Slashdot Mirror


Can We Avoid Government Surveillance By Leaving The Grid? (counterpunch.org)

Slashdot reader Nicola Hahn writes: While reporters clamor about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee, NSA whistleblower James Bamford offers an important reminder: American intelligence has been actively breaching email servers in foreign countries like Mexico and Germany for years. According to Bamford documents leaked by former NSA specialist Ed Snowden show that the agency is intent on "tracking virtually everyone connected to the Internet." This includes American citizens. So it might not be surprising that another NSA whistleblower, William Binney, has suggested that certain elements within the American intelligence community may actually be responsible for the DNC hack.

This raises an interesting question: facing down an intelligence service that is in a class by itself, what can the average person do? One researcher responds to this question using an approach that borrows a [strategy] from the movie THX 1138: "The T-H-X account is six percent over budget. The case is to be terminated."

To avoid surveillance, the article suggests "get off the grid entirely... Find alternate channels of communication, places where the coveted home-field advantage doesn't exist... this is about making surveillance expensive." The article also suggests "old school" technologies, for example a quick wireless ad-hoc network in a crowded food court. Any thoughts?

264 comments

  1. Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will eventually find your heat pattern no matter where you try to hide. The only real hope is to smash the grid or at least the "smart" parts of it.

    1. Re:Drones by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The type of people who believe they are "living off the grid" in a Food Court would be laughed *back* to the grid, if not shot outright, by the type of people who really live off the grid.

    2. Re:Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I avoided government surveillance by leaving the country. For all the US government knows, I don't even exist.

    3. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Turn around and look out the window. Hi there.

    4. Re: Drones by mandy2tom · · Score: 0

      Why would I care about government surveillance. If they want to watch me jack off Who cares

    5. Re: Drones by mandy2tom · · Score: 1

      And on the plus side maybe they can tell me who robbed me three years ago

    6. Re:Drones by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real answer is to be politically active. If you are willing to put your life at such a disadvantage to live off the grid, you might as well put your effort in being politically active with the goal of creating safeguards in the system to insure our privacies are met and convince the general public that their privacy is more important than losing it for getting a marginal benefit of safety from the government enemies.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Drones by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Only if they know where to look. If you walked to Brazil and lived in the Amazon, nobody would ever find you there. If you were going to be tracked with $10B worth of surveilance looking for you and only you, you'd hide in Brazil in the favelas. They couldn't pick you out of the millions. There are similar places in the US to do the same thing, but in a foreign country, the search is harder, and less likely to work.

    8. Re:Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if they know where to look. If you walked to Brazil and lived in the Amazon, nobody would ever find you there.

      Fuck that, too much work. I decided to get a job at an Amazon fulfillment center. Once in, I just never left. Nobody notices me, because I fit in. I'm typing this in on a cellphone I snarfed from my bin and I'm living on bottled water and energy bars. Just gotta avoid the supervisor, I think she's on to me.

    9. Re:Drones by strstr · · Score: 0

      drones aren't worth shit. those are parallel construction tools w/ the fiber optic upstream taps.

      National Security Agency has global satellite/radar grid. They actually magnetic resonance image/electron spin resonance/radar our brains, bodies, homes, buildings to 3D holographically scan us, listen, watch, steal info, even pull out memories/video/audio from the neural decoding.

      James Bamford and the NSA whistleblowers fucking retards .. how come only I and a select few of my friends know the specs of the NSA's satellite/radar systems?

      you can't go off the grid from those. they're designed to image through mountains, oceans, caves, etc.

      low IQ derps don't know the first military radar/satellites had MRI/ESR back between the 1930s and 1945 development of them during WW2. the patent for scanning AND altering (to communicate with spies, or do remote interrogation/torture) the entire brains electrical activity from military radar/satellites was filed in 1974. doctors offices didn't get MRI till decades later. it came from miniaturizing military radar. lol.

      NSA literally records people taking dumps and farting on the toilet, having sex, masturbating, with no cameras, microphones, or implants anywhere on the premises.

      after making scans/records, they can go in like spectator mode, and view the turd drop and replay in 3D from your anus in full resolution. they might even masturbate off a womens hot pussy. lol. black world baby. you guys are clueless derps.

      drrobertduncan.com obamasweapon.com

    10. Re:Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you legally own the property you are on, then you're not really off the grid. A lot of people I know have remote cabins without electricity or running water and like to tell me how they are "living off the grid". But where they live is public information, easily found online through county records.

    11. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know which _country_ I live in? Saying "hi there" is a complete non sequitur and, contrary to your delusions, doesn't prove anything.

      You're as clueless as those morons in the US government.

    12. Re:Drones by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Milton, is that you?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    13. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humor, motherfucker! Do you speak it?

    14. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't care, why do you bother posting about how much you don't care? A lot of people do care and your post's sole purpose is to say how much you don't want to participate in the conversation.

    15. Re:Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real answer is to be politically active. If you are willing to put your life at such a disadvantage to live off the grid, you might as well put your effort in being politically active with the goal of creating safeguards in the system to insure our privacies are met and convince the general public that their privacy is more important than losing it for getting a marginal benefit of safety from the government enemies.

      You need to convince me that being politically active (Voting for the right persons? Staging protests? Lobbying your representative?) is effective. The way I see it, is that you need numbers to be effective (and secondarily get money, or the withholding of money, and maybe military force out of those numbers). "The system" is quite stacked against that conceivably happening, as people are too wage-slaving, comfort-dependent, and being thought-for-by-the-media for them to change. The System is self-perpetuating.

    16. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... says the paid govt shrill

    17. Re:Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I avoided government surveillance by leaving the country. For all the US government knows, I don't even exist.

      Not likely. All it means that the CIA watches you instead of the FBI.

    18. Re:Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had $10B in my budget and you were hiding in the favelas, that would be great. Poor people are so much cheaper to bribe to nark you out.

    19. Re: Drones by Drethon · · Score: 1

      If you don't care, why do you bother posting about how much you don't care? A lot of people do care and your post's sole purpose is to say how much you don't want to participate in the conversation.

      So you are saying only one side of the conversation (do care) should weigh in?

    20. Re:Drones by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Being politically active is more than just trying to get people elected. But trying to convince others that they should change their minds, and as a population to change the direction.

      For example in just the past generation, the growth in LBGT rights wasn't because of protests, and the political officials, but because of a brave group of people willing to show that these were normal people with normal needs and wants in life, and not sexual deviants.
      It means humanizing the group, and putting there best foot forward. In terms of privacy, you need to convince people that privacy needs to be an issue. A protest even a large one shows just a loud minority. Lobbying your representative will only get limited appeal. But changing the culture it is hard work, but much more effective. And it is better than locking yourself away from the boogy man.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    21. Re:Drones by erapert · · Score: 1

      You need to convince me that being politically active (Voting for the right persons? Staging protests? Lobbying your representative?) is effective.

      Cody Wilson proved that there's more ways to be politically active than just opening your mouth.
      In other words: research ways to keep Second Amendment rights active even if the powers that be don't want citizens to have weapons. Armed citizens are free citizens.

      But bottom line: civilization is a team effort. If everyone else on the team wants to go one way and you want to go another then there's absolutely nothing you can do except leave the team and hope there's another team out there that's running things the way you would prefer.

    22. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if for instance some fundamentalist comes to power and passes a law that jacking of is illegal
      he would then immediately have the evidence needed to jail anyone he doesn't like

    23. Re: Drones by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And on the plus side maybe they can tell me who robbed me three years ago

      If they were trying to solve crimes perhaps but this mass surveillance has little to do with solving crime and a lot to do with supporting the police state that we draw ever closer to. Stasi would be proud. Keep in mind that we spend billions on perceived problems while actual mundane real problems get ignored. For example, illegal immigrants have killed far more US citizens than terrorists yet we spend many times more dollars "fighting terrorism". The illegal immigrant drunk driving deaths exceed 9/11 every year.

      citation:

      http://www.wnd.com/2006/11/39031/

    24. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly . If you live "off the grid"(as if thats even possible) you make it that much easier for someone to "dissappear you".

    25. Re: Drones by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      And on the plus side maybe they can tell me who robbed me three years ago

      *shallow breath* "Costs too much. Going back to playing with drones and laser-guided missles. So much less energy" /sarcasm

    26. Re: Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much are they paying? That would be awesome.

    27. Re: Drones by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting people who don't care have anything meaningful to say?

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    28. Re:Drones by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      An impressive wall of text on those websites. I've not see it's like since timecube.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    29. Re:Drones by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      So many people say "But I hate all of the choices" and I say "Well get involved in politics and work to put better people on the ballot"

    30. Re:Drones by lambsonic · · Score: 1

      Done that. What I found was that political parties are private organizations with political monopolies. You can become a member of one, but all that does is provide them with a mandate. If you find success locally, the national level just funds your opponents.

      --
      # make clean sig
    31. Re: Drones by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting people who don't care have anything meaningful to say?

      They often seem to be very vocal.

    32. Re:Drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which reminds me of Albert O. Hirschman's excellent 1970 work, "Exit, Voice, and Loyalty". Recommended reading.

    33. Re:Drones by erapert · · Score: 1

      A quick look at the Wikipedia article and I agree that this sounds interesting and relevant.

      I see that it's divided into four states which sort of form a matrix:

      1. for benefit of all + active = voice (talking to manager(s) or taking some other action to remedy the situation)
      2. for benefit of all + passive = loyalty (waiting for things to improve)
      3. for benefit of self + active = exit (leave)
      4. for benefit of self + passive = neglect (showing up late, not giving a crap, being lazy)

  2. post #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    comment #1

  3. yes tell the fbi now how you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats right tell them......i'm not have a nce day lol funny site ya gotz here

    1. Re:yes tell the fbi now how you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully when you go back to grade school this September, they'll teach you how to fucking speak English properly.

    2. Re: yes tell the fbi now how you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak

      Spell

  4. somewhere... by steak · · Score: 2

    a neckbeard with a handle like KE5ISQ is smugly stroking said neckbeard.

    1. Re: somewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop stroking your neckbeard and tiny cock while reading Slashdot. Thanks!

    2. Re:somewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a neckbeard with a handle like KE5ISQ is smugly stroking said neckbeard.

      I believe your best option at this point is to masturbate with a cheese grater.

  5. RTFA this time by mschuyler · · Score: 2

    Here's a sample:

    "Just remember that the collective mood of society will change as the climate gets warmer and factions of billionaires compete over dwindling resources. The unenlightened self-interest of the global elite will compel the misery index ever upwards in their never-ending quest for economic efficiencies and infinite growth. Itâ(TM)s not a matter of âoeifâ an uprising will occur but rather âoewhen.â Ultimately people will mobilize as a matter of survival. And so your humble narrator, as he watches the baleful telescreens multiply, leaves this guidebook for future activists. Here are some tools. Get out there and use them. Good luck."

    This guy belongs on Above Top Secret. Go off the grid? Riiiiight. I'm sure everyone will get right to it. Take an axe so you can chop your own firewood, too.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:RTFA this time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chopping your own wood is a valuable skill - as is accessing safe drinking water when the electricity cuts out. Not saying that people should live this way daily, but keeping the skills available is actually a good thing. If you haven't chopped wood in 20 years, then suddenly need to do so, you might find that there's more to it than finding and swinging an axe.

    2. Re:RTFA this time by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you haven't chopped wood in 20 years, then suddenly need to do so, you might find that there's more to it than finding and swinging an axe.

      Umm... no. That really is all there is to it. Your muscles may need a few weeks to build back up if you haven't been exercising them, but chopping wood with an axe isn't a hotbed of technological innovation. It's pretty much worked the same way since the stone age, even though the tools have gotten a bit better.

    3. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we need the surveillance, though. Otherwise, we won't be able to stop the towelheads from attacking us and trying to force us to live that way. I'd actually prefer that we simply demolish all mosques and destroy Islam, but because we're not allowed to do that, tracking the towelheads is the next best thing.

    4. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why are we tracking us and not the towel heads?

    5. Re:RTFA this time by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2

      But, hey, he's first to break the news about Julian Assange's sex change:

      In a manifesto that he wrote during the early days of WikiLeaks, founding member Julianne Assange observed that security services, confronting the threat of internal data breaches, would have to be extra vigilant in order to fly under the radar.

      (emphasis mine).

