bodies evolved over millions of years to crave the smell, taste, and texture of COOKED meat?

      Not millions, but easily tens of thousands. Which is enough to to develop an aversion or affinity to a certain kind of smell.

      Try this test. Take a chunk of raw beef, slice it in half and cook one of them on an open fire (in an appetizing way so that you'd wanna eat it... don't burn it). Leave the other half raw. Present both halves to a dog and see which one it goes for first. Now repeat this test on a tiger or some other non-domesticated carnivore.

      I'll bet you the dog goes for the cooked meat and the tiger goes for the raw meat.

    20. Re:Why not eat meat? by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The dog will go for whichever one is closer and then try to eat the second one, at least judging by all the dogs I've known. Dogs are not as particular as you imply.

    21. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1. The current medical literature shows significantly lower incidence of diseases such as cancer and ischemic heart disease in populations eating a vegetarian diet. Beyond personal benefit, increasing public health is beneficial for any society that has any kind of publicly funded healthcare system.

      Naturally! You do not need those brains in the current society anyway, after all. :)))
      http://www.couriermail.com.au/...
      http://evolutionarypsychiatry....

    22. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The roughly one billion people on the planet who intentionally don't eat meat because of cultural/religious reasons seem not to know that their body craves for it.

      And seem also not to know how to invent or design anything more complex than a shovel. Just an unfortunate coincidence, yeah sure. ;)
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    23. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of this biochemical engineering to come up with a meat substitute is reminiscent of all the chemical companies trying to come up with artificial sweeteners. The end result is probably as bad for you or worse than the original.

      Another example would be Crisco and the other vegetable oil based shortening products that have loads of trans fats. They were originally touted as being more healthy than lard, but are actually much, much worse.

    24. Re:Why not eat meat? by wickerprints · · Score: 1

      Humans, like our primate relatives, do eat non-vegetable matter. Moreover, there is a case to be made that it is through our discovery of FIRE that our success as a species really started to take off, because while other animals consume their nutrition raw, the act of cooking one's food to break down plant and animal matter enabled the human digestive system to be simpler and less energy-consuming. We essentially offloaded a good part of the function of digestion into cooking, and this is what allowed us to evolve an increased intellectual and physical activity.

      That said, the reason for meat substitutes has little to do with theories as to whether we as a species were/are "intended" or adapted to eat meat. It has a lot more to do with the environmental efficiency and cost of producing large volumes of meat for a very large population of humans; moreover, a greater proportion of the human population is increasing consumption of meat due to the general rising standard of living in developing nations.

      Therefore, any discussion of the palatability of artificially synthesized meat (i.e., any meat not systematically produced from the raising and slaughter of live animals), must include a discussion of the efficiency of the process. How much water does it use? How must does it cost to implement at large scales? How much electricity does it use? How much organic/raw material does it need? How much does it pollute, and what are its polluting byproducts? And how good is its nutritional profile? All of these questions should be evaluated in themselves as well as in comparison to existing meat production processes.

      Meat consumption will never go away unless the supply disappears completely. What matters is not why we eat it or whether we should stop; what matters is how we can do it in a way that is sustainable from an economic, environmental, and public health perspective.

    25. Re:Why not eat meat? by russbutton · · Score: 1

      Eat meat. Celebrate life at the top of the food chain!

    26. Re: Why not eat meat? by joh · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some people can condition themselves to suppress their cravings. And if you want to live that way, go right ahead. But eating meat is an instinct inherited through evolution.

      Statistically, as a tendency, yes. Categorically, for everyone, no. I know people who never liked meat. They just don't crave meat.

      People are generally common, but they're not just all the same.

    27. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but they also evolved to die of old age at 25 too..."

      Bullshit. Once you factor out infant mortality below age 1, people lived at least 50, 60 years.

      ", when you get a little older some things, like digestion, just don't work as good as they used to."

      More bullshit. Granted, I've seen a lot of sad-sack middle-aged potato-shaped bald pot-bellied pasty and doughy assholes, but we don't all fall apart that easily. 46 myself. Give me steak, scotch and aged cheese! Then I'll bike 50 kilometers and easily catch up and pass most people.

      Booyah!!!

    28. Re:Why not eat meat? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try this test. Take a chunk of raw beef, slice it in half and cook one of them on an open fire (in an appetizing way so that you'd wanna eat it... don't burn it). Leave the other half raw. Present both halves to a dog and see which one it goes for first. Now repeat this test on a tiger or some other non-domesticated carnivore.

      Ok, I tried this experiment. I ate the dog, and then I ate the tiger.

      What do I do now . . . ?

      Please advise.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    29. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were designed to eat meat

      NO, we EVOLVED to eat meat; get it right!

    30. Re: Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also evolved over millions of years to shit wherever we want. Doesn't mean we should shit wherever we want.

    31. Re:Why not eat meat? by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      My dog is an idiot. He'd first go for the parsley on the plate. then, later he'd think about trying the meat. He'd inhale it once he got it, but he's a little slow on the figuring things out side of things.

    32. Re: Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My body doesn't crave meat and i don't particularly like the taste of many meats, especially beef. I would take good cheese or nice rye bread or vegetables over meat any day

      I got bad news for you, bro: You've got low testosterone. Or maybe you're a woman -- or should have been a woman, as the case may be. Of course the low-T issue could be easily handled with diet -- by eating delicious, nutritious MEAT.

    33. Re:Why not eat meat? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I like to thing one of my dogs is fairly average intelligence but she absolutely loves food. She would eat the parsley, both steaks, the plates and anything else that smelled like the meat. She will lick every inch of her dish three or four times after eating something like real meat just to make sure she got every ounce of scent out. She also eats so fast that I'm surprised she hasn't choked to death already.

    34. Re:Why not eat meat? by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      Eat your meat. That way you can have your pudding.

      I can't believe no one caught on to this. Damn kids don't know good music these days.

    35. Re:Why not eat meat? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Our bodies evolved over millions of years to eat meat. The fact that your senses crave the smells, taste, and texture of meat means... your body wants meat. Now, we all know that you should eat it in moderation because of the problems of overeating. But meat in reasonable portions is naturally good for you.

      All of this biochemical engineering to come up with a meat substitute is reminiscent of all the chemical companies trying to come up with artificial sweeteners. The end result is probably as bad for you or worse than the original.

      Eat your meat. That way you can have your pudding.

      I'm 36, vegan since 18, haven't eaten animals on purpose for soon 30 years.

      I guess some things smell nice, I associate it with meat-products and try to avoid the smell though so .. Guess fish smell better?

      I can't really tell how it tastes longer and I don't long for it or the texture where I have the same issue. How could I when I don't really remember how it is?

      For me personally I would be more interested in a plant-based product which supposedly taste like meat, but I'm just fine with "tastes nice" I don't care if it taste like meat or not, I have nothing to go by, than actual grown animal muscle cells. I don't see the problem with the later for those who are ok with eating animals and I see little moral issue with it either it's just that I know .. And well, it also depend on what it's feed with of course.

      I don't follow your logic. Broccoli is good for me. Garlic is good for me. Fish or flax seed oil is good for me.
      Nothing of that taste good at all. Chocolate taste good and so do alcoholic cider but .. (Yeah I know about cacao, but let it pass.)

      If the flavors are carcinogenic then sure, you're right. But plant-based diets can have additional benefits and the main idea for why not to use animals is likely about 1) Not having to lock them in and kill them and 2) Resource consumption, possibly more about the later. (It's weird how the alternative products cost more though, like 1 liter of oat milk which is really just a little oat flakes, water and sugar cost more than cow milk, how do that make any sense relative the ingredients?)

