Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Would You Pay To See Open Sourced?

jbrase writes: It's in the interest of the open-source community to make open-source development as profitable as possible. One potential means of making money from open source is crowdfunding, [but] proprietary vendors aren't likely to be enthusastic about using their flagship product to try out a relatively untested business model. Crowdfunding the open source release of legacy technologies of historical significance could provide a low-risk way for vendors to experiment with making money by crowdfunding: The product has already turned them a profit.

With that, I'd like to ask Slashdot readers, what would you pay to see open sourced?

Slashdot reader jonwil left a comment suggesting old games ("where the game is no longer being developed/worked on and where the engine/tech is no longer being used for anything"). But the sky's the limit here, so leave your own best answers in the comments. What would you pay to see open sourced?

483 comments

  1. Photoshop by pestilence669 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... no, Gimp is not an adequate replacement.

    1. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would be much better if any camera company funds gimp development and bundles it with their hardware

    2. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on what you need - does all I need and more

    4. Re:Photoshop by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... no, Gimp is not an adequate replacement.

      GIMP 1.x was social experiment intended to test how far people would go to use an application. They ended quietly ended the experiment after avid GIMP fan was found in another GIMP user's apartment by police after a neighbor reported gruesome screams. The developer had been cutting off the fingers of there users who did not utilize every keyboard shortcut for GIMP. Shortly thereafter the GIMP 2.x series was released with an improved GUI that was just good enough to not drive people insane. The results of the experiment were recorded and they pushed forward on their new larger social experiment: GNOME 3. The intervention of outside parties improving Gnome 3 was unforeseen and ruined the experiment. However, the project was revived by a the Nazi scientist, Lennart Poettering. Project "EWONTFIX" continues to this day a scale greater than ever before. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    5. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also Serif Photo. It is paid, but it is at a price of a dinner for 2

    6. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe add a nice intuitive sensible gui first?

    7. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And apply the same to Photoshop. Coming at both from the perspective of an absolute novice, I found GIMP's easier to figure out.

    8. Re:Photoshop by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it would be much better if any camera company funds gimp development

      A decent Photoshop replacement should not use Gimp as a starting point. It has the worst UI I have ever seen. It is legendary for being unusable. Someone once joked that they took a book full of bad UI design patterns and used it as a "how to" guide. But there is no way that is true since Gimp has many bad UI "features" that appear no where else.

      Gimp is a classic example of what goes wrong with OSS projects when the developers have no financial incentive to care about their users.

    9. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krita might have a prettier interface but Gimp has many more features and would be a decent replacement for PS if it had native CMYK.

    10. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Krita is for raster digital painting. Photoshop is for editing and touchup work. They serve entirely different purposes.

    11. Re:Photoshop by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Photoshop + Excel and there is no reason to have Windows at work.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also there is the lack of support for greater than 8bit depth (and no, silently converting from any greater depth to 8bit on import does NOT count).

    13. Re:Photoshop by oic0 · · Score: 1

      As someone who uses both, at least with gimp you can learn your way around once and work from there. Photoshop has multiple modes you can activate that just needlessly complicate it. I also found both to be much easier than any 3d modeling program I've tried. I want to see one of those with an understandable interface. I eventually gave up trying to learn them due to sheer frustration.

    14. Re:Photoshop by tsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can't expect a 3D modeling program to be as 'simple' as Photoshop and Gimp and the like. Introducing that extra dimension while still using a 2D screen just opens a big can of worms concerning the interface.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor painters always blame the brush and the paint. If they can't paint a good picture, then it's because the brush isn't good enough.

      There's much more money and development behind Photoshop than GIMP, but 99.9% of people don't need a fully-blown Photoshop for what they're doing - it's an adequate replacement alright.

    16. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      3D modelling goes way beyond simply adding another dimension. You've got textures, materials, shaders, lighting, environment maps, bump/normal/parallax maps, UV mapping, specularity and diffuse maps, boning/rigging, etc. etc. It's FAR more complex than working with just simple 2D media.

    17. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather pitch in on making Windows open source (preferably Windows 7 or Windows 8).

    18. Re: Photoshop by Camembert · · Score: 2

      There is a gui option that makes Gimp rather photoshopish, it's quite ok.

    19. Re:Photoshop by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Photoshop has now adopted a multi-window gimp type GUI so they don't think it's so bad.
      In a multi-screen or multi-virtual desktop environment working on several images at once the gimp interface makes perfect sense. If you are stuck on one screen, not so much, hence photoshop being a full screen window with subwindows and acting as it's own window manager because MS Windows wasn't doing the job.

    20. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My attempt at a Counterstrike map was ridiculous. I couldn't get sunlight, I enclosed the map into a giant cube for god knows why, had a room decorated with a cone sticking out of the ceiling and a light with brightness that cycled, leading - after a hole above a great height - to metal "stairs" outdoors (in the dark), more like slopes that would hurt you when climbing them down...

      After demonstrating it I couldn't stop laughing for a while

    21. Re:Photoshop by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Someone once joked that they took a book full of bad UI design patterns and used it as a "how to" guide. But there is no way that is true since Gimp has many bad UI "features" that appear no where else.

      I like the UI. It makes much, much more sense if you have a focus-follows-mouse (or better sloppy focus) based Window Manager as was popular on UNIX when gimp was in its infancy. Apparently the gimp developers agree with me that this is the way, the truth and the light and they keep making a user interface which I like.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    22. Re:Photoshop by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You can't really compare the a 2D graphics package and a 3D modelling package. Maybe you could compare 2D vector drawing, like Inkscape.

      FreeCAD is pretty good. Still developing fast so there are a lot of features that commercial packages have which it lacks, but for a lot of tasks it's fine. In many ways I find it easier to use than apps like Photoshop and GIMP because it's just a case of logically arranging and specifying everything, rather than trying to be artistic with the mouse.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It is legendary for being unusable.

      We did a very small usability test for Gimp. One test person was Photoshop user, other was newbie. Our results were that there were no found usability issues in Gimp. So if you claim that there is usability issue in Gimp, please tell what is it that you can't easily do in Gimp?

    24. Re:Photoshop by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Would of course be nice, but I'd rather take a Linux port of the entire Creative Cloud as it stands. It would bring a lot of professionals over and give Linux a much higher standing as a workstation OS. If I were to spend money on getting the source code for a blob it would probably be for compatibility, like say the source code for MS Office or DirectX or nVidia's graphics driver. Then again, not very likely they'll sell it for any reasonable amount.

      Looks like there's some progress though, you can now play Overwatch and GTA V is up to Bronze and Witcher 3 is now up to Silver. Still tough to be a gamer on Linux though, now my friends are talking about maybe trying Forza Horizon 3... looks like I'll need a Wintendo (Win10) box in the near future. Not letting that spyware near anything of importance, that's for sure. Bah, was hoping to avoid that a while longer...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    25. Re:Photoshop by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Rather than open source Photoshop, I'd want to see a "close enough to work alike" set of OSX emulating libraries that would make it trivially easy for anyone who writes for Mac OSX to cross compile their product to be able to run under Linux. Also, to the extent that Wine isn't there already, it'd be good to have something similar for WinXP.

      Truthfully, between Picture Window Pro (now free to use) and Adobe Lightroom (for those times when nothing but adjustment layers will do) I find little need for a full version of Photoshop.

    26. Re:Photoshop by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd rather take a Linux port of the entire Creative Cloud as it stands.

      Fuck no. SaaS is unacceptable for desktop applications. People need real programs that don't depend on phoning home.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would help. GIMP needs at least the following features to be taken seriously by serious amateur and pro photographers:

      * RAW support (non-destructive)
      * full support for 16-bit per-channel color (ideally more)
      * adjustment layers

      GIMP also needs one other change to be taken seriously in academia and corporate culture:

      * A new name, one that doesn't walk the RGB(50,50,50) path of violation of HR "hostile workplace" policies. Whether or not you agree with the need for a name change, as a PRACTICAL matter, the current name limits its adoption in public schools, higher ed, and the corporate world. Even just a rebranding skin would be adequate.

      GIMP is heading in the right direction, but not quickly enough. Funding from camera manufacturers might help.

    28. Re: Photoshop by siege72 · · Score: 2

      I had the opposite experience. I used GIMP for years, and even as I gained experience it felt like the UI was fighting against me. I switched to Windows and purchased Photoshop (CS5); I was immediately more productive on a new piece of software than I ever had been with GIMP. I (jokingly?) consider my $10/month Photoshop subscription to be a protection fee, so that I don't have to use GIMP again.

    29. Re:Photoshop by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      The best UI ever designed for 3D modelling was Mirai. They also made a junior version called Nendo. There is an open-source clone http://www.wings3d.com/ which is sort of a combination of the ideas in Mirai and Nendo.

      It's too bad AFAIK there isn't a NURBS/CAD modeller that has such a good UI design.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    30. Re:Photoshop by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, apart from textures there's none of those things in Sketchup. If other features are present, then they're automated.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    31. Re:Photoshop by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Photoshop has multiple modes you can activate that just needlessly complicate it.

      That's an interesting critique given GIMP's ability to fundamentally change how the entire interface works in the settings.

    32. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. How about Source Tree since no one likes the Windows version?

    33. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't pay for windoze only software! Ever. Having a mac version is the bare minimum.
      Preferably buy only software that has linux version.

    34. Re: Photoshop by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      Gimp 2.9 has had it since at least Nov 2015, but has yet to make the stable branch.

      http://ninedegreesbelow.com/ph...

    35. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that Photoshop *CAN* do 3D modeling (not a render, you can rotate the parts and all), and that you can make it print on a 3D printer, right? I'm not joking. It can also use vector content and videos. It's FAR more powerful than anyone will ever admit to around here. Nothing comes even close. They're *decades* ahead of dozens of areas.

    36. Re:Photoshop by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That already exists, it is called "Qt", like probably 2 decades.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      http://qt.io/
      http://qt-project.org/

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    37. Re: Photoshop by corychristison · · Score: 2

      You clearly have no idea what Creative Cloud is....

      It's the entire Adobe collection of "Creative" applocations. Including, but not limited to, Photoshop, Illustrator, Animate, Acrobat (pro), etc.

      It is very loosely coupled to a cloud storage service, but you do not have to use it.

    38. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised you're saying this. Have you contributed anything to GIMP's UI or UX?

      With all of the negativity, I still use it after all of these years. Same goes for LibreOffice (used to be OpenOffice), and Firefox as well (maybe we'll see some good forking of Firefox coming up here in the next few months).

    39. Re: Photoshop by mooterSkooter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. I've only ever used GIMP for simple graphical stuff (used to be backend web dev and sometimes tinkered with images instead of asking the 'pros' to do it in PS). Everything I needed to do (resize, cut bits n bobs, move stuff around) all was easy to do. I tried the same in PS and was like "dunno how to do anything". I think PS'ers complain about GIMP because they're not used to it. Same as Windblows users who 'can't use' linux because it's 'too hard'. It's just different.

    40. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...just to keep Adobe out of it. I'd go as far as to say open sourcing any of Adobe/Oracle/Microsoft/SAP's products would do the world a favour by getting the vendor the hell away from it.

      Software only seems good if a small company made it...

    41. Re:Photoshop by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Qt will let you be able develop cross platform applications if that's your intent from the start. I was talking about something that duplicates enough functionality that one doesn't have to attempt to make their application cross platform. Something that would allow a person with access to the Photoshop source code written for MacOS 10.1 to, with only trivial modification, compile an executable that would run on Linux where the emulator resources have been installed. The notion is not to provide the user with a MacOS like experience, but rather to provide the software company an almost zero effort way to make their product also available on Linux. For a publicly held software company, no effort for more money is a decision that could only go one way, or they might be sued by their investors. The idea is similar to that of Qt, but with the added intent to make life extra easy for closed source vendors of software on a particular other platform. If there was a version for MacOS 10.1 and a version for WinXP, that would be a good start.

    42. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Particularly in single window mode.

    43. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried JUCE?

      It's "cross platform" in the sense that you can use the same design and code to compile for multiple targets, but I'm not sure you could just hand the Windows code to a Mac developer and be done.

    44. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell?

      Where would you come to that conclusion based on the post you responded to?

    45. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sketchup does have a few of those, but the rest are things it simply cannot do. But then, you don't use sketchup for much more that architectural renderings and maybe some 3D print models.

    46. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol... I have seen hundreds and hundreds of usability gripes around Gimp, specifically, over more years than I care to think about.

    47. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Sketchup is meant for creating quick drafts and mock-ups, not for production. For that you want something like Maya or Blender to finish off the details.

    48. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One only need watch a Bob Ross video to know this is true. He didn't use any fancy equipment, yet could create a beautiful painting in less than half an hour.

    49. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimp presumes that you are actually going to take five minutes and think about what you want to DO with the software, and therefore customize it to your own workflow. Every tab, every tool, every dialog can be put into different docks and dialogs. It's DESIGNED that way.

      They presume that you are going to ask yourself "Am I using it for drawing mostly or am I doing photo-manipulation, or am I doing basic photography edits" and setting it up accordingly. If you're drawing, you might want your pallettes and colour picker in their own dock on the right. You might not want a layer dialog at all. If you're doing photo editing, you might eschew a pallette dialog in exchange for a histogram. Etcetera, etcetera.... EVERYTHING is about creating a workspace that works for you. My own workspace will look nothing like anyone elses workspace because my workflow isn't LIKE anyone elses.

      It's up to YOU to take five minutes and create the workflow that YOU want based on your use case.

      If you're too lazy to do that and would rather Adobe spoon-feed you a universal workflow, that's fine. But that is unequivocally YOUR problem, no the developers.

    50. Re: Photoshop by houghi · · Score: 1

      It does however nothing for the silly things they added. Open a file, e.g. a JPEG and edit it. You can't save it, like in any other program, you need to use 'save as'. (Unless they have changed that) That and the fact they are unable to write a usable manual for the scripting makes me not use it anymore.
      In the past each version upgrade broke the scripts I had. Not sure if that is still the case, as, like I said, I don't use it anymore.

      So now I use ImageMagick on CLI when possible or nothing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    51. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subscription != SaaS

    52. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From their website:

      > Wings 3D is written in Erlang,

      Ouch. That's pretty much a guarantee it will die without ever being forked.

    53. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if stupid whingey whores like you paid 5-10% of what they willingly fund the enemies of humanity with, FOSS projects would be way better than your precious slaveware. You also probably judge FOSS replacements based on how well they copy everything about your precious malware's gui because you're like a invalid and can't learn anything. Stay on adobe's bloated shit, dumb ass. we don't need more entitled crybabies.

