Slashdot Mirror


Too Fat For Facebook: Photo Banned For Depicting Body In 'Undesirable Manner' (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report on The Guardian: Facebook has apologized for banning a photo of a plus-sized model and telling the feminist group that posted the image that it depicts "body parts in an undesirable manner". Cherchez la Femme, an Australian group that hosts popular culture talkshows with "an unapologetically feminist angle", said Facebook rejected an advert featuring Tess Holliday, a plus-sized model wearing a bikini, telling the group it violated the company's "ad guidelines". After the group appealed against the rejection, Facebook's ad team initially defended the decision, writing that the photo failed to comply with the social networking site's "health and fitness policy". "Ads may not depict a state of health or body weight as being perfect or extremely undesirable," Facebook wrote. "Ads like these are not allowed since they make viewers feel bad about themselves. Instead, we recommend using an image of a relevant activity, such as running or riding a bike." In a statement on Monday, Facebook apologized for its original stance and said it had determined that the photo does comply with its guidelines.Facebook said that its team scans millions of ad images every week, and sometimes understandably misses out on a few.

281 of 485 comments (clear)

  1. How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...their busy schedule of banning conservatives for daring to say that they ban conservatives to determine what an appropriate bikini body is...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by beh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It does confirm that it was the right decision to close and delete my facebook account 3 or 4 weeks after using facebook and still not seeing the point of it.

      Now seeing how busy facebook seems to become in policing what its users might want to see, good riddance Facebook... ...not nearly ruing as much having signed up here a "while" ago... ;-)

    2. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Shortguy881 · · Score: 2

      Did you see that picture? I nearly went blind. Why would anyone want to look at that.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    3. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you're revolting looking you should NOT post a public photo of yourself.

      That is the salient point that this "model" appears to have missed.

    4. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well I for one welcome our new bikini-clad land-whale overlords.

    5. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Shortguy881 · · Score: 2

      First of all, that is not irony. Secondly, I actually have muscle tone. I work hard to stay in shape, but I find it is worth the effort. Thirdly, I still don't photograph myself and flaunt my body. I stay in shape for me and no one else.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    6. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by HumanWiki · · Score: 2

      Did you see that picture? I nearly went blind. Why would anyone want to look at that.

      Well, to be fair... The concept of beauty is widely debated now and has changed greatly over the years.

    7. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      If you can toss her over your shoulder and carry her away she's not to big. Just saying...

      Although I'm not really into tattooed girls no matter how skinny they are.

    8. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by GungaDan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I fail to see the need to be fair to that 350+ pound beshemoth. She left 'plus sized' behind a tenth of a ton ago. If it is harmful to show young girls images of models considered too thin to be healthy, it must be equally harmful to show images of "models" that are three cupcakes away from losing a foot, or exploding their overburdened hearts. The "healthy at every size" thing is dangerous nonsense.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    9. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      ...their busy schedule of banning conservatives for daring to say that they ban conservatives to determine what an appropriate bikini body is...

      They just trying to compensate by moderating conservatively as well as liberally.

    10. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by GungaDan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Fat Self Acceptance" is one thing and "Fat Acceptance" is quite another. I have no problem with the former. The latter, however, is nothing more than misery attempting to create company for itself by encouraging morbid obesity in others. That's harmful, disgusting and frankly intolerable.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    11. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by HumanWiki · · Score: 1

      I fail to see the need to be fair to that 350+ pound beshemoth. She left 'plus sized' behind a tenth of a ton ago. If it is harmful to show young girls images of models considered too thin to be healthy, it must be equally harmful to show images of "models" that are three cupcakes away from losing a foot, or exploding their overburdened hearts. The "healthy at every size" thing is dangerous nonsense.

      So, what about "healthy" sized people that are smoking, vaping, dipping, are doing something risky and dangerous with their life that could also be teaching people it's ok to partake in these dangerous and potentially fatal activities? I personally think it's 100% insane to bungie jump, sky dive, base jump, etc just for the thrill and every one of those people are 1 mechanical failure from death. Does that mean I should be allowed to ban their pics?

    12. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      She's only 5ft 4in I could toss her over my shoulder.

    13. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Irony is the use of words expressing something other than their literal intention.

    14. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Dins · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I "deactivated" my account a couple years ago. My only regret is that I didn't follow various guides to delete it completely, or as completely as can happen. But logging back in to the account in order to delete it at this point is not something I want to do so I'm letting sleeping dogs lie.

      I hate Facebook more than is probably rational, though. Both for solid IT nerd reasons like the rest of us but also because it had a huge hand in ruining my marriage. Yes there were other issues there, but Facebook certainly didn't help.

    15. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by GungaDan · · Score: 2

      Your analogy is off. Instead of banning skydiving pics, ban pics of junkies shooting up. That's precisely what Tess Munster is all about. "I am morbidly obese and I love it - you can be morbidly obese and love it, too!" Until that first amputation. The beetus is coming for Tess. She should not be recruiting others into her world of impending doom.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    16. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You really fail to see the point of fat acceptance.

      Fat acceptance is exactly as harmful as pro-ana/pro-mia or promoting smoking.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    17. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or maybe "fat acceptance" leads to inaction because, what the heck, it's okay to step on a scale and for it to say "One at a time, please."

      Nobody should be complacent being way past morbidly obese. You can say you're a happy happy hippo all you want, but you'll be a dead dead hippo if you don't take action.

      Obesity is the #2 killer nowadays. Keep this up, it will be #1.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    18. Re: How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Honestly, most people find a "plus sized model" disgusting. Most people also don't enjoy seeing disgusting things while browsing facebook. Ergo, that ad should stay banned.

      Uh, huh. You know what? You don't have a right to not be disgusted, any more than you have a right to not be offended.

    19. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by HumanWiki · · Score: 1

      Your analogy is off. Instead of banning skydiving pics, ban pics of junkies shooting up.

      Incorrect. People skydiving are needlessly endangering themselves with an activity that has 0 value to me. They are the same and my analogy was correct.

    20. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by GungaDan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Morbid obesity is not an activity, and it has negative (not zero) value to you and everyone else in terms of tangible societal cost (mostly in health care).

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    21. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by OakDragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      New Facebook motto : "No Fat Chicks"

    22. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by twotacocombo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once someone labels themselves as Fat and Ugly then they lose hope and stops trying to live a healthy lifestyle.

      So I was fat once. 260 was my high water mark. One day I thought to myself "Holy shit, I'm fat as fuck and this sucks". Know what I did? Something. Through diet and exercise, I lost 70 pounds. Labeling myself fat gave me the motivation to not be fat. If I had thought "I'm fat and I'm OK with this", I'd still be fat, probably fatter.

      I also worked for several years doing shitty low paying jobs. One day I said "Holy shit, this job fucking sucks" and I went back to school to start a career. If I had said "This job sucks, but I'm fine with it" I'd probably be 400 pounds, or dead.

      Without realizing how low you are, you may never find a reason to crawl out of it. Labeling yourself as fat, or a failure, or whatever, is not a negative thing. It all depends on what you do with that realization. You can bitch out, or you can do something about it. Your call, but don't blame society for making you 'feel bad' and then give up.

    23. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If your marriage can be ruined by Facebook, it probably could be ruined by many other unrelated things.

    24. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or maybe "fat acceptance" leads to inaction because, what the heck, it's okay to step on a scale and for it to say "One at a time, please."

      That sounds like a testable hypothesis...and science shows the opposite is true.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    25. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You need to keep yourself in a positive mood, but you can keep yourself in a positive mood while still understanding that you need to make progress on obesity.

      Being obese has real issues like joint pain, stress, heart disease and diabetes. Even if rejection of beauty was not an issue, that would be enough to make anyone miserable.

      I do think the shaming should stop, because these people are not bad people simply because they weigh more than is safe.

      However, it should also not be encouraged, and there should be some understanding that, while I don't think you're a bad person for having a high weight, attraction is frequently based on an instinctive response to a particular visual image (especially for men).

      It is true that standards of beauty change and that in earlier times, attractive women could weigh in at about 200 pounds, but 200 lbs in all the right places can be presented fairly well on a female frame. 350 lbs... not so much unless the woman is like seven feet tall.

    26. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it is important to be realistic about where you are, while at the same time realizing that you can always be more than that. If anything, that should be the message here. If someone is fat, then call a spade a spade, but remain supportive of their struggle to become healthier and also uphold their confidence that they are a person who, no matter what their weight is, is a good person. It's just that they are a good person with a disease they should fight, not just accept.

      On the other hand, there's obese and there's perfect. No one is going to go from fat to Hollywood hot, and not even stars do that without a full staff and a lot of money. The goal should always what makes you healthier and more comfortable. Don't let "perfect" become the enemy of "good".

    27. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Skydiving is an activity that can be dangerous, but if handled safely is a lot of fun. And you will walk away from it as healthy as you've ever been. More to the point, you only do it for a few minutes and even the most dedicated skydivers aren't doing it all day every day. The danger level is there, but it isn't constant.

      Being obese has a risk level like repeatedly jumping out of a plane every single hour of every single day, with zero benefits to you. It doesn't even have being fun going for it. Yes, you can live with the extra weight for awhile, but eventually, it's going to shorten your life, and more importantly perhaps, it is going to reduce your standard of living.

    28. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Speaking as someone who has lifted 350 lbs in a gym with safety equipment and a spotter, you are not going to toss anything weighing 350 lbs over your shoulder unless you're built. You'd probably have to be stronger than average to even move that with a fireman's carry. That's both heavy and the weight is not going to be well distributed.

    29. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      why would that be so - I do not think being this fat is health or sexy but I a sure as hell there are people that do. There are also people that like to be disgusted and there are many things that I consider normal and they think is disgusting and thus exciting too. Humans - they are all weird.

    30. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I thought "irony" is where people laugh at themselves while admitting they didn't understand the scope of the words used, and thought there was a contradiction, but then realized there wasn't one?

      Any intentional attempt at irony would of course be included in the literal intent of the words, so I don't think your definition can encompass the most common uses. Unintentional uses seem to universally be not-ironic to people that understand the subject; they're just things people usually don't expect about the subject.

    31. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by killfixx · · Score: 1

      You truly believe that, don't you?

      That is called self-acceptance. Accepting my lot in life does not mean I should be claiming enlightenment due to my ailment/impairment/shitty fucking lifestyle choices, it came from deep introspection and a truckload of work. That should be the message.

      Fat acceptance says I should accept that fat people are beautiful, too. Fuck that.

      I had been fat all my life (still about 20lbs over my ideal BMI), like seriously fat. Morbidly obese was the term. I worked my ass off to lose half my body mass.

      Losing weight didn't grant me enlightenment, it just made me lighter. Enlightenment came from the years of mental struggle, overcoming my own demons that got me to that weight.

      Fuck that. Celebrating what makes a person shitty is not good.

      But what do I know, I don't own a media outlet.

      --
      "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    32. Re: How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      The only other thing it means is "made of iron" or "resembling iron".

      Irony does not mean "unexpected". It's not even a stretch of the definition. It's applying the word to a completely different meaning. Irony's core meaning is derived from eiron, which means dissembler. Irony is 100% about intended meaning and definitions differing.

      Note that using "irony" incorrectly is not itself ironic unless you specifically intend to use the word against its definition. You can't be ironic accidentally.

      Next you'll try to trot out "common usage" or "language evolves". If we blindly follow common usage and accept errors as valid, our endgame will be filled with nothing but grunts and emoji. As language evolves, it also devolves.

      Before you rush to Google, "dramatic irony" is simply irony applied to a dramatic work, wherein a character is unaware of the irony present in the plot. The audience may or may not be aware of the true meaning, though dramatic irony is typically pretty heavy handed so even a first timer will pick up on it.

    33. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's not "my" definition, it's the definition. Irony is about intent. You can't be unintentionally ironic. Irony has deception at its core - it comes from eiron, which means dissembler.

    34. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      She is short and weighs less a lot less than you think and yeah I could although I'm sure her husband who looks like he wouldn't have much trouble either might not like it.

    35. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by avandesande · · Score: 2

      Yeah he mentioned that it wasn't the 'real' cause. However a facebook divorce is probably a lot more publicly humiliating.....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    36. Re: How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Google "cosmic irony".

    37. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Tanktalus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I do not think being this fat is health or sexy but I a sure as hell there are people that do

      False equivalence. You're treating two things, one subjective (what's sexy) and one objective (what's healthy) as if they were equivalent. They aren't.

      This feminist group is doing likewise. Acceptance of unhealthy obesity is tantamount to abuse. It's statistical murder. Instead of encouraging people (let's face it here, they're focused on women, but the same applies to men as well) who are obese to, you know, do the work to get to an objectively healthy body weight and save their lives, they're encouraging these women to revel in their obesity and thereby shorten these women's lives. And that's pro-woman?

      If you're into BBW, all the power to ya. But don't pretend like you're doing those women any long-term favours. You're participating in their deaths just as surely as if you stuffed the twinkie in their mouth yourself.

      As to Facebook, they should really stay the fuck out of it. Allow groups who promote healthy body images to flourish. The proper response to negative speech like this group's is positive speech, not banning.

    38. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      As someone who also lost 70 lbs. The first part of it was convincing myself that I could change myself first. To get to that level I needed get over my self consciousness of my weight. Then I could put my time and effort into losing it. The initial problem was once I labeled myself as fat, I didn't care for a while and put on 20 more lbs.
      The thing is people don't want to be fat or have the health problems. But with people insulting you and making you feel less valuable as a human being getting to a state where you can take the risk of changing your lifestyle makes it more difficult.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    39. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Fat acceptance isn't about not trying to control your weight or living a unhealthy lifestyle. But to accept yourself as you are then you can start to work on the problems. There is a reason why don't see fat people at they gym, you may really skinny guys trying to bulk up but less fat people trying to lean down. Why? Because society makes fun of fat people. The idea of a fat guy or woman walking on a treadmill sweating at 3mph while the fit guy next to them is jogging at 6mph without breaking a sweat, is often shown as comedy. This type of stuff that portraits these people as somehow sub human. Just convinces them to avoid going out and doing something more.