    36. Re:Why not eat meat? by myid · · Score: 1

      The fact that your senses crave the smells, taste, and texture of meat means... your body wants meat.

      I crave lots of things that aren't good for me - Twinkies, ice cream, french fries, pie, thick malted milk, etc. Just because we want to eat something doesn't mean it's necessarily good for us.

    37. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Through evolution, our bodies also lost the ability to produce Neu5Gc. Since it's found in red meat (and produced by most mammals), it seems likely that ingesting it produces and inflammatory response. Not settled science by any means, but seems like a possible explanation for increased risk of colon cancer among red meat consumers.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25548184

    38. Re:Why not eat meat? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I'd have said the same thing at 46. Alas, that was 20 years ago. I may not be able to bike 50 kilometers (Of course, I never was much for biking once I'd learned to drive.) but I can still walk farther than most people my age, and look at least a decade younger. It may help that my father lived into his 80s, and my mother reached 90.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    39. Re:Why not eat meat? by flacco · · Score: 1

      > The fact that your senses crave the smells, taste, and texture of meat means... your body wants meat.

      Or that you have been acculturated and acclimated to meat.

      Until my mid-20s, I ate meat, lots of it, all the time.

      After quite some time as vegetarian, I not only do not want real meat, the taste of real meat (or traces of it in my food) is quite unpleasant.

      That said, I eat the fake meat replacements all the time. They are functionally the same, and vaguely similar in taste, without the greasy gaminess of real meat.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    40. Re: Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure some people can condition themselves to suppress their cravings. And if you want to live that way, go right ahead. But eating meat is an instinct inherited through evolution.

      Keep telling yourself that. Look, if you want to eat meat, just do it. Enjoy it. But don't try to rationalize it or try to convince yourself that people who don't are somehow struggling everyday to do it. It's sort of insulting.

      Yes, we have glutamate taste receptors. But no, not everyone who doesn't eat meat craves it. There's plenty of ways to enjoy glutamate without meat, and it's satisfying in other ways.

      I personally think it's great that people are trying to increase food options--the more the merrier. But I'm one of those who isn't really looking to replace meat--I would like a greater variety of tasty food, but my guess is it would be even better to just focus on finding things that taste good than finding things that are like meat.

    41. Re:Why not eat meat? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The dog will go for whichever one is closer and then try to eat the second one, at least judging by all the dogs I've known.

      Dogs are not as smart as Chimpanzees, who will hoard food and then "cook" it later.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    42. Re:Why not eat meat? by Hidyman · · Score: 1

      Actually, you could eat meat for every meal. It's the processed grains that are killing us.
      Processing grains to take all of the fiber out of them is definitely NOT natural.
      The best way to eat grain is to feed it to a cow, then eat the cow.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me ...
    43. Re: Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utter rubbish. Millions of Indians have absolutely no desire and/or biological craving at all for eating meat. They may perhaps have a curiosity but absolutely no craving. In fact, it's likely that many would get quite sick eating meat after a lifetime of a vegetarian diet.

      Eating almost anything is an instinct inherited through evolution. However your personal diet from childhood into adulthood has a massive impact on your cravings and desires. I have relatives who are almost physically ill at the smell of cooking meat. They were about to throw up outside of what turned out to be a butcher shop from the smell while I couldn't smell anything at all.

      Cravings for meat are conditioned by the diet of your upbringing and you can alter or eliminate those cravings completely over time.

      We are omnivore's by nature but the variety in individual diets and cravings is extremely large.

    44. Re:Why not eat meat? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      And as a guy who hit 40, when you get a little older some things, like digestion, just don't work as good as they used to. And processed bean protein will almost certainly digest easier than red meat

      ..and as a guy who just hit FIFTY this year, eats meat every single day, has a bodyfat percentage somewhere between 9 and 12 percent, is an amateur athlete, and who has NO digestive issues to speak of, I say you need to look for other reasons for your problems than eating meat.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    45. Re:Why not eat meat? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Bah, I prefer engineered nutrition. It doesn't matter what our ancestors ate, as long as we get adequate nutrients in proper ratios.

    46. Re: Why not eat meat? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Why it is so difficult to grasp? I don't have any scruples eating meat and my cholesterol is perfect so the doctor wouldn't mind. Nevertheless I hate beef and mutton and am mostly indifferent to pork. Chicken legs are okay and so is an occasional horse steak.

      Mostly just too lazy to cook the meat the way I prefer so I just skip meat without any regret. But I bloody love gorgonzola on a sourdough rye bread with caraway.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    47. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to avoiding animals in favor of vegetables... Isn't it true that there is a huge ratio of animal material in cheeses and vegetables etc. in the form of microscopic fauna? You're always killing millions, and always ingesting mostly dead animal remains. The concept of purely vegetarian is false, all you're doing is choosing microscopic critters over big ones.

    48. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturalistic fallacy

      We also evolved to want to cheat on our significant others and to harm rivals

    49. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't really tell how it tastes longer and I don't long for it or the texture where I have the same issue. How could I when I don't really remember how it is?

      If you're interested, you might try that seaweed that tastes like bacon when cooked...

    50. Re:Why not eat meat? by oxbow+lake · · Score: 1

      No, standard scientific procedure is to include controls for that kind of thing. So you don't compare young health nuts with the general population; you compare young health nuts who happen to be vegetarian with young health nuts who eat some red meat.

      From a systematic review published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2009 (Am J Clin Nutr May 2009 vol. 89 no. 5 1607S-1612S):
      "There is convincing evidence that vegetarians have lower rates of coronary heart disease, largely explained by low LDL cholesterol, probable lower rates of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and lower prevalence of obesity. Overall, their cancer rates appear to be moderately lower than others living in the same communities, and life expectancy appears to be greater. However, results for specific cancers are much less convincing and require more study. There is evidence that risk of colorectal cancer is lower in vegetarians and in those who eat less meat; however, results from British vegetarians presently disagree, and this needs explanation. It is probable that using the label “vegetarian” as a dietary category is too broad and that our understanding will be served well by dividing vegetarians into more descriptive subtypes. Although vegetarian diets are healthful and are associated with lower risk of several chronic diseases, different types of vegetarians may not experience the same effects on health."

      From the published Position of the American Dietetic Association on vegetarian diets (Journal of the American Dietetic Association [2009, 109(7):1266-1282])
      "It is the position of the American Dietetic Association that appropriately planned vegetarian diets, including total vegetarian or vegan diets, are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases. [....] Vegetarians also appear to have lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, lower blood pressure, and lower rates of hypertension and type 2 diabetes than nonvegetarians. Furthermore, vegetarians tend to have a lower body mass index and lower overall cancer rates."

      Is this all screaming that meat is bad for you? Not at all. The point is that the argument has merit, if not proven. So, as I originally stated, for some people it is problematic.

      My searches didn't yield more recent publications discrediting the studies up until 2009, but if you are aware of them by all means I am curious.

    51. Re:Why not eat meat? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ditto from the 60 years age bracket, except rather than being an amateur athlete, I do physical work every day. And I've noticed how much better I feel when I get enough protein from red meat. (Fish and chicken don't cut it.)

      But if I want to give myself gas and bloating and other symptoms of poor digestion, as well as chronic fatigue.... well, all I have to do is substitute beans for meat.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    52. Re: Why not eat meat? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There was some interesting research on middle-aged women who suddenly decided "meat smells bad" and therefore became vegetarians... turned out this was directly caused by estrogen deficiency. (I suspect testosterone deficiency might have the same effect in males.) Likely their bodies were trying to make up the deficiency by seeking phytoestrogens (the human sense of smell being better than is usually credited), which can more or less substitute for animal estrogen.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    53. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our ancestors were using fire to cook meat long before recorded history.

