Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Purges Unlimited Data Customers, Targets Those Using 200GB (arstechnica.com)

If you're a Verizon customer on an unlimited data plan who uses more than 200GB a month, you will soon need to switch to a limited plan or be disconnected, according to Verizon. "Because our network is a shared resource and we need to ensure all customers have a great mobile experience with Verizon, we are notifying a small group of customers on unlimited plans who use more than 200GB a month that they must move to a Verizon Plan by February 16, 2017," Verizon spokesperson Kelly Crummey told Ars Technica today. Ars reports: Since Verizon stopped offering unlimited data to new smartphone customers in 2011, this change affects only longtime customers who were allowed to hang on to the old plans. Verizon could simply force all customers who aren't under contract to switch to new plans, but instead it has periodically made moves that reduce the numbers of unlimited data subscribers. This policy will apply to people who average more than 200GB "over several months," Verizon said. Customers who do not move to limited plans "will be disconnected," Verizon confirmed. On limited plans, customers get reduced speeds after they exceed monthly data limits unless they purchase extra 4G LTE data. Verizon previously purged its unlimited data rolls in August 2016. In that case, Verizon set a limit of 500GB a month, the company told Ars today. This is more specific information than we previously reported. Shortly before the August 2016 move, Verizon told us that it was targeting customers who were "using data amounts well in excess of our largest plan size (100GB)," but Verizon did not specify that it was only targeting customers using at least 500GB. With the threshold being dropped from 500GB to 200GB, the latest move will affect customers who weren't using enough data to be caught up in the last round.

196 comments

  1. This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a great time to get a different provider.

    1. Re:This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or... Perhaps keep the same one but convert to a limited plan and be prepared to pay for overage charges...

      sarc off

    2. Re:This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or... Perhaps keep the same one but convert to a limited plan and be prepared to pay for overage charges...

      Or . . . even better idea . . . stop doing stupid shit like watching movies and TV shows 13 hours a day on your fucking phone.

    3. Re: This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not that, it's people setting up hot spots and letting everyone else with limited plans connect to it. You can run it up very quickly.

    4. Re:This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better, force companies like Verizon to conduct their business honestly and stop advertising limited plans as unlimited. They are the ones responsible for the situation they are in. If they didn't have the ability to truly provide unlimited to all of their customers, then why are they allowed to lie about it and oversell their capacity?

    5. Re: This is a great time... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Verizon disables the hot-spot feature for users on unlimited plans. Activating it starts separate metering for it under a capped plan. Was the case for my iPhone 4, still the case for my iPhone 7 Plus (recent upgrade, retained plan).

      Of course, Verizon isn't offering credit for people who underuse their plans.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re: This is a great time... by Wootery · · Score: 1

      How does this work? NAT-detection? Or is the phone notifying Verizon that it's running a hotspot?

    7. Re: This is a great time... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Actually they do now. You get data carryover with their new plans.

    8. Re:This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so stupid about that? It's 2017 and being able to do that is a key selling point for a bunch of ISPs.

    9. Re: This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon offers unlimited hotspot for LTE unlimited data plan users and has since the thunderbolt. It is $30/mo extra and is still offered.

    10. Re:This is a great time... by ruir · · Score: 1

      bah. Me and my wife are out of home all day working, and we reach easily 200GB-300GB per month without doing much besides streaming our favourite series, and the occasional movie - and no 4K videos involved. The data needs have been growing steadily over time, get over it.

    11. Re: This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had another option other than big red around here, but no one else any any reception - and if they do they're just repurchasing vzw bandwidth so their prices are even sillier. :/

      That just means I install a vpn and reroute through my home broadband ISP. VZW hasn't locked us down that far.

      Yet.

    12. Re: This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The phone will often use a separate APN for hotspot traffic, allowing the provider to better segregate and manage the hotspot traffic including QoS.

    13. Re: This is a great time... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Curious, which cellphone carriers are looking for users that consume 7-10 Gig of data per day?

      --
      Ken
    14. Re: This is a great time... by kenh · · Score: 2

      Me and my wife are out of home all day working, and we reach easily 200GB-300GB per month without doing much besides streaming our favourite series, and the occasional movie - and no 4K videos involved.

      If you are consuming 7-10 Gig/day, every day of every month watching your "favorite series, and the occasional movie" on your cell phones you are most definitely NOT an average cellphone user. Myself, I've never streamed a feature-length movie on my cellphone, and I suspect that is true for many/most cellphone users with data plans.

      --
      Ken
    15. Re: This is a great time... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Nexus 6P Verizon user. Never asked me for permission. Tethered plenty, though I've never abused it.

    16. Re:This is a great time... by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Nobody else offers unlimited plans, though. And, honestly, 200 GB is... quite a bit. I don't know how somebody could go through that in a month. When AT&T forcibly converted me, kicking and screaming, from my unlimited plan to a metered plan, I went for 10 GB a month, thinking for sure that I'd blow right through it and end up paying ridiculous overage fees. After a few months, I scaled it back to 5 GB a month because I was never even close to hitting my limit, even though I'm on my phone all the time.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    17. Re:This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't watch TV on your phone fuckstick.

    18. Re: This is a great time... by slinches · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be difficult to use that much data with HD streaming on a 90+ minute commute each way on public transit. Maybe that's not an average use case, but I wouldn't call it excessive.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    19. Re: This is a great time... by Wootery · · Score: 1

      So the phone is 'in on the act', huh? Do all phones do this?

    20. Re: This is a great time... by allo · · Score: 1

      And how do you enforce, that my phone uses this apn?

    21. Re: This is a great time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nexus is a Google manufactured (well partnered) phone. Try tethering on an unrooted Motorola or Samsung phone runing a manufacturer specific fork of Android that's been loaded with provider bloatware.

  2. Crummey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helluva name for a spokesperson

  3. Unlimited? by Place+a+name+here · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So "unlimited data" customers who use more than a 200GB cap are forced into a limited plan? That's a rather odd definition of "unlimited" from Verizon.

    1. Re:Unlimited? by nsuccorso · · Score: 1

      All the US providers have been pulling variations of this stunt for the last decade. Today, "odd" is calling something unlimited and having it actually be unlimited.

    2. Re: Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how "unlimited" used to not even include an asterisk that redefined it wasn't considered false advertising. At least now, you can read what providers define as unlimited.

      Over time they've groomed customers to accept extremely low data caps. It's now so common place that it's just profit, profit, profit.

    3. Re:Unlimited? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want to be obtuse: unlimited plans are grandfathered, kept for existing customer loyalty purposes but not offered to new subscribers. They could force everyone (out of contract, which is everyone on unlimited plans) to switch to their 100GB plan or simply terminate service - just because they offered the unlimited plans back in 2011 does not obligate them to continue to offer them in 2017.

      Now, having defended the big red V, let me say that they are douchebags to do business with and I dropped them like a hot potato once I moved to a location where they weren't the only provider with decent coverage in my neighborhood.

    4. Re:Unlimited? by sit1963nz · · Score: 2

      Wow, I have not used less than 350GB in a month for some years now unless we are not at home.

      99% of our TV viewing is streaming from services like Netflix.

      One month when we still had teenage kids at home we went through 1600 GB, yep thats right 1.6TB, no problems, no slowing down, no "fair use" warning, no blocking of any ports/services , all on VDSL 70/30.

      I run my own servers from home, that not a problem, I have both POTS and SIP for phones.

      I have access to maybe 20 different ISPs whom offer variations on the service plans, not all have unlimited but over half do. And next year I should be moving over to 100/100 fibre at no extra cost.

      The naked DSL costs NZ$75/month (US$52), though ATM I am on a "special" for 12 months where I pay NZ$55 (US$39) [or there abouts]

      My ISP can be located anywhere in the country because they ALL have to pay the same wholesale rate for the line and that rate is set by a government body.

      By 2020 (I think) 95% of NZers will have access to broadband (fibre or high speed wireless for rural areas), ALL NZ schools are connected already.

      There are no "high speed" channels, all data is treated as data no matter where the data comes from/goes to. Yes you can upgrade the speed to 200/200 and there is even gigabit in the offering for some extra $.

      Internet as it SHOULD be.

    5. Re:Unlimited? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      It's unlimited right up to the moment where they no longer want you as a customer. It is truly unlimited. But they're letting you know that you only get one month unlimited before you'll be kicked to the curb.

      If you offer "free electricity!" but someone comes and plugs in a hybrid car through an extension cord you can ban them and it doesn't make the electricity they used any more or less free.

    6. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is about mobile internet over cell, not wired/fiber internet to your home.