      I had lost 70lbs myself and much closer to my official BMI however I needed to convince myself I could do it. And risk people insulting me at the gym (Although that didn't happen) But I had to accept that I was a useful human first before I could take the next step on working at it.

      Having Fat People feel like they are beautiful means they are more willing to go out and be active in the world. These Fat Acceptance isn't a Fat Fetish it is celebrating the person's beauty not because of the fat but because of the beauty. The Fat Fetish will only focus on the fat, that isn't healthy

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    40. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Too bad you didn't actually read beyond the headline so you could make a quick, but inaccurate, retort.

      The results were based on a survey, rather than experimental data, so you can't make conclusions about whether the fat-shaming actually caused the weight gain.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    41. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      BTW - most of the posts on her facebook page agree that it's stupid to popularize being not just obese, or even morbidly obese, but super obese. She has a bmi of 46.6. We no longer let models be anorexic, why are we promoting this?

      The smart thing would be for her to get her stomach stapled. Of course, she can't do that because the only talent she has is being really, really fat. She's doomed.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    42. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Give it 3 weeks and it'll change. After all, they said that salt was bad for years, and now too little salt and especially no salt is worse for you then having too much.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    43. Re: How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If cancer can destroy your marriage then it was weak to begin with. Most wedding vows include language like "in sickness and in health". That stuff isn't just in there to sound pretty. That's the traditional expectation.

      Of course many people can't really follow through. They bail quickly over far less difficult issues.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    44. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Your notion of risk analysis is badly distorted. Due to the seriousness with which skydiving is treated. It's probably FAR LESS of a risk than constantly abusing your body. It's probably less risky than commuting for the same reason that flying is.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    45. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Don't kid yourself. In previous centuries, Victoria Secret models would be viewed as under age or sick. You don't have to bother with paintings. There's plenty of photographic evidence. The idea of scrawny as a beauty standard is a very new thing. It has even gone out of fashion occasionally even in modern times.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    46. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Presumably that includes the adrenaline junkies GP spoke of?

    47. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      No. A proper libertarian say that "knowledge is power" and that you should take what you've learned and game the rules. That's part of being self-reliant and not being a helpless victim.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    48. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The main problem is that people openly mock fat people to their faces. If someone is fat, that is their problem, and we should respect them as individuals. It doesn't mean we have to date a fat person, just treat them respectfully like any other person.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    49. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or maybe two.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    50. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It does confirm that it was the right decision to close and delete my facebook account 3 or 4 weeks after using facebook and still not seeing the point of it.

      After 3-4 weeks I'm not surprised you don't see the utility in a service that requires you to build up a large network of diverse people in order to gain the benefits.

      In other news I installed Tinder this morning. I'm still single now so I don't see the point and deleted it.

    51. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Dins · · Score: 1

      Nothing can "ruin" a marriage except the participants.

      Yep. Completely true. I'm a firm believer that both parties are at fault in relationship issues if you really look at root causes (barring extreme circumstances). Hence my statement, "...hand in ruining my marriage. Yes there were other issues there..." Nobody is interested in the sordid details, so rather than go into the entire story I abbreviated to the above. Let's just say nobody's in denial here...

      Getting back on topic, Facebook sucks and nobody should use it.

    52. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Having seen the picture I would have thought the BMI would be much higher as I have a BMI of about 38 but then I do a lot of power lifting and strength training. My work out weights for some lifts are bench press 455lbs, squat 715lbs, clean and jerk 355lbs, curl 205lbs so even though I have a very high BMI it isn't like I am by any definition fat, 32" waist 54" chest 22" neck and sink in pools. That said I don't have that body builder look as that requires a very different style of workout where you build muscle mass, tone, and definition, I go for raw strength as I find it beneficial. Also I make it a point to do a fair amount of cardio (I run or bike for 1.5 hours three times a week instead of lifting) since if one doesn't it can lead to heart problems.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    53. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I have told friends of mine who were fat that were afraid of going to the gym because of people like the ones you mention that they shouldn't care. There are only about 3 types of people who go to the gym. First you have the people who use it as a social event. These are the ones who spend more time talking while sitting or standing next to the equipment than using it. They may make snide comments about a fat person but they often are too absorbed in their discussion so don't worry about them. Then you have the people who are the look at me types. These are the people who bang the weights around, grunt loudly, strut around. These people are about as likely to comment about fat people being there as the ones who use it as a social club but often are too absorbed in themselves. The last group is the ones who are there for their own benefit. This group shows up starts their workout, does it and leaves and only badmouths someone if they are hogging a piece of equipment by having a social discussion or being annoying by banging equipment and making a shit ton of noise.

      Having helped a number of my friends who were fat lose the weight I have had to put some people in their place for making snide comments while at the gym. What I have told my friends is that you are there for you benefit, not someone else's so fuck them. You are there to get into shape and be health and everyone has to start somewhere. I help them learn how to use the equipment right, learn how to work out right, learn a proper warmup and cool down routine, and how to push themselves (this is probably the hardest). The other thing everyone has a hard time learning is to not expect fast results as building proper strength, endurance, losing fat, etc takes a long time to do it right and when done right you don't risk injury and have a better chance of the results sticking. Shows like the biggest loser make this worse as they basically show miraculous results so everyone expects that.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    54. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I could, then again as you said one would have to be built and have well above average strength. This is said as someone who works out a 455lbs on bench press, 715 on squats, and cleans and jerks 355lbs. Carrying that much around would be a different story as you would have one hell of a lean.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    55. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      You send a trim, fit Victoria's Secret model back to 17th century Morocco and she would blow their minds.

      Or, for that matter, today's Morocco.

    56. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The only skydiver I ever knew well broke his back. Fortunately, he appears to have completely recovered from that, but I was watching his toes move carefully when I first got to the hospital to visit him. He's not a careless person, but he made a mistake he couldn't recover from.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    57. Re: How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      blah blah blah ... sex changes reduce the number of deaths among transsexuals, so it's something that other transsexuals should emulate, for their own health. Being so obese that you are too fat to be considered "only" morbidly obese is not someone who anyone should aspire to be. Super obese is something we instinctively react negatively to, the same as anorexic, because part of us instinctively recognizes these as being VERY unhealthy states.

      So, instead of making false comparisons, show what the benefits are of being classified as super obese, or STFU, mkay?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    58. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, she's not doing the exercises you're doing, and her waist is probably bigger than your chest by now - it was claimed to be 49" back in 2014. Plus, fat weighs less than muscle. If it were muscle instead of fat, her weight would be MUCH higher.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    59. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by countach · · Score: 1

      Aversion therapy to stop you eating.

    60. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by countach · · Score: 1

      The best thing for this woman would be to accept society's standards, and lose some pounds before the universe does it for her with a body bag.

    61. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by beh · · Score: 1

      OK, let's clarify - I've been on other social networks at the time (e.g. linkedin) - and in those I did see the utility.

      In Facebook, even in friends I have who had been on it for quite a while - I don't see it, apart from being a platform for advertising - and I don't see why I should feed facebook in exchange for ads I don't want in the first place.

      Also, at the time I deactivated the account, I had somewhere around (IIRC) 80-90 facebook connections - and I did put on my wall that I didn't see the point of the platform asking my connections to show me what the point of it would be within a week or I'd delete the account - a week (and 0 responses) later, I deleted the account.

      The connections to the people I was connected with before, I still have - and apart from that, I'm just happy not to have fed more personal information about myself to them.

      But, more generally, don't you start things that you need to invest time into with a purpose in mind? (you start learning to drive long before you're allowed to drive on public roads with a view to driving later. You get vaccinated against tropic diseases before a holiday in the tropics specifically in order to prevent catching a tropic disease. But - what other thing is there where you just take it up, and continue paying for it for weeks/months/longer, if you don't see a specific purpose for it. The only specific purpose I see in facebook is selling me ads - sorry, no thanks. Not for me.

    62. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      That is why when I saw the picture I would have thought he BMI would have been much higher. I guess a lot of that comes from the BMI point of reference of myself so people who are very fat I just kind of assume have some huge BMI because if I were shaped like that I would have a huge BMI.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    63. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In Facebook, even in friends I have who had been on it for quite a while - I don't see it, apart from being a platform for advertising - and I don't see why I should feed facebook in exchange for ads I don't want in the first place.

      The only specific purpose I see in facebook is selling me ads - sorry, no thanks. Not for me.

      That says it all. You approached the idea of the network with a mindset that was cemented from your first use combined with a group of people who weren't using it to it's potential and thus further destroying your idea of what the platform is good for. It's like wanting to go to a concert, so you friends take you to a heavy metal concert, but you don't like the idea of heavy metal. So you go to another friend who takes you to another heavy metal concert, and by the time you're done with the idea of concerts because of your closed in experience.

      I only see the occasional advert. I've filtered out idiots who do nothing but re-post crap "She put it in the microwave, what happens next no one will guess." I've unfriended idiots who do nothing but trashtalk politics, and those who only seem to exist to play Facebook games and invite you to join.

      So what's the point as I see it?
      - Updates from interesting people about their lives.
      - Photos from friends and family who are spread across the globe.
      - An organised event calendar which not only shows things people invite me to, but public events near me people are attending.
      - Easy messaging app.
      - Free VoIP calls without having to install the clusterfuck that is Skype, or deal with the problem of wWhatsapp with a mother who travels a lot and uses different SIM cards (Whatsapp does not like it when your phone number changes).

      People who don't understand the features of a product or don't have a use case for it are very quick to dismiss something as useless and then sit and ponder what 1.6billion people in the world find so fascinating about it (note I don't believe that number regardless of what Facebook says).

    64. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Fatties can blubber in their blubber all they want, but someone who is classified as "super obese" is probably going to die earlier rather than later - IF they're lucky. Otherwise, they'll be rolling around in their electric carts dragging their oxygen supplies behind them, etc., for a while before they finally die.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    65. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      She says she's in shape - because "round is a shape" :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    66. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by beh · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying Facebook is useless - it just isn't the tool for me.

      I get updates from friends, but I prefer to have them face to face, say, over dinner - which seems to become a bit of a lost art for many. Just look around, even sometimes you see groups of people sitting together in pubs, and there faces still glued to their smartphones only. That's what I would call wasted opportunities.

      And I finding out about interesting people? Was that really something new? Either way, I seem to find out about them with or without facebook.

      Free VoIP features - nice - I've got that with my phone (flat rate)... Yes, for that I pay, but I'm free of advertising - which I value more. (Even here on slashdot, for a while there was an option to just pay for ad-free pages - sounded great to me, and I happily paid some money to slashdot to have ads suppressed -- yes, an ad-blocker would achieve the same, but I do see that even slashdot might occasionally need to make some money)...

      Messaging? Ever heard of email? Sounds fairly easy - no ads on my mailhost either.

      Stupid casual online games? Sorry -

      Seriously - congrats to you, if facebook is the tool for you. It isn't for me.
      And I trust that you will not engage in too many new products / services for extended periods if you don't see them fulfilling any needs for you - you just wouldn't have the time for facebook any more.

      I've tried lots of services on the Internet - but I also stop using services and deleting my accounts, if I don't see the point of them for _me_.

    67. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by rhazz · · Score: 1

      So, what about "healthy" sized people that are smoking, vaping, dipping, are doing something risky and dangerous with their life that could also be teaching people it's ok to partake in these dangerous and potentially fatal activities?

      In many countries it is illegal for a cigarette ad to depict a person smoking, because of that exactly. Does it work? Hard to attribute it to a single thing, but there has certainly been a significant reduction in the number of smokers over the last generation.

    68. Re:How nice of Facebook to take time out of... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah I agree that all of these things can somewhat be done but:

      And I finding out about interesting people? Was that really something new?

      It's hard enough sending postcards to relatives at Christmas, a social news feed is trivial and can allow you to keep up with people easily. This doesn't need to be Facebook, but for the people I know it (for better or worse) IS Facebook.

      Free VoIP features - nice - I've got that with my phone (flat rate)

      I don't. And that's kind of the problem. Phone call rates differ around the world, as do the services that are provided. My work has provided me a nice phone and a relaxed agreement to do what I want with it. My mother, less so. When she's travelling in Europe she has the option of jumping into an internet cafe and being provided with a free VoIP service bundled within Facebook. There are other services available ... but I'll get to that.

      Messaging? Ever heard of email?

      I have. It's a nightmare for short messaging, and email in many social circles is dead, and in many cases was never a non-starter. Facebook messaging is more like and is displacing the common SMS, with a neat interface and the easy ability to transfer data too. Two people don't stand at taxi stands emailing their friends asking where they are. They never have even back when email was the only internet based option. Following large conversations is also quite a bit easier through social services, especially ones that track to see if you've seen something or not. I send you an email wondering why you're not at the club yet and I get nothing. is the email in your spam filter? Did it get blackhole routed? Did you drop your phone in the sink? Are you ignoring it? Who knows.

      Stupid casual online games? Sorry -

      Don't be sorry, grab a baseball and come join me. This is Facebook's equivalent of people letting their dog shit on the sidewalk. The world would be better without it.

      And I trust that you will not engage in too many new products / services for extended periods if you don't see them fulfilling any needs for you - you just wouldn't have the time for facebook any more.

