Slashdot Mirror


A Bot That Drives Robocallers Insane

Trailrunner7 writes: Robocalls are among the more annoying modern inventions, and consumers and businesses have tried just about every strategy for defeating them over the years, with little success. But one man has come up with a bot of his own that sends robocallers into a maddening hall of mirrors designed to frustrate them into surrender. The bot is called the Jolly Roger Telephone Company, and it's the work of Roger Anderson, a veteran of the phone industry himself who had grown tired of the repeated harassment from telemarketers and robocallers. Anderson started out by building a system that sat in front of his home landlines and would tell human callers to press a key to ring through to his actual phone line; robocallers were routed directly to an answering system. He would then white-list the numbers of humans who got through. Sometimes the Jolly Roger bot will press buttons to be transferred to a human agent and other times it will just talk back if a human is on the other end of the line to begin with.

253 comments

  1. Caller ID Blocker by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can buy one of these for $50.00 from Amazon, and they have been around for a few years. Not so amazing...

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    1. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT is, cause there weren't 50 Congressional committees involved, lots of bribes, I mean donations, and national do not call registries.

    2. Re:Caller ID Blocker by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The bot is designed not just to reroute the callers, but to frustrate them and waste their time, as well.

      Oh, I don't know ... wasting their resources and annoying the hell out of them if you can sounds way cooler.

      So much telemarketing is just spam these days, and the companies who rely on it bought exemptions so the same people in the same call centers could call us with both "real" bullshit as well as the fully scam bullshit. Between that and the laundry list of exemptions, it's not like do not call lists work.

      If you can fuck up the business model and tie up their resources, maybe that will help get rid of more of it. And, really, where I live I have apparently called myself on numerous occasions with spam calls, despite me telling myself to stop doing that.

      I doubt your caller id blocker can fix the problem of carefully crafted fake caller ID which looks like a local call.

      What needs to happen is stop the stupid exemption for fake caller ID to allow corporations to use those call centers in the first place. If you don't have a real, verifiable caller ID, your call gets dropped in the system.

      I don't care if your business model is having someone call me from Bangladesh ... not my fucking problem.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Caller ID Blocker by darkain · · Score: 1

      This scenario is already inferred by TFS. The guy uses a white list of trusted callers. Not on the trusted caller list (no Caller ID data at all would fall into this category), then you're met with a challenge which requires a response before it'll ring through to the main line. So yeah, this scenario is already easily handled.

    4. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They sell automated system on amazon that wait for the human to say things and then respond to them and keep them on the phone for as long as possible by talking back to the telemarketer? Link please.

    5. Re:Caller ID Blocker by One+Intention · · Score: 1

      I have an app for my iPhone called Sentinel (jailbreak required) that allows me to automatically block phone calls with No Caller ID. It is amazing. I highly recommend it. http://apt.thebigboss.org/onep...

    6. Re:Caller ID Blocker by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      If you can fuck up the business model and tie up their resources, maybe that will help get rid of more of it.

      This is exactly what I do, and I enjoy every minute of it. :)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      No, the content was in the subject line. "Caller ID Blocker".

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    8. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Neither will the system in the summary. The advanced call blockers do everything stated in the summary with the exception of the last sentence, they don't jabber or press buttons randomly.

      They operate in two modes, whitelist only smart mode and white/black list or training mode. In the training mode everything rings through except black listed numbers. You manually indicate white or black list status to the device for a few weeks for incoming calls. Then, once you have built a whitelist database up, you put it in smart mode. That only allows whitelist calls through, and anything else gets answered with a prompt to be put through if you are a human caller.

      Rejected calls and "no caller ID", "anonymous" and "unknown" are all automatically blocked. I have one and I'm very happy with it, and no I don't work for either a manufacturer of them or Amazon.

      Although it doesn't maximize the time-wasting aspect of annoying the incoming callers, it at least answers and hangs up on them, so it costs them their dime.

      Anyway, most telemarketers use Entropy mass dialers that call 10 numbers at a time and only transfer the one that answers to a live agent, so 9 out of 10 times you're bot is only hassling another bot.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    9. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But that isn't what the thing in TFA does.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this does answer, and it answers with "Hello? Hello? Hello?!?!" if that doesn't get you transferred to a live agent, the dialer is a failure.

    11. Re:Caller ID Blocker by xaosflux · · Score: 2

      Calling line ID spoofing is very common in corporate systems. Some carrier require to you identify you call to them, but still allow you pass a spoofed ID on to the called party. There are some very legitimate reasons for this such as: Changing your call back number to a toll-free number, and maintaining the original calling number on forwarded calls.

    12. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have several games I play with them. One is to make myself sound very old with a feeble voice, forcing them to listen closer, then scream bloody murder. Another starts the same but I kite them along until they want an identification of some nature. Then I tell them "I can't remember, I'll get my credit card." This engenders the desire to wait. Then I quietly set the phone down and go about my business.

      There are others, but those two are the most fun.

    13. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      So much telemarketing is just scam these days

      TFTFY

      Most of them seem to be trying to get me to donate to their political campaign or charity, which after further research, doesn't exist.

    14. Re:Caller ID Blocker by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      they don't jabber or press buttons randomly.

      ... which means they don't solve the problem by disrupting the business model. The jabbering and button pushing is the most critical feature.

    15. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Ehh. To me the most important feature is my phone not ringing with annoying, intrusive, unwanted sales or other annoying calls. Wasting their time is a plus, but not my primary objective.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    16. Re:Caller ID Blocker by ripvlan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah - I have 2 that I play. My time is valuable (to me) so I make it short - but I like to make them uncomfortable.

      Old married couple who can't hear what the person is saying. They keep talking angrily back and forth "if you put your hearing aid in like I said" "shut up woman" "you old sob - I should have listened to my mother" "I don't have a good grip - don't drop it" [drop phone] [click]

      When the Windows Tech Support people call I use this one:

      [Dad voice] "I have a virus on my computer again? hold on - I told my kid to stop messing with the computer. Son!! Get your ass down here now. How many times have I told you... why you S-O-B... I'm going to beat you"
      [whack some object for effect]
      [child voice] "Ow Dad, ow ow I'll be good. [waah] stop it please stop it"
      [Dad voice] "Here - you talk to this mother-f'r and fix the goddamn computer. We're going to have a looong conversation when this is over"

    17. Re:Caller ID Blocker by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like it -- and if the fake tech support person is smart enough, he'll be even more offended: when the father calls his child a S-O-B, he's really accusing himself of bestiality.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Caller ID Blocker by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      If the call is routed from Bangladesh VOIP to a call center in Nebraska before hitting the POTS, I'm cool with that, the ID can read Nebraska.

      What I'm not cool with are the calls from different random area codes and numbers, over and over from the very same marketing scheme (claiming to "Update your Google Listing"), which change from pressing 2, 9, 7 or whatever to be removed from their list and only tell you that after 45 seconds of BS, and within a week you're getting another call with the same scam from yet another random number. That kind of practice needs a heavy penalty, easily imposed, or they shouldn't be allowed to show a U.S. origin caller ID at all.

    19. Re:Caller ID Blocker by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Not exactly for sales calls, but when I'm stuck with tech support and they feed me some "got to reload the OS from scratch" B.S. that's going to take forever (for no reason), I find that putting the phone on speaker and setting it down next to a laptop cooling fan is at least some small measure of revenge.

    20. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats technically almost not possible. Many international calls don't have any routing info associated with them. You could block all of them, if you don't expect any international calls though.

    21. Re:Caller ID Blocker by russbutton · · Score: 1

      You can buy one of these for $50.00 from Amazon, and they have been around for a few years. Not so amazing...

      What is it called? Where can I find it on Amazon? Got a link?

    22. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I wrote a few simple scripts for Asterisk using a bunch of celebrity sound board samples (borat etc), but something with silence detection and some crude speech recognition could be a lot more amusing...
      I'm surprised there isn't already something like this you can download and plug into asterisk.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:Caller ID Blocker by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      " then scream bloody murder."

      careful how loud you scream...friend of mine played a prank call on some guy once that incorporated some screaming, ended up rupturing the guy's eardrum. No idea of all the circumstances involved (phone volume etc.) but would be a good idea to not go over the top with it.

    24. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the bigger picture and the long run, this better serves your primary objective.

    25. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Tangential · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So much telemarketing is just scam these days

      TFTFY

      Most of them seem to be trying to get me to donate to their political campaign or charity, which after further research, doesn't exist.

      Nowadays I think I'd rather donate to a political party that doesn't exist than to one that does..

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
    26. Re:Caller ID Blocker by operagost · · Score: 2

      A caller ID blocker (if it works; sometimes the ID is blocked or invalid) is like a blacklist, while this device is like a tarpit.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Rei · · Score: 2

      Back when I lived in the states (I've never gotten a single telemarking call here in Iceland) I've often been tempted to respond with, "Why should I buy your product when I'm going to kill myself as soon as I get off the phone?" Suddenly making their job waaaay more stressful than they expected when they picked up the phone.

      Never did it, but... ;) Honestly, I just couldn't get myself to be that mean to them, they're just normal people on the other end working menial, low paying jobs.

      --
      It's times like this I wish I had a friend named 'The Professor'.
    28. Re:Caller ID Blocker by earthloop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just Google for "It's Lenny" :)

    29. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Rei · · Score: 2

      You mean Hello, this is Lenny? Yes, it exists. Yes, it's bloody hilarious ;) There's tons of them on YouTube.

      --
      It's times like this I wish I had a friend named 'The Professor'.
    30. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      These days you might accidentally SWAT yourself that way.

    31. Re:Caller ID Blocker by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      I think that rupturing a telemarketer's eardrum would be considered a feature, not a bug.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    32. Re:Caller ID Blocker by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      I get mean. Just because you aren't Hitler himself and are merely following orders, I don't let you off off the hook....

    33. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're talking about telemarketers here. If you can physically harm them over the phone line... it might delay the next call. Totally worth it.

      If no innocents are being killed, I say fire at will, stake those vampires!

      They have no right to call you, you merely don't have methods to stop them. Often they're calling in violation of the law, and if they harm themselves doing it, well they should buy telephones that don't harm them. Blaming their victim for screaming too loudly is pathetic; it is their telephone manufacturer who has a duty to make a safe device, not the person they call with it.

    34. Re:Caller ID Blocker by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Do they have this for iPhone or Android?

    35. Re:Caller ID Blocker by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But this does answer, and it answers with "Hello? Hello? Hello?!?!" if that doesn't get you transferred to a live agent, the dialer is a failure.

