Slashdot Mirror


How Facebook Figures Out Everyone You've Ever Met (gizmodo.com)

"I deleted Facebook after it recommended as People You May Know a man who was defense counsel on one of my cases. We had only communicated through my work email, which is not connected to my Facebook, which convinced me Facebook was scanning my work email," an attorney told Gizmodo. Kashmir Hill, a reporter at the news outlet, who recently documented how Facebook figured out a connection between her and a family member she did not know existed, shares several more instances others have reported and explains how Facebook gathers information. She reports: Behind the Facebook profile you've built for yourself is another one, a shadow profile, built from the inboxes and smartphones of other Facebook users. Contact information you've never given the network gets associated with your account, making it easier for Facebook to more completely map your social connections. Because shadow-profile connections happen inside Facebook's algorithmic black box, people can't see how deep the data-mining of their lives truly is, until an uncanny recommendation pops up. Facebook isn't scanning the work email of the attorney above. But it likely has her work email address on file, even if she never gave it to Facebook herself. If anyone who has the lawyer's address in their contacts has chosen to share it with Facebook, the company can link her to anyone else who has it, such as the defense counsel in one of her cases. Facebook will not confirm how it makes specific People You May Know connections, and a Facebook spokesperson suggested that there could be other plausible explanations for most of those examples -- "mutual friendships," or people being "in the same city/network." The spokesperson did say that of the stories on the list, the lawyer was the likeliest case for a shadow-profile connection. Handing over address books is one of the first steps Facebook asks people to take when they initially sign up, so that they can "Find Friends." The problem with all this, Hill writes, is that Facebook doesn't explicitly say the scale at which it would be using the contact information it gleans from a user's address book. Furthermore, most people are not aware that Facebook is using contact information taken from their phones for these purposes.

129 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. LinkedIn Also. by Hylandr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    LinkedIn Also does this.

    It's just more in your face about it.

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    1. Re: LinkedIn Also. by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      facebook is good for kids and retired ones. its not for the professional world.

    2. Re: LinkedIn Also. by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      Facebook is just where AOL escaped to.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    3. Re: LinkedIn Also. by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is the bastard child of AOL and Myspace.

    4. Re:LinkedIn Also. by hackwrench · · Score: 2

      The lawyer is stupid though. It doesn't take much to figure if you are both lawyers in the same town you MAY know each other. No email scanning required. Frankly, I'm surprised it hasn't yet told me I may know Kevin Bacon.

    5. Re: LinkedIn Also. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      I can endorse that. Lol

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    6. Re:LinkedIn Also. by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      The lawyer is stupid though. It doesn't take much to figure if you are both lawyers in the same town you MAY know each other. No email scanning required. Frankly, I'm surprised it hasn't yet told me I may know Kevin Bacon.

      I don't think you can say the person is stupid. However, you could say that the person has no understanding/knowledge of the "Internet" and/or today technologies.

    7. Re:LinkedIn Also. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      You can. The universe made me say it. The lawyer also has no concept of how relationships are formed between people outside of the internet. Stuff that was done off the internet shouldn't be a mystery to him. Word generally got around as to who should know who.

    8. Re:LinkedIn Also. by datavirtue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is that no one fucking knows how it happened....not even Facebook.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    9. Re:LinkedIn Also. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      LinkedIn seems bad at it then. It's the place where I have the most connections, and it still recommends complete strangers to me, and people I have no interest of ever linking to even if I do know them.

      Facebook is pretty simple here, I have 10 friends on it, I turn off a lot of stuff and it's not on my phone. I expected it to at least suggest friends from my small high school class, people that I might want to actually connect to, but it has never done that despite having all the necessary info to do so. It has never recommended any family members to me either, people who I do want to follow. Instead it suggests complete strangers; for example coworkers of a friend of mine who lives on a different continent, students of a friend of mine at yet another different continent who don't share a common language with me, and so forth.

      I'm probably just late to the game. Every time I try to find a particular person on Facebook I can never find them, so maybe it's just not popular anymore?

    10. Re:LinkedIn Also. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Yea, Stalking is SO out of fashion these days. :p

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    11. Re:LinkedIn Also. by youngone · · Score: 1

      Facebook is really good at recommending half naked young ladies who really want to be my friend though.

    12. Re: LinkedIn Also. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      facebook is good for kids and retired ones.

      I can understand that it's the perfect medium for stalking and grooming kids, but retired people? They're old, and smell of mothballs.

      Or is it so you can rob them?

    13. Re:LinkedIn Also. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Jumping to the defense of Facebook? Why?
      It certainly is creepy to see how Facebook mines your data.

    14. Re:LinkedIn Also. by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

      ...I try to find a particular person on Facebook I can never find them, so maybe it's just not popular anymore?

      According to my daughter, FB is third-tier behind Instagram and Snapchat. She used to be a big FB and Twitter user, but has since deleted her Twitter account and now uses FB just for concert/musician groups.

  2. Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I disable the FB app that the cell provider baked into the Android rom so even though it spouts dire warnings about the system not working properly if that's done. I assume that's enough to prevent it from sucking out my info but who knows for certain anymore and what about people who don't disable it?

    1. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      How do we know that? Can you point to the section of the source code that does it?

    2. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      We need something as open as Android w/o the marketing bullshit mixed in. Android is by far the superior OS, but the fucking security issues are too huge to ignore.

    3. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by fisted · · Score: 1

      Now how would you do /that/ in turn?
      Can you even point to the source code that your phone's firmware was built from?

    4. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by spaceman375 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I disabled facebook on my android phone. I can go back and look at it anytime I want to verify that it says disabled. Funny how it also lets me "Force Stop" the running app, within 2 days of having killed it. With no reboot, no launching or asking permission from anywhere, it just "mysteriously" keeps re-launching, disabled or not.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    5. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something specific to the carrier build rather than android. I don't have facebook on mine at all

    6. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Well I have a custom ROM on mine, so yes.

    7. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by fisted · · Score: 1

      If you built it from source, fair enough (modulo compiler backdoors /tips tinfoil hat).
      If you didn't, my point still stands.

    8. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Well that's always a risk, but at some point it gets a bit paranoid to worry about, especially that there's a large amount of monitoring code being inserted.

