Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Launches Initiative To Attract More Minorities and Women To Coding (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Facebook has launched TechPrep, a new initiative to attract more minorities and women into coding. The project draws a very strong analogy between the learning of computer coding skills and the learning of spoken languages, a field which is important to people whose first language is not English, and which engages with the popular understanding that women are better at learning languages. TechPrep is seeking to engage with parents and guardians to get its target audience into coding earlier in life.

157 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about hiring more people over 40 as well.

    1. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't speak for Facebook, but my team is currently comprised of

      8 Caucasian men
      1 Caucasian woman
      5 Indian men
      4 Indian women
      2 Asian men

      (Note that my metro area is ~78% white). I can only hire from the applications I receive, so I can't bring in Latino or African American devs/BAs/PMs/etc... I've been thinking about doing an outreach program to see about visiting some of our local high schools' CS programs and see what I can learn about our next generation of coders.

      The youngest people on my team are late 20s. A couple of months ago one of the women on my team retired. I have multiple team members that are looking at full retirement in the next 5 years (one of whom I hired last year). Probably half of my team is in the 40+ category and a good portion of that has been hired on in the last 3 years.

      There are dev managers in the world that don't give a crap about your age or skin color as long as you can code, document, lead, teach, test, implement, or what ever else we need done.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:How about... by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are dev managers in the world that don't give a crap about your age or skin color as long as you can code, document, lead, teach, test, implement, or what ever else we need done.

      Maybe we should stop putting people into categories and treating them differently (+ or -) based on the amount of pigment in their skin?

      Maybe we should judge people not based on the color of their skin but on the content of their character?

    3. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I think we need to create category labels for different age groups!

      Under 21: tenderfoot
      21-30: ute
      30-45: daddies and mommies
      45-60: overhills
      60-65: gram(p)s
      70+: gravebait

    4. Re:How about... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Sorry that won't work. That would mean paying people actual market rates for skilled jobs. We just can't have that. Particularly when there is an endless supply of 3rd world talent willing to work for a fraction of what you and I would work for. So let's just open the H1-B floodgates and let them all in. It's the Walmart-ization of high tech. Careful what we wish for.

    5. Re:How about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I can only hire from the applications I receive, so I can't bring in Latino or African American devs/BAs/PMs/etc

      Then you need to do more recruiting. If the corporation is more interested in meeting diversity targets, then you don't need to worry about qualifications; just go find someone and hire them for the job. I'm sure the cafeteria janitor can become a PM or developer.

    6. Re:How about... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Asians don't count towards your diversity quota. They are an over represented group, and their sum should just be added to the caucasian group.

    7. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You better hope he's just a white geezer. If that's a black lesbian, you're in SO deep shit...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Listen, if I get an application that fits the profile and the person provides what I'm looking for, I'm hiring him or her.

      I am not going to compromise the financial situation of my company for the sake of pandering to some PC fad.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:How about... by x0ra · · Score: 2

      "I am a non-semicolon terminated line, I DEMAND to be considered as any other semicolon terminated line is."

    10. Re:How about... by maharvey · · Score: 1

      Is your metro area population also 50% H1B foreigners?

    11. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Fuck racism along with political correctness. I'd rather be a terrible person than march along to that PC bullshit.

      Play the race card on me only if you really want to forfeit the game early.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:How about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Why are you worried about the financial situation of your company? The company doesn't belong to you.

      What's important is what your bosses want. Do they want diversity, or do they share your attitude? If they're pushing diversity uber alles, then you should propose promoting one of the janitors to high-skill jobs so they can fill those quotas. See what the CxOs say about that.

    13. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Why would a black lesbian want to hunt someone down for calling them a cis-het white male shitlord? Assuming they would, what about them being black or lesbian suggests they would be able to do as you would like us to fear?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Maybe we should stop putting people into categories and treating them differently (+ or -) based on the amount of pigment in their skin?"

      Typically, sure, but when we are picking someone to cross the desert for us, I think I'll stick with racism :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Shit, up until now I didn't even know you was a nigga

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re:How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Why are you worried about the financial situation of your company? The company doesn't belong to you."

      You didn't seriously just post that on Slashdot for everyone to read did you?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re: How about... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I thought Friday was social justice warriors day where we need to make sure vaginas are equal to or greater than penises."

      I can't speak for you specifically, but most of us here on Slashdot concluded that vaginas are greater than penises many, many years ago.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    18. Re:How about... by flajann4415 · · Score: 2

      I'm over 50, and my phone rings off the hook with recruiters falling over themselves to plug me into a new job. These days, it only takes a week or less to find new work in the software arena. If there is age discrimination anywhere, I am scratching my head why I am not seeing it.

    19. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .... social responsibility .... local racial distribution .... racial or social profiling .... identified subgroups .... disadvantaged ....

      And I stopped after only the first few sentences as my brain hurt from all the idiotic buzzword spouting drivel. You come off as the type of guy/girl/... who gives talks at all the TEDx type stuff about what an amazing person you are etc... And you and DEFINITELY come off as a hipster with no idea about anything coding related yet your in a tech company.

