Slashdot Mirror
'No Drones or Driverless Trucks', Demands Teamsters Labor Union (cnbc.com)
An anonymous reader quotes CNBC:
No drones or driverless vehicles for delivering packages -- that's one of the major demands from the Teamsters labor union in the big contract negotiation it's undertaking with UPS this week. The union wants to ban UPS from using such new-fangled technology, which the logistics company has been reportedly testing... The current agreement affects 260,000 full and part-time UPS employees and expires in July. "UPS is focused on a contract that provides the flexibility needed to remain highly competitive, given the challenge of an increasingly crowded logistics segment," the company told CNBC.
The Drive notes the smaller carbon footprint of drone deliveries, while adding that "one completely understands and empathizes with the aversion truck drivers have toward this stark, autonomous future.
"If it feels like their jobs are being endangered by the incredible exponential growth in technology, it's because they are."
The Drive notes the smaller carbon footprint of drone deliveries, while adding that "one completely understands and empathizes with the aversion truck drivers have toward this stark, autonomous future.
"If it feels like their jobs are being endangered by the incredible exponential growth in technology, it's because they are."
Good old featherbedding.. Tell me what else is new.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
If their contract still protected animal drivers, none of them would have a job.
They built this country.
We should tell them that we will put "no drones" or driverless trucks into their contract as soon as we finish putting the "no horse-less carriage" rule into effect that the stablemen are demanding.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
They're called "teamsters" because they used to handle teams of horses to move freight. It's a good thing they didn't allow any new-fangled technology encroach on that business model!
Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
... With the transition from teams of horses to trucks, they were still the "driver." Now they are fighting the elimination of the "driver."
When did we allow electronics to make phone connections. I should have to tell the Operator what URL I want to be connected to. I think I'll put my wooden shoe in a automated loom.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
But only because the fata$$ wanted a new BMW.
Itâ(TM)s time we fire up the first Soylent Green factory.
Those angry men are more likely to put you in the meat grinder than the opposite. Progress with no benefit to society as a whole is pointless. Science and technology is supposed to service us, not the other way around.
Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
Just think the jobs that could created if all deliverers had to be delivered by hand or hand truck?
Forgoing driverless vehicles for package delivery will be the end of UPS. The cost of logistics will be too much to compete when FedEx and DHL start
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
Even if they get their way and UPS doesn't use drones or driver-less trucks, other companies around the world will continue to develop the technology. When a the new technology is ready, they will get everything in place and then layoff every driver all at once. That will be far more devastating to them than if they are have a period of time to actually get new jobs.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
It's the fundamental concept of how the economy is supposed to work, if you don't pay anyone!
If you automate all the jobs away, then where, precisely, is the money supposed to come from, that your potential clients would use, to buy your stuff in the first place? In other words: How would you make money in the first place?
Everybody would be fine with full automation, if the wealth that that causes would go to those, who actually worked to generate it. Instead of those, who merely leeched on them, mooching off of society, taking bailouts, causing inflation, stifling the free market by doing everything they can, to prevent their victims and their enemies to gain a lever that would keep it healthy and balanced.
People always teach kids that example with the lemonade stand, where $1 goes around in circles, and you end up with the same $1, making no money.
But that's how the entire economy works in the real world too! (At least the legitimate parts.) It's so much more complex, that it's well obfuscated.
The only way it can be different, is when money is literally made up out of thin air. (Like stock markets, bank loans, abused crypto-currencies, etc) And that's actually still the same, because by doing it, the money itself loses value. So the wealth still doesn't magically appear out of thin air, but comes out of the pockets of everyone who owns some of that money, via inflation.)
Frankly, the union should STFU, collect some money from its members, buy their own driverless trucks and drones, and spread the profits among the members, in return for their investment.
That would be compatible with the philosophies of the most extreme capitalists, libertarians, socialists and communists.
The only ones who would absolutely hate it, would be those who want to keep leeching. Be it the capitalist or the socialist kind.
Because the biggest part of UPS is their interstate transfer system.
We need to engage in the unsexy business of building a lot more rail. If something has to move from a port to 800 miles inland, barring it being military equipment that the military deems too sensitive to send by rail (ie things like nuclear weapons), it should be sent by rail most of the way. That is way more cost-effective than fleets of trucks for the same purpose and much more environmentally sound.
