Slashdot Mirror


HAARP Holds Open House To Dispel Rumors Of Mind Control (adn.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader writes: HAARP -- the former Air Force/Navy/DARPA research program in Alaska -- will host an open house Saturday where "We hope to show people that it is not capable of mind control and not capable of weather control and all the other things it's been accused of..." said Sue Mitchell, spokesperson for the geophysical institute at the University of Alaska. "We hope that people will be able to see the actual science of it." HAARP, which was turned over to The University of Alaska last August, has been blamed for poor crop yields in Russia, with conspiracy theorists also warning of "a super weapon capable of mind control or weather control, with enough juice to trigger hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes."

The facility's 180 high-frequency antennas -- spread across 33 acres -- will be made available for public tours, and there will also be interactive displays and an unmanned aircraft 'petting zoo'. The Alaska Dispatch News describes it as "one of the world's few centers for high-power and high-frequency study of the ionosphere... important because radio waves used for communication and navigation reflect back to Earth, allowing long-distance, short-wave broadcasting."

148 comments

  1. They're not capable of mind control... by SpankiMonki · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thant's what they WANT you to think!

    1. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lol that's why they are "getting together" to "dispell" rumors. Why don't they turn on their big brainwasher and use that to dispell rumors.

    2. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably think there is no secret arctic base and no one living on the moon or mars already either. And the Tunguska event was just a gust of wind. And Hillary is definitely not an alien, that would be too unbelievable. Even though she was born 9 months after Roswell.

    3. Re:They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      All glory to the HAARPnotoad!

    4. Re:They're not capable of mind control... by goombah99 · · Score: 2

      This is not the mind control device you are looking for.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    5. Re:They're not capable of mind control... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That's what they remotely programmed you to think, right?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Its purpose was to analyze the ionosphere and investigate the potential for developing ionospheric enhancement technology for radio communications and surveillance. The HAARP program operated a major sub-arctic facility, named the HAARP Research Station, on an Air Force-owned site near Gakona, Alaska.

      Work on the HAARP Station began in 1993. The current working IRI was completed in 2007, and its prime contractor was BAE Systems Advanced Technologies. As of 2008, HAARP had incurred around $250 million in tax-funded construction and operating costs. It was reported to be temporarily shut down in May 2013, awaiting a change of contractors. In May 2014, it was announced that the HAARP program would be permanently shut down later in the year. Ownership of the facility and its equipment was transferred to the University of Alaska Fairbanks in mid-August 2015.

      So if it were a successful secret mind-control/weather-control tool, the military decided it didn't work, er something. Of course, in my mind, it does seem a bit odd that they spent so much money, in Alaska of all places, to choose to test radio communications and surveillance. Just a hunch, but maybe that's because Alaska has cleaner air to transmit through?

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    7. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It seems odd to you that the US military would waste billions of dollars on a silly idea? It seems odd to you that they'd spend those billions in the least likely place?

      Oh, to be young and ignorant again...let me clue you in on recent events. Well not recent, more like 15 years ago. There was this little incident involving some airplanes and a couple of towers, World Trade...something or other, feel free to look it up on Google. Anyway, it was clear from the very beginning, covered by every major news outlet that covered the "event," that the people who hijacked these planes were a majority of Saudi Arabian nationals. Recently declassified reports suggest what everyone's already known for over a decade.

      What did the US military do? They bombed, shot and tortured the shit out of Afghanistan, that's what. Take a look at Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan on a map, try and tell me how the most advanced military force on the earth missed THAT BADLY. Of course it was all for perfectly good reasons! The Taliban were Muslim extremists (and probably still are), they were committing atrocities no better than what's happening in Syria today. Plus, being evil Muslims, they had to have been funnelling cash and resources to al-Qaeda somehow, because that's what evil Muslims do apparently. That was the ONLY justification for going to "war" in Afghanistan. There were some bad Muslims there and bad Muslims (from an entirely different country, mind) were responsible for the attack. The American public lapped it up like it was Donald Trump's own jizz-puddle because they wanted revenge, not justice. Easy to understand I suppose.

      What's not so easy to understand is how they missed TWICE, because there are two infinite wars the US is currently engaged in...the second one in Iraq. Again, check that old map out and see if you can spot the difference between Iraq and Saudi Arabia. I'm sure you can do it, which makes it curious to think how the Americans couldn't.

      Of course, they had good reasons this time as well! Saddam Hussein was not a terrorist, I doubt his religious background was of any significance...but he was developing weapons of mass destruction! We know that because Colin Powell showed us some pictures of a theoretical "moving chemical lab" in a truck that never existed, with a very serious expression on his face to boot. UN inspectors failed to find a thing, but they weren't given much time as they were swiftly rushed out of the country so the Americans could bomb, shoot and torture the shit out of more brown people. No weapons ever found and in the power vacuum created by toppling Hussein (who while thoroughly evil detested terrorists to the point that they didn't have much of a lifespan in post-war Iraq), ISIS moved straight in. Now America's fighting infinite war number three, against an enemy that only exists because of their terminal screw-ups over the past 15 years.