      I've tried lots of services on the Internet - but I also stop using services and deleting my accounts, if I don't see the point of them for _me_.

      And that's kind of the crux of why a lot of people use Facebook. It does a LOT. It's the master of none, but for most people near enough is good enough which is why I'm back to the VoIP comment. I don't look or seek VoIP as a package on my phone, because ... Facebook does it, and I have it for other reasons. If the cost of this is targeted advertising then all I can say is "cameras". Now hopefully I'll at least get some relevant adverts.

  2. Cushion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The more cush'n, the better the push'n.

    1. Re:Cushion by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There's a limit. If you need flour to find the wet spot, it's... OMG, don't try to imagine this!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Cushion by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      When you can't find the naughty bits, there is way too much cushion.

    3. Re:Cushion by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      The limit is when the wet spot is basically any part of the body.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Cushion by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Only if they move.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Cushion by countach · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't have a problem finding the tits.

  3. Re: I doubt it was innocent mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We found the fatty boys. Let's all point and laugh.

  4. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > For some reason there's a huge number of people who absolutely hate on people who are fat.

    No, there's a huge number of people who hate on people who are fat that say it's perfectly healthy to be fat.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  5. how is this news for nerds? or stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This doesn't matter to me as a nerd.

  6. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    There was also policy not to show too much skimpy attire in advertisements, meant to block your typical Budweiser beach bikini ads (drink our beer and these girls might talk to you!). Facebook should have just stuck with that reasoning from the start, or maybe say "our robot filters were confused by the skin to bathing suit ratio" here.

  7. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by sanosuke001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They didn't make a mistake; Tess Holliday is obese and tells everyone that its okay. It's not okay, its unhealthy (I know, I'm the same way and know I need to get in shape; I'm not trying to by a hypocrite) it is hard to get back in shape and I don't blame her for being fat but I do blame her and her kind for perpetuating the "healthy at any weight" bullshit on the internet. She's not fat, she's obese; she's unhealthy and allowing her to tell people that it's okay is not okay. I know it's not okay for me to be obese, either, but I'm not telling people that it is.

    Facebook, for once, did the right thing the first time; she shouldn't be allowed in an ad just like anorexic models shouldn't be either. Reversing their decision was the mistake.

    --
    -SaNo
  8. internet scandal of the week by known_coward_69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    99% of us don't care

    1. Re:internet scandal of the week by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      99% of us don't care

      Ironically also the top trending and most commented on article on Slashdot today.

  9. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

    Everyone has the ability to eat less. It literally requires no effort. People who are fat, just like everyone in this world, do not have the right to have people like them. That's not a thing. It's not "life, liberty and happiness." You have to achieve that last one on your own.

    --
    Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  10. Not just 'unhealthy' bodies. by Robadob · · Score: 1

    They also recently rejected a sponsored post by a powerlifter because it contained a tape measure as it might "invoke a negative reaction from viewers". http://imgur.com/APsVNp7

  11. Re:Good riddance! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    It's an advert for body positivism, the idea that health is more important than a certain body shape or weight. I'm not sure I with it completely, but the image is suitable.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. Repulsive is still Repulsive regardless of "spin" by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    I don't care whether it is in any compliance of any guidelines - an overweight woman wearing a bikini is repulsive, no matter what "plus size" spin the "unapologetically feminist" organization puts on it.

    Anybody can dispute otherwise, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So sue me.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  13. Re:Good riddance! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    It is more a political or social message. Are those allowed?

    Not all ads are about cars and hamburgers.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  14. Dating site ads.... by Bugler412 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the dating site ads that people are inundated with on the site with breasts photoshopped up to about 200% actual size with gravity defying physics are perfectly OK

    1. Re:Dating site ads.... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with photo shopped breasts to 200% of their size.
      I prefer small breasts, as long as fat ladies don't shrink their breasts to get my attention, all is fine.

      How a society became so ill that woman think breasts so big that you get spine issues are a "good thing" or sexy or beautiful is beyond me.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Dating site ads.... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      There's a basic difference between X is good (and if you are ~X, by implication you suck) and ~X is bad, and if you are ~X, fuck you.

      I think it's fine to say that ads shouldn't show fat people and advertise weight loss products. Whereas, dating sites (and many others) obviously use sex to sell.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Dating site ads.... by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      How a society became so ill that woman think breasts so big that you get spine issues are a "good thing" or sexy or beautiful is beyond me.

      It's called sexual dimorphism. Why do you think "society" has anything to do with it?

    4. Re:Dating site ads.... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Because breast implants and the desire for big breasts only are a big issue in certain countries.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Dating site ads.... by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Sexual animals frequently evolve exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics (peacock? Plenty of primate examples, etc). Butts and breasts are the two most common exaggerated traits in humans. My point is not that all humans find the exact same traits attractive but rather that it's programmed into us to be drawn towards these exaggerated traits.

      I heard an interesting talk the other day in which the speaker speculated that human males get aroused watching other people have sex because, evolutionarily, men who are ready to spring into action after another male are more likely to procreate successfully. (The physical structure of the penis seeming to be especially good at scooping semen out.)

    6. Re:Dating site ads.... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What people find "sexy" is mostly culture.

      The genes are only a very little part. We are minimum 40,000 years after the time where only genes defined what we are doing.

      men who are ready to spring into action after another male are more likely to procreate successfully.
      Which is biologically wrong, as the semen of the first one is killing the semen of the following ones. Humans have three kinds of sperms, sperms that fertilize the egg, sperms that build a cocoon like buffer in front of the womb to prevent "enemy sperms" to get in and killer sperms that actively hunt "enemy sperms".

      And: speculated that human males get aroused watching other people have sex the same is true for women.

      Getting aroused like that much more likely leads to orgies in a tribe like society where everyone has sex with his/her spouse when some one started it.

      Even amoung apes "rape" is "illegal" and punished by the elders.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Dating site ads.... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Advertisements for weight loss products shouldn't show people for whom the product is developed?

      Advertisements for weight loss products should sell the benefits of their products to people who want to lose wait. They shouldn't try to increase demand by making people feel shitty unless they conform to a stereotype. This is different from teh car, where they are selling... a car. A weightloss product with a picture of a model is promising "you get to look like this" whereas they cannot even promise you will lose weight.

      Advertiser caused anxiety/body issues have caused a lot of problems in the past, redefining beauty standards for corporate profit. The world would have been better off without them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:Dating site ads.... by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      What people find "sexy" is mostly culture.

      As I said before, it's not that different societies can have different ideals of beauty or "sexiness", it's that what is "sexy" is almost always exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics. That's what's programmed into us. Interest in phalluses, pudenda, butts, and breasts, is pretty much universal. (Straight male primates are interested in other males' penises too, FWIW.)

      No, interest in breasts is not a uniquely western thing (see Kama Sutra, see ancient Chinese figurines and art, medieval Persian art, etc.), for the obvious reason that stimulation of breasts produces an erotic response.

      Amongst humans, breast size, penis size, and butt size have all been sexuality selected for. That's evolution for you.

      Which is biologically wrong, as the semen of the first one is killing the semen of the following ones. Humans have three kinds of sperms, sperms that fertilize the egg, sperms that build a cocoon like buffer in front of the womb to prevent "enemy sperms" to get in and killer sperms that actively hunt "enemy sperms".

      Thus the belief that the "shovel" shape of the human penis is design to scoop out the previously present semen. See, e.g., http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/02/penis-shape-explanation_n_1642613.html

      Getting aroused like that much more likely leads to orgies in a tribe like society where everyone has sex with his/her spouse when some one started it.

      Interesting, I've never read that speculation (well, other than in Clan of the Cave Bears--the sequels at least) nor read about any precedent in any extant human societies. Could be logical. Give the above belief about the physical structure of the penis, I would still be more inclined to go with the "ready for action" theory.

    9. Re:Dating site ads.... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Luckily in most nations I hang around we prefer quality over quantity :D

      So a very nice looking (that includes small) female breast is much more honoured than a big one :D

      The penis shape explanation is imho bogus, but well ... mine works fine so I don't care.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  15. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They didn't make a mistake; Tess Holliday is obese and tells everyone that its okay. It's not okay, its unhealthy (I know, I'm the same way and know I need to get in shape; I'm not trying to by a hypocrite) it is hard to get back in shape and I don't blame her for being fat but I do blame her and her kind for perpetuating the "healthy at any weight" bullshit on the internet. She's not fat, she's obese; she's unhealthy and allowing her to tell people that it's okay is not okay. I know it's not okay for me to be obese, either, but I'm not telling people that it is.

    My kingdom for mod points. I'm the same btw. BMI > 38, BP of 170/110 and cholesterol levels through the roof. It's unhealthy, period.

    I'm an ugly, fat, middle-aged man, and I know it. And for that reason I don't shower in the gym. Not because I feel ashamed, but because I don't want to make anyone suffer by looking at my plump ugly fat ass.

  16. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or, spend a year WWOOFING. (www.wwoof.net). You work on a farm, in exchange for food from the farm, and a place to stay. A lot cheaper than a gym membership, and a lot more effective. And a lot more fun.

    The excuses that "I can't lose weight because of my genes" or "I can't lose weight because I can't afford a gym membership", are complete bullshit. If you go work on a farm for a whole year, and only eat food from that farm, i.e. no processed junk food, you WILL lose weight, and become strong and muscular, guaranteed.

  17. Facebook vs. Feminists by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a bit like a reverse Alien vs. Predator.

    Whoever loses
    We win

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Facebook vs. Feminists by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You needn't be misogynist to understand that the whole mess has gone out of proportion. Any form of criticism is verboten, no matter how justified.

      You don't have to look any further than the Ghostbusters trailer. A trailer that has been panned by critics left and right, nearly all of them explaining exactly WHY it is a train wreck. The FX look like something you'd expect from straight-to-TV movies, the characters are uninteresting and one-dimensional, the presentation uninspired and to top it all off, the only black lead character comes across like a racist stereotype.

      But that's not allowed. It's a movie with 4 female lead characters so if you dare to not like it, you must hate women. It can't be that the movie is shit.

      It's Kirk Cameron's Saving Chrsitmas all over. It can't be that it's BORING as fuck to watch two guys yak in a car for an hour, no, you must hate Christianity if you don't like that movie!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Facebook vs. Feminists by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You still expect someone to win. That's not going to happen. Who should win? And most of all, how? The only thing that could happen, and most likely will, is that Facebook will issue a token "whoopsie, sorry" message and that's it. Nobody wins, nobody loses, but at least both are occupied for a while.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    No, there's a huge number of people who hate on people who are fat that say it's perfectly healthy to be fat.

    Self-righteous fitness nuts who think they can lecture people on how to eat and diet.

  19. Quickie Mart by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Facebook is like a convenience store. You go there for specific and fairly basic reasons: share photos with families and friends, let them know what's going on in your life, message each other and arrange get togethers...probably 90% of what a person does on Facebook.

    But, like a convenience store, the places is polluted with hundreds of items you have no interest in and would never buy or use. And if you did actually want any of it, you sure as hell wouldn't get it from a convenience store....or Facebook.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  20. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by SumDog · · Score: 2

    Exactly. Plus I find it really funny her photo is totally airbrushed.

  21. Let's be honest. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Many of the +sized model are really ++++++++++++++++sized.
    They managed to fuck up the pirelli calendar with that. :D

    1. Re:Let's be honest. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and then i actually looked at the picture on TFA. 10*plus size indeed.

    2. Re:Let's be honest. by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Many of the +sized model are really ++++++++++++++++sized.
      They managed to fuck up the pirelli calendar with that. :D

      But it works great for Michelin.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:Let's be honest. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      I guess Bibendum are the exception. :)

  22. Is this really healthy? by diakka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll bet that nobody would kick up much of a fuss if they decided to ban a photo of an anorexic model. Tess Holiday, being morbidly obese, obviously suffers from disordered eating due to a food addiction, yet is paraded around as some kind of paragon of moral virtue, while pictures of women with anorexia would be censored for being harmful to little girls. But seriously, do you think that presenting a morbidly obese woman as a socially acceptable norm sends girls a message about body image that is any less harmful?

    --
    -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
    1. Re:Is this really healthy? by skipkent · · Score: 1

      According to the SJW crowd. losing weight makes you fatphobic: http://i.imgur.com/0v0bHs0.png
      And if you're able to stand on your own then you are as healthy as anyone else: http://i.imgur.com/URsVifV.jpg

    2. Re:Is this really healthy? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a complex topic (I keep saying that about things...).

      There's a fairly-curvy model out there who did a bunch of ads pushing back on fat shaming, claiming she's proud to be fat. SHE'S HAWT. Seriously. She has firm abs. She's got larger, padded, but firm thighs. She has a narrow waist, broad hips, and an overall-feminine form. She is the depiction of beauty in old Greek art. This is not a fat chick.

      That should tell you something about this whole political wargarble.

      People are going out with 600-pound land whales shaped like miniature cattle and claiming they're healthy and proud and there's nothing wrong with them. Bullshit. They're morbidly obese. "Morbidly" does not mean "I disagree with this because it hurts my little feelings"; it means "you are exposed to severe health problems."

      Fat people are unhealthy. The additional belly fat causes more heart burn, leading to esophageal cancer and bad teeth (and halitosis). They're more at-risk for diabeetus. Their hearts have to work harder, but aren't equipped to work harder--larger, more buff people have made more work for their hearts while making their hearts stronger--and so are more prone to failure. Their metabolism isn't burning all the crap away, so their blood cholesterol is more likely to clot and get stuck in odd places (coronary arteries, cranial arteries, etc., heart attacks and strokes are bad). They also smell bad--we can put smokers on that list, too.