I'm actually surprised Musk hasn't hedged his bets on this and offered to have the Boring Company help build small networks of tunnels to make direct routes by rail cheaper and less reliant on eminent domain. (It wouldn't be big business, but it would be a great way to test the tech)
Many times this winter we got packages from UPS or FedEx and I thanked the driver for braving the elements for me. I feel the same about this as I do about pizza; if there is no one to walk the package to the door for me then the service is not nearly as good or valuable to me. Now if automation halves the delivery cost because it now lacks this service then fine, but I'd like to know what my inconvenience is worth. There is something to be said for human involvement.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Don't replace me with automation or I'll go on strike!?
Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
No parking in second row, no throwing of packages over walls, no rough handling of delicate packages, no stealing of valuable items, no poisoning dogs, ...
But seriously, in which millennium do they think they live?
If we assume the previous contract length indicates the length of the next one, agreeing to not use drones or automated vehicles for delivery doesn't seem to make much difference the chance that either is allowed in the next 5-years is zero.
When it comes to fighting technical innovation the unions always lose. Economics always wins. And if it's by old companies going out of business and the new ones based on automation rising.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
Itâ(TM)s time we fire up the first Soylent Green factory.
Those angry men are more likely to put you in the meat grinder than the opposite.
Those angry old men are rather ignorant and stuck in their ways, much like the societal reward system.
Progress with no benefit to society as a whole is pointless.
Oh, but there IS a point to all of this. Just ask the owners of companies embracing autonomous/AI solutions. Greed is once again getting rewarded by the "employee" who never complains about minimum wage, getting sick, or at risk of creating a sexual harassment issue (that last one adopted for 2018). Believe me, the rich will be rewarded.
Science and technology is supposed to service us, not the other way around.
Most humans are wasting 40 - 60 hours a week doing a job that automation/AI will soon come along and do. The "service" would be to create a utopia where humans can do whatever they want to do in life, not merely accept what they can do, and turn it into a shitty lifetime of servitude.
Science and technology can deliver. The question is can a society hell-bent on greed adapt.
Of course we need more rail, and ideally better rail.
We need more rail because it's better than the alternatives by far. It's more efficient than cars. It can be and usually is safer than cars. It can be faster than cars. It pollutes less. It also pollutes less than planes, and is much, much better travel experience because you don't have to deal with the ridiculous security theater, because it is roomier, because it is more reliable, and because when there is a problem it is fixed faster.
Just because the union puts this on the table, it doesn't mean they think they are going to get it. The more you have on the table to take off, the more you end up getting in return. It's negotiation 101.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Go for it.
More space for startups, less work for unions.
Problem 1: We can't get the economy to grow at a sustainable 3% because we already have 4% unemployment. Without productivity growth or population growth, the economy is not capable of 3% growth long term. The labor is just not available.
Problem 2: Automation at restaurants, grocery store checkouts, and with driverless cars and trucks will allow businesses to do the same work with fewer workers. This huge increase in productivity will put millions of cashiers and drivers out of work.
Each problem is the solution to the other -- unless government steps in and prevents it from happening.
Ahh Teamsters... so lazy
Not lazy... Stupid
Over the years, the teamsters have had to fill their ranks from among those who could get and wanted the pre-requisite jobs (The inside minimum wage jobs that nobody wants). The result is that their rank and file are barely qualified to draw oxygen from the atmosphere. (Yes, I know there are exceptions, there always are, but on balance if they were smarter, they would go get jobs in better industries).
For a long while, that was ok, because there was no other way to move goods around the world. There is a better way now, and the world no longer needs the people the teamsters are protecting. There simply aren't jobs left for people who can barely read and write, and who's only skill is driving. I warned these idiots 10 years ago that their jobs were going to be replaced with automated systems, and they just looked at me funny and insisted that *I* was the idiot. "Computers will never be able to drive trucks" they said. I moved on. They didn't.
I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
I am not so sure this will ever get off the ground. Frankly the trucking industry is so regulated and we have yet to really see complete driver less trucks or cars. You still have someone behind the wheel having to be the backup in case something goes wrong. Personally I think these companies are sold a line of goods about how self driving the trucks really are. Were a long way off from complete reliable self driving vehicles.