    7. Re: Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And across the Tasman we're stuck with either shitty adsl over old copper, or wireless with a fucking 4gig/month cap.

      Fucking disgrace ! Fuck you Turnball

    8. Re: Unlimited? by SumDog · · Score: 1

      Three in the UK/Ireland has that little * that states they throttle you at 5GB.

    9. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So "unlimited data" customers who use more than a 200GB cap are forced into a limited plan? That's a rather odd definition of "unlimited" from Verizon.

      Dear Consumer,

      If you don't like it, I dare you to find another provider who won't collude in this industry and pull the same exact shit very soon.

      We do whatever we want, because there will always be enough of you to make us rich, and we don't give a shit about fucking you over at any time.

      Fuck You Very Much, and Have a Nice Day.

      Hugs and Kisses,

      - Verizon

    10. Re:Unlimited? by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      Thanks

    11. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're trying to get rid of the remaining legacy alltel customers.. unlimited and super cheap compared to current plans from verizon itself (cheaper than verizon's own legacy 'unlimited' plans even). and around here, they use the hell out of it... very rural, lucky to even have the cell towers, so it's that or satellite.. and satellite sucks ass.

      but verizon has been 'purging' them 'unofficially', one-by-one for years now.. tricking customers by telling them they "have to" move to a new more expensive and not-unlimited plan whenever they change/add/remove device(s) regardless of how much or how little usage there is (hint: they don't have to either way)

    12. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The 'Unlimited data' plans aren't offered anymore. They were part of a two year contract that they stopped offering in about 2011. Once the contract it goes into a month to month contract, with either party (either the end customer or Verizon) able to choose whether or not to continue renewal.

      Verizon is saying is, "You can go past 200GB, but we will not be renewing the contract at the end of the month if you do so." The end user still has unlimited data for that period of the contract. Nothing terribly odd about it.

    13. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to be obtuse: unlimited plans are grandfathered, kept for existing customer loyalty purposes but not offered to new subscribers. They could force everyone (out of contract, which is everyone on unlimited plans)

      I'm under contract and on unlimited for 1.5 more years. Quite a few people have unlimited and are under contract.....

    14. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mentioned your 1.6TB is over VDSL. the article is talking about cellular -- namely, Verizon 4G LTE.

    15. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you are disconnected, does that means Verizon terminated your contract, and if so are you free to keep the phone without ETF and go to another carrier?

    16. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet a lot of people are tethering and using their cell as their only internet. Or being a hotspot for everyone in the office or whatever. But lets be a devils advocate. These guys are 100 finger wonders watching simulatanous netflix and skype. They actually need 200GB a month for whatever reason.

      Okay so how is moving them to a limited plan going to solve the problem? Won't they just pay overages and still get up to 200GB, I mean they need it and somehow magically have no access to wifi (maybe they are rural and have crap for other options). Sure they might not be able to afford it but say they can. Moving them to limited didn't solve the shared resource problem. It just made Verizon more money. The solution to the 200GB a month guys is fatter pipes to the towers. Hopefully they actually use the extra money to do so and increase quotas for everyone and/or make going over by 10s of GB financially doable. It would be great if people with no other options could do better than 5-10GB a month or whatever through a cell or satelitte service at "normal" prices.

    17. Re:Unlimited? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      That's a rather odd definition of "unlimited" from Verizon.

      Maybe when they first released it they advertised that it was "literally unlimited". But since the definition of "literally" has changed, they might as well change the definition of "unlimited" too.

    18. Re:Unlimited? by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They have unlimited data. Really, Verizon doesn't limit anyone on an unlimited plan.

      If they're under contract, per the contract terms, Verizon can change it at any time and make unlimited go away - but also per the contract, the user then has a choice. If they don't like it, they can leave without having to pay any early termination fee.Their choice.

      If they're not under contract, what's the problem? There's no obligation for either party to continue.

      Verizon has been very reasonable about allowing people to remain on unlimited plans, they could simply make everyone on one sign up for a current plan if they wished. But they don't - they're still letting people who use less that 2x the current maximum plan stay around, and at less cost than moving to that plan.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    19. Re:Unlimited? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "out of contract, which is everyone on unlimited plans"

      Not quite. There have been loopholes which allowed renewing unlimited plans - that would happen if you got a subsidized phone and didn't change plans. I'm still on an unlimited contract until later this year. But your point is taken, they could terminate unlimited even for people under contract if they wanted to, but those people would have the opportunity to leave without paying an early termination fee.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    20. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one Point it was limited by the Slow network speeds.
      It still is figure out what the radio can handle in 30 days at top speed, that is the limit.

    21. Re: Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the phone is locked to Verizon you are free to connect it to any wifi network you choose.

    22. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the US providers have been pulling variations of this stunt for the last decade. Today, "odd" is calling something unlimited and having it actually be unlimited.

      Cell phone providers really need to stop selling unlimited plans.

      I had the 10GB plan for my moms house using a hotspot, since it was the best deal I could find. I moved it to unlimited when it was offered and it worked until Trump won and they figured net neutrality could begin to be ignored. She probably used less than 20GB generally. (No streaming.) I replaced it with T-Mobile rather than waiting until they just killed the line. I tried talking to them, but it was useless. (I would have paid more for say 20GB than deal with the aggravation of changing.) Either way, T-mobile works.

      The main thing is all the cell phone carriers need to stop selling unlimited plans, not telling people that they can only use unlimited if all the bytes are downloaded to their phones. That is just them assuming they can get the sales for "unlimited" while trying to rig it so it can't be used. Be honest from the start.

    23. Re:Unlimited? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Verizon has been very reasonable about allowing people to remain on unlimited plans, they could simply make everyone on one sign up for a current plan if they wished. But they don't

      Verizon hasn't been reasonable at all... They've had their asses kicked by the Obama FCC every time they tried to impose limits or restrictions. They've tried not to piss off the FCC, and now that Trump is about to gut the agency, Verizon no longer has anything to worry about, for the next 4 years at least.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re: Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) the plan is not free.
      2) people do that all the fucking time with the electrical company and never have a problem because electric company's don't oversell like assholes.

    25. Re: Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it be great? They're really not needed or wanted online. Oh, yay! Another Facebook user or Netflix viewer!

      Yeah, just what we need. Get rid of most of them and the web would be a better place

    26. Re: Unlimited? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Really? That low? Just looked and their "all you can eat" data plan allows 30GB of it to be used as a personal hotspot, implying you can use more than that as long as it's not as a hotspot. Their highest limited plan is 30GB, so I doubt they'd throttle unlimited at 5GB?

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    27. Re:Unlimited? by jbolden · · Score: 0

      Its not pipes to the towers that's the problem. There are technological limits on interference given a limited range of frequencies. The problem for the carriers is the amount of spectrum available and the current limits on sensitivity of phone antennas plus some algorithm limits based on using TCP/IP. There is going to be quotas based likely on money for over the air internet consumption for a generation at least. Improvements will continue but they will be moderate.

    28. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlimited plans that aren't always seemed a pretty cut-and-dried case of false advertising to me. Then again it seems equally obvious that there is something fishy going on if you see a plan advertised as unlimited for an affordable price - bit like a lifetime warranty, seems to good to be true because they are using non-standard definitions to trick the customer.

    29. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, the Obama FCC hasn't been that damned good. And this is about Verizon, not Cheeto Jesus. Is everyone on Slashdot willing to turn this into a 'Trump v. everyone else' bullshit?

    30. Re: Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use bandwidth management, but it doesn't seem to be as simple as throttling after a certain amount of data used.

    31. Re: Unlimited? by kenh · · Score: 0

      I moved it to unlimited when it was offered and it worked until Trump won and they figured net neutrality could begin to be ignored.

      What the hell does net neutrality have to do with the data limits on cellphone plans?

      What the hell does Trump's winning the US Presidential election have to do with cellphone data plans?

      What the hell are you talking about?

      --
      Ken
    32. Re: Unlimited? by kenh · · Score: 1

      I always wondered how "unlimited" used to not even include an asterisk that redefined it wasn't considered false advertising.

      Really? You don't understand the difference between 'unlimited' and 'unthrottled'? The unlimited plans we are discussing today have no actual defined data 'limit' you can consume as much data bandwidth as you like, only the first 100-200 or more Gigabytes of data are unthrottled, after you exceed the carrier-defined threshold your data rate slows down, but does not stop - if it stopped, it would be limited.

