Slashdot Mirror


The Popular Over-The-Counter Cold Medicine That Science Says Doesn't Work (forbes.com)

HughPickens.com writes: Back before methamphetamine cooks started buying up non-prescription decongestants to brew crank, all of us were able to buy effective decongestants right off the store shelf without a problem. Now David DiSalvo writes at Forbes that to fill the store-shelf void, drug companies substituted the already-FDA approved ingredient phenylephrine for pseudoephedrine. But the oral decongestant phenylephrine simply doesn't work at the FDA-approved amount found in popular non-prescription brands, and it may not even work at much higher doses. Researchers at the University of Florida are asking the FDA to remove oral phenylephrine from the market. "We think the evidence supports that phenylephrine's status as a safe and effective over-the-counter product should be changed," says Randy Hatton. "We are looking out for the consumer, and he or she needs to know that science says that oral phenylephrine does not work for the majority of people."

In 1976, the FDA deemed a 10 milligram oral dose of phenylephrine safe and effective at relieving congestion, making it possible for companies to use the ingredient without conducting studies. But Leslie Hendeles and Hatton say phenylephrine does not effectively relieve nasal stuffiness at this dose. They say the FDA cited four tests demonstrating efficacy at the 10 milligram dose, two of which were unpublished and sponsored by drug manufacturers. In contrast, the FDA cited six tests demonstrating no significant difference between phenylephrine and placebo. Hendeles said a higher dose may work, but no research has been published regarding safety at higher doses. "They need to do a dose-response study to determine at what higher dose they get both efficacy and safety," says Hendeles adding that until then "consumers should go that extra step and get it (pseudoephedrine) from behind the counter."

310 comments

  1. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who has taken a product sans pseudoephedrine already knows they don't work.

    1. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I 3 the state. Oh save me great one. Make my asthma medication safe for the ozone, and my cold medicine safe from the meth heads.

    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. The CFC free inhalers suck ass.

    3. Re:Duh by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      And anybody with a history of high blood pressure who takes pseudoephedrine needs their head examined.

      Oh, great no stuffy nose. Pity about the stroke.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Duh by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Yea, that was a slick move. They got rid of the over the counter inhaler that way, and jacked the price of albuterol inhalers tremendously. It's another life saving medicine that went from being incredibly cheap to being quite expensive. Anyone looked at the price of epi auto injectors lately? Same damn thing.

    5. Re:Duh by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      In my ignorance, I bought the Sudafed containing phenylephrine, and I could not figure out why Sudafed, which was my go-to medicine for daytime cold relief, did not work! I wasn't really expecting to suddenly hear an angelic choir from the heavens after taking the stuff, just some relief. Instead, nothing. Not a goddamn thing.

      I did the research and figured out what was wrong: I was rope a doped. Not only is the good stuff only behind the counter, the pharmacist (at least here) defaults to giving you the Sudafed with phenylephrine unless you specifically ask for the pseudoephedrine. So, counting that money wasted I got the good stuff, and miracle of miracles, it worked. I was my own blind trial. Phenylephrine is bullshit, don't waste money on it.

      I have not done the research on meth cooking methods, but I believe it continues unabated with this blockade on pseudoephedrine... I get the strong feeling we're wasting our time here, all hail the war on drugs.

    6. Re: Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take primatine tablets for colds. It already has the expectorant--same ingredient as mucinex. Cheaper and more effective.

    7. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stuffy nose" doesn't adequately describe the panicked feeling of suffocation when your sinuses are completely clogged and blowing your nose does absolutely nothing, while you gasp through your raw, dry, raspy throat that feels like it's contracting in on you. Pseudoephedrine is the only damn thing that works for me when I have a nasty cold, and it works just well enough to open up the air passages enough to breathe. So I just watch my blood pressure as best I can and take it easy.

      Yes, I've been to a specialist before and they claimed there was nothing they could do, even with surgery. Hurray genetics.

    8. Re:Duh by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well here's the real problem - pseudoephederine is a short cut to making meth. Meth cooks made meth before they figured out you could use decongestants. Meth cooks still make meth after the so-called restrictions.

      In fact, meth cooks in Mexico make meth using extract from natural ephedera plants that grow like weeds, and then smuggle it across the border the same as anything else.

      In the end, we've just made it harder for legit use, just like practically all other "think of the children" and drug war legislation. Oh, and the pharma companies were able to perpetrate a multi-billion dollar placebo scam for the last 10 years by selling a decongestant that does NOTHING.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    9. Re:Duh by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Most of the meth in the US isn't made in the US. It comes across the border (mexico mainly, but a fair bit from canada) from factories using raw, pharmaceutical grade pseudoephedrine from India. That used to happen in the US as well, but the FDA finally learned to look at the millions of licenses they'd been granting for purchases of pseudoephedrine.

      That said, there are plenty of local cooks that will use off-the-shelf pills to make meth. Drug companies have been putting binders in those pills to make it harder to make meth with them, and of course, there are the idiot reactionary laws that "prevent" cooks from acquiring them.

    10. Re:Duh by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has taken a product sans pseudoephedrine already knows they don't work.

      This, I always avoid phenylephrine products because they simply don't work. Fortunately here in Australia all you need to do to get pseudoephedrine over the counter is show your drivers license. That is enough to stop the meth cooks from buying enough to make a kitchen viable. Its the same with Codeine, fantastic stuff for those of us who use it properly (I.E. rarely) but many of the same countries who banned OTC pseudoephidrine have also banned OTC codeine. This is why when I travel I usually buy a box of pain killers in Australia.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, phenylephrine HCL is the ONLY nasal decongestant that DOES work for me. I've taken it for allergy caused congestion for many years.

  2. This isn't news by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone knows PE doesn't work. It's only there so the government can claim they haven't removed all the useful OTC decongestants from the market. Yes, technically you can still buy pseudoephedrine in most states, but doing so puts you on a list which gives them probable cause to bust down your door on suspicion of meth manufacture.

    1. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Furthermore, the FBI's own stats show that the ban/restriction on pseudoephedrine has made the problem worse. Before the ban, meth was mostly a mom & pop business. For the next 2 or so years after the ban meth sales dropped, but then the mexican cartels more than filled the gap with wholesale production (like Breaking Bad style industrial manufacturing importing the raw ingredients from China) and now instead of little guys who are mostly dumbasses selling to their neighbors you've got organized crime networks all over the country.

      Meanwhile I don't feel safe buying a sudofed and there are a bunch of stories of people being arrested for having bad allergies. I don't have the link handy, but the very first person arrested for buying too much was buying it for his kid.

    2. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If we can't sleep easier to due clear nasal passages, at least we can rest better knowing that all those truck drivers on the roads aren't wide awake on drugs.

    3. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PE does work, just for only 5 or so hours and some days I need to double the dosage. This is still less of a hassle for me than to go to the pharmacy counter and get treated like a potential meth dealer in order to get barely two weeks worth of the good ol' stuff.

    4. Re:This isn't news by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The government would be better off decriminalizing all drugs and producing chemically pure versions and controlling the sale of those substances while investing the revenues in treatment programs. It won't eliminate addiction, but it will go a long way to reducing the amount of organized crime in this and other countries that make their profits off the back of illegal drug sales. That in turn would go a long way towards freeing up law enforcement who wouldn't have to devote nearly as much activity towards dealing with the gangs that run the illegal drug trades.

    5. Re:This isn't news by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it will go a long way to reducing the amount of organized crime in this and other countries that make their profits off the back of illegal drug sales

      These crime gangs will just look for some other large profit activity. If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    6. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Alcohol prohibition proves you wrong. Eliminating it greatly reduced gang crime. History is a great teacher, people are just to fucking stupid to realize it.

    7. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and controlling the sale of those substances

      You don't realize what you just said. That's what you can't do now. If you make them available and they prove addictive (and those are the best kind, right?) then the government will have to restrict their availability, the very thing it can't do now. Addictable people will still provide demand in the market, and someone will figure out how to satisfy that demand.

      Bad idea all around. The root problem is that human beings are addictable. Solve that first.

      (captcha: "artery")

    8. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go making sense again.

      Unfortunately this is not how the government works.

    9. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > These crime gangs will just look for some other large profit activity. If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      You are half right. Yes - having developed the skill sets to be criminals they will look for other work. But it will be less lucrative work and so it will not attract new recruits. It took about 50 years for the syndicates created by Prohibition to die off, but they did. And side benefit, the murder and violent rate immediately reversed a 2 decade long increase the year Prohibition was repealed. And not just a small change, it was huge and the decline continued for decades.

    10. Re:This isn't news by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the short term, existing gangs will move to other areas of criminality, which are less profitable (or else they would switch now). The reduced cash flow will also intensify competition (read: violence) in those endeavors.

      In the medium term, a few organizations will die out, the remainder will claim their new turf but with less wealth to spread around both for status (read: bling) and patronage (read: cheddar, philanthropy). There won't be much less crime here at this stage, but the organizations will be less able to buy loyalty (kinship).

      In the long term, the reduced status and patronage will mean fewer recruits and ultimately an equilibrium with less crime. But you are right, gangsters don't go into accounting. The difference comes from convincing kids to go into accounting instead of criminality, and to do that you've got to reduce the total revenue of the criminal organizations.

    11. Re:This isn't news by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it will go a long way to reducing the amount of organized crime in this and other countries that make their profits off the back of illegal drug sales

      These crime gangs will just look for some other large profit activity. If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      Sorry, the accountant cartel has that one already sewn up. But seriously, much of all of this goes back to good old ethanol. When the puritans decided we couldn't have it it just opened up the floodgates for funding criminal based business, as people aren't going to stop getting their buzz on, and those who will provide can make a lot of money for their risk.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Other high water marks for OC were the Harrison act in 1914 and the Marijuana Tax act in 1937.

      But when old Dick Nixon declared "War on Drugs" in 1971. The money really started pouring in for the bad guys, and the military tactics we used got them into military tactics of their own.

      There will always be bad guys. There will always be vice. What you do, is remove the profit from it. When there is no profit, you are probably as close to controlling it as you can ever get.

      One thing is for certain - The staunchest anti-drug strong law crusaders are on the same page with the most ruthless drug cartels in wanting strict anti-drug laws.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:This isn't news by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      FDR appointed Joe Kennedy as the first chairman of the SEC for a reason.

    13. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. Paranoid much?

    14. Re:This isn't news by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      These crime gangs will just look for some other large profit activity.

      If the alternative activity was profitable, someone would already be doing it. Most crime is opportunistic. If you eliminate the opportunity, you eliminate the crime. There is not a fixed amount of crime in the world, and there is no reason to believe that eliminating one type of crime causes increases in other crimes.

    15. Re:This isn't news by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Outside of drugs, the next biggest criminal enterprise is probably prostitution, which is yet another vice crime that shouldn't be illegal. As Carlin said, "Selling's legal. Fucking's legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?"

      Once you eliminate those you're down to much lower profit margins and can't support the kind of massive gangs that trouble law enforcement so much. Even if they try to stick with the illegal drug business who would want to buy from them when you can get a better product from a legal source?

      Also, you still need someone to work at the store that's selling the drugs. Seems like there are probably some out of work drug dealers that could handle a counter job and be tax paying citizens. If taxes are used to fund other organizations to help people get over their addictions, etc. that's additional jobs that are being created rather than having the revenues end up in the coffers of criminal enterprises while still leaving society with the cost of cleaning up the consequences.

    16. Re:This isn't news by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      That in turn would go a long way towards freeing up law enforcement who wouldn't have to devote nearly as much activity towards dealing with the gangs that run the illegal drug trades.

      ... And they would instead have to devote twice as much time and manpower to controlling public intoxication and domestic incidents resulting from such a move. Not to mention the stress and damage that this type of drug puts on families and then eventually the extra burden it puts on an already dysfunctional foster care system. What is now a relatively quiet issue with pockets of violence more or less isolated geographically would turn into an overt epidemic on a country wide scale. Meth isn't the same as pot or mushrooms, this one really messes with your head. Keep in mind that even with all of the negative health effects we know about smoking in addition to a ban on advertising we still can't keep people from starting on tobacco. Now look up what Methamphetamine does to a person and then tell me that is something you want to legitimize.

    17. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Experience from those countries having made this move in a controlled manner indicates that you are wrong. Care to back your statements up a bit more?

    18. Re:This isn't news by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Or, as the saying goes ... "People who don't learn from history, are doomed to repeat it"

      The counter argument is "But DRUUUUGGGGSSSS!!!!"

      Yeah, so, making them illegal has stopped them from being used? It has created associated crimes hasn't it?

      I am opposed to drugs, because they are bad for people. I am also equally if nor more so, opposed to government making them illegal. In trying to protect us from ourselves, the government actually has made things worse. As it usually does.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    19. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That in turn would go a long way towards freeing up law enforcement who wouldn't have to devote nearly as much activity towards dealing with the gangs that run the illegal drug trades.