    54. Re: Photoshop by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Single window mode.

      Works pretty well (except on my multi monitor machine, where I use GIMP as intended. Tool pallets on the small screen, image on the big one).

      Sam

    55. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ImageMagick is great if you know what all the tools do and how you're going to apply them in advance.

      If you need to try different effects to see which result you prefer, IM is torture. It's like trying to bake a cake in a pitch-black kitchen.

    56. Re: Photoshop by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that's a legacy of when, as I vaguely recall, GIMP wouldn't edit JPGs at all because of the usual not-free-format religion. (I may be dysremembering.)

      Oh, there's another I'd pay for:
      Corel PhotoPaint, preferably v8.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    57. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does however nothing for the silly things they added. Open a file, e.g. a JPEG and edit it. You can't save it, like in any other program, you need to use 'save as'.

      That's because when you "open" a JPEG in GIMP, it's really an import operation in disguise. GIMP only edits in its native format.

      (FWIW, the Photoshop "save" operation for a JPEG is really a "save as" in disguise)

    58. Re:Photoshop by doyouwantahotpocket · · Score: 0

      GENIUS

  2. BeOS by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BeOS

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re: BeOS by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      OpenVMS before that.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:BeOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tracker, the desktop, already got open sourced. Haiku uses it.

    3. Re: BeOS by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      It's being ported to x64 by a third party. VMS will outlive us all.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:BeOS by tigersha · · Score: 1

      I still have an old Pentium II IBM Laptop with 256 MB of RAM running that, for nostalgia reasons.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    5. Re:BeOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think this is the winning answer of the thread. The only thing that I think might be more useful that's been mentioned would be Solidworks, but I don't think near as many people would use it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    M$ lock-in is the worst thing about Windows 7. It's a great desktop OS in most ways. I paid $300(AUD) for it anyway - it would have been nice to pay $300 for it to be free instead.

    1. Re:Windows 7 by tonique · · Score: 1

      There's ReactOS targetting Windows NT, though. But it's been proceeding incredibly slowly.

    2. Re:Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why go for older versions? I'd want Windows 10 open sourced - then I'd immediately start ripping out all the bullshit Microsoft put into it from the spyware to forced updates, etc.

    3. Re: Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 7 > Windows 10

    4. Re:Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can say that again, I remember in the late 90s that the target was a free OS that could replace Windows 3.1.

    5. Re:Windows 7 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      While we're leading an active fantasy life -- make that WinXP and XP64 !!

      (Since to my mind, they started breaking usability after that.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. I would give my left nut to see the sourcecode of Windows 7 ultimate + all updates so I can dyke out all the "Phone Home" crap and other extraneous rubbish.

    7. Re:Windows 7 by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I think 7 was an improvement on XP64, much how XP was an improvement on 2000.
      I would like to see WinXP &&|| Win7 open sourced. Vista too, specifically for the diffs to XP and 7 so we can see what *not* to do!

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    8. Re:Windows 7 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Probably some technical improvements under the hood, but I have XP, XP64, and Win7/64 side by side, and every time I have to use Win7, it's one little annoyance after another, and I am SO glad to go back to XP.

      One problem with opensourcing commercial software is that usually there's a spaghetti tangle of licensing, since it's a rare commercial product that doesn't use code licensed from somewhere else.

      Of course there's always ReactOS, which should be viable about the time Windows 26 is released...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Picasa by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nothing else currently available on Windows comes close.

    1. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding. ACDSee fucking destroys Picasa.

    2. Re:Picasa by johannesg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Totally agreed. Hey Google, how about it?

    3. Re: Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. Better a hopeful open source software than a confirmed abandonware.

    4. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's XnView MP that is available for linux, a follow up to XnView. It's freeware, for personal use. Haven't tried it. XnView is long-running and good software, friendly enough to non technical users managing their jpeg photographs.

      It's part of why I had a good opinion of the Windows freeware model (or shareware like Paint Shop Pro in the nineties. That one just said "your evaluation has expired for 980 days" but didn't lock you out!). Menu bar, toolbar, no Internet does nothing behind your back and written by a dedicated individual basically. You can install it or Irfanview using "Ninite" on Windows.

    5. Re:Picasa by crath · · Score: 1

      Definitely, Picasa should be open sourced! There is no other application like it in terms of simplicity and just doing what it needs to do. All it' competitors either do too little or over-reach themselves and do too much. The replacement that google trundled out, Photos, is a 2nd-rate tool that doesn't even attempt to act as a real replacement; rather, it's a competitor of Flikr.

    6. Re:Picasa by crath · · Score: 1

      ACDSee looks like a fine application; but, I don't need DAM or layered editing; I just need a way to make basic edits, organise my photos, and create albums. Yes, ACDSee can probably do all three of those things, but only at the personal cost to me of having to learn a complicated interface. I've got better things to do with my time.

    7. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely! They've mothballed it anyway, so why not?!

    8. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah it did back in 2003. Now it's one of the most bloated pieces of shit around, and the simplified viewer doesn't support something as fundamental as loading the monitor profile before displaying a damn picture.

      I used to use ACDSee as the only application that displayed pictures in the correct colour. Now it seems to be the only one that doesn't. *golfclap*.

    9. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone at Google is listening, +1 for Picasa. I'm on OSX still using the latest version available.

    10. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't happen. Reason: The cloud.

    11. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picasa: Photo (mis)management for people who don't know how to use a computer

    12. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Since I still use an ancient ACDSee v3.something that came in a printer bundle... I'll consider myself warned!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes when I "upgraded" to ACDSee Pro 5 it basically forced my move to Picasa. I still keep ACDSee around as Picasa sometimes craps itself when opening files with a width larger than around 40000 pixels.

    14. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL what is in Picasa besides uploading facial recognition data to Google that you need to do? Lightroom is a great replacement, and there are tons of alternatives to lightroom. If you're in it for the sorting - adobe bridge or an alternative to adobe bridge is better. Picasa sucks so much even Google decided to retire it.

    15. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I hate when that happens! Just stop fucking with my software already!

      I never did try Picasa. What am I missing?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I hate when that happens! Just stop fucking with my software already!

      I never did try Picasa. What am I missing?

      Feature wise not much. To be honest I'm probably the one missing something since I never used ACDsee or Picasa for any of their cataloguing or editing functions. I was using them mostly as image viewers. My requirements for those were simple:

      1. Light weight.
      2. Have zoom to fit, zoom to 100% as quick options. (continuous zoom is a bonus)
      3. Interpolation other than nearest neighbour when zooming.
      4. Support automatic conversion of the image colour to the monitor profile (I have a wide gamut monitor so if this isn't done colours look hyper saturated)
      5. Easy scrolling and switching between images.

      - ACDSee split their light weight viewer out from their main viewer. The main viewer fails on 1. The lightweight viewer fails on 3 and 4.
      - Windows Picture viewer (windows 7) fails 2 and 4
      - Windows Picture viewer (windows 10) fails on 5 since it relies on integration of the explorer to decide what images to display next. e.g. I click on a downloaded jpg in Chrome's download window and I can't scroll between any other pictures even thought there's more in the downloads folder. It also fails on 1 since MS is trying to turn it into a social networking application cum movie player. (I kid you not one of the insider previews renamed the Photo Viewer to "Story Remix" whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean). It also is slow to scroll.
      - Irfanview sort of failed on 4 because it was unable to automatically read the monitor profile and it needed to be set manually in the settings, so on my laptop which I sometimes plug into my monitor it would have the colours incorrect unless I change it at every dock.

      But really something that has grown on me is Picasa's no nonesense auto-fading interface http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AB3p... and simple keystroke navigation. pgup/down zooms fit/100%/400%, up/down arrows are stepless zoom. left right previous / next. Defaults to fullscreen but hitting enter makes it windowed. esc key exits. moving the mouse to the bottom exposes a scrollbar of images in the folder as well as control buttons for the keyboard impaired.

    17. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the rundown. I use ACDSee mainly as a quick way to run through the zillions of images from digital cameras (continuous mode was invented by the devil). Stepless zoom sounds worth the install all by itself, and I probably have an older Picasa here somewhere.... I haven't looked at Irfanview in ages, didn't like it much way-back-when, but as we're bitching, things change!

        "Story Remix" sounds like they're letting kindergarteners steer development. WTF??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I forgot one infuriating feature in Picasa Viewer. There's no sort functionality. It will run through the pictures by last modified time. If the modification times of images are screwed (e.g. I downloaded a comic book in image format from a torrent), then again I revert to ACDSee, though I have on occasion used the touch command to change the last modified times.

      "Story Remix" sounds like they're letting kindergarteners steer development. WTF??

      It gets better it's now called Photos and Videos in the latest build. There's also an app called Movies and TV. Now which one should you use to play video files...

    19. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      If I want lack of sorting, I'll use the default Windows viewer! Geez, but that would be Google... any functionality that a raw beginner can't find, we can ALL do without.

      Photos and Videos vs Movies and TV... I'd guess it means "amateur-made" vs "commercial source" but yeah, someone only knew cellphone-speak.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  5. How about FinalCut Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be a game changer for Linux, and might make FinalCut Pro more stable too.

    1. Re: How about FinalCut Pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AVID

  6. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...or at least, the Win32 API and userspace components needed to run Windows applications.

    1. Re:Windows by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

      You can't avoid it yet, but if it was oss could finally make wine work more reliably...

      Wine doesn't work reliably b/c they haven't ever focused on a single version of Windows and gotten that right before moving to a new version. They always try to mimic the latest release. They can change their process and probably get full compatibility sooner by actually focusing on the APIs available in a specific release of Windows. Win7 would probably be a good target right now; Win8/8.1/10 wouldn't be hard to add after that - again, one at a time - since the deltas are smaller once the base is completely there.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    2. Re:Windows by TemporalBeing · · Score: 0

      ...or at least, the Win32 API and userspace components needed to run Windows applications.

      Everything is so inter-twined that you'd have to open source the whole system...it's just one big knot of spaghetti.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    3. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I honestly wouldn't mind seeing the entirety of Windows open-sourced. Wishful thinking, I know...

      Everything is so inter-twined that you'd have to open source the whole system...it's just one big knot of spaghetti.

      I thought most Windows applications called into a runtime dynamic library that implements the Win32 API, which could have its internals replaced to work on e.g. Linux. I read that the NT kernel supports different userspace subsystems, one of which is Win32. Is there something I am missing here?

    4. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's how WiNE works. It reimplements the Win32 API on top of the X Window System's windowing calls.

      Technically, the NT kernel calls are a different kettle of fish to the Win32 calls.

    5. Re:Windows by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand how massive the Windows API is. Their stats page lists 114312 functions, granted 18k of those are forwards but that's still 96k real functions and 28k of them are just stubs in the WINE project. Of the 68k functions that do have a real implementation it's near impossible to say how many of them are completely and correctly implemented, since they don't actually conform to a specification only "whatever Windows does". And it's not like they're simple formulas, they're interfaces to huge state engines like DirectX. They could concentrate on one version all they want and probably still never finish the first one to perfection.

      Fortunately for us there's a long tail of rarely used functions and dependencies on obscure bugs and behaviors. Implementing the mostly used functionality of the mostly used APIs does make the most common application work and then there's a never ending TODO list of bugs you could investigate. WINE is always going to be a band aid, they do more good staying current and relevant than trying to solve every corner case. And I think the argument really works just as well in reverse, by spending some effort on the small deltas they get a lot of software working and find bugs that benefit older software too. It's happened to me many times that old software works better with newer wine versions, even though they haven't had any patches directed at them.

      Of course it also happens that they break things, regressions happen. But they're pretty good at fixing those if you can point to a working version (or better yet, bisect to find the offending patch). Overall I'd say the progress is positive, but it's no substitute for native applications.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Windows by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand how massive the Windows API is. Their stats page lists 114312 functions, granted 18k of those are forwards but that's still 96k real functions and 28k of them are just stubs in the WINE project. Of the 68k functions that do have a real implementation it's near impossible to say how many of them are completely and correctly implemented, since they don't actually conform to a specification only "whatever Windows does". And it's not like they're simple formulas, they're interfaces to huge state engines like DirectX. They could concentrate on one version all they want and probably still never finish the first one to perfection.

      Fortunately for us there's a long tail of rarely used functions and dependencies on obscure bugs and behaviors. Implementing the mostly used functionality of the mostly used APIs does make the most common application work and then there's a never ending TODO list of bugs you could investigate. WINE is always going to be a band aid, they do more good staying current and relevant than trying to solve every corner case. And I think the argument really works just as well in reverse, by spending some effort on the small deltas they get a lot of software working and find bugs that benefit older software too. It's happened to me many times that old software works better with newer wine versions, even though they haven't had any patches directed at them.

      Of course it also happens that they break things, regressions happen. But they're pretty good at fixing those if you can point to a working version (or better yet, bisect to find the offending patch). Overall I'd say the progress is positive, but it's no substitute for native applications.

      Oh I understand. I also understand how much they're intertwined, built-off each other etc. You have to build a certain base level - starting with the NT Kernel - and them move up and out of the stack.

      But what you're missing is that it's far easier to hit a stable-target than it is to hit one that's constantly moving. If you get NT4 (a much smaller target complete), then move to Win2k - the delta isn't that great. Move to XP, and again - the delta isn't that great (smaller than NT4->XP); and keep moving on. Additionally you'll have more and better software compatibility across the board instead of the hit-and-miss that it currently is.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  7. Nvidia Drivers by ARos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nvidia sucks.

    1. Re:Nvidia Drivers by skids · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, drivers, drivers, drivers, firmware, firmware, firmware. And full chipset documentation for no-longer-commercially developed hardware.

    2. Re:Nvidia Drivers by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Source to CUDA would also be nice.

    3. Re:Nvidia Drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately closed source drivers are not to protect software IP, they are to protect hardware IP which you can infer from driver source. You'd be better off open sourcing the hardware... but good luck convincing nVidia and ATI with that. There are efforts to create open source hardware alternatives for cheaper things like wifi/bluetooth usb etc, some that you could realistically implement on an FPGA.

    4. Re:Nvidia Drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they do but less than AMD/ATI.

    5. Re:Nvidia Drivers by skids · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the question just mutates to whether companies would be willing to rescind IP rights for older hardware for a price.