      Think of bandwidth like the 'unlimited' breadsticks at Olive Garden - the first few hundred bread refills are of multiple breadsticks, but then, after say 200 refills, the waiter starts bringing you one breadstick at a time. He never refuses your request for more breadsticks, but they just start coming slower... No reasonable person would say that dropping refills of breadsticks from several per refill to one at a time was a denial of breadsticks, but when it comes to data packets people think "unlimited" = "unthrottled" and "throttled" = "no data".

      --
      Ken
    33. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could force everyone (out of contract, which is everyone on unlimited plans)

      Grandfathered unlimited customer on a contract, here.... You have no idea what you're talking about. Verizon allowed customers to renew their unlimited plan contracts until very recently. I'm not even certain they've stopped, already. There was a mad rush of unlimited customers renewing their contracts right before the $20 price hike from $30 to $50 this past fall.

    34. Re:Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So "unlimited data" customers who use more than a 200GB cap are forced into a limited plan? That's a rather odd definition of "unlimited" from Verizon.

      They have been doing this for years. I am one of these.... I really wish the FCC would get on them for this as illegal.........

    35. Re: Unlimited? by nmb3000 · · Score: 2

      What the hell does net neutrality have to do with the data limits on cellphone plans?

      Moving away from unlimited and into more expensive and limited plans pushes people towards provider-sanctioned services for which the bandwidth does not count towards your monthly usage. This goes against network neutrality, even if the topic is bandwidth usage instead of transfer speed.

      What the hell does Trump's winning the US Presidential election have to do with cellphone data plans?

      Trump is an opponent of net neutrality.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    36. Re:Unlimited? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Do you really need to watch a youtube video demo or will browsing regular webpages do? do you really need a video call or will voice/text do? Does it really need to be done right now or can it wait until I get back to somewhere with a fixed line? do you really need to watch cat videos to entertain yourself or could you play a game with minimal data usage instead?

      That is the kind of question that people on limited mobile plans will be asking themselves, and in many cases the answer will be that they don't need to use large volumes of expensive mobile data.

      Sure some people will be too rich to care, but I expect those people are a small minority.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    37. Re:Unlimited? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Cell phone providers really need to stop selling unlimited plans.

      Pretty much all of them have but most of them also grandfather in old customers some of which have unlimited plans from back when the average bandwidth used was a lot lower than it is today. I'm actually surprised that they all have such generous grandfathering provisions when to my knowledge they are under no obligation to honor a contract that expired 10 years ago. Very few other industries do this. It's normal in other industries to get occasional rate hikes. For instance, unless there are specific laws prohibiting it, it's pretty common for places to raise your rent or your car insurance rates every few years.

    38. Re:Unlimited? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      There's no technical reason why an LTE network can't be engineered to provide truly unlimited data with acceptable speeds in most instances. There is, however, a financial reason, plus the usual regulatory/political concerns that get in the way of new cell sites. It's worth noting that T-Mobile manages to offer unlimited with an asterisk (video throttled to 1.5Mbps) and in many cases delivers superior speed than Verizon, so it's clearly POSSIBLE and PROFITABLE to use as a business model.

      In rural/fixed-wireless settings LTE is actually cheaper than DSL/cable and the favorable contention ratios (i.e., low population density) make unlimited possible with today's network. It's a mystery to me why they won't offer an unlimited product for this market segment at least; it would be the death blow for satellite internet.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    39. Re:Unlimited? by allquixotic · · Score: 1

      What's the difference? If your only other option is unreliable 3 Mbit ADSL that drops out when it rains, you're damned right people are going to use this as a home Internet connection.

      If Verizon thinks they have a problem with unlimited data users on the cellular network, they can easily fix it by bringing FiOS to the 97% of the customers in their monopoly "turf" who get no service at all from them, or only ADSL. This is a problem they themselves created.

    40. Re: Unlimited? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      There is a simple technical reason:

      A) there is a limited amount of spectrum
      B) technologically we need to use a non zero portion of spectrum per connection
      C) we are close to capacity today
      D). Given a zero cost per byte usage would skyrocket.

      Ergo it has to be rationed. T-mobile rations via inconsistent connections and slow performance. Verizon rations via price.

    41. Re: Unlimited? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      As far as rural... rural is often shockingly expensive. Mostly no one wants rural customers without heavy subsidy. The subsidies and the desire for a more complete network is why rural gets service.

      You are correct though that given low population density a genuinely unlimited (or very high limits) is possible.

    42. Re: Unlimited? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Small cells negate the "limited amount of spectrum" argument. It's a financial + logistical + political/regulatory limitation, not a technical one.

      Technology will eventually advance to the point that the financial consideration is less important. We're already working with beam-forming -- a technology that's existed for decades, in radar applications -- for instance. Wireless is the future, no matter what the naysayers think, and if you're still thinking of "spectrum" as the limiting factor you're behind the curve. Makes me think of the folks who deploy IPv6 for the first time and start worrying about the "waste" of addresses.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    43. Re: Unlimited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have three with unlimited data in the UK and no throttling AFAIK. I use between 10 and 30GB a month.

  4. Un limited by rossdee · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have altered the deal
    pray I don't alter it any further

    1. Re:Un limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This deal...is very fair and I'm happy to be a part of it!

    2. Re:Un limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, now I'm nervous.

      Since we're altering this here deal; do you accept dank memes, Coinye, seven legged spider drawings, or Slashdot karma as payment?

    3. Re:Un limited by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Troll

      The terms of the deal have been Trumped.

    4. Re:Un limited by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

      The deal is the same as it has always been. It's unlimited, but after the original contract period expires it switches to a month-to-month plan. At which point either party of the contract is free to cancel it for any reason at the end of the month. Verizon was, up til now, doing these people a favor by allowing them to continue under the terms of the old plan, even though they no longer offered that plan.

      If they let you have unlimited data during the time you had the plan, then they've fulfilled their contractual obligation. There is nothing in the contract which says they have to allow you to stay on that plan in perpetuity. And neither should there be. Otherwise your landlord could force you to continue to pay rent as long as he wanted, even if you wanted to move out.

    5. Re:Un limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the old Ma' and Baby Bell Telco's ever disconnected anyone for any kind of over-usage, they'd be sued, they would lose, and they would pay for it. That's the price for taking public money, using public lands, and being handed a business on a silver platter. They billed by the minute, they competed on that cost, AT&T maintained the copper and provided the CO's, and we got VOIP for our efforts. To this day you will never see a hard line, copper POTS unlimited plan. You'll see a VOIP unlimited plan, but never a copper POTS one.

      The problem today is we've got an industry that's playing fast and loose with the term "unlimited" because there are binding arbitration clauses in their contracts which stipulate their customers can't file class action lawsuits. You do not need to put "unlimited:" anywhere in your contract, anywhere on the brochure, or anywhere near your plan if it is not as such. What needs to happen here is we need to do a class action lawsuit anyway, sue the ever living bejessus out of them, get a judge in there that isn't in their back pocket, and make sure the punishment is harsh enough the stock tanks for the next 3 years. My sincere opinion is the FBI needs to step in, investigate the c-level execs, arrest them, and put them in prison where they belong for pissing public money down the drain on these shenanigans and on top of it skirting the law. At the very least, put them back to zero net worth.

    6. Re:Un limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: Landlord example - it is actually opposite. You should be able to stay in rented apartment, even if landlord wants you to move out. This is actually how it works in Europe, nobody can throw you out or raise your rent significantly.

      And I would expect the same for telecommunications, it should be solved by regulators.

  5. and I quote by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

    With the threshold being dropped from 500GB to 200GB, the latest move will affect customers who weren't using enough data to be caught up in the last round.

    Funny way to say more customers will be affected by lowering the threshold.

    1. Re:and I quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are altering the deal. Pray they don't alter it further.

  6. Who cares? by DogDudeIsCool · · Score: 0

    I mean this literally... other than bandwidth hogs, who cares? Every decade or two, when it's time to get a new wireless plan, I go to the wireless store, and I buy something that they have in stock, within my budget. I couldn't care if it was 200 GB, 500 GB, or FairyDust GB. A wireless plan is a wireless plan is a wireless plan.

    1. Re:Who cares? by slaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know several people who have gone through any number of calisthenics to maintain their "unlimited" data plans on Verizon's network. This generally involves sticking with an updated phone or paying retail to buy a phone outright. Verizon really does have the largest network with the best overall coverage within the United States and there are plenty of places that there really isn't a better option.

      For example, Verizon LTE service is often a better and more attractive internet option than marginally-available DSL or laggy, data-capped satellite internet for rural homeowners.

      Granted, I'm not using 200GB/month through my phone either, but I certainly do recognize that this is a real problem for a lot of people, especially who aren't necessarily close to any other sort of fat data pipe.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    2. Re:Who cares? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If a company signs a contract...they shouldn't be held to that contract?