      That's what "morbidly obese" is: you're fat to the point of serious damage to yourself.

      On top of all that, what makes a good body image is not what you think about your body; it's what society thinks about it. What *we* find attractive is what *is* attractive. There's fat-chick dudes who go riding the hog, and that's their business, and you and them can get along just fine; but when 98% of all dudes are telling you you're way too fat and not attractive, that means you're way too fat and not attractive. It's the same as if I started insisting all girls are supposed to want to have sex with me because I'm pantie-melting hot--I can keep saying it, but it's not gonna get any more true unless I start doing some serious push-ups. Stick with your fat fetish man and stop telling us all what we're supposed to think about it.

    3. Re:Is this really healthy? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      The SJW crowd are a never ending source of comedy. I liked the recent one about huffpo's all woman editorial meeting. Comedy gold.

    4. Re:Is this really healthy? by skipkent · · Score: 1

      "According to the SJW crowd. losing weight makes you fatphobic"

      Not to mention you have to be careful now if you post a photo of yourself getting fit and skinny quickly after giving birth. That also means you hate fat people and are pressuring them to lose weight.

      Taking the "fat phobia" further, it's getting to the point where if a man chooses a skinny woman over a fat one, he must hate fat people. People need to be "trained" to find fat women more attractive because they have been "trained" to think otherwise and must be wrong. If you don't date someone overweight there is a problem with you.

      There are actually services for women to rate doctors that don't harp people to lose weight when they are obese. It's pure insanity when a doctor can't express concern over someones well being because it may trigger them.

    5. Re:Is this really healthy? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's an odd twist. It's true that doctors blame everything on weight if you're overweight. No chance for an accurate diagnosis when there's low-hanging fruit to jump at. But that's another thing entirely from avoiding a doctor who might suggest there's some benefit and that there are fewer health problems with being lighter.

    6. Re:Is this really healthy? by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      You've made an extensive presentation about how her life choices are unhealthy. True, that it is a matter of choice is extremely scientifically debatable, but let's roll with it.

      Please add in the part explaining how her health is your business.

      Because they are claiming it is healthy. Since that is the claim, that makes it the subject for the discussion.

    7. Re:Is this really healthy? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite :
      http://trendmodels.es/fine-bau...

    8. Re:Is this really healthy? by tgv · · Score: 1

      They're just pandering to their users: lazy, middle-aged women with died hair. And they are doing their best to keep them sitting on the sofa in a onesie, clicking their bloody ads.

    9. Re:Is this really healthy? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      While there are actually men who want women with a fairly ... let's say if they were to be represented by an Euclid body it would be a sphere... body, I still have to find the woman who goes after the lardo look.

      So who needs training here, eh?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Is this really healthy? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      There's a fairly-curvy model out there who did a bunch of ads pushing back on fat shaming, claiming she's proud to be fat. SHE'S HAWT.

      Pics or she doesn't exist. Or her name.

    11. Re:Is this really healthy? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Iskra Lawrence.

    12. Re:Is this really healthy? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Yumyumyum.

    13. Re:Is this really healthy? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between harping on someone and expressing concern. No doctor has been harping on me to lose weight, but I've been informed that losing some would be a good thing for me to do.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    14. Re:Is this really healthy? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      No doctor has been harping on me to lose weight, but I've been informed that losing some would be a good thing for me to do.

      I went to a doctor many years ago because my allergies were very bad. The doctor, ex-military, told me three time that I was fat. I asked him what does being fat has to do with my allergies. He kicked me out of his office.

  23. Screw Tess Holiday, she's a scammer by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 4, Interesting
    She has scammed her supporters numerous times the below text was taken from this link, to see the image gallery from the Reddit chain click here.

    There's no doubt in my mind that you all know who Tess Holliday is. Founder of "Eff your beauty standards", plus size model, (apparent) body positivity icon.. oh, and scam artist! In November 2014 hundreds of her loyal fans purchased shirts with her "EYBS" branding emblazoned on them,also under the impression that a portion of the proceeds would be donated to a Domestic Violence charity (many fans have said that the reason they were able to justify spending $40 on a shirt is that they were glad that some of the money would to go a DV charity). Not only did hundreds of fans NEVER receive their shirts/merchandise, but not a single cent went to charity. Fans asked Holliday why they hadn't received their items yet via Facebook, Instagram and Twitter, only to be blocked by her (Tess herself has admitted that she is in control of all of her social media accounts).

    After several attemps by many disappointed fans, the Facebook group "Eff your Customer Service" began. With now 450 members, Holliday could no longer ignore the fans who had rallied against her.

    The clothing company Redress took on Holliday's EYBS merchandising responsibilities, and tried their best to reimburse customers.

    Still, many were disappointed that none of the proceeds from their purchases were going to the DV charity as they had been lead to believe. Holliday claims that the reason for this is because EYBS operated at a loss, despite doing their own packing, advertising and selling shirts at $40 each. Fans asked her why she couldn't just donate some of her own fortune to the charity to write her wrongs, however no comment was made. Holliday (whose real name is Ryann Maegan) claims to earn 6 figures, and her constant updates on her expensive lifestyle understandably angered fans who were left with no refund, no shirt, and no DV charity contribution.

    Of course, making donations to things like Amber Rose's Slutwalk is no problem!

    Holliday's scamming/thievery goes even further, as this image suggests. The identity of the person who made this comment is protected, as this Facebook group was a secret group where people could talk about their experiences with her without facing scrutiny from Holliday and her friends, who are constantly harassing anybody who speaks out about her.

    Holliday is also known as a horrible person to work with. Despite claiming to be against traditional beauty standards and standing up for body positivity, many photographers who have worked with her in the past have said that they will never choose to work with her again.

    Additionally, the plus size clothing company Torrid have severed ties with Holliday for a number of reasons.

    In a Buzzfeed video, Holliday is seen claiming to be a size 22, while complaining about the fit of a pair of size 28 Torrid shorts, despite having modelled for them in the past.

    Lastly, Holliday's general stalking-behaviour of people speaking out about her says a lot about what kind of person she is. She knows she's doing wrong, and she knows that people can tear her down if they need to.

    tl;dr, Don't hate Tess Holliday because she's fat, hate her because she's a scam artist, liar, and generally a bad person.

    Her response to this? Blame everyone but herself in the press like here in People magazine, the comments sections are particularly informative about the fact that not everything has been addressed. Any group associated with this person is enabling a scam artist.

    1. Re:Screw Tess Holiday, she's a scammer by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any group associated with this person is enabling a scam artist.

      Criticizing her in public forum is almost impossible. She is a) feminist b) plus sized person c) public advocate. No matter what she does to you, just preemptively apologize and hopefully SJW lynch mob won't completely ruin your life.

  24. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Shortguy881 · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, there's a huge number of people who hate on people who are fat that say it's perfectly healthy to be fat.

    Self-righteous fitness nuts who think they can lecture people on how to eat and diet.

    Self-loathing fat person who lacks self control...

    --
    Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  25. Re:Repulsive is still Repulsive regardless of "spi by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    And nowhere near as repulsive as the coward hiding behind the AC.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  26. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's an advert for body positivism, the idea that health is more important than a certain body shape or weight

    Which is complete bullshit. Obesity is not healthy. They are complete opposites.

  27. Dangerouse Road for FaceSpace by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    Basically they have just admitted their policy is meaningless. They will bend and twist the language as needed when political pressure is applied.

    They are essentially giving up the curating and running of their own site, its mob rules now.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  28. Please help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just want to be clear about what is being discussed here:

    1) The feminist group wants to show photos of half-naked obese women because it helps to "destroy" the concept of the perfect body?

    (Already, I'm completely lost. How does this work exactly? Men see a fat woman in a bikini, and start to get turned on -- thereby changing the standards of beauty? Would that work with other images too?)

    2) The feminist group wants men to stop "objectifying women" physically, so they are using a photograph of a fat woman in a bikini to help us stop thinking about women ... in terms of their physical bodies.

    (Swoooooooosh!...that was some kind of feminist logic doing a low-altitude fly-by somewhere near my head)

    1. Re: Please help me understand by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point comes off to me as being that some people aren't happy with the fact that most males have their own ideas about what is attractive to them (which sometimes includes other males while excluding all females) and that often means no attractiveness to certain body types, of which being grossly overweight often falls out of bounds (which if you consider evolution, that actually does make sense.)

      I don't think it is right or wrong for anybody to have a particular thing that they're attractive to and thus want to prefer it, rather, it just is, and that's life. However I do think it is wrong for people to shame other people for not wanting a relationship with a certain segment of the population. For example, if you're white and you don't want to ever date a black person, that is perfectly acceptable.

    2. Re:Please help me understand by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's like how I try to convince women that a being a fat, alcoholic slob is attractive by posting pictures of myself passed out naked on the street.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Please help me understand by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What amazes me is, on Tinder, how many women have photos of themselves holding an alcoholic drink. They're not passed out naked (yet), but there's definitely a huge culture of alcohol consumption here. I'm not a teetotaler either, but when you post photos of yourself on a dating site, the idea is to 1) show what you look like, and 2) show yourself doing something that other people would like to do with you. So of course you see people posting photos of themselves at exotic locations, because even though Macchu Picchu is cliché now, who doesn't want to travel the world if they can afford it? But when you post a bunch of photos of yourself at the bar, that makes it look like you're an alcoholic who just spends all their time at the bar instead of doing something more interesting.

    4. Re:Please help me understand by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Warcraft 3, dryad unit, line after being clicked a bunch:

      Want to hear my human call? said in Valley Girl voice "I'm so wasted--I'm sooo wasted!"

    5. Re: Please help me understand by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not about individual's preferences.

      Here's a tip though. The novelty of having a magazine body wears off quickly. And it doesn't guarantee good sex either. It certainly doesn't correlate with a good personally or good relationship either. Once the lights are off, once you get into doing things together... there are more important things.

      Also, there is something wrong with not ever wanting to date a black person. What possible reason could there be other than racism? Black people have all body types, all personality types... if it's just skin colour, that's terrible.

      That might be the way you want things to be, but our biology doesn't work that way. Believe it or not, it is completely impossible for a male to control whether or not he has an erection and thus can even have intercourse. It truly is an involuntary function, much like your heartbeat. Sure, you can produce the circumstances that cause you to have an erection, just like you can run to cause your heart to beat faster, but it still remains out of your control. This is also why it's possible for a female to rape a male, triggering involuntary ejaculation. Similar biological processes determine what the male would rather have in a mate, and that can exclude any number of things, big or small, from hair color to personality.

      Likewise, it's not racist to have no attraction to somebody of the opposite race, just as it's not sexist for homosexuals to have no attraction to the opposite sex.

    6. Re: Please help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of non-racist reasons for not wanting to date people of a particular race. Simple lack of attraction, cultural differences, fear of disease (blacks for example are 44% of new HIV/AIDS cases per year despite being only 12% of the population as of 2014).

      My little sister (early 20's) recently had a (rather overweight) friend of hers try to put on the moves and she rejected his advances. He started harassing her online and offline posting about how she's biased against fat people because he's such a perfect guy and if she's not biased against fat people he should be dating her. In reality she's always seen him as a friend and she's crushing on some other guy right now so he hasn't got a chance.

      Realistically people are going to date whoever they're attracted to, don't be the fat stalker kid and think that people are being biased against *you*. Move on.

    7. Re: Please help me understand by William+Baric · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wish I could be like you and control my ejaculation through thought alone. That way, instead of having to watch porn and waste 5 minutes masturbating, I could just think about it and tada! Instant orgasm!

      When I think about all the money I spent, all the time I wasted, and all the shit I had to do simply to have sex... I sincerely envy you.

    8. Re: Please help me understand by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Even if you orgasm with thought alone, you're creating the circumstances that will trigger it; thought alone can make your heart beat faster as well. However you can't just orgasm on demand, and if you could have an erection on demand, then nobody would ever buy Viagra.

      And no, attractiveness or lack thereof isn't ever racist. I found myself less attracted to this girl I knew who changed her hair to blonde, and I don't have anything against blonde, I'm just not as attracted to it. And guess what? That's very common. Skin color is much more noticeable than hair color, so it makes sense that somebody would feel that way. And believe it or not, humans have a natural biological preference to associate with people who look more like themselves, which includes relationships.

    9. Re: Please help me understand by Petfish · · Score: 1

      Likewise, it's not racist to have no attraction to somebody of the opposite race, just as it's not sexist for homosexuals to have no attraction to the opposite sex.

      There is an opposite race?

    10. Re: Please help me understand by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      There is an opposite race?

      Strictly within the context of the conversation, only two were mentioned, so yes.

    11. Re: Please help me understand by righteousness · · Score: 1

      There is an opposite race?

      Strictly within the context of the conversation, only two were mentioned, so yes.

      Err, no. I see people talking about black skin and light skin in the conversation. That's skin colour, not race. You do know that there's more than one race with black skin, don't you? Just like there's more than one race with light skin.

      --
      Don't fornicate. Seriously, just don't do it.
    12. Re: Please help me understand by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish I could be like you and control my ejaculation through thought alone. That way, instead of having to watch porn and waste 5 minutes masturbating, I could just think about it and tada! Instant orgasm!

      The Internet has some pictures of fat chicks in bikinis if that would help.

    13. Re: Please help me understand by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Err, no. I see people talking about black skin and light skin in the conversation. That's skin colour, not race. You do know that there's more than one race with black skin, don't you? Just like there's more than one race with light skin.

      Well if you want to be a dick and split hairs over semantics then you're wrong because humans are just one race.

