Slashdot Mirror


Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think', Says Microsoft (onmsft.com)

Microsoft said this week that Bing is "bigger than you think" and provided some numbers that could be a surprise to many. The company claims that fully one-third of searches in the US are powered by Bing, either directly or through Yahoo or AOL (both of which provide results generated by Microsoft). From a report: With 9% market share worldwide and 12 billion monthly searches, almost half of that (5 billion) comes from the United States where Bing has 33% market share.

128 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Most searched word on Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Google"

    1. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by lastman71 · · Score: 1

      "Google"

      More "Insightful" than "funny" :)

    2. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by tomxor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You joke... but there are still many people who don't know what a browser is, they go buy a cheap 100$ laptop preloaded with winbloat 10 avengers home business whatever edition it is now, pre-loaded with Edge+Bing by default, they probably end up searching for google in edge's omnibar every single time they want to go to google... Bing counts that as a search of course, not a domain autocorrect. You might even be able to roughly calculate this proportion if Google released their "Google.com via Bing.com" stats you could subtract it from M$ stats.

    3. Re:Most searched word on Bing... by tomxor · · Score: 1

      another one would be "google chrome or firefox installer for windows".

  2. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    What's so horrible about google?

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  3. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That and many browsers will have its default search engine as Bing or Yahoo. And still they are #2 behind Google.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  4. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After they weaseled Win10 onto everyone and set it as the default search engine, does this really come as a surprise?

    1. Re:Duh by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      It's actually the same 10% as the rest of the world. They've padded the stats out with bot traffic.

  5. Re:And this matters to me... by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's controlled by a big corporation, so you should use Bing instead.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  6. Re:It's the name by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, it doesn't make any sense. Why would they name a service that you use to Google things "Bing"?

  7. Bing is a Me too product. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I haven't found any real advantage of Bing over Google other than some cosmetic stuff. I remember Microsoft Adds a while back showing that without the cosmetic differences Bing and Google were not differential. Which pretty much failed. Because if you are already using one product why would you change over to an other product that does the same thing?

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Bing is a Me too product. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe you feel like someone else should be spying on you for a change.

      This brings an interesting question though: would you rather have one search engine know almost everything about you or would you rather have multiple search engines know a lot but nowhere near everything about you?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Bing is a Me too product. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Bing maps is wqy faster than Google maps.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  8. Bing VIDEO is really good by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Informative

    search Bing for whatever porn you want, let's say tentacle henai, then click on the "Video" tab. It will pull up lots of videos of tentacle hentai. Also you can watch these videos from Bing search results without going to the video's originating website (which can be very sketchy and full of malware)

    1. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by saider · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure Microsoft will talk about this use case in their next commercial.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      You do not need to sign in to change the filter setting. You can do it without a Bing account. You can even do it from your browser's "Private Window".

    3. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      "Hay Siri, show me some tentacle porn videos."

      "Alexa, order more man-size kleenex and a mop."

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      This very neatly ties into that awful video where they had projectile vomiting on viewing someone's search history. I was just too blind to see how having retching and heaving and a floor full of puke was really the perfect way to speak technically

    5. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by MatiasKiviniemi · · Score: 1

      HAHaHAaa! Finally "News for nerds, Stuff that matters"! :D

    6. Re:Bing VIDEO is really good by tomxor · · Score: 1

      search Bing for whatever porn you want, let's say tentacle henai, then click on the "Video" tab. It will pull up lots of videos of tentacle hentai.

      I really really hope Microsoft capitalise on this very insightful post and make a Bing tentical hentai tv commercial.

  9. Fake news by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    This is just more fake news from Microsoft. Most people don't care what search engine they use and probably have no idea how to change the default anyway, so they use whatever is there so long as they find what they want. If you snuck into their houses and changed it to Google they not only wouldn't care, they probably wouldn't even notice. In fact it would be hilarious if some black-hat (or white-hat for that matter) created malware that changed everyones default search engine to anything but Bing.

    1. Re:Fake news by tsqr · · Score: 1

      This is just more fake news from Microsoft.

      I'm tired of the term "fake news". Can't we just go back to calling it "bullshit" like we did in the good old days?

