Slashdot Mirror


San Bernadino D.A. Says Shooter's Phone Could Harbor "Cyber Pathogen" (theguardian.com)

Mr.Intel writes with the Guardian's report that : San Bernadino D.A. has a novel argument for why Apple should be forced to provide the FBI with tools to decrypt the iPhone once used by mass-shooter Syed Rizwan Farook: a "dormant cyber pathogen," he says, could have been unleashed by the county's electronic infrastructure, and only by examining the phone's content can any really be sure. From the article: The questionable claim comes from Ramos's amicus brief in the case, filed with the US District Court on Thursday afternoon. In it, Ramos supports the FBI's argument that Apple should be compelled to build a one-use version of its operating system to load on to the seized phone – used by the mass-murderer, but still technically property of his employer, San Bernardino county – in order to weaken the security and allow the Government to brute-force the shooter's passcode. ... Ramos said: 'The iPhone is a county owned telephone that may have connected to the San Bernardino County computer network. The seized iPhone may contain evidence that can only be found on the seized phone that it was used as a weapon to introduce a lying dormant cyber pathogen that endangers San Bernardino County's infrastructure and poses a continuing threat to the citizens of San Bernardino County'.

253 comments

  1. Yesterday's retracted news by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I don't have a link handy, but I saw something in the news yesterday or today saying there was no good reason to think this is true.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't have to read the news to know there's no way this is a serious possibility.

    2. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No need to even speculate, it's just absurdity on the surface. A totally non-technical person made up a new "security" term to scare people. If you want to find a link countering it, it's trivial - including quotes from the DA that he made it up...

      http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...

    3. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its in the article that Apple's iphone security guy said that the "cyber pathogen" was a unicorn. I'm not surprised at the D.A. lying to make his case. Cops do it all the time. Politicians are born to lie.

    4. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Informative

      Think of a computer illiterate trying to sound as smart as possible talking about a virus for the first time. If you substitute "trojan virus" for "lying dormant cyber pathogen", it sounds a lot more realistic.

    5. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this basically enciting panic? If people do anything stupid based on his fantastic story can he be held liable?

    6. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 2

      I'm not 100% sure, but isn't this something from the movie Hackers?

      Didn't the bad guy manage to get the FBI to chase down the kids because of a cyber pathogen?

      I wonder if this cyber pathogen is named "The DaVinci Virus".

      It worked for the guys in the movies... maybe it'll work for the lawyer.

    7. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      I don't have a link handy, but I saw something in the news yesterday or today saying there was no good reason to think this is true.

      It's a very interesting theory legal wise, but I don't buy it.

    8. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      It is truly county property, but it would appear the FBI directed the county IT staff to reset the iCloud password, preventing the phone from backing itself up and creating this whole conundrum to start with.

    9. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I could have a bomb, child porn, or pirated music on my phone or PC. And so could you. That's a good reason for the feds to come knocking you up tonight, so better delete that evidence (wipe x 100 just to be sure) and behave from now on, comrade!

    10. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I don't have to read any 'retracted news' to know that this is likely complete and utter bullshit made up out of wholecloth in a desperate attempt to spread FUD and panic the public into shifting their sentiments away from Apple.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    11. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. He's not telling people to act, so he won't be liable if they do. Just like your weatherman isn't liable when he reports a hurricane is coming and people panic and fight each other over the lasr groceries on the shelf.

    12. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though the whole "pathogen" thing is retarded beyond belief, if it is truly county property, then IMO it's a no brainer to let the government access it.

      I don't think anyone is arguing against that, or at least not many. Now whether Apple should be forced to create a version of firmware that overrides the security of the phone, is another matter entirely. I tend to think they should not be force to hack their own phones...

    13. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Think of a computer illiterate trying to sound as smart as possible talking about a virus for the first time. If you substitute "trojan virus" for "lying dormant cyber pathogen", it sounds a lot more realistic.

      Think of the San Bernadino computer techs that are most likely now working 24/7 searching all of their computer system for the most mundane of things :)

      A blessing for those who out of the blue had all this overtime dropped into their laps.

    14. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the pathogen might escape and kill a cyber! We need to keep it locked up! Apple is right!

    15. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 5, Funny

      Asian people will eat anything. They are disgusting.

      Tic

      We eat what keeps us alive. Asians have an odd diet due to what's available, Japanese eat anything out of the sea, and the United States will eat anything disguised as meat.

    16. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 0

      Isn't this basically enciting panic? If people do anything stupid based on his fantastic story can he be held liable?

      Freedom of speech and freedom of press... Rather than having the government establish and dictate the truth, freedom of speech enables the truth to emerge from diverse opinions. http://www.lincoln.edu/crimina...

    17. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, the government can do all it wants to try to gain access. Compelling Apple to write backdoored firmware is something completely different.

    18. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by tlambert · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even though the whole "pathogen" thing is retarded beyond belief, if it is truly county property, then IMO it's a no brainer to let the government access it.

      Of course.

      The government should have their most excellent programmers access it. No one wants to prevent the government from accessing something they have permission to access. So their most excellent programmers should do an end run around Large Number Theory, and magically access it.

      Or they could just apply to a FISA court for a warrant, and ask the NSA for the data, since the NSA PRISM program monitors the communications that would have been used to back up things like the address book in the first place.

      No need to involve Apple at all!

    19. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by skywire · · Score: 1

      The government has it in their possession. No-one is denying them access to it.

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    20. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by meerling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except a Trojan and a Virus are two entirely different types of malware.
      Back to the topic though, the D.A. is talking out his ass regurgitating hollywood movie bullshit in an attempt to stir up fear in the ignorant masses to get what he wants. I bet he still believes computers run on pixie dust.

    21. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2, Informative

      Asians will see a pile of shit on the ground and the first thing that pops into their heads is "Can I eat that?"

      Gelatin blood cubes, century eggs, dogs, cats, monkey brains, elephant feet, tarantulas...there is nothing that asians won't stick into their mouths.

      I've lived in the Philippines, the family invited to many Filipino parties which included a feast of food, nothing there I wouldn't eat except Balut (your century eggs). Yet the eggs seen as quite a delicacy.

      Rats, yes at carnival's they came flayed on a stick and eaten as a treat. Again something I've never given a try.

      Cats, can't say, they are rather rare and can't I remember seeing any.

      Monkey brains, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... says it's a tribal thing. I've never heard of them as food outside of a tv program that made it seem a rare and expensive indulgence.

      Dogs, yes as a boy scout in the Philippines a yearly event was to walk 50 miles of the Bataan death march, during which I've seen a few dogs laid out being butchered. I've lived all over the world (Air Force dependent) in many Asian/non-Asian countries I see dog as a dietary main stay when they can be found, or raised.

      As I understand it there's no nutritional value in poop, so more energy eating it than it provides. Plus the sanitary facilities make it rather hard to acquire.

      The rest of your list (elephant feet, tarantulas (spiders)) I can imagine them being eaten, but not by the general populous as they aren't common but to a small area.

      A tribe in Central America eat huge spiders common in that area, they toss them into a fire and turn till done (History channel).

    22. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asians will see a pile of shit on the ground and the first thing that pops into their heads is "Can I eat that?"

      Gelatin blood cubes, century eggs, dogs, cats, monkey brains, elephant feet, tarantulas...there is nothing that asians won't stick into their mouths.

      Of course. Basic human survival depends on obtaining nutrition to keep your body functioning. The first reaction should always be "can I eat that". In that way the Asians are no different than the Americans, only that you at some point decided that you'll eat things based on look and opinion rather than nutritional value.

      I find it funny that you have no problem eating the remains of an animal that spends it's life rolling in a mudpile and it's own shit with a side of a chicken's period for breakfast, but can criticise someone eating an animal that spends a disproportionate amount of it's time keeping itself clean (cat).

      Funny side story in Australia we got news of the European scandal where someone was substituting horse meat in pre-packaged lasagnes. I heard this news on the way home from the local market where a German butcher sells delicacies. 2 friends of mine in the car lost their mind and were disgusted at the prospect.

      I bought a horse salami at that butcher and just kept quiet.

    23. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      True... That horse thing was here in Denmark. Minced cow were mixed with horse to make it look more red and inviting to buy. The scandal was not that horse were sold. The scandal was that you bought something that was not what the label said it was.

    24. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The ritual of having a daily morning bath has been practiced for thousands of years by the "hindu" people of India. The western practice of having a daily shower/bath is relatively quite recent .

      Smelly perfume however is a western invention.

    25. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though the whole "pathogen" thing is retarded beyond belief, if it is truly county property, then IMO it's a no brainer to let the government access it.

      Apple cannot acquiesce to these insane and unsubstantiated claims by the Government. The smartphone cannot accept a device software update without end-user intervention to accept and initiate the installation. The liars in the government and their ignorant constituents deserve to be put in prison and summarily executed for the sake of national security.

    26. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only filthy dagos would eat horse salami. Are you a wog or dirty arab or gypo ?

