Slashdot Mirror


The Car of the Future Will Sell Your Data (bloomberg.com)

Picture this: You're driving home from work, contemplating what to make for dinner, and as you idle at a red light near your neighborhood pizzeria, an ad offering $5 off a pepperoni pie pops up on your dashboard screen. Are you annoyed that your car's trying to sell you something, or pleasantly persuaded? From a report: Telenav, a company developing in-car advertising software, is betting you won't mind much. Car companies -- looking to earn some extra money -- hope so, too. Automakers have been installing wireless connections in vehicles and collecting data for decades. But the sheer volume of software and sensors in new vehicles, combined with artificial intelligence that can sift through data at ever-quickening speeds, means new services and revenue streams are quickly emerging. The big question for automakers now is whether they can profit off all the driver data they're capable of collecting without alienating consumers or risking backlash from Washington. "Carmakers recognize they're fighting a war over customer data," said Roger Lanctot, who works with automakers on data monetization as a consultant for Strategy Analytics. "Your driving behavior, location, has monetary value, not unlike your search activity."

241 comments

  1. Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by The123king · · Score: 4, Informative

    But here in the UK we have strict regulations on distractions whilst driving. That's the same reason the billboard isn't a thing here in the UK.

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    1. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This American will mind. This American will be irate.

    2. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But here in the UK we have strict regulations on distractions whilst driving. That's the same reason the billboard isn't a thing here in the UK.

      BULLSHIT.

    3. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      Of course you'd have to buy one of these untenable pieces of shit for it to be your car. Also cars of today sell your data, they just don't have ad-delivery systems yet.

    4. Re: Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Billboards in the UK are allowed in towns and cities but are illegal on high speed Motorways (highways) and dual carriageways for obvious reasons. They are also banned in green countryside areas in the UK too as they are classed as an eyesore.

    5. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Is there any way for the car owner to disable these systems from "phoning home"??

      I imagine it has to be a cellular connection in the car, is there a relatively simple way for the average person to disable this communication outlet?

      I would have to imagine with new cars being so complex, that the gathering would be difficult if not impossible to stop, but it would seem easy to be able to disable or block the car from phoning home?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We have billboards by the road in the UK, lots of them.

      However, a pop-up ad in the car is probably illegal. At least, the very first person with one of these cars to claim that the ad distracted them will quickly put and end to the practice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Alioth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      GDPR should be a fairly healthy deterrent to anyone implementing anything like this (that is, if the UK doesn't throw it in the bonfire of EU regulation after 2019).

    8. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Higaran · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the cars that have this will most likely be self driving, so the distraction thing will not be an issue.

    9. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by trabby · · Score: 1

      That is when said self driving car gets a punch, right in the screen.

    10. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by LS1+Brains · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, and it's typically pretty easy once you locate the module. The cellular radios are often socketed and easily removed, and barring that, there's a bunch of ways you could attack and disable the radio from effectively connecting to a tower (e.g. pinning the coax going to the antennae).

      Of course once auto manufacturers catch on that people are circumventing their systems, they'll just label them as 'safety' related and lobby to the government to allow punishments for interfering with them.

    11. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by danbert8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I disconnected On-Star from my GM Vehicle and odd things started happening, the most annoying of which was the cruise control would randomly stop working. The dealership plugged the On-Star module back in and voila everything worked fine again. They will integrate these systems so that you will not be able to unplug them.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    12. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by morethanapapercert · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Let's not overlook the number of probably legal but annoying things they could do first to drive adoption:

      1) This will be part of the "infotainment" system obviously. Have the system do a systems check and refuse to operate any of the display screen functions (radio, navigation etc) unless the system passes all checks.

      2) The cell radio is also crucial to things like On-Star, so cooperate with the big insurance companies to make a disabled system more expensive to insure. On the basis that On-Star and automatic collision reporting are "vital safety systems"

      3) Many cars now have a "limp home mode" where the vehicle will still operate, but with severely reduced performance. This is intended for things like emissions systems failures, engine computer failure and so on. It would be obvious and straight forward to have a car go into limp home mode if any of the many computers, logic controllers or other electronic parts fail the self check.

