Slashdot Mirror


Happiness is on the Wane in the US, UN Global Report Finds (theguardian.com)

From a report on The Guardian, shared by five anonymous readers: Happiness in the US is declining and is expected to continue on a downward path, with Donald Trump's policies forecast to deepen the country's social crisis. The US has slipped to 15th place in the World Happiness Report 2017, produced by the United Nations. The world's economic superpower is well behind top-ranked Norway, although it remains above Germany in 17th place, the UK in 19th, and France in 32nd. Norway knocked Denmark off the top spot as the world's happiest country, with Iceland and Switzerland rounding out the top four. The report's authors stress, however, that the top four are so close that changes are not statistically significant. The next tier of countries are regular leaders in international happiness surveys: Finland is in fifth place, followed by the Netherlands, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Sweden. The world's "unhappiest" countries are all in the Middle East and Africa: war-stricken Yemen and Syria feature in the bottom 10, with Tanzania, Burundi and Central African Republic making up the final three.

382 comments

  1. Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd expect this trend to continue for at least the next 4 to 8 years, depending on how the 2020 elections go. Perhaps even longer than 8 years, depending on how much damage is done to the average citizens' lives due to selfish and thoughtless policy decisions and legislation.

    1. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd expect this trend to continue for at least the next 4 to 8 years, depending on how the 2020 elections go. Perhaps even longer than 8 years, depending on how much damage is done to the average citizens' lives due to selfish and thoughtless policy decisions and legislation.

      Speaking of selfish and thoughtless policy decisions, the exact same statement could have been said 8 years ago.

    2. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny. I don't recall the entire civilized world protesting President Obama, like they are with Donald.

    3. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would not exactly call many of those protesting civilized. Perhaps you should step outside of your echo chamber for a while...

    4. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you think Trump is only staying in office for 8 years? Shoot, he's already taking a crap on everything else. I was thinking he was going to take a crap on presidential term limits as well. We may never be free of Trump! :-(

    5. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones who would have protested are largely blown up.

    6. Re:Sounds about right by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Wait, you think Trump is only staying in office for 8 years? Shoot, he's already taking a crap on everything else. I was thinking he was going to take a crap on presidential term limits as well. We may never be free of Trump! :-(

      He's 70. And looks like he's up for an aneurism any day.
      The bad news is that the real president (Bannon) might find another marionette to operate.

    7. Re: Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA != world, basement you live in != house

    8. Re: Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your head out of Donald's ass and try reading some news once in a while:

      https://www.google.com/search?q=global+trump+protests&oq=global+trump+protests&aqs=chrome..69i57.5264j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

      Or are you going to pretend it's fake news, because you don't like what they are saying?

    9. Re:Sounds about right by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Bannon looks like he's one wafer thin mint away from a catastrophic integument failure.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    10. Re:Sounds about right by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call many Trump followers civilized. Neither is Trump. As for happiness, there are people who are unhappy in the US who can either illegally enter Canada as refugees, or legally move to Canada. In doing so, they will be removing unhappy people from America and, once they are in Canada and happy, add to the number of happy people in Canada.

      Win - win.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    11. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so fast there Sparky, Bannon is actually the Golgothan and not subject to short human lifespan.

    12. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. I don't recall the entire civilized world protesting President Obama, like they are with Donald.

      You just wait, Trump is going to end up getting impeached. This is a fact, you don't make wild accusations without any evidence, you do not lie 80% of the time to the public and get away with it, you don't treat American allies with utter contempt for no reason and not get some sort of backlash.

      You have all these people that try to compare Trump to Obama, but Obama did not violate the constitution, Obama did not play games with his taxes, Obama did not create policies that ignore science in the name of profit, Obama did not try to screw over the American working class financially in the name of making the top 1% pay less taxes.

      Trump is going to get impeached. Period.

    13. Re:Sounds about right by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if Hillary had been elected, some republican, as stupid as you, would blame it on her.
      Do you really think this is a 3-months process?

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    14. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I am happy. I voted for Trump! Sore loser!

    15. Re: Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be realistic. Trump will only be impeached if the Republicans decide to allow it. At the moment they still think they have something to gain by riding the crazy train and to hell with anything they said about him earlier. In short they have to grow a backbone and some balls first, in no particular order.

    16. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your talking about the Liberal Snowflakes , not the people that make this country tick, were very happy, hopefully for at least the next 8 years. Speak for yourself Flake.

    17. Re: Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans are incapable of growing backbones or balls, so removing the Russian Traitor will most likely require a military coup aimed at ensuring the security of the USA.

    18. Re:Sounds about right by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I think that might be more the case of the unhappy being unhappy wherever they are.

    19. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd expect this trend to continue for at least the next 4 to 8 years, depending on how the 2020 elections go. Perhaps even longer than 8 years, depending on how much damage is done to the average citizens' lives due to selfish and thoughtless policy decisions and legislation.

      This study was done with Obama in power, the study years are 2014 - 2016... but somehow its magically Trumps fault... The left is lost right now, they can't even be honest, and critically look at their own policies and ask the question, are we actually working to help the average person? This is whole reason Trump won in the first place, and instead of the left looking inwards, they have doubled down in the insanity.

    20. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      retard

    21. Re:Sounds about right by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I'd expect this trend to continue for at least the next 4 to 8 years, depending on how the 2020 elections go. Perhaps even longer than 8 years, depending on how much damage is done to the average citizens' lives due to selfish and thoughtless policy decisions and legislation.

      You are identifying a problem of a Negative thinking President, aided by a racist confident. And Pence is the wishy-washy VP that will take over and hopefully change the tone and attitude of Americans. You are being conditioned to live in fear. Shame on your President.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    22. Re:Sounds about right by syntotic · · Score: 1

      Aaah... but all these people bought the Chinese method and learnt what it means to want to be and live like they were Africans and now only live for their sband or disband making them even more miserable because they have the hope of living without voices at the expense of getting rid of babies, money, anything mentioned in their schizophrenia and basically all people who tune well to them, abstaining of places, eating bad food, wanting descerebration, wanting to know not wanting to know who is what name and whether they... AFTER, their expectation of having found something useful and life vital are broken because they were NOT the person they think and they got nothing off it but STILL lived it and will keep talking about it ... and with no end in sight because sband they do not understand means exactly the same as the killer of Phnom Penh but they believe it is like a movement and the best they can do is DENY IT ALL, SAY IT ALL BACKWARDS, SAY NO, DEFIND HUMAN AS REPTILE OR INSECT for reasons they do not understand and do not dare brake, hearing threats the whole day, etc. Do they still think about happiness? NO. Basically it seems all things giving happiness have been forbidden or are in the process of being denigrated and destroyed, including radio, TV, videogames, good coffee, clean beer... What did you expect? This comes after the Monitor announced Norway is the champion in happiness. If you cannot find info on the killer of Phnom Penh it is but an example of the atmosphere, lest people do understand what is sband...

  2. Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 0, Troll

    with Donald Trump's policies forecast to deepen the country's social crisis.

    Gosh I'll be so sad when all the illegal Mexican rapists are deported!

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      <sarcasm>Gosh I'll be so sad when all the illegal Mexican rapists are deported!</sarcasm>

      FTFY

    2. Re: Oh no that sucks! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't worry. You'll get used to living back in your home country eventually!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Oh no that sucks! by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, you're on an aging, mostly white discussion board devoted to technology: If you want to troll slashdotters, say something about how it's important to cut research funding.

      "I'll be so sad when they cut funding for useless nuclear fusion research, LOL, we don't need another chernobyl. We should spend the money on copyright protection instead, crack down on linux ripping off windows!"

    4. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwvlbJ0h35A

      If you need a federal government to make you happy, I think your problem is far deeper than just who was elected President.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's NO evidence they commit more crimes than the average population, and even less by some estimates. Most come here to work; they can commit crimes in their home country better because they know the language, if crime were their goal.

      The crime angle on that is a Fake Problem. Bad Trump.

    6. Re:Oh no that sucks! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      BAN MEXICAN RAPIST CARDS!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      devoted to technology

      This has nothing to do with technology. It's meant to incite outrage and generate comments. If I had to bet money on reasons for unhappiness (I'm not, I don't know how many of my friends are, but I'd guess the number is low), I would put it on all this why being a large contributor.

    8. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Mikkeles · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A federal government can't make you happy, but they're certainly able to make you unhappy.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    9. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 0

      There's NO evidence they commit more crimes than the average population

      Average white population?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    10. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, average population, period.

      If T wanted to reduce crime in general, which should be the logical goal, he should ask, what's the best way to reduce crime per federal dollars spent? I've seen no evidence that spending more fed dollars on JUST illegal immigrants is more effective than spending on it on general law enforcement, such as more FBI staff, systems, and/or more cops.

      He's just obsessed with "outsiders" as a personality quirk. It's not based on any sound crime-solving monetary/resource allocation logic or model. I don't think he'd have the patience to review any such study or model with a critical eye. By all appearances, it's his gut tribalism instinct driving his decision process, not math, models, and logic. You are welcome to demonstrate he has given crime-fighting resource allocation some real thought...

    11. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... but... but... BROWN SKIN!

    12. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By definition they have committed more crimes than the average population by entering the country illegally.

    13. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's completely and utter non-sense. The U.S. Federal Government's primary reason to exist is to enable the pursuit of happiness. They help build roads which allow you to move from place to place, they create law enforcement frameworks so you have consistency across the union.

      In more recent history they cleaned up the rivers and lakes that were so polluted they would catch on f'in fire. This hate of government bs is what got us where we are with our current President. It is stupid, government can does certain things well, there are certainly things it should not do as well. That is why we have a legislature and a Supreme court and even a President.

      I hate this I got mine so screw everybody else crap. We are by far the richest country in the world and yet we are gonna make our children go hungry because we somehow can't afford to feed them? We are gonna kick millions off healthcare and discourage younger people from obtaining insurance and penalizing them if they get the balls to get try and get it so we are gonna kill more and more hospitals as uninsured people show up again.

    14. Re: Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think politicians are great and not criminals? What is the racial composition of, say, the US Senate?

      Seems like the worst criminals are mostly older, white males by that basis.

      Please defend your choice of white pride or "boo" Congress. Because you can't keep both of your diatribes on the rails without contradicting yourself.

    15. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also untrue as the average person breaks many laws on a daily basis. Also untrue as many were children and brought here by their parents. So their parents broke the law and not them.

    16. Re:Oh no that sucks! by swillden · · Score: 1

      By definition they have committed more crimes than the average population by entering the country illegally.

      It's not a crime to enter the country illegally, unless you have been previously deported. This, BTW, is why lawyers and other people who are picky about accuracy when it comes to legal issues call them "undocumented immigrants", rather than "illegal immigrants". That's not just a kinder or more politically correct phrasing... it's the most accurate description.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    17. Re:Oh no that sucks! by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's NO evidence they commit more crimes than the average population, and even less by some estimates. Most come here to work; they can commit crimes in their home country better because they know the language, if crime were their goal.

      The crime angle on that is a Fake Problem. Bad Trump.

      Actually by definition anyone who is here illegally is a criminal. But ignoring that there is still a *huge* amount of imported crime. The usual lie is to group all immigrants together when looking at crime since the legal ones generally do commit fewer crimes. The legal ones pull down the average. The MS13 gang, ~70k strong in the US, is largely a product of illegal immigration. But keep preaching that they are all here to helpfully mow your lawn and have no downsides.

      Immigration can be a net win (ie educated law abiding types) or a net loss (low skilled or illegal) depending on how you play the game. But lying about how many deaths illegals cause by drunk driving (shockingly high numbers) and crime in general won't help that discussion.

    18. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've met both of them

      they're really not bad people

      Not nearly as bad as the cuckolds who hire illegal imported labor, now those fuckfaces should die in all the fires

    19. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a crime to enter the country illegally

      How is it not a crime to do something illegally? Doesn't the fact that it is illegal mean by its very definition that it is a crime? A rose by any other name...

      For the first improper entry offense, the person can be fined (as a criminal penalty), or imprisoned for up to six months, or both. For a subsequent offense, the person can be fined or imprisoned for up to two years, or both. (See 8 U.S.C. Section 1325, I.N.A. Section 275.)

      Sure sounds illegal to me...

    20. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You assume we know who and where the perps are. We don't. And going after perps who are here illegally is no easier than going after perps who are here legally. The goal should be to get the most perps per fed money spent, not to target group X over group Y for the heck of it. That would be like the highway patrol going after only Ford speeders and not Chevy speeders. It's both inefficient and discriminatory.

      Your "law and order" statement seems to be referring to "sanctuary cities". Cops have found they get more cooperation from the population if they don't ask citizenship status of witnesses and victims. There's your "law and order".

      illegals...never going to vote Republican...will almost always vote for more government.

      Ahah! So it's not really about crime itself, but a political power battle to you. Your true colors are shining through. Whether true or not, that's a change in topic from crime.

      If you really want to reduce illegals, then audit businesses for their employment practices. However, biz bribes GOP not to, calling it "excess business regulation". T and GOP are hiding this from you, and distracting you with crime talk.

    21. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe the ADVANTAGES of global warming... that could get things rolling here

    22. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The usual lie is to group all immigrants together when looking at crime since the legal ones generally do commit fewer crimes. The legal ones pull down the average. The MS13 gang, ~70k strong in the US, is largely a product of illegal immigration. But keep preaching that they are all here to helpfully mow your lawn and have no downsides.

      I didn't say there were no downsides, only that the average is not demonstrably higher. Before T claims that illegals commit more than average thefts and violence, he should FIRST get evidence.

      If as a politician I claim that group X causes more problems than group Y, I should first collect and present good evidence, not guess out of my keester.

      Once T did actually give a source of such claims: his "border guard friends" told him. That's barely more scientific than a divining rod. My friends tell me you are a demon spawn; should I deport you?

      By the way, I'm not against cutting back the quantity of illegals in the country, it's just that T is doing it wrong (per sister message).

    23. Re:Oh no that sucks! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Per CNN, in 2014 there were about 250,000 illegal immigrants who committed crimes and were either in jail or deported after committing a crime. That represents about 13% of all those in prison. Even though illegal immigrants are about 4% of the total population. So their rate of criminal action to population is about 3 times higher than the average population.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If you really want to reduce illegals, then audit businesses for their employment practices. However, biz bribes GOP not to...

      More on this: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...

    25. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was living in a land not my own I'd be pretty damn sure to make sure I wasn't committing any crimes, sure I might miss something small like not having a reflective triangle in the trunk for traffic accidents or something like messing up and not registering a vehicle or using form A instead of B... Violent crimes stats for non-US born should be pretty close to zero. If not, then WTF are we doing with our immigration policy? I hate to put people into groups, but people from some places seem to do a lot better than others. That's life.