      The American military spending billions in tax dollars on pointless wars isn't even new at this point. While you're on Google you might want to look up a little country called Vietnam. Maybe search for "Bay of Pigs Invasion" if you're really up for a little reading. Those who forget history aren't doomed to repeat it...they're doomed to be killed in wars that will never end, for reasons that even the soldiers on the ground can't make sense of. All the while the senators, super PACs and other Washington trash are counting the money, avoiding any count of the civilian casualties.

      Oh it gets even better. Maybe you've heard a little bit about the NSA recently. You see, in their efforts to combat terrorists that again, were already dead in a plane crash that occurred more than a decade ago, the NSA collaborated with other countries to create a total, pervasive surveillance system for the entire Internet. Sure, most of the people they've actually targeted were legal protestors and human rights activists, two groups of people that Americans hate almost as much as they hate blacks. Protest the Keystone XL pipeline? You're on a watchlist, my friend. Come from a country with a Muslim population? Wearing a hijab? Be prepared to be groped, violated and generally pestered by the TSA, THEN added to a watch list.

      Open your fucking eyes.

    8. Re:They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *waves hand* You will believe we are telling the truth.

    9. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you forgot the fact that Afganistan was harboring Bin Laden prior to his terminal stay in Pakistan. That's sort of a biggie. But you have an agenda, and facts aren't part of it.

    10. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      TL;DR.

      Your fine rant, though, ignores the fact that the Iraq war is the one without an actual reason. The war in Afghanistan started because they were harboring Osama bin Laden, and we demanded they turn him over to answer for what al-Qaeda had done. It certainly went off the rails from there, with many people believing the Taliban had something to do with 9/11, but the original reason for the war was good enough to pass muster with a large coalition, including multiple nations that have had a significant aversion to military action since the mid 20th century sending troops as well.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    11. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Funny how you selectively ignored all the other facts in the post, yet you're accusing someone else of "having an agenda." That's a conservative for you, too stupid to think for themselves so they just parrot whatever talking points came out of Alex Jones' asshole this week. That's okay, you have an agenda too and it consists of the lines "I hate muslims" and "Go Donald Trump" written thousands of times in Sharpie. I'd be willing to say that my agenda is better than yours. At the very least, it's probably written above the third grade level.

      You know what's great about you conservative cocksuckers? The fact that you'll all be dead someday. Every last one of you. No one will miss you either, because you never had anything to contribute to society other than racism and stupidity. If your whore of a mother had any sense she would have shat you into the nearest manhole but no, since your family line is obviously doubling up on the cousin-fucking, she decided to give her biggest mistake a name.

      Do everyone a favour and choke on the next dick you suck, tinfoil boy.
      Now go ahead and write your witty little retort, I'll be off in another thread laughing at your paranoid, sorry ass.

    12. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having children makes you immortal. I'll never die.

    13. Re:They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think they're quite capable of mind control. And if they're programming my mind then they must want me to think they're capable of mind control. Which... oh god... is exactly what I think! They did this! This is proof, PROOF!, that they're programming my mind! It's logic, a mathematical proof, that my thoughts are what they must have intended. But why???

    14. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      f course, in my mind, it does seem a bit odd that they spent so much money, in Alaska of all places, to choose to test radio communications and surveillance. Just a hunch, but maybe that's because Alaska has cleaner air to transmit through?

      Closer to the magnetic poles is better for some research related to the ionosphere, because there are various space weather and terrestrial effects that follow the magnetic field lines. There is also some ionosphere research stations in Antarctica listening to the other end of the field lines (but passive, not active). Things like whistler waves that bounce back and forth between the poles can be picked a well equipped amateur setup, away from inference sources. The location of HAARP is completely logical choice to anyone familiar with basics of related research.

    15. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a genuine process put together to hand bin laden over and it was very difficult for the US to push ahead as if that wasn't happening. But push ahead they did. It was tough, if they hadn't invaded as quickly as they did he may have been handed over before they could start bombing.

      The Afghanistan war coalition happened because anyone who dared question the push for war was called a terrorist sympathiser.

    16. Re:They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thant's what they WANT you to think!

      Well, how else can you explain Donald Trump?

    17. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      There were two main reasons. One was that Osama bin Laden was in Afghanistan. The other was that a large amount of the perpetrators of 9/11 had been in Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan.

      As for how they found the perpetrators so quickly isn't particularly hard. They checked the passenger lists and Al-Qaeda had bombed the World Trade Center before so it wasn't much of a stretch to assume they were doing it again. So basically all they had to do was check for possible links to Al-Qaeda. Basically anyone who had traveled in the past either to Afghanistan or to a country bordering Afghanistan (where Al-Qaeda had training camps) was suspect.