      How do you know, it wasn't recorded?

    54. Re:Why not eat meat? by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      Does cannibalism count as a carbon offset?

    55. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We hear you like meat so much that you pay junkies to shove their meat up your faggot asshole.

    56. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You have a lot invested into these theories to legitimize your being a faggot, don't you.
       
      Listen, I don't give a fuck if you like a big tubestake in your mouth. Makes no difference to me but can you lay off trying to convert everyone else into being a Boy George loving faggot?

    57. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a health point of view there's no reason not to eat anything "in moderation", and by eating small amounts of meat it's probably easier to be healthy than being vegan.

      That said, most vegans are vegan for reasons other than health, namely environmental and ethical and that argument for veganism holds strong regardless of which part of human history you look at and what the "natural" diet was for that period.

    58. Re:Why not eat meat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of something my dog did when I was a kid. I was helping make dinner one evening. The dog was begging for scraps. I dropped a piece of parsley for him. It went in his mouth and he let it fall out of his mouth to the floor and continued begging.

      It was the only food I ever saw him NOT have any interest in eating at all.

      He would even eat ice. Put a few cubes in his water dish and since I guess he couldn't see them very well he would keep shoving his snout into the water dish looking for more even after they were all gone.

      Of course, parsley was more of a garnish than food for my family. I don't think even my mother ate it when she served it to us along with dinner and it was also the only food that was put on my plate that I was allowed to leave on it.

    59. Re:Why not eat meat? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Evolution happens over millions of years. Fire was likely not used until 100,000 years ago at the latest.

      We were thoroughly developed as an omnivore species well before fire.

      Fire did allow us to unlock more calories, as well as reduce the chances of disease from meat. We lived longer, had more energy, and could out compete other animals given the same set of resources using fire and other tools.

      I suspect all animals who eat meat love the smell of cooked meat (I know my dogs do!). Not because we evolved alongside cooked meat, but likely because raw meat smells good because of evolution, and cooked meat just puts out a lot more of that same smell, as well as converts part of the meat into other familiar and favored compounds, like sugars (Maillard).

  6. Is this really important? by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    I've been eating fake meat in various forms since the late seventies. It's mostly a matter of convenience, so I can partake in events like barbecues as a vegetarian. Fake meat patties and cutlets and so forth have various flavors and textures, none of which taste like real meat. (at least, as far as I can remember) But is it necessarily bad that they have their own taste? If the taste and texture are pleasing, (some are, and some are not) does it really matter if it tastes nutty or tofu-y and not meaty? I guess what I'm asking is, what problem are we trying to solve here?

    I have a friend who is a vegetarian chef, and she says if you're trying to be vegetarian but only eat products that ape the food you don't eat anymore, what's the point?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Is this really important? by Goragoth · · Score: 2

      Some vegetarians don't eat meat because they don't like it but for many that isn't the reason. They like the way meat tastes but they refuse to eat it for a variety of other reasons. It might be moral (they don't like animals being slaughtered for food), due to health concerns (meat is often said to be bad for you, although this is generally not true if you eat it in moderation), or because meat production is horrendously inefficient (usually out of some concern for the those starving in poor countries, even though in reality this is a distribution problem and not a production problem at all).

    2. Re:Is this really important? by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who is a vegetarian chef, and she says if you're trying to be vegetarian but only eat products that ape the food you don't eat anymore, what's the point?

      The point is that I'm not trying to be vegetarian, yet some vegetarians and most climate change activists are screaming that raising livestock for meat is a horrendous generator of methane and CO2, a tremendously poor use of land and water resources, and ethically suspect.

      Despite all this, ham and beef are very tasty.

      So forgive those who believe that devising vegetable-based substitutes that are similar tasting and similarly tasty has a point. I will instead pillage the planet, because your friend deems it unnecessary to develop any alternatives to satisfy that problem.

    3. Re:Is this really important? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      For those who like meatish things there is always Arby's.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Is this really important? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2

      The only non-pretentious dietary vegan (she still buys and wears leather, etc) I know switched in an effort for her and her husband to get off cholesterol meds. It has worked for them, but yeah, they eat a lot of "replacement meat-like products". As was said upthread, why bother if you are just going to eat stuff that (poorly) imitates what you no longer eat by choice?

      One other NPV (who is no longer vegan, or even vegetarian - back to omnivore-hood!) I know did it to become more conscious of the world around him and how he interacts with it - he went vegan for 2 years or so... but even in the middle of it he said that if he hit a deer with his car he'd happily take it home and eat it - he had already interacted with it, it was no longer a choice of "do or do not" and why waste perfectly good meat?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:Is this really important? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Well as an omnivore, if I buy a vegie burger to cook on a barbecue I'm expecting it to taste of caramelized chickpeas and exotic herbs and spices of the Levant.

      It would be a disappointment, personally, if it tasted of beef.

    6. Re:Is this really important? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well as an omnivore, if I buy a vegie burger to cook on a barbecue I'm expecting it to taste of caramelized chickpeas and exotic herbs and spices of the Levant.

      It would be a disappointment, personally, if it tasted of beef.

      Yes, exactly my point. Even speaking as a vegetarian, I figure if you want to taste beef, eat beef.

      I still miss bacon, though.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:Is this really important? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      he said that if he hit a deer with his car he'd happily take it home and eat it - he had already interacted with it

      Please post a link to the tube of "him" . . . "interacting" with a deer.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    8. Re:Is this really important? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      He didn't... But I was querying him about his choice for vegan-ism.

      Beer? Yah, yeast don't count.

      What about your leather jacket, etc? It was before this "experience" and the effect of him purchasing it had already rippled out, no longer a concern.

      "Well, what if you hit a deer on your way home from work?"

      "If it were dead or totally disabled I'd cut its throat, bleed it out, and grill it up - no use in wasting. It isn't *my* choice to hit the deer - rather, it is the deer's choice to jump the road in front of my truck"

      Of course, if you want a gore movie of a deer being hit by a car, I'm sure there are more than a couple on u-toob

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    9. Re:Is this really important? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I don't know your tastes, of course, but have you tried grilled eggplant and/or portabella mushroom caps? Not only do they taste good that way (assuming that you like them at all) they're good for you. In fact, some brands of portabellas are a good source of Vitamin D because they're exposed to UV light to develop the dark brown color, causing the same reaction that sunlight does on human skin. Brush them with a little olive oil before putting them on the barbie, and they'll come out nice and moist, but not too much, because they'll soak up more than you'd expect if you let them.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:Is this really important? by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      I guess what I'm asking is, what problem are we trying to solve here?

      We've got a lot of people out there who really like to eat meat, and aren't likely to give it up anytime soon. To meet their demand, we've got a meat industry that is inefficient, unhygienic, environmentally harmful, and cruel to animals.

      If (and it's a big if) someone can come up with a meat substitute that is sufficiently similar to the real thing, and cheaper to produce and to buy, then the problematic meat industry will likely shrink down into a much-less-problematic niche/specialty market for foodies.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re:Is this really important? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      > Fake meat patties and cutlets and so forth have various flavors and textures, none of which taste like real meat. (at least, as far as I can remember)

      I have had tofu that tastes and feels almost exactly like chicken - not exactly but very, very close. Unfortunately now that I know I have a soy intolerance (plus a mild allergy) I avoid eating products made entirely of soy. It gives me migraine and cluster headaches, and makes me irritable.