    26. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Taxes to high? Give more. For the most part anyway, I'm for the Nun's Loophole to come back (and with President Trump, it just might).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    27. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Consistency across the union makes no sense when economically we're 11 different nations with distinctive spending habits.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    28. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. So basically the selling point for the illegal mexican rapists is that they're slightly less criminal than blacks? Great, ship 'em on in.

      No, their basic selling point is that they're mostly Christians. Mexico has a higher % of Christians than the US. Ditto blacks in America. % wise blacks have more Christians and less atheists than the US average.

      The other is that the illegal mexican rapists or their anchor babies eventually vote Democrat.

      That's not a problem though. First, the babies. As above, they're mostly Christians, so them having more babies is a good thing - you end up with more Christians to perpetuate Christian culture.

      As for voting Democrat, that is also not a problem, as the D's are the party for Christians and the religious in general, as religion leans left. In the history of the US, the D's treat Christians better. Pre-Civil War, the Ds let Christians run their plantations in peace, and they didn't petition government to push their morality on others like the Not True Christians in the north. Post-Civil War, they listened to Christians and implement Jim Crow laws. When the D's found that blacks were actually more Christian than whites (see above on %s), the D's switched towards them and pushed for civil rights and feminism and the other social justice stuff.

      Democrat is about letting more Christians into the nation. They are pro-choice because they know only non-Christians and godless commies would take the non-Christians choice, and that's a good thing for Christians as that means the atheists commies and non-Christians are reproducing less. The D's also support single moms, because single moms may very well be Christians (as most single moms are blacks and latinos - demographics with high Christian populations)

      Republican is the party that does the opposite. Their policies will throw Christians into the wild, in a world that hates and persecutes Christians. They PRETEND to protect Christians with their pro-life and wall and border control rhetoric, but as above, those policies actually hurt Christians. Not ignoring and not covering up rape is also harmful to Christians. Because you know, the meme about priest and little boys.

    29. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      8/8 gr8 b8 m8.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    30. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'm just saying Republican talking points back. I even used some of yours (remember, the whole bit about cultures need mothers and men with mates to keep reproducing?)

      If I'm baiting, then that just means you were/are baiting too.

    31. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Ahah! So it's not really about crime itself, but a political power battle to you. Your true colors are shining through.

      And I'm saying this is why the Dems are so recalcitrant about stopping any flow of 3rd worlders into the US. Because they vote Democrat. Imagine if there were a magic portal from Fundieland, where productive safe white fundamentalist Christians were being persecuted and killed by evil atheists. So if we started taking Fundieland refugees and shoveling them by the millions into California, changing the voting demographics there to Republican, I guarantee all of this "refugees welcome" crap would turn around really fucking fast.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    32. Re: Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Gee let me think. Fuck congress. Happy now?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    33. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      If I'm baiting, then that just means you were/are baiting too.

      Do you know what a strawman argument is?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    34. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm saying this is why the Dems are so recalcitrant about stopping any flow of 3rd worlders into the US.

      Other way around. This is why the REPUBLICANS are so adamant in stopping them. It isn't about protecting borders or protecting us bad hombres or terrorists or anything like that.

      Because they vote Democrat.

      No, because they won't vote Republican.

      Imagine if there were a magic portal from Fundieland, where productive safe white fundamentalist Christians were being persecuted and killed by evil atheists.

      Don't have to imagine it.

      So if we started taking Fundieland refugees and shoveling them by the millions into California, changing the voting demographics there to Republican, I guarantee all of this "refugees welcome" crap would turn around really fucking fast.

      Nah, it would be the "refugees get out" rhetoric from Republicans that will be changing really fast.

    35. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what a strawman argument is?

      Of course I do! If I didn't, I wouldn't be able to keep up with you.

    36. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      You still changed the subject away from crime itself.

      Both parties have been laxidasical on the issue, but for different reasons. I will agree a good many Democrats view them as a future source of votes, but as I mentioned nearby, businesses also see them as cheap abusable labor, and lobby GOP to look the other way. GOP only gives the issue lip service, and STILL does in terms of business inspections. When W had both houses, GOP stonewalled on reform and did nothing. Democrats also proposed a bill to increase border guards, but GOP invented silly excuses, including budget reduction, to turn it down and showed no interest in renegotiating a revised bill.

    37. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      GOP establishment get money from donors who want cheap labor. That doesn't do shit for GOP voters. Yes, the GOP establishment did nothing about illegal immigration. The GOP base was really, really pissed about it, and elected Trump, the first Republican presidential candidate in a long time to actually promise to do the thing that's (depending on the poll and how you ask the question) got the approval of 55-65% of Americans: build wall; deport illegals.

      There are lots of reasons for wanting to do this:

      1. Protecting borders is the most basic function of government (law and order).

      2. Some illegals commit crimes, and they shouldn't even be here. The government refusing to deal with the problem is betraying the citizens. When Jamiel Shaw Jr was gunned down by an illegal mexican who'd been deported 3 times telling his dad "well they're not all criminals" is cold comfort.

      3. Illegals are exploited by greedy businessmen for profit, and drive down wages for everyone else. Especially bad for our poor blacks and legal hispanics.

      4. Illegals consume public resources paid for by citizen taxpayers.

      5. 80% of central and south american women and girls who cross the border illegal are raped during the process, and that sort of thing is frowned upon.

      6. Open border allows for easier drug, gun, and sex trafficking. The profits from this fund monsters like the Zetas, turning Mexico into a blood drenched hell hole. Not a good thing to have next door, and the violence spills over the border.

      7. They fucking vote Democrat.

      These are all really good reasons to oppose illegal immigration, but Dems (both establishment and voters) will ignore or make excuses for 1 through 6 because 7 while the GOP establishment ignores 1 - 2; 4-7 because 3. Trump (and Trump voters) make no excuses and dropkick the illegals back over the border.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    38. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The government refusing to deal with the problem is betraying the citizens.

      Re: #2 - It's not ignoring the problem; what you proposes creates 2 new problems to solve 1. Bad trade-off choice. You just seem to be robotically quoting political slogans/memes rather than show a comparison of choices.

      I generally don't disagree with 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 but do question 4. Most pay the same taxes as citizens.

      As I've mentioned in nearby posts there are more sane ways to reduce illegals (more border guards and biz audits), but neither T nor GOP are interested in anything that offends their biz donors & friends. They'd rather F with families than offend the precious 1%. Typical GOP.

      By the way, a wall isn't going to stop drug trafficking. It's pretty easy to get drugs under or over a wall. A 7 year old can do it.

    39. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Correction, I generally don't disagree with 1, 3, 5, 6, and 7.

      In general, GOP does nothing about it beyond lip service, and T does it ham-handed. Perhaps you could try to argue ham-handed is better than nothing.

    40. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      As I've mentioned in nearby posts there are more sane ways to reduce illegals (more border guards and biz audits) but neither T nor GOP are interested in anything that offends their biz donors & friends. They'd rather F with families than offend the precious 1%. Typical GOP.

      Trump has already added thousands of BP and ICE agents, and nationwide E-Verify is part of Trump's immigration plan that was on his campaign website (the site has since been updated for the administration rather than the campaign or I'd link it). So one of the things you recommended Trump has already done and the other is part of his campaign promises, but that requires legislative action and right now Congress is doing other things. We'll see what happens.

      By the way, a wall isn't going to stop drug trafficking. It's pretty easy to get drugs under or over a wall. A 7 year old can do it.

      But a wall with sensors and more BP agents will definitely help, no?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    41. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could try to argue ham-handed is better than nothing.

      Yes, that's essentially the fundamental premise of the Trump movement. What we have is multinational corporations that own the politicians and 90% of the media. There's some dispute between the interests of citizens and the interests of multinationals/foreigners, and on every single issue the politicians take the side of the foreigners/multinationals and then the media propagandizes the public as to why this is somehow "moral." It's really not, it's just the financial interest of the elite. What a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people" should do is say "no, fuck you" to the foreigners and multinationals. This is all Trump is doing and it's got the media, the left, and the GOP establishment apoplectic.

      Illegal immigration is bad for citizens/workers, good for business/foreigners. No, fuck foreigners, deport illegals.

      Shady muslims bad for citizens, good for foreigners. No, fuck them, ban terrorist muslims.

      Trade deals bad for workers, good for business/China. No, fuck China, protect workers.

      Repeat on each issue. That's basically it.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    42. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'm not confident T will fix more things than he breaks. Your opinion is probably different on that.

    43. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Trump has already added thousands of BP and ICE agents

      No he hasn't. They were already backlogged in hiring before the election. Training and background checks take roughly 2 years. Congress will have to fund it by then if they continue.

      nationwide E-Verify is part of Trump's immigration plan...but that requires legislative action

      Yes, it has to pass Congress first. Wishes are common, signed bills are not. Business will complain to GOP, and businesses have a lot of pull with GOP. GOP will likely water it down.

      But a wall with sensors and more BP agents will definitely help, no?

      In general, Democrats were never against such. GOP blocked such bills before just to hurt O politically. GOP may block it for budget hawk reasons, you never know.

      We'll see. In the end even if such legislation is successful it won't likely change anything noticeable for average citizen anyhow. The illegals were workers and consumers just like the rest.

    44. Re:Oh no that sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's essentially the fundamental premise of the Trump movement.

      So I'm right: the Trump movement is a leftist movement. The so called True Conservative Christians who thinks they're fighting lefties by siding with Trump are actually doing the exact opposite and empowering those they claim to hate.

      "Something is better than nothing" is the mantra of the left. They don't care whether that "something" is actually helpful, they just want their "something" done, consequences be damned.

      What we have is multinational corporations that own the politicians and 90% of the media.

      So what you have is capitalists doing what capitalists do best: owning the means of the production and enjoying the fruits of said means of production.

      And "the workers", the proletariat, is pushing back with a big "fuck you", the same way the unions did, or the Progressives, or the Soviets, or Mao, etc.

      Unfortunately for them, history has shown that this rarely turned out well for the workers.

    45. Re:Oh no that sucks! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      But it's nationalistic, right? So nationalist, and socialist? Somebody should start a political party like that.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  3. Something stinks by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Happiness in the US is declining and is expected to continue on a downward path, with Donald Trump's policies forecast to deepen the country's social crisis

    This line should tell you everything you need to know about the related article.

    Look, I get it. Your candidate didn't win and it's upsetting to you. However, throwing little hissy fits every chance you get only serves to reinforce WHY folks had the temerity to vote for trump; the behavior of Hillary supporters ( and, let's face it, Hillary herself ) soured her support outside of her base.

    Obviously a lot of people are pretty happy that Trump was elected, and are encouraged by his positions and actions. So the nonsense that happiness is expected to trend downwards is...exaggeration at least.

    Note: I'm not a Trump or Hillary supporter. Can't stand any politician, although I will say Trump has been more amusing than I could ever envision Hillary being. The literal crying from Hillary's camp on election night was particularly hilarious.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Something stinks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Friend, we don't have time for an 'amusing' Leader of the Free World; not anymore. It's not Amateur Night on Planet Earth anymore, things have gotten terribly, horribly real, and we really, really needed someone responsible, experienced, respectable, and capable of making thoughtful, insightful decisions on big and little issues alike. Sadly, we were not offered any such Candidate, not from any political party. So now we're stuck with this disgusting clown who is taking a chainsaw to just about everything. I'm not laughing. Neither are a lot of people who voted for the sonofabitch, either, and neither are a whole bunch of the GOP. Oh and by the way if you didn't figure it out, I am also not a Hillary or Trump supporter.

      Oh and by the way I'd like to point out that Angela Merkel was called 'Leader of the Free World' by the press last week; that's about the worst black-eye the U.S. could possibly get so far as I'm concerned; the destruction of the credibility of the U.S. is now more or less complete. We're right down there, now, in the muck with so many African and South American countries, that seem to have a regime change every other week. It'll likely take many decades for us to fix our reputation, if it's even possible to do anymore.

    2. Re:Something stinks by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . We're right down there, now, in the muck with so many African and South American countries, that seem to have a regime change every other week.
      Were that true, then Trump would have been disposed by now. So saying crap like this undermines your point.

      Regardless, I can take this as the joke it is because in the 20+ years I've been voting I have never had a candidate worth voting for. They've all been horrible. Yet every damn election cycle we pretend they're some holy figure come to save us, only to say the same thing about the next guy, all without breaking a smile. You can either rage against the idiocy of the voting public, maybe cry a little bit, or you can enjoy the show for what it is. Me, I tried the first couple options for a while, but found it's far more enjoyable to be "in" on the joke.

      Here's the thing though; the world isn't ending, and it's never bad as it appears. We'll survive Trump, and the moron after him, and the moron after that. Maybe we'll be a bit wiser for it too.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    3. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get over yourself.
      The only reason anyone ever called America the leader of the free world was ironically to point out how over inflated the american ego is.
      The fact that you took this seriously just goes to show how delusional you really are.
      Any credibility the US had was destroyed by bush and nobel peace prize bomber Barack Sadam Hussein Osama bin Laden Obama.

    4. Re: Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a big pile of steaming bullshit exaggerated by the press, because that's what they do. I'm german, so I don't give a rat's ass who is reigning the USA, but no sane person here likes Merkel. We just can't get rid of her, thanks to our election system, and it's not like there were/are any good alternatives.

    5. Re:Something stinks by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Funny

      having been to germany in 08 and most recently last year, i can say that the country is not as great as it used to be

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    6. Re:Something stinks by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      So the nonsense that happiness is expected to trend downwards is...exaggeration at least.

      Is it?
      Hint: Are Trump's policies going to bring the USA closer to countries making the top of this report? It seems pretty obvious he is going in the opposite direction.

    7. Re:Something stinks by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't see in TFA any mention of *who* and how has forecast that Donald Trump's policies will deepen the country's social crisis. But I've noticed the sources The Guardian quoted in the past were those who forecast Hillary's victory and people like the Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman whose forecast was "if Trump wins the market will crash and will *never* recover".

    8. Re:Something stinks by meta-monkey · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm not laughing. Neither are a lot of people who voted for the sonofabitch, either, and neither are a whole bunch of the GOP.

      You're projecting. Trump is doing an amazing job of keeping his campaign promises, and his supporters are very happy about it. They did a straw poll at CPAC and something like 90% of conservatives agreed with what Trump was doing.

      Yes, the neocon assholes on TV like Bill Kristol and John McCain are mad. But these are the same people the Trump voters rebelled against because they see them as traitors.