      Take a good long hard look in the mirror and say out loud "I'm a cliche, I'm what's wrong with the tech industry right now."

    20. Re:How about... by evilsofa · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should stop putting people into categories and treating them differently (+ or -) based on the amount of pigment in their skin?

      Maybe we should judge people not based on the color of their skin but on the content of their character?

      Facebook did that, and in 2013, out of a total of 1,231 people hired, 7 were African-American.

    21. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Is this kinda the reverse race card?

      It's a new move, I gotta give you that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:How about... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      "Why are you worried about the financial situation of your company? The company doesn't belong to you."

      You didn't seriously just post that on Slashdot for everyone to read did you?

      Not everyone works for a startup. If you work for a bank or large established corporation, it would be pointless to worry too much about its finances (unless you're the finance director or something).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Nope. My contractor group is about 35% H1B visa workers.

      I work for the State, so we do not sponsor anyone for Visas, they have to work out sponsorship on their own. They must be legally able to work in the US, and that is vetted thoroughly. But by state statute, I am not allowed to ask or judge by their type of residence status, only that they are legal. I typically only find out that someone is on an H1B visa when elections come around and they volunteer the information, or they request a 2+ week absence to return to their home country to renew their visa.

      For FTEs, since the state will not sponsor, all of them are legal residence, some of them are 1st or 2nd gen Americans, but they are all full citizens.

      From the contractor side, it's rough. The problem we face is that IT unemployment in the metro area hovers around 1-2%, which means getting new local talent in is limited to poaching skilled employees, picking up layoffs/terminations, or getting college grads at the end of the school year. And as this is a State gig, we don't really have the money or benefits to poach :(

      So yeah, when we post contractor positions, I'll get 70-100 resumes, and 90%+ of them are likely H1B visa workers.

      So like I said, I can only work with what I get.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    24. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Then you need to do more recruiting. If the corporation is more interested in meeting diversity targets, then you don't need to worry about qualifications; just go find someone and hire them for the job. I'm sure the cafeteria janitor can become a PM or developer.

      I'd recommend actually working in a hiring management position prior to spouting off such nonsense.

      The Corporation in this case, is the State, so we get held under a pretty hard magnifying glass when it comes to hiring practices.

      The State has diversity statutes that deal with HOW we hire people, not WHO we hire. For example, FTEs must be interviewed by a panel that includes 3 people: 2 from management, 1 from the same/similar classification. Of those 3, at least 1 must be a woman and 1 must be a minority.

      The point of that requirement is to minimize the impact of a racist line manager (which absolutely still exist).

      The statutes don't say that I MUST hire a diverse team. I as a manger though, with experience in working in a homogenous white-bread young-middle aged dev shop where out of 80 developers we had 1 girl, 1 Indian, and nothing but white guys, feel that having a more diverse team creates a much better work environment.

      Having a multi-cultural team of people who respect each other and each other's cultures has created great bonds within the team. Sure, it's a bit more challenging to get through the storming, but at the end of the day, I have a better team to show for it.

      I would never hire someone for a position I did not feel they were more than capable of handling. I look for candidates that show not only the immediate skills I need, but the knowledge, ability, and desire to grow into what I'll need next year. And those people are all around, of all races, and of any gender.

      So IF that cafeteria janitor has spent their nights completing their college degree, and has the cafeteria staff running like a well oiled machine with schedules, inventory management, new employee training, etc... then yeah, they might be the very person I'm looking for. But if they aren't looking to move into a PM role, and they aren't looking to expand their skillsets, then no, they would not likely be eligible for the position regardless of their race or gender.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    25. Re:How about... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      In the local metro, Asia represents just over 7% of the population. At my full staff level, the two Asian employees I have represent less than 10% of my team. So I wouldn't consider their position as significantly over represented.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    26. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because racism. Because you assume that she's a cis-het white male and that's racist.

      Don't ask me, I don't make the rules. I only mock them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:How about... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      You have 9 Asian employees, which represent over 50% of your team.

    28. Re:How about... by Bartles · · Score: 1

      ...err exactly 50% even.

    29. Re:How about... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      I have a wife and kids, and am over 40. I also just read an article about how rents in Mouintain View make some folks rather live in their car and use Google corporate perks as part of their "home" (food, showers, laundry services, etc.)

      The "have a family" and "living in a car" are mutually exclusive. This skews Googlers to non-family people, and also younger people. Whether that's an accident or by design, i'm not sure. But Google gets a bunch of people just out of school, fewer competing responsibilities, ability to get less sleep at night, etc...

    30. Re:How about... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree that a more diverse team (esp. with women) is a better work environment. However, you can't get blood from a stone. So my point with the prior post was basically pointing out that if diversity is sooo important (that you're going to try to get blood from a stone anyway), then you might as well forget about the qualifications part.