      They've presented zero evidence that the network is suffering reliability...their commercials seem to indicate it's rock solid. The 'best' even.

      This isn't costing them a viable economic business....they are still raking in profits hand over fist.

      This is nothing but a pure money grab by violating their own terms.

      Nobody would argue with throttling on specific towers WHEN congestion arises. It's funny how that isn't their solution...it's ban the heavy users even when there are plenty of times the heavy use doesn't impact anyone.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    3. Re:Who cares? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 3

      I would assume that the contracts are for a specific duration. I would also assume that the right to vary the contract is written into the contract.

    4. Re:Who cares? by nsuccorso · · Score: 2

      Yeah, now that you mention it, this water seems a little hotter than it was a few minutes ago. So, who cares? It's always been fine before, a little hotter isn't going to hurt anyone!

    5. Re:Who cares? by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a company signs a contract...they shouldn't be held to that contract?

      Any unlimited contract has long expired and gone to a month to month plan, which the only reason Verizon didn't force everyone to change was in order to keep them as a customer.

    6. Re:Who cares? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Really? I don't ever remember a cell phone contract specifying an 'end' date. They sorta want you to keep paying them forever.

      As far as assumptions, they are irrelevant. If a company signs a contract, they should have to honor it.

      Specifically if they said 'unlimited' date.

      I will of course be willing to trade unlimited cell contracts for the revocation of ISP's apparently 'unlimited' life franchise agreements. It's a 2 way street...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    7. Re: Who cares? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      Do you have a contact for the month or forever? Just like they can increase the price, they can end their current plan. You are not forced to continue to pay if you don't like the new terms.

    8. Re:Who cares? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Contracts have expiration dates.

    9. Re:Who cares? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      uh, So it's still in effect. Verizon is now changing the deal. Are they going to lower the prices charged to these people since they are giving them less than originally offered?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    10. Re:Who cares? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 3

      Not in the US so I haven't seen your contracts. But my Telstra contracts all have an end date written in them. They are all 2 years from the date of the contract which then goes to month by month terminatable by either party on 1 months notice. So it does keep rolling for ever, but the locked down period is 2 years.

      I agree that a company should have to abide by the terms of their contract. But as I said I would be amazed if they haven't reserved the right to vary the contract. Every contract I have has that escape clause.

    11. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes: they're going to terminate the contract, disconnect the customer, and the customer will pay $0.

    12. Re:Who cares? by slaker · · Score: 1

      Among US Cell carriers, Sprint and some of its associated MVNOs are still offering fully unlimited data plans. It's definitely possible to get Unlimited LTE service in the USA, just not from Verizon, ATT or Tmobile.

      Of course, then you're going to be on Sprint's weirdo CDMA network, but if you're in a a reasonably urban area, it's probably fine.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    13. Re:Who cares? by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Even without a duration, pretty much any contract of this style (where one party has like 99.9% of the negotiating power) contains language to the effect that the company can unilaterally change the contract at any time and just like the original contract "negotiation," your only options are to bail completely or bend over with very close to zero middle ground.

      Most of the time they'll require themselves to at least give advance notice (typically 30 days.) Of course, depending on the company and how sneaky they're trying to be with any particular contract change, "advanced notice" could be anywhere from an email or text message direct to your registered email address/phone# all the way down to a one-liner in a "notices" page buried somewhere on their website that you're responsible for monitoring if you care enough.

    14. Re: Who cares? by jeepies · · Score: 1

      Verizon use to offer 1 or 2 year contracts, so that's what anyone who had Unlimited would have had. After that it's month to month and can be terminated by either side at any time. At this point, even folks who got a 2 year contract just before they stopped offering Unlimited have been off contract for 4 years. Verizon continuing to renew it every month is just to keep their customers. Now they've decided it's no longer in their interest to continue to offer that to some customers, so they're terminating it for users who go beyond a certain threshold.

    15. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a company signs a contract...they shouldn't be held to that contract?

      Any unlimited contract has long expired and gone to a month to month plan, which the only reason Verizon didn't force everyone to change was in order to keep them as a customer.

      Negative. I'm under contract as are many others with unlimited plans

    16. Re:Who cares? by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really? I don't ever remember a cell phone contract specifying an 'end' date. They sorta want you to keep paying them forever.

      Most contracts used to have a defined 1-2 year period, which rolled over to a month-to-month contract at the end of the 1-2 year period. When in the month-to-month time, either side can cancel. I think it is more common for all new wireless service contracts to be month-to-month now.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    17. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Verizon did not sign a contract to provide an unlimited data plan forever. The two year time limit is long up, either side can choose to end the plan at any time with no penalty.

    18. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does not work that way.

      That contract is still in force. Otherwise they could just randomly change how much they charge. VZ goes out of its way to make sure its feature codes stay in effect. That is per contract and per law and per court cases.

      What was funny I downgraded my plan from unlimited when they did exactly what you said. They raised the price. They win. But they didnt. I now pay HALF. I was willing to pay 2x for it. Guess they wanted less money.

    19. Re:Who cares? by KingBozo · · Score: 1

      Yes you are under contract, which is a month to month contract you can cancel your plan anytime, Verizon can cancel you plan at the end of each month to month contract. You should read your contract.

    20. Re:Who cares? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2

      If a company signs a contract...they shouldn't be held to that contract?

      Yup, just like if you sign a contract to work for an employer for a year for $50k, you should be held to that contract: $50k a year forever, and you can never leave.

      Right?

    21. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the contract. the contract says they can alter the contract with advanced notice and you can choose to accept the alteration or end the contract. changing the contract is IN the contract. the contract has more than just how much data you get or for how long.

    22. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Sprint has the worst coverage and the slowest speeds of the four national carriers.

    23. Re:Who cares? by Imrik · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing like many others, the GP is actually on a longer contract that they've managed to keep going by getting new phones before their contract expired. If this is the case, the change in contract would allow them to keep their phone without having to buy themselves out of it.

    24. Re:Who cares? by Imrik · · Score: 1

      They had to lobotomize the frogs to get them to stay in the water, humans aren't as smart.

    25. Re:Who cares? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Really? I don't ever remember a cell phone contract specifying an 'end' date. They sorta want you to keep paying them forever."

      Verizon did 2 year contracts when you got a new subsidized phone. After that contract term, it went to a month-to-month basis and either party could cancel on a month's notice. You seem to think that there was an inequitable relationship where the customer could end the contract when they wanted, but the provider couldn't. Your belief is incorrect.

      "As far as assumptions, they are irrelevant. If a company signs a contract, they should have to honor it. "

      Which VZW has done. Once the contract has ended, neither party has any further obligation, and can end it or agree to a new one. Even during the contract term, Verizon's contract allowed them to change things with the condition that the customer could leave without paying an early termination fee - so they could walk away with phone which hadn't been fully amortized.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    26. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI to mods, this poster is just making a bunch of dumb meme posts of 'who cares' of the same thing as per his post history. Mod accordingly.

    27. Re:Who cares? by jbolden · · Score: 1, Interesting

      First off Verizon's model is to take long term fixed costs and break them out as per byte costs. If you aren't willing to incur the full costs for the fixed cost model, for example 20 year contracts and being charged for heavy static usage you don't get to complain about the fact they aren't charging you based on other aspects of the fixed cost model like most bytes incur almost 0 cost to Verizon. You don't get to mix models to your advantage.

      Nobody would argue with throttling on specific towers WHEN congestion arises. It's funny how that isn't their solution

      Because they didn't design their system to support that. The towers don't know about your rate plan when they serve you signal. That's computed after the fact.

    28. Re:Who cares? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      That's just one of the things Sprint has to do to get/keep some customers, because their network is Inferior to any of the others'. You can bet your arse that if Sprint improved their network to the level of T-Mobile, ATT, or Verizon, their Unlimited offerings would disappear in short order.

    29. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Any unlimited contract has long expired and gone to a month to month plan, which the only reason Verizon didn't force everyone to change was in order to keep them as a customer."

      This is incorrect. I'm barely into a year on a shiny new contract where I got a pair of Galaxy S7's subsidized and kept my unlimited plan.

    30. Re:Who cares? by houghi · · Score: 1

      If a person signs a contract...they shouldn't be held to that contract?

      So what if the person does not want to be in a contract anymore for whatever reason, should they not be allowed to cancel said contract? Same for the company.

      Basically what they do is end the contract and offer you a new contract that you then can decide to take or not.

