Slashdot Mirror


This Year's H-1B Visa Applications Look A Lot Like Last Year's (newsweek.com)

"This year's round of H-1B visa program applications was scheduled to launch Monday, and it was largely absent of President Donald Trump's proposed policy changes," writes Newsweek. An anonymous reader quotes their report: The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services last updated its online page dedicated to the program, which granted visas to skilled foreign workers, Wednesday with the rules mostly similar to those of last year and quotas remaining the same. These requirements were set to launch despite Trump's vow to reform the program on the grounds that companies exploited it to fill jobs once held by U.S. citizens who earned higher wages.

An alleged draft of an executive order was leaked last month and widely circulated, raising fears that the administration was preparing to gut the program. These measures were never announced. "There was a window in which the White House could have made serious reforms," Russ Harrison, head of government relations for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers-USA, told The Wall Street Journal. "For whatever reason, they decided not to take it."

143 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine that, trump sold out his voters.

    1. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not even 100 days yet. He's already accomplished more than I expected from a full 4 years of Jeb. And we don't have a hot war with Russia like we would have had with Hillary. Things are great.

    2. Re: Sell out by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know 'golf' and 'accomplishment' are not synonyms, right?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re: Sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Found the idiot. You really do believe that it was a conspiracy, not that most Americans readily identified Hilary as a sold out piece of shit. I've got low expectations for Trump, and he's already been not as bad as Hilary.

    4. Re: Sell out by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Clinton had more votes than Trump. Pull your head out of your ass.

    5. Re: Sell out by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      If the pink-ko and chief is choking while playing golf, then he's not doing much damage to the planet; mostly.

    6. Re: Sell out by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

      It's amazing Trump "won" an election by being completely full of shit. I wish I could do nothing all day and inherit all of my Daddy's money.

    7. Re: Sell out by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You DO know there is a REASON why there is an electoral college, yes? That it was designed for precisely this purpose where the majority of states say "we do not want this person" only for the two most populated states to say "tough shit we don't care what you think" and getting to rule in perpetuity?

      Whether you like it or not when HRC announced her candidacy her approval rating? 15%. After a year and a half of the media throwing themselves at her feet, actually running their stories by her for her approval AND if that wasn't enough the DNC actually rigging the primary in her favor? After all of that and hundreds of millions spent trying to sell her her approval rating was....14%.

      Lets face it Hillary Clinton was a lying backstabbing arrogant money grubbing influence peddling insider that could have been beaten by the corpse of Richard Nixon, she was THAT hated by the majority of the country. There was literally not a worse possible candidate that could have been chosen by the insiders and her "Its her turn" campaign slogan just showed how fucking arrogant she was and sealed the deal. ironically it was Hillary herself that told the media to push Trump as he was a "pied piper candidate" that, again because she was so fucking arrogant, she thought she could easily defeat by dividing the country up into nice neat little demographics and using some pandering so obvious Ray Charles could see through it basically buy votes. Her "basket of deplorables" was her final Willie Horton that insured she would lose, NY and CA would of course give her the popular vote because....well they would vote for a crackhead for POTUS if they had a D after their name which again shows EXACTLY why we cannot go by the "popular vote" because it would allow 2 states to dictate to the other 48 who was in the White House no matter what the 48 thought.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re: Sell out by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You're a retard. Even adding those numbers together, you don't get "most Americans".

      X voted for HRC. {ALL AMERICANS} - X did not. X {ALL AMERICANS}/2. MOST AMERICANS didn't vote for her.

    9. Re: Sell out by blindseer · · Score: 2

      I think of a sport analogy more like the World Series, points equals votes and games equals states. If if's team HRC vs team DJT and you get a score like 9-1, 9-1, 9-1, for wins for HRC followed by DJT wins by 3-4, 3-4, 3-4, 3-4 then team DJT wins 4 games to HRC's 3 wins. HRC got 39 total point compared to DJT having 15. Quite the spread there in points and one might argue that team HRC is in fact the better team based upon that. The narrow wins by DJT can be considered flukes, luck, and this can bring doubt on them being "worthy" of getting the trophy.

      What I think has happened is that team DJT understood the goal better, they knew the rules. A defeat in a game is a defeat regardless of the point spread. What counts are the wins, even if the win is by a small margin.

      What we've been seeing through the election is a large number of national polls which showed HRC ahead. This, IMHO, influenced the election, which was the intent. What the polling places wanted to do is create an image in the people's minds of a HRC win. I believe this actually worked against them. The less informed voter saw these numbers and thought HRC would win and this discouraged HRC voters to show, because if there are enough votes then she wins anyway.

      The informed voter, on the other hand, would take a closer look at the numbers and find where in the demographics DJT was weak. DJT went to rally in places where doing so would have the best chance of changing people's minds. HRC went around to places that she'd already won and tried to get her old base motivated to vote, they didn't see to care about getting more people, only to have their traditional voter base to show up.

      This tactic by both parties made the national polling look good for HRC but that is not how the election works. We don't vote as a nation, we vote as a federation. It was only near the end when team HRC saw that they might not have enough states to win that they tried making up for their bad strategy. HRC at some point figured out that it's states that need to be won, not votes, but by then it was too little too late.

      I hear team HRC complain about the loss. I've also seen team DJT respond that if the rules were different then they'd have played a different game, and likely still won. We cannot change the rule is the middle of the game because it makes one team look bad. Part of the game is knowing the rules.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    10. Re:Sell out by rworne · · Score: 1

      Perhaps,

      But you can look at it this way:

      With the "stop him at all costs" mantra in the press and running at all levels of the government, combined with the recent court cases regarding the executive orders targeting certain Muslim-majority countries, I'd expect California, Washington, and any other state with a lot of tech companies to file similar lawsuits because an H1-B ban would obviously be targeting people of Indian ancestry.

      It would probably be a safer bet for him to get the SCOTUS back to a 5-4 conservative majority first, get his E.O. upheld, then pursue these goals.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    11. Re:Sell out by joboss · · Score: 1

      Whether you like Trump or not, Trump has been in office for how long?

    12. Re: Sell out by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yup, a real bot we got here. Just a really fucking lame one. So weak. Sad.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re: Sell out by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      ...and her "Its her turn" campaign slogan just showed how fucking arrogant she was and sealed the deal.