Look, I don't think driverless anything is nearly as close as some people assert but to simply stomp an angry foot and deny what's coming isn't a strategy - it's a pathology. A terminal one, because when it does (almost inevitably) arrive, then you're entirely unprepared.
-Styopa
"Here, let us raise the cost of your labor, and transfer the benefits not to you, but to the union, which is gonna skip town anyway when your employer decides to off-shore, outsource, automate, or use cheap illegal alien labor!"
Alternative Right.
As soon as those techs become reliable, FedEx and DHL will make use of them and will out compete UPS.
Screaming at clouds won't help. Time to rethink things for those fools.
I am a huge advocate for unions, but the teamsters fucking suck. Same for the UAW.
The unions can chill out. The only "incredible exponential growth in technology" in drones and autonomous vehicles was 5-10 years ago. They've been struggling against the wall of reality ever since.
Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
I can recall the same issue affected newspaper Linotype operators who became unnecessary in the 1950's. The final settlement was I believe paying all the existing operators until retirement for doing nothing. The same idea might work for UPS drivers although I suspect the average age of UPS drivers is less than that of the Linotype operators. Perhaps this is just a portent of future labor unrest although unions have mostly been destroyed by Republicans with sad to say Democratic party acquiescence.
The first of many Teamsters battles that are coming in next decade. They may win a few but in the end they are going to lose and go the way of buggy whips.
The union knows all too well that automation is inevitable. UPS' R&D of automated delivery shows that they realize they'll be roadkill if they don't get out in front ot the automation juggernaut, and the union sees that too.
What they really want is a guarantee that no jobs will be lost and no pay cuts, e.g. drivers will be retrained as drone wranglers.
The problem is that, say, an experienced driver makes $30-40/hour. As a driver, he's worth it because of high productivity and safety. However, as a drone wrangler he's starting from scratch and no more valuable than a newbie making $14/hour. Structurally high labor costs could put UPS at a huge disadvantage in the upcoming drone delivery price wars.
Drones and Driverless Vehicles are going to be the death of the Teamster's Union.
If UPS agrees to the Teamster's demands then UPS will be killed off along with the union as competitors undercut UPS by having lower costs of delivery.
If UPS balks then the Teamster's threat is they'll kill UPS now by striking. That in turn will hasten UPS to adopt drones and driverless vehicles quickening the death of the Teamsters.
Either way the Teamsters lose. They had their time and place. They are no longer needed and are now a parasite on the system. They are like the dinosaur lice that specialized to suck the blood of dinosaurs. When the dinosaurs died off so did those lice.
The only question is can UPS find a path forward that lets them get from here and now to then and there where they will have to go: drones and driverless vehicles.
I like my UPS driver. He's a great guy. But it is a job that is facing extinction. I wish him the best in finding a new and exciting job.
Robots don't get any paychecks to skim for hookers and blow for mobsters and politicians.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
Or as maths tutors. They could teach journalists what exponential actually means.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
The rich aren't going to share the proceeds from all this increased productivity. They'll pocket it for themselves. And they won't need consumers if robots make all the stuff they want. They'll need a few servants for appearances sake, a few engineers to keep things running and a few doctors to treat their illnesses. That's maybe 10% of the population. Then they'll pit the other 90% of the population against each other to see who gets to join that 10% servant class.
People like to focus on the improved standard of living the industrial revolution brought us and forget about the 40-80 or so years of unemployment, chaos and social strife (the 'Gilded Age') that followed the last two industrial revolutions before other technologies caught up and employed the people who were put out of work.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
...Because when they don't get an income anymore, no matter how rich you are - they WILL be coming for you.
What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
Either you will learn to adapt to the change or be left behind. It's that simple, the only way this could be disrupted is by patents and laws. And even if you were to try and disrupt or delay autonomous vehicles its pointless. The potential benefits are so far reaching and lucrative that companies are pouring billions in R&D into it.
If I were the teamsters, I would be pushing for alternative training, early retirement beni's, etc. Change will happen slow because of laws and the scale of the operation so they have time to shuffle out the younger gen with training. Retire off late generation, and create a artificial shortage of drivers and pump the pay through the roof and try to make the turnover / retirement faster.
I would embrace and prepare for the change while hurting the companies bottom line as much as possible. Right now drivers are critical to the company and need to press the for as much as they can get while they still have leverage. But once the technology to becomes available it will be too late and the companies wont need to come to the table.