      It's worse for you too, if you're working for a government (state or national, probably worse for federal jobs though). Not only do you not have a lot of "diverse" candidates to choose from out of the entire labor pool, you probably have even fewer good ones who actually want to work for you and are willing to apply. You don't pay very well, and they'll have to put up with all kinds of ridiculous bullshit on the job because the organization is completely broken. So the good candidates are going to work in private industry instead.

      I used to work at an extremely large semiconductor company, and the diversity there was much, much, much better than what you describe. I will say around half of the women, if not more, were Indian (or close, like Bangladeshi). And most of the women I worked with seemed very competent too, in fact most everyone I worked with did. But that was a company that had a very good reputation, had a pretty grueling interview process (to weed out any lackluster candidates), and had excellent benefits and which looked really good on a resume. You probably can't offer most of that, so you're not going to get the greatest applicants, or you're going to get applicants who like some other aspect that you do have to offer (perhaps your location is some out-of-the-way place where locals would like to stay, but you're never going to be able to recruit many Indian women to move to).

    31. Re:How about... by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1

      Its only fair that the NBA and NFL need to step up their game as well. They've always preferred 'minority' employees. It's time they stopped their racist hiring practices.

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
  2. It's a daily SJW treat now! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hooray smash the patriarchy!

    1. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm still waiting on all the "Why aren't there more straight men in the fashion industry?" articles that I just know must be coming any day now. ....still waiting......

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is actually sad. We all went on trough liberation from the patriarchal society only to end up in some hysteric surveillance joint where anything you say can be taken out of context and used against you or alternatively anything can be fabricated if perpetrators of currently fashionable crimes are missing. I never thought this would be possible but I miss the commies I had to endure back then in my years of youth. There were idiots and bastards but the same can be easily said about current elites in almost any Western society. At least there were less crime. I would miss the pr0n tho.

    3. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only thing keeping straight males out of the fashion industry is feedback from straight males.

      Nope, these articles have taught me that the only possible explanation for the underrepresentation of a gender or race in a given field is that the field is either hostile or discriminatory (or both). It can't possibly be by personal choice or because of social pressure from within the gender or race itself.

      If someone isn't present, it's because they're being excluded or discriminated against by the powers in the field.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by MacTO · · Score: 1

      Some school boards do try to attract male teachers for the younger grades. Some recreation programs do try to target attract male leaders for programs that serve children. Many parents and children appreciate male role models for their children, particularly if they have boys. Many children appreciate male teachers and recreation program leaders as well.

      The stereotypes certainly exist, but they are not universal. Men do have to be somewhat more careful because of those stereotypes, so it is better to work in group settings where you won't be alone with one or two children (e.g. you probably won't see much encouragement on the babysitting front, but child care settings are fine). On the whole though, the biggest thing preventing men from entering these fields are men themselves. Some of it is based upon overblown fears. Like I said, you won't face allegations if you don't work with children alone. Some of it is purely practical. Few men want to work in these fields because they don't pay very much. And that's before you face societal pressures as to what men should and shouldn't be.

    5. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Trade is an aggressive, testosterone driven, field, often implying to be away from home for large period at a time. Not very feminine.

    6. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, most school districts try avoid male teachers, because they are afraid of sexual harassment lawsuits. Explaining that it is actually the men's fault, because they just shouldn't "work with children alone" if they want to avoid rape and sexual harassment allegations, is absurd sexism.

      And no, school teachers are not paid that little. In many places, like San Francisco or Chicago, they get paid well over $100,000/year - often twice or three times the combined family income of the students they teach.

    7. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " there is a strong stigma that can be simplified as "X can't/shouldn't do Y""

      You just hit the nail on the herad there pal. The question isn't why aren't there more women in high tech, but rather why are there so many men? Just because you can (sort of) doesn't mean you should. Seriously. If you got into computers because it is "where the money is", please leave the industry ASAP. You are ruining it for the competent among us. Thanks.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Adults in nursery schools (kindergartens) in the UK are not supposed to work with children alone, whether they're male or female. There have been some notorious female paedophile cases here too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:It's a daily SJW treat now! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed the STRAIGHT part of "straight men."

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  3. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just get people who are actually interested in coding to participate? Why do they have to be women or minorities? That seems rather bigoted.

    1. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because STEM is paying well, and the induced physical risk and requirement is null. You will never see a progressive campaigning to have more women working in mines.

    2. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 2

      Are you assuming there are no women and minorities who are interested? Or who might be interested if it were presented in the correct manner (which does not imply easier).

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Actually I have. I have seen women recruited for industrial electrical work, driving big as trucks in open pit mines, and running equipment underground. Or launched into space using liquid oxygen and or HME.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      It's also funny you won't find progressives campaigning to have more women and minorities working in the law field. And why not? It's a typically high paying job, with low physical requirement and risk as well. Law degrees carry just as much variety within within the field in terms of what you can actually do with them as a CS degree does.But someone with a U.S. law degree can go anywhere they want in the U.S. and get certified by the state's Bar Association and work in private practice, for local government, et. al. You get a CS degree, you end up going to a handful of cities, to work for a handful of different companies (like Facebook) and you're locked out of switching with non-compete agreements and other rights you sign away with your contract.