    27. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Matt.Battey · · Score: 1

      Straws, Grasping at. Look it up people! ;)

    28. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard Italians referred to as "dagos" in... ever; must be a lower-class UK thing. Pretty sure there're no cultural compunctions against eating horse on the British Isles...

    29. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Exactly and hence this whole attempt to distract the public from the real issue...

    30. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Cederic · · Score: 1

      While everybody is rightly mocking the DA for being an idiot, the term Cyber Pathogen is actually a pretty good one.

      It encompasses the whole range of naughty software. A Cyber Pathogen could be a trojan, a virus, a worm, ransomware, adware, some other form of malware. It's the catch-all term that acknowledges all of these are nasty and it doesn't really matter which specific flavour of nastiness it is.

      I'd class it as a superset of malware. A worm isn't really malware, for instance.

    31. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Balut is not the same as century eggs.
      Balut is an egg where the embryo is allowed to grow until almost ready to hatch.
      Century egg is an egg that has been chemically treated so that the proteins are altered.

    32. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the DA is setting himself up to attempt to get elected to higher office.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    33. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      While I think the accusation made by the DA is bollocks, I don't think the story itself is so out-of-left-field as to be completely unbelievable. I could imagine a situation where some ransomware (perhaps a Cryptolocker variant) was uploaded to county computers and it has been secretly encrypting data in the background, and if it doesn't receive a special code at certain intervals it will chuck the encryption key making all that data inaccessible. This would create a clear-and-immediate need for Apple to unlock the phone, which is obviously what this claim is intended to present.

      Now, as I said, I do not think the hypothetical situation above has any truth to it, but I can imagine such a scheme being thought up as a reason to force Apple to unlock the phone. The term "cyber pathogen" sounds like something a non-technical person made up trying to sound as if he knows what he is talking about. "Hey, let's spin a story about how there's a virus on the phone that might take down the government network, meaning there is a clear and immediate need for Apple to unlock the phone. "Okay, but 'virus' sounds so common; educated people use words like 'pathogen'... and since this is all on a computer, I'll prefix it with 'cyber-'."

      I've more worry that somebody - whether the FBI as 'proof' that there is a compelling need for the phone to be unlocked, or now the DA to cover his own ass - will mock up some sort of 'evidence' that there was some sort of intrusion into the county's network by Farook. Provide a few doctored log files showing Farook's phone's IP made a connection with the network and have somebody with a bit more technical aptitude explain the "situation". Ramos' initial brief will be explained away as a non-expert writing up a claim in haste without taking the time to fully understand the terminology because the situation was so dire.

    34. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's no more unrealistic than spending large sums of $$ to force a company to develop backdoors instead of just copying hardware data (into virtual environment (virtual ipad) and automating the brute force password approach. Of course, automating the brute password approach wouldn't generate as much press. Using the clone methods (e.g. similar to tranfer my ipad image from 32mb ipad to 128mb ipad) might be see as being in violation of the DMCA. So, we'll just make the group that can sue under the DCMA make the changes. At least that'd make more technical sense.
      I guess now we'll see a bill introduced into Congress requiring/forcing all hardware developers to have a virtual version of the hardware that can be turned over & used to script automated attacks.

    35. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      C'mon the term malware is the right word for this already. They use this new word to ellicit thoughts of ebola outbreaks and the zombie apocalyse to scare and further their repressive agenda.

    36. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I heard it has plans for a robot t rex army! Can we risk Isis getting this? There's only one way to be sure.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    37. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess adding the "latent" part was to cover the 3d bioprinter file, too!

    38. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Cats, can't say, they are rather rare and can't I remember seeing any.

      Possibly because cats are seen as competing predators, eating up all those tasty mice, rats, and spiders?

    39. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I heard that the San Bernadino shooter had unleashed a zombie apocalypse virus and the only copy of the cure is stored on the phone.

      Or was it that the phone has a timer application running on it which, if it's not stopped, will hack into all nuclear weapon control centers and launch them all simultaneously.

      We can prove that any of this is false unless Apple unlocks the phone!!!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    40. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > freedom of speech enables the truth to emerge from diverse opinions. Still waiting for that to happen...

    41. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by dryeo · · Score: 1

      That's the theory, in practice it seems that whoever repeats something the loudest is believed. Unluckily there doesn't seem to be a better system as even the educated would rather believe what agrees with their personal philosophy rather then what is actually true.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    42. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People here in Northern Europe are fine with horse meat in wurst. Many people consider it preferable to wurst made of pork.

      "The products are safe to eat but are recalled because they are mislabeled" was what the news here said, about the horse meat 'scandal'.

      I hear the Brits are squeamish about horse meat though.

    43. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ate curry everyday, you'd want to take a ritual bath everyday as well. I once rode a commuter train in India several years ago. My nose still doesn't work right.

    44. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Both of your scenarios sound absurd to me.

      As far as the BFI or anyone else "doctoring" evidence: they would have to have done it *before* it became international news with a case that may end up in the Supreme Court. And even then, given the scrutiny the case has now, if they had done it earlier the chances are WAY more likely than not their deception would be discovered and those doing it caught and prosecuted themselves...

    45. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      > freedom of speech enables the truth to emerge from diverse opinions.

      Still waiting for that to happen...

      It's a good line, the article was rather large and I was looking for something short to explain it in one sentence. My first thought were the diverse opinions in a political discussion, the only people who are seen as right or on track are after the election. Yet it's diverse opinions that can sway an election.
      .

    46. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Balut is not the same as century eggs.
      Balut is an egg where the embryo is allowed to grow until almost ready to hatch.
      Century egg is an egg that has been chemically treated so that the proteins are altered.

      My bad, Balut is the only egg I knew of that's treated differently for it's outcome.

    47. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Africans drink cow piss and milk if I remember correctly, so I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

      I read a lot of odd facts, many books on the subject, 000 in Dewey decimal system. My bathroom material is "Strange stories, Amazing facts"; which I take as fact. It was mentioned in one book.

      A nurse from Africa did verify this fact in one of those odd conversations one can get into.

      The reasoning behind it was the dietary habits of different cultures.

      Each post being seen as off topic, so a bit too much of a deviation from the main subject.

    48. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that in most balut the embryo is quite young, barely formed, definitely not ready to hatch. They do eat deep fried chicks, though, after they're hatched.

    49. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by slazzy · · Score: 1

      The urine is used to preserve the milk when no refrigerator is available.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    50. Re: Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-sequitur much?

    51. Re:Yesterday's retracted news by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Apple isn't preventing the government from accessing it. The government has it in custody. What they aren't doing is creating new tools for the government, which, in my opinion, is perfectly fine and justified. Naturally, other people disagree, which is also perfectly fine.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  2. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    San Bernardino D.A. admitted he made the whole thing up.

    1. Re:Old News by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 4, Funny

      a lying dormant cyber pathogen that endangers San Bernardino County's infrastructure and poses a continuing threat to the citizens of San Bernardino County'.

      San Bernardino D.A. admitted he made the whole thing up.

      making him a lycanthropic doormat carbon-based pathological lying golem that endangers San Bernardino County's infrastructure and poses a continuing threat to the citizens of San Bernardino County.

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    2. Re:Old News by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      San Bernardino D.A. admitted he made the whole thing up.

      Are you sure? "Cyber Pathogen" sounds like one of those fictional words I hear on C.S.I., I doubt he came up with that nonsense on his own.

    3. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey now, don't give werewolves a bad name.

    4. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, he never suggested that this was anything but a made-up threat in the first place. He doubled down on making it up and argued that the phone really needs to be decrypted in order to check whether his fantasies have any bearings in fact.

      In other words: law enforcement should be entitled to make up plausible cause any way they can imagine.

    5. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other nonsensical bullshit will government officials make up to try and justify shredding the last vestiges of citizens privacy rights in the name of their authoritarian national security demagoguery under the color of authority?

    6. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not fictional - thesaurusical (I can make up words too.)

      from http://www.merriam-webster.com/ :

      Simple Definition of pathogen

              medical : something (such as a type of bacteria or a virus) that causes disease

      Definition of cyber

              : of, relating to, or involving computers or computer networks (as the Internet)

      Therefore, as Cyber = computer, and Pathogen = virus... wait for it... computer virus.

      DA: "Hey P.R. Bob, I need to sound intellectual. What's another way of saying computer virus?"
      P.R. Bob: (rifles through thesaurus) "Cyber Pathogen"
      DA: "Brilliant! This will make me sound as techie as those geeks on Slashdot."

  3. Unicorns by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps the phone contains unicorns farting rainbows. I am sure that looking for unicorns would be good reason to crack the phone.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Unicorns by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is more probable than you think and potentially another of the reasons why the terrorist wanted to kill infidels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Unicorns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The phone actually contains a cat that eats cakes, farts a rainbow and jumps around to annoying music. A dangerous pathogen indeed, and it did spread around fast.

    3. Re:Unicorns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the D.A. can comment on computer technology then I should be able to comment on legal terms. The habeous corpus of the peanut butter sandwich is likely to safe harbour a threat to national security of jurisdictional proportionality to our legal and national interests.