  8. IME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel Management Engine. (trollface)

  9. Obviously by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

    The JVM

    1. Re:Obviously by cb88 · · Score: 1

      Java... and the JVM (several implantations actually not just the Sun / Oracle one) are open source.

      Google got sued because they didn't make a compliant Java implementation.... and instead just reused parts of Java in Android.

    2. Re: Obviously by nasch · · Score: 2

      If that were why they got sued they would have lost. They got sued because Oracle saw them making a bunch of money with Java and wanted some.

      Am I internetting right?

    3. Re: Obviously by cb88 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.... got sued for those reasons, but the didn't lose because the parts they were using were basically headers which are a grey area.

    4. Re: Obviously by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They got sued because Java is a trademark.
      Using the trademark requires that you follow all Java standards. E.g. portability of the byte code.

      Google/Android basically don't use the trademark. They reimplemented a bunch of "API's" and Oracle came and said: "You do Java, but you do it wrong".

      Google answered: now, we don't do Java in the sense of the trademark. We use "Java, the language" and a few clean room implemented API's/libraries. (in italics because it is not clean room in the original sense, but since Java exists people have a problem grasping what a clean room implementation really is).

      Of course with cross compiling existing Java tools (does Google have its own javac?) google is a bit on thin ice, on the other hand all the tools involved are GPL. The Google VM is their own thing. Just because "Java the language" is involved and GPLed Java libraries I don't see a violation in terms of usage for the word Java (the platform).

      However an attempt to open source (it likely is?) the Dalvik VM and have running Dalvik VMs on MacOS or Linux would be interesting. (I googled for it a while ago, but the results where not promising).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re: Obviously by nasch · · Score: 1

      They got sued because Java is a trademark.

      I'm afraid not. "Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc. is a dispute related to Oracle's copyright and patent claims on Google's Android operating system (emphasis added)." So every kind of intellectual property right except for trademark.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

    6. Re: Obviously by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The only case they would have had would have been in Trademarks.
      There is clearly no copyright infringement, and patents hardly can apply to copying an API.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re: Obviously by nasch · · Score: 1

      Right, that's why Oracle keeps losing.

  10. The source code to slashdot by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh wait. Too close to home?

    1. Re:The source code to slashdot by sconeu · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:The source code to slashdot by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Slash, the CMS code used to run Slashdot, is already FOSS. I'm pretty sure that there was never a time when it wasn't in fact.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:The source code to slashdot by vipw · · Score: 1

      I don't think slashdot is still running on Slash. And slashdot was many years old before slash ever open sourced.

      Soylent, not slashdot, is the news for nerds site that uses open source.

  11. The AMD/Intel co-processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What they are for, what they do, what code runs on them, the whole shebang.

    1. Re: The AMD/Intel co-processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're for spying on us, of course. Duhhhhhh.

  12. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't avoid it yet, but if it was oss could finally make wine work more reliably...

  13. Slashdot by StupidHelpDeskGuy · · Score: 0

    I'd pay to have Slashdot back.

    1. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but what do women and people of color want?

  14. Too obvious to be mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    by the hipsters at /.

    1. Microsoft Windows
    2. Apple iOS
    3. Apple Siri
    4. Google search engine
    5. Amazon e-commerce engine, including recommendation
    6. Amazon fulfillment engine
    7. Cisco IOS
    8. Oracle RDBMS
    9. MATLAB

    1. Re: Too obvious to be mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually oracle is the one thing on the list i wouldn't want opened. Partly because I'm an oracle DBA but mainly because it's the one item on the list that still gets real development from the owner. Most of the other items are closed to maintain the monopoly that the owner has and this would also be the case for oracleâ too. However, I'm still amazed at how much the product still gets in terms of improvements in each version. Sure there's plenty of crap, the less said about 11gR1 to the better but oracleâ still develop in an active and competitive market and this shows in the ongoing improvements. It's what should be happening in commercial markets.

      Operating systems is a great example. Putting Linux to one side, no one competes with ms. Apple have there own platform and their own computers. yes you can put Windows on a Mac but not many do. Apple won't sell you macos to run on a generic pc. Ms has it by default, no healthy competition.

    2. Re:Too obvious to be mentioned by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      9. MATLAB

      If I have a choice between the two, I'd prefer Mathematica.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  15. Flash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would you pay to see open sourced?

    Flash Media Server.

  16. Napster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Napster

  17. Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly I feel pretty well served by what we've already got.

  18. Maya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What would you pay to see open sourced?

    Maya

    1. Re:Maya. by Frobnicator · · Score: 2

      Maya

      Be grateful there is a substitute today. I'm one of the old fogies who helped get Blender freed up. At least today there is one substantial 3D tool open.

      I'd put several tools and technologies far before Maya. Consumer routers are probably top on my list, particularly from the companies where the only option is the locked-up corporate version.

      I love my FTTP gigabit connection's speed, but the only option is AT&T in my region, and since 2015 that has been a mandatory eternal rental. No purchase option, no other devices can be attached, no choice of box. All customers have a mandatory rental fee which cannot be escaped, and no other equipment can be used. The closest I can come is attach my own device to the gateway, but it lives behind their locked-away gateway no matter what.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    2. Re: Maya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blender isn't very intuitive. Is Maya?

    3. Re:Maya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be grateful there is a substitute today. I'm one of the old fogies who helped get Blender freed up.

      I don't want to sound unappreciative, but Blender is not a substitute for Maya. It may be similar to many end users, but for a plugin writer there's no comparison.

  19. Easy by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Informative

    macOS

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Easy by tigersha · · Score: 1

      This. MacOS/X. Apple would probably gain by Open Sourcing it too.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    2. Re:Easy by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Apple would probably gain by Open Sourcing it too.

      I doubt it. The hardware lock-in is central to their revenue.

      There's also the way that Apple gets full control over what hardware they need to support. This wouldn't necessarily change if they open sourced macOS, though - use on other hardware could remain officially unsupported.

    3. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. The other side of it... by toonces33 · · Score: 0

    A more fun question - what piece of software would you pay to be totally shitcanned? Yeah, I know - a ton of people will reply "systemd".

    1. Re:The other side of it... by Dracos · · Score: 1

      And WordPress. $deity, that shit is awful.

  21. Yahoo Pipes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no close substitute. Some things perform a cumbersome limited subset of what Pipes did (IFTTT) but nothing comes close to the ease and flexibility

  22. the only app keeping me using Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visio

    1. Re:the only app keeping me using Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good one.

  23. Is that the soylentnews fork or the slashdot fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    SoylentNews has a fork that is mostly the old open sourced SlashCode from ~10-15 years ago, updated with new stylesheets and a few minor format modifications. Unlike the current slashdot site it also supports collapsed threading view via stylesheets and without javascript, so none of this 'you need javascript enabled to see all the messages, or log in.' BS

    The site isn't nearly as popular as the slash, and the quality of articles is about the same, but the code seems pretty nice, and it is updated to mod_perl 2.0 and all the other fund new tech so you can use it with a modern apache server instead of 1.3 :)

  24. Uh, your sister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ? I'm here all week.

    1. Re:Uh, your sister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why?

  25. Can we ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... stream it?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  26. I need to bitch slap some chickens... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    A modern version of Dungeon Keeper 2.

    1. Re: I need to bitch slap some chickens... by Aethedor · · Score: 1

      Try War of the Overworld. Very entertaining! http://store.steampowered.com/...

      --
      It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
    2. Re:I need to bitch slap some chickens... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah!

      I only had the german version, but it was hilariously funny.

      Playing 2:00AM at night, a voice from the off "Your monsters demand a cable TV!"
      4:00AM a voice from the off "We al know you are at sleep, let the monsters sleep, too! They did their share of butchering knights to night already!"
      Or similar stuff, cant remember :D the exact words.

      I was usually playing with my GF, she in her room and I in mine, not sure if it was cooperative, but at some point she would get the voice from the off and then I would get it.

      So funny.

      And the game was great. Imagine a Dungeon Keeper on the iPad, I guess I would have to apply for social aid as I would be unable to work anything.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:I need to bitch slap some chickens... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Dungeon Keeper on the iPad, I guess I would have to apply for social aid as I would be unable to work anything.

      The iOS version exists. The reviews aren't great.

    4. Re: I need to bitch slap some chickens... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Try War of the Overworld.

      Thanks for point this out!

    5. Re: I need to bitch slap some chickens... by ls671 · · Score: 1

      No problems, thanks for write a reply!

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    6. Re:I need to bitch slap some chickens... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... unusable. Works only with an internet connection.
      I only play games when I have no internet connection, obviously.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  27. Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Top to bottom, we should have a DRM-free open-source cell phone, including hardware and software.

    1. Re:Cell Phones by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I would LOVE to see the source code to more parts of my Nokia N900 Linux phone be released. Don't care that the radio firmware is proprietary, what I want to see open sourced would be the various proprietary audio components, the browser UI, the various binary components that handle WiFi (including the various WiFi encryption bits) and any hardware related items that remain closed source (e.g. the cellular services daemon that sits on the linux side and talks to the cellular modem)
      So much more could be done if these things were open source (or even if some of these libraries and things had their interfaces/documentation/etc published)

    2. Re:Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open mesh, free base stations, no proprietary code for CPUs or modem, free firmware, all would be needed and very useful to all people working to remain free. It would be a major project from new silicon artwork to cash register.

    3. Re:Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be the point? You can't buy these chips easily if at all. Modern SoC's (that you can buy) require so much proprietary glue to do anything that you'll be right back in the same boat.

    4. Re:Cell Phones by mdkathon · · Score: 1

      Well, that's going to be tough. The bits that make them work cost a lot of money to develop. Like, a lot. Like, like, like, a ton. I think we find many things on this list that are not going to make the list, but you're asking to open up *everything* in hardware and software. That's the same as asking *everything* in a computer to be open sourced. Think that's going to happen soon? Might as well find Woz's home address and start collecting donations.

  28. Wikileaks emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're all about transparency, but they ain't very transparent.

    1. Re:Wikileaks emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, yup, yup.

    2. Re: Wikileaks emails by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      They're all about transparency, but they ain't very transparent.

      Assange is translucent for a few minutes whenever he sheds his skin.

  29. AutoCAD by digitect · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are no open source CAD softwares capable of producing the drawings used in architecture, engineering, design, and manufacturing. Yet, that same, expensive proprietary package continues on with the same performance hogging, unstable, fluff enhanced software that hasn't really changed in 15 years.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:AutoCAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, it changes every year. the version gets incremented, an older one gets EOL, (captcha: unending) prices go up. same old, same old; but yet different, too. just hop on the train and go for a ride. just don't forget your valid credit card.

    2. Re:AutoCAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gets my vote too!

    3. Re: AutoCAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AutoCAD doesn't matter anymore. We need SolidWorks or better available for nix

    4. Re:AutoCAD by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      It's not Open source, but I've had great success with their new cloudified product Fusion 360.

    5. Re:AutoCAD by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FreeCAD works for me. I especially like scripting in Python. AutoCAD uses Lisp for scripting, but it is buggy and not included at all in the "lite" edition for students.

      Even if AutoCAD was free, I would prefer FreeCAD.

    6. Re:AutoCAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Autocad stays as closed and locked up as much as possible. I doubt even Autodesk has the source code for some of the ancient parts of the code (which is probably why the whole pile is still single threaded in 2017). I'd much rather see Rhino3D open-sourced, and use that for all may 2D and 3D cad work. Using both on a daily bases, the Autodesk interface is just stupid. Autodesk has even more bugs than LibreOffice, and they are fixed even slower.

    7. Re:AutoCAD by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Holy shit is FreeCAD slow though. In fairness I don't know how it compares to AutoCAD since I've not used that. The only major project I've done had a lot of parameterisation via the spreadsheet like thing. I was replacing the OpenSCAD model because the injection moulding place wouldn't take high res mesh models, and I needed a surface model so I got it done in FreeCAD in the time it took the SolidWorks distributor to take my life story and etc.

      Even slow, it was not very fast.

      But it did work, and the product reached market.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    8. Re: AutoCAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dev version o freecad is getting there actually, in terms of manufacturing drawings. I'm hopeful it might be ready for prime time soon. If you really would pay for this, you could. I'd genuinely pay too in crowdsourced fundraising to get it there.

    9. Re:AutoCAD by digitect · · Score: 1

      FreeCAD can't do basic drawing. It is primarily a 3D program, which sounds great, but the entire AEC industry operates with the assumption that 2D drawings are the final legal documents defining a contract.

      This is the same argument against BIM. You can model everything cleverly, but you still have to draft half the sections, details, elevations, notes, and schedules for the legal 2D printed documents. BIM is pretty bad at extrapolating from model to parametric flat projections, so there's really no benefit versus using a great 3D modeler alongside a parallel process of 2D CAD.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    10. Re:AutoCAD by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Not libre, but free-as-in-beer: Draftsight, from the same company that produces SolidWorks.

  30. The Internet (a codepocalypse) by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    ..it would be like having everyone's DNA unravel all at once, and all that would remain would be spaghetti code filling every corner of the conceivable universe!

  31. Re: Is that the soylentnews fork or the slashdot f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does APK use soylentnews? I refuse to use anything not properly endorsed by him.

  32. Sketchup. by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    Not disagreeing with the autocad comment.

  33. DirectX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    its the only thing stopping me from kissing windows bye bye and switching to linux 100%

  34. FoxPro by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    FoxPro, best tool ever for ad-hoc data chomping.

    1. Re:FoxPro by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Microsoft really messed up on that one.
      If you're not going to continue selling software, the only decent thing is to make it open source.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:FoxPro by Gondola · · Score: 1

      To open source something you

      1) need to get it to a state where it compiles with modern, available toolsets
      2) have to unlink it from any third party libraries you had to license (what stops most things)
      3) remove any third party assets you had to license, like sounds, graphics
      4) open your old customers to exploits people can glean from reading the source, which is bad PR

      All of which requires a budget with no business case and not even a tax-deductible dollar amount associated with it.

    3. Re:FoxPro by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The only one they had to worry about was #3 or #2. The other two are FUD.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:FoxPro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did the same thing with Caligari trueSpace, shutting it down shortly after purchasing it. I reached out to the Microsoft product manager whose team now owns trueSpace, to determine whether the IP could be purchased back from Microsoft, and turned Open Source. After all, Microsoft doesn't even have the smallest bit of interest in a program like that, unless they could somehow manage to turn it into a content creation tool for HoloLens. Of course, the manager never replied to emails or voicemails.