      Seems to me all this Code.org, Fwd.us BS is just another way people with a lot of power and money try to exploit those extremely lacking in both. Not even the fact that they're doing it under the guise of helping those whom they're exploiting is new. I guess...maybe I'm starting to see why some /. members get all rankled whenever M$FT, FB, Kid's Soup, iFruit [...] push for more K-12 computer science learning: they're not doing it for good reasons.

    5. Re:Why? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Because the people who tend to buy into this crap believe that anything other than an even gender/sex ratio must be due to discrimination and couldn't possibly be explained by other causes such as differences in the male and female brains over hundreds of thousands of years of evolution that shape our culture just as much as societal norms and influence vocational interests.

      As such, they either don't regard the treatment as sexist or racist, or if they do see it that way feel that it is justified in order to treat the imagined issue of discrimination in hiring practices, etc. that must be to blame for the imbalance.

    6. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Driving a truck doesn't account as "being a miner".

    7. Re:Why? by c · · Score: 1

      You will never see a progressive campaigning to have more women working in mines.

      It does happen. A friend of mine spent about 20 years as a welder because of one of those "get women into the trades" programs.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    8. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. In an open pit mine.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    9. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 2

      My point has not been demonstrated to be false, because we don't have the same definition of "miners". Point that highlighted by the comparison between fighter pilot and drone pilots.

    10. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh yes, I forgot. Your definition of "miners" is not the common one of "people who work in mines".

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    11. Re:Why? by x0ra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So an administrative secretary working in a mine would fit as "miner" ?

    12. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      While we all take you at your word that you have lots of experience with minors, or as you call them "miner"s, that's no account of ours here on Slashdot.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      STEM. The E is for "Engineering". That still leaves three.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      A wrote a story about a monkey once, but it was a horrible unmaintainable mess (the story I mean; the monkey was actually rather gifted)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re:Why? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Guy with a login here. We know if you are an AC already. There is no need to announce it. Thanks.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re:Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Where did the OP say anything about administrative secretary?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    17. Re:Why? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Because the majority of lawyers, prosecutors, judges and legal advisors are women as it is

      Not where I live.

      Law is certainly one of the fields which women can do well in but you'll find that the vast majority of the partners in big law firms (for instance) are still men.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Why? by Greystripe · · Score: 1

      A truck driver is not a miner, they are a truck driver regardless of where they drive that truck. A miner is someone who uses tools to mine ore. This really isn't that difficult.

    19. Re:Why? by plopez · · Score: 1

      A truck is a tool. As is a drag line and explosives. I have also seen front end loaders, side dumps, and D8 Cats in underground mines. Are people using that equipment not miners?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  4. Coding is irrelevant by x0ra · · Score: 2

    The way concepts are expressed is irrelevant, what matter is how structured they are to one another. To make a culinary parallel, everybody can use a pan and a pot, but not everybody can marry food in delicate and tasty way.

    This, or Facebook is looking for code monkey.

  5. I know a lot about this comment by thedonger · · Score: 3, Insightful
    FTA:

    Another notable finding was that men were five times more likely than women to say that they knew a lot about computer programming.

    Holy shit, really? Men are more likely to claim they know a lot about anything.

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    1. Re:I know a lot about this comment by plopez · · Score: 2

      That's not the only thing they lie about. ;)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:I know a lot about this comment by avandesande · · Score: 1

      LOL and how much do men outnumber women in programming.... maybe 5 to 1?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:I know a lot about this comment by turning+in+circles · · Score: 1

      Confidence is rarely related to competence, and may be a factor why there are so few women leaders. Similarly, I suggest sometimes coding requires more confidence than competence, making men more suited to this discipline. (Ugly code out there, eventually made to work by brute force).

      --
      Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
    4. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Sure but that was the results of one of the research papers. Women feel they must know 100% about something before attempting it where Men feel like they must know about 60% about something before attempting it and will learn the rest on the job.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      confidence and bullshitting will get you a job. and a raise.

    6. Re:I know a lot about this comment by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      FTA:

      Another notable finding was that men were five times more likely than women to say that they knew a lot about computer programming.

      Holy shit, really? Men are more likely to claim they know a lot about anything.

      Yeah, ask men about their dick size and then ask their wives the same question.

  6. Define minority by srees · · Score: 2

    Define minority please. Heck, for that matter these days, define women! This is baloney. I don't give a rat's ass about a programmer's sex, color, background, etc. I care that they like what they do and that they do a good job of it, without being offensive to the team. Frankly, I care more if they smoke or wear too much cologne and come in stinking up the office several times a day.

    1. Re:Define minority by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's any racial group that's in the minority in a given population--except Asians of course, because they just learn, work hard, and refuse to play victims.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Define minority by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      Here are the 2015 Scripps National Spelling Bee finalists:

      https://lintvkoin.files.wordpr... ...or, as like to call them, "7 reasons why the myth of Asian high achievement isn't a myth, and also 3 white kids."