      Oh and by the way I'd like to point out that Angela Merkel was called 'Leader of the Free World' by the press last week;

      Who the hell cares? Fuck the press.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    9. Re:Something stinks by butchersong · · Score: 1

      This is to me more indicative of how relevant the press is in today's world and the attitude that at least in part is responsible for their decline in relevance.

    10. Re:Something stinks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's adorable that you think polls mean anything. All that tells you is what the people polled think, not what the rest of the nation thinks. I could probably find (or create) a poll that would lead you to believe that the Earth is actually flat, too, and it would have just about as much credibility.

    11. Re:Something stinks by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If you need a federal government to make you happy, your problem may be something entirely different and far deeper

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:Something stinks by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Trends like that don't happen overnight nor are they accurately measured that way, so none of this is currently indicative of "Trump's America".
      What grinds down people's spirits? -increased violent crime, rioting, racial strife, an increased welfare state, a stagnate economy, etc.. most or all of which worsened over the past several years.
      Besides, this is from The Guardian. Might as well be posting something from Breitbart, if you wanted the opposite opinion. Not biased at all, nope... Now, if the trend continues, *then* they can point some fingers at trump.
      This country has been unhappy for quite some time, which explains why trump was elected in the first place. People are sick of the status quo, so much so that they were willing to roll the dice.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    13. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Here's the thing though; the world isn't ending, and it's never bad as it appears."

      I'm sure lots of people have said that right before their world ended and everything turned out to be much worse than it appeared.

    14. Re:Something stinks by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All that tells you is what the people polled think, not what the rest of the nation thinks.

      Yes, and the people polled were the politically active conservatives. Your claim was that people who voted for Trump are now regretting their decision. No they're not. They're very happy with what Trump is doing.

      They wanted illegal Mexican rapists deported. Illegal Mexican rapists are being deported. They're very happy.

      They wanted TPP killed. TPP is killed. They're very happy.

      They wanted conservative Supreme Court justices. Gorsuch got something like a 94% approval rate at CPAC. They're very happy.

      They want the Federal bureaucracy gutted. Bannon said at CPAC they're "dismantling the administrative state." The new budget outline shows executive departments slashed. They're very happy.

      I could go on and on. You don't like Trump so you want to pretend everyone else doesn't like Trump, even people who voted for him. Wrong.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    15. Re: Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and saving the world from every disaster since its froming.

      That little task.

    16. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Amateur Night on Planet Earth anymore, things have gotten terribly, horribly real, and we really, really needed someone responsible, experienced, respectable, and capable of making thoughtful, insightful decisions on big and little issues alike.

      Oh, did the little teenager finally wake up and realize how the world works and has been working for thousands of years?
      Protip, fool: ever heard of a world war? Cold war? Black death? Malaria? Hundred years' war? Know what a monarchy is? How about feudalism? Stalinism? Ever heard of a holocaust or a genocide?

      What conceit! What arrogance! What stupidity! You think things just got real because someone you have a low opinion of got voted into office?!
      You should be orgasmic that this is the thing you're concerned about instead of the bubo on your thigh that you just noticed this morning or where you're going to get your food today or whether the army is going to rape everyone in town and then burn it all down.

      You're a spoiled, immature, arrogant child.

    17. Re:Something stinks by bongey · · Score: 1

      The five anonymous readers were BeauHD, BeauHD,BeauHD,BeauHD and you guessed it BeauHD.

    18. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right, polls mean nothing. Your baseless personal anecdote and claims have FAR more credence.

    19. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh and by the way I'd like to point out that Angela Merkel was called 'Leader of the Free World' by the press last week;

      As of now, the leader of the Free World is Michel Temer, president of Brazil, the largest democracy after the US [India is not a democracy].

    20. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was called leader of the free world not for any reason other than to swipe at Trump. That is the beginning and the end of it. She hasn't done anything to project that her influence goes much further than Germany's borders, and certainly not even in the EU itself despite Germany being the biggest player in it.

    21. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Regardless, I can take this as the joke it is because in the 20+ years I've been voting I have never had a candidate worth voting for. They've all been horrible. Yet every damn election cycle we pretend they're some holy figure come to save us, only to say the same thing about the next guy, all without breaking a smile.

      This suggests to me that what the people who aren't "in on the joke" are looking for something other than a president. Maybe something more like a Messiah, or maybe a father figure. It's like the people who say things were so much better when they were young. Well of course it was better, you jackass, you were young for crissaake. There was even a time when it was possible that you'd be an astronaut or pro ball player some day. But entropy took all those unlimited possibilities and turned them into vague regret. That doesn't make you special, it makes you just like everyone else -- even the ones who grew up to be astronauts. No politician can fix that, because it's not a problem; it's life.

      It's ridiculous expectations that force the candidates to be so absurdly pretentious. If you strip away all the bullshit, there have been a number of qualified candidates for the job, if not the fantasy. I'm a Democrat, but I'll stand up and say Bob Dole was the real deal. I disagreed with his politics, but if he'd been elected nobody would be saying that the president was a clown. And yet, it was the fact that he wasn't a clown that made him look ridiculous. He was a grim old man with an arm that had been irreparably shattered by German machine gun fire. His buddies pumped him full of morphine and then wrote "M" on his forehead in his own blood so the medics wouldn't give him a second, fatal dose. It made people laugh that he always looked so stiff and uncomfortable.

      In American presidential politics, the more serious you are the bigger joke you are.

      There has always been bullshit in politics, particularly presidential politics, but we're living in a storm surge of BS. The philosopher Harry Frankfurt, in his book On Bullshit, observes that people have lost confidence in the very concept of factual correctness. We no longer care whether what someone says is true, we want it to be sincere. All we ask of a candidate is that he sound like he feels what he is saying is true. That's almost impossible for a normal person on the campaign trail, even if he believes what he is saying, because he has to give the same speech twenty or thirty times a week. It's only the habitual bullshitters who can pull it off -- or the monomaniacs like Bernie Sanders. Which is why he's currently the most popular politician in the US: even if you think he's nuts, you can't deny he sincerely hates bankers and billionaires.

      In a world where the electorate has become intellectually craven and lazy, the best person to run for president is a clown.

    22. Re: Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I breathed the smoke and donated blood on 9/11. I supported papa Bush...

      The current mess is a clear case of party before country and it is going to get worse the longer it goes on. Trump and soon to be "alleged co-conspirator" Pence need to go. Hopefully the Repubs will do it and get Paul Ryan in so we can avoid a wag the dog distraction war with nukes.

    23. Re:Something stinks by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Every president we've had since I was born has been inept, just in different and lest obvious ways.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    24. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angela Merkel was called 'Leader of the Free World" by the (((press))) last week. I'm sure Trump is fucking upset about that!

    25. Re: Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but many, many more have said it at times more worrying than they are now, and have been wrong.

    26. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait until I'm elected president and I get to make total examples of fuckheads such as yourself. You will be the first against the wall son

    27. Re:Something stinks by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Oh and by the way I'd like to point out that Angela Merkel was called 'Leader of the Free World' by the press last week; that's about the worst black-eye the U.S. could possibly get so far as I'm concerned; the destruction of the credibility of the U.S. is now more or less complete.

      So lets pull out of Europe and see how this new German leadership goes. As near as I can tell they haven't been able to solve the Greek debt problem nor the Syrian refugee problem despite both having gone on for years. I'd say that their leadership record doesn't look so hot recently.

    28. Re:Something stinks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Well, then, I suppose you're also going to contradict me that what I hear and read in the news, about not only voters but members of Congress not being terribly happy, is just 'fake news' or something I'm making up out of wholecloth -- because You like Trump so you want to pretend everyone else likes Trump, even people who didn't vote for him. Wrong. xD

      Reminder: 'Politically active conservatives' are not the entire 300,000,000 citizens of the United States, and by the way only roughly HALF the country voted for Trump. So who you're referring to is actually a MINORITY, not the MAJORITY.

    29. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wanted illegal Mexican rapists deported. Illegal Mexican rapists are being deported. They're very happy.

      3 above what it would have been otherwise.

    30. Re:Something stinks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Sure thing buddy, let's 'pull out of Europe', and NATO while we're at it. Who needs those freeloaders, right? And we'll get a nice 'thank you' card from Vladimir Putin out of the deal, since it'll make it that much easier for him to conquer Europe -- or didn't that occur to you?

    31. Re:Something stinks by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Considering the participation rate in voting it probably was just about 1/3rd ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    32. Re:Something stinks by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The "Greek Debt Problem" can only be solved by the Greek.
      The "Syrien Refugee Problem" can only be solved by removing the terror regime in Syria. And killing IS(IS).

      Why you think Germany or the EU had a magic button it just could switch to solve one of the two problems is beyond me. Germany or the EU per se has no "Syrian Refugee Problem". The total amount of refugees is about 4million. Over 3 million immigrated into the EU. The EU has now about 750 million inhabitants. So this is roughly 1 refugee per 200 EU citizens. That is not a problem.

      I'd say that their leadership record doesn't look so hot recently.
      And I would say: morally and humanity it looks perfect.
      I have not much a clue how the USA can waste their money in a way that a huge part of the population is poor. Syrien "refugees" are already vitalizing the german economy. Most of them either speak adequate english and/or are learning german.

      However I would like to see your comment when you read in the news: thousands of refugees starving and freezing to death at EU borders: "because the EU refuses to let them in"

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    33. Re:Something stinks by NaCh0 · · Score: 0

      Well, then, I suppose you're also going to contradict me that what I hear and read in the news, about not only voters but members of Congress not being terribly happy, is just 'fake news'

      If you are getting your "news" from the same sources who said Hillary had a 98% chance of winning, what do you expect?

      When you don't balance your liberal news sources with a conservative view like Breitbart, you're not getting the whole picture.

      Right now it sounds like you live in a special "Pauline Kael" kind of world where you don't know anyone happy with President Trump.

    34. Re:Something stinks by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Russia does not have the resources nor technology to conquer Europe. They can bomb us into the stone age, but so we can bomb them.

      And why would they? They gain more from Europe by simple trade.

      If the US pulls out from Europe, they basically lose the most important bases to attack/control the "middle east".

      Pulling out of the NATO, well, then you probably need some new trade agreements, too. Lets see how long a Nimitz class carrier can operate without spare parts from Germany, rofl. (Less than 40 days ... for your interest)

      3 month after the US pulled out of the Nato, your fleets are no longer operating. You don't have the industry to support it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    35. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that a problem? We are paying for other's defense so they can have universal healthcare and bash us for not being able to afford it. Fuck them. Let them pay their own way or subsist on vodka and borscht.

    36. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same news that claimed Trump couldn't possibly win?
      The same news that claimed Hillary had a 95% chance of winning?
      Even though poll after poll showed she was within the margin of error?
      The news has always portrayed Trump as being unliked by people.
      It's like you see shareblue posting some blatant anti Trump story and you actually believe it.

    37. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PARAPHRASE: Everything is so horribly wrong. Angela Merkel was called 'Leader of the Free World' by the press last week ... the U.S. credibility is destroyed ... no better than third world country ... CTR / SHARE BLUE talking points ... OMG!

      How can you still believe the press isn't engaging in propaganda with that obvious nonsense statement? Germany ... Merkel ... LEADER of the Free World? Do you still believe that the MSM and "journalists" haven't sold their journalistic souls and aren't pushing an agenda that turned into 24/7 screeching in the 2016 election? Or that a globalist agenda pushing press wouldn't call a globalist leader how they want the public to view her as? Stop listening to the delusional left wing MSM and it won't be such a world shattering shock when Donald Trump is reelected in 4 years.

    38. Re:Something stinks by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, at present Putin's facing a financial crisis that is going to force him to drop military spending from 69 billion to 48 billion dollars. Germany is raising its defense spending to 40 billion, and if you factor in it doesn't need to defend vast terrain or have a multi-ocean blue water navy, Germany alone should be more than a match for the conventional forces of Russia.

      Things may have looked different ten years ago when Russia was riding on high energy prices -- one of the reasons that the Obama administration was so pro-fracking: to contain Russian power. But today Europe really doesn't need the US to defend itself. Sure it'd have to shift some of its defense spending away from things that support US military operations to things that replace them.

      In fact support of US power has been a major reason for continuing NATO since the collapse of the Warsaw Pact. The multinational force in the Iraq War wouldn't have been possible without NATO, although it wasn't a NATO operation per se. Afghanistan was a NATO operation; in fact it is the sole time in the history of the organization that the Article V mutual defense provision has been trigger -- by the US in response to 9/11.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    39. Re:Something stinks by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Sure thing buddy, let's 'pull out of Europe', and NATO while we're at it. Who needs those freeloaders, right? And we'll get a nice 'thank you' card from Vladimir Putin out of the deal, since it'll make it that much easier for him to conquer Europe -- or didn't that occur to you?

      They claimed that they were leaders, let them lead. You have to get out of the way first to let someone else lead. I occurred to me, I've just had a hundred too many lectures on how bad the US is to care. I'm merely giving them their wish. If they don't want us that's fine, we will go. I think a *huge* number of citizens in the US feel underappreciated as the US care first about the 1% / corporate interests, followed by various special special interests, followed by illegal immigrants, and at the very bottom are the hard working citizens who have got to be the most taken for granted group ever.

    40. Re:Something stinks by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Wasn't exactly a meeting of minds, was it? Merkel has a PhD in quantum chemistry, Trump can't spell "tap".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re: Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious.

      Like keeping out of both World Wars until absolutely forced to, and then waltzing in right at the end proclaiming how you won them all by yourselves ?

      Or pucking fights with 5 foot tall asians in pyjamas and then getting your asses handed to you ?

      Or bombing Bronza Age desert dwellers, invading them....and then getting your asses handed to you before cutting and running as fast as you could ?

      That's all just recently. Lets not forget picking a fight with the power that expended vast sums to protect you during the Indian Wars, and whom you refused to pay back even a little bit as your smuggling was too lucrative, and where you ran off to get the French to do all the fighting for you......afterwhich you then haven't shut up about your fake victory for the last 200 years....

    42. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twenty-five years ago, when I was forced to take Political Science and History at a State-run University, it was obvious that social unrest was partially a function of the difference between the elite and the poor. The wider the gap, the more unrest. The charts tended to validate the idea that wide wage gaps were strongly related to unhappiness and (in the extremes) riots, revolts, and revolutions.

      Now we have a person who's driving for deeper gaps between the rich and the poor, by cutting the safety nets of the poor while cutting the taxes of the rich. It doesn't take a college degree to see in which direction this will head, so don't act like the conclusion on the horizon is unforeseeable.

      We already have had protests that the President took power. Do you really think that the people would restrain from further, more aggressive protests if the economy keeps going the way it is? In the last 3 months, we have had 1% inflation per month. If it keeps up like this, by the end of the year, it will be very similar to every person receiving a 12% wage cut (except those who are powerful (rich) enough to ensure they get their raises).