      In Europe when you sign a contract, the first period will be 1 year. After that it becomes a month to month contract that you can cancel, unless you decide to sign a new one year contract for whatever reason.

      The cancel will be done by the customer most of the time, but it can also be done by the company. Most of the times this will involved informing the customer about the change. This can be ANY change in contract. Then let the customer ample time to cancel without question or cost.

      I have seen changes where service was extended. e.g. doubling the data and call minutes on a service. They still needed to inform the cutomer that there was a significant change in the contract and that they where allowed to cancel without any question or cost if they so desired.

      Obviously you would have to be an idiot to cancel, but still. Change in contract allows you to cancel. Same for the customer who wants to cancel.

      And it being a pure money grab. Sure it is, just like it was a moneygrab for the customers who took the service. Besides the one who took it because he liked the name, people took it because it was the best financial decision for them.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    31. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm almost certain that ANY unlimited contract has since ran out and is on a month to month basis. I feel pretty sure I was the last person on the east coast to get unlimited with Verizon and I've been on month to month for years. Given that, it is trivial to drop me (using contract mentality).

      Having said that, surely you do see how "unlimited" (by definition) is impossible, right? Since you want to stick to absolutes, then don't skimp. I want ALL data everywhere. I don't want to share ANY bandwidth. Verizon == my network! Unlimited or damn it all! Not your choice of words, I know. Marketspeak is usually lost on me as well. It isn't a money grab, it is logic. Throttling was an option to fix the marketspeak, which pisses people off as well.

      Yes, this is defending Verizon. I am not affected by this. But, I do realize that they may drop it to 100G next time... and 50G next time, etc etc. Eventually, I'm sure I'll be affected. But it is business. If I don't like it, I move on.

    32. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This applies almost completely to people whose contracts expired and are on month to month. Once the contract's expired, the contract is expired.

    33. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you didn't read the contract. I don't ever remember a cell phone contract that did not specify the end of the term. Everywhere I looked it was "$1 with two year contract" or "$99 with two year contract". You honestly don't remember that?

    34. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even you say it's a 2 way street, so are you saying that someone in an unlimited plan must be forced to be in that plan forever?

      "Hello Verizon, I am switching to AT&T, I'd like to cancel my contract."

      "Nope, sorry, there is no end date to your contract so you are not allowed to leave."

      Fast forward to 2040. "Grampa, why do you still have a cellular phone instead of a new ?"

      "Because jimmy, I signed an unlimited contract 30+ years ago and it didn't have an end date."

  7. What about limiting bandwidth? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    So.. Are we moving beyond simple throttling and are throwing unprofitable but paying customers over the side because they use too much of their "unlimited" data transfer limits? You idiots, just institute progressive throttles on your "problem" paying customers until they start switching, but DON'T announce it to the world. Either that, or start raising rates for these customers.... Oh wait, you locked them into long term contracts? Live with it, pay them to leave or what have you, but it's YOUR mistake to deal with not your customer's...

    Why am I not surprised this is Verizon? Hmm?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:What about limiting bandwidth? by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

      Huuu sounds familiar... like our health care system. Nothing new here. Standard company profit tactics.

    2. Re:What about limiting bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure AT&T got smacked with a nasty lawsuit for throttling their unlimited data customers. So instead of going that route, Verizon just opted to discontinue the service of those who are using large amounts of data. Unlimited data on the Verizon network has definitely been a good thing for a very long time, but let's not pretend that those who are using 200GB+ of data are using it for what it was originally intended and are somehow victims here. They're out of contract, and had to know that eventually the gravy train would dry up.

    3. Re: What about limiting bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve was clear that to get the smart phone adopted, ATT would have to offer unlimited data.

      Your not getting the full wireless experience if you can't use it as you want.

    4. Re:What about limiting bandwidth? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      So.. Are we moving beyond simple throttling and are throwing unprofitable but paying customers over the side because they use too much of their "unlimited" data transfer limits? You idiots, just institute progressive throttles on your "problem" paying customers until they start switching, but DON'T announce it to the world. Either that, or start raising rates for these customers.... Oh wait, you locked them into long term contracts? Live with it, pay them to leave or what have you, but it's YOUR mistake to deal with not your customer's...

      Why am I not surprised this is Verizon? Hmm?

      Short-term wins are all that's in most companies' minds. Of course there are smart ones that think long-term but when there's a battle and a finish line in sight, companies don't think because they want to be the winner. What I'm saying is Verizon didn't have a problem with unlimited because it was the "thing" at the time that was driving customers to other companies. Eventually, the other companies got rid of unlimited data, but didn't throw away (at least not publicly) the ones that survived (unlimited contracts). Those other companies also throttled speeds and got throttled financially.

      Now there's this '5G' thing coming out and the companies are going to compete for it. What a lot of people (not saying you, just a lot) is that each tower location has either a microwave relay to another 'hub' location with inet connection(s) available, or they have just plain old available connections from the telco/cable company/whoever hooked up at the cell site. There's a limit on the bandwidth to keep the entire operation profitable. With the introduction of something that's capable of higher speeds (hence, higher immediate throughput), a company that doesn't have enough immediate bandwidth available to pony up will get called out or sued for lying about their '5G' speed. Sure, the tower might be able (even with timing and fast-moving handsets) be able to keep up, but the backbone 'net connection still has a limit of immediate availability.

      Do I agree with Verizon's actions? No. Do I agree with the customers that used this unlimited plan for so much actual data throughput? No. Do I think it was a bad idea to have both shake hands on paper without including future expansion problems in mind? Yeah.

      I think the customers that use so much are lazy asses, companies tethering for their office internet availability, or people using in areas where there isn't wired 'net available but LTE still works (or LTE is faster/cheaper than the wired alternative). Side but related notes: I have a relative in such an area so I know they exist. Why she sticks with dial-up is because she has an old computer and really only looks at the weather. I was also able to get Gigabit fiber at $69/99/mo (fees added it came to $80 and change) in the last place I lived; the bandwidth was actually testing for lengthy periods up to 800mbps! Once the Google Fiber competition dropped, my telco suddenly stopped rolling out fiber to new locations, and started jacking the prices up. Now, where I live (call it "other side of town, richer area), I have only 30mbps DSL available and fiber less than a block away with "no estimate on time" for expansion to be available to my house. Imagine that. I digress. Anyhow, with the last (only fast 'net that can be accessed) excluded, I believe the others are using one side of the tower for RF and the inet connection for their data. They're limiting others. It didn't matter because no one complained or if they did, they didn't leave. There was a profit.

      Internet wired connections are getting more and more ridiculous as time goes on in terms of price, so the cell companies wouldn't turn as much of a profit if they add more bandwidth to their tower sites and also introduce the new competitive technology to be on teh win, while people are still eating up a good portion of it and not financially compensating for that usage.

      I believe this is a strong-arm tactic w

  8. First they came ... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    First they came for 200 GB users, I was not a 200 GB User, so I did nothing.
    Then they came for 100 GB users, and I was not a 100 GB User, so I did nothing
    Then they came for 50 GB Users, and I was not a 50 GB users, so I did nothing.
    Then they came for me, and millions like me, and we all cried like babies.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:First they came ... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      ...and we all cried like babies.

      but not for very long because we hit our data cap

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:First they came ... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Except Verizon wants to keep their customers, so they let them keep their Unlimited data plans, as long as they don't actually use them.

      If you use enough data where it would be profitable to Verizon for you to upgrade, then eventually, Verizon is going to strong-arm you into upgrading.

    3. Re:First they came ... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      My Google Fi account says that I use about 0.4GB per month on average - but, then, I don't usually stream video except when in WiFi coverage, and I only stream Pandora to the car on weekend trips.

    4. Re:First they came ... by NominalLoss · · Score: 1

      Fi here too. I stream Google Play Music just about every day at work and rarely hit 4 GB a month. That includes plenty of casual browsing. How in the heck are people using 50+ GB *without* watching videos. I call B.S. Do these people not have real internet at home? That said, you have to configure your Facebook app to not auto launch videos and you would be surprised how much your data usage goes down. Facebook has become a hog.

    5. Re:First they came ... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      My wife uses Facebook, and if she plays with posting videos while out of the house, she'll hit 3-4GB a month - 200GB a month, what are these people doing? Serving torrents?

  9. I've always said. by skoony · · Score: 0

    I have been saying for years that paying for data instead of a connection is the worst deal imaginable. Unfortunately most consumers do not understand they re totally being ripped off. When I was using a 4g modem (basically a permanent home based hot spot) to get internet from Clear.com I paid $50 dollars a month unlimited. I had up to eight connections. Typically had three connections active.Not being a gamer or mega user of any sort, my typical consumption was approximately 80 to 160 GB a month. Not a single problem for the 3 years I used the service. Sprint bought out the company and shut them down.Try getting that much bandwidth tethering your laptop to your cell phone for only $50 a month.