There's no way that robots can do what human drivers do. Driving a simple vehicle around some simple roads is one thing. Unloading boxes from a truck, putting them on handtrucks and getting them into our business is a whole different thing.
I don't respond to AC's.
Say most of routine human work can be automated. There will always be some demand for human labor - because we like to see each other's faces and because of one off tasks for which it's not worth building a robot. According to laws of supply and demand, a little bit of human labor will then buy a lot of robot labor. Works for $19.95 smartphones right? So you will work for two days per week and enjoy living in a home built by a home-building robot, eating produce harvested by a self driving combine harvester and so on. Just like in a primitive society people used to spend 3 days hunting a zebra and two weeks eating a zebra while painting cave walls and dancing around the fire. Except you get to live much nicer by having robots raise and butcher your zebras. Instead, we insist on confining ourselves to industrial monestories for much of our waking time. If anything, lots of software people can afford to work part time from remote and still get by in an affordable area of the country. Maybe that will set a trend? What the world needs now is an army of slackers.
... and lose.
The largest expense in delivery is people.
Workers have lost out to automation before and yet we're still here.
This, too, shall pass.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
Banning technologies for the sake of jerbs is not something i cam get behind.
...they would allow and even embrace the drones and driverless trucks...as long as the maintenance and repair positions to manage these new delivery mediums were Teamster organized. The Teamsters have an opportunity to make inroads into the growing industry of automation maintenance and can move their union into the 21st century. They can be the union that plants the flag of organized labor firmly onto the portions of the tech industry that still need human hands to do work. But...we all know they won't be that proactive nor forward thinking.
Social Media Handywoman at Texas Boys Balloo
I bet you tortured little animals as a child. Nothing but a perverted and dysfunctional mind could ever dredge up such bile.
... at the Texaco refinery in Port Arthur, Texas, ca. 1980.
"We are all going to lose our jobs to computers!"
The union had a major cow and the company really, really wanted to decrease the costly, annoying workforce.
Didn't happen.
The fucking automation was crappy in a harsh hydrocarbon-rich environment; only the manufacturers understood their product and knew nothing about cooking crude.
We had triple the workforce for years -- new construction, trained operators, analysts from the vendors, engineers from Texaco and the instrument suppliers ...
Automation speeds up the work that humans do, but automation is unintelligent.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
When multimodal containerized shipping threatened the longshoreman union jobs, they simply negotiated a contract where the shipping companies could use it, but all the labor cost savings needed to be redistributed to the remaining workers. Basically the shipping companies could save in everything, but labor costs. This is one of the reasons why a longshoreman can get a 6-figure income.
It'll be so nice when AI takes over all contract and civil legal proceedures and 99% of the lawyers are unemployed homeless.
Brave future coming chaps, hold tight!
They cut our members work hours by many hours, and would put a lot of them out of work. What's next? Electric drills?
I realize this will never happen, but the solution to income, employment, jobs going the way of automation, is for individuals to own the labor savings device, not the corporations. This allows individuals to continue providing the work force (and get paid) even though they aren't physically doing the work. The individual becomes freed to explore new things while their "robot" does the work.
Bill Gates recently said that people shouldn't have standing behind a counter to serve people when it could be automated but we have to resolve how people continue to earn when they aren't the ones dong the work. Having individuals owning the work force solves that. Deciding where the line between a "normal" machine and a "human" job is the difficult part.
Stores are already replacing people with "self-checkout" and each of us are providing the checkout labor for free - we don't get a discount for using them even though the business saved money by not employing more checkout people to handle their customer volume. ATMs used to (maybe they still do, I've quit using them) even charge the customer to allow the bank to not pay a teller.
Obviously this won't happen naturally as it is the corporations taking advantage of the new tech to reduce their labor costs. It would require government intervention and big gov is also evil.
--XYZZY--
Like Trump did to the press via Twitter
What Amazon will do to UPS... Create his own private shipping system
Unloading boxes from a truck, putting them on handtrucks and getting them into our business is a whole different thing.