    6. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it has not worked the same way. The hardness of the material you are using to chop makes a very big difference in how you go about chopping wood. Still, we can ignore that since it is fair to assume that the method has not changed for anyone in a span of 20 years. But 20 years will make a giant difference in your ability to do so. Think your joints are going to be in the same condition 20 years from now?

    7. Re:RTFA this time by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Your muscles may need a few weeks to build back up if you haven't been exercising them, but chopping wood with an axe isn't a hotbed of technological innovation.

      Your hands will blister long before your muscles get sore. Get a nice pair of leather work gloves, and get them NOW. When civilization goes to shit, it will happen much faster than you think, and you won't be able to rush to Walmart and buy what you need. The shelves will already be empty. Try to be like The Little Red Hen, and plan ahead.

    8. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we don't know where the towel heads are. Same reason you search for the contact lens in the well lit area, even though it fell behind a bookcase.

    9. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Try to be like The Little Red Hen, and plan ahead.

      Wrong story. Little Red Hen is about pulling your own weight.

    10. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the article has been fundamentally mis-billed. It isn't about "living" off the grid or conducting your everyday life while trying to avoid the panopticon that is becoming an ever more serious threat.

      It's about information exchange and counter-intelligence techniques that minimise the risk of threat from establishment agencies leveraging their advantage with mainstream communications technologies when one is actively working against them.

      That's legitimate in itself, but it says nothing to someone who might want to actually *live their actual, regular life* "off the grid". It also doesn't address the bigger picture of solving the problem that is attacking the panopticon setup itself, or that anyone living off the grid to do so is likely to become a target of greater surveillance anyway.

    11. Re:RTFA this time by stephenmac7 · · Score: 1

      Not sure merely knowing how to chop wood and having leather gloves is going to make much difference "when civilization goes to shit." If you actually believe that will happen, I'd wager that your preparation might need to be a little more than that.

      --
      "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." -- Judge Gideon J. Tucker
    12. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not tracking "us" but they do have the tool set to do so if they wanted to. And those fixated on being tracked lead lives so commonplace and unimportant so why would anyone bother tracking them in the first place. Contrary to popular belief the intelligence agencies do not even come close to having the unlimited resources needed to analyze every byte of data streaming over the internet from one place to another.

      And none of the information released by Snowden was a secret. The NSA even posted jobs online using specific program acronyms. And US foreign intelligence agencies were also quite aware that their systems were under attack since they were all busy doing the exact same thing to the US. And the most important piece of information is that any government on the planet is just as vulnerable to electronic attacks as the general public. I would say the government is in a more precarious position because the potential targets are well known and limited in number.

      It's regrettable that today's idiotic internet horde are such complete idiots. Their historical knowledge only goes back a few years and even their interpretations of the facts are wrong and the further back in history you go the more confused they become. People think using 140 character messaging to impart knowledge is all they need to explain complex events. They decide what "facts" to use based upon how many "likes" they get in their echo chamber messaging communities. The security agencies can basically ignore these people because they rival Congress on the stupidity meter and are only dangerous to themselves. The FBI barely has the resources to prosecute the worst cases in the US. The NSA and CIA have their hands full dealing with Russia, China, and every other foreign country looking to interfere with US policies and goals. Oh and the people divulging information from within the NSA are not whistleblowers they are felons. Had they the brains of an insect they would have found a way to bring their information to the attention of those in the government capable of looking t the data and trying to resolve the problems. It would be difficult to go this route and safer all around instead of just blind dropping the data into the hands of people who have made no secret of their hostility towards the US and thus tailor the release of the data in a way that promotes their ideology. People so arrogant to think they can go through the data and decide what data is safe to release. Why should we trust these people? Where is all the data related to the documents that outline certain intelligence operations? Anyone who has ever created a software project knows the amount of design, technical specifications, project requirements, and e-mails get generated in even small software and hardware projects.

    13. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucker!

      That argument makes zero sense, and that idiotic mentality is part of the problem.

      If you were being sarcastic, it wasn't even funny.

    14. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd use one of these plus a few solar panels.

    15. Re:RTFA this time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 0

      And that's kind of my point. In theory: you swing the axe, the log splits... if you haven't done that in two decades, you might be shocked at how little wood you can actually split with an axe - maybe you need a wedge and sledge, or better: hydraulic assistance. Then there's the whole: are you actually mentally fit to wield an axe for a couple hours of heavy labor? Most people get stupid when they're exhausted, and if you're stupid when you swing that axe with all your might, things might get ugly.

    16. Re:RTFA this time by Tuidjy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, but having the axe will. Not as much as having an AK-74, a SSG 82 and a few hundred 5.45Ã--39mm rounds.

      But you know what? Actually living in a close knit community with nearby farming land and no large cities nearby is even better... And yet, somehow, I have no desire to leave Southern California which is a death trap if civilization goes to shit, for South Carolina, where I own property in an area which is perfect for survival (and where my firearms and bows are stored, since my wife does not want them around our infant daughter. When she is ten or so, we will have that conversation again, though)

      I'm afraid that I will be like most other people here - my head firmly in the sand until it is too late to do anything about anything.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    17. Re:RTFA this time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the last time you swung an axe you were 35, and now you're doing it at age 55, without decent sleep the night before, slightly hungry, and pre-occupied with other things while you're trying to get the wood split... it becomes a very different thing. Compound that with the risk of injury being much higher due to lack of available medical care...

      If you had just split a half-dozen logs last month, you'll know better your limits of exhaustion, technique to back up the log while holding it at a good height for cutting, how much to worry/not about sharpening the axe, whether an axe is the right tool for this job or maybe a 6lb maul works better on this kind of wood, etc. etc.

      The water thing I personally experienced - after a Hurricane, my uncle pulled out his old pitcher pump and screwed it onto the wellhead - easy access drinking water. Literally thousands of nearby homes had no clue how to do that, even if they had a pitcher pump, which they didn't. Most of them, given a pump and a clue of what it's for, still wouldn't have known where to find their well head, and when they did find it, would have had to obtain extra plumbing bits to get it hooked up. If they had bothered to do a little bit of post-catastrophe prep, they wouldn't have had to wait for the National Guard to arrive with water for them to drink. Of course, half these idiots didn't realize that they had 40 gallons of clean water in their heater tank, either... and with no electricity, getting word around to them about that was basically impossible.

    18. Re:RTFA this time by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      And that's kind of my point. In theory: you swing the axe, the log splits... if you haven't done that in two decades, you might be shocked at how little wood you can actually split with an axe

      Listen to Joe. When I was living up in Connecticut last year, my wife wanted wood from the fireplace and I thought I could still split some logs, no problem. After a few, I decided I'd rather be watching the Patriots pre-game show and made a phone call to order firewood.

      Fell asleep in the chair well before kickoff.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:RTFA this time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends on how much "to shit" you are preparing for. Hurricanes happen, and that can result in anywhere from a couple of days to a few months of "camping in your own home" afterwards. I doubt we'll all be hunting Pokemon one day and playing Mad Max in real life the next, it's probably going to be a bunch of little shocks that bring civilization down, bit by bit. And, the less civilization we've got, the longer it will take to recover from disasters like hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, floods, guys at the electrical sub-station screwing up and blowing the grid, etc.

    20. Re:RTFA this time by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I'd wager that your preparation might need to be a little more than that.

      I have prepared more than just the gloves. Specifically:

      In my pockets:
      wallet
      cellphone (can also serve as a flashlight)
      fine tip sharpie pen
      on keychain:
      64GB USB thumb drive w/ important documents, photos, files
      mini leatherman (scissors, knife, tweezers, screwdriver)
      screw top tube containing:
      List of emergency contact numbers
      needle+thread, safety pins, waterproof matches,
      asprin, antibiotic pills, baking soda

      In my backpack:
      A copy of this list
      Water
      Several breakfast bars
      Small Chomebook + charger
      sewing kit (needles, thread, safety pins)
      Small first aid kit
      Toothbrush, toothpaste
      unwaxed dental floss (a good all-purpose string)
      Alcohol gel (can be used as an antisceptic, and to start a fire)
      mini roll of duct tape
      LED flashlight
      compass, paper map of local area
      asprin
      chapstick
      sunscreen
      vaseline
      lighter
      backup sunglasses
      toothpicks
      tweezers
      razor
      whistle
      pepper spray
      signal mirror (doubles as a shaving mirror)
      sharpie pen, paper
      money - about $100 in small bills
      epoxy glue
      parachute cord
      snaplinks
      wire
      fish hooks
      fingernail clip

    21. Re:RTFA this time by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      Realize that wood does not naturally come in 15" rounds, you need a chain saw to buck it up first. You are more likely to be gathering sticks in the forest if you haven't done any preparations or live on a farm.

    22. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      I laugh when I see preppers with their automatic weapons. Where do they think they're going to get the ammo for those when they run out?

      If you really expect civilization to go to hell, use arrows.

    23. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This particular post in this thread is by far the saddest and most likely one.
      I've gone from being a very early adult who discovered peak oil conspiracies* on the internet and _freaked the fuck out_ to someone a little older realising it'll probably be far more simple than that even, just full economic collapse or global warming that finally nails us.

      The main issue as usual is the economic system, population and environment, those 3 things are in no way working anywhere near in the same leagues as each other.

      My personal guess is the vast majority of us nerds reading this thread, can be as smart and aware and planned ahead as we like, unless we have _significant_ wealth (and I mean damned well significant) then we're likely boned. The cost to have a 'backup' house in a cooler climate which is not only well stocked but is relatively comfortable, survivable (long term, ie: sustainable) and defendable is frankly, astronomical.

      Furthermore how many cooler climate places won't turn to shit anyhow with global warming, be it flooding or acid rain or contaminated water supply etc?

      The best case scenario, for "normal" non rich people, is to own a 'farmish' kind of house in the far outer suburbs of a cooler climate environment (over 50 miles from cities) and hope that when shit hits the fan, it is far slower than it potentially could be, as time goes on and the quality of living starts to goes down (personally I think that began in 2008.. though) that your quality of living goes up, compared to the average.
      If you can begin to accept a more humble lifestyle now, grow a small amount of your food and hope that local food prices *only* triple or quadruple, then you might end up with an ok kind of life, again, compared to the average.

      If shit hits the fan hard, 99.99% of us are boned, even the farm people. You need a proper, movie-esque compound to survive a full societal collapse and even then, you're surviving in some compound for what? There's kind of nothing left, you're not gonna lean back and relax in your recliner and watch 'the game' on the TV you were smart enough to stock up there or browse the net on your PC or phone...

      I no longer 'believe in the system' myself and so it makes things difficult to think of a solution, there's not really one. We're all on a massive paddleboat, blindly and desperately rowing directly towards a waterfall edge and you can't stop it, you can't get off it. What do you do?

    24. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to SC.... been here a while. Prepping too. Guns, Rabbits, Garden, Neighbors. de ai4px

    25. Re:RTFA this time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The US manufactures about 10 bullets for every person on the planet. There's no shortage of ammo, just a distribution problem. And you don't need that much. After the first 10 corpses pile up at the "keep out" sign, even the aggressive raiders, will get the hint. And a tin of 1,000 .22LR will not cost more than the gun pile the nuts have.

    26. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you have so much computer equipment. That stuff is gonna be super useful with no electricity and no networks.

    27. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      You're thinking short term. Fine for things like hurricane recovery or a bit of civil unrest, but not for world went to hell. How many YEARS worth of ammo can you squirrel away?

    28. Re:RTFA this time by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      Might want a rooster if you want chicken and eggs in the long term.

    29. Re:RTFA this time by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      If you have 1000 bullets, and shoot 10 people outside your house a day, the pile of rotting corpses would serve as a deterrent. and if you have more than 10 raiders a day trying to break into your compound, you should have spend more time/effort disguising your compound, rather than preparations to defend it.

    30. Re:RTFA this time by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      The author should take his own advice and get off the grid, then we wouldn't have to read his silly articles!

    31. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * oops forgot to say,

      I still completely believe in the mathematics in regards to peak oil and our huge dependence on the stuff and fossil fuels in general, but I suspect it's not the big one that's going to do us in the end.
      Furthermore, some of the peak oil fearmongers, while mostly right, are profiting from book sales and what have you. I got caught up in the hype.

    32. Re:RTFA this time by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Might want a rooster if you want chicken and eggs in the long term.

      I live in San Jose, CA, and roosters are illegal here. Too noisy.

    33. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      So you expect to never need to hunt for food? To not need more than a single 22 round to kill an intruder (or food)?