      4) The easiest and most legally defensible, simply have the check engine or service engine light come on when the self check fails.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    13. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is when said self driving car gets a punch, right in the screen.

      That will show you are a non-compliant member of society [maybe a dangerous outlier] and need correction.

    14. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      I disconnected On-Star from my GM Vehicle and odd things started happening, the most annoying of which was the cruise control would randomly stop working. The dealership plugged the On-Star module back in and voila everything worked fine again. They will integrate these systems so that you will not be able to unplug them.

      Hmm..wondering if you leave the module plugged in, can you then find the antenna it uses and cover it with a faraday cage type unit to prevent its transmissions?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least, the very first person with one of these cars to claim that the ad distracted them will quickly put and end to the practice.

      Not that I'm for the ads in any way...BUT, if you in the UK are so distracted by a simple ad, how in the hell do you drive while fiddling with the radio/stereo, smoke a cigarette, keep the cold beer between your legs and try to talk on the phone???

      I mean, hell...that's the new basic driving test here for men in the US.

      The ones for ladies substitute the beer holding for putting on makeup i the car....

      But hey, its easier than it used to be when you had to do all that AND shirt the manual transmission. I'm old school and still do that, but most today don't have to pass that qualification.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But then you wouldn't be able to set the cruise control speed from the android app. This isn't 2016 anymore, no one wants a car that isn't cloud-enabled.

    17. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they simply make the car refuse to work if it cannot phone home.

    18. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or they simply make the car refuse to work if it cannot phone home.

      But, that really can't work, can it?

      I mean, there are times and places that you will lose signal, like in a tunnel, or perhaps parts of the country where there isn't great cell coverage, etc....

      I would think they would have to take those use cases into account, and if they do..then you just block the signal perpetually...?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please.

      What is really going to happen is that people won't want their data drained by this shit, and the minute it starts happening the in-car navigation system gets it's sim card pulled, and everyone goes back to older GPS-only systems.

      Advertisements have basically destroyed the "web" ecosystem and have done significant damage to video, and apps that basically everyone is moving back to paywalls.

    20. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Awesome. I did not think I needed more reasons to keep using old cars, but got some anyway...

    21. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by The123king · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't even want my smartphone cloud-enabled. If it dies and loses its data, it's my fault for not backing it up. I'd rather know it's me in charge of my devices than some faceless corporation

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    22. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by LS1+Brains · · Score: 2

      To date, OnStar doesn't do anything negative when disabled, and you can just pull the fuse to disable it with no lights or warnings. OnStar emergency response is a subscription service you must pay for (after the initial free period) if you want it. Outside of the subscription, if you disable OnStar, you miss out on relatively superfluous features such as the monthly email about vehicle 'health' and the ability to use your phone as a keyfob.

    23. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ask the farmers with John Deere equipment.

    24. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To date, OnStar doesn't do anything negative when disabled, and you can just pull the fuse to disable it with no lights or warnings. OnStar emergency response is a subscription service you must pay for (after the initial free period) if you want it. Outside of the subscription, if you disable OnStar, you miss out on relatively superfluous features such as the monthly email about vehicle 'health' and the ability to use your phone as a keyfob.

      Fuse does not work. I physically unplugged the OnStar module in my car and I keep getting phone calls from them telling me that my car needs to be taken in for service because they cannot connect to it.

    25. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by plopez · · Score: 1

      Not without violating a warranty or EULA.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    26. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by plopez · · Score: 1

      Or even better, ads in your social media feeds. Drive past chain restaurants. Lo and Behold! Coupons appear in you social media feeds!

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    27. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by judoguy · · Score: 1

      Or they simply make the car refuse to work if it cannot phone home.

      But, that really can't work, can it?

      I mean, there are times and places that you will lose signal, like in a tunnel, or perhaps parts of the country where there isn't great cell coverage, etc....

      I would think they would have to take those use cases into account, and if they do..then you just block the signal perpetually...?

      If I were tasked with this as an engineer, I'd just buffer the data and transmit when comm available. Wouldn't you?