The robot won't use a hand truck, the robot will be the delivery cart. And the truck will also be a robot, and besides driving it will be able to handle stacking. That's two things it will do better than UPS. I've had a UPS guy go off the side of the hill here where I expressly told him not to turn around, and where any idiot would have seen was a bad place to go in wet conditions, when there was plenty of room to turn around where I told him to turn around. I turn a Sprinter around there all the time, I'm not sure why he couldn't manage it. To top it off, he didn't bother to let me know he went off the side of the hill, so the first I found out about it was that a fucking tow truck came up my driveway. I'm a car guy, and that's not something I want to be seeing unexpectedly. A self-driving truck will be able to read the grade and simply not drive onto surfaces like that. Of course, it probably wouldn't come up my driveway at all, but that's fine. I prefer it that way. In normal conditions, it won't have any trouble at all.
As for the stacking issue, I have a friend who used to work for UPS. He told me they would inevitably wind up literally throwing packages on trucks. A robot won't do that shit. It doesn't go home, so it doesn't have some special time when it comes in or when it leaves. It can patiently stack boxes 24/7. And the trucks can run 24/7 too. They'll make deliveries during the day, and then they'll do the long hauls in platoons at night, eliminating the current UPS trucking fleet more or less entirely. The whole reason we use such large, cumbersome trucks in the first place is to permit one driver to haul so much freight. They are a liability in every other way. At first, we will do the same thing with autonomous vehicles, so this won't happen instantly — although the long-haul trucking jobs will still go away, since the big OTR trucks will be automated first. Local delivery trucks will be automated much later or at least much more slowly, because of the substantial cost per vehicle.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
And who decides what is a benefit to society and what isn't?
Oh and something to add before you reply:
Killing or forbidding an invention or industry because a government decides that it is bad for society is perhaps the most defining economic element of fascism.
I warned these idiots 10 years ago that their jobs were going to be replaced with automated systems, and they just looked at me funny and insisted that *I* was the idiot. "Computers will never be able to drive trucks" they said. I moved on. They didn't.
Frankly, you sound like a massively smug cunt, so I'm not surprised they "didn't listen".
screw this unions... I am in one and this fools do nothing for the fee payers, only their own interests.
UPS Testing of Residential Delivery Via Drone:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx9_6OyjJrQ
of miners in most countries? Scary stuff even today. Same thing for indentured servants. It'll mean slavery, and slaves haven't been treated well at the best of times. Even the Romans only treated them OK when the population of slaves got too big to oppress, and the Romans didn't have automatic weapons and aerial drones. You don't need very many cooks or whores either. There's a limit to how much a billionaire can eat and screw.
That old 'Idle hands are the Devil's plaything' is bullshit. Give most folks beer and football and they're set. Give the rest video games and you're good. Bread & Circuses and whatnot. The problem's going to be when the ruling class have enough firepower that they don't need to bother with the Bread & Circuses. The question is are we gonna let them. As far as I can tell all signs point to yes.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I have some FedEx stock. This is good news for me :)
On a more serious note, they cannot sit idle while competition will use more automation and lower the delivery costs. Even if the big ones (UPS, FedEx, DHL) do not take up on this, the local ones will probably do so, and become large taking their thrones.
The benefit to society here is that we can support more people with less human work. All those people who used to drive UPS vans can now either go and do more important jobs, or can go and relax on a beach. The only difficulty is that we ALSO need to make progress on how to structure an economy where not everyone needs to work all the damn time in order to survive, and how we make sure that all the benefits of that society get spread out to the whole society, rather than constrained to a few extremely wealthy individuals.
Yes, almost 100% of all workers will be replaced , not just truckers. Stalling and failing to prepare for a new world with new economics and new social systems is the worst thing we could dream of doing. Re-training is simply not an answer at all. People will become permanently unemployed and that means that unless we give them ample financial support they can not make any purchases thus destroying commerce. everything we think and believe must change to adapt to the advance of technology. Big coal is one obvious on the first to go down list. Liquid fuels will soon follow Mines will become so automated that they employ next to no one at all. Machine shops are getting more and more rare as better machines produce more with less human involvement. Adapt or perish.
The Gangsters Union just needs to think outside of the box a little.
They should just unionize the trucks themselves, charge the trucks a union due per mile driven and continue to rake in their ill-gotten gains.
Say it aint so.
You guys are funny.
Pretty easy actually... If a union wants it, it is good for the union and bad for society. Unions are legalized extortion and nothing more.
you're preoccupied with where the money comes _from_. The ruling class, OTOH, is preoccupied with where it goes _to_.