    4. Re:Unicorns by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the phone contains unicorns farting rainbows. I am sure that looking for unicorns would be good reason to crack the phone.

      Must be why then. I hear Obama's supply of them have run out, and that's why the stock markets have been so bad the last 8 months.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Unicorns by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You seem like a nice enough guy so I probably shouldn't do this but, well, I'm an ass like that:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Don't click that link. My daughter was over for the holidays and shared that with me. She gets a kick out of it. I admit to chuckling a couple of times. The scary part is my daughter's an actual medical doctor. Yup... And she shared that with me. And one about some Salad Fingers. That was just... It was just different.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Unicorns by meerling · · Score: 1

      Nah, just go to North Korean, they've apparently already discovered a cave of them. :P
      I wonder if the D.A. has already booked a tour for himself.

    7. Re:Unicorns by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Needs more jurisprudence. You should also ask the judge, "Your honor, do you wear Amicus Briefs of boxers?" Judges love a good joke. Seriously, if you've ever got to go to court for a speeding ticket that you want to fight, make sure to ask him that. He'll dismiss the case and probably invite you to a cake and ice cream party!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Unicorns by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      The Great Leader was in charge of the expedition himself!

    9. Re:Unicorns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true. Apparently they found it when they did their manned expedition to the sun, where they landed at night.

  4. In other news... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Bull hockey... And don't forget the children!

  5. Link to news this is made up by davidwr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Link to Ars Technica version of original story, which was updated to say that it is a non-issue: http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...

    Link to Ars Technica story on the fact that the first story was false: http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Link to news this is made up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, "that the first story was false"? Rather that Ramos admitted that his "cyber pathogen" nonsense was pure fabrication, but that one needs to decrypt the phone to make sure that this pure fabrication was not accidentally true.

      Paraphrased, Ramos stated "I may be a lunatic but that should still trump the law". That's not "fact that the first story was false". It's Ramos willing to double down on being an idiot.

    2. Re:Link to news this is made up by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

      While the technical aspect is a "non-issue" (as pretty much anyone with any understanding of tech could guess), the story itself is neither a non-issue nor is it false. Rather, the DA is backpedaling and trying to cover his ass. "Oh, there was no cyber-pathogen, I was just worried about what the Farook might have done with the phone."

      It is as much bullshit as his initial claim. He lied in an amicus brief to a judge with his initial claim. That he can get away with such a blatant lie to a judge - and in such a high-profile case - is embarrassing. He ought to at least lose his job, if not get smacked with perjury or contempt of court.

  6. Shoot this idiot with a very real bullet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will be apparently able to make up any number of plausible excuses for what possibly happened, and you'll walk away scot free.

    1. Re:Shoot this idiot with a very real bullet. by lucm · · Score: 1

      Why don't you post those death threats to an elected official under your real name?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Shoot this idiot with a very real bullet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron. It's not a death threat. You're a moron.

      Haiku.

    3. Re:Shoot this idiot with a very real bullet. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Why don't you post those death threats to an elected official under your real name?

      No need. The FBI will just order Apple to decrypt "Anonymous Coward" and they will capture him/her immediately.

    4. Re:Shoot this idiot with a very real bullet. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Then please don't use the
      Imperative, then pretend
      You didn't. Moron.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:Shoot this idiot with a very real bullet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll use whatever
      I fucking feel like chump.
      And you can suck it.

  7. Holy Water by kenwd0elq · · Score: 5, Funny

    The ONLY CURE for a "lying dormant cyber pathogen" is for the phone to be boiled in holy water.

    1. Re:Holy Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ONLY CURE for a "lying dormant cyber pathogen" is for the phone to be boiled in holy water.

      This is false. We know from documented facts that the only way to defeat a "dormant cyber pathogen" is to freeze it with liquid nitrogen, and then throw it in a bath of molten metal.

    2. Re:Holy Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ONLY CURE for a "lying dormant cyber pathogen" is for the phone to be boiled in holy water.

      This is false. We know from documented facts that the only way to defeat a "dormant cyber pathogen" is to freeze it with liquid nitrogen, and then throw it in a bath of molten metal.

      Look, we all saw the movie (that is, the only sequel worth being called that). The freezing in liquid nitrogen was only temporary (the scripted glitches it caused were only in the director's cut). The steel bath was what did the trick twice.

  8. What IQ test you have to fail to become a DA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Next filing Ramos will argue there might be a cyber demon hiding there just like the one on Buffy, ready to eat the souls of all Americans except the atheists.

    1. Re:What IQ test you have to fail to become a DA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      cyber demon hiding there

      Thankfully we know how to defeat those.

      Pro tip: 'To defeat the Cyberdemon, shoot at it until it dies

    2. Re:What IQ test you have to fail to become a DA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    That's the real reason Christie Dropped out. Well, at least this seems nearly as plausible as the DA's claim.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DO NOT WANT!

      On the other hand, that would explain the subtext of tonight's opening skit for Saturday Night Live.

    2. Re:Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by lucm · · Score: 1

      Saturday Night Live.

      SNL: the Fox News of liberals

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re: Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that Fox News is actually a sketch comedy show and not a news channel? Yeah, sounds about right, Billy Bob.

    4. Re: Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by lucm · · Score: 1, Informative

      So you're saying that Fox News is actually a sketch comedy show and not a news channel?

      Yes, and just like dimwitted liberals believe SNL skits (like the "I see Russia from my kitchen window" one), dimwitted conservatives believe Bill O'Reilly when he basically says that disagreeing with him is anti-american. Same same.

      Did you see that youtube video where they ask liberals where they take their news? Most popular answers: "Not Fox", Jon Stewart and Bill Maher.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Yep, those people vote on your side.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re: Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And KKK members, neo-nazies, and gun nuts vote on yours...
      Did you have a point in that statement?
      Or where you writing just to satisfy your own ego?

    6. Re: Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by lucm · · Score: 2

      And KKK members, neo-nazies, and gun nuts vote on yours...

      Let's see what Wikipedia has to say on this:

      The members of the first Klan in the South were exclusively Democrats.

      If reading is too demanding for you, try this video, they explain the long love story between the KKK and the Democrats.

      http://www.newstalk1130.com/on...

      Besides, people in the video I shared previously are not extremists, they are regular Obama supporters. If you have to use a (flawed) KKK example to "balance out" their ignorance, you've pretty much made my point for me.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re: Naked Picture of Trump and Christie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see that youtube video ...
      Well that's an argument.

      You seem to enjoy leaping from "stupid people disagree with me" to "people who disagree with me are stupid".
      It's a sad way to live.

  10. Lolwut by flopsquad · · Score: 4, Funny

    The seized iPhone may contain evidence that can only be found on the seized phone that it was used as a weapon to introduce a lying dormant cyber pathogen that endangers San Bernardino County's infrastructure and poses a continuing threat to the citizens of San Bernardino County.

    Look, we know they had guns. That's just the part we know about.

    What we *don't* know is whether these nefarious masterminds also had a cyber malworm with nuclearized darkweb spearphishing viruses that could use long-blockchain cloud replication vectors to infect all the computers in San Bernadino AND THE PEOPLE WHO OWN THEM!!

    Only by decrypting the phone can we be 100% sure it doesn't contain such a doomsday "cyber pathogen."

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    1. Re:Lolwut by Barny · · Score: 5, Funny

      Could these spearphishing viruses use the IoT to vector into self-driving cars and thus, synergize with illegal 3d printer technology?

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:Lolwut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only by decrypting the phone can we be 100% sure it doesn't contain such a doomsday "cyber pathogen."

       
      Not true. Incinerate it. Then you can be sure it contains nothing.

    3. Re:Lolwut by flopsquad · · Score: 2

      Oh god I hadn't even thought of that! Yes of course, it all makes sense.

      I hope it's not too late to amend the brief. The judge needs to know that the threat of a hacked botnet of drones equipped with self-firing 3D printed guns is both real and credible.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    4. Re:Lolwut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the phone contains an exe file, we are better off leaving it encrypted. I just know the FBI is going to start there examination by double-clicking it on there win-XP desktop.

    5. Re:Lolwut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For whatever reason, I heard that entire post in Patricia Arquette's voice.

      The end of that show can't come soon enough.

    6. Re:Lolwut by Barny · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At this point if Apple do not assist, we can only assume they are harboring TERRORISTS. How long with these monsters be allowed to go unhindered on US soil? Drone strikes are of course, the only answer.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    7. Re:Lolwut by lolococo · · Score: 1

      Truth by incineration. Why ain't I think of that

    8. Re:Lolwut by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but will it scale?

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    9. Re:Lolwut by Barny · · Score: 1

      If it can leverage the power of web3.0 and make it into the cloud there is no telling where this threat to international safety could end!

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    10. Re:Lolwut by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If it's so powerful, decrypting the phone won't believe it - it will just morph itself back into the regular OS. It's a quantum virus - you look at it, it ceases to exist, and appears on some other phone.