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    28. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Cederic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The ones for ladies substitute the beer holding for putting on makeup i the car....

      I guess that's because of their innate advantage due to the built in beer bottle holder?

      if you in the UK are so distracted by a simple ad, how in the hell do you drive while fiddling with [everything]

      Driving while distracted will already get you spanked. It's reasonable to assume that something explicitly intended to distract you will not be looked on kindly by the powers that be.

    29. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      If I were tasked with this as an engineer, I'd just buffer the data and transmit when comm available. Wouldn't you?

      I'm hoping that's exactly what they're doing....that way it isn't trying to actively disable the car due to non-communication.

      So, just let it buffer, while you have the communication antenna blocked or disconnected.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Not without violating a warranty or EULA.

      I don't know that I've ever signed or even seen a EULA when buying a car...?

      And at least in the US, mods do not necessarily negate a warranty....by law.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Alypius · · Score: 2

      Except that it'll be tied into the central infotainment system, so you'll also lose the ability to listen to the radio or change your climate settings.

    32. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by taustin · · Score: 1

      Or just design the ignition system to require a connection before the car will start. (They may need to use a satellite phone system to do it, but cars are so expensive these days that's actually not that big a bump in price.)

    33. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by taustin · · Score: 1

      The price of satellite phone equipment will come down dramatically if there is demand for 60 million more units a year (one for every car manufactured). Cars cost so much now another few hundred for that won't even be noticeable.

    34. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by taustin · · Score: 1

      You've certainly never bought a new car without signing multiple contracts. Did you read every word of the hundred or so pages?

    35. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by taustin · · Score: 1

      Two doors down from where I work is a store that sells car radios, with installation. Their business seems to be thriving.

    36. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have stereos in your cars there, don't you?

      Who said it needs to be a visual AD.

    37. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

      No billboards at all...

      https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4891586,-0.31282,3a,75y,59.24h,99.11t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1syCZQ9l6x2jv6smM5gW2_Lg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

    38. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Is there any way for the car owner to disable these systems from "phoning home"??

      It is easy: don't buy the car.

    39. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) This will be part of the "infotainment" system obviously.

      Infotainment systems should be replaceable. 20 years ago, you bought a better radio. Today, you buy a better stereo system. In the years to come, you buy a premium screen - higher resolution, brighter, better stereo, bigger - whatever. Even the car manufacturers themselves want replaceability - so they can sell you 'upgrades' in the years after you bought the car. The aftermarket will also hook into such replaceability.

    40. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a new car. There were only two pages, mostly specifying the exact model & color & pricing, and checkboxes for all sorts of optional equipment. Also some info the government wants (so they knows for sure who owns the car with those licence plates.) There'd be more if I wanted a loan, but I didn't need that.

      100 pages? The owner's manual is not part of the contract.

    41. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since you're leaving the EU and are going to manufacture everything locally so people with fond memories of the 60s can work in factories again, you'll all soon be driving around in Ford Cortinas and Reliant Robins, I dont think you'll need to worry about your dashboards advertising at you in those ;-)

    42. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You've certainly never bought a new car without signing multiple contracts. Did you read every word of the hundred or so pages?

      Actually, I *DID* just buy a new car just before the holidays last year and there were not that many pages to sign and yes I read them.

      You always should, to make sure you are not getting hidden charges, etc.

      My dealer ship was very straightforward, simple forms which spelled out exactly what we negotiated.

      NO EULA.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    43. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      It is easy: don't buy the car.

      Well, it isn't easy to FIND a car that doesn't have it.

      Hell a few years back when I was shopping for a corvette, I asked what it would take to order one without OnStar in it...the dealer said it wasn't possible to get one without OS....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    44. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by BitterOak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fuse does not work. I physically unplugged the OnStar module in my car and I keep getting phone calls from them telling me that my car needs to be taken in for service because they cannot connect to it.

      Just tell them you disconnected it because you don't want the OnStar feature. If the calls persist, just hang up on them. They'll eventually get the message. It sounds like you're letting yourself get bullied by your car company. Not a good idea