      ... And they would instead have to devote twice as much time and manpower to controlling public intoxication and domestic incidents resulting from such a move. Not to mention the stress and damage that this type of drug puts on families and then eventually the extra burden it puts on an already dysfunctional foster care system. What is now a relatively quiet issue with pockets of violence more or less isolated geographically would turn into an overt epidemic on a country wide scale. Meth isn't the same as pot or mushrooms, this one really messes with your head. Keep in mind that even with all of the negative health effects we know about smoking in addition to a ban on advertising we still can't keep people from starting on tobacco. Now look up what Methamphetamine does to a person and then tell me that is something you want to legitimize.

      Versus all the time and money spent on incarceration and the often worse damage done to families when a member goes to prison for years over what is really a medical condition?

    20. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    21. Re:This isn't news by f3rret · · Score: 1

      it will go a long way to reducing the amount of organized crime in this and other countries that make their profits off the back of illegal drug sales

      These crime gangs will just look for some other large profit activity. If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      No, but a significant amount of them would.
      It's easy to paint all drug dealers as these evil super criminals who do nothing but profit on the misery of others. And yes, there are some who are like that, but honestly, a significant amount of drug dealers simply like making money and would go legit if they could do so safely.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    22. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That in turn would go a long way towards freeing up law enforcement who wouldn't have to devote nearly as much activity towards dealing with the gangs that run the illegal drug trades.

      That's what a reasonable person would think. For many law enforcement officials it's more like this:

      That in turn would go a long way towards restraining law enforcement who wouldn't be able to devote nearly as much activity dealing with the gangs that run the illegal drug trades.

    23. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the SEC? Who is Joe Kennedy, and why should I care if he was appointed to the SEC? And what was that reason? Seriously, I don't know why you were modded up with a single sentence not contributing anything to the discussion.

    24. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's debatable by different papers and stating this as a fact with condescension and swearing shouldn't warrant an insightful score. Here's one source: http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html. Not that he's for prohibition, nor am I but there are statistics on it. I don't think you really cared what the other poster had to say, but just wanted to get a "I'm superior to you" comment in. Please give us all a chance to validate your response and make a fair reply by citing sources next time.

    25. Re:This isn't news by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Alcohol prohibition proves you wrong.

      Not really. It depends on how seriously a drug can effect a person's life. A few decades before Prohibition almost all drugs *were* legal. Opium parlors were found in most large cities, Coca Cola really did have cocaine. The social problems caused by drug use were serious enough that laws were passed restricting their sales. Prohibition took it a step further, but that turned out to be too much, so it was repealed.

    26. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well now, Slashdot doesn't get a lot of people bragging about being a clueless idiot! Good show, sir!

    27. Re:This isn't news by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Instead of getting snarky, why don't you do a bit of research? Google is your friend.

      Joe Kennedy was a bootlegger and stock manipulator. President Roosevelt appointed him chairman of the Securities Exchange Commission to crack down on stock cheats because Kennedy knew all about cheating.

      Now look at the context in which GP's post appears - former gang members becoming accountants? Sure, it worked for Kennedy.

    28. Re: This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This behind the counter crap has to end, as does the whole war on drugs, war on pain medicine, etc. It's all just a war on people trying to live their lives.

      I'm fortunate. I don't get sick much. I just suffer from incredible rage every time I do get sick because of having to sign forms which basically accuse me of being addicted to something. I can't imagine having to live with constant breathing problems, or constant pain, knowing there's a DEA agent or worse out there who just totally knows what's good for me much more than my doctor does.

      Not only do we bankrupt you for getting certain diseases in the US, but we try to jail you for treating them too. Gotta love the wonders of the greatest nation on earth, huh?

    29. Re:This isn't news by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The SEC is the Southeastern Conference. Joey Kennedy used to write for the Birmingham News. Don't know who the FDR character was, maybe he was in some comic book.

      Just kidding, AC. You seriously need to learn a little bit of history. That single sentence you scoffed at had more insight and knowledge than a hundred regular posts here.

      I wish I had some mod points, but I can't seem to get any nowadays. It's been weeks since I had any.

    30. Re:This isn't news by sjames · · Score: 1

      So you're saying there's a bunch of perfectly functional adults out there who would totally dive into meth but since it's illegal, they are t-totalers?

    31. Re:This isn't news by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I dunno what they would train as. But there's a big city in southern Nevada that's a fine example of how organized crime can't compete against major corporations once a market is legitimized and the real businesses decide that their shareholders would benefit by entering.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    32. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, many organized crime organizations have found that submitting fraudulent Medicare invoices through shell companies is as profitable as the narcotics trade, but without the violence. If they get caught, the punishment is less.

    33. Re:This isn't news by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I hear that Google and Wikipedia are hard to use.

      No seriously, don't expect everything to always be handed to you. Learn to do some legwork yourself.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    34. Re:This isn't news by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      That's the beauty of FUD - you don't need to cite any actual evidence! You just spout out the absolute worst possible thing that could ever happen as if it's an inevitability.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    35. Re:This isn't news by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Posting an anonymous "Nuh - uhh!" to a story that shows scientific evidence otherwise isn't useful.

      If you are one of the distinct minority that actually gains benefit from Phenylephrine, good for you. The rest of us have been sold something completely ineffective. Your single data point doesn't refute a double-blind study of 277 people.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    36. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too

    37. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government would also be better off canning and flogging drug users than throwing them into prison.

    38. Re:This isn't news by labnet · · Score: 1

      Alcohol prohibition proves you wrong. Eliminating it greatly reduced gang crime. History is a great teacher, people are just to fucking stupid to realize it.

      But where would the CIA get all their slush fund income from? How would Jeb finance his campaign?

      --
      46137
    39. Re:This isn't news by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      And if we hadn't had Alcohol Prohibition the Kennedy's wouldn't have been a dynasty either.

    40. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so totally ignorant, I wonder if you are on drugs yourself or maybe just a troll. Alcohol prohibition increased crime. The only thing you got right was, "History is a great teacher", but only if people know 'History', you are just so fucking ignorant that you do not realize it.

      Regards
      AC

    41. Re:This isn't news by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If there was another similar large profit activity, wouldn't they be in it already?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    42. Re:This isn't news by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Instead of getting snarky, why don't you do a bit of research? Google is your friend.

      Joe Kennedy was a bootlegger and stock manipulator. President Roosevelt appointed him chairman of the Securities Exchange Commission to crack down on stock cheats because Kennedy knew all about cheating.

      Now look at the context in which GP's post appears - former gang members becoming accountants? Sure, it worked for Kennedy.

      He is still right, although has a very bad analogy.

      Prohibition demonstrated that fact.

      If Marijuana is made legal, cartels wont be shipping it over the border from Mexico any more because everyone will be able to get a legal, legitimately grown and transported product grown elsewhere. The huge logistics of running a private military to sell drugs will become a cost that a legitimate farmer in America doesn't have to deal with. They simply wont be able to offer the product at the same price.

      Same with Cocaine, even if Colombia cant do anything about the revolutionaries (both FARC and AUC use drugs to fund their activities), decriminalisation will allow it's neighbours to capitalise on production which will squeeze the revolutionaries out of the market.

      Whilst I don't agree with flat out legalisation, a lot of the problems with drugs will be solved if we (and by this, I mean the US) would stop spending so much time and money trying to fight them.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    43. Re:This isn't news by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, the FBI's own stats show that the ban/restriction on pseudoephedrine has made the problem worse.

      It depends on your definition of "worse" and what is the first problem you're trying to solve.

      In the Pacific Northwest, regulating pseudoephedrine has almost entirely wiped out local meth production. Prior to this meth houses were a massive issue; the aforementioned "dumbasses" were causing incredible environmental damage as meth houses themselves were all but inhabitable, frequently leeched out into the surrounding environment, and were extremely expensive to decontaminate and dismantle. Meanwhile said dumbasses were producing poor quality meth that was getting even more people killed.

      Regulating pseudoephedrine didn't completely eliminate meth - and no one expected it to - but it has definitely made things better for everyone around here. I'd support it again in a heartbeat if it was brought up for a vote.

    44. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alcohol prohibition proves you wrong. Eliminating it greatly reduced gang crime. History is a great teacher, people are just to fucking stupid to realize it.

      TOO fucking stupid

    45. Re:This isn't news by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      The first time I tried that PE junk I joked to my wife the PE stood for placebo effect.

  3. Already knew this by aldousd666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remind the pharmacist every time I have to sign my life away to buy the real stuff that the PE doesn't work. They always wink and laugh like 'sure it doesn't, we know you're cooking very small amounts of Meth with this at home, no need for the cover story.'

    --
    Speak for yourself.
    1. Re:Already knew this by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

      The pharmacist already knows PE doesn't work, and these stupid rules annoy them far, far more than they annoy you.

      Instead of you just walking up, grabbing what you need, and checking out... You instead have someone making $75+/hr forced to stop whatever useful task they had in progress and waste five minutes of their day to check your ID and have you sign the book, and then they need to store the book on the off chance the DEA decides to chase after allergy sufferers in your area.

    2. Re:Already knew this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      I remind the pharmacist every time I have to sign my life away to buy the real stuff that the PE doesn't work.

      Sign your life away? Is talking to a pharmacist and showing an ID really the same as "signing your life away"?

      Such drama. You can still buy your Sudafed, but it might require you to have contact with a human being for 15 seconds. I know to some Slashdotters that's the same as "They took away all my rights!" but come on.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Already knew this by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, it's usually a pharmacy technician or a pharmacist's assistant (essentially a clerk) who handles the Sudafed requests at my drug store, and I doubt they make $75/hr. You only get the pharmacist if you have a question about something like drug interactions.

      Overall it's quite easy to obtain pseudoephedrine; you just pick up a card from a bin located where the OTC decongestants are and take it to the pharmacy counter. You have to wait in line with people picking up their prescriptions, but the clerk will ring up your other purchases so you don't have to wait in line again at the regular checkout. The net result is that it's just a minute or so longer to make all your purchases. And you do have to show an ID and sign a register.

      Given the behavioral impact of amphetamines I don't think these measures are an unreasonable burden -- if they work. That's the big question. Are we reducing the supply of amphetamines, or creating a business opportunity for drug operations that are already smuggling weed from Mexico? But assuming these measures do reduce the supply of methamphetamine, the main problem with them is that they dissuade people from buying effective medicine because they anticipate a big hassle. It's not a big hassle.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why the fuck do they act like I'm a meth head?

      I know a guy who's working in a pharmacy. I keep quiet every time he goes off with stories about all the meth heads who are buying Sudafed from him. What would be the fucking point? He's otherwise an ok guy. He's also very intelligent. Yet, he's a COW who believes that the only reason somebody would want Sudafed is to cook meth.

    5. Re:Already knew this by operagost · · Score: 1

      It's a problem because pharmacies are not open 24 hours.

      But it doesn't need to be a problem... it's a violation of human rights to impose absolutely needless laws for political reasons.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Already knew this by aldousd666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did you ever read the waiver you sign? $100,000 fine and imprisonment, not for making meth, but for buying too much Sudafed.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    7. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walgreens by no means hires pharmacists that make $75/hr. They hire pharmacy technicians that make $10/hr. Maybe $15/hr, tops, if they've finished their 2-year trade school certificate program.

      And the meth-head log book annoys them too.

      It's not worth anyone's time. The DEA is just a bunch of tyrants and dickheads that need to be fired for incompetence and not replaced.

    8. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sign your life away? Is talking to a pharmacist and showing an ID really the same as "signing your life away"?

      You aren't just showing ID. You have to sign a long form which if you bothered to read it, would let you know that your ID and purchase history are being supplied to Law Enforcement, and that if you attempt to purchase too much, too often, you consent to LE coming to your home and searching it. It also lets you know that purchasing it for someone else (including your wife or child) without an actual prescription is illegal and you could face jail time if caught.

    9. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring your own pen. Imagine how many sick people a day sign that register

    10. Re:Already knew this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Did you ever read the waiver you sign? $100,000 fine and imprisonment, not for making meth, but for buying too much Sudafed.

      The only thing that will stop a bad guy with Sudafed is a good guy with Sudafed.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mean hourly for a pharmacist is $56.96 http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes291051.htm

    12. Re:Already knew this by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is much easier to get meth than it is to get pseudoephedrine in some areas. It seems that the Mexican cartels have no problem getting massive bulk shipments of pseudoephedrine and since they already have their smuggling pipeline and sales channels set up, they have no problem getting it to a street corner near you. Yeah free trade!