      These days a lot of autodialers ARE failures. If you actually answer it, about half the time it either hangs up on you or there is nothing there but silence and you eventually get tired of saying "hello" and hang up.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    36. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It will be funny when the caller gets the cops or social services to break down your door, and you get fined for wasting their time.

    37. Re:Caller ID Blocker by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      . There are some very legitimate reasons for this such as: Changing your call back number to a toll-free number, and maintaining the original calling number on forwarded calls.

      It should be pretty trivial to develop a system where the carrier can verify that the spoofed ID is in fact a legitimate number tied to the calling organization.

      It should be even more trivial to develop a system where the callerid spoofed on my handset can be reported to the carrier, with the time of the call, and they can immediately determine where the call REALLY came from, and report that to me, to the police... to whomever.

    38. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

      I told the "Microsoft Tech Support" crook "But I don't have a computer."

      That apparently wasn't in his script; it took a while for that to register.

      My wife was about to bust up laughing. After I hung up, she said "You lied!".

      I said "No, I didn't. I don't have *a* computer. I have *a bunch of* computers.

    39. Re:Caller ID Blocker by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      My cousin used to live for screwing with telemarketers. He could string them along forever. But my favorite bit was when he would simply answer the phone by screaming "I'M *TRYING* TO MASTURBATE!!!"

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    40. Re:Caller ID Blocker by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Really? Godwin'd this early in the chain?

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    41. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The model I got is called Sentry II and it was a bit over $50.00. There are several models out there and this looked like it had the best features of all of them available at the time.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    42. Re:Caller ID Blocker by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I strung him along by responding literally to his questions while using a handy FreeBSD server I had sitting there under the table until he gave me their logmein url(which I later reported to logmein support, who promised to close their account), then allowed him to finally make sense of my somewhat responses (I don't see a Start button, but I do have a window I can type that command in... What version am I using? The OS says version 10, etc...) when I finally asked him what kind of computer engineer has never heard of FreeBSD before...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    43. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Wait. You believe that story? You actually think that you can scream loud enough into a phone to rupture someone's ear drum?

      Dude, seriously, think about this for a minute. There is NO WAY that happened.

    44. Re:Caller ID Blocker by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      No excuses.

    45. Re:Caller ID Blocker by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      well it was someone we both knew who later kicked his ass for the little joke... so...this isn't a random story off the internet or a story from a casual acquaintance. Maybe the guy had an unknown defect in his eardrum, I said I didn't know all the circumstances. Still, phone call, scream, ass kicking same day, diagnosis of ruptured eardrum next day. Them's the facts.

    46. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But this does answer, and it answers with "Hello? Hello? Hello?!?!" if that doesn't get you transferred to a live agent, the dialer is a failure.

      These days a lot of autodialers ARE failures. If you actually answer it, about half the time it either hangs up on you or there is nothing there but silence and you eventually get tired of saying "hello" and hang up.

      Indeed. I can't count the number of times I have answered the phone to have dead silence on the other end. It makes me wonder why they even bother. I mean, presumably they are actually paying for this, right? Is the sole purpose of these robo-dialers just to annoy the shit out of us? Well, if it is, then...mission accomplished!

    47. Re: Caller ID Blocker by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Congress aalways exempts itself. I'm in NH and I have about a hundred numbers on my political blacklist so far.

      Somebody else please take the #1 primary spot!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    48. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know who really liked to Godwin people in arguments? Hitler.

    49. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often been tempted to respond with, "Why should I buy your product when I'm going to kill myself as soon as I get off the phone?"

      You have to be careful with that in the states. Suicide is still a crime, and is something people are imprisoned for. There is no time limited sentence, you are kept until two doctors and a judge deem you mentally sound and no longer a danger to yourself and others.
      Being completely subjective, any argument from your end or claims of it being a joke (assuming a humorless judge, which is a good assumption most of the time) you will not be released anytime soon.

      You are generally only taken to the ER if you have already harmed yourself and need medical attention.
      But after the ER has stabilized you the police are called in.
      If you haven't harmed yourself then you pretty much are taken straight to jail.

      US hospitals are for physical harm, not mental. Jails and prisons are used in place of asylums.

      If you are not rich, powerful, famous, have connections, have a large family and/or circle of friends to help, or are actually a true sociopath able to talk your way in to and out of any situation, you are likely facing a multi-year to life of imprisonment.

      As someone with a pretty dark sense of humor too, I completely get what you are intending to do (and even find it very comical as a mental exercise type thing) but this is one of those topics that is still pretty zero-tolerance and overloaded with so many layers of bullshit over such a long period of history, it isn't one of those roads one wants to send themselves down out of ignorance of the consequences.

      This has been your high-blood-pressure-anger-inducing public safety announcement for the day.

    50. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      My greatest achievement in telemarketer trolling goes as follows:
      I'd been getting a lot of marketer calls, so I knew the ones calling me where going strait to a real operator, so I made a plan, and when I got the next call from them, I put on my most official sounding voice, and say:

      "Thank you for calling the FBI self incarceration hotline. To surrender in English, press 1. Para español presione dos."
      There is this pause, then the guy goes "Hello?"
      "Thank you for calling the FBI self incarceration hotline. To surrender in English, press 1. Para español presione dos."
      longer pause "Hello?"
      "Thank you for calling the FBI self incarceration hotline. To surrender in English, press 1. Para español presione dos."
      another pause, and then, to my eternal glee, *beeeep* as the guy presses 1.
      At this point, i'm trying so hard not to laugh that I break down and shout "Your are an absolute idiot!" and hang up on the guy. I've refined my plan for this, and have several more sub-menus of script in my head for future callers.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    51. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bot is designed not just to reroute the callers, but to frustrate them and waste their time, as well.

      Oh, I don't know ... wasting their resources and annoying the hell out of them if you can sounds way cooler.

      Well you won't ruin their business model as their business model doesn't work the way you think it does, and the person you annoy is the under payed phone operator who doesn't have any control over the business and probably hates the whole enterprise even more than you do (they spend all day every day dealing with it) not someone in a position to do anything that results in less robo-calls.

    52. Re:Caller ID Blocker by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      Ditto that - I usually step into a conference room and keep them on the phone for as long as I possibly can before I ask them how they got my number. The more time they invest in the call, the less likely they are to just hang up on you at that point.

    53. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serves them right for ignoring DNC lists.

      I AM in the states, and I fully intend to do this the next time I get one of these bullshit calls...THEY're breaking the law too - I don't think they'll be in a big hurry to call the cops.

    54. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When caller ID first came out, we were promised units that would have capabilities to have both a blacklist, and a whitelist. This was never implemented. I would love for my phone to be able to use my contact list as a whitelist, so that only those on my contact list could call or text me! I believe that this would be very simple to implement, and that all phones should have this capability built in. But the telemarketers, and other charitable or political organizations would never allow this, just like Hollywood will not allow us to have video recording devices that automatically skip commercials. And it really really SUCKS that political calls and charitable organization calls are exempted from the do not call list!!

      Its time that we who buy our phones and pay the bill for phone service (cell and landline) take back total control and demand to decide what calls we want to receive, and the ability to only receive those calls and NO OTHERS!!!! Its time to outlaw robocalls, telemarketing, and political/charitable organizations calling anyone at all!!!!!!!

    55. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, that just sucks for the underpaid employee that took a job harassing people.

      I am under no obligation to be nice to anyone that calls me without my giving them my number first, and I don't give two fiddly fucks if I hurt their feelings. They challenge my intelligence by calling a number on the DNC registry and they challenge my patience by not honoring their own "press 1 to remove your number" shit.

      FUCK THEM. I honestly don't think I can type this loud enough for the emphasis to come through.

      If they don't like talking to rude people on the phone they should find another job.

    56. Re:Caller ID Blocker by quantumphaze · · Score: 1

      Having never reached the remote desktop stage I have always wanted to mess around with them in a virtual machine and contort the desktop resolution to some insanely short resolution and claim I have an ultra wide screen. There should be barely enough space to see the content of the window between toolbars.

      Their scripts probably can't handle the victim using a Mac, let alone FreeBSD.

    57. Re:Caller ID Blocker by quantumphaze · · Score: 1

      I suspect that they are overcalling beyond actual capacity to put their people on the incoming calls. It would be cheaper to have dead calls than to leave their agents idle.

      If you have 30 agents and place 50 calls in the autodialer. Say that 15 of the calls don't get answered, the first 30 get a telemarketer leaving 5 with silence. Less idle time then if they made the calls only after the last one finished and having to wait for grandma to make it down the stairs. You may notice that sometimes you get an answer after a couple of seconds because someone has been freed.

    58. Re: Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've said that I was committing suicide a few times now, never had a problem, probably never will. Even if they report it and somebody comes to the house to do a welfare check, my response will be I wasn't even home to answer the phone. I guarantee you they won't be pulling phone records to prove otherwise as it is not worth the effort to have a judge sign a search warrant for the phone company.

    59. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could do the exact same thing this guy did with a voicemail card from 1987.

    60. Re:Caller ID Blocker by dbIII · · Score: 2

      I suspect some of those are compiling lists of active numbers at different times of day.
      But I'm probably just assuming too much competence and they are probably just broken.

    61. Re: Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some are just for making a list of numbers that aren't disconnected. Those don't need anything but an answer and their job is complete.

    62. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you could tell them you were trying to D/L "playground sluts" and complain about how child porn just won't download OK...can you help me ?

    63. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JustAnotherOldBlowhardBULLSHITTER why'd ya lie about working for Microsoft? Can ya prove that statement? No? Thought not. Must be an "NDA" that ya signed with yer fantasyland fake name here online, right? Hahahahaha (the bullshit and foam spewing from JustAnotherOldBLOWHWARD's piehole will ensue - stay tuned, keep yer seatbelts on everyone! Hilarity will ensue, guaranteed!)

    64. Re:Caller ID Blocker by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I would absolutely love to get some of those calls. I'm retired and often bored. I'd build out a stack of VMs just to play with 'em every other day.

      Alas, they never call. I mean never - I never get any sales/telemarketing calls. I never get support calls. I never get political calls. Maybe I should start giving my number out to people? How does one get on this tech support gig's calling list 'cause I can really have a lot of fun with that. I'll even rig it up to record the screen and call and then sync it so that it's in real time. We could have some fun with this.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    65. Re: Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Calls Blacklist. If I or my phone does not recognize a number I just let it ring. If no message is left I happily put in the blocklist which simply hangs up if they call again. Works for me.

    66. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a number I do not recognize or is obvious telemarketer, I answer and mute it. Often times it just hangs up quick and other times a human says hello for 30 seconds and then hangs up. If I was bored, I'd have a recording that said hello, can you hold on for a sec. Make some noise in the background and just let that keep going, maybe even yelling, hold on, I'm coming from a distance.