      It's giggle time!

    34. Re:RTFA this time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Hunting for food in an apocolypse would be dificult. Imagine today, but where every other hunter wants you dead. You wouldn't leave the safety of your compound. Your meat would be locally grown, or you'd become a vegetarian. What would you hunt for? Deer? Where are you where you can walk to an area with numerous deer? Because you can't drive there, because fuel wouldn't last you "years", again, unless you are cooking your own. And yes, a single .22 in the chest would stop any unarmored intruder. If they are armored, aim for the eye, or having a backup firearm with greater penetration.

      How long do you think 1000 rounds would last you?

    35. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really is all there is to it.

      Wrong.

      1) One needs to concentrate or that speeding blade will break your own legs. As a very simple tool, swinging a weighted lever is exhausting work.

      2) Many times one needs to chop down a tree to get firewood: As YouTube DIY failures reveal, it's a lot different to a 'Looney tunes' cartoon. Real trees do not fall down like a hinged flagpole: Trees spin, slide sideways a few feet, then topple. That makes it very difficult to predict the landing zone. Then one has to chop off the branches but the trunk isn't nicely mounted on a chopping block and the unwanted branch isn't rising vertically from the ground. It makes trimming the trunk a slow, tiring task.

    36. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      You propose that you will aim a .22 for the EYE at any significant distance and not go through a few dozen boxes of ammo in short order! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

      As for deer, I see them often enough in my back yard. Once the people who are lost if the nuker and electric can-opener don't work are gone, the deer will multiply significantly.

      Again, you're thinking short term. What do you expect to be doing in 10 years? 20? Remember, we're not talking civil unrest or natural disaster, civilization went to hell.

      A good bow can last a lifetime and it's easier to 'reload' an arrow.

      BTW, if you're hoping to take someone down w/ a .22, you'd better actually hit the heart if you don't want them to kill you back before they drop.

    37. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... if civilization goes to shit ...

      Do you mean all technology dies and we're living in the 1700s again, or an apocalypse has destroyed the climate and people are running out of food and water?

      The first is a food and water distribution problem, and converting homes to horse/dog/wind power. Cities and factories will be useless deathtraps.

      The second means decimation of the population and the rise of feudalism. This will probably happen in the first scenario too but semi-rural areas will rapidly adjust.

    38. Re:RTFA this time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You really suck at planning. How many shots per day do you think you'll average? Would that be vastly different if you were using a bow or a firearm?

      Let's say you are 12, because you act like it. Then, let's (wrongly) assume life expectancy doesn't change after an apocalypse. So that's 67 years, or about 25,000 days. So if you average 1 shot per day, that's 25k bullets/arrows. If you average 10 shots per day, that's 250k. Your arrows are less lethal than the .22 you make fun of, and good for about as many shots each. Especially at the start of the apocalypse, firearms will be vastly superior. The rate of fire and reload will protect the owner at the start, when roving gangs of looters try to rush them.

      And 10-20 years later, they can make a bow, if they need. Starting with an inferior weapon with some delusions of longevity in the apocalypse seems a bit insane, even worse than the preppers you make fun of.

      And because you are assuming the opposite, I'll let you know that I'm not a prepper, own no guns (and no bow, because here they are firearms), but am proficient with both bows and guns.

    39. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realize that a lot of people will die? There simply aren't enough trees to chop down and streams to drink from for everyone.

    40. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You missed the obvious. You can pull an arrow out of your dead target and use it again. It also doesn't instantly telegraph your location to everyone in the area. Your idea of one shot one kill under adverse conditions with a 22 is ludicrous.

      I assume you think I'm 12 because I made you feel stupid and you have to take it out on someone in your mind. Sorry I deflated your internet tough guy routine with facts. You were the one chest thumping about piling up rotting corpses everywhere. You'll be needing more than 10 shots a day if that's your plan.

      I'm not a prepper either. I do know how to shoot gun and bow. I know someone who was shot by a .22 and didn't realize it until he sobered up. He got better without going to a doctor. Admittedly, he was hit in his leg, not gutshot, but it does suggest limited stopping power. An arrow would have impeded his movement enough to notice.

    41. Re:RTFA this time by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Literally thousands of nearby homes had no clue how to do that, even if they had a pitcher pump, which they didn't.

      My well is 160 feet deep, you insensitive clod! Nothing is coming out of there without a pump. I do have a backup generator, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    42. Re:RTFA this time by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In a real zombie apocalypse scenario, nothing will leave you undisturbed except living well into the mountains. It's a PITA to get there at the best of times, and a lot of people are going to drop trees across roads if things get super sketchy. Anything on flat ground is going to be overrun.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be nice typing this on the taxpayer's dime

    44. Re:RTFA this time by rndmtim · · Score: 2

      Food... intruders? Potato, pahtahdo...

    45. Re:RTFA this time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can pull an arrow out of your dead target and use it again.

      Yes, you could, how many times will it work? Twice? Ten times? Once, for fun, I shot at a tree. 0% of the arrows were re-usable after that.

      Sorry I deflated your internet tough guy routine with facts.

      Yeah, your magic indestructible arrows, and 10,000 people per day lining up to break in, but they wait orderly in a line so you can shoot them all, one at a time, and take your magic arrow out and re-use it for the next.

      My simple point is that:
      1) you underestimate the amount of ammunition hoarded by the preppers.
      2) Your magic arrow solution is much more stupid than anything you are accusing me of.
      3) I never claimed that a .22 is a one-shot kill. Are you going to continue being a lying sack of shit, or are you going to act more than your 12 years? I did say that a shot to the chest would stop someone. a .22 to the leg won't take you down, but a hit to the chest will take out a lung or heart. A gut shot won't kill either. Well, it will eventually, from an infection, but the .22 doesn't carry enough energy to kill with hydrostatic shock, where a .44 could hit in the gut, and miss everything vital, and still kill. a .22 would have to hit something vital to kill. And no, you won't shrug off a .22 in the lung. That's fatal, and if not immediately so, it'll prevent you from breathing freely, and will eliminate the ability and will to fight.

      You refuse to answer clear questions designed to promote honest debate, and lie about what I say, and just ad hominem all over the place. Yes, for the first time, I insulted you, but you've been doing it from the start, because you know the facts aren't on your side, and all you have is badgering and insulting anyone you argue with, until they give up, so you can declare victory. Congratulations on winning every Internet fight, despite never being correct.

    46. Re:RTFA this time by rndmtim · · Score: 1

      If you've dropped a bunch of trees you find you can land them wherever you want - provided you preset them with a pulley and come-alongs and use wedges. Doing it a few times, getting a course on it, and finding people who know what they're doing quickly get you to the right equipment, which is not just an axe. I've fit a tree between two others in a space where I had about 30 degrees to work with and not gotten hung up. But this goes back to all of the prepper gadgetry in the world is useless for someone who has no practice doing the tasks...

      I don't use an axe, I use a woodsman's maul (I partially heat my house with wood in upstate NY). But I'd say (at 45) that the person who's suddenly trying to process their own 3 or 5 cords at age 50 is going to be disappointed when they take out their shoulder for a few weeks...

    47. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting list. Might I suggest a gas can and a solar powered battery charger.

    48. Re:RTFA this time by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      No solar panels? They are good for USB charging, even if they take a long time. Add a USB battery charger and you can keep your batteries topped up too. Eneloop are the best rechargeable cells available, they hold their charge and are extremely reliable.

      A battery powered radio wouldn't go amiss either. Those foil blankets they give out at sporting events can be bought online for next to nothing, and fold down very compact.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    49. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you where you can walk to an area with numerous deer?

      Michigan, if what my friends tell me is true. Except that it's more the other way around, and will someone please help me get this goddam deer out of the kitchen?

    50. Re:RTFA this time by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      That pile of rotting corpses would serve as more than that. It's a distinct health hazard and good luck getting someone to come in and treat you when you live like like that.

      If you have to kill 10 people a day, you're seriously besieged. Any normal war would mean that probably 100 people would actually be trying to take you out if you were managing a 10-person kill ratio. And if there really are 10 people trying per day, it's virtual certainty that they'll start ganging up. How many can you take out at once? Or do you expect to have help? Don't forget to share out the bullets.

      In fact, I think 10 percent is probably a good estimate for almost anything along those lines. Hunting? Unless you're better than predator cats, only about one attempt in 10 will bag you dinner. But even at a 100% kill rate and only one animal in the pot a week, expect the ammo to run out in around 20 years. Assuming you didn't use it up faster barricading your home with corpses.

    51. Re:RTFA this time by Drethon · · Score: 1

      You can also put five arrows in a deer and have it run off with all your arrows, or have the arrows snap on impact. Arrows also have significantly less range and a much higher skill requirement. Crossbow bolts probably would be better, though the crossbow may not last forever.

    52. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the people who are lost if the nuker and electric can-opener don't work are gone, the deer will multiply significantly.

      Perhaps not. One reason why deer are so numerous now is that we have spent a lot of time and effort in attempting to exterminate their natural non-human predators. Who can be expected to make a comeback if no one's doing that job any more. Save a few of those 1000 bullets for wolves and panthers.

    53. Re:RTFA this time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      These fools were sitting on a high water table, maybe 15' of head required to get it out, the wells themselves may go down to 200', but it's the final lift that counts. We have a well that's 170' deep, but all we have to do is open the valve and it flows - about 11 months of the year. We've got shallow pumps for the other month.

    54. Re:RTFA this time by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      I did see recently a video in which someone drops a bowling ball on an axe, chopping the ball in half. I think I will manage to survive using that technique with wood.

    55. Re:RTFA this time by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      7 Billion people chopping wood, well, the entire planets trees will last a few weeks, what happens next, I know, use those axes on each. Community keeps you safe now and it is the only thing that will keep you safe in the future. Fuck the axe et al, work with local people to rebuild the community, the one and only priority.

      When it comes to surveillance, misinformation is always going to be the number one tool for privacy, tainting information makes it unreliable and worthless. Lying on the internet, the norm it seems, makes much of the information from social media worthless, simply so much of it is not true. So join in the fun with social media illusions of yourself, consider it an extended massively multi player online role playing game, where the roles you play and illusions for the government to chase it own tail over. When it comes to corporate version simply refuse to buy any product target marketed at you.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    56. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I don't consider myself a prepper. But I do a lot of hunting, own a remote cabin with only solar power, grow and can a lot of my own vegetables....so I'm probably closer to "ready" than a lot of the preppers ;-) Anyways, one of my hobbies is long range shooting, so I have enough supplies to reload 4k-5k rounds in long range rounds (my preference being 300 RUM, 338 Lapua). Those both take about 100grs of power so I could double that if I stuck to 308 or triple it for 30-30. The brass would probably hold up ok, I have tons of extra 30 cal bullets, primers are probably my downfall...somewhere in a book I own on the history of guns I remember there was enough detail I think you could get the chemicals right to make it work...but I like my fingers and eyesight enough I think I'll wait to try it until I absolutely need to ;-p

      Oh, for the prepper thing, I'm probably short on water. The cabin only has 2 water options, little sandpoint well and a nearby stream/lake that is pretty clean, but no massive storage.

    57. Re:RTFA this time by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I laugh when I see preppers with their automatic weapons. Where do they think they're going to get the ammo for those when they run out?

      A lot of preppers also have reloading kits.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    58. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the idea is to have the ammo for the first round of looters / mobs / idiots who think they can rob you in a power vacuum. Just like in Africa / Middle East, war lords and other organizations of people will form quickly and no amount of ammo can save you if they are against you. If you make it past the first round of worthless humans you will likely be able to make deals with the war lords (or become one) for protection while providing a portion of your time / output (taxation). Think about and look at what happens in ISIS territory.

      Society will quickly restore to a semi-normal state with new people in power, you just have to survive the initial chaos. Much like farmers who carry guns today - the goal is to be able to defend yourself against the stray idiot or looter (self policing) not an entire society. If you aren't from a rural area you just don't understand how people act if they think there is a power vacuum (and in the country there is effectively always a power vacuum because police will take so long to arrive). That is why farmers have guns and it is the same reason you would need guns if society "breaks down" which is code for the creation of a larger power vacuum.

    59. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean a semi-automatic weapon right dumbass ?

      You have to have a FFL plus a federal/state/local licence to own or store a actual automatic weapon. Not very easy even for a cop to pull off.
      Fed and state is pretty easy, getting the local sheriff to sign off even in a non-communist state is pretty hard.