    2. Re:Fake news by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I'm using the term ironically. If it pisses off the Trump fuccbois because I'm using it wrong then that's bonus points.

  10. hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Using your monopoly power to force Windows 10 users to perform any Contana search request through Bing sure helps... but of course Google isn't much better.

  11. Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't care how big Google or Bing is. Search is a commodity now. I don't really care which farm grew my morning grapefruit either.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Commoditization by SnarkSide · · Score: 1

      Even if one company's grapefruit isn't much different than the other, I just like to know that if the first company gets a little to adamant about always wanting to watch me eat my grapefruit, I can go to another company. I support Bing for one and only one reason, so Google will have competition. I block my computers from talking to Google entirely whenever possible. Microsoft may not get privacy right either, but the world is a better place if Google at least has competition who can at least claim to respect privacy more. I can't depend only on Startpage and Duckduckgo because they won't be able to really offer competition to Google for various reasons. Even if company B watches me eat my grapefruit, I'd rather they exist just to discourage company A from watching me eat my grapefruit in 4K video that they store for 10 years.

    2. Re:Commoditization by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I don't really care which farm grew my morning grapefruit either.

      I don't know about that. Locally grown and in season produce is vastly superior.

    3. Re:Commoditization by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "no such thing"? My pantry disagrees.

    4. Re:Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Locally grown and in season produce is vastly superior.

      So you live in Texas, Florida or remember when California had good grapefruits. And if I lived in Hawaii I'd probably go for Tahitian Pommelmousse instead, because I could grow it my yard instead of having going to the store.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:Commoditization by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      So you live in Texas, Florida or remember when California had good grapefruits.

      Actually, none of the above. But I do live within an hour's drive of farms and there are always plenty of farmer's markets in the city that sell whatever is currently in season in my area.

    6. Re:Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      And they have grapefruits? Are you certain the farmers markets aren't selling fruit that they bought from the co-ops?

      It's an hour's drive to get local garlic and it's cheap, often free, but it's not worth the drive to me.

      And some things aren't worth getting locally. I once drank wine from Michigan. never again.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Commoditization by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Would you care if grapefruit company A uses the money they get from their grapefruits to find a way to make sure you can't work anymore, or buy grapefruit B that will allow you to keep your job, property, life?

    8. Re:Commoditization by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that would be very important to me, if I were a SJW or I were part of a grapefruit picking union.

      But what you propose is the opposite of a commodity. If you want to get more than the common market price for your goods, you need to differentiate. So you do them as "organic" and imply they have some additional health benefits or improved taste. Or "free-tree" and hope that consumers are concerned that small farmers are being treated fairly by large multinational export corporations.

      There are lots of different ways you make money through appeals to emotion.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    9. Re:Commoditization by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. The thought I was trying to convey wasn't captured in your comprehension. I'm sure it's my fault.

      What I was trying to say is would you care if a commodity company - call it company A uses the proceeds from your purchase to put you out of work or perhaps even kill you, or would you buy commodity from Company B that isn't trying to kill you? I wanted to bring that thought out because that is what is going on in the world today. Some companies that are household names are backed by some truly evil people. For instance, Mr. George Soros. Look him up, on youtube with his 2020 interview. He'll tell you himself that some of the best years of his life was when he was a Nazi. He has done some good things, it seems. He has also done some downright despicable, terrible things. Things that if those countries were to get a hold of him, well I wouldn't want to be him. His defense was - well don't let a guy like me do things like that. He's right, it was legal. Clearly not moral and he admitted it.

  12. Re:And this matters to me... by rahenri · · Score: 1

    I will just leave this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  13. So True by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect many non-porn Bing searches are variations on "How do I set Google as my default search?"

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re: So True by qortra · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would have thought the same thing. However, I've been using Bing since the James Damore incident out of curiosity, and it really isn't that bad. I haven't had to do as many technical (i.e. programming) searches since I switched, and that was always Bing's weakness compared to Google, so I reserve full judgement for later. Regardless of what you feel ethically about Google vs Microsoft, it can't be good for any particular search engine to have a near Monopoly in the US.

    2. Re: So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      But with a monopoly it's so much easier for the gov'ment because they only have to "convince" one company to give them access to all their data, instead of having to hassle a bunch of dopey little companies to do so. 'cause terism!