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:Define minority by Raseri · · Score: 1

      You mean Southeast Asians (China, Japan, etc.). South Asians (India, Bangladesh, etc) are a completely different story.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    4. Re:Define minority by chipschap · · Score: 2

      I read through the linked article and it's enough to make me sick. In the end it's just another feminist who hates evil white males, 100% of whom are oppressors and 100% of whom deserve to die. The ostensible thesis, though, is that by praising successful Asians we promote prejudice against blacks. Seriously ... white people can't get anything right, apparently ... even when they praise people who have overcome hardship and done well, there has to be a reprehensible motive for it.

      Many people have worked their way up. With great courage and perseverance they earned their success. They deserve praise. And we ought to, now, withhold that praise because some others didn't succeed in the same way?

    5. Re:Define minority by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Define minority please. Heck, for that matter these days, define women! This is baloney. I don't give a rat's ass about a programmer's sex, color, background, etc. I care that they like what they do and that they do a good job of it, without being offensive to the team. Frankly, I care more if they smoke or wear too much cologne and come in stinking up the office several times a day.

      Only knobends unironically uses the word "team" to describe their co-workers.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Define minority by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Being good at rote learning is not a sign of high achievement, just of a different educational emphasis.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Define minority by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Really? What's wrong with South Asians?

      They have brown skin. This really annoys racists.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:Define minority by dywolf · · Score: 1

      nope.
      not a troll post.
      just an article about how the model minority stereotype is as harmful (and bigoted) as the lazy minority stereotype.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    9. Re:Define minority by dywolf · · Score: 1

      if that's what you got, then its a reflection of your own biases and a lack of reading comprehension.

      no, you shouldn't withhold praise, but neither should you engage in stereotyping consisting of "this is how to be a good minority". both the model minority and lazy minority stereotypes are harmful bigoted myths that no one should engage in.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    10. Re:Define minority by Raseri · · Score: 1

      If you've never had to clean up after a few hundred shit-tier "programmers" from India, you should count yourself lucky. Strangely, good programmers seem to come from every other part of the world: the US, Mexico, the UK, Norway, Spain, Japan, China, you name it. Hell, I even worked with a guy from Nigeria for about a year (turns out that Nigerians who have moved to the US *really* hate 419 scammers, to the surprise of absolutely no one). Who knows why Indians can't program? Beats me. Maybe look into their school system.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
  7. Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Fragnet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It doesn't matter what shape their genitals are.

    1. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because SJW.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      The people have to exist if you're going to hire them.

      TFA isn't about hiring unqualified people just because they're from underrepresented groups. It's about encouraging people from underrepresented groups to seek and acquire the qualifications in the first place.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like your company was being incredibly obtuse when they announced they were hiring a female Java developer. They should have just said they were hiring a Java developer, and left it at that.

      Whether a person is qualified or not becomes obvious enough after they start contributing. And everyone has to deal with self-doubt from time to time. All I can say is ... persevere.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Orgasmatron · · Score: 3, Informative

      That sounds cruel.

      The underrepresented group is the "low IQ" group, and unless I missed some big developments, IQ isn't something that can be acquired by seeking.

      The root problem is that membership in the fundamental group is not distributed evenly across superficial demographic groups. But reality (genetics) can't be moved by wishing, shrieking or blaming.

      The implications of IQ distribution by demographic groups has been discussed in gruesome detail elsewhere. Pay particular attention to the parts about thresholds and tails.

      Of course, everyone already knows this, and are increasingly recognizing that these stories are about power, not programming.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    5. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like your company was being incredibly obtuse when they announced they were hiring a female Java developer.

      FTFY

    6. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      IQ tests measure how good you are at doing IQ tests. They don't necessarily correlate to an individual's abilities in all areas.

      In any case, my post was not about average IQ of a particular group. It was about opening the door to groups that might perceive that they are closed. People still need to make the grade. We just need to make sure they aren't discouraged to try.

      Not long ago, women represented about 10% of physics majors. In recent years, that number has increased significantly, and not because women got smarter. It's because they were encouraged to consider physics as a career.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    7. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      IQ tests measure how good you are at doing IQ tests. They don't necessarily correlate to an individual's abilities in all areas.

      They (IQ scores) correlate very strongly with success. They've always correlated very strongly with success.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    8. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by Fragnet · · Score: 1

      Precisely. It's just virtue signalling.

    9. Re:Why not just hire the best people for the job. by LessThanObvious · · Score: 2

      I would hire a black person, I would hire a woman, I would hire a latino, I would never hire a SJW.

  8. YAMICI by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    I reckon these initiatives are close to outnumbering the people in the target groups. They'll have to start moonlighting to keep up with the supply.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by "The project draws a very strong analogy between the learning of computer coding skills and the learning of spoken languages"

  10. Re:Facebook to abuse minorities and women! by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep. Women and minorities work for lower pay.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  11. Re:Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People who think computer languages are anything like natural languages know nothing about either.