.1% of the population. We can stop it, but not while we're busy calling each other leeches while the aristocracy claims everything for themselves.
You've figured out that if we automate all the jobs away the entire economy will grind to a halt. Good job. I mean it. That's the first step. But you still think the ruling class is just like the working class, e.g. that they depend on the economy for their livelihood. This is incorrect. The ruling class makes their living by _owning_ things. They don't need a functional economy to do well.
The ruling class can own everything and rent it out to what remains of the working class. This is how things were done for centuries. They used a smattering of well fed knights to keep the peasants in line. One well fed knight was a match for a dozen or more peasants because the peasants were weak from being underfed. If that balance was tipped from time to time than a caste system would divide the working class and prevent them from over throwing the ruling class.
It took two world wars for the working class to claw a decent living in about 1/3 of the world. We only got it because our numbers were decimated and there weren't enough workers, and because the wars made brothers of us all and weakened the caste systems. Thanks to nukes and globalization that's probably not going to happen again. We're heading for a new dark age (or gilded age, if you prefer). Of complete, total monopolization of wealth by
One last thing, I'm sure I haven't changed your mind. I'm mostly just venting. But to anyone reading this who sees through the systems used to contain and oppress the working class, any ideas how to convince this AC before it's too late?
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
I dont think anyone disagrees that unions were a necessary part of history, but the self-serving idiolog of the past needs to modernize its thinking and be a part of progress bot opposed. After all who are the unions organizing against, in this case, but the stated desire of the market to shop from home at lower prices.
Then there's the government unions.... that's a whole 'nother can of worms.
The FAA will have a difficult time reconciling the risk level of that many drones flying around populated areas. There is no possible way to keep them from falling and killing people. There will too many of them which will significantly increase the risk envelope beyond the one you fly in your back yard that everyone things of.
And, what about the sound and visual pollution these things will create?
Why do these things always get swept under the rug when it comes to greed?
These companies already have complex logistics software. Removing the drive will neither increase or decrease the demand for it. It already exists and is in use. You're not going to need more computing power for it either. It's basically a solved problem. The limits are the drivers, not the software that pushes them around.
Speaking of the hospitality industry, I swear everytime I think about the upcoming driverless vehicle revolution I'm reminded of a new group of folks who are going to lose their jobs: Truck stop employees. After all, no drivers, no truck stops. It'll hit rural communities hard. A lot of them get by on that traffic....
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
and nobody wants to pay for it. We're much more likely to keep using the (already bought & paid for) roads from the 60s and 70s. Nice idea though. Wish there was political will for it.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
If the union sinks the company, they will still be out of a job.
If the union substantially hits the revenue of the company, not destroying it, but greatly harming it, they will still be out of a job.
This is not the 1930's where human-intensive the only option.
The union isn't bringing much to the table.
In 5 years, there might be nothing the union can bring to the table, especially if their damage is permanent.
It is an existential moment.
Look for the folks that UPS calls "wolves at the door" and if one of them gets good value from automation, it should signal beginning of the end for both the union, and for UPS.
Ever met a pissed of truck driver with a tire iron? Now consider one with a lot of time on their hands.
In this world of ever increasing automation has anyone here guessed who all of the frustration will eventually be taken out on?
My ism, it's full of beliefs.
So, the teamsters are upset with being replaced. TOO BAD! Let's see...do we still manage buggy whips? Telegraph operators, and on and on? Nope...unfortunately, progress means that certain jobs may disappear. Now, if you want to live like the 12th century people of some parts of the middle east, just drop an EMP over the planet and we can all have jobs again. Hey teamsters....SUCK IT.
of the owner class. Being able to live comfortably without risk off the things you own does. You can't just buy a robot, you have to know how to use it or hire people who do. That means either a) you're a skilled engineer, bully for you or b) you own enough robots that skilled engineers will work for you despite the fact that you yourself have no skills (and no, owning things doesn't count).
Said it before, say it again, when it comes to class warfare the best kind of war is one where the other side doesn't know they're fighting.
