Slashdot Mirror


E-Cigs Are Exploding In Vapers' Faces At An Alarming Rate (buzzfeed.com)

E-cigs are becoming increasingly popular, but are they safe enough? BuzzFeed News is reporting about accidents where e-cigs have exploded in vapers' faces. The report claims that these incidents are occurring at an alarming rate. From the report (condensed): Across the country, defective e-cigarettes -- the nicotine delivery machines that have taken over every strip mall and sidewalk, seemingly overnight -- are creating hundreds of victims like Cavins (a 63-year-old Orange, California-based family therapist who lost an eye after an e-cig device exploded in his face), people whose lives are suddenly and horrifyingly changed when their devices blow up. They are people like Thomas Boes, whose vape exploded while he was driving outside San Diego and struck him with such force that two of the three teeth he lost lodged in his upper palate; Kenneth Barbero, whose exploding device ripped a hole in his tongue; and Marcus Forzani, a 17-year-old whose left leg was charred from his calf to his thigh after a vape battery exploded in his pocket. An unpublished FDA analysis found 66 reports of e-cigarette overheating, fires, and explosions in 2015 and the first month of 2016, a number the agency calls "an underestimate of actual events."

361 comments

  1. darwinian pressure by just+another+AC · · Score: 5, Funny

    And people say evolutionary pressure doesn't exist in modern society...

    1. Re:darwinian pressure by just+another+AC · · Score: 2

      And before the bleeding heart crowd jump down my throat, I refer to the lamentation that previously darwinian habits (like deliberately inhaling things that cause cancer etc) do not have the corresponding effect due to socially responsible advances in medicine.

    2. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Link to study that shows nicotine causes cancer?

      Not tobacco, not cigarettes, nicotine.

    3. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the problem is that the reproduction is decoupled from the habit, as the addiction does not immediately have effect, and may even have an increase in reproduction since smoking is cool.

    4. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Settle down bubble boy. Every piece of hardware on that device you are typing on has material that causes cancer FYI.

    5. Re:darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cigarettes used to slowly degrade your teeth, affect your eyesight and turn your face into something that looks like roadkill. Looks like these e-cigarettes are a huge improvement then! No more waiting 20 or 30 years for the cancer to set in, instant results in the blink of an eye.

    6. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really Darwinian as it tends to show up more after the age when procreation is more normally expected to have already occurred, therefore has minimal impact on evolution or the passing on of ones genes.

    7. Re: darwinian pressure by thoolou · · Score: 0

      Uh, link supporting that ludicrous claim michelcolman?

    8. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the lamentations of their women.

    9. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cancer is one of the leading causes of nicotine. (Apologies to ZW.)

    10. Re: darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Did you read the summary? Lost teeth and eyes, charred faces,... Looks pretty similar to the link in my previous post. What more links do you need?

    11. Re:darwinian pressure by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood his comment. He was expressing disappointment that using tobacco ("previously darwinian habits ") didn't result in death as often due to modern medical advances.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    12. Re:darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Exploding cigarettes are a big improvement then, since they do have an immediate effect.

    13. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of these people died before they could breed? Come back when you understand evolution.

    14. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want to be thought of as the kind of scumbag that calls compassionate people "bleeding hearts?" That would lump you in with hate-radio lunatics, and wingnut bloggers. Do you really want to sound like one of those worse-than-useless creeps?

    15. Re:darwinian pressure by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Every piece of hardware on that device you are typing on has material that causes cancer FYI.

      That material causes cancer only if you're in California.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    16. Re:darwinian pressure by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Exploding Vapes is not a bug, it's an (evolutionary) feature!

    17. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to read the label again. You only know it gave you cancer if you're in California.

    18. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you keep them near your crotch.

    19. Re:darwinian pressure by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I make sure not to vaporize and breathe my keyboard.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    20. Re:darwinian pressure by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute...if he's in California, that material causes cancer? Does that mean that the fate of the whole world lies in his hands...uh...legs?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    21. Re: darwinian pressure by michelcolman · · Score: 3

      I know what "specious" means. My turn now, you look up the word "humor". Perhaps you misunderstood my joke.

      Some e-cigarettes blew up in their users' faces and made them look like some of the cigarette cancer victims. That's all I "claimed". If you want me to provide links to make you understand the joke, I'm sorry but I have better things to do.

    22. Re:darwinian pressure by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      If you want to eat your computer, sure...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    23. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular belief, nicotine is NOT a carcinogen. Ingredients in tobacco are. In fact, nicotine is found not only in tobacco but naturally in a lot of fruits and veggies we consume. (tomatoes for one)

    24. Re: darwinian pressure by thoolou · · Score: 0

      Can we rig your keyboard to blow off your hands when you post some that incredibly stupid? Immediate effect and all that...

    25. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thatsthejoke.jpg

    26. Re:darwinian pressure by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      very piece of hardware on that device you are typing on has material that causes cancer FYI

      Yeah, but I'm probably not going to try and grind up and smoke my computer.

    27. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link to study that shows nicotine causes cancer?

      Not tobacco, not cigarettes, nicotine.

      He never said nicotine causes cancer, he said inhaling things (i.e. cigarettes) that cause cancer.

    28. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only if you are a fucking moron who is pairing a mech mod with a sub-ohm coil.

      Notice how none of these people are willing to show the vape gear they were using? That's because they didn't know what they were doing, mismatched equipment and it blew up. I am willing to bet every single one of these cases is due to user error.

    29. Re:darwinian pressure by grub · · Score: 0

      Don't make fun of those hipsters who felate electronic vapour-cocks. That's as close to sex as most of them can get.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    30. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even run through your filter, it's better than being a bleeding heart, hippie.

    31. Re: darwinian pressure by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Always been humor. It's not like I stubbed my toe, that's tragedy. (para. Mel)

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    32. Re: darwinian pressure by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And if you bother to dig any deeper, rather than take these "studies" at face value (many of which are paid for by Lorillard through their "citizens for a concerned America" PAC) you'll find they ALWAYS land in one of 3 camps,

      1.- Rich dumbshit with more money than sense buys a $300+ mech mod, which has warnings all over it saying how you MUST know ohms law, resistances, and the strength of the batteries you intend to use to use this product safely, then promptly buy a $20 gas station top and slap on it, thus blowing his deserving dumbass up,

      2.- Cheapskate dumbshit buys a $10 knock off of a $90 unit off of Chinabuye and then is shocked! Shocked I tell you! That a cheapo Chinese Crap knock off is actually unsafe and blows up in his dumbass face,

      3.- Impatient dumbshit ignores all the warnings in the brochure that came with his battery that says to ONLY use the slow trickle charger that comes with the unit, thinks "hey its USB, my fast cellphone charger is USB!"...can you see where this is going? Yep he uses the fast charger to cook the batteries and then is amazed when a device designed for a slow trickle charge becomes unstable when you use a charger that puts out 4 times the amps as what the unit was designed for.

      I'm sorry but stupid is as stupid does, and if you actually buy quality units instead of fakes and follow the instructions that come in the box? Then you have NOTHING to worry about. These scare studies hold about as much truth as the ads staring doctors big tobacco used to run, because they ignore the fact that the users were either ignoring instructions, using fakes they picked up off a ChinaMart, or like the mech mod moron buying a unit designed for guys with the skill to build their own sub-ohm coils from scratch and just slapping some top he got in a gas station on it.

      To use a /. car analogy it would be like blaming motorcycles for the rich kid that buys a Ninja for his first bike and wraps it around a pole at 150MPH+ or the cheapskate that buys one of those "long fong" Chinese scooters and finds out the brakes don't work going down a steep hill.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    33. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you've never had to use Microsoft Word

    34. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair the gear blew up...

    35. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt even you could post something as stupid as a what a vaper exhales.

    36. Re: darwinian pressure by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair the gear blew up...

      So do frozen turkeys if a dumbass drops one in a gas-burner deep-fryer.

      Funny, nobody suggests banning deep-fryers or frozen turkeys.

      There is very little that is safe when the people involved are the "Hold mah beer, watch *this*!!" type.

      Considering the tens of thousands or more vaping devices of the mechanical-mod type already out there and comparing vaping-gear related deaths/injuries to how many are injured or killed annually by normal, everyday things like ladders and hammers, at under 100 deaths vaping gear is very safe indeed. Particularly when you factor in the lives saved by people stopping their tobacco smoking by switching to vaping.

      Many thousands saved from lung cancer/COPD/etc versus...what? Less than 100 deaths/injuries? Of stupid people because they acted stupidly?

      I'd call that a bargain!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    37. Re: darwinian pressure by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yep, goldrush mentality that allows bad designs to thrive will do that. See also "hoverboards" that catch fire.

      As a kid I used to set fire to batteries to blown them up. Some of the batteries we have now used for things like this would go off like bombs in comparison.

    38. Re: darwinian pressure by slazzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The batteries shouldn't explode whem plugged into a USB with higher ampage available. That is a defective product.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    39. Re: darwinian pressure by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      Now we know Clippy is the source of cancer

    40. Re:darwinian pressure by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      You can say that again.

    41. Re:darwinian pressure by houghi · · Score: 1

      Well, it is proven that medical studies cause cancer in rats, so there's that.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    42. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any product using lithium ion batteries should protect the battery from conditions that will make the battery dangerous. Good engineers know this. Designers of knockoff products don't know or don't care. There's more engineering in the battery and management circuits of a cell phone than in an entire e-cig.

    43. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, but #3 is a legitimate defect. USB is capable of self-regulating and should do so without exploding in a user's face.

    44. Re:darwinian pressure by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      I'm sure these people losing eyes and having their teeth lodged in their upper palate are less likely to reproduce as well.

    45. Re:darwinian pressure by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Batteries explode. Batteries are used in things other than e-cigs.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    46. Re:darwinian pressure by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, where anything you don't personally do is idiotic. These are batteries that are blowing up mate. Shitty batteries blow up in any kind of device. Presumably you can improve your chances of reproduction by not using batteries. lol.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    47. Re: darwinian pressure by giggles778 · · Score: 1

      nobody's rushing to ban hoverboards yet....

    48. Re:darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, "grub" thinks it's silly. Guess I better stop then.

    49. Re:darwinian pressure by hummassa · · Score: 1

      Batteries usually explode more (*) if you heat or short circuit them. Connecting a heating element to a battery seems like both to me. (*) more often, more espectacularly...

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    50. Re:darwinian pressure by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Link to study that shows nicotine causes cancer? Not tobacco, not cigarettes, nicotine.

      We'll be waiting a long time for that one...

      I started smoking at age 10; at age 62 I tried an e-cig "just for the hell of it," fully expecting it to be unsatisfying, or "just as nasty, or whatever... I inadvertently quit "smoking" on the spot... two years later, still happily cigarette free. My wheezing when climbing stairs went away almost immediately (I noticed this 12 hours later). No more huffing and puffing. No scent of "tobacco" and associated tars, etc, on my clothes, in the car, in the house. Friends who were "allergic" to smoke invite me to vape at will in their homes and cars.

      I had one nasty "accident." I had a pocket full of quarters (extremely rare for me, as I hate "change") that I was going to dump in the console of the car, for parking meters, and put a battery (not an e-cig, just the battery) in the same pocket. My pants caught fire while I was taking a leak. Stupid? Yeah, definitely. Related to vaping? Not in the least. The quarters provided a closed circuit for the battery. Really dumb. But...vaping? One of the brightest "choices" I ever made.

      Almost all of the anti-vape, "we need regulation", etc., "ads" and "PSAs" out there, are funded by big tobacco, in an effort to "regulate" all the mom 'n' pop vape retailers, juice mixers, and gadget head makers into oblivion, so that Big Tobacco can take over the industry. I try to avoid the Chinese marketplace, as a safety precaution. I recommend others do the same.

      And I'm saving a shitload of cash, vaping organic naturally-extracted flavoring of tobacco, with USP-grade nicotine. Even with high-end vaping gear, a total economic winner. People in the US are exposed to tens of thousands of chemicals, on a daily basis, that have never even been screened for carcinogenic properties. I'll take my chances with nicotine & caffeine... everybody else can sit in their "smoke-free" bars and parks/stadiums (etc) and tut-tut themselves into early sugar- and booze-enabled graves. RIP suckers...

    51. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being maimed by malfunctioning electronics doesn't constitute Darwinism. And smoking cigarettes only shortens your life in the modern era, when people live longer. In pre modern times, they may not hadn't noticed the effects of tobacco.

    52. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The manufactures of e-cigs should have not allowed mismatched parts to be used. It shouldn't be so easy to blow your face off.

      This is the result of an industry popping up over night, because of the internet. Expect harsh regulations. No industry ever regulates itself, it seems.

    53. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but stupid is as stupid does, and if you actually buy quality units instead of fakes and follow the instructions that come in the box? Then you have NOTHING to worry about.

      Nothing? Really? Well you may not need to worry about the devices literally exploding in your face, but whilst vaping may be better for you than smoking, it almost certainly is not good for you. Does anyone need to vape? As you say, stupid is as stupid does ... aka "it won't happen to me".

    54. Re: darwinian pressure by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      The manufactures of e-cigs should have not allowed mismatched parts to be used.

      How are government regulations and laws going to stop some idiot from building his own atomizer coils and screwing up his electrical resistance calculations and shorting out a non-short-protected battery he bought from Evilbay and having it explode on him?

      This is the result of an industry popping up over night, because of the internet.

      No, this is the result with anything, regardless of whether it's regulated or made totally illegal, when people who are stupid are involved.

      Expect harsh regulations.

      Expect people will build their own and/or buy smuggled (even more cheaply made and dangerous) knock-off vape gear and ignore any such regulation. Yay! Now there's another way to fill prisons with more people guilty of non-violent, victimless crimes while keeping the money rolling into the hospice industry, oncologists, the tobacco companies (gotta protect *them*!), and last but not least, government tax coffers! Drug Wars - Part Deux!