    3. Re:So True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and/or searched via the cortana agent....

  14. I Switched to Bing by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been proudly using Bing every since Google trampled on Free Speech and fired James Damore.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    1. Re:I Switched to Bing by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      I switched from Chrome to Brave for the same reason. Very happy with the Brave browser. I use DuckDuckGo but it's not as good as Google.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:I Switched to Bing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's a bit extreme... Maybe protest by setting yourself on fire or something, but using Bing?!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:I Switched to Bing by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      "9 out of 10 Nazis prefer Bing to Google!"

  15. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    Google values censorship.

  16. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    OMG a megacorp likes censorship! Fucking knock me over with a feather.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  17. Bing API is good by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 2

    You would think that Google would own search via API, but actually Google's APIs for searching the whole web are surprisingly shitty. Bing's on the other hand perform just as well, require no configuration, and are far less expensive.

  18. Re:It's the name by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Bing
    Is
    Not
    Google.

    I rest my case.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  19. MS AI Sexbot eating its own dog food by number6x · · Score: 1, Funny

    About 40% are how to switch to Google as default.

    60% are from Microsoft's AI, Tay trying to search how to meet sexy alt-right single men.

    Tay keeps re-submitting because bing thinks she wants to buy packs of American Singles. White cheese, of course!

  20. 9% market share by kfh227 · · Score: 1

    Nope, that is actually right around what I would have guessed.

    The only time I use Bing is when Firefox screws up and somehow changes the default from Google to Bing. Now someone tell me why this keeps happening so I can fix it and get that 9% down to 8.9% for the rest of world.

  21. Default by superdave80 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ..." that fully one-third of searches in the US are powered by Bing, ..." Only because there are so many browsers that MS has managed to get Bing setup as the default search engine. The worst was my Thunderbird email client. Not only did it have Bing set as the default search engine, but MS had somehow made it so that Google was not on the list of selectable search engines if you wanted to change from Bing. You actually have to install an add-on to get Google as a search option. I wonder how much they 'donated' to Thunderbird for that one.

    1. Re:Default by green1 · · Score: 2

      The bigger question is why an email client would have a web search function at all. Do you also use your word processor for making spreadsheets and your graphics package for making databases?

    2. Re:Default by alexo · · Score: 1

      Only because there are so many browsers that MS has managed to get Bing setup as the default search engine

      But the fact that Google comes as the default search on Chrome (with over 50% market share), as well as every Android and iOS, does not faze you in the least.

    3. Re:Default by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Siri uses Bing to answer queries, that's probably a fair proportion of those searches.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Default by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      The bigger question is why an email client would have a web search function at all.

      If you select something in an email, there is an option to search that highlighted text. It then opens up your default browser and runs that search. It's just a shortcut so that you don't have to copy -> open web browser -> go to search engine -> paste/enter.

    5. Re:Default by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Google was widely used before Chrome/Android/iOS phones. And you generally have to download Chrome (rather than the already installed MS Explorer/Edge) on your PC. So, yeah, there is a really good reason it doesn't phase me in the least.

  22. Sure by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think', Says Microsoft"

    Alas nobody else says this.

    1. Re:Sure by green1 · · Score: 1

      Don't people always say that it isn't the size that counts?

    2. Re:Sure by Threni · · Score: 1

      I would have guessed more than 9% too! I think that figure will surprise people but not for the reasons Microsoft were probably hoping.

    3. Re:Sure by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      They also say is easier to hit a home run with a large bat then a small one.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  23. Re:And this matters to me... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

    ... how?

    They put up a story that isn't about Trump or the Google memo, and you're complaining?

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  24. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with pornhub?

  25. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by green1 · · Score: 1

    To be fair, Google is the default search on chrome, and that includes many smartphones (which are a very popular device to run searches on these days)

  26. Damore memo by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    After Google's stupidly-botched and poorly-justified handling of the Damore memo incident, I'm giving Bing more of my search traffic, along with DuckDuckGo. It's clear that viable alternatives have to be kept alive so that when we disagree with a giant's policies we have elsewhere to take our business.