    18. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      liberals do the same selective memory bullshit

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    19. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have visited HAARP, and I can verify that it is, indeed, not a mind control device.

      I know there are people out there who think the authorities are always up to no good. After seeing HAARP and its completely innocent scientific research purpose, I know that the authorities always have our best interests at heart, and as such we should always submit to the authorities. I love the authorities!

    20. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming your post got marked funny because that's what it'll be when you/your descendants have no one left to defend your personal freedoms and you're forced to become submissive slaves to every savage that comes along and claims you from the last, until one finally decides you're a bother and chops off your head/burns you alive in a cage.

      Or do you think they'll spare you for sympathizing with their woeful plight?

    21. Re: They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the leader!

      Nananananananana leader!
      Nananananananana leader!
      Leader! Leader! Leader!

    22. Re:They're not capable of mind control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep explaining the mechanisms to achieve it, but it is ignored. Not that it can be done by just anyone... but anyway.

  2. Weird waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean by all means have an open house but the kind of people who go HAARP == MIND CONTROL!!! aren't out looking for logic.

    1. Re:Weird waste of time by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      The key is to find the people who aren't looking for anything, and show them logic first. Then when the quacks come talking about mind control and weather engineering, it sounds as absurd as it really is.

      An added bonus is that there's always that one kid who asks "Why not?". We hope that he goes on to do real science in the field of weather or psychology, advancing the state of the art.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Weird waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is weather engineering absurd?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And what is advertising but mind control? We don't need anything as blatant and big as HAARP when we've got decades of psychology and marketing that do much better for cheaper.

    3. Re:Weird waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most science facilities have open houses and other outreach efforts, as often there is a small amount of money in federal research grants set aside specifically for public education about the work. The outreach is there for anyone interested. That such programs and events fly in the face of people who try to insist some locations are impenetrable, isolated fortresses is icing on the cake.

      I've more than once been at public talks where someone from the public tried to use the Q&A secession to stir up conspiracies (although about other much more minor facilities), and they were quickly deflated by the speaker essentially say, "Anyone can come by on these dates and just see for themselves... or just about any other day if they ask nicely." It doesn't change the mind of the conspiracy theorist, but it makes it look extra dumb when their argument is partially based on something being hidden inside a building. But that isn't the point of the open houses in the first place.

    4. Re: Weird waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quacks are absurd, they would be the same when talking about aglets or sand castles.

      It may seem like advertising is mind control, but no, when people say mind control, they're talking Manchurian Candidate, not Supersize Me.

    5. Re: Weird waste of time by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      The quacks are absurd, they would be the same when talking about aglets [...]

      HEY! Don't diss aglets!

    6. Re:Weird waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what is advertising but mind control?

      What is "intellectual property" but mind control?

  3. And surprise surprise... by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody who visited the site remembers seeing anything suspicious...

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:And surprise surprise... by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I don't have the funds to travel to alaska so I look forward to watching a video of the tour someone puts on youtube.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:And surprise surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      50% hilarious, 50% terrifying

    3. Re:And surprise surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:And surprise surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your scepticism is understandable, but extensive video footage of the event has been released.

      I hope this sets your mind at ease.

    5. Re:And surprise surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think they will let the visitors leave?

    6. Re:And surprise surprise... by dwye · · Score: 1

      Your scepticism is understandable, but extensive video footage of the event has been released.

      I hope this sets your mind at ease.

      And extensive video footage has been released showing that NASA reached, walked upon, golfed upon, "danced" upon, and drove upon the Moon. And STILL Buzz Aldrin has to deck idiots, every so often.

      Some people will not have their minds set at ease by anything but their eventual death.

  4. Its a simile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No one is really talking about HAARP being the source of mind control. They are referring to driving plasma with a steerable high gain, high frequency signal modulated at ELF/SLF/ULF rates, which is the method used to write data to brain employing a maser.

    1. Re:Its a simile by bmo · · Score: 1

      This, right here. That's what they're doing. Enhancing radio waves from the computer on the moon.

      http://www.bentoandstarchky.co...

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Its a simile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Enhancing radio waves from the computer on the moon." Followed by an ad for a Slovenian cult who looks like they learned their web development skills back when Geocities was still a thing.

      I can tell by your low-ID luser status, you've been on the Internet so long that dementia is starting to set in. Take your meds and shove your "astrocism" right up your ass, nothing good ever came out of Slovenia and nothing good will ever go back there.

    3. Re:Its a simile by bmo · · Score: 1

      You know how i know how you really didn't read anything on the site except the word "astrocism" and "slovenian?"

      Your post itself.

      >my dementia

      Is far more advanced than anybody's. It's magic.

      --
      BMO

  5. see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no mind control here. now if you'll excuse me while i return to the top secret laboratory.