      I didn't know that was her official slogan. I thought it was something a PAC thought up. Regardless, it was definitely a joke. It's the Presidency. There are no "turns". Otherwise you and I would get one too.

      Me, I refused to vote for Hillary Clinton because I refuse to establish any more political dynasties in the US. Having the Kennedys still around is bad enough. We tried the dynastic thing with Bush, and that didn't go so well. Never again, says I. So I didn't vote for either major party candidate, and my vote literally wasn't counted (write-ins aren't counted at all in my state).

    14. Re: Sell out by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      She had posters hung up at all her stops with that slogan, sold t-shirts on her website and at her rallies with that slogan, hell they even were peddling caps and keychains with that slogan. I don't think at that point it really matters who thought it up, she adopted it as her own and just showed how fucking arrogant she was when she started hawking it instead of condemning it.

      And now thanks to Wikileaks and an unnamed DNC staffer we know WHY she was so fucking arrogant, it was because she knew she was gonna win the primary before the first vote was ever cast. After all with the DNC handing her the debate questions, the press running major stories by her, and several of the largest media outlets running interference for her how could she not? But in the end it just showed the hubris of HRC and the DNC and how out of touch with anything not in NYC or CA they were because all one had to do was look at her approval ratings to know she didn't have a chance in hell, NOBODY has EVER won the POTUS with approval ratings even half that low. Mitt Romney didn't even score THAT low after his "48%" comment, she was so hated that she scored worse than Mittens at his lowest before she even opened her mouth and said a single word!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. Why is this bad? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The story is framed as bad but isn't it better that they take some time to craft a reasonable update to the policy? Trump has been president just a bit over two months now!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why is this bad? by Medinole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trump announced his presidential campaign in June of 2015 and came into office with the established policy of putting American workers first. He and his team have had over a year to "craft a reasonable update to the policy". Trump was elected on the promise that he would get to work for America on day one, not get elected then figure out how things work. The administration should have started action on H1B in January.

    2. Re:Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He had plenty of time to craft a reasonable policy. What? Are presidents allowed to make campaign promises without any plans to implement them? Are they just promising ponies to gullible kids? ... apparently so

    3. Re:Why is this bad? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A reasonable update to the policy would be something very simple like requiring a minimum wage of H1-B workers to be $150K (adjusted for inflation). It's very simple because doesn't take much to deal a fatal blow to abuse while keeping it available for the people that it was originally intended to help bring into the country.

      Everything we've seen so far from the Mango in Chief has only benefitted businesses, the wealthy and bigots at the expense of everyone and everything else.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re: Why is this bad? by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      You do realize presidents aren't really suppose to legislate, right? Congress should fix this problem. Trump and his team are suppose to govern.

    5. Re: Why is this bad? by Medinole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please. I didn't say legislate. This is about having a policy which can be implemented by Congress. The Congress which is controlled by Republicans in the House and Senate. The Republicans who are led by Trump. Any major legislation which gets passed will be, at a minimum, strongly influenced by the President.

    6. Re:Why is this bad? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Trump has been president just a bit over two months now!

      He claimed that he already had a plan. So either he lied about having a plan, or he lied about what his plan was. Either way, he's a liar, and there's no third way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Why is this bad? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The story is framed as bad but isn't it better that they take some time to craft a reasonable update to the policy? Trump has been president just a bit over two months now!

      You speak as if he's actually been busy on this for the past few months. While an early draft EO in January mentioned H1-B reform, since then Trump's ADHD has brought all progress to a halt.

      There is huge support in Congress for cracking down on H1-B abuse- this is one of those rare issues where which both parties agree. But actually getting something accomplished takes time away from tweeting, golfing, and monitoring Fox and Friends for intelligence updates. In desperation Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) went on twitter himself two weeks ago and begged for Trump to call his office about H1-B reform. One tweet read "I've been waiting for six yrs for a president interested in fixing H1B and that person has finally arrived/DRAIN SWAMP". Six down, four to go!

    8. Re: Why is this bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The story is also a fake news. There is a big difference this year. No premium cap processing. I know this first hand: I'm applying for H-1B right now.

      Basically, IT companies are getting hit since they typically pay for premium cap processing to make sure they get the people they want.

    9. Re: Why is this bad? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I do NOT approve of the way you disparage mangos in that post!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re:Why is this bad? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because statistically at least half of them will be smarter than you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Why is this bad? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That's good for industry but too high for a lot of academic posts. Though they could make those a different category, I suppose.

      Is there an H-1D? You could get an H-1D with your PhD!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Why is this bad? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There is a third way: he doesn't/didn't know whether he has a plan or not.

      Technically it's not lying when you're so mentally deranged you don't know what you're saying. That might not reassure you much, given that he's the one with his finger on the big red button.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Why is this bad? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he just assumed that government was like a large business empire, with him as the CEO. Replace some staff with his family and friends, do a few deals, everyone thinks they are getting rich, problem solved.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Why is this bad? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      That's good for industry but too high for a lot of academic posts. Though they could make those a different category,

      Make an exception for positions at a university funded by a non-profit or federal research grant for education, public, or university academic research.

    15. Re:Why is this bad? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Or he had ans still has a plan and the plan is leaving the program in place but actually enforcing it and letting people only hire foreigners when Americans with those skills can't be found. Or the existing plan isn't ready for immediate deployment. Or the existing plan involved legislation that has to go through Congress and will just kill the program entirely. Or the existing plan is to issue an executive order at any point in time and call for the immediate halt of the program. Or...

    16. Re:Why is this bad? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what those on the left want to believe, Republicans actually have more diversity and difference of opinion than the Democrats. If you browse through the historical voting record of the House and Senate and sort by "votes with party", you'll find it's the Democrats who vote more as a bloc, and Republicans who are more likely to cross the aisle. As we saw with the failure of the Republicans to repeal/replace Obamacare, having the House, Senate, and Presidency controlled by Republicans doesn't mean they'll be able to pass whatever they want as easily as when Democrats are controlling those three branches.

      Anyhow, while immigration law is made by Congress, immigration enforcement is controlled by the President. People can apply for as many H1-Bs as they want. If Trump signs an executive order instructing INS not to grant any H1-Bs, none of those people will get H1-Bs. So it remains to be seen what Trump will do about H1-Bs. That is how the balance of power works between those two branches. The Legislative can pass whatever laws they want, but the Executive gets to choose how to enforce (or not enforce) those laws.