      Of course, that's almost as nutty as the DA.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    11. Re:Lolwut by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      If the phone contains an exe file, we are better off leaving it encrypted. I just know the FBI is going to start there examination by double-clicking it on there win-XP desktop.

      Director Comey, by heedlessly double-clicking that .exe, you have become the very thing you sought to destroy.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    12. Re:Lolwut by flopsquad · · Score: 2

      It's all well and good for us to take the piss out of a bunch of statist Luddites.

      But some small part of me worries in 15 years I'm going to be standing up at a school board meeting, holding my temples and grimacing with exasperation, "Our children are not, and never have been, in danger from NDSVs! There's no such thing as nuclearized darkweb spearphishing viruses! It was a joke posted on the Internet years ago, and this prosecutor in California kept repeating it because it sounded scary!"

      Grumbles and shaking heads, and an angry dad stands up, "Hey, terr'ists I-O-T-ing into my truck with illegal 3D printers ain't no joke!"

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    13. Re:Lolwut by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Decrypting the phone is exactly what they want you to do. Once it is decrypted then the cyber virus is unleashed upon the world to bring about the fall of all technology. And I think there is a non-cyber virus in there also that will infect 99.9% of the population and kill them within minutes.

      See, the San Bernadino DA is one of the terrorists. That's how he knows about the cyber-virus. That's why he wants it decrypted. He has already gotten the immunity for the civilization destroying biological weapon locked up in the phone and he wants it to be released so it can start the work they planned.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  11. Anyone's Phone... by seven+of+five · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you assert the existence of a "cyber-pathogen," there's no reason to stop at one phone... why not decrypt and search every phone? Only way to be sure...

    1. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Nuking it from orbit is the only way to be sure.

    2. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds great! We're working on it

    3. Re: Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You express yourself so clearly; you must be an intellectual worth listening to.

    4. Re:Anyone's Phone... by aralin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You remind me of the people who were so afraid of vaccines harming their kid, they didn't let the doctor vaccinate him and then the kid drowned in their backyard pool, because drowning is still actually the #1 cause of children under 5 dying.

      You are so afraid of the terrorists trying to kill us by poisoning our water, that we spend trillions on trying to prevent it, which forces us to try to save a million dollars by switching a water source and poisoning water for tens of thousands of people.

      You, uninformed citizen, are the number one leading cause of death, suffering and loss of freedom.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    5. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you aware that the guy is a known terrorist who killed 14 people?

      Are you aware the government already admitted they made up the entire thing?
      The link in the summary quotes them saying the entire attack was fabricated.

      Not to mention the phone hasn't been decrypted yet, and the only way to know or prove that 14 people died is by decrypting the phone. Thus there have been zero deaths shown to have happened so far, not 14 like you claim.

      This is all straight from the mouths of our government officials.

      No terrorist attack happened. No 14 deaths. No anything.

      It must suck to be you, constantly being proven wrong by everyone from random slashdot nerd to all of the world governments.

    6. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "uninformed citizen"

      Hmm, interesting descriptive term, I prefer to refer to them as fucktards and I'm pretty sure that covers 95% of the populace.

      Using the principles of fear, uncertainty and doubt any politician with an IQ approaching 100 can pretty much get them to do anything.

    7. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! Let's nuke OURSELVES from orbit! It's the only way to PRECRIME with certainty!

    8. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a sock-puppet of cold fjord or just a complete moron unable to think even a single step ahead? I mean, cold fjord is at least somewhat intelligent while spewing his bullshit. You are ... not.

    9. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you assert the existence of a "cyber-pathogen," there's no reason to stop at one phone... why not decrypt and search every phone? Only way to be sure...

      Are you aware that the guy is a known terrorist who killed 14 people?

      Why would he have done that if it interfered with his ability to unleash a dangerous cyber pathogen affecting the whole country? Because the only way to really unleash that pathogen endangering the whole national information infrastructure was to kill those people.

      The pathogen is called "precedence". Don't underestimate it.

    10. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      You, uninformed citizen, are the number one leading cause of death, suffering and loss of freedom.

      Anyone who modded that bullshit up is the uninformed.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    11. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      When is the last time you contributed an actual opinion to a discussion instead of just throwing insults at people you disagree with?

      It's hard to tell if you're "at least somewhat intelligent" if you don't bring up meaningful points.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    12. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      The link in the summary quotes them saying the entire attack was fabricated.

      You should send your resume to North Korea, they need bold people like you in their ministry of information.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    13. Re:Anyone's Phone... by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      I wasn't suggesting a course of action, just pointing out a possible dangerous line of reasoning. Nor do I think the D.A.'s idea is anything but a fantasy cooked up to justify getting into an iPhone.

    14. Re:Anyone's Phone... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      No, your original argument is BS. There is absolutely no indication that anything of interest is on the phone. So, no probable cause. And if you want to get it decrypted, either get the owner (the county) or hire someone else to decrypt it. After all, if Apple could do it, so can the Chinese, the Russians, and the NSA.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    15. Re:Anyone's Phone... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that the guy is a known terrorist who killed 14 people? Can't you see how this is different from other clueless IT-related law enforcement incidents?

      No, I can't see how this is different from other clueless IT-related law enforcement incidents. Why don't you enlighten us on the difference?

    16. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feeding the troll -1 for you

    17. Re:Anyone's Phone... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      You remind me of those people who, after the latest mass murders in France, said that "the important thing" was not to think that all Muslims are murderers. They probably jerked off listening to themselves repeat that on TV.

      You are aware that Muslims are about 20% of the world population, right? This is a fact. If ALL Muslims were terrorists 1 in 5 people or 1.4 billion people would be terrorists. If that many people are terrorists, you'd be dead and the Earth would a crater of death and destruction. But let's not facts get in the way of your illogical hatred.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    18. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly this. People worry about terrorism like it's a daily occurrence here. Even if we include the 9-11 attack (which was clearly an outlier), there have been something like 4,000 people killed in terrorist attacks on American soil in the past 15 years. That's an average of 267 a year. Given that there are about 308 million Americans, that means we have a 0.00009% chance of being killed by a terrorist every year.

      According to the CDC, 10 people die of drowning every day. That would be 3,650 people a year or over 13 times the risk of being killed in a terrorist attack. But you don't see a "War on Drowning", will calls to ban swimming pools and erect giant fences around lakes. You don't see plumbers being called in for questioning on suspicion of installing a bathtub that could lead to someone drowning.

      There are always going to be wackos who threaten lives. We can be smart about finding them and stopping them, but the risk they pose isn't nearly high enough to justify the amount of liberties we are giving up. Whether we should give up liberties at any risk level is another story, of course, but the insanely low risk of terrorist attack makes it all the more ridiculous.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    19. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic, see if I can track an IP address.

    20. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know what 'Anonymous Coward' means right? It is not an account for a singular person in the same vein that not every Muslim is a terrorist. You do have the capacity to understand that right?

    21. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      Did you see this one?

      Sandefur’s son, Larry Daniel Kaufman, was among the 14 people killed at the Inland Regional Center on Dec. 2 as a husband and wife sprayed an office holiday party with gunfire during a terror attack.

      On Thursday, Sandefur weighed in on the dispute between technology companies and law enforcement. In a letter released by an attorney representing several relatives of victims, Sandefur wrote that Apple should help FBI agents trying to access encrypted data on an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters, Syed Rizwan Farook.

      http://www.latimes.com/local/l...

      But of course you're "more right" than them since you have no personal interest whatsoever in this case, you're just clamouring for the principle of the matter, which is obviously always the right answer.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    22. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that the guy is a known terrorist who killed 14 people? Can't you see how this is different from other clueless IT-related law enforcement incidents?

      No, I can't see how this is different from other clueless IT-related law enforcement incidents. Why don't you enlighten us on the difference?

      Who is "us"? Are you on a Slashdot Family Plan, reading comments out loud to your dad while your mom is fixing your breakfast? If that's the case, tell her that she raised an idiot who can't see how 14 people being killed matter.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    23. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      You accuse other people of trolling, but anyone who takes a minute to read your comment will see that there's absolutely no content other than insults.

      So according to the actual definition of trolling:

      make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them

      you are, my friend, a genuine internet troll. Congratulations!

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    24. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      You remind me of those people who, after the latest mass murders in France, said that "the important thing" was not to think that all Muslims are murderers. They probably jerked off listening to themselves repeat that on TV.

      You are aware that Muslims are about 20% of the world population, right? This is a fact. If ALL Muslims were terrorists 1 in 5 people or 1.4 billion people would be terrorists. If that many people are terrorists, you'd be dead and the Earth would a crater of death and destruction. But let's not facts get in the way of your illogical hatred.

      How do you explain that it's not the 80% of non-Muslims that commit suicide bombings on a daily basis and that beheads people on youtube?

      Also if you see "hatred" in those comments you sir are in dire need to meet actual hatred so you can learn what the word means. A quick trip to Syria should help.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    25. Re:Anyone's Phone... by khallow · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, tell her that she raised an idiot who can't see how 14 people being killed matter.