  12. because ebonics by rtkluttz · · Score: 2

    Not mine, copied from a forum...

    sup
    {
        gimme fibo bitch
        a be 1 bitch
        b be 1 bitch
        putou a bitch
        putou b bitch
        fibo be fibo widout 2 bitch
        slongas (fibo bepimpin 0)
            c be a an b bitch
            a be b bitch
            b be c bitch
            putou b bitch
            dissin fibo bitch
        nomo
    }

    --
    Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
  13. The purpose is to reduce wages not increase them. by trout007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can be sure anytime employees want more people in a field it means they want to reduce labor costs.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  14. Programming is not a language by tomhath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    seeks to analogise coding skills with language skills to make the subject of computer science less forbidding and opaque

    Good luck with that. Programming is about logic, not language.

    1. Re:Programming is not a language by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      seeks to analogise coding skills with language skills to make the subject of computer science less forbidding and opaque

      Good luck with that. Programming is about logic, not language.

      How do you explain a logic problem to someone else? With language. Get your head out of your arse. Programming is not strictly a science.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Programming is not a language by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Programming is about logic, not language.

      oh yeah? well then how do you explain LISP?! ;P

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Programming is not a language by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      With a minimum of "S" sounds.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Programming is not a language by fnj · · Score: 2

      Get your head out of your arse. Programming is not strictly a science.

      It sure as hell isn't a liberal art. And you can't treat it like a language used to communicate with people. You don't get your head out of your ass and distinguish clearly between to, too, two, Two, TWO, etc., and you are a shitty programmer. If you write about a car's breaks, or braking a dish, a human can figure out what you actually mean inside that besotted head, but a compiler cannot.

    5. Re:Programming is not a language by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      More like an applied art because sometimes there is no single right answer. Just because it compiles and works doesn't mean it couldn't have been done better or worse.

    6. Re:Programming is not a language by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Yeah by writing it, not speaking it. I don't know how many times a customer has given me a nonsensical requirement and when I asked them to write it down they then realized it didn't make any sense.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re:Programming is not a language by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Get your head out of your arse. Programming is not strictly a science.

      It sure as hell isn't a liberal art. And you can't treat it like a language used to communicate with people. You don't get your head out of your ass and distinguish clearly between to, too, two, Two, TWO, etc., and you are a shitty programmer. If you write about a car's breaks, or braking a dish, a human can figure out what you actually mean inside that besotted head, but a compiler cannot.

      Yes, I must be a shitty programmer. Are you familiar with NER or Coreference Resolution? Named Entity Recognition is a subset of natural language processing. Software like SIRI uses various methodologies like Corefrence resolution to determine who or what you are talking about or what subject is inferred by your question based on past questions.

      I am focused more on complex event processing to detect patterns of behaviour but I am also familiar with entity resolution and I leverage that as well to detect behaviour across multiple entities that might not at first glance appear to be exactly the same entity.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    8. Re:Programming is not a language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Programming is not strictly a science.

      No. Programming is a minor subset of mathematics, just one that happens to pay rather well at the moment.

    9. Re:Programming is not a language by x0ra · · Score: 1

      with much more parenthesis.

    10. Re:Programming is not a language by tomhath · · Score: 1

      You could say the same about *any* field of study - Law, Particle Physics, Psychology, whatever. The language used to explain a problem isn't the same as expertise in the field.

    11. Re:Programming is not a language by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

      Women, in general, are good at language and its use to appeal emotionally. Explain to me how that translates, say, in writing system code in C++, or an algorithm in Java or Ruby or Python? I am all ears.

  15. Re:Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by by trout007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Programming languages exist because natural languages are ambiguous. This is why the whole legal profession exists.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  16. Women are better by mesterha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So if woman are better at languages then there are differences (surprise) between the sexes. If you open that door, maybe men are better at programming.

    --

    Chris Mesterharm
    1. Re:Women are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Physical advantageous traits for women and blacks are well understood and documented.

      Just don't mention IQ distributions..

    2. Re:Women are better by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      I believe the IQ factoid on this is really just a good trap.

      If you want to spark a flame-war, or look like an anti-PC bad-ass on the Internet, bringing it up is a good way to do it. I believe this because any intelligent, productive conversation afterwards is usually impossible. It's like Godwin's Law, only better. An actual productive conversation could go in a few interesting directions, with points that could be debated on their own merits, but I almost never see that happen.

    3. Re:Women are better by x0ra · · Score: 1

      But, aren't men, women, black or whites all equal ?!? I'm lost...

    4. Re:Women are better by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      So if woman are better at languages then there are differences (surprise) between the sexes. If you open that door, maybe men are better at programming.

      Sure, as long as you're aware that those facts allow you to make inferences only about populations, not specific individuals.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    5. Re:Women are better by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

      Being "better" at spoken languages does not necessarily translate to being "better" at writing code, which requires logical thinking, mathematical ability, and being able to visualize and analyze problems, abstract reasoning, etc.


      So much for woolly-headed liberal thinking.