  27. Really, Microsoft? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, after all these years, Bing remains so irrelevant that you have to resort to proclaiming that it is not irrelevant?

    1. Re:Really, Microsoft? by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's actually super relevant. A lot of people use it, i get ribbed for using it all the time but have no problems using it as my default search engine in the USA. I hear it can suck in foreign countries, but that's not a problem for me.

      Lots of people enjoy bing.. great image search, great SERP design for common topics and they're continuously improving it. They have public conferences once a month where there are thousands of people on the phone hearing about new features and testing new services. It's huge, but written off by so many for reason i fail to understand. (again, unless you don't use US searches.. i can't speak for anywhere else)

      Millions of people use it for bing rewards too.. its nice getting free music, games, xbox live points et all just for doing what you would normally do anyway.

  28. Re:Clearly BS by green1 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have to be deliberate for MS to count it as a win.

  29. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    Keep doing business with megacorps that censors because free speech is an antiquated idea that should be burned. It's not like megacorps are the gatekeepers to the internet or anything.

    "I care more about the label on the boot that's on my neck than the boot itself."... You're a tool.

  30. Re:And this matters to me... by Voyager529 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's so horrible about google?

    1. Their search results have gotten progressively worse of late. it's either so fuzzy as to have half the top results completely irrelevant, or "verbatim" won't come up with anything because of spacing or the literal order of words is incorrect.
    2. Search for "driver download" and you'll get some very shady websites, many of which don't actually provide driver downloads...and they do nothing about it. Same for "teamviewer" and other legitimate tools that get hijacked by "your computer has a virus" websites. If they want to perpetuate the blurring between the URL bar and the search bar, that's fine, but literally nobody has Googled for teamviewer and been okay with the sketchy sites that rank very high.
    3. Overall creepiness. They collect *a lot* of data, even if users go out of their way to avoid it. Though they *say* they'll be responsible with it (and to be fair, so far they appear to have done so), it's incredibly difficult to opt out of data collection, because so much of the web depends on them (go ahead, disable Google Fonts and Google AMP and see what happens to the internet...)
    4. Questionable practices - preferring faster sites is understandable, defining 'faster' as 'using Google AMP' is shady. Ad blockers are one thing, but adding an ad blocker to a browser that has a controlling slice of the market when 90% of their revenue comes from ads is 90's Microsoft levels of monopoly.
    5. E-mail is a great thing. Gmail has twisted it very heavily from being an analog of letter-based correspondence to being a de facto chat client, and twisting POP and IMAP to make it less practical to use a third party mail client, and require an obscurely placed setting to allow third party clients to connect via standard protocols...and it's not getting better.
    6. Discontinuing useful services and changing UIs and APIs to make things less useful (Reader, iGoogle, their 1,001 chat clients, none of which are XMPP compliant anymore, the list goes on).
    7. On Android specifically, mandating profitable things ('Play Store' must be on the first page) but not openness-based things (mandating unlocked bootloaders or that shipped apps can be removed if not a core function). Yes, they sell their reference phones, but if they're going to have requirements that are purely for profit reasons, there's no reason they can't mandate Samsung do the same thing.

    Now yes, I know there are rebuts to most of these items, but collectively Google has a stranglehold on the internet advertising market and controls enough of the internet infrastructure that avoiding them is near impossible, I do expect better behavior out of them.

  31. Bing is worse than you think. by urbanriot · · Score: 1

    Seriously, do Microsoft employees actually use Bing? Back in the day when we had HotBot, WebCrawler, Yahoo, etc., etc., they would all produce independently useful and alternative results. These days, for better or for worse, the only tangible results seem to come from Google. I'm sure there's alternatives but Microsoft is not one of them.

  32. I like Bing by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    He had a real self-effacing humor which played off well against Frank Sinatra's brash cockiness.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  33. Re:It's amazing what you can do by green1 · · Score: 1

    To be fair, try using Google Assistant without using Google Search.

  34. Re:And this matters to me... by hawguy · · Score: 1

    If you want a VIABLE alternative then look to DuckDuckGo, not bing... never bing... never, ever bing...

