Slashdot Mirror


China Fakes 488 Million Social Media Posts a Year To Deceive Its Citizens (bloomberg.com)

In an attempt to keep its citizens from seeing bad news and getting involved in sensitive political debates, China's government fabricates about 488 million social media comments a year, reports Bloomberg citing a study (PDF). The propaganda workers who post comments are known as Fifty Cent Party because they are believed to be paid 50 Chinese cents by the Chinese government for every comment they post. From the report: Although those who post comments are often rumored to be ordinary citizens, the researchers were surprised to find that nearly all the posts were written by workers at government agencies including tax and human resource departments, and at courts. The researchers said they found no evidence that people were paid for the posts, adding the work was probably part of the employees' job responsibilities. Fifty Cent Party is a derogatory term since it implies people are bought off cheaply. About half of the positive messages appear on government websites, and the rest are injected into the 80 billion social media posts that enter China's Internet. That means one of every 178 social media posts on China's micro blogs is made up by the government, the researchers said. The sites affected include those run by Tencent Holdings Ltd., Sina Corp. and Baidu Inc.

78 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. I'd join the "Fifty Cent Party" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    Too lazy to RTFA, but a "Fifty Cent" party sounds like a good time.

    >> China Fakes 488 Million Social Media Posts a Year To Deceive Its Citizens

    Hmm...that seems low. Here in the US, I'll bet we're at least over a billion on this statistic.
    e.g., http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/18/ap-perpetuates-tale-benghazi-attack-caused-anti-is/

    1. Re:I'd join the "Fifty Cent Party" by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good name for a band, or a rapper.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  2. Free!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    fortunately in the US we have useful idiots that make the same types of postings free of charge!

    1. Re:Free!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Like you. Thanks for serving the country.

  3. only 488M? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    slackers. less than a billion followers, too.

  4. All lies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Our glorious country and it's beloved leaders would never do such a thing. Please report to a nearby office for re-education.

    1. Re:All lies! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      P.S.: I haven't gotten my money for this week, party dear, you still owe me for 3,000 posts. No hurry, just wanted to make sure you know I serve you well!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Oh, the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fifty Cent Party is a derogatory term since it implies people are bought off cheaply.

    And to think there are people in the world willing to do this for no money at all! Imagine being paid, even if it is 50c, for something that you would likely already do, anyway.

    1. Re:Oh, the irony... by snemiro · · Score: 1

      In India women are daily paid 5 us$ to collect the 1st big sack of tea leaves and us$ 2 for any extra sack (Munnar). In a cold and wet weather.

  6. Re:Always trying to one-up the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're doing it much more efficiently too. Things that people post most about in the US- food, and cats. In China they are combined in one picture!

  7. Irony... by Archtech · · Score: 1

    I can't help finding it slightly ironic that this academic study was apparently funded by the US federal government.

    "Our thanks to... DARPA (contract W31P4Q-13-C-0055/983-3) and the National Science Foundation (grant 1500086) for research support".

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    1. Re:Irony... by gtall · · Score: 2

      DARPA doesn't tell you how to conduct you research, it either funds you or does not. In this case, DARPA was willing to fund a study that either supported or debunked a claim about their bureaucracy polluting social media. The authors were quite up front about what they were studying in the abstract of their paper.

    2. Re:Irony... by Archtech · · Score: 1

      DARPA doesn't tell you how to conduct you research, it either funds you or does not.

      Yeah - just like Monsanto.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  8. 50cents/post sounds low but it beats going outside by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Where you would literally choke on the government's propaganda, ie the horribly polluted air.

  9. Meanwhile in the USA... by wardrich86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    488 million accounts are being faked to help spread doom, fear, and other bad news over stupid, menial things like which bathroom people should use, and why unisex bathrooms are the worst idea in the history of the world.

    1. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm very sure the US is NO DIFFERENT.

      we all suspect that various social media sites (this one included) are invaded by paid shills to slant the discussion in the direction that their funders wish.

      the US is definitely not above this. what's different is that its not blatant and official; but that does not mean it does not exist.

      lets also remember that over the last 20 years, the media has been bought by the government in all practical terms. when wa the last time you saw a hardball question thrown to a candidate by the mainstream 'news' ? when a story about privacy or terrorism is breaking, does the news side with the gov or the people?

      corporations are also 'people' now and they pay shills to tip the story balance in their favor via commentors.

      this should be taught in schools; that we are bombarded by info at all directions but that most of it, sadly, is propaganda and you have to be suspicious of everything you hear and see since, well, so many agendas are out there and news isn't news anymore, its paid PR spin.

      at least in china, they know this. in the US, many of us still think that news is real. many of us still think wrestling on TV is real, too (sigh).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by wardrich86 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right. After I made my silly bathroom post, I remembered reading about Hillary Clinton having her own Propaganda machine hitting sites like Reddit to try to convince people that she's not a bought-out liar.