      No industry ever regulates itself, it seems.

      No industry *should* be regulated unless there is a real, serious, and ongoing issue like public safety (no, fewer than 100 deaths does not rise to that bar) where all other methods of remediation have failed. Government regulation/involvement should always be the last resort.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    55. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How are government regulations and laws going to stop some idiot from building his own atomizer coils"

      Look, if you are learning that much about e-cigs -- to build your own coils and shit -- you probably know what your doing (and anyway, you are on your own, in terms of safety). I'm just saying that you shouldn't be able to just screw together any of a million different atomizers and batteries, and have it blow up in your face from an extremely preventable circuit failure.

      "No, this is the result with anything, regardless of whether it's regulated or made totally illegal, when people who are stupid are involved."

      I'm not saying vaping should be illegal, firstly. I'm saying that this was a gold rush to develop and sell these products, without first considering safety. You actually don't have to be stupid to get hurt like this, just ignorant of electronics.

      "Expect people will build their own and/or buy smuggled (even more cheaply made and dangerous) knock-off vape gear and ignore any such regulation"

      Not saying these should be illegal. That would be stupid. But what I am saying: If you are a manufacturer of vape pens, you should not feel okay with this. They should make different sizes for different voltages/resistances/whatever. Make it so batteries can't be over-charged. Prioritise safety, value the lives of your customers, or you deserve harsh regulations.

    56. Re: darwinian pressure by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Look, if you are learning that much about e-cigs -- to build your own coils and shit -- you probably know what your doing (and anyway, you are on your own, in terms of safety).

      Not at all necessarily true.

      If you are a manufacturer of vape pens, you should not feel okay with this.

      It's not the vape pens that are exploding. It's home-built gear and people forcing together incompatible parts while ignoring all the included warnings (yes, they include warning labels and warnings in the included instructions for commercially-made gear...the atomizer and tank I just bought has warnings on the box and on the sheet inside, and so did the commercially-made box-mod battery unit I purchased).

      From your comment mistakenly including/blaming 'vape pens' it seems you're for regulating something you clearly don't understand. Stop that. That's how we got things like the 'War On (some) Drugs' and 'civil forfeiture' laws.

      There simply is no way to prevent stupid people from doing stupid things. Even if you regulate away all freedom and choice. I don't want to live in such a society. Let Darwin have his way with those too stupid to live. It strengthens the gene-pool.

      Look, at less than 100 deaths/injuries total to-date to show for the tens of thousands of vaping units sold every year, it's a tempest in a teacup. Aren't there any more bathrooms left for the government to regulate, FFS?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    57. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not the vape pens that are exploding. It's home-built gear and people forcing together incompatible parts while ignoring all the included warnings (yes, they include warning labels and warnings in the included instructions for commercially-made gear...the atomizer and tank I just bought has warnings on the box and on the sheet inside, and so did the commercially-made box-mod battery unit I purchased)."

      It's lithium ion batteries which are exploding, because they are being used with the wrong charger, or wrong heating elements. It's not just home built stuff either. Google it. I see that you are into the e-cig scene, and so you are trying to defend poor product designs. Stop that. Warning labels are a poor substitute for good engineering, and design.

    58. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because none of them actually hover. Once someone figures that out, they'll be banned left & right!

    59. Re: darwinian pressure by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      ... you are trying to defend poor product designs.

      There is no design in the universe that can stand against "Hold mah beer! Watch *this*!".

      You could use the same argument against automobiles/automobile-related deaths and automakers when some Darwin Award-winner puts together a wheeled deathtrap in their garage and kills/injures themselves with it. Is it "poor design" on the part of car makers that some idiot used a cutting torch and a welder to put a high-performance V8 engine in a tiny car designed for a 4-cylinder engine and kills himself? If not, why is it the fault of vape gear makers when somebody does the equivalent with their gear?

      How are you going to stop some idiot from modifying vaping gear to an unsafe state? As far as using incorrect chargers etc go that's already an issue with other things like cellphones and laptops. Nothing is safe when stupid people do stupid things regardless of how much regulation there is.

      Attempting to regulate against stupidity just removes freedom and choices from everyone else and never solves the problem. Plus, in the case of vaping gear, making it more difficult/expensive for people to use it to stop smoking tobacco.

      How many house/apartment fires and subsequent deaths/injuries does tobacco smoking cause every year and how do those numbers compare to injuries/deaths from vaping gear? Why do you want more people to die in smoking-related fires and from smoking-related health issues?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    60. Re: darwinian pressure by billcopc · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct on all counts, hairyfeet. I don't vape, but I have learned more than I ever cared about vaping, after challenging my wife on all the technical aspects and the pseudo-sciencey specs she was parroting from the manufacturers.

      While I find it rather absurd that anyone would buy a device that is little more than a shiny chassis around a shorted battery (the "mech mod"), well these things do exist and they often attract a very special kind of idiot who will absolutely cause it to blow up in their face. To me, that is Darwinism at work, and perhaps a few disfigured imbeciles will scare some sense into the rest.

      It reminds me of this kid I drove when I was a cab driver, 18-19 years old. He had flipped his nitro-boosted Honda while illegally racing on a main street, but somehow dodged jail time. The crushed door frame sliced his arm lengthwise, dude looked like something out of a horror movie, skin grafts and inch-wide scars all over. So what does he do ? He builds another nitro ricer and crashes it, hardly a year after his first accident. Luckily (for society), that killed him outright.

      TL;DR, idiots do idiot things, because they're idiots. They always have, and always will. Vaping is no exception.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    61. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, people burn down houses or even forests with cigarettes, lighters, fireplaces/campfires. I guess that means fire is to blame and it should be banned.

    62. Re: darwinian pressure by Bevvegas45gmail.com · · Score: 1

      I would like to say 'good looking out' for you insightful comment. I have seen damage to someone's finger from 'vape bombs', the ever popular and more ethical alternative to 'cancer causing' cigs. Alternatively, I have quite a few smokers in my family (I have a whole lot of cousins, etc...), but so far, the only ones who have been bitten by cancer are older, do not smoke, and worked in jobs where known, actually proven carcinogens were a constant problem.

    63. Re: darwinian pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as your mother is alive there will be a place for toothless one-eyed vapers to drop a load

  2. Wow by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

    1. Re:Wow by BenJeremy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hundreds of victims!

      No way is this FUD from the tobacco industry trying to protect their cigarette, gum and patch sales.

    2. Re:Wow by TemporalBeing · · Score: 5, Interesting

      66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

      I wonder..how many...new Lung Cancer incidents due to tobacco were there in the same period? house fires? car fires?

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hundreds of victims!

      No way is this FUD from the tobacco industry trying to protect their cigarette, gum and patch sales.

      Thats 100 more than hurt by Fukushima radiation, so its a catastrophe.

    4. Re:Wow by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      From what I've read on forums, it seems a lot of people are trying to use the 18650's from old laptop and power tool batteries or order the cheap "ULTRAFIRE" brand on eBay. And from the comments on those forums, I'd say there really is a danger with these stupid devices.

      Even if you use one with the built-in battery, who's to say the manufacturer didn't cut costs by going with the same ULTRAFIRE battery?

      I'd be more interested in analyzing the BOM of each exploded device.

    5. Re:Wow by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm missing this one - the tobacco industry presumably supplies the nicotine that's vaped by these things, why would they be against it, especially as it's probably the only form of non-prescription nicotine that's likely to still be legal in 20-30 years? (And probably the only form that could grow the market, as - exploding E-Cigs aside - it deals with most of the health and social issues.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Wow by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was looking for those 18650 batts for an arduino project (good for quadrapeds) and I noticed all the really scary sounding chinese brand names like ultrafire.

      could the chinese - oh, I don't know - HIRE someone who speaks english as a first language and consult with them before picking stupid anglo sounding names?

      whoever thought that adding the word 'fire' to a BATTERY would help sales - he needs to spend some qualty time with the same batteries for extended periods.

      china simply sells the lowest quality that will still allow them to continue to sell but that is so dangerous and has no q/a that a US vendor would be sued to bankruptcy in no time flat.

      thing is; you can't sue china or their companies! this is the scam. you guy some dangerous shit from amazon or ebay via chia brands and it blows up on you. who do you go after? amazon has lawyers to cover themselves. good luck with that. ebay, same thing and they'll just blame the seller, who is already on his 23rd company name, soon to 'go out of business' and restart all over again.

      this is the scam. they are untouchable and they know it.

      china batteries are the issue. its not about anything else but the batteries and the chargers. both are fires just waiting to happen.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's more than the number of transgender people (who only make up a fraction of a percent of the population anyway) on record as causing a ruckus in bathrooms. That merited countervailing laws and edicts of varying levels of legitimacy at three levels of government and public furor that drowns out all the real news. Surely e-cigs can provide as much a smokescreen the next time the news agencies either suffer a slow news day or whatever mysterious cabal of lizardmen is in power decides to jam the airwaves with much ado about nothing.

    8. Re:Wow by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      i really don't understand how lithium was ever deemed safe for pocket devices. if i had a tesla car, i'd be really scared of even the smallest collision. fortunately, my hybrid has a NiMH battery.

    9. Re:Wow by lawaetf1 · · Score: 2

      Cigarettes - $10/day habit.

      e-juice: $1-$2 / day

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    10. Re:Wow by leathered · · Score: 1

      I'm missing this one - the tobacco industry presumably supplies the nicotine that's vaped by these things

      You presume wrongly.

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    11. Re:Wow by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's funny because tesla cars are the least-dangerous in the most-severe collisions. Even when the battery is all fucked up, the fire is isolated away from the passenger compartment; and high-impact collisions transfer much less energy to the driver and passengers, thanks to enormous crumple zones.

    12. Re:Wow by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Informative

      i really don't understand how lithium was ever deemed safe for pocket devices. if i had a tesla car, i'd be really scared of even the smallest collision. fortunately, my hybrid has a NiMH battery.

      Which tells me that you haven't examined the risks. For example, you don't worry about the gasoline tank in your hybrid, but that's a lot more likely to be involved in or cause a fire.

      Tesla has had a few cars catch fire, but at a lower rate than traditional vehicles. Perhaps even more notably, they've been able to warn their occupants to get out, and even then erupt in fire slowly enough for people to safely escape.

      Looking at the other comments, it seems that people are attempting to use dodgy cells in them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    13. Re:Wow by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

      Since you're the self-appointed arbiter, please specify the minimum number of people injured / killed before any action (or even investigation) should be taken on a possibly faulty or poorly designed consumer product? Is it okay for 66, but not 100 ... While I assume you were joking, there *are* people that think like that.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    14. Re:Wow by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Ban all non-underwriters laboratories certified batteries from sale? Deny insurance claims caused by non-compliant batteries?

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    15. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the same time, how many people were killed or injured by fires caused by cigarettes?

      Oh, the guy who burned his leg had a bare unpackaged lithium ion battery in his pocket, along with his keys. You can guess what happened, and it wasn't the fault of any e-cigarette.

    16. Re:Wow by Llamalarity · · Score: 1

      Don't forget suicides due to Chantix. Oh, and many of the exploding batteries are loose in someones pockets, not 'In someones face'. So user error is too blame. These batteries are far more powerful than the AAs people are far more familiar with and less forging when you do something stupid.

    17. Re:Wow by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Were you looking on BangGood.com? Love that name.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    18. Re:Wow by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      OK, so who supplies it? I thought Nicotine was pretty rare outside of tobacco.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    19. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A single exploding e-cig is unacceptable.

      There are already laws against selling products that explode in the user's face, for good reason. The childish Libertarians, who your post unfortunately sounds a lot like, would have people just choose to stop using a product after it blows up in their faces.

      If someone is using an e-cig with a very low danger of exploding instead of wrecking themselves with cigarettes, the e-cig is probably still the better choice, but if someone is using the same e-cig to vape hash oil instead of smoking cannabis, the e-cig is the more dangerous choice until this problem is fixed.

      It would be better if we require manufacturers to use batteries and charging electronics that prevent explosions, and yes this is an area where the government sets the standards and needs to enforce them.

    20. Re:Wow by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine if 66 people died from smoking cigarettes? Why, they'd be banned immediately.

      cf. regulatory capture

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China makes good batteries, but they are not that much cheaper than US made batteries.

    22. Re:Wow by Qaa · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine if 66 people died from car accidents? Why, they'd be banned immediately. not.

    23. Re:Wow by geek · · Score: 1

      66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

      Since you're the self-appointed arbiter, please specify the minimum number of people injured / killed before any action (or even investigation) should be taken on a possibly faulty or poorly designed consumer product? Is it okay for 66, but not 100 ... While I assume you were joking, there *are* people that think like that.

      Of course there are people that think like that. I was directly making fun of them. It's not about numbers, it's about personal choice and responsibility. These should be civil cases and remain civil cases. The press should do their job (in this case they did) and report on it. People can then make an educated decision.

      If cell phones could blow up in peoples pockets, I'm not sure why people didn't think these things wouldn't blow up in their faces. But how many people were burned by regular cigarettes in the same time period? How many fell asleep and burned their houses down with a lit cig? We can play numbers games all day long.

    24. Re:Wow by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

      Actually, we might. Is this really anything to do with vaping? Seems to me it's more about making electronics with rechargeable batteries not explode.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    25. Re:Wow by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      66 whole reports?! Why, we need a law immediately! Someone call Congress!

      We don't need a law - the FDA has already unilaterally passed a rule that will essentially get rid of the e-cigarette market. Except, of course, for the crappy disposables that Big Tobacco sells at convenience stores.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    26. Re:Wow by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Fukushima hurt -34 people?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    27. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is what happens when you store your victim count using signed byte, instead of int.