    43. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot. Trump has been in the house a couple of months, and now he's all vindicated?

      Firstly, his policies haven't taken effect yet, in as far as the have even been presented. Secondly, may I remind you of another seemingly wildly successfull politician? Time magazine crowned him "man of the year" in 1937 iirc... That didn't end very well, did it?

      What you are doing is the equivalent of declaring Hitler a rageing succses in 1933.

    44. Re:Something stinks by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      [Vladimir Putin] to conquer Europe

      First, Vladimir Putin will not conquer anything alone. The correct subject here is Russia.

      Second, Russia will not conquer Europe. The only land Russia integrated recently was Crimea, where they enjoyed a 98% support from local population. They did not integrate Transnistria, Southern Ossetia or Donbass, because the support there was less cheerful.

      Even Donbass integration was rejected by Russia's parliament despite local referendum showing 80% of votes for joining Russia. This is because 20% of opponentS will turn integration into a nightmare. I suspect Russian leaders remember Afghanistan war.

    45. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Slashdot, and the EFF, hated the tpp until they got what they wanted. So people are hypocrites, idiots or both.

      EFF: the Final Leaked TPP Text Is All That We Feared

      Re:Kill it with fire! (Score:5, Insightful) by Aurien ( 1357861 ) Alter Relationship on Friday October 09, 2015 @09:14PM (#50696971) Funny, I don't see Republican's going against this new trade deal. Last I checked they have majority in both houses. They could vote no and stop this, but they'll all vote yes. But yeah, it's all Obama's fault right? Republican's just have to vote yes right?

    46. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone outside the US ever considered the US to be part of the free world since the first Bush Jr. presidency.

    47. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is not paying for anyone's defence except for their own oversized military.

    48. Re:Something stinks by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Maybe the rich people at CPAC are happy, but the poor people losing their health care, medicare, and next their social security are not. Trumps overall approval rating is now below 37%.

    49. Re:Something stinks by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      because You like Trump so you want to pretend everyone else likes Trump, even people who didn't vote for him.

      You're just flailing all over the place here. No, I absolutely know lots and lots of people do not like Trump.

      You were the one who asserted that Trump voters no longer liked Trump. I said that was bullshit, and cited a poll of conservatives (Trump voters) showing that they love him. I'm a Trump voter, I love what he's doing, and every Trump voter I know loves what he's doing, because he's doing exactly what he said he would do.

      Now you're claiming that I'm stating that "everyone loves Trump." What the fuck? You're not even moving goalposts, you're installing a basketball hoop at the 50 yard line and chucking hockey pucks through it. You're deranged man.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    50. Re:Something stinks by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Oh shit an internet tough guy! I'm skeeeeered now!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    51. Re: Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already went over this a few articles ago. That won't stop the Trumptards though, they'll lie and they'll lie then they'll lie again. It costs them nothing except their credibility and their souls.

    52. Re: Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we call it "annexed" not "integrated". It's also pretty easy to get a 98% approval rating if you drag the people away who dissaprove. Russia is far more subtle than exercising raw military power these days. It's all about internal subversion and breaking apart alliances these days.

    53. Re:Something stinks by randallman · · Score: 1

      "if Trump wins the market will crash and will *never* recover

      Well, he'll certainly set the stage. No doubt he'll remove regulations put in place to prevent a recurrence of the 2008 collapse.

    54. Re:Something stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany ... Merkel ... LEADER of the Free World?

      POTUS has been called the Leader of the Free World for a while now, not because the US literally leads other countries, but because the US is the 800lb gorilla in the room on the global stage. When the US decides to do something, it has repurcussions for its allies and the rest of the world. They look to the US to see what's going to happen next and how to react.

      So what's changed? It isn't the power of the US, that remains in military terms much the same, although in terms of diplomacy you might as well have just gone round shitting on various heads of state thanks to various comments made freely and rather too easily by the current president.

      What's changed is that outside of Trump's diminishing supporters in the US, the US is no longer seen as part of the free world.

      A populist authoritarian nationalist has risen to power on a xenophobic platform that blames the countries problems on certain races and religions and intellectual "elites" (as opposed to actual elites). Rallies are held, and opponents are attacked with easy lies and distraction as the new tool of state. Every single checkbox for the textbook definition of fascism has been checked, it is correct to say that the US is currently under fascist rule. I don't say this because I disagree with all of Trumps policies (scrapping the TPP I agree with), I say this because it is accurate and the best way of describing the current rule in the US, you can go and verify the definitions for yourself (of which there are many, fascism cannot be summed up in a single sentence)

      You can see it in the followers of Trump (outside of the few literal neonazis) when they use phrases like "snowflake", which quite literally implies that to be different to anyone else is wrong, to be weak is wrong, individualism is wrong, people should conform to the standard for the good of the country. This is fascist philosophy, again, the textbook definition.

      So, given that the US has fallen to fascism, who is the next largest controlling economic interest? Germany. Merkel is now the de-facto leader of the free world, other countries will take note and direction from her decisions.

      The US is still an 800lb gorilla, just not one that is part of the free world.

  4. Or when the wall is so high I can't see the sun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I'm happy I still have to work!

    All joking aside, it is very interesting that Nordic people are very happy.

  5. Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a moderate conservative, I was happy with Obama and would've been happy with Hillary. None of the 16 Republican candidates in 2016 made me happy, which was why I switched my political registration to Democratic in late 2015. Now we're stuck with sore loser Donald Trump, who is neither a conservative nor Republican, and, until a few short years ago, was a Clinton Democrat. Sad!

    1. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Translation: you're a fence sitter who doesn't care much as long as it doesn't impact you.

      Nope. I voted in every election since 1988 when I came of age.

    2. Re:Meh... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Ironically if T doesn't grow some maturity soon, he may end up damaging the GOP more than the Dems in the end.

    3. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a moderate conservative...

      Translation: you're a fence sitter who doesn't care much as long as it doesn't impact you.

      Congrats, you just described most Americans.

    4. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Ironically if T doesn't grow some maturity soon, he may end up damaging the GOP more than the Dems in the end.

      The Republican Party is already doomed to become a white nationalist, southern regional political party. Trump is just accelerating the process with his electoral win.

    5. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant self-aggrandizement. You must be a narcissist. This explains so much.

    6. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Irrelevant self-aggrandizement. You must be a narcissist. This explains so much.

      According to Mayo Clinic: "Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration and a lack of empathy for others. But behind this mask of ultraconfidence lies a fragile self-esteem that's vulnerable to the slightest criticism."

      http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/basics/definition/CON-20025568

      Uh, no. You're confusing me with Trump.

    7. Re: Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might wanna look at the way the nation voted last year champ.

    8. Re:Meh... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      "Sore loser" Trump? In what alternate reality are you living?

    9. Re: Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Might wanna look at the way the nation voted last year champ.

      I'm well aware of how the nation voted last year. Doesn't change my statement regarding the Republican Party.

    10. Re:Meh... by misexistentialist · · Score: 2

      As a Maoist conservative, if there isn't a candidate conservative enough, you vote liberal socialist. Not very interesting

    11. Re:Meh... by bongey · · Score: 1

      Just stop with "I am really, really was a conservative that voted Clinton". No one believes you were a conservative ever.

    12. Re:Meh... by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      So you're the kind of person whose fragile ego and identity are bound to a particular political party no matter how awful they are or become.

    13. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > an inflated sense of their own importance
      Well, he is the president of the US, so he's kinda sorta important.

    14. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Just stop with "I am really, really was a conservative that voted Clinton".

      That's what I did after being a Republican for 20 years.

      No one believes you were a conservative ever.

      Both Obama and Hillary are right of center if you examined their policies closely (i.e., co-opting the Republican like Bill Clinton did with welfare). It's one of the reasons why Bernie Sanders came out of the woodwork, why the progressives wanted someone more liberal than Hillary, and why the Russians interfered with the elections to get Trump elected.

    15. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing in your post history reflects anything other than firmly left of center in your politics.

    16. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Well, he is the president of the US, so he's kinda sorta important.

      Being POTUS haven't stopped Trump from being Trump by sabotaging his own agenda with baseless accusations to sooth his insecure ego.

    17. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Nothing in your post history reflects anything other than firmly left of center in your politics.

      As if my comment history on Slashdot is an accurate measurement of my politics.

    18. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      "Sore loser" Trump?

      Have you noticed that Trump just won't shut up about the 2016 elections?

      In what alternate reality are you living?

      The present. What about you?

    19. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      As a Maoist conservative, if there isn't a candidate conservative enough, you vote liberal socialist. Not very interesting

      I vote moderates, I don't vote for extremists.

    20. Re:Meh... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Translation, he's an actual conservative, as in Edmund Burke, who supported the monarchy, but wrote about monarchists as self-evident idiots. He was well aware that monarchs don't have any moral claim to rule; he just thought that Britain had managed against all odds to make it work. He'd feel about the free market exactly as he felt about the crown.

      Burke was the kind of ferociously skeptical conservative who loves liberty but despises theories of liberty, even when those theories support his own position. In other words he had integrity, which is rare in thinkers of any stripe.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    21. Re:Meh... by s.petry · · Score: 0

      You are very confused. The progressive left and owned media continue unabated with claims of being a Russian puppet (Comey stated again today that there is no evidence for Russia connections). This is in addition to the Progressives claiming him and everyone else who disagrees with their agenda is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, xenophobe, misogynist, Nazi, antisemitic, and deplorable. The only time Trump or his administration said something about wiretapping was to force them to put up or shut up. Which amazingly the media changed their tune and went from dozens of reports from unnamed sources to "we don't know where he got that information".

      Meanwhile the Progressives and their paid-for protesters continue to lose support because people are fed up with the lies from them and media. GP stated that he left the Republican party, and I laugh. I know at least a hundred family members, friends, and acquaintances who left the Democratic party since they started their tirade the day after the election.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    22. Re:Meh... by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Now we're stuck with sore loser Donald Trump

      You mean a sore winner. I've never seen anyone so butthurt over a victory.

    23. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were happy with Obama, and would have been happy with Clinton, you were not a conservative.

      Obama was progressive in both social and economic policy, an in his foreign policy he was just opportunist. He was a statist, flat out. Hillary was poised to continue almost all of Obama's policies, except in those cases where she announcde her intent to extend them.

      None of these positions are conservative, in any sense. The do not oppose change, in the classical sense, nor to they advance the right's ideals of small government, strong military, and strong law-and-order.

      You were never a conservative; it's just a lie you tell people to make yourself sound 'credible'. It doesn't work.

    24. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You were never a conservative; it's just a lie you tell people to make yourself sound 'credible'. It doesn't work.

      Why would I "lie" to be "credible" on Slashdot? I come here to amuse myself by playing with the trolls while waiting for a script to finish running at work.

    25. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You mean a sore winner. I've never seen anyone so butthurt over a victory.

      Like proverbial dog who caught a car, Trump didn't expect to win and doesn't know what to do as POTUS.

    26. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You are very confused. The progressive left and owned media continue unabated with claims of being a Russian puppet (Comey stated again today that there is no evidence for Russia connections). This is in addition to the Progressives claiming him and everyone else who disagrees with their agenda is a racist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, xenophobe, misogynist, Nazi, antisemitic, and deplorable. The only time Trump or his administration said something about wiretapping was to force them to put up or shut up. Which amazingly the media changed their tune and went from dozens of reports from unnamed sources to "we don't know where he got that information".

      Meanwhile the Progressives and their paid-for protesters continue to lose support because people are fed up with the lies from them and media. GP stated that he left the Republican party, and I laugh. I know at least a hundred family members, friends, and acquaintances who left the Democratic party since they started their tirade the day after the election.

      Your comment is a perfect example of why I left the Republican Party before the 2016 campaign started.

    27. Re:Meh... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Trump, being a businessman, won efficiently. That made it look as if he wasn't trying very hard; that doesn't mean he didn't want to win. He did just enough to ensure his victory, expending the most effort at the end of the campaign when it would be most effective..

      Trump has a good idea of what he wants to do as President, and how to accomplish it. The blind, spitting opposition by Democrats is the greatest risk of continuing America's decline.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    28. Re:Meh... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Trump, being a businessman, won efficiently. That made it look as if he wasn't trying very hard; that doesn't mean he didn't want to win. He did just enough to ensure his victory, expending the most effort at the end of the campaign when it would be most effective..

      That's an excuse, not a winning strategy. A winning strategy is winning the election AND re-election(s) with 51% of the vote, which was what Obama, Eisenhower and Roosevelt did in their own campaigns.

      Trump has a good idea of what he wants to do as President, and how to accomplish it. The blind, spitting opposition by Democrats is the greatest risk of continuing America's decline.

      People who make excuses for Trump are contributing to the decline of this country.

    29. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were happy with Obama and would have been happy with Clinton, you are not a "moderate conservative".

      You are a neocon.

    30. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically if T doesn't grow some maturity soon, he may end up damaging the GOP more than the Dems in the end.

      The Republican Party is already doomed to become a white nationalist, southern regional political party. Trump is just accelerating the process with his electoral win.

      Truth!

  6. NO WAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A culturally homogenized society is happier than a very diverse one where conflicts is bound to happen! NO WAY!

    In other news water is wet...

    1. Re:NO WAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, ignore all the myriad other reasons why these countries' populations may be happier... Whatever makes you feel good/smug/etc.

    2. Re:NO WAY! by afgam28 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is that really true though? The report has an entire chapter on "The Key Determinants of Happiness and Misery", and the authors don't seem to think that multiculturalism is something that makes people sad. Why do you think that?

      Japan and South Korea are probably the most culturally-homogeneous and highly-developed nations around. They sit at 51st and 56th place, respectively. Meanwhile Switzerland speaks four different languages and are the 4th happiest in the world. Canada, Australia and New Zealand, all of which are just as multicultural as the USA, are in the top 10.

      I'd argue that Japan and South Korea's unhappiness comes because of, and not in spite of, their strict cultural homogeneity.

    3. Re:NO WAY! by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Or they have been set up against each others by divide-and-conquer supremacy-loving white peoples' governments.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    4. Re:NO WAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we had a culturally homogeneous society, we'd have to shutter slashdot so we could drink piss-beer and watch sports in all of our leisure hours. What, you think YOUR culture's going to be the one that gets to be the homogeneous one?

    5. Re:NO WAY! by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      To be fair in Australia it is a happy day when you get to work in the morning without being killed by some dangerous animal, angry weather, or the sun itself along the way.

    6. Re:NO WAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switzerland is not really multi-cultural.
       
      If you compared to race mixed cities in the US or a country such as Brazil and South Africa, then I would listen to your argument.