    1. Re:I've always said. by SumDog · · Score: 1

      There have been so many other articles on here showing that there is more than enough 4G/LTE bandwith and we are no where near approaching capacity in most urban areas. This has nothing to do with being a good netizen and more to do with money.

  10. Month to month *contract* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a subtle but important distinction. They can't change the contract at literally anytime but next month they can refuse to offer you this month's contract terms.

    1. Re:Month to month *contract* by mysidia · · Score: 1

      They can't change the contract at literally anytime but next month they can refuse to offer you this month's contract terms.

      If they want, they can cancel your agreement mid-cycle and decide to just not bill you for that month, and your only recourse is to switch carriers....

  11. Oh they sign a contract by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    LOL, somewhere buried in the fine print no one reads it probably says you agree to the terms of this contract, which we can change anytime we want, but in legal mumbo-jumbo.

  12. WOW by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not to be an apologist for a telecom company, in this case Verizon, but holy crap 500 GB is a lot of 4G/LTE data used in a month, even 200 GB on a single cell device is a lot of data. I personally can't imagine using that much data or spending that much time on a smart device. What uses would other /. residents find for that amount of data, unless it was your only access point, e.g. you had no wireless at home or were on the road as a full time mobile user ?

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep I think those all sound like reasons people are pulling 200GB/mo.

      But it shouldn't matter, if it is unlimited it's unlimited. But beyond that, it doesn't matter it's like anything else, including wired connections, the switches will load balance anyway, you're only going to be getting this data if the network isn't congested, if it's full, it's full for you too. Download caps make no sense, if I am pulling 100mb /s over my verizon LTE at 3AM what does that matter if I am the only one up. If they had throughput caps based on current usage that would make more sense, and guess what that's how it works anyway.

    2. Re:WOW by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      I think you'd have to be tethered to use that kind of data, and downloading a shit ton of content to get to 500GB. I don't even use that much on my home Internet connection supporting 3 adults and a teenager.

    3. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you send me $200 a month, I'll send you unlimited cash*.

      *unlimited cash is limited to $200 per month

    4. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or as i suspect, that most of them have no other options if they want reasonably fast internet. Loads of places that has shit wired connections, and its not only faster but cheaper with mobile.
      And with streaming being the new way to consume content, 200GB isnt really that much either.

    5. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be an apologist for a telecom company, in this case Verizon, but holy crap 500 GB is a lot of 4G/LTE data used in a month, even 200 GB on a single cell device is a lot of data. I personally can't imagine using that much data or spending that much time on a smart device. What uses would other /. residents find for that amount of data, unless it was your only access point, e.g. you had no wireless at home or were on the road as a full time mobile user ?

      I live out in the sticks. For awhile our choices were Verizon, Satellite or dialup. Got grandfathered in under an old Alltel plan with unlimited 3G data. Verizon/Alltel's 3G network was pretty good for awhile, consistent 150KB/sec, 250ms pings or so, was averaging ~50GB a month on a 3G connection.

      Then iPhones hit the network in early 2011 and it went to complete crap, dropping down to 1x speeds of 22KB/sec, and worse, 2000ms+ ping times when the network was congested. There was no incentive to upgrade 3G any further when 4G LTE was JUST introduced around the same timeframe. Ended up switching to satellite as a result. The 25GB/month data cap and 750ms pings were better than the quality of the 3G network with all the smartphones on it. Unfortunately at the time didn't realize Verizon had similar "unlimited" 4G plans as otherwise would have grabbed one. Now - I'm now on fiber operated by a local telco coop so have real option available.

      To parent's post - I could easily see hitting 200GB/month on a 4G connection per month in those circumstances when there are no other real alternatives. HOWEVER, that also being said if I was one of those heavy users and riding the unlimited train for this long, I wouldn't try start to start a fight with Verizon. There is ZERO business incentive for them to keep you as a customer any longer. Read the fine print about month-to-month and if you really feel inclined go argue with Verizon in court for a year or longer about it. You'll be stuck without internet in the interim because you were a dumbass about it. You get a warning, treat it as such, keep it quiet, curb your usage ... don't abuse it.

    6. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon is moving away from copper and fiber based networks and moving towards wireless networks which have higher profit margins.

      They've sold-off their wired phone and internet networks Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and part of California.

      Basically they want people to move from wired networks to their wireless network.

      Which means people will be streaming their music and video over wireless and you can imagine how easy it is to stream over 200GB of YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, etc video in a month.

      If they actually cared about customers, they'd be beefing up their wireless network, technology is getting better and cheaper every day, but it's more profitable to pretend that's too much of a burden and just charge customers an arm and a leg instead.

    7. Re: WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's weird is that there is this cool method of recieving content over wireless that is completely free. In fact in the 1960s you could utilize it with a low cost reciever that only had six transistors in it. And believe it or not, if you still have one of those old six transistor recievers, it still works to recieve the free content. There are even variants of this wireless medium where you can recieve video content, including movies, news, and other programming, entirely for free.

    8. Re: WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it's called using a mesh of wi-fi extenders to piggyback into your neighbors' internet.

    9. Re:WOW by swb · · Score: 1

      I kind of struggle to see how you'd do it at all.

      We often stream two programs at once here, I work from home half the time supporting projects where I have to push ISOs/patches, and I barely hit 200 GB a month.

      I can only guess this is a cell device tethered not just to one computer but possibly to a larger network where it is the sole source of Internet connectivity and moving data at nearly the throughput limit of the connection almost continuously.

      I think if it were mobile it'd be a stretch to get that 200 GB, since you'd have to factor in periods of mobility where the mobile device itself was the only thing using data.

    10. Re:WOW by houghi · · Score: 1

      So I send you 200AUS and you send me 200USD? Nice
      FYI 200USD is 272.44AUS
      200AUS is 146.82USD

      I am sure others will find better ones that are $ when used.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:WOW by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I kind of struggle to see how you'd do it at all.

      We often stream two programs at once here, I work from home half the time supporting projects where I have to push ISOs/patches, and I barely hit 200 GB a month.

      I can only guess this is a cell device tethered not just to one computer but possibly to a larger network where it is the sole source of Internet connectivity and moving data at nearly the throughput limit of the connection almost continuously.

      I think if it were mobile it'd be a stretch to get that 200 GB, since you'd have to factor in periods of mobility where the mobile device itself was the only thing using data.

      Agreed. Le me put it this way to say why I agree - I can get 30mbps where I live for $49.99/mo (plus tax/state,fed fees/etc) or I can get 80mpbs using my phone and tethering. At night time when the network volume is down, I can get 110mbps over the air from ATT. So yes, I agree. If I were someone else who needed net access and the local service was unavailable or overpriced, I'd go with what's cheaper.

      FTR, I get 16GB/mo with rollover. I don't use more than 10, tops (some months, less than 1). If I started using 16, I'm sure they would advertise another plan to me to get my pesky data-hogging ass away from using the big numbers of available data I see on paper/screen. :)

    12. Re:WOW by swb · · Score: 1

      Have you found a compelling way, though, to use your phone with tethering to provide broader network access, though?

      I made a half-assed attempt, thinking it would be reasonable on a short-term basis to use it as failover interface with pfsense. The challenge I have is getting the tethering network accessible to my LAN. I rummaged through my collection of access points and couldn't get one that would attach as a bridging peer to the phone's internal access point.

      Phone would show a connected hotspot device, but the APs would never gain an IP address.

    13. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the people using that much data are using their phones as a hotspot for their laptops or home computers.

      Why pay for landline internet, when you can get it from your phone.

      Some major label games come in at over 50gb and straming 4k movies takes some bandwidth also. So usage in the hundreds of gb doesn't seem outrageous to me.

    14. Re:WOW by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Well, HD (1080) video from Netflix is 2.3 - 3.0 GB per hour. If you assume 3 GB/hour, that translates to 4,000 minutes a month. A season of Star Trek is ~1,000 minutes (Orange is the New Black is clocking in ~800). So, I suppose if you're binging a season a week of some show, you hit that data limit without anything else. That's two hours a day, which is a lot, but not beyond unreasonable to the average American. Especially if you are viewing it while commuting/waiting in airports/some other time when its not your primary activity.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    15. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I have found essentially such a method, although, not by using my "phone" exactly. Verizon actually sells a 4G LTE wireless router, or at least they did a year or two ago when I bought one from them. I took my sim card from my old phone that had unlimited data and popped it into that router, then hooked up my PCs, game consoles, and WiFi to that router. I later discovered it's actually just a neutered router that's also available without the Verizon branding (and the hardware locked firmware!) elsewhere.