    6. Re:Women are better by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

      I see no value in lumping individuals into groups. Yes, there will be various differences in distribution in any arbitrary grouping for any number of reasons, but what really matters is the Individual.

      As long as the Individual is free to take action, that's all that is needed. The rest is up to the Individual.

  17. Re:It is about culture. by truck_soccer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All those things you mentioned as "geek culture" are the new mainstream. Look at the news media: Today is back to the future day? Star Wars merchandising permeating EVERY media outlet? Your logic has failed. My "geek" friends no longer wish to identify with "geek culture" and have since kept all of their inherent "geekiness" under wraps because it has become a giant pain in the ass, and the most obnoxious thing any "geek" can experience is having people talking to them about common interests. To be a geek is to be socially inept, and as such this new found corporate fascination with all things "geek" has created a cultural paradox. Much like how the word "hipster" is regularly used today to describe the exact opposite of what a hipster is.

  18. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I learned today: It's okay to say women are better at language, but clearly men can't be better at programming.

  19. Please explain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please explain how a statement such as "popular understanding that women are better at learning languages" is acceptable while "popular understanding that men are better at mathematics, applying the scientific theory and thinking in a logical manner" will get you lynched. They're both inflammatory statements.

    It seems that any statement which includes women must be respectful and filled with praise to avoid social outrage. Any statement which includes men is permitted to disparage them, paint them as unintelligent, as buffoons and as dangerous criminals.

    How is this social justice?

    1. Re:Please explain. by x0ra · · Score: 1

      Positive discrimination is not discrimination...

  20. Politically Correct Compliance Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's see what passes the PC compliance test:

          "Women are better at learning spoken languages" - PASS
          "Therefore men are not as good as woman at learning spoken languages" - Eyebrow inperceptively raised, but PASS
          "Men are better [on average] than women at computer programming" - RED ALERT RED ALERT RED ALERT !!!

  21. Question by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Is "wiling to work for minimum wage" considered a valid minority now?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  22. Re:is this really a problem? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    When I worked at Cisco, I was part of a minority group that two white guys and one Latino guy, all native born. Everyone else was from India.

  23. Re: whipping girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Life pro tip: don't be a tranny.

  24. Remember the story how FB won't hire grey beards? by CQDX · · Score: 2

    And multiple posts by people over 30 were saying they won't even consider working for FB? It's SJW shit like this that experienced engineers loathe.

  25. Re:It is about culture. by x0ra · · Score: 2

    Not only a girl, but the typical, if not stereotypical, SJW, as far as I can see...

  26. Re:Please tell me I'm not the only one bothered by by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    When I was looking through college catalogs in the early 1990's, some degree programs allowed the substitution of foreign language classes with programing language classes. Alas, eight years in Commodore 64 BASIC didn't qualify as an acceptable programming language for college.

  27. learning spoken vs writing by avandesande · · Score: 1

    "The project draws a very strong analogy between the learning of computer coding skills and the learning of spoken languages"

    Seems to imply speaking a language, which is not right at all. It's about writing a language. Maybe not coincidentally, male authors outnumber women authors by about the same proportion as in software development.
    http://www.theguardian.com/boo...

    BTW one of my favorite authors is Mary Stewart, her Arthurian Saga is awesome!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  28. Re:It is about culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Keep whining, or why don't you just shave your neckbeard, buy some decent clothes, and bathe once in a while shitlord? I'm a girl btw.

    And why don't you lose some weight, stop wearing butch-dyke overalls, and shave your armpits occasionally, you land-whale?

    See how bigoted assumptions work both ways? Or is it only fashionable to insult males?

  29. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are they cheap labor, or slaves? Make up your mind.

  30. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's what I thought. "Attracting minorities and women" is code for, "we're aiming tp pay minimum wage with no benefits".
    Would you like files with that?

  31. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    There isn't that much difference. The main reason you'd want slaves is so that your labor cost is close to zero: the only cost involved with a slave is the initial purchase price, and then the ongoing maintenance costs (mainly food, but also housing and medical care). Of course, these days with government welfare programs it's probably cheaper to hire cheap laborers than to buy slaves: by paying the workers minimum wage, they qualify for government assistance, so you effectively outsource some of the cost of that worker to the government, and by extension the taxpayers at large. With slaves, you have to pay for all their costs, plus you have to go to the trouble of managing their daily lives too, instead of letting them do it themselves like you do with non-slave workers.

  32. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If you count food, shelter, training and potential medical bills, slaves are more expensive than wages.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    We need more H1B visa. Look, in the US we only get applications from white males, but we want diversity in our company!

    For example, Indians are really underrepresented in our work force!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. Re: whipping girl by x0ra · · Score: 1

    I'm a V8.

  35. Category Shift by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    grave bait

    Thanks, I always wondered what came after MILF.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Category Shift by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I always heard it was GILF; Grandmother...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:Category Shift by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I always heard it was GILF; Grandmother..."