    67. Re: Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But this *is* a random ancedote from the internet!

    68. Re: Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caller ID blockers can save lives!
      http://youtu.be/pzDgaGTARqE

    69. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      I can also get most of this functionality using an old computer (700Mhz PIII, 500MB Ram), a Fax/Voice/CallerID modem and a free ware program (Phone Tray V1.0) with unlimited phone number call blocking capability to intercept my calls. I turn off the ringers on my phone and let them talk to my answering machine.

      For added points I can waste their time by playing a wav file that makes it appear that I can't hear them.

      Best of all, it was a one-time cost.

      He's offering a service for the masses. From his kickstarter page...

      "We are asking for funding to build the first version of a consumer-friendly monthly service"

      Great! Another monthly bill to help reclaim my privacy!

    70. Re:Caller ID Blocker by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I'd love to trade phone numbers with you!

    71. Re:Caller ID Blocker by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I do have a crazy ex and she likes to get drunk and call me with the caller ID set to private. If we trade numbers, you might not want to answer calls marked as private. Well, you can but she's some kind of crazy. I mean, like stab you in your sleep crazy - except she's never done that, just called me and told me she was going to. Like I can sleep if you're calling me over and over again?!?

      But, you can answer 'em. She's pretty damned cute. Like model kind of cute. She did, in fact, have a modeling "career" at one point. And yes, yes I do have nudes but if you browse the 'net, you too can have nudes. She is, however, straight up crazy. Not the good kind of crazy but the truly insane crazy. Under the advice from my lawyer, I paid her to go away - kind of crazy.

      Other than that? I pretty much only get calls from people I want to talk to. No telemarketers, no political surveys, no helpful guys trying to fix my Windows computer, nothing. I should get a second phone and number and just start putting it out there on lists and see if I can amuse myself with the various calls. It's not a secret or private number. There's no mechanism that makes me phone number any different than your number.

      I've two land lines and one of those is unlisted and unpublished. That one also screens calls for me when I'm home. I'm nowhere near that phone, however. The number is not even forwarded. Right now, it has a message telling folks I'm gone and will be back. I'm sure it has messages but I've not checked them. The other? I think only locals know it and it's not meant to be answered (long story).

      None of them get marketing, survey, or support calls. I'm kind of disappointed.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    72. Re:Caller ID Blocker by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      I've had a few of these calls. I learned a way to wind them up till they almost explode. When they tell you you've got a virus ask for the software ID. They will just try to blaise by that but just keep asking, be calm and patient. Then explain you've got X number of machines and need to know which one is going wrong. One time I got a long silence then a noise like the guy had broken then he hung up..
      As far as I'm concerned they are impersonating Microsoft and so are committing fraud.. they are criminals and deserve anything they get. (Need to send the Guantanamo Bay guys over to their call centres in India or wherever..)

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    73. Re:Caller ID Blocker by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Sadly not. Most of the callers are essentially just expendable 'robots' following their scripts, working for a few thin Rupees. The system decides who to call and when, and it follows its given list.. They have no power over it.. I'd rather be a sewer cleaner than a telemarketer..

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
    74. Re:Caller ID Blocker by toddestan · · Score: 1

      When caller ID first came out, we were promised units that would have capabilities to have both a blacklist, and a whitelist.

      Not even sure how that would work, as the caller ID isn't transmitted until after the first ring. I know people have cobbled together solutions (I used to do something similar before I dropped my landline), but they still had the problem where the phone would always ring once before the call got "blocked".

    75. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be a sewer cleaner than a telemarketer..

      Exactly! I was young and needed a job once, and I applied at one of these places... listened in on the line for a few minutes, and realized wow, I'd rather dig for grubs in the forest than do a job that sleazy.

      How many of the people on the phone even waited until they were starving to death before stooping so low? Probably none. They're just sleazy assholes who don't mind.

    76. Re:Caller ID Blocker by anyGould · · Score: 1

      No reason they can't be doing both. If I was immoral enough to be doing telescam work, I can't think of a reason why you wouldn't track live numbers while also overdialing. It's not like the people you're calling know who to complain to, right?

    77. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you could rupture someones eardrum. But the fax whistles are very annoying and I might start using a whistle to respond to these calls.

    78. Re:Caller ID Blocker by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Yeah - another one goes like this: after slowly stringing them along ("let me climb the stairs to my office" and "wait while I boot my computer") - they tell me to press the Windows key. I ask "hmmm... how about an Apple key?" They immediately hangup - no further discussion on that point.

      If I'm particularly busy and not willing to play I start the call with "MS tech support??! I have a Mac." [always - click. their script must say "goto end"]

    79. Re:Caller ID Blocker by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      I once read an article by a guy who did let them into a VM he had. He had been reviewing something and was about to throw away the VM when they called.

      Apparently the "tech support" guy upgraded his version of office for him, emptied the trash, and made some performance related registry changes/ improvements. All apparently legit stuff (even if the software was illegal copies). Then asked for "$20" for his work. The author even compared the Office ISO to a known good copy and couldn't find any illegal payload. This was pre-ransomware (or at the very emergence of it)

      Many of these virus tools won't run in a VM - they know that the honeypots are all VMs so the software attempts to detect and remain hidden.

      My favorite was a video on YouTube. There's a version of Linux that doesn't store files permanently. The video is of the hackers console as they download files and then can't execute them. They unpack a zip file... "ls" and see results. But then attempt to run the utils and they aren't there. So the guy "ls" again - sees empty folder, does a "cd" thinking he unpacked to the wrong folder. Nope. Downloads again. Checks the version of Linux. Tries again. Repeats many times before giving up.

    80. Re:Caller ID Blocker by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      that would be evil. After giving the support guy a hard time he SWATs you on the way out.

    81. Re:Caller ID Blocker by anyGould · · Score: 1

      It should be even more trivial to develop a system where the callerid spoofed on my handset can be reported to the carrier, with the time of the call, and they can immediately determine where the call REALLY came from, and report that to me, to the police... to whomever.

      Honestly, it should be trivial to require that the number displayed connects to the source number. I get that large organizations and such want everyone's CID to be the front desk and that's a legit use - but the fact that the phone company will merrily show CID for a number that it knows full well has nothing to do with the actual caller is just extending the money grab.

      That said, you do have to respect the telecoms for playing arms dealer to both sides. They'll charge me for caller ID to see who the number is, and then charge you to not send the number, and then charge me again to block numbers that don't display it...

    82. Re:Caller ID Blocker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vat? Two rupee an hour isnt make a very very good wage please? :-0

  2. Huh? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can't drive robocallers insane... they're already there!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Huh? by OakDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Have your robot call my robot."

    2. Re:Huh? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 0

      some of these calls made me genuinely cringe. i expected to feel "serves you right" but ended up feeling sorry for the callers. they're just people who can't get a job anywhere else.

    3. Re:Huh? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who made "mass marketing email software". SPAM software. he knew people hated the emails, but needed the cash. He just got married at that time.

    4. Re:Huh? by thoromyr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I knew someone who worked at Sprint's telemarketing center in Georgia. Stress is high, pay is low, and, naturally, turnover is high. People don't tend to stay at those places long, but if you haven't been able to get other work it can help pay bills until you can.

      Hating on the people making the calls is wrong, hate the companies who pay the telecoms to do it for them. Hate the telecoms for double dipping (taking money for a number to be unlisted, then taking money to provide lists that include unlisted numbers, then taking money for a number to be unpublished, etc.). Hate on the companies that use robocallers that spoof the source.

      But please realize that not everyone can have a desirable job.

    5. Re:Huh? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Yes, they need a job ... boo hoo.

      So many of them are utterly outright fraudulent I have no sympathy for any of them.

      The Microsoft Support? The air duct cleaning? Rachael from cardholder services? That cruise I supposedly won? The people calling to say I owe tax money or will go to court? That opinion poll I have no way of knowing is real?

      Sorry, all of these things means I simply can't expend the time to give a shit about the feelings of some random telemarketer, since I have no way of knowing (or caring) if they're yet another fraudulent asshole, or just some poor schmuck trying to earn a living.

      If I have a business relationship with you, send it to me via mail, in an official company envelope on official company paper ... if I don't have a business relationship with you I'm not prepared to invest any energy in pretending I don't assume you're running a scam.

      So, I can't spend the effort to feel sorry for the honest ones, because they've been drowned out in a sea of lying bastards.

      Feeling sorry for them is simply no longer possible.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Huh? by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Neither can criminals. What's your point? They know full well they're lying to you.

    7. Re:Huh? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I had a friend who made "mass marketing email software". SPAM software. he knew people hated the emails, but needed the cash.

      I knew someone who was a pickpocket on the subway. He knew people hated losing their wallets, but he needed the cash.

    8. Re:Huh? by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um, no. I'll hate on the people making the calls too. Sprint Telemarkers are legal, so it isn't a problem. They don't call me. The ones that call me when I am on the do not call list are not legal. They are doing illegal things, and they know it, and they don't care. Sociopathic. There are plenty of ways to make money without doing illegal things.

    9. Re:Huh? by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Hating on the people making the calls is wrong..." Opinion. Not shared by all. Also, hating the others on your list is not a mutually exclusive activity.

      Absolutely no one is unaware that telecallers are a hated species. Don't take that job if you can't handle the hate.

    10. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one is legal? Which one isn't?

      Idiot.

    11. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but ended up feeling sorry for the callers. they're just people who can't get a job anywhere else.

      Do you feel sorry for hit-men and pimps and dope dealers too? Consentration camp guards? The probably couldn't find work elsewhere either. . .

      No sympathy at all. I'd rather be unemployed than be a telemarketer. Or join some army.

    12. Re:Huh? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      I knew someone who panhandled for a living, following and trying to 'shame' those who didn't fork over money. Terry, in Kansas City. Try your argument now.

    13. Re:Huh? by thoromyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      says the person who is not going hungry and has a roof over his head.

      Yep, some people are judgemental assholes. I know that, I don't need reminding.

    14. Re:Huh? by thoromyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep, feel the hate. I know, its fun to hate people. Just hope you never get in a bind and have to make choices between your beliefs and getting fed.

      I met people with the same basic attitude in college. Privileged little kids who never met the real world and would go on at length judging other people. Just makes me sad.

    15. Re:Huh? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      some of these calls made me genuinely cringe. i expected to feel "serves you right" but ended up feeling sorry for the callers. they're just people who can't get a job anywhere else.

      Are there no prisons? And the Union workhouses. Are they still in operation?