  7. On the wane since 2007?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Happiness" is a pretty subjective concept. From the "World Happiness Report 2017" (yes, I read it):

    "The USA is a story of reduced happiness. In 2007 the USA ranked 3rd among the OECD countries; in 2016 it came 19th. The reasons are declining social support and increased corruption (see Chapter 7) and it is these same factors that explain why the Nordic countries do so much better."

    Soo... From 2007 to 2016 the USA declined from 3rd to 19th. It's not "on the wane" as the post suggests, It's been free falling since 2007.

    1. Re:On the wane since 2007?? by Nutria · · Score: 2

      It's been free falling since 2007.

      No comment on who was the American President for 89% of that time...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  8. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is well known homogeneous cultures, with as little income disparity as possible, report highest levels of contentedness.

    The "most diversity makes things best" line of reasoning is never based in reality. Of course - the people screaming at the rest of the country for more diversity - Seattle and Portland - are some of the least diverse cities in the nation.

  9. I was happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    until I discovered how unhappy I should be.

  10. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably a misogynist too, right?

  11. Happiness is declining by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    And yet the cure is available online: https://www.youtube.com/playli...

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Happiness is declining by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      And yet the cure is available online: https://www.youtube.com/playli...

      Here too.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  12. Happier times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And it is very interesting that America was happier before mass immigration of asians and brown people.

    1. Re: Happier times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please be aware that theguardian readers don't think (logically or otherwise)

  13. Hooray! MAGA by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Happiness in the US is declining and is expected to continue on a downward path, with Donald Trump's policies forecast to deepen the country's social crisis.

    Make America Grim Again - or something like that...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Hooray! MAGA by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Make America Grim Again - or something like that...

      Make America Greatly Depressed.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    2. Re:Hooray! MAGA by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      "The country's social crisis" consists of what?

      Mental defectives protesting
      Don't let them marry each other.

      Bad race relations
      Reverse Obama's program of agitation and paid unemployment. Working people are too busy doing worthwhile things, to cause trouble.

      High murder and crime rates in some cities.
      Deport illegals.

      Trump seems to be on track to fixing the latter two.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Hooray! MAGA by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Ah Huh. So... What flavor of the Kool Aid is your favorite?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  14. But...but... by RyanFenton · · Score: 2

    But, we chose the entertaining choice! How could we not be entertained? Trump is the only person I can think of that would be more absurd as a president than William Shatner when in-character.

    I think the problem might be the same with someone trying to make a sequel of the 1950's, without understanding it, and trying to fix that by just going completely over the top in terms of ambition, trying to make up for a completely broken budget process. It's entertaining in a sense - but sort of a sad entertainment.

    The folks that supported trump did seem to do it out of a sense of ironic satisfaction rather than actually something they wanted.

    Turns out though, it's not a sequel to the 1950's, it's actually a sequel to the Robber Barons, it just couldn't be marketed that way, because that's only ever been popular with a small audience.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:But...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know about you, but I am most definitely entertained.
      I haven't followed the news and late night shows this much ever.
      Every week there is some new even that people are losing their shit about.
      It's hilarious.
      I'm from south america though, so that might just be schadenfreude.

    2. Re:But...but... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But, we chose the entertaining choice! How could we not be entertained? Trump is the only person I can think of that would be more absurd as a president than William Shatner when in-character.

      Kirk had some real leadership skills in that he'd assemble staff and experts together to discuss, and look for a consensus. T doesn't have the attention span for that, often interrupting to change the subject, usually about himself.

      T is more like an amalgamation of Rodney Dangerfield, Andrew Dice Clay, Bozo, and Barney Fife (ego-wise).

    3. Re:But...but... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The Titanic sinking can be quite entertaining, UNLESS you happen to be on it.

    4. Re:But...but... by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      Now I'm hoping William Shatner runs in 2020.

    5. Re:But...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'm hoping William Shatner runs in 2020.

      He can't, he's Canadian.

    6. Re:But...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's Canadian

    7. Re:But...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in or out of character, even the dad in that horrible 'shit twitter says' show. better choice than what we have now.

      shatner 2020: a... voice of..... reason. for... all americans.

    8. Re:But...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Without Trump we never would have had the chance to enjoy the comedic stylings of Spicy Spicer and the Fresh Princess (a.k.a. Kellyanne Conway).

  15. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK OFF with this bullshit

    The markets are optimistic, no one is denying that

    Happiness follows

    And your polling methods are purposely flawed.

    Burn in hell

  16. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    Then again, if you get too homogeneous, you end up with hereditary diseases (i.e. asheknazi jews like me), or their intellectual parallels (i.e. every little crappy town out there, and to some extent the reason that the Seattle and Portland people are so disconnected from reality).

  17. Inflammatory headline by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you read the actual report (figure 2.3, Changes in happiness from 2005-2007 to 2014-2016), you see that pretty much every first world nation except Germany and South Korea, and Norway and Switzerland (barely - within the confidence interval) have gone down in happiness, not just the U.S. The U.S. isn't even the first world nation with the biggest drop (Italy is, with Spain close behind).

    A more fitting headline would've been "Happiness is on the wane in developed nations. Which might actually help explain the rise of nationalism in recent elections.

    1. Re:Inflammatory headline by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A more fitting headline would've been "Happiness is on the wane in developed nations. Which might actually help explain the rise of nationalism in recent elections.

      No, you're messing up the narrative! Here's how to spin this: Trump is causing a drop in happiness across the world, especially among Italians and Spaniards, who had such high hopes for Hillary Clinton. Just stick to the narrative, or people might start thinking for themselves.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Inflammatory headline by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Very good! Nice cut through the partisan, First World Problems bullshit.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Inflammatory headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quit taxing me to death and allowing companies to spy on me for their benefit. That will vastly increase my happiness level! I'm from Canada.

    4. Re:Inflammatory headline by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Trump isn't the cause, he's a symptom. People feel threatened, they get tribal and mean... and they tend to do stupid things that make the problems causing them to feel threatened get worse.

      Trump was elected over economic fear. Fear of the 1% (whose frankly ludicrous levels of wealth get thrown in our face by the media daily... and those aren't even the richest tier of people), fear of foreigners stealing our jobs.

      So... vote in Trump to keep out the foreigners and stop the 1%ers in Washington. Which damages the economy and it turns out the kind of guy you vote in to the top position actually wants to line his own pockets and those of his (significant) supporters... the 1%.

      It's a global problem because the same socioeconomic forces are driving the same mob reactions around the world.

    5. Re:Inflammatory headline by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You are writing something disturbing ... USA is (still?) a first world nation? I mean ... now as Trump is dismantling health care ... to be honest I rather have an accident in Thailand than in the USA. Not sure if I ever even muster the bravery to visit the USA.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Inflammatory headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for not visiting! We'd appreciate our visitors to have even the slightest clue about how our government works before spouting their ignorant mouths off about it.

    7. Re:Inflammatory headline by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I haven't followed the media in over twenty years. Maybe that's why I'm happy

  18. Trump may not make Americans happy by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 5, Funny

    but he makes me really, really happy to be Canadian!

    1. Re:Trump may not make Americans happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the CBC news comments(those few reports where commenting is allowed)...It seems as tho the majority (60%+) bloody hate the massive immigration and downward slope.. Speaking as a Canadian, I'm just begging for a revolution group to form so people can signup...

      I've vote/fight to join the USA in a heartbeat... Doublely so if they ban the worthless refugees(skilled/wealthy ones, ok)..

    2. Re:Trump may not make Americans happy by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      One of the reasons Canadians tend to be happy, is they don't read the comments.

      Try it, it works.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Trump may not make Americans happy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      me really, really happy to be Canadian

      But isn't it more like finding out your neighbor is arsonist?

    4. Re:Trump may not make Americans happy by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      I've vote/fight to join the USA in a heartbeat...

      I guess we will be on opposite sides of the civil war.

    5. Re:Trump may not make Americans happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the reasons Canadians tend to be happy, is they accept whatever their government throws at them

        Fixed that for you.

    6. Re:Trump may not make Americans happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i just saw a poll where 48% of canadians want to start deporting the record number of people entering your country. 2 months into it! you guys are wayyyy different than your southern neighbors.

  19. Just stop asking me to pay for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it. YOU want something, then YOU pay for it.

  20. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    way to increase happiness in your country is to make it whiter and less diverse, then?

    Or, maybe they just found a nice balance between capitalism and socialism, unlike the rest of the world.

    Here in the USA, we are taught to "work hard and play hard", which is a recipe for getting worn out both physically and mentally. We have to keep up with the Jones' both at work and at home.

    The "work hard and play hard" mantra could be said to be from the "protestant work ethic", or could be from plutocrat propaganda, being that working hard and playing hard gets the plutocrats the most profits: employees that work their asses off, then get home and spend their asses off on the plutocrats' hyped products and fashions.

  21. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So...the UN is telling us that the way to increase happiness in your country is to make it whiter and less diverse, then?

    Yes. It couldn't you be confusing cause and effect or correlation is not causation. Seriously, the way to increase happiness is to decrease great economic disparity and to maintain significant cultural uniformity. Oh, and you have to have enough actual resources per capita that you're not constantly struggling with maintaining your civilization--*cough*Japan*cough*.

    Put in that context, it's clear why Ireland, the US, and Japan rank where they are. Oh, and of course, the whole "Happiness is on the Wane in the US" is just trolling. You get bumped up/down one spot and act like it's a big deal? Whatever.

  22. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switzerland, with its four official languages, isn't exactly the picture of homogeneity.

  23. Northern countries fare better by postmortem · · Score: 1

    Even with climate of extremely cold winters, top 5 are all countries from cold climate. Yet countries that are gifted good climate are well behind. Looks like folks appreciate more what they got if it is scarce.

    1. Re:Northern countries fare better by Piata · · Score: 1

      That's because you will freeze to death in cold climates if you don't look out for one another.

      Living in a place where a blizzard can strand you in your car tends to make people a lot more considerate of others. Just last week about 300 people got stranded on a highway in Montreal: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

    2. Re:Northern countries fare better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Population size matters. It is the driver of poverty and complicated government programs. Every kids born will need to have a job and make hundreds of thousands of dollars.

  24. R.I.P. Slashdot by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Remember when Slashdot used to be News for Nerds, News That Matters?

    Pepperidge Farm remembers....

    1. Re:R.I.P. Slashdot by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      No one remembers that ad ya old fart...

      "Sips Bartles and James"

    2. Re:R.I.P. Slashdot by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, gone with BSD, and Junis's porn collection.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:R.I.P. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your support!

  25. As usual, a garbage survey. by will_die · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Per usual for this report they use non-normalized data for things like generosity and life expectancy.

  26. I blame the bailouts and the "recovery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prices for everything have gone to the moon as a result of the enormous money printing. We need a new recession/depression to correct things. Or they could just undo the 80%~ of fake currency they "printed."

  27. What exactly? by ishmaelflood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It's not Amateur Night on Planet Earth anymore, things have gotten terribly, horribly real,"

    Poor people are living longer, earning more, eating more, all over the world. There are fewer large wars.Sure there's a few existential problems around, but you are living in a very successful century so far as homo sapiens is concerned.

    1. Re:What exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where'd you get your rose-colored glasses, they sound like they really do make everything look awesome. Or is it the meds they have you on? Do they make colors brighter, food taste better, too? I got news for you, Sunshine: Things are turning to SHIT rapidly. You, I guess, will know when you're up past your mouth in it.

    2. Re:What exactly? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There are fewer large wars.

      That's often the case just before a huge (and I mean yuuuuge, folks) one breaks out.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:What exactly? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      We've been in WWIII since 1998, and you claim there's fewer large wars?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:What exactly? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      A lot of people just call it 'globalism' now.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:What exactly? by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Poor people are living longer, earning more, eating more, all over the world

      Not in the United States.

      Life expectancy in the US is declining. https://www.washingtonpost.com...

      Also, real income went down in the 2008 recession, and have not recovered for anyone not in the top 2% of incomes.

      Also, food insecurity is up by quite a bit among the poor.

    6. Re:What exactly? by Scroatzilla · · Score: 0

      Never question the Misery that represents the lynchpin of the Progressive philosophy.

    7. Re:What exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not Amateur Night on Planet Earth anymore, things have gotten terribly, horribly real,"

      Poor people are living longer, earning more, eating more, all over the world. There are fewer large wars.Sure there's a few existential problems around, but you are living in a very successful century so far as homo sapiens is concerned.

      And with our powerful institutions built upon quicksand, that can all change overnight. Electronic attacks on our nations infrastructure can cripple it in hours. The future of the EU is in question. We are closer to nuclear war (North Korea) than we were just a decade ago. Just because there are fewer large wars doesn't mean a big one isn't brewing. WWI certainly didn't take much time to get started.

      I'm not saying were doomed, I'm saying don't kid yourself into thinking that these problems were solved once and for all. It requires nothing less than careful consideration, planning, and execution to keep our global society thriving.

    8. Re:What exactly? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I think 'make America great again' might just translate to 'sweep all the stuff we don't want to deal with under the rug, like we used to do, so we can live in the ILLUSION of greatness again'.

    9. Re:What exactly? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I was talking about the Islamic Jihadi declaring war on just about everybody else in the world. It's impressive that the first world has it so well contained and covered up you don't even realize you're in a real shooting war.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re: What exactly? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I know people in Africa who have to hit the floor everyone a band of warlords comes by. You think a shooting war is something special? People around the world get shot at all the time.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    11. Re: What exactly? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Most of those warlords *are* Islamic Jihadi, that's why they are warlords.

      The GGP was saying "there are fewer large wars". I don't see fewer, I just see consolidation into one.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  28. Happiness on the wane? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Yeah, ever since Kennedy died... It's been all downhill since then

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Happiness on the wane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been all downhill since then

      Pretty much.

    2. Re:Happiness on the wane? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Which one? Joe? John? Robert? Edward?

      The Kennedys - You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  29. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Dunno about that.... Canada has *roughly* the same amount of cultural diversity as the USA, and is consistently placed near the top of these kinds of lists.

  30. Typo in headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happiness is on the ween.

  31. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by butchersong · · Score: 1

    It could be that a nice balance between socialism and capitalism is only possible when you reach a certain level of cultural homogeneity. -We could probably go in circles discussing this for hours...

  32. Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your candidate didn't win and it's upsetting to you...the behavior of Hillary supporters ( and, let's face it, Hillary herself ) soured her support outside of her base.

    Rather than argue about which side is the most evil/bad/mean/incompetent, let's agree the culture war in the USA is intensifying, which is a big source of tension in the USA for both sides. Remember, Texas talked of secession after Obama's election win.