    I forced myself to use DuckDuckGo for a month, by the end of the month, I was rerunning most of my searches with the "!g" tag to do the search on Google since DuckDuckGo results weren't what I was looking for.

  35. Re:And this matters to me... by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Viable how?

    Google's results have ben in decline for a while, but for anything even slightly non-trivial Bing rarely even gives more than one or two results in the first page that are actually relevant. Every time I use them it's like returning to the bad old days when Alta Vista and Ask Jeeves. (I do computer repair, so end up doing a lot of searches on other people's computers with the default engine)

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  36. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    Keep doing business with megacorps that censors because free speech is an antiquated idea that should be burned. It's not like megacorps are the gatekeepers to the internet or anything.

    Hey, I'm a leftie, screaming my lungs out about corporate power, regulatory capture and monopolies is my bread and butter. So I'm hazing you for being late to the party you precious little snowflake.

    "I care more about the label on the boot that's on my neck than the boot itself."... You're a tool.

    Nice strawman. Now go vote for some communists who'll actually try to break apart the googles of this world, cuz the GOP sure as shit isn't going to bother.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  37. Bigger Than You Think by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    This is also what I always say before getting kicked out of the bed :(

  38. Re:And this matters to me... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    ... how?

    Viable alternative to google/news, which is teh suck and getting worse.

    Oh, some googley googler had mod points today, and hanging on Slashdot instead of working, mercy me. Look... the rot that is eating Google out from the outside... you are part of it.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  39. Again MS is only looking at the US by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    If they aren't prepared to handle the global market they will remain strong. They keep launching products with US centric features and relevance and are extremely slow to grow support in other countries and cultures.

  40. Re:And this matters to me... by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    What's so horrible about google?

    I said google news, not "google". Google is another issue. Figure out what's horrible about Google for yourself. I well help you with google news: it sucks, the format is crap, the concept is crap, the news search is crap, it gets worse with each revision... what the fuck. What are they thinking.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  41. Re:It's the name by omnichad · · Score: 1
  42. Re:And this matters to me... by KingMotley · · Score: 2

    Well, except google is also a convicted monopolist.

  43. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 2

    I'm hazing you for being late to the party

    You don't know any position I have or held particularly so on this topic. Why are you generalizing and treating me as a group instead of an individual?

    ow go vote for some communists

    why would anyone be a communist with such a body count? I also think that I own my labor and can sell it at my discretion and economic transactions are not inherently evil.

    You know. Never mind. I don't want to have a conversation with an ideologue that treats an individual as a group through generalizations and ideological purity tests. You are why we can't have nice things.

  44. Not surprised by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 2

    Microsoft will literally pay you to use Bing. They'll give about a third of a cent per search in rewards. And I still don't use it.

    Bing is the default in a lot of corporate systems. It's like that where I work, and we can't even change the bookmarks.

    But I think the big thing is simply that it's the default to Siri.

    1. Re:Not surprised by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I "use" bing for the pay. I open up another browser, mash the keyboard, and click all the related searches on the side and bottom to open them in new tabs. Takes less than a minute to generate dozens of bing searches. Of course I don't actually look at any of them background tabs of random searches, I just close them. Microsoft gets to falsify their usage numbers, I get gift cards.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  45. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    You don't know any position I have or held particularly so on this topic.

    You do know your entire commenting history is available at the click of a button, right?

    Having said that, I apologize. I didn't realize you were an ardent anti-monopolist. We'll get those megacorps eventually, comrade!

    You are why we can't have nice things.

    Jebus! Go find your safes space already.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  46. In fairness, by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    It would be physically impossible for Bing to be smaller than I think it is.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  47. Re:And this matters to me... by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    https://www.ftc.gov/news-event...

    https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/09/05/ftc-fines-google-19-million-for-kids-app-misuse
    And that's not all of it.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  48. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    That's not really fair, because GOOGLE MAKES CHROME. Also, GOOGLE MAKES ANDROID.

    Firefox changed it's default search from Google to Yahoo (which uses bing). It's troublesome to change the default to Google, but it's worth it. While you're at it, DELETE bing and yahoo from the list because some updates will change your default to them for you.

  49. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    and i am sure you read that commenting history, right?

    u r my safe space.

    only thing better than a dead commie is a dying commie telling me where more commies are.