    14. Re: Please help me understand by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Not being into the person you're with is a definite problem. The stresses of normal life are easier to tolerate when you don't have a deep seated but suppressed revulsion for who you are with. A certain contingent likes to pretend that it's "enlightened" to ignore you inner animal but it's really just unnatural and stupid.

      And again we come back to the liberal inclination to engage in the very sort of oppression they claim is wrong. People are free to believe in what they want and make their own choices. That's what makes a country free, rather than a fascist police state.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    15. Re: Please help me understand by diakka · · Score: 1

      I think you should marry an overweight black single mother in her 40s with a charming personality to set a good example and show the world just how just and not racist you are.

      For me, I stay in shape because that is a habit I have been able to forge due to my perseverance and quality of character. When I choose a woman to be with, I will choose a woman who represents similar values, one of which is not being a lazy entitled fat slob who thinks they are entitled to a partner who is not fat, lazy or entitled.

      Sure, tolerance for the flaws of others is important in a relationship, but if you're unable to maintain a functional relationship with anyone, then it's probably because you had more tolerance for your own flaws than the flaws of your potential dating partners.

      --
      -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
    16. Re: Please help me understand by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, it is completely impossible for a male to control whether or not he has an erection and thus can even have intercourse. It truly is an involuntary function, much like your heartbeat.

      I'm a man, and I can control whether I want to have an erection just fine, which puts a bit of a dent in your claim, I think. I suppose it is a comfortable excuse for not trying to control you behaviour, claiming that you have "no control", but that is all it is. I think the truth is that it is all too easy to persuade some men that they want to have sex - but somewhere along the line, there is a voluntary act: you accept that you want to.

    17. Re: Please help me understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Also, there is something wrong with not ever wanting to date a black person. What possible reason could there be other than racism? Black people have all body types, all personality types... if it's just skin colour, that's terrible.

      I'd say it becomes racism when you start telling other people not to date a (whatever colour) person. If you don't want to personally for whatever reason then that's just you.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    18. Re: Please help me understand by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think it depends what "whatever reason" is. While it might be fairly harmless by itself, it still fits the definition of racism for most possible reasons. I'm open to suggestions for non-racist ones though.

      Having said that, this argument is largely irrelevant, since people who really would never date someone from a certain race tend not to keep their opinions to themselves.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Please help me understand by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      because women's breasts are fetishized in western society. That's not a natural thing, there are societies where it isn't the case.

      Can you name one large scale non-western society that doesn't? Western cultures are over-all the most open about topless women but that doesn't mean it is not sexual. Women's breast are a sexual signifier; trying to deny it doesn't make it stop being so. Clothes in general are "not natural" but somehow I doubt you're advocating men should be running around with their wangs out.

    20. Re: Please help me understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Having said that, this argument is largely irrelevant, since people who really would never date someone from a certain race tend not to keep their opinions to themselves.

      Good point, well made.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    21. Re: Please help me understand by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      No, you only think you can, but in reality you can't. That entire function is part of your autonomic nervous system.

    22. Re:Please help me understand by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's just an indication of how far western, really Victorian/Christian prudishness has spread. For example, 150 years ago it was normal for men and women to bathe together at public baths. Then they decided to "modernize" by adopting some western habits, like wearing suits and segregating genders when nudity is involved.

      Parts of southern Europe are better, where toplessness on beaches is normal and not controversial. South America too, despite there being quite a lot of Christians is less bothered by breasts. And once you get into the Amazon or to more remote African tribes, no-one cares except for the missionaries.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re: Please help me understand by egatok · · Score: 1

      racÂism/ËrÄËOEsizÉ(TM)m/ noun the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races. pretty sure that you're using the wrong word here because attraction isn't tied with racism however similar it may sound. if they had said, that "being Black is bad for human genetics" or that they "could not stand to have to drink at the same water fountain"... that's racist.

    24. Re:Please help me understand by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      So no, you can't name any large scale non-western societies. Why didn't you just say that?

      And once you get into the Amazon or to more remote African tribes, no-one cares except for the missionaries.

      So you agree that men should let their knobs fly free? Women's breasts are sexual. You can only argue otherwise from complete ignorance. And it would seem that large societies tend to prefer people to cover up their sexual organs under most circumstances. The why on that would be an interesting discussion. It likely has to do with reducing competition and increasing cohesion because of that blah blah blah. That preference existing is, however, a fact. And it is not something uniquely from the West unless you count pretty much anything east of Europe to be the West. But then you'd just be an idiot.

    25. Re:Please help me understand by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What is the sorority girl mating call? I'm soooo drunk.

      What is the big fat sorority girl mating call? I SAID I WAS DRUNK!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    26. Re: Please help me understand by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      if you could have an erection on demand, then nobody would ever buy Viagra.

      You seem to be starting with the fact that a bodily function can be disabled by various medical conditions, and concluding that said bodily function is involuntary. I know a guy who can't wiggle all his toes (nerve damage during cancer surgery); does that mean that toe-wiggling is an involuntary function?

      In fact, lots of guys can get an erection by thinking appropriate (inappropriate?) thoughts, and can think other things to lose one.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re: Please help me understand by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      The way you "control" your erection is to think sexy thoughts or think unsexy thoughts (and good luck trying to do the latter if Scarlett Johansson is in front of you). You're not directly controlling it; as the GP says you're indirectly controlling it.

    28. Re:Please help me understand by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Personally I wouldn't be bothered by seeing a guy's dick, but I think there is a difference. Women's breasts have utility, such as feeding children, that most people seem to agree should be available in public spaces. For sanitary reasons the same is not true of genitals.

      It's also a question of equality. You could rightly point it that men's chests are sexy, that buttocks are sexy, that legs are sexy, that hips are sexy... but for the most part the same standards apply to both genders, except for breasts.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:Please help me understand by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of cultures, past and present, that do not require covering the female breast. I'm not sure how large-scale they were or are. I'm also not familiar with all that many cultures.

      Boobs aren't inherently sexual. They're secondary sexual characteristics, but so is facial hair, and I was never asked to cover up my mustache when I had it (or told it was sexy, actually).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    30. Re:Please help me understand by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      It is almost as though there is a sexually dimorphic and evolutionary difference between male breats and female breasts. I wonder if anyone has ever looked into that?

    31. Re: Please help me understand by SirLordGodfrey · · Score: 1

      You know there are black people that say the same in regards to white people, or asians, or middle easterners...

      It's common for all ethnicities and races on the planet, but if you spend a lot of time around people that are not like you, that can change over time.

      It's a similar thing for when someone says "all X people look the same to me" - it is because they haven't spent much time living around or interacting with people of that ethnicity/race.

      And not everyone gets the chance to live in a cosmopolitanistic society, though many more live in a multicultural one with enclaves of different groups of people living together and almost never interacting with people of other backgrounds.

      --
      "Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
    32. Re: Please help me understand by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You know there are black people that say the same in regards to white people, or asians, or middle easterners...

      You know black people can also be racist too, right?

      It's a similar thing for when someone says "all X people look the same to me" - it is because they haven't spent much time living around or interacting with people of that ethnicity/race.

      Sure, that's a thing, but it doesn't excuse "I would never ever date an person".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Please help me understand by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Beards and breasts are not the same despite sharing many common letters- got it. More seriously: just because two things are both secondary sexual characteristics does not mean they are the same in any other aspect. If many to most large cultures consider something sexual there is likely a reason for it.

    34. Re:Please help me understand by countach · · Score: 1

      There was a study which showed that women who tick the box of being drinkers or big drinkers get a massive amount more contacts than other women. I guess the guys are looking for a woman who will drink and put out (or pass out?), so the women cater for the demand.

    35. Re:Please help me understand by countach · · Score: 1

      So next time a man cat calls a woman saying "show us your tits", he should be praised as a feminist who is merely trying to de-fetishize the female form by making us accustomed to open displays of breasts.

      Nice!

    36. Re: Please help me understand by jandersen · · Score: 1

      The way you "control" your erection is to think sexy thoughts or think unsexy thoughts (and good luck trying to do the latter if Scarlett Johansson is in front of you). You're not directly controlling it; as the GP says you're indirectly controlling it.

      Well, where I come from, control is control: You make a conscious decision and cause something to happen. There is no sharp separation between 'conscious' and 'unconscious' - or between autonomic or somatic, for that matter. Even the functions under conscious control go through indirect routes, so it is only a matter of degree. And control is control, however indirect.

    37. Re: Please help me understand by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      " if it's just skin colour, that's terrible."

      Huh? How is it different than hair or eye color?

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    38. Re: Please help me understand by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      "it's possible to just not like anything but light skin, but in practice it's almost always just racism."

      Not true. I'm caucasian and mostly date black women, asians and latinas. I don't care much for white girls. Does that make me racist?

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    39. Re: Please help me understand by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There is some historical context difference I suppose, but those are pretty bad too. Saying "I'd never date someone with ginger hair" doesn't have quite the same historical context of mixed race marriages being illegal and shunned, but it's not exactly a ringing endorsement of your great personality and maturity that you can't see past it either. I mean, if you met someone who was great in every way except you didn't like their eye colour, you would be kinda crazy not to give them a try, right?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    40. Re: Please help me understand by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It depends on your reason for not liking white girls. If it's some white supremacy thing of treating non-whites as disposable sex objects while you wait for your pure, virgin white wife to come along then it's racist, but if it's just that you haven't met any you like yet but wouldn't be at all prejudiced if you did then it's not racist.

      Reasons and intent matter.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Please help me understand by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I'm not an anthropologist, so I can't speak to a lot of cultures, and I don't know whether covering something means it has to be sexual. I can find large cultures where it is or was bad for a woman to let her hair be seen in public, but I don't think that's inherently sexual.

      There have been a lot of cultures where bare breasts were fine, although I don't know how large they were or are. I don't know how strict the covering rules are over cultures, and I do know that some cultures are presented as having no bare boobs despite routinely baring them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    42. Re: Please help me understand by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Sure, even if I prefer some types, I wouldn't kick one out of bed because of eye or hair color...

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    43. Re: Please help me understand by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Wow. Kinda harsh, I like you :)

      I'm just not attracted as much to white women, but if I meet the right person I won't even care about skin color or hair color or anything else.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    44. Re: Please help me understand by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I don't care what video games think about the issue. The term "race" came about because in the 19th century, scientists believed that there was a big biological distinction between what they termed white, black, brown, yellow, and red people. I'll let you figure out which those correspond to. However modern science has found that to not be the case; there actually isn't a significant enough difference between us for different races to be called a subspecies (i.e. how a dog is a subspecies of a wolf.)

  29. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Self-loathing fat person who lacks self control.

    I'm a fat person who accepted being big and has control to limit my diet to 150 grams of carbs/1,500 calories per day. Will you change your prejudice or call me a liar?

  30. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by war4peace · · Score: 1

    You know, when you say "people who hate on people that are fat" you might be onto something there.
    Some psychologists say that there's some atavistic sense kicking in when we see people who are too thin or too fat. regarding "too fat", back when we were yet to invent writing, being fat was a sign of using up someone else's food resources (tribe's, community's, etc). Being fat meant there's too much food available to you while too little was available to all others.
    Likewise, "too thin" usually meant "sick" and people tend to isolate those who are unnaturally thin. As a 6.1 tall / 140 pounds heavy person, I encountered this behavior. Even doctors were trying to find what's "wrong" with me (turned out it's genetic, my father was thinner than me, my grandfather was like a walking stick).

    So yes, there are limits beyond which people are perceived as abnormal. I'm guessing the uncanny valley plays a role in this too.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  31. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by FuzzMaster · · Score: 2
    Shot:

    ... I no longer give a shit about what other people think.

    Chaser:

    ... few people are willing to risk their life to fat shame me in person.

  32. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    And biologists, medical researchers, and practitioners.

    I was born fat. Doctor told my mother that she would have twin girls (five pounds each), and got a ten-pound bowling ball of a boy. School officials ordered repeated rounds of blood tests in the 4th, 5th and 6th grades to figure out why I was so big. A principle tried to fat shame my parents by calling them in for a conference but was shocked to discover that they were skinnier than him.

  33. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by war4peace · · Score: 1

    Everyone has the ability to eat less. It literally requires no effort.

    And it could fuck up your life even worse.
    There are people who, if they eat less, will develop a whole series of diseases which, when turning chronic, would send them to the grave ASAP.
    On the other hand, those people while overweight, would not be sick and their state of being would not be unhealthy. Still, they shouldn't say "it's generally okay to be like me".

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  34. Why by aoism · · Score: 2

    Why is this 'news for nerds' ? It's SJW nonsense. Keep it on Tumblr please.

  35. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you completely sedentary? Because that's the only way a 1500 calorie diet could sustain your weight.
    Try moving your fat ass.

  36. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Vermonter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry, but unless you recently started your strict calorie limit of 1500 per day, or you are exceptionally short, or you have some bizarre medical condition, there is no way your are being honest. If you are overweight, it means you are eating more energy than you body needs, and so it stores the extra energy as fat. If, every day, you eat only what is required for your body to maintain a healthy weight, then your body will move towards that weight, whether you are underweight or overweight to begin with. I'm not trying to "body shame" you, or any of that crap. If you are fat and happy, then it's no skin off my back. But don't sit here and tell me you eat 1500 calories per day and you're still overweight. Dishonestly like that may convince someone who is unhappy being fat that "it's just the way their body is and they can't change it".

  37. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Spoken like a true fatty. I don't exercise, but I limit the amount I eat to less than elephantine portions every meal.

    You're making some YUGE assumptions there. My diet is 150 grams of carbs and 1,500 calories per day. I also walk 20 minutes per day and work out at the gym every weekend. Despite being 350 pounds, I'm doing a lot more than you are.

    I haven't known a single fatty fat that didn't eat a shit ton of fatty/sugary foods.

    I had skinny people accused me of trying to shame them because I eat less than they do at a restaurant. I only eat half a plate for that meal and then take the other half for a different meal.

  38. Slippery slope by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

    Would you want to see advertisements that included bikini girls with hairy moles, cleft palates, and lobster claw hands? How about one that's so fat she's starting to become one with the fabric of the sofa she's lived on for the past 3 years. Why not? You can be a quarter-tonner and still be healthy, all women are beautiful, right? At what point does Facebook get to state that they are not obligated to accept every ad, and some of these images are driving off more people than they're bringing in? They are a business, after all. This isn't fat shaming, or whatever the fuck guilt-laden term you want to call it, these are images people find to be unappealing and generally don't want to see. I'd rather watch that Sarah McLachlan commercial with the dogs than look at this woman in a bikini. I'm fine with her believing that she looks good, but a lot of us don't agree and don't want to see it. Nobody would want to see my hairy ass walking around in a bikini either, and I totally respect their wishes.

  39. So not being ok is reason to ban? by fuzzyf · · Score: 1

    So it's ok for anyone to ban/censor everything that is not ok? Really?

    1. Re:So not being ok is reason to ban? by fuzzyf · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention free speech.
      And the ad didn't state that this is a healthy individual.


      If they ban ads based on what is good for you, or anything that could be dangerous then the ad business would look very different.

  40. *sigh* Lucy Lawless *sigh* by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If she can't toss me over her shoulder and carry me away she's not big enough.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:*sigh* Lucy Lawless *sigh* by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      My friend got his picture taken with some UFC fighters when he went to see them fight and they were so tiny compared to him. Lucy is only like 5' 10".

    2. Re:*sigh* Lucy Lawless *sigh* by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Only? That's pretty big for a woman - slightly taller than me.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:*sigh* Lucy Lawless *sigh* by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I'm 5' 11" she might be able to carry me off but I'm certain I could bench press her with out breaking a sweat. I some how always end with women my height or taller.

  41. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by chipschap · · Score: 1

    or you have an actual medical condition

    You can't rule this out. My weight was fine until I went on a certain medication (Actos) that is known to cause weight gain in many people. I steadily gained a pound a month and couldn't stop it even with 60 minutes of good exercise 6 days a week and a diet that should have worked. After two years on Actos I looked like a small whale. I would NOT put my picture on Facebook, that's for sure.

    But I quit the Actos and weight is starting to drop.

    Overweight is not pretty and it's not healthy. Now, it would be hypocritical of me to criticize others for being overweight or for their appearance, and I don't and won't. But if this plus model is telling people that it's okay to be morbidly obese, that does no one a service.

  42. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    I'll call you a liar. Unless you're under 5' tall, 1500 calories a day will cause you to lose weight. Source: Me. Also a fatass who finds when I cut my intake to 1500 calories and sticks with it - regardless of carbs - I lose weight. It's like magic, you give your body less fuel and it burns its reserves to make up the difference needed to operate. Or are you saying you're somehow still fat despite cutting intake to a confirmed 1500 calories that you have maintained for a considerable time? If so, please contact the James Randi foundation as I am sure they have some sort of 1 million dollar prize for demonstrating your immunity to the laws of physics in a controlled environment.

  43. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    But don't sit here and tell me you eat 1500 calories per day and you're still overweight.

    When I did weight training and ate a 3,000-calorie per day diet, my weight went up to 400 pounds. I loved the muscle mass but finding 4XL shirts was a bitch. Now I'm going in the opposite direction (borderline 2XL/XL), I'm going in the opposite direction.

  44. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Facebook, for once, did the right thing the first time; she shouldn't be allowed in an ad just like anorexic models shouldn't be either. Reversing their decision was the mistake.

    Hold on there, Smokey. Facebook really shouldn't be in the business of curating advertisements. Do they want that kind of liability? Once they say they are, they become liable.

    Fat people buy clothing and fat people should be buying clothing that's modeled by fat people. That's just obvious - you can't get an idea about what something, like a swimsuit, is going to look like on you if you weigh twice as much as the model.

    It may be unhealthy, but it's reality. I can't find the victim here.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  45. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >I don't exercise, but I limit the amount I eat to less than elephantine portions every meal.

    Try limiting it to the point that you feel sick and have the urge to throw up, but can't because you've eaten nothing. And then repeat that or 1 or 2 years. Then get back to us that you call fatty fat about your success.

    You literally don't know what it's like to be overweight, because you've never been there. Or, if you have, it was for a few months. Find someone who has been overweight for 10+ years and ask them just how horrible the experience of losing weight was. Preferably, find someone who has also gone through quitting smoking cold turkey so you can get a comparison between the two. Hint: Quitting smoking cold turkey is much easier and far more pleasant.

    That isn't to say that being overweight is healthy. It isn't. But your advice is not only unwanted, but pointlessly hurtful. It's on the same level as telling a heroin addict to just stop using, immediately, forever, with no other support whatsoever. And then insulting them for not doing it or not being successful.

    If you don't understand this, that's fine, you've never been overweight and I hope to hell you never are. And being an ignorant asshole is totally your prerogative. But now you've been told what *you* are, perhaps you'd like to change it? I bet quitting being an asshole cold turkey is still easier.

  46. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    I replied to you upthread but have to post again seeing this. Again, please report to the James Randi foundation for testing and to claim your prize for breaking the laws of thermodynamics. Unless you're awake for 15-20 minutes a day and spend the rest of your time comatose, your basic metabolic burn rate will exceed 2500 calories per day sitting in a recliner and not moving. Either you're lying or you can't measure calories.

  47. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    For some reason there's a huge number of people who absolutely hate on people who are fat.

    I can't say I really ever cared in the past. But my wife has MS and in the last few years has not been able to get around on her own. So we finally got a handicapped tag so I can park closer to the stores for her. But half the time there are no handicapped spots because apparently being fat now qualifies. And then if the stores have motorized chairs, most of the time they are all taken by fat people. So yeah, it's pretty damn annoying. Especially since parking closer to the store and not walking isn't helping their situation.

    Not everyone has the ability to simply "work out and eat less" to lose weight. Sometimes there's medical or genetic reasons why it's difficult to go down in weight.

    True, but that is not the case in most situations. It's pretty damn obvious that it's not genetic when I see people riding around in the motorized chairs stuffing their face with cookies and chips and a soda the size of a beer keg.

    People should be able to feel good about themselves, not live in mental torture and anguish from the crazy people who spew hatred about some specific physical aspect of their body.

    People who are actually handicapped should be able to use services that are in place for them. But they can't because of people who CHOOSE to weight what they do.

  48. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

    Note the bolded part. It's important. Note that you can "pursue happiness" while overweight. or underweight. or normal weight. Whether you catch it is another question entirely....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  49. Re:Good riddance! by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

    It's an advert for body positivism, the idea that health is more important than a certain body shape or weight.

    It's not a boolean, it's a sliding scale. Health is more important when you're 5kg overweight. Weight is more important when you are (like the woman in the photo) close on to 70kg overweight.

    We don't allow advertisments to tell people that smoking is healthy. Why should we allow advertisments that tell people morbid obesity is healthy?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  50. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The New York Times had an article on the study of the 2009 Biggest Loser contestants who regain their original weight. Their metabolism slowed down from dieting (expected) but never recovered seven years later(unexpected). If they ate a normal diet for their height and weight, they still ate an extra 400 to 800 calories because their metabolism slowed down. It's almost as if their body wanted to regain the weight back.

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/02/health/biggest-loser-weight-loss.html

  51. Re:Good riddance! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    That's where I tend to agree with you. At some point extreme weight does start to become a health issue. But below that threshold, I tend to agree that it's better to be healthy than look like a photoshopped model (who is probably quite unhealthy).

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  52. Re:Good riddance! by tsqr · · Score: 1

    An advertisement is supposed to be appealing to people.

    No. An advertisement is supposed to make an impression on the observer. The deeper the impression, the more successful the advertisement. If the advertisement gets people to talk about it, as in your case, it's very successful.

  53. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    In other words, you're either lying (to us or yourself about how much you actually eat) or you have an actual medical condition to maintain a weight of 350 pounds on an actual dietary intake of 1500 calories per day.

    Unless I'm lifting weights to gain more muscle mass (400 pounds), I've always been 350 pounds as an adult. I've been on the 1,500 calorie diet for two months now. I've been getting comments from coworkers about how muscular (probably less rounded) I've become.

  54. I'm so sorry... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a free ride when you've already paid

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I'm so sorry... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It makes sense. You just bought a train/bus ticket, and you meet a friend at the station who's going to drive there.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  55. Re: I doubt it was innocent mistake by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    It's an addiction to sugar just like smoking is addiction to nicotine and alcoholism is addiction to alcohol and just like them it can be beaten. Pretending it's ok to be addicted to something is the same denial you get from smokers and drinkers. The difference is that there's no healthy at every black lung or cirrhosis acceptance movement.

  56. Re: Good riddance! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    A 350lb body does not promote any kind of health. It's just as bad as the 100lb starving ones.

  57. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Thanks for saving me the time of posting this.

    And I think it's because when you gain weight, you produce new fat cells. But when you lose weight, those fat cells empty out - but they are still there trying to store fat. Getting the proper metabolism back for your size depends a lot on how long you've been overweight.

  58. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by friesofdoom · · Score: 2

    I have the exact same problem. I am, and have always been pretty fat, and I know it is unhealthy and unattractive. I try ridiculously hard to keep it under control. I eat about 1500 calories and no candy. I'm 6 foot tall. I walk at least 40 minutes every day. I constantly feel like I am absolutely STARVING. I often feel so hungry that I want to throw up, this happens at least once a day.

    Then I get assholes, who have always been as skinny as a beanpole and can eat thanksgiving dinner every meal with out gaining any weight, who tell me I am lying about how much I eat, I cant possibly walk or move at all, being skinny is SOOOO easy, etc. etc.

    The science is clearly not out yet on all factors of weight gain, and a simple "calories in = weight gained" model is bullshit flawed quack science... I'm not going to complain about fat shaming being a bad thing, I think everyone should be encouraged to loose the extra few kg they are carrying around, but this bullshit idea that naturally skinny people have that being skinny is easy REALLY pisses me off.

  59. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You punch anyone in the mouth that dares give you honest feedback about your life decisions?

    Nope. Only pricks who get into my face and expect me to cower before them.

    You must have some really great yes-men friends that never give you an constructive criticism.

    I had a whole church full of them. That's Jesus for you.

    I'll give you some opinion right now - check that ridiculous aggression - it's only going to hold you back.

    That aggression gets the bullies to leave me alone and find a weaker person to pick on.

  60. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Based on your height, weight and age that you stated elsewhere, you resting mass intake is 2800 calories per day. Even if your body freaked out and dropped that by 800 calories you're still looking at 2000 calories per day for maintenance. Which is last time I checked, still greater than 1500.

    Then there's the question of adding exercise to the equation. Moving around takes energy, there's no way around that.

  61. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Facebook really shouldn't be in the business of curating advertisements.

    Yes, they should. No advertising network should openly accept scams, for example.

  62. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Then there's the question of adding exercise to the equation. Moving around takes energy, there's no way around that.

    I'm trying to master the rowing machine at the gym. It's... painful... in a good way.

  63. eye of the beholder by fche · · Score: 1

    Not to mince words, yes, the image is rather undesirable.

    1. Re:eye of the beholder by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      She should be on the Women of Walmart website.

  64. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

    If you've stopped allowing yourself to be affected by what other people think of you, good for you! That's an excellent step towards living a much happier life. Internalizing others' judgement and setting aside your own value judgements in favor of theirs leaves you vulnerable to the whim of others' emotions. You're in a much better place.

    If you're trying to make choices to improve your own health because that's what you want to do, also good for you! Your own desire for change is the only thing that can motivate that. Bending to others' judgements and trying to change yourself to fit their ideal never works, at least not for long. I wish you nothing but the best in your effort. I've made the effort myself over the course of the past few years shedding about half my body weight, and it's been life changing.

    That said, as others have said,150g carb/day isn't even close to low-carb. More like 20g/day would be low-carb. You'll still lose weight at 1500kcal/day, regardless of the composition of those calories; but if you're making other health decisions based on the premise that you're eating low-carb (and thus achieving both the benefits & drawbacks of doing so), you should be careful. It's unlikely your body is operating on a fat-based, low-carb metabolism at 150g/day. Again, no doubt you will drop weight at 1500kcal/day, but you're not getting the benefits of low-carb, if in fact that's what you're seeking.

    There's one thing you're NOT doing though, and this is another good for you: You're not telling people that being at your current weight is a healthy thing that they should accept as good. You're not saying that there are no health drawbacks to being overweight and therefore there's no health reason that other overweight people shouldn't attempt to lose weight. That's what Tess and the rest of the Health At Every Size followers are espousing. Specifically that Tess at BMI 46+ is just as healthy and will experience no negative health consequences as compared to someone at BMI 20.

    That assertion is the one thing I have against Tess & other HAES adherents. I would never tell anyone they have to feel bad because they're overweight. It's your body, and you can do what you want with it. It's entirely possible to both not hate yourself for being fat but also take steps to work towards becoming less fat. Loving yourself isn't the same thing as giving up on changing yourself.

    The HAES movement is reprehensible for its claim that there are no health or other benefits to not being overweight. They serve as a collective denial and self-apology movement where members can reassure each other that a host of problems they have in life don't actually have anything to do with their weight. (Can't fit in chairs, always tired / no energy to do basic life things, can't walk up a flight of stairs, medicines don't work properly, have to take a boat load of daily prescriptions just to stay healthy, can't just walk into any store and buy XXXXXL clothing, etc. etc....). They reinforce the idea that they're "perfectly happy" being overweight and that no aspects of their life could possibly be improved if they were less overweight. They also advance the claim in many cases that's it's actually "impossible" to lose weight. With things like "set point theory" and other pseudo-science that try to claim that your weight is controlled exclusively by your genetics and that your diet and exercise levels have nothing to do with it. They insist there's just no sense trying, and they re-badge "giving up without trying," as "just being happy the way you are."

    To be clear, I understand that your genetics, your upbringing, life situation, etc. can have a huge amount to do with your appetite and your activity level. I don't doubt that some are genetically predisposed to eat more, or at least to not have satiation signals that work as well. I don't doubt that it's part genetics, part addiction, and part mis-learned coping mechanisms from using eating as an emotional b

  65. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Don't take any advice from anyone, you're the victim, and you're such a tough man.

    I don't have a problem taking advice from people who are sincere about the advice they're giving. It's the pricks who get a power trip from talking down to someone that I have a problem with, especially when they think that my weight . Playing the victim game means letting the bullies get away with their abusive behavior. They're not going to change until someone confronts them.

  66. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The Biggest Loser metabolism finding DO NOT correspond to people who lose weight in a proper, controlled fashion.

    I lost 70 pounds one summer as a teenager when I got a bicycle that I road everywhere. My weight was 325 from riding my bike 20 miles per day for three years because I had a restaurant job down the street (yes, it was 10 miles away). When I got into weight training as an adult, my weight went up to 400 pounds. After I stopped weigh training and did treadmill only, my weight settled to 350 pounds for the last decade. I only recently cut my calories to 1,500 to see if that makes a different.

  67. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Try 50 grams carbs day and eat what you want... seriously I am not being a jerk. It's not easy but it works.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  68. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    If that's the case then I'd really suggest looking at how you're measuring that 1500 calories, because once I started doing it, the weight came off so I suspect that what you think you're eating is probably not actually 1500 calories. My big (ha!) problem is that I lack willpower and am lazy. Need to get back on it again.

  69. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    I started to loose weight when I woke up every single morning for a few months with a significant back age (sometimes lasting all day) whilst having adjusted my bed for the heaviest weight possible. After 5kg lost, the back pain was gone, now at 15kg down, no longer fearing going to bed but sleeping like a baby and waking earlier. Obesity isn't healthy.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  70. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about your life but mine has no aggression in it.

    I live an aggressive-free live, but I don't shy away from confrontation. It's like when I ask a stupid question at a group meeting. Some people will take me aside to tell me that I've asked a stupid question. I ask them to tell me how many people in the audience wanted to ask that same stupid question but were afraid of looking stupid by someone else. They can't give me a number. The people who thank me for asking a stupid question outnumbers the people who criticizes me for asking a stupid question by 3 to 1.

  71. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    But if this plus model is telling people that it's okay to be morbidly obese, that does no one a service.

    If you're in the business of selling plus-size clothes to women, what kind of models would you suggest to where those clothes in an advertising spread?

  72. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

    It's not "life, liberty and happiness." You have to achieve that last one on your own.

    I was saying the same thing.

    --
    Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  73. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

    As soon as your change your prejudice on fitness nuts ;)

    --
    Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  74. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    That said, as others have said,150g carb/day isn't even close to low-carb. More like 20g/day would be low-carb.

    Low-carb diets are 150 grams or less per day.

    http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/150-carbs-per-day-still-considered-low-carb-7754.html

    You're not telling people that being at your current weight is a healthy thing that they should accept as good.

    I wrote that I accepted the fact that I'm a big person, which means I'm not going to beat myself up emotionally it as I have no desire to relive my teenage years. Nowhere did I write that being fat was healthy. If that was the case, I wouldn't be on a diet and eat whatever I wanted.

    Specifically that Tess at BMI 46+ is just as healthy and will experience no negative health consequences as compared to someone at BMI 20.

    Arnold Schwarzenegger, Tom Cruise, Sylvester Stallone and Mel Gibson are morbidly obese based on his BMI score. If I shed my fat and tone my muscles, I'll still be morbidly obese. It's not a reliable indicator.

    http://www.docshop.com/2008/04/08/arnold-schwarzenegger-is-obese-problems-with-body-mass-index-bmi-calculations

  75. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    It can take awhile for a lower calorie diet to have an effect though. Your body will attempt to maintain an even weight. This will eventually change unless there is an external reason for that not happening. I've found that when I do lose weight, it is essential to track it over time, and it will take forever at times to show results. For the most part, on a serious diet, I can lose as little as one pound every two weeks, but in the end, as long as the overall trend is downward, the desired result is inevitable. The hard part is the plateaus and the occasional up ticks. You pretty much have to be a machine about it because while results can be drastic and immediate for some people, for others, it is glacial.

    That said it is certainly possible to have an endocrine system that promotes the storage of fat to a certain percentage. That can be harder to overcome and you may need medical advice about weight loss in that situation.

    The question is whether this can be a healthy weight for you to be at. This woman in the picture is 350 lbs, like you are, but I'd hazard to say that you probably have a much better frame for carrying that amount of weight than she does simply by dint of being male. Women can carry a lot of weight in certain parts, but if it is all over, it starts to become dangerous.

  76. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 1

    How about a punch in the mouth? I found that most bullies are unwilling to pay the price for their opinions and flee from imminent harm.

    Watch out, we got a badass over here!

    --
    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
  77. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    There is no fucking way that you are even remotely telling the truth on anything here, you lying fat piece of shit.

    Why would I lie?

    You fat fucks are like children who tell outrageous lies to adults and think we're buying the shit you're selling.

    I'm always called a liar. The funny thing is that no one has ever proven me to be a liar. Some people have trouble accepting a reality that varies from normal. Nothing in my life is normal.

    You don't even know how fucking retarded you sound.

    Because I was poster child for mongolism, I spent eight years in Special Ed. No one though it was odd that I graduated the eight grade with a college-level reading comprehension. I had skip high school to go to community college to get a real education. The difference between treated like an idiot in grade school and an adult in college was night and day.

  78. Re: I doubt it was innocent mistake by rvw14 · · Score: 1

    I'm not addicted, I can stop anytime I want to.

  79. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    As soon as your change your prejudice on fitness nuts ;)

    As long they stay on their side of the gym and dance to the Jane Fonda fitness video. :)

  80. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

    That said, as others have said,150g carb/day isn't even close to low-carb. More like 20g/day would be low-carb.

    Low-carb diets are 150 grams or less per day.

    http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/150-carbs-per-day-still-considered-low-carb-7754.html

    The source cited by your source is "the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans." IE the same people who have espoused for years that fat was the devil and we should be getting over half our daily calories from sugar & starch. Defining "low carb" as "less than the way too much we've been told to eat the entire time we've become the fattest people in history," is maybe not the best definition. I think a far more reasonable definition of low-carb is the point at which you have metobolic changes versus "normal carb" eating. Anything less than that is just changing your diet without it having a specific effect. From my experience, the benefits of being in ketois taper off above 20g/day and are pretty much gone by 40-50g tops.

    Specifically that Tess at BMI 46+ is just as healthy and will experience no negative health consequences as compared to someone at BMI 20.

    Arnold Schwarzenegger, Tom Cruise, Sylvester Stallone and Mel Gibson are morbidly obese based on his BMI score. If I shed my fat and tone my muscles, I'll still be morbidly obese. It's not a reliable indicator.

    http://www.docshop.com/2008/04/08/arnold-schwarzenegger-is-obese-problems-with-body-mass-index-bmi-calculations

    Arnold, Sly, and Tom are are huge (or tiny...) outliers because of their height and/or muscularity. BMI doesn't work well on the edges of the human population, but it's a very reasonable indicator within average ranges of height & muscularity. It's a poor model when applied to professional athletes or the very tall or very short, but it's pretty good for everyone else. Not sure what's up with Mel, but that applies to both physical & mental condition for him...

    If you're a few BMI points off your ideal range, it's certainly very possible you're fine. Arnold was supposedly BMI 33 when he was Mr. Universe, but that's still a far cry below Tess' 46. I'm not aware of any body builders or other athletes that are 40+ BMI. There may be some for extreme heavy weight lifters perhaps, but you're by definition at the outliers of normal human physique there.

  81. Re: I doubt it was innocent mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >Pretending it's ok to be addicted to something is the same denial you get from smokers and drinkers.

    I do not pretend that it's okay to be overweight and I do believe it is unhealthy.

    However, telling someone overweight to just stop eating so much is literally worse than worthless advice. Not only does it rarely have any success, it generally leads to making the person fatter than their original weight because the diet fails.

    My advice to those who want to tell a fat person they're fat:

    a) Don't bother. You think we can't tell?
    b) Don't bother telling us to eat less if that's where your advice ends. You seriously believe fat people are that stupid? That somehow we got overweight without the knowledge that more calories in than burned == increased weight? My 6 year old (who is actually rather skinny, since you might wonder) knows this. Every overweight person knows this. Repeating it with no help to back it up is just being an asshole. It's like telling the smokers outside your building "You'll die smoking those" every time you go by.
    c) If you actually want to help, help in a worthwhile manner. That will take your time and effort, possibly a significant amount of it. If you can't offer those, simply ignore and move on.

    Anyways, yes, it can be beaten. There's proof out there of it. But snarky comments sure as fuck won't get anyone there.

  82. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

    I didn't say that they should ban normal ads. Tess Holliday and her HAES (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_at_Every_Size) followers are telling people being obese is okay and that science is wrong; you can't lose weight and 400+ lbs might be your "healthy" weight. What they're saying is dangerous and borderline criminal. They shouldn't be allowed on the internet.

    --
    -SaNo
  83. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    > For some reason there's a huge number of people who absolutely hate on people who are fat.

    No, there's a huge number of people who hate on people who are fat that say it's perfectly healthy to be fat.

    I've also seen people hating on fit people as if there is something wrong with it. Criticizing them because they are in shape. It's hard work but enjoyable work to be in shape. If people think it's hard work or too expensive to be in shape wait until they see how much the medical bills will cost them later in life. Humans adapted to walking about 35km a day to get food and we are still the fastest animal to *accelerate* to our top speed so there is little doubt that we all have to do some exercise.

    Personally I've found that having martial arts in my life, like Muay Thai, Jui Jitsu and others has made being fit more fun because it was a consequence of trying to achieve a new grading, stripe or belt - I wasn't trying to get fit, I just did. The added benefit was not only did the fitness make me a better coder by clearing my mind and making for better sleep, learning things like meditation helped me tame some of the anti-social aspects of my character.

    Nothing wrong with big people that are carrying fat, some of those big guys have got a lot of power. Despite the fantasy, many Spartan warriors carried extra fat because it added some protection against weapons penetrating vital organs. Also I've experienced getting a flu while I had very low body fat and it is a very unpleasant experience, very painful. The issue is when big people don't exercise *and* they're fat, it's a recipe for diabetes.

    However in almost every instance of a fat guy coming to our gym (BJJ) and fighting is that if they stick with it they turn into big powerful guys and loose most, but never all of their fat.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  84. More cushin' for the pushin', Mark! by JesseEnjaian · · Score: 1

    hahaha big, beautiful women get love too <3 True story: I used to work with the woman who fought her case to the Supreme Court of California and won, making it illegal in California to discriminate against someone based upon their weight when their obesity problem is due to an underlying medical problem for employment purposes (http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1429&context=californialawreview). I think it's incredibly unfair to simply write off their weight problem as a lack of work ethic or hedonistic desire for food regardless of its health impact (which, actually, aren't that bad https://www.nih.gov/news-event... in the grand scheme of things -- smokers, alcoholics, drug abusers, etc I'm sure are far worse off). https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  85. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Why would I lie?

    I believe you. My brother is in the same situation and I am really fit. He used to exercise with me however I'm starting to come to the conclusion that the gut flora has a lot to do with the situation. Like him, you are probably really strong guy and exercise might be a little painful to get through. I eat full cream milk, cheese yoghurt, vegetables and fruit - I can't stand processes fast foods, but he eats them. You're probably one of those types of people that are hyper sensitive to fast foods - if you eat them at all dump them and let you instinct guide you to the fresh foods you like, learn some recipes you like and hack your gut flora by varying the yoghurt and cheeses.

    Oh, beer, it's hurts to miss it, but it's a big one if you drink it for big guys like you. I don't think it's the carbs, I think it's the yeast.

    Some people have trouble accepting a reality that varies from normal. Nothing in my life is normal.

    Yeah, that's not cool. I can see why it would piss you off, especially when you are working so hard. My mate I train(ed) with weighs 140Kg, what that's roughly 260 odd pounds? He gets that too. When he strips down, he is still a big guy but the difference is I'm 85Kg at fight weigh and almost 90Kg off training. He is around 100Kg so he looses almost half my body mass. I can still choke him out, but once he paniced one day as I did and both our body weights landed on my shoulder and dislocated it. I think he apologized about 50 times but there certainly was never any animosity, after all we were friends and we both got something different out of it. I learned I can control a big guy like and overcome the intimidation and as he learned to control his power, he became lethal.

    The difference between treated like an idiot in grade school and an adult in college was night and day.

    Yeah, just ignore that stuff, humans are varied creatures and nature finds a balance. My concern for guys like you is you are probably susceptible to diabetes. If you don't mind me saying though, I can sense your frustration and I can't say I blame you. If weights and pissy aerobics aren't working for you go find a Brazillian Jui Jitsu school and start to train. They are humble guys and if you are too, they will welcome you as fighting you will be outside their comfort zone as well, you will make good friends that respect you. It's not easy, but I think you will like it - think 'body chess'!