    Progressives want bigger gov't-backed safety nets and education opportunities, and conservatives believe that the private sector will make everyone's boat float higher if the gov't gets out of the way such that they don't need a safety net. (And there's also climate change, abortion, pollution, etc. etc.)

    I believe heavy-trickle-down is kaflooey* in modern times, but realize I'm not going to change conservative minds on that such that both sides are stuck at an impasse, thinking the other side is getting in the way.

    Perhaps it's time to split the USA rather than waste resources and anger on gridlock and seesaw politics.

    * The benefits of increased economic activity from lower taxes and deregulation almost always have flowed UPward since about 1980, not outward. Automation, offshoring, and the death of unions changed things toward the 1% compared to pre-1980. Trickle down ain't work anymore; the TD model is broken and leaking oil.

    1. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's time to split the USA rather than waste resources and anger on gridlock and seesaw politics.

      Let me sum that statement up in two words for you: Civil War.

    2. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, we can hopefully mutually agree to split. No war necessary.

    3. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      No need for a civil war if both sides think they'd be better off without the other.

    4. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you're either living in a fantasy world or you're trolling, that's never going to happen, for more reasons than I can easily ennumerate.
      Of course this will never even be an issue for serious discussion, since the country would have to be geographically split down the middle, and there'd have to be a Civil War in progress, before any such so-called 'division' would happen. Otherwise, do you really think Congress is going to approve it? The office of the President (not the SITTING President, but ANY President)? LOL, no, not happening. There'd have to be an entire block of states who agree to secede, can raise an army, establish a border between their nascent State and the U.S., and they'd have to be willing to fight and kill their former countrymen over it. Pretty much like before, and it'd end pretty much like before, except the order of magnitude of how it affects the rest of the world would be much, much higher. Meanwhile all the enemies the United States has accumulated over the decades would see their opportunity to take pot-shots at both sides, while they're otherwise occupied and weakened. Former U.S. allies wouldn't be of much help since they wouldn't know which side they should be backing, if any side at all. It would be a complete and total disaster.

    5. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be so optimistic

      The problem is that most states aren't "red" or "blue", but shades of purple. People living in the same general geographic area may very well be on opposite sides of the culture war. Things aren't so clear cut in which states belong to which side of the war.

      When it comes time to split, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of a Bleeding Kansas happening in almost every state to decide which side the state will go.

    6. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I have the same exact things to say to you that I said to the other guy: https://slashdot.org/comments....

    7. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards. If a state were to choose to leave and was willing to negotiate mutually agreeable terms, who would pick up arms to stop them? By 1988, even the Soviets weren't willing to use force to oppose popular secessionist movements. You have a low opinion of the US government if you think they would be more tyrannical the Soviets.

    8. Re:Culture War Rages [Re:Something stinks] by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Progressives want bigger gov't-backed safety nets and education opportunities, and conservatives believe that the private sector will make everyone's boat float higher if the gov't gets out of the way such that they don't need a safety net.

      (Not directed at you personally)

      Just give me my fucking money. I get it, you are the big bad brigands who took over civilization and will take your share before anyone else gets their share; however, if you do not leave anyone else a share, they will kill you.

      Social safety nets and such are utter bullshit. You take my resources (as is proper, you are the brigand after all), and then, instead of giving any of it back, you promise that you will hold on to it for me just in case I have any troubles. Fuck you. You have never helped me. You never will. Give me my fucking money.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  33. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

    Parent needs to be modded excessively intuitive and intelligent (been so long since I've had mod points I can't remember the categories).

    Every problem Portland, OR has is directly related to forced attempts at diversity. Right up and including being a sanctuary city

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  34. Asspained libtards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asspained libtards everywhere.

  35. This is correct by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Has to do with Russian Nazis destroying our infrastructure and our government at every level.

    It will get worse for a few years, as anyone who survived Nixon could tell you.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  36. Re: TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure not the UN, rather your ability to exercise logical thinking. I don't know if she's called Adolf though.

  37. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Knuckles · · Score: 2

    So...the UN is telling us that the way to increase happiness in your country is to make it whiter and less diverse, then? Was the lead author a guy named Adolf, perhaps?

    Actually, ethnic diversity has increased considerably in Norway in recent years.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  38. It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course other nations don't support President Trump.

    Unlike so many past administrations, he's actually putting the interests of the USA before those of foreign nations! Imagine that!

    Obviously this won't end well for countries that have been leeching off of the USA to fund their defense capabilities for several decades now, for example. They'll lose this source of significant and easy funding, and this won't make them happy. So we should expect them to bitch and complain.

    This also won't end well for the countries that have benefited from imbalanced trade pacts that disadvantage the USA. When these trade agreements are renegotiated, if not eliminated completely, then these other countries will have to play on an even footing again. This won't make them happy. So we should expect them to bitch and complain.

    He's also very unlikely to throw anywhere near as much, if any, money at leftist "development"/"aid" organizations working in undeveloped regions. The USA shouldn't waste any more money on the countries of Africa, for example. Billions upon billions of dollars have been thrown at them for decades, with nothing to show. This lack of money won't make them happy. So we should expect them to bitch and complain.

    He's also indicated he'll properly enforce the nation's borders, making it harder for illegal aliens to enter the USA, obtain money through illicit and criminal means, and then remit it back to their home nations. Cutting off this flow of tainted money won't make them happy. So we should expect them to bitch and complain.

    It's a good sign that there's so much international opposition to his policies. That indicates that they are, in fact, working to benefit Americans rather than everybody else. This is exactly what the USA needs after so many decades of being exploited by foreign nations.

  39. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    America is beyond protestant work ethic. America is just powerful feeding on less powerful people until the host dies.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  40. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes sense. Diversity is forced upon us and divides societies.

  41. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Canada has French and English speaking groups, and they get along fairly well. I'm not sure if that's a diverse enough "test", however. What are some mixed-ethnic countries that seem to be getting along fairly well?

  42. Aliens always has the answers. by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

    That's it, man. Game over, man. Game over! What the fuck are we gonna do now? What are we gonna do?

    Or

    Maybe we can build a fire, sing a couple of songs, huh? Why don't we try that?

    Or the final option we have left:

    I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

  43. article talks about many countries by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    so article talks of many countries, some with greater happiness drop than U.S.A., but oooo it's Trump's doing for USA?

    tards

  44. Happiness is a warm tranny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people had a Yasmin Pires or Andrezza Lyra at home, people would be a lot happier!

  45. USA is not a happy place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless you are in the top 10% in income (I am myself one) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... If you are in the bottom 2/3 you are going to have a hard time.

  46. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sure he'll get around to all of that when he gets back from his taxpayer funded golf trips.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  47. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's funny that when my neighbors parents were visiting AZ (from somewhere in northern New York) they incessantly commented how bad it was here and how all the people were racists against Mexican (this was back right before SB 1070)...but then basically disowned her for marrying someone who was 1/4 Mexican. The hypocrisy is so rampant that people don't even try to hide it any more or even know when they are.

  48. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did some quick looking, to say Canada has roughly the same amount of cultural diversity as the USA seems....misinformed. 90% of Canada comes from either Europe or Asia. Another 4.5% is aboriginal. That leaves roughly 5% for the rest of the world. The US white population (counting latino) is smaller as a percentage than just Canada's European descended population.

  49. no surprise producive whies are unhappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With so many ghetto-blastiing nibbars, narco.MEX bangerboiz and Obamacare muzzi-wog terrorists floating about, no kidding that Anglos are pissed. Time to resolve the issue ..... you need a postcard palsy ?

  50. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by cayenne8 · · Score: 0
    Well, in general the US was MUCH more happy in general decades ago before all the "diversity" BS being pushed on everyone.

    Say what you want, but those "horrible" white guys got the US to where it is in terms of wealth and power in the world....and well, ever since we've been putting them down and trying to diverse EVERYTHING...well, the US is declining in power, wealth and happiness in general.

    You don't have to be Einstein to put things together.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  51. USA happiness index will rise by dskoll · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The USA will rise again. Unfortunately, that's because the damage Trump et. al will do will damage lots of other countries so they sink. Basically, everyone will get more unhappy which will make the USA look less bad.

    Slashing the State Department budget coupled with a crazy hike in military spending... you'd have to be stupid not to see that Bannon et. al. mean to lead the United States into war.

    1. Re:USA happiness index will rise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom dropped you on your head, didn't she?

    2. Re:USA happiness index will rise by dskoll · · Score: 1

      Zing, ow! Such a comeback from such a brave Anonymous Coward! How long did it take you to compose that masterpiece? I guess in between your mom calling you up from the basement for lunch and her coming down to do your laundry, you managed to hunt-n-peck your way to a classic.

    3. Re:USA happiness index will rise by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Trump removing the burdens of over-regulation from the United States will improve the lives of every person on Earth, except only those whose lives are dedicated to destroying the US.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  52. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please visit Geneva. Because of the concentration of international organisations, it's one of the most diverse place in the World.
    There is close to 1/3 of foreign living or cross-border working in Switzerland.
    Switzerland certainly enjoy a stable political system in the World since 1848, and this is the most important point to me. The process of getting a new president is done every year in less than one hour without any glitch. Compare that to almost all others "democratic" counties, especially this time...

  53. Set logic by skids · · Score: 1, Troll

    Civilized E Protesting & Uncivilized E Protesting !-> Civilized ^ Protesting != Civilized.

    Anyway, it's going to be kinda hard staying happy when the elderly neighbors get taken away on stretchers for lack of preventative care. A tax break ain't gonna be much of a balm for that.

  54. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, in case you missed it, we have a new POTUS now, one that owns golf courses, not just lives at them. There is a difference.

  55. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Phics · · Score: 1

    Cite some sources. Also, are you talking about immigration, or are you talking about ethnic roots. You don't even discuss trends. Your "quick looking" isn't terribly helpful. Also useful to a discussion about "happiness" might be how ethnic identities are perceived or maintained. Does the society lean towards a mosaic or melting pot? And how relevant is that? Seems a little more complicated than "quick looking" allows for. If you don't have the time to add actual data to a conversation, (like me), why not ask some good questions instead?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world; those who believe there are two types of people, and those who don't.
  56. He's proposing massive tax cuts for the rich by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and a huge cut in public services for everybody else. This isn't rocket science. Elections have consequences. 22 million will lose health care under Trump (getting a paltry $3000 tax credit in it's place). There are massive cuts to science programs coming. The EPA is getting slashed. Water will be less clean, and in poorer cities contaminated with lead. Air will be dirtier. Kids will get asthma. These things will happen. It's got nothing to do with Red/Blue. It's just what happens when you deregulate. Those regulations weren't made to spoil anyone's fun. They were made to solve problems.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:He's proposing massive tax cuts for the rich by Ogive17 · · Score: 2

      A tax credit that most people who will lose their health care won't qualify for anyway.

      Politicians continue to ignore the root cause and that is sky rocketing health care costs.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  57. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by PoopJuggler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    he's actually putting the interests of the USA before those of foreign nations

    Sure, if our interests are cutting education funding, cutting the EPA, cutting elderly food programs, cutting women's rights, cutting healthcare, and increasing racism and military spending. Nothing will make America great again like a generation of stupid kids, sick and hungry people, and weapons.

  58. Proverb disproved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much for that ignorance being bliss thing.

  59. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racists will always find a way to see thing from an angle that justifies their hatred.

    I'll show you another angle: If you could measure the level of happiness of individual cells in your body, you'd probably find that the happiest of all are cancer cells.

    They are the most prosperous, well fed, fastest reproducing cells in the body. They monopolise all the resources and let the rest of the body take care of their waste.

    But we all know how that story ends.

  60. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Dunno where you got your figures from... but as of about 2011, about one out of every five of the population of Canada are a visible minority, compared to roughly one out of every four of the population in the USA. Canada has also been increasing in diversity in recent years far faster than the USA has, so it is likely that we will discover very soon whether that 5% difference in ethnic diversity is actually a significant factor.

  61. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is well known homogeneous cultures, with as little income disparity as possible, report highest levels of contentedness.

    Of course. Tell that to the Japanese...

  62. Re:I'm happy Donald Trump is President... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, APK, I didn't know you had it in you. Despite your imaginative punctuation and your inevitable postscript, you've made a Slashdot post that expresses an opinion that isn't either batshit crazy or trivially falsifiable, and has absolutely no mention of hosts files.

    I worry that this accomplishment actually says more about our current political climate, though. Is it a sign of the end times?

  63. Re: It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to die fighting darkies. And they won't have the last name Trump.

  64. I wish they broke it down by states by lcall · · Score: 1

    I haven't looked hard yet, but do they ever break this down by states, within the USA? (A skimmable source for it would be nicest.) If they do, that would be more interesting, useful, and relevant to summarize in news, given how the US constitution has reserved most powers to the states.

    --
    A Free, fast personal organizer for touch typists: onemodel
  65. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or, maybe they just found a nice balance between capitalism and socialism, unlike the rest of the world.

    For very socialist values of balance, at least here in Norway. According to the world bank we have third lowest Gini coefficient in the world, meaning our income is extremely evenly distributed by international standards. There is not a lot of really poor nor very wealthy people, with notable exceptions of course but looking at income stats if you divide into 10% slices the 80-90% slice make just under twice as much as the 10-20%. The best paid executives in Statoil, our huge mostly state owned company the CEO makes about $1.7 million a year. If you go to a similar foreign oil giant like say Schlumberger the CEO makes $18.6 million a year. Working at McD you earn ~$15/hour the first four months if you're 18-20, after that or from day one if you're older ~$18.50/hour. And you don't need health insurance or a 401(k) on top of that, the public healthcare system and public pensions are entirely adequate. Granted you can't directly compare prices, but you live okay on one "minimum wage" job. So at McD you make $35k/year and your average doctor makes $95k/year, the tax system makes the difference even less in practice. But we want it. And a very high percent of the population works, that helps. It's still an odd country.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  66. Every single one is a criminal. Also: Mariel boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single illegal immigrant is a criminal. Also: Mariel boat lift shows historical precedent for countries trying to dump criminals on other countries.

  67. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wikipedia page. The US is roughly 72% white (all classes of white including non-Caucasian whites), and Canada has roughly 74% descended from Europeans alone. I've noted where my figures came from, care to do the same?

  68. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the cancer cells are more comparable to uneducated, unskilled people from cultures where the kill gays and own women. JS.

  69. Re: TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother. Those racists tend to think a town of 10,000 is a "big city" bc they can't fire their rifles through the double wide trailer's wall to let some air in.

  70. Re:Every single one is a criminal. Also: Mariel bo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Illegal immigration is a civil infraction not a crime. That's why they go to detention centers not jails. And it's also why, and this is probably the main reason we do this, they don't get a government paid attorney.