    60. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to point out that the average human is much more valuable to a war lord (politician) alive and working than dead. Tax that person 25% of their output annually and you have a huge income stream - kill that person and you get what they have that day. Every 4 people you keep alive is like a slave working for you full time - yet they will have little animosity and may be willing to defend you. Powerful warlords will have an incentive to keep things *relatively* peaceful so people can be productive and the warlord can earn protection fees. What they won't be able to do, initially, is act as a full fledged police force with judge, jury, etc.

    61. Re:RTFA this time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I guess the points are:

      1. did you duplicate this bowling ball / axe demonstration for yourself?

      2. do you even know where to lay hands on an axe to try with?

      3. have you extended this demonstration to use on wood?

      4. wood that you can collect yourself (not purchased at a store?)

      when you try any of these things, you'll usually find that DIY doesn't work the first try like it does on YouTube.

    62. Re:RTFA this time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      All good points - it's not just finding something that looks like an axe and starting chopping... that list of tree-felling equipment is rather long and not easy to come by during times of short supplies.

      I thought I was pretty good at felling trees with my chainsaws & rope, the first 10 or so that I took down were all "easy lies" they wanted to fall where I wanted them to fall. The last big one I took down was leaning toward the house (had already dropped a major chunk of canopy during a storm and put a hole in the roof) - I roped it off and went to work chopping, when it let go, it went not where I was pulling it to, but straight sideways - landed between a bench and a big clay pot, less than 6 inches clearance on either side, zero damage... all is well that ends well, but that was a rather humbling experience after so many trees falling exactly where I wanted them to.

    63. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are insane if you think the world is going to exist for more than a few weeks in a state of "every man for himself" where you are just killing everyone you see. People naturally form groups, especially if their life depends on it. These groups will begin to form FAST (immediately(premeditated), hours, days) and will expand to cover large physical areas. You are either part of a group that wins or part of a group that loses (and a bow won't help you win). Going it "alone" is a recipe for disaster and you will die regardless of your prep level.

      The ultimate winning and losing will go on forever (see war today) but your everyday life will not be shooting at every person you see. Your personal guns are for protection within your group and you may offer some up a to help defend the group as a whole.

    64. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      Reloading requires supplies. Primers and powder for example. Hard to make out in the woods.

    65. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      All the more reason that subset of preppers wanting more automatic weapons than they have people and such are laughable. Nothing says "I'm going to be a problem for you if I'm not taken out" like being holed up somewhere with weapons mostly suited to killing people.

      Bow and arrows, perhaps a hunting rifle, etc suggests someone who won't be a dead weight and willing to be part of a community.

    66. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      I never claimed that a .22 is a one-shot kill.

      Actually, you effectively did but the spittle was flying in such volume you may not have known what you were saying.

      Since you're resorting to insults and name calling, I'll just leave it with "have fun tough-guy"

    67. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      You can make more arrows with a knife if you have to. Try whittling a bullet and some powder.

    68. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I would say you are much more "ready" than the preppers I'm referring to.

    69. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiiight. Not that wood only comes upright-tree form with branches, it's not next to your fireplace (if you even have one), that there are some critical differences between an axe and a splitting maul, or how to twist the maul so it doesn't get stuck in the log.

      Please let me know where you live, so I know one more easy person to raid for supplies.

      --Anon. We are many; you are one

    70. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is a significant difference between having a gun and some ammo and the rabid prepper with 3 AKs and a certainty he can kill'em'all.

      It is the latter I laugh at. A bow is still a good idea if you expect thingd to get bad enough that new ammo might be unavailable.

    71. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't expect to live out your weird doomsday fantasy. I've been hearing this crap since I was a kid and in 50 years I have yet to see any signs of armageddon, the End of Days (oooooohhhh scary), or Russian commies crashing in through the living room window while we are distracted by Monday Night Football!

      And I don't expect to see any in the coming decades.

      I do expect the gullible to continue to spend tens of thousands on more weapons than they could use in ten lifetimes, mountains of dry beans, and gold, because when the world ends, gold will somehow become edible or something?

      As far as "giggle time", I think the purpose of those prepper' TV shows is to giggle at the preppers.

      Call me when you catch a squatch.

    72. Re:RTFA this time by littlewink · · Score: 1

      "chopping wood with an axe isn't a hotbed of technological innovation. It's pretty much worked the same way since the stone age, even though the tools have gotten a bit better."

      But the risks remain. Chopping wood is a dangerous and potentially lethal activity. Your axe/hatchet must be sharp but a sharp axe can, in a flash, sever a tendon, an artery or even a leg. Suddenly you will want the latest 21st-century surgical technology. Are you able to sew up a severed artery? Even a tendon? My, my....

      Wear sturdy boots - tall boots designed to protect you from an axe. Check your equipment: a loose axehead will ill serve you if, when you give it the "good ole college try", it flies off the handle and embeds itself in your significant other's belly. Can you sew up a severed aorta? In 5 minutes or less? Can you do a field blood transfusion to replace the blood the victim lost? My, my....

      Point is, we've forgotten much of how to do things that we _think_ we understand. Most people today could not chop wood with an axe without, at some point, seriously hurting themselves or others. There is no substitute for experience and learning.

      Finally, forget about the axe/hatchet. Use a hand saw - it's far safer. But learn and practice how to use it first: an artery severed by a saw is harder to patch than one severed by an axe.

    73. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      No I don't dogfuck.

    74. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black powder is very easy to make. With slightly more advanced than high school chemistry knowledge, smokeless powder and primer compound can also be made.

    75. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, just step into the convenient high school chemistry stock room and ....Wait, where is it?

    76. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when your axe breaks, do you have the skills to fix it or do you freeze to death because you have no firewood? And if you accidentally swing and chop off/open your foot, what do you do? Do you have the medical skills to prevent infection or stop the bleeding? Is running to a hospital on the grid really living off the grid? Are you really good enough at hunting to provide enough calories to maintain your current weight in a situation where you are expending calories rapidly trying to chop wood or just stay warm? Ever heard of Rabbit starvation? So you have a gun/bow and lots of ammo; what happens when you accidentally fall and lose or break your gun/bow? What happens when multiple people show up to take your supplies and your life? You've never killed another human being before and now you plan to shoot them in the eye or heart before they shoot you? What if it's a robot that shows up sent by that same government your fleeing? How will you evade thermal detection from the sky?

      No one person has all the skills anymore to survive and evade a world gone mad. As a somewhat large group with diverse skills and initial sharing of resources, long-term survival may be possible, but as an individual or even a small family unit it would be insurmountable! Like the grid today, we would have to rely on others for our survival. It would be a new kind of grid, perhaps, but you'd be on a grid none the less.

    77. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's not my fantasy. I'm the guy who watches and giggles. Occasionally injecting a practicality or two to see how many gallons of spittle will spew forth as a result.

    78. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as much as having an AK-74, a SSG 82 and a few hundred 5.45Ã--39mm rounds.

      If you're planning for the collapse of civilization, why would you willingly pick a tool that requires exotic (for the region) consumables to operate? You can find 5.56x45 mm ammo in every sporting goods store, police station, military depot, etc. You can find parts for an AR15 under every rock. An AK-74 only makes sense if you live somewhere in the former Soviet footprint.

      Unless you plan to kill a whole lot of humans, you're better off with a .22 rifle and a rifle in some sort of relatively common deer cartridge.

    79. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So start a kickstarter to breed a quiet rooster.

    80. Re: RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all respect, I suggest you supplement your bleach with 50 - 100 lbs of swimming pool chlorine tablets or powder. Chlorine is dirt cheap, great for disinfecting drinking water, and dang handy for some less common chemistry reactions. Be careful with it, though.

    81. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5-pin or 10-pin?

    82. Re:RTFA this time by Do+You+Smell+That · · Score: 1
      The people on one of my relative's block have an interesting solution to that:

      Everyone who's "prepping" all have the same style/caliber of weapon. This way they can all use each others caches if/when they become available.

      ...I took it upon myself not to point out that this also implies there are lots of people with guns around who know where "things of value" will be found...

      --
      I'm not good at making signatures...
    83. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, they buy the supplies to make their own, and store such. It really isn't that difficult. My brother used to handload in a one room apartment. a few pounds of the appropriate gun powders and a few boxes of 10000 primers then all you need is lead... Dillon makes many different handloading presses, powder measures, molds for bullets (think wheel weights melted down). and there you go, reasonable bullets to last you a lifetime of hunting. a Few hundred dollars and you are shooting game for food for the rest of your life (and your children's lives).

      Also, you do know that almost no one is licensed for automatic weapons, you are referring to SEMI automatic weapons, but as your discussion shows you are ignorant about firearms, I can understand your confusion.

    84. Re:RTFA this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gun pile? .22 ammo is roughly $70/500 (not including shipping) so 1000 bullets is less than $200. And if you go shooting paper targets with a couple of friends (like I do a couple of times a month) 1000 rounds lasts maybe 2 weeks.

    85. Re:RTFA this time by sjames · · Score: 1

      I know how reloading works. I also know that many legal semi-auto weapons can be converted to full auto, some with trivial modifications. Further, I know some do those conversions "off the books" and others intend to as soon as civilization goes to hell. Perhaps you didn't know that.

      Further, I know that reloading enough rounds to support an automatic weapon will be quite time consuming.

      I'm not saying a firearm isn't useful. For example a hunting rifle is quite useful. And since a bolt action is simple and fairly foolproof it will serve better in that situation.

      I am saying that if you're in a situation where you may have to fabricate your own parts from only what you can find, a bow is more likely to help you and it is less likely to draw unwanted attention to you.

    86. Re:RTFA this time by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My well is 160' deep and the water is at about 158' and it's full of rust. I have to change the spun poly filter every couple of weeks or so at the most. Luckily they are reasonable on Amazon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. puteiro não cobra aluguel, mora com a Bianca. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vai dar teu cuzinho Helena filha da puta, porque Eu não tenho dou importância nenhuma pro que tu faz com teu raboa, sua stalker filha da puta.

  7. Off the grid = mall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Article talks about getting off the grid and mentions ad-hoc network in a mall's food court... I think most people have a very different idea of what it means to live off the grid.

    1. Re:Off the grid = mall by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I think most people have a very different idea of what it means to live off the grid.

      Correct, and TFA doesn't get it. Living 'off the grid' means:
      o No Internet
      o No phone
      o Using cash for everything, no electronic funds transfers of any kind

      It may also mean:
      o Not using electricity from the local provider, or not using electricity at all
      o Not using natural gas from the local provider, or at all

      It might even go so far as to mean:
      o Not using municipal water or sewer sources, or even waste collection services

      Of course there are problems with all the above. In many places if you do not have electric service in active use at your residence, it is automatically considered to be 'uninhabitable' and will be condemned, even if you have a generator or some other self-produced power source, or just plain don't need it at all; wouldn't at all be surprised if it's the same with water and sewer service in many places. Going cash-only in 2016 means you get flagged as a possible terrorist and/or criminal, which means getting law enforcement up in your business. Not having Internet or a phone? Good luck getting any sort of meaningful paying work, and if you're self-employed, how will your customers contact you? Furthermore if you go cash-only and are self-employed, what's that going to look like to your customers? Another thing: you go cash-only and are self-employed, guarantee you you'll have the IRS and maybe the Justice Department all over you and up in your business for potential tax evasion and maybe suspicion of money laundering. If I sat here long enough thinking through it, I could keep coming up with things that would make it difficult-to-impossible to be completely 'off the grid'; it becomes an unending game of whack-a-mole of problems, with one 'solution' giving rise to more problems to solve, and in the end you end up looking like Ted Kaczynski to most people. Maybe you could live 'off the grid' in 1916, but in 2016 the game is rigged against you being able to do so at all; we live in the Surveillance Age now. Your best bet is to learn how to 'hide in plain sight' and blend in with all the white noise.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  8. WiFi across the food court by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

    The FBI busted Russian sleeper agents using the WiFi across the food-court trick.

    As such, I don't think the WiFi across the food-court would help the DNC.

    See the story. There are many articles on the cell. Only a few mention the WiFi link. Quite a few debate whether the agents were actually sleeper agents.

    1. Re:WiFi across the food court by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The Intelligence services chase the easy dollar. They will first target the most common solutions. Therefore if you use the common solutions you already lost. We must choose between easy/lazy and secure.