      Verizon tries to obfuscate the situation to hide the truth, and their employees frequently misunderstand the situation and espouse many lies about you not being able to transfer your sim card to other devices, but as I understand it, the FCC actually requires them to do so as part of the licencing deal for their spectrum. The sim card is really what you're "activating", even though they always refer to it as "activating your device".

      For the last few years I've been using that 4G LTE wireless router for our (slightly) rural home internet connection. It's our only option besides satellite, due to our home being just outside the "big city", and our neighbors having too many trees (a small forest really) for us to get a fixed wireless signal. The copper lines are crap, as it's a remote and old neighborhood, so even DSL is not a real option. So, 4G has been pretty great overall, with gaming working pretty well, typically with 150 ms or so latency, and we usually get about 4-8 MB/s download speeds, which is usually enough for HD Netflix, etc.

      With a bit of daily HD Netflix and a couple kids using Youtube a few hours a day, and with game (auto) updates in the dozen+ GB frequently (I'm looking at you Ark: Survival Evolved), plus holiday gifts/purchases resulting in game full downloads, we've racked up just over 300 GB of data usage the last couple months. I just received notice from Verizon that they're dropping me from my unlimited plan this month, unless I switch to another plan.

      On their currently offered plans, a 300 GB cap would cost roughly $2,800 a month (that's $710 for the first 100 GB, and $2,000 for the 200 GB overage). Their "best value" plan is $110 for 24 GB, which is roughly the same price I've been paying for unlimited, but allowing only a tenth the data I've been using recently.

      So, now I'm looking into spending many thousands of dollars on a tower/mast to get above the treeline for a fixed wireless connection. That's pretty much my only remaining option now that can have low enough latency for some online gaming and high enough data caps and bandwidth for light Netflix and Youtube usage. I considered keeping a low cap 4G just for the gaming and supplementing it with satellite for downloading, but satellite looks pretty terrible all around, with low caps (around 2 - 30 GB), low *actual* typical peak usage speeds ( 0.5 kB/s), meaning that streaming video wouldn't even work well there.

      So, I'm just trying to relish my many years of getting a $2,800 "value" for just $110 a month, while trying to figure out if I can pull off subsidizing a 100'+ tower/mast by slapping a 5 kW wind turbine up there alongside a fixed wireless dish. :)

    16. Re:WOW by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Have you found a compelling way, though, to use your phone with tethering to provide broader network access, though?

      I made a half-assed attempt, thinking it would be reasonable on a short-term basis to use it as failover interface with pfsense. The challenge I have is getting the tethering network accessible to my LAN. I rummaged through my collection of access points and couldn't get one that would attach as a bridging peer to the phone's internal access point.

      Phone would show a connected hotspot device, but the APs would never gain an IP address.

      Sorry for the delay - These work. I've done it and it works, but I stopped because, you know, I have no economical or social reason to do it. Just tested. I now just use wired internet->wireless->repeater with said repeater.

  13. Look, don't touch by Moof123 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Marketing:
    We have an amazingly fast network capable of moving TBs of data a second!!! Download a movie in super-ultra-HD while boarding your plane in seconds!!! Buy now!!!

    Contracts:
    We will charge you 1 kidney per movie you download, and shame you in the public square. It is horrible to everyone else if you actually use the network.

    Me:
    F U. Worrying about getting reamed for data sucks the fun out of it all. Buys a pay-as-you-go phone and doesn't try to do anything "cool".

    1. Re:Look, don't touch by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Marketing:
      We have an amazingly fast network capable of moving TBs of data a second!!! Download a movie in super-ultra-HD while boarding your plane in seconds!!! Buy now!!!

      Contracts:
      We will charge you 1 kidney per movie you download, and shame you in the public square. It is horrible to everyone else if you actually use the network.

      Me:
      F U. Worrying about getting reamed for data sucks the fun out of it all. Buys a pay-as-you-go phone and doesn't try to do anything "cool".

      You make a good point, but don't forget the overall equation - they have the amazingly fast network capable of moving TBs in a second because no one is using it. Put 100 users on it watching movies, browsing the web, downloading/backing up/etc and the timing shifts at the controller and utilized air time take that amazingly fast network and make it a jittery really fast network. Wait, don't we already have that? ;)

  14. 200GB per month on a cellular connection? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    How are people even doing this? Are they running their entire house through hotspot tethering or something? I rarely use that much on my hardline cable modem, the idea of using it over cellular boggles the mind!

    Maybe people in rural areas who can't get better Internet are taking advantage of this...but then rural areas don't have high contention for cellular access, so Verizon really shouldn't be dicks to them.

    1. Re:200GB per month on a cellular connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did nearly 400GB whilst on holiday this summer over cellular tethering. Backing up photos uses a lot of data.

    2. Re: 200GB per month on a cellular connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backing up photos to flash storage or a usb hard drive costs pennies. That cloud around you? Stop being the pig at the buffet luncheon... And take something for that gas problem.

    3. Re:200GB per month on a cellular connection? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      ~3 gigs an hour for HD streaming

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  15. ecorp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I dropped them years ago

  16. Our network can't handle this! by WolfgangVL · · Score: 2

    Unless we double your monthly bill of course.... then the network can handle it fine.... until... you know... next time it can't......

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:Our network can't handle this! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Unless we double your monthly bill of course.... then the network can handle it fine.... until... you know... next time it can't......

      Amen. Addendum: "..and come on. We are rolling out '5G'. We have to have somewhere to corral the non-contiguous and over-the-limit users."

  17. Verizon is gradually coming clean by tepples · · Score: 0

    Or better, force companies like Verizon to conduct their business honestly and stop advertising limited plans as unlimited.

    Verizon hasn't advertised an "unlimited" plan to the public for years to my knowledge, and this story is about Verizon phasing it out to grandfathered customers. It's obviously a gradual rebranding of the grandfathered "unlimited" plan to what Verizon intended it to be in the first place: a 100 GB/mo plan.

    1. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by paulatz · · Score: 2

      If they intended it to be 100 GB/month, why did they sell it as unlimited?

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    2. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The context changed and this changed the meaning of what they were selling. At the time of EVDO it was almost impossible to use 1GB/mo. You had phones with very limited internet features using a terrible data network. The use case was infrequent internet for short bursts. From there there were use cases like Blackberry which had all sorts of compression features to limit data usage....

      Today's phones have rich applications which can consume almost unlimited data and the network is quite good.

    3. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice excuse but you're conveniently forgetting that no matter what the max bandwidth of the time was capable of transferring, it was still the same percentage of their overall bandwidth. It also doesn't explain why they didn't just advertise it as 1GB (or whatever the maximum that could be obtained relative to the technology of the time) instead of lying about it and claiming it was unlimited.

      Today's phones have rich applications which can consume almost unlimited data and the network is quite good.

      And tomorrow you'll be making the same apologist excuses about today.

    4. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by jbolden · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And tomorrow you'll be making the same apologist excuses about today.

      I'm not certain will see another surge like we just went through but if we do then yes most likely the context will have changed and today's plans will contain clauses that in the new context don't make sense.

      Nice excuse but you're conveniently forgetting that no matter what the max bandwidth of the time was capable of transferring, it was still the same percentage of their overall bandwidth.

      That's simply not true. The relationship between a heavy user and the max bandwidth was lower. Landline connections to the towers and available spectrum were relative to today less constrained. Heavy users of data (excluding extremes) were still not going to tax the towers as much as moderate users of voice. The vast majority of people had no desire to consume much bandwidth. Under those circumstances one can be quite cavalier about offering "unlimited". I can offer free unlimited drinking water at a restaurant, I can't offer unlimited farming water.

    5. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by paulatz · · Score: 1

      They sold this plan until 2011, at that time 3G connection had been available for 8 years, and 4G was already being discussed. They are a professional service provider, they had the ideal amount of information to predict future technology and market development. Still they decided to sell unlimited plans.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    6. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      If they intended it to be 100 GB/month, why did they sell it as unlimited?

      Roping in customers and competing with sales words that other companies were using.

      Long-term fallout is that they have customers leaving and their bandwidth availability decreasing because of increased utilization. Wait, the other companies are the same!