    28. Re:Wow by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Bes' price. Bes' price!

      --- Every Chinese marketing / salesperson ever.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    29. Re:Wow by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      whoever thought that adding the word 'fire' to a BATTERY would help sales - he needs to spend some qualty time with the same batteries for extended periods.

      Or they might need to have a fire sale.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    30. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm OK with ultrafire... surefire on the other hand... :-)

    31. Re:Wow by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      This is arguably the worst part of the FDA's new regulations on e-cigs. Even if there are still manufacturers making e-cig batteries, ALL changes will be frozen. So even if the manufacturer discovers a flaw and wants to fix it, they can't without a long and expensive approval process that will delay the update, possibly for years.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    32. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Delete this!!!"

    33. Re:Wow by harperska · · Score: 1

      How many times have the rather large lithium batteries in the smartphones currently in millions of peoples' pockets right now exploded? It is not a matter of chemistry, but a matter of quality control. If e-cigs were regulated at the same level as smartphones (or at all, really), we would not be having this conversation.

    34. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > some dangerous shit from amazon or ebay via chia brands and it blows up on you

      ch-ch-ch-chia!

    35. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla pretty much has the safest car on the road. And even when they had problems with battery puncture from road debris, the fires were away from passengers, providing plenty of time to safely exist the vehicle.

    36. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly how the FAA is destroyed free market economics and frequently creates a less safe flying environment. This is why a $200 part frequently costs $20,000+. Anything the government touches they will fuck up.

    37. Re:Wow by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Don't forget suicides due to Chantix. Oh, and many of the exploding batteries are loose in someones pockets, not 'In someones face'. So user error is too blame. These batteries are far more powerful than the AAs people are far more familiar with and less forging when you do something stupid.

      Well...a lot of people carry around a lot of powerful batteries in their pockets and by their heads now-a-days (e.g cell phones). Still the issue should be pushed as a battery issues not an e-cig/vapor issue since the vapor is basically water+nicotin+flavoring, IOW, nothing explosive in itself.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    38. Re:Wow by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      The battery is directly under the passengers ... That's an absolute-fucking-lutly horrible place for a fire to happen, you know how fire travels ... Right? Where is the gasoline in an ICE car? Behind the cabin and away from the road surface where it can be damaged.

      And the car actually carries FAR MORE energy in the passenger cabin during frontal impacts. In normal front engine ICE cars, the engine and all its mass is the first thing to stop, adding no stress to the cabin.

      On the other hand, the tesla battery is directly attached, very strongly to the cabin... Effectively driving it forward with all the battery mass/energy. Are you still so silly to think that's better cause if so you need some basic physics lessons.

      Hate to break it too you, but those two things are examples of tesla getting it wrong because ... That's the only F'n place you can stick that much mass on the car other than under the trunk or hood.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    39. Re:Wow by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      And so this is where globalism triumphs: assemble your own from parts easily found online and screwed together. Let's see the FDA do something about that.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    40. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fukushima hurt -34 people?

      At least (absolute value). If they were not using nuclear power the last fifty years, seems like coal and oil use would have been the likely replacements, leading to drilling and mining deaths, transportation deaths and of course air and water pollution from heavy metals, sulphur, etc.

      Even after the disaster (with was less than a thousandth the disaster the quake+tsunami were), Fukushima is still a net positive on the environment vs dumping fifty years of coal ash in that bay.

    41. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a matter of chemistry, but a matter of quality control. If e-cigs were regulated at the same level as smartphones (or at all, really), we would not be having this conversation.

      Not to mention the 'modding' craze among many vapers....

    42. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im pretty sure the UL hologram wont survive a meltdown.

    43. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well...a lot of people carry around a lot of powerful batteries in their pockets and by their heads now-a-days (e.g cell phones). Still the issue should be pushed as a battery issues not an e-cig/vapor issue since the vapor is basically water+nicotin+flavoring, IOW, nothing explosive in itself.

      Phone batteries (all I've seen) have protective circuitry that prevents over [dis]charging, over current/short circuit protection etc. "Mod'ed" e-cigs (big and thriving among vapers) are unlikely to have such niceties in place. Couple that with high-power (low ohm) heating coils... Also, the vapor doesn't necessarily contain nicotine - many use just flavored juice, without nicotine.

    44. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly if it is I couldn't care. People are using vapers as an excuse to continue to "smoke". It is a bad habit period so if what people are claiming to be a "safe alternative" is no longer safe. Maybe people will stop using it as a excuse to not stop smoking.

    45. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diesel is the solution

    46. Re:Wow by valinor89 · · Score: 1

      They also reuse batteries and sell them as new, sell the rejects that didn't pass QA etc. You can get good quality from china, but expect to pay for it. Also expect to be burned some times.

    47. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A single exploding e-cig is unacceptable. There are already laws against selling products that explode in the user's face, for good reason. .... It would be better if we require manufacturers to use batteries and charging electronics that prevent explosions, and yes this is an area where the government sets the standards and needs to enforce them.

      How many of these cases actually involved e-cigs straight from the manufacturer? IE not modified with bigger (unprotected?) cells, lower resistance coils etc, or completely scratch built from parts possibly never intended to go together?

    48. Re:Wow by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's an absolute-fucking-lutly horrible place for a fire to happen, you know how fire travels ... Right?

      In every Tesla crash which has breached the battery and caused a fire, two things have happened. First, the passenger compartment was more-than-adequately protected--to the point that passengers actually came back WHILE THE CAR WAS ON FIRE, got back in the car, retrieved personal effects and left. I recommend against this, as lithium smoke is bad. Second, firefighters tried putting out metal fires with water--never do this.

      And the car actually carries FAR MORE energy in the passenger cabin during frontal impacts. In normal front engine ICE cars, the engine and all its mass is the first thing to stop, adding no stress to the cabin.

      The engine carries more momentum and can act as a ram to possibly break down an object that's distinctly not a tree (if you hit a tree, it will stop you). Otherwise, the engine is a huge brick that doesn't do much to protect the passenger, and gets in the way of crumple zones--meaning the car disperses less of the energy of stopping, and SLAMS the passenger to a stop where a Tesla more gently slows the passenger to a stop ("slows" is a relative term here, as is "gently").

      On the other hand, the tesla battery is directly attached, very strongly to the cabin... Effectively driving it forward with all the battery mass/energy. Are you still so silly to think that's better cause if so you need some basic physics lessons.

      I think it's better because, in all tests and all real-life collisions, it has proven to be better.

      Hate to break it too you, but those two things are examples of tesla getting it wrong

      What's wrong is your basic theoretical understanding of the practical engineering of the Telsa car versus an ICE in the context of a high-speed collision. You can scream about how you *think* high-energy impacts are going to work in each platform all you want; and, in the real world, they'll work out HOW THEY ACTUALLY HAPPEN.

      This is the same thing as when you look at a sheet of aluminate glass and say, "oh, that's a glass, it can't possibly hold up to an impact," and then somebody smashes a 25 pound sledgehammer into it and it bounces off. Aluminate glass, at 1cm, holds up to impact pressures of well-over 1,000 kg per meter even when heated to hundreds of degrees celsius. Whether you perceive it as being a frail material matters as much as whether you perceive a Tesla to be dangerous: when the hammer comes down, those perceptions won't hold up.

    49. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ultrafire was a HUGE battey name before lithium came along. Just bad luck on the name.

    50. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention user responsibility. With all these reports going about, IF you were going to make the switch to vaporizers wouldn't you think to research safe use of these things? Full disclosure, I am a vaper, and quit the cigs the first day while doing as much research as I could into the topic. A year later, now, and I've had no problems.

      To those unbeknowst to the safe use of an 18650: Know your ohms law, make sure the insulating wraps are pristine, make sure the insulator ring is intact, and (if using a mechanical mod) make sure the 510 pin is long enough to not cause a hard short, monitor batteries while charging, and you're pretty much good to go.

    51. Re:Wow by z3d4r · · Score: 1

      of course, we do things upside down here in Australia, where it is the big tobacco companies that are pushing the government to legalize e-cigarettes in order to protect their business... from the governments anti smoking laws (plain packaging, ever increasing taxes, limits on where people can smoke...).

      P.S. the vaping units themselves are legal, but it is illegal to sell the nicotine juice.

      --
      You shall know him by his Sig
    52. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This, I don't vape, I don't smoke, but many people I've known have used vaping as a tool to quit smoking. some successfully. using it like the patch, decreasing the amount of nicotine to nothing, and then slowly giving up the habit of smoking since they no longer need the nicotine.

    53. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's the autism-hating Slashdot troll!

    54. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem with Ultrafire 18650s as they hold less than quarter of advertised capacity. :)

    55. Re:Wow by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Forget the gasoline tank.

      There's motor oil lubricating your engine. It's very flammable.

      In fact, that's how car fires tend to start--spurting motor oil from cracked seals.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    56. Re:Wow by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Honestly if it is I couldn't care. People are using vapers as an excuse to continue to "smoke". It is a bad habit period so if what people are claiming to be a "safe alternative" is no longer safe. Maybe people will stop using it as a excuse to not stop smoking.

      Vaping supposedly is safer for others, meaning no second hand smoke. I've also heard that it's easier to overdose on nicotine using e-cigs. If someone absolutely must have nicotine, I prefer a means which doesn't impact me.

    57. Re:Wow by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      We already have bodies like Underwriters Labs and Conformité Européenne which certify consumer products as safe to use. Additionally, the FDA has an even more stringent regime of compliance and certification for durable medical equipment; which is where these "vape pens" logically fit, given that their purpose is to provide humans a non-disposable means to ingest a drug. Tellingly, the "vaping" industry has not seen fit to build their products to standards for UL or CE approval, much less that of the FDA.

      It's past time for the "vaping" industry to grow up, leave the head shops and gas-station quickie-marts behind, and generally knock off the semi-legitimate, fly-by-night, grey-market crap.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    58. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok since you're the expert, how much regulation goes into smartphone batteries. What are the tests/requirements they have to go through?

    59. Re:Wow by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Well...a lot of people carry around a lot of powerful batteries in their pockets and by their heads now-a-days (e.g cell phones). Still the issue should be pushed as a battery issues not an e-cig/vapor issue since the vapor is basically water+nicotin+flavoring, IOW, nothing explosive in itself.

      Phone batteries (all I've seen) have protective circuitry that prevents over [dis]charging, over current/short circuit protection etc. "Mod'ed" e-cigs (big and thriving among vapers) are unlikely to have such niceties in place. Couple that with high-power (low ohm) heating coils...

      Agreed. But that's a choice of the quality of the batteries and equipment one purchases, not with vaping itself.

      Also, the vapor doesn't necessarily contain nicotine - many use just flavored juice, without nicotine.

      True, it doesn't have to contain nicotine, but people use vaping to quit smoking by reducing the nicotine levels over time as they can cope with the changes. One of my friends did that - he tried other methods but they didn't work; vaping he quit in 30 days and hasn't turned back. He continues the habit of vaping but now with zero nicotine - it's just flavored water vapor and far safer than anything in a cigar/cigarette.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    60. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have there been any studies done regarding second hand vaping?

    61. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a Chinese battery company named Thunder Sky.

    62. Re:Wow by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Funny

      Diesel is the solution

      No it's the solvent.

      If you aren't part of the solution, you are the precipitate.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    63. Re:Wow by Solandri · · Score: 1

      18650 batteries are largely used in small high performance flashlights. "Ultrafire" is an attempt to sponge off the reputation of Surefire in that market.

    64. Re:Wow by sjames · · Score: 2

      THIS!

      Many newer e-cigs specify that their batteries must be rated for at least 20A discharge and they mean it. If you put old laptop cells and such it them (or flashlight batteries), there is a real risk of it failing "dramatically". Given how many people do that, I'm actually impressed and surprised that it's only 66.

      Of course, I notice the FDA lumped everything from mild redness due to an overheat and something that might be describable as an explosion into the same category to fluff it up to 66.

      So, use only batteries rated for 20A discharge or greater. Since a few "cloud chaser" devices need even more, be sure to read the instructions and use the appropriate rated batteries. Also make sure your PV's battery case is SIDE vented or has a magnetic battery door so it can't rocket itself into your mouth.

      DO NOT use old LiIon batteries, use lmr batteries. The formulation is intrinsically safer.

    65. Re:Wow by sjames · · Score: 1

      Tobacco has a few close varieties whose nicotine content is several times higher than "regular" tobacco.

    66. Re:Wow by sjames · · Score: 1

      Though there have been one or two genuinely bad designs, most of the problems come from ignoring the battery requirements. For example, some people salvage old cells from a laptop battery. If you use an lmr battery (as specified), even the bad designs won't rocket into your mouth.

    67. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are companies who specialize in a extracting nicotine for either industrial (pesticide) or pharmaceutical purposes. Many of these are overseas. There are also a few smaller companies who extract nicotine primarily to sell to eliquid companies. This nicotine is as pure as possible and then diluted down for use.

      AFAIK none of these smaller companies are owned by big tobacco companies. In fact, if they were they would almost certainly refuse to sell to anyone who might use it in eliquid.

      Electronic cigarettes are the first and only external competition Big Tobacco has ever had as an industry, and they are scared to death.

    68. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Second hand vapor contains barely detectable levels of environmental pollutants. The vast majority of what is exhaled is vegetable glycerine, propylene glycol, water, and flavors in an aerosol. The same stuff that is inhaled basically, minus almost all the nicotine and plus some water from the inside of the lungs.

      Unless you literally inhale a vaper's exhale through some sort of reverse mouth to mouth resuscitation, you would be in more danger from inhaling the smell from a sheet of freshly baked cookies than from cookie flavored second hand vapor.

    69. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does it score lower than some other cars in Euro NCAP?

    70. Re: Wow by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It seems a hell of a lot of deflection is going on here. I'm kinda guessing that "Big Tobacco" is such a bogeyman, the vaping community doesn't want to believe that any money they spend on liquids goes to it.