      I can have soy sauce though, and most vegetable oils without problem, thank goodness.

      The problems that people are trying to solve? Ethical issues - some people feel really bad about eating other animals. Others are concerned about the inhumane nature of "factory farming" where animals are treated very cruelly. Consider even chickens - dumb as a box of rocks but even they experience emotion. There is also the matter of poorly-managed ranches where not one flying fuck is given regarding ecological conservation. Some won't eat meat due to insanitary conditions in slaughterhouses.

        I have a Savannah cat (an obligate carnivore who requires higher levels of taurine than most domestic cats) and I used to feel bad eating other animals for a brief period but looking at the food chain and considering that we are more toward the carnivorous side of the omnivore spectrum (we can eat vegetable matter but we really do not digest it efficiently) I now look at it differently. I like lambs and cows and such and think they are cute creatures and make wonderful pets (I've raised sheep, goats, chickens, and other farm animals as pets) but I recognize that I am mostly carnivore thanks to evolution (or god, or flying pasketti monster, or whatever ;)) and have no problem eating tasty animals. Meat is fuel for the complex machine I inhabit.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:Is this really important? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      The thing that fake meats never get right, is the texture. I've never had a vegetarian dish deliver the texture of meat. For me, that is the single biggest factor.

      I guess what I'm asking is, what problem are we trying to solve here?

      Well, for me, I know for a fact how bad raising cattle is for the environment. Both to climate, and land. I know it is cruel to the animals, is promoting the destruction of rain forests worldwide, isn't very good for me if I eat it 4-5 days a week, etc... There are bunch of problems with meat. But damn it tastes so good and has nice a unique, irreplaceable texture.

      If they can get the taste correct, and the product can be barbecued/charred, and the texture is correct, I would give up real meat in a heartbeat.

  7. alternatives really aren't that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just don't taste like meat. It's like soymilk - if you go into it thinking it will taste like milk, you'll be disappointed. Just enjoy it for what it is!

    1. Re:alternatives really aren't that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just don't taste like meat. It's like soymilk - if you go into it thinking it will taste like milk, you'll be disappointed. Just enjoy it for what it is!

      Right! It's soy juice, not soy milk.

    2. Re:alternatives really aren't that bad by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Vanilla soy juice from Silk is pretty good. They also have chocolate soy juice and dark chocolate soy juice.

  8. Get yer head out of 1970s by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Well this is nice, but people have been doing this since the 1960s.

    How about a bread substitute that has 0 carbs? And almost no calories for that matter. Slay Type II diabetes by chopping out the bulk of calories eaten.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Get yer head out of 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could stamp out type ii diabetes if the food lobbies didn't rail against nutrition labels with recommended sugar amounts.

    2. Re:Get yer head out of 1970s by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I can only presume that you don't know much about Type II, or how to live with it. I was diagnosed back in March of '02, so I'm more than a little familiar with the subject. Living with Type II doesn't mean eating a low-carb or no-carb diet; that's just as bad for people like me as stuffing myself with carbs would be. I need to eat enough carbs to keep me going, but not too much. Depending on how active I am, I need anywhere from 30 to 60 grams of carbs (after fiber is subtracted) at each of three meals a day and, if I'm active, an afternoon snack with about 15 more. For breakfast, at least, two slices of toast give me most, if not all of the carbs I need to start my day, and I suspect that most other people with Type II would say pretty much the same. Please, if you don't understand the subject, do everybody including yourself a favor by finding out instead of just shoving your foot down your throat.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:Get yer head out of 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst I agree with you, I think the point that GP was trying to make (perhaps hamfistedly), is that we should be looking for ways to reduce excess carbs and in particular refined carbs from our diets to prevent people from getting type II diabetes in the first place.

  9. Amino acids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >Plant based meat
    I wonder how many m of land you require for this compared to what you'd need for chicken if you were to replace KFC with KFP....

    Also, what about the essential amino acids we need to live?
    Most of them are not percent in plants, oar on very little amounts.
    Spirulina has high amounts of tryptophan (needed for serotonin and melatonin) per gram, but is much less dense than egg.

    On a side note, probably I should make an account, I've been posting as AC for years...

    1. Re:Amino acids by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, protein quality is something they'll have to engineer into the product, but the process would have to be pretty inefficient to take more land area than actual meat. This is basic ecology: you put food into an animal, and after you've deducted what the animal needs to grow and survive 90% of that is lost before the next animal in the food chain eats that one. So for one lion to grow to full size it has to consume ten lion masses of gazelle; those ten lion masses of gazelle in turn have to eat 100 lion masses of grass. Aquatic animals are considerably more efficient because they don't have to expend energy counteracting gravity, but the same principles apply.

      Of course one of the insights the classical economists had is that it's not just the *amount* of land that matters, it's the *quality* of land. You can grow grass-fed beef on land that's not suitable for growing feed corn at all; you need a lot *more* land, but it's not land as useful for as many things the kind you'd choose to grow corn or soybeans on.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  10. Star Citizen and other scams by Dunbal · · Score: 0

    I wonder how much "fake" meat they can come up with for $108 million. Because $108 million sure buys a lot of cattle and the land to keep them on. And a herd large enough to maintain its numbers and pay its own expenses. I know a lot of farmers who have started with far less...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re: Star Citizen and other scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice Star Citizen meme? Did you miss the highlights from the CitizenCon event on Oct. 10th?
      http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6FF-ewiwmhs

      There's another snippet of the stream that goes behind the scene of creating the facial twitches, light based pupil dilation, etc.
      http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G1eLecTsTSw

    2. Re:Star Citizen and other scams by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much "fake" meat they can come up with for $108 million. Because $108 million sure buys a lot of cattle and the land to keep them on. And a herd large enough to maintain its numbers and pay its own expenses. I know a lot of farmers who have started with far less...

      If you come up with a killer meat substitute you can sell to large parts of the population, you can sell for way more than 34 cent per American. It's a bit like asking how many drivers could you hire for the money Google has spent on a driverless car. Probably a lot, but if you can make it happen you'll still make killer profit. On the other hand if it's another substitute only vegetarians and masochists would eat, not so much.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re: Star Citizen and other scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the event where they released more cinematics and announced that there might be an alpha of part of the game in 2016?

  11. Alternate plan by blue9steel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not just genetically engineer plants that grow meat, that way you get the best of both, flavor and saving the fuzzy animals. I look forward to sampling the bacon bush and porterhouse tree.

    1. Re:Alternate plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can't wait for time travel to improve so we can go back, save the dinosaurs and have brontoburgers again.

    2. Re:Alternate plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just genetically engineer plants that grow meat, that way you get the best of both, flavor and saving the fuzzy animals.

      You're only saving individual animals that way. But if everyone stopped eating meat today, all the "meaty" species would go nearly extinct.
      The only reason there are so many cows, pigs, chickens, etc is because we're eating those species.

    3. Re:Alternate plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two soldiers walking through forest, hungry.
      First says, "Look, food at last, a bacon shrub!"
      Second says "WATCH OUT -- that's not a Bacon Shrub -- its a HAM BUSH!!!" (say it out loud)

    4. Re:Alternate plan by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/07/19/3681740/bacon-seaweed-environmental-benefits/

  12. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disgusting.

  13. vegetarians love their fake meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not vegetarian, but I have a lot of friends who are. They are always wanting to go to a local restaurant that specializes in fake meat dishes. I guess people who grow up eating meat still get cravings for it. I expect that this market will continue to grow.