  71. Re: TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republicans like almost everything about America in the fifties. Everything that is, except the taxes that made it possible. The top tax rate was 90% on (the portion of) income over a (inflation adjusted about a) couple million dollars per year.

    The 1850s seemed great to them too.

  72. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diversity makes things best comes from a long history showing it to be true. Why do you think Arabs were the first to build guns? They traded with Chinese merchants to produce gun powder. Two very different cultures met and a whole new era was born. This is also how modern math was created. Flash forward with the creation of the atomic bomb and our journey to the moon. Both accomplished with lots of ideas coming from lots of different places and cultures. Diversity isn't perfect but it does promote the fastest evolution along with rapid development.

    Blaming your fake problems on immigrants has never been helpful and it has been tried again and again in this country. The Italians, the Irish, the Chinese, the Africans, they have all had the same stupid tired rhetoric thrown about.

  73. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty happy Trump won. :D

  74. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As mentioned in my post below, my "quick search" was Wikipedia. Before you go off and bitch about Wikipedia, they go in depth on their sources, if you have any problems with them, please explain why they're wrong. I will not accept a simple "it's wikipedia so it's wrong". That's just as intellectually lazy as my (admittedly) lazy wikipedia search. But wikipedia does cite its sources and I don't personally know enough to refute those citations. And the numbers are from ethnic roots of the overall populations of the US and Canada.

  75. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 0

    It is well known homogeneous cultures, with as little income disparity as possible, report highest levels of contentedness.

    The "most diversity makes things best" line of reasoning is never based in reality. Of course - the people screaming at the rest of the country for more diversity - Seattle and Portland - are some of the least diverse cities in the nation.

    We could fix that by giving them their wish and deporting the criminals there. It might wise them up while simultaneously giving them their much desired diversity. I live in Southern California and anyone who thinks that more immigrants is a good thing hasn't seen the end game like I have.

  76. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh for sure. Only good can come of Trump's presidency. I am sure things will be so much better for the ordinary citizen any day now

  77. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If his policies are so good, why will he only be a one-term president?

  78. Your diversity metric is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go see how the white people who are "diverse" because they're speaking languages from 30 miles apart are treating the first nations, and you'll realize that your assertion is 100% horseshit.

  79. You are proof that the DNC is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your statement is proof that the DNC is dead. The arrogant billionaires appointed Empress Hilary, and never noticed that the blue collar democrats realized she had no values in common with them.

    1. Re:You are proof that the DNC is dead by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And your statement is proof that the DNC is dead.

      The DNC is alive and well and looking forward to 2018, which might be a huge problem for the RNC if the Republicans do/don't repeal ObamaCare.

      The arrogant billionaires appointed Empress Hilary [...]

      Hillary was elected, not appointed.

      [...] and never noticed that the blue collar democrats realized she had no values in common with them.

      Have you seen the Trump budget proposal? Blue-collar Democrats AND Republicans are going to get rimmed to pay for right-wing priorities that have no basis in reality.

    2. Re:You are proof that the DNC is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The DNC is alive and well
      Hahahahahaha
      The denial is real. Holy crap.
      Do you even follow what goes on in you party?
      They are having a catastrophic meltdown. They have learnt all the wrong lessons from Trumps win.
      Clinton is gearing up for 2020. Sanders has been ousted. Some are looking at Cuban, because apparently the reason Trump won is because he's a Billionaire (Even though he's really poor because he's such a bad businessman, and a tax evader for all the money that he doesn't make because of all his failing businesses. I can't really keep track of their arguments)
      Meanwhile, Trumps flavor ability right now is higher than the DNC, and Sanders is 20 points higher than that still.
      The Dems are caving left and right on Trump's appointees, and there is no reason to believe this will stop any time soon.
      Unless someone with a brain manages to take over the DNC they are done.

    3. Re:You are proof that the DNC is dead by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Trumps flavor ability right now is higher than the DNC

      Classic tea party response. Most people are going to find Trump very sour-tasting in the near future. Trump's favorability is still sinking and lower than the DNC.

      http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/03/20/trump-approval-rating-low/99409570/
      http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/democratic-party-favorable-rating

      The Dems are caving left and right on Trump's appointees, and there is no reason to believe this will stop any time soon.

      Last I read that Trump was still trying to find 500+ people out of 320M people who haven't said a negative thing about him to fill all those vacant government positions.

      http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-filling-staff-positions-2017-2

    4. Re:You are proof that the DNC is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [huffingpost.com]

      Wow. Just wow. It's hard to find a more biased source than the oh so diverse Huffington Post. They're even worse than MSNBC.

    5. Re:You are proof that the DNC is dead by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Just wow. It's hard to find a more biased source than the oh so diverse Huffington Post. [prntly.com] They're even worse than MSNBC.

      A biased source would Breitbart or Fox News. See how much trouble Trump's gets into after tweeting something from those sources?

    6. Re:You are proof that the DNC is dead by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Neither first lady nor Secretary of State are elective offices.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:You are proof that the DNC is dead by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Senator Clinton served eight years (2001-2009) in the Senate before becoming Secretary of State. She also won the primary elections for the 2016 Democratic nomination. She's certainty more qualified than the current occupant of the White House.

  80. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you mean the kind of society that Mike Pence and other Christian extremists want to take america back to ?

  81. At least everyone here understands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is due to Republicanism. 3 Months worth enough to fuck the entire planet.

  82. Want to be happy? End the taxes and leave the city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of places where taxes are relatively low, cost of living is low, and good jobs do exist. New Hampshire for instance is very liberty-friendly particularly thanks to the migration of liberty-minded people to the state from around the country. The states actually making progress in a variety of areas of bringing more freedom to the state and handing control back to the individual. From eliminating restrictions on crypto currency companies from banking regulations to eliminating permit requirements for conceal weapons (NH already had open carry anyway). Cutting taxes here is a bit harder- but it's also a reactively low tax place. There is no income tax, no general purpose sales tax, and property taxes remain lower than many other high tax big government states like NY, NJ, MA, and CA. If you want less government check out the Free State Project's effort to migrate liberty-minded persons to the state. Things free staters support: end to copy"right", end to driver licenses, end to taxes, end to government schooling/wellfare/etc, pro decentralization (ie crypto currencies), etc. We have a no victim no crime mentality (vehicular registration, drivers licenses, license plates, etc should not be mandatory). What you do to your own body is your business (drugs). The only crimes that should exist should be those surrounding fraud, coercion (threat of violence), violence (ie environmental for instance, non-consensual violence, like in most cases hitting another person with your first, etc), and theft.

  83. Fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a person that bases their happiness on them getting their way all the time and goes mental when they don't would believe this SHIT. If you try your happiness to politics you will always be and always were miserable. Trump said during his ENTIRE FUCKING CAMPAIGN that he was going to increase military spending. So guess what? He did and now all the people that didn't support him, who apparently were too fucking busy telling everyone how opened minded they are while saying it's their way or the highway, must have missed him saying that and are crying from the roof top like it's some smoking gun. I am sure these people are miserable have hundreds of conflicting opinions bouncing around in their heads.

  84. Cut down on illegals and visa workers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then happiness will shoot up quickly.

    Rebalance trade so Americans aren't forced to compete with sweatshop labor and happiness with increase.

    It's not that difficult.

    Word verification: keyword

  85. Re: It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike so many past administrations, he's actually putting the interests of the USA before those of foreign nations! Imagine that!

    You must be fucking kidding. The only interest the US government has always had is only its own interest, an interest that also not necessarily is in line with the best interest of the majority of its citizens I might add.

    Or do you believe other countries are happy with the US toppling their democratically elected governments or 'bombing their country back to the stone-age'?

    I would happily contribute to Trump's wall; while he's working on that he should also start one at the northern border.
    As long as americans stay inside, I'd be happy to pay my part.

  86. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    "Source of significant and easy funding?" So you're going to finally stop subsidizing Israel's war efforts? Hey, that could certainly incentivize Israel to finally make peace instead of faking it just enough to keep people thinking that maybe there's a hope in hell that Israel wants peace.

    As for Trump's claim that Germany needs to pay the US more for defence, Germany doesn't pay the US for defence. Trump doesn't understand how NATO works. Same as he doesn't understand the difference between truth and lies.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  87. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    I'm sure he'll get around to all of that when he gets back from his taxpayer funded golf trips.

    It is funny that the people that complain about Donald playing golf are the same people that complain when he stays at his desk and gets stuff done.

    Personally, I think the more time he spends playing golf the better.

    There was a famous meeting while Eisenhower was president to discuss sending American troops into Vietnam following the French defeat at Dien Bien Phu. He cut the meeting short and left because he had a golf game, and the troops never went in. If LBJ was more dedicated to his game, the Vietnam War might have been avoided a second time.

     

  88. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    And the figures you quoted are even more similar to eachother than what I can recall hearing about. I remember 80% in Canada, and 75% in the USA... Instead of a 5% disparity between the two countries, however, you are suggesting there is only a 2% one. This makes them even more similar... nearly to the point of being unobservable with regards to the amount of diversity one would encounter in the two nations without very close study, which was the underlying point I had made that was originally disputed.

  89. US has lower suicide rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and higher birth rates than countries the UN considers happier. Not sure how the UN is figuring this, but if it is the same way they choose delegates to their human rights commissions, I'm not sure who would trust its accuracy.

  90. Too subjective to be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need a grain of salt or two with these kinds of statistics. Comparing happiness between countries/cultures/languages is extremely tricky, because two cultures may not even have or use the same words/concepts to describe happiness. One country may take the question as "are you satisfied" and another interprets it as "are you experiencing pleasure", for instance.

    http://www.jpe.ox.ac.uk/papers/what-can-we-learn-from-happiness-surveys/

    (You might have slightly better luck measuring a trend over time within a country however.)

  91. Nice troll? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    I put that as a question because perhaps you are just living in a bubble. Why not ask researchers and thought leaders on the other side of the aisle thoug?

    Trump isn't the cause, he's a symptom. People feel threatened, they get tribal and mean... and they tend to do stupid things that make the problems causing them to feel threatened get worse.

    Are you saying that the smart thing to do was vote for the continuation and status quo of Hillary? Who exactly is being stupid? Doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result each time is insanely delusional.

    Trump was elected over economic fear. Fear of the 1% (whose frankly ludicrous levels of wealth get thrown in our face by the media daily... and those aren't even the richest tier of people), fear of foreigners stealing our jobs.

    Not exactly. Immigration and borders were at least as big of an issue. An issue that politicians were promising to address since I was a kid in the 70s and have yet to do anything about (except make the situation worse (see Visa expansions)). I say bullshit about fear of the 1%, because it was more about being pro-American after 8 years of anti-American rhetoric, and 8 years of wars. TPPIP was shit for Americans, we saw the releases and discussed them here. Like H1Bs they are crap for Americans and a boon to foreigners. Cancelling those deals is not anti-Foreign, because the deals were made to benefit the foreign. Cancellation simply levels the field a bit.

    So... vote in Trump to keep out the foreigners and stop the 1%ers in Washington. Which damages the economy and it turns out the kind of guy you vote in to the top position actually wants to line his own pockets and those of his (significant) supporters... the 1%.

    Sure, that was a part of it. Then you grab your crystal ball and start making predictions which have no basis in fact. President Trump already lost a ton of wealth because of the oligarchs disliking their loss and his win. You know, those same oligarchs that several University studies stated were controlling the US instead of "We the People".

    It's a global problem because the same socioeconomic forces are driving the same mob reactions around the world.

    No, it's a global problem because the same oligarchs trying to spoil the US have been working time in numerous countries across the world. The push back is against a group pushing for global authoritarianism, not global liberty. If it was the latter, people would probably be happy. It's not, as we can see by damage in virtually every way from Europe to Africa to the Americas. The oligarchs get richer, and everyone else has become poorer. The oligarchs sit beyond the law, and everyone else continues to lose liberty.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Nice troll? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Wow. Read your post from title to end and the only conclusion I can come to is that you're a raging asshole if you can only express your opinion with such vitriol.

      But you have a manifesto to keep you company, so there's that.

    2. Re:Nice troll? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I asked reasonable questions and answered each of your points. Your response is to head right to a personal attack. Who exactly is the asshole? Oh, you.. the Leftist. Troll

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  92. Equator vs Poles by irrational_design · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that the report suggests that the closer you live to the poles (i.e., the farther from the equator) the happier you are in general. Did they include anyone living in Antarctica? I wonder how they would compare ;-)

  93. I'll bet a month's pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm willing to bet a month's pay that all posters who critisize the methodology of this survey or otherwise question its value are americans.

  94. Happiness is on the Wane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess that's probably correct for the Progressives at the UN. They are very good at projection.
    For classical liberals, conservatives, and most libertarians I'd say happiness is on the rise.

  95. Re: It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is funny that the people that complain about Donald playing golf are the same people that complain when he stays at his desk and gets stuff done.
    Personally, I think the more time he spends playing golf the better.

    90% of it is because it is now on our dime. 10% is because of how it shows Trump as a hypocrite and fraud.

    Personally, I'd be happy if he retired. Today.

    There was a famous meeting while Eisenhower was president to discuss sending American troops into Vietnam following the French defeat at Dien Bien Phu. He cut the meeting short and left because he had a golf game, and the troops never went in. If LBJ was more dedicated to his game, the Vietnam War might have been avoided a second time.

    Or if America had stepped up, Eisenhower would have cut the length of the Cold War in half, and instead of a bunch of dead Kennedys we would have had the glasnost occur on the Moon. Cancer would be cured, and your average house would be twice as huge.

    For Want of a Nail can be played either way.

  96. Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how the Republican / conservative group operates.
    Everyone, except the 1%, is supposed to suffer their whole life..

  97. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bing.

    End of thread...

  98. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by hey! · · Score: 2

    Well, you can prove anything if you get to make up the categories, but seriously, lumping Europe with Asia? 60% of the world's population lives in Asia, and 15% of the world's population lives in Europe. So it's hardly amazing that if one of your categories comprises 75% of the people on the Earth that there there doesn't appear to be a lot of diversity. Your friends could include a Pakistani, Tibetan, Uygher, Eskimo, Finn, Scot, Basque and Serb and they wouldn't be a "diverse" group.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  99. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as outlined perfectly here: https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

  100. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Your argument relies on an arbitrary selection of the criteria, namely the top 10. If you expand it to the top 20, all countries which are not far behind the leaders, there are several quite diverse countries including the US and UK.