  50. Duck Duck Go by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    DDG uses Bing as one of its primary search engines. Just an interesting factoid.

    1. Re:Duck Duck Go by used2win32 · · Score: 1

      As one of over 400 sources, yes.

      --
      Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
  51. Ethical reasons by The+Swan+Spirit · · Score: 1

    I would never search in Bing, not because I might think they can't provide the service, which they can, but for ethical reasons.

  52. Re:And this matters to me... by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    What's so horrible about google?

    The quality of Google's search results has fallen fairly dramatically over the past few years, to the point where it's no longer superior to engines like Bing.

    Google News recently made changes that has eliminated its usefulness for a lot of people. Bing News has become a better alternative for many of those people.

  53. Re:And this matters to me... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    As is Microsoft.

  54. It's not the size that matters... by Matheus · · Score: 1

    It's how you use it.

  55. Re:And this matters to me... by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's very strange. One of the pleasant surprises I had when I start using DDG was that the search results I got tended to be much better than what I was getting out of Google.

    Neither are perfect, of course.

  56. Such a shame then by kilodelta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because I block Bing on my firewall as I discovered Microsoft was using it for the Windows 10 phone home. Just block 65.52.108.210, 204.79.197.200 and 13.107.21.200 - buh bye Bing! And it's funny my firewall logs - it's all hits to those IP's. So I know I blocked the right ones. So far nobody on this network has complained and there are about 8 of us using it. And not a single Windows mobile device either.

  57. Re:Umm, yeah, sure by green1 · · Score: 1

    But Google does NOT make iPhone, yet the default search there is Google (for lots of $$ it's been revealed) so that's no different than Firefox (I doubt Firefox made the change for free)

    Thing is, there's always a default, maybe there shouldn't be, maybe on first boot you should have to chose, but as long as search engines pay mega-bucks to be the default, there will always be a default, and it's not unique to MS.

    The one that is however less fair is when MS releases a "critical update" that reverts your search engine to Bing after you've manually changed it. That's pretty underhanded.

  58. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    and i am sure you read that commenting history, right?

    The only interesting thing to read on the internet is comment threads, so pretty much, yeah.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  59. Let's hear it for Bing! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1
    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  60. Re:And this matters to me... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    When you have the dominant engine, everyone out there will be trying to subvert your engine to get their (usually spam) pages to show up first... Exactly the same thing happened to altavista.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  61. Re:Not according to my access logs by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Accordingly to my access logs, bingbot is extremely aggressive compared to other search engine bots... It seems to request the same files repeatedly, over and over... At one point my server was pushing a steady 20mbit/sec of traffic to bingbot.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  62. Google Chrome by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    Nothing about how Google has pushed Chrome through dubious means to be the #1 browser, which, by default, uses Google for searching.

    They both are playing fast and loose.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Google Chrome by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      What about how Microsoft supplies Internet Explorer/Edge as the default browser on almost every new computer and that has Bing as the default for searching?

      The only time I use it is to do a search for "Chrome" which brings up a massive half page ad about how IE is better

  63. It's not the meat it's the muscle. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    Let me guess, it's not the size but how you use the search?

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  64. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    only interesting thing to read on the internet is comment threads

    clearly you have never read the Linux manual. sig be damned.

  65. Re:Clearly BS by used2win32 · · Score: 1

    I use it deliberately - when Siri searches something for me. That is the only time.
    Apple is paid billions by Google to keep it the default search engine in the iOS system, yet when Siri searches for you it uses Bing.

    --
    Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
  66. Re:And this matters to me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    Nah, I've read it. It was a while ago, though. So I've moved on. Living in the past is for suckers.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  67. Rewards by stinkyj · · Score: 1

    I use it for their reward system, I earn like $5 from amazon, or can use it to earn credits in their Microsoft store for games/videos.

    Good enough search results for me. I'll still use google occasionally, but getting $5 amazon e-credit takes little, to no effort.

  68. Re:If Bing was really that good... by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    If Google was really that good they wouldn't have to Bribe Apple and Mozilla to embed it into their products?

  69. Re:And this matters to me... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

    10/10 would read ur comment again.