    17. Re:Why is this bad? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I totally agree. That's why I think all the various "scandals" are taking his administration by surprise. In the business world, you have to fuck up Enron or Madoff level before anyone really will say or do much about it. The US federal government is an entirely different game, one that he's trying to run like one of his businesses that have virtually no "over-site", no premade investigative bodies, no need to justify anything money related, and no one is really watching who you talk to or where you do business unless you really go to extremes. He's used to operating in the semi-dark, only beholden to himself and whomever his shareholders might be. Shell companies, business with Russia, none of that mattered before he stepped into the biggest spotlight on the planet, the US Presidency.

    18. Re:Why is this bad? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      Actually, his own party (Freedom Carcass) and the Judicial branch have been blocking everything. There just aren't enough Democrats in Congress to stop much of anything. The Democrats didn't even get a chance to vote on the "new healthcare". Everything else he's done is via executive order. The only thing he has accomplished is chaos and a YUGE drop in international standing for the US.

    19. Re:Why is this bad? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe this IS his plan...H1B doesn't affect blue collar workers, and the whole healthcare thing really tied up his forward momentum.

    20. Re:Why is this bad? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      He's followed through on many of his promises

      No, President Mango has not.

      Drain the swamp? It's swampier than ever.
      Lock her up? Zero follow up.
      Repeal and replace the ACA with something better and cheaper? Tried to replace it with something vastly inferior and failed at it.
      Quickly defeat ISIS with some magically awesome plan? Didn't happen.
      Muslim ban? Completely unconstitutional so it never had a chance.
      Bring back coal jobs? They aren't coming back.
      Build a wall and make mexico pay for it? Downgraded to a fence and US consumers will be paying for it.
      Cut spending? He wants to spend more than ever!
      Gut the EPA? Check.

      So, that's one out of nine promises. Doesn't really seem like most.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    21. Re: Why is this bad? by nyri · · Score: 1

      Trump announced his presidential campaign in June of 2015 and came into office with the established policy of putting American workers first. He and his team have had over a year to "craft a reasonable update to the policy".

      No he didn't. He ran for the office as a total outsider. Basically whole Washington elite was against him. This means that he didn't get much or any support from them for running. He had to digure it out by himself. It is pretty obvious that he was running full time and he didn't have time for formulating policies.

      I think you intuitevly know this but ignore it so that you can have some bad to say about Trump.

    22. Re:Why is this bad? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Basically, it looks like the administration knows changing the H1-B policy to a protectionist policy will result in higher prices and lower growth for Americans, a decrease of middle-class wealth, and a general economic recession, so they don't want to open by screwing up the economy until they have a way to somehow blame Obama.

      What Trump most wants is a $36 million annual decrease in his personal tax burden, hence his proposed tax policies. $400,000 presidental salary is nothing compared to what he can cut out of the Federal burden on his $500,000,000 alleged income.

    23. Re: Why is this bad? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The legislation gives the president the power to execute an immigration policy.

  3. Money talks by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    Trump is a Businessman, he does what he is paid to do. Rich multi-national outsourcing companies clearly pay well to keep replacing American workers with third world minimum wage workers.

  4. Told ya so by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Informative

    He only wanted your votes. He hires Mexicans to build his properties and uses shady contractors to cut costs doing so maintaining them.

    Joke is on you for thinking he would be different. You can't be pro automation and pro free market and libertarian and cry wahaha it's not fair ai have to compete too?

    1. Re:Told ya so by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Joke is on you for thinking he would be different. You can't be pro automation and pro free market and libertarian and cry wahaha it's not fair ai have to compete too?

      Most Trump voters are none of those things, although most of them they like to claim that they are in favor of a free market. In reality, they want a market which is manipulated in their favor, and the next guy can go fuck himself. Trump voters could not possibly be farther from supporting the free market.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Told ya so by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They support the free market unless it applies to them. They want the government to bud out and have open competition and less regulation ... Except at the factory they work at.

      But my post was referring to slashdotters who say vote for Trump as Clinton is not on your side on with h1b1 visas. Then in the next story the same posters go on how the free market dictates no increase in minimum wages and that automation increases jobs

    3. Re:Told ya so by gtall · · Score: 1

      Most Trump supporters don't understand the difference between a free market and an unfree market. When the economy of the U.S. was changing, they never popped up their heads and looked around and thought, maybe I should get more education...if they could afford it. They continued to vote in jokers who complained they couldn't afford to give their voters more education because that would require the federal government spend money on them and possibly raise taxes to do it. They were perfectly potty with their voters being on disability and other government programs, the costs for those programs are already buried in the yearly budgets.

      Now their voters have the worst of both worlds, they remain uneducated and their elected representatives like it that way. Just to make things worse, they believed some yokel called Trump was a businessman when in truth he was just the CEO of a Ma and Pa Kettle operation. He knows nothing, hasn't read a book in years, has the attention span of gnat, and whose big idea is to bring back coal jobs for an economy of the 1970s he still thinks exists.

    4. Re:Told ya so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But my post was referring to slashdotters who say vote for Trump as Clinton is not on your side on with h1b1 visas.

      The irony is that she was starting to talk about H1B visas in a way that acknowledged the problems. And unlike that con man, she knows how to get shit done, that's why she was so popular with her constituents as a senator. We had a much better chance of real H1B reform with her.

    5. Re:Told ya so by enrique556 · · Score: 1

      "More education" isn't a magic bullet - most people doing menial jobs are doing them because they're not mensa material in the first place - in spite of the left's insistence that everyone's completely equal in every single way.
      Even if they were able to turn more education into marketable skills, there's already a glut of skilled white collar workers in the west; I'm sure you've read plenty of articles about millenials being stuck working at mcdonald's paying off a 5 year college debt.
      As for the coal miner's jobs, I do agree that those guys could've at least tried to get an electrician apprenticeship and get a job installing solar panels or something.

  5. Re:#MAGA by sabri · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers.

    Who would not take this opportunity with both hands?

    I've worked with many Indian people on an H1-B, and my anecdotal evidence is that they really are just like everyone else. Some are good, some are a bit less. But all share the same hope and dreams of being able to permanently stay in the U.S. and doing it the legal way.