    13. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they also limit how much they will sell you to what for me ended up being a two week supply meaning I had to go back to the pharmacy every two weeks. Before this I was able to get Claritin D in bulk from amazon for about 1/2 - 1/4 the price they were charging at the pharmacy.

      I have really bad allergies that hit me about 48 weeks a year so was always taking a decongestant. I found a really good allergist who helped me find other ways to allow me to breath through my nose so haven't taken a decongestant in ages. But when I was still doing so it was a huge pain in the rump to jump through the stupid hoops.

    14. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever read the waiver you sign? $100,000 fine and imprisonment, not for making meth, but for buying too much Sudafed.

      Whats the fine for selling too much Sudafed?

    15. Re:Already knew this by afidel · · Score: 1

      And $14.10 for a pharmacy technician which is probably the person who actually fills out the paperwork 99% of the time.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have to sign anything in costco, they just scan the license.

  4. Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Figures Florida would be behind this.

    There is no requirement to obtain a prescription in this state for any drug. Because of this, people are bussed in from all around the east coast to buy Oxycontin, etc., and these drugs end up on the black market in New York:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re: Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that part in the begininng where chick is all "Why do you think the doctor prescribes you pills?" That's called a .... Prescription.

  5. Thanks to the War on Drugs by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to take Sudafed for my allergies, but then they had to change because METH. Now I take Claritin D, and if I want more than a 2 week supply, I have to get a prescription. This requires me to go see my doctor every so often, because she isn't keen to give prescriptions without checkups. All of this mess because somebody might use a drug as an ingredient for a drug that used to be legal.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      This requires me to go see my doctor every so often, because she isn't keen to give prescriptions without checkups.

      Hell, no... neither will mine. That office visit fee is seemingly habit-forming.

      Physicians, by and large, would be for more drugs regulated by prescription.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the way it works. The government would rather try to stop people from getting high (which hasn't seemed to work) than make sure you can get relief. Think of the children!

    3. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sucks. I came here to mention that I travelled to Florida from Canada. Drove there on my Enhanced Driver's License (I don't have a passport). Got a cold while vacationing. I have tried and found out for myself that phenylephrine is worthless. I've had success with ephedrine (which is OTC banned in much of the US) and pseudoephedrine. Couldn't find anything but phenylephrine. Asked at the prescriptions counter for what I needed.

      Turns out you can't get pseudoephedrine in Florida without either some sort of state ID or a passport, and it is hidden behind the counter. My wife (who has a passport) had to go in and buy it for me. They would only allow one purchase a week, so I made sure to get the largest box of it they had, just in case. Felt worse than buying Tylenol-1 in Canada. LOL.

      But I suppose I could have bought pot in some other US states instead? Not that it would suppress the symptoms, but I suppose I wouldn't have cared much? *sigh*

    4. Re: Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you mean *cough*.

    5. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      I get the Wal-Mart brand of Claritin or Zyrtec. No Prescription needed even for 6+ month supplies. I find I have to alternate between the two every few months. There's something in the Georgia grass that my skin just doesn't like being around...and my body tries to kill me if I go out and mow, no matter what med I take.

    6. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by tylikcat · · Score: 2

      I have ridiculous allergies, and take a number of antihistamines to keep them in check (but hey, the asthma is enough in check that I can run, so I'm happy.) I have found that for me guaifenesen, which is usually thought of as a expectorant, works pretty well as a decongestant with the added bonus that it's non-drying - a huge plus in Ohio winters.

      It thins mucous and does something with its consistency that protects the vocal cords - a lot of singers take it for this reason. I take it if I'm getting a scratchy throat and know I'm going to be talking a lot. I pretty much never get the kind of prolonged laryngitis that I used to when teaching with a minor cold. (Though these days that's more about getting through a major conference when I'm staying in a random AirBnB.)

    7. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Ioldanach · · Score: 2

      Claritin D is just Claritin with sudafed in it. (That's the "D" for decongestant.)

    8. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This requires me to go see my doctor every so often, because she isn't keen to give prescriptions without checkups.

      If you want to complain about the costs of seeing a doctor, that is one thing, but by itself it isn't clear what is the problem for seeing a doctor for illnesses which require prescriptions.

    9. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yep. Its particularly annoying for things that don't get you high.

      For instance, I've got gout. To avoid being off my feet for a few days every other month or so, I take Allopurinol daily, and cholchicine if I ever do feel any pain coming on.

      I have needed these medications for ~10 years now. I'll almost certainly need to keep taking them for the rest of my life. So why the heck do I have to see my doctor every 6 months just for him to say "Yep, you've still got gout - here's your permission to buy your meds."?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    10. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS: Claritin doesn't work either - in efficacy trials the effective dose beyond a margin of error was found to be 40mg, but it was found to have drowsiness-inducing side effects. The proscribed dose of 10mg was not distinguishable from placebo, but it was selected because Claritin was _designed_ to be a non-drowsy improvement on existing allergy medications.

    11. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I get the Wal-Mart brand of Claritin or Zyrtec. No Prescription needed even for 6+ month supplies.

      I also get the generic equivalent, but they only sell them in 2 week packs, and will only sell one at a time. The other reason I get the prescription is because thanks to Obamacare, I now have to have a prescription to use my HSA $. Before Obamacare, I could use my HSA on OTC medicine. So yet another hoop to jump through, and people ask me why I'm against big government. None of these things is overly terrible taken on it's own, but cumulatively...

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    12. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      It works for me, so 10mg must be enough. I have awful allergies, and it seems to work for me most of the time.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    13. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same with Type 1 diabetes. It's not like the insulin dependence is going to magically get better.

    14. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by dfenstrate · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have ridiculous allergies, and take a number of antihistamines to keep them in check (but hey, the asthma is enough in check that I can run, so I'm happy.)

      Try eating a tablespoon a day of locally produced honey, unfiltered, for a month or so. The beekeeper should be the closest one to your home you can find, though even 100 miles out still ought to work.

      Sending the local pollen through your digestive tract gives your immune system another shot at getting used to pollen without causing respiratory problems. I used to have terrible allergies that could barely be controlled by double doses of claritin. I still have allergies, but they're much milder and much more controllable by medication.

      It's a pretty low-cost, low-risk home remedy. I stumbled across it when I was doing an internet search for "Is it safe to take double doses of Claritin?", and I figured 'What the hell, it's not like honey is expensive or dangerous.'

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    15. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      To be clear, I mean 10mg is enough for me. Everyone reacts to drugs differently.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    16. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by glitch! · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this works for you, but here is an option:
      https://www.inhousepharmacy.vu...
      I have ordered from them and have been satisfied, other than waiting a month for delivery.

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    17. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only was meth legal, it is THE MOST PRESCRIBED DRUG in US history. It was and is currently used widely be armed forces around the globe including mandatory use by US Airforce for certain missions (Go-Go Pills and the Tarnak Farms Incident).

    18. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by operagost · · Score: 1

      The physician's dream, actually, would be to have a full schedule for the day but have every patient show up 10 minutes late, so that they can tell them they won't see them (yet they will still be billed for the visit).

      Obama made outrageous claims about unnecessary amputations for profit. Meanwhile, he did nothing about the routine billing corruption by doctors and hospitals.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    19. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      and to be clear, the reason "she isn't keen to give prescriptions without checkups" is because, as the source for the prescription, she is under at least as much scrutiny as the purchasers. The reason for this is obvious on reflection: the doctor (and the pharmacist) are gatekeepers who grant access to the drug. A good way for a doctor to get in serious trouble is to hand out too many narcotic prescriptions. In an effort to protect themselves, some doctors will "turn in" patients they think might be buying too much of a drug. Not that they think the patient is a dealer or supplying, but because they are far better off if *they* turn the patient in before an investigation starts. And it doesn't matter if the drug purchasing is warranted and approved, too much will get some unfriendly attention.

    20. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      to add to that, in your case you *could* "just deal with it". Say someone is going to die from a hyperactive thyroid and so it is removed. After that they *must* take some sort of thyroid medication (say, thyroxin) in order to live. But they still have to go see a doctor (at least once a year, if not twice) in order to keep their prescription filled.

      Is there any chance that they've magically grown a new thyroid? Of course not. But the government is afraid of what you might do with a prescription medication. I suspect the answer has nothing to do with health, but with control and politics (see my post above about Afrin being over the counter).

    21. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by tsqr · · Score: 0

      You have a disease that kills nearly 70,000 Americans every year, and you're complaining that you have to go to the doctor every once in a while?

    22. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Claritin D has sudafed in it... that's the D. Same with Allegra D.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    23. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Regular Claritin and Zyrtec don't have psuedoephedrine in them. The -D variants do. The government doesn't care about basic allergy pills, they care about meth precursors like pseudoephedrine. Unfortunately pseudoephedrine is the only really useful decongestant that we have at the moment.

      Fun fact though, if you take one of those time-release Sudafeds that's supposed to last 12 hours - sometimes it will completely dissolve in an hour or so and dump the full dose into your system. It's like a caffeine buzz x2 when that happens and it makes my heart race like a jackhammer.

    24. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's FDA regulations. If she does write prescriptions for someone that she hasn't seen recently, where 'recently' is defined by the FDA, then she'll lose her license to prescribe anything ever.

    25. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by fropenn · · Score: 1

      There is some evidence of honey's impact on specific kinds of allergy symptoms, although honey, especially unfiltered and raw honey, can be dangerous. Some research has suggested honey "should not be considered a completely safe food" due to potential toxic compounds. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...

    26. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Old myth. The pollen that bees pick up from flowers are too heavy to be blown around by the wind, but the pollen allergens that irritate you (and this ONLY applies to pollen, other irritants aren't put into honey,) are the lighter ones that get blown around without the need for bees.

      You can go ahead because honey is delicious, but there's no scientifically conducted study that corroborates the theory.

    27. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Claritin D is just Caritin with Sudafed... FYI. Also you don't need a prescription, all of the D meds are just with sudafed and are treated the same as sudafed.

    28. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have hypothyroidism (Hashimoto's).

      The annual visit is to get a blood test to make sure I continue to have the correct dose of synthroid.

      Sometimes it changes, for various reasons, and it's not a bad idea to have a regular checkup.

      People with hyperthyroidism are rarely if ever treated with surgery these days - with perhaps the exception of thyroid cancer patients. The modern treatment is to inject you with radioactive iodine to kill part of your thryroid, so most people will have some activity left.

    29. Re: Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big government is what made the HSA inn the first place, you know, but I digress...

      The prescription thing is by far one of the worst aspects of the ACA, but you can blame Republicans and their obstruction for that. They removed that tax advantage to fund the program because raising new revenue sources was impossible given how the bill was passed. If the republicans had wanted to do anything except block anything at all and not pass any bill ever that was avoidable.

      Still is, but despite a majority in Congress you don't see a fix for that, right? They'd rather have you mad and inconvenienced than fix the problem and risk having you not hate the ACA so much.

    30. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... isn't the reason you have to go back periodically because you need to check in with your doctor and describe any potentially related symptoms (those probing questions they ask you) as well as periodically monitoring your thyroid levels for any necessary adjustments because getting those levels messed up can cause all sorts of issues? I can't imagine that you'd really want people self-medicating their thyroid hormone replacement therapy and for some people a malfunctioning thyroid is life threatening...

    31. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That "nuisance" can interfere with his drug supply.

      Something that interferes with his drug supply can KILL him.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    32. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by sjames · · Score: 1

      Consider, for some people the required office visit and associated fees are the final bit that forces them to skimp on their needed insulin, hastening death.

      How might you feel if you had to pay a doctor to get a permission slip to take air for treatment of your long-term oxygen dependence?

    33. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister came home from a trip to Austrailia with a fiance once. He was diabetic, and brought his insulin with him. That was the week when we discovered that the bottom shelf in our refrigerator was cold enough to freeze insulin. We were fortunate that my mother is a pharmacist, and knew what needed to be done to get him a replacement supply ASAP, or he'd have been in *real* trouble, considering that his doctor was *literally* on the other side of the world.

    34. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      antihistamines != decongestants

      The antihistamine can help prevent the congestion that necessitates using a decongestant, but not always. This is why you can get things like Claritin-D and Allegra-D that combine the decongestant and antihistamine.

      There are also generics that do this - I have a box of 24-hour generic Allegra-D on my desk right now.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    35. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that might work for seasonal allergies, the same as immunotherapy. It doesn't work for all allergies, such as those of us that are ridiculously allergic to dust mites.

      There's basically nothing you can do except manage symptoms and common sense stuff like vacuuming all the time and deleting carpet from your house.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    36. Re: Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You remember that the ACA was passed when Democrats owned both the House and the Senate (where the Democrats had 60 seats due to a special election, and a Republican switching parties), right?

      How in the hell are you blaming Republicans for *anything* to do with that?