      Grandmother I Loathe Fondling?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  36. Big F'ing Deal - What about ageism? by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    Now that he's past 30, I wonder if Zuckerberg will pay attention to it.
    http://www.fastcompany.com/303...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  37. Re:It is about culture. by x0ra · · Score: 2

    A 200lb black women wearing a Captain America outfit at Comic-Con is not being part of geek culture.

  38. Re:Just in time for some other ship to sail by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Logic, knowledge, and discipline are timeless.

    Too bad they don't teach that in school.

  39. Re: It is about culture. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do geeks very laid more now? Do they get hassled less? Do women swoon and men feel small at the sound of a Star Wars quote from a neckbeard? The mainstream may have appropriated geek things but little has changed for the average geek. Just watch Big Bang Theory for an example of how geeks are viewed.

  40. Re:It is about culture. by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's 2015. Many women already ARE endeared to geek culture.

    Impossible. University of Washington Assistant Professor of Social Justice Sapna Cheryan has made her career demonstrating that first of all, women don't like geek culture, and second, that's why there aren't so many women in tech, and third, if we just stomped on the geeks, made them dress like normal people and put away their toys, we'd have parity between men and women in tech.

  41. Re:"stereotype" by _merlin · · Score: 1

    I disagree with your last assertion. I had exposure to multiple languages from the day I was born, and I think it was great for me because it gave me that disconnect between concepts and words. I have far less trouble learning languages than my wife, who grew up with a single language and learned English later.

  42. Re:"stereotype" by _merlin · · Score: 1

    What the actual fuck? I was born in an environment where English, Kanada, Hindi and Dutch were spoken. I can speak five languages now. I understand how to use tenses, and that different languages have different tenses available. That's never been an issue for me. Are you going to claim next that bilingual children can't use articles? Or the verb to be? Oh I know, verb conjugation! That's an easy one! Bilingual children can't conjugate verbs!

    I'll grant that a child whose parents aren't fluent English speakers isn't going to learn to speak perfect English at home, that's to be expected. But isn't school supposed to remedy that? What's the point of sending the kids to school if it isn't even providing basic language education? Don't they teach English/ESL?

    I think there's another issue at play, in that some teachers simply take English for granted and never put in the effort to actually understand it fully, leaving them unable to teach it properly. Perhaps one should be required to speak at least one other language in order to be qualified to teach English. You learn a lot about how a language works when you see how another language does it differently.

  43. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "You can be sure anytime employees want more people in a field it means they want to reduce labor costs."

    To be fair, You can be sure anytime employees don't want more people in a field it also means they want to reduce labor costs. (i.e. companies always want to reduce labor costs.)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  44. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    They are mo' cheap

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  45. Re:It is about culture. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "There is the side benefit that accomplishing this will make it a helluva lot easier for me to find a woman with whom I can really have a mutually-satisfying, meaningful relationship. So....GET ON IT!"

    Dude, your best hope lies now, as it always has, in the hopes that cybernetic women are just around the corner. Keep on pulling for her!

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  46. Re:It is about culture. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Dude, for someone who can't figure out how to create A Slashdot account and log in she's probably out-geaking him. Besides, what you got against BLOW?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  47. Yet another attempt that will fail flat. by flajann4415 · · Score: 1

    I have seen this attempt time and again over the decades, and they never seem to gain traction. Why not? Simple. It's all about the passion, and especially in today's world of the Internet, with endless resources available online for free at every level to for anyone even mildly curious about software development.
    If you are interested, you already would've Googled and checked it out. Many sites allow you to write code in your browser in just about every major language out there. Development platforms can be setup and downloaded for free to any computer. Etc., etc. So what will FB do that will enhance what's already there? I think they will get maybe a handful interested, but you will not see the "sea change" they seek. You either have the knack or you do not, and no amount of flag-waving will change that much. "Women" and "Minorities". I don't see the point in targeting specific demographics like that. It's very condescending.

  48. More misandrist articles by ruir · · Score: 2

    In a male dominated board. Bring it on fuckers, it is excellent PR.

  49. Re:It is about culture. by x0ra · · Score: 1

    I don't care about wrestling, but don't call it "geek culture".

  50. It's because of Asperger Syndrome by zmooc · · Score: 1

    Asperger Syndrome is about 4 times more prevalent in males. Males are about 4 times more prevalent in coding jobs. I believe the vast majority of software developers to have (undiagnosed) Asperger Syndrome and I believe that that fully explains the "lack" of female software developers.

    Now let's go invent the Overly Considerate Disorder that affects mostly females in order to explain the lack of male nurses so we can finally put an end this "equality" bullshit.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  51. Re:The purpose is to reduce wages not increase the by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

    i'm really sick of this employer cynicism i see on slashdot. it basically comes down to: "i'm am highly skilled and no one else can be".

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  52. "To Attract More Minorities and Women To Coding " by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    So with all these H1-B stories floating around, I assume they mean white people when they say "minorities"?

  53. SCIENCE isn't strictly a science! by friesofdoom · · Score: 1

    Oh, but by that logic, SCIENCE isn't strictly a science because you have to use Language to talk about anything in science!