  35. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to pay for any useful software, proprietary or open source, as long as I am free with no restrictions to use it on all my devices without further hassle. I refuse to buy any software that restricts me to one installation.

  36. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows. Any version from 2000 onward, really.

  37. Visual Basic 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Want to see how it works and compiles

    1. Re:Visual Basic 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opensource updated VB6 would be really useful for so many people, just like it was before.

  38. I don't want to pay anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I use open source.

  39. My choices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adobe Photoshop, Flash Virtual Machine, good CAD (Pro/E, SolidWorks), Lightwave

  40. IBM OS/2 Warp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An old OS still going with a community around it, but it has kernel issues, needs 64 bit upgrade and would benefit from being opensource...

    1. Re:IBM OS/2 Warp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    2. Re:IBM OS/2 Warp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at IBM in the late 90's/early 00's and there was a point when open sourcing "classic" OS/2 was *seriously* considered. I saw with mine own an email from the head of the software group at the time discussing what the pros and cons of such a move would be. From what I understand the factors that ended up going against it were that a) huge parts of OS/2 are written in assembler, and assembler "source code" ain't actually all that useful and b) Microsoft owns a large part of the code base and "buying them out" would have cost too much or been too difficult. I do know that the release of JFS for Linux (which actually originated from the OS/2 code base and not the AIX one) eventually worked its way through to completion.

  41. One dollar (US) ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... for Windows Freecell.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:One dollar (US) ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write it yourself! It's little more than a sophomore level program.

    2. Re:One dollar (US) ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a freshman, you insensitive clod!!

  42. There's no question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Super Mario Bros. Or, maybe Robotron. Perhaps, Pac-Man?

    Oh, wait, THEY WERE WRITTEN IN ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE! For some projects, the machine code is the source.

    Get the fuck off my lawn.

  43. Dwarf Fortress by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    Toady won't live forever. Moreover, what he has produced is very difficult to build on without his participation (specifically tracking combat). As a superior talent in a number of fields, I'm sure there's plenty of lessons to be learned from the code about scaling very large, application development, from a solo developer perspective.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  44. Google Cam Processing Logic for Pixel's HDR+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although they should do it for free to obliterate the one edge that iPhones had previously maintained.

  45. list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here are just a few:

    Microsoft Windows

    Microsoft Office

    Flash

    Audio Drivers for mid-high/high-end audio interfaces by companies such as:
    RME, Lynx, Burl, Prism, Antelope, Apogee
    - Many of these companies say their devices support class compliant, but they're most are not natively supported enough to be run on linux. Can't get any professional audio work done there.

    Roku devices

    Any Smart TV firmware - So we have the ability to go in, flash it, run a custom one, or disable all call-home features

    Intel Management Engine and AMD's equivalent
    (See Smart TV firmware)

    Automobile firmware - so we can keep companies such as Tesla honest by not sending home every piece of obscure data they have on the driver back home

    Routers - so we can override whatever techniques they're now putting in on purpose to block users from running custom firmware.

    Computer BIOS

    1. Re:list by tsa · · Score: 1

      Automobile firmware - so we can keep companies such as Tesla honest by not sending home every piece of obscure data they have on the driver back home

      i wonder how hard that is to achieve by a hardware hack. Just disconnect the antenna or something. Of course the car's firmware can't be updated anymore then, but is that really a bad thing? The car also can't be remotely hacked anymore, which is a plus.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  46. CorelDraw! by pcjunky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should be easy as they ported to Linux several years ago.

    1. Re:CorelDraw! by tsa · · Score: 1

      Oh, a Mac version of Corel Draw would be fantastic! I now use Inkscape, which works but lacks a lot of CD's functions.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:CorelDraw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, a Mac version of Corel Draw would be fantastic! I now use Inkscape, which works but lacks a lot of CD's functions.

      No, just no. We have so many good drawing and illustration applications on the Mac, why drag us down with CorelDraw.
      I've worked in professional print production and many times, the only way we can get a CorelDraw file to output correctly is to run the EPS through Illustrator first to fix it.

    3. Re:CorelDraw! by jonwil · · Score: 1

      You would be far better off spending money to pay people to add the missing things to Inkscape than paying whoever owns it these days to open source Corel Draw.

    4. Re:CorelDraw! by gomadtroll · · Score: 1

      It ran on wine..not ported ...

      greg

    5. Re:CorelDraw! by AndyCater · · Score: 1

      Actually, for me, just Corel Ventura Publisher. Now that GEM has been open sourced, we could have a really high resolution publishing app. that was world winning 20 years ago and still pretty good even stacked up against some of the things we have today.

    6. Re:CorelDraw! by tsa · · Score: 1

      What good drawing and illustration applications are there? I don't mind paying for one if it's not too deer.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    7. Re:CorelDraw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 insightful

    8. Re:CorelDraw! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Dunno, but for general bitmap editing... I try other stuff, and always wind up fleeing back to Corel PhotoPaint. I've actually bought CorelDraw just to get PhotoPaint. (Admittedly at a sharp discount, but still.)

      PhotoPaint v9 for linux exists, and was a free download back in the day, but I've heard is an Adventure to get running.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  47. Re:Buy Windows from Microsoft, make it open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You just ned 559Billion dollars as of last friday.

  48. Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of it

    1. Re:Android by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      What part of Android isn't Open Source?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  49. Quartz and QuickTime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so I can compile a QuickTime player that can play its own freaking native .mov format again without having to convert...

  50. Re: Is that the soylentnews fork or the slashdot f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  51. FPGA compilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just Lattice but also Xilinx and Altera/Intel.

    1. Re:FPGA compilers by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Seconded. They don't even need to open source the software, just publish the specs for the hardware and bitstream.

      --
      Nullius in verba
  52. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To be sensitive to common problems in society, GIMP needs to be renamed to "Disabled Image Editor" otherwise known as DIE to be a better representation of its usability helping your hopes of editing an image die one step at a time.

  53. Win9x and WinXP up to NT 5.1 (XP x64/2k3) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Former for the 90s era games it is still the best for, and XP x64 because it was the last non-sucky version of Windows in my opinion. Too bad it was only ever offered OEM, so nobody still has legit transferrable licenses for it :(

  54. Games that need a central server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any game that customers paid for that requires a central server that the parent company shuts down after a couple years, bricking the game. Seriously, this shit should be illegal, but it's growing..

    1. Re:Games that need a central server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not open per se, but..."source available" happens somewhat regularly. Ex: Star Wars Galaxies https://bitbucket.org/swgmaste... Others leak on the torrent sites and ragezone. Unfortunately they no longer get shared on betaarchive, as that recent BS story about "Windows Source Code" forced them to pull the source archives for things that were otherwise abandonware.

    2. Re:Games that need a central server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      City of Heroes/Villians for one. :(

  55. Demcratic elections voting infrastructure by evanh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems to me to be an obvious first port of call. The weak points become well documented so also become well protected. Couldn't get a better demo of the security obtained.

    1. Re:Demcratic elections voting infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! Complete with blockchain tech to allow it to be fully publicly auditable while protecting the info of who voted for whom. PLEASE!

    2. Re:Demcratic elections voting infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "CHVote : a public system, Swiss and open source

      The electronic voting system CHVote is a concrete answer and a real breakthrough in digital technology and e-government.

      This system is the fruit of a partnership between the State Chancellery and the General Directorate of Information Systems (DGSI) of the Department of Security and Economy (DSE) of the Geneva Canton.

      The State of Geneva is pioneering in the e-voting domain with over 100 polls successfully accomplished since 2003.

      CHVote, entirely developed, hosted and operated by the Geneva Canton is today one of only two accredited electronic voting systems by the Federal Council in Switzerland. It is offered to nearly 125’000 voters in 4 cantons (Geneva, Bern, Lucerne and Basel), as much for voting as for electing at the communal, cantonal and federal levels. It also allows people with disabilities to participate in the polls."

      https://republique-et-canton-de-geneve.github.io/chvote-1-0/index-en.html
      https://github.com/republique-et-canton-de-geneve/chvote-1-0

    3. Re:Demcratic elections voting infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have an open source version of that. It's called paper ballots and has been successful for thousands of years.

  56. BrlCAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it was good enough for the army...

    The only bad part about it is that it is a total pain to build on linux. Older versions UI was literally from either the 70s or early 90s, and it has a high learning curve.

    Latest versions even include gcode solvers for end to end design, modelling, and gcode output.

    That said, AutoCAD or 3D Studio Max would be awesome just for exporting the Star Trek ship models available into another format. It really sucks how all the coolest ships are only in max format so anyone unwilling to pirate needs to spend thousands of dollars just to open/render/reexport them. :(

    1. Re:BrlCAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > The only bad part about it is that it is a total pain to build on linux.

      Ubuntu/Debian:

      https://sourceforge.net/projects/brlcad/files/BRL-CAD%20for%20Linux/7.26.2/

      Arch:

      $ pacaur -Ss brlcad
      aur/brlcad 7.26.2-0 (57, 1.00)
              An extensive 3D solid modeling system.
      aur/brlcad-bin 7.26.0-0 (5, 0.20)
              An extensive 3D solid modeling system.

      It's really only a problem if you're using RHEL/CentOS.

    2. Re:BrlCAD. by cb88 · · Score: 1

      It was broken on Gentoo last I checked... wanted to give it a shot.

    3. Re:BrlCAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      needs ebuild

  57. Picasa and (cringe) Outlook by silversword · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the Outlook, but the business users made me say it ;)

  58. World of Warcraft client and server. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Fuck you, Blizzard.

    1. Re:World of Warcraft client and server. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bnet.d, never forget!

    2. Re:World of Warcraft client and server. by Meneth · · Score: 1

      Servers are available. Popular forks include MaNGOS and TrinityCore.

      The regular graphical client is still closed, but somewhat moddable, and works well with the above servers. There's also a command-line player-assisted vanilla bot.

  59. Aperture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Aperture. Apple abandoned it and it is (still) so much better than Lightroom

  60. StarCraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    StarCraft. The game is very popular and is being used in AI research. But if you want to write your bots under Linux, you are bound to have a pretty hard time.

  61. Haha Funny For Reasons You Don't Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could open source DirectX tomorrow and Linux would never have it.

    Linux is not a for-profit operating system, so it has the distant 4th best of everything -- behind Windows, the Mac (Metal framework), even far beyond Android.

    There is simply no financial incentive to improve Linux beyond its use as a server.

    Not only will this not change --- and Linux is falling further behind at a rapid pace.

    This is why there are no "nice" desktop environments for Linux.

    1. Re:Haha Funny For Reasons You Don't Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like KDE 3.5, KDE 4, KDE Plasma 5, Enlightenment, XFCE, and MATE.
      There are probably other nice desktop environments I just haven't seen yet.

    2. Re:Haha Funny For Reasons You Don't Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE is almost ok, but never enters the realm of "being a nice desktop".

      More frustrating because it knows it would like to be a nice usable desktop, but never can complete the journey.

      Macos and even old Windows 2000 are far better desktop environments than any of the one you mentioned. And Windows 7 is in its own special universe high above those.

    3. Re:Haha Funny For Reasons You Don't Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha, found the m$ shill lol...

  62. ^^^ It's really needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Toady is concerned about people forking it and ignoring his original, I think that having a year or two old versions to work off of would be excellent for a number of reasons:
    1. Bugfixes. Toady has had some bugs lasting through 3 or more major reworks of the code, which amounts to 3-5 years of development. Given that there are only ~5 patches done before he spends another year to year and a half on reworking core systems, having stable snapshots of the source code for doing bugfixes against, both for regular users playing and as resources for him, should he need/choose to patch later revisions of the code for which those bugs still exist, it would be a win/win for both parties.
    2. Non-Dwarf Fortress usage. A *LOT* of people have wanted the opportunity to use the Dwarf Fortress map generator and produce worlds for alternative graphics engines, like Minecraft/Minetest/Infiniminer/etc, all of which stated Dwarf Fortress was one of their major inspirations, while also complaining about the slow addition of features and lack of graphical options. While I think the ascii based graphics are fine and help Toady keep from becoming distracted by graphical interactions in the gameworld, which might cause overcomplication/simplification of other systems in his game engine, I also think the players need the opportunity for both experiences. Especially right now while DF is unfinished, there is a lot of unpleasantness in playing either adventure mode or dwarf fortress mode 'all the way through', due to both unfinished features, as well as partially broken features, many of which don't get discovered until midway into the major release cycle at which point new minor releases are not being made.
    3. As others have said, because Toady and Threetoe may not live forever, and without a convent ensuring it will be released at sometime after they pass, we are completely at their mercy and given that some people have invested 11+ years of their life into it, very similiar to a major MMO, it could have wide ranging emotional effects on players if they were suddenly cut off, left with a dead game, or worse yet had it Tolkienized with tiny tidbits doled out for hand over fist prices for years to come, never quite completing the tapestry and claiming all IP related to it for themselves.

  63. ZTerm, Kermit by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    I miss the old days.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:ZTerm, Kermit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Procomm or Procomm+ ? Yes, I'm that old.

    2. Re:ZTerm, Kermit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, the author of ZTerm (terminal emulation program for the macintosh) lives near me. Haven't seen him in years though. Hi Dave, if you're watching :)

  64. This!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We really need VB6 for a whole generation of Windows 3.1 to 9x to XP era applications. Between 90s-00s era videogame editing tools to whole videogames themselves, VB6 was used for everything during the millenial transition years, and not having the tools available to be fixed for modern processors and to ensure the reproduction and survival of that software for future generations is a travesty against humankind.

    For all the crap that VB6 got, it made an excellent language for simple applications and was a far more pleasant environment for developing GUIs than Visual Studio/C++ for many many years.

  65. Re:You're Mom by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Funny

    As opposed to yo mamma who is open sores, not open sourced...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  66. LastPass or 1Password by pavon · · Score: 1

    If there is any piece of software that needs to be auditable and have options for self-hosting it is password managers. Especially now that 1Password is backing off of their support for hosting your database file somewhere other than their servers.

    Unfortunately, I haven't found any open source password managers that pass the WAF, which requires seamless browser integration and syncing on all major platforms.

    1. Re:LastPass or 1Password by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with KeePass? I sync the password database with Syncthing. I don't need or want my password manager automatically interfacing with my browser. I wouldn't trust my browser with the ability to interface with my password manager, and you shouldn't either. In fact, on Windows I keep my password manager and database inside a Linux VM to make interfering with it more difficult. Looking up and bringing a password into the clipboard is a 3 second procedure.