      Based upon what I see, it looks like nicotine is being extracted from tobacco for vapers. If that weren't true, then the argument that "Big Tobacco" sees this as something they're scared of seems ludicrous because there's absolutely no reason why they can't enter the same market - with the huge advantage of money, experience, and an unlimited supply of tobacco.

      You guys are going to have to do more than handwave and change the subject if you're going to convince me.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    71. Re:Wow by houghi · · Score: 1

      Well, it is not as if they didn't try to warn you. They even hired a native English speaker to come up with a name to make you aware of the situation by name only.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    72. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plus many vapers gradually reduce the nicotine until they are not using any anymore.

    73. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only expertise you need is the things aren't blowing up in our hands

    74. Re:Wow by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Did the exploding vape article have any links for burn units? If so, someone pass it on to BitZtream cause I think they need it.

    75. Re:Wow by objectdisoriented · · Score: 1

      I wonder..how many...new Lung Cancer incidents due to tobacco were there in the same period? house fires? car fires?

      I bet the number of things set on fire by traditional smoking materials is greater still.

      In fact, a significant percentage of your house and car fires were started with a cigarette, cigar, pipe, joint, match or spilled lighter fluid.

      --
      Performance must be inherent in every aspect of the system. It is not an afterthought, but always thought. - me
    76. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a smoker or a vaper so I'm probably not the best person to explain most of this, but I've been reading a lot about all this ecig stuff lately and I'm pretty upset about the direction where things are going, so I'll chime in.

      I think you are confusing the "tobacco industry" with "Big Tobacco." The tobacco industry includes all of the growers and suppliers of tobacco plants (I believe most is grown in China, but there are still a lot of tobacco farms in the US.) When people talk about the so called big, evil tobacco companies, they refer to them as "Big Tobacco." When they say Big Tobacco they mean the big three tobacco corporations - R.J. Reynolds, Philip Morris, and Lorillard.

      The nicotine in electronic cigarette liquid comes from chemical extraction from tobacco plants. The Big Tobacco companies are not making their billions of dollars from selling tobacco plants to the chemical extraction companies that produce extracted nicotine. They view the companies that supply extracted nicotine and most of the electronic cigarette industry as a direct competitor to their business model.

      What is a bit tricky to understand is that Big Tobacco simply doesn't want to enter the same market. The current market for electronic cigarettes is one of open systems. You can purchase any of a large number of designs from a multitude of manufacturers. A key feature of the current crop of products is that they are refillable (cheaply) with whatever electronic cigarette liquid the user wishes to use. Electronic cigarette liquid is produced by a huge number of manufacturers and vendors as well as blended by local "vape shops." It can easily and cheaply be made by just about anyone at home. The only tobacco related part of the product is the extracted nicotine (and I would certainly question how useful it is to continue to consider the relationship between tobacco and the extracted nicotine at the levels of purity being achieved for the nicotine extraction), to which food flavorings, propylene glycol, and/or vegetable glycerin are then added. The amount of nicotine used can vary from a lot to none. All of these items, including extracted nicotine, are presently readily available for purchase to anyone in the US.

      The hardware itself is configurable, swappable, etc. You can elect to use one liquid storage tank with a particular set of features from one manufacturer with a "box mod" (containing a replaceable battery) with a particular set of desirable features from another manufacturer. More advanced users can even purchase their own wire and construct their own heating coils from a variety of metals each with their own features.

      All of this represents a huge loss of control unlike any the Big Tobacco companies have ever had to deal with before. They want to maintain their present business model - keep the people returning to them over and over buying cheaply made throwaway cigarettes at huge markups with a fixed amount of addictive nicotine always present and specified by them to ensure their customers remain hooked. They've begrudgingly entered the electronic cigarette market due to its growing popularity, but have done so with this same mindset. They have closed system devices, that aren't re-usable/re-fillable, that users must buy, throw away when done, and then return to them to buy more.

      That's what this story is actually about and I'm honestly sad to see the agenda being promoted here on Slashdot. It's part of a campaign to eliminate the current open state of the electronic cigarette industry, and return it to what has existed in the past - something closed off and highly profitable for the big tobacco companies, the big pharmaceutical companies (tobacco addiction products are also a very bug business), and the tax coffers, all to the detriment of actual public health. That last one is why I care about any of this. These devices have insanely high success rates for moving people entirely off smoking things that cause cancer. The benefit of that to society and to our healthcare system is what I'm i

    77. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2010 according to FEMA there were 350 smoking related residential fire deaths and 950 injuries. See https://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/statistics/v13i6.pdf .

    78. Re:Wow by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      I wonder..how many...new Lung Cancer incidents due to tobacco were there in the same period? house fires? car fires?

      I bet the number of things set on fire by traditional smoking materials is greater still.

      In fact, a significant percentage of your house and car fires were started with a cigarette, cigar, pipe, joint, match or spilled lighter fluid.

      That was kind of my point.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    79. Re:Wow by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

      In 2010 according to FEMA there were 350 smoking related residential fire deaths and 950 injuries. See https://www.usfa.fema.gov/down... .

      Great numbers. Probably any of the numbers I listed would make the 66 injuries for e-cigs look really small.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    80. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for "a carrier"

      You are so full of shit.

    81. Re:Wow by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is the use case. E-cigs are very high current devices. Smartphones are low current devices. Take those smartphone batteries and try pulling 30W from them, they might start blowing up. Take the E-cig batteries and never draw more than 1-2W from them, and you may never have a problem with them.

    82. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep exactly. if there's one thing to not cheap out on (for ANY product) it's lithium ion batteries. This goes for vape gear, for laptops, whatever. stick to the trusted name brand stuff. LG, Samsung, Sony all make reputable 16850 batteries.

    83. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      18650 batteries are aimed at the torch market. The brand names come from the torch brands, so they use words like 'fire'. Some manufacturers even warn customers to only use their batteries in torches.

    84. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pressures of well-over 1,000 kg per meter

      WTF?

  3. Regulation Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just criminalize them? I really don't want to pay more for health care because of other people's stupidity.

    1. Re:Regulation Please by phishybongwaters · · Score: 2

      Sure, lets criminalize sugar, being lazy, and making bad choices while we're at it.

    2. Re:Regulation Please by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Just wait ..

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:Regulation Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R U big tobacco shill?

    4. Re: Regulation Please by thoolou · · Score: 1

      And I don't want to pay more in taxes, and increase oppressive governmental regulation due to someone's misinformed stupidity...

    5. Re:Regulation Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obesity costs the system more than smoking does. The thing is, smokers tend to die pretty quickly when the complications set in. Obese people have ongoing expensive health complications.

    6. Re:Regulation Please by unrtst · · Score: 1

      First of all, fuck off.

      Second, they have put laws on the books in many places, but those laws have made it illegal to sell e-cigs that do NOT have nicotine.
      For example, in NYC, you can not sell the flavored ones, or ones without nicotine. This was supposedly to protect the children somehow.

      I quite the real things 1.5 years ago. I bought some nicotine-free ones online - used several brands, though I'd recommend the "blu" ones for ease of use and taste. I didn't use them all that much, but when in a situation that causes significant cravings, they were enough to get by. If they had been nicotine ones, it would have put me right back on the wagon, resuming the chemical addiction.

      IMO, they should require that the cig/juice distributors offer a nicotine free version, if they're going to add any requirement.

    7. Re:Regulation Please by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Sure, lets criminalize sugar, being lazy, and making bad choices while we're at it.

      It's not the nicotine that's exploding, but the battery so it's not really the "bad choice" to which you're alluding. What if that battery was in a bluetooth headset and it blew someone's head off for just listening to the radio? Would you still be so condescending?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    8. Re:Regulation Please by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That bluetooth headset isn't a pure resistive load, nor as heavy a load as the heating element in an e-cig. That said, I have a couple Firefly vaporizers and a Firefly 2, not the little cig-shaped and not used for nicotine; more medicinal than that. They're wonderful little devices, well built, but I also take care not to overwork the lithium bombs they contain, given the high-wattage load they power and the proximity to my face while they're powering said load. No need to condescend the bluetooth headset user, as even someone who is aware of the dangers will realize there really isn't any danger in that little headset. Perfectly acceptable to condescend to an e-cig user completely unaware of the (somewhat obvious) dangers of those devices, though; and I'd expect to be talked down to as an idiot if I held power on one of my Firefly vapes with a full battery, because the dangers are clear: arc flash from a failed heating element, explosion or fire from an overheated (overworked) battery, or both.

      And yes, using the cheapest chinese shit batteries (with "fire" in the name, no less) or cells from a damaged laptop or tool pack is a bad choice.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    9. Re:Regulation Please by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      I believe that the idea behind not allowing sale of the flavoured ones was something like "The flavoured ones sort of kind of taste almost candy-like. This will entice the children into trying them at an earlier age, and get them addicted to smoking. Therefore, it is bad. We shall only allow selling the normal ones, which taste terrible, because no child has ever smoked cigarettes before in all of history."

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    10. Re:Regulation Please by BlueStrat · · Score: 1, Troll

      Or just criminalize them? I really don't want to pay more for health care because of other people's stupidity.

      People will never stop doing stupid things that get them injured/killed. The only way to not pay more for health care because of stupid people doing stupid things is to not have a system that forces you and others to pay for other peoples' health care.

      The only way to minimize the cost in a shared-cost health care system is to restrict the freedom of the people to make individual choices. Every decision and choice affects health in some manner. It's like the interstate commerce clause. It can be stretched to cover pretty much anything those in power want it to cover. It's the government's "master key" to removing individual freedom and the ability to choose.

      There will always be individual risk in a free and open society. Deal with it or move somewhere where individual freedom and choice don't exist.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    11. Re:Regulation Please by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      The new FDA regulations on e-cigs did NOT ban flavors. It will, however, effectively put every manufacturer out of business with the exception of the big tobacco conglomerates.

      You won't see any more innovation or options in e-cigs either. Every component is regulated and banned without a long and expensive approval process. In fact, it will probably be the end of refillable e-cigs and the sale of e-juice. It's going to be too expensive as each and every blend will require a separate application and set of laboratory testing.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    12. Re:Regulation Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And obese people tend to cost the system less, since they tend to die of heart attacks, strokes, etc. before they get to the age where incredibly expensive long-term round-the-clock care is needed.
      The public expense argument is an argument against health.

    13. Re:Regulation Please by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      If a bluetooth headset pulls that kind of amperage out of a battery, then it's clearly a very shitty bluetooth headset and would never pass UL, and very likely would never be sold.

      Garbage lithium batteries + huge electrical load + proximity of face = blown up face. Why is this hard to understand?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    14. Re: Regulation Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a smoker who pays four times the insurance rates you do, I don't particularly want to fund your completely accidental health issue, which you are too cheap to pay more than a tiny fraction of to fix your own problems.

      The sword goes both ways. If I'm not allowed to make my own choices, then neither are you.
      Now pay your own fucking health bill.

    15. Re:Regulation Please by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Or people will just buy from somewhere outside the FDA's jurisdiction and have it shipped in. Good luck checking millions of UPS and FedEx packages for e-cig parts that look just like every other god damn electronic parts ever.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    16. Re:Regulation Please by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      If a bluetooth headset pulls that kind of amperage out of a battery, then it's clearly a very shitty bluetooth headset and would never pass UL, and very likely would never be sold.

      Garbage lithium batteries + huge electrical load + proximity of face = blown up face. Why is this hard to understand?

      Wrong detail on which to focus genius. The example device (bluetooth headset) was simply meant to be an innocuous device not associated with what the GP implied by mentioning "sugar, being lazy, and making bad choices". It could be any non-cigarette type thing. But you're correct in that the e-cig draws a higher immediate load than most other electronics.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    17. Re:Regulation Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just criminalize them? I really don't want to pay more for health care because of other people's stupidity.

      People will never stop doing stupid things that get them injured/killed. The only way to not pay more for health care because of stupid people doing stupid things is to not have a system that forces you and others to pay for other peoples' health care.

      The only way to minimize the cost in a shared-cost health care system is to restrict the freedom of the people to make individual choices. Every decision and choice affects health in some manner. It's like the interstate commerce clause. It can be stretched to cover pretty much anything those in power want it to cover. It's the government's "master key" to removing individual freedom and the ability to choose.

      There will always be individual risk in a free and open society. Deal with it or move somewhere where individual freedom and choice don't exist.

      Strat

      So much this.

      And modded "Troll"?

      I guess some people become upset when they are confronted with unpleasant truths they'd rather not think about because those truths conflict with what they want.

    18. Re:Regulation Please by sjames · · Score: 1

      In general, when an ecig blows, it's because the user ignored the manufacturer's instructions about the correct battery type/rating. That's the bad choice part.

      To be fair, it can also be a scuzzy seller who re-labeled salvaged batteries. We already have laws for that, but these tend to come from China and we have no good way to push back on that ATM.

    19. Re:Regulation Please by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Well, when you arbitrarily say that details don't matter, then yeah, okay. However, in my world (and everyone else's), details DO matter, and a bluetooth headset just isn't capable of pulling anywhere close to the kind of load necessary to make the battery explode without burning out other components along the way. As it turns out, designed wattage matters when it comes to this kind of thing.

      "Genius"

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    20. Re: Regulation Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire us in the name of your products also ...

    21. Re: Regulation Please by adolf · · Score: 1

      Please show me an example of a UL or CSA certified Bluetooth headset.

      I'll wait.

    22. Re: Regulation Please by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Yes, indeed it is, as part of another word. UltraFire, on the other hand... well, "Fire" stands on its own there. Further, my products (rather, the ones I'm using, I don't product, market, or sell them) are intended to heat up, it's what they're supposed to do, so "fire" is appropriate. A lithium battery? Not so much.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    23. Re: Regulation Please by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      gah... proofreading... "I don't produce, market, or sell them".

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    24. Re:Regulation Please by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      So I should by as much e-juice as possible now?

      I really hate the government. They destroy anyone small while propping up big corporations and still the people think that our administration is there for the little guy.

  4. And the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Government to the rescue!

    Seriously, use a protected battery, use only one battery in the device, in low wattage devices that have short-circuit protection, and don't overcharge your battery. And don't buy the cheap shit batteries - the three bucks you save won't be worth it. It's that fucking simple.

    1. Re: And the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not quite that simple. There have been instances of reputable manufacturers having problems. Think Sony. Think laptops on fire.

      The whole problem with protection circuits on batteries is the same as the problem with poorly made batteries. Many of the protection circuits simply don't work or work incorrectly. Even with good quality protection circuits, the end user is left with a battery that will never come close to meeting the performance specs that the OEM has built into the battery. Many 18650 batteries capable of delivering 10 to 20 amps safely but won't reach 5 amps with a protection circuit because that circuit will trip. Protection circuits are almost entirely added on to the batter by a third party. Panasonic to my knowledge, doesn't make a single li-ion that comes with overcharging/over discharge protection. The most likely culprits in many battery fires.

      What they do provide you with is the knowledge that each battery should have such protect

       

    2. Re:And the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build that wall!

    3. Re:And the solution by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but EVERY SINGLE BATTERY from china is unsafe.

      china is the problem. china has been the problem for a long time now.

      we need to address the complete lack of ability for americans to sue the chinese companies if they cause us harm.

      failing that, suspend all power-based electronics from china unless there is a US company that front-ends it and is liable. if people can be sued, you can bet they'll quickly address qa and build issues.

      until people who build and sell these are held liable, nothing will change.

      and I don't care if the battery says panasonic or samsung or sony on it. its all unsafe. its made 'to a price point, all of it, and all of the high density batteries (ie, lithium based) are unsafe.

      not to mention the chargers. most of they are not safe either.

      I feel very strongly about this; I was involved in a li-poly battery based project and I saw how poorly the whole thing was handled. it really woke me up and forced me to pay attention to this field.

      china only wants quick money. deaths do not matter. westerns deaths - HA - they matter even less to the chinese.

      we need to fight back and force them to increase their standards or hit them where it hurts, in their wallets.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re: And the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't use protected batteries in any device made in the last 2 years or so, it wouldn't be able to output sufficient current, and it probably wouldn't fit anyways. The use of NiMH chemistry has completely superceded protected batteries. Although the devices the batteries go into should have protections, and all the legit ones do.

  5. Well I do declare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..I've come down with a case of the vapers!

    1. Re:Well I do declare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ..I've come down with a case of the vapers!

      Except in this case it's not "Turning Japanese", it's turning Chinese!

  6. Time to mandate by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Time to mandate that they're sold in plain black packaging with a scary picture on it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Time to mandate by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Black is in style. That would be encouraging kids to vape. We'll have to make them an uncool color. Perhaps hotpink.

    2. Re:Time to mandate by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Nah too cool. How about #666633 or another baby poop color?

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    3. Re:Time to mandate by Sperbels · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding? That's my favorite shade of green. How about we just cover them with COMCAST logos?

    4. Re:Time to mandate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you reward Comcast by associating their brand with something *less* bad?

  7. stupid people blow up their faces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and not the devices themselves.

    That's just big pharmas FUD spreading.

  8. Not just e-cigs, mind you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind that it's not just e-cigs that can explode in your face when smoked. The same thing can happen if you choose to smoke pole. It's a slightly different kind of explosion, but in both cases one's face can take the brunt of the impact.

    1. Re:Not just e-cigs, mind you. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      if you choose to smoke pole.

      I googled. Now I know.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  9. Vapin' in the boys room! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This explains what brought down Flight 804.

  10. Lose an eye?? by Foundryman · · Score: 1

    Can't risk losing an eye, time to switch back to regular cigarettes where I can only lose a lung....

  11. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet sweet irony.

  12. They forgot to mention by phishybongwaters · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The battery... I've only ever heard of them exploding or overheating with the massive, third party, batteries that go well beyond 4.8v This is the same nonsense as the "e-ciggs cause popcorn lung" fiasco. No, they don't. But if you are an idiot that heats it up to 700 degrees, you deserve what you get. I've quick smoking thanks to my ecigg, and i'm basically done using that as a crutch. THAT'S why these reports exist, follow the trail and you'll find yourself at the feet of big tobacco

    1. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any lithium cell can reach an explosion point with the exception of the coin cells that don't really have the amount of electrolyte (or the architectural strength of a cylinder) to explode.

      Thermal fuses are not expensive, I can't imagine they're saving that much money by omitting them. My best guess is "cut cells"* from China are not reattaching the fuses and the double whammy with the reduced capacity is what's causing them to explode.

      (Cut cells are what we refer to as the degraded cells that some Chinese companies dig from the wastebucket. They dissemble the cell, remove the parts of the electrolyte paper that are no longer conducting, run a wire to connect the remaining part of the cell to the far cathode / anode, wrap a label to hold it together, and sell it as new at the capacity it was originally rated at but no longer maintains). Multi cell batteries for laptops and what not have a similar process done where the dead cells are removed / bypassed / reconfigured. As long as the battery pack can maintain the listed voltage at "max charge" it will be resold--even though it cannot hold the mAH it was listed at.

      Since charge controllers don't know when this has happened, they overcharge the battery resulting in unsafe things happening to the battery. It also can get discharged lower than expected due to the reduced capacity in some applications.)

    2. Re:They forgot to mention by gosand · · Score: 1

      ecigs to help people quit smoking? *golf clap*
      ecigs that are modified and/or used for "competitive vaping" *shrugs*

      Idiots ruin everything, and lawyers soon follow. That may be redundant.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    3. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I crank up the voltage on my mod, first it will start to taste like ass and then the coil will burn out. I wouldn't know how to make it explode if I wanted to.

    4. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a whole subculture of the ecigg subculture on modding/overclocking eciggs to put out more heat. And there is also a category of models that charge up a capacitor bank and attempt to shove as much current as possible into the coil.

    5. Re:They forgot to mention by Kohath · · Score: 1

      And big government. Government makes a hell of a lot more money on cigarettes than tobacco companies do. E-cigs are a competitive threat to that revenue stream, and early death from cigarette smoking is a cost savings to government.

      If "follow the money" is predictive, expect e-cigs to be heavily regulated and taxed to try to make sure the nicotine-addicted are still paying more and costing less.

    6. Re:They forgot to mention by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Try replacing the battery with a piece of shit from China that is unsafe to begin with. Then put a massive resistive load on it (like a coil designed to flash liquid into vapor instantly) which draws far more amperage per unit time than can safely be drawn from that piece of shit battery.

      It's a pretty good recipe for how to make something go "bang".

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep sucking that Trump dick, you lying faggot. If it weren't for government intervention your little vaping habit would be used to push all kinds of drugs but you can't face the facts about how it keeps people hooked and just as prone to cancer.

    8. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same - my favourite was the story of the Florida guy who "rolled his own" out of a stack of watch batteries. I'd doff my cap to him out of respect for his knowledge of electronics....except for the way things turned out.

      Personally I quite smoking five years ago, and decided I couldn't be assed vaping anymore two years ago. Having tried to quit cold turkey and with gum before I sincerely doubt I could ever have stayed off the smokes without the intermediate step.

    9. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know it's not the nicotine that gives you cancer, it's the burning tar, right?

    10. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try replacing the battery with a piece of shit from China that is unsafe to begin with. Then put a massive resistive load on it (like a coil designed to flash liquid into vapor instantly) which draws far more amperage per unit time than can safely be drawn from that piece of shit battery.

      It's a pretty good recipe for how to make something go "bang".

      Actually it's the LOW-RESISTENCE coils that draw more amperage from the battery. Do brush up on basics like Ohm's Law before you comment on a subject, won't you?

    11. Re:They forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you until:
      "Since charge controllers don't know when this has happened, they overcharge the battery resulting in unsafe things happening to the battery. It also can get discharged lower than expected due to the reduced capacity in some applications.)"

      Estimated SOC of a lithium battery may be driven by coulomb counting, but the hard thresholds at the top and bottom of charge/discharge SHOULD be voltage dependent(massive negligence not-withstanding).

      Charging lithium batteries can be done with a bench-top power supply with the voltage set to the max allowable for that cell's chemistry(minus safety margin), or you can charge at a faster rate by increasing the power supply's voltage setting and watching the measured voltage between the terminals climb until it approaches the max allowable. This assumes that the battery is rated for the charge rate the power supply can source. If you have a 1C rated lithium cell with a 5000mAh capacity: the max charge rate is 5000mA aka 5.0 amps. If you exceed that rating: you're going "off-spec" and anything that happens to your dumbass is your own fault. When you're dealing with big lithium cells, it's very difficult to exceed the max charge rating the cell is capable of soaking up, so finding a charger that will cook the cell before it "browns-out"(voltage droops) is hard to do($$$).

      Here's a good rule of thumb to not be an idiot:
      When I buy a Chinese 10000mAh battery rated for 10C continuous, 20C burst: I treat it like it's 5C continuous, 9C burst (90A).

      Discharge and charge ratings are independent of each-other, with charge ratings usually being more conservative than discharge ratings. Puffy cells are normally a product of either overcharging(voltage or current), or overdischarging(voltage or current). Battery fires are almost always a consequence of the same two types of operator error. These batteries almost never spontaneously blow up unless the charge controller manufacturer is negligent or inept(~10-20% in my experience) or the user was doing something stupid(bypassing safety interlocks/taking a fully charged battery "off charge" then immediately putting it back "on charge" hundreds of times, etc.).

      I find the cases of laptop battery fires more interesting because those charge controllers should have been fully vetted, which means the power supply wasn't made to manufacturer specifications, aftermarket battery, or there was a manufacturing defect(and I'm struggling to imagine the first scenario causing a fire).

    12. Re:They forgot to mention by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Mine too. In fact, anything above 4.3 tastes pretty awful.

  13. Chinese crap + carelessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to construct high power ( > 1000 mW ) hand-held lasers as a hobby, which has quite an active community on the Web.

    As anyone in that community will tell you, a VERY high priority safety issue (amongst others) is lithium ion battery safety. We would work to figure out which brands were the safest and most reliable, make sure newbies understand the dangers of recharging and handling the batteries, and knew the best practices.

    The trouble with these vapes are that the batteries are coming out of whatever crap factories in China can make them for the least expense (by cutting corners), and these crap batteries are being used by people who have not been educated about the dangers or the best practices.

    Just like the "hoverboards"...

    1. Re:Chinese crap + carelessness by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Those 18650's are not called "ULTRAFIRE" for nothing...

    2. Re:Chinese crap + carelessness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've got one in a flashlight and it works fine. If you don't try to exceed its nominal current capacity it will probably last ages. People are making vapes without circuit protection and then getting surprised when they asplode.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Chinese crap + carelessness by rsborg · · Score: 1

      The solution to all this is to DRM the battery-interface and enforce "made-for-ecigg" labeling scheme... yeah, that's it!

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    4. Re:Chinese crap + carelessness by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      A flashlight is quite a different beast from a resistive coil meant to flash liquid into vapor.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  14. I imagine it's the customizable units.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been vaping for about 1 1/2 years using White Cloud E-Cigs. They are made in America and are basically a cylinder battery that can't be modded. The cartiridges are also prefilled. Kinda like "Blu" but much more normal looking.

    I would imagine that it's these crazy giant type batteries/vaporizers that are causing the exploding issues/hazards that are coming from all over the world. I would never touch those. A person at my work has one of these customizable ones and it's the size of a Sony Walkman from 1980. He carries two different ones of those in addition to about 3 bottles of liquid of different flavors. Too much of a hassle.

    1. Re:I imagine it's the customizable units.... by war4peace · · Score: 2

      I vape since November 7th, 2011. Never smoked a regular cigarette since then.
      My current mod is an eLeaf iStick 100W (http://www.eleafworld.com/istick-100w/) holding two 18650 Panasonic batteries (NCR18650B: http://www.batteryspace.com/pr...). The atomizer is an Aspire Nautilus with 1.6 Ohm resistor. I use VW mode on the mod with 14W setting.
      Charging the batteries is not done using the integrated mod's charger. I have a certified 18650 battery charger for two batteries, with 1A total charging capacity, that is 500mAh charging capacity per battery. This means the batteries charge slowly. The charger has high temperature and short circuit protection embedded.

      My alternate/backup mod is a Cloupor Mini with one battery (same brand/series as above), using an Aspire Nautilus Mini atomizer. The battery does not stay in the mod unless I actively use the mod.

      Using products manufactured in China is not a problem. The problem is whether those products are manufactured with strict Quality Control or not. The rule of thumb is: if it's cheap and you never heard of it, don't buy it. And never, EVER skimp on batteries or chargers.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:I imagine it's the customizable units.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm a longtime vaper with plenty of experience with mech mods (never even played with really low ohm, ultra high battery draw setups) and battery safety.

      Your gear is indeed safe, mainly thanks to the regulated mods you use and the 1.6ohm high-resistance coils.

      The Cloupor Minis did suffer a couple of cases of melting electronics, out of tens of thousands sold, but nothing worse happened outside the mod's metal casing.

      High quality external charger is always a good idea, even if just for convenience. Even better idea is to never leave the charger unattended when it's charging. Even with the most reliable gear something can go wrong so why take unnecessary risks.

      Your choice of batteries is not ideal though. NCR18650B's are considered reliable and they have high mah capacity, but they have a relatively low "constant draw" amperage limit, being rated only at around 4-5A, and as the battery is used and it's voltage goes down or as it ages your safety margin disappears. (although the regulated mod is still there to safeguard the batery)

      I'd look for reputable brand batteries with safe IMR or hybrid chemistry (they vent slowly rather than explosively in the worst case) and constant draw rating of 10A or more. The latest temperature controlled mods can require the latest 20A or higher rated batteries.

      Couple of links worth reading:

      https://www.misthub.com/blogs/...

      https://www.e-cigarette-forum....

      Happy vaping and middle finger to Big Tobacco!

    3. Re:I imagine it's the customizable units.... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Unrelated: I used to work for Big Tobacco, huehuehue.
      About the batteries: since the iStick 100W has parallel battery setup (the mod also works with only one battery installed), the low draw ceases to become an issue. I usually replace the batteries with freshly charged ones when they reach 3.8V (cca 30% remaining, graphically speaking, on the mod).

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:I imagine it's the customizable units.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my Aspire tanks, they're very well made - my logic regarding batteries has been to buy the big brand available in all garages in the UK that's a recognised company because at least then I know they're worth suing and should be trying to not be dangerous. It is funny though that their packaging often labels standard safety measures as a selling point (for example "NEW!! 5v cutout!! or NEW! Now with FUSE!)

  15. Regulation of 'battery safety'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one thing to look at regulating these things as 'cigarettes' (which I don't agree with) but quite another in regards to their batteries. Isn't there any regulation regarding batteries? This is a particular use case only, we know of batteries that have exploded/caught fire in laptops, electric skateboards etc. I am only presuming, but isn't there any kind of regulations regarding the safety of batteries? If not that would seem relatively strange given we regulate most everything else.

    Clearly this particular use case is one of the most dangerous (having it blow up in your face can't be fun), but it seems to me this isn't about the e-cig so much as the batteries these companies are using.

    1. Re:Regulation of 'battery safety'??? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      In the US there is not much in the way of government regulation of electronics, except when it comes to RF emissions (think FCC).

      The regulations around causing fires are principally imposed by insurance companies (hence the name Underwriters Laboratories). Not getting UL certification for your product will make it hard to get product liability insurance.

      Of course if you are a nameless manufacturer from a place far far away, liability insurance is more expensive than just being impossible to locate after your product explodes.

      In other places there are government imposed safety certifications (Think C.E.). Take a look on the nearest wall wart power supply and look at the bazzilion markers for different certifications for different places.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  16. Buzzfeed = News Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's not even a link to somebody I would trust to even claim to be reporting facts in TFA.

  17. Looney Toons by Kenshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why you never accept a vape from Bugs Bunny.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Looney Toons by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      This is why you never accept a vape from Bugs Bunny.

      Or else

  18. Don't use a sealed device by Urban+Nightmare · · Score: 1

    To many are also using devices that are completely sealed so if the battery does "let go" the pressure exits the easiest way. This is out the atomizer connection as it is usually only pressure fitted. One final thing about they guy who put the battery in his pocket and burned his leg. Well don't put a high energy battery in a pocket with loose metal. It shorted out and dumped all of it's energy in a split second causing his pants to catch.

    1. Re:Don't use a sealed device by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      You sure about that? It's well know that pirated battered made in China have horrible quality control issues. And depending on the device, the E-Cig could have been a cheap knock-off with no circuitry protection.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Don't use a sealed device by sjames · · Score: 1

      I have a few rubber covers specifically meant to keep 18650 cells from shorting in my pocket. They work well. You can also get plastic boxes for that.

      Also, use lmr batteries. They can get hot and vent, but they don't vent violently like the old LiIon batteries do.

  19. According to TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There have been 66 cases reported according to the first link. 66. Out of tens of millions of devices.

    This is just a typical case of control freaks in government looking for something else to get their fingers in.

    1. Re:According to TFA by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      There have been 66 cases reported according to the first link. 66. Out of tens of millions of devices.

      This is just a typical case of control freaks in government looking for something else to get their fingers in.

      Actually, they are trying to drum up public fear so they can win the lawsuits against their crazy new regulations. Which will basically cause all e-cigs to vanish from the market. Except the ones sold by the big tobacco conglomerates.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    2. Re:According to TFA by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this post - I switched to vaping a month and a half ago and haven't touched a cigarette since.

      Hopefully they win this lawsuit.

      On the side, do you know any good sites to buy off of? I found a good local store but it's about 40 minutes from where I live.

  20. I need a safe space from the fascist liberals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..who believe big government regulation is the solution to everything.

    Also LOL @ the Buzzfeed article being taken seriously.

    1. Re:I need a safe space from the fascist liberals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who believe big government regulation is the solution to everything

      If cheap chinese knockoffs keep killing their potential customers, I think you'll find the vape manufacturers being the first to call for it, before they go the way of the hoverboards. These are the stuff libertarian nightmares are made of: an actually free market, full of liars and frauds destroying the market on their own for a quick short-term buck with no way to control them.

  21. Reminds me of a song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We three Kings of Orient are; Tried to smoke a rubber cigar; It was loaded, it exploded; We two Kings...

  22. No, Not Good by WheezyJoe · · Score: 0

    Poorly made batteries are a problem for everybody. Think outside the box and wonder why more phones, laptops, and other ubiquitous devices that depend on high-energy batteries don't start blazing away, and whether they may start now that this cheap shit is flooding the market. It may be fun to poke at the vaper who cooks his balls, but how about the vaper who checks her vape into the luggage compartment of the airplane you're riding? ISIS will claim responsibility for your plane going down, 'cause, you know, why not - prove they didn't, but all along it was just some mislead nico-addict who thought she was doing the right thing for her health.

    Besides, this takes attention away from the real harm in vaping... all that completely unregulated shit they put into that liquid. Tobacco is bad, sure, but who the fuck knows what solvents, preservatives, and fuck-knows-what goes into those little bottles that you breathe all... the... way... in.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    1. Re:No, Not Good by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Tobacco is bad, sure, but who the fuck knows what solvents, preservatives, and fuck-knows-what goes into those little bottles that you breathe all... the... way... in

      Polyethylene glycol, menthol, and a little nicotine. Essentially harmless stuff, unless you try chugging it. Nicotine's toxicity is rather high (it's a few thousand times the psychoactive dose, just the psychoactive dose is tiny); polyethylene glycol is pretty harmless (a soda can's worth per day would have negative health effects, mostly straining your kidneys; high doses are acutely toxic); and menthol is just mint oil.

    2. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget all that deadly vegetable glycerin!

    3. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean propylene glycol, not polyethylene glycol.

    4. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polyethylene glycol, menthol, and a little nicotine. Essentially harmless stuff, unless you try chugging it. Nicotine's toxicity is rather high (it's a few thousand times the psychoactive dose, just the psychoactive dose is tiny); polyethylene glycol is pretty harmless (a soda can's worth per day would have negative health effects, mostly straining your kidneys; high doses are acutely toxic); and menthol is just mint oil.

      And you are "just" introducing these substances directly into your lungs, while waving away the risks based on what happens if you do something completely different by ingesting them.

      Wanna try inhaling a tablespoon of "harmless" water ?

    5. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bit disingenuous, menthol is a component of mint oil, not the other way around... and also toxic.

      So 3 toxic chemicals there, good job!

    6. Re:No, Not Good by mlts · · Score: 1

      Polyethylene glycol or propylene glycol? The first is a very powerful laxative (it is what they give when going to get an endoscopy), the second is something used in applications like RV antifreeze and other items.

    7. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thing is a lot of phones and laptops HAVE exploded due to cheap batteries but the media has long since stopped caring about covering every instance of it. This is only being covered now because it's e-cigs which get a lot of attention, especially negative attention from tobacco industry lobbyists who don't want to lose more customers to e-cigs, so all the blame is on the e-cigs and not the cheap batteries some of them use.

    8. Re:No, Not Good by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Propylene glycol, you're right. I mixed up the wood preservative with the food-grade antifreeze preservative. Propylene glycol's toxicity is even lower, so my argument stands.

      Man I've been having a bad day. That's twice now someone's had to correct me on something.

    9. Re:No, Not Good by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      At a humidity rate of 57% there's 10g of watervapor in a cubic meter. We inhale about 11,000 liters of air a day , which is 11 cubic meters. So on a bit humid day, you inhale a little over 100 grams of water a day. At 15 grams of water per tablespoon, I think we should all panic right now!

    10. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At a humidity rate of 57% there's 10g of watervapor in a cubic meter. We inhale about 11,000 liters of air a day , which is 11 cubic meters. So on a bit humid day, you inhale a little over 100 grams of water a day. At 15 grams of water per tablespoon, I think we should all panic right now!

      And how much do we inhale in a single breath, which was the challenge?

    11. Re:No, Not Good by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Informative

      Propylene glycol is also known as fog juice, the stuff that goes into stage smoke machines, and it's used as a food additive. It metabolises to lactic acid and is considered safe, which is why it's used in e-cigs.

      Antifreeze is usually ethylene glycol, which is toxic. However, both salt and ethanol can also be used as antifreeze, and while they can be lethal in sufficient quantities they too are considered fit for human consumption. Calling something "antifreeze" tells you no more about its toxicity than calling something "natural" (i.e. snake venom) or "organic" (i.e. benzene).

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    12. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At what dose are they toxic?

      Hint: Anything is toxic at a high enough dose, including *WATER*. The dose, literally makes the toxin.

      Unless vaping introduces these chemicals at high enough doses to be toxic, you're just doing a really bad job of scare-mongering.

    13. Re:No, Not Good by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Doesn't water contain DHMO, which has been shown to be a serious health risk?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that menthol is one of the few additives for cigarettes that make them worse for you, right? It causes crystallization of the lungs. It's something you really shouldn't inhale. And as for the propylene glycol, there isn't enough evidence to determine if it's safe. For most people it seems to have no short term problems, though for some it can cause irritation in the lungs and there does seem to be evidence that long term exposure can cause asthma and increase severity of allergies (and as an allergy sufferer if you say that's harmless, seriously, fuck you, hay fever can be miserable).

      Nicotine itself is fairly harmless, though it is known to increase growth of blood vessels, which when mixed with cigarettes is really bad, because it helps good blood flow to be established in tumors. But so long as you don't develop any tumors....

      TL;DR, some stuff is known to be dangerous, other stuff just isn't known yet to say if these things are harmless or not.

    15. Re:No, Not Good by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Have you tried it without nicotine?

      I'm down to 3

    16. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the second is something used in applications like RV antifreeze and other items.

      Other items, like fog machines or nebulizers and other medical applications. But nope, you're not scaremongering at all.

    17. Re:No, Not Good by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I don't smoke; I habitually bite my nails.

    18. Re:No, Not Good by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Don't mix up ethylene glycol with propylene glycol. Ethylene glycol is used as de-icing fluid and anitfreeze in your car's radiator, and is rather toxic. Propylene glycol is used as a food additive / preservative. I wouldn't want to breathe either of them into my lungs.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    19. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      safe for eating does not mean safe for inhalation, however.

    20. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's twice now someone's had to correct me on something. "

      That you know of.

    21. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, this takes attention away from the real harm in vaping... all that completely unregulated shit they put into that liquid. Tobacco is bad, sure, but who the fuck knows what solvents, preservatives, and fuck-knows-what goes into those little bottles that you breathe all... the... way... in.

      You don't know what you are talking about.

      I do know exactly what goes into it because I make the stuff myself. 40% vegetable glycerine, 40% propylene glycol, 19% flavour extract and 1% nicotine (if desired). All food/medical grade and aside from the nicotine, all things commonly used for cooking. That is the standard recipe that most eliquid makers follow. You might as well say "well you shouldn't eat any food you didn't farm yourself because fuck-knows-what goes into it".

      And if you think regulation is going to do anything, you obviously haven't a clue what kind of crap tobacco companies put into cigarettes. Shit like *tar* and *formaldehyde*. Add to that the fact that it's smoke , which is extremely harmful no matter what is burning and you have something that is much, much more harmful than inhaling the vapour of food grade liquids.

    22. Re: No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows what's in ejuice? I do. Some mixture of flavors, usually comprising something less than 20% of the volume, the flavors are made from (typically) aromatic volatiles (AKA "natural and artificial flavors") and suspended in propylene glycol. The remaining volume is made up of additional propylene glycol (if desired) and vegetable glycerin. Nicotine is not required but if present it will be in solution at as close to the advertised concentration as practicable. For example 3mg/mL would mean a 10mL bottle contains ~30 total mg of nicotine in the bottle. It's effect on the volume is negligible.

      That's it. That's what's in e-juice, and it's not a secret, no one is trying to hide any part of this (except what exact flavors they mix together to make thier "brand").

    23. Re: No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love what a sin being wrong TWICE is in nerd world.

    24. Re:No, Not Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to throw a little fuel on the flames (hah). Propylene Glycol has been found to be a risk with childhood asthma.

      That said it's still way better for children than cigarette smoke so...

  23. Get Serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/statistics/v13i6.pdf
    http://www.pfa.org/firesafe/CFSC_facts.pdf
    http://www.tcforensic.com.au/docs/uts/essay5.pdf

    Would you rather live in an apartment next to a smoker OR a vaper?

  24. Am I supposed to care? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    I don't get it.

    1. Re:Am I supposed to care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then let me clear this up for you.

      The CEO of Phillip Morris's bonus is taking a big hit over eCigs.

      That means less "Campaign Contributions" to congress.

      And that is a HUGE problem.

      Not to mention the loss in tax revenues.

  25. Lawsuit time! by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know that the first thing people will reach for is regulatory oversight, including banning them, but I remember that Underwriter's Laboratories isn't a government agency, and people are buying vaporizers from dodgy sources. Lawsuits, in this case, can only do so much I think. The companies will simply go bankrupt.

    So I have to ask, as I'm a non-smoker who hasn't looked into it, are there any safety organizations that have published safety standards and are offering their guarantee mark to vaporizers that meet said safety standards?

    A few stories like this making the rounds of e-cig communication lines(forums, magazines, websites), and the saying to 'get a UL listed one or you risk it blowing up!', and safety should improve.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Lawsuit time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a piece of wire wrapped around some cotton and connected to a battery

      what standards do you want, for fuck's sake?

  26. Re:Ban them by lawaetf1 · · Score: 1

    3/10 on troll quality, would not recommend. Too over the top, needs a question mark in there somewhere to try and lure a response. Disappointing.

    --
    CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
  27. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese lithium batteries are exploding in people's faces. How is it news that substandard Chinese merchandise is malfunctioning?

  28. No problem by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Everybody knows that smoking kills you. The 'modern' method just does it quicker.

    1. Re:No problem by Llamalarity · · Score: 1

      Actually there is only one known death so far and it was due to choking. Toddler and the autopsy report is sealed so it not known if it was choking due to vomiting up the E-liquid (which is typical with many child 'poisonings') or he choked on the cap which was never found.

      Also unknown if the cap was child proof to begin with. Many E-liquids have used these for years even though they will not be required by law until next month when the FDA deeming regulations start taking effect.

  29. They have to keep on killing... by timotej · · Score: 1

    Tobacco industry and medical industry probably has enough shareholder overlap, so they are legally obliged to making the shareholders happy. So they have to continue making people sick or injured. Once all the cancer from tar and that crap was curbed a bit, they had to invent a new way to hurt everyone!

  30. Another article thin on the details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of these incidents you never get any details what the device in question actually was.

    Was it a mechanical mod or similar where the user did not have the technical skills/experience to be running it in the first place (which anecdotally appears to be the majority), was it a shoddy Chinese knock-off?

    I've yet to hear about a more typical temp/volts regulated device from a reputable manufacturer. I've got a very strong suspicion the vast majority of these are you get what you pay for, and know what your personal capabilities are.

  31. This is what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when you listen to liberals. You stop smoking real men's cigarettes and start smoking faggy e-cigarettes and get your face blown off. That is the liberal agenda. To blow your face off. Blow your face off.

  32. Don't use cheap batteries. by ArylAkamov · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is why you DO NOT BUY CHEAP BATTERIES.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    This is what happens if you get a shitty 18650 without any kind of protection circuitry and/or an ecig without a vented battery compartment.

    How to tell if the battery is likely to explode:

    http://www.lygte-info.dk/info/...

    http://lygte-info.dk/info/isMy...

    tl;dr stop buying cheap shit and expecting it to withstand a 35+ amp draw.

    1. Re:Don't use cheap batteries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is what happens when you remove the protection circuitry and then short the battery (spoiler: the same thing that will happen with any lithium ion cell)
      I wouldn't trust this ultra cheap brand, but this guy is a moron who has no idea what he's doing.

    2. Re:Don't use cheap batteries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also only buy high drain batteries. Regular 18650s are for flashlights, not mods.

  33. People are fickle. it can happen very quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I went to college, it was still legal to smoke in class. The work office always had a smoke cloud clinging to the ceiling. It was all acceptable and the norm. In under a decade both these practices were illegal. Bars and other places where people went to smoke a decade later. Maybe with the push for legalization of marijuana it will be legal again.

    1. Re:People are fickle. it can happen very quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the best thing that ever happened was when people stopped smoking in bars and restaurants. Finally I could taste my food and drink. the only people who lost out big time are the dry cleaners, because your clothes wouldn't reek after a night out.

  34. It was lighters before that by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bic lighters have been blamed for several deaths and several injuries over the years too. The link above was in regards specifically to Bic lighters from 1979 to 1984.

    1. Re:It was lighters before that by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, if you wanted one more encore. You rigged you bic to throw out a 2 second, 6 foot flame. These days it only works on really cheap lighters.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:It was lighters before that by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I remember that. You had to pop the silver wind-guard off of it, Then turn the valve one way by lifting the red slider each time you turned it back. It was also funny as hell to do that to someones lighter when they left it lying around, or were too drunk/stoned to notice. I'm pretty sure just about everyone I knew, myself included, singed their hair and eyebrows from that at one point or another.

    3. Re:It was lighters before that by sjames · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with an ecig battery, but I did once need to quickly figure out where to throw a disposable butane lighter when it threatened to become a blowtorch.

    4. Re:It was lighters before that by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Damn we're old.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  35. Re:Ban them by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> The world doesn't need one more way for humans to kill themselves

    Sure we do. Humans keep removing all sources of natural selection and thats a bad thing. Its not the job of the government to turn the whole world into nanny state and put rubber bumpers on every sharp corner.

    We should let these weak, stupid people that have a habitual need to suck on an electric tit carry on and kill themselves and do the rest of the world a favor.

  36. You're forgetting about taxes by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    And all but a couple bucks of that cigarette pack are taxes, so it's not money that the tobacco industry is seeing.

    My answer would be that e-cigs likely use synthetic nicotine.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The links I'm seeing online (and I admit to not being an expert, so there may be a better thing to Google than "synthetic nicotine") seems to suggest that the latter is considered unfit for human use. It's made, but generally used as a pesticide. Suppliers actually seem to consider the rumor they use synthetic nicotine as an insult.

      Supposedly vaping nicotine generally comes from plants, though not necessarily tobacco (I'm having difficulty finding information specific on this point.)

      Disclaimer: Not a vaper. Have never cared for (recreational) drugs so no interest beyond thinking it's an interesting use of technology.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: Not a vaper. Have never cared for (recreational) drugs so no interest beyond thinking it's an interesting use of technology.

      I'm not one either.

      Another thought - even if they're getting their nicotine from tobacco, they might be getting it from 'scrap' tobacco that was deemed unfit for use in cigars, cigarettes, as dip, etc...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Have never cared for (recreational) drugs

      Just curious - do you drink alcohol? Or caffeine? If so, do you define "recreational" drugs as "any drugs other than the ones I use"?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, you're right on the former, I do occasionally drink, so I was wrong there.

      Caffeine - if decaff coffee tasted like regular coffee I'd probably drink that. I've switched where possible to decaff colas etc. I don't like the effect on me, and I only deliberately use it when I need to use it medicinally - ie certain types of headache, or just keeping myself awake.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all but a couple bucks of that cigarette pack are taxes, so it's not money that the tobacco industry is seeing.

      My answer would be that e-cigs likely use synthetic nicotine.

      You can by the liquids without nicotine as well. Don't know why people assume all e-cigs have nicotine

    6. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      How is it theft if you are voluntarily purchasing a product that bears a tax? If you don't like paying taxes on certain products, don't buy those products. It's not like it's a huge tightly-held secret that tobacco products have the shit taxed out of them by each and every jurisdiction that can lay claim to the sale.

      That might possibly be the dumbest argument against tobacco taxes ever.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by grub · · Score: 1


      You can by the liquids without nicotine as well.

      You can also buy de-alcoholized beer and I would bet the sales of both are similar: a drop in the bucket.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    8. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Have never cared for (recreational) drugs

      Just curious - do you drink alcohol? Or caffeine? If so, do you define "recreational" drugs as "any drugs other than the ones I use"?

      I don't drink alcohol, coffee, or tea. I don't smoke. I'm not adverse to caffeine (I enjoy chocolate and the occasional cola), but don't consume energy drinks. I don't care what others consume as long as it doesn't put others (myself included) at risk.

    9. Re:You're forgetting about taxes by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Now that is why the obvious kneejerk of "stupid druggies blowing themselves up" should be revised to discussions about faulty drug implements. It's like drinking coffee from a cup quickly welded up out of used razors when there are other cups out there.

  37. Big tobacco doesn't like competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem is big tobacco doesn't like competition from e-ciggs. They can't or don't seem capable of making decent e-ciggs and the mom & pop competitors are literally eating into big tobacco's market. Start looking at whose funding these studies and whose drumming up the fear mongering you'll notice it is all linked to big tobacco. Sure- there are busy bodies everywhere too propagating this FUD, but they're not the root of it. Cigarettes are worse than pot generally speaking (unless maybe your a habitual pot smoker), but e-cigarettes are better than traditional cigarettes. The small number of people relative to the numbers harmed also is telling of just how much *safer* e-cigarettes are relative to traditional cigarettes. If we have a mere few hundred or few thousand deaths from e-cigarettes it'll be far far far fewer than the more than 480,000 people in the United States along who die for traditional tobacco products.

  38. Ecig Sales Are Alarming to Big Tobacco by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on, no-name lithium batteries have to fail sometime.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  39. I was smoking an e-cig on my hoverboard... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I was smoking an e-cig while riding on my hoverboard when my Dell laptop battery exploded in my backpack.

    1. Re:I was smoking an e-cig on my hoverboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo dawg, I heard you like exploding batteries...

  40. Regulated vs Non-Regulated mods by GrBear · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've yet to hear of any regulated mod (battery voltage regulator) blowing up.. only non-regulated ones. The non-regulated ones are simply a push button switch that shorts positive and negative terminals of the battery via the coil of the device.

    Of course if you're coil is of so little resistance as to cause a short, the battery is going to explode.. much like jumpering the postitive and negative batteries of a car battery.

    If people stopped being uninformed idiots that don't know how to use an unregulated mod, then they deserve what they get..

    Or in other terms, don't stare into laser with good remaining eye.

    1. Re:Regulated vs Non-Regulated mods by swb · · Score: 1

      I gots to keep up with the leet vaperz on the intertubz.

      I got me a 20kWh unregulated battery, a .1 ohm coil made from kanthal I bought direct from de China mail order place and some 3.6% nic juice I brewed from botanicals at the local hippie shop.

      Best part is, if my car dies I can get so cranked on nicotine I can push it the last 10 miles or my mod can jump start it.

    2. Re:Regulated vs Non-Regulated mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking about uninformed idiots. Jumpering the positive and negative car battery terminals will do exactly nothing except heat the wire, assuming the wire is large enough. The car battery isn't going to explode.

  41. Natural selection by allo · · Score: 0

    Too little bad chemicals in the smoke, so we need another measure.

  42. Re:Ban them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a practicing Progressive, I think these undesirable people should all die off. Is there a way to put a bigger battery in these things?

  43. No, they're not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please stop doing big tobacco's dirty work for them, you useful idiots.

  44. exposing lithium-ion batteries to heat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not rocket science. If you expose a lithium-ion battery to a high amount of heat it can explode

  45. E-cigs and Hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With this latest news, I can only imagine what would happen if a bunch of people started vaping while riding around on their hoverboards. Sounds like it'd be a blast!!

  46. Wrong battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Morons are using the wrong batteries and/or buying dirt cheap gas station devices.

  47. Mech mods, cheap batteries and user error by fl_litig8r · · Score: 4, Informative

    will undoubtedly account for 99% of these cases. There are no details in this story about what caused the batteries to explode, but I've read other articles which sometimes shed light on these cases. The guy with the leg burns kept loose batteries in his pocket with keys and coins. Another victim was a brand new vaper using a mech mod (it said he pushed the button on the bottom of the device, a tell-tale sign that it was a mech mod), and it was clear that someone else has prepared his gear and he had no idea what he was doing. In fact, I'd wager that most people with exploding batteries were mech mod users. Why mech mods still exist is beyond me. They have no protective circuitry, so if your build causes too high a draw on the battery, or the device gets stuck in the "on" position, you're going to have a big problem.

    The one possibly unavoidable problem with any e-cigarette is counterfeit batteries. If you're trying to be safe and you buy Sony, Samsung or LG batteries, it can be tough to tell if they're genuine or not (I've gotten counterfeits myself through an Amazon third-party seller). If I have any doubts that a battery I'm using isn't genuine, it gets boxed and disposed of immediately. Of course, counterfeit batteries aren't only a problem for vapers, but the proximity of the device to your face will generally cause more damage than for, say, a flashlight user.

    1. Re:Mech mods, cheap batteries and user error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mech mods are 100% safe. IF you're not an idiot.

      The safety is 100% all on the user. Too bad most of them are stupid.

  48. Only 66 cases vs 40 000 000 smokers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen worse odds.

    1. Re:Only 66 cases vs 40 000 000 smokers? by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      Compared to burning dried tobacco near your face, vaping is a lot better.

    2. Re:Only 66 cases vs 40 000 000 smokers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to burning dried tobacco near your face, vaping is a lot better.

      Tobacco? F that sh*t. Vaping is for pussies who can't roll their own. Vapers can all die in an explosion for all I care.

  49. Buzzfeed takes a bribe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ~500K Americans will be killed by smoking this year, ~10 million worldwide.
    66 people were injured by being dumb with the only effective smoking cessation method (well 1 of 2, the other being death). Yes, they were dumb. We have EEs in here probably already explaining what you do not do with a vape.
    Ban vapes!!! OMG TERRAR! BAN THEM!!
    Big Tobacco is part of the Pro Cancer movement looking to ban vapes for obvious reasons.
    Big Pharma is against vapes as the best they can put out is products with a lower success rate than nothing (cold turkey)
    Politician often are Pro Cancer for the campaign contributions, as well as having people taxed like no one's business via something they cannot quit. Then there are the tobacco bonds.. Which this article misattributes to doing well due to low gas prices rather then the success of the Pro Cancer movement and its war on vapes http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...

    So give some ad money to Buzzfeed and they will help kill millions.
    Join the Pro Cancer movement and you can help kill millions. BAN VAPES! Think of the children!

  50. It's not bad batteries at all.... by burtosis · · Score: 3, Informative

    These types of batteries are basically identical to those found in iPhones or any other modern device. Most are cylindrical lithium polymer. What is causing the problems is three basic things.

    1) A complete lack of safety circuitry. Forget a smart battery system and gas gauging, many of the units I took apart had no safety at all (relied on the charger alone) to at most a leaky over and under voltage protection that was custom implemented. No charge or discharge current sensing and no temperature sensing. No faulty cell detection and no permenant disable for a faulty battery. Just like when Lipo batteries first hit the hobby market this means fires galore, and when enclosed, sizable explosions.

    2) People use the incorrect chargers. Add to that little to no safety and it's a disaster.

    3) People modify thier units without knowing what they are actually doing. They may have read a forum post or read a blog or had a friend do it. They don't realize any dangers or take any precautions.

    Disclaimer: I have designed smart battery systems for products in the field. I have had failures but nothing the safety systems did not shut down before catastrophe.

    1. Re:It's not bad batteries at all.... by sjames · · Score: 1

      They should be using lmr (Lithium Manganese) batteries, not LiPo. LMR do not need a protection circuit since they don't vent violently with flame when they fail. They can get quite hot and smoke if sufficiently abused, but they won't rocket the device into your face. Generally they are rated at 35-45A continuous with momentary 100A discharge.

      I still prefer a regulated PV (ecig) with short circuit and over discharge protection.

  51. Take it as news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a danger and I will warn my friends who might use one.

    Pretty fucking simple shit.

  52. e-Cig Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you pay close attention to the words used by the e-Cig marketing campaigns, they all go very far out of the way to say they are "less dangerous" or "less unhealthy" than cigarettes, not "safer than" or a "safe alternative" to them.

    To be clear, e-Cig makers are not claiming their products are safe to use, nor that they are healthy, and are basically admitting that either their products or dangerous or that we don't know whether they are safe. Why would we want to push so hard for ubiquitous acceptance of a product that nobody says is safe?

    That's how asbestos and mesothelioma became a thing.

  53. The Clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The clue is in the summary : "left leg was charred from his calf to his thigh after a vape battery exploded in his pocket"
    It's not e-cigs exploding, per say, so much as cheap & nasty chinese batteries.

  54. BuzzFeed? THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE NEWS FOR NERDS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. If you have any hope of recapturing your audience, you won't post garbage by Buzzfeed.

  55. Good by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    Now if only there was some way to make real cigarettes do the same thing...

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  56. Not really an "alarming" rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An alarming rate would be 1,000s or 10,000s. 66 may be some, and even a significant number, but compared to the # of users of these things, I don't think its alarming. I'd be very surprised if there weren't significantly more injuries and damage caused by cigarette smoking causing fires or other accidents than this.

  57. Hi! We've been breathing in burning compost... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    for some time now. It gives us a buzzy head and make us die sooner. That wasn't good enough. We figured out a way to add circuitry and potentially explosive batteries. We will now get buzzy heads and die sooner but not as soon. We promise not to be surprised when something goes badly. Is it just us or do dolphins sound like they're laughing?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  58. suckers CAPTCHA: synonym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cigarette industry always advertised that there would be second-hand smokers available to the tobacco users. Smoking is a breast-feeding fantasy. The cigarette (or vape) in your mouth is the nipple; your hand against your lips is the breast; the smoke is the milk and the most important part, the second-hand smoker, is your mother. You can't breast feed alone. You can do the math.

  59. Buzzfeed? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What on earth went wrong here that we started posting Buzzfeed articles? Please go find the source that Buzzfeed plagiarized and post that instead. Thanks!

  60. Bullshit. by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

    Articles like this are a heaping load of shit. I'd take them more seriously if they actually mentioned the device that was being used during each incident. They reason why is that a lot of these expolosions aren't from the device exploding, it's from the batteries inside of them. And further more, you'll find that nearly all of them are inexperienced people using mechanical or unregulated mods. Either they're using garbage batteries from Trustfire or Efest, or they're building their coils far far too low for what their batteries can handle. The other possibility is that these people aren't properly maintaining their batteries when the insulating wrapping is damaged, which risks creating short circuits inside the device and once more causing the battery inside to explode. We'd absolutely have fewer articles like this if people weren't complete morons when it comes to using 18650 batteries for vaping.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  61. Traditional smokers still cause more fires... by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

    As a non-smoker, I really prefer occasional battery incident now and then if this reduces the ordinary fires caused by ordinary burning tobacco products. From the smokers view, it could be different. Smoker usually dies in the fire and that's all, vaper survives and complains. If you are concerned, QUIT SMOKING, after all...

    1. Re:Traditional smokers still cause more fires... by sjames · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be at all surprised if there have been more injuries in the same time period from people trying to take the cap off of a still hot radiator.

    2. Re:Traditional smokers still cause more fires... by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      You are soooo 80's... but still probably right.

  62. addict slave whines his addiction hurt him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So instead of one drug dealer (cigarette shop) he turned to another drug dealer (vape shop) and now he complains his addiction hurt him.

    Here is the new boss, same as the old boss.

    He'll be vaping again. The addiction must be satisfied, slave.

  63. Good batteries or hand grenades by rocqua · · Score: 1

    As it turns out, making a really good battery means putting a lot of energy into a small thing. Enough energy that failure induced rapid discharge is basically an explosion.

    Combining this with low-weight requirements leads to little shielding, which makes the batteries more vulnerable. Finally, lets add some heat in usual use, and we get this.

    Basically the same thing happened with the hoverboards. l-ion scares me.

  64. Even evil has standards by Dirk+Becher · · Score: 1

    So the Joker went electric.

  65. choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am more afraid of second hand explosions not second hand smoke

  66. No, we don't need a new law by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    we've got perfectly good laws already and they're going to be enforced. Also you wouldn't be making light of it if you or one of your friends or family was one of those 66.

    Now, we might want some new laws that allow small businesses to safely sell vaping gear and equipment. The current laws were all written for big tobacco. They're likely to put mom & pops out of business. I'd like to see a middle ground here. We can start by properly funding the regulatory agencies so that it doesn't take them 2 years and $100 grand to review an application. You don't think this sudden push for enforcing existing laws came out of nowhere do you? Where do you think the political will to get it done came from?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  67. Batteries vs Devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the real issue may be the quality of the batteries being used.

  68. False comparison by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    If you're smoking you at least know damn well you're engaging in dangerous behavior. If you're vaping you have no expectation that the vape pen is going to blow up in your face. The exact opposite actually. You expect it to be safe.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:False comparison by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      If you're smoking you at least know damn well you're engaging in dangerous behavior. If you're vaping you have no expectation that the vape pen is going to blow up in your face. The exact opposite actually. You expect it to be safe.

      It's no different than any other activity. If you phone (which you would assume to be safe) blew up in your pocket because of a bad battery, are you going to then blame all cell phones or just the manufacturer for *your* phone? No, they'll just go after the manufacturer of your phone and then any manufacturers of parts as revealed by the litigation. Same should apply to vaping - blame the equipment maker and battery maker for their faults, not vaping itself.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    2. Re:False comparison by sjames · · Score: 1

      True, but most devices are quite clear in the instructions what kind of batteries should be used. If you follow the instructions, you don't get explosions. For example, they say to use lmr batteries, not LiIon. Those can still fail if abused, but they get hot and smoke rather than venting violently with flame.

      If you put gasoline in a kerosene lamp, it will be bad. Same for the wrong kind of battery in an ecig.

  69. Hyperbole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet it's no where near the amount of cell phones, laptops and tablets explode annually.

  70. Volts, Ohms, Watts, Amps by subk · · Score: 1

    I equals V over R. If your battery cannot supply the amps you are asking it for, it may pop.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  71. Now that 2nd hand cancer is less of a concern... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to worry about 2nd hand shrapnel?!?

  72. Basic Ohm's Law by mpaladini · · Score: 1

    As a longtime tobacco user, I made the switch to vaping about 4 years ago. I agree with the above posters that speak of either cheap knock off batteries, and overly ambitious "Mods". I don't even like going into a vape store anymore and purchase anything I need online because of all the idiots toking on their drip mods with coils that they wound themselves, and that resemble the huge exhaust tips on some kids Ricer-mobile. They seem to think they everywhere they go is a cloud competition. I was grateful that vaping allowed me the opportunity to give up tobacco when nothing else worked, and as far as whether it's as harmful or not, time will tell. but common sense would dictate that inhaling something that is essentially on fire or at least smoldering is bound to be more harmful than water vapor with a little nicotine added. My bottom line is that its all about moderation, and whatever you do, you need to make sure you know what you're doing. I would bet money that every one of those 66 incidents involved either cheap knock-off hardware/batteries, or some idiot who was pushing the envelope and lost.

  73. Don't cross the streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shorting high current batteries with "sub-ohm" coil modifications and/or using cheap Chinese suppliers may explode. Same goes for cheap cell phones. There are many safe local companies that use quality materials.

  74. where they modfyed by luther349 · · Score: 1

    tons of people do stupid stuff with there e-cigs including ruining them hot or at hi wattage. i mean really a battery is going to get pretty dam hot before exploding you will notice something is wrong unless your stupid.

  75. Laurel and Hardy? by almostadnsguy · · Score: 1

    The story reminds me of Laurel and Hardy's exploding cigar gag (Great Guns 1941). Someone should put them up on Youtube so we can all watch.

  76. Morons by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    It's almost like smoking nicotine products is BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH!

  77. natural selection doesn't apply by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    missing and eye and your front teeth doesn't really slow you down from procreating. Given that your offspring would have their eyes and teeth, as e-cig explosions don't alter your genes. So you really only need to survive until they are able to take care of themselves.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:natural selection doesn't apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh it would slow you down a bit. i think the ladies will not be as eager ;-)

    2. Re:natural selection doesn't apply by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I assume statistically there would be just as many women as men with disfiguring injuries. It seems likely that both sexes could eventually find a mate, perhaps with similar non-terminal injuries.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  78. Wow, people know nothing about vaping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine this if you will slashdotters:

    You read an article on some website about how computer programmers are causing people to get viruses that steal their bank accounts. One commenter even heard somewhere that a computer virus can infect the outlets in your house if you leave it plugged in after you catch the virus.

    This is how vapers feel when they read comments where almost none of the commenters has the slightest fucking clue what they're talking about. It just sounds like someone repeating words they heard on the news from some OTHER people who had no fucking idea what they were talking about either.

    I'll try to break this down:

    There are many different types of vaping devices.

    They all use lithium ion type batteries, some replaceable, some internal. Various battery chemistries are used, depending on desired attributes.

    Most of these are regulated devices, meaning they have electronics built in to control the output power and to protect the battery. These devices fail almost never. If they do, the cause is typically an incorrectly selected battery which simply fails to provide adequate power to operate the device.

    Then there are the unregulated devices. Aka mech mods. They actually have sort of an interesting history but the upshot is they are considered ADVANCED tools for people who know what they are doing. You must be well versed in Ohm's Law and battery safety to use them safely.

    The problem is, well, SoCal. A bunch of hipsters on the west coast thought they looked cool and/or were sold these things by people who knew they would be perceived as "ironically cool" or something. And thus began the problems.

    If you over-discharge Lion batteries with no protection, they will first heat up, then vent, then possibly catch fire especially if you continue to discharge them after they have begun to fail. If you put a spare Lion battery in your pocket with your keys and a pocket full of change, you will probably end up with a burned leg at best.

    All of this can be avoided with some basic knowledge, much of which a certain class of vaper steadfastly refuses to learn, presumably because it would no longer be hip if they're following a bunch of rules.

    These are the people who blow up thier batteries, that it happens in thier face sometimes is just a coincidence. They are lost causes, which the vast majority of the vaping community spends all thier time trying to simultaneously educate for all our sakes and distance themselves from.

    It's like people who cut the ground prongs off every plug on everything they own because "it doesn't matter". I never trot out my qualifications normally, but here I actually can. I'm an electrician of 15 years and I can say with some confidence those people are correct right up until they are wrong. You don't need that ground until you do, and when you do, if it's not there, YOU will be the ground.

    An unfortunate tiny percentage of the vaping community keeps cutting off the ground prongs, and making us all look like we can't be trusted with access to outlets.

    Probably 99% of people who vape do so using regulated devices, at low power, for the sole purpose of trying to quit, or remain off of, cigarettes.

  79. Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not even sorry

  80. It's all about the money. by byrdfl3w · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, at the same time this relentless fear-porn negative coverage about e-cigs is being bandied about (among other things like "vape juice is worse than cigarettes!"), millions of people are saving their own lives by switching to electronic cigarettes. The big tobacco companies do not like this one bit. Nor do governments who see billions of dollars every year in cigarette tax, nor does big Pharma, who generate massive sums off the "management" of cancer victims and others. This is why we only see a negative narrative with regards to the phenomenon.
    One has only to examine the sources of the many studies for and against E-cigs to see that the negative ones - while not completely irrelevant - are largely funded by big tobacco in collusion with governments.
    Even more interesting, companies like Philip Morris are developing their own proprietary vape technology even as they spend obscene amounts of money trying to convince us E-cigs are evil. It works by vaporizing actual tobacco in a traditional cigarette form factor, ensuring a transition to smokeless cigarettes while still maintaining the high prices and exclusive government approval for public sale. As always, follow the money - not the hype.

  81. Bullshit by samantha · · Score: 1

    Slashdot now does the work of the anti-freedom forces and establishment busybodies? This is FUD.

  82. Popcorn Lung is a possibility!! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    Researchers at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that the chemical diacetyl (and acetoin) is present in several vape flavors. Diacetyl is used for "butter flavor" in popcorn & candy - and over a decade ago workers at the popcorn factories began to show signs of the lung disease Bronchiolitis Obliterans, hence the name Popcorn Lung. Links were made between diacetyl and this irreversible lung disease.

    There is a very real concern that breathing in vapes containing diacetyl could give uses Popcorn Lung.

    Sure - we don't always need a law. But how many people know of this link - and is there a responsibility to inform them? Whose job is that?

    CBS News account of the story: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/e-...
    Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  83. Re: Ban them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I've met bigger cunts than you , but I am not sure.

  84. Re: Ban them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean your mom?

  85. Batteries involve stored energy. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Stored energy is potentially dangerous.

    Any counter examples? Any?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"