    Instead of only discussing those pesky Indians taking American jobs, let's keep this in mind as well. Let's focus on the companies that are responsible for the abuse of the program. Southern California Edison, Disney, etc. Wipro and Infosys committing visa fraud. These are the bad guys, not Balu from Bombai.

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  6. Wow, once again he goes above and beyond by TimothyHollins · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, are you telling me that once again Trump *didn't* help his voters in favor of his rich business associates? You know, this together with the gutting of the FCC and the EPA almost, *almost*, makes me think that he's not trying that hard to make America great again.

    I know you can't see my face right now, but if you could, it would have a look of surprise.

  7. because the current WH is incompetent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone from the nyc building trades will tell you Trump never ran a tight ship. His buildings are a confusing headache to work with and work in. He's an idiot, not a manager and certainly not a good business man. He just played one on TV.

    That said the Visa program is yet another corporate scam. If they do get it together to "reform" it I'll be surprised that they were walking and chewing gum but it would be a good thing.

  8. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India. I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    The program is repeatedly lobbied for by these companies. It needs to go. That, or these companies should relocate to Mumbai and America should embargo their goods/services and release their patents to the public so that new startups can fill the void. Infosys and friends can see how well SaaS and other insanely overpriced abstract IT rubbish sell to people who can't keep the lights on and who think proper sanitation is shitting in fields and on beaches.

  9. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by darthsilun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh that patronizing response again. I don't remember your side "getting over it" when you were the losers. We got to look at your "Impeach Obama" bumper stickers and the rest of your crap for eight years.

    Guess what. We're not going away. So you can just Shut The Fuck Up with your "get over it" crap. We're totally going to be in your fucking face for the next 45 months. Get used to it.

  10. Re:Thats the free market..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everybody knows it is not about "better" candidates, it is about "cheaper" candidates. You are nothing but an Infosys, TCS, [fill in any staffing agency here] shill.

    STFU

  11. Re:Do you even know what Past Tense is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > No Trump voter voted for Trump based on promises of what would be done.

    Are you kidding??

    Survey after survey showed people supported Trump specifically because of what he promised to do - namely, to build a wall to stop illegal immigration, repeal Obamacare, prosecute Hillary and create jobs.

    Whether America will be great after he does any or all of these things remains to be seen...

  12. Re:Thats the free market..... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do slashdotters hate government clampdowns on freedoms except when it comes to H1B visas? I fucking hate the hypocrisy of it all.

    Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea. What businesses are allowed to do should be well regulated to prevent disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire. What people want is the government to keep them safe from corporations that frankly wouldn't mind if you died suffering as a direct result of their actions. What people don't want is the government interfering with the civil liberties of individuals.

    If you have a problem with H1B tech workers then make yourself a better candidate, FFS.

    If you bring the individual worker having to compete on a global scale to it's logical conclusion, it means that Americans have accept the lowest standard of living of any country. That doesn't seem like a good thing for anyone but the rich.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  13. Re:Thats the free market..... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why do slashdotters hate government clampdowns on freedoms except when it comes to H1B visas?

    Tee hee. You're cute, little guy.

    I fucking hate the hypocrisy of it all.

    Who the fuck are you?

    Our company

    What company? You and the other cowards? Cowards 'R Us?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Re:#MAGA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India.

    UK fucks up India

    UK spawns another nation

    Indians go to that nation for jobs

    epyT-R cries about it

    Indians laugh.

    I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    That is what they are doing. The culture that spawned our culture shit on their culture, and now they're trying to get their shit back together. You can whine about the outcome all you like, but all you're doing is crying about how you can't shit on other people without consequences. You're still profiting from what the UK did to India, and you don't want to see it fixed.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Putting an "Impeach Trump" bumper sticker on your car won't get it keyed - it takes no balls to do that.

    But putting a "Darwin" fish on my first car (a 1960 Dodge Dart) was enough to get my car scratched up by the fuckhead who stole it, presumably because they were offended that I put some reality on the back of a classic American car.

    Get it straight, if conservatives had balls, they wouldn't be afraid of equality.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm happy to take a lower salary if it helps people out in the slums of India.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No. I don't want to keep that in mind. Indians should fix India. I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    The program is repeatedly lobbied for by these companies. It needs to go. That, or these companies should relocate to Mumbai and America should embargo their goods/services and release their patents to the public so that new startups can fill the void. Infosys and friends can see how well SaaS and other insanely overpriced abstract IT rubbish sell to people who can't keep the lights on and who think proper sanitation is shitting in fields and on beaches.

    Exactly. Let these "best and brightest" fix their own country.

  18. Re:#MAGA by LifesABeach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it's OK for dad to lie to Americans? And it's OK for dad's supervisors lie to Americans? Your dad isn't alone in taking my wrath. Our pinko and chief has said, "America First." H1B visas put America NOT first. I've worked with Ginness's, they don't need to be "trained" to do their job. But for some magical reason, Disney's mickey mouse managers, and SoCal-Eddy's-Son have to train H1B visa holders, then the trainers are fired/lay-off/what-ever.

  19. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How much less would you be happy with?
    10%?
    50%?
    Not having a job at all?

  20. Re: Trump = Congress by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

    Source?

  21. Re: IT'S CALLED FUCKING DEMOCRACY, BITCH by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

    Where are you moving to?

  22. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Troll

    If Indians really want their country back they should overthrow their corrupt, sell-out government and take it back. You've got a nice selective view of history, btw.

  23. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Troll

    Perhaps you are but others may not be able to afford such a luxury.

  24. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gotta love the hypocrisy. When Slashdotters talk about Mexicans, it's all "no human is illegal", "tear down the wall", etc. But when a brown person comes not to steal some redneck farmer's job, but their own hipster techie job, then suddenly locking down borders and deporting people becomes okay.

  25. Re:#MAGA by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers.

    Bullshit!!!!!

    You haven't actually talked to those Indians about their backgrounds.

    All those H1B Indians come from wealthy Indian families. Those dirt poor Indians simply don't have the opportunity to get a degree and get to the USA.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  26. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

    Calm down, bro. We know your Dad owns a dealership.

  27. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by BotFinder5000 · · Score: 1

    Source? Infowars doesn't count.