    2. Re:LastPass or 1Password by pavon · · Score: 1

      Its fine for me (I actually prefer vim & gpg encrypted file), but non-computer geeks (eg every family member I have tried to get to use KeePass) hate having to:
      * Stop what they are doing
      * Open another program
      * Type in an unlock password
      * Search for the site they want,
      * Copy the password
      * Go back to the browser
      * Paste the password
      It takes more like 10-15 seconds for most people I've watched, and adding new passwords is takes longer.

      Furthermore, synchronizing an entire encrypted database as a blob using another tool can be extremely error prone if the clients don't all have constant connectivity with the server, which can result in lost passwords. Some cloud sync tools don't even notify the user when a conflict occurs, and even if you are notified manually resolving the conflict is a pain in the ass. The synchronization feature KeePass 2 made it a little better, but it is still a manual process that you have to teach people to recognize, and how to perform.

      I tried for years to cobble shit together with KeePass & bittorrent sync (before syncthing was stable) and the end result was my family hated it so much they only used it for bank passwords and others that I absolutely insisted on. I don't like some of the security compromises LastPass makes but it is more secure than a password manager that isn't used.

    3. Re:LastPass or 1Password by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Its fine for me (I actually prefer vim & gpg encrypted file), but non-computer geeks (eg every family member I have tried to get to use KeePass) hate having to:
      * Stop what they are doing
      * Open another program
      * Type in an unlock password
      * Search for the site they want,
      * Copy the password
      * Go back to the browser
      * Paste the password
      It takes more like 10-15 seconds for most people I've watched, and adding new passwords is takes longer.

      You're doing it wrong. You need this and this. The first gives you automated recognition and entry of username and password into websites, as long as you populate the URL field in KeePass correctly (and it will help you do that). The second syncs to Google Drive, including upload, download, and download-merge-upload options.

    4. Re:LastPass or 1Password by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Woops. And also this. I set it all up so long ago I forgot the details. It Just Works(TM).

      It's one plugin each for Chrome and Keepass to allow automatic entry of usernames and passwords into websites, plus one plugin for Keepass for database backup and synchronization.

    5. Re:LastPass or 1Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use KeePass 2. The actual common workflow is not the one you described, but this:

      1. Visit website, click login button
      (If this is your first unlock, enter your master password)
      2. Press Ctrl+Alt+A
      3. You're logged in

  67. Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drivers, firmware and specifications for common computing platforms. Open source, with a way to verify the source code corresponds to what's actually running on them. Maybe then we can start clawing back some level of trustworthiness in our devices.

  68. You eat at expensive places by tepples · · Score: 1

    Now called Affinity, and priced at $50. I could buy dinner for 7 with that.

    1. Re: You eat at expensive places by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 0

      No wonder Europeans aren't getting laid!

    2. Re:You eat at expensive places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well!!!

      That plate *identifies* as food! RDA values are a construct of the patriarchy!!! You will not be allowed in our establishment until you establish four YouTube channels, all based on talking about your other YouTube channels!

    3. Re:You eat at expensive places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that mean? Krita is not Affinity.

  69. An Point of Sale App for Alt Coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a working app for brick and mortar stores to take Bitcoin which is great. However BitPay isn't cooperating on adding other crypto currencies to the list. We need a solution that does this for al coins that is also free software and we have the source code to. Unfortunately the developer behind AnyPay.global a new Dash POS system has decided to withhold the source code. Or he's otherwise refusing to answer any questions in regard to anything making claim to "security". It seems absurd to me given how easy it would be to duplicate. The code for QR code generation for BitCoin and all the real work has already been done and released under GPLv3 and MIT licenses. The problem is it's not been merged into a single package. It probably wouldn't take someone more than a weekend to do, but someone still has to do it. Anyway- I'd certainly pay a developer to work on this provided the code got released properly. The only code that I'm not entire sure about that needs to be written is the part where it checks the status and receipt of payment on the network such that it can flash "paid" on the retailer's POS system. However I don't think its that difficult. It's probably just a matter of scraping or polling something. I wasn't sure how difficult that piece of code would be to write until I started thinking about it. If anybody were interested in working on this contact ThinkPenguin, Inc. Adequate compensation would be available.

  70. Radio protocols have a shelf life by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unlikely to happen. By the time the patents expire on 20-year-old radio protocols, the spectrum licensees have moved on to protocols several generations newer and sunset service using the old protocol. Case in point: Neither analog cell phone service nor D-AMPS TDMA works anymore on U.S. carriers.

  71. My country's future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like the future of my country to be decided by the people and in the open. No more back-room dealing and secrecy.

  72. Voting machine software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Voting machine software seems to be the easy answer.

  73. Debugging symbols and comments by tepples · · Score: 1

    Machine language proper lacks variable and subroutine names, comments (which document each subroutine's preconditions), and the original data from which compressed level maps were generated. This is what an NES game's asm source code looks like:
    Thwaite; RHDE

    1. Re:Debugging symbols and comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, the hex editor linked was originally written in machine code, and its "source" is derivative from that. There was no comments or variable names, but the systematics of the registers in use themselves. CX for the counter variable, CS for the code segment... my, my, just look at that trampled lawn though.

  74. AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Probably the most amazing operating system I've ever used, albeit very long in the tooth today. There's an open source clone, AROS, but I'd love to see the real thing open sourced, removing all the legal questions once and for all and allowing people to fork it and move it forward.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see the real thing open sourced, removing all the legal questions once and for all and allowing people to fork it and move it forward.

      How would you hope to move it forward more than AmigaOS4 is already doing?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:AmigaOS by DMJC · · Score: 1

      AROS is already adding 64-bitm SMP, and x86 support. How far along exactly does it need to go? From what I'm aware of Amiga, the way the chips interfaced with each other was where the real magic of the system was, and that's no longer relevant to how computers are designed. So you're left with a nice desktop OS which needs an overhaul it's getting to run on modern hardware, and it needs backwards compatibility emulation to run old apps, with integrated clipboard between the emulator and the x86 code. As far as I'm aware AROS has this already. Beyond that, it's yet another desktop OS which is struggling to be relevant because of the Windows game/app library it's missing. Similar to Linux, except with a smaller pool of developers. Correct me if I'm totally wrong, is anyone actually innovating software on Amiga? Not just developing on Amiga/reimplementing stuff from windows. But actually developing new technologies and concepts?

    3. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, it would be nice if we could implement some of the old concepts from the Amiga in our contemporary operating systems. We have, kind of, in a sloppy and piecemeal fashion, but it really did have a lot going for it. We have all these various plugin systems for different types of media, but the Amiga had one plugin system that would allow any application to view any file for which there was a datatype. That's pretty cool. Your application didn't have to have library support for a filetype in order to load it, just datatypes support. The way filesystems work is also very cool. The filesystem driver is actually installed to the disk, so that you can carry it to another system and plug it in and have it "just work" so long as the filesystem is supported on the new host. This stuff is only practical because the Amiga has a limited pool of architectures and a microkernel architecture, but I still admire these features.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      AmigaOS 4 is essentially an evolved version of AmigaOS. I don't think AmigaOS can really evolve into an operating system viable for an era of modern networking.

      What I'd like to see is for people to look at it, say "Reverse compatibility be damned!", and rewrite it significantly without having to worry that because they copied the basic structure, some generic legal firm that currently owns the rights can sue the pants off of them.

      AmigaOS was immensely efficient, but some of that efficiency was at the expense of security. We can probably keep that by adopting, say, a managed code or a software implemented capability architecture, but that will involve being able to rewrite significant amounts of the code.

      I'd love AmigaOS to be the starting point of a next generation operating system, but unless the shackles are removed, that's not going to happen. Instead something inferior has to be used as the basis, or a whole new unfamiliar system with no tested legacy built from scratch.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see is for people to look at it, say "Reverse compatibility be damned!", and rewrite it significantly without having to worry that because they copied the basic structure, some generic legal firm that currently owns the rights can sue the pants off of them.

      Isn't that what AROS is? It's rewritten completely, because the community did not get access to the source codes. Instead they passed into the hands of the current owners, who developed AmigaOS 4.x.

      It seems like the cleverest thing to do is to just support AROS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      AROS is a clone, it's rewritten in the sense that the code isn't a copy, but it's ultimately trying to implement the exact same operating system, in the same programming languages (more or less.)

      It seems like the cleverest thing to do is to just support AROS.

      Leaving aside that leaves you with a clone of AmigaOS, with all of the problems of the latter, rather than a next generation operating system that uses AmigaOS's basic structures and concepts, that doesn't address the last part of the sentence you quoted.

      Regardless: I'm not looking for a clone of AmigaOS, or even AmigaOS, I'm looking for the basic concepts to be used as the basis of a modern operating system. Until the legal issues are resolved, that's impossible.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not looking for a clone of AmigaOS, or even AmigaOS, I'm looking for the basic concepts to be used as the basis of a modern operating system. Until the legal issues are resolved, that's impossible.

      Which basic concepts do you imagine to be legally encumbered? Amiga didn't really invent anything, it just tied together lots of stuff in an affordable package for the first time.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:AmigaOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless: I'm not looking for a clone of AmigaOS, or even AmigaOS, I'm looking for the basic concepts to be used as the basis of a modern operating system.

      Just out of curiosity, if you had the Amiga OS source (say, v.3.1) what would you do with it?

    9. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have time ;-) But if I did, and the money to afford a team of people to work on it, some of what I would do would include: rewriting most of it in a memory safe language, and using this as the basis of a security system (code couldn't get run unless written in a memory safe language, perhaps using intermediate bytecode as a distribution format); adding the higher level security, adding full networking; replacing {graphics/layers}.library with something more in keeping with modern graphics hardware and replace intuition.library with something reflecting both the changed underpinnings and more modern UI requirements.

      Lower priority but still necessary would probably include more efficient file system handlers. I don't know what 3.1 has, but I know just opening and closing a file took approximately a second on my old 500+.

      That would leave you with an operating system that has AmigaOS's architecture and all of the advantages of its architecture, but with enough security to survive on the Internet without being owned or crashed.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:AmigaOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you could do most of that without the source, just using publicly available documentation.

    11. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Possibly, possibly not, but legally trying to copy the OS without some sort of license is a gray area, even if it's recreating it from documentation. That's the problem.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    12. Re:AmigaOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it would be a legal problem; this is what clean-room reverse engineering does. You get someone to document the funtionality and then get someone else to implement it, who has never seen the code.

      Pattenson cloned CP/M from the docs. Linus made Linux from studying the design of Unix and Minix. Apple sued MS over "stealing" their OS design and lost. Likewise DEC vs. Microsoft over VMS & Windows NT. ReactOS copies the design of Windows. There exists a ton of precedent that cloning an OS is perfectly legal unless you copy the actual code.

  75. FoxPro by dixonpete · · Score: 1

    Visual FoxPro. Would be great to have a 64 bit version. FoxPro was really great at data manipulation.

  76. I'd pick OS/X.. cuz why not by cmorgan503 · · Score: 2

    I know that not all of OS/X is opened sourced beyond Darwin (unless things has changed in the last few years when I last looked). Surprised no one brought up OS/X so far.

  77. Opera Presto by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    Presto is (was) the rendering engine used in Opera versions 7-12. They even talked a little about open-sourcing it after the switch to Chromium/Blink, but unfortunately nothing ever came of it. It would need a rewrite for multiprocessing and ... well, all the new stuff in the web in the last few years, but at the time it was sppedy and flexible. If we're being realistic about thing that could be open-sourced, that's the top of my list.

    1. Re:Opera Presto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://developers.slashdot.org/story/17/01/17/1534229/opera-presto-source-code-leaks-online

  78. Total Commander by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    Total Commander - there isn't a comparable File Manager, although DoubleCMD and MultiCommander at least try.

    1. Re:Total Commander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total Agreement!

      The other two tools I am missing from my Windows days are:
      TOAD
      UltraEdit

    2. Re:Total Commander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is - ConEmu+Far. I was using Total (Windows) Commander for years but I've switched and never looked back.

  79. Sketchup by Glock9mm · · Score: 1

    Sketchup would be great.

  80. Infocom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I'd just pay for a copy--legitimate or not--of the full ZIL source tree to Infocom's text adventures. I don't really care about a free license.

    1. Re:Infocom by dexotaku · · Score: 1

      There are several z-machine clients out there for multiple platforms that are free or open source. People still make z-machine games, too. Also, Infocom have published a collection of basically every game they made, that might still be buyable somewhere. :)

    2. Re:Infocom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course I knew all that. What I want is the ZIL source.

  81. Siemens NX by mmiscool · · Score: 1

    Free cad is a joke and there are no truly good parametric 3d modeling application for linux

  82. Clippy! by darkain · · Score: 3, Funny
  83. My picks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4DOS

    WordPerfect for Windows

    Paradox for Windows

    PowerBASIC

    Turbo Pascal

  84. Unix by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I would release a distro called Gnu is Now Unix

    1. Re:Unix by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You could call it GNU DRONE (Doesn't Run On New Equipment)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Unix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  85. Picassa by ka9dgx · · Score: 1

    Google's Picassa had unmatched facial recognition, and I've got 500Gb of photos to organize... but there was a bug, and it started getting confused... then they discontinued development and support.

    I'd also like Google Reader to come back

  86. Modern Linux Surveillance NVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    motioneyeOS comes close, but doesn't offer basics like external triggers and lacks it stability. ZoneMinder is difficult and large. A full-fledged system that can be relied upon is what is still missing after so many years of hoping and even trying to pitch in.

  87. sublime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's that good.

    1. Re:sublime by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

      Maybe if it was open source we could get Japanese input working on Linux.

    2. Re:sublime by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      or print

      --
      Nullius in verba
  88. Just one? by cb88 · · Score: 1

    Solidworks
    AutoCad
    Xilinx ISE and Quartus ,Mentor Graphics's stuff etc....
    Simics
    Visual Studio
    KiCAD is good enough at the moment so no real needs there.
    eASIC's design suite (they want like 15k or something insane for it)
    WinAMP
    A decent drawing program ala Corel something something... (I have an artistic sister)
    I don't need office... I just need people to stop using proprietary formats.

    1. Re:Just one? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Nope ... They never stated or implied "just one"

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  89. jp turn-based strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be cool to see some mods for Super Robot Taisen and Langrisser games.

    also: Opera 9, WinNT/2K/XP, various drivers, oh and how about vehicle ECU firmware while we're at it?