    I miss my big mate, I really wish he'd stuck with it for all the physio it cost me to train with him ;) - Good luck to you!

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  86. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by dasunt · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but unless you recently started your strict calorie limit of 1500 per day, or you are exceptionally short, or you have some bizarre medical condition, there is no way your are being honest.

    Could be mismeasuring the amount of calories he's consuming. But it does appear that dieting can permanently alter a metabolism in a negative way.

  87. Re: I doubt it was innocent mistake by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

    I totally agree. I'm a bit overweight too. My weight has gone up and down in my life. Nothing was as demotivating for me as when loved ones asked if i wasn't overdoing my obsession with it (at bmi 24!) or when a girlfriend said she likes a tummy (at bmi 27!). But hey if you say it's a feminist thing, they suddenly need to agree with whatever you say.

  88. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    The problem wasn't the slow metabolism, that just means you have to eat less. The problem was, even after eating enough to give themselves energy, they still felt hungry.

    In other words, they needed the hacker's diet, which takes into consideration the fact that your hunger doesn't match your eating needs.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  89. Re:Good riddance! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    The way I look at it,

    1) "I am not a bad person just because I am fat"
    2) "I have good qualities even though I am fat"
    3) "People shouldn't mock fat people"

    Those are all good ideas, and we should especially spread the last one. However,

    1) "I am perfectly healthy even though I am fat"

    There are serious problems with that idea.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  90. Re:Not gonna happen by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    She could borrow Desperate Dan's.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  91. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

    Calories in - calories spent = weight gained/lost

    This is clearly true, and almost completely irrelevant. As should be clear from the post by friesofdoom, some people simply want to eat more. They need to eat more before they feel similarly full to another person who may have eaten less. This means that those people, in order to remain thin, must fight a constant never-ending battle against themselves, that no human being can ever be expected to win. Of course if you eat more, you get fat, and if you eat less, you get thin. But imagine you were in a situation where if you didn't eat more than your body technically required, you felt hungry. Now imagine being hungry every day, for the rest of your life. Imagine that hunger, present, all the time. Imagine that if you gave in to that hunger, you would gain weight. Now imagine trying to remain thin in that situation. Perhaps if you were in that situation, you would not be so glib about 'thermodynamics'. And, of course, I am not the only person who understands this

  92. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Vermonter · · Score: 1

    You win, I fell for your troll.

  93. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    am very obese and I feel bad about it.

    Great. Is that 'feeling bad' actually helping? Or are you just basically feeling bad? Honest question.

  94. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    Of course you will. But then, when you move back to a country that surrounds you constantly will fatty and sugary foods, that weight will pile right back on. Which simply demonstrates that the true cause of obesity is not individual moral failings, but the food that we are surrounded by. It's so unbelievably clear, that I find it astonishing that anyone could believe otherwise. The evidence is literally all around us.

  95. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    It literally requires no effort.

    This is completely untrue. Given a strong desire to eat unhealthy food, do you really believe that constantly fighting against that desire requires no effort? Does it also require no effort to forego other pleasures in your life? There are books on this subject.

  96. Dead at 55 by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Forget beauty, whatever you or the next person thinks it is. Being that obese means that her children, if she has any, will be left without a mother rather early.

    It's like smoking, or free-solo climbing. Sure, you can do it, it's a free country. But if you have people that love you and don't want you to die young, it's really not OK.

  97. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    It's the internet. You are being the angry "tough guy".

    I can be a "tough guy" off the Internet too. Except for the occasional fitness nut, most people aren't that stupid to provoke a person with enough muscle mass to put them in the hospital.

    If you don;t want to see fat people on the internet, don't post your picture on it.

    You posted a headshot from 2009 (thanks for reminding to change that pic). Here's most recent headshot is from 2013.

    http://cdn-www.cdreimer.com/images/cdreimer.jpg

    Both pictures are nearly identical in showing my head. What these pictures don't show is my broad shoulders and narrow waist. Even if I completely eliminated my body fat, I doubt my jowls will go ever away.

  98. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You've trolled that 1500 calorie claim for a _long_ time in a lot of stories and it is just not credible.

    I love trolling the trolls.

    You are now free to dismiss my empirically justifiable claims with your internet tough guy swagger, as per your usual MO.

    Slashdot exists to keep me amuse while I'm waiting for a script to finish at work. Thank you for your participation.

  99. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You win, I fell for your troll.

    Your comment made no sense whatsoever.

  100. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    No, we will call you a disgusting tub o' lard. Which is what you are. You didn't have to "accept being big", you simply lacked the willpower to do anything about your nauseating condition. You're a mass of yellowish flesh, your grossly misshapen body trundles about in a parody of human walk. The stench of sweat in your presence is overpowering. Why don't you do the right thing and kill yourself?

    You got the potty mouth of a third-grader! LOL!

  101. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    unless you only had it one day a month

    I'm entering month three since I started with a 1,500-calorie cap. The mechanical scales at the gym is no longer thunk at 350 pounds (maximum weight for scale), but it's very hard to get the scale to balance out. I may be down to 345 pounds.

  102. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    All the proof I actually need is you saying you eat 1500 calories and are continuing to be a fat fuck and that you ate 3000 calories WHILE working out and got to 400lbs.

    If you want to gain muscle weight, you need to increase your calorie intake while lifting weights. I liked being at 400 pounds, I loved the muscle mass. But buying 4XXL shirts was a bitch.

    Being this delusional. Just wow.

    This is Slashdot. You must be new around here.

  103. 1984 by brunnegd · · Score: 1

    FB is rapidly becoming the bad guys from the novel 1984.

  104. Re: I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I think you're miscounting your calories.

    My growling stomach in the morning after a 12-hour fast disagrees with you.

  105. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    In my experience, there are plenty of people who like to hate on fat people, and that is a problem for lots of fat people. I haven't had a fat friend claim that fat was perfectly healthy, probably because they're smarter than that. (I have one who told his doctor that he'd go on any weight loss program that had better than a 5% success rate over five years. I think he pretty much gave up on his weight, but he knows it isn't healthy.)

    I'd like the fat shaming to stop, because then maybe some of my friends could stop feeling defensive and start addressing their weight issue more rationally.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  106. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Luckily, nature does correct this: he'll be dead long before a normal-weight person.

    Not likely. I don't smoke. I don't drink. I'm on a diet and work at the gym. I get my flu shot every year (perk from working in a hospital). I haven't seen a doctor in 16 years. Besides seasonal allergies, I haven't been ill in years. That's called living a healthy lifestyle.

  107. Re:They shouldn't be banning her ... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    They should be directing her to appropriate medical attention, because she's morbidly obese and in dire need of intervention.

    What would that be exactly? I was literally the only fat kid at school. School officials ordered my parents to take me to the doctor and get blood tests. Three years of repeated blood tests failed to find anything wrong with me. Some people are just big that the doctors can't do anything.

  108. Re:Delicious by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    "Instead, we recommend using an image of a relevant activity, such as running or riding a bike"

    The fat fuck probably can't do either.

    Running for a fat person is a quick way to blow out your knees. You don't want to be hobbling around like those skinny guys who get replacement knee surgery because they play basketball to aggressively. Jogging in the swimming pool is a better idea. When I rode my bike 20 miles a day to get to a restaurant job in a different city for three years, my average wait during that time was 325 pounds.

  109. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Being fat meant there's too much food available to you while too little was available to all others.

    Being fat was a sign of wealth in African cultures. Some of the wealthiest people in America are black people. Go figure.

  110. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I'd like the fat shaming to stop, because then maybe some of my friends could stop feeling defensive and start addressing their weight issue more rationally.

    I think fat shaming will be the last form of legalized discrimination, which is one of the reasons why I'm pushing back against it.

  111. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Another idiot that believes what fat people tell them.

    You mean like the idealized versions of bodies we see in advertisements. You should really question your belief systems and try to uncover which version of photoshop they came from. Why is that any healthier?

    Ectomorph, Mesomorph, Endomorph do you even know what that means?

    Yep, breaking the laws of thermodynamics is fine because "everyone is different".

    Humans aren't internal combustion engines with a stoichiometric ratios and mechanical inefficiencies that can be factored.

    Their gut floras are magically grabbing calories out of thin air. Okay. He's the specialest snowflake that ever existed.

    No, people's gut flora are different. He can change it if he chooses just like you can stop being a cunt if you choose to.

    It's just a shame the taxpayers will be the ones shouldering the financial burden of keeping him alive so he can shovel more shit into his mouth for a while longer.

    Well there are people out there like that and it is unhealthy, however that is a factor of the fast food and sugar industry spending billions of dollars on getting us to shovel that shit down our throats. If you eat that shit and drink those crap drinks you're every bit to blame for not being able to exert self control.

    creimer is obviously functional because if he was morbidly obese he would barely be able to communicate and the evidence shows that this is not the case. In any case how does anything you say help people in that situation. If you were sincere you would be lobbying against the fast food industry for being able to advertise to children and I doubt you are doing that.

    Slashdot always was a fat sympathizing group. Mostly because I believe a majority of you are fat fucks, yourselves.

    I'm a purple belt in brazillian jui jitsu. My warm up is most people's work outs which is generally 2 hours of fighting a day 6 days a week, sometimes twice a day because I love it. I have abs that you can see and can do two finger pushups. I understand how ATP transaction in muscle work and I know I look good because of the way females look and interact with me.

    Take a step back and try to see what is going on in the world Mr AC. I've told you about my experiences and taken the time to do so but all you can do is meet it with hostility. This suggests you probably have some issues of your own and are in self denial about it. At least this man is honest about his experiences and all I am saying is they are consistent with people I have met and trained with.

    I suspect if you ever walked into a BJJ gym you would be folded into a cube and told to fuck off because you're coming across as a real asshole. Why don't you go focus on your own issues instead and try to make the world a better place.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  112. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I updated my picture on Indie Book Lounge. Thanks for point that out!

  113. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Try 50 grams carbs day and eat what you want.

    I did 150 grams of carbs and ate whatever I wanted for four years. When I put a calorie cap on what I ate two months ago, it made a difference. I'll wait another four months before I reduce my carb intake.

  114. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    i was 10lb 10oz. I'm a normal build at 33. Get your shit together, son.

    I'm being lectured by a millennial. How cute.

  115. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I once was a fatty, I'm now off to ride 50km.

    I used to ride my bike 20 miles per day for three years to a restaurant job in a different city. My weight during that time was 325 pounds.

  116. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by countach · · Score: 1

    They should have gone on a tofu diet. all protein, no sugar or carbs, zero GI. makes you feel full.

  117. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by countach · · Score: 1

    Because they are eating the wrong things. Should be eating tofu and lo-GI.

  118. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    Yes. Obviously. But we do not live in a society that surrounds us with easy access to those foods. Quite the opposite in fact.

  119. Got it wrong by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    Facebook said that its team scans millions of ad images every week, and sometimes understandably misses out on a few.

    That response is BS, because facebook took the time to clarify their stance. They didn't miss anything, they just got it wrong.

    Facebook: It's not a huge issue here, so just admit your prejudice.

  120. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    You were 400lbs of pure fat, just like every other morbidly obese fuck.

    Nope. You're totally wrong on that point.

    You're gonna talk to me about fitness when you spew out shit like this?

    You're assuming that the human body is a perfect thermodynamic machine. It is — on paper. Individual people are deeply flawed thermodynamic machines. We're all different.

    I'm done.

    I doubt that. ACs reply to me all the time.

  121. It's not about attraction by p0larity · · Score: 1

    Showing different body types baring skin doesn't mean that the issue is attraction.

    The issue is that fat women (and men!) get a lot of shit that they don't deserve from other people imposing their "concern" on them.

    The issue might be about FEELING attractive because as human beings that's important.

    The issue is that it's their body and they should be allowed to dress as they see fit. If you think it's obscene, that's your issue. You don't have to like it, but you also don't have any right to harass them over it.

  122. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    i'm no where near a fitness nut, but that lady is super obese and i'll be shocked if she isn't dead in the next 3 years at that weight.

    It's the same as seeing a heroin addict with needle scars up and down both arms, but you don't have a moment of herion users speaking up for themselves and shaming anyone concerned about their addiction.

  123. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    but in your mind anyone you disagree with is being insincere. see the problem?

  124. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    the bullies are the ones punching people for expressing their opinion. you just expressed a willingness to intimidate another person with violent force for expressing themselves.. and then you called them a bully.

    I think you have your head up your ass, maybe you should come punch me in the mouth

  125. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    i'm no where near a fitness nut, but that lady is super obese and i'll be shocked if she isn't dead in the next 3 years at that weight.

    As another poster pointed out, she's 350 pounds. I've been 300 to 400 pounds for my entire adult life. I'm 46-years-old. I don't smoke, I don't drink, I exercise regularly, I'm on a low-carb diet and I get my flu shots every year. I haven't seen a doctor in 16 years because the only thing I get each year is allergies. I've been hearing for years that I'm going to drop dead at any moment. I don't pay attention to that nonsense.

  126. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    but in your mind anyone you disagree with is being insincere. see the problem?

    I don't have a problem with someone wanting to talk to me about my health. I do have a problem with someone getting into my face to talk me about my health. One person is sincere and polite, the other person is insincere and confrontational. See the problem?

  127. Re:I doubt it was innocent mistake by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I think you have your head up your ass, maybe you should come punch me in the mouth

    Are you standing in my face? No.

    Are you trying to intimidate me? No.

    Are you threatening me with physical violence if I don't cower before you? No.

    Do I care about your opinion? Oh, hell no.