Not needing humans to toil is only a good thing if we have some mechanism to distribute the productivity increases besides "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law". Otherwise what we're gonna see if the rich turn their wealth into power and do terrible things to keep it. This isn't idle speculation. I've got 3000+ years of human history backing me up. You've got about 70 years post WWII of a few countries not being complete dicks to their working class and even then first chance they owner class got they shipped the jobs overseas where they could go back to being awful. History is on my side here; though that's cold comfort.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Do this at your own peril. Yes, you my block their usage for this contract cycle, but one of these days the company will just make a complete switch over at the end of your contract and you will lose your jobs forever. You cant cry scab when the entire labor force gets replaced. Better to take your lumps now and let it phase in over time.
If UPS doesnâ(TM)t deploy driverless and drones, someone else will. Amazon will do it themselves before long and the USPS, FedEx, DHL, and UPS will lose that.
Pitney Bowes will partner with someone to do the same for eBay if eBay doesnâ(TM)t just do it themselves.
Walmart will buy into it to.
If UPS and their peers donâ(TM)t automate, youâ(TM)ll find every retailer simply outsourcing it or building their own same-day delivery drones and trucks.
So... good luck with that. Garbage trucks, taxis, busses, tow trucks, cargo (milk, paper, etc)... Pretty much all driving jobs are short-listed for end of life. Eventually, weâ(TM)ll see big rigs with containers that can be shifted between vehicles while in motion. There will be trucks that can ride on rails and roads and integrate with the railway management systems.
Donâ(TM)t worry, weâ(TM)ll automate most factory jobs as well. Weâ(TM)ll also automate trash sorting and recycling. Weâ(TM)ll automate stocking shelves in stores. Weâ(TM)ll automate cashiers. Fast food will go too.
Lawyers, general practitioners, local surgeons, network engineers, construction workers, thereâ(TM)s no end to it. The good news for Americans is that the US is proud to maintain an enormous military, police force, prison system and TSA. The government will create jobs for all of you. And if they can increase the crime rate through things like illegal breathing in public, they can remove a considerable percentage of the work force.
They can't stop progress. Driverless trucks are coming and so are drone deliveries, just like trucks replaced horses and so on.
They should rather be figuring out what to do when their jobs gets obsoleted.
"For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
If we get driverless trucks, will they still change lanes without looking?
go $%^^ yourself, unions
I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
I remember many years ago that some unions in Japan required that companies pay union dues for every "robot" installed. Consequently, I've been expecting unions to start complaining.
You'd think investors would have picked up on this and started selling.
https://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUPS&ei=NlhvWriiJpbUjAGyz6f4DA
are on track to retire. So you're not making a good case. My dad contributed to his 401k for years and year. His 'retirement' was 2008. You can imagine how well that went.
The problem isn't how much the rich consumes, it's how little. They can't drive an economy by themselves. But they want the power to get anything they want whenever they want it and for nothing in return (unless you count being born rich something). The way to do this is to exploit scarcity. You do as they say because they control food, water, shelter, medicine. They dole out the best to their thugs and you do as they say because either your one of those thugs or you're afraid of those thugs.
Above all they don't want people by and large to have enough to live comfortably because if that ever happens then they lose most of their power. You don't listen to Bill Gates or the Koch Bros. because they're smart. You do it because they're rich, you're hoping to get some of that wealth, and besides if you were ever a threat to them they'd crush you like a gnat.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
In the U.S. workers have to go on strike just to have their benefits not be cut by corporations enjoying historic profit levels. Whereas in Germany, a union responded to automation not by agreeing to job cuts but by demanding a 28 hour work week with no loss in compensation.
Which is how it should be.
I have to call bull on that one pending some sort of proof. Electric creates a larger carbon footprint than internal combustion and in what mythical universe does a drone internal combustion vehicle have a lower carbon footprint that one with a thinking driver? Or, is someone inflating the minuscule savings of a vehicle that doesn't have a driver taking lunch and washroom breaks?
NRRPT/RCT
The massive use of drones for delivery, monitoring, law enforcement, etc will create a cacophony of unending noise in our skies. No longer will anyone be able to enjoy a quiet walk in the park, or anywhere else. People are using drones everywhere, now that it is fashionable and acceptable to do so, regardless of concerns for privacy or quiet.
The sound of drones in incredibly loud and annoying. Once they are flying about everywhere at all hours people will have to bunker in place to avoid the constant buzzing. How will this effect humanity and nature?