  90. Has to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unreal Tournament (99) Game of the Year Edition

    1. Re:Has to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I miss from PC gaming. Great games that you can play at 100 fps on shit hardware. And that I can play when I don't have Internet at all or the Internet is down.

  91. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None software. Why pay for free software? It costs close to nothing to copy. Artificial scarcity is a dumb idea that limits intellectual pursuits.

  92. Re:Is that the soylentnews fork or the slashdot fo by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Soylent news loads so much faster. That site was started after they tried the "beta" layout.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  93. Search engines by stormhalplus · · Score: 1

    They are the doors of the internet and affect not only business but our entire life. They are too biased towards the pocket of a few extortionists that have created a non competition hell for anyone comming close to them.

  94. Someone has to say it . . . by hduff · · Score: 1

    Windows 7

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  95. The entire Strategic Simulations Inc catalog, by blunttrauma · · Score: 1

    The entire Strategic Simulations Inc catalog, from about 1980 to about 1999. There was a slew of excellent war games, plus a bunch of licensed Dungeons and Dragons games.

    SSI changed hands a couple times, until Ubisoft acquired them and killed them off.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  96. Google Assistant by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2

    In imagining the future computing world, I've always imagined it would include personal AI assistants. I never imagined that they wouldn't be running directly on my home computer and accessing the net as my proxy.

    I believe the most critical open source need today is a strong AI assistant. Missing it is like missing the addition of Linux to open source.

    1. Re:Google Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. Mycroft.ai is a starting point, but it still needs Google for voice recognition.

    2. Re:Google Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check this out - I'm not done yet, but you can kind of see the direction I'm going. In trying to download a ton of images for training a neural net, I'm using Selenium web drivers. You could do that with any type of content. So the combination of a neural net and test automation software is the foundation for what you want:

      https://github.com/DiginessForever/machineLearning

      The above programming is in Python.

    3. Re:Google Assistant by ilikenwf · · Score: 1
  97. Probably nobody here has heard of it, but.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Genetica

    Unfortunately, the developers seem to have largely abandoned it, and no new work has been done on it in some time. The website it needs to connect to in order to download any needed content seems to be keeping maintained, but the forums, once booming with activity with questions from users and fast responses from the development team have all but dried up completely.

    While it was once (and still is) commercial, open source seems to me like the only way that project can get any new life at this stage.

  98. I wish the public would pay to liberate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish the public would pay to liberate the following:

    * h264 : Let's just get this over with! Firefox's inability to play videos all over the web is just lame -- and content providers just aren't embracing WebM or Theora enough. Just offer MPEG-LA $200 MILLION to just end this ridiculousness. I wish Bill Gates or Warren Buffet or some similarly charitable billionaire would step up and do this, because I think this will indirectly have as much impact as mitigating/curing some physical diseases. For example, accelerated information exchange would help scientists and the public learn, which would benefit a wide range of endeavors, including the prevention or eradication of diseases.

    * Major fonts : Let's just end this, too. Maybe the world just shares fonts freely anyway, but let's make it official. Pay to fully liberate all the major fonts on Mac OS X and Windows. The liberation list would be based on the top-10 fonts for each platform.

    The above were serious suggestions, but now jokes:

    * Open source CyberLink PowerDVD so a class action lawsuit can be brought against CyberLink for intentional failure to simply maintain Blu-Ray keys for previous versions of PowerDVD.

    * Open source the Windows Firewall code to determine why it is incapable of simply alerting the user when apps are blocked from accessing the Internet -- and also so that the code can be modified to be able to prevent Windows Telemetry from bypassing the firewall.

  99. Re:Buy Windows from Microsoft, make it open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I myself would go even further. MS Windowstook major ideas from IBM when the two companies collaborated on MS/IBM OS/2. Then when Microsoft and IBM split up in the early 1990s, Microsoft brought in Dave Cutler from DEC to rework the OS/2 code they had inherited from their work with IBM. So MS Windows NT contains stuff from both IBM OS/2 and DEC VMS.

    To clear the mess, and prevent another The SCO Group incident at some future date, I would like to see OS/2, VAX VMS, and Windows NT open-sourced, preferably under the GPL v3.

  100. Adobe Flash by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have no interest in building or running the software... but I imagine reading the code comments would be hilarious and enlightening.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: Adobe Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash will be dead by early 2019. Why? Chrome, the king of browsers on desktop and mobile stats, plans to kill it later this year. It will take a little longer for free sites like Newgrounds to give up, and for commercial video pages to realize this is a [more properly dangerous] Y2K moment in their timelines.

      Oh, and did I mention that Apple's Webkit and Mozilla's Firefox always copy Google's moves? I for one am glad, but MP4 video is not available for Chromium, so when I want what should be a web stream, a download popup appears and demands a lengthy wait for 100% completion. I do not trust the Chrome client on my phone.

    2. Re:Adobe Flash by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Source for MSDOS is out there (it seems to be v5 with some of v6's changes, but not a complete v6) ... a search therein for "IBM" or "fuck" (often arriving at the same spot) will indeed provide enlightenment.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  101. Battlefield 1942 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modernize it, spiff up the graphics and make it VR-ready. Port the weapons from Desert Combat, BF2, BF3 etc.

    Still the best go-anywhere, do-anything combat game!

  102. AppleScript by myid · · Score: 2

    AppleScript. I absolutely need AppleScript.

    Apple has paid so little attention to AppleScript, at least in public recently, that I'm concerned that they might stop including it in macOS some day. I sure hope not.

    If they do stop including AppleScript in macOS, I hope they'll open source it, so that people who need it can keep on using it.

    1. Re:AppleScript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ick. Throw it out and replace it!

      I remember back in the day, Apple promised a "programmer's dialect" of AS that would follow a more sane syntax for those of us used to real programming languages... they never delivered.

      I can't think of another language that puts you through so much pain figuring out what works and what doesn't, through trial and error (lots of error).

      It hurts more than JavaScript, PHP, and Python combined.

    2. Re:AppleScript by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      AppleScript is super buggy right now.
      So yes, an OSS version would be great.

      OTOH you can do via the OSAScript interface everything AppleScript can do via basically any programming language.

      Check out Automator, too. It is quite powerful.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:AppleScript by myid · · Score: 1

      I can't think of another language that puts you through so much pain figuring out what works and what doesn't, through trial and error (lots of error).

      Reading and writing files with AppleScript can be hard. How do you reference a regular file vs. an alias? Using a traditional Mac (colon-delimited) style file name vs. a Unix style file name? I wish accessing files were more straightforward.

    4. Re:AppleScript by myid · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'll check out OSAScript. And I'll see if Automator can do what I need.

      I use AppleScript mainly to read/write data in/out of applications.

      For example suppose I want to transfer data, from an iWork Numbers spreadsheet, to a Safari web page. An AppleScript can read the data from the spreadsheet, and then use a "do javascript" command to send that information to a web page.

      Or the AppleScript can read the contents of the spreadsheet, and write them to a .js file, writing the contents in the form of JavaScript commands. Then the next time I display the web page, the web page can read the .js file.

      I might also use AppleScript to click on deeply-nested menu items. And occasionally I make it speak or listen for my commands.

      But mainly I use it to send data to and from applications.

      By the way, am I the only one who thinks that the character EVE (in Pixar's movie WALL-E) looks a lot like the icon for Automator?

  103. Vehicle Infotainment Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of them are partially Open Source already, but most of them SUCK with limited ability to customize them or add your own apps.

  104. Microsoft BASIC by rolfeb · · Score: 1

    Microsoft BASIC.

    1. Re:Microsoft BASIC by AndyKron · · Score: 1

      Wow. That brought back mixed memories. I liked VB for DOS.

  105. Source code of nokia 3310 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, need it to install on one of hardy androids, to convert them into a good senior citizen phone without all app-mania. Plain colorfull extra-huge font text/tty/terminal phone

  106. Authorware by Camembert · · Score: 1

    Authorware was an interesting multimedia development tool by Macromedia, after the company was sold to Adobe it eventually was discontinued. It had a flowchart metaphor that allowed non-technical people to produce decent e-learning modules, including animations etc. In addition it had an interesting scripting language to create more powerful routines. I always thought that the program could have a future if maintained and expanded towards web based learning output etc (back then you could technically run it with a plug in, which nowadays would't be done anymore). It was quite a cool tool.

  107. 3D CAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) 3D CAD that doesn't suck. SolidWorks, etc.
    2) G-code generator. Not just for 3D printers. See #1.

    That is all I guess. Everything else is already available. I did try FreeCAD but it is still not complete - it cannot open some 3D models and it crashes sometimes. It also doesn't have a good sheet metal module (there is one in beta however). G-code generator is also very buggy. I also looked at BRL CAD but it is very clunky. HeeksCAD is incredibly slow and it is buggy.

    I was recently looking at purchasing a decent 3D CAD software that runs on Linux (couple of options), but they are super expensive. It would cost (minimum) about $1500 and that is way too much for a hobbyist.

    On related note - it used to be the same way for schematic capture and pcb layout software. However, KiCAD has really improved to the point where it is pretty amazing piece of software. Lets hope we see the same thing with 3D CAD software as well...

    1. Re:3D CAD by dbIII · · Score: 1

      G-code generator. Not just for 3D printers. See #1

      I wrote one of those (in autolisp) some time around 1989. It was not hard for a single tool BUT how the code is interpreted by the device differs, so writing something that will work on everything requires access to everything and setting what device the output is intended for somewhere in the program.
      There are some python DXF libraries that you could use as a starting point to write a G-code generator that would work on your stuff over a weekend. That's probably the only way you are going to get an open source G-code generator that works on your stuff.

  108. GPU drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't we been here already? Drivers need open sourcing. Not just GPU but all drivers, including Intel Management Engine and AMD TrustZone.

    1. Re:GPU drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many slashdot readers practically sit on top of some desperately needed source code? Leak it. Come on.

  109. Snapseed by JarekC · · Score: 1

    I would happily pay to have Snapseed open-sourced. I really like its effects / filters, but the fact the app is limited to Android and iOS is ridiculous. If it was open-sourced, I hope the effects / filters could be ported to a library which then could be used by GIMP or DigiKam.

    1. Re:Snapseed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try G'MIC for GIMP. It has every effect you can dream of.

  110. If you don't want to give support/maintain it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you should open it and let someone else do it.

  111. Tableau by hanzoach · · Score: 0

    Analytics like Tableau or RapidMiner. And being a photo hobbyist, Lightroom or Photoshop

  112. CAD by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    CAD software! And not that fucked up shit from Autodesk that insists you have an account, and you must be logged in.

    1. Re:CAD by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There's qcad which isn't bad for 2D stuff.
      For 3D or if you are going anywhere near FEA since you've got to wrap your head around things anyway an ancient interface like brlcad isn't going to add a lot to the learning curve.

    2. Re:CAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Freecad quite a bit lately to do FEM thermomechanical analysis on PCB designs, its still under development but works reasonably well actually in the daily builds

    3. Re:CAD by dbIII · · Score: 1

      From those screenshots freecad looks like it has far more modern interface and usable interface than AutoCAD used to have a few years back. If AutoCAD was good enough back then I'd say this thing is good enough now.

  113. Intel's and AMD's backdoor systems by Pravetz-82 · · Score: 1

    It is going to have a big impact if either or both of them get open sourced or reverse engineered.

  114. Slysoft Any-dvd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open source BD ripping. IANAL but hopefully no sales equals nothing illegal.

  115. Winamp and Picasa by johannesg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After reading the other article, why not open source winamp? Surely it would be more useful than it is rotting away... Same for Picasa.

    1. Re:Winamp and Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much love for Winamp, would be great to see that happen.

    2. Re:Winamp and Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently did a build of audacious for the Mac. If you really want it, I could most likely get it to build with gtk+mingw if you want a long-term windows winamp like player.

    3. Re:Winamp and Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      WinAmp, for all the obvious reasons in yonder thread.

      AOLpress, which completely ruined me for more-modern HTML editors, because of one singular feature: the ability to behave as a browser *while* editing. This is a huge timesaver when working on a heavily linked site.

      WordPerfect 5.1 DOS, need I say why?
      (tho I understand this source has been lost. And IIRC, it was in assembly!)

      Netscape 3.04, so you bloody slow modern browsers can figure out why it did the same job in 1/100th the time
      (source also probably lost)

      RoughDraft, another unique editor

      Crap, I still use a lot of antique software...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  116. Intternet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So we can finally add a compatibility mode for IE only corporate web apps to Firefox.

  117. Speech to text by dbIII · · Score: 1

    There's some IBM stuff that became abandonware when they sold it off to Nuance which makes it look like there's now nothing at all for download or money that will do speech to text on powerpc.

    1. Re:Speech to text by pavon · · Score: 1

      This is a great one. I had started working a a mp3 player for my car that used those libraries, and then let it wither when they stopped making it available. At the time the free libraries from universities weren't nearly as good. I haven't looked around to see if there are any better open source packages now with the recent renaissance of machine learning.

  118. I'd pay with time, knowledge, and community suppor by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, it's not open source. Donations are only meant to fill in the gaps and not to be used as motivation. If you want to get payed to be "creative," get a Patreon account.

  119. ATI or NVIDIA Drivers by bsdpanix · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately just having drivers for one chipset wouldn't help for long.
    I would pay to have an entire company commit to making new, leading edge graphics cards with device drivers always and forever open sourced.

  120. Google Apps by LordFolken · · Score: 1

    A lot of functionality which was earlier in android has been absorbed into the google apps. (ActiveSync support for example). Since this stuff is fundamental to many smartphones, i'd like to see it opensourced.

  121. Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To fuck them by the backdoor

  122. Old/dead things I would pay to see as open source by jonwil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1.ZTree. Its a clone of the old XTree file manager for dos except ZTree is a 32-bit Windows app with support for a bunch of windows things (copying to the clipboard, long file names and more). I use it all the time because it has ways to do things that would require a lot more effort to do using other methods and it would be good to see it updated to modern standards (e.g. make it 64 bit, add more features, stuff like that)

    2.C&C Renegade from Westwood Studios. I have been reverse engineering C&C Renegade for more than 15 years and I probably know more about the internals of the game than anyone else on the planet at this point but there are still many holes in my knowledge. Having the original source code to Renegade (and the level editor, 3ds max export plugin and other tools) would allow all the mysteries of the engine to be sorted out once and for all.