    37. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some evidence of honey's impact on specific kinds of allergy symptoms, although honey, especially unfiltered and raw honey, can be dangerous. Some research has suggested honey "should not be considered a completely safe food" due to potential toxic compounds. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...

      Modding, so A/C post.

      Dude: really with the cautionary note on honey? Surprised you did not go all in with a honey-coated bacon rip.
      C'mon, lighten up a little.

    38. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Megane · · Score: 1

      I've used Actifed since I was a kid. Each Actifed tablet has twice the pseudoephedrine of a Sudafed (or at least how much used to be in a Sudafed), plus triprolidine which is a very good anti-allergy antihistamine (works great for hives from an allergy). I usually take half a tablet at a time when I need it, and push the other half back under the foil. If I take a whole tablet, 30 minutes later I fall asleep for four hours, so I only take a whole one when I'm serious about getting some sleep, too.

      You can get it generic from behind the counter, but you will probably need to mention triprolidine to get the right stuff. The pills themselves should be small white pills in bubble/foil packaging. Using only half a tablet at a time also means that you can go twice as long before you have to get more.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    39. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      It helped me. That's all I can really say.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    40. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      I adore honey, and have bought mine from local beekeepers (or traded with friends who keep bees)... but it hasn't had an appreciable effect on my allergies, and I haven't seen research which backs this up. Of course, allergy shots also didn't do much for me, despite having them for four years. (Antileukotrienes, on the other hand, were a life changer. There was a ton of lung capacity that I just wasn't getting to use, and with it an awful lot of endurance - who knew?)

    41. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conslder, that anyone with type 1 diabetes that isn't seeing their doctor twice a year is already hastening their death.

      I have to see my doctor once a year to get my prescriptions for asthma treatment renewed. I take care of that during my annual physical exam. It never occurred to me to think of it as an inconvenience or an imposition.

    42. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does not work, for a couple reasons. The most salient one is that the plants that pollinate via bees are not causing your allergies. Plants that rely on wind pollination are the ones that send pollen everywhere. If the bee-pollinated plants did this, they'd have no need for insects.

    43. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it isn't a problem for you. Count yourself fortunate but don't assume that it's true for everyone.

    44. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by antdude · · Score: 1

      Isn't its sugar bad?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    45. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helped me. That's all I can really say.

      Sigh

  6. I'm all Afrin now by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    After CMEA, I switched to oxymetazoline nasal spray, which works better than oral pseudoephedrine ever did. People say Afrin can be addictive, but I reduce risk of rebound congestion by using it in one nostril in the morning and the other at night.

    1. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah but pseudoephedrine relieves all congestion, not just nasal.

    2. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That still leads to rebound. Once a week you are safe. Once a day, you are not. That's why you keep needing to use it.

    3. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      ^^^ THIS ^^^

      Usually when I get a bad head cold, it's my ears that get plugged up to the point that I become almost deaf. Then I head to the pharmacy, get the "you dirty meth head!" look, try my best to interact with them verbally (maybe I should learn sign language), get more "you druggie!" looks, sign the "I'm a COW! Mooo!" form, take 2, and in 15 minutes my ears completely unplug.

    4. Re: I'm all Afrin now by tepples · · Score: 2

      I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at. I've read stories of people still needing to use it after a cold has cleared, but I've been able to avoid it. As directed, I use it for only three or four days during the peak of symptoms. But I take a weaker dose (3 sprays in one nostril instead of 2 or 3 in each) so that there's even less rebound after the half week course of treatment ends.

    5. Re:I'm all Afrin now by tepples · · Score: 1

      Usually when I get a bad head cold, it's my ears that get plugged up to the point that I become almost deaf.

      Are you sure it isn't just ear wax? Usually Debrox (carbamide peroxide ear drops) clears that up for me.

    6. Re: I'm all Afrin now by ememisya · · Score: 1

      I just get angry at something and my nose pops right open, got to be standing up though.

    7. Re:I'm all Afrin now by thoromyr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Afrin is pure, unadulterated evil. It is, far and away, the best decongestant on the market, bar none. It is also over the counter.

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word. There are no cravings that result from Afrin use. No one is going to feel a compulsion that they "just gotta have it". No junkie related crime. What *does* happen is that your body starts to rely on Afrin to keep the airways clear. Without it, you are stopped up and cannot breath. Even worse, after prolonged use the efficacy of Afrin is decreased. So eventually you will be using it three shots each nostril several times a day and still not be able to breathe.

      Thankfully, you *can* wean yourself off of Afrin. It is miserable, however, and not likely something you want to go through. The sooner you start the better. Although I've never had the misfortune to abuse Afrin like that I've known multiple people who have. At the beginning they talk about how wonderful it is (and it doesn't hurt that it is "just over the counter" so "it must be safe"), then they have to recover from it. I have significant long term breathing issues and at least twice a year I have to use Afrin for a few days in a row. Even at that I eventually noticed a diminishment of effect.

      The fact that something so debilitating, so damaging to the user's health, is sold over the counter while other less harmful drugs are strictly regulated says a lot about the true functioning of the FDA.

    8. Re:I'm all Afrin now by jbwolfe · · Score: 2

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word.

      I think your right. A more accurate description would be that one can become physically dependant on oxymetazoline as the rebound congestion becomes worse the more its used. Additionally, and perhaps worse, regular use can cause a host of unwanted side effects:http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+3143/

      --
      Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
    9. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

      Afrin is pure, unadulterated evil.

      Preach it, brother! My parents were hooked on Dristan nasal spray and I ended up hooked on it as a teenager. I had a serious dependency on it all through high school, especially when trying to sleep. I decided to go nearly cold-turkey in college which led to many sleepless nights due to feeling like I was suffocating and a roommate who almost punched me for snoring when I finally did get to sleep. It was worth finally kicking the habit, though.

      I don't know that it should be banned. It's wonderful stuff when you're suffering a cold but you really need to stop using it when the cold is gone.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    10. Re:I'm all Afrin now by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 0

      > The fact that something so debilitating, so damaging to the user's health, is sold over the counter while other less harmful drugs are strictly regulated says a lot about the true functioning of the FDA.

      Wait, what, we're not talking about Alcohol ? :-)

      * Hard to Others + Self

    11. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Salamander · · Score: 1

      Plus, most of these sprays contain benzalkonium chloride as a preservative, and that stuff can cause its own problems.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    12. Re: I'm all Afrin now by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > As directed, I use it for only three or four days during the peak of symptoms.

      Well...as directed, that is why its directed as such.

      MY first experience with it was at my doctor's recomendation. They gave me a script for a nasal steroid, and told me to use the OTC spray for the first 2 days, because it would take a few before the steroid started to help. Worked like a charm that way.

      Ever since I keep it around, needed it maybe twice a year, and never for more than the 2 days.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    13. Re:I'm all Afrin now by burbilog · · Score: 1

      It is possible to get rid of decongestant dependency with the help of hormonal nasal spray. It's called Nasonex in Russia, don't know about international names. It takes a few weeks to kick in and suddenly you don't have to use any decongestant, then it takes a few weeks to slowly stop using hormonal spray.

      I used it to get rid of horrible decongestant dependency. It worked like magic. Of couse, you have to be free of hormonophobia (some people prefer to die instead of taking hormonal drugs).

    14. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Afrin is great for your nose, especially if you have a deviated septum and chronic sinusitis. However when you have a full blown cold, it takes a bit more.

    15. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word. There are no cravings that result from Afrin use

      Maybe, this stuff to me is one of the greatest drugs ever. It actually works, works quickly, and is night/day. If you have nasal issues such that even when healthy you aren't breathing that well, Afrin is very compelling (it also helps if you don't want to have surgery you know you need to have). You will breathe really, really well. So there might be a psychological component, however minor.

      No one is going to feel a compulsion that they "just gotta have it".

      While I wouldn't describe it as anything like what heroin users allegedly go through, there is also a physical component. The rebound congestion effect of the stuff is similar to physical addiction in many senses and you will want to take more of the stuff to fix the problem. Eventually you end up with possibly a dangerous condition that requires surgery to resolve, or you man up and endure the side effects until they pass (usually 12 hours). Significantly less terrible than working through heroin withdrawal, but it is a form of withdrawal.

      I think it just degrees of addiction, but I think addictive is a good word for the way a user is likely to behave w/o education. It is definitely a far easier habit to kick than tobacco or opiates of course... I'm not sitting here jonesing for my afrin fix.

    16. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually when I get a bad head cold, it's my ears that get plugged up to the point that I become almost deaf.

      Are you sure it isn't just ear wax? Usually Debrox (carbamide peroxide ear drops) clears that up for me.

      How would it be ear wax or ear drops help? Ear congestion is between the nose and the eardrum, nothing you put into the ear is going to get in there.

    17. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word. There are no cravings that result from Afrin use. No one is going to feel a compulsion that they "just gotta have it". No junkie related crime. What *does* happen is that your body starts to rely on Afrin to keep the airways clear. Without it, you are stopped up and cannot breath. Even worse, after prolonged use the efficacy of Afrin is decreased. So eventually you will be using it three shots each nostril several times a day and still not be able to breathe.

      That is EXACTLY what addictive means, it is in fact the worst form of addiction: A physical one, a psychological addiction is considered less of a problem medically.

    18. Re:I'm all Afrin now by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      to be clear, I'm not saying it should be banned. I *am* saying that it is ridiculous for Afrin to be unregulated given how harmful it is compared to drugs that *are* regulated.

      I (unfortunately) have to use Afrin from time to time. I would be very upset if it was banned. Requiring a prescription would be annoying, but not that much of an issue (I already have to see the doctor regularly to renew other prescriptions for substances that are far less harmful).

    19. Re:I'm all Afrin now by tepples · · Score: 1

      (after a bit of research)
      I guess today I learned a head cold can block Eustachian tubes in some patients.

    20. Re:I'm all Afrin now by thoromyr · · Score: 2

      Nasonex is not the answer -- its long term use is harmful. And, speaking anecdotally, it is about as useful as regular use of saline solution. Or not.

      Regrettably I have quite a bit of experience with congestion. At one time or another I have been on a wide variety of medications. Nasonex, flonase, patonase, etc. In my experience none of them (with the exception of Afrin) have any meaningful effect. Allegra D was the one oral medication that provided *some* relief, but I eventually fell victim to one of its side effects and can no longer take it. I had some for quite a while after I switched to another and even tried switching back. It takes a few days and the reaction starts in.

      Now, if the pharmaceuticals could make a drug as good as Afrin without the consequences? That would be something. Heck, I'd settle for half or a quarter of Afrin's effectiveness.

    21. Re:I'm all Afrin now by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      Yeah... but we use language in a cultural context. And the *connotations* of saying something is "addictive" are more than that. Would you actually call someone who habitually used Afrin an addict?

      (If you answer "yes" be sure it isn't from pedantism, but what your actual usage would be. Further note that this is out of joint with the vast majority of speakers of English and would result in misunderstandings, some of them at your expense.)

    22. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alcohol can be made by anyone. You don't need a sophisticated lab. Trying to regulate things that are easy to make in the home always fails.

    23. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Dins · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, can it. I had a really bad one 5-10 years ago that included an ear ache. My hearing didn't return to normal for probably 6 months... It did eventually get there, though, but I was starting to wonder.

    24. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Amen! By brother had a nasty run-with Afrin (and clones). Only use in rare circumstances. The label should have a huge bright warning about repeated use.

    25. Re:I'm all Afrin now by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      One of the most painful things I've experienced was a cross-country flight with plugged Eustachian tubes. Not so bad going up to altitude as pressure comes off, but landing was excruciating.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    26. Re: I'm all Afrin now by lgw · · Score: 1

      I use one spray in each nostril, am free for 12 hours, then utterly plugged for 12 hours. People differ. I still use it in one nostril when it's the only way I can sleep but I wish for something better.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    27. Re: I'm all Afrin now by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Depending on the corticosteroid they prescribed, you may be able to get that over the counter now too.

      I just don't see it as much of an issue to take the card to the pharmacist to get pseudoephedrine once a month or so. I'm fine with the federal law the way it is. The real punch in the balls was when the State of Oregon passed a 'fight meth' law that made Pseudoephederine prescription only. When I lived in Portland that meant that I either had to get a script from a doctor / nurse practitioner and then wait an hour for a pharmacy technician to get to filling my script, which I then got to pay extra for; or drive across a bridge to Vancouver, WA and buy it for $5 with a driver's license.

      Phenylephrine is fucking snake oil - it doesn't do shit, and never has. I wouldn't mind seeing a class-action lawsuit against these pharma motherfuckers for the billions they've made selling a placebo to hundreds of millions of people.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    28. Re:I'm all Afrin now by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct - my mother became dependent on Afrin when she had an undiagnosed deviated septum. Once she (and her doctor) figured out what was going on (and a surgery later) all was well and the Afrin was no longer necessary.