    Pretty much all anti-immigration/white supremacy arguments are just this kind of abuse of statistics.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  101. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Your reasoning needs some more statistical rigidity.
    If a large part of the foreigners in Switzerland live in Zurich, then that still doesn't mean the majority of the Swiss people live there...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  102. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Since the genocide on the native Indians, hypocrisy is enshrined in the American psyche.
    Americans have no choice than to be hypocrite, the amount of collective cognitive dissonance resulting from accepting their (ancestors') crimes would be too much to handle. So it has become the main feature of American thinking, acting, arguing and, most notably, foreign policy.
    All the world can clearly see it except for the Americans themselves, they just wouldn't be able to cope...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  103. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Of course these are not the only factors, if even the decisive ones...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  104. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Yugoslavia before Germany and USA started fomenting war there?

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  105. No N Korea? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    What? no entry for N. Korea?
    They would obviously be #1 because the people there are literally dying to show us all how happy they are.

  106. Re: TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike Pence wants to implement Sharia and kill all the gays ?

    Wow....he's terrible !

  107. Want to know the REAL me? Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & "here 'tis" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEp1nO9Circ/ - ask Derek Simard (Coren22).

    * I'm what you'd call an "Agent of the FREE..."

    ( :) )

    APK

    P.S.=> This tape will destruct in 60 seconds... apk

  108. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    You're just bitching around and actually not contributing much to the discussion.
    If you don't have the time to add to the conversation then by all means don't. Or limit yourself to replies that are more positive.
    Or not, if you're hard headed...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  109. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Correction: The US was MUCH more happy in general before the charter on the FED and income taxes was accepted. After that it continuously went down hill.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  110. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Cancer cells aren't 'happy', they are confused.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  111. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you look at the makeup of the Population of really quiet happy New Zealand

  112. Re:I'm happy Donald Trump is President... apk by slashrio · · Score: 1

    I'm confused... was this a compliment? ;)

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  113. Re: It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the U by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    90% of it is because it is now on our dime.

    Hogwash. If that was true the people complaining about Trump's golfing would be the exact same people that were complaining about Obama playing golf, and that is not true at all.

    10% is because of how it shows Trump as a hypocrite and fraud.

    Then you should complain about his hypocrisy rather than his golfing.

    But here's some free advice: You should complain about neither. Trump's supporters don't care about his golfing or hypocrisy any more than Obama supporters cared about his birth certificate. If you want to change people's minds, you should criticize his policies rather than his hobbies and personal faults.

  114. I can top that! by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Earth civilization sounds like an interesting idea in concept, but do you think it will ever be feasible?

    1. Re:I can top that! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Earth civilization sounds like an interesting idea in concept, but do you think it will ever be feasible?

      No. At least, not with humans. Maybe the next species will learn from our mistakes. Problem is, to rise to the apex, you need aggression. So be very, very afraid of first contact with aliens that come visiting - they are going to have a lot more experience at being aggressive, whether they are biological or robotic.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  115. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by AaronW · · Score: 1

    It also depends on what group you were in terms of happiness. Blacks, for example, had it pretty tough in many parts of the country due to segregation and discrimination. You were basically happy if you were white and male. Women were expected to stay at home while the man worked. Generally women didn't go to college and there were few methods for women and minorities to get ahead.

    One thing that drastically improved people's lives were labor unions for blue collar jobs. That's where things like the 40 hour work week, time and a half and many other benefits came from. Labor unions peaked in 1954 where almost 35% of all workers belonged to a union. The labor unions significantly improved the standard of living for all workers, even those who didn't belong to unions. Combine that with the 90% tax bracket and the fact that the pay difference between the CEO and the line worker was significantly lower than it is today. Back then you also got a pension plan from the company you worked for. Later, however, laws were relaxed and companies skimped on their pension contributions then switched everything over to 401Ks and IRAs.

    Decades ago the tax system was also quite different. There was a 90% tax rate, for example. Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...">historically the minimum wage was higher when one takes into account the purchasing power.

    After World War II the GI bill sent millions of people to college which also significantly improved the lives of many people.

    My grandparents, who sadly passed away around 2000 had gone through the great depression and world war 2. My grandfather was born in 1906. They said the "good old days" weren't that great.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  116. Why does happiness even worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still don't understand why happiness is assumed to be inherently worth pursuing.

    The answer I got was that it is true by definition. Sounds like circular reasoning to me. Not convinced.

    My tentative take is behavioral. The brain is wired with reward mechanism built in, as a legacy of our reptilian ancestors. Our primate new brain tend to rationalize it as "pursuit of happiness" but in the end of the day we're automatons programmed to seek out certain stuff. There is no inherent value in Happiness and it only exists as a mental construct amenable to a whole lot of external factors.

    So how is a decrease of happiness necessarily bad? It's just an adaptation mechanism and any attempt to attach an artificial value judgement to it is doomed to failure.

  117. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    Those who value greed more than happiness, will be unhappy. Sad but true and note they will make all those around them unhappy too, that greed attacks the happiness of others.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  118. Thank you by s.petry · · Score: 1

    I find it hilarious that people like you want to complain about everything Republican and ignore your own party. FWIW I'm an independent and not affiliated with any party. I voted simply for the lesser of two evils this year. I have no sympathy for the Democratic party, and the lumps they are continually taking are well deserved. The Democratic party has become the party of the 3rd wave feminists, terrorist sympathizers, and openly socialist who despise the US Constitution and our form of Government.

    Stay in the Democratic party, I'm sure they have a way to play to your identity too. Until of course you are no longer useful to them.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Thank you by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Stay in the Democratic party, I'm sure they have a way to play to your identity too.

      What identity would that be?

    2. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Democrats prefer to categorize people according to their ethnic identity (the hispanic vote, the black vote, etc.) but class and gender will do in a pinch.

    3. Re:Thank you by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The Democrats prefer to categorize people according to their ethnic identity (the hispanic vote, the black vote, etc.) but class and gender will do in a pinch.

      You don't think the Republican's don't play identity politics as well? The Southern Strategy is based on pitting poor white voters against minority voters to get them to vote against their own interests while millionaire and billionaires make screw them over.

  119. Since there are already 2 'He's Canadian' replies: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me just add, I hope Shatner, and perhaps even Mike Meyers give Justin Trudeau a run for his money in whatever year the next PM election takes place.

    Having said that, Trudeau actually attempts to comport himself as a statesman, even if he doesn't always succeed, unlike 90 percent of ALL political bodies on the planet that even pretend to be civil. And most of those are some of the most uncivilized places of all if you pare away the veneer. Does anyone have to wonder why it rhymes with 'sneer'?

  120. Not news, not for nerds, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is out-and-out trolling. This has no business being shown as if it was news. And the responses that are marked as "Interesting" are just further flame bait. The claim that Trump is responsible for unhappiness, has no backing of any kind and is simply ludicrous. Maybe "News for nerds, stuff that matters" should be replaced with something else. This isn't news, isn't for nerds, and doesn't matter.

    1. Re:Not news, not for nerds, doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more interesting bit of information to consider. If you look at the most liberal cities in the nation like LA, Detroit, and DC, those are the places that are most unhappy. The socialism that the left is selling people breeds crime, poverty, and despair.

  121. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know why people bring up his golfing and expensive trip to the "winter whitehouse"??
    It is because he is a big hypocrite, that whined and moaned about Obama's occasional vacations or golf trips and the expenses caused by it and yet what does he do??
    He does it so much that by one single year he will have wasted more tax payer money on his leisure activites than Obama did during his entire two terms.
    If he had kept his mouth shut about Obama, then no one would have really brought this up.

  122. Clairol was right. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Blondes have more fun. Thus the happiness in Nordic countries. Happiness in the US is decreasing because the illegals invading the US are anything but blondes.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  123. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Isn't part of Portland's problem that they're all wet? The weather, I mean.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  124. Unhappy down spiral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can only hope the self destructive feedback loop will completely destroy liberal news media, Demonrat Party and safe place regulars.

  125. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Is the word "individual" unknown to you?

    It is perfectly acceptable, and indeed preferable, to reject your forbears if they were evil.

    Morality is an individual issue. It is NOT hypocritical to reject your ancestors, their actions and yours are mutually exclusive.

    "Collective thought" is an oxymoron.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  126. compare to 1937? by dillee1 · · Score: 1

    oblig. godwin

  127. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what. Trump has said America can't be paying for Everything, we're in debt. Let all the other countries take all the refugees and pay for all the problems of the world.

    Instead of arguing about something not that important, what part of that actual point is wrong?

  128. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Decades ago the tax system was also quite different. There was a 90% tax rate, for example. Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]">historically the minimum wage was higher when one takes into account the purchasing power.

    I'd say it was peaked in the early 60's...and Kennedy slashed taxes....remember Camelot as it was described?

    I'm not saying it was perfect....no, blacks should not have been segregated and all, BUT...the black communities in themselves, seemed to be much more at peace and harmony within their own....you didn't see the widespread hard drug use, the unwed pregnancies, nor the gang behavior.

    They pretty much also had "normal" sounding names...something that is now used to discriminate against them presently. That wasn't the case back then, other things were, but not a name on an application alone, like it can be today.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  129. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    A month ago we are all frozen. Nice to have the rain again.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  130. Danish? Happy? by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

    Could've fooled me. The most rigid and unreadable people I've ever met. Always stuffy, always money-focused. It could be selection bias though, as my interactions have been mostly corporate in nature.

  131. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the cut in the chemical safety board. Expect that increase of weapons spending to include an increase in Americans accidentally killed by those weapons.

    But sure safety is #1. He tweeted so therefore it is.

  132. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    What's wrong is that Trump thinks that individual countries pay into some sort of "NATO fund", and that the US deserves more payments from that imaginary fund. He's a fucktard who's giving Kim Jong Un a race for the title of Craziest Wannabe Tyrant with Bad Hair. And he's winning.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  133. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, maybe they just found a nice balance between capitalism and socialism, unlike the rest of the world.

    For very socialist values of balance, at least here in Norway. According to the world bank we have third lowest Gini coefficient in the world, meaning our income is extremely evenly distributed by international standards. There is not a lot of really poor nor very wealthy people, with notable exceptions of course but looking at income stats if you divide into 10% slices the 80-90% slice make just under twice as much as the 10-20%. The best paid executives in Statoil, our huge mostly state owned company the CEO makes about $1.7 million a year. If you go to a similar foreign oil giant like say Schlumberger the CEO makes $18.6 million a year. Working at McD you earn ~$15/hour the first four months if you're 18-20, after that or from day one if you're older ~$18.50/hour. And you don't need health insurance or a 401(k) on top of that, the public healthcare system and public pensions are entirely adequate. Granted you can't directly compare prices, but you live okay on one "minimum wage" job. So at McD you make $35k/year and your average doctor makes $95k/year, the tax system makes the difference even less in practice. But we want it. And a very high percent of the population works, that helps. It's still an odd country.

    How would one go about immigrating to Norway? And may I subscribe to your newsletter?

  134. The right to pursue happiness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just not to have it in a statistically significant way.

  135. Circular by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Which countries are the happiest? The ones the UN likes the best.

    Well look at that! The happiest countries align with the UN!

  136. Re:TLDR: UN says more whites = happiness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women were expected to stay at home while the man worked. Generally women didn't go to college

    Now they don't stay at home and go to college. Incidentally, Women's happiness is also trending down.

  137. Re: It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aww, Kim's hair isn't bad. When compared to President Cheryl it's actually quite stylin'

  138. Orange haired devil by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    Comments on this article seemed like a circle jerk of Trump haters, making me think this was editorial upmodding. Well congrats, Trump is the new ultimate scapegoat, or straw man, depending on how you look at it. Direct your ire at him, and pay no attention to the man behind the curtain or what has been happening for the past thirty years.

    We've been in a race to the bottom for too long, with a government that has been captured by corporate interests, while a media ensures that we stay distracted and at each other's throats with a strategy of 'four legs good, two legs bad'. We're training our foreign replacements for the jobs not already being outsourced, finding ourselves unable to pay for our kids education, going bankrupt paying healthcare costs, and generally looking forward to working till we drop dead rather than retiring, for a variety of reasons. We've been relegated to being a 'human resource' suitable only for maximum exploitation, and the next generation only has a life of indentured servitude to look forward to, if they are even lucky enough to have a job.

    But hey, who cares about that we can pour ourselves another tall sparkling glass of Koolaid while coming up with a new creative euphemisms for the meat puppets putting on a show for us.

  139. Mentality by dddux · · Score: 1

    I would just like to mention that happiness depends on the mentality of its residents, too. We are not all the same. Some people are just more prone to depression than others, cope with work differently etc. It is not just the amount of money that influences the level of happiness, far from it, actually. What I'm saying is that even if we all had the same government and wealth, the levels of happiness would differ, possibly even look the same.

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  140. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they would have brought it up. if you believe otherwise, you're delusional. I had someone yesterday berate me for not being properly angry at Trump. Not that I agreed with him, but that I wasn't sufficiently upset.
    It's like HUAC all over again.

  141. Re: It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you dislike his xenophobia by hating the Americans.
    The fact that you cannot see any irony in this is, well, not surprising at all.

  142. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    he's actually putting the interests of the USA before those of foreign nations

    Sure, if our interests are cutting education funding, cutting the EPA, cutting elderly food programs, cutting women's rights, cutting healthcare, and increasing racism and military spending. Nothing will make America great again like a generation of stupid kids, sick and hungry people, and weapons.

    If I go into a business arrangement with a partner, and he makes money and I make money, it is a win-win. Even if he does not have the larger investment, but he makes good money, should some of his benefit be taken away? Think Nafta, Mexico, Canada.
    Canada buys all it's winter fruits and vegetables from the USA. It buys American cars. Does Trump know or understand what is fair trade? You need to look at the annual balances and decide if trade is fair or is not fair. Measure as well, the jobs created in each country.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  143. They're not ignoring it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they're profiting from it. This is why the left want single payer. Get the middle men out of it and just pay the bloody doctors.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  144. Re:It's a good sign. Shows he's working for the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What he's doing makes me happy!

  145. Me, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me, too.

    I couldn't be happier watching his muslim ban fail. Watching his healthcareless plan fail. Proposing budgets that will never pass. Watching him make an all-around ass out of himself.

    I couldn't be happier.

  146. Re: American collective psyche by slashrio · · Score: 1

    No, "individual" is not unknown. I'm just afraid that there aren't that many individuals that think like you, or at least the majority of American citizens doesn't.
    The absolutely hypocritical statements by the current and most past governments' people suggests that the majority of the voters is as hypocritical as I described in my previous post. That's why I call it 'collective psyche'.
    Well, granted, I didn't formulate it exactly as 'American collective psyche', but that's what I meant to say.
    Maybe a more or less valid definition of 'American collective psyche' would be the average of the American psyches...

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.