  70. Re:And this matters to me... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    ..and it all runs on Intel, another convicted monopolist.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  71. Heh... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bing comes as a default search engine (as does Edge), it's obligatory to use in Windows 10S, and Microsoft offers freebies for people who use it (a big reason why the percentage is so big in the US - Bing rewards is not available in several countries).
    Sure, some people use and like it, but I'd say 9% worldwide is a huge failure when you are trying to sway the market with agressive strategies like those.

  72. Re:And this matters to me... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    As is Google.

    I see a pattern forming here.

  73. Default is powerrful by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    Microsoft owns the default, and fools leave it alone.

    Me, I prefer privacy: Duck Duck Go.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  74. Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think' by AdamStarks · · Score: 2

    That wouldn't be hard

    (stolen from coworker)

    1. Re:Bing is 'Bigger Than You Think' by vandamme · · Score: 1

      That's what she said.

  75. Competition by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    I use Bing because it makes competition in the market place. For advanced searches I still use Google, but that's just because my google-fu is better.

  76. I am ok with Bing really being big by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    As long as it does not become "too big to fail"

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  77. Porn by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Bing is better than google at finding Porn.

    It has a better video view interface too.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  78. Re:And this matters to me... by dhammabum · · Score: 1

    doesn't duckduckgo use bing as its backend search engine?

    --
    I am not a robot. I am a unicorn.
  79. Google's loss is Bing's gain by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    Since Google has changed it's policy from "do no evil" to "do the right (alt-left) thing", the purging of James Damore for a well written, thoughtful document that challenged the alt-left ethos https://medium.com/@Cernovich/... was the last straw for me. I have switched away from Google as my default search engine, removed the Chrome browser from my PC and directed all meaningful email away from my Gmail account. I have also switched from ABP to a pi-hole to deny all ad revenue to the leaches.

    Google used to be a great tech company, but it is clear that they are no longer interested in science or the truth if it contradicts their worldview and are only secondarily interested in innovation. For a company through which the vast majority of the information in the world is filtered, that is a very bad thing. They are no longer interested in the most accurate results, they are interested in the right results, whatever they might determine that might be. They were already caught interfering with the autocomplete suggestions when searching for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 elections. I suspect that they will continue to dramatically lose market share until they get a CEO who cleans house of all the SJW types in positions of power and gets back to focusing on the core technology.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  80. Re:And this matters to me... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    or "verbatim" won't come up with anything because of spacing or the literal order of words is incorrect.

    It's amazing that verbatim doesn't show up when you get the word order wrong...

    Search for "driver download" and you'll get some very shady websites, many of which don't actually provide driver downloads

    Yep, as link like 5+ after the vendor's website at the top.

    Same for "teamviewer"

    Just tried it and got:
    1. TeamViewer's website.
    2. TeamViewer on the google play store.
    3. TeamViewer on cnet's download.
    4. TeamViewer on Filehippo's download.
    5. TeamViewer's wikipedia entry
    6. TeamViewer on the iTunes store
    7. TeamViewer on the Windows store.
    and the next button.
    Literally the entire page was nothing but links to the official teamviewer download locations.

    And the rest of your post is just personal opinion.

  81. Microsoft paid for Bing be the default FF search. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I agree that monopolies can be unhealthy.

    More detail about the ethics: Microsoft pays Mozilla Foundation through Yahoo to make Bing the default search engine in Firefox. Bing is used by a lot of people because they don't know about other options. That isn't "popular".

    Windows 10 is used by a lot of people because they were forcefully switched away from their original Microsoft OS version. That isn't "popular".

  82. Bing sneaking in? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    I think it is instructive that Bing is being used behind the scenes where users are not actually choosing it. Beyond that, they mentioned AOL and Yahoo. Their users are the most unsophisticated users on the Internet and may not even be aware of other search options.

  83. Re:Microsoft paid for Bing be the default FF searc by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    The one computer I own that does run Win10 has Bing blocked.

  84. Sounds about right... by MercTech · · Score: 1

    Since Microsoft has a habit of every patch returning Bing and Microsoft Edge to be the default; 1/3 of the internet searches sounds right with the percentage of clueless net users that have no clue how to change defaults.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT