Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Would You Pay To See Open Sourced?

jbrase writes: It's in the interest of the open-source community to make open-source development as profitable as possible. One potential means of making money from open source is crowdfunding, [but] proprietary vendors aren't likely to be enthusastic about using their flagship product to try out a relatively untested business model. Crowdfunding the open source release of legacy technologies of historical significance could provide a low-risk way for vendors to experiment with making money by crowdfunding: The product has already turned them a profit.

With that, I'd like to ask Slashdot readers, what would you pay to see open sourced?

Slashdot reader jonwil left a comment suggesting old games ("where the game is no longer being developed/worked on and where the engine/tech is no longer being used for anything"). But the sky's the limit here, so leave your own best answers in the comments. What would you pay to see open sourced?

251 of 483 comments (clear)

  1. Photoshop by pestilence669 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... no, Gimp is not an adequate replacement.

    1. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:Photoshop by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... no, Gimp is not an adequate replacement.

      GIMP 1.x was social experiment intended to test how far people would go to use an application. They ended quietly ended the experiment after avid GIMP fan was found in another GIMP user's apartment by police after a neighbor reported gruesome screams. The developer had been cutting off the fingers of there users who did not utilize every keyboard shortcut for GIMP. Shortly thereafter the GIMP 2.x series was released with an improved GUI that was just good enough to not drive people insane. The results of the experiment were recorded and they pushed forward on their new larger social experiment: GNOME 3. The intervention of outside parties improving Gnome 3 was unforeseen and ruined the experiment. However, the project was revived by a the Nazi scientist, Lennart Poettering. Project "EWONTFIX" continues to this day a scale greater than ever before. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also Serif Photo. It is paid, but it is at a price of a dinner for 2

    4. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And apply the same to Photoshop. Coming at both from the perspective of an absolute novice, I found GIMP's easier to figure out.

    5. Re:Photoshop by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it would be much better if any camera company funds gimp development

      A decent Photoshop replacement should not use Gimp as a starting point. It has the worst UI I have ever seen. It is legendary for being unusable. Someone once joked that they took a book full of bad UI design patterns and used it as a "how to" guide. But there is no way that is true since Gimp has many bad UI "features" that appear no where else.

      Gimp is a classic example of what goes wrong with OSS projects when the developers have no financial incentive to care about their users.

    6. Re:Photoshop by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Photoshop + Excel and there is no reason to have Windows at work.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Photoshop by oic0 · · Score: 1

      As someone who uses both, at least with gimp you can learn your way around once and work from there. Photoshop has multiple modes you can activate that just needlessly complicate it. I also found both to be much easier than any 3d modeling program I've tried. I want to see one of those with an understandable interface. I eventually gave up trying to learn them due to sheer frustration.

    8. Re:Photoshop by tsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can't expect a 3D modeling program to be as 'simple' as Photoshop and Gimp and the like. Introducing that extra dimension while still using a 2D screen just opens a big can of worms concerning the interface.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      3D modelling goes way beyond simply adding another dimension. You've got textures, materials, shaders, lighting, environment maps, bump/normal/parallax maps, UV mapping, specularity and diffuse maps, boning/rigging, etc. etc. It's FAR more complex than working with just simple 2D media.

    10. Re: Photoshop by Camembert · · Score: 2

      There is a gui option that makes Gimp rather photoshopish, it's quite ok.

    11. Re:Photoshop by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Photoshop has now adopted a multi-window gimp type GUI so they don't think it's so bad.
      In a multi-screen or multi-virtual desktop environment working on several images at once the gimp interface makes perfect sense. If you are stuck on one screen, not so much, hence photoshop being a full screen window with subwindows and acting as it's own window manager because MS Windows wasn't doing the job.

    12. Re:Photoshop by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Someone once joked that they took a book full of bad UI design patterns and used it as a "how to" guide. But there is no way that is true since Gimp has many bad UI "features" that appear no where else.

      I like the UI. It makes much, much more sense if you have a focus-follows-mouse (or better sloppy focus) based Window Manager as was popular on UNIX when gimp was in its infancy. Apparently the gimp developers agree with me that this is the way, the truth and the light and they keep making a user interface which I like.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:Photoshop by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You can't really compare the a 2D graphics package and a 3D modelling package. Maybe you could compare 2D vector drawing, like Inkscape.

      FreeCAD is pretty good. Still developing fast so there are a lot of features that commercial packages have which it lacks, but for a lot of tasks it's fine. In many ways I find it easier to use than apps like Photoshop and GIMP because it's just a case of logically arranging and specifying everything, rather than trying to be artistic with the mouse.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Photoshop by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Would of course be nice, but I'd rather take a Linux port of the entire Creative Cloud as it stands. It would bring a lot of professionals over and give Linux a much higher standing as a workstation OS. If I were to spend money on getting the source code for a blob it would probably be for compatibility, like say the source code for MS Office or DirectX or nVidia's graphics driver. Then again, not very likely they'll sell it for any reasonable amount.

      Looks like there's some progress though, you can now play Overwatch and GTA V is up to Bronze and Witcher 3 is now up to Silver. Still tough to be a gamer on Linux though, now my friends are talking about maybe trying Forza Horizon 3... looks like I'll need a Wintendo (Win10) box in the near future. Not letting that spyware near anything of importance, that's for sure. Bah, was hoping to avoid that a while longer...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    15. Re:Photoshop by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Rather than open source Photoshop, I'd want to see a "close enough to work alike" set of OSX emulating libraries that would make it trivially easy for anyone who writes for Mac OSX to cross compile their product to be able to run under Linux. Also, to the extent that Wine isn't there already, it'd be good to have something similar for WinXP.

      Truthfully, between Picture Window Pro (now free to use) and Adobe Lightroom (for those times when nothing but adjustment layers will do) I find little need for a full version of Photoshop.

    16. Re:Photoshop by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd rather take a Linux port of the entire Creative Cloud as it stands.

      Fuck no. SaaS is unacceptable for desktop applications. People need real programs that don't depend on phoning home.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re: Photoshop by siege72 · · Score: 2

      I had the opposite experience. I used GIMP for years, and even as I gained experience it felt like the UI was fighting against me. I switched to Windows and purchased Photoshop (CS5); I was immediately more productive on a new piece of software than I ever had been with GIMP. I (jokingly?) consider my $10/month Photoshop subscription to be a protection fee, so that I don't have to use GIMP again.

    18. Re:Photoshop by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      The best UI ever designed for 3D modelling was Mirai. They also made a junior version called Nendo. There is an open-source clone http://www.wings3d.com/ which is sort of a combination of the ideas in Mirai and Nendo.

      It's too bad AFAIK there isn't a NURBS/CAD modeller that has such a good UI design.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    19. Re:Photoshop by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, apart from textures there's none of those things in Sketchup. If other features are present, then they're automated.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    20. Re:Photoshop by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Photoshop has multiple modes you can activate that just needlessly complicate it.

      That's an interesting critique given GIMP's ability to fundamentally change how the entire interface works in the settings.

    21. Re: Photoshop by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      Gimp 2.9 has had it since at least Nov 2015, but has yet to make the stable branch.

      http://ninedegreesbelow.com/ph...

    22. Re:Photoshop by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That already exists, it is called "Qt", like probably 2 decades.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      http://qt.io/
      http://qt-project.org/

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re: Photoshop by corychristison · · Score: 2

      You clearly have no idea what Creative Cloud is....

      It's the entire Adobe collection of "Creative" applocations. Including, but not limited to, Photoshop, Illustrator, Animate, Acrobat (pro), etc.

      It is very loosely coupled to a cloud storage service, but you do not have to use it.

    24. Re: Photoshop by mooterSkooter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. I've only ever used GIMP for simple graphical stuff (used to be backend web dev and sometimes tinkered with images instead of asking the 'pros' to do it in PS). Everything I needed to do (resize, cut bits n bobs, move stuff around) all was easy to do. I tried the same in PS and was like "dunno how to do anything". I think PS'ers complain about GIMP because they're not used to it. Same as Windblows users who 'can't use' linux because it's 'too hard'. It's just different.

    25. Re:Photoshop by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Qt will let you be able develop cross platform applications if that's your intent from the start. I was talking about something that duplicates enough functionality that one doesn't have to attempt to make their application cross platform. Something that would allow a person with access to the Photoshop source code written for MacOS 10.1 to, with only trivial modification, compile an executable that would run on Linux where the emulator resources have been installed. The notion is not to provide the user with a MacOS like experience, but rather to provide the software company an almost zero effort way to make their product also available on Linux. For a publicly held software company, no effort for more money is a decision that could only go one way, or they might be sued by their investors. The idea is similar to that of Qt, but with the added intent to make life extra easy for closed source vendors of software on a particular other platform. If there was a version for MacOS 10.1 and a version for WinXP, that would be a good start.

    26. Re: Photoshop by houghi · · Score: 1

      It does however nothing for the silly things they added. Open a file, e.g. a JPEG and edit it. You can't save it, like in any other program, you need to use 'save as'. (Unless they have changed that) That and the fact they are unable to write a usable manual for the scripting makes me not use it anymore.
      In the past each version upgrade broke the scripts I had. Not sure if that is still the case, as, like I said, I don't use it anymore.

      So now I use ImageMagick on CLI when possible or nothing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    27. Re: Photoshop by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Single window mode.

      Works pretty well (except on my multi monitor machine, where I use GIMP as intended. Tool pallets on the small screen, image on the big one).

      Sam

    28. Re: Photoshop by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that's a legacy of when, as I vaguely recall, GIMP wouldn't edit JPGs at all because of the usual not-free-format religion. (I may be dysremembering.)

      Oh, there's another I'd pay for:
      Corel PhotoPaint, preferably v8.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  2. BeOS by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BeOS

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re: BeOS by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      OpenVMS before that.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re: BeOS by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      It's being ported to x64 by a third party. VMS will outlive us all.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:BeOS by tigersha · · Score: 1

      I still have an old Pentium II IBM Laptop with 256 MB of RAM running that, for nostalgia reasons.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    4. Re:BeOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think this is the winning answer of the thread. The only thing that I think might be more useful that's been mentioned would be Solidworks, but I don't think near as many people would use it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    M$ lock-in is the worst thing about Windows 7. It's a great desktop OS in most ways. I paid $300(AUD) for it anyway - it would have been nice to pay $300 for it to be free instead.

    1. Re:Windows 7 by tonique · · Score: 1

      There's ReactOS targetting Windows NT, though. But it's been proceeding incredibly slowly.

    2. Re:Windows 7 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      While we're leading an active fantasy life -- make that WinXP and XP64 !!

      (Since to my mind, they started breaking usability after that.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Windows 7 by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I think 7 was an improvement on XP64, much how XP was an improvement on 2000.
      I would like to see WinXP &&|| Win7 open sourced. Vista too, specifically for the diffs to XP and 7 so we can see what *not* to do!

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Windows 7 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Probably some technical improvements under the hood, but I have XP, XP64, and Win7/64 side by side, and every time I have to use Win7, it's one little annoyance after another, and I am SO glad to go back to XP.

      One problem with opensourcing commercial software is that usually there's a spaghetti tangle of licensing, since it's a rare commercial product that doesn't use code licensed from somewhere else.

      Of course there's always ReactOS, which should be viable about the time Windows 26 is released...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Picasa by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nothing else currently available on Windows comes close.

    1. Re:Picasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding. ACDSee fucking destroys Picasa.

    2. Re:Picasa by johannesg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Totally agreed. Hey Google, how about it?

    3. Re:Picasa by crath · · Score: 1

      Definitely, Picasa should be open sourced! There is no other application like it in terms of simplicity and just doing what it needs to do. All it' competitors either do too little or over-reach themselves and do too much. The replacement that google trundled out, Photos, is a 2nd-rate tool that doesn't even attempt to act as a real replacement; rather, it's a competitor of Flikr.

    4. Re:Picasa by crath · · Score: 1

      ACDSee looks like a fine application; but, I don't need DAM or layered editing; I just need a way to make basic edits, organise my photos, and create albums. Yes, ACDSee can probably do all three of those things, but only at the personal cost to me of having to learn a complicated interface. I've got better things to do with my time.

    5. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah it did back in 2003. Now it's one of the most bloated pieces of shit around, and the simplified viewer doesn't support something as fundamental as loading the monitor profile before displaying a damn picture.

      I used to use ACDSee as the only application that displayed pictures in the correct colour. Now it seems to be the only one that doesn't. *golfclap*.

    6. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Since I still use an ancient ACDSee v3.something that came in a printer bundle... I'll consider myself warned!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes when I "upgraded" to ACDSee Pro 5 it basically forced my move to Picasa. I still keep ACDSee around as Picasa sometimes craps itself when opening files with a width larger than around 40000 pixels.

    8. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I hate when that happens! Just stop fucking with my software already!

      I never did try Picasa. What am I missing?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I hate when that happens! Just stop fucking with my software already!

      I never did try Picasa. What am I missing?

      Feature wise not much. To be honest I'm probably the one missing something since I never used ACDsee or Picasa for any of their cataloguing or editing functions. I was using them mostly as image viewers. My requirements for those were simple:

      1. Light weight.
      2. Have zoom to fit, zoom to 100% as quick options. (continuous zoom is a bonus)
      3. Interpolation other than nearest neighbour when zooming.
      4. Support automatic conversion of the image colour to the monitor profile (I have a wide gamut monitor so if this isn't done colours look hyper saturated)
      5. Easy scrolling and switching between images.

      - ACDSee split their light weight viewer out from their main viewer. The main viewer fails on 1. The lightweight viewer fails on 3 and 4.
      - Windows Picture viewer (windows 7) fails 2 and 4
      - Windows Picture viewer (windows 10) fails on 5 since it relies on integration of the explorer to decide what images to display next. e.g. I click on a downloaded jpg in Chrome's download window and I can't scroll between any other pictures even thought there's more in the downloads folder. It also fails on 1 since MS is trying to turn it into a social networking application cum movie player. (I kid you not one of the insider previews renamed the Photo Viewer to "Story Remix" whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean). It also is slow to scroll.
      - Irfanview sort of failed on 4 because it was unable to automatically read the monitor profile and it needed to be set manually in the settings, so on my laptop which I sometimes plug into my monitor it would have the colours incorrect unless I change it at every dock.

      But really something that has grown on me is Picasa's no nonesense auto-fading interface http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AB3p... and simple keystroke navigation. pgup/down zooms fit/100%/400%, up/down arrows are stepless zoom. left right previous / next. Defaults to fullscreen but hitting enter makes it windowed. esc key exits. moving the mouse to the bottom exposes a scrollbar of images in the folder as well as control buttons for the keyboard impaired.

    10. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the rundown. I use ACDSee mainly as a quick way to run through the zillions of images from digital cameras (continuous mode was invented by the devil). Stepless zoom sounds worth the install all by itself, and I probably have an older Picasa here somewhere.... I haven't looked at Irfanview in ages, didn't like it much way-back-when, but as we're bitching, things change!

        "Story Remix" sounds like they're letting kindergarteners steer development. WTF??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Picasa by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I forgot one infuriating feature in Picasa Viewer. There's no sort functionality. It will run through the pictures by last modified time. If the modification times of images are screwed (e.g. I downloaded a comic book in image format from a torrent), then again I revert to ACDSee, though I have on occasion used the touch command to change the last modified times.

      "Story Remix" sounds like they're letting kindergarteners steer development. WTF??

      It gets better it's now called Photos and Videos in the latest build. There's also an app called Movies and TV. Now which one should you use to play video files...

    12. Re:Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      If I want lack of sorting, I'll use the default Windows viewer! Geez, but that would be Google... any functionality that a raw beginner can't find, we can ALL do without.

      Photos and Videos vs Movies and TV... I'd guess it means "amateur-made" vs "commercial source" but yeah, someone only knew cellphone-speak.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  5. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...or at least, the Win32 API and userspace components needed to run Windows applications.

    1. Re:Windows by TemporalBeing · · Score: 2

      You can't avoid it yet, but if it was oss could finally make wine work more reliably...

      Wine doesn't work reliably b/c they haven't ever focused on a single version of Windows and gotten that right before moving to a new version. They always try to mimic the latest release. They can change their process and probably get full compatibility sooner by actually focusing on the APIs available in a specific release of Windows. Win7 would probably be a good target right now; Win8/8.1/10 wouldn't be hard to add after that - again, one at a time - since the deltas are smaller once the base is completely there.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    2. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I honestly wouldn't mind seeing the entirety of Windows open-sourced. Wishful thinking, I know...

      Everything is so inter-twined that you'd have to open source the whole system...it's just one big knot of spaghetti.

      I thought most Windows applications called into a runtime dynamic library that implements the Win32 API, which could have its internals replaced to work on e.g. Linux. I read that the NT kernel supports different userspace subsystems, one of which is Win32. Is there something I am missing here?

    3. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's how WiNE works. It reimplements the Win32 API on top of the X Window System's windowing calls.

      Technically, the NT kernel calls are a different kettle of fish to the Win32 calls.

    4. Re:Windows by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand how massive the Windows API is. Their stats page lists 114312 functions, granted 18k of those are forwards but that's still 96k real functions and 28k of them are just stubs in the WINE project. Of the 68k functions that do have a real implementation it's near impossible to say how many of them are completely and correctly implemented, since they don't actually conform to a specification only "whatever Windows does". And it's not like they're simple formulas, they're interfaces to huge state engines like DirectX. They could concentrate on one version all they want and probably still never finish the first one to perfection.

      Fortunately for us there's a long tail of rarely used functions and dependencies on obscure bugs and behaviors. Implementing the mostly used functionality of the mostly used APIs does make the most common application work and then there's a never ending TODO list of bugs you could investigate. WINE is always going to be a band aid, they do more good staying current and relevant than trying to solve every corner case. And I think the argument really works just as well in reverse, by spending some effort on the small deltas they get a lot of software working and find bugs that benefit older software too. It's happened to me many times that old software works better with newer wine versions, even though they haven't had any patches directed at them.

      Of course it also happens that they break things, regressions happen. But they're pretty good at fixing those if you can point to a working version (or better yet, bisect to find the offending patch). Overall I'd say the progress is positive, but it's no substitute for native applications.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Windows by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand how massive the Windows API is. Their stats page lists 114312 functions, granted 18k of those are forwards but that's still 96k real functions and 28k of them are just stubs in the WINE project. Of the 68k functions that do have a real implementation it's near impossible to say how many of them are completely and correctly implemented, since they don't actually conform to a specification only "whatever Windows does". And it's not like they're simple formulas, they're interfaces to huge state engines like DirectX. They could concentrate on one version all they want and probably still never finish the first one to perfection.

      Fortunately for us there's a long tail of rarely used functions and dependencies on obscure bugs and behaviors. Implementing the mostly used functionality of the mostly used APIs does make the most common application work and then there's a never ending TODO list of bugs you could investigate. WINE is always going to be a band aid, they do more good staying current and relevant than trying to solve every corner case. And I think the argument really works just as well in reverse, by spending some effort on the small deltas they get a lot of software working and find bugs that benefit older software too. It's happened to me many times that old software works better with newer wine versions, even though they haven't had any patches directed at them.

      Of course it also happens that they break things, regressions happen. But they're pretty good at fixing those if you can point to a working version (or better yet, bisect to find the offending patch). Overall I'd say the progress is positive, but it's no substitute for native applications.

      Oh I understand. I also understand how much they're intertwined, built-off each other etc. You have to build a certain base level - starting with the NT Kernel - and them move up and out of the stack.

      But what you're missing is that it's far easier to hit a stable-target than it is to hit one that's constantly moving. If you get NT4 (a much smaller target complete), then move to Win2k - the delta isn't that great. Move to XP, and again - the delta isn't that great (smaller than NT4->XP); and keep moving on. Additionally you'll have more and better software compatibility across the board instead of the hit-and-miss that it currently is.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  6. Nvidia Drivers by ARos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nvidia sucks.

    1. Re:Nvidia Drivers by skids · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, drivers, drivers, drivers, firmware, firmware, firmware. And full chipset documentation for no-longer-commercially developed hardware.

    2. Re:Nvidia Drivers by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Source to CUDA would also be nice.

    3. Re:Nvidia Drivers by skids · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the question just mutates to whether companies would be willing to rescind IP rights for older hardware for a price.

  7. Obviously by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

    The JVM

    1. Re:Obviously by cb88 · · Score: 1

      Java... and the JVM (several implantations actually not just the Sun / Oracle one) are open source.

      Google got sued because they didn't make a compliant Java implementation.... and instead just reused parts of Java in Android.

    2. Re: Obviously by nasch · · Score: 2

      If that were why they got sued they would have lost. They got sued because Oracle saw them making a bunch of money with Java and wanted some.

      Am I internetting right?

    3. Re: Obviously by cb88 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.... got sued for those reasons, but the didn't lose because the parts they were using were basically headers which are a grey area.

    4. Re: Obviously by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They got sued because Java is a trademark.
      Using the trademark requires that you follow all Java standards. E.g. portability of the byte code.

      Google/Android basically don't use the trademark. They reimplemented a bunch of "API's" and Oracle came and said: "You do Java, but you do it wrong".

      Google answered: now, we don't do Java in the sense of the trademark. We use "Java, the language" and a few clean room implemented API's/libraries. (in italics because it is not clean room in the original sense, but since Java exists people have a problem grasping what a clean room implementation really is).

      Of course with cross compiling existing Java tools (does Google have its own javac?) google is a bit on thin ice, on the other hand all the tools involved are GPL. The Google VM is their own thing. Just because "Java the language" is involved and GPLed Java libraries I don't see a violation in terms of usage for the word Java (the platform).

      However an attempt to open source (it likely is?) the Dalvik VM and have running Dalvik VMs on MacOS or Linux would be interesting. (I googled for it a while ago, but the results where not promising).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re: Obviously by nasch · · Score: 1

      They got sued because Java is a trademark.

      I'm afraid not. "Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc. is a dispute related to Oracle's copyright and patent claims on Google's Android operating system (emphasis added)." So every kind of intellectual property right except for trademark.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

    6. Re: Obviously by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The only case they would have had would have been in Trademarks.
      There is clearly no copyright infringement, and patents hardly can apply to copying an API.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re: Obviously by nasch · · Score: 1

      Right, that's why Oracle keeps losing.

  8. The source code to slashdot by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh wait. Too close to home?

    1. Re:The source code to slashdot by sconeu · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:The source code to slashdot by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Slash, the CMS code used to run Slashdot, is already FOSS. I'm pretty sure that there was never a time when it wasn't in fact.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:The source code to slashdot by vipw · · Score: 1

      I don't think slashdot is still running on Slash. And slashdot was many years old before slash ever open sourced.

      Soylent, not slashdot, is the news for nerds site that uses open source.

  9. The AMD/Intel co-processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What they are for, what they do, what code runs on them, the whole shebang.

  10. Too obvious to be mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    by the hipsters at /.

    1. Microsoft Windows
    2. Apple iOS
    3. Apple Siri
    4. Google search engine
    5. Amazon e-commerce engine, including recommendation
    6. Amazon fulfillment engine
    7. Cisco IOS
    8. Oracle RDBMS
    9. MATLAB

    1. Re:Too obvious to be mentioned by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      9. MATLAB

      If I have a choice between the two, I'd prefer Mathematica.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  11. Maya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What would you pay to see open sourced?

    Maya

    1. Re:Maya. by Frobnicator · · Score: 2

      Maya

      Be grateful there is a substitute today. I'm one of the old fogies who helped get Blender freed up. At least today there is one substantial 3D tool open.

      I'd put several tools and technologies far before Maya. Consumer routers are probably top on my list, particularly from the companies where the only option is the locked-up corporate version.

      I love my FTTP gigabit connection's speed, but the only option is AT&T in my region, and since 2015 that has been a mandatory eternal rental. No purchase option, no other devices can be attached, no choice of box. All customers have a mandatory rental fee which cannot be escaped, and no other equipment can be used. The closest I can come is attach my own device to the gateway, but it lives behind their locked-away gateway no matter what.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  12. Easy by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Informative

    macOS

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Easy by tigersha · · Score: 1

      This. MacOS/X. Apple would probably gain by Open Sourcing it too.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    2. Re:Easy by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Apple would probably gain by Open Sourcing it too.

      I doubt it. The hardware lock-in is central to their revenue.

      There's also the way that Apple gets full control over what hardware they need to support. This wouldn't necessarily change if they open sourced macOS, though - use on other hardware could remain officially unsupported.

  13. Is that the soylentnews fork or the slashdot fork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    SoylentNews has a fork that is mostly the old open sourced SlashCode from ~10-15 years ago, updated with new stylesheets and a few minor format modifications. Unlike the current slashdot site it also supports collapsed threading view via stylesheets and without javascript, so none of this 'you need javascript enabled to see all the messages, or log in.' BS

    The site isn't nearly as popular as the slash, and the quality of articles is about the same, but the code seems pretty nice, and it is updated to mod_perl 2.0 and all the other fund new tech so you can use it with a modern apache server instead of 1.3 :)

  14. Can we ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... stream it?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  15. I need to bitch slap some chickens... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    A modern version of Dungeon Keeper 2.

    1. Re: I need to bitch slap some chickens... by Aethedor · · Score: 1

      Try War of the Overworld. Very entertaining! http://store.steampowered.com/...

      --
      It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
    2. Re:I need to bitch slap some chickens... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah!

      I only had the german version, but it was hilariously funny.

      Playing 2:00AM at night, a voice from the off "Your monsters demand a cable TV!"
      4:00AM a voice from the off "We al know you are at sleep, let the monsters sleep, too! They did their share of butchering knights to night already!"
      Or similar stuff, cant remember :D the exact words.

      I was usually playing with my GF, she in her room and I in mine, not sure if it was cooperative, but at some point she would get the voice from the off and then I would get it.

      So funny.

      And the game was great. Imagine a Dungeon Keeper on the iPad, I guess I would have to apply for social aid as I would be unable to work anything.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:I need to bitch slap some chickens... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Dungeon Keeper on the iPad, I guess I would have to apply for social aid as I would be unable to work anything.

      The iOS version exists. The reviews aren't great.

    4. Re: I need to bitch slap some chickens... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Try War of the Overworld.

      Thanks for point this out!

    5. Re: I need to bitch slap some chickens... by ls671 · · Score: 1

      No problems, thanks for write a reply!

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    6. Re:I need to bitch slap some chickens... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... unusable. Works only with an internet connection.
      I only play games when I have no internet connection, obviously.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  16. Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Top to bottom, we should have a DRM-free open-source cell phone, including hardware and software.

    1. Re:Cell Phones by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I would LOVE to see the source code to more parts of my Nokia N900 Linux phone be released. Don't care that the radio firmware is proprietary, what I want to see open sourced would be the various proprietary audio components, the browser UI, the various binary components that handle WiFi (including the various WiFi encryption bits) and any hardware related items that remain closed source (e.g. the cellular services daemon that sits on the linux side and talks to the cellular modem)
      So much more could be done if these things were open source (or even if some of these libraries and things had their interfaces/documentation/etc published)

    2. Re:Cell Phones by mdkathon · · Score: 1

      Well, that's going to be tough. The bits that make them work cost a lot of money to develop. Like, a lot. Like, like, like, a ton. I think we find many things on this list that are not going to make the list, but you're asking to open up *everything* in hardware and software. That's the same as asking *everything* in a computer to be open sourced. Think that's going to happen soon? Might as well find Woz's home address and start collecting donations.

  17. AutoCAD by digitect · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are no open source CAD softwares capable of producing the drawings used in architecture, engineering, design, and manufacturing. Yet, that same, expensive proprietary package continues on with the same performance hogging, unstable, fluff enhanced software that hasn't really changed in 15 years.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:AutoCAD by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      It's not Open source, but I've had great success with their new cloudified product Fusion 360.

    2. Re:AutoCAD by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FreeCAD works for me. I especially like scripting in Python. AutoCAD uses Lisp for scripting, but it is buggy and not included at all in the "lite" edition for students.

      Even if AutoCAD was free, I would prefer FreeCAD.

    3. Re:AutoCAD by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Holy shit is FreeCAD slow though. In fairness I don't know how it compares to AutoCAD since I've not used that. The only major project I've done had a lot of parameterisation via the spreadsheet like thing. I was replacing the OpenSCAD model because the injection moulding place wouldn't take high res mesh models, and I needed a surface model so I got it done in FreeCAD in the time it took the SolidWorks distributor to take my life story and etc.

      Even slow, it was not very fast.

      But it did work, and the product reached market.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:AutoCAD by digitect · · Score: 1

      FreeCAD can't do basic drawing. It is primarily a 3D program, which sounds great, but the entire AEC industry operates with the assumption that 2D drawings are the final legal documents defining a contract.

      This is the same argument against BIM. You can model everything cleverly, but you still have to draft half the sections, details, elevations, notes, and schedules for the legal 2D printed documents. BIM is pretty bad at extrapolating from model to parametric flat projections, so there's really no benefit versus using a great 3D modeler alongside a parallel process of 2D CAD.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    5. Re:AutoCAD by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Not libre, but free-as-in-beer: Draftsight, from the same company that produces SolidWorks.

  18. The Internet (a codepocalypse) by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    ..it would be like having everyone's DNA unravel all at once, and all that would remain would be spaghetti code filling every corner of the conceivable universe!

  19. Sketchup. by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    Not disagreeing with the autocad comment.

  20. Re:The other side of it... by Dracos · · Score: 1

    And WordPress. $deity, that shit is awful.

  21. DirectX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    its the only thing stopping me from kissing windows bye bye and switching to linux 100%

  22. FoxPro by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    FoxPro, best tool ever for ad-hoc data chomping.

    1. Re:FoxPro by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Microsoft really messed up on that one.
      If you're not going to continue selling software, the only decent thing is to make it open source.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:FoxPro by Gondola · · Score: 1

      To open source something you

      1) need to get it to a state where it compiles with modern, available toolsets
      2) have to unlink it from any third party libraries you had to license (what stops most things)
      3) remove any third party assets you had to license, like sounds, graphics
      4) open your old customers to exploits people can glean from reading the source, which is bad PR

      All of which requires a budget with no business case and not even a tax-deductible dollar amount associated with it.

    3. Re:FoxPro by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The only one they had to worry about was #3 or #2. The other two are FUD.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to pay for any useful software, proprietary or open source, as long as I am free with no restrictions to use it on all my devices without further hassle. I refuse to buy any software that restricts me to one installation.

  24. Visual Basic 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Want to see how it works and compiles

  25. One dollar (US) ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... for Windows Freecell.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  26. Dwarf Fortress by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    Toady won't live forever. Moreover, what he has produced is very difficult to build on without his participation (specifically tracking combat). As a superior talent in a number of fields, I'm sure there's plenty of lessons to be learned from the code about scaling very large, application development, from a solo developer perspective.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  27. list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here are just a few:

    Microsoft Windows

    Microsoft Office

    Flash

    Audio Drivers for mid-high/high-end audio interfaces by companies such as:
    RME, Lynx, Burl, Prism, Antelope, Apogee
    - Many of these companies say their devices support class compliant, but they're most are not natively supported enough to be run on linux. Can't get any professional audio work done there.

    Roku devices

    Any Smart TV firmware - So we have the ability to go in, flash it, run a custom one, or disable all call-home features

    Intel Management Engine and AMD's equivalent
    (See Smart TV firmware)

    Automobile firmware - so we can keep companies such as Tesla honest by not sending home every piece of obscure data they have on the driver back home

    Routers - so we can override whatever techniques they're now putting in on purpose to block users from running custom firmware.

    Computer BIOS

    1. Re:list by tsa · · Score: 1

      Automobile firmware - so we can keep companies such as Tesla honest by not sending home every piece of obscure data they have on the driver back home

      i wonder how hard that is to achieve by a hardware hack. Just disconnect the antenna or something. Of course the car's firmware can't be updated anymore then, but is that really a bad thing? The car also can't be remotely hacked anymore, which is a plus.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  28. CorelDraw! by pcjunky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should be easy as they ported to Linux several years ago.

    1. Re:CorelDraw! by tsa · · Score: 1

      Oh, a Mac version of Corel Draw would be fantastic! I now use Inkscape, which works but lacks a lot of CD's functions.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:CorelDraw! by jonwil · · Score: 1

      You would be far better off spending money to pay people to add the missing things to Inkscape than paying whoever owns it these days to open source Corel Draw.

    3. Re:CorelDraw! by gomadtroll · · Score: 1

      It ran on wine..not ported ...

      greg

    4. Re:CorelDraw! by AndyCater · · Score: 1

      Actually, for me, just Corel Ventura Publisher. Now that GEM has been open sourced, we could have a really high resolution publishing app. that was world winning 20 years ago and still pretty good even stacked up against some of the things we have today.

    5. Re:CorelDraw! by tsa · · Score: 1

      What good drawing and illustration applications are there? I don't mind paying for one if it's not too deer.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    6. Re:CorelDraw! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Dunno, but for general bitmap editing... I try other stuff, and always wind up fleeing back to Corel PhotoPaint. I've actually bought CorelDraw just to get PhotoPaint. (Admittedly at a sharp discount, but still.)

      PhotoPaint v9 for linux exists, and was a free download back in the day, but I've heard is an Adventure to get running.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  29. Re:Buy Windows from Microsoft, make it open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You just ned 559Billion dollars as of last friday.

  30. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To be sensitive to common problems in society, GIMP needs to be renamed to "Disabled Image Editor" otherwise known as DIE to be a better representation of its usability helping your hopes of editing an image die one step at a time.

  31. Games that need a central server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any game that customers paid for that requires a central server that the parent company shuts down after a couple years, bricking the game. Seriously, this shit should be illegal, but it's growing..

  32. Demcratic elections voting infrastructure by evanh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems to me to be an obvious first port of call. The weak points become well documented so also become well protected. Couldn't get a better demo of the security obtained.

  33. BrlCAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it was good enough for the army...

    The only bad part about it is that it is a total pain to build on linux. Older versions UI was literally from either the 70s or early 90s, and it has a high learning curve.

    Latest versions even include gcode solvers for end to end design, modelling, and gcode output.

    That said, AutoCAD or 3D Studio Max would be awesome just for exporting the Star Trek ship models available into another format. It really sucks how all the coolest ships are only in max format so anyone unwilling to pirate needs to spend thousands of dollars just to open/render/reexport them. :(

    1. Re:BrlCAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > The only bad part about it is that it is a total pain to build on linux.

      Ubuntu/Debian:

      https://sourceforge.net/projects/brlcad/files/BRL-CAD%20for%20Linux/7.26.2/

      Arch:

      $ pacaur -Ss brlcad
      aur/brlcad 7.26.2-0 (57, 1.00)
              An extensive 3D solid modeling system.
      aur/brlcad-bin 7.26.0-0 (5, 0.20)
              An extensive 3D solid modeling system.

      It's really only a problem if you're using RHEL/CentOS.

    2. Re:BrlCAD. by cb88 · · Score: 1

      It was broken on Gentoo last I checked... wanted to give it a shot.

  34. Picasa and (cringe) Outlook by silversword · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the Outlook, but the business users made me say it ;)

  35. World of Warcraft client and server. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Fuck you, Blizzard.

    1. Re:World of Warcraft client and server. by Meneth · · Score: 1

      Servers are available. Popular forks include MaNGOS and TrinityCore.

      The regular graphical client is still closed, but somewhat moddable, and works well with the above servers. There's also a command-line player-assisted vanilla bot.

  36. Aperture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Aperture. Apple abandoned it and it is (still) so much better than Lightroom

  37. StarCraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    StarCraft. The game is very popular and is being used in AI research. But if you want to write your bots under Linux, you are bound to have a pretty hard time.

  38. ZTerm, Kermit by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    I miss the old days.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  39. Re:You're Mom by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Funny

    As opposed to yo mamma who is open sores, not open sourced...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  40. LastPass or 1Password by pavon · · Score: 1

    If there is any piece of software that needs to be auditable and have options for self-hosting it is password managers. Especially now that 1Password is backing off of their support for hosting your database file somewhere other than their servers.

    Unfortunately, I haven't found any open source password managers that pass the WAF, which requires seamless browser integration and syncing on all major platforms.

    1. Re:LastPass or 1Password by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with KeePass? I sync the password database with Syncthing. I don't need or want my password manager automatically interfacing with my browser. I wouldn't trust my browser with the ability to interface with my password manager, and you shouldn't either. In fact, on Windows I keep my password manager and database inside a Linux VM to make interfering with it more difficult. Looking up and bringing a password into the clipboard is a 3 second procedure.

    2. Re:LastPass or 1Password by pavon · · Score: 1

      Its fine for me (I actually prefer vim & gpg encrypted file), but non-computer geeks (eg every family member I have tried to get to use KeePass) hate having to:
      * Stop what they are doing
      * Open another program
      * Type in an unlock password
      * Search for the site they want,
      * Copy the password
      * Go back to the browser
      * Paste the password
      It takes more like 10-15 seconds for most people I've watched, and adding new passwords is takes longer.

      Furthermore, synchronizing an entire encrypted database as a blob using another tool can be extremely error prone if the clients don't all have constant connectivity with the server, which can result in lost passwords. Some cloud sync tools don't even notify the user when a conflict occurs, and even if you are notified manually resolving the conflict is a pain in the ass. The synchronization feature KeePass 2 made it a little better, but it is still a manual process that you have to teach people to recognize, and how to perform.

      I tried for years to cobble shit together with KeePass & bittorrent sync (before syncthing was stable) and the end result was my family hated it so much they only used it for bank passwords and others that I absolutely insisted on. I don't like some of the security compromises LastPass makes but it is more secure than a password manager that isn't used.

    3. Re:LastPass or 1Password by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Its fine for me (I actually prefer vim & gpg encrypted file), but non-computer geeks (eg every family member I have tried to get to use KeePass) hate having to:
      * Stop what they are doing
      * Open another program
      * Type in an unlock password
      * Search for the site they want,
      * Copy the password
      * Go back to the browser
      * Paste the password
      It takes more like 10-15 seconds for most people I've watched, and adding new passwords is takes longer.

      You're doing it wrong. You need this and this. The first gives you automated recognition and entry of username and password into websites, as long as you populate the URL field in KeePass correctly (and it will help you do that). The second syncs to Google Drive, including upload, download, and download-merge-upload options.

    4. Re:LastPass or 1Password by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Woops. And also this. I set it all up so long ago I forgot the details. It Just Works(TM).

      It's one plugin each for Chrome and Keepass to allow automatic entry of usernames and passwords into websites, plus one plugin for Keepass for database backup and synchronization.

  41. You eat at expensive places by tepples · · Score: 1

    Now called Affinity, and priced at $50. I could buy dinner for 7 with that.

  42. Radio protocols have a shelf life by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unlikely to happen. By the time the patents expire on 20-year-old radio protocols, the spectrum licensees have moved on to protocols several generations newer and sunset service using the old protocol. Case in point: Neither analog cell phone service nor D-AMPS TDMA works anymore on U.S. carriers.

  43. My country's future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like the future of my country to be decided by the people and in the open. No more back-room dealing and secrecy.

  44. Voting machine software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Voting machine software seems to be the easy answer.

  45. Debugging symbols and comments by tepples · · Score: 1

    Machine language proper lacks variable and subroutine names, comments (which document each subroutine's preconditions), and the original data from which compressed level maps were generated. This is what an NES game's asm source code looks like:
    Thwaite; RHDE

  46. AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Probably the most amazing operating system I've ever used, albeit very long in the tooth today. There's an open source clone, AROS, but I'd love to see the real thing open sourced, removing all the legal questions once and for all and allowing people to fork it and move it forward.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see the real thing open sourced, removing all the legal questions once and for all and allowing people to fork it and move it forward.

      How would you hope to move it forward more than AmigaOS4 is already doing?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:AmigaOS by DMJC · · Score: 1

      AROS is already adding 64-bitm SMP, and x86 support. How far along exactly does it need to go? From what I'm aware of Amiga, the way the chips interfaced with each other was where the real magic of the system was, and that's no longer relevant to how computers are designed. So you're left with a nice desktop OS which needs an overhaul it's getting to run on modern hardware, and it needs backwards compatibility emulation to run old apps, with integrated clipboard between the emulator and the x86 code. As far as I'm aware AROS has this already. Beyond that, it's yet another desktop OS which is struggling to be relevant because of the Windows game/app library it's missing. Similar to Linux, except with a smaller pool of developers. Correct me if I'm totally wrong, is anyone actually innovating software on Amiga? Not just developing on Amiga/reimplementing stuff from windows. But actually developing new technologies and concepts?

    3. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, it would be nice if we could implement some of the old concepts from the Amiga in our contemporary operating systems. We have, kind of, in a sloppy and piecemeal fashion, but it really did have a lot going for it. We have all these various plugin systems for different types of media, but the Amiga had one plugin system that would allow any application to view any file for which there was a datatype. That's pretty cool. Your application didn't have to have library support for a filetype in order to load it, just datatypes support. The way filesystems work is also very cool. The filesystem driver is actually installed to the disk, so that you can carry it to another system and plug it in and have it "just work" so long as the filesystem is supported on the new host. This stuff is only practical because the Amiga has a limited pool of architectures and a microkernel architecture, but I still admire these features.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      AmigaOS 4 is essentially an evolved version of AmigaOS. I don't think AmigaOS can really evolve into an operating system viable for an era of modern networking.

      What I'd like to see is for people to look at it, say "Reverse compatibility be damned!", and rewrite it significantly without having to worry that because they copied the basic structure, some generic legal firm that currently owns the rights can sue the pants off of them.

      AmigaOS was immensely efficient, but some of that efficiency was at the expense of security. We can probably keep that by adopting, say, a managed code or a software implemented capability architecture, but that will involve being able to rewrite significant amounts of the code.

      I'd love AmigaOS to be the starting point of a next generation operating system, but unless the shackles are removed, that's not going to happen. Instead something inferior has to be used as the basis, or a whole new unfamiliar system with no tested legacy built from scratch.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see is for people to look at it, say "Reverse compatibility be damned!", and rewrite it significantly without having to worry that because they copied the basic structure, some generic legal firm that currently owns the rights can sue the pants off of them.

      Isn't that what AROS is? It's rewritten completely, because the community did not get access to the source codes. Instead they passed into the hands of the current owners, who developed AmigaOS 4.x.

      It seems like the cleverest thing to do is to just support AROS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      AROS is a clone, it's rewritten in the sense that the code isn't a copy, but it's ultimately trying to implement the exact same operating system, in the same programming languages (more or less.)

      It seems like the cleverest thing to do is to just support AROS.

      Leaving aside that leaves you with a clone of AmigaOS, with all of the problems of the latter, rather than a next generation operating system that uses AmigaOS's basic structures and concepts, that doesn't address the last part of the sentence you quoted.

      Regardless: I'm not looking for a clone of AmigaOS, or even AmigaOS, I'm looking for the basic concepts to be used as the basis of a modern operating system. Until the legal issues are resolved, that's impossible.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:AmigaOS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not looking for a clone of AmigaOS, or even AmigaOS, I'm looking for the basic concepts to be used as the basis of a modern operating system. Until the legal issues are resolved, that's impossible.

      Which basic concepts do you imagine to be legally encumbered? Amiga didn't really invent anything, it just tied together lots of stuff in an affordable package for the first time.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have time ;-) But if I did, and the money to afford a team of people to work on it, some of what I would do would include: rewriting most of it in a memory safe language, and using this as the basis of a security system (code couldn't get run unless written in a memory safe language, perhaps using intermediate bytecode as a distribution format); adding the higher level security, adding full networking; replacing {graphics/layers}.library with something more in keeping with modern graphics hardware and replace intuition.library with something reflecting both the changed underpinnings and more modern UI requirements.

      Lower priority but still necessary would probably include more efficient file system handlers. I don't know what 3.1 has, but I know just opening and closing a file took approximately a second on my old 500+.

      That would leave you with an operating system that has AmigaOS's architecture and all of the advantages of its architecture, but with enough security to survive on the Internet without being owned or crashed.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:AmigaOS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Possibly, possibly not, but legally trying to copy the OS without some sort of license is a gray area, even if it's recreating it from documentation. That's the problem.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  47. FoxPro by dixonpete · · Score: 1

    Visual FoxPro. Would be great to have a 64 bit version. FoxPro was really great at data manipulation.

  48. I'd pick OS/X.. cuz why not by cmorgan503 · · Score: 2

    I know that not all of OS/X is opened sourced beyond Darwin (unless things has changed in the last few years when I last looked). Surprised no one brought up OS/X so far.

  49. Opera Presto by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    Presto is (was) the rendering engine used in Opera versions 7-12. They even talked a little about open-sourcing it after the switch to Chromium/Blink, but unfortunately nothing ever came of it. It would need a rewrite for multiprocessing and ... well, all the new stuff in the web in the last few years, but at the time it was sppedy and flexible. If we're being realistic about thing that could be open-sourced, that's the top of my list.

  50. Total Commander by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    Total Commander - there isn't a comparable File Manager, although DoubleCMD and MultiCommander at least try.

  51. Sketchup by Glock9mm · · Score: 1

    Sketchup would be great.

  52. Siemens NX by mmiscool · · Score: 1

    Free cad is a joke and there are no truly good parametric 3d modeling application for linux

  53. Clippy! by darkain · · Score: 3, Funny
  54. Unix by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I would release a distro called Gnu is Now Unix

    1. Re:Unix by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You could call it GNU DRONE (Doesn't Run On New Equipment)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  55. Picassa by ka9dgx · · Score: 1

    Google's Picassa had unmatched facial recognition, and I've got 500Gb of photos to organize... but there was a bug, and it started getting confused... then they discontinued development and support.

    I'd also like Google Reader to come back

  56. Just one? by cb88 · · Score: 1

    Solidworks
    AutoCad
    Xilinx ISE and Quartus ,Mentor Graphics's stuff etc....
    Simics
    Visual Studio
    KiCAD is good enough at the moment so no real needs there.
    eASIC's design suite (they want like 15k or something insane for it)
    WinAMP
    A decent drawing program ala Corel something something... (I have an artistic sister)
    I don't need office... I just need people to stop using proprietary formats.

    1. Re:Just one? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Nope ... They never stated or implied "just one"

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  57. Re:Is that the soylentnews fork or the slashdot fo by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Soylent news loads so much faster. That site was started after they tried the "beta" layout.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  58. Search engines by stormhalplus · · Score: 1

    They are the doors of the internet and affect not only business but our entire life. They are too biased towards the pocket of a few extortionists that have created a non competition hell for anyone comming close to them.

  59. Someone has to say it . . . by hduff · · Score: 1

    Windows 7

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  60. The entire Strategic Simulations Inc catalog, by blunttrauma · · Score: 1

    The entire Strategic Simulations Inc catalog, from about 1980 to about 1999. There was a slew of excellent war games, plus a bunch of licensed Dungeons and Dragons games.

    SSI changed hands a couple times, until Ubisoft acquired them and killed them off.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  61. Google Assistant by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2

    In imagining the future computing world, I've always imagined it would include personal AI assistants. I never imagined that they wouldn't be running directly on my home computer and accessing the net as my proxy.

    I believe the most critical open source need today is a strong AI assistant. Missing it is like missing the addition of Linux to open source.

    1. Re:Google Assistant by ilikenwf · · Score: 1
  62. Probably nobody here has heard of it, but.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Genetica

    Unfortunately, the developers seem to have largely abandoned it, and no new work has been done on it in some time. The website it needs to connect to in order to download any needed content seems to be keeping maintained, but the forums, once booming with activity with questions from users and fast responses from the development team have all but dried up completely.

    While it was once (and still is) commercial, open source seems to me like the only way that project can get any new life at this stage.

  63. Adobe Flash by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have no interest in building or running the software... but I imagine reading the code comments would be hilarious and enlightening.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Adobe Flash by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Source for MSDOS is out there (it seems to be v5 with some of v6's changes, but not a complete v6) ... a search therein for "IBM" or "fuck" (often arriving at the same spot) will indeed provide enlightenment.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  64. AppleScript by myid · · Score: 2

    AppleScript. I absolutely need AppleScript.

    Apple has paid so little attention to AppleScript, at least in public recently, that I'm concerned that they might stop including it in macOS some day. I sure hope not.

    If they do stop including AppleScript in macOS, I hope they'll open source it, so that people who need it can keep on using it.

    1. Re:AppleScript by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      AppleScript is super buggy right now.
      So yes, an OSS version would be great.

      OTOH you can do via the OSAScript interface everything AppleScript can do via basically any programming language.

      Check out Automator, too. It is quite powerful.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:AppleScript by myid · · Score: 1

      I can't think of another language that puts you through so much pain figuring out what works and what doesn't, through trial and error (lots of error).

      Reading and writing files with AppleScript can be hard. How do you reference a regular file vs. an alias? Using a traditional Mac (colon-delimited) style file name vs. a Unix style file name? I wish accessing files were more straightforward.

    3. Re:AppleScript by myid · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'll check out OSAScript. And I'll see if Automator can do what I need.

      I use AppleScript mainly to read/write data in/out of applications.

      For example suppose I want to transfer data, from an iWork Numbers spreadsheet, to a Safari web page. An AppleScript can read the data from the spreadsheet, and then use a "do javascript" command to send that information to a web page.

      Or the AppleScript can read the contents of the spreadsheet, and write them to a .js file, writing the contents in the form of JavaScript commands. Then the next time I display the web page, the web page can read the .js file.

      I might also use AppleScript to click on deeply-nested menu items. And occasionally I make it speak or listen for my commands.

      But mainly I use it to send data to and from applications.

      By the way, am I the only one who thinks that the character EVE (in Pixar's movie WALL-E) looks a lot like the icon for Automator?

  65. Microsoft BASIC by rolfeb · · Score: 1

    Microsoft BASIC.

    1. Re:Microsoft BASIC by AndyKron · · Score: 1

      Wow. That brought back mixed memories. I liked VB for DOS.

  66. Re:Infocom by dexotaku · · Score: 1

    There are several z-machine clients out there for multiple platforms that are free or open source. People still make z-machine games, too. Also, Infocom have published a collection of basically every game they made, that might still be buyable somewhere. :)

  67. Authorware by Camembert · · Score: 1

    Authorware was an interesting multimedia development tool by Macromedia, after the company was sold to Adobe it eventually was discontinued. It had a flowchart metaphor that allowed non-technical people to produce decent e-learning modules, including animations etc. In addition it had an interesting scripting language to create more powerful routines. I always thought that the program could have a future if maintained and expanded towards web based learning output etc (back then you could technically run it with a plug in, which nowadays would't be done anymore). It was quite a cool tool.

  68. Snapseed by JarekC · · Score: 1

    I would happily pay to have Snapseed open-sourced. I really like its effects / filters, but the fact the app is limited to Android and iOS is ridiculous. If it was open-sourced, I hope the effects / filters could be ported to a library which then could be used by GIMP or DigiKam.

  69. CAD by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    CAD software! And not that fucked up shit from Autodesk that insists you have an account, and you must be logged in.

    1. Re:CAD by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There's qcad which isn't bad for 2D stuff.
      For 3D or if you are going anywhere near FEA since you've got to wrap your head around things anyway an ancient interface like brlcad isn't going to add a lot to the learning curve.

    2. Re:CAD by dbIII · · Score: 1

      From those screenshots freecad looks like it has far more modern interface and usable interface than AutoCAD used to have a few years back. If AutoCAD was good enough back then I'd say this thing is good enough now.

  70. Intel's and AMD's backdoor systems by Pravetz-82 · · Score: 1

    It is going to have a big impact if either or both of them get open sourced or reverse engineered.

  71. Winamp and Picasa by johannesg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After reading the other article, why not open source winamp? Surely it would be more useful than it is rotting away... Same for Picasa.

    1. Re:Winamp and Picasa by Reziac · · Score: 1

      WinAmp, for all the obvious reasons in yonder thread.

      AOLpress, which completely ruined me for more-modern HTML editors, because of one singular feature: the ability to behave as a browser *while* editing. This is a huge timesaver when working on a heavily linked site.

      WordPerfect 5.1 DOS, need I say why?
      (tho I understand this source has been lost. And IIRC, it was in assembly!)

      Netscape 3.04, so you bloody slow modern browsers can figure out why it did the same job in 1/100th the time
      (source also probably lost)

      RoughDraft, another unique editor

      Crap, I still use a lot of antique software...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  72. Intternet Explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So we can finally add a compatibility mode for IE only corporate web apps to Firefox.

  73. Speech to text by dbIII · · Score: 1

    There's some IBM stuff that became abandonware when they sold it off to Nuance which makes it look like there's now nothing at all for download or money that will do speech to text on powerpc.

    1. Re:Speech to text by pavon · · Score: 1

      This is a great one. I had started working a a mp3 player for my car that used those libraries, and then let it wither when they stopped making it available. At the time the free libraries from universities weren't nearly as good. I haven't looked around to see if there are any better open source packages now with the recent renaissance of machine learning.

  74. I'd pay with time, knowledge, and community suppor by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, it's not open source. Donations are only meant to fill in the gaps and not to be used as motivation. If you want to get payed to be "creative," get a Patreon account.

  75. Re:3D CAD by dbIII · · Score: 1

    G-code generator. Not just for 3D printers. See #1

    I wrote one of those (in autolisp) some time around 1989. It was not hard for a single tool BUT how the code is interpreted by the device differs, so writing something that will work on everything requires access to everything and setting what device the output is intended for somewhere in the program.
    There are some python DXF libraries that you could use as a starting point to write a G-code generator that would work on your stuff over a weekend. That's probably the only way you are going to get an open source G-code generator that works on your stuff.

  76. Re: Wikileaks emails by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

    They're all about transparency, but they ain't very transparent.

    Assange is translucent for a few minutes whenever he sheds his skin.

  77. ATI or NVIDIA Drivers by bsdpanix · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately just having drivers for one chipset wouldn't help for long.
    I would pay to have an entire company commit to making new, leading edge graphics cards with device drivers always and forever open sourced.

  78. Google Apps by LordFolken · · Score: 1

    A lot of functionality which was earlier in android has been absorbed into the google apps. (ActiveSync support for example). Since this stuff is fundamental to many smartphones, i'd like to see it opensourced.

  79. Re:Android by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    What part of Android isn't Open Source?

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  80. Old/dead things I would pay to see as open source by jonwil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1.ZTree. Its a clone of the old XTree file manager for dos except ZTree is a 32-bit Windows app with support for a bunch of windows things (copying to the clipboard, long file names and more). I use it all the time because it has ways to do things that would require a lot more effort to do using other methods and it would be good to see it updated to modern standards (e.g. make it 64 bit, add more features, stuff like that)

    2.C&C Renegade from Westwood Studios. I have been reverse engineering C&C Renegade for more than 15 years and I probably know more about the internals of the game than anyone else on the planet at this point but there are still many holes in my knowledge. Having the original source code to Renegade (and the level editor, 3ds max export plugin and other tools) would allow all the mysteries of the engine to be sorted out once and for all.

    3.Other C&C games from Westwood Studios and EA. Having the source code to the older games (C&C1, Red Alert 1, Tiberian Sun, Red Alert 2 and maybe Generals) would allow the people who have been reverse engineering (or trying to reverse engineer) those games to stop doing that and work with the original code instead. Source code to console ports of the games (e.g. the Nintendo 64 port of the first C&C) would also be great to see.

    4.LEGO Mindstorms RCX. I own the original yellow LEGO Mindstorms RCX brick. I would love to see the complete source code for everything that runs on the device as well as the complete source code to the drivers and software so it can be made to work on modern operating systems (Windows 7 in my case).

    5.WinAmp. I still use it as my audio player of choice and if whoever owns it doesn't plan to continue development, opening it up and letting someone else take over would be nice.

  81. SoftImage XL by maynard · · Score: 1

    Thanks for buying and killing it, Autodesk. Really. No. Actually, I can't hate you enough.

  82. Silverlight rebuilt with .NET Core by art123 · · Score: 1

    Silverlight with .NET Core and XAML based ui framework would be a great alternative to JS/HTML/CSS for rich browser based apps.

  83. Wing Commander, All of them by DMJC · · Score: 1

    Wing Commander 1/2/3/4 Prophecy, Secret Ops, and of course Privateer. I'd like all the art assets made available so we can remaster 2,3 and Privateer in HD. The games' code is freaking useless, EA has no idea what they're doing with it. There will never be a great definitive edition of the series put on Good Old Games, just re-bundled versions of the DOS games. Open the code and let the community make proper cross platform ports and add weird features like VR support. It worked for Freespace 2 and there's a big enough Wing Commander community to make it work. EA obviously doesn't want to make a new game so why bother holding onto 27 year old sourcecode? The only other thing I really want Open Sourced is Caligari TrueSpace. The sourcecode got leaked onto the internet in 1998 but I can't find a copy of it anywhere (.NFO files indicate it was stolen and released). Microsoft bought out Caligari in 2008 and shut it down when the GFC hit. Sure TrueSpace is freeware now, but it's buggy and could do with a lot of patches/updates.

  84. Re:Renegade! I have a copy of that! by jonwil · · Score: 1

    If you are still interested in Renegade, you should visit http://www.renegadeforums.com/ and look up the Tiberian Technologies scripts 4.4 update (its an unofficial patch for C&C Renegade written by me and some other people that adds new features, fixes bugs and does other good things)

  85. Google Play Services by damaki · · Score: 1

    Android is a not a real open source OS. A supposed open source OS should not have any closed source API.

    --
    Stupidity is the root of all evil.
  86. eDirectory! by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

    There is still no other LDAP directory close to it. Having a fully capable directory service available open source on Linux could change the game.

  87. After Dark by Hemi+Rodner · · Score: 1

    I miss After Dark screensavers so much...
    I installed them in a Windows 98 virtual machine, but it's far from enough.

    --
    hemi
    1. Re:After Dark by MrGregg · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought too and I did the exact same thing. Looney Toons, Star Trek, Simpsons... just think of the cool stuff people could license today... FireFly, Doctor Who, StarGate, Harry Potter...

    2. Re:After Dark by Hemi+Rodner · · Score: 1

      [like]

      --
      hemi
  88. Hardware! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    Sure, there is lots more software that needs to be open-sourced - but software is still light-years ahead of hardware in that respect. And really, the lack of open hardware hinders software development, especially in key areas such as phones. If the system contains any closed bits, then it isn't truly open. And only true, complete openness has a chance of saving us from the shit-show of corporate dominance, government spying, and general ass-fuckery the powers-that-be are subjecting us to.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  89. Re:sublime by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 1

    Maybe if it was open source we could get Japanese input working on Linux.

  90. Google Pagerank by Nuitari+The+Wiz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think Google Pagerank is what defines what most of us see whenever we search for something on the web. Being such an important gateway between someone and the information. Does it have biases? How much censorship does it do ? How many false positive happen for the spam filtering? and so many other questions.

  91. Silverlight and VB6 by gosand · · Score: 1

    I'm actually serious.
    I thought about this, and my gut reaction is that I can't think of anything from a personal perspective to have open sourced. I am happy with Linux and the tools I have, even GIMP. There are a few things I use at work that I don't think I would really use at home, like Snag-It. Irfanview is something I always use as well, it's just a great all-around image viewer, screen capture, and image resizer.

    But at work, we have an enterprise-level application that uses Silverlight a lot, and we have some VB6 apps as well. The next couple of years are going to be spent updating those, and as the manager of the testing group I am not looking forward to it at all. Save the comments for WHY we have those... we're a MS shop and those decisions pre-date me being there by many years. :)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Silverlight and VB6 by fafalone · · Score: 1

      I'll second the call for VB6. It's hands down the best tool for creating desktop apps. Very easy to use, but also so powerful you can do whatever you need too, dropping down to inline ASM if you want. My pet project in fact is bringing in all the new shell features from XP and Vista+, especially the new Common Controls features, so you can have all the same GUI goodies and shell APIs/COM interfaces as a modern tool; you can't tell from looking at my apps that they're written in a decades old IDE.
      VB.NET is something entirely different, and not at all a suitable replacement. If VB6 was ever updated with 64bit support (which would be trivial for MS because they did update the language itself for VBA) and a few other features, it would be huge.

  92. Patents ? by pedz · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see many of the image and video format patents released to the public domain. I think that would stimulate a lot of new innovation. It sounds from various articles and events as if research in this area is strangled because of fears that a patent troll will bring an expensive lawsuit.

  93. Don't see the need by guruevi · · Score: 1

    I am already using open source and Linux versions for pretty much everything I do.

    I'm sure there are people that are comfortable using a certain application a certain way but even things like Photoshop and AutoCAD have gotten the entire kitchen sink worked into them (I started using AutoCAD 20 years ago and have abandoned it after early 2000 versions). Perhaps Eagle for PCB, there are few "good" Open Source PCB GUI although there are plenty of command line/parametric driven ones.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  94. Re: Buy Windows from Microsoft, make it open sourc by bpechter · · Score: 1

    Just another vote for VMS and OS/2. Add Unix Sys V as well.

  95. Alpha Centauri by jrincayc · · Score: 1

    I'd pay towards opensourcing Alpha Centauri and Alien Crossfire.

  96. 1) Win7 2) SolidWorks by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

    In both cases include the externally and internally libraries and helper applications that go with it--not just the items written by the prime developer for the primary product.

    --
    - Sig
  97. Ableton Live. by Ace17 · · Score: 1

    This would be the fastest road to get a GNU/Linux port.

  98. iTunes by davemchine · · Score: 1

    Functionally we need a cross between iTunes and Plex. Something that will allow us to manage the physical files and the metadata like iTunes does. Also, something that will allow syncing between devices the way Plex does (wirelessly and from anywhere).

  99. FoxBase +/Mac by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    There was some really great things in that application, the interfacing and graphics capability was simply fantastic.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  100. Congress by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Open sourced or out-sourced to SE Asia.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  101. IRIX by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I would love to see SGI open source IRIX. IRIX is a fantastic OS and it's graphics implementation would go far to really improve the graphic capability of Linux and BSD.

  102. Bethesda's game engine by wildstoo · · Score: 1

    Creation or whatever branding they've given it. It must be the most Frankenstein style, cobbled together engine ever used to power AAA games. I would put good money on there being more TODO and HACK comments in that source than actual lines of code.

  103. My List: by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Affinity Designer
    Affinity Photo
    Corel Draw
    The Fusion Video Suite (professional video postproduction software, hideously expensive)
    Kaleidoskope App (diff tool for macOS)
    Transmit (FTP Client for macOS)
    everything from Jetbrains (developer tools)
    Adobes entire Flash related line of software

    Games:
    Everything related to the line of "Tribes" games ... Old school arena games desperately needed!
    Eve Online
    WoW + Server
    StarCraft 1&2
    GuildWars 1&2 + Server
    Dota 2
    MineCra(ft/ck)
    Some line of open world games, ... Probably Watchdogs 1&2 or the entire GTA line including servers.

    That's from the top of my head.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  104. Obviously by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    Windows XP + IE11. It's still a wonderful OS.

  105. Re:IRIX by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    It's owned by HPE now.

  106. FreeHand by sombragris · · Score: 1

    Too bad it got killed when Macromedia was acquired by Adobe. FreeHand was a nice vector drawing tool.

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
  107. WordPerfect by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    I don't write many documents anymore with the change in jobs but when I had to before I always preferred writing in WordPerfect because I found it easier to see what was going on with the reveal codes section when I had to fix something that wasn't working right. The reveal codes section made it easy to see everything that was going on in the document.

  108. Re:FPGA compilers by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    Seconded. They don't even need to open source the software, just publish the specs for the hardware and bitstream.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  109. Re:sublime by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    or print

    --
    Nullius in verba
  110. Front Page Sports Football '99 by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

    Game never worked, but have some promising features. Let the community fix it!

  111. Red Faction by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see this fantastic game open sourced so that I could run it without Windows or Wine

    --
    Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
    Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
  112. Government by easyTree · · Score: 1

    ...no 'democracy' is not an adequate replacement.

  113. Re:I'd pay with time, knowledge, and community sup by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    Actually, Stallman hates the word "open source." I'm not anit-money, I just think you have a bunch of young college students that got duped into being computer science majors and now that everyone's a "developer" and the popular thing is "open source," 20 year olds that don't understand the philosophy and origins want to get paid for it when they could be developing proprietary software & PC games and just let those that actually care about a FOSS project do what they do best. Your allusion to 1984 Soviet Union is also innacurrate and probably has to do with your millenial mind-set and the book "1984." In the Soviet Union, science and technology were very heavily linked to politics and ideology (much like in the U.S. today). They may have all been driving tanks for cars, but they were kicking ass in computers and engineering, especially Japan. Poor East Germany didn't get a break though. Even the U.S. space program was built on Nazi tech and scientists. So...I'll just take what you said as a compliment.

  114. Dragon Naturally Speaking by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    I learned to dictate with a human secretary more years ago than I care to contemplate. Dragon was an easy transition for me and I love it. I would love to see a good FOSS speech-to-text program. Nothing compares to Dragon. Android's speech to text is passable, but often fails in hilarious (and dangerous) ways.

    GIMP vs PS. User of PS since 1.0 so it is almost instinctive. When PS went to subscription in a fit of pique I decided to undergo the pain of learning the unfortunately-named G.I.M.P. I find it quirky, but usable and flexible once it's counter-intuitive eccentricities are mastered. I will allow that my PS experience may bias my perception. I will also allow that there are things about GIMP that I like better. "Crop to selection" comes to mind.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  115. Reply was to the other AC by tepples · · Score: 1

    Anonymous Coward #55050609 wrote, with a link to Krita:

    You're doing it wrong.

    A presumably different Anonymous Coward #55050697 wrote:

    Also Serif Photo. It is paid, but it is at a price of a dinner for 2

    When I tried to look up its price to verify the claim of "a price of a dinner for 2", the first result for serif photo on Google Search was Serif PhotoPlus. I assumed that "Serif Photo" was a colloquial abbreviation for Serif PhotoPlus. The Serif PhotoPlus page states that the Serif PhotoPlus product has been discontinued in favor of Affinity Photo. So I instead looked up the price of Affinity Photo and wrote in reply to Anonymous Coward #55050697:

    Now called Affinity, and priced at $50.

    You wrote:

    What does that mean? Krita is not Affinity.

    That's why I replied to Anonymous Coward #55050697, who suggested the predecessor of Affinity Photo, not Anonymous Coward #55050609, who suggested Krita.

  116. Adobe Fireworks by Geek+On+The+Hill · · Score: 1

    There's really no replacement for it, and Adobe's pretty much abandoned it.

  117. Quicken by rleibman · · Score: 1

    It's one of the few things keeping some people on Windows... I second the comments above on Photoshop and AutoCAD... basically, anything that's preventing people from switching away from closed-source OS.

  118. I would pay to see this open-sourced... by partialorder · · Score: 1

    Echelon

  119. Not quite correct by gillbates · · Score: 2

    Painter here. Yes, that kind of painter.

    While a poor painter may blame his brushes, a good painter knows that he's no better than the brushes he uses. A great deal of painters try to imitate Bob Ross with poorer quality paints and brushes (i.e. something other than the Bob Ross branded paints and brushes), and only end up frustrated. I'm one of those - Bob's knife techniques simply don't work with acrylics. He eventually comes around to mentioning this in one of his episodes, but that's years of time under the bridge.

    I spent several years painting with "traditional" oil paint brushes, using acrylics, and ended up very frustrated with the limitations. But a few years ago, I discovered golden taklon brushes, and it was the difference between night and day. There are simply things you can't do with hog hair brushes, and no amount of skill will compensate for that.

    There are a lot of amateur artists who remain amateurs, I suspect, because they don't have sense enough to buy good quality art supplies. They think, "If only I were skilled enough, I could do this right," instead of, "If I want the results of a great master, I have to use the same tool a master uses..." And sadly, they often give up, thinking they lack some fundamental talent necessary. More often than not, it's a matter of time and materials rather than talent.

    Think of it another way: most of us could write in assembly if we needed, but why would we do that if C/C++/Java was available? If we insist on having the best tools available, why wouldn't a painter do the same?

    And I have tried GIMP. Yes, I could use it for painting, but why? I'd spent less time doing it the traditional way, on canvas.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  120. MS Visio! by totoroxxx · · Score: 1

    I know there are "alternatives" foss and non-foss but sadly enough there are too many stencils already done. To recreate must deal with too much annoyances... so opensource of MS Visio will really simplify TI people and non-TI people a lot!

  121. Microsoft ESP by codecore · · Score: 1

    This could be the basis for a AR world crowd-sourced SLAM database.
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff798293.aspx

  122. Civilization 4 by jfoucar · · Score: 1

    Civ 4 is one of my all-time favorite games and I still play online games of it to this day. After 10+ years of playing, I'm still discovering new game mechanics and new strategies. For those who don't follow civ, civs 1-4 consisted of a gradual expansion of concepts in each sequel, with tried-and-true mechanics being preserved, flawed mechanics being re-worked, and new mechanics building on top. This approach allowed the series to evolve and continue to improve with each iteration. Then came Civ 5 which abandoned most of the classic civ game mechanics and started fresh with a slate of new (and inferior, poorly balanced) mechanics. The predictable result was that Civ5 was a disaster. With Civ6, the designers have resumed a more evolutionary process, keeping the core of Civ5 but making significant improvements. Civ6 is pretty good but still no where near as good or deep as Civ4. I've always wished that civ4 would go open source so that a series of games could preserve and build-upon that lineage.

  123. The internet. by endercase · · Score: 1

    Shiftnrg, filecoin, sia...

  124. IBM OS/2 Warp and later by kriston · · Score: 1

    IBM OS/2 Warp and later would be great--even the assembler source code. We can rehost it in C and enjoy an operating system stable enough for automatic teller machines.
     

    --

    Kriston

  125. Linux-XP Frankenstein... by dddux · · Score: 1

    I would like to see a Windows XP/7 "desktop environment" with Linux underneath. It would get rid of many Windows file system and OS shortcomings while giving us a very usable and simple to use OS. So simple and so "unobtanium", eh? :( Although I must admit I really love MATE DE and it could become just what I'm asking for really soon. Almost there.

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  126. Re:Old/dead things I would pay to see as open sour by Reziac · · Score: 1

    While we're in ancient history, Vern Buerg's LIST, v9.final.

    LIST v6.0 source code was released as public domain, but good luck finding a copy; it seems to have vanished off the planet (tho I have one stashed on an old HD somewhere).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  127. Kerbal Space Program by miceliux · · Score: 1

    I would love to see what the community can do with Kerbal Space Program