  9. Horrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you try to avoid being tracked, that makes them suspicious, and they'll track you even more.

    1. Re:Horrible idea by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you try to avoid being tracked, that makes them suspicious, and they'll track you even more.

      Reminds me of the early days of networking and mailing lists.

      My wife and I ran a mailing list on a controversial subject, from a server in our home. This was back when civilian encryption was very new and deployment uncommon. We made a point (and made it clear to our subscribers) that NO encryption was used. Reasoning was this:

        - If the police decided to check the mailing list (or other communications with us) for something of interest, and it was unencrypted, they could get what they wanted with a passive tap. They'd prefer that, because if they DID find something to go after, they wouldn't tip off the target, while if they didn',t there'd be no sign they had even snooped.

        - If the police decided to check and anything was encrypted, the easy way to get it would be to raid the place and seize everything that might be evidential: computers, printers, backup media, answering machine, printed paper - and smash up everything else while they were at it. They'd have found nothing - but caused lots of loss for us. And of course they'd have trashed our reputation - deliberately - both to get a warrant in the first place and to head off claims of police misconduct.

      So we "ran bare", made the rule that nothing illegal, nor confessions of doing anything illegal, could be on the mailing list, and ENFORCED that rule: To the point of ejecting a number of people, and one actually shutting down the list for a week (when a participant made it clear he was about to violate the terms) and only bringing it back, reluctantly, under a new name and new terms after being petitioned by many more reasonable users.

      (Eventually a law change made it, in our opinion, too much risk and work to continue, and we shut it down permanently, after advance warning and migrating our users to another list, started by some of our users more dedicated to the underlying subject. Then I was free to use an encrypted tunnel when a job, shortly after, required it.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re: Horrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly the point of the article. Go back to Facebook, its cheaper to track you there.

    3. Re:Horrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd guess the topic was "right to die." Am I close? -PCP

    4. Re:Horrible idea by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      If you try to avoid being tracked, that makes them suspicious, and they'll track you even more.

      ^This! My plan is to hide in plain sight. Unless They (tm) have a specific reason to single me out, I'm just one of 300M Americans, lost in a big crowd.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  10. Living in proverbial woods won't work by sinij · · Score: 1

    Living in proverbial woods won't work, the solution must be technological or legislative. Technological in form of encryption and p2p adoption so there aren't high-value, high-impact targets to breach. Legislative in form of making 'just because' data collection and breaching illegal, so it won't be blatantly used in the open.

    1. Re: Living in proverbial woods won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real solution is for you dorks to start acting like normal, well-adjusted people. Unfortunately, that seems to be asking far too much.

    2. Re: Living in proverbial woods won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      repeat normal like me.. normal like me

  11. Telegrams? Pony express? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    Since almost all types of communication relies on computers now, it would be hard to get away from it. Phones can be tapped. Physical mail can be intercepted and read. Shortwave radio can be intercepted. Even point to point lasers can be spied on if you really want to put in the effort. Start using CB radio. No one would expect that.

    1. Re:Telegrams? Pony express? by wnew · · Score: 2

      _Shortwave radio can be intercepted_ Spread-spectrum shortwave with frequency-jumping sequence determined by random single-use seed used by both transmitter and receiver is fairly difficult encryption to break. Method used since VietNam for uber-secure communications in military of messages that themselves are rarely clear text but have another level of encryption. Much easier today with compute power in cell phones. Just sayin'

    2. Re:Telegrams? Pony express? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CB is not secure in the slightest. Use some form of digital communications with AES-256 or similar if you want privacy.

    3. Re:Telegrams? Pony express? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      The problem stated in the summary was just to make surveillance more "expensive" not impossible for the spying parties. An ad hoc communication/information system that doesn't pass through, e.g Facebook/Google's servers fits the bill. A step up would be a system that doesn't use commercial ISPs, e.g. mesh networks. So there's still a world of choice before you start using your CB radios or narrow-casting using lasers.

    4. Re:Telegrams? Pony express? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      No, CB is completely unsecure. It's also almost unused anymore and no one would think to monitor it.

  12. YES! This SOOO MUCH!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get off the grid! Did you not see TRON?! Already everywhere we see those who stare blankly at phones walking in our midsts. Those are LOST SOULS! But you can be saved! GET OFF THE GRID!

  13. Enemy of the State by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Almost like the character "Brill" from the movie...off the grid and all of that.

    1. Re:Enemy of the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Not at all.

      The movie was about being "off the grid" by being "under the grid". He never gets searched, therefore he never gets found. He was always "on the grid", its just that no one was looking.

      What this article proposes is four steps beyond that. Getting "off the grid" by REMOVING yourself from the grid. No digital, nothing permanent, nothing traceable. Do you sleep in the same 15 meter area more than once a night? If so, you already fucked up.

    2. Re:Enemy of the State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Do you sleep in the same 15 meter area more than once a night?

      I only sleep once a night no matter where I am.

  14. CHAF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer a simple CHAF method to obfuscate electronic and physical surveillance.

       

  15. No. What have you to hide Citizen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To start, no, you are paranoid if you think the Government is interested in you as a person. You as a person have no value. Marketers also have no interest in you as a person. The Government and Marketers are interested in your social networking. If you live off the grid, you actually draw attention to yourself in ways you might not consider.

    The average person:
    - Buys groceries on their credit card or perhaps a debit card with their name on it
    - Has a cell phone
    - Pays for internet service through that phone, or through a wireline
    - Has a television or a computer, may or may not subscribe to a television service.

    The paranoid individual:
    - Pays cash for a used RV, doesn't insure it, takes the plates off it and drives it into the middle of the boonies, and then takes a nailfile and grinds the VIN numbers off the RV in case someone finds it.
    - Buys a years worth of food, in cash, primarily canned and dehydrated MRE's, since frozen food won't be an option
    - Owns no phone, no mailing address, nothing with a serial number

    Which one is going to be the suspected terrorist? The one that is paying in cash but can't be located. So let's say our cash-paying friend wants to grow a garden so they stay off the grid longer. They will have to buy fertilizer. Who else buys fertilizer? Terrorists making bombs.

    Where as your typical person who lives in a city might buy 1KG of fertilizer and have a patio garden, the off-the-grid paranoid guy will buy enough fertilizer to grow an acre of food. (That's roughly 1kg per square meter, or about one square yard.) Intelligence services are really interested in that guy who is buying fertilizer.

    It is better to hide in plain sight. If you are up to no good, instead of covering your tracks, you obscure your tracks so that someone following them has no probable cause to investigate where they lead. To take the "food court wifi hotspot" example, you would use a public WiFi spot to communicate with other "off the grid" people by having a preshared key to hotspot that exists in a space that nobody is actively aware of. Someone with a WiFi sniffer would certainly see it, and thus would raise suspicion if it's "Gustav's Secret WiFi", but not raise any suspicion if it's just "Dairy Queen POS" or something of that nature.

    Likewise if you wanted to avoid the government or marketers invading your privacy and monitoring your purchases, first of all you'd buy pre-paid credit cards with cash, and second of all you'd attach those cards to ApplePay or something similar so that the transaction record looks like a regular card.

    Prepaid Debit and Credit cards is the marketers gift to terrorists and paranoid people. Withdraw cash from your bank account at one end of the city, pay with cash a prepaid card at the other end of the city, nobody will know unless the bill's serial numbers were tracked.

    Which they are. If you want to avoid being tracked by all means necessary, only pay in quarters.

    1. Re:No. What have you to hide Citizen? by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which they are. If you want to avoid being tracked by all means necessary, only pay in quarters.

      This sentence is pure, beautiful, trollish, poetry. (Because the ridges on quarters are like barcodes.....better pay in nickels or pennies).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:No. What have you to hide Citizen? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      You're just talking crazy! There's no way in hell that I'm using a nail file to take the VIN off an RV. That would take forever. I would use a grinder because I've got a garden to plant.

    3. Re:No. What have you to hide Citizen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's say our cash-paying friend wants to grow a garden so they stay off the grid longer. They will have to buy fertilizer. Who else buys fertilizer? Terrorists making bombs.

      Where as your typical person who lives in a city might buy 1KG of fertilizer and have a patio garden, the off-the-grid paranoid guy will buy enough fertilizer to grow an acre of food. (That's roughly 1kg per square meter, or about one square yard.) Intelligence services are really interested in that guy who is buying fertilizer.

      Not disagreeing with the general gist of your post, but I think your fertilizer example is quite contrived. There are many types of fertilizer that can't be used for bomb making. On top of that, "off grid" would involve not buying things (including Ammonium Nitrate or Fuel Oil), and it is quite possible to have a sustainable garden without external inputs. A lot of movements have sprung up in the past decades to propagate just that. While I'm not off grid myself, I do keep a vegetable garden running to supply me with fresh, local and organic vegetables. Apart from some fish emulsion once, it hasn't seen any fertilizer or pesticides since ... from the start. The veggies flourish in beds of almost pure compost, which is made from garden refuse - and one would suppose that off grid locations are quite rich in biomass, with the same result. (Of course, one could try to go off grid in the Nevada Desert, but don't try to plant a garden there.)

    4. Re:No. What have you to hide Citizen? by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

      You make good points sir. I'll also add that 1Kg of fertilizer is *more* than enough to raze all kinds of hell, when properly applied.

    5. Re:No. What have you to hide Citizen? by cloakedpegasus · · Score: 1

      This is a very well-thought-out reply. Thanks for contributing.

  16. Off the grid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible. You would need a cabin in the woods with no utility connections. I would install a PV system and septic and drill a well. If you need WiFi, I would carry a laptop to Starbucks and use Tor over their WiFi, then GTFO. I would also encrypt the laptop with Veracrypt and use PGP for all email. No car either, because then you need a driver's license, etc. You could fish out of the river and trap/hunt animals.

  17. Not possible if you want to stay connected. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Even the evasion tactics they discuss wouldn't really work. Optical networking that isn't easily detected is one of your only hopes.

    There really isn't anything you can do and participate in society at the same time... if you are a person of interest. The question is really if you can avoid being a person of interest at all.

  18. vai te fuder Fernanda Brizola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why those Tor baby dick suckers are insisting in compile new kernels on their "victim" machines to support that pedo shame?

  19. Why should we have to do all of that to begin with by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    Why should we have to do all of that to begin with? Why are we allowing this to happen? Is our government completely out of our control now?

  20. Filthy Casual!! by mfh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cover your body with tinfoil so they can't find you!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Filthy Casual!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. They're looking for warm dots, not bright reflecting dots!

    2. Re:Filthy Casual!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or at least your new chip and pin card with integrated rfid for easy touch and go payment.

    3. Re:Filthy Casual!! by strstr · · Score: 1

      tinfoil actually amplifies signals emitted from your body, and beamed into your body, and is easily scanned through using the NSA's global building penetrating/mountain penetrating radar/satellites MRI/ESR/radar.

      only way to shield would be super conducting magnetic shield to reflect 100% of the signals but those aren't cheap.

      drrobertduncan.com obamasweapon.com

    4. Re:Filthy Casual!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you'd be found anyway since you are the only thing that reflects 100% of the signals back (whereas everything else absorbs some of the signals).

    5. Re:Filthy Casual!! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Right idea - wrong implementation. You need to disappear into the data - be average. Being off the grid means somebody will notice when you do re-enter the system. No noise - then suddenly noise. Buying 100lbs of beef jerky once a month is sure to set off some alarms.

      You have to be noise. Gray, average, no polka dots. Drive a boring car, work in middle management.

      But have alternate email addresses and different devices to access the information. Don't do it from the same location.

      Become the wallpaper !

    6. Re: Filthy Casual!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you ground that tin foil

  21. Can we affect changes by going offgrid? by zedaroca · · Score: 2

    Fighting injustice is what should be done, not running away from it.
    If in the fight you have to go off-grid for a while, then go off-grid. But don't run away from your government forever.

  22. KILL THE TREASONOUS EMPLOYEES aka FBI/CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is FBI, FBI murder eg. Ian Murdock of Debian.

    So what do they deserve? More of your tax payer dollars to squander on black tinted Cadillac Escalades and Nordstrom Rack suits?

    No. They deserve what all treasonous agencies get. Employees of the tax payers that back stab... painful death then Hell.

    Hide mother fuckers. The public do not believe spies.