  6. It's a trap! by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

    It's a trap to control the mind of those who knows HAARP is capable of mind control and make them believe HAARP cannot control mind.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  7. Quotes from visitors: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This facility is only used to research the ionosphere and help with global communications. Also they had great pizza and the petting zoo was fun."
    - John from Juno

    "This facility is only used to research the ionosphere and help with global communications. Also they had great pizza and the petting zoo was fun."
    - Mary from Anchorage

    "This facility is only used to research the ionosphere and help with global communications. Also they had great pizza and the petting zoo was fun."
    - Ryan from Kodiak

    "This facility is only used to research the ionosphere and help with global communications. Also they had great pizza and the petting zoo was fun."
    - Mike from Fairbanks

    1. Re:Quotes from visitors: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That looks like some of Correct The Record's work on reddit for Hillary. I've seen five comments in the same post with the same comment.

    2. Re:Quotes from visitors: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Science is a big con job. Global warming is a hoax, and Mexicans are all rapists."
      - Donald from New York

    3. Re:Quotes from visitors: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      See, the machine works! It convinced a used-casino salesman to run for president, go to a drunk barber, and say silly shit.

    4. Re:Quotes from visitors: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The eels! They're eating my brain!"
      - Random guy in parking lot

    5. Re:Quotes from visitors: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Made my day, man. :)

    6. Re:Quotes from visitors: by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      [twitch]

  8. Explaining things by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Expect to hear a related story on Sunday about the completely unrelated findings of a new study titled: "Facts, and the effect on them on people wearing tinfoil hats."

    1. Re:Explaining things by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd wanna wear tinfoil anything around all those hi powered antennas!

  9. This'll go over well.. by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    Like a fart in a Megachurch.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    1. Re:This'll go over well.. by WheezyJoe · · Score: 2

      Like a fart in a Megachurch.

      Not sure I get that one. If the service is jumping with all the music and outstretched hands, drool and what-not, not unlike an Metallica concert, a good fart should go completely unnoticed, particularly the silent-but-deadly kind likely to be mistaken for B.O., which from the looks of a typical mega-congregation should be intense. Megachurch services are not quiet, seance-like affairs.

      Now, a fart in a confessional, that'll lead to a few Hail Mary's.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    2. Re:This'll go over well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're mixing denominations. Catholics, while they do confessional, are not the outstretched hands and rolling in the isles. I believe that's more the baptist or pentecostal route. Catholic services are mellow and reserved. Or maybe "official" is a good way to describe it. You let fly on one of those wooden pews, and I can promise you, that fart will be heard quite clearly by the whole place.

      Source: grade school class clown with a stint in private school.

  10. Clever by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Obfuscation while everyone is in line with the mind warping antenna array. Clever.

    1. Re:Clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be to identify people and hit them with the real thing....

      "You are not to think that citizen!!!!"....along with a little pavlov conditioning just for effect.

      Or maybe they will make good experimental subjects, as who would exectly believe them???

  11. Very sad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We hope to show people that it is not capable of mind control and not capable of weather control and all the other things it's been accused of..." said Sue Mitchell

    How sad that so many Americans could seriously believe in this bullshit, but that's what happens when you're fed a steady diet of FOX News and a constant drumbeat of right-wing conspiracy theories.

    That one of our preeminent research facilities would be compelled to hold an open house to show that they're not involved in "mind control" is a sad and embarrassing commentary on the state of this country.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Very sad by MikeMo · · Score: 2

      I was with you up to the Fox News mouth-frothing. Actually, all of the conspiracy-theorists I know are all extremely left-leaning. Most of these nuts believe the government has been behind everything - those types are not typically conservatives, although there is a branch of the right wing that is just as crazy as their left-wing peers.

    2. Re:Very sad by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      How sad that so many Americans could seriously believe in this bullshit, but that's what happens when you're fed a steady diet of FOX News and a constant drumbeat of right-wing conspiracy theories.

      The only attributed claims in either of the two links provided belonged to a couple of Russians.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Very sad by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      ... And following one of the linked article's links leads to a claim from former Venezuelan President and Well-Known Lunatic, Hugo Chavez.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Very sad by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Informative
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey at least the right wingers make up fun conspiracy theories. Their left wing counterparts think that all the men in the world are conspiring to mess with the air conditioning just to make women feel uncomfortable.

    6. Re:Very sad by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Actually, all of the conspiracy-theorists I know are all extremely left-leaning.

      Actually, it depends.

      The left-leaning ones talk about how the good government is being corrupted by evil businesses. The right-leaning ones talk about how the evil government is fighting good businesses.

    7. Re:Very sad by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      That one of our preeminent research facilities would be compelled to hold an open house to show that they're not involved in "mind control" is a sad and embarrassing commentary on the state of this country.

      Holding an open house will solve nothing anyway. The kind of luddites that believe HAARP is controlling people's minds wouldn't understand what any of the equipment does. They'd just see antennas and powerful computers and assume they were right.