  28. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for the others, but I think people who are here illegally should be sent home and that the H1B program should be heavily modified or scrapped. Race has nothing to do with it.

  29. Re: #MAGA by backslashdot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In that case nobody should ever emigrate anywhere.

    Why did your ancestors go to the country you are in now?

  30. "craft reasonable policy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Funny, it takes about 150 people in a government team to craft a reasonable policy over 3 years, but you think a campaign team should be able to write several dozen in 2 years, while running the campaign? Let me guess, you "supported" Bernie but didn't actually get around to voting.

  31. Re:#MAGA by sit1963nz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, and while you keep shouting USA USA USA and USA First, the rest of the world will simply go USA last.

    Why should any other country take US made goods ?
    Its only worth $2 Trillion to the US economy

    Likewise, people from all around the world are avoiding the USA now, hundreds of billion is lost revenue from Tourists

    The USA makes up 4% of the worlds population and 20% of the worlds GDP, Asia makes up over 60% of the population, Chinas GDP is already bigger than the US and it will not be too many years before the EU is bigger too, and Asia is where all the consumer growth is, does the USA want to be locked out of that ? Tell us what happens when Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Twitter, HP, Dell, Amazon, Walmart, etc etc etc get locked out of Asia, it may well be the Americans go to Asia to find jobs. Alibaba is already massively more profitable than Amazon.

  32. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by darthsilun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If progtards had brains, they wouldn't equate racial and sexual quotas with equality.

    Oh, we've gone from libtards to progtards. How droll. Shall I call you a conservitard in return? How about I just cut to the chase and call you a plain old retard? (Thanks to Twitler we're long past the need to be politically correct.)

    I'm happy to have you call me a libtard or a progtard because I know it means instead of spouting whatever tripe President Brannon, Kellyann, and Vladimir tell you to think, I can think for myself. I know my side doesn't need to resort to nonsense like gerrymandering election districts, or passing laws to inhibit and intimidate voters, or any of the other dirty tricks your side uses to rig elections. When your side stops that shit I'll start taking you seriously again. You and your side's "win at any cost even though we're the minority" mentality proves to me that you're morally bankrupt. And the fact that you post as AC just further confirms to me how broken you really are.

  33. Re:#WILLSAYIMADEITUPHAHATRAP by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they really are just like everyone else.

    I haven't heard of French parents scaling the walls of a school to help their kids cheat in exams.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. That's not who's getting H1-Bs by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they're the Indian middle class. I don't know why it's so hard for Americans to understand that India has a middle class. They're a country of over a billion people.

    These aren't refugees from poverty, they're mostly folks coming over here to take advantage of the currency differences with the plan to go back home with fat stacks of cash. A lot don't because they have kids, they kids put down roots and they stay around. But they're not escaping poverty. If you want those guys than ban the Indians are let the Syrians in. They're not just escaping poverty, they're escaping genocide.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That's not who's getting H1-Bs by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If you want those guys than ban the Indians are let the Syrians in. They're not just escaping poverty, they're escaping genocide.

      Indians may be the wrong colour, but Syrians are the wrong religion and that makes them worse.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  35. Because Trump promised action day 1 by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and he's got the power to do it via Executive Orders. He won the election by a hair's breath and part of that was tech workers who want their jobs back. It's not unreasonable to expect a man who's portrayed as a great negotiator and who's party controls a super majority in Congress could get some Executive Orders done. American Tech workers are suffering now. They don't want to wait another year, two or 4. If they wanted to be patient they could have thrown their lot in with Hilary.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Because Trump promised action day 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He did. It's a fake news from the left.

      https://www.uscis.gov/working-united-states/temporary-workers/h-1b-specialty-occupations-and-fashion-models/h-1b-fiscal-year-fy-2018-cap-season

      Premium processing is what's used by the IT industry to get their workers almost guaranteed. Furthermore, many employers are changing their existing other visas (ex. L1) thinking H-1B is safest. Now there's a lot of uncertainty..

  36. Re:Do you even know what Past Tense is? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    No Trump voter voted for Trump based on promises of what would be done.

    60-something million people tossed coins, and they all landed asshole side up?

    Or perhaps the USA is full of time lords.

    I'm sure you can come up with something even more ludicrous - without trying and without knowing.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  37. That's the trouble by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people want the government to keep _them_ safe. Them. No the other guy. The other guy just needs to work harder and stop leaching off them.

    The best quote I've heard in years came from a CNN pundit calling Rick Santorum to task over his opposition to Medicaid for the poor. She said Nobody's a Conservative when it comes to their family. She was right, too.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  38. I wish all we got was "Impeach Obama"... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    anyone else remember seeing "Don't re-nig"?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  39. Re:Do you even know what Past Tense is? by Rakhar · · Score: 1

    his FOUR YEARS of dong things

    I guess that's one way to look at it...

  40. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    I'll take my chances. The current situation simply means most americans will end up being as poor and as miserable as most of the people in those countries you listed. If it's so great there those companies are welcome to try selling thousand dollar cell phones to people who make $2/week. I'll pass, thanks.

  41. Re:Thats the free market..... by swb · · Score: 1

    A better candidate or a cheaper candidate? I'm not willing to live with 6 people in a two bedroom apartment while working 60 hours a week.

    Be honest, H1Bs are not about quality, they are about applying minimal talent on a mass scale. For the kind of results one would naturally expect when quantity is a quality all it's own.

  42. Re:#MAGA by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Being protectionist / isolationist will achieve the same thing, just faster.

  43. Re:#MAGA by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    What MANY of the ones I've worked with also say is that they want to come here, make good money, and then go back to India eventually where they will invest in businesses and property and retire. This ain't Slumdog Millionaire starring Dev Patel, kid.

    I think that the more recent immigrants from India want to eventually go back, but the ones who have been here a couple of decades are more likely to want to stay.

    The Indian government doesn't make its expats welcome to return. India does not allow dual nationality, and full Indian citizenship is required for some things, including buying farmland. An Indian who returns to India without US citizenship must abandon his or her social security payments (you cannot receive Social Security when you retire if you are an Indian citizen living in India).

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  44. Re:#MAGA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The people getting degrees are mostly coming from the new middle class, not the slums. The slums don't offer much opportunity for pre-university education and learning English.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  45. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    So will slavish acceptance of unchecked immigration.