    3. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      The differences being that the Chinese government is expecting their campaign to be 0. effective and 1. meaningful.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm very sure the US is NO DIFFERENT.

      And you're very WRONG. The scale of the posts in China is much, much larger. Like comparing a molehill to a mountain. That, combined with the governments ability to wantonly delete any comments or websites that aren't "government approved", makes a huge difference compared to government and corporate activities in the Western world. Knowledge of this actually isn't that well known among the general Chinese population and you can sure that Chinese language versions of this story won't be available in the mainland. There is a minority group that has extensive international travel and speaks English, but even so they aren't nearly political enough to even broach the discussion. It's also ridiculous to suggest that Slashdot matters enough for anyone to waste effort on "slanting discussions." Not to mention the fact that remarks outside the Slashdot group-think are often labeled as shills out of pure spite.

    5. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by gurps_npc · · Score: 2

      Yes of course. Which is why any mention of Ferguson is wiped from the internet the way any mention of Tiananmen square is.

      And why in the US, politicans routinely vanish for weeks, and no one dares ask if they had a heart attack.

      And why in the US, reporters refuse to accuse a Secretary of State of having committed crimes, out of fear they will be arrested and charged.

      And why in the US, people that are not established, long standing, loyal members of a political party have zero chance of leading the country.

      Oh wait, NONE OF THOSE ARE TRUE. Just as none of the wacko nightmares that haunt your paranoid mind are true.

      There is a real difference between the US where people try to influence public opinion and sometimes pass convoluted laws to help out the state and a Tyranny where public opinion is locked in by state run media and all laws are directly made for the benefit of the state

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    6. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by gtall · · Score: 1

      The question isn't whether members of the public are doing it, the question was whether any arm of government was doing it. If any arm of the U.S. government were to do it and it were discovered, there'd be no end to controversy and probably law suits.

    7. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm very sure the US is NO DIFFERENT.

      we all suspect that various social media sites (this one included) are invaded by paid shills to slant the discussion in the direction that their funders wish.

      the US is definitely not above this. what's different is that its not blatant and official; but that does not mean it does not exist.

      lets also remember that over the last 20 years, the media has been bought by the government in all practical terms. when wa the last time you saw a hardball question thrown to a candidate by the mainstream 'news' ? when a story about privacy or terrorism is breaking, does the news side with the gov or the people?

      corporations are also 'people' now and they pay shills to tip the story balance in their favor via commentors.

      this should be taught in schools; that we are bombarded by info at all directions but that most of it, sadly, is propaganda and you have to be suspicious of everything you hear and see since, well, so many agendas are out there and news isn't news anymore, its paid PR spin.

      at least in china, they know this. in the US, many of us still think that news is real. many of us still think wrestling on TV is real, too (sigh).

      Interesting how a story about China turns into a condemnation of the USA.

      PS. I'm not American.

    8. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by axewolf · · Score: 1

      Uh...wow...what exactly is going on with you? We have a real casualty of institutionalization here.
      How is it that you know any of this garbage you claim?

      It's also ridiculous to suggest that Slashdot matters enough for anyone to waste effort on "slanting discussions."

      This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
      SLASHDOT EXISTS TO CREATE "SLANTED DISCUSSIONS".
      Obviously it's worth the effort to some one to present information in a particular way otherwise this site would not exist.

      And anyway, do you not believe in AI or something? Even if some matters are not worth sending a human to muddle up, an AI could be deployed at a fraction of the cost to have at least some effect. And the potential for that effect grows with every day.

    9. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by axewolf · · Score: 1

      Before you reply, check to make sure you read what I actually wrote rather than what you assume an idiot would write

      But this effort turned out to be a waste, since the two are identical in this case

    10. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by axewolf · · Score: 1

      How can you say something so completely stupid after seeing the public reaction to the unveiling of total surveillance?