    8. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intelligence is not natural. Critical thinking skills must be learned, and then perpetually refined over a lifetime.

      You lament the stupidity of your peers with such derision....but you fail to recognize the significant advantages you've had in terms of education.

      Calling them stupid, though true, will only reinforce their anti-intellectualism and make them hold even faster to their religious or other ignorant beliefs. The only thing that you (or anyone) can do to enlighten the masses is demonstrate the value and desirability of education. Convince them that it is worth their effort. Beyond that, you are just wrestling with pigs.

    9. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are somewhat differently styled conspiracy theories

    10. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Education funding doesn't help capitalism pursue immediate profit. This is just typical American ignorance.

    11. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well known far right lunatic.. oh wait

    12. Re:Very sad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually, all of the conspiracy-theorists I know are all extremely left-leaning.

      No offense, but you need to get out more. Oh sure, there are crazies on the left too, but for a genuine unending stream of daffy shit, the right has it won hands down. And there's some overlap, to be certain, but the right is the undisputed leader of the nutjob brigade.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:Very sad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The only attributed claims in either of the two links provided belonged to a couple of Russians.

      Except I'm not referring to that article alone or specifically. Look at the vast majority of kooky conspiracy shit and you'll find that an overwhelming preponderance is right-leaning.

      From birtherism to anti-vaxxers, most of it comes from the right.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    14. Re:Very sad by dwye · · Score: 1

      I could list a few left-wing conspiracy theories, including my one friend's theory that the Clinton Death Lists were real and driven by Bill and that was a GOOD thing, because it balanced out the political assassinations performed under George H.W. Bush's aegis. I would point out, also, that it is extremely unlikely that you know any of MikeMo's conspiracy theorists, as you two clearly travel in different circles.

      Multiple anecdotes do not qualify as data, regardless of which ever side counts them.

    15. Re:Very sad by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      How sad that so many Americans could seriously believe in this bullshit, but that's what happens when you're fed a steady diet of FOX News and a constant drumbeat of right-wing conspiracy theories.

      Doesn't that kind of prove the point that FOX News has mind control abilities?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    16. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's some good ones, too!

      Oy vey, it's Annuda Shoah I tell ya! Annuda Shoah!

    17. Re:Very sad by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I could list a few left-wing conspiracy theories, including my one friend's theory that the Clinton Death Lists

      You think it was the Left that started the Clinton Death List conspiracy theory?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think it was the Left that started the Clinton Death List conspiracy theory?

      Why is this surprising? The Left, specifically Hillary Clinton, started the whole "Obama was born in Kenya" theory.
      Actually, Obama did that himself when he faked his biography for the first book he didn't write, but the whole "Birther" movement was founded by Clinton amongst Lefties during the 2008 primaries.

    19. Re:Very sad by Third+Position · · Score: 1

      So tell us... who was behind the Kennedy assassination?

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    20. Re:Very sad by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      So tell us... who was behind the Kennedy assassination?

      Reptilans from Jupiter, in conjunction with Elvis and Marilyn Monroe working from their secret Martian moonbase on Pluto. Like, duh.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    21. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, who is brain-dead and misinformed enough to think that something like that could be used for "mind control"? HAARP is for weather control.

    22. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad how many people do not realize they do not need to have HAARP to have mind control. You mentioned how brain numbing Fox news is, but how do you know it is brain numbing? It is because you have been brain washed by your own leftists media to know that Fox news is racist, biased and bigoted (not saying that it isn't; but I don't think your chosen media outlet is better)

      Peoples 'reality' is constructed by our media outlets. We are all living in a fish bowl, being told this such and such is a reality. Whether you are conservative or liberal largely depends on where you grew up, and the biases of your parents. We are all brain washed. People who think for themselves are few and far between.

    23. Re:Very sad by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1

      Fox News is promoting HAARP mind control conspiracy theories? I'm not saying it is impossible, but I don't recall ever seeing such a thing. Do you have a citation?

    24. Re:Very sad by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Look at the vast majority of kooky conspiracy shit and you'll find that an overwhelming preponderance is right-leaning.

      From birtherism to anti-vaxxers, most of it comes from the right.

      You're blatantly wrong and just showing your own bias and ignorance. As an anti-Obama movement, sure, the "birthers" we're on the right. But anti-vaxxers? You've got people like Jenny McCarthy and Robert Kennedy Jr.

      And are you going to tell me the 9/11 "truthers" are right-wing? The moon hoaxers? The chemtrail guys? What does any of this shit and stuff like mind control have to do with left or right wing politics? These are conspiracists, who see conspiracies in everything, no matter who is running the government.

    25. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How sad that so many Americans could seriously believe in this bullshit,

      You haven't the foggiest idea of how the modern advertising industry, or CIA HVD handlers work, now do you? "Breaking down a resistance posture" (something that sadly applies easily to both aforementioned things) is 'mind control'. Getting the public to buy more of your product than they otherwise would by exposing them to carefully crafted communications, is, again, 'mind control'. The distance from there to "dance like a chicken at exactly 3 oclock" is merely a spectrum for future scientists to explore.