    9. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      You are right: Samsung, the most popular provider. Did it on my s6, now also the s8.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    10. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by adolf · · Score: 1

      "The most popular provider" where? AFAIK, Facebook was not included on the S5, S6, or S7 with "the most popular provider" in the US (Verizon).

    11. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by Zaelath · · Score: 2

      I spent the first 10 hours of owning an Android device back in 2011 working out how to root it so I could remove Facebook. Even then I had to use a backup program to 'trick' it into uninstalling. On the upside, that returned 20% of my battery per day and extended the useful like of the phone for a year.

    12. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      useful life even...

    13. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by n329619 · · Score: 1

      I assume that's enough to prevent it from sucking out my info but who knows for certain anymore...

      use a network logger app. If you still see facebook on the list, it's not really disabled. If you haven't restart your android device after disabling it, try restarting and check again. If it still isn't really disabled, use a noroot firewall. It will now block it for you.

      Other alternative includes rooting to uninstall it.

    14. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Funny how it also lets me "Force Stop" the running app, within 2 days of having killed it. With no reboot...

      Reboot your device and try it again. It was said that disabling is applied after next startup.

    15. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by pots · · Score: 1

      Android has several excellent per-application firewalls available, which I recommend to anyone who will listen (very few people). AFWall+ is great and very simple to use, but requires root. I haven't used NetGuard, but I'm told that it's good for people who don't have rooted devices.

      This seems like the most effective approach if you want to make sure that things like the Facbook app aren't reporting home about you. Facebook is far from the only culprit here.

    16. Re:Thanks, cell provider, for baking it in by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      I have the S5 and it didn't have it - I installed LineageOS and that doesn't have it either so probably not a core component of Android

  3. It should be regulated by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Time for new privacy laws, I guess.

    Private companies should not be permitted to collect data on people not in a business relationship with them just because someone else shares it with them.

    Let my sister mention my email address on her Facebook wall - Facebook shouldn't be able to do anything with it unless I am already a Facebook user and have provided that same email address.

    Legislate them into purging any such mapped relationships from their databases, legislate them to ban rebuilding those relationship maps.

    Just because privacy isn't important to someone else doesn't mean I should have to surrender mine.

    1. Re:It should be regulated by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Time for new privacy laws, I guess.

      New privacy laws would imply that there is a society that actually wants it.

      Our society doesn't give a shit about privacy. Hasn't for a very long time now.

      Sadly, those that still fight for privacy have now become an anomaly, so you stand out even more.

    2. Re:It should be regulated by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Further, it should be mandated that every company like this have an easy way to exit and remove posts and personal information permanently. Facebook is one of the worst out there for making it hard to summarily delete your presence once you become thoroughly creeped out. Once they started tagging faces I disabled my account, but I'd rather that I could quickly cull what is left behind or completely NFO.

    3. Re:It should be regulated by lengel · · Score: 2

      No, it is more like that magic phrase "Terms of Service". By signing up for an account you give consent to all this. In the real world you are not giving explicit consent to be stalked so the law is on your side.

      That is why I never have had nor do I ever plan on having an account there.

    4. Re:It should be regulated by jgullstr · · Score: 2

      New privacy laws are coming, at least in the EU. According to the General Data Protection Regulation, EU residents will, among others, have options to access and purge information collected about them come May 28th, 2018. How this will work in practice remains to be seen.

    5. Re:It should be regulated by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      We already have laws against stalking, spying, and harrassment. Why do those laws not apply here? Is it that magic word "online" again?

      Probably, though you likely to get quite far if what you propose isn't directly about privacy but rather ensuring that the companies gathering the data are legally responsible for any reasonably foreseeable consequences--if nothing else, it might manage to get it to where Facebook has to confront the possibility that, in fact, people are not always going to be friends.

    6. Re:It should be regulated by gnick · · Score: 2

      That is why I never have had nor do I ever plan on having an account there.

      You never signed up for an account there. I'd be shocked if you didn't have one. Did you sign up for Experian?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    7. Re:It should be regulated by giampy · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Indeed i might be among the ones who doesn't give too much shit about my privacy, because i don't feel like (for now) i have much to hide.

      Much more importantly, though, I do think many criminals and otherwise shadow actors, sometimes in governments but not exclusively, have too much privacy, and everybody (and i mean everybody not just facebook and google) should know better what they are up to (e.g. where they are and how they launder they money). Especially if these guys are there to serve society interests, and are basically paid by us.

      --
      We learn from history that we learn nothing from history - Tom Veneziano
    8. Re:It should be regulated by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Our society doesn't give a shit about privacy.

      I don't know if that's true. I think they might just not be aware of how these things work, and how much information is being gathered on them. For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      Granted, that's not about Facebook. Still, even when there's public information that their privacy is being violated, people still don't realize the scale of the problem.

    9. Re:It should be regulated by sootman · · Score: 1

      > New privacy laws would imply that there is a society that actually wants it.
      > Our society doesn't give a shit about privacy.

      True. I made a facebook group for people concerned about online privacy and no one joined. :-(

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    10. Re:It should be regulated by lengel · · Score: 1

      I do not doubt I have what the article calls a shadow profile given the number of people I know who use it. There is no way I have an account there though unless what you call an account is not what I would call an account.

      I have never used Experian either.

    11. Re:It should be regulated by tsqr · · Score: 1

      People not being educated is not the same as people not giving a shit.

      It is, if people don't give enough of a shit to educate themselves.

    12. Re:It should be regulated by geekmux · · Score: 1

      We already have laws against stalking, spying, and harrassment. Why do those laws not apply here?

      Because you failed to grasp the point of that EULA you never read.

      You know how a lawyer spells consent?

      I Agree.

    13. Re:It should be regulated by gnick · · Score: 1

      ...what you call an account is not what I would call an account.

      Yes, I referred to a shadow profile as an "account". It fits the bill in my head. Semantics.

      I have never used Experian either.

      You sound very certain of that. How can you know? They don't ask for volunteers.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    14. Re:It should be regulated by ffreeloader · · Score: 2

      I'm not too sure that a lot of people just don't realize the scale of the abuse. I've talked to people I know about online privacy and how their information is used against them. Most of those I've talked to think I'm paranoid and they could care less that their privacy is compromised.

      My wife doesn't get it and doesn't care, and she and I have had this conversation many times. She is so addicted to Facebook she can't stay off it for more than a couple of hours at a time. Me? I don't even have an account. Never have had.

      She gives out her email address and cell phone number for any "free" stuff she sees an ad for, and then wonders why she gets several hundred spam emails and a half dozen phone calls a day from people wanting to sell her stuff. Tells me once again I'm paranoid when I tell her why she is getting so much spam.

      She isn't stupid about things in physical life, but she is techonology-challenged big time. She insists she never uses the internet even while she's connected to Facebook. She thinks if she doesn't open her browser she's not online even though I've told her dozens of times that she is when she's on Facebook. She can't get it through her head that the only way to reach Facebook is on the internet. She thinks it is on her phone. Physically on her phone. She's just as helpless with a desktop or laptop too. Computers are just a big black box to her. Her brain was never wired to understand technology. I've seen a lot of people like her. Talked to, and helped, hundreds of people with post graduate degrees who couldn't program their own thermostats, (I worked in the HVAC trade) and were just as ignorant about how to use a computer. Some intelligent people's brains just do not function in any way related to techology.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    15. Re:It should be regulated by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Indeed i might be among the ones who doesn't give too much shit about my privacy, because i don't feel like (for now) i have much to hide.

      I don't have much to hide. But that doesn't make my personal life anybody else's business. Privacy isn't just about hiding. It asks the question, "Does this party have any right to this information?" If the answer is no, they should buzz off. And that's not just about shadow actors and criminals, but applies to what I do in my bedroom or bathroom, what my bank account number is, information about my minor children, my medical history, and even tastes and preferences I don't feel like advertising. Unless I explicitly feel like sharing, nobody ought to be able to take that information from me. Right now there's a whole bunch of quasi-to-fully-shady stuff were other parties are collecting information, but not clearly letting the rest of us know when or how they're doing it, and that makes it much closer to the "taking things they have to right to" side than the "we willingly gave it to them."

    16. Re:It should be regulated by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      It is impossible at this point. The data exists and there is value in linking it... so someone will.

    17. Re:It should be regulated by nine-times · · Score: 1

      You say this:

      I'm not too sure that a lot of people just don't realize the scale of the abuse. I've talked to people I know about online privacy and how their information is used against them. Most of those I've talked to think I'm paranoid and they could care less that their privacy is compromised.

      But then you use your wife as an example:

      My wife doesn't get it and doesn't care ... She can't get it through her head that the only way to reach Facebook is on the internet. She thinks it is on her phone. Physically on her phone.

      I'd posit that your wife is actually a good example of my claim that people don't realize the scale of the problem. Even when they say that they don't care, the real problem is that they don't understand.

    18. Re:It should be regulated by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Legislate them into purging any such mapped relationships from their databases, legislate them to ban rebuilding those relationship maps.

      It must be nice to live in a world where mega-corps actually comply with such legislation, and where we could rely on them to destroy the data they say they've purged instead of secretly backing it up to use when a more favourable legislative climate prevails. Where do I sign up?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    19. Re:It should be regulated by pots · · Score: 1

      Or they're just, you know, not Americans. Europe has been doing pretty well with this stuff lately.

  4. SciFi by forkfail · · Score: 1

    I thought it was cool when I got my Star Trek communicator (flip phone) and trichorder (smart phone).

    Not so much when I find that Hari Seldon's psychohistory and MAC III's predictive modeling (Sea of Glass, Barry B. Longyear) is in the hands of Facebook et. al.

    And we still don't have flying cars!

    --
    Check your premises.
    1. Re:SciFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No flying cars and no living on the Moon. This ain't the future I signed up for.

    2. Re:SciFi by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Sea of Glass, Barry B. Longyear

      Man, in the 25-ish years since I've read that book, this is the first time I've seen someone else mention it. I'd forgotten the computer's name, but the book itself really stuck with me, and I still think about it now and then.

  5. Strange game... by TWX · · Score: 2

    Only winning move is not to play.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Strange game... by dmomo · · Score: 2

      This is apparently untrue, because to "not play" requires the ability to choose not to play. There is no opt-out on shadow profiling.

    2. Re:Strange game... by citylivin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Only winning move is not to play."

      And have none of your friends play, or your work colleagues, or your landlord, or anyone who you have ever given your phone number to.

      I don't use facebook, but i'm sure i have quite the impressive shadow profile considering my wife, my son, my dad, and pretty much every other person i've ever met does use it. The article talks about how facebook uses your phone number as a unique identifier, and other peoples non-consensual contact sharing of your information, to build a shadow profile of you.

      So no, its not as simple as not playing the game. You have been entered into the game if you have your phone number in anyones phone book, and come on, that's everyone. Who doesn't have a phone, either at work or at home. Unless you solely communicate with disposable burner phones, (and no one adds those numbers and your name into their phone book :P), then you are just as vulnerable. They probably even have your picture that someone helpfully tagged.

      Its pretty depressing that they can get away with this, and that people don't really care and willingly help them.

       

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    3. Re:Strange game... by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Exactly. FB has had the option of syncing with your local address book for years. This isn't a FB only address book - no - it is everything on my local phone uploaded to them.

      So I don't enable it because I don't want to share it. However, a friend decides to use it -- and guess what.... all my contact info is uploaded to FB without my permission. FB has my email address - and can link it to that other synced address book. Now they know me and a lot more info than I shared with FB. Sorry - my read birth date is not January 1.

      While I may opt-out of what I tell FB they can't share/know about me -- Somebody ELSE can make a different decision for me. Yeah - I don't like that.

    4. Re:Strange game... by tquasar · · Score: 1

      I do not use any "social media" and assume everything I do on the web is monitored and saved forever. Me and my son used to email using words like bomb or fight, etc. Shirley we are in all the three letter DB's.

    5. Re:Strange game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The solution to this is a social norm: Share other's information (contact lists, photo tagging, or what-have-you) should be regarded as about as socially-acceptable as farting on an elevator.

      It's 2017, ignorance of how all of this works is not acceptable, and should not be excused.

      95% of the people who read this article knew the answer before they read it.

    6. Re:Strange game... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Only winning move is not to play.

      Your "winning" move is nothing more than an anomaly.

      Game Over.

  6. You are being tracked ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Film at 11.

    The real question is:

    When are people going to put to a stop to a company

    a) collecting copious amounts of info about you,
    b) not informing you _what_ exactly they DO know about you, and
    c) profiting off of it

    What's that? I can't hear you over the Capitalism propoganda ...

    1. Re:You are being tracked ... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      a) Might make an interesting case. We have a law that gives anyone the right to demand from companies all the personal information they have stored. That does not cover some other person simply giving my phone number to FB, but it seems to me that it should cover any cross correlated file they have on me, i.e. a shadow profile. That profile might not have my name attached to it yet, but phone or email ought to be sufficient to identify it. It'll be interesting to see if I can get FB to cough up my shadow profile.

      Personally I agree with an earlier posted who said there ought to be a law forbidding companies from collecting data on people with whom they do not have a business relation. That might be overly broad as it covers a lot of perfectly valid use cases. They should perhaps be allowed to collect such data, but they are only allowed to store it in aggregated, anonymized form (and no: age + zip code is not anonymous anough), and correlating it with other data sets should be expressly prohibited.

      There's plenty of people that care about this issue, but it's rather low down on their list compared to taxes, national security, the cost of health care, education, highways and public transportation, etc. And thus over here it always ends up being political pocket change, something to be traded away in return for other political concessions.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:You are being tracked ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > We have a law that gives anyone the right to demand from companies all the personal information they have stored.

      We do ??? I know for the government we have the FOIA request (Freedom of Information Act) -- what's the corresponding one for corporations?

      > Personally I agree with an earlier posted who said there ought to be a law forbidding companies from collecting data on people with whom they do not have a business relation.

      Concur 100%. I have NO business relation with FecesBook, and I _never_ want one. How is an individual supposed to communicate that to a corporation with some "legal teeth" behind it? Threaten them to sue? Since it would be a civil case, under what "damages" ?

      Having a law limit what data can be collected by a corporation would be a good first step.

      > There's plenty of people that care about this issue, but it's rather low down on their list compared to taxes, national security, the cost of health care, education, highways and public transportation, etc.

      Sadly, I agree the priority just doesn't seem that important. Maybe we need more "leaked data" of famous people before it takes a higher precedence?

    3. Re:You are being tracked ... by es330td · · Score: 1

      If you aren't paying for it you are the product being sold. It is as simple as that.

    4. Re:You are being tracked ... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If you aren't paying for it you are the product being sold. It is as simple as that.

      That's fine if you're USING the service. You're getting something in exchange. For those of us not on Facebook; we're the product and we've never used their stupid service. I should be compensated if I am the product and I haven't signed up to be.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  7. It uses navigator by fjin · · Score: 1

    It must just use cellphone navigation devices (cell tower mapping or GPS) to find out who facebook users has been nearby each other at some point. This works only between those users who has also facebook account entered to cellphone.

    1. Re:It uses navigator by Megane · · Score: 1

      This. I barely even use social media (I have an Apple ID that dates back to when it was used for developer accounts, and a Google account that hooks up an ancient YouTube account, everything else is on my own server), yet recently Google told me I had been at a place before. The only way it could have known was by constantly monitoring my GPS/location info. Fortunately, I leave my cell phone hard-off (so I won't have to recharge it later) most of the time, and rarely even take it when me when I leave home. I don't need for people to be able to contact me every moment of the day. Send me e-mail, I'll get around to it when I can.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  8. Stop using Facebook and smartphones by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    When are people going to learn? Your privacy is worth something, and if you use so-called 'social media' and smartphones, you're giving that away for FREE to people and organizations that don't give two shits about what's good for you, only what makes them the most money. Nothing Facebook is 'giving' you is worth what you're giving up. Your 'smartphone' is just a mobile surveillance and data-collection platform, and you're paying through the nose to have one. Seriously, when are people going to wise up?

    1. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The promises and dreams of a high tech future increasingly are not worth it. Most smartphone and web stuff has become an ad service first, and a useful service second. Services to connect us have become creepy liabilities you have almost no control over.

    2. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by N7DR · · Score: 1

      When are people going to learn?

      We all know by now, or at least strongly suspect, that the answer is likely "never", unless some catastrophe occurs to wake people up. I've given up trying to explain to otherwise-intelligent people what these companies (Facebook, of course, being only the most obvious example) are doing. No "ordinary" person seems to understand.

      My personal "shake my head in wonder" issue is the attorneys who happily use gmail for their business. I am honestly surprised that it is legal for attorneys to use any e-mail "service" that is known to scan e-mails for any purported purpose whatsoever. But then, in my naïveté, I wonder why attorneys are not required by law to use encryption for all work-related e-mail anyway.

      (Of course, add "health workers" and any other business that deals with confidential information to the above.)

    3. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by totallyarb · · Score: 1

      "you're giving that away for FREE to people and organizations that don't give two shits about what's good for you"

      Small correction: no, you're not giving it to them for free. You're giving it to them in exchange for being allowed to use Facebook. It's a pretty straightforward deal: They give you a piece of software which makes it easy to communicate with your friends, and you give them some information. Quid pro quo. The real mystery is why people think that just because no actual money changes hands, that makes something "free".

      --
      -- Note to Mods: There is a good reason there's no "-1 Disagree" option. --
    4. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many times does it need to be repeated:

      It doesn't matter if you don't use Facebook, you still have a shadow profile as long as anyone you know uses Facebook.

      You have a Shadow Profile in Facebook. I can pretty much guarantee it. All it requires is that you know people who use Facebook. If they shared their contacts with Facebook - your email is now known to Facebook. If other people did too - guess what, they now know other people who know you, and can start building a graph of people you likely know.

      Facebook also tracks you across websites. Any website that embeds a Facebook "like" button is letting Facebook track their visitors. Even if you manage to keep your ad shadow profile and your contacts-based shadow profile separate, they still exist. Facebook is still tracking you.

      It manages to get even creepier than that. If you have friends who take pictures of you and post them to Facebook or Instagram, Facebook's facial recognition will also track you from pictures it sees. Again, no need for you to "opt in," as long as other people have opted in, Facebook knows you.

      And this is the problem - even if you never create a Facebook account, even if you want to opt out from all the tracking, even if you block all the Facebook trackers online - as long as people you know use Facebook, Facebook is still tracking you through them. And good luck convincing them to stop.