    1. Re:vegetarians love their fake meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I imagine lesbians crave fake meat in much the same way...

  14. Who says I want the taste of real meat? by Twinbee · · Score: 2

    Fake 'meat' made from ingredients such as quorn, soya or veg is no panacea, but after getting used to Quorn mince, minced beef now tastes a little, erm 'metallic', or at least strange in some way. For those who don't like the taste of liver, it's a little like that, though less extreme.

    I don't want to have the taste of meat. Nor do I want the slightly cardboardy taste of current "veg meat" foods (though it is improving).

    Instead, I want something which combines the best aspects of the flavours of both real meat and fake meat.

    Only fake meat can even attempt to reach that solution, or at least can offer a far bigger variety of flavours than real meat could hope to offer.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  15. It just needs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to be good enough. Many people smother meat with condiments anyway, so as soon as someone hits "good enough" it will take off.

    1. Re:It just needs... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      They usually do that if the meat is prepared like crap. I personally think a good marble steak gets ruined by condiments.

    2. Re:It just needs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your a doosh

    3. Re:It just needs... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I personally think a good steak is ruined already if it's from an animal so fat as to be marbled (if you don't eat it quickly it's a congealed fatty mess) but tastes vary.
      Lean grass fed steak cooked well done for me - on a steakburger with pineapple and beetroot - one man's perfection is another man's horrorshow :)

  16. Self-contradicting terms by mi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    veggie burger

    A self-contradicting — meaningless — term like "space helicopter", "low-sodium salt", or "gay marriage".

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Self-contradicting terms by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      A self-contradicting â" meaningless â" term like... low-sodium salt", or "gay marriage".

      Potassium chloride.
      Calcium chloride.
      Magnesium chloride.

      Several of my friends from high school, and the first amendment, and a government where religion does not have monopoly rights to defining a purely legal arrangement (says this atheist).

      Sod off you relic.

    2. Re:Self-contradicting terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      veggie burger

      A self-contradicting — meaningless — term like "space helicopter", "low-sodium salt", or "gay marriage".

      That last one isn't self-contradicting; it's just a Non sequitur

      For example, people don't eat "gay lunch", it's just lunch.

      And, people don't go "gay mountain climbing", it's just mountain climbing.

    3. Re:Self-contradicting terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are in for a surprise when you get to base camp...

    4. Re:Self-contradicting terms by mi · · Score: 1

      Potassium chloride.

      So, all you have is semantics? Figures...

      defining a purely legal arrangement

      Ah, yes, sure. Pure legalese, this:

      "Three words, dear Romeo, and good night indeed.
      If that thy bent of love be honourable,
      Thy purpose marriage, send me word to-morrow,
      By one that I'll procure to come to thee,
      Where and what time thou wilt perform the rite;"

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    5. Re:Self-contradicting terms by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Tuna "fish".

    6. Re:Self-contradicting terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's right. You're a bigoted relic, disgusting to intelligent people. You're caught up in old-time tribalism and hate. I'm embarrassed for you.

    7. Re:Self-contradicting terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and people don't get gay married, they get married. It's just the gay-hating dead-enders, like the backward fool you responded to, that try to differentiate gay marriage now that they can't legally oppress gay people anymore. Screw these hateful morons that often fail doubly by blaming their hate on their superstitions.

    8. Re:Self-contradicting terms by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      So, all you have is semantics? Figures...

      Only a true moron has the gall to claim that something is a "self-contradictory, meaningless term" and then complain that the argument against them is "semantics."

      se-man-tics
      noun
      the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning

    9. Re:Self-contradicting terms by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Of course you can get gay married. You just need to find the gay priest to perform the ceremony first. Come to think of it most weddings I've been to were pretty gay, with chiffon and taffeta and flowers all over the place followed by little tea sandwiches at the reception. It's tradition!

    10. Re:Self-contradicting terms by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    11. Re:Self-contradicting terms by mi · · Score: 1

      Only a true moron

      Only a fucking asshole would call an opponent names during argument. Fuck you, asshole.

      complain that the argument against them is "semantics."

      When I spoke of "salt", it was, quite clearly, the kitchen kind. You chose to pretend, I meant the generic term from Chemistry and based your (fraudulent) argument on that. A classic semantic change, you underhanded asshole.

      Why wouldn't you likewise redefine the "space helicopter" to mean something, that can move in airless space — and deal with my other example with the same semantics-argument? Wouldn't that be a winner, you fucking asshole?

      Please, don't hate!

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  17. Is it the taste that matters? by theIsovist · · Score: 1

    Or is it the texture? I'm an omnivore who tends towards vegetarian most days, but when I find that I have a craving for meat, it's not the taste that matters, it's the texture. I have yet to find any non-meat meal that has the same sort of tearing/chewing goodness that a good meat dish has. I can satisfy umami cravings with other dishes, but there's something about that feeling that's hard to satisfy without the going for animal protein.

    1. Re:Is it the taste that matters? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      How about fish? Yes, it's kind of meat and it's in the animal kingdom, but there are plenty of reasons to eat fish over other kinds of meat. You also get a pretty good meaty texture, although it varies quite a lot between species.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Is it the taste that matters? by theIsovist · · Score: 1

      Fish is fine. My complaint is that while many items have simulated the same flavor, the texture is off. Consuming food engages every sense. You can hope to match the flavor, but if the feel is off, the experience is off. For instance, we have excellent vegan sausages out here, flavor wise, but the vegan items will never be as moist or have wonderful flow of juices when breaking through that "skin." It's those moments that define the food. Without them, it's not as memorable.

      My issues aren't moral in the sense of animal rights, but environmental. Meat is a resource hog, so I consume less to, well, consume less. Unless there's a breakthrough, I would imagine that I'll continue to focus on making the ingredients stand on their own, as opposed to matching something they are not.

    3. Re:Is it the taste that matters? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      My issues aren't moral in the sense of animal rights, but environmental. Meat is a resource hog, so I consume less to, well, consume less. Unless there's a breakthrough, I would imagine that I'll continue to focus on making the ingredients stand on their own, as opposed to matching something they are not.

      My thoughts exactly. I'm more interested in energy and environment than the flora-fauna division, and I think free-range fish is better than anything that comes from heavy production farming. I also don't see much point in emulating things I want to avoid.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  18. Carbs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't find any info if this will be soybean based. If it's high in carbs, I can't eat it. If they make a veggie based meat that has nearly zero carbs, I'd be quite impressed and would consider adding it to my diet if the price isn't too high.

  19. Re: Holy Fuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yoga or any breathing exercise actually does make you a more effective coder.

  20. Re:Fake meat is for cows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are all tofu.

  21. Aye by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    The Food Conglomerate Lobbyists also rally against displaying how many teaspoons of sugar something has - as consumers would be able to make a somewhat educated decision then.

    Example: I went to purchase a Dog Treat the other day from Costco, "Healthy Choice" something Milk Bones, ingredients: 1| Chicken, 2| Sugar...

    What the fuck is sugar being added to dog treats for. And that is pretty much your choice for any packaged Human food too, if it doesn't have HFCS or the branded newly branded "Corn Sugar" (which I've also seen on other human products @ Costco), then it has added sugar to it -- as a filler and to make it more pleasing/addictive.

    1. Re:Aye by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is sugar being added to dog treats for.

      Roll up your shirt sleeve, and take a bite out of your arm. It will taste rather salty. Now, put some ketchup, which is mostly sugar, on your arm, and take another bite. It will taste better.