  46. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    You're free to donate if you choose. You shouldn't impose that choice on others.

  47. Focusing on the abuse? by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Problem is.... the H1B program is really only valuable to a company that plans on abusing it.

    If you're a typical small or mid-sized business with a need for technical employees, it doesn't make sense to try to hire foreigners who have thick accents / language barriers, as well as a work history that's often a total "unknown" (since you can't just skim a resume and get an idea of their skills and knowledge based on who they worked for previously -- because you're likely not that familiar with any foreign firms they worked for).

    I've worked my whole life in I.T. and know for a fact there are plenty of Americans with solid expertise in various parts of the field. I can barely imagine a scenario where nobody in America is competent in what's needed, while someone from over in India is just who they need? It's all about getting budget priced labor and nothing more.

    At the end of the day, sure -- we're all human beings and have similar wants, needs, and hopes / desires. You can make an appeal to emotions about someone, anywhere in the world, who is in an unfortunate situation. But most of those are the result of the government their country is ruled by. America, for all of its faults, is still pretty good about ensuring its citizens enjoy a top-tier lifestyle. That doesn't mean we "owe" it to everyone else on the planet who'd like to come here and get in on the action.

  48. Re: #MAGA by zerocool512 · · Score: 1

    Gotta love those people who talk about something they do not even know anything about. Honestly, we did not have a single good option for President but Trump was not the best of the worst. The Republicans are going to run the country into the ground before we can recover from the mass corruption of the Republic Empire.

    --
    If techs didn't disagree with each other, then Microsoft would rule the world.
  49. Re:Thats the free market..... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    When the "free market" results in companies hiring Pinkerton men to kill protestors, and anyone against corporate murder is a "socialist", then yes, I'm a "socialist" and you should be too.

  50. No time to fix H1B, too busy trying to kill ACA. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    And avoid exposure of his russian connections.

    how about those 2015 tax forms, while we are at it?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  51. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by tomhath · · Score: 1

    We got to look at your "Impeach Obama" bumper stickers and the rest of your crap for eight years... Get used to it.

    Yeah, after listening to you crybabies saying "Shrub" stole the election for eight years, everyone is used to your whining already.

  52. But but but by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    But but but Trump said he was going to "eliminate" or "radically scale back" the H1-B program. Don't tell me he was fibbing!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  53. Re:#MAGA by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Chicago. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and work for a tech company.

    Who would not take this opportunity with both hands?

    Every one in the US would like to take opportunity, but they can't because most of the available positions are filled with people from Mumbai.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  54. Re:#MAGA by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    UK fucks up India

    UK spawns another nation

    You realize you have this chronologically backwards, right?

  55. Re:#MAGA by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    it will not be too many years before the EU is bigger too

    That is highly doubtful. The UK is outright leaving with Netherlands and Denmark populace showing strong interest in doing the same, while Switzerland and Iceland both withdrew their applications. And as for the remaining states, Greece, Italy, and Portugal are all bordering on insolvent.

  56. Re:#MAGA by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Time will tell. It maybe that those other countries will have growth opportunities made available because the UK has exited. I think that the UK is about to realise that things will not "keep calm and carry on", who knows, maybe Scotland will become part of the EU or part of Ireland and get into the EU that way. I really don't expect the USA to treat the UK any better no matter how much grovelling the UK PM does or how many Royals get whored out to meet Trump.

  57. Re:#MAGA by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    We don't want temporary guest workers, we want immigration. Bring them here permanently and make us stronger.

  58. Re:#MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not. Know why? Because if I take a lower salary, then my peers end up with lower ones, as they are pressured to stay at what is regarded as a market rate and it is much harder to get higher rates out of a company when you need it than it is to donate the money when you don't. At the same time there is this "Shortage of talented and trained professionals", we see massive layoffs in similar, or the same fields. We see that million plus dollar companies only need a relative handful of people.

    But you know what really pisses me off? We also see that there are people who can't afford training, be it trades or college, while we work to import others to take jobs, rather than doing what through history, was a the sensible course of action, IE, paying for people to be trained in order to get enough of them. We have executives getting paid enough money that we could hire 200 people instead, and still pay the CEO 4X the average wage. In other words, work a single year as a CEO, and not only could you get a golden parachute, you, and one generation of descendants could live on that.

    If you have enough money to pay CEO's that much, you have enough money to hire away workers from other firms if you need to, while paying people to attend training. Apprenticeships, and OTJ training work. India can dig itself out with their own efforts, and willingly given money, rather than by taking jobs for less than market rates, ruining the odds of getting living wages, and sending money home. Or else they could you know, figure out a way to have fewer people (Don't have kids, let them starve. sterilize people, don't care.). There are lots of solutions, and most don't require them to send their best and brightest to the US, or faking it either.

  59. Re:#MAGA by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I see little reason to give a damn that Indians can't be bothered to take a shot at a first rate society while they leech ours, driving down our standard of living.

    Here's the thing: One of the reasons you enjoy a privileged life in the west today is your forefathers ran roughshod over places like India, Asia, South America and the Middle and Far East - Extracting resources, using cheap labour, installing corrupt governments - You name it. America, Canada, the UK - Your way of life was built on the backs of the people in those parts of the world.

  60. Re:#MAGA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly drinkypoo just literally illustrated the cuckolding of a nation

    Even if that were true (it's not)...

    and is happy about it.

    point to where I said I was happy.

    On the other hand, if we don't share our wealth with them, they will share their poverty with us. Perhaps we should find a way to do that which doesn't involve putting American citizens out on the street.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  61. Re: #MAGA by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    Epy pleeease, immigrate to India

  62. Re: #MAGA by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    THIS IS GREAT!

  63. Re:#MAGA by ruir · · Score: 1

    The golden question is wether those nations can solve their problem.
    Most of those people are only fleeing from themselves, and bringing their problems to other nations.

  64. Re:Thats the free market..... by swb · · Score: 1

    It's not even as much about quality as perception of quality.

    I work for a SMB consultancy we've had success with exactly one Asian guy who is Korean by his parents, but in general is whiter than I am in every cultural respect.

    The other non-whites have bombed because the clients hated them for mostly made-up reasons, but it kind of boils down to what do you do when your client wants a white male on the job.

  65. Re:#MAGA by blindseer · · Score: 2

    Have you considered the possibility that lowering the number of technology workers coming to the USA from India would help India?

    Think about it this way, these people coming to the USA for work are supposed to be the best and brightest in the world. If they weren't the best in the world then employers would find someone better elsewhere. If these people leave India then we've now deprived India of their intelligence, education, and work ethic.

    These visiting workers might send money home for their family but that would not help India near as much as if they were doing this work in their home nation. While they are working in the USA they are mentoring people in the USA, depriving India further of their intelligence and education. If these people had stayed in India then they'd be training the next generation of technology workers, people that are currently living in the slums of India.

    For the sake of the people in India I believe we should stop importing workers from there. I'd be willing to have co-workers of lesser intelligence and education if it helps out people in the slums of India.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  66. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    If you have numbers that show that, it would be interesting, but it isn't intuitively obvious.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  67. Re:#MAGA by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    What about the people who aren't privileged enough to have the high-end education and class benefits to make $100k in IT but have still worked their entire lives to get what they have and develop amazing skillsets? What about the people in the $40k-$60k range in the small to mid-sized businesses who have now lost their niche due to overseas outsourcing to India for pennies on the dollar or at the very least are subject to greater abuse and reduced benefits due to the THREAT of being outsourced?

    A lot of people making over $100k are safe. It's the working poor and lower middle class who are screwed these days.

  68. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    The robin hood act is getting a bit old. That's an arbitrary number too. You don't know whether I make that much or not, or for how long, how much debt I might have accrued, how many dependents I have, or how much I've saved for retirement. It's quite selfish to suddenly impose a substantial tariff on everyone just so you can feel better about yourself/virtue signal to others how much you care. If you really give that much of a shit, donate your entire future income to them and move there to help build that New India. Somehow I bet you'd balk because, like most people, you're freer with other people's money and time than with your own.

  69. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Oh, that's the worst you can think of? What about the people who are literally slaves, living their lives carrying heavy loads in a brick kiln? What about them?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  70. Re:#MAGA by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    Those guys were outsourced ages ago.

  71. Re: #MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Hey, there's a reason it's called Slacker News.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  72. Re: #MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    That's a horrible example. If Einstein had stayed in Germany, he would have been tortured or killed. Any economic gains from his work in America would have been completely lost. It was better for all the world, including Germany, that Einstein left Germany. If you're going to give a historical example, at least choose one that makes sense.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  73. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    So you want to help Indians get out of the muck by trading their places with low income americans? Like I said, maybe you should just pack up shop and move there. You're welcome to make that choice with your own life. You are not welcome to make that choice for others.

  74. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    False dilemma. Actually, what I said was I don't agree with using force. That is not equivalent to selfishness.

    Follow your own advice. If that's what you expect of others, go first. Show the world how it's done. Assuage your guilt at being 'rich'. Take the initiative and donate some large percentage of your future income to the relevant charities. I don't think you'd do it so why should anyone else?

  75. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    You are not welcome to make that choice for others.

    I don't think you understand how government works. Governments do exactly that every day: they make choices for people that they themselves wouldn't make, and don't want.

    In other words, if the government agrees with me, then that choice will be made for others.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  76. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think we both understand it quite well. Thankfully, you are not the government. The problem with these faux bleeding hearts is that they're always justifying why the take needs to be a greater percentage than last year. Then they wonder why the jobs go over seas to shitholes with no human rights in the first place.

  77. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Perhaps we should focus on why that is and fix it instead of opening the floodgates to people looking for quick handouts, people who hate everything our society stands for (or is supposed to stand for), and those who otherwise have no intention of integrating.

  78. Re:#MAGA by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    but all you're doing is crying about how you can't shit on other people without consequences.

    How is declining visitors the same as "shit on other people"? Are you actually clinically insane, to equivocate in this manner, or are you simply attacking the posters character?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  79. Re:#MAGA by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    It's likely your HR dept is more concerned with meeting racial quotas than hiring on relevant attributes like reading comprehension. I didn't say that Infosys management shits on beaches. I said that Indians do. Public defecation is quite common there because they've got nowhere else to go. Companies that outsource to save money typically end up paying 'insource' consultants multiple times what they paid originally to clean up the mess.

    Like I said, try selling your overpriced services to people making $2/week and see how those sales figures look. If you're telling me you can find a glut of qualified workers in Mumbai while America is this barren wasteland of washouts, then move your whole operation there. What are you waiting for?

  80. US wants immigration by monkeyxpress · · Score: 1

    Look, the harsh reality is that every western government in the world needs 20-40 year olds to pile into their nations. Why? Because for the last 30 years politicians and corporations have made a succession of unrealistic pension promises to the current crop of workers, and those workers didn't have enough babies to pay for those promises in the future.

    Your retirement contributions now pay for current retirees - not your future retirement. That will be paid for by whoever is working at the point you retire. It is a ponzi scheme that only works if your population continues to grow at the rate you are making outrageous promises to win votes. Unfortunately, most western nations stopped growing from natural population increases decades ago.

    This is why, despite widespread anger about immigrants in almost all western countries, governments will not do anything about it. Look at the UK. A major reason for the Brexit fiasco was a desire by many to slash immigration, and yet the government refuses to commit to reducing it after Brexit. The reason they won't commit, is because they have decided that people would rather whine about immigrants than have their pensions slashed.

    Trump will have seen the projected pension cost figures now. Even he will be able to conclude that stuffing the country with workers who the USA didn't have to pay the costs of raising and educating, is a remarkably good deal for the country. All he has to do now is make the right noises so that it appears he is doing something about it, then ultimately do very little.

    1. Re:US wants immigration by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Your retirement contributions now pay for current retirees - not your future retirement

      Social Security has always been a flow-through system. Money has a short half-life and is not a good store of value. The Social Security administration wasn't designed to use 40 working-years of your life in which you had to pay a mortgage, health insurance, car payments, and so forth, as well as build up your luxurious lifestyle with the large amount of unnecessary income you collect, to pay for the 15-20 years of your life when you have a house and get medicare (a separately-funded program); it was designed to have 50% of the country pay base expenses for the 20% who are retired with their life-expenses paid up.

  81. Re:So now Trump is to blame for applications by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Otherwise you'd try to refute your own null hypothesis -- perhaps the car wasn't stolen or defaced because of the Darwin emblem.

    Right, that's why they removed the Darwin emblem. What a bullshit douchebag you are.

    Unlike you, I require pics or it didn't happen.

    Unlike you, I can see that someone damaged my car removing my Darwin fish, and put two and two together.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  82. Re:Thats the free market..... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

    Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea.

    It's interesting, really. Every time I see some left-winger bitching about the terrible effects of unrestrained capitalism or such they're actually bitching about cronyism, which is a very different beast.

    H-1B visas aren't issued by business. They're government interference in a market. In a truly free market (and we're really talking about "free markets" rather than "capitalism") there aren't enough tech people so the salaries go up until more people want to get into the field and it reaches a sort of stasis. In a cronyist environment there aren't enough tech workers and their salaries are too high so the cronyist whines to the government which then allows them to bring people from much poorer countries over at dramatically lower wages to kill two birds with one stone - lower the average salary and have more workers.

    Geeze. This is like right-wingers who think that drugs cause street gang violence.

  83. Re:#MAGA by blindseer · · Score: 1

    I don't have numbers, at least not all of them. Here's a few to consider, the average IQ in the USA is 98, in India it's 81.

    I'm sure India has a lot of very smart people, if only because of their large population and the way the bell curve works. So even with an average IQ of 81 there's probably more geniuses in India than the USA. However, if the smartest people in India keep leaving for places like the USA then one can expect India to have a brain drain over time.

    It would be in India's best interest to somehow keep these intelligent people in their borders.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  84. Re:Thats the free market..... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea.

    It's interesting, really. Every time I see some left-winger bitching about the terrible effects of unrestrained capitalism or such they're actually bitching about cronyism

    Which part of "disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire" is about cronyism? You don't need corruption for unrestrained capitalism to be an insane idea. Secondly, why would you exclude cronyism from capitalism when laws and regulations become commodities that can be bought and sold? Cronyism is just a branch of capitalism.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  85. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 1

    Who the hell ever said otherwise? Nothing makes it easier to make a point than to attack an argument that nobody is making.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  86. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 2

    He actually meant that he's happier with you taking a lower salary.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  87. And by NewYork · · Score: 2

    "Politics is the art by which politicians get money from the rich and votes from the poor on the pretext of protecting each from the other" -- Oscar

  88. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 1

    Because as long as even one person has less than you have, you don't deserver anything. You won't deserve anything until everybody has more than you have. Then you'll deserve something. Until you get it, and then there will be somebody with less than you again and you'll be back to not deserving anything.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  89. Re:#MAGA by computational+super · · Score: 1

    OP is a rich white kid who grew up in private schools and assumes that everybody else in America was the same.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  90. Re:#MAGA by MooseTick · · Score: 1

    " maybe you should just pack up shop and move there. You're welcome to make that choice with your own life. You are not welcome to make that choice for others."

    That was the same mentality used for centuries to keep women and minorities out of the workforce.

  91. Re:#MAGA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    That just sounds like the Flynn effect of education hasn't happened in India yet. They're a bunch of simple country people, still.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  92. Re:#MAGA by m00sh · · Score: 1

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers.

    Bullshit!!!!!

    You haven't actually talked to those Indians about their backgrounds.

    All those H1B Indians come from wealthy Indian families. Those dirt poor Indians simply don't have the opportunity to get a degree and get to the USA.

    Nope.

    They are a mix of all backgrounds, mostly middle class, some upper-middle and some lower-middle. Just mostly depends on if their parents put them through engineering or medical school - because that's all US cares about: STEM immigrants.

    Wealthy Indians would never leave India. Why would anyone leave from being the top class in a society to be the bottom rung in America?

  93. Re:Thats the free market..... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Unrestrained capitalism is frankly an insane idea.

    It's interesting, really. Every time I see some left-winger bitching about the terrible effects of unrestrained capitalism or such they're actually bitching about cronyism

    Which part of "disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire" is about cronyism? You don't need corruption for unrestrained capitalism to be an insane idea. Secondly, why would you exclude cronyism from capitalism when laws and regulations become commodities that can be bought and sold? Cronyism is just a branch of capitalism.

    Cronyism is the antithesis of a free market. Capitalism can work quite well without cronyism. And you're creating a false-dichotomy. We can have good regulation, and there are plenty of good regulations out there. But cronyism is never good. We're talking about cronyism.

  94. Re:Thats the free market..... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Which part of "disastrous outcomes like rivers catching fire" is about cronyism?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  95. Re:#MAGA by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    OP is a rich white kid who grew up in private schools and assumes that everybody else in America was the same.

    You mean me, or the guy who posted "Trump Trump Trump"?

    If you mean me, then no.

    I grew up far from rich by most standards and I realized early on that even with my modest start, lots of people didn't have the opportunities I had.

    Was I "rich" by Mumbai standards? Probably, but I didn't live in Mumbai...so I wasn't at any particular advantage in terms of "wealth" in my surroundings.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  96. Re: #MAGA by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    In that case nobody should ever emigrate anywhere.

    Why did your ancestors go to the country you are in now?

    Because their home country had been overrun by Nazis and totally trashed.

  97. Re:#MAGA by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Imagine this: you live in the slums in Mumbai. Your father goes thru trash every day, hoping to find tin cans to sell, and your mother tries to sell home-made bread on the market to feed all of your 6 brothers and sisters. Now you get the opportunity to get a three year degree in software engineering and go to the U.S. to work for a tech company. You have no clue about all the politics surrounding H1-B in the U.S., and you don't know that you will be grossly underpaid comparing to your American peers. Who would not take this opportunity with both hands? I've worked with many Indian people on an H1-B, and my anecdotal evidence is that they really are just like everyone else. Some are good, some are a bit less. But all share the same hope and dreams of being able to permanently stay in the U.S. and doing it the legal way. Instead of only discussing those pesky Indians taking American jobs, let's keep this in mind as well. Let's focus on the companies that are responsible for the abuse of the program. Southern California Edison, Disney, etc. Wipro and Infosys committing visa fraud. These are the bad guys, not Balu from Bombai.

    TL:DR don't hate the player, hate the game

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u