Merry Christmas - Be an Erector Engineer!
theodp writes: More than 50 years ago, lucky kids found an Automatic Conveyor Erector Set under the Xmas tree. And while President Obama lamented last year that kids — including his own — were done a disservice by an educational system that failed to introduce computer science concepts 'with the ABCs and the colors', Radio Shack advised 'Parents Who Care' to put a TRS-80 under the tree for their kids to program way back in 1978. So, to bring things up-to-date, what are the hot tech/science gifts that Santa brought children today?
There's got to be a crude joke about erector engineers in here somewhere...
Snap Circuits. Yeah, baby.
How about a fucking clue? Electrical Engineering is a dead-end profession in the West, and programming is a never-ending treadmill of tech "fashions" that you must keep running on.
A real gift would be a social change. But keep dreaming that knowing the same things as a billion Indians and Chinese is somehow gonna give you an "edge".
Considering buying this for my child in the near future.
http://littlebits.cc/
When I was younger, I read the RadioShack catalogs from front to end. At one time, I lusted after the SSB CB Base station and 5/8 base antenna. I bought and assembled a couple of the kits with plastic bases, and even a couple of "surprise boxes". When they put a TRS80 in every store, I was even more surprised. I played with it and even got the moon landing to work out.
I bought a different computer, but what exactly is the problem here?
A dingo ate my sig...
Can you still get those 501-in-1 electronic kits they used to have? With door bells, radios, and whatnot. Haven't seen ads for anything like that in ages - mail-order catalogs used to carry those, but I guess kids aren't trusted to be thinking for themselves today...
Kids want only tablets and phones. Finding a way to program in these electronic devices is almost futile: Lame IDE kits, obsolete and broke ports of languages, webserves that cannot read local files... When I was kid I did carve for a C64 or Apple II, now I my tablets only drops birds and wait to hearts for recharge. Meh.
And if you didn't got it: WANT KIDS TO BECOME CODERS AND ENGINEERS? PORT THE TOOLS TO ANDROID AND IOS!
I was looking into some of the other stuff Sphero did outside of the BB-8, and they have an education app/ball. Pretty fun once you start putting your own programs on it - http://www.sphero.com/education
Well duh, an iPad of course, because downloading and "installing" apps is all that any kid needs to learn these days.
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
By the time I was five or six I had an electric train set that my Father taught me how to put together and wire up each time I would use it. I wasn't much, if any, older when I had a chemistry set with chemicals in it that would get you on a terrorist watch list if you bought them today. Before I was ten my Father had taught me how to solder and I got a very nice soldering iron when I was ten and used it to assemble my first radio receiver kit. It used vacuum tubes, which took hundreds of volts to work. What would the parent police think or do today to the parents of a ten year old who was given a 300 degree C soldering tool and left alone to use it to build a radio with high voltages. Yes, I also had an Erector set, and toy guns and latter a BB gun and all of the other things that made kids from the 1940's and 1950's into the engineers and scientists that got us to the moon in 1969.
To learn you have to do and try and sometimes you fail and sometimes things might have some risk but not to try and not to do is a complete dead end for society.
The most hopeful thing I see on the horizon is the Maker Movement, although I think that sometimes it tends to candy coat real learning. Learning is not always easy or fun but LEARNING that is is almost always worthwhile and enriching is one of the most important lessons anyone can have and the earlier the better.
The TRS-80 and similar system have something no other system has:
* A simple DOS like system (Linux is just a steep learning curve)
* A solid Basic / JavaScript system at boot up
* Simple IO communications
* Easy hardware maintenance
* Self-contained system
Raspberry Pi is a step in the right direction but if something goes wrong I can't soldier in a new RAM chip or pull the processor. People really like a simple all-in-one unit. The wide range of choices and lack of uniformity makes it hard design a solid education program.
You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
My kids each got their own 13" Macbook Air.
What they don't know is that they're going to get Raspberry Pi Zero's when availability improves, a pile of robotics components, and some age/context appropriate literature on Python.
I'm an Irate Erection Engineer!
Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!
Vote for Bernie in 2016!
2 sons (8 and 9) received usb gamepads. They have no console, but they like video gaming with friends. Now they have the means. But first they must learn:
How to load an OS onto their SD card.
How to boot my Raspberry Pi.
How to download, compile, install, and run a SNES emulator.
So we're a linux family.
Santa brought a Kano for my five year old today am hoping that will help her to learn.
My 6 year old just tucked her two robots, Dot & Dash, in and wished them good night. These two robots are made available by Wonder Workshop. These robots can be programmed to play a recording. Dash can move. They have an interface to legos and even have a kit to play a xylepho. Can be programmed using a version of MIT's Scratch.
I'm also one of us that remember dicking about with electronics and designing/building/programming early computers at home...
That culture of exploration seems to have died with us.
I have a 10 year old son. Neither him or any of his friends or school mates are interested in anything that isn't completely pre-packaged, comes with full instructions, and is 100% convenient. If anything requires any creative thinking or even any slight effort on his part, it just gets left unfinished in a drawer.
Sadly I think thanks to the sick liberal values in society and promoted by mass media, this level of laziness and total absence of scientific curiosity is completely typical of the current generation of at least middle class US kids now, and simple market demand explains the complete lack of electronic sets, chemistry sets etc in toy stores these days.
They would still learn a lot more with one of these than a modern PC with all its distractions and focus that isn't programmer-centric.
Go search for BOYS' [First, Second, Third, Fourth] BOOK OF RADIO & ELECTRONICS by Morgan.
A lot of us get our start that way, and there is no reason someone couldn't write a similar, inspiring set of books today. Dangerous experiments like those described made us who we are.
As a child I wanted an Erector Set. My parents gave me Lincoln Logs instead. My childhood was ruined.
I dislike snap circuits because the block units tend to roll up too much of the complexity making them more magical and less electrical. I liked my ancient electronics kit that had discrete components with springs that clamped the wires you used to make connections. What was good about that was you could make errors or try shorting things out or removing things and see what changed. Plus they included some fun stuff like high voltage shock circuits you could build.
Now the thing is I could be wrong about preferring discrete components. These days no one at all builds analoc circuits from scratch. You want a thermometer, well no worries, no need to bias a themistor or measure the voltage on a reversed biased junction. No just buy a thermometer chip with an SPI data bus and connect 3 wires to your arduino. Simple! And absurdly that hideously complex way of making a thermometer turns out to be cheaper and easier than the discrete component approach. No need ot learn any analog electronics.
SO maybe I'm just old fashioned in liking discrete components. kids won't ever use that stuff, the magic bits will all be rolled up for them into block elements they can snap together on their SPI bus.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
...a progression of professions. Start with an erector set, but mechanical engineers are the lowest paid engineers. Progress to simple electronic kits, but electrical engineering is a dying profession. Get a Raspberry Pi, but all software is now offshored. Sell all those used kits; now, sales is a lasting profession.
Erector, perhaps; what about Meccano?
Last time I checked (two minutes ago), Erector products were made by Meccano.
From reading these comments, it really seems like most of you haven't been in a toy store in decades. I can assure you that there are tons of science-based toys on the market. Definitely way more now than there were when I was a kid in the 80s. I know lots of kids that are super interested in science and getting down and dirty with real technical learning. Sure, plenty of kids these days are glued to cell phones, but technical kids have always been and will always be the minority in society. Trust me, American children aren't as fucked up as Slashdotters seem to think.
When I was a kid, we had stores, not online marketplaces...
Yeah, and no seatbelts in the back seat. And leaded fuel. Bring back the good ole days !
My Xmas wish-list this year was basically an Arduino starter's set (Arduino, breadboard, various LEDs and other components), in the hope that kids and I could have fun together trying to build stuff.
For kids who are into robotics (or parents who want to get their kids interested in robotics) LEGO Mindstorms is a good place to start.
Its easy to assemble, usable with all the other LEGO bricks out there and easy to program with the LEGO supplied development environment.
Plus the programmable brick runs Linux under the hood and every single thing running on the brick itself is open source (as far as I know anyway). The brick even has bluetooth for talking to the outside world.
Let's see...
First electric train (Lionel) at age 6; played with trains almost daily for years. First Estes rocket at age 13 (I think); with Erector sets in between (temporally). I enjoyed the pace and care required to build balsa& tissue paper model aircraft -- which I then flew with the usual semidestructive results.
My latest (gift from child this Xmas) is the ThinkGeek solar-powered marble kinetic sculpture kit. I hope I never lose the enjoyment of building stuff.
https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
Why is everyone trying to force kids into a certain path? I know this article doesn't do that but does talk about wanting to introduce programming in the education system.
How about introducing children to a wide range of activities and then encourage the ones that they like? Not everything has to lead into a career. Let children have some fun. Maybe what they discover will turn into a hobby. Maybe it will just be some fun. It could make them some friends. Or they could possibly find their calling.
There is an apocryphal story that Winston Churchill enjoyed playing with Erector set as a boy. While he did not become an engineer, he was technically astute enough to push for the development of the tank during World War I, and later the development of code breaking and radar during World War II.
And while President Obama lamented last year that kids — including his own — were done a disservice by an educational system that failed to introduce computer science concepts 'with the ABCs and the colors',
Always the victim. Always lamenting and bitter. It was the educational system's fault, not his or Michelle's. The concept of personal responsibility simply does not exist for these people.
You could get seat belts for cars since 1945. They were a factory option for Nash in 1949 and Ford in 1955. Maybe your parents didn't love you enough to buy rear seat belts?
This story is based on real life events. A small company I was working for was bought-out by another small, but out-of-state electronics company. The new owners were well versed in bit-banging and CPU. My former company was 99% analog. We used op amps and R/C circuits for timing/filtering. They used code on CPU's. The new owners flew me out to their facility on three different weeks, to help their staff incorporate this whole new product line into theirs.
One interesting discussion I had with them involved creating a 0.5 second power-on reset signal for a USB interface chip, to allow the rest of the unit to "settle" before bringing up the USB interface. One guy said he'd just use a little 8-pin CPU and some code. I suggested an op-amp, some resistors, and a cap. They looked at me like I had two heads.
I reminded them that because these devices were intended to be used in environments with high levels of radio frequency energy, and high sensitivity receivers, (transceivers) RFI ingress and egress were important! The op amp and R/C circuits were virtually RF immune, and generated NONE. A CPU generates some, and is sensitive to RF.
Case-in-point: They had a high-current, DC switching system (multiple DC power ports that could be controlled remotely) that was driving them completely bonkers, because of random resets or other unpredictable behavior when they switched loads on and off. When I tried to explain current loops and grounding, they again looked at me like I had two heads. One even said, "But isn't ground, just GROUND??" (Insert FACEPALM here!)
I had to briefly explain OHM'S LAW to them! Ground planes have a measurable (albeit small) resistance, and when you are passing a dozen amps or more, you start to see dozens of millivolts from the E=IR drops... sometimes, switching spikes were high enough to false-trigger CPU inputs or other circuits, because the CPU was "riding" up and down on those voltages! When I showed them one of our old ANALOG designs, with separated ground paths... and explained WHY those paths were separate... I think they finally "got it". Their next complete redesign didn't have the issues of the first.
I summed it up by saying, "It is an ANALOG WORLD, guys!" ;)
Willie...
I've four sons, aged 8 to 28. They each got an Arduino powered kit from Sparkfun.com. After gifts where opened, and appetites satiated, we all spent several hours in my home lab learning how to solder, troubleshoot and eventually change the software running to power their boards ( a mix of a Simon Says game and digital alarm clocks).
I remembered building miniature bulldozers and tanks with my dad out of our Erector Sets and then having "pulling" contest to see who had the best design. I enjoyed my boys jesting about who could make the most useful mod to their kit.
Over the years, Erector Sets gave way to Kinnex, and Kinnex gave way to video games, But our ability as parents to ignite creativity has never changed, only our commitment to do so.
Nothing evolves faster than the word of god in the minds of men who think themselves divinely inspired.
One of my brothers was bemused by the fact that his iPad/gaming obsessed kids spent most of the day playing with low tech toys I got them (Spirograph, gyroscopes, mecanno set, football etc) and not with the various electronic games etc they had got them. It was more to help them do something different than stare at screens all day, use their imaginations and have fun in a different way.
Ditto here. The wife got the grandparent to get it for the kids. It is a bit of a disappointment. I wish it at least had a couple of different resistor values, a few caps, and maybe a discrete transistor or two. In terms of documentation for the "IC" blocks, the manual did contain some description, and the PDF on their web site contains the internal circuit diagram (well, sort of. The inside of their custom ICs are still "black box".) I had one of these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... as a kid. It was wonderful. I wish my folks didn't get rid of it after I moved out. My brother had one o these http://cba.sakura.ne.jp/ex/mx1..., which I inherited after he moved on to bigger and better things. Both of those beat the pants off of snap circuits.
-- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
These make up the majority of my son's toy "box". I am amazed at how much variety there is even with the wooden tracks even though they pretty much limit to 2-D vs. Lego's 3-D.
I started out designing the tracks, moved on to building what he asked for, and now he only needs me for assistance in the most intricate tracks.
I am really excited for when he starts to bring his own ideas to life with Legos.
The closest he has gotten to programming thus far is the robot turtles game. However, I don't believe this has in any way put him at a disadvantage. The same sort of problem solving he is learning through the toys I played with as a kid won't hold him back. One of the greatest things I learned was confidence that I could build anything I imagined.
IMDb entry germane.
Tracy Johnson
Old fashioned text games hosted below:
http://empire.openmpe.com/
BT
Raspberry Pi is a step in the right direction but if something goes wrong...
Nothing goes wrong with the Raspberry pi, it just "goes". If you smash it with a hammer you buy a new one for $5.
Don't dumb it down and them complain that it was dumbed down.
there's still lots of science kits available at places like michael's which have lots of hands on: rock tumbling, astronomy, whatever. astronomy is particularly good, because a talented and ambitious and diligent (and/or just lucky) kid can still make actual discoveries just like a tenured prof.
Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
When I was a kid, we had stores, not online marketplaces...
when i was a kid my major metropolitan area was still a one horse town so i bought all this stuff via mail order, which is just like amazon but slower.
Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
LittleBits are phenomenal and have nearly no limit for growth. However i would say they have to be at least the age of a young teen to get much out of it. Younger then that Legos. Strawbees are good for any age and are incredibly safe and easy to replace. Bareconductive is great cause it allows kids to literally draw circuits onto paper and build a house of paper, push buttons and leds. Little girls can do anything boys can, but if you've got a little girl and are having a hard time getting her interested in engineering, try Roominate. Roominate is a set of educational toys aimed specifically at girls and created by two aweomse women with Stanford Masters degrees.