    3.Other C&C games from Westwood Studios and EA. Having the source code to the older games (C&C1, Red Alert 1, Tiberian Sun, Red Alert 2 and maybe Generals) would allow the people who have been reverse engineering (or trying to reverse engineer) those games to stop doing that and work with the original code instead. Source code to console ports of the games (e.g. the Nintendo 64 port of the first C&C) would also be great to see.

    4.LEGO Mindstorms RCX. I own the original yellow LEGO Mindstorms RCX brick. I would love to see the complete source code for everything that runs on the device as well as the complete source code to the drivers and software so it can be made to work on modern operating systems (Windows 7 in my case).

    5.WinAmp. I still use it as my audio player of choice and if whoever owns it doesn't plan to continue development, opening it up and letting someone else take over would be nice.

  123. Re:I'd pay with time, knowledge, and community sup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bullshit.... open source means open source. your aversion to a monetary aspect is your own hangup. Even Stallman is fine with money being involved and that guy is a zelot.

    can you see the source? Can you modify it? Can you redistribute? It's open source.

    Take your anti-money b.s. back to 1984 Soviet Union..

  124. Gentoo ebuild is sadly sloppy :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old 5 series versions compiled cleanly on gentoo if you had the right tcl version (honestly for a long time tcl was the weak link due to changes in the tk bindings that broke a lot of gui applications.)

    The newer versions, since changing the UI to support QT/OpenGL and the cmake build system compiled for me on Fedora, HOWEVER g++ miscompiles some of the code, notably the gcode solver which resulted in the testsuite hanging. This has actually been my big complaint with g++ since the 2.95 days. They still don't have an adequate ABI regression suite (llvm suffers the same problem btw. I haven't played around enough with other compilers, although I have heard similiar complaints on the dos/windows side dating back 20 years.) leading to many cornercases where system libraries compiled with a different compiler version, or a different C++ standard (ie C++98 instead of C++11, or sometimes even the same C++ standard but two different compiler versions, see gcc's -fabi-version option for examples of why.) result in miscompilatoins that don't show up until a particular codepath is followed, and even then might not be diagnosable without a true C++ sage.

  125. SoftImage XL by maynard · · Score: 1

    Thanks for buying and killing it, Autodesk. Really. No. Actually, I can't hate you enough.

    1. Re:SoftImage XL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used Generic-CAD on DOS. It had a really neat interface, even without toolbars and ribbons. Autodesk bought it and killed that too.
      More recently, we used Navis-Works, a less than 10 MB 3D viewer that we could e-mail to clients. Autodesk bought it and now it's a 3.5 GB download, and I can't even install the newest viewer because lack of disk space during the installation. And the functionality is in many ways less than the original 10 MB program. (When Autodesk bought Navis-Works, there was hardly an upgrade path, many users needed to re-buy the software they already had after Autodesk too over.)

  126. BrlCAD has a gcode solver/generator. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't looked at what it supports, but I believe it has dxf import support as well as its own native output format.

    Should check it out.

  127. Renegade! I have a copy of that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ended up getting it in a collector's pack, since after playing the demo I didn't have a good enough CPU/GPU to play it when it first came out. The multiplayer side of things was kind of a letdown, although it has some wild item placement options for the time (Only Savage beat it out, since it actually had a full 3d FPS+Strategic mode, like if they redone C&C1 on top of Renegade, instead of just implying it was C&C1 era with the units/cutscenes.)

    Getting the opportunity to shoot your way through the buildings, blow shit up, and snipe enemies as a commando was pretty tight though. As was stealing vehicles (the feature most lacking in multiplayer if I remember correctly.)

    1. Re:Renegade! I have a copy of that! by jonwil · · Score: 1

      If you are still interested in Renegade, you should visit http://www.renegadeforums.com/ and look up the Tiberian Technologies scripts 4.4 update (its an unofficial patch for C&C Renegade written by me and some other people that adds new features, fixes bugs and does other good things)

  128. Lightroom, MIcrosoft ICE and XnView by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fast and reliable best of breeds, 98.6% of photo needs, and yet fraught with glaring, trivial oversights and omissions. ne plus ultra.

  129. Silverlight rebuilt with .NET Core by art123 · · Score: 1

    Silverlight with .NET Core and XAML based ui framework would be a great alternative to JS/HTML/CSS for rich browser based apps.

  130. Wing Commander, All of them by DMJC · · Score: 1

    Wing Commander 1/2/3/4 Prophecy, Secret Ops, and of course Privateer. I'd like all the art assets made available so we can remaster 2,3 and Privateer in HD. The games' code is freaking useless, EA has no idea what they're doing with it. There will never be a great definitive edition of the series put on Good Old Games, just re-bundled versions of the DOS games. Open the code and let the community make proper cross platform ports and add weird features like VR support. It worked for Freespace 2 and there's a big enough Wing Commander community to make it work. EA obviously doesn't want to make a new game so why bother holding onto 27 year old sourcecode? The only other thing I really want Open Sourced is Caligari TrueSpace. The sourcecode got leaked onto the internet in 1998 but I can't find a copy of it anywhere (.NFO files indicate it was stolen and released). Microsoft bought out Caligari in 2008 and shut it down when the GFC hit. Sure TrueSpace is freeware now, but it's buggy and could do with a lot of patches/updates.

  131. skype, discord, spotify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electron and CEF doesn't make you open source. It makes you a shitty webapp.

  132. Atlassian Stack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JIRA, Confluence, Bitbucket: Yes there are alternatives, but not with the ecosystem (plugins). Licensing for medium companies is prohibitively expensive.

  133. Google Play Services by damaki · · Score: 1

    Android is a not a real open source OS. A supposed open source OS should not have any closed source API.

    --
    Stupidity is the root of all evil.
  134. eDirectory! by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

    There is still no other LDAP directory close to it. Having a fully capable directory service available open source on Linux could change the game.

  135. After Dark by Hemi+Rodner · · Score: 1

    I miss After Dark screensavers so much...
    I installed them in a Windows 98 virtual machine, but it's far from enough.

    --
    hemi
    1. Re:After Dark by MrGregg · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought too and I did the exact same thing. Looney Toons, Star Trek, Simpsons... just think of the cool stuff people could license today... FireFly, Doctor Who, StarGate, Harry Potter...

    2. Re:After Dark by Hemi+Rodner · · Score: 1

      [like]

      --
      hemi
  136. Hardware! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    Sure, there is lots more software that needs to be open-sourced - but software is still light-years ahead of hardware in that respect. And really, the lack of open hardware hinders software development, especially in key areas such as phones. If the system contains any closed bits, then it isn't truly open. And only true, complete openness has a chance of saving us from the shit-show of corporate dominance, government spying, and general ass-fuckery the powers-that-be are subjecting us to.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  137. Irix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irix

    1. Re:IRIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I would love to see SGI open source IRIX.

      SGI is dead... they went bankrupt and got sold for parts.

      Someone must own the IRIX IP, but good luck getting it released. You'd probably have better luck tracking down the developers who created IRIX and pay them to work on a Linux distro.

    2. Re:IRIX by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      It's owned by HPE now.

  138. Google Pagerank by Nuitari+The+Wiz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think Google Pagerank is what defines what most of us see whenever we search for something on the web. Being such an important gateway between someone and the information. Does it have biases? How much censorship does it do ? How many false positive happen for the spam filtering? and so many other questions.

    1. Re:Google Pagerank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just bing it.

  139. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government.

  140. Silverlight and VB6 by gosand · · Score: 1

    I'm actually serious.
    I thought about this, and my gut reaction is that I can't think of anything from a personal perspective to have open sourced. I am happy with Linux and the tools I have, even GIMP. There are a few things I use at work that I don't think I would really use at home, like Snag-It. Irfanview is something I always use as well, it's just a great all-around image viewer, screen capture, and image resizer.

    But at work, we have an enterprise-level application that uses Silverlight a lot, and we have some VB6 apps as well. The next couple of years are going to be spent updating those, and as the manager of the testing group I am not looking forward to it at all. Save the comments for WHY we have those... we're a MS shop and those decisions pre-date me being there by many years. :)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Silverlight and VB6 by fafalone · · Score: 1

      I'll second the call for VB6. It's hands down the best tool for creating desktop apps. Very easy to use, but also so powerful you can do whatever you need too, dropping down to inline ASM if you want. My pet project in fact is bringing in all the new shell features from XP and Vista+, especially the new Common Controls features, so you can have all the same GUI goodies and shell APIs/COM interfaces as a modern tool; you can't tell from looking at my apps that they're written in a decades old IDE.
      VB.NET is something entirely different, and not at all a suitable replacement. If VB6 was ever updated with 64bit support (which would be trivial for MS because they did update the language itself for VBA) and a few other features, it would be huge.

  141. Patents ? by pedz · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see many of the image and video format patents released to the public domain. I think that would stimulate a lot of new innovation. It sounds from various articles and events as if research in this area is strangled because of fears that a patent troll will bring an expensive lawsuit.

  142. Don't see the need by guruevi · · Score: 1

    I am already using open source and Linux versions for pretty much everything I do.

    I'm sure there are people that are comfortable using a certain application a certain way but even things like Photoshop and AutoCAD have gotten the entire kitchen sink worked into them (I started using AutoCAD 20 years ago and have abandoned it after early 2000 versions). Perhaps Eagle for PCB, there are few "good" Open Source PCB GUI although there are plenty of command line/parametric driven ones.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  143. Finalcut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could finally bring a real video editor to linux

    1. Re:Finalcut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kdenlive, blender or if you're a hollywood pro then ligthworks or davinci resolve.
      finalcut my ass, you lamer.

  144. Microsoft Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have yet to see a database development tool as easy on the developer as MS Access. Forms, reports, embedded code, table design, ER modelling.

    1. Re:Microsoft Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I have yet to see a database development tool as easy on the developer as MS Access.

      That's because MS Access isn't really a database development tool.

      It's a demo meant meant to fool people into thinking that database development is fun and easy, and put them on the road to buying MS SQL Server. :)

  145. Re: Buy Windows from Microsoft, make it open sourc by bpechter · · Score: 1

    Just another vote for VMS and OS/2. Add Unix Sys V as well.

  146. All drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything, tv tuners, frame grabbers, touchpads, whatever . No more blobs. I would pay for it. Definitely. Even Apple kexts. For software, FOSS is way better.

  147. Alpha Centauri by jrincayc · · Score: 1

    I'd pay towards opensourcing Alpha Centauri and Alien Crossfire.

  148. Writing as a coder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open Source is great people develop software for 3, and if I choose I can just alter the code to my desire.

    Keep up the excellent development :)

  149. AutoCAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Preferably release 12-when ever they started using ribbon menus. Auto desk needs to stop destroying their own software.

  150. Intel Management Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and AMD's Secure Processor (PSP)

  151. 1) Win7 2) SolidWorks by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

    In both cases include the externally and internally libraries and helper applications that go with it--not just the items written by the prime developer for the primary product.

    --
    - Sig
  152. Ableton Live. by Ace17 · · Score: 1

    This would be the fastest road to get a GNU/Linux port.

    1. Re:Ableton Live. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because we dont have enough boy/girlband-y autotune-y disco-ey dance-y electro-ey rapcrap-y shit.

  153. iTunes by davemchine · · Score: 1

    Functionally we need a cross between iTunes and Plex. Something that will allow us to manage the physical files and the metadata like iTunes does. Also, something that will allow syncing between devices the way Plex does (wirelessly and from anywhere).

  154. Sketch or Figma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inkscape doesn't come close in user-friendliness.

  155. A DRM-free e-reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E-ink e-readers are almost nonexistant... Kobe and the kindle are just about all that's left. The nook still technically exists, but I doubt for long. Sony stopped making them and the kindle sucks for a lot of reasons. I'd love to see an open source version that will simply work.

  156. FoxBase +/Mac by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    There was some really great things in that application, the interfacing and graphics capability was simply fantastic.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  157. ZFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as the universal filesystem that would work on all computers, linux, windows, macos.

    1. Re:ZFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZFS is under an open source license. They just deliberately made the standard implementation incompatible with the GPL.

  158. VideoReDo Suite - and ported to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VideoReDo - and ported to Linux.

    It is the last reason I still have Windows.

  159. An old system performance tool old UNIX hands ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... may remember: Polycenter Data Collector and Performance Advisor. (Two products/tools really. The PA product needed a pricey license.)

    It was really useful in identifying performance bottlenecks on DEC UNIX such as what users or processes were using the most CPU (yeah, can do that today) but the aspects that we found to be most useful were the listing the "hot files" list on the system (those with the heaviest I/O) and the kernel parameter tuning suggestions. Maybe it's not all that needed with SANs and The Cloud but smaller systems could still benefit from such a tool. And the charts/graphs available from the PA tool were invaluable to have on hand to wave in front of the people controlling your budget when you needed a justification for buying more resources. Surely there are some old DEC UNIX/Tru64 developers out there--they can't all be dead--who could adapt these products to Linux. Unless CA completely erased all evidence of the product's ever having existed. (They sure priced it to death after they bought it.)

  160. Congress by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Open sourced or out-sourced to SE Asia.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    1. Re:Congress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace congress with an Ardunio-based robot.

  161. Windows Seven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coding-wise, it's probably a can (cistern?) of worms to sort out though :D

  162. Re: Buy Windows from Microsoft, make it open sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Add Unix Sys V as well.

    Have you looked at Illumos? As I understand it, it's the most modern derivative of OpenSolaris available and the closest you can get to actual SVR4 source code.

    TUHS has lots of ancient Unix source code up to Version 7 and 32V. I haven't dug into it but I imagine you could get close to a full SVR4 system with the available sources.

    But then, Linux and the BSDs have evolved so much since then, I'm not sure having SVR code would gain you much. It's just for historical interest IMHO; you can now do anything with the available free code that you could do with SVR, and more.

  163. IRIX by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I would love to see SGI open source IRIX. IRIX is a fantastic OS and it's graphics implementation would go far to really improve the graphic capability of Linux and BSD.

  164. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has a rubber sex mask got to do with disability? Is it a us thing?

  165. Bethesda's game engine by wildstoo · · Score: 1

    Creation or whatever branding they've given it. It must be the most Frankenstein style, cobbled together engine ever used to power AAA games. I would put good money on there being more TODO and HACK comments in that source than actual lines of code.