    1. Re:KILL THE TREASONOUS EMPLOYEES aka FBI/CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know some FBI and they are really strange people. Very quiet, sneaky, spooky like scared, always asking you questions. You can't even talk to an FBI employee without feeling like wtf is wrong with you?

      They are not normal people. They cant be because their job depends on their ability to lie.

  23. Re: You dorks are pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US swimmers robbed at gunpoint last night.

    Awaiting your mea culpa.

  24. ICE PICKet signs probably are needed for these FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    feel me?

  25. Re:ICE PICKet signs probably are needed for these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is where these fed shits are.

    Registry Registrant ID:
    Registrant Name: Host Master
    Registrant Organization: SourceForge Media, LLC
    Registrant Street: 1660 Logan Avenue Suite A
    Registrant City: San Diego
    Registrant State/Province: CA
    Registrant Postal Code: 92113
    Registrant Country: US
    Registrant Phone: +1.8584545900

  26. Maybe Opposite by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Suppose a twenty year old has no cell phone and no computer and never goes online. To a smart law enforcement agency they would take a look at that person. That person is off the bell curve of normal behavior. It could be that the person is severely handicapped or has some rational reason for being out of step with the world but more likely or not they are trying to be invisible. I'll bet all kinds of criminals could be caught by simply examining eccentric ways of life of individuals. How far does it go? Criminals with outstanding warrants or who are under investigation often flee to large cities with good public transportation as they know that a traffic stop is the most common way of coming into contact with law enforcement. A subway or public bus gets you away from scrutiny. Now if you travel long distance by bus you must get a clearance from Homeland Security. They require a credit card and not cash be used to buy a bus ticket and if you buy a ticket for someone else there is a $19. fee added to the price of a ticket. They call it a guest ticket. The feds also demand that hotels along the major highways only accept credit or debit cards. It makes it harder and harder for criminals to exist.

    1. Re:Maybe Opposite by DeanPentcheff · · Score: 1

      Suppose a twenty year old has no cell phone and no computer and never goes online. To a smart law enforcement agency they would take a look at that person. That person is off the bell curve of normal behavior. It could be that the person is severely handicapped or has some rational reason for being out of step with the world but more likely or not they are trying to be invisible. I'll bet all kinds of criminals could be caught by simply examining eccentric ways of life of individuals.

      Doubtless.

      But in the U.S., that's not how it works.

      We have this thing called the Fourth Amendment that has been interpreted to mean that I have the right to be off the bell curve and live in eccentric ways without federal, state, or local scrutiny. The exception is when authorities provide probable cause that I have committed a crime or that there is evidence of a crime present in the place to be searched.

      Just being different really isn't probable cause that a crime is being committed.

      And of course I'm not naïve enough to think that's the way it always works in practice. But that's the standard that we, as citizens, are charged with vigilantly supporting.

    2. Re:Maybe Opposite by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Different isn't probable cause, but could be a cause for more (legal) surveillance. If a crime is committed, it will quickly be possible to rule out the great majority of on-the-grid people because law enforcement will know their location and activities at the time of the crime. That could then lead law enforcement to look very carefully at off-the-grid people because they don't have an electronic alibi.

      Depending on the surveillance laws in place at the time, this could be completely legal.

    3. Re:Maybe Opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phones and computers are the main tools used to monitor people. If someone doesn't use them then they'll be much harder to track. The only thing that can track them now is documents, photos of them by others, cameras. But it's almost impossible to know that someone doesn't use a cellphone/computer just by looking at them walking on the street. Therefore your argument that law agencies would find those people easily is incorrect.

      By the way, computerization and spying hasn't done anything to stop the creation of criminals. In fact, there's probably more money being stolen now than before, and through "legal" ways. It's easy to focus on the criminals on the streets and forget about the ones in offices and in government. I guess the only thing that's easier now is to catch small fish, but the big ones are still at large.

    4. Re:Maybe Opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The feds also demand that hotels along the major highways only accept credit or debit cards. It makes it harder and harder for criminals to exist."

      They do?

    5. Re:Maybe Opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't listen to Justin Bieber or follow the Kardashians - am I off the curve?

  27. what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You can get off the grid: become a homeless bum, move to a third world country, etc. But there are obvious disadvantages associated with that. If you own a house, have a salary, drive a car, take a plane, see a doctor, own a gun, use a credit card, etc. you are being tracked. NSA surveillance is really the least of your worries. And the thing to recognize that most of that tracking has nothing to do with terrorism, but with financial regulations, taxes, mandatory insurance and retirement plans, gun control, the war on drugs, the war on poverty, equal opportunity enforcement, zoning, building inspections, etc.

    That is, the progressive social welfare state is inextricably linked with government tracking and surveillance: government can't right the supposed wrongs in society, manage the economy, and help everybody to become healthy and smart without detailed information about what people do and want. So, if you don't like that level of surveillance and tracking, the only way is to turn back the progressive welfare state.

    1. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >government can't right the supposed wrongs in society, manage the economy, and help everybody to become healthy and smart without detailed information about what people do and want.

      Actually, before we had all that surveillance stuff it was perfectly possible: it's called answering surveys and statistical methods.

    2. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Unless you insist on means testing and demand a zillion measures to prevent 'cheating' (that cost more than the cheating), the whole thing can be more or less anonymous.

    3. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Unless you insist on means testing and demand a zillion measures to prevent 'cheating' (that cost more than the cheating), the whole thing can be more or less anonymous.

      The social welfare state isn't just "welfare", it includes public health care, public education, public utilities, public retirement programs, gun control, tax breaks for desired behavior, sin taxes, financial regulation, strict income tax enforcement, etc. Those cannot be "more or less anonymous", they require government to keep track of your entire life, from cradle to grave.

    4. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, if income tax is replaced by sales tax, that kills a lot of tracking. Forget the tax breaks and sin taxes. go to basic income and you can get rid of retirement programs. Gun control isn't intrinsic, it's just a common feature. It is entirely feasible for government to not even know where you live (only what P.O. box you have).

      Will they actually respect privacy to that degree? Doubt it, but neither will the other choices. But that isn't INTRINSIC.

    5. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Actually, if income tax is replaced by sales tax, that kills a lot of tracking.

      Sales taxes are highly regressive; one of the major tenets of progressivism and social welfare states is the reduction of inequalities, and that requires progressive income taxation.

      But that isn't INTRINSIC.

      Yes, these features are INTRINSIC for progressive welfare states because the premise of such states is that the government makes rational, science-based decisions that maximize the welfare of society and protects individuals against their own ignorance and mistakes. Government can only fulfill that function if it has massive amounts of information on both society and on individuals.

      A state that is financed by sales taxes, redistributes that money as basic income, and otherwise leaves citizens alone is not a progressive state or a social welfare state, it is essentially a libertarian state.

    6. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I see you have redefined your terms to suit. If you eliminate the reasons for sales taxes to be regressive, they are no longer regressive. For example, if you don't tax staple foods and other basics and give everyone a basic income, then it need not be regressive. And, I would say at a guess most of the Libertarians I run across would rather rip out their own livers with a spoon than implement a basic income.

      The government would need a great deal of information in aggregate, but not so much personally identifiable.

      If it seems intrinsic, it is due to lack of imagination (and yes, there are progressives guilty of that as well).

    7. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      the progressive social welfare state is inextricably linked with government tracking and surveillance: government can't right the supposed wrongs in society, manage the economy, and help everybody to become healthy and smart without detailed information about what people do and want.

      This is, of course, ignorant and stupid and wrong. For instance, drug testing for welfare recipients. When we do that we find out that virtually none of them can afford drugs, and that it costs vastly more to find that out than to not bother. Or, welfare in general. If you move to a minimum guaranteed income then the only fraud cases you'll have are people collecting benefits for people who are dead. It greatly simplifies the problem and makes enforcement comparatively cost-free.

      building inspections, etc.

      Oh, you want your house to burn down every other week because someone else didn't do theirs properly?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      This is, of course, ignorant and stupid and wrong. For instance, drug testing for welfare recipients. ... Or, welfare in general.

      No, what is "stupid and wrong" is that you keep confusing the "social welfare state" with the US welfare system. The term "welfare" in the "welfare state" and the "welfare system" are largely unrelated.

      If you move to a minimum guaranteed income then the only fraud cases you'll have are people collecting benefits for people who are dead. It greatly simplifies the problem and makes enforcement comparatively cost-free.

      A state that only provides a minimum guaranteed income and otherwise doesn't keep track of the health and welfare of its citizens is not a "welfare state", it's a form of libertarian state.

      building inspections, etc.

      Oh, you want your house to burn down every other week because someone else didn't do theirs properly?

      Not at all; I simply don't want the state to have the power to perform such inspections; there are many alternatives.

    9. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      see you have redefined your terms to suit.

      No, you keep redefining terms to suit your argument. If you eliminate the reasons for sales taxes to be regressive, they are no longer regressive. For example, if you don't tax staple foods and other basics and give everyone a basic income, then it need not be regressive.

      Sales taxes already exclude staple foods and other basics; if you restrict them any further, they turn into luxury taxes. But be that as it may, of course they are still regressive, for the simple reason that people with higher incomes tend to only spend a smaller fraction of their incomes. It also doesn't work out fiscally. Germany collects a VAT, not just a sales tax, and has few exemptions, yet it raises only 20% of their total taxes, $140 billion. If you distributed that across all Germans as a basic income, you end up with $2000-3000/year/person, nowhere near enough to live on, and you're proposing to reduce the tax base even further.

      And, I would say at a guess most of the Libertarians I run across would rather rip out their own livers with a spoon than implement a basic income.

      Hayek supported it, and the Cato institute published an article favoring it. Many libertarians would view a no-strings-attached basic income as far preferable to the current massive system of government benefits, for reasons of privacy, self-determination, and efficiency.

      The government would need a great deal of information in aggregate, but not so much personally identifiable.

      You are making the erroneous assumption that progressivism and the welfare state are only about handing out money to people with low incomes; that is simply false. Both ideologies are about government helping people and improving society, and that requires attention to the details of every individual's life.

      As I was saying, a society in which the function of the state is reduced to that of collecting sales taxes and turning them into a basic income guarantee is a libertarian state. Many libertarians (myself included) simply believe that that is not fiscally feasible; that's also the conclusion reached by governments that have looked into it. Furthermore, we fear that attempts to push it through politically would simply result in a basic income in addition to the current massive and intrusive welfare system.

    10. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Suggesting conditions or modifications that would make something no-longer true is not redefining.

      Yes, there are libertarians who would prefer the basic income to the current mess. It would likely fly with left-libertarians.

      Improving society and providing opportunities for all does not at all need details about any particular individual. Information in aggregate is suffiocient.

      Don't confuse the closet authoritarians for people with an actually progressive approach.

    11. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Suggesting conditions or modifications that would make something no-longer true is not redefining.

      It isn't necessarily redefining, but it often is. When you "modify" an automobile by changing the number of wheels from four to two and replacing the internal combustion engine by pedals, you no longer have an automobile, you have a bicycle.

      Improving society and providing opportunities for all does not at all need details about any particular individual. Information in aggregate is suffiocient.

      You seem to live under the misconception that progressivism and/or the social welfare state are synonymous with the goal of "Improving society and providing opportunities for all". In fact, those are the goals of many political ideologies, and progressivism and the social welfare state are actually pretty poor at accomplishing those goals.

      Don't confuse the closet authoritarians for people with an actually progressive approach.

      The progressive approach is authoritarian. That is, if you want society to make progress, to improve and to provide opportunities for al, then adopting "progressivism" is the wrong ideology because it doesn't actually work very well.

    12. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by sjames · · Score: 1

      It isn't necessarily redefining, but it often is. When you "modify" an automobile by changing the number of wheels from four to two and replacing the internal combustion engine by pedals, you no longer have an automobile, you have a bicycle.

      So what got it's definition changed in your example?

      The progressive approach [wikipedia.org] is authoritarian. That is, if you want society to make progress, to improve and to provide opportunities for al, then adopting "progressivism" is the wrong ideology because it doesn't actually work very well.

      Literally nothing in your link even touches on authoritarianism or on your surrounding claim of digging into the minutia of people's lives. Rather it talks of using broad policies to accomplish social goals in aggregate.

    13. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Literally nothing in your link even touches on authoritarianism or on your surrounding claim of digging into the minutia of people's lives

      Oh, it touches on plenty of it, you are simply too ignorant of history and contemporary policy to see it.