      I imaging the model like breathing - Verizon can suck up a bunch of customers but eventually will have to accommodate for the saturation; customers get pissed and leave to go to another company. Other companies then breathe them in with sales tactics and short-term goals (1 year minimum term is the goal). Then, Verizon does something to please the pissed and the other companies do something to piss their customers off. Customers leave those companies and switch to Verizon. Repeat process.

      I see this as nothing but (pardon the pun but it fits perfectly) giving themselves breathing room to suck up the next wave of customers with something "Newest/first/best/fastest/blahblahblah". It'll only last a year before those customers see they're getting screwed or the other companies have made a really awesome place for those customers to transition over to. Inhale, exhale, inhale, exhale. Repeat and avoid doing that ONE BAD THING that will ruin you forever (I'm thinking of Sprint/Nextel right now. Such bad smokers they can't afford to put up more towers/obtain space, so they breathe very lightly and get worse every year with more and more customers leaving). ;)

      "5G" is the next big thing that everyone is going to sell like hotcakes only to start the breathing process in motion again.

    7. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The "unlimited" plans were not unlimited in duration. They were just letting people ride along with old plans for reasons of customer satisfaction. Clearly they have changed their view, but that doesn't mean anyone is getting screwed - they held up their end of the bargain and some.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      Are you arguing that if a company offers an "unlimited" plan that it should be available forever without any changes? Would it be ok if they allowed people to stay on the unlimited but only if they connect via 3G or whatever service was available when they signed up?

      And to the person that said it was time to find a new service, I'm sure Verizon would love those people using 200-500GB/month to go elsewhere.

    9. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you believe any company selling anything as "unlimited" then you're the gullible one and deserve to be smacked in the face with the company dick.

    10. Re:Verizon is gradually coming clean by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Did you mean to reply to the parent? I'm arguing the exact opposite, that Verizon already fulfilled their side of the contract. The high usage people should congratulate themselves for finding a bargain while it lasted.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  18. Unlimited? by hduff · · Score: 1

    No such thing as Unlimited. It's always been limited.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  19. Yeah... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    I also hear that Verizon is doing away with contracts all together. This is how they will worm out of the grandfathered unlimited plans. They will say it only applies to contract customers once the contracts are gone so is the unlimited data. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Yeah... by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "This is how they will worm out of the grandfathered unlimited plans."

      You speak as if they should offer unlimited forever, even if there are edge users using 500+GB/month. Are you also for rent control so someone who moved into an apartment in Manhattan in 1960 would still only pay $85/month? That doesn't seem fair. There is a reason they are called "grandfathered" customers. And like most grandfathers, they eventually die.

    2. Re:Yeah... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting they offer grandfathered plans forever. I am suggesting that they honor the plans for existing customers. This reminds me of the airlines and the frequent flyer miles. Instead of doing away with the program they just devalue the miles and make it more difficult to redeem them. Eventually the miles become essentially worthless.

      The TelCo's are doing the same thing with "unlimited" plans. Keep bumping up the price and eventually the remaining grandfathered customers will drop out.

      I'm not denying that there are people out there that abuse the unlimited data. If so, then deal with that small majority and leave the rest of us alone. For the record, I'm one of the AT&T grandfathered data users and I don't use anywhere near 500 GB per month. Probably more like 3-4GB. And what is my reward for being responsible with my data usage? They charge me more. Yeah. Once my contract is up I'm gone.

  20. Purge Verizon then. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If Verizon wants to screw customers more, then keep that in mind when they have to reinstate unlimited data (and in a way that is accessible to the masses) to get access to 5G.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Purge Verizon then. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      If Verizon wants to screw customers more, then keep that in mind when they have to reinstate unlimited data (and in a way that is accessible to the masses) to get access to 5G.

      Agreed. I can see it now:

      I open a new phone for Xmas and am trying it for the first time after the "5G" roll-out.

      Download SpeedTest... Check speed at my location with my nearby towers' levels to see what I get.

      Find out I've already gone over my limit after the test.

  21. Compu$erve loves you. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you never knew of the restrictiveness of the Compuserve era.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re: Compu$erve loves you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the $12 per hour connection cost if I connected at 1200 baud. It was half that if I dialed in to the 300 baud modem pool.

  22. ITT: tons of VZW shills. by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    This is when the libertarian snark really does no favors.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  23. Another cellular provider's commercials disagrees by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I forget which, but another cellular provider's commercials claim that all the networks are within %1 of each other. Don't believe it? I don't either.

  24. I'm tired of subsidizing others 200GB by clay_shooter · · Score: 1

    Everyone other Verizon customer is paying so these folks can be heavy users. Doesn't bother me that bandwidth hogs get throttled or have to pay...

    1. Re:I'm tired of subsidizing others 200GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... They're paying so the execs can line their pockets, pay off congress to pursue dead-ends like FIOS, expand network coverage area into the middle of death valley so the map looks better in commercials, and make boneheaded acquisitions like yahoo.

  25. a finite resource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because 1's and 0's will run out if they're not careful...

  26. Shocking by kbg · · Score: 1

    Wow what a shocker. You mean unlimited doesn't mean unlimited? who would have thunk it?

    1. Re:Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you honestly think "unlimited" was referring to the the length of the contract? Because that's what we're talking about here.

  27. Sweet! 60% decrease! by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    We'll be down to a bit under 10GB/mo allowed in 3 years if they follow this 60%/mo decrease pattern.

  28. Definition of Unlimited by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Unlimited in their dictionary means = you can use it any way you want as long as it does not violate our rules

  29. Credit by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I just wish that the data I don't use per month could be credited back. It seems pretty fucked up that I can use 3/5 gigs this month and get no credit back, then have to pay an overage next month if I use 7/5 gigs.

    1. Re:Credit by kdekorte · · Score: 1

      The current plan have rollover, but it is limited to a max of 2GB and you can only roll over from the previous month.

  30. n00bs by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Per month? What do they do if you use 200GB per day? Send an employee around to throttle you ['re connection] ?

  31. this is the way of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first they came for the 500GB but I wasn't one so I was silent
    then they came for the 200GB but I wasn't one so I only posted on slashdot
    then they will come for the above 100GB but I'm not one so I only clicked like on the EFF
    then they will continue to jack up prices and offer less ....

  32. That's diabolical! by kenh · · Score: 1

    With the threshold being dropped from 500GB to 200GB, the latest move will affect customers who weren't using enough data to be caught up in the last round.

    Wait, by lowering the threshold they'll snare more people? Wow, thanks for pointing that out Captain Obvious!

    --
    Ken
  33. in the USA... by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    In the USA... unlimited limits you.

  34. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're using 200GB a month of wireless data you're clearly a fuckstick who should be purged from the planet.

  35. Re:Another cellular provider's commercials disagre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    t-mobile. Finally, I can now call myself a 1-percenter!

  36. Just Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Verizon was in the Interstate toll road highway business.

      "Because our Interstate is a shared resource and we need to ensure all customers have a great driving experience on Verizon tollway, we are notifying a small group of customers on unlimited plans who drive more than 200 miles a month that they must move to a limited Verizon Plan by February 16, 2017, such as the 30 mile toll plan for $120, addition miles would be build at $10 per mile."

  37. Why limit data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously.

    I had one of the accounts that was unlimited. I purposely held onto it when they stopped selling it. In 2014, I deployed via the US Military and send a registered letter to Verizon requesting that they do a military suspend on my account for a period of 12 months or until I contact them about it. They did just that initially and provided me a letter stating that it was under a military suspension and could be reinstated by making a phone call or would be automatically reinstated after 12 months.

    When I returned to the states I was informed by a baffled customer service rep that I no longer had an account with Verizon and that I had requested my account be terminated, not suspended. There was no way to reinstate the account as unlimited and I was offered one of their limited data accounts.

    I didn't use more than 15 GB per month. I did not use it for illegal downloading. I used it to tether via wifi or USB to connect my laptop to the internet to be able to get work email, web browsing, and SSH - no video streaming, no hefty downloads. I just enjoyed the unlimited data for the peace of mind when tethering.

    I went to another company and haven't considered going back to Verizon. Granted, I'm not unlimited, but at least my money isn't going to a company that sees unlimited data plans as undesireable enough to do something like they did to me.

  38. Not to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon also increased the cost of the unlimited data plan from $29.99 to $49.99 (that's in addition to whatever voice plan you had) just a few months ago.

  39. New Verizon Math by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Would be amusing in the wrongest of ways if they used Verizon Math to set quotas.

    For example:
    100 Gigabytes -> 0.100 Gigabits

    It's not like they've done that before.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  40. ITT: tons of VZW shills, some with mod points by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Libertarian snark really does no favors here.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.