    26. Re:Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean prominent, not preeminent, though i still catch your meaning

    27. Re: Very sad by Suffering+Bastard · · Score: 1

      How sad that so many Americans could seriously believe in this bullshit, but that's what happens when you're fed a steady diet of FOX News and a constant drumbeat of right-wing conspiracy theories

      FOX controls more minds than HAARP ever did. Easy to do when minds are weak.

      --
      "Molest me not with this pocket calculator stuff."
      - Deep Thought
    28. Re:Very sad by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      You're confusing Republican small business owners with Liberal pot-smoking hippies. HAARP isn't one of the conspiracies the right wing believe in.

    29. Re:Very sad by dwye · · Score: 1

      I could list a few left-wing conspiracy theories, including my one friend's theory that the Clinton Death Lists

      You think it was the Left that started the Clinton Death List conspiracy theory?

      No, he just took that (right wing crazy) theory and ran with it in the opposite direction (making a left-wing crazy theory).

      Anyway, the Clinton Death Lists were just lists of everyone tangentially related to the Clintons who had died after knowing them, including lifers working in the Ark. Governor's Mansion who died in their late 50s and early 60s from the usual causes from which trustee lifers die. It is no more sensible than a theory that the reason that all the steam locomotives were run to death during 1941-1945 was that GE bribed the government to take over the railroads and skip normal maintenance (entirely ignoring that little WWII thing).

    30. Re:Very sad by LienRag · · Score: 1

      How sad indeed, but it there was actual transparency about things like MK-Ultra or the use of psychological warfare units in the promotion of shale gas, paranoia would not be considered the sanest way of thinking in a troubled world...

    31. Re:Very sad by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      CIA/Mafia/Rothschild family
      It was a group effort.

  12. Mind control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never heard that one before. Weather control? Of course its capable of not very well directed weather control.

  13. I wonder by mhkohne · · Score: 1

    if the guys organizing this actually think it will help, or if they just like to show off - because I guarantee you that anyone who believes it's for mind control is NOT going to be convinced by seeing it up close.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  14. Who Needs Mind Control When You Have by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Propaganda Control.

    1. Re:Who Needs Mind Control When You Have by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /cynical And here I thought PC stood for Political Correctness. Oh wait, it still means the same thing. :-/

    2. Re:Who Needs Mind Control When You Have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Police Constable master race!

    3. Re:Who Needs Mind Control When You Have by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that PC is an oxymoron. Nothing is correct about being political.

  15. Mind control? meh. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Everyone smart knows its really an airport for alien UFOs.

  16. Meeting highlights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A flashing strobe light and a repeating message... "This is not the mind control you're thinking of, move along"

  17. Obligatory Futurama by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
  18. It's research... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can confirm as an amateur radio operator- it's a research project. We've heard it's signals on the air, and frankly it;s the only thing it could be doing. No encoding, transmit response pattern- it was trying to map the propagation patterns in the ionosphere.

    But there is a punchline: WSPRnet does the same thing for free. Really.

    http://wsprnet.org/drupal/

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:It's research... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative

      WSPR tells you when communication paths are open between two points at a specific frequency and S/N ratio. This is useful but does not span the extent of research that HAARP is directed to. One of the most interesting things about HAARP is that it can incite the formation of radio-reflective regions in the ionosphere. That takes a lot of power.

    2. Re:It's research... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider therapy.

    3. Re:It's research... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Gee, I don't feel marginalized. BTW, it's a hobby, you're supposed to have fun.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re: It's research... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Tee hee! Back in the day, one of the points I made to the old farts was that I had passed the 20 WPM exam and had my K6BP call to show for it, but refused to use the code on the air until the requirement was gone. Nobody spat at me or punched me out, the worst that ever happened was a poor behaving slim using my call and a postcard from the ARRL observer who thouht it was me.

    5. Re: It's research... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      You missed his sarcasm :-)

    6. Re: It's research... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

      I knew you'd get it :)

      73

      --
      Another consultant who stuck it out.

      "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    7. Re: It's research... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Damn it, I hate it when I do that!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    8. Re: It's research... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I'm actually crap at code, got my general after no-code. Mostly these days I just play with old Motorola gear I impulsively buy on ebay. My latest project is making an adrino IP to QuickCall II encoder for the pile of Pageboy II pagers that I bought. Not that I have any use for that, it's just something I like to play with. I love the old batwing and Bell System stuff. My work phone is a 5 line Touch-a-matic 32 with the KSU under the desk.. chime bell, of course.

      Okay, I'm an odd duck.

      73 de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    9. Re:It's research... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Back in about 2003 my wife and I were contracting to ACS up in Anchorage we drove up to the HAARP site. Can't see anything from the road but got nice pictures of all the nasty military do not enter under penalty of death signs at the gate. HAARP was a really cool project. I would love to get back there and take a walk through it.