    16. Re:Huh? by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm on the do-not-call list, so the call is illegal. If the 'product' or 'service' is fraudulent, then the call is illegal. If the call is a robocall, then it is illegal (with few exceptions).

      If you want to learn the true character of the people calling you, make a click on the line so it sounds like you hung up. After they have heaped abuse upon you (thinking you can't hear them), ask them to repeat it and listen to them swallowing their own tongue as they hang up.

    17. Re:Huh? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Which one is legal? Which one isn't?

      Idiot.

      Which one is the bigger blight on society? The one who lifts a few wallets everyday, or the one who spreads misery to literally millions?

      Legal shouldn't be the only basis for behavior.

    18. Re:Huh? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Does that include Robert, with the extremely thick Bengalese accent, calling about my prescription plan and how I need to change because my current prescription is no longer covered? He calls every couple of weeks...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    19. Re:Huh? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      But please realize that not everyone can have a desirable job.

      My mom was a school teacher, in the summer sometimes she did telemarketing for a little extra cash - she eventually decided that the money wasn't worth the slime factor and found better ways to spend her time.

      People should really demand higher pay for the stress, leave the job immediately when opportunity to do so presents, and even prank the damn company on the way out the door for providing such sleazebag work. I realize that some people get put in a position where they need to sell their body on the street for a little quick cash; but really, most people who are there could do something else if they really wanted to.

    20. Re:Huh? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. These telemarketers would starve if they didn't scam us. We might be judgemental, but you are just a plain asshole.

    21. Re:Huh? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 0

      So you're saying it's OK to scam people or lie to them because you can't get a better job, 'cause that's what it sounds like you're saying.

      That's pretty close to saying that going on a crime spree is justifiable for the same reason.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    22. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Talk about privileged little kids. You are not entitled to commit a federal crime to feed yourself. Wow, just, wow.

    23. Re:Huh? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah? Well I know someone who makes a piece of software that modifies the hosts file, with the intention of blocking advertisements, but then in order to market his software he goes online and spams Slashdot. He knows that people hate spam, but he has to feed his ego.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    24. Re:Huh? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      And some guy down on his luck who needs money and picks up a gun and robs people is just another excuse.

      Saying "I had no choice" is a lie. It may be an unpalatable choice, but it's still a choice.

    25. Re:Huh? by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      Legal does NOT equal right.

    26. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many can't go there; and many would rather die.

    27. Re:Huh? by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      I think a lot of these shady call center operate in a gray area.

      While robocalls may be illegal, there are several exceptions.

      One common exception is that if you make the calling process so that it has a human involved (click to call), this is not considered a "robocall". So someone can just click a button several times to initiate several outbound calls and only get the ones that answer routed to him/her.

      Another is if you are already "opted in", the call is not illegal. There are all kinds of ways to get opted in to a list. One way is if you ever put your phone number into any web form. The operator of that form can then just sell that number onto a list. You need to be very careful about who you give your number out to.

      Another way is if you already have a relationship with the party calling you. Similar to opting in, if the company you have a relationship with sells your information, I think the relationship transfers with the info.

      So, anyway, people get work where they can. You cannot judge someone for working for a "corrupt" company... I mean, do you have the same scorn for the janitor at a law firm where all the C levels are engaged in illegal activity?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    28. Re:Huh? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Stealing bread for your family is noble.... at least that is what the movies tell us...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    29. Re:Huh? by misterborden · · Score: 1

      If you sell your soul to the devil, you shouldn't be surprised to find yourself in Hell.

    30. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh right. These scammers are going to starve if they don't scam us. Fucking ridiculous. Don't be sad, just know you are a sociopath.

    31. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're going with the Nuremberg Defense?

    32. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you. everyone who contributes to such systems continuing deserve every ounce of hate they get and more.

      Excuses like 'i was just doing my job.' or 'i was only following orders.'.
      Are not allowed excuses at the most extreme levels. And still not acceptable at any level.

      the world would improve without such people. guaranteed.

    33. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, anyway, people get work where they can. You cannot judge someone for working for a "corrupt" company... I mean, do you have the same scorn for the janitor at a law firm where all the C levels are engaged in illegal activity?

      You're right - I cannot judge a person based on the company that they're working for, this is true.

      But if that person contacts me on behalf of their company, then I'm not DEALING with an individual, I'm dealing with the representative of the company. Moreso if they are UNWILLING to tell me what company they're calling from.

      What they are doing is unethical and rude and they should anticipate the backlash. If they aren't capable of handling the stress maybe they shouldn't have dropped out of school or committed their particular felony.

    34. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, feel the hate. I know, its fun to hate people. Just hope you never get in a bind and have to make choices between your beliefs and getting fed.

      Make your choices, but be ready to pay the price.

      If you have to take a job harassing people, be ready to be hated.

    35. Re:Huh? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      People don't tend to stay at those places long, but if you haven't been able to get other work it can help pay bills until you can.

      Swiping wallets from tourists at a busy attraction can also help you pay the bills until you can, but I don't think that's a valid argument in favor of the person doing so.

    36. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones that call me are scammers. All of them. Minimum once per day I get a "you won a trip!" call. Am I supposed to be nice to people who are trying to steal my money? Who do steal others' money? They target the elderly and otherwise cognitively impaired, am I supposed to just wave that off as "following orders" and let it be?

    37. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gstoddart no business would establish a relationship with a broke loser like you that lives in his mama's basement

    38. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My very first job was telemarketing and I quit after less than two weeks because I was too honest to be good at it (1-3 sales per day of who knows how many calls) - I preferred being unemployed instead. Now, I'm childish enough to fuck with telemarketers as much as I can when they call me now because I want them to quit too. However, I think you're exaggerating if you say telemarketers are sociopathic, most seemed to know that they were annoying but needed jobs and were more or less tricked into doing things by the company. For instance, I had a long list of numbers to call and did what I was there to do but after a few replies like "why did you call us? we're on the do-not-call list!!!" I began to wonder and asked if there was a mistake somewhere. Well, only then was I told that the numbers in the list which had a small asterisk next to them were do-not-call numbers - evidently put there so that those of us who were new would call them too until we knew better.

    39. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others quoted feed APK's ego well enough to have apk made you eat your words on it amicusnycl http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    40. Re:Huh? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Hating on the people making the calls is wrong...

      Hating on people working for legit companies operating within the law is a bit much. But hating on that asshole with "windows support" who knows good and damned well he's trying to infect your machine with malware in order to extort you, well not hating that jerk would be ridiculous.

    41. Re:Huh? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      They may not know it unless you tell them. Their managers might just give them a list of numbers and not mention the DNC list. In addition, knowing that something you're doing is illegal, and not caring that it's illegal isn't necessarily sociopathic. Jaywalking safely is illegal, but you aren't a sociopath for doing it.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  3. Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    By definition, a robocaller cannot be driven insane. That would only happen to humans. Also, this is not news for nerds, stuff that matters.

    1. Re:Insanity by denis-The-menace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No but this is effectively a tar pit for their bot.

      While it's busy, it can't harm other people.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:Insanity by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The point is to get through to a person though, and then waste their time. Listen to the video in TFA. The bot will ask the caller if they are a person, and if the caller does not stop to consider the question then the bot will press 1 a few times to get through to a person, and then proceeds to waste that person's time. In other words, the bot does exactly what a robocall bot does, tries to reach a person then wastes their time.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apk making you eat your words is a waste of your time amicusnycl. Eating your words isn't good nutrition http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  4. Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why hasn't the Do Not Call list worked? Seems there was too many loop holes and ways around the law I guess.

    1. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Too hard to enforce. We get three or four robocalls plus one or two nuisance "surveys" every day. The robocallers almost never display a real phone number. How can the authorities track down and execute (robocalling is capital offense, right? If not, it should be) Rachel from Cardholder Services without her phone number?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    2. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Why hasn't the Do Not Call list worked? Seems there was too many loop holes and ways around the law I guess.

      Because... technology.

      The same technology that enables you to call home and long distance for cheap is the thing telemarketers use to bypass the DNC list. Basically, telemarketing has been offshored.

      The telemarketers call using VoIP from places like India, ensuring that they do not have to follow the DNC laws (because they're not subject to US laws).

      And it doesn't matter if you go after the US company responsible - they're almost always scams run by two-bit fly by night companies, so at the end of the day, they take down their company sign and hang a new one up on the van. (They almost always advertise some service, like "air duct cleaning" and they universally do a poor job of it. Or it's a real traditional scam).

      So it's not a case where they're bought a loophole, it's more a case where they're using modern technology to do a run around the law.

      For me, the most obvious sign is they always re-use the first 3 digits of the 7 digit number - (e.g., in 523-555-1212, the caller ID will always be 523-555-xxxx), so that's almost a dead giveaway it's a scam call.

    3. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      I am in Europe and was getting up to 10-15 calls a week from Italian numbers 2-6 years ago. The numbers seemed to change pretty much with every call although I seem to remember it was only the last 4-6 digits which would vary. I would have cheerfully blacklisted the entire country but could not find a way to do this.
      As it was I would turn the telephone off when I was away for more than a day, really "off" - "The number you are dialing is currently unavailable".

      In the end (after years of this) they put me on their own blacklist.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    4. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The robocallers almost never display a real phone number.

      That's the root of the fucking problem, right there. The telco knows where the call originated, they keep very good track of that for billing purposes. Even if the call is a nonrevenue toll-free call, they still log the information and can determine who made the call. In the case of VOIP gateways, they know which one injected the call into the POTS network and that gateway knows which of its users is responsible. But the telcos have no incentive to do anything about the problem or to help us do anything about it. The robocallers and scammers are paying customers after all.

      Caller ID has outlived its usefulness. I think we're at a point where consumers should receive the unforgeable ANI information by default.

    5. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by pr0t0 · · Score: 2

      For me the obvious sign that it's a scam call is...the caller ID is not in my contacts list. The cool with cell phones is you can set them to not ring if the caller isn't in your contacts. That doesn't work for everyone, but it works for me just fine. If it's a legit call, they'll leave a voicemail and I'll notice that within an hour or sooner.

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    6. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because so far it's not possible to shoot whoever is on the other end of the phone.

      Invent it and becomes rich and famous.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Put the companies selling these services under.

      Protip: Most of them are owned by, or subsidiaries of, Level 3. Of those that have failed to adequately obfuscate their phone numbers, every single one I've gotten so far has originated from Level 3 or a company directly related to them.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It isn't too hard to enforce. It is just that no one is enforcing it. The phone company knows who these people are. They just don't care. The phone company is BILLING these people. They aren't letting the calls go through for free!

    9. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they all just move off shore.

    10. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It was a feel-good law composed by the industry that works as well as Do Not Track. White listing is the only effective measure.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re: Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://youtu.be/pzDgaGTARqE

    12. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by labnet · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should move to Australia; it works here.
      We also have free health care, 'the metric system', less corrupt politicians, sane gun laws, chill work culture, and hot women! ... Ohh And for you camel pilot, we have lots of them in our outback, so many in fact we shoot them on mass from helicopters, so come to Oz and be out Camel Pilot!

      --
      46137
    13. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by KalvinB · · Score: 1

      It works. I successfully settled with a telemarketer for $300. Suntasia out in Florida. I'm in Arizona. They later got raided by the feds.

      You have to tell them not to call you, document every call they make to you and track them down. I managed to find Suntasia's lawyer and got the ball rolling. They hired a local firm so I made it a point to divide responses between the states to waste their time and money.

      After they gave me $300 I told the lawyer that I really didn't care who got their money, I was happy that the lawyer made some money as well. I didn't hire a lawyer. I think it cost a few bucks to file. So basically they probably spent 3-4 hours of their money on very expensive lawyers and lost.

      You have to read the telemarketing laws and match up your documentation with the laws they broke and then file the paperwork and follow through.

      It takes awhile and they'll fight it but you just have to stick with it until they cry uncle.

    14. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Who has time for that? Let's say it takes me a couple hours to sue a telemarketer. If it takes me about 5 seconds to pull out my phone, answer a call, listen, and hang up on a telemarketer, and they call maybe once a week, then it'll take over 20 years to equal the time it took to sue the telemarketer. Worse, yet, it's probably not the same telemarketer calling each time, so I'd have to sue each of them in turn.

    15. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, thats what puzzles me the most about telemarketers. They get someone to answer, and that person calls them a cockbiting fucktard and hangs up, and then, instead of blacklisting that number (because obviously, your not selling them ANYTHING) they call back every day for two years, wasting their own time on calling a number that is guaranteed to not profit.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    16. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too hard to enforce. We get three or four robocalls plus one or two nuisance "surveys" every day. The robocallers almost never display a real phone number. How can the authorities track down and execute (robocalling is capital offense, right? If not, it should be) Rachel from Cardholder Services without her phone number?

      Grantee if you call the White House with a Bomb threat using spoofed number... they will find you. Government could care less about these guys. They can do it but the "war on terror" keeps em pretty busy.

      Why can't the NSA do some good for once and shut them down? They eavesdrop on every phone call anyway.

    17. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in a call center that does outbound calling. We're exempt if it's done for market research or if it's on behalf of a company that already has your permission to call them. There's a lot more rules and restrictions than that, but that's probably the simplest explanation of why it doesn't work for some calls.

      The other ones, I suspect it's just the lack of enforcement and, as you said, other loop holes in the law.

    18. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      You realize that the entire purpose of the device featured in this story is to spend a little money to annoy the heck out of people you hate?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    19. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't the Do Not Call list worked? Seems there was too many loop holes and ways around the law I guess.

      Because the rules for the DNC list were made by politicians. If they had designed a DNC list without loopholes, then they couldn't call you next year during their reelection campaign.

    20. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why hasn't the Do Not Call list worked? Seems there was too many loop holes and ways around the law I guess.

      The simple answer is: unethical practice of law.

      In and of itself, stealing a portion of somebody's life is a violation of fundamental rights. In almost every respect it is indistinguishable from kidnapping. In US law, this means it is a violation of rights arising under the 9th Amendment.

      As such, to send somebody or call somebody with unsolicited advertisements or offers (whether for goods, services, religion, political causes) is a violation of fundamental rights, and hence illegal under the highest law of the land (which has authority greater than Congress, and thus can limit freedom of speech and the press, something that Congress - under the 1st Amendment - can not do).

      But the US legal profession is terrified of the 9th Amendment, because so much of the practice of law in the USA violates it. The dual rights to ethical government and ethical practice of law, where even the appearance of conflict of interest must be avoided when reasonable alternatives exist, arise under the 9th Amendment and invalid much of the status quo that lawyers profit from.

      Hence, with the occasional rare exception, the legal profession does everything it can to ignore the existence of the 9th Amendment, and all rights arising under it. It's not a conspiracy, but rather a consequence of amoral individuals looking out for their own interests while doing long term harm to society. This is the same kind of thinking that allowed slavery to be part of the legal system for so many years.

      Since they're are already ignoring the highest law in the land, ignoring lessor laws (such as the Do Not Call law), is trivial.

      It's not just amoral lawyers we're talking about, of course, any more than the slavery system resulted from just the actions of lawyers. Amoral business people, religious leaders, people in political parties, and so forth must also share some of the blame. All of these people know, or should be able to figure out, that what they doing is wrong when they steal a portion of somebody's life.

      Worse, the Do Not Call law has even been written (like so many other laws) to give the illusion that certain types of rights violations are allowed (such as political calls), even when not wanted and not solicited. In doing this, of course, Congress is violating the Bill of Rights. But - no surprise - the judiciary selected by a corrupt Congress (and the Bar Associations) has no interest in rocking the ethics boat. The US Supreme Court routinely ignores serious legal ethics issues that are inherent to many of the cases it hears, and the lessor courts are seldom any better. At best, they occasionally throw somebody to the wolves to give the illusion of caring about ethics, while doing absolutely nothing about the core problems.

      It's an ugly situation. Fix the legal ethics problem, and it's a short step to fixing the call problem. But the legal ethics problem is like a cancer that has metastasized and spread throughout the whole legal system. Fixing the disease will be very difficult.

      Both political parties, and the majority of political leaders, have clearly demonstrated that they have no interest in being responsible and doing the right thing with respect to this issue. Until something changes, the people of the US (and the rest of the world) will pay a high price, and not just in lost time: these problems come with serious social and economic costs that have far reaching effects in the modern global economy.

    21. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's not like they have someone physically dialing your number. They have a computer doing it. It basically costs them nothing to have a computer harass you by calling your number every day for years.

    22. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picture a disgruntled employee. ALL telemarketing employees are disgruntled. Now imagine you just called him a cockbaiting fucktard.

      He knows it will take but a second to put your name on the "hot prospect" list, whereby automated systems will ensure your torture endures at the hands of a different operator every day. He takes special satisfaction knowing you could be getting calls long after he is dead

      He is aware that he will not pay a cent for this amazing lifetime TaaS (Troll as a Service), and he does not like being called a cockbaiting fucktard.

         

    23. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't the Do Not Call list worked?

      VoIP is the answer to this question.

      The telcos are no longer really in charge of the traditional telephone world. They have all moved on to selling wireless and backbone services.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    24. Re:Whatever happened to the do not call list? by anyGould · · Score: 1

      You know, thats what puzzles me the most about telemarketers. They get someone to answer, and that person calls them a cockbiting fucktard and hangs up, and then, instead of blacklisting that number (because obviously, your not selling them ANYTHING) they call back every day for two years, wasting their own time on calling a number that is guaranteed to not profit.

      Because next time someone else might pick up. Or they'll be selling a different line. Or you might be in a different mood. Or the company just doesn't want to cross off a number.

      Even legit telemarketers (like university fundraisers, where I did a stint 15-20 years ago) are *loath* to actually remove a name and number from the file. And with robocalls, it costs them effectively nothing to ring that phone again, so why would they remove it?

  5. Kickstarter by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see he has a Kickstarter going for a commercial version. Problem is that as soon as more than one person has it, the callers will learn to recognize the voice in the first few seconds. In fact they will train their computers to recognize the voice and not even put it through to a human being, so really it's no better than just hanging up.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Kickstarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop whining. If it's really as easy as you claim to defeat (it isn't), it would be just as easy to come up with new countermeasures.

      This arms race of technologies would make robocalling much less profitable, not that it will actually ever happen, since they'll just focus on their usual customers to make money (idiots), who won't own this device.

    2. Re:Kickstarter by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Right, because there's totally no way you could record your own phrases.

      Before anyone gets carried away by how fucking brilliant I am, I'd considered building a telemarketer tormentor using Astrerix. It never got past the beermat stage, but we thought of that problem and solved it before we'd even finished the first beer.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Kickstarter by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Then everyone can use his voice as their voicemail. Sounds good to me!

    4. Re:Kickstarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is that as soon as more than one person has it, the callers will learn to recognize the voice in the first few seconds.

      Easily fixed. The system merely need ability to let people record their own stuff. A lazy customer might go with default voice - but even that can be manipulated through some variation in sampling rate and electronic filters. (Same as funny-voice boxes, but toned down a bit.) Others will add their own messages. So when your bot calls me, you get my genuine voice. You merely don't get me.

    5. Re:Kickstarter by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      Right, because there's totally no way you could record your own phrases.

      Before anyone gets carried away by how fucking brilliant I am, I'd considered building a telemarketer tormentor using Astrerix. It never got past the beermat stage, but we thought of that problem and solved it before we'd even finished the first beer.

      I saw this on kickstarter and considered supporting it until I saw that it was a subscription service. I have zero interest in a subscription service. Now if it was a consumer device for $50 (or an android/iphone app) then I would consider it especially if it allowed some customization and/or had randomization.

    6. Re:Kickstarter by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      I think if you programmed it to modulate the voice a little each time (by varying its pitch or other parameter), it would prevent matching algorithms or force said algos to become a lot more intelligent.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    7. Re:Kickstarter by jfmiller · · Score: 1

      In fact at the $180 level of the Kickstarter you can do just that. RTFA.

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
  6. You mean It's Lenny? by Monoman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love listening to the itslenny calls.... https://www.reddit.com/r/itsle...

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    1. Re:You mean It's Lenny? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I just keep telling them stories that go nowhere to frustrate them. Like that one time when I was trying to get a new heel for my boot. I had an onion tied to my belt. Which was the style at the time...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:You mean It's Lenny? by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Last time I got a call from "microsoft support" I put the speakerphone next to the computer and told the guy on the line that he needed to sing to the computer to heal it. The conversation lasted a good 15 minutes as I insisted over and over that singing had restorative power over technology, I even offered to sing along with him.

      Come to think of it they never called back.

      --
      Nullius in verba
  7. Could be better. by marciot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To really piss off telemarketers, the robot should give itself away after a few minutes by saying "this has been a recording. Have a nice day." In this sample call, the telemarketer just eventually hung up, thinking he was talking to a person who just had too much time on their hands. I think the reaction would have been better had he known he had been duped by a machine.

    1. Re:Could be better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To really piss off telemarketers, the robot should give itself away after a few minutes by saying "this has been a recording. Have a nice day."

      "Ha! Elaborate voice mail hoax! Leave it!"
      "We're sorry, the voice mail of [air horn] is full. Good bye."

  8. Nice. However... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In those rare instances that one such call gets through my filters, I simply hang up immediately on noticing the nature of the call. I do not care whether it is a bot or a human. Without a word. Apologies and politeness are not due, and losing one's marbles is useless.

  9. It's fun to screw with them by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I fuck with telemarketers mercilessly, waste their time, and generally ruin their day until they hang up. :)

    I also have a list of test questions that I make them answer before I let them proceed. Some are legit questions (how deep is the Mariana Trench?) and some are trick questions.

    Question: If I have 10 apples and you take 5, what do you have?
    They always say "5"....
    My answer: No, you have two broken arms, because NO ONE takes my fucking apples!

    I love running them ragged and by the time they hang up in frustration (or if they fail 3 questions) they realize that they suck and should seek honest employment.

    Sometimes I make an "appointment" with them, but I give them a bogus address. Sometimes I give them my actual address and just play dumb when they show up a day or two later. It quickly becomes a lose-lose situation for companies to hire these telemarketers and they don't re-hire them, lol. :)

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:It's fun to screw with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they fail 3 questions...

      You throw them in a chasm?

    2. Re:It's fun to screw with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >seek honest employment
      What, phone bitch was the top pick?

      >companies to hire these telemarketers and they don't re-hire them
      They don't give a fuck if you ruin some grunt's day. If the sucker gets burnt out they throw in another, there's desperates lined up to replace him.

      Even when dealing with a lifeless metal machine, it feels disgusting to intentionally crunch on a failing part, a cog, to burn it until it breaks. But we'll do it to proles over and over.

      I have no problem with you throwing a wrench into the system, I might even encourage you, but you're under the impression that you're having a direct effect on someone who matters.

    3. Re:It's fun to screw with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing too but it's kind of like pissing in the wind.. I totally hate the FCC for being so fucking useless. Here we have a digital record (the call), financial records (they usually want you to buy some shit) and yet the FCC acts like this is such a difficult problem.
       
      Murder is a crime because it robs someone of the time they had left in their life. Robocallers steal the equivalent of lifetimes every day and our useless regulatory agencies sit on their hands.

    4. Re:It's fun to screw with them by Thelasko · · Score: 2

      Sometimes I make an "appointment" with them, but I give them a bogus address

      1060 W. Addison?

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    5. Re:It's fun to screw with them by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course you are having an effect. When you keep the asshole busy on the line the asshole that pays him gets nothing for his money. When you hangup you just free him to interrupt someone else's dinner.

      At least say, 'hang on, there is someone at the door' and put the phone down. Hang it up 15 minutes later.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:It's fun to screw with them by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Local jail address is always good. Never any parking nearby.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:It's fun to screw with them by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      1060 W. Addison?

      No, I either give them an address next door or else the nearest police department.

      Sometimes I give them my address, and then I look at them like they're idiots when they show up...."Duct cleaning? I don't need any duct cleaning...no, I have no idea who gave you this address."

      After a few of those dry holes and fruitless runs maybe they'll rethink the idea of hiring a telemarketing firm to drum up business for them. :)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    8. Re:It's fun to screw with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JustAnotherOldBlowhardBULLSHITTER why'd ya lie about working for Microsoft? Can ya prove that statement? No? Thought not. Must be an "NDA" that ya signed with yer fantasyland fake name here online, right? Hahahahaha (the bullshit and foam spewing from JustAnotherOldBLOWHWARD's piehole will ensue - stay tuned, keep yer seatbelts on everyone! Hilarity will ensue, guaranteed)

    9. Re:It's fun to screw with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just explain how annoying unwanted calls are and they stop. They didn't seem to understand language based explanations, so I explain via example: I call back and get someone on the line, listen to them talk and say nothing. When they hang up I immediately redial. After an hour or two at most THEY block MY number. It might seem like a waste of time, but I work second shift and sleep in; after being woken up early it helps recover my mood to hear the frustration in their voices, and the longer scripted greeting devolving to a weary "hello?"

  10. Auto submit complaint by Digital+Mage · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't take much to have the bot also submit a complaint to here:
    https://complaints.donotcall.g...

    Who knows if the government checks the list but couldn't hurt.

    1. Re:Auto submit complaint by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2

      And that has fixed things so well that we need this gadget.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:Auto submit complaint by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Considering I submit the same number about 4 times a week, no.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:Auto submit complaint by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

      or just forward the call to the FCC if they have an 800 number

      --
      Nullius in verba
    4. Re:Auto submit complaint by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. And that too, is part of the problem.
      What's the point of having a law, if there is little to no enforcement?

  11. Also, bill collectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had a friend who was getting called and he let me listen in both to the collector calling and and the freaking phone tree he got when he tried to call them back.

    Here's the idea. Have a number just for creditors; landline or skype. Never answer it, turn the ringer off. Let it go to VM on your answering machine or your computer. Have the VM demand lots of information from them s they can be processed correctly- collector license number, identifying account number of the collection case, amount, due date, amount past due, name of original creditor etc etc. Ignore their input. However, randomly interrupt their tedious input tasks with the message "a response must be entered in the time allotted. Please call back.", then hang up. That is very similar to what my friend encountered when trying to deal with them.

    Sure, it's not a productive answer to his issues,but then again the chief technique of bill collectors is the intentional infliction of emotional distress. At least this serves some socially redeeming purpose, namely, it teaches bill collectors what it's like to deal with an asshole.

  12. Debt collectors don't like robo calls either... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I was unemployed for two years (2009-2010), and getting ready to file for chapter seven bankruptcy in 2011, the credit card companies sold my debts to the debt collecting agencies. Most debt collectors were disappointed to find a note in the file that I was filing for bankruptcy and left it at that. A few weren't so polite. One debt collector kept hanging up on me when I demanded that he acknowledged the note in the file. I called five times in five minutes, tying up his phone during that time, before he gave me what I wanted.

    1. Re:Debt collectors don't like robo calls either... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I just wish debt collectors weren't so fucking dumb. There is someone who is substantially older than I am with the same name and they apparently took out some student loans before I was even born. The debt is so old that any of the reputable debt collection agencies have long since given up on it and now it is passed around to the scummy ones. Every 3-6 months it gets sold to some shitty company and they call a bunch of times and don't believe me that it is physically impossible for this debt to be mine since it dates to 10 years before my birth. Some of them I have sent letters to stating that it can't be mine if I was able to get contact information from them but they never pay attention to that it seems. Eventually they stop and then it gets sold to the next shitty company. A lot of these shitty companies don't even provide a phone number on the caller ID or it is some BS like 1-800-444-5555 so good luck ever finding out who they really are.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Debt collectors don't like robo calls either... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, my wife got dunned by several different collection agencies for the debts of some guy who had the discourtesy to die an a hospital without paying his bills.

      She had never lived even in the same city as he had. Admittedly, the did have the same name, but nothing else even close.

      I don't, however, believe that it's being dumb. I think it's a combination of malice and fraud. Unfortunately, proving that in court would be difficult.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Debt collectors don't like robo calls either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can sue for behaviour like that. You should. The rewards from the lawsuit are VERY much worth your time. You probably won't even need a lawyer.

      I would make sure first that I record all my calls, for proof. If you're in a state that lets you do it without warning the other end, even better. If not, just state that you're recording the call when you finish this sentence, and if the collector is not happy with it, they may hang up and desist calling. Record that you said this, of course.

    4. Re:Debt collectors don't like robo calls either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, debt collectors are hilariously dumb.

      I remember getting the shotgun approach with finding a debt.
      One particular company sent letters to neighbours to try attack my reputation. Hilarious.
      When I heard about the letters to neighbours, we laughed.

      Equally one with Readers Digest after they were sold off to some scrubs. They seem to have either ignored or screwed up their sales system because my bill "never went through", so tried to get me to pay.
      I had a receipt of payment for it.
      They still continued.
      I used their letters as fire material. Happy days.

  13. Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't had a landline in about 10 years, but I hand out my last landline phone number to anyone who asks for a phone number - let them waste time calling a dead line. Only real people that I know and trust get my cell number, and the are entered as contacts. Any call from someone in my address book pops up with their name, so I know it's safe to answer. If it is a call with no address in my phone, I don't answer. If they leave a message, I see if it is junk or if it is a legit communication. If legit, I add it as a contact and respond.

    I very occasionally will get a robocall from a random dialer, but the above procedure kills the problem in the nest.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize that someone else has been assigned that number in the 10 years since you last used it, right? It's not a dead line if some other poor schmuck (your true victim) has to answer your calls.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    2. Re:Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a landline in about 10 years, but I hand out my last landline phone number to anyone who asks for a phone number - let them waste time calling a dead line.

      Phone numbers get reused so there is a good chance they will not be calling a dead line but instead will be calling whoever happened to be allocated that number after you stopped renting it.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      To answer the question you posed in your subject, yes.

      When power goes out in an area, cell towers can get affected too... and if the outage lasts long enough, any backup generators they had on a given tower won't last through it.

    4. Re:Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by ripvlan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Phone numbers get reused. I've been buying & agreeing to stuff in your name for 9 of the past 10 years.

      In other news - I moved to Google Voice and it has a "press 1" feature for unknown callers - plus they have to state their name. AND it has Google Spam detection which is pretty cool.

    5. Re:Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone numbers get reused so there is a good chance they will not be calling a dead line but instead will be calling whoever happened to be allocated that number after you stopped renting it.

      Then they learn not to trust numbers people hand them. Sheesh.

    6. Re:Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      Vast majority of our calls are cell, however we have 2 young kids in the house and want them to be able to use the phone in an emergency. Landline phone is big, easy to use, always in the same place and doesn't require a code to unlock or navigation of menus. Since bundling my phone/TV/internet from FiOS is cheaper than getting just TV/internet, it works out well.

    7. Re:Cord-Cutting: Is a Landline Needed? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Seriously, get a Google voice number.

      When I was last in the job market, I just handed out my GV number to everyone and put it in my online resumes knowing that the number would effectively become public knowledge.

      It has 2 really great benefits. 1. your phone never rings 2. you get voice to text transcription of every message.

      It is now 4 years later and I STILL get 1 or 2 calls every day on that number... but it doesn't bother me at all.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  14. Different strategy, same effect by Rudisaurus · · Score: 2

    Simply switching off the ringer on my landline has had the same effect; after tailing off over the first 6 months or so, I rarely get telemarketing calls anymore (as in, not even once a month). Anyone who really wants to reach me will leave me voicemail. Messages from those few telemarketers who don't hang up get deleted on recognition within the first couple of seconds of playback. And anyone who really needs to reach me directly will have been given my cell number to do so. Works admirably.

    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
  15. Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this deals with a landline when the homeowner wants to dial out. I setup an Asterisk system that just dumps callers not on my list to a menu and immediately gives them a challenge/response in a slightly confusing way so there's little time to connect their agent with my line. If they don't answer, the system hangs up on them and that's the end of it. As a result I haven't had a telemarketing/robo call in over 7 years and I still have the ability to dial out through my landline any time I like. I'd rather they move on than to waste their time with my system and on my phone line when I could be getting or making far more important calls. The only way around the system is to already have the agent connected to the line as the call is being placed and have them aware that the challenge/response is happening. No muss, no fuss. Sure, my system doesn't make headlines but I don't have telemarketers tying up my lines either.

  16. Answering Hello by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    I do this on my voice mail, since robo calls will hang up. Just answer "Hello, Hi" wait 3-4 seconds, repeat, Takes about 5-6 seconds for the robocall to transfer to a human when it thinks its not voicemail. Really pisses them off when they transfer and they hear "Yup, its really not hear, you got the machine"

    I suspect they dont get paid for voicemails, so they get really really mad. I've heard some swearing and cussing, love it.

     

    1. Re:Answering Hello by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I think I might start doing something similar, but actually answer the call, say whatever is needed to get a real person on the line, then "Please leave a message after the beep..." [airhorn]

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  17. I'm wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if he didn't cause the whole world to waste much, much more time, than if he had just hung up.

    for my part I just wasted 10 mn of my life listening to the recordings.

    I'm not thanking him.

  18. Don't take out on the human callers by accessbob · · Score: 0
    The people who end up in these jobs generally need them.

    They are just trying to make a living.

    Actual robocalls on the other hand...

    1. Re:Don't take out on the human callers by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      They are just trying to make a living.

      So do burglars. Doesn't mean I have to support it. Actually, any second of their lifetime wasted by a machine without them being able to make the life of another person miserable or waste another person's time is a second won.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Don't take out on the human callers by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      The people who end up in these jobs generally need them.

      They are just trying to make a living.

      Actual robocalls on the other hand...

      The goal isn't to "take it out" on the human caller. The goal is to make it unprofitable for the telemarketing company to continue. Most of my "telemarketing" calls these days tend to be complete scams too in which case when they are trying to install a virus on your computer and/or steal your money then they deserve it but even if they are an honest employee working for an honest telemarketing company (assuming that exists), the only way to reduce the amount of calls is to make it unprofitable which is what a system like this is designed to do.

    3. Re:Don't take out on the human callers by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Except that there are all kinds of ways for robocalls to not be illegal.

      Also, for you to equate a call center peon to a burglar is pretty disingenuous.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    4. Re:Don't take out on the human callers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ok, then compare them to Jehova's Witnesses or the bum trying to sell you some ancient newspaper he found. Not illegal. But annoying as all hell.

      And of those three, the ONLY one actually worthy of a nanosecond of my time is the bum, for he alone has the chance to not be responsible for the situation he is in.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. I will pay good money for an Android version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I no longer have a land line. What I really need is this functionally in an Android App. I want to be able to answer the call normally, but if it is a bot on the other side, then I would like to transfer the call to the app and have it record the results for later enjoyment.

    1. Re: I will pay good money for an Android version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have this already, it's called the ignore button and voicemail. I've heard good things.

  20. Simple Solution For Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simply set your answering machine to pick up in one ring.
    Set the answer to: "Hello..." Pause for about 7 seconds then "I'm sorry we're not interested, please remove us from your call list."

    We went from about 8 calls a day between 8am and 10pm to roughly 2 calls a week (most IRS scammers)

  21. Retaliation just because you can? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure, most people really despise the robocalls, but wasting the caller's time doesn't really help much, either. Just like with spammers, the robo-callers are being paid to do a job - and believe it or not annoying you is not what they are paid for.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Retaliation just because you can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To clarify, the robo-callers are being paid per hour to do a job by a company that expects to turn a profit by doing this crap. Wasting time that these companies are paying for directly reduces their throughput per dollar. It is a public good to reduce the throughput so far these companies cannot continue to profitably use this approach.

    2. Re:Retaliation just because you can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      wasting the caller's time doesn't really help much, either. ... and believe it or not annoying you is not what they are paid for.

      Umm, exactly. They're being paid to sell you some worthless thing or another. Their success rate is low, so the way they make their profits is by pitching the largest number of people in the shortest period of time. It's a numbers game. Telemarketers don't pay retail rates, but they do have to pay for phoneline time, outgoing connections, equipment, staff, etc. They do it because they can sucker a small fraction of callees into paying. That low response rate makes up for the operating costs.

      If you can somehow raise their operating costs, or drop their success rate, the cost/benefit analysis starts to tip in the direction of unprofitability, and they'll stop calling people. Waste the callers time, and you've tipped things towards being less cost effective. Tie up their lines, and they can't make additional outgoing calls. If enough people did it, there wouldn't be a reason to do it.

    3. Re:Retaliation just because you can? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      That depends on what the (human) callers are doing. If they are administering a survey or something of that sort, then they are almost always paid by the hour. However if they are doing cold-call sales, then they are more likely paid on commission. If you are wasting the time of someone who is on commission, you are lowering their wage but not significantly impacting the bottom line of their company.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    4. Re:Retaliation just because you can? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, if people are cold calling on commission, then I consider them accomplices in fraud. They may, perhaps, not know that they are accomplices, but that doesn't make them innocent.

      How often, do you think, on a percentage basis, are cold-call sales pitches not fraud? My guess would be 10% or less.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Retaliation just because you can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can somehow raise their operating costs, or drop their success rate, the cost/benefit analysis starts to tip in the direction of unprofitability, and they'll stop calling people. Waste the callers time, and you've tipped things towards being less cost effective. Tie up their lines, and they can't make additional outgoing calls. If enough people did it, there wouldn't be a reason to do it.

      It just occurred to me that a good way to tip the scale even further would be if you could somehow make it so that the telemarketers could not terminate the call once they initiated it. As it currently stands, the only way that we can tie up their lines is to entice them to stay on the line until they understand it is a waste of their time and hang up. What if we could make it so that once they have started the call they cannot disconnect until the callee terminates the call? Kind of like a telephone honey trap. Has anyone tried doing this? It would be even more amusing if the honey trap was an endless recording of the hello Lenny guy.

      CAPTCHA: ransom. If I didn't know better, I would swear that thing is sentient!

  22. Government corruption by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0

    If the U.S. government was healthier, something would be done about robocallers.

  23. I thought this post was going to be one of those.. by kuhnto · · Score: 2

    Jennifer was SO TIRED of harassing telemarketing calls until she learned this one old telephone trick! Now Shes making them wish they never called!

    --
    "A 'person' is smart. 'People' are dumb, panicky animals and you know that."
  24. Not a new idea by laing · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Telecrapper 2000 is my favorite example of how to torture telemarketers.

    1. Re:Not a new idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I'm not the only who remembered :)

  25. method that actually work by nvm_my_comment · · Score: 1

    I use a voip line which give me acces to an IVR (a menu) For the phone to actually ring, they need to dial the right number or it simply hang after 6 seconds. Final twist (might be why it actually work) The message in the menu greeting that that mention the number is in another language than english. sucess after 5 years is 100%

  26. Telecrapper 2000 TC2K by sims+2 · · Score: 2

    Sounds like a reimplementation of the telecrapper.
    tho the telecrapper is over 10 years old now I can understand how people would forget..
    http://www.engadget.com/2005/0...
    http://myplace.frontier.com/~p...
    http://soundbytes.org/forums/t...

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  27. How the hell is this even a business anymore? by geekmux · · Score: 1

    How the hell is robocalling still a viable business when we are proving more and more every day that humans do not speak to other humans on phones anymore?

    Seriously, I can't believe we're not sitting here talking about what a pain in the ass robotexting is...

    1. Re:How the hell is this even a business anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is robocalling still a viable business when we are proving more and more every day that humans do not speak to other humans on phones anymore?

      Seriously, I can't believe we're not sitting here talking about what a pain in the ass robotexting is...

      Shhhhh! Don't give them any ideas, dammit!

  28. Steve, send the phone spiders by crtreece · · Score: 1

    I guess we're NOT interested.

    --
    file: .signature not found
  29. DIY Fun With Phone Solicitors by ZipK · · Score: 1

    If you like to do it yourself: http://www.amazon.com/Fun-Phon...

  30. Needs better logic by DirkDaring · · Score: 2

    Listened to some of the recordings, very cool. I can just imagine when the logic in this gets better. Like when they ask 'Who....?' 'Which....?' 'What....?'

    The bot doesn't do any answers for that, just go 'mm-mmm' 'right' 'ok'. Same with 'How are you'.

    But these are fantastic, I'd love to enter voice into this.

  31. This is hilarious (and reminds me of Eliza) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When can I get a mobile (iOS?) version of this on my phone? I'd love to have my phone answer calls (whose number matches a pattern) this way and record them for future lolz

    I'd easily route all 1-800* calls to this software, and am willing to pay $$$ for the lolz

  32. made my own by slugstone · · Score: 0

    I use a Raspberry Pi and NCID to drop the call on first ring and done with it.

  33. The Asterisk solution by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

    I've been thinking about running my own in-home PBX to deal with this, too.

    Whitelisted numbers, friends, family, and businesses I want to talk to: Rings right through.

    Numbers not on the whitelist: straight to voicemail, my phone does not ring, not even once. The voicemail says, "Hello?" a few times to see if anyone answers, then says "This is a recording, please leave a message" in order to (presumably) get the robo-calls routed to an actual agent.

    Numbers on the blacklist: Forwarded to Lenny, or something very special I program myself. (I don't like that "Lenny" says "Yeah" and similar positive type words from time to time; those crooks might claim that was an agreement to get a subscription to The Wisdum of L. Ron Hubbard crammed onto my phone bill.) My ideal would be to sound perfectly normal, do some interpretation of what they're saying to actually address things they say, and do a "curious about the product but not agreeing to anything" act for as long as they stay on the phone.

    On the top of the blacklist are those evil <redacted> who call six times simultaneously, so the phone rings a whole lot longer than normal before going to voicemail, and the Caller-ID announces their name six times. Bastards. This is the sort of thing that makes me yearn for the "Scanners" power to reach down the phone line telekinetically and set their computer on fire.

    Bonus, custom voicemail messages for appropriate callers, white/non/blacklisted. Like "Hi, Mom, we're not home, call my cell."

  34. Why anyone listen that by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 1

    I am not from USA, so I really don't know how it goes with robocalls. What's the point? You are supposed to listen to the recorded advertising message? I'd expect that 99% of people immediately hang up.

    --
    No sig today.
    1. Re:Why anyone listen that by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      the other 1% punch through the menu tree to get a human operator, and issue verbal abuse and threats.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  35. Landline? what is this strange concept? by JustNiz · · Score: 0

    Do many people still even have residential landlines any more?

    1. Re:Landline? what is this strange concept? by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because not everyone gets great cell reception at home.

      Personally, I get awful cell reception at home for about 8 months out of the year. Why? Because the leaves on the trees block the signals from the cell towers. Once the leaves fall, my cell reception is noticeably better.

  36. I get tons of robo and scams on work cell by Comen · · Score: 1

    I get a ton of robo and scams on my work cell phone for some reason, happens a ton.
    I get they guys that call and ask me if I am in front of my PC all the time and I mess with them when I feel like it.
    But honestly what I want to know is why law enforcement does nothing about these calls, some are total scams and should be 100% illegal.
    How hard would it be to setup a phone number that has no real use outside of a honeypot for call spam? so if someone is calling it they are more than likely not legit. then record and take them down ASAP.
    Why is this not a issue, they are trying to scam money for innocent people all the time, I would hope they would be prosecuted, are they all outside the US or something so it makes it impossible? Most of the calls look like they are come from a local number when they are trying to scam out I found.

  37. Bad Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... unless the call spammers are reduced to the kind of gibbering drooling relics that you get from a face to face encounter with a Lovecraftian Entity, I don't want to hear it.

    Sadly, this device does not properly render the call spammers "insane" as advertised.

  38. Blacklists by radish · · Score: 1

    I use Ooma for my home phone service. It has a blacklist feature (both personal and a "community" shared list). You can choose whether to send them to voicemail, play them a message or what have you. It's worked perfectly for me for years, zero robocalls (other than legit ones like schools which I can always block if I need to).

    I imagine it may not work forever (I remember the rise and fall of spam blacklists) but right now it's great.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  39. "Remove" everyone. by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Years ago, I had problems with a FAX spammer who would send junk every night. We had to leave it on overnight because it was a transport company and we would receive bills of lading at all hours. This also meant, however, that we had a separate phone line for voice calls, which did *not* need to be left free all night.

    Anyhow, all of these faxes had a removal number to call, which made you jump through all sorts of hoops. I noticed shortly after attempting it that it actually *increased* the volume of spam to TWO a night. The "removal" number was, however, toll-free. This gave me an idea.

    I listened and noted the timing of prompts, and the associated menu options, for the "removal" service. I brought in an old modem from home, and set it up to autodial their number (on their dime) and start "removal" processes. This I did in two different ways:

    (1) First my modem would call them and demand removal of a number. They were so helpful and asked if I wished to remove another, so of course my modem would say YES, and proceed to "remove" the next number in sequence. It would cycle through all 1000 numbers in a block before disconnecting, and each time it did this, it incremented the number of the block being removed (except for invalid ones like 555). This took about four hours, all of which they had to pay the charges for. Not long after (and possibly as a direct consequence), they started limiting the calls to three numbers before hanging up.

    (2) My second iteration of the program would select a random number, go through the "removal" steps, but then when asked "are you sure?" it would hit the button for "NO", at which point the process would start again. It would pick a new random number and do this again and again. If the call was terminated, it waited five minutes and called again. Since it never completed the process, the three-number limit did not apply. I think this worked for three or four days before they implemented a fifteen minute cutoff regardless of what you were doing at the time. I didn't re-program for this at all, I just tolerated the 25% loss of efficiency at driving up heir phone bill and let it call back five minutes after being disconnected.

    Finally I got an angry call, during business hours, demanding that I stop doing this. I flat out said "sue me." The person at the other end finally said "why would you want me to do that?", to which I responded "because then I'll know exactly who you are, and can sue you for each of the hundreds of faxes you have sent, which I have been keeping as evidence." He coughed and said "Look, just stop calling us, eh? Nobody else can call when you're doing this." (Did I mention they were in Vancouver?) I just said "I will cease the calls as long as you do."

    We got another one two weeks later, but I could only run the auto-dialer at night, so I couldn't do anything right at that moment. I got a VOICE call fifteen minutes later telling me to please disregard and not start the remove-bot again. That was the last time I heard from them.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:"Remove" everyone. by stephows · · Score: 1

      I had a friend that received lots of spam fax messages that used up lots of paper - the expensive thermo paper roll type that was common in the 1980's. He printed up a reply that basically said "do not send fax messages to number XXXXXXX". Then he'd dial the reply number (conveniently printed on the spam they just sent him), feed this message in and then loop it around and sticky-tape the beginning to the end. He'd let this cycle around for 10 minutes or so while he did other stuff and then hang up. Used up ALL of the spammer's expensive thermo paper. Very few repeat offenders after that.

  40. Nomorobo FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use a VoIP provider, sign up for Nomorobo. I've been using it for over a year and like it. Their web site is a bit gimmicky (probably because they're trying to appeal to the elderley, who are the most likely to fall for these phone scams), but it's legitimate and free and it works. You get the benefit of an automated, shared blacklist and whitelist plus a system intelligent enough to see calls hitting a bunch of users, realize they're robocalls, and start blocking them.

  41. Not an American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy way to stop at least human beings from ever calling you again: "Sorry, I am from overseas and I don't have a social security nunber". Most calls are over before you can even say "have a nice day"

  42. Passes the Turning Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The telemarketer can't tell he was talking to a machine.
    A riot!

  43. Kudos to Roger Anderson by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I've thought of building one of those for a long time, but never quite enough to actually do it.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  44. The Real Solution by ssufficool · · Score: 1

    Don't allow phone calls without a pre-negotiated secret. Here, have my phone and a PIN just for you. I will add that PIN to my access list. If you abuse it, I will revoke it. Same for email.

    Queued communication is all the rage. Down with instant communication.

  45. Fun with "Windows Technical Department" scammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been having lots of fun with the "Windows Technical Department" scammers lately.

    One time I wasted well over an hour of their time, with 4-5 different people total. They even called me back a couple times. First, when they wanted me to turn on the computer, I just told them "hang on, it's a bit slow" and used that to string them out for more than 5 minutes before it finally booted... to the DOS prompt.

    > Yes, now go to the Start Menu and...
    I don't have a Start Menu, it's just a command line.
    > Type in eventvwr.msc and...
    It says that eventvwr.msc is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
    > What OS do you have? Microsoft?
    Yes, Microsoft Disk Operating System (DOS) 6.2 ...
    > Can you open a browser?
    Yes, I have Lynx here...
    > Linux? I thought you said Microsoft.
    No, Lynx, like a Tiger or Lion, not Linux.
    > Whatever, just go to supremocontrol.com and look for the big link in the middle.
    Ok, I went to supremocontrol.
    > Do you see the big link?
    No, I just see a lot of HTML.
    > What do you see?
    Umm, DOCTYPE HTML TRANSITIONAL 4.01 EN ... (ramble off more HTML mixed with parts of the actual site text).

    I repeated this skit about 5-6 times with several different people before they finally just gave up.

    Someday I want to prepare a VM where all the standard commands they use have been replaced with joke programs. Like ones with pictures of Borat smiling and saying this is totally not a virus. Or maybe they can trigger some horrible virus that will cause the computer to explode unless the Microsoft Technical Department wires 1 bitcoin to some address and then fake some explosions and a disconnect.

    That or maybe I can convince them to yank out the wires on their phone system before it hacks them. Or maybe to pour water on it? Hmm... so many fun ideas.

  46. How to end this by Joe+Branya · · Score: 2

    This is criminal activity. If the federal government wanted to stop this they CAN trace a call, follow it back to the U.S. call center or credit card billing number. How? Find 100 people willing to have a tap on the phone; tell them to agree to anything and pay with a government credit card they are given; trace the credit card info and land on the U.S. part of the operation HARD using the conspiracy laws.

    If you don't think they have the ability to do that do the following though experiment: How fast would it take for the police to arrive at your door if the robo call was saying "I think we should bomb the White House with confetti using toy drones. Would you like to buy one set up to use? If so, press one.

    If any of the people running for President made it a campaign promise to shut these people down I'd vote for him or her at the March 1st Texas primary

    1. Re:How to end this by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would work if "windows support" or others of their ilk were in the US, but they're in Bangalore or Kolkuta.

  47. VoIP by GrahamJ · · Score: 1

    You can set up such a system in about 5 minutes with something like voip.ms

  48. Nice idea, but it's gonna fail by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

    Their Kickstarter campaign will fail because their implementation sucks, for several reasons:

    1) It's a subscription service instead of a device that you pay for once
    2) It requires manually forwarding every Robocall to their service

    If it were a device similar to the Caller ID blockers that you can buy on Amazon, then I'd contribute to their campaign.

  49. NoMoRobo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have VOIP and your ISP provides it, NoMoRobo is incredibly effective. I have Time Warner, which does provide it as a free option. I've had it set up for a couple of months and haven't had a single telemarketer get through. I get one ring and then silence, telling me it's killed yet another call. http://www.nomorobo.com/ http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2492079,00.asp

  50. Root Call Blocker - Android App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're annoyed by telemarketers you can use this App, Root Call Blocker. (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=fahrbot.apps.rootcallblocker.beta).

    It works on rooted phone and allows you to place the telemarketer on-hold, or forward to another number.

    Since JollyRoger doesn't have an app yet, you can use this App on your mobile to allow you to have the Root Call Blocker pickup the calls which match you blacklist and forward to his robot.

  51. How to through robos and marketers off your line. by qfman · · Score: 0

    The first wave of robo marketing happened while I was in collage. The robot would wait for the initial hello and then start asking questions and waiting for your response. I made a really long message that started by saying hello press x to leave a message. Then a pause followed by diresions of this type of behavior and a few more seconds of silence .... for about 15 minutes. After several weeks there was a marked decrease of this type of call. When Verizon was my carrier Goggle Voice would let me use a separate message for any call not in my contact list. Those calls would get https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... followed by this number is no longer accepting calls from robots. If you would like to talk to the owner of this number please leave a message with the number you are calling from and why you are calling. I will add you to my white list so my phone actually rings when you call. I will also return your call. I set my default ring tone to silent and use a group ring tone setting program to assign a ring tone to people in my contact list. Loss of this functionality and an increase in missed calls from robo and telemarketers is the only down side I have noticed from switching to Tmobil. Something I am willing to suffer with for the $200+ / month I am saving as a result of the switch.

    --
    They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.