    5. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I guess if you really want to completely ignore the real meaning behind what I said and cling to your Facebook and smartphone addiction, that's your business, but your privacy is worth a million times whatever it is that Facebook is 'letting you use', which really is worth next to nothing. You can be 'social' and 'network' with people without ever even using the Internet at all, let alone Facebook, we did it for thousands of years, and you can do it now, for free, without Facebook.

    6. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      I mean there is value in social networks, maybe not for you but different people have different setups and being where your friends are is useful. Staying in loose-contact with people outside the 6 or 7 that you are able to meet regularly is much easier, and in some cases only possible, with tools. But that's just personal choice, and you are free to make other choices.

      The real issue here is that *you* are on Facebook whether you are signed up or not. If a sufficient number of your friends are, if the service is popular enough, then they can construct you from the hole that you leave. Your ability to opt out is being eroded.

      At some point we're going to have to legislate and determine what is acceptable and normal in the digital-age. I know saying that on /. is virtual heresy... but this is moving past what the individual can do to protect themselves. We will have to act collectively to protect individual rights.

    7. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      There is no value to using Facebook. Why not use email to keep in touch with these people you apparently aren't all that close to? Why do you NEED Facebook? Rhetorical question, you do not need Facebook at all. Stop trading your privacy for mere convenience and leave Facebook behind. Oh and if you're actually using your real name on Facebook then I guess you're screwed -- I never did use my real name, and I deleted all the entries and the account 10 years ago, and nobody I know ever referred to me using my real name anyway, so then so much for your theory about Facebook knowing anything about me; it does not and never will.

    8. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

      Urgh. I know imagination is not a valued trait here but you could atleast try. Repeat after me: "other people have lives that work differently"

      If you haven't been on the site for 10 years then it's difficult to take your assessment seriously. If it had no value then people wouldn't use it. You're right, nobody *needs* it. But that doesn't mean it doesn't have value.

      And I don't know why you're being so superior, if you use email then who's to say that all that information hasn't been captured and processed by Google or whoever? I suppose you encrypt your emails and share keys too? No I didn't think so. If you do then you are in an extremely narrow group who is able to impose that palaver on your friends.

      If enough of your friends have uploaded their phone contacts, or email address book, then they already have your name, and who you are in contact with. That without even going into what can be done with facial recognition on their photos of you. Again, to get out, it's not just up to you, you have to persuade everyone you know to quit also.

    9. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by joh · · Score: 1

      Saying that you give FB something for FB letting you use FB without paying money for it just means that this is a deal. It does not necessarily mean it is a good deal for you, but it is a deal. You don't get anything there for free and what FB does is not free either.

    10. Re:Stop using Facebook and smartphones by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      No, you repeat after me: "Most people are DUMB and don't know what's good or bad for them".

  9. Another possibility... by zarmanto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The info that you (and other Facebook users) provide voluntarily is certainly the primary source, but I think it's reasonable to speculate that it is by no means the sole source of Facebook's "connections" capabilities. Just like anyone else who wants to know something about someone, Facebook almost certainly Google's you. In this particular situation, it's worth mentioning that court cases are typically public record, and many of those records have been made available online. Therefore, a comprehensive search of the web would likely eventually turn up a record which includes the names of the two counsels on each side of any given case, as well as other people who were involved in that case. Cross-reference those names against the Facebook user list, and there you have it: several new potential connections.

  10. Unintended consequences by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    reminds of that story where a father found out his teenage daughter was pregnant because Target sent her a coupon for baby powder or some such based on her purchase history. I understand it's a big problem in the closeted LBGTQ community and among sex workers because they'll have two FB profiles for their double lives and FB will constantly link the two.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  11. Geolocation by Albanach · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm expect that using the system tools to block access to the address book is probably sufficient on Android and iOS - so long as it's done before the app is ever launched.

    What surprises me more is that people don't consider geolocation. Many many facebook users share their location with Facebook. It's then trivial for facebook to see that you are repeatedly in the same location at the same time as another person.

    That lawyer might have met defense counsel at a couple of mediation hearings in a lawyer's office, then they went to the same court house at the same time every day for a week. It's easy to suppose they know each other.

    Similarly for the sex worker who meets the same client at a handful of different hotels. Both their phones arrived at the hotel at the same time on the same days. Then they left together. Again, the connection is trivial.

    At least with Google, you are paid for this data with better traffic reports and better directions. You can decide if that is worth it or not. With Facebook it seems you get nothing in return while they amass a huge amount of information you thought was private.

    1. Re:Geolocation by nine-times · · Score: 4, Informative

      What surprises me more is that people don't consider geolocation. Many many facebook users share their location with Facebook. It's then trivial for facebook to see that you are repeatedly in the same location at the same time as another person.

      I've actually been suspicious for a while that Facebook is doing something with geolocation.

      I have a Facebook account. The main reason I have it because of friends and family who expect you to have it. I look at it sometimes, but almost never post anything. A couple of years ago, Facebook got pretty aggressive in sending notifications suggesting that I "friend" people that I might know-- not like I was looking for people that I might know, but they were actively sending me notifications. At first, it gave me a bunch of people that I did in fact know, and I friended some of them and it all seemed normal.

      But then, within about a month, they got even more aggressive with the notifications, and a lot of the notifications were for people that I did not know. It seemed odd to me. Of the ones that I didn't know, some of them did seem a little familiar, like maybe I'd met them before. I was looking at the profile picture for one of those suggestions, and it clicked: It was someone who worked in the same building as I do. Not the same company, or on the same floor, but it was someone I'd seen in the elevator multiple times.

      I looked through the other suggestions again, and realized some lived in the same apartment building. Over the next couple of weeks, I seemed to get a lot of suggestions to be friends with people who lived or worked in areas that I frequently visited. There was a girl who worked at a coffeeshop near my office, and a guy I sometimes saw walking around my neighborhood.

      I spent a while trying to figure out how it would have made the connection, and the only thing I could think of was location. There were no Facebook friends in common, and no other connection I could find. I hadn't put my work or home address into Facebook. I'm pretty sure it had to be going off the GPS, noticing that I spent a lot of time in the same location they had, and made a connection that way. I'm still convinced that must be the explanation.

      What's a bit disturbing to me is that I don't use the Facebook app much, and like I said, I almost never post anything. It's possible that the couple of things that I've posted were posted at home and at work, and it made the link based on that, but I'm still left wondering when Facebook is gathering location information. Does it gather information whenever you look at Facebook, whether you post or not? Does it gather location information from your phone, even when the Facebook app isn't open?

    2. Re:Geolocation by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I don't use facebook much at all - maybe I login a total of once a month (on average - I usually go 6+ months without logging in at all - enough so Facebook sends me emails about how to get back online). I don't have any photos up other my profile photo, which is a scan of an actual photo that was taken ages ago. I didn't have an electronic copy of it.

      I didn't install the facebook app on my phone (I don't use it often enough to justify it), neither my iPhone, nor my iPad, nor any of the Android phones I have (which are Nexus models and thus do not come preloaded with it).

      And yet, earlier this year, it came up with a really uncanny recommendation - it actually found my flight instructor, someone who I lost contact with about a decade and a half ago when he went on to pursue an airline career (typical pilot career progression - you're a student, then you get your private, you work on your commercial license, then you become a flight instructor until you can get hired by a regional, etc).

      Sure, he's active on Facebook, but not only am I not, we have absolutely nothing in common - no mutual friends, etc. Heck, I'm pretty sure I didn't even put the name of the flight school I went to in my facebook profile. And the scanned photo has no geolocation information so it was a scan.

      Yet one day I get an email saying he was the top #1 pick of someone I might know.

      The photo I have was of my solo - so it's just me, in front of a Cessna 172 (i.e., one of the most generic airplanes out there). I'm not really sure how Facebook put us together, but given the limited data set it can be fairly shocking.

    3. Re:Geolocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Concur. I twice visited a bar in an unusual part of a city where I worked for half a year. There's very little chance any friend I've had from other places visited there, nor my coworkers. Facebook started suggesting the bartender to me after the second time.

    4. Re:Geolocation by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does it gather information whenever you look at Facebook, whether you post or not? Does it gather location information from your phone, even when the Facebook app isn't open?

      Do you really have to ask? Of course the app is cyber stalking you!

      If you have to use Facebook from your phone I would recommend using the website. It's still tracking you, but it won't be able to access the data on your phone. You should also consider turning off GPS. Do you really want someone to be able to easily determine your daily routines?

      I hate sounding like a Luddite since I got into computers when I was a little kid, but technology has turned the Internet and our electronic devices into a pervasive surveillance system. The only way to resist is to not participate.

    5. Re:Geolocation by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Does it gather information whenever you look at Facebook, whether you post or not? Does it gather location information from your phone, even when the Facebook app isn't open?

      If you check the EULA, I'll bet you see that you've authorized the latter.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    6. Re:Geolocation by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I had a Sharp Wizard in 1991 or so, and since then rarely delete contacts, which to this day live in my address book. These were slurped up by LinedIn way back when, and every so often someone I emailed once 20 years ago comes in as a contact suggestion.

      That is likely how your flight instructor came in; they do it with phone numbers too.

    7. Re:Geolocation by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

      They do it with texts as well.

      My dog got out from the fence a couple of days after moving into a new house. Next door neighbor saw a post about it on NextDoor and texted me the the link. She was not in my address book. I was not in her address book. On the basis of one text, Facebook recommended her as a friend a few hours later.

    8. Re:Geolocation by Albanach · · Score: 2

      Here's some stuff discussing Target's ability to identify customers who are expecting. This is, apparently, big business.

    9. Re:Geolocation by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Do you really want someone to be able to easily determine your daily routines?

      Remember that GPS is not the only source for location information. Geolocated Wifi SSIDs, geolocated IPs and geolocated cell tower locations make location tracking peanuts for sufficiently large companies.

      Try finding your favorite WiFi-networks here: https://wigle.net/
      Cell tower database: https://opencellid.org/

      You can bet your ass that (semi-)static IPs are geolocated using that data as well.

    10. Re:Geolocation by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Geolocated Wifi SSIDs, geolocated IPs and geolocated cell tower locations make location tracking peanuts for sufficiently large companies.

      So make yourself the 'higher-hanging' fruit. I can't do anything about cell tower location data unless I render my phone useless for its primary purpose. But all those people who leave their cellular data and Wi-Fi turned on all the time, (when I use mine only briefly and infrequently as needed), are much easier to track, and give away more detailed data about their location.

      As for Facebook, I don't have it on my rooted, firewalled phone. And I don't have an account - never have. I'm sure they have plenty of data about me - but I'm also sure they have a LOT less of mine than they have of most other people's.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    11. Re:Geolocation by doom · · Score: 1

      The only way to resist is to not participate.

      Um... I don't participate willingly, but I'd be surprised if facebook has no information about me. People keep posting pictures of me, for example.

    12. Re:Geolocation by n329619 · · Score: 1

      I didn't install the facebook app on my phone...

      And yet, earlier this year, it came up with a really uncanny recommendation - it actually found my flight instructor...

      Interesting. Do you have any friends you know in his class? Do you leave cookies undeleted in your browser? Have you searched anything of your interest using facebook?

      Plenty more of those can be used to link the connection, but I'll bet it's due to the other people on facebook who knew your flight instructor and one single activity you did to connect the dot.

    13. Re:Geolocation by Gussington · · Score: 1

      And yet, earlier this year, it came up with a really uncanny recommendation - it actually found my flight instructor, someone who I lost contact with about a decade and a half ago...

      I'll have a stab. It's wasn't you, it was him. Maybe (purely guessing) he has contact details of his students on a device somewhere, and when he logged into FB one time it sucked them all up. It knows he's a pilot, it knows he knows you somehow via his contacts, and it picked up on the Cessna being a plane which you have a picture of, so joined the dots.
      Vague I know, but the other thing you have to remember is that even if you don't details of yourself, FB gets them from everyone else. For example, I'm not on FB, but my wife is. So FB probably have a vast collection of data about me, where I go on holiday, who I was at the restaurant with etc, without me even participating. If I ever register I bet I'll be slammed with suggestions from day 1 because they already know everything.
      This shit is off the scale. Someone needs to bomb their head office.

    14. Re:Geolocation by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I'm expect that using the system tools to block access to the address book is probably sufficient on Android and iOS - so long as it's done before the app is ever launched.

      What surprises me more is that people don't consider geolocation. Many many facebook users share their location with Facebook. It's then trivial for facebook to see that you are repeatedly in the same location at the same time as another person.

      From my experience, their geolocation is pretty shit. As is every other system designed to find people I know... because I don't know fecking any of them... often, they're not even in the same country as me. It used to have some relevance when they suggested friends of friends, but I suspect this hasn't been generating new connections in some time. Facebooks problem is with users switching off and the platform going the same way as Live Journal, MySpace and many others.

      Much like their target ads, their "people you may know" is on another planet. If this is the quality of their product, I doubt they'll be able to glean anything useful from the handful of dad jokes and occasional car pic I post. We passed peak facebook a while back IMHO. Cant tell exactly when but most people are over it.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:Geolocation by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure facebook purchases data, so they might have the actual flight school enrollment in their database.
      It's also possible that someone uploaded a group photo from the flight school and they tagged you with facial recognition.

  12. It's just meta-data -- what's the problem? by sandbagger · · Score: 2

    Orwell never thought that the noose that would go around peoples' necks would come from the private sector.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:It's just meta-data -- what's the problem? by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      He needn't worry. The private sector, in this instance is right in bed with the government.

    2. Re:It's just meta-data -- what's the problem? by Megane · · Score: 1

      I've known for a long time that Little Brother is the bigger problem.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:It's just meta-data -- what's the problem? by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Orwell never thought that the noose that would go around peoples' necks would come from the private sector.

      And the funny part is that the main force against the noose wielders is actually the government. I know it's popular to hate on the government, but if you put the papers down for a but and turn off the radio, you'll find there's a lot of good work done by the public services to improve lives.

  13. Use CopperheadOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Based on Android, 100% open source, hardened for security and privacy.

    https://copperhead.co/

  14. nuke 'em from orbit until they glow by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Nah, you're screwed if your friends or family or coworkers play.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  15. Not just Facebook by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

    Years before Facebook even existed, I regularly used Lexis Nexis for work (journalism, although anyone can have an account), tracking down people, seeing who was "attached" to an address (connections determined through a secret algorithm), their phone numbers, their mortgage information, and lots of other public records data.

    My point, I guess, is that this is nothing new, and that there are for-pay databases (like LN, but many others too) where ANYONE can get your info, see your connections, and find out about your life. FB certainly does it well (and more personally), but I'm sure these other companies have new and better technology than when I was using them.

  16. Re:You are a lazy socialist ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    I don't use Facebook at all.

    The problem is that a friend might take a photo of a group of people, with me in it, and upload it to FazeBook. I have ZERO ways of informing FecesBook to NOT collect _any_ data on me. I also don't _know_ what information they have ALREADY collected about me. If this was the government we could file a FOIA request (Freedom of Information Act request) and find out.

    As a corporation they have the legal motivation to do fuck all with my request.

    See the problem now?

  17. Happened to me by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    This happened to me with facebook when I had just started dating someone. We had been going out about a week, and she said that facebook kept recommending my profile to her, even though we had no friends in common, etc. The only connection I could see was that she was using the same phone to text me and access facebook. I thought maybe facebook accessed her contacts on her phone, saw a new contact that matched the phone number I have stored with facebook, and suggested me to her.

    Of course she turned out to be rather stalker-ish, so maybe this didn't happen and she simply used her stalking abilities to find me on facebook.

    1. Re:Happened to me by joh · · Score: 1

      This happened to me with facebook when I had just started dating someone. We had been going out about a week, and she said that facebook kept recommending my profile to her, even though we had no friends in common, etc. The only connection I could see was that she was using the same phone to text me and access facebook. I thought maybe facebook accessed her contacts on her phone, saw a new contact that matched the phone number I have stored with facebook, and suggested me to her.

      Yes: The FaceBook app uploads all contacts on the phone to the FB servers at every launch. So as soon as she had your contact on the phone and then used Facebook, Facebook knew your contact data, knew it was new and suggested you to her. There is nothing mysterious about that, it works exactly like that and it is supposed to work like that. This was one of the reasons I stopped using Facebook rather quickly.

    2. Re:Happened to me by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      I do volunteer work and the organization uses a closed FB page for communicating to volunteers. I created an account with an alais, a disposable email address and didn't indicate any locality information. No photo of me.

      It suggest my son as "someone I might know".

      Rather creepy that it is this intrusive.

    3. Re:Happened to me by kackle · · Score: 1

      But did she blend?

    4. Re:Happened to me by joh · · Score: 1

      I do volunteer work and the organization uses a closed FB page for communicating to volunteers. I created an account with an alais, a disposable email address and didn't indicate any locality information. No photo of me.

      It suggest my son as "someone I might know".

      Rather creepy that it is this intrusive.

      If you used the same phone or the same browser on a computer for both accounts you immediately told them that both accounts were you. If you want to keep two accounts separated you need to use two different devices for them. And even then some data crunching will give you away sooner or later.

  18. Not necessarily... by joh · · Score: 2

    "We had only communicated through my work email, which is not connected to my Facebook, which convinced me Facebook was scanning my work email."

    Well, but the other person may have had this work email in his address book that Facebook pilfers completely. When I still had a Facebook account it often suggested people from which I knew they had my email address I used for my Facebook account.

    It's hopeless, you may stay as far away from FB as you want: If you interact in any way with people who ARE Facebook users FB will learn a lot of you. Just as with WhatsApp: You may not use it and not upload all your contacts to WhatsApp, but other WhatsApp users do this (WhatsApp uploads all contacts) and so WhatsApp knows who has your address in his contacts, so they know who's connected to you even if you don't interact with WhatsApp in any way yourself.

    They all may not see you, but they see a you-shaped hole in the network.

  19. Magic word: "commerce" by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Stalking, spying and harrassing people are illegal things if they are done for "creepy" reasons, where creepy is defined as.. uh, I don't know.

    But "creepy" does not include trying to sell something to someone.

    I can put a hidden camera inside your toilet bowl, if the purpose of that is to tell you the exact moment that you should consider buying Cajun Bowl (TM), the only toilet bowl cleaner that 7/10 focus group members said smells a bit like Jambalaya.

    I can put a microphone in your bed, if the purpose is to gather your sex frequency so that I can sell you Cajun Lube (TM), the lube that tastes like hot sauce.

    These aren't creepy intriusions; I just want your money. Next time you think you feel my cold hand on your ass, remember: that asscheek is where you hold your wallet. I'm just money-grubbing. Now let me give you a little squeeze. Mmmmmm, yes, I feel some 100s in there. You rich! Might I interest you in a Cajun Cask (TM), the only coffin proven to not float away in a flood?

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  20. Shadow Profile by XXongo · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you read the article: https://gizmodo.com/how-facebo... Facebook is constructing a "shadow profile" of you, taken from other people sharing information.

    Here are some of the cited links:
    http://mashable.com/2013/06/26/facebook-shadow-profiles/
    http://www.zdnet.com/article/anger-mounts-after-facebooks-shadow-profiles-leak-in-bug/
    http://www.zdnet.com/article/firm-facebooks-shadow-profiles-are-frightening-dossiers-on-everyone/
    https://splinternews.com/facebook-recommended-that-this-psychiatrists-patients-f-1793861472

    1. Re:Shadow Profile by Hylandr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you had a LinkedIn account you would understand that's a no-shit sherlock moment. LinkedIn *is more obvious* about what it does, in the same way.

      It's no secret. It's not new. The Facebook crowd is *just now* understanding how the tech they been using works.

      You must recall that Facebook pretty much sums up the least common denominator in the Internet society.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  21. Hrm... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

    Well, when I got on Facebook, some years ago, I didn't do so to connect with people. Well, technically, I did. I was trying to track down the person whose tax forms I'd received. To make a long story short, you couldn't search for someone on FB without being on it, so I joined, didn't find them, and tried to find the person through other methods.

    Within a half-hour of creating my FB account, I decided, "I'm not really going to use this, am I?" and went to delete it.

    I already had over a dozen friend requests from people who knew me, including a couple relatives.

    Yes, I had to put in some personal information about where I lived. But it's damn spooky how quickly it can make associations and provide that information to their userbase.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  22. Why I don't use social media by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

    Adds no value and creates more work for me to have to manage my reputation.

  23. it's even worst... by zantafio · · Score: 1

    ....FB has suggested I may know people I've met in a swinger club!

  24. Don't use facebook by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    That's my solution. I don't use it and I won't use it. I had linkedin for awhile, ditched it as well.

    I'm not a socialist so I don't put any importance in their networks.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  25. Away from it by jf_moreira · · Score: 1

    Another excellent reason to be off Facebook. The three year anniversary is to happen soon. : )

  26. Re:You are a lazy socialist ... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Dude there is no right to privacy if you are in a public place, people could always see you or take photos etc, it is not new, if you don't want that then stay indoors.

    Tinfoil hatters, nobody is coming to get you, you are not that important.

    You can be in your own private house and someone comes over, takes a photo and later uploads it to Facebook. Bang... privacy gone just as easy, and you were just in your own home... now Facebook has your face, your home's location, and connections to other people and you don't have a facebook account.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  27. Another posibility by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    We had only communicated through my work email, which is not connected to my Facebook, which convinced me Facebook was scanning my work email,"

    Or they were scanning the other guys email account that he had allowed Facebook into? With email, it takes two to tango.

  28. Re:Take responsibility yourself by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    People always want to run off to the government to supposedly solve things; it does not work. If you have a problem with Facebook, stop using it. Delete your account. Block their trackers. If everyone who complains all the time about Facebook privacy, who still is USING Facebook, took these steps then it would force the company to change or go under.

    Translation: I have no idea what Facebook is or how it works

  29. So, it's not about what YOU share.. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    It's about what others share about YOU.
    With how people carelessly sign-up for services that politely ask you if they can scour your contacts to see if they can find someone who also uses said service so they can link you both; why is it surprising to anyone that you eventually become known despite never actually having shared anything yourself?

    We have the ability to compute a LOT of information in this day and age. Think of what Facebook, et al, are doing as detective work on super-steroids.

    My 2 cents. I'm probably full of shit, surely?

    --
    I tend to rant.
  30. Well if it gets too bad.. by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Maybe we can create a new slap face organization. A monument to what they've done to your privacy.

  31. I don't believe this by zmooc · · Score: 1

    The world is small. And Facebook knows many of its connections. It probably mostly suggests friends based on your connections, favoring people that are connected to you through multiple paths, not just through friends of friends but also through communities and events. Often, such connections are not that easy to find due to blocked friend lists and you not wanting to scan through 200x200 peoples lists of friends, but Facebook can easily find such paths. I don't believe it does anything more spooky than that. They could do super spooky stuff, but they don't because it would probably scare people away.

    What it might do, though, is suggest you friends based on what those people looked at, your profile for example.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  32. Don't use the app by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Years ago I deleted the Facebook app due to excessive battery drain. Judging by how hard they have been trying to get me to install it since, I made the right decision. Besides the access to Contacts touched on in TFS, it is also tracking your location constantly, so it is just as likely that the match to the defense attorney came from them being in the same courthouse at the same time on a number of occasions, perhaps combined with other factors such as social class, and perhaps some shared friends of friends.

  33. If the government did this.... by Wizardess · · Score: 1

    If the government did this we'd be screaming loud and clear to our lords and masters in our Legislature to put an end to it. We've already done this, repeatedly.

    Why in hell should I trust Facebook more than the government? Why in double plus hell should I trust Facebook to never ever under any circumstance share the data with the government?

    I always figured there was a good reason to avoid Facebook, twitter, and such while I fudge, a lot, with linkedin. It's not paranoia when you know "they" are out to get low lying fruit and you happen to be low lying fruit for their picking.

    {^_^}

  34. Who do you report sencond party data breaches to? by ukoda · · Score: 1

    I had a problem with LinkedIn suddenly wanting to invite hundreds of email address I never gave them.I have only ever used LinkedIn via a desktop web browser and always refused to give them access to my email accounts despite the weekly requests they send. Then suddenly they had all sorts of obscure email address they wanted it invite. Doing some research I found the email address in question were present in my imap inbox on my private mail server. This all happened around the time I brought an AT&T phone while in the USA and gave it access to my email account, so that has to be the prime suspect.

    The real problem came when I challenged LinkedIn to tell me where they got the email addresses from. They simply refused. So what can I do? Who can you actually lay a complaint against them with? I want them to explain where the information came from and to delete it but there seems to be no way to do that with a USA based company.