      This is what we call a non sequitur. Question: what does the death of 14 people have to do with whether there is "cyber pathogens" on the phone? Answer: not a thing.

    26. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      Question: what does the death of 14 people have to do with whether there is "cyber pathogens" on the phone? Answer: not a thing.

      Yeah that cyber pathogens thing is ridiculous. But there's people being ridiculous on both sides of this issue, such as Apple who refuse to unlock a dead terrorist phone while giving the keys to the castle to the Chinese government so they can spy on their (alive) citizens.

      Law is not a simple yes/no thing. There's ample leeway to do this unlock thing correctly without the event becoming a trigger to extensive phone spying by the FBI. Apple is not fighting them for privacy, they're just milking this for marketing purpose; they've already shown that they have no problem whatsoever helping foreign governments spy on their customers, who besides fanbois will ever believe that suddenly they believe in protecting their customers? Total bullshit.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    27. Re:Anyone's Phone... by khallow · · Score: 1

      such as Apple who refuse to unlock a dead terrorist phone

      That's not the problem. They were asked to break the security on all phones, not just the terrorist's phone.

      who besides fanbois will ever believe that suddenly they believe in protecting their customers?

      Apple does. Because caving in to this demand loses Apple a lot of business.

    28. Re:Anyone's Phone... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      The fascist slashdot troll lcum wrote:

      Did you see this one?

      Sandefur’s son, Larry Daniel Kaufman, was among the 14 people killed at the Inland Regional Center on Dec. 2 as a husband and wife sprayed an office holiday party with gunfire during a terror attack.

      On Thursday, Sandefur weighed in on the dispute between technology companies and law enforcement. In a letter released by an attorney representing several relatives of victims, Sandefur wrote that Apple should help FBI agents trying to access encrypted data on an iPhone 5c belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters, Syed Rizwan Farook.

      http://www.latimes.com/local/l...

      But of course you're "more right" than them since you have no personal interest whatsoever in this case, you're just clamouring for the principle of the matter, which is obviously always the right answer.

      Because someone wants something doesn't mean they have a legal right to get it. So, you're still a fascist willing to override legal rights.

      And yes, as someone with no personal interest whatsoever in this case (not even my country) I can afford to stand up for the "principle of the matter." And what's so bad about standing up for the principle of the matter? At least I HAVE principles, and I believe they're worth standing up for, unlike you, where it's all about "expediency" or "convienience" or "mob rule" rather than the rule of law - in other words, fascist bullsh*t. If you don't stand up for your principles, you don't have principles.

      And I guess you missed the fact that the mother whose son was killed by those same shooters sides with Apple. That's integrity - standing up for principle even when it hurts. Of course, you don't have any.

      A mother whose son was killed in the San Bernardino, California, shooting last year is siding with Apple in its battle to protect consumer’s privacy rights by refusing the FBI’s demands for new software to break into the iPhone of her son’s killer.

      Carole Adams, the mother of Robert Adams — a 40-year-old environmental health specialist who was shot dead by Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife in December - told the New York Post Thursday that the constitutional right to privacy “is what makes America great to begin with.”

      She stood by Apple’s decision to fight a federal court order to create software that would allow federal authorities to access the shooter’s password-blocked iPhone. The software would allow authorities to retrieve personal banking passwords, photos and other information.

      If you hate the constitution and the rule of law so much, why aren't you living in some place that hasn't got either?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    29. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      "mob rule"

      A bit rich coming from a typical SJW who hides in the flock of outraged people who aren't even concerned by the legal matter.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    30. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      They were asked to break the security on all phones, not just the terrorist's phone.

      Repeating this lie won't make it true. We're not in Brave new world where "Sixty-two thousand four hundred repetitions make one truth".

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    31. Re:Anyone's Phone... by khallow · · Score: 1

      They were asked to break the security on all phones, not just the terrorist's phone.

      Repeating this lie won't make it true.

      For something to be a lie, it has to be untrue first. Read up on this and you'll see what really is at stake.

    32. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's the case, tell her that she raised an idiot who can't see how 14 people being killed matter.

      This is what we call a non sequitur. Question: what does the death of 14 people have to do with whether there is "cyber pathogens" on the phone? Answer: not a thing.

      Wrong. Going on a shooting and suicide spree makes it less likely that the shooters had some insidious master plan involving network infiltration. Because the shooting spree would completely thwart the chances of bringing their master plan to fruition.

      Unless the cyber pathogen on the phone is "precedent" and they were planning to attack the liberty of U.S. citizens by handing the job over to DA and FBI via the suicide attack. Of course assuming that this has not been an FBI job in the first place. Sacrifice a dozen people for the chance to gain control over hundreds of millions: probably an even better deal than the JFK assassination if it works.

    33. Re:Anyone's Phone... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      "mob rule"

      A bit rich coming from a typical SJW who hides in the flock of outraged people who aren't even concerned by the legal matter.

      Really? That's the best you can do? You can't defend your fascist position, so now you accuse me of being an SJW? You don't know who or what you'r talking about.

      Much of the world is watching this case, because of the incredible "argument from fear" that is, again, being raised to circumvent the constitution and people's rights. The FBI and NY police have already admitted they lied when they said it was "just one phone" - that they had over 1,000 phones they wanted to crack. Americans are looking more like scared chickensh*ts every day. "Terrorists terrorists think of the children and screw your civil rights!"

      There are plenty of good honest people who pay extra so that they don't have to pass through an American airport because of your useless security theatre and the arbitrary nature and total screw-up of the no-fly list.

      And let's not forget the fact that there's a 100-miles-within-the-border no-constitutional-rights zone that affects 200 million americans. Fascisim - it;s a state most americans live in.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    34. Re:Anyone's Phone... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Couldn't resist chiming in here. Your retort is terrible. What justification do you have for your ad hominem attack here?

      Also, your earlier facetious comment, about BarbaraHudson being "more right" on account of having "no personal interest whatsoever in this case", do you understand how stupid it sounds? You're basically suggesting that unbiased people are less capable of having an objectively correct opinion. You're holding up bias as an indication of correctness. What the fuck?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    35. Re:Anyone's Phone... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      How do you explain that it's not the 80% of non-Muslims that commit suicide bombings on a daily basis and that beheads people on youtube?

      Er what? The vast majority of people whether they are Muslim or Christian are not terrorists. There are a number of Christian terrorists like those who bomb abortion clinics in the US, like those who practice forced ritual female circumcision in Africa. Yet we don't call for the imprisonment of Christians in the US and Africa, do we? Singling out a single religion that you believe are terrorists despite factual data to the contrary underscores your bias.

      Also if you see "hatred" in those comments you sir are in dire need to meet actual hatred so you can learn what the word means. A quick trip to Syria should help.

      Yes pick a country under the midst of civil war that has among its participants those who were not from Syria at all. Your example is quite poor as is your logic.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    36. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      You manage to put "ad hominem attack" and "stupid" in the same message. I could make a clever reply but the facts speak for themselves.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    37. Re:Anyone's Phone... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1
      First, a premise:

      ad hominem, adv. adj.,

      (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

      Now, some context:

      Also, your earlier facetious comment, about BarbaraHudson being "more right" on account of having "no personal interest whatsoever in this case", do you understand how stupid it sounds?

      Emphasis mine.

      And finally, some grammar:
      The predicate here, that something sounds stupid, has a subject of the earlier-mentioned facetious comment. Since this subject, a facetious comment, is not a person, but is instead a position that a person was maintaining, it is not true that my earlier comment constitutes an ad hominem attack.

      I understand English is not everyone's native language (and it's not mine either), but perhaps you shouldn't comment about things that you don't understand?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    38. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      Your explanation is idiotic. How's that for not ad hominem?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    39. Re:Anyone's Phone... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      It's great. Congratulations on being one step closer to English proficiency.

      Now, back to the original subject, where you're holding up bias as an indication of correctness. Can you explain your reasoning there?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    40. Re:Anyone's Phone... by lucm · · Score: 1

      It's great. Congratulations on being one step closer to English proficiency.

      Now, back to the original subject, where you're holding up bias as an indication of correctness. Can you explain your reasoning there?

      You're not clever, you're tedious.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    41. Re:Anyone's Phone... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      See, that is an ad hominem attack. Well done!

      Now, moving back to the original subject. You suggested that bias is an indication of correctness, or at least that lack of bias prevents one from being "more correct" than someone who is biased. Can you explain the reasoning behind this statement, or would you prefer to implicitly acknowledge that there is no rational argument that could be used to support your statement by continuing to deflect the question?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    42. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Ad hominem is not just a personal attack, it's the implication that their position is wrong because of their character flaws, attitude, background etc.

    43. Re:Anyone's Phone... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Indeed, fair point. I was assuming that the previous context (discussion of my explanation) held. Whether or not this assumption is valid is subjective, as it hinges upon the prevailing etiquette on slashdot. As this is a threaded discussion, I felt that it was a reasonable assumption to make. However, I grant that others could disagree, as we're well into subjective territory here. Well played!

      That being said, I'm really hoping lucm can provide some explanation of his reasoning. I'm eager to hear how lack of bias implies a diminished ability to be correct regarding a given subject.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    44. Re:Anyone's Phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the traditional response to this type of attack is, "I know you are, but what am I?" :)

  12. And the DA's skull could harbor a brain too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it doesn't seem likely to be a large one, based on his reasoning.

  13. The phone probably contains nothing significant by mark-t · · Score: 1

    And if they should make what would otherwise appear to be a successful decryption attempt and they do not find anything along the lines of what they are looking for, they will forever remain uncertain whether their decryption attempt did not inadvertently erase part of the phone's contents or if this whole thing was just a wild goose chase.

    1. Re:The phone probably contains nothing significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it HAD contained something significant, they would not have ordered its password changed to lock themselves out of it.

      The whole thing was explicitly written up to try and get this precedent.

      The FBI cannot be trusted with anything. Not even the letters F, B or I, or the number 3.

    2. Re:The phone probably contains nothing significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone contains the most significant thing ever. It contains precedent. Getting it unlocked opens the path to every other phone in the country.

    3. Re:The phone probably contains nothing significant by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Um.. It is either decrypted or not. This is a binary value. There would be no uncertainty of missing data should they decrypt the phone.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    4. Re:The phone probably contains nothing significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.. It is either decrypted or not. This is a binary value. There would be no uncertainty of missing data should they decrypt the phone.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deniable_encryption

  14. when Ramos askede a priest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ramos: howto holywater?
    Priest: boil the hell out of it.

  15. Owner by AndyCanfield · · Score: 0

    It seems reasonable to me that San Bernardino county could ask Apple, politely, to please break the encryption. No warrant, no lawsuit, no precedent. Just a customer request.

    1. Re:Owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a retard. This isn't about Apple accessing ONE PHONE. It's about them being forced to build a custom version of the OS or Firmware for the phone. Firmware that the FBI will certainly KEEP.

      Do you think Apple would break their own security to help YOU unlock your phone?

      Why the fuck should any company be force to build a custom anything for anybody? That's called involuntary servitude. I don't give a fuck if you get paid or not. If you are FORCED to do something, by someone with the power to put you in jail.....

    2. Re:Owner by lucm · · Score: 0

      It seems reasonable to me that San Bernardino county could ask Apple, politely, to please break the encryption. No warrant, no lawsuit, no precedent. Just a customer request.

      They've done that, Apple said no. A judge told Apple to do it, Apple said they would challenge it in a higher court.

      Look at the timeline:
      http://www.tripwire.com/state-...

      This is total PR bullshit on Apple's part, who never gave a shit about privacy or confidentiality in the past. That corporation, which is rotten to the core, is just a disgusting marketing machine and that's just the latest example. Fuck Apple.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue here isn't just this--it is that as the owner of the phone, they should have the capability of gaining access to the contents. If broken down in this way, and that Apple provides the OWNER of the phone to actually control the phone, this entire situation would be a non-issue.

    4. Re:Owner by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Looky looky - right wing troll who thinks that the court appeal process should be bypassed because safety is more important than the constitution, so we can do whatever we want even when there is zero evidence of a threat in the phone, as opposed to the 2 phones the killers destroyed. Yep - put on your jack boots, fascist.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:Owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Apple gave a shit about privacy, why are they bending over backwards to do whatever the Chinese government asks? It's just another demonstration of how Apple is rotten to the core, and willing to do anything if it makes them money.

      Apple's PR response to this case has been full of lies from the very beginning, demonstrating exactly how much Apple cares about marketing and PR to the expense of actual quality, reasonable pricing, truth, or actual privacy. And suckers like you eat it up.

    6. Re:Owner by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      1) Chinese laws are different from American laws.
      2) No proof whatsoever that Apple has built such software for the Chinese
      3) All the evidence to date indicates you are still a fascist right-wing troll.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  16. This is "Saddam has WMDs" wtf wtf wtf they REALLY by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    believe that the public is infinitely stupid!

  17. Could have???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It could have anything.

    Let's unlock it because it "could have":

    1/ The secret to unlimited green energy
    2/ A list of the sporting records for the next century
    3/ A picture of a cat in a box
    4/ The entire global drug supply network's name and addresses
    5/ The location of the largest weapons grade plutonium deposit in the universe
    6/ The source code for Windows 22
    7/ Nothing at all interesting

    FFS: make a decent case as to what it probably has.

  18. Hardly compares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This summary contains buzzword pathogens that eat brain cells

  19. Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is their idea of a clever argument.

  20. Decrypted for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The phone should be decrypted and the results made known to the courts.

    If nothing useful is found, the bar should be significantly raise for future mandated decryptions.
    If something useful is found, the bar should remain the same.

    We shouldn't have court orders without a feedback loop in place.

    1. Re:Decrypted for sure by tlambert · · Score: 1

      The phone should be decrypted and the results made known to the courts.

      The better to infect them with the cyber pathogen in question.

      The first rule of the envelope full of Anthrax: DON'T OPEN THE ENVELOPE FULL OF ANTHRAX!

      The second rule of the envelope full of Anthrax: ...

  21. Need to dissect Mr. Intel just to be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would Mr. Intel have such confidential information? Was he part of the plot? Doesn't it sound suspicious that he would have such insider information. Perhaps Mr. Intel was conducting research himself.

    Maybe his brain contains a genetically engineer super-virus.

    Considering the seriousness of these possibilities, the only way to know is to dissect Mr. Intel.

  22. Terrorists, drug dealers, and pedophiles by phorm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yup. Terrorists kill people. Drug dealers kill people or deal drugs which kill people. Pedophiles abuse children.

    And you know what, the authorities and governments fucking LOVE to use those guys to create or abuse laws in order to give themselves new and expanded powers. We already know that there's not just one phone, but at least 17 other cases where they're asking for pretty much the same fucking thing (and none of those terrorists). All they need is a nice precedent and a year from now they'll be using it break open the phones of everyone charged slightly above littering or jaywalking. It'll also be very helpful when they seize mobile devices at those ever-growing "borders" from pesky reporters or political types.

    The authorities have already said they don't really know that there's anything useful on the phone (but we have to do everything, just in case). Given the wiretaps and other B.S. they've already been pulling, it's probably also a safe bet that most of it (if not all) they have already. But evidence gathered through illegal clandestine means can't be used in court, so you've gotta set a precedent for a nice new "legal" method.

    Sorry, but I applaud Apple for taking a strong stance on this, unlike the fuckers at Amazon who decided the best way to deal with the issue is to preemptively remove device-encryption with their latest (mandatory) update.

    1. Re:Terrorists, drug dealers, and pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know what, the authorities and governments fucking LOVE to use those guys to create or abuse laws in order to give themselves new and expanded powers. We already know that there's not just one phone, but at least 17 other cases where they're asking for pretty much the same fucking thing (and none of those terrorists). All they need is a nice precedent and a year from now they'll be using it break open the phones of everyone charged slightly above littering or jaywalking.

      Sounds like a new cyber pathogen class to me. Not "virus", "trojan" or "worm" but "precedence". Those are the worst since airgapping does not help at all.

    2. Re:Terrorists, drug dealers, and pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Terrorists kill people. Drug dealers kill people or deal drugs which kill people. Pedophiles abuse children.

      Yup and our government kills more people than any terrorist camp every day but what are doing about that? Why aren't the people giving the orders to kill in jail?

  23. oh come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cyber pathogen.

    Seriously? they trying to fool the old people?

    1. Re:oh come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm old enough for the Senior Citizen discount at Denny's and they ain't foolin' me one damn bit.

  24. about as legit a claim as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the d.a. is a bacon loving terrorist who love to suck donkey dick in his spare time.

  25. While we're fearmongering... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Maybe the phone entraps a balrog that will get free and kill us all if the phone is unlocked.

    Or two balrogs. Best let sleeping dogs lie.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  26. No, It's True! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Colin Powell will be warning the UN General Assembly about it later this week, and plans to show them a vial of deadly cyber pathogen to prove it!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:No, It's True! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And at the end of the week, Reagan's estate proposes a strategic phone defense initiative which enables bricking any dangerous iPhone from the orbit.

    2. Re:No, It's True! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colin Powell will be warning the UN General Assembly about it later this week, and plans to show them a vial of deadly cyber pathogen to prove it!

      You guys will fall for anything. There can be no "vial of deadly cyber pathogen" since cyber pathogens are digital. He'll be showing a dial of deadly cyber pathogen.

  27. Because if it's a polite request... by tlambert · · Score: 4

    It seems reasonable to me that San Bernardino county could ask Apple, politely, to please break the encryption. No warrant, no lawsuit, no precedent. Just a customer request.

    Because if it's a polite request from a customer, large number theory and computability theory don't apply any more?

    Can we get an H-1B in here to do STEM stuff for this guy?

    1. Re:Because if it's a polite request... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Because if it's a polite request from a customer, large number theory and computability theory don't apply any more?

      No because it appears there is a security flaw where the updatable main CPU software checks for the 10 retries before issuing a wipe command as opposed to the non updatable secondary security processor. Therefore, by updating the main software, you can (a) remove failure checks and (b) do the 10,000 checks automatically very fast. This means the phone can be craked open rather easily. However, the processor won't boot unsigned code, so only Apple can replace the software to do that.

      Apparently.

      Not sure if it's true, but that's the claim. If it wasn't true, I don't see how it would be possible for Apple to comply, but that doesn't seem to be their argument. It seems there's a security flaw in the phone that allows Apple and only Apple to crack it. With this type of flaw, I strongly suspect that the only solution to fix it is with better hardware on new phones.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  28. Then unlocked iPhone = biggest threat by burni2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the iPhone holds a "Cyber Pathogen" then it must be destroyed, because the second that iPhone is unlocked by an Apple intervention the cyber pathogen could spread through the whole United States and infect everything from your pocket calculator to your android smartphone.

    It is a threat that must be destroyed, incinerate that phone right now

    (Because I'm just fed up with the whole order to encrypt and denying battle of Apple, that we should all know is a big charrade by Apple, because if it had been requested silently they'd done it.)

    Just get it over with!

  29. Not just the cyber pathogen! by aglider · · Score: 4, Funny

    That phone could also contain:
    - The solution to a number of longstanding open mathematical problems
    - The answer to the ultimate question about Life, Universe and Everything
    - Proof to put Snowden and friends in jail forever
    - The undeniable identity of JFK murderer
    - A tiny piece of code that could make windows much faster than Linux

    We do all need to unlock that phone, definitely!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    1. Re:Not just the cyber pathogen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      - The answer to the ultimate question about Life, Universe and Everything

      It's 42.
      What we don't know is the question.

    2. Re:Not just the cyber pathogen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That phone could also contain:
      [...]
      - A tiny piece of code that could make windows much faster than Linux

      Given sufficient interest, I could write a patch for Linux to do that. Getting it accepted might be tricky, but there's always systemd.

    3. Re:Not just the cyber pathogen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they're at it, they should definitely decode the first 29896 bytes of /dev/random, because I'm convinced it's an encrypted proof of P vs. NP.

    4. Re:Not just the cyber pathogen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to a number of longstanding open mathematical problems

      Only if there's enough margin in the memory chips to write to.

    5. Re:Not just the cyber pathogen! by aglider · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but that's all has been found there inside. Maybe we'd investigate into someone else's iPhone for that question...

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  30. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... only by examining the phone's content ...

    Only "by examining the phone's content" can we "really be sure" that ET doesn't have a home phone, that Reagan doesn't remember having Alzheimer's disease, or that the grinch stole Christmas.

  31. In more news, the Pope is catholic by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    The opportunity for journalists to trash future presentations by the people involved in these cases is getting enormous. The FBI director claimed it wouldn't set a precedent, but has now retracted. Sadly journalists, despite their reputation for addressing issues with 'no fear or favour', in practice realise that if they demolish the person they are challenging, there WILL be consequences for their employer. Let's hope that defence counsels up and down the land take the lesson however.

  32. Title by Isendur · · Score: 1

    Mr Intel? "Intel claims Apple should unlock the phone". What a waste of good clickbait.

  33. In other words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There are no limits to a DA's powers as long as he can pull bullshit out of his arse." No, I don't think that's the kind of limit the U.S. judicial system is supposed to be based on. Granted, with plea deals and absurd charges and prosecutorial immunity and whatnot, that's what we are getting at. But as long as it's not official, Ramos needs to do better than that.

  34. But what if... by jouassou · · Score: 1

    ...decrypting the phone releases the pathogen?

    1. Re:But what if... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      But what if decrypting the phone is the only way to stop the pathogen from activating? Crap it's Schrödinger's pathogen!

  35. What a moron by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "...and only by examining the phone's content can any really be sure."

    It could also be aliens, strange gods, spaghetti monsters or the invisible man and only by examining the phone's content can any really be sure.

  36. But but but by Rattenhirn · · Score: 2

    wouldn't opening up the phone not RELEASE that dormant cyber pathogen?

  37. What me worried? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. Justice Dept. is worried about what is on a single cell phone while Obama has left our boarders wide open to anyone who wants to come in. The FBI has misplaced priorities worrying about a single cell phone. They need to worry about the terrorist entering the U.S. with impunity. This, of course, shows that they simply want into every IPhone.

  38. Oh, Come on. You are better than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is the best the government can do? There is no reason to even suspect that these people even considered a cyber attack on anything, let alone tried to use the phone to do it. This is NOT "Live free or die hard".

    The US Government has some of the best cryptographers and some of the best tools in the world at their disposal. If the government wanted in that phone that bad, they would have been in it LONG ago. This entire situation is being used in an attempt to weaken consumer grade encryption throughout the digital world. While they have the capabilities to crack anything, it takes time and a lot of computing power to do it. If they can get the courts to agree that they need the help, they can sooner or later convince the courts that there MUST be a back door in all encryption. This would make their data collection much easier because they wouldn't have to waste the computing power for decrypting things that are only encrypted because Mrs. Grandma had a grandson that suggested she select a box saying keep this secure.

  39. Phone is owned by the county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the courts will side with the county eventually. Just a matter of time.

  40. You Fail To Understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is a new technological development created by the brilliant scientists at ISIS. They used genetic engineering to create a human virus that attacks only Americans. I've read on the dark web that the virus makes the dicks of American men fall off, turning them into even bigger pussies than they seem to be in San Bernadino. Genius ISIS engineers have hidden the virus in the phone and when the battery bursts, as all batteries do with age, it will be released.

    This is the biggest threat that America has ever faced. With nothing but dickless American males, not only will Americans be unable to reproduce, but also Hillary Clinton will have the biggest dick(incapable of reproduction) in the country. Obviously, that can't possibly end well.

    Our only hope is to burn the phone in Whogivesafuckistan. But, it's only a matter of time before teh masterminds at ISIS figure out that UPS, FedEx and the USPS exist and deliver the virus in a greeting card. We've got to eliminate greeting cards and package delivery services before it's too late! For our safety.

  41. Obama "crying" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This goes right with Obama "crying". BS!

  42. San Bernadino DA could be lizard alien overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without taking the skin off it to check if there's an alien underneath, there's no way to be sure he's not planning to enslave the entire earth.

  43. Whatever happened ... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    to the idea that probable cause should mean that the cause be near the 1.0 end of probability and not the 0.0 end?

  44. Wouldn't that be a reason to ,,. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that be a reason to throw it into a volcano instead of removing all safeties and turning it on?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    1. Re:Wouldn't that be a reason to ,,. by hierofalcon · · Score: 1

      I was thinking sledge hammer, or shotgun at close range, but that would prevent yet another wave of hysteria being promulgated to further... I don't know ... lot's of ways to fill in that blank.

  45. It is dangerous! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Unlock the phone...and risk the disease getting out?

    No, clearly this DA is clueless as to how technology works.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  46. lawyers are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and retarded. They can't see beyond the little box of them

  47. A retard like that at the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were so doomed just a matter of time. It is plain as the nose on your face that terrorism is the very least of Americas worries.

  48. Cyber Pathogen by PPH · · Score: 1

    OMG! The phone contains systemd!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  49. But the NSA already has access to the phone.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... further proof this is all smoke and mirror's propaganda from the good 'ol USSA!
    The NSA has been able to hack iPhone's (and every other mobile phone platform) for YEARS. Why is the goobermint making a stink about this one old-device, then? Oh, right, only the tin-foil hat wearing crowd know's for sure, but they're nutjob's, so ya know, can't trust them.

  50. It could contain pathogens - destroy it by rossdee · · Score: 1

    There could beviruses that infct humans on it (HIV, Ebola Zika,etc)
    as well as computer viruses.
    Destroying it with high enough temperature is the best bet.
    For example thermite

  51. Everybody already knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the shooter's iPhone contains gay porn.

  52. Alien DA's? by djent · · Score: 1

    I think any cyber threat that exist were purely originated by alien DA's from Uranus.

  53. Fails the "sounds like a load of bollocks" test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And fails it real good !

  54. Someone ate some bad shrooms by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    This DA sounds like he is on a paranoid drug trip, similar to some crazy conspiracy theorist who forgot to take his asenapine saying that the government has implanted listening devices in his fillings. Rizwan was a food inspector and Malik was (educated as) a pharmacist. There is little if any indication that they had any background in advanced programming. And even the FBI seems unable, try as they might to stretch the definition, to tie the two of them to any significant terrorist organization so its unlikely that they received anything that way. As with most of these cases government officials seem happy to play to the idiots who watch too much 24 or similar programs that portray some massive conspiracy at play when in fact most of these cases are a few nutjobs randomly lashing out.

  55. Of course it has a cyber pathogen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily, the same D.A. has been selling his patented tin foil hats, to protect us all from this impending apocalypse.