  166. My List: by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Affinity Designer
    Affinity Photo
    Corel Draw
    The Fusion Video Suite (professional video postproduction software, hideously expensive)
    Kaleidoskope App (diff tool for macOS)
    Transmit (FTP Client for macOS)
    everything from Jetbrains (developer tools)
    Adobes entire Flash related line of software

    Games:
    Everything related to the line of "Tribes" games ... Old school arena games desperately needed!
    Eve Online
    WoW + Server
    StarCraft 1&2
    GuildWars 1&2 + Server
    Dota 2
    MineCra(ft/ck)
    Some line of open world games, ... Probably Watchdogs 1&2 or the entire GTA line including servers.

    That's from the top of my head.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  167. Electronic Music Equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I curerntly dream of writing my own code for the Arturia Beatstep Pro. Fantastic hardware sequencer but buggy and unimaginative software.you can't even put it into a mode so that it works as a dumb controller.

    plenty of old syths have had firmware re-engineered to fix/enhance them like the Roland JX3P (added simultanious midi and external hardware controller, plus listen to CCs), Roland JX10 (improved all round, properly supports CC and SYSEX, plus works with some hardware mods like adding PWM and a new screen), Cheetah MS6 (CC enabled) etc.

    but it was all a little easier with these smaller, older items.

  168. Obviously by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    Windows XP + IE11. It's still a wonderful OS.

  169. Dead OSes and games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mainly AmigaOS (that "Amiga Forever" shit has to die) and Fallout 1 & 2 (since Bethesda certainly isn't going to improve them). However, really, anything else that has been abandoned. It's not like it will make anyone actually involved any money any more; at best it will make some other opportunist make money as part of a collection (see "Amiga Forever", for instance).

  170. Would love to see the engines for morrowind and ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Community has already done wonders with them as it is.

  171. Research / Patents Granted to Public Universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait. I already paid for that.

  172. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "gimp" is someone who's lame or hobbled. That meaning goes way back, decades before the BDSM usage...

  173. DirectX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Level the playing field for games with Linux/BSD and it will benefit everyone...except M$ shareholders...

  174. FreeHand by sombragris · · Score: 1

    Too bad it got killed when Macromedia was acquired by Adobe. FreeHand was a nice vector drawing tool.

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
  175. WordPerfect by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    I don't write many documents anymore with the change in jobs but when I had to before I always preferred writing in WordPerfect because I found it easier to see what was going on with the reveal codes section when I had to fix something that wasn't working right. The reveal codes section made it easy to see everything that was going on in the document.

  176. Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't think of anything in the proprietary world that I need?
    I have a better OS (acutally, a selection of better OSes) than them.
    Anything I need for a server or workstation - open source has equivalent or better. Particularly word processing, where proprietary is so far behind they aren't even interesting.
    Games? I'm lucky there, as I don't care about the latest titles. The games I play are open.

    Can't think of anything I envy the payers.

  177. Front Page Sports Football '99 by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

    Game never worked, but have some promising features. Let the community fix it!

  178. Red Faction by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see this fantastic game open sourced so that I could run it without Windows or Wine

    --
    Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
    Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
  179. Re:Is that the soylentnews fork or the slashdot fo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  180. Novell Netware and NSS file system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Novell was dipping its toes in the water with NSS file system on Linux with Open Enterprise Server. Too bad it never went anywhere. POSIX (via Linux) you've been my bread and butter for two decades now but nothing has ever rivaled NSS on standard Netwware 5 and higher, IMHO.

  181. Codecharge Studio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This IDE let you create a web fast and easy, and publish it on php, asp, java, etc. Qith a touch of a button. But it has been abandoned for a few years, even so the forum is still active.

    1. Re: Codecharge Studio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it. I think yessoftware will be willing to sell it (if the company still exist), even when there has been no new release in 3 years the forum is still active. I stopped paying last year after calling and sending emails to support and receiving no response, I really think the company is dead and somebody just forgot to turn off the web server ðYI think a lot of us would be willing to cooperate in opensoucing codecharge.

  182. Dwarf fortress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every few releases all mods break and we have to wait months for dfhack upgrades to enjoy latest features on mods.

  183. Government by easyTree · · Score: 1

    ...no 'democracy' is not an adequate replacement.

  184. 123D Catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want multiple feature detectors implemented in an open source way (no patent worries) into open source photogrammetry systems that can run in real time on live video streams. Probably 123D Catch and others are not currently capable of this.

  185. Genera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Genera from Symbolics. Make OS non-proprietary and free licensed. And make an image for RPi.

  186. xmms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xmms is basically winamp without the suck parts.

  187. Plenty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game Engines: Valve's GoldSrc and Source.
    Games: Kings Quest series, Jones in the fast lane, Super Mario Bros., Mortal Kombat, Street Fighter 2, Warcraft, Halo, Minecraft,
    Games Consoles: All console operating systesm and roms (Xbox, PS, Nintendo, Sega etc...)
    Antivirus Software: Symantec Antivirus, Kaspersky
    Office Software: MS Office, Skype, Adobe PDF Creator, Winzip,
    Operating Systems: Windows 7/10, MacOS, Apple IOS, MS DOS, Windows 3.11
    Programming Languages: .NET, Visual Basic, MS Basic, QBasic
    Network Operating Systems: Cisco IOS, All router and modem operating systems
    Artistic Software: Ableton, Photoshop, Adobe Premier, Winamp,
    Abandonware: Xtree Gold, Telix, Remote Access (BBS Software), IceChat, IceEdit, Legend of the Red Dragon, Winzip, Dune 2, Norton Ghost, Qmodem Pro, Sim City, Zork, Xenon 2, Zany Golf, ScreamTracker 3, Fast Tracker 2, Prince of Persia,
    Enterprise Software: Oracle Peoplesoft, Oracle Database, Java, Symantec NetBackup, NetApp Data OnTap, Gmail, Google Docs, Dropbox,
    Other: Any blobs in linux. Drivers etc...

  188. Re:I'd pay with time, knowledge, and community sup by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    Actually, Stallman hates the word "open source." I'm not anit-money, I just think you have a bunch of young college students that got duped into being computer science majors and now that everyone's a "developer" and the popular thing is "open source," 20 year olds that don't understand the philosophy and origins want to get paid for it when they could be developing proprietary software & PC games and just let those that actually care about a FOSS project do what they do best. Your allusion to 1984 Soviet Union is also innacurrate and probably has to do with your millenial mind-set and the book "1984." In the Soviet Union, science and technology were very heavily linked to politics and ideology (much like in the U.S. today). They may have all been driving tanks for cars, but they were kicking ass in computers and engineering, especially Japan. Poor East Germany didn't get a break though. Even the U.S. space program was built on Nazi tech and scientists. So...I'll just take what you said as a compliment.

  189. Dragon Naturally Speaking by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    I learned to dictate with a human secretary more years ago than I care to contemplate. Dragon was an easy transition for me and I love it. I would love to see a good FOSS speech-to-text program. Nothing compares to Dragon. Android's speech to text is passable, but often fails in hilarious (and dangerous) ways.

    GIMP vs PS. User of PS since 1.0 so it is almost instinctive. When PS went to subscription in a fit of pique I decided to undergo the pain of learning the unfortunately-named G.I.M.P. I find it quirky, but usable and flexible once it's counter-intuitive eccentricities are mastered. I will allow that my PS experience may bias my perception. I will also allow that there are things about GIMP that I like better. "Crop to selection" comes to mind.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  190. phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phone hardware drivers, phone bootloaders etc...

    That would allow people to safely escape the clutches of Google While still having an android sandbox for android applications on your new private Debian phone

  191. All The Sims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be gold to integrate it with some custom AI's

  192. World of Warcraft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of cause... What else do we need?

  193. VxVM and VxFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Veritas Volume Manager and Filesystem.

  194. CodeCharge Studio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy to use WYSIWYG IDE you write once and it will automatically export to .php .net .java etc.

  195. ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would keep an open an honest election.

  196. Reply was to the other AC by tepples · · Score: 1

    Anonymous Coward #55050609 wrote, with a link to Krita:

    You're doing it wrong.

    A presumably different Anonymous Coward #55050697 wrote:

    Also Serif Photo. It is paid, but it is at a price of a dinner for 2

    When I tried to look up its price to verify the claim of "a price of a dinner for 2", the first result for serif photo on Google Search was Serif PhotoPlus. I assumed that "Serif Photo" was a colloquial abbreviation for Serif PhotoPlus. The Serif PhotoPlus page states that the Serif PhotoPlus product has been discontinued in favor of Affinity Photo. So I instead looked up the price of Affinity Photo and wrote in reply to Anonymous Coward #55050697:

    Now called Affinity, and priced at $50.

    You wrote:

    What does that mean? Krita is not Affinity.

    That's why I replied to Anonymous Coward #55050697, who suggested the predecessor of Affinity Photo, not Anonymous Coward #55050609, who suggested Krita.

  197. Adobe Fireworks by Geek+On+The+Hill · · Score: 1

    There's really no replacement for it, and Adobe's pretty much abandoned it.

  198. Quicken by rleibman · · Score: 1

    It's one of the few things keeping some people on Windows... I second the comments above on Photoshop and AutoCAD... basically, anything that's preventing people from switching away from closed-source OS.

  199. I would pay to see this open-sourced... by partialorder · · Score: 1

    Echelon

  200. Not quite correct by gillbates · · Score: 2

    Painter here. Yes, that kind of painter.

    While a poor painter may blame his brushes, a good painter knows that he's no better than the brushes he uses. A great deal of painters try to imitate Bob Ross with poorer quality paints and brushes (i.e. something other than the Bob Ross branded paints and brushes), and only end up frustrated. I'm one of those - Bob's knife techniques simply don't work with acrylics. He eventually comes around to mentioning this in one of his episodes, but that's years of time under the bridge.

    I spent several years painting with "traditional" oil paint brushes, using acrylics, and ended up very frustrated with the limitations. But a few years ago, I discovered golden taklon brushes, and it was the difference between night and day. There are simply things you can't do with hog hair brushes, and no amount of skill will compensate for that.

    There are a lot of amateur artists who remain amateurs, I suspect, because they don't have sense enough to buy good quality art supplies. They think, "If only I were skilled enough, I could do this right," instead of, "If I want the results of a great master, I have to use the same tool a master uses..." And sadly, they often give up, thinking they lack some fundamental talent necessary. More often than not, it's a matter of time and materials rather than talent.

    Think of it another way: most of us could write in assembly if we needed, but why would we do that if C/C++/Java was available? If we insist on having the best tools available, why wouldn't a painter do the same?

    And I have tried GIMP. Yes, I could use it for painting, but why? I'd spent less time doing it the traditional way, on canvas.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Not quite correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the FUCK are you trying to substitute acrylics for oils? You are not a painter or an artist, so stop lying.

  201. Agricultural machinery - tractors, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is increasing discussion and concern in some corners regarding limitations imposed by manufacturers' (eg John Deere) proprietary code and systems that are increasingly hamstringing farmers in their day to day operations.

  202. MS Visio! by totoroxxx · · Score: 1

    I know there are "alternatives" foss and non-foss but sadly enough there are too many stencils already done. To recreate must deal with too much annoyances... so opensource of MS Visio will really simplify TI people and non-TI people a lot!

    1. Re:MS Visio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the Visio alternatives are any good - and this program is the only reason I need to log into Windows at work.

      However, it wouldn't have to be MS Visio. Something like the Shapeware version would be fine.

      A program with key features of Visio, Autocad, and Mathcad would be even better - with Ruby as the automation language.

  203. Mostly low-level stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Motherboard firmware, the "platform management software" that Intel and AMD are so secretive about, video card drivers, etc... all the stuff you'd need to make a fully functional Windows, Mac, or Linux PC without any binary blobs.

    Oh, and Windows and macOS, too :-)

  204. Microsoft ESP by codecore · · Score: 1

    This could be the basis for a AR world crowd-sourced SLAM database.
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff798293.aspx

  205. Microsoft Quick C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great fast compiler for small applications. I would like to see what's under the hood.

  206. Civilization 4 by jfoucar · · Score: 1

    Civ 4 is one of my all-time favorite games and I still play online games of it to this day. After 10+ years of playing, I'm still discovering new game mechanics and new strategies. For those who don't follow civ, civs 1-4 consisted of a gradual expansion of concepts in each sequel, with tried-and-true mechanics being preserved, flawed mechanics being re-worked, and new mechanics building on top. This approach allowed the series to evolve and continue to improve with each iteration. Then came Civ 5 which abandoned most of the classic civ game mechanics and started fresh with a slate of new (and inferior, poorly balanced) mechanics. The predictable result was that Civ5 was a disaster. With Civ6, the designers have resumed a more evolutionary process, keeping the core of Civ5 but making significant improvements. Civ6 is pretty good but still no where near as good or deep as Civ4. I've always wished that civ4 would go open source so that a series of games could preserve and build-upon that lineage.

  207. The internet. by endercase · · Score: 1

    Shiftnrg, filecoin, sia...

  208. IBM OS/2 Warp and later by kriston · · Score: 1

    IBM OS/2 Warp and later would be great--even the assembler source code. We can rehost it in C and enjoy an operating system stable enough for automatic teller machines.
     

    --

    Kriston

  209. Linux-XP Frankenstein... by dddux · · Score: 1

    I would like to see a Windows XP/7 "desktop environment" with Linux underneath. It would get rid of many Windows file system and OS shortcomings while giving us a very usable and simple to use OS. So simple and so "unobtanium", eh? :( Although I must admit I really love MATE DE and it could become just what I'm asking for really soon. Almost there.

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  210. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original definition of "gimp" is "Twisted silk, worsted, or cotton with cord or wire running through it, used chiefly as upholstery trimming.", predating your definition by centuries.

  211. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, but it wasn't applied to people back then.

    The original meaning of 'faggot' is a bundle of sticks, but if you call your program FaggotPaint, you're going to get lambasted.

  212. Markdown that can do everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Markdown

            Math, Music, flowchat, ......

          software, disseration......

    everything we have been writing with paper and pen

  213. Re:Old/dead things I would pay to see as open sour by Reziac · · Score: 1

    While we're in ancient history, Vern Buerg's LIST, v9.final.

    LIST v6.0 source code was released as public domain, but good luck finding a copy; it seems to have vanished off the planet (tho I have one stashed on an old HD somewhere).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  214. Kerbal Space Program by miceliux · · Score: 1

    I would love to see what the community can do with Kerbal Space Program

  215. RSX-11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RSX-11 and most of the stuff Mentec is purported to own