    11. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thanks to Snowden we know for a fact that GCHQ, a sub-division of the NSA, does in fact do a lot of manipulation of social media. In fact they mention Slashdot by name.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      Every discussion on slashdot that is based on negative coverage regarding any nation ALWAYS devolves into a US comparison and bashfest. It's like Godwin's Law, only I'm not sure what it's called. Slashdot's Law?

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    13. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      There is no reaction because there is no total surveillance.

      Now go to bed and don't worry your pretty little mind about it. There are Top Men in charge.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    14. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by axewolf · · Score: 1

      yes I suppose humor is the best if not the only way to draw attention to this issue and make people care

    15. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Exhibit A: Robert Siegel ... paid by US taxpayers to advocate for The Party on NPR's All Things Considered.

      Exhibit B: The National Endowment for the Arts ... paid for by US taxpayers to advocate for electing Barack Obama.

      Exhibit C: The entire NPR network for sacking DEMOCRAT anchors who were not liberal enough (Juan Williams).

      Seriously ... give federal revenues a haircut. Waste, waste, corruption, and more waste.

    16. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by s.petry · · Score: 2

      You just explained your own lack of objectivity, you didn't explain their lack of the same. You are claiming that being force fed cyanide kills you, he is claiming that arsenic in low doses will kill you over time. In both cases you are being poisoned and in both cases you die. You seem to want to deny the poisoning is occurring, or claiming that if it's not cyanide it does not matter.

      Pointing out what should be obvious, convincing people to drink water instead of arsenic laced juice is a good thing. You attacking people trying to do that, is a bad thing.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    17. Re:Meanwhile in the USA... by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Interesting how a story about China turns into a condemnation of the USA.

      PS. I'm not American.

      You misread that post. That was a proactive denial of wrong doing, not a condemnation. Read it again.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  10. Now we need the same for the C-USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We need now the same kind of study to verify how many paid drones do so on the corporate states of america. I don't doubt the number of government-sponsored posts is very low in the USA, but the corporate propaganda drive there should never be underestimated...

    1. Re:Now we need the same for the C-USA by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I'm confused about your distinction between government and corporations.

    2. Re:Now we need the same for the C-USA by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      "the corporate propaganda drive "

      You refer to the Worldwide News Media.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:Now we need the same for the C-USA by Sique · · Score: 1

      Corporation don't even try to convince you that you have a right to elect their board of directors. They name the price for the priviledge to vote and call it "price per share".

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:Now we need the same for the C-USA by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There still is. Corporations have to buy politicians who will then create laws.

      Only Trump can cut out the middle man! Vote Trump!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Re:Nuclear? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

    I do it for free.

  12. Whats worse, them or the Putin / Russia shills? by oic0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seems on english speaking sites I run in to far more Putin shills.

    1. Re:Whats worse, them or the Putin / Russia shills? by Ulfilas2000 · · Score: 1

      How much do you suppose Putin's people are paid? What's half a ruble?

    2. Re:Whats worse, them or the Putin / Russia shills? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Half a ruble is 2-3 pieces of ammo for Awtomat Kalaschnikowa.

      Now keep working comrade or you get paid!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. The sad part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sad part is that if you asked around (in China), you would find that a large percentage, if not the majority, of Chinese people actually "support" these forms of oppression. THAT is the power of indoctrination. When you spend your entire life knowing nothing but authoritarianism and oppression, and being told constantly that it's for your benefit, you will have a very difficult time imagining the alternative. It's similar to how a life-long prisoner, upon being set free, finds that he just can't function properly outside of prison. The authoritarianism is actually comforting to them, and that's exactly how the rulers would have it. The only people who dare to imagine a better society are the radicals, and we all know what happens to radicals in China.

    1. Re:The sad part by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      recurse/
      The sad part is that you replied to that post. /recurse

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:The sad part by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> The only people who dare to imagine a better society are the radicals, and we all know what happens to radicals in China.

      And back here in the US, those of us who dare to imagine a better society are mostly ignored and then arrogantly told that our preferred candidate should "do the right thing" (endorse the status quo) when we try to use our existing democratic process to advance our agenda. Sounds like becoming a radical might be the smarter course of action... :)

    3. Re:The sad part by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1, Insightful

      not to mention the progressives who are anti-individual freedom and pro-nanny state.

      Freedom of your own body (abortion) but don't have freedom to decide whether or not to wear seat belts.

      Yah. only watchers of "ox" news are this dumb.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    4. Re:The sad part by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Vs the conservatives, who support freedom to own a gun but want the government policing the media to stop people saying dirty words?

      "Freedom" is a concept so abstract that it's impossible to even agree on a definition.

    5. Re:The sad part by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      not to mention the progressives who are anti-individual freedom and pro-nanny state.Freedom of your own body (abortion) but don't have freedom to decide whether or not to wear seat belts.

      Vs the conservatives, who support freedom to own a gun but want the government policing the media to stop people saying dirty words?

      Have you considered that maybe both of you are right?

      "Freedom" is a concept so abstract that it's impossible to even agree on a definition.

      Actually, it's very simple: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action.

      Freedom is what liberals & conservatives are against. They may allow you some token freedoms, but usually with ulterior motives. Conservatives tout free market principles then bail out banks that are "too big to fail," because they know where their kickbacks come from. Liberals say they are "pro-choice" because they're cool with women doing what they want with their bodies, UNLESS the woman wants to smoke cigarettes/meth/whatever or eat food with trans fats or GMOs. I think the real concern for them though is population control.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    6. Re:The sad part by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I didn't disagree with the poster above. My intended point was the symmetry: Liberals and conservatives, and most political factions, agree that freedom is a good thing... they just want to make a few exceptions. The exact extent of these exceptions varies greatly. All sides insist that their restrictions are absolutely necessary for a healthy and peaceful society, and the other sides are oppressive tyrants who will take your freedom away for their own ends.

    7. Re:The sad part by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Radicalization is the problem. The two-party system effectively splits the voting population in half, maximizing the influence of radicals on both ends of the political spectrum. This disenfranchises the bulk of voters in the center, who end up dissatisfied with the choice of candidates. It's why the two candidates with probably the highest disapproval ratings are going to be the nominees - because most of that disapproval is from the half of voters who aren't voting in that party's primary. (Trump is a bit of an oddball - his views on specific issues varies widely from very conservative to liberal, which puts his mean score in the moderate category. But statistically he has a huge standard deviation, making his mean score less reliable.)

      If, hypothetically, the primary system were changed so that everyone could vote in every party's primaries, Sanders, Clinton, Trump, and Cruz would've had no chance because they're too radical. Instead, moderates like Christie, Paul, and Bloomberg - people whose political views align more closely with the average of all Americans instead of just those in one party - would win.

    8. Re:The sad part by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      where did I mention guns?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    9. Re:The sad part by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Conservatives tout free market principles then bail out banks that are "too big to fail,"

      Did you just call Obama conservative?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:The sad part by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, the Democratic party doesn't have any radicals. Keep dreaming about that one.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  14. Re: Whats worse, them or the Putin / Russia shills by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or maybe your worldview is so skewed, you call everyone who disagrees with you a shill.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  15. Re:50cents/post sounds low but it beats going outs by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    It is not 0.50 USD. It is 0.50 RMB, or about 0.08 USD.

  16. Re:Nuclear? by halivar · · Score: 1

    I think mdsolar forgot to log in.

  17. In the west, that's called TV by snemiro · · Score: 1

    At least money goes to the people and not to the managers.

  18. Russian Trolls! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Russian Trolls!

  19. Works out to by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Over 1.33 million posts a day
    Almost 55,500 an hour
    Just over 9000 per minute....

    That's one way to bump up employment

    1. Re:Works out to by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And their form of job creation for the unemployables doesn't even clog the airports!

      We should copy... no wait, doesn't work for us here. You have to be literate for that kind of job.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Works out to by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      And Americans trust government so little, that the fake posts don;t really affect much...

    3. Re:Works out to by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It would just have to come from Joe Average from Backwater, Missouri instead of Agent Brown from D.C.

      And yeah, of course a lot of them would be accused of being government shills. So what, people are accused of that already. If every company that I allegedly have a contract with would pay me a buck a month I could buy Apple.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Re:50cents/post sounds low but it beats going outs by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    China provides you with all the smog you could possible want and you still complain? They have NO smog at all in the western world, or at the very least they can only get it in really huge cities, and even then not always. In wonderful China you can now even have it in the countryside more often than not, and the Chairman and his people are toiling hard day and night to ensure that you will never have to exist without!