      In any case, you are welcome to try to come up with an actual feasible policy that implements progressivism; sales taxes plus basic income isn't it since it is neither economically feasible nor a progressivist policy.

    14. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by sjames · · Score: 1

      You are so deeply buried in your own opinion you can't even imagine what things look like from the outside. For that reason, you have no chance to ever convince anyone from outside the echo chamber of your beliefs. That can only be to your own detriment.

      Effectively, you have newspeak-ed yourself and don't understand why nobody speaking the old modern English seems to not understand you.

      The irony of that is far from lost on me. Do you see it?

    15. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      I am so deeply buried in my own opinion that I can't even imagine what things look like from the outside. For that reason, you have no chance to ever convince my from outside the echo chamber of my beliefs.

      There, FTFY.

      As I was saying, the idea that a welfare state or progressive state can be implemented based on only sales tax plus basic income, like you suggested, is ludicrous: such a program is both economically and fiscally impossible, and it is contrary to what both progressives stand for.

      And your idea that Bismarck, the Catholic church, the Social Gospel, or Woodrow Wilson don't "touch on authoritarianism" or aren't concerned with "digging into the minutia of people's lives", you really don't know any history.

      You just keep demonstrating that you are a blithering idiot.

    16. Re:what are you trying to accomplish? by sjames · · Score: 1

      You are arguing from fallacy. Adolph Hitler liked dogs. You like dogs. Dogs touch on Hitler, therefore you are a Nazi. QED!

      I don't remember anything about Woodrow Wilson wanting to know people's shoe size, their hobbies, or what brand of underwear they preferred. I'm pretty sure the church didn't send out clerics with guns to enforce that encyclical. The encyclical itself proposed a hands off approach to labor unions (not terribly authoritarian). Since then it has been the conservatives working to bust unions (that is, break the people's voluntary associations and return the power to management and government).

      And now the namecalling begins. I'll just skip that part if you don't mind (or if you do).

  28. Great idea. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    By all means, you should get off the grid. The sooner the better. In fact, if you could do it by Wednesday, that would be great. I'm willing to kick in a case of canned peaches to the first 50 people who get the fuck off the grid and stay off.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  29. We've been using only "feature phones". by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    My wife and I have been using only 2G "feature phones" since we got cell service just before the turn of the millenium. (A cellphone is for use as a PHONE, darn it!.) And some "toy" bling from years ago that blinks a light when it hears them transmit. (Was interesting for looking at the schedule of their checkins with the cells, and confirming that they hadn't been activated as a room bug, which required much more air time.)

    Still no guarantee. But there's less on them to be hacked, and you can always pull the battery if you don't want them to keep the net informed of your whereabouts or possibly act as a bug.

    If we wanted to go cross-country without being tracked we'd have to shut 'em down. If we were serious about it we'd also use the old car that predates the serial-number-broadcasting, federally-mandated, tire pressure monitoring devices in the wheels, and avoid routes with licence-plate reading cameras.

    We wouldn't do this lightly: The cellphones, in cooperation with the "Sync" entertainment center, also do the equivalent of OnStar, so we wouldn't have automatic 911 calls in a crash that rendered us unconscious. (But at least we can CHOSE to go somewhat dark - unlike those who have a real OnStar device, which has its own built in cellphone.)

    But AT&T is shutting down their 2G service at the end of the year. So we'll have to buy and switch to something more recent (and no doubt more infiltrated by NSA.)

    I'm considering going to an android phone running Replicant, to minimize (if not eliminate) the spyware opportunities. Not so much to keep NSA out. (I figure if they really want in they'll manage it, but they're reasonably good at not publishing what they find outside the spook community.) But more to impede other actors, such as identity thieves, industrial spies, private investigators, ....

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      If we wanted to go cross-country without being tracked we'd have to shut 'em down. If we were serious about it we'd also use the old car that predates the serial-number-broadcasting, federally-mandated, tire pressure monitoring devices in the wheels, and avoid routes with licence-plate reading cameras.

      Also: Put the automatic toll collection trasponder in a metal box and avoid toll roads, lanes, and bridges (which use database-connected licence-plate-readers as a backup for toll transponders that have failed.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't worry too much about malicious apps, you obviously dont need to install any. Get an unlocked phone directly from google/apple/blackberry or whatever and only use what comes on it.
      The built in software on my BlackBerry Classic does everything I need already: read docs, email, photos, etc.

    3. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry too much about malicious apps, you obviously dont need to install any. ... The built in software on my BlackBerry Classic does everything I need already: read docs, email, photos, etc.

      ROFL!

      We're talking about going off the grid - and out of the sight of state actor surveillance. That means aftermarket apps aren't (so much) the issue. Much of the concern is spyware built into the device and the network, along with network monitoring and intervention devices (such as stingray).

      Blackberry has a track record of giving governments anything they ask for about their customers and their communications and data.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by Nethead · · Score: 1

      2m ham autopatches for the win!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The NSA is just one of many domestic collection teams, federal and federally funded state task forces can now afford to do bulk phone connection in any part of a city long term for any reason.
      Re The cross-country part is getting interesting with random internal boarder checkpoint questions about citizenship far from any international boarder.
      Face, passengers face, plates get captured on approach for long term storage by a few different agencies. New CCTV networks at a city, town level will do the same.
      Just moving around risks a random encounter with local police looking for "cash" or "compartments" in a car during a chat down.
      Banking now faces structuring requests and chat downs on any kind of account activity. Renting a car now induces an itinerary conversation.
      The overtime, funding, tracking and public/private partnerships surrounding domestic surveillance is getting very difficult to avoid.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not yet an option as far as I know. But you could support the design of mobile phones which remain radio-silent and are on standby with incoming calls routed to the POCSAG pager network. Good coverage, and with the right software, if you like call back your callers within a minute or so. You will only become discoverable if you feel like being on the map.
      There is a small movement to include this function as a plug-in module for the yet unreleased0 Neo900 phone's hacking interface, which is being made by the same devs who made the OpenMoko.

    7. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way to avoid surveillance is to not be a target worth watching. Being noise not a signal. Being a small round rock at the bottom of the river, not the boulder creating rapids.

    8. Re:We've been using only "feature phones". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a track record of complying with warrants and allowing governments onto their network for specific purposes. They cooperate to the extent that they can, but they can't always. You can, actually, lock down a BlackBerry very tightly, and the company, being Canadian, isn't subject to the same insane laws that Apple and Google are.

  30. I haven't been on the Internet since 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't been on the Internet since 2012.

    I feel much more secure in my privacy.

    And there are still many analog media and communication channels available, so I do not lack in news, entertainment, and contact with friends.

    Newspapers and magazines, single player video games purchased on discs, DVD movies, driving (in my 1995 Toyota) to a friend's house.

    And no, I do not need to chop firewood. I just steal electricity from my neighbor.

    I'll leave it up to you to guess how I read and post to Slashdot.

  31. Answer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

    Surveillance existed pre-internet/grid-stuff. :) Done.

  32. Slashdot == reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy fuck it's like eternal September all over again

  33. Avoiding "them" by jodido · · Score: 1

    If it's important enough to the cops to find you, they will. "Off the grid" or on. Google Unibomber. Chances are you're not doing anything that interests them anyway. I'm not defending government snooping--just stating what I believe the facts are right now.

  34. Re: You dorks are pathetic by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

    The whole point was the location was a terrible choice. Even if people aren't falling down ill I think we'll still see it was, in fact, a terrible choice.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  35. Living off the grid means you're worthy of attn by Improv · · Score: 1

    It's pretty simple - living off the grid, whether as an exercise of vanity and paranoia, or because one actually has something worth hiding, makes people more worthy of surveillance.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Living off the grid means you're worthy of attn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I prefer hiding in plain sight. My digital footprint is flooded with false/random facts. Good luck finding anything useful in that sea of randomness.

  36. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though you don't even *have* to leave the grid. All of the fancy govt agencies are fucking dimwits who are incompetent on every level.

    Nobody has anything to worry about.

    "Surveillance" !? Ha!!!

  37. The only sure way to hide from them by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    The best way to hide is six feet underground in a coffin, because dying is the only thing you can do to get away from the government's attention.

    But on the bright side you can still vote for Democrats!

  38. Slashclickdotbait headlines ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are Slashdot's headline-in-the-form-of-a-question posts annoying?

    Do they annoy some of us into not wanting to read the attached article?

    Should the editors just post regular headlines instead of making /. sound as dumbed-down as every other "news" site?

    ANSWERS: Yes, Yes, and Yes (would have also accepted CowboyNeal)

    Raise the bar, editors! Please. These headlines make me want to grind my teeth.

  39. Get off the grid? No. Play with the grid. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is nearly impossible to leave the grid. You will leave traces. Few and subtle ones, but you will.

    There is an alternative, though. As a statistician by education, I know that there is something that is far, far more devastating than not getting much information. With little information, you can still work something out. The worst you can give me is poisoned information. Information where I cannot determine which is genuine and which is fake. This is by some margin the worst kind of situation you can put anyone in statistics (or profiling) in. Because then he really has nothing to work with. Worse, he may already have worked out a pattern or profile and doesn't even know that it doesn't fit.

    How can this be pulled off? Well, it takes effort. Think of it as some kind of reverse SEO. Your goal is to get as many bogus information points to your name as possible while at the same time putting as few genuine ones in as you can. In the end, this evens out, if done right.

    I would not recommend doing the old joke of buying whipped cream, condoms and doggy treats, but that's basically the direction this is going. What you do is you start a second (and third, fourth, depending on your creativity) persona. Give them hobbies and make sure you know a thing or three about those fake hobbies you're picking up. Let them go on vacation, find some pictures of the areas and tack them to your Facebook page. Express your interest in opera. Be creative, start playing an instrument for all I care. The more well rounded and believable your new persona is, the more likely it will be considered real while the few tidbits that surface about your real life would be considered false information or misplaced.

    Yes, that's quite a bit of an effort. I didn't say you should do it, you asked how to escape surveillance.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Get off the grid? No. Play with the grid. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      The worst you can give me is poisoned information. Information where I cannot determine which is genuine and which is fake. This is by some margin the worst kind of situation you can put anyone in statistics (or profiling) in.

      Sort of like what I managed to do to facebook at one point. It thought I was looking for a Gay Jamaican Jewish lover as for a couple of months that is all I saw ads for.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Get off the grid? No. Play with the grid. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What we should maybe do is make it a status symbol to get wrongly targeted ads. Maybe we should create a page where people can show off how much they managed to mislead FB and the like when they get targeted ads for luxury yachts and vacations in Dubai when they can't even afford a rowing boat and a trip to Vegas.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Get off the grid? No. Play with the grid. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      That would be fun, maybe just have a site dedicated to poorly target ads.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:Get off the grid? No. Play with the grid. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      People could send in screenshots and the most hilarious miss would get a prize.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  40. Personas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try maintaining two or more separate identities/profiles, online or offline. One for your real life "average dude" social activities, one for hanging out with anonymously handled buddies, one for your really dirty secrets, etc.

  41. Tinfoil. Buy Plenty of Tinfoil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it now.

  42. Re:Why should we have to do all of that to begin w by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    The moment government invented superior weapons, like nuclear bombs, the government has been out of the control of citizens.

    Third parties are afterthoughts, and even the wrong first party candidate loses support. The citizen cannot vote for change. Minor change, sure, but that barely registers.

    The revolution will not be televised. It will happen so slowly that any concept if control goes out the window. There is no control, only the occasional nudge.

    We can avoid the iceberg if a lot of people take over the wheel, or if a few start it turning at the first warning. So far, neither has happened. Not significantly.

    That's why we have to do this.

  43. nike tn 2016 pas cher femme by zhenfanlon · · Score: 0

    nike tn 2016 famous brand always supplies a dazzling and lightning guise in the public and helps persons set up an outstanding figure in the crowd. These dazzling accessories make people have a big dream and make people enjoy the comfortable feeling. Therefore, if persons can buy cheap Nike Air Max, it will be a pretty perfect choice for everyone. Wearing such an unique shoes will make you become the attention of people who around you. As we all know, Nike Air Max sport footwear are equipped with fashionable and integrally leather lined lace-up, mesh upper, attention dazzling colors, special and creative style, exotic fabric, calf leather, handmade product, perfect grip and fitness, synthetic, the amazing mermaid wedding ceremony gowns that you simply will discover for purchase eBay. ideal right here you can uncover mermaid gowns within the traditional light or ivory also as in the choice of colours and shades. Just following all there is practically nothing whatsoever that says you do must get married within light apparel and instead a handful of females are now opting to obtain married in other colours additionally to white. Get began along with your wedding ceremony Dress Yes, producing your mermaid fairytale wedding ceremony theme begins along with your wedding ceremony dress.