      Now that I'm older and have a lot of vacation time I want to go see science sites. My next is going to be the LIGO site at Hanford, at least it's just a day trip for me. You can't get more sciency than that!

      https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/W...

      73 OM, de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  19. Still waiting for Remo Williams by Chas · · Score: 1

    Fully expecting the HAARP project to get blown up by person or persons unknown...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Still waiting for Remo Williams by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      The Adventure Begins.

      And Ends.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  20. Don't confuse people with facts by ITRambo · · Score: 0

    Facts and evidence rarely change a tin-foiler's belief system. Nice try though.

  21. Re:I really tire of SlashDot's over coverage of qu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    opening the place up to the public seems to be just what you want?

  22. Don't be silly by PPH · · Score: 1

    HAARP is not mind control. Please don't look up.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Don't be silly by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      Yeh, but its off. So no chemtrails.

  23. Re:I really tire of SlashDot's over coverage of qu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because 33 acres of antenna stuffs paid for by taxpayers isn't geeky or interesting at all.

    Had Slashdot did an article exploring why so many elder-geeks seemingly become angry jaded combative naysayers of damn near everything, then I might agree with your criticism of article choices.

  24. "Study", heh. by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

    IIRC, HAARP was intended to heat the ionosphere so as to disrupt the flight path for Russian ICBMs. IMO, "study" using HAARP is like studying the sonar capabilities of Right whales by setting off massive underwater bombs. Which is what the Navy, and oil companies, are so eager to do.

    1. Re:"Study", heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, HAARP was intended to heat the ionosphere so as to disrupt the flight path for Russian ICBMs. I

      It heats a patch of atmosphere roughly a kilometer in size, which is completely too small scale for something intended to stop an ICBM attack involving more than one ICBM. And even if it was bigger scale, it would likely help the ICBM attacks, not hurt it. A lot of the issues with building a missile defense system is targeting the incoming ICBMs fast enough, and a potential countermeasure to ground based targeting is to precede an attack with a source of plasma in the upper atmosphere that would blind radar based detection such that targeting would have to be done well after the warhead entered the atmosphere, a short time before impact. And it is not like HAARP would be good at creating that plasma for the offensive either, as it would be simpler to detonate a warhead in the sky or have a warhead full of metal dust that gets dumped ahead of the actual payload.

  25. What exactly about Mind Control is unscientific? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly about Mind Control is unscientific?

    We are machines. Biological machines.

    Machines can be affected, and yes controlled, by outside forces, by modifying their environment, and by various forms of force - mechanical, electromagnetic, and so on.

    What scientific basis do you have to refute that biological machines cannot be affected/controlled by external means. In fact we know that certain vectors do affect us. Simplest example - increased depression caused by less light in the winter months.

    What basis do you have to ignore not just the possibility, but the reality that governments, including the US government have performed covert experiments on their citizens.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment

    Burden of proof is on the government to show they are not doing harmful things.

  26. Psychic group consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst thing, cetacean psychic group consciousness, http://templeinteractiv.byethost7.com/app/group_consciousness.docx

  27. Weather as a Force Multiplier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

    It's not entirely as if the notion of weather modification never occurred to anyone. There may even be other, better references. It is a very interesting subject, which is not being received too intelligently here, so far.

    1. Re:Weather as a Force Multiplier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the paranoia regarding HAARP seems to actually pertain to weather manipulation - not mind control. Addressing this topic, rather than mind control, would be much more interesting and appropriate, that is, if one is inclined to wax fanciful about HAARP at all.

  28. Re:What exactly about Mind Control is unscientific by chadenright · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We are complex machines about which we almost have sufficient understanding to consistently do simple maintenance and repair operations which typically rely primarily on the machine's self-repair mechanisms. We do have the ability to turn these machines off, but we are then unable to turn them back on.

    While we have observed that the operations of these machines is sometimes affected by their environment, the difference between the scope of what we know and can do at this time vs "mind control" is the difference between saying, "gee, this computer doesn't run as well when it's really warm out" vs saying "I'm going to write a piece of software for this computer".

    It is true that various entities -have- tried various mind control and behavior control experiments before, but the simple fact of the matter is that it's something we have consistently failed to accomplish for decades. For example, look at drug rehab programs. The relapse rate for drug rehab programs is between 40 and 60 percent. If we were actually able to program someone's mind, this would be a prime candidate for reeducation.

  29. Re:What exactly about Mind Control is unscientific by chadenright · · Score: 1

    Forgot to cite my source: https://www.drugabuse.gov/publ...

  30. FBI GRAND CONSPIRACY THEORY RIGHT HERE NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you comment here and they postulate. HMMMmmm how can we rattle the truth and re-brand anybody who gets it "conspiracy theorists"?

    HAARP is real, and it is real stupid.