      That is why sugar is added to doggie treats . . . it's their ketchup.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  22. And? by dbialac · · Score: 1

    Do vegetarians seriously think that everybody is suddenly going to abandon eating meat when a fake meat alternative is created? In the West, we happen to live in a place where food is plentiful enough that vegetarians have the luxury of being vegetarians.

    1. Re:And? by neminem · · Score: 1

      If it's honestly exactly the same taste, texture and nutrition, then why not? Meat is expensive, and kinda sucks for the environment. I don't have moral objections to eating meat in terms of the fact that an animal bred for the purpose is getting butchered, as long as it's done humanely, but I certainly have objections to it on environmental grounds, there just aren't any good alternatives. If there were, though... why not?

    2. Re:And? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not suddenly, but if it tastes good enough, there are nutritional reasons (lower fats, for example) and most importantly the price is right, then I could easily see artificial meat sitting in the grocery store and being offered on menus.

      There will always be a huge market for real meat, of course, but if alternatives are available then alternatives will always be taken by somebody.
      =Smidge=

    3. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because of a little thing called supply and demand. As the bulk of the world improves the demand for meat grows while the ability to produce more fails to keep up, you can see this happening already and most predictions are that your average middle class family won't be able to afford to consume meat at every meal. Meat will become a luxury, especially red meat. Me personally I'm waiting for vat meat to have my next steak, until then I'm not a big fan of the fake meat so just stick to my veggies.

    4. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boy, you need to do some reading, meat is the luxury, vegetables are the more efficient food. It takes a hell of a lot more energy and inputs to produce meat than veg. To live on a vegan diet takes a fraction of the land and energy to live on an omnivore diet. That said, no ill intent towards omnivores, just stating well known facts you are not aware of.

  23. Ultimately, it doesn't matter if it tastes like me by Kevoco · · Score: 1

    What matters is if it is nutritious, tastes good, and can be produced with less water, waste, and environmental impact.

  24. I don't know if fake meat tastes like real meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having been vegetarian for over 30 years I've no idea what real meat tastes like and can't compare anything to it.

    1. Re:I don't know if fake meat tastes like real meat by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      I don't eat red meat, just don't like it, so I never seek out "fake meat". Seems silly, if you want meat, eat meat.

  25. plant based burger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bugger off.

    Find the tastiest cow in the world and clone it.

  26. Re:Fake meat is for cows. by rahenri · · Score: 1

    What is up with this cow posts on every news?

  27. But does it have truly complete protein? by kheldan · · Score: 2

    Does their fake meat have really complete protein (not missing or deficient in any essential amino acids) or is it just the typical vegetarian junk that's incomplete in one way or another? Taste is not important; nutrition is. If it's protein is not as complete as the meat they're trying to replace, then it's useless.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this going to be more than half of people's diet? Otherwise amino acid ratios aren't really relevant, even if you're an athlete.

    2. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point: they'd have people eating NO meat whatsoever. You, apparently, don't understand the ramifications of eating a strictly vegetarian diet: you WILL end up malnourished due to deficiency of at least one amino acid, since most plant-based proteins are deficient. Furthermore there are other substances in meat that are highly beneficial to human health, and you can't get them from plant-based sources.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    3. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Except there seem to be a few million people who don't eat meat and who are not malnourished.

      Meat is the shortcut but it isn't the only way. I've met some vegetarians who had a very poor diet but they were far too fussy to eat the lentils, beans etc that would give them protein and were instead living off a standard western diet with the meat removed - a very bad idea.
      I eat quite a lot of meat myself but have done a lot of vegetarian cooking due to doing a bit of hiking since before quality dehydrated meals were available. When you are walking for a couple of weeks you want to carry food that provides a bit of everything and doesn't go off in the heat. You also want something you can cook without thinking which means practice so cooking a lot of vege stuff while not hiking.

    4. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS is the question that really needs to be asked.

      I ain't going near anything that is missing essential nutrients just because of some self-hating morons and hippies.

      So much crap junk food has been stripped of essential nutrients so they can carefully "put them back in at controlled levels" (unhealthy levels, non-sustainable levels).
      Always go fresh food. Never ever buy crap processed food because it is always devoid of useful nutrients, artificially flavored, or stuck in so much sauce that they make an honest attempt to try hide the lack of taste. Curry ready-meals be damned.

      Make your own sausages or find a good local butcher.
      No local butcher and you have a passion for food? Become one in your spare time if you have any.
      Buy a few large freezers and get stuffing intestines and get'em sold my boy.
      Can't beat combining a passion or hobby with producing money as well. Even if it goes tits-up, you are still only doing it for the love of it anyway.

    5. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I've been keeping track daily of everything I eat (not just calories, but macros) for years, so I know exactly what I'm eating. Lentils and beans are nutritionally about the same. You end up eating far too much fiber and far too much carbohydrate, leading to becoming overweight, if you use beans for your protein source. It's more or less the same with other plant-based protein sources. You can tell me to use something like soy protein powder, but now you're using an expensive, highly processed product instead of eating actual food. I'll even admit it's possible to find the perfect combination of plant-based foods to get all the aminos without eating too many carbs and fiber, but by the time you've done that you're limiting your diet so much that you'd better be OK with eating a very narrow selection the rest of your life. No thanks, I'll just keep eating meat.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      They should also have cholesterol for people who require it in their diets.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Also, I've known quite a few vegetarians (and a fair number of vegans) over the years; without exception, they're all weak, have some sort of funny health problem(s), and to be quite blunt their cognitive processes seem to be slightly impaired. Not a single athlete among them. I also work with a fair number of Indians, and they're all vegetarian; they're also small, skinny, and weak-looking. Don't know any of them personally enough to inquire about their health. None of the above is a great advertisement for swearing off meat. Again: Thanks, but no gracias.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    8. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      There's high protein beans such as red kidney beans - I didn't mean green beans. As for "soy protein powder", people just eat more soy in the form of tofu etc instead.

      but by the time you've done that you're limiting your diet so much that you'd better be OK with eating a very narrow selection the rest of your life

      Yes, but many people do that and get enough nutrition. I'm not one since I cook up a few slices of pepperoni in with my red kidney beans, onion, chilli and garlic, but even without the pepperoni (~2% by volume) there is plenty of protein in such a dish.

    9. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you admit that your "science" is shit and that you have no idea what the possibilities are like when it comes down to involving amino acids from vegetable based sources and that you just want to eat meat?

      As a vegetarian, I don't give a fuck what you eat. I'm not interested in converting you. Why do you have to make up shit to make people believe that being a vegetarian isn't nutritiously responsible? Why are you so invested in your diet that you have to make up propaganda like that?

    10. Re:But does it have truly complete protein? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Not a single athlete among them

      Self selecting since they are doing it as a lifestyle choice so probably not so interested in doing anything athletic - I'd bet they are consuming what is mostly a traditional western diet with the meat removed, a few trendy bits added on, and excluding dairy products for no good reason. A diet based on food from places with a large number of vegetarians makes a lot more sense - Indian vegetarians I have met are as healthy and athletic as anyone I know. They eat butter (ghee) and cheese (eg. paneer) but are vegetarians because they do not eat meat - they are just not the "trendy" vegetarians restricting an existing diet and sprinkling the fairy dust of the moment on top. Many cheese based curries are nice even for people who don't like hot curries - I was going to give a specific example but just google "paneer" and you are bound to see a combination that looks good.

  28. Re:Holy Fuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like you're a dumb reactionary. There are too many idiots like you here since the smart people left.