      Unfortunately, the usual thing given for recovery from that type of surgery for inflammation? Afrin.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    29. Re:I'm all Afrin now by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Allegra-D is just regular Allegra with a good shot of Pseudoephederine. That's the 'D' - for Decongestant.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    30. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you just described is a physical addiction.

    31. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Full stop.
      Just because you choose to add extra connotations to a word, doesn't mean the rest of us have to stop using it.

    32. Re:I'm all Afrin now by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Some people actually have other medical issues that can be triggered or exacerbated by corticosteroids. The solution is not to ban oxymetazoline in favor of mometasone, or vice versa. Just let people have both, as needed, and trust them to use them responsibly. Sure, some people won't. But it's not like a little rebound congestion makes people violent or puts them out on the streets hustling for their next fix.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    33. Re: I'm all Afrin now by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      Blech I hate the idea of needing to show ID and be put on a list; in order to enforce a failed policy that has been eating itself for years.

      It was the law that created the market that caused idiots with a little chemistry knowledge to decide they could make good money risking blowing up houses. 50% of the people in burn units were not there for trying to make meth in apartment buildings before the laws made it profitable.

      Hell, before that, meth was just one of several stimulents some people abused, it was only the law causing meth to get selected on the basis of being "easiest to make in a bathtub lab" that really made it king.

      Drug laws have done many things, but the one thing they have utterly failed to do is even touch addiction rates....the one thing they were intended to do! And now, every time I get the sniffles, I have to be reminded of this abject failure?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    34. Re:I'm all Afrin now by wwalker · · Score: 1

      I have one simple lifehack to wean yourself off any of the decongestants that have a rebound effect (i.e. your nose gets stuffed up after you stop using them even though you are not sick any more). Just spray only one of your nostrils, and alternate next time. Yeah, you'll be breathing through just one of the nostrils, but it'll give the other one a chance to rest and recover from the rebound effect. Use the redundancy of paired organs that evolution gave us! :)

    35. Re:I'm all Afrin now by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Rebound congestion doesn't cause people to go out and harm others. And it doesn't really even harm the sufferer, it just makes them miserable. And I'm really annoyed by the trend to deny responsible users of medications, tools, chemicals, whatever; access because a minority are irresponsible.

      I take a bottle of Afrin with me whenever I'm going to have to significantly change altitude. I learned that lesson after an especially painful flight, having caught a cold when I was away from home for business. Most of the time, I don't use it. But it would really annoy the crap out of me if I had to run to my doctor before every business trip, vacation, or drive up to Yosemite.

      Maybe, just maybe, it might be a good idea to move it behind the pharmacy counter with the ephedrine*. But I think making it prescription-only would be going too far.

      * For that matter, has moving the ephedrine (pseudo, or otherwise) behind the counter really put a significant dent on the availability of amphetamine? Based on what I follow of the topic on the news, it seems like it's just as prevalent as it ever was.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    36. Re: I'm all Afrin now by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Phenylephrine is a great drug, just not for clearing nasal congestion. It's used all the time in anesthesia (to increase blood pressure).

    37. Re:I'm all Afrin now by neoritter · · Score: 1

      For me, it usually happens if I have a head cold getting onto a plain. Sucks all the crap into my ears.

    38. Re: I'm all Afrin now by neoritter · · Score: 1

      Man that sucks, getting Pseudophedrine in VA is easy. Yeah, they take your card to track the usage, but other than only being able to get it when the pharmacy is open it's a cake walk.

    39. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with Afrin is it makes you more congested 12 hours later than you were before. So you have to keep using it.

      I used to live in San Diego, and I frequently went swimming in the Ocean. Getting blasted by giant salt water waves is far and away the best decongestant "on the market" and it lasts for days. But if you don't have access to the ocean, the next best thing are saline sprays, hot steam from the shower with a little bit of eucalyptus oil dripped onto a candle based oil burner, and plenty of fresh air. Some foods also make congestion worse, so try to avoid those as well.

    40. Re:I'm all Afrin now by neoritter · · Score: 1

      It's not a true addiction unless there's a physical dependency. The psychological aspect is optional. It is medically correct to say that Afrin is addictive.

    41. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true. Afrin could cut through the Hoover Dam. But it's a necessary evil.

      Couple shots in each nostril, wait 15-20 minutes, blow your nose--you'll be breathing like a race horse for the next 8 hours.

    42. Re:I'm all Afrin now by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I describe caffeine as addictive. I describe video games as addictive. I don't see why I wouldn't describe Afrin as addictive (or maybe soften it by saying it "has addictive properties", or something). I've never run into any issues or misunderstandings due to my use of the word; perhaps we've had contact with different populations of English speakers.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    43. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Yeah but pseudoephedrine relieves all congestion, not just nasal.

      So does Nasacort ( triamcinolone ). I've used it in prescription for many years after they banned phenylpropanolamine. Pseudoephedrine was only ever marginally effective for me, and I tried a lot of things before finding the Nasacort.

      Not sure if the new over-the-counter Nasacort works as well or not, I'm still using the prescription.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    44. Re:I'm all Afrin now by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      A physical one, a psychological addiction is considered less of a problem medically.
      (facepalm) It is the opposite around. A physical addiction usually is over after one week of detox (alcohol, heroine etc.) with the exception of nicotine perhaps.
      The psychological one is the problem.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    45. Re:I'm all Afrin now by markhb · · Score: 1

      I just had that happen this weekend!

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    46. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      They mean addicted as in habit-forming. Kind of like Chapstick - and, yes, that stuff is horrendously habit-forming.

      Afrin is not as bad as the nasal spray they used to sell over-the-counter. My mom used that stuff enough that it completely destroyed her sense of smell. I mean completely. I can't remember what it was called.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    47. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * For that matter, has moving the ephedrine (pseudo, or otherwise) behind the counter really put a significant dent on the availability of amphetamine?

      I'd bet it has, because the people who cook meth probably would never think of getting pseudoephedrine by paying off a pharmacy worker, or by hijacking a truck on its way to the pharmacy, or...

    48. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      * For that matter, has moving the ephedrine (pseudo, or otherwise) behind the counter really put a significant dent on the availability of amphetamine? Based on what I follow of the topic on the news, it seems like it's just as prevalent as it ever was.

      I don't think so, based on likely the same news sources you have seen. They're just making it out of nastier chemicals now with even worse side effects, like If your teeth falling out and skin sloughing off like a walking dead character aren't bad enough already.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    49. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to a f'ing doctor, jesus christ....

      If you can't sleep due to Afrin rebound congestion all you have to do is take a low dose, wait for it to relieve congestion, then wash your nostrils with saline, then GO TO SLEEP. You shouldn't have full on rebound congestion the next day nor need further Afrin after a couple hours into the next day

    50. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg. I know what you mean. It's really painful when landing.

      I went to an ENT specialist who diagnosed me with Eustachian tube dysfunction. He suggested that I use some over the counter nasal steroid spray and spray it back towards my eustachian tubes. After two months it's done nothing. Only pseudoephedrine works for the symptoms but doesn't address the root cause.

    51. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't think it's all that addictive. I've suffered for years with chronic night-time nasal congestion, and so I've used oxymetazoline continuously ever since I found it months ago. At first I did as you do, one nostril in the morning and the other at night, but eventually I realized that I could do the same thing if I was addicted to it, and so I could easily continue my addiction with one nostril (and thus continue to breathe normally) while weaning the other nostril off of the stuff. So with my fears eliminated, I began using the stuff 24/7 in both nostrils, testing just how addictive it is.

      The withdrawal effects are limited to about a day, seemingly no matter how "addicted" you become. Also, just keeping in mind the limit of how much I should use seems to be enough to avoid needing more and more of the stuff. I use 3 sprays per nostril before going to bed (to make sure it works all night long), then after I wake up I use just one spray per nostril whenever breathing through my nose becomes annoying difficult, and a single spray does have an effect, it just isn't as obvious as the recommended 3 sprays and it takes longer, but using just one spray at a time does seem to be key to avoiding building up a tolerance to it during the day. I end up using 6 to 8 sprays per day, and despite keeping that up for months, my nasal congestion is still much improved compared to what it was before I found oxymetazoline, so I don't seem to be developing any tolerance.

      In short, you do have to be responsible with how you use it, but to become seriously addicted to it seems to require a lack of care in how you use it.

    52. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never seen it here but back in Europe I used to get the kid's dosage nasal decongestant spray and only spray one time but both nostrils and usually only before going to sleep. Never had a problem. Can't find that dosage here in Canada...

    53. Re:I'm all Afrin now by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      By brother

      You need Afrin so badly it shows in your typed text!!

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    54. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have persistent sinus troubles when landing in airplanes. I guess the trouble is that the airplane was pressurized a lot lower than the air pressure of the place where we're landing, so the relatively fast increase in pressure outside my sinuses, which my sinus passages are apparently unable to normalize quickly enough, causes a pressure differential that can be quite painful. As you say, one of the most painful things I've experienced. Proceeding under the belief that the pressure in my sinuses at that point is lower than the external pressure, I plug my nose, close my mouth, and force a small amount of air from my lungs into my sinuses. This balances the pressure (there is a sound when it happens that is audible to myself and even to people nearby, if the ambient noise is low enough) and the pain vanishes instantly.

      Before I knew what do to about it, I was flying in to Boston one night and had the most excruciating pain, which eventually subsided. When I got to the hotel later, I blew my nose and produced a very large amount of old and clotted blood. I think the pain subsided because I bled out into my sinuses, equalizing the pressure. It's a little bit alarming that the pressure differential was so great as to cause blood vessels to rupture, but I guess that's what happened.

    55. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happens to me every time I get a cold, no exceptions. It's really not fun being half-deaf for a solid week, and can even be quite painful at times.

    56. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alcohol is made by everyone. It's a metabolic byproduct.

    57. Re:I'm all Afrin now by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      It kinda does? It says on the bottle in the directions not to use for prolonged periods of more than a week or two.

    58. Re:I'm all Afrin now by NulDevice · · Score: 1

      Biggest problems with oxymetazoline are, as I've discovered both firsthand and from my ENT:

      1) Rebound congenstion. After a period of use, Oxymetazoline has the exact opposite effect - it makes everything worse.
      2) Tolerance - the period before rebound congestion gets shorter the more often you use it. I'm at the point where I get one spray use and that's it.

      --

      ----
      "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

    59. Re:I'm all Afrin now by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to talk to some heroin users and get good tips on managing that stuff.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    60. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lul wut? Chapstick is addictive? That's silly.

    61. Re: I'm all Afrin now by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Lul wut? Chapstick is addictive? That's silly.

      Try using it at least once a day for 3 or 4 weeks (common usage during winter especially) and get back to me when you try to stop. Better yet, research it for yourself.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  7. My personal remedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a hot shower and blow your nose while in the shower. Clear your nose to the point that you can breathe through both nostrils. It's disgusting, yes, but just grab the soap and wash your hands off before moving on. I do this even when I'm not sick, and I haven't been sick enough to need to take a day off in years.

    Note that I said 'sick enough', though. I sometimes still get the burning eyes and headaches, but I almost never get a stuffed/runny nose or suffer from coughing fits. I'm still sick, but I'm more of a carrier at that point than a sufferer.

    1. Re:My personal remedy by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      Clear your nose to the point that you can breathe through both nostrils.

      Doesn't work when your nasal membranes are swollen shut. Plus, you could blow out an eardrum if you try to clear your nose too strenuously. I know this personally.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:My personal remedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. I get sinusitis around twice a year, with the changing of seasons. An ENT I spoke to about it says it's just allergic reaction, so not much sympathy there. I generally avoid most drugs, mostly because I don't feel so much better that I would risk the side effects (let alone the costs) - from cold meds and decongestants all the way to antibiotics.

      I have started using a neti pot to rinse out the gunk in the nose and lowest sinus cavity with some salt solution. The morning routine seems to be most beneficial since stuff seems not to drain as well when sleeping (horizontal) as opposed to during the day (vertical). Keeping things moist enough so that natural drainage doesn't stop also helps. I still do get the sinus episodes, but they seem to be fairly mild and I haven't taken prescription meds for the last couple. Bed rest for a day or two, some doctor-recommended vitamins/supplements, and off I go again. (Yes, I'm thankful for my GP that is understanding that way and doesn't put some medical gestapo on my case when I ask her if there's an alternative treatment to the antibiotics course she would otherwise prescribe.)

    3. Re:My personal remedy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      but just grab the soap

      No sir. You're not gonna trick me a second time.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:My personal remedy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I have started using a neti pot [wikipedia.org] to rinse out the gunk in the nose and lowest sinus cavity with some salt solution.

      You should try this stuff I found a few years ago, Alkalol. It's an old remedy and you can buy it at CVS and most Walgreens and it's on Amazon. It comes with a little neti-pot type thing and it works great. I find it a lot more effective than just the neti pot with saline solution.

      http://www.alkalolcompany.com/

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Law don't follow the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In many places, the sale of pseudoephedrine is straight up banned. In many other places, the purchasing of pseudoephedrine is severely limited in quantity which is enforced by a pretty widespread database. The last time I purchased some, I got grilled for 10 minutes by an assistant manager because I last purchased some 3 or 4 months ago. They kept apologizing because I was 'near the limit' but that the authorities threatened them with removal of their various pharmacy licenses if someone went over their 'allotment' at their pharmacy. They went so far as to give me a box of 'the other stuff' for free. After I left I was immediately pulled over and grilled by a police officer about 'trying to obtain narcotics.' Yes, the motherfuckers called the police on me after I left.

    It doesn't stop there. Trucks to major stores, carrying pseudoephedrine products, have been stopped and searched/delayed only ending when those products were surrendered, for no legal reason. Still the meth epidemic continues mostly unabated as the serious meth cooks just buy their shit from China, filter it through a few people, and have enough supply to cook for a decade. Everyone else suffers. Its literally easier to obtain meth where I live than it is to obtain two boxes of medication containing pseudoephedrine.

    1. Re:Law don't follow the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an article on making pseudoephedrine from meth...

    2. Re:Law don't follow the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still the meth epidemic continues mostly unabated as the serious meth cooks just buy their shit from China

      That's because nobody ever used the stuff at the store to make any significant quantity. It was primarily used by people who wanted the ease of access, they'd get a couple buddies to all throw in $20 to cover the supplies and then get geeked out for a few days on it. And although Law Enforcement likes to call the drug "meth", it was actually a slightly different drug referred to on the street as 'Crank'. The specifics of what the drug actually was could vary based on what was used as a base, and the process and other substances used to cook it up.
      A lot of the small time crank dealers were already closing up shop due to the increase of real Meth (usually called 'Crystal' on the Streets). If you have the know-how and the equipment, it's actually still really easy to get large quantities of the needed ingredients. As it became more popular, the Cartels in Mexico started setting up huge labs and producing industrial quantities, then shipping it across the border.

      So the real effect of the law was to put a lot of small time dealers out of business, resulting in a large increase in the big industrial operations. LE likes that, because instead of making a dozen busts of "less than a gram" they can grab headlines busting shipments of kilos of pure Crystal every couple of months. The Cartels were also able to turn it into a major money maker. It was a pretty direct parallel to what happened with Pot in the 70's... it used to be common to see people grow a few plants for personal use and then do some small-time dealing to cover costs, but heavy enforcement action resulted in very few homegrown operations and the rise of major growhouses and farming operations.

      Another item of note is that very few people attempted to use liquid forms of pseudofed to make crank. Most liquid forms contained painkillers and other medicines which make the cooking process longer and more complicated, requiring additional skills and ingredients to get a usable product. You'd end up spending more than you could sell it for, just to get something that might not even work... in many cases it'd be easier, more reliable, and safer just to buy a case of Nyquil and drink it to catch a high. But the ban didn't just cover the solid, pure pill forms, it covered everything. So now you have to find a 24 hour pharmacy which stocks it, or suffer until the regular stores open. Then you get to hand your ID and purchase history over to the local cops, who can use pretty much any purchase attempt as 'probable cause' to kick down your door, shoot your dog, and trash your house searching for a 'meth lab' at 3am, while Child and Family Services waits to rush in and kidnap your children.

      Personally, any time I need some these days I have my Doctor call in a prescription for it. Which means I can then legally have my wife pick it up for me so I don't have to drag my diseased carcass out of the house and stand around in line at the store sneezing and spreading illness. Plus, it gets covered by my health plan and I end up paying a lot less for it.

  9. Meth is a CII prescription drug by tepples · · Score: 1

    In fact, Desoxyn (methamphetamine hydrochloride tablets) is still legal in the USA. It's a prescription drug used to treat obesity and ADHD, in the same Schedule II as Ritalin (methylphenidate hydrochloride) and Adderall (mixed amphetamine salts).

    1. Re:Meth is a CII prescription drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, Desoxyn (methamphetamine hydrochloride tablets) is still legal in the USA. It's a prescription drug used to treat obesity and ADHD, in the same Schedule II as Ritalin (methylphenidate hydrochloride) and Adderall (mixed amphetamine salts).

      It also can induce psychosis. Take it long enough--how long that is depends on a combination of genetics, dosage, specific drug, and luck--and you'll get a psychotic episode.

    2. Re:Meth is a CII prescription drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One benefit of having an ADHD diagnosis is that Ritalin is a rather effective decongestant --- in my experience anyway. So much so that I often don't notice respiratory-tract infections, due to the general absence of mucus, or at least don't realize I am suffering from one until I piece together the other symptoms that may be present. At least until my dose starts wearing off in the evening... but sure enough my congestion clears up the next morning around the same time my first dose starts doing its thing.

      I never bothered taking any decongestants for a cold or flu before starting on Ritalin so I can't make an informed comparison as to the efficacy for this purpose, but it seems to work for me...

    3. Re:Meth is a CII prescription drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wikipedia article you linked says, several times, that it is only induced by overdose or the chronic use of high doses. The doses used for medical treatment are much lower than recreational doses and I've never known of anybody who uses it for medical purposes having a psychotic episode.

      Don't you have a DARE meeting that you should be attending right now?

  10. all trials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Enough of this, help support http://www.alltrials.net. They demand that all trials are registered and published.

  11. The good news... by w3woody · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is that crystal meth is relatively easy to obtain, and it can be converted to Sudafed. Now all we need is for researchers to simplify the process and provide a practical process for the layman.

    1. Re:The good news... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up... :)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:The good news... by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Chemistry can be used in clever ways.

    3. Re:The good news... by pla · · Score: 1

      No need to convert it (unless your employer drug tests) - Meth itself works great as a decongestant all by itself, at low doses; and hey, better than coffee to get you moving in the morning. XD

    4. Re:The good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it give me runny shits at 10am the way coffee does?

    5. Re:The good news... by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Ahhh,... you beat me to it. Love that paper you linked to.

      Now we just need a way to convert crack (big jail time) into powder (smaller jail time) and we'll all be happy.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    6. Re:The good news... by w3woody · · Score: 1
  12. Claritin D works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too much pain in the ass to get it. Have to go to different stores if you have more than one person with alergies in the same house. Can't buy enough to last any reasonable amount of time when living out of town. Easier to just suffer with allergies.

  13. Howa about oral penis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very effective, according to researchers at the University of Arizona.

  14. pseudoephedrine or not by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Nothing else taken orally works for me. PE also raises my blood pressure temporarily. That's where the warnings should lie. Making it difficult to acquire sufficient amounts to produce meth had the effect of pushing the manufacture over the border and increasing the amount of violent crime involved in smuggling it back into the US. Oh yeah, and puts me on more government lists. They'll probably put me on the no-fly list for being chronically congested.

  15. It's not popular... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    It's the only thing that is offered because these companies are cheap assholes.

    I only buy the good old stuff you have to give blood samples and anal probings to get. Luckily the guy at costco will let me do two transactions to get two 15 pill packs to last for a while.

    Do not waste time with any of the alternate crap as it really is 100% ineffective.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:It's not popular... by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      Luckily the guy at costco will let me do two transactions to get two 15 pill packs to last for a while.

      Most states have a reasonable limit, like 3.6g/day purchase (up to 7.5g/month). At 60mg per pill, that's 60 pills in a single purchase. It sounds like your Costco guy doesn't know what he's doing. With the log book, it doesn't even make a difference that you split them into two transactions, the limit is per day not per transaction.

    2. Re:It's not popular... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      most places allow you only ONE box. and some stores stopped carrying the 15 pill boxes and only have the 10 pill boxes just to be assholes.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:It's not popular... by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      It does depend on what you buy exactly. The 12 hour time release variants have 120mg / pill which makes 30 pills your daily cap and no more than 60 in a month (which, rather conveniently, covers a single user for the entire month at the recommended dose). The 24 hour variant has 240mg per pill. I do no recommend the 24 hour version though because the time release mechanism is sketchy and can sometimes dissolve immediately resulting in...undesirable side effects. The side effects are tolerable in the 12 hour pills, but still quite uncomfortable. I have this feeling like my heart would explode if that happened with the 24 hour dose.

    4. Re:It's not popular... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Because the consequences of a single slip-up are WAY overblown, most chains err on the side of excessive caution.

  16. Medication for Common Cold? by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

    I never take medication when I have a common cold. It just doesn't help. Is your throat sore? Just drink some tea. Is your nose stuck? blow it. It will get better in a day or two. Only if I get a headache I may take some Acetaminophen or Ibuprofen, but that's it.

    1. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I never take medication when I have a common cold. It just doesn't help.

      How would you even know if you haven't tried it? And if you have, perhaps you've only tried the one in this story that doesn't work.

      And the correct medication does work, very well, for many people. It does not get rid of the cold, it only reduces, or, for some, completely eliminates, the most annoying symptoms. This has been proven in double blind testing.

      >Is your throat sore? Just drink some tea.

      That has never worked for me, if anything, the extra heat irritates the throat.

      >Is your nose stuck? blow it. It will get better in a day or two.

      So I can blow it raw for two days, or take a pill that clears it up in an hour. Choices...

    2. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never take medication when I have a common cold. It just doesn't help me.

      There, FTFY. Different people's immune systems respond differently to viral infections.

      _You_ may have an immune system that fends off the virus and doesn't produce significant symptoms as side effects. _I_ have an immune system that fends off the virus and produces moderately strong symptoms as side effects. Ibuprofen + decongestant during the 72 hours of infection for a cold makes a huge difference for me, especially for the succeeding 96 hours.

    3. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong. Medications do in fact work. It's a science thing.

      However most people who take Sudafed don't have a cold, they have chronic nasal congestion or swelling that makes it difficult to sleep.

    4. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Medications for colds aren't meant to cure it - they merely manage the symptoms. If you want - sure, just deal with it and it will go away on its own, but you can use medication to make that time between when you get sick and when you get better a lot more tolerable.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Only if I get a headache I may take some Acetaminophen or Ibuprofen, but that's it.

      Ibuprofen is also useful for reducing inflammation and lowering fever. I've been specifically prescribed ibuprofen after wisdom tooth operations for the former reason, though I didn't need anything for the pain. Fever is another useful bodily response you may need to limit at times.

      Acetaminophen is great if you really want liver damage.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    6. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Acetaminophen is not dangerous if you follow the instructions. You're not supposed to take it continuously.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by operagost · · Score: 1

      The point is that you can't blow your nose, because the congestion is in your SINUSES.

      If medicines don't work, why are you taking ibuprofen for your headache? Just bash your head against the wall until you pass out!

      If you can't understand something, maybe it's because you're ignorant.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't understand the difference between ignorance and stupidity, maybe it's because you're stupid.

    9. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Same here, I even avoid the pain killers you mentioned (although I can tell their efficacy when giving them to my kids when they have fevers).

      About all I use is a warm steam machine (the cold mist ones are no where near as effective as the heat versions). Clears the sinuses and makes the throat feel better. Helps with sleep preparation as well (and probably good for the skin).

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    10. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, acetaminophen causes more acute liver failure in the U.S. than all other causes combined. Why risk it when there are much safer and just as cheap and effective options?

    11. Re:Medication for Common Cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but you can use medication to make that time between when you get sick and when you get better a lot more tolerable.

      I have found that they also shorten the time to recovery, though obviously not from any curative effect. I can get more sleep when I can breathe through the night, and I'm not coughing, etc. The effects of tea/honey never last 6 to 8 hours, and acetaminophen does essentially nothing for congestion and coughing. Better sleep yields a faster recovery, at least for me.

      - T

  17. Free the Fed!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put seudofed back on the counter now that we've solved the meth problem.

  18. Spicy! by tmshort · · Score: 1

    Spicy feeds clear the sinuses. Hooray for capsaicin!

    1. Re:Spicy! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Horseradish does this also. Eat some freshly ground horseradish and it'll clear your sinuses right out. If you must get the bottled stuff, go for the white bottled horseradish. The purple stuff is mixed with beet juice and is weak. I could eat forkful after forkful of that stuff with no reaction. But one nice forkful of fresh horseradish and your sinuses clear RIGHT up!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Spicy! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really seem to do that for me. I get a strong burn in my nose if I eat too much horse radish but it's just a quick reaction that clears up after a few seconds. Capsaicin actually gets the sinuses open and draining for a while.

      From a culinary perspective though I enjoy both, though I'll admit horseradish was much more of an acquired taste.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:Spicy! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Boil some sliced fresh ginger. Make green tea. Mix them and sprinkle some cayenne on it. Stir. Add lemon if you want.

      It tastes great and will open up your head in a hurry. You can sweeten it if you need.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  19. Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese Amazon aromatherapy does better than phenylephrine. On the rare occasion I have a head cold bad enough, I always head for the pharmacy desk and ask for generic Sudafed. I get the "you're just a filthy meth head" look, sign the "I'm a COW. MOooo!" form, take two, and it clears up within 15 minutes.

    (Disclaimer: not the cow guy, just a fan of his/her work.)

    btw, where is the cow guy? Somebody mod him/her informative if s/he posts in this thread.

  20. "We are looking out for the consumer ..." by Nutria · · Score: 1

    "and he or she needs to know that science says that homeopathy does not work for anyone."

    That's the study I really want to see!!!

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:"We are looking out for the consumer ..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please suit yourself: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/cam02

  21. I thought it was just me? by funky49 · · Score: 1

    I've tried the OTC nasal decongestants for a few years before giving up. I would just suffer without wasting my money. They never seemed to work for me. The neti pot worked better. I thought it was just me those pills didn't work for. Now science brings me comfort. A pox on the snake oil being sold!!

    The behind the counter stuff works great but makes me feel 'speedy' and stimulated until it climaxes in a creepy anxious state. Feeling the effects of pseudoephedrine makes this chill person have extra compassion for people with anxiety. I never really understood it until using 'the good stuff'. Now I just suffer without it as well.

    f49

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
    1. Re:I thought it was just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had some luck with 1mg xylometazolin. It seems to work fine in a spray form, but dries up the nose as well.

    2. Re:I thought it was just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do not try ephedrine then !

    3. Re:I thought it was just me? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the 12 hour stuff is less likely to give you the 'speedy' anxious side effects, probably to do with a time release matrix whereas the other dose probably dumps the whole thing in your blood all in one go.

  22. You interviewed Science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky you. That guy/gal never replies to texts/emails/calls... maybe I got the wrong contact info?

  23. The point of stopping the little guy by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Was never to save people from meth, it was to contain the damage to the poor communities. One of the byproducts of our drug war is that the poors keep their misery to themselves. If they start spilling over we toss then in jail. Meth broke that. You had desperate folks cooking it in middle class neighborhoods. Making it otc restored the balance and put the drug way back where it belonged: in poor neighborhoods

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The point of stopping the little guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has got to be the dumbest thing anyone ever said.

      Seriously? Making PE OTC moved meth back into the ghetto. That sounds like the whacky tabacky talking to me.

    2. Re: The point of stopping the little guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor -ãblack
      let's be fully honest

    3. Re: The point of stopping the little guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there are black people that use meth, but it seems that meth is a predominantly white trash kind of drug, the same way that crack was predominantly an african-american problem.

  24. ColdFX by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Meh. There are plenty of BS "remedies" for all sorts of aliments. All citing "clinical studies" usually of some unknown origin or bought and paid for by themselves. I think ColdFX is one of those. It is far from alone. There is a reason that "Snake Oil Salesman" has its origins in the medical industry's past. One that has never completely gone away. You can walk into any pharmacy anywhere, and probably point to literally hundreds of things that dubiously do anything, don't have any research pointing to that they do, or are marketed in such a way as to not require it.

    I don't think any government agency FDA included really does enough about consumer protection in this regard. It is like homeopathy, a government agency will go so far as to say that it is "safe" (of course it is, it is basically nothing), but that is as far as they go, providing no consumer protection against marketing and ripping off consumers thinking they are buying a useful product.

  25. Never take any of that garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never understood it, even decongestants don't work for more than 20 min or so......might as well just take a shot of JD or Schnapps.

  26. So much for the idea that the FDA protects us by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    It's supposed to assure us that the medications we take are both safe and effective. In practice, we have seen approvals of compounds that later turn out to be dangerous (Vioxx) or ineffective, as in this case. Meanwhile, the glacial pace of the FDA approval process makes every drug we buy more expensive than it should be.

    Time to make FDA ratings advisory, rather than mandatory. Let patients, doctors and insurance companies decide whether they want to stay with the gold standard of FDA-approved, or take a risk on something new and still in the pipeline, or use one of the many medications that are approved in Europe or Japan, but have not yet passed the FDA.

    And no, there wouldn't be the explosion of quackery you fear. "Alternative medicines" are already exempt from FDA scrutiny as 'supplements', so that whole area would see no change.

    1. Re:So much for the idea that the FDA protects us by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      Agreed that the FDA has serious flaws, but I want to go off on a tangent here

      "...compounds that later turn out to be dangerous (Vioxx) "

      Vioxx is a case study in USA ignorance. This drug was an extremely effective treatment for arthritis and other chronic pain. All of a sudden it's found to increase the risk of heart attack and stroke and in typical knee-jerk USA fashion, it's promptly banned. "Vioxx == bad". What a shame. We're not talking about something that's inherently dangerous, only something that increases risks of certain health events.

      It should be up to the individual to decide if they are willing to trade off the risks for the reward of pain relief. The idea of "increased risk" for an overweight chain smoker with arthritis is entirely different than "increased risk" for a 50 y/o marathon runner with chronic joint pain. For a healthy non-smoker with an extremely low risk of stroke or heart attack, even a 50% increase in their risk might be trivial. A compound like Vioxx has the potential to significantly increase the quality of life of millions of people. The fact that it's unavailable because of certain risks associated with using it is demonstrative of the stupidity of our society.

  27. Can anyone explain to me.... by tekrat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How I can buy 50,000 bullets and high capacity magazines, no questions asked, but if I try and buy 30 boxes of decongestant, cops show up at my door?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Can anyone explain to me.... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Because America, you commie pinko!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Can anyone explain to me.... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Because there is no 2nd amendment right to have clear sinuses. Oh, and, Charlton Heston never stood in front of a crowd, held aloft a mortar and pistil, and told the government they can pry it from his cold, dead, and shaking hands.

    3. Re:Can anyone explain to me.... by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      But if we're talking mortar LAUNCHERS and pistols, well, I think he's done that once or twice. ;)

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    4. Re:Can anyone explain to me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it's all right if people die, but not if they get high first.

    5. Re:Can anyone explain to me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there is an official War on Drugs and only an unofficial war on guns. Tracing and tracking ammo was tried from 1968 through 1986, it didn't help anything so was dropped. Perhaps we'll get lucky and the same will happen with sudafed.

      All other things being equal, maybe the person with 50k rounds is going here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... (knob creek night shoot)

    6. Re:Can anyone explain to me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would take far more than 30 boxes of the cold medication that they used to sell from behind the pharmacy counter to make any meth at all. From what I have read, it would take at least half of a semi-load! The whole thing was just to make people think that something was being done about meth making. Now the stores around here do not even sell the good stuff from behind the counter any more because of greatly reduced sales numbers. The purpose of big pharma is to rip off as much $$$$$$$ from people as possible with as little cost to themselves as possible!!!

  28. While they are at it... by MrVictor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the FDA is at it, can they please tackle all the other snake-oil products at the drug stores? All the homeopathic crap, Airborne Head On, magnet bullshit, diet pills, etc. They are all 100% bullshit placebos.

  29. All it does is raise blood pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing that phenylephrine is good for is raising blood pressure. It does absolutely nothing for congestion. Any decongestant effects, I'm convinced, are just the placebo effect.

  30. Dosage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sudafed has 120mg of PE HCI. That seems to be more than 10mg in the study?

    Anyway, decongestants with PE are the only ones that work for me. I really don't know why so many people here are saying it doesn't do anything. And no, it's not the placebo effect for me.

    1. Re:Dosage by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Sudafed has 120mg of PE HCI. That seems to be more than 10mg in the study?

      Anyway, decongestants with PE are the only ones that work for me. I really don't know why so many people here are saying it doesn't do anything. And no, it's not the placebo effect for me.

      Reactions to drugs vary widely. Morphine doesn't work for everybody, but it works for most. PE doesn't work everybody, but it also doesn't seem to work for many.

      When a drug has no effect for most people, people are allowed to say "drug does not work" rather than "drug does not work for most people, except for a few ACs on slashdot who say it works for them"

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  31. I was right! by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

    I've been calling Sudafed PE "Sudafed Placebo Edition" for years.

    --

    --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
  32. Heroin used to be legal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and, hey, if you take it orally, it's not nearly as addictive as using it i.v.

  33. Where I live by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

    The allergies are so bad where I live meth dealers have been turning meth back into pseudoephedrine.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  34. Still readily available in Canada by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    Pseudoephedrine is still readily available in Canada in many forms, and we don't have huge problems with meth manufacture and addiction. Making it illegal won't solve the social problems which cause people to seek it out in the first place. If you stop people from obtaining pseudoephedrine, they'll just move on to some other drug.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Still readily available in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Which brands? I used to take Contac for colds but now they do nothing because instead of pseudoephedrine they now use phenelyphrine.

    2. Re:Still readily available in Canada by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The two I can think of off the top of of my head are Advil Cold and Sinus and Benelyn. Not all versions of Belelyn have pseudoephedrine. Some of them have switched to phenylephrine. Here's the info from their web sites.

      Advil Cold & Sinus

      Active Ingredient(s) & Purpose:

      Daytime Caplets: Ibuprofen 200 mg / Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride 30 mg; Analgesic / Decongestant

      Nighttime Caplets: Ibuprofen 200 mg / Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride 30 mg / Chlorpheniramine Maleate 2 mg; Analgesic / Decongestant / Antihistamine

      Benelyn All-In-One

      EACH CAPLET CONTAINS:
      DM Cough Suppressant:
      Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide
      Controls dry cough. 15 mg
      D Decongestant:
      Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride
      Relieves stuffy nose and nasal congestion. 30 mg
      E Expectorant:
      Guaifenesin
      Relieves chest congestion. 100 mg
      A Analgesic:
      Acetaminophen (Extra Strength)
      Relieves pain, fever, headache and sore throat pain.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Still readily available in Canada by compro01 · · Score: 2

      1. All of them AFAIK. Tylenol has different formulas, some with pseudoephedrine and some with phenelyphrine (look at the ingredients list to tell the difference). Benelyn, Advil, Buckley's, and the store generic brands seem to all be pseudoephedrine.

      2. Most pharmacies around here also carry straight pseudoephedrine tablets. They're behind the counter, but you just ask for it, no ID needed (I'm not sure if there's any kind of limit on purchases, as I've never needed more than the one pack at a time). Comes in packs of twelve 120mg tablets and is good for about 12 hours. These are my go to decongestant.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  35. Here is what works. by emil · · Score: 1

    Crushed garlic. Eat it raw.

    A small (146 healthy adults) double-blind, placebo-controlled study found that a daily supplement containing purified allicin, had dramatic results by reducing the risk of catching a cold by 64%, the symptom duration was reduced by 70% and those in the treatment group were much less likely to develop more than one cold.

    Allicin has antiviral activity both in vitro and in vivo. Among the viruses susceptible to allicin are Herpes simplex type 1 and 2, Parainfluenza virus type 3, human Cytomegalovirus, Influenza B, Vaccinia virus, Vesicular stomatitis virus and Human rhinovirus type 2.

    Allicin has been found to have numerous antimicrobial properties, and has been studied in relation to both its effects and its biochemical interactions. One potential application is in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), an increasingly prevalent concern in hospitals. A screening of allicin against 30 strains of MRSA found high level of antimicrobial activity, including against strains that are resistant to other chemical agents. Of the strains tested, 88% had minimum inhibitory concentrations for allicin liquids of 16 mg/L, and all strains were inhibited at 32 mg/L. Furthermore, 88% of clinical isolates had minimum bactericidal concentrations of 128 mg/L, and all were killed at 256 mg/L. Of these strains, 82% showed intermediate or full resistance to mupirocin. This same study examined use of an aqueous cream of allicin, and found it somewhat less effective than allicin liquid. At 500 mg/L, however, the cream was still active against all the organisms tested—which compares well with the 20 g/L mupirocin currently used for topical application.

    1. Re:Here is what works. by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Garlic works wonders.

      My Grandpa ate a clove of garlic every day, and never got sick (no colds, no flus, no pneumonia, no bronchitis, etc). The only ailment he got was the heart attack that killed him (but even that was mild in that he took a shower, walked into his bedroom, sat down on the bed, and just collapsed quietly and passed away).

      When we have fresh garlic in the house, we try to munch on it while we're cooking dinner (even the kids). Makes those weeks much more pleasant (although our breath isn't). Then we tend to forget we have it, it goes bad, and we don't buy any for awhile.

      I've heard the garlic pills help with the bad breath and burning, but aren't as effective as eating fresh garlic.

    2. Re:Here is what works. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      My Grandpa ate a clove of garlic every day, and never got sick (no colds, no flus, no pneumonia, no bronchitis, etc).

      Because his breath was so horrendous no one ever got close enough to spread an infection to him.

    3. Re:Here is what works. by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      Hey, whatever works man.

            - Howard Hughes

    4. Re:Here is what works. by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite home remedy for congestion is a Tom Yum Soup paste imported from Thailand I found one day at my local Asian food store. Just add hot water (and if you want to get fancy shrimp, mushrooms, green onions) and it makes a fiery hot soup. It's delicious and instantly clears up any nasal or chest congestion.

    5. Re:Here is what works. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Great!

      Now what are the effects of garlic on allergy sufferers? Not everyone that uses decongestants are fighting a virus. Some of us have over-active immune systems that thing very benign things like pollen and dust are threats that need to be destroyed at all costs.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    6. Re:Here is what works. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If the garlic is fresh, that means young plants, not stored to long (especially not in the fridge) you should not have breath/smell problems.
      Also occasionally teeth brushing helps :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  36. more nanny state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "consumers should go that extra step and get it (pseudoephedrine) from behind the counter."

    Like I'm given any fucking alternative by the nanny state. The phenylephrine does nothing, I wasted my money on it and found no relief from it.

    Methamphetamine sales have continued to rise even in states that have long required pseudoephedrine purchases to be made at the counter. It's all theater, stupid middle class white folks don't want people cooking in their neighborhoods, they'd rather cartels cook the stuff in Latin America and East Asia and import the garbage in massive quantities.

    When will America stop creating black markets that are the foundation of powerful cartels? We make the world a worse place with every new federal law we enact. It's staggering the amount of lives we'd save by disbanding the US Congress.

  37. Who cares about the dumbass meth heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring back cold medications that actually work!

  38. Accounting for illegal businesses by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

    I have news for you. A lot of them ARE de-facto or even actual trained accountants. If you want to do something illegal on a big scale and not go to jail for it, you had better have a more than passing familiarity with accounting. All that money has to be accounted for same as with any other business and it has to be moved around and used to pay bills, buy materials and stored somewhere. Who do you think does all that? The tooth fairy?

  39. Why buy at all? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    Ephedrine from Ephedra plant (or Ma Huang, if you're Chinese) is exactly as effective as pseudoephedrine, and anybody can grow it in their own garden... why is there a market for the chemically synthesized version in the first place? IIRC, the only difference between ephedrine and pseudoephedrine is that one is a right-handed and the other is left-handed molecule, meaning both good be used for manufacturing meth... makes me wonder when Walter White is going to take up gardening...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Why buy at all? by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      Didn't they ban the sale of Ephedra also? I used to get weight loss smoothie powder from GNC with Ephedra back in the 90s. I think the FDA banned it due to people supposedly having cardiac events. It seems to be banned from sale as a nutritional supplement in the U.S., but I'm not sure how that affects the ability to grow it privately.

    2. Re:Why buy at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you know how big a dose you're getting.

    3. Re:Why buy at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes me wonder when Walter White is going to take up gardening...

      Perhaps you forgot that Walter White (aka Heisenberg) is already pushing up daisies.
      Maybe Jesse Pinkman will take up gardening?

  40. Big Pharma lying? Never! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather like Big Pharma and so-called 'vaccinations'... they will lie through their teeth, because their are billions of dollars to be made...

    Jenner was a fraud. And thus all of 'vaccination' is a fraud.

    http://www.whale.to/v/hadwen1.html

    Why has nobody ever refuted any of Dr Hadwen's talks on 'vaccination'?

  41. There are existing crime ecosystems by tempest69 · · Score: 2

    They can't just move into running guns, as there are already criminals that do that, but their main buyers (drug pushers) are not buying, so it doesn't work.
    So then there is human trafficking, black markets, illegal gambling, theft, counterfeiting, and extortion.
    I don't think there is much growth potential in most of these fields.
    And with police relieved from most of the interdiction work, there are more resources left enforce the other problems.

  42. can we remove the other placebos? by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    I have yet to find a non-prescription cough medicine that works, yet plenty are available for purchase.
    Oh, and how about all those homeopathic choices on the shelves?

    1. Re:can we remove the other placebos? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Dextromethorphan works quite well on me, although I have to exceed the dosage suggestion by a considerable margin. It is safe to take quite a bit of it, I find the side effects distracting from having a cold.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  43. Funny how that can be restated as: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to take Sudafed for my allergies, but then they had to change because METH. Now I take Claritin D, and if I want more than a 2 week supply, I have to get a prescription. This requires me to go see my doctor every so often, because she isn't keen to give prescriptions without checkups. All of this mess because somebody might use a drug as an ingredient for a drug that is illegal.

  44. Thanks, drug addicts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad that the drug culture robbed us of more effective ingredients for cold medicine.

    I wonder how many more products will have to be altered because addicts found a new way to misuse them.

    1. Re:Thanks, drug addicts by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Which drug culture would that be? The one that's allowed by the government because they get big payoffs from big pharma, or the one that is declared illegal, because they won't grease the right palms?

      Drugs are drugs. Some are illegal and some are not. And as far as I can tell, it's completely arbitrary.

      For example, Oxycontin is one of the most addictive and deadly drugs there is, yet it is legal with a "prescription". Meanwhile cannibis is mildly addictive, with few side effects, and is generally safe compared to most, but is illegal in most states of the USA.

      So, "drugs" being good or bad has nothing to do with their relative danger, it has to do with politics, and politics ONLY.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  45. Great. It actually works for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like I am in the minority, but it keeps my ears unplugged during allergy season, and I survived a recent minor cold/cough only using the little red pills.

  46. Stuffy nose about 20 days a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a stuffy nose about 20 days a year and hit the drug store about every 2 yrs to get a 36/48 pill pak. Don't recall much about it except I could pick up those tiny red pills at the military hospital for free as needed.

    Tried the other crap. Didn't work. Tasted nasty and I think there were other side-effects. Felt "funny" all day.

    With pseudoephedrine, my nose clears up and I forget about it until tomorrow. I always take about 10 pills when traveling - worry a litte about it entering places like Japan and Singapore where these are illegal, but nobody cares when it is personal-use drugs.

    These days I have to show ID, get a pharmacist, fill out a form and have a short talk about how nothing else works 12 hours and is as cheap. Last pharmacist insisted this was necessary to slow the meth problem. She didn't like when I said it was a waste of me time.

    Simple, effective, cheap. Just like I like it. Just how Tex-Mex food should be too.

  47. What's the point? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    Cold "medicines" do nothing except mask some of the symptoms, you have the cold and feel crap for just as long regardless.

    You might just as well keep yourself woozy with brandy.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  48. Re:Don't bother by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As an allergy sufferer, and a nerd, it matters to me. And go fuck yourself besides. Your comment adds nothing.

    If you don't like the submissions here, then find better stuff for them to post. Don't just bitch about it, do something.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  49. Use what actually works zinc gluconate by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Go out and get zinc gluconate lozenges or tabs. Ignore CVS's idiot marketdroids calling it "homeopathic", because it's *not*. When I was first introduced to it, 15 years ago, the packaging had about five citations from legitimate medical journals - JAMA, NEJM, with studies that *PROVED*, clinically, that it works - catch the cold in time, and it stops it in its tracks; after it's gotten into you, it'll cut the time it lasts by *half*.

                          mark

  50. Huh? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    Anybody else confused by TFS?

    "[...] all of us were able to buy effective decongestants right off the store shelf without a problem."

    "[...] drug companies substituted the already-FDA approved ingredient phenylephrine for pseudoephedrine."

    "[...] phenylephrine simply doesn't work" at the FDA-approved amount found in popular non-prescription brands and it may not even work at much higher doses."

    So, they removed products from the shelf that had an ineffective ingredient, replaced it with one that has an effective ingredient, and that is a bad thing?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got it turned around backwards. Let me see if I can clear it up a bit.

      "[...] all of us were able to buy effective decongestants (A) right off the store shelf without a problem."

      "[...] drug companies substituted the already-FDA approved ingredient phenylephrine (B) for pseudoephedrine (A)."

      "[...] phenylephrine (B) simply doesn't work" at the FDA-approved amount found in popular non-prescription brands and it may not even work at much higher doses."

      They removed products from the shelves with the effective ingredient (A), and replaced them with products using the less effective, or even ineffective, ingredient (B).
      All because meth cookers discovered that the effective ingredient (A) could be used to short-cut part of the cooking process.

    2. Re:Huh? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Essentially a lot of people started making meth with pseudoephedrine, and someone slipped a rider into the patriot act that if you wanted a cold medication with the stuff in it, you'd need to use some form of ID.

      You can still go to the pharmacist and ask for something with the good stuff. Box of Primatene tablets usually does the trick.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  51. My Approach by kackle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have learned to use Afrin to get all the way through a bad cold, but then when I'm feeling better, I use pills to recover from the Afrin dependency, which is usually brief.

    PS - I have dramatically reduced my nasal issues in life once I started taking very good care of my teeth. It never dawned on me that germs have 8 hours every night to travel a short, wet, warm path to my sinuses.

  52. Roll the sequel! by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    ... is that crystal meth is relatively easy to obtain, and it can be converted to Sudafed. [io9.com] Now all we need is for researchers to simplify the process and provide a practical process for the layman.

    Breaking Good

  53. thanks druggies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for yet again fucking things up for normal people because you're too damned preoccupied with getting high. I hope you're happy. pinche idiotas

  54. Always have... by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    always will use pseudoephedrine.

  55. NO SHIT by Dingo.Neal · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

  56. PE by aap · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it stand for Placebo Effect?

  57. Since when has "works" mattered? by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Quack therapies and activities abound. F'rinstance:

    1) Chiropractors
    2) Homeopaths
    3) Aromatherapists
    4) Psychoanalysts
    5) Congress
    6) Quantitative Easing
    7) Astrology
    8) Classical economics
    9) Trickle down economics

    And the list goes on and on and on....

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  58. Headline is wrong! by rthille · · Score: 1

    It works just as well as a sugar pill, which is better than nothing...

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  59. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reminds me old joke about flu taking two weeks and properly treated just 14 days...

  60. Fluticosone and Oxymetazoline by labnet · · Score: 1

    Read this interesting paper on combining Fluticasone with Oxymetazoline (Diflam) to reduce eliminate the rebound effect.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...

    I get blocked eustachian tubes when flying which for me can result chronic pain an middle ear bleeding. I take Fluticasone then Oxymetazoline when flying to try prevent the rebound effect. This combo seems more reliable than pseudo.

    --
    46137
  61. Still the (impure) freebase. Need convert to salt by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    Hypothetical outline:

    Crush crack rocks, dissolve in water, discard whatever dissolves (mostly baking soda).

    Take insoluble remnants (largely cocaine freebase), dissolve in excess of Et2O.

    Bubble HCl gas through solution to precipitate Cocaine as the hydrochloride salt. Filter from solution, and recrystallize as needed.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  62. Iodine ~banned, too. Look out at next Fukishima by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Also effectively banned, thanks to paranoia over its use in illegal drug manufacture, are most Iodine-containing preparations.

    I found this out just after Fukishima. While the fallout was on its way to California I tried to get some potassium iodide pills to load our systems with NON-radioactive iodine before it arrived. And I discovered:
      - No iodine suplements. (It's not that they were sold out - non of the chain stores OR health-food stores carried them anymore.)
      - No iodine-based water purification tablets at the camping stores. (They'd gone to other chemicals and/or methods.)
      - No tincture-of-iodine antiseptic for cuts.
      - Not even iodine-based disclosing tablets for toothbrushing.
    The local compounding pharmacy offered to special-make some potassium-iodide pills (at a hefty price). But they didn't have the material in stock and would have had to order it from the manufacturer - with a delay of about a month. It would have arrived long after the fallout.

    I found out from one of the stores what the problem was: Though the Federal Government hadn't actually BANNED iodine preparations, they'd put so much paperwork and inspection in place that it was no longer profitable to sell them. So all the retail outlets had switched to other alternatives or just quit carrying it.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  63. Really OLD news! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

    Although hearing that they want to remove it from the market as useless crap is heartwarming.

    My gripe with the pseudoephedrine restrictions is that it makes it IMPOSSIBLE for someone with minor chuildren to buy enough to treat the houseful of kids. I just

  64. Re:Don't bother by volmtech · · Score: 1

    I didn't think I had allergies. I just thought I had small, easily plugged nasal passages. After I became psychotic from lack of sleep due to the continuous feeling of suffocating my doctor proscribed Fluticasone propionate. After suffering for years, I can breath.

  65. Re:Don't bother by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    Uh, what comment?? Yours is the first post.

  66. Re:Don't bother by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    It is not.

    Click the handy "Parent" link on my post.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.