    But to have it here on FBI Slashdot? They need the nutjobs to chime in so they can call anybody with a fact a nutjob too.

    FUCK THE FBI MOTHER FUCKERS.

  31. Prove we can't do something by CanadianRealist · · Score: 1

    Show people they're not capable of mind control? Hopefully nobody smart enough to realize how ridiculous that statement is, is a conspiracy nut.

    Look, there's no "X" in this room. See, we've proved that we don't have "X".

    GLaDOS: "Have I lied to you? I mean in this room.

  32. Suddenly I feel an overwhelming urge... by new+death+barbie · · Score: 1

    ... to drive to Alaska.

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

  33. Good by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    Honesty here is the best policy. Haarp isn't used for mind control; it's used for talking to the aliens. The mind control stuff is employed in a more controlled fashion.

  34. google maps by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

    Someone explain to me why google map had restrictions for viewing the area.
    I havn't checked it for a decade. not sure if it changed.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  35. Even more sad by Texmaize · · Score: 1

    A quick google search does not turn up a link to foxiness and HAARP, beyond the story referenced in this article.

    However, left leaning NBC has a few discussing this. Also, left leaning links like the daily beast have several.

    This is the general problem with the left today. It is very fast to define anything that is not agreed with as "right-wing," and this belief is very reflexive, often with little thought or any further reading. It is a very dangerous mentality, because it breeds to worst kind of colloquialism. The version of "my team is always right, because they are my team." Self criticism becomes next to impossible, because self doubt is non-existant. Since beliefs are never challenged, they quickly become stupid and ignorant...much like this.

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
  36. Let me break it down for you by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Actually, all of the conspiracy-theorists I know are all extremely left-leaning.

    Actually, it depends.

    The left-leaning ones talk about how the good government is being corrupted by evil businesses. The right-leaning ones talk about how the evil government is fighting good businesses.

    You see it all makes sense if you add in well known problems like the revolving door [1] and regulatory capture [2].
    In this case the evil/corrupt corporations (and their wealthy owners) take over the government (and vice-versa), and then fight the good business to help out their evil cronies.

    Finally, the combination of these two work together to perform rootkits on democracy like the Citizens United ruling, and the TPP/TTIP/TISA, so they can corrupt and dominate other countries as well.

    It works if you think of corruption like an infection.

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  37. I loved it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I loved it. It was much better than Cats. I'm going to see it again, and again, and again."

  38. Re:What exactly about Mind Control is unscientific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... able to program someone's mind ...

    This was the original purpose of LSD: Whether it's mind control or permanent hypnosis, is not known.

  39. but everything else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but everything else like earth quakes and such by directed beams is like not at all an issue right?

    the reason it got shut down last time was when confronted the dude in charge looked so guilty ya had to know that these conspiracy nuts were onto something

  40. I'd like to see... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    "Dr." Nick Begich attend the open house, and for someone to be rolling video on him. He is singularly responsible for the conspiracy theories via his book "Real Angels Don't Play This HAARP".

    Not that, as most people here say, it would change any minds. They merely move the goal posts or say that everything really worthwhile has been hidden from view during the open house, or misrepresented. Conspiracy theorists don't want to learn, they just want to be right.

  41. Re:What exactly about Mind Control is unscientific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computers are definitely machines, which are very commonly controlled by outside forces. So why is it unscientific for me to think the government is injecting software into my computer via people using ultrasonic transmitters from the street in front of my house?

    What scientific basis do you have that typical PCs computers can't be controlled 100 ft away by sound waves? We know that sound can affect computers. Simplest example is voice control in modern OSes.

    Considering that the US government has performed covert experiments on their citizens, what basis do we have to ignore my theory?

    Burden of proof is on the government to show they are not sending out ultrasonic signals that affect my computer.

  42. "It's a magical place" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's a magical place"

  43. Of course not.. (wrong terms) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remote control and programming: https://sellfy.com/p/TQ4F/

  44. Re:What exactly about Mind Control is unscientific by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

    DARPA was flying a beetle around with a remote control in 2006ish. Its been a whole decade. Since then, from what has been published, they have made significant headway with mammals (rats, monkeys, dogs).

    Non-invasive forms of mind control have been in development for some time with research papers going back to 2013: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... If it is in the public's hands, it's been in DARPA's longer as they have been doing this kind of research for over a decade.

    While I'm not some crazy conspiracy theorist and I do believe we are still short of controlling people, it's not as far off as we may think.

    --
    Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  45. Mind Control by Suffering+Bastard · · Score: 1

    Is it ironic that the minds of people who believe in mind control are being controlled by the belief in mind control?

    --
    "Molest me not with this pocket calculator stuff."
    - Deep Thought
  46. Mind Blown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could a mind-control system cause you to believe that it was a mind-control system, and thus cause you to lose credibility as a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist? And thus protect the secrecy of the mind-control system?

    Mind = Blown!