  29. Re:Fake meat is for cows. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    In soviet russia, cow posts you, kid.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  30. Oh FFS. No, it's not people. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    True spoiler alert: it's algae. The whole "people" thing? Just Hollywood screwing up a good SF story. As usual. No more than that.

    Harry Harrison: Make Room, Make Room

    Read it. I guarantee it will be a better experience than that ridiculous movie ever was.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  31. Because by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    But meat in reasonable portions is naturally good for you.

    Oh, I agree. However, I also recognize that eating meat is a little hard on the animal that supplied it, at least the way we're doing it now, which is to say, we're killing them.

    While I would welcome a veggie burger that actually tasted like meat, I'm feeling dubious that it actually does. Until it does, I put my charitable donations towards development of tech that may be able to (eventually) provide meat raised without a host animal. The tech is nascent, but they're working on it pretty hard. If it comes to pass, I will very happily partake. Because it's not meat I have a problem with. It's killing animals.

    Not a bad idea to stop raising huge herds of animals, either. They're a pretty serious problem, environmentally speaking.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  32. How about a counter opinion? Or you know "Facts". by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    How to fight desertification and reverse climate change
    HINT: Bring back the cows to desert areas.

  33. Re:How about a counter opinion? Or you know "Facts by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    FYI: The problem in North America is that the grazing animals (Cows, etc) do not MOVE and Roam. Not merely that they exist are bred.

  34. I just don't get the point of mimicing meat by bughunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why even try to mimic meat? It struck me the first time I walked into a grocery in an Adventist community - there were multiple aisles of highly processed vegetable/fungus/grain matter trying to resemble meat.

    I mean, especially if you're living a totally meatless lifestyle, why even kowtow to the omnivore food culture?

    For example, look at Middle Eastern cuisine. Sure, they have kabobs, etc, but things like Falafel, Faul, Hummus, Baba Ghanouj, Tabouleh and Dolmas are all fantastic, and none of them are trying to mimic a hunk of beef or chicken.

    Same with Asian food. There are fantastic meatless dishes that don't try to resemble an animal part.

    Why do we do it in the West? Marketing?

    --
    I can see the fnords!
    1. Re:I just don't get the point of mimicing meat by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      This. A lot of people are vegetarians for ethical reasons (e.g. sustainability and energy conservation, not just tree hugging and cute animals). They don't need constant reminders of the negative associations they have with meat. They also don't believe that meat is the one true food that other foods should emulate.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:I just don't get the point of mimicing meat by havana9 · · Score: 1

      Yes, alo the mediterranean diet has a lot of vegetables. Could we talk about pizza? Stop to eat Pepperoni pizza and start to eat "pizza con i peperoni". Easy. Or if you prefer some more northern food, let's talk about "pizzoccheri della valtellina" or "polenta concia" or "riso e fagioli".

  35. One step closer to the 1 calorie Burger and Fries! by argee · · Score: 1

    For those of us that are waistline challenged!

  36. Soylent Burger by bellboa45 · · Score: 1

    If science fiction has taught me anything, after the scientists cannot get the burger to taste right and meet the shareholder's expectations, the secret ingredient will turn out to be people.

    1. Re:Soylent Burger by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      If science fiction has taught me anything, after the scientists cannot get the burger to taste right and meet the shareholder's expectations, the secret ingredient will turn out to be people.

      I read a novel a very long time ago, where the secret ingredient was some kind of giant spider that was grown and harvested in secret so the population wouldn't know of this "fruit that tasted just like meat". Come to think of it, I never did get the point of the novel. It seemed to be both pro-vegetarianism and anti-vegetarianism at the same time.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Soylent Burger by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > wouldn't know of this

      Should have been "wouldn't know the origin of this".

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Soylent Burger by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Substitute "vat grown fungus" for the spider and you got the reality of Quorn, which isn't bad so long as you treat it like mushrooms and not real meat.

  37. "tastes real"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow meat eaters feel that veggie food does not taste good. The truth is that for human being, meat is an acquired taste. I am mostly vegetarians but have eaten meat and it tasted pathetic. I hate going to gathering where they have pseudo vegetarian food, "veggie burger", "veggie hotdog". If you truly want to see variety of veggie food, you should go to India. Vegetarians don't even enter in a restaurant where they serve non-veg food and they are totally happy with their food.

    1. Re:"tastes real"???? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      As a vegetarian, I'm totally happy with Indian food. It doesn't try to be anything other than what it is, and can be really tasty.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  38. Instinct is over-rated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But eating meat is an instinct inherited through evolution.

    One of the things we also inherited through evolution was the ability to analyze our own instincts and ignore them as necessary in order to improve our outcomes. (Hell, even my dog can do that.)

    That is one reason why many of us are able to live longer, healthier and overall more pleasant lives than our ancestors.

  39. Re:How about a counter opinion? Or you know "Facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a vegetarian and aspiring vegan, I champion this all the time.

  40. Vegetarians taste like cows, not chicken by billstewart · · Score: 1

    (ObMOOOO.) Cows are usually vegetarian (not vegan, of course, but it's not exploitative for calves to drink cow's milk.)

    Chickens aren't - their natural diet includes insects, but if your corpse were lying around and had time to rot a bit, they'd totally eat you too. Pigs and goats would probably wait until you're dead, but not much longer. Almost all fish eat other fish; it's only the really bottom end of their food chain that eat plants. Sheep don't have the same reputation that goats do about eating anything they can get, but I suspect their tastes are similar.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  41. They eat vegetables in Hamburg by billstewart · · Score: 1

    My experience as a vegetarian wandering around the Germanies on vacation is that if you leave out the beef and pork, and convince them you don't eat fish or chicken either, the cuisine is, if not light-weight exactly, at least light enough to lose weight while still not being hungry all the time. Sometimes you have to resort to beer being the protein course of your meal, but that's ok.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  42. What Foods are Toxic to Dogs? by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1
    What Foods are Toxic to Dogs?

    Sugar – This applies to any food containing sugar. Make sure you check the ingredient label for human foods – corn syrup (which is a less expensive form of sugar or glucose) is found in just about everything these days. Too much sugar for your pup can lead to dental issues, obesity, and even diabetes.

    1. Re:What Foods are Toxic to Dogs? by schnell · · Score: 1

      Too much sugar for your pup can lead to dental issues, obesity, and even diabetes.

      So? Too much sugar for your ANY ANIMAL INCLUDING HUMANS can lead to dental issues, obesity and even diabetes.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
  43. Probably hundreds of thousands of years by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Some archaeological work I read in the news recently has found evidence of cooking that's about 800,000 years old, and there's some suspicion that we may have been cooking for more like 2 million years (not sure if that's meat or vegetables, but cooking root vegetables makes a huge increase in the accessibility of nutrition which was important for our evolution.)

    We've also got about 10-20,000 years of agriculture, which allowed humans to go from small bands of hunter-gatherers to large civilizations, and most of that's grain agriculture, not just herding.

    But just because meat's tasty and we've got senses designed to tell us that it's tasty (or when it's spoiled), that doesn't mean we have to kill animals for food. Doesn't mean I wouldn't like a veggie burger that tasted like Real Dead Animals on occasion.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  44. Re:Fake meat is for cows. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Hu-fu

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  45. Hey Mutant, most adult humans can't digest milk. by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, I called you a mutant. I'm one also, from the Northern/Western European version of the mutations that let adult humans digest lactose. (There are other groups of humans that also have that - the Masai in Kenya, for instance - and most of them evolved independently about 5000 years ago.) Most normal humans are lactose-intolerant as adults, so they get indigestion if they drink raw cow milk, though most of them can handle cheeses and some other sufficiently fermented milk products.