  44. It's increasingly difficult to live off grid. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Places around the country have been criminalizing it. If you don't tie in to municipal utilities like water, sewage and electricity, they'll condemn your property and then arrest you for trespassing if you remain on it.

    We need political solutions every bit as badly as technological ones.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  45. Re: You dorks are pathetic by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

    US swimmers robbed at gunpoint last night.

    Awaiting your mea culpa.

    The Brazillians just wanted to make sure that the American athletes felt right at home.

    /ducks

    --
    Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
    Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
  46. No, not many can. Re-institute democracy instead. by rodia · · Score: 1

    Further text not really necessary, right?

  47. Desensitization vs been very unique by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The problem with going more off grid is sooner or later private CCTV or federal agency will have facial recognition of a new person walking around in the wrong place, past a protected building, in a car, as a passenger, at a bus station, waiting for a train, shopping and a lot of connected databases will be lacking details. A random chat down will then be requested to get photo ID no matter the local stop and identify laws. Locals seen often may not induce such scrutiny.
    If the federal gov and its private sector contractors want details, provide them with everyday normality.
    Gov/mil digital entry into any computer system is now more legal domestically in many nations, so ensure a lot of keywords can be found and get used often :)
    If your a journalist fill your computer with stories about political leaders at a state, city, federal level and start "creating" whistleblowing shorthand and hints of meetings to hand over details. Read up on impressive past political issues and recreate with emerging local leadership.
    Go for bulk creativity and ensure a new supply of sensational new material every few weeks. Sooner or later the average security contractor, gov bureaucrat will work out its all just a random work of keyword fiction that halted their complex search.
    Make long calls that mention party political matters a lot as background to a new story. Keep adding story details to your always online, cloud supported computer.
    Drive around with several phones on, be sure to be seen by CCTV on the way to meet private sector or federal sources.
    Maybe the informant could not make the meeting, but a journalist was seen for a few hours, just waiting. Electronic diary made a clear mention of that meeting...
    If your a photographer or blogger, get a second hand DSLR with a long zoom and big lens hood. Be seen a lot in a city with different cameras and that fully extended zoom.
    Desensitize private sector CCTV operators to be seen with a camera. Its just that journalist, their hobby, another first amendment audit on public land.....
    Get real work done without a phone or free consumer computer that backs up the cloud or shares all keyword searches with a brand that enjoy collecting for the gov/mil.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  48. p2p social sharing by terbeaux · · Score: 1

    This is a novel decentralized approach to social sharing https://ssbc.github.io/patchwo... It really doesn't address the threat of a state actor hacking your endpoints but it's a start.

  49. Middle age efficient technique by jtayon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once upon a time, the absolute kings where having a grip of iron on population and would jail anyone having sedditious thoughts.

    They would spy and jail people for what they were saying regulating every printed media.

    But the populations found ways: speaking their own crafted language

    Langue de feu (Fire tongue), javanais for some merchants
    Verlan, (play on rules of construction) for priests and litterates
    Slang for the thieves (using a lot of ambiguous use of legitim words else sending IA in the wild of misiinterpretation)
    dialect and patois for various religious minority (elsacian, cevenols, yiddish)
    François (initial french speaking) for François Villon my favourite polemist
    Cockney for the dockers in London

    Now think of it: what if you learned Navajo? NSA & else may have the capacity to intercept communication, but what if the clear text message is requiring costly human interpretation or making the IA get crazy because of the apparent non sense?

    If going apple and pear is going upstairs, what the automatic NLP will understand?

    1. Re:Middle age efficient technique by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      And here I was reading the title like you're talking about being in one's 40s. The whippersnappers can't figure out all the shit old people say?

      Geez I hate Mondays.

  50. Yes. by bytesex · · Score: 1

    The city of Amsterdam has, by its own last estimate, 100000 people living in it that it has no idea of. And I don't mean the homeless: these people live in houses, pay and receive money (cash), have cellphones and children that go to school, and show up in hospitals which provide them with free healthcare (which those hospitals then have to balance against the people that /do/ pay). There are laws (and local regulations because, hey, it's Amsterdam) in place for each and every one of those aspects of their lives.

    Sometimes, in this country, it makes sense to stop and wonder why on earth you should choose to live a, you know, /regular/ life.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, they're like... parasites?

  51. Did it before, my thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I left the grid before in 2001. I found myself facing 9/11 uninformed relied only on FM radio. By now I have Internet again. While a second time seems tempting I'm reluctant and the advice I'd give to others is to just start small. Leave Facebook first, leave Twitter. Leave all social network platforms and perhaps start your own social platforms with your friends. This is helpful because Facebook is in cahoots with the government to spy on you, and you're making it easy for them. If you have your own website there is a certain amount of control you have over information on who looks at your site. I do this, but I don't look at special IP addresses I'm taking a lazy approach. It depends on my mood situation and often i'm the slacker. I have room to improve on this. Right now I just exchange SMTP which was there before everything else. Anyhow if you find a solution to all of this without leaving the grid entirely I give you respect.

  52. Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your problem is to chat in the same range of a wifi, you can use your speaker and mic, and go with ultrasounds. A softmodem/demodem on mic/speaker is not so hard to implement. If you want to cover the building, you could use powerlan technology, which is very cheap to buy on amazon, and use the power wires...

  53. The Grid. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    A digital frontier. I tried to picture clusters of information as they moved through the computer. What did they look like? Ships? motorcycles? Were the circuits like freeways? I kept dreaming of a world I thought I'd never see. And then, one day...

    - Kevin Flynn

  54. my solution: by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Don't do anything the NSA would care about. It's pretty easy.

    1. Re:my solution: by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Don't do anything the NSA would care about. It's pretty easy.

      Where is their list of things they "Care About Today; Unabridged"?

      Buddy, for all I know, I could be an NSA target for walking outside at lunch time to talk on my mobile phone, looking at the sky, and wandering back under a cover. Once I know the guidelines and rules that are complete, non-extendable, all-inclusive with no margin of error, and the ability to view all servers at all locations at any time with multiple government, private, and independent individuals checking all information sources, connections to "the world", etc., etc., I might think about considering it. Until that point, hell, even looking at what they care about is likely a honeypot. Wait, it's always a honeypot. Disregard.

    2. Re:my solution: by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      No list, obviously. But it's easy to make a reasonable guess. I don't work on crypto. I don't have a lot of friends from "suspect" foreign countries. I'm not a terrorist. I don't associate with terrorists. I don't say incendiary things about elected officials. I'm not an "activist" of any kind. I don't traffic in protected IP, child porn, weapons or drugs. I'm not a black hat.

      Basically, the NSA has no reason to care about me. I'm a nobody. And my online profile makes it extremely unlikely that I'd be tagged by an algorithmic solution.

    3. Re:my solution: by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

      Like a true father, they care about you more than you'll ever know ^_^

  55. They only have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open your mailbox before you do.

  56. Re:Why should we have to do all of that to begin w by erapert · · Score: 1

    The moment government invented superior weapons, like nuclear bombs, the government has been out of the control of citizens.

    I only partially agree with you. Nukes are not useful in a civil war because the point of a civil war is to gain/regain control of the country-- nukes defeat the point by destroying the resources. That's not to say that a couple cities won't be nuked if we do have another civil war, but it'll only be a handful of cases at most. The war will still be fought and won with conventional weapons in a scenario very much like Syria.

    We can avoid the iceberg if a lot of people take over the wheel, or if a few start it turning at the first warning. So far, neither has happened. Not significantly.

    Agreed.

  57. It's illegal in more and more places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worth pointing out that it's illegal in more and more places. In many communities, the following has become illegal:
    o storing rain water
    o growing your own food
    o not using electricity or not using an electric hookup

    Technically, "going off the grid", is fairly difficult and frequently illegal.

    1. Re:It's illegal in more and more places by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Worth pointing out that it's illegal in more and more places. In many communities, the following has become illegal:
      o storing rain water
      o growing your own food
      o not using electricity or not using an electric hookup

      Technically, "going off the grid", is fairly difficult and frequently illegal.

      That's ONLY because it screws up their census data and all... *snickersnort*

  58. Re:Why should we have to do all of that to begin w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is our government completely out of our control now?

    Yes.

  59. Being off-grid is esy. by deadweight · · Score: 1

    I can sail my boat around in the middle of the ocean and be utterly invisible to everyone. I could hike back in the woods and hunt my own food. I could be homeless in the city. What is about impossible is to live anything like normal life interacting with normal people and conducting normal business. Putting yourself in some kind of voluntary prison is not winning!

  60. Scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless Ad-hoc network?
    It will scan for certain type of words including "Slang", etc.
    If you are in a food court with a million people. The device can still single you out from millions of voices & conversations.
    Then it will monitor your conversation(s).
    ** To do a DDOS type on the system. Everyone would have to use the keywords that it captures then it would over whelm the system.
    This would include 1 +Billion chinese, 1+ Billions Indians(India), etc.
    Repeating keywords over and over.
    Yeah. I applied with them, but no cigar or cigarette butts.

  61. No...the answer is 'no' by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Can We Avoid Government Surveillance By Leaving The Grid?

    No. Refusing to send emails, use credit cards, or social media doesn't mean your personal information isn't still in databases.

    Take it further and you're crossing into a 'lifestyle' of infosec where staying 'off the grid' will basically consume all the time in your day and becomes your life. Maybe *comparatively* to others a dedicated infosec lifer could say "I am 'off the grid'"...from a functional perspective they are as far as a person can get, but no one is entirely 'off the grid' unless they were born without a birth record...born 'off the grid'

    This is waaay older than Prism or Snowden or even the NSA itself, and it is inherent to any situation where information is being mediated by a 3rd party.

    It's part of existence in the modern world for large entities to have information about what you do...whether you are a serf in Europe in the 1500s or today.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  62. Love the Sign Off by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Funny how the last sentence asks you to debate it on Facebook. Oh the irony!

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
    1. Re:Love the Sign Off by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Funny how the last sentence asks you to debate it on Facebook. Oh the irony!

      Damnit, someone wants money and we all fell for it. Typical. Should have known.

  63. well -- Don't use Amazon drone delivery by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    The folks in Iraq know all about drone delivery services and attempting to be off the grid.

  64. people are dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government doesn't have the infrastructure or manpower to handle keeping track of every detail of every person in the country nor is there a motivation to do so- if they did it would be expensive and pointless. What they do have is the ability to flag and cross reference based on need which is cheaper and more efficient and achieves the same goals.

  65. Other ideas on dealing with social hurricanes by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://pdfernhout.net/on-deali...
    "This approximately 60 page document is a ramble about ways to ensure the CIA (as well as other big organizations) remains (or becomes) accountable to human needs and the needs of healthy, prosperous, joyful, secure, educated communities. The primarily suggestion is to encourage a paradigm shift away from scarcity thinking & competition thinking towards abundance thinking & cooperation thinking within the CIA and other organizations. I suggest that shift could be encouraged in part by providing publicly accessible free "intelligence" tools and other publicly accessible free information that all people (including in the CIA and elsewhere) can, if they want, use to better connect the dots about global issues and see those issues from multiple perspectives, to provide a better context for providing broad policy advice. It links that effort to bigger efforts to transform our global society into a place that works well for (almost) everyone that millions of people are engaged in. A central Haudenosaunee story-related theme is the transformation of Tadodaho through the efforts of the Peacemaker from someone who was evil and hurtful to someone who was good and helpful. ..."

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  66. The US has not been under the people's control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since George Washington marched at the head of a conscripted army to deal with violent protesters over the first unrepresented taxation in America: The Whiskey Tax which unfairly targetted Appalachian and frontier folk over 'big city' distillers who produced in such quantity that they could take a 'flat tax' payment option instead of having to pay percentages on every quantity sold.

    Anybody who thinks we've *HAD* control of our government really hasn't paid any attention to when changes in social acceptance happen, most are changes pushed by big shot callers to shift attention away from other problems the nation is facing at that time, even abolition during the Civil War.

  67. Tyre kit, pump... by q4Fry · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming you also have an actual bicycle.