  56. Does It Aslo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it also contain the location of Jimmy Hoffa's body? That might be their next claim.

  57. To misquote Fawlty Towers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    "... and I said to her, no no no, the Spaniards are dagos. These people are wops."

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  58. Ridiculous manipulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Iraq may have had WMDs and there may be a God.

  59. Most merkins are so dumb and shit scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the government don't need to resort to such a convoluted ruse. The magic phrase '"because he is a terrorist!" will do.

  60. Someone's been watching... by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

    Too much CSI Cyber.

    --

    It's a perfect time for being wasted.
    A perfect time to watch the stars.
    - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  61. It turned me into a newt by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Chuck it in water. If it floats, burn it!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  62. I've found the cure for cancer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it's encrypted in this iPhone and Apple won't unlock it!

    -Sean Connery, The Medicine Man 2016 -

  63. Burger and French Fries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the phone may contain a Burger and French Fries.

    The San Bernadino D.A. really, really wants that Burger and French Fries! We must do everything to ensure that the D.A. isn't unduly inconvenienced by the need to visit a fast food joint. Only the terr'ist iPhone Burger and French Fries will do!!

  64. Someone find a stick and twine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DA's fishing again.

  65. KKK in 1865 "exclusively Democrats" = well duh! by davidwr · · Score: 0

    Remember, the South had just lost the Civil War and after the "Radical Republicans" took control of Congress in early 1867, the South was under a mix of actual and de facto federal control. Just about everyone who voluntarily supported the Confederacy - which included practically all former Confederate officials and commissioned military officers - lost their right to vote during this time (this right was later restored).

    Excluding free slaves, those who were against secession in the first place, and the "Damn Yankees" who flooded into the South during Reconstruction, almost all adults in the South hated the "Radical Republicans" and as such, they were almost exclusively Democrats (or they would be, if they were eligible to vote).

    So, saying the "first Klan" (former Confederate States of America, 1865-1871) was "exclusively Democratic" isn't saying much. It's like saying "there were practically no racists in the South who supported the Radical Republican tear-the-South-apart give-voting-rights-to-former-slaves political agenda. In a word: "Duh."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:KKK in 1865 "exclusively Democrats" = well duh! by lucm · · Score: 2

      The KKK was founded by Democrats and the membership remained mostly Democrats for a long time after the Republicans fought slavery. And there's plenty of racism in the history of the Democratic party after that, such as Woodrow Wilson who segregated the military and federal employees (which was undone by a Republican, Eisenhower).

      Associating the KKK to Republicans to paint a racist picture of the GOP is dishonest and lazy.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  66. Hahahaha what an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you call a hobbled-security OS for a phone so tightly protected that no cyber pathogen could ever be inserted by anyone other than the company that makes it? A cyber pathogen!

  67. The first cybernetic pathogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first cybernetic pathogen this can potentially cross the boundary from being a digital pathogen to being a genetic pathogen we should all be very afraid.

  68. Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sky is falling, the sky is falling!!

    CAPTCHA: Captive

  69. OH NOES, IT'S A SUMERIAN META-VIRUS!! by j-turkey · · Score: 1

    This dormant cyber pathogen must be some sort of neo-Asherah virus from the terrorists! They will control our minds! Apple must write a nam-shub so that the FBI can protect us!

    Your tax dollars at work, folks. Anyone else want to send this DA some of Stephenson's early work to save him the trouble of having to reinvent the wheel?

    --

    -Turkey

  70. "Dormant" by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    This is the key. He screwed himself right there. It it's dormant, the best thing to do is to burn the phone.....which they should do anyway.

    Cyber Pathogen? The only people who say Cyber-Anything have no idea wth they're talking about.

    It's pretty obvious, but it's just another ploy to reach the emotional center of the problem, which shouldn't exist in the first place.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  71. While we're just making stuff up by RH434 · · Score: 1

    It could also contain the cure for cancer, world peace or limitless energy supply, you know, while we're just making shit up it might as well be good.

  72. This is a 2000 years old war, wake up by lucm · · Score: 1

    There are a number of Christian terrorists like those who bomb abortion clinics in the US

    Worldwide there's been TWO HUNDRED terrorist attacks by islamists with a combined death toll of 1000+ this year alone (and we're barely in March) but there's been ZERO abortion clinics bombing. Actually, in the US there's been no abortion clinic bombing in like 10 years, and most of those who happened in the past had none or very few victims. It's not a fucking secret it's all there on Wikipedia.

    So before you tell people that their examples are poor and illogic, check your facts.

    Tell me - why is it ok, for example, to say that domestic violence is bad and that it's mostly men who beat up women, but it's "hatred" to say that terrorism is bad and that it's mostly Muslims who commit such acts of violence? In both case EVERYONE knows that it's not the majority of the specified demographic segment that is guilty. Going on Bill Maher's show and warning people against "putting all Muslims in the same basket" is not commendable, it's politically correct bullshit.

    There's a serious issue with islamic terrorism right now, there's people beheaded, journalists killed, people tortured, women sold in sex slavery and entire towns decimated, not mentioning the slow but constant destruction of the entire arab and persian civilizations, and it's far worse than what is reported in the liberal media because it's "hatred" to talk about it.

    Fuck that hypocrisy. It's like that situation in Rotherham UK where 1,400 children were subjected to a pakistani pedophile ring for a period of TEN YEARS because the authorities were afraid to be called racists if they were to intervene. Look it up and see what the lunacy of politically correct bullshit can lead to.

    Yes pick a country under the midst of civil war that has among its participants those who were not from Syria at all.

    What's going on in Syria is not a mere civil war, it's the culmination of a 2000 years old fight between two Muslim factions: the Shia (Iran, Hezbollah, Syria's government, Iraq's majority, etc.) and the Sunni (ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Chechens, etc). The extreme violence of the last decades has been precipitated by the overall geopolitical situation and by blunders in the US foreign policy (such as pushing out the pro-Saddam Sunni minority from the Iraq government after the invasion, which radicalized a lot of people). But make no mistake: this war was raging for centuries before America started showing up on world maps. This is a Muslim problem and we're all collateral damage. So save me the politically correct bullshit with the "hatred" and "singling out one religion".

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:This is a 2000 years old war, wake up by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Worldwide there's been TWO HUNDRED terrorist attacks by islamists with a combined death toll of 1000+ this year alone (and we're barely in March) but there's been ZERO abortion clinics bombing. Actually, in the US there's been no abortion clinic bombing in like 10 years, and most of those who happened in the past had none or very few victims. It's not a fucking secret it's all there on Wikipedia.

      Pffft. So you're limiting Christian terrorist attacks to abortion bombings but comparing all attacks by Muslims. Your sample bias is showing. Please do some research.

      So before you tell people that their examples are poor and illogic, check your facts.

      You have yet to counter the fact that if 20% of the world's population were actually terrorists, you'd be dead by now. It took a handful of terrorists to stage 9/11. With billions of terrorists, the Earth would be a smoking crater. Please counter that fact.

      Tell me - why is it ok, for example, to say that domestic violence is bad and that it's mostly men who beat up women, but it's "hatred" to say that terrorism is bad and that it's mostly Muslims who commit such acts of violence?

      This is an illogical comparison. All domestic violence is bad; however, the vast majority of abusers are men. This is a fact. Your illogical comparison is to say "all men are domestic abusers" or "all Muslims are terrorists". Both of these statements are factually untrue. You seem also to ignore that there are known Christian terrorist groups like the KKK who have operated in the open for decades in US alone. Decades. Please counter this fact.

      In both case EVERYONE knows that it's not the majority of the specified demographic segment that is guilty. Going on Bill Maher's show and warning people against "putting all Muslims in the same basket" is not commendable, it's politically correct bullshit.

      Again your grasp of math and facts is lacking. 1.4 Billion terrorists in the world is not exactly reality. Anyone with common sense should know this.

      What's going on in Syria is not a mere civil war, it's the culmination of a 2000 years old fight between two Muslim factions: the Shia (Iran, Hezbollah, Syria's government, Iraq's majority, etc.) and the Sunni (ISIS, Al Qaeda, the Chechens, etc). The extreme violence of the last decades has been precipitated by the overall geopolitical situation and by blunders in the US foreign policy (such as pushing out the pro-Saddam Sunni minority from the Iraq government after the invasion, which radicalized a lot of people). But make no mistake: this war was raging for centuries before America started showing up on world maps. This is a Muslim problem and we're all collateral damage. So save me the politically correct bullshit with the "hatred" and "singling out one religion".

      You destroyed your own point. A civil war among two different Muslim groups is hardly supportive of any of your arguments that the religion is full of terrorists. You realize that over the history of the Western world, wars between Christian groups have also had collateral damage. Protestant vs Catholic violence over the last thousand years has been written about by many scholars. Let's look at just the UK: Starting with the Wars of the Three Kingdoms in the 1600s to The Troubles of modern Ireland which had religious underpinnings, the UK has had its deaths due to Christian conflicts. By your logic, all Christians are terrorists

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.