    Also, dear party, I haven't been paid for over two weeks... I mean, I had the pleasure of enjoying participating in the glorious spreading of our enlightened truth for two weeks but I'd like to get some ramen again, if you could possibly find it in your endlessly big heart to fuckin' pay me?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Re:50cents/post sounds low but it beats going outs by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    So the approximately 50 posts I shit every day into /. are worth about 4 bucks?

    Hmm... Is there any kind of requirement how long or informative the posts have to be?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. When You Point Your Finger by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    3 point back at you.

  23. Re:Just another day at the office... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Careful there, people have been executed for smaller errors in their bookkeeping. Embezzlement is a capital offense in China!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Re:Nuclear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a degree in nuclear physics. Why would I need to get paid for commenting on nuclear?

  25. Very low number! by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    That does seem low. Only 488 million?? In a country with eighty billion social posts a year?
    I would have guessed a much higher number.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Very low number! by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      They have thousands of years of momentum.

    2. Re:Very low number! by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 2

      That does seem low. Only 488 million?? In a country with eighty billion social posts a year? I would have guessed a much higher number.

      If your numbers are correct, that means that only about 0.61% of posts, about 1 in every 165, are government astroturfers. That really does seem low. I almost feel like those may be better odds than you get on Slashdot.

      Still, I mean, most social media posts nowadays are just pictures of food. That throws off the statistics, because the Chinese government probably doesn't feel the need to fake many of those. North Korea is another story. I heard that 19 out of the 26 posts on North Korean social media last year were pictures of food faked by the government..

  26. That's a lot of work by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Here in the USA, we just pay Fox News to do all that for us.

  27. A slight change by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Certain people have purchased media, and at the same time placed puppets into the Government. This is why no matter who we have in office the shit continues. We don't hear about horrible policies and are drown in "interest" stories (AKA Propaganda).

    This is not new, it started back in at least the 60s. Start to track the point where "Conspiracy" synonymous with "false narrative" and "Conspiracy Theorist" was used as an ad hominem against certain types of investigative reporters covering specific types of stories.

    Not that the public at large was ever crazy intelligent, but in the last 50 years we have gone from mostly rational to a place where in general people can not tell fact from fantasy. "Feelings" today trump facts in the majority of our discussions in Political Philosophy and Sociology.

    I read long ago that there are two possible ways to view the world. One, pushed by media and politicians, is that everything is accidental and results which could never be predicted. The other, which is ignored by media and politicians, is that most things are intentional with results which are predicted with reasonable accuracy. When you consider that the people in politics are the highest educated among society, with literally teams of highly educated people working as advisers and think tanks, which do you find the more likely world view?

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  28. What about in America? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Americans fake billions of social media posts every day to deceive other Americans.

  29. How many 50 cent posts on this thread ? by balbeir · · Score: 1

    So the question is, how many posts on this thread will be from the 50 cent party ?

  30. So, are they ahead or behind USA forum sliding? by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Every forum or google search I've done on anything controversial in the last few years is rather obviously populated by people trying to bias opinions or spread obviously false (but oh, so *happy-talk*) information.

    Mentally, you filter it out. Many folks don't, I'm sure.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  31. Re: Whats worse, them or the Putin / Russia shills by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    I don't. I know people like him. They even call me a Putin shill just because I disagree with their opinion even though I've already been on Slashdot when Putin was a small fish yet.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  32. Time to wake up Rip by s.petry · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how you slept through the last several years but you did. Snowden dumped the complete playbook and we found it to be the US Government inside of everything all the time. More than half of the countries we ally with in Europe have shit canned US services and ban new projects from landing on US servers. Not because "Ebil IBM and MS" but the more "EBIL UNCLE SAM".

    Several whistle blowers have been jailed, reporters have been jailed and threatened, and lawsuits have been filed by numerous parties. Stonewalls have been erected all over Washington DC, and countless very high ranking politicians spend extended durations of time doing nothing but denying what they did was "really" wrong.

    Since you have slept through the last few years, you probably also missed the US having black sites, covering up wrongful death in the middle east, etc....etc.. Maybe you should try living out of the cave for a while. You can't be an incarnation of a different sockpuppet 'cf" trying ot re-write history can you? Nah, you have to be crazy from all the batshit.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  33. Going broke! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    How can Tencent Holdings afford to pay fifty cents a post?

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  34. Dominant minority by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Expel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... from your country