    Theoretically I can drink milk; in practice I almost never do, unless it's got coffee or cocoa in it, or it's on cereal or something.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  46. Re: Hey Mutant, most adult humans can't digest mil by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello my Lactose Master Race brothers! Is this where the meeting is at?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  47. If it looks and tastes exactly like real meat... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...how will you know it's fake?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  48. Re:I found a retard by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    What chemical shitstorm? The article says plant extracts. Not chemically created plant-like extract imitations. It's stuff from plants.

    Did you read something else?

    Or better, did you read?

  49. Re:I found a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Plant extracts, like:

    I might be getting whooshed here, but a plant based diet is by no means safe. Not to mention the difficulty in getting a decent amino acid profile.

  50. Ex-vegetarian anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up vegetarian (including eggs and dairy) - my parents and grandparents were big into it. Obviously the ethicism spin played a big part, but of course also the health part. It also included a fair amount of indoctrination: meat was eschewed like something unclean and gruesome, and "meat-eaters" were looked down upon.

    (I still agree with the sentiment that one should try and eat in a way that optimizes your own health.) We were regularly fed fake meat ("plastic meat" we brothers called it). Made mainly from hydrolyzed soy protein. Which didn't gel with the "health" part for me, because... chemicals. (As a male treasuring my testosterone I also now avoid soy due to the phyto-oestrogen content.)

    Non-vegetarian friends occasionally commented that the stuff was a fairly good approximation of the meat products they were used to. I suppose mainly because it came in the form of processed meat imitations, e.g. salami, sausage, crumbed nuggets, etc. which are already removed a few steps from the raw material. I could never understand why one would want to eat the fake thing if you abhor the real thing. It is not as if I didn't like vegetables - and would have been content, taste wise, to continue on a diet without the fake meat.

    Anyhow, after a couple of decades of this, I developed some deficiencies that supplements didn't seem to fix (seems those refined minerals often lack "co-factors" - which are found in "natural" food - that help absorption and utilization). An endocrinologist suggested starting eating meat. Initially the fake meat experience did help me make the transition - a sort of gateway drug leading to the path of meat eating, hehe.

    And no, didn't seem like my body couldn't handle the new introduction - no noticeable digestive differences. Health did improve as expected, and I finally got rid of that proverbial "vegetarian sweet tooth", as well as excess weight (and some attendant risks).

    No, I don't consume massive amounts of red meat - a quantity about the size of my hand without fingers, per week, seems about right. The ethics part is problematic, but I think modern "well-meaning" man has taken things completely out of proportion. I regularly kill living things, intentionally and unintentionally: insects, bacteria, plants (some of which is consumed, intentionally or unintentionally). My body in turn will most probably be killed or at least be consumed after death by some other living being(s) - the whole circle of life thing. So I don't buy into that either, despite that part having become quite fashionable and even politically correct in recent years. Everybody has some measure of "similar to me" (don't eat) and "unlike me" (can be eaten), but there isn't always much scientific objectivity to it, so the line is drawn in different places for different people.

  51. Sod that - work on fake fried taste by dbIII · · Score: 1

    So you've got something like tofu - soy paste, doesn't taste like much. However fry it and you've got something that tastes fried and crunchy enough that you don't care that it's not meat but is probably worse for you than lean grilled meat.
    I was at an event where there were enough vegetarians to make catering for them a problem so we just went full vegetarian - even the most dedicated carnivores in the bunch were happily munching through the onion pakoras until they were full with no complaints about the lack of meat. However living off deep fried stuff is only a short term thing - one way or another.
    So IMHO if you've got no meat it's just worth going for something that tastes OK as it is instead of going for pretend meat that disappoints (I used to go hiking with soya chunks etc because meat wouldn't keep in hot conditions, but all efforts to make it appear to be like meat failed so I gave up on the imitation meat chunks and went the vege curry route).

  52. They probably will - see Quorn for an example by dbIII · · Score: 1

    People eat Quorn which is just about as artificial as you can get, yet it's in the vegetarian section because it's a factory grown fungus. Sometimes when prices get reduced I eat it too.

  53. Re:How about a counter opinion? Or you know "Facts by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    Cows certainly do roam over my land.

  54. no it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a vegetarian for over 20 years and many of my family still are. I've tried almost every fake-meat product of the last 30 years. Many of them are tasty; some of them are horrid. None of them taste like meat. The irony is most people who eat them are vegetarian and have no idea what meat tastes like so they try to convince you that it tastes "just like the real thing". Nope. I eat both. It doesn't.

  55. Forget artificial meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't eat anything. You'll die healthy, and soon.

  56. Obligatory 'Better Off Ted' comment by MooseDontBounce · · Score: 1

    Lem: Maybe the meat blob's not taking in enough nutrients. I guess I could try and give it a mouth. Ted: I'm gonna say no to the meat blob getting a mouth. Mostly because I don't want to hear what it has to say

  57. Re:How about a counter opinion? Or you know "Facts by Reziac · · Score: 1

    That's a load of bull. Even cattle that end their lives in feedlots spent most of it on the range, and every herd roams over thousands of acres -- just like bison did before them. (Actually, there were about 20% more bison in North America than there are now cattle.) In the same ecological niche. Grasses evolved to be grazed. When grassland is not grazed, it deteriorates to weeds and eventually to unproductive hardpan desert (which is rather different from a healthy --and grazed-- desert).

    If this weren't so, explain why ranchers would pay property taxes on millions of acres of uncroppable western America, and grazing fees on land that's not even worth the property tax to own it, since in a great deal of the American west it takes 10 or even 100 acres to support one cow/calf pair, and that ground can't raise a plant-based crop at all. (Crops are much more profitable than livestock, thus if rural land =can= be cropped -- it generally already *is*.)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  58. Re:How about a counter opinion? Or you know "Facts by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Savory is right; I've seen it in action with sheep in the desert. Where it was grazed by big commercial flocks several times a year, it was all native grass and flowers. When the sheep stopped coming, within three years it went to tumbleweeds and hardpan (despite being years with higher rainfall than average).

    This might interest you as well:

    The Desert Tortoise in Relation to Cattle Grazing
    (U. of Arizona research publication)

    https://journals.uair.arizona....

    TL;DR: the more cattle graze the desert, the more tortoises there are -- because they don't eat plants; they eat dung.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  59. Re: Yoga or any breathing exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yoga or any breathing exercise actually does make you a more effective coder."

    I imagine sex would too, but I guess this being Slashdot, yoga class may be as close as they will get.

  60. Re: Hey Mutant, most adult humans can't digest mil by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Meeting's down at the ice cream place.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  61. Soylent Green by Evan+Langlois · · Score: 1

    And once this "fake meat" is marketed and made cheap enough, sales of meat drop and environmental pressure and lack of sales (plus pressure from corporations that want an alternative product that takes less work and less money to produce with a shorter return on investment) drive its price higher and higher until only the rich get real meat, and the rest of us get the fake stuff, which doesn't REALLY taste like real meat, but the next generation will never know the difference anyway. Too bad the protein content isn't as high, but we can just eat more of it, get fatter, and shit more, and probably suffer mild forms of brain damage. Meanwhile, we'll thank corporations for making food more affordable for the masses, because .. look how expensive meat got! And one day, somebody finds that the latest fake meat is made from something else ... someone solved the problem of not having enough graveyard space ... Soylent Green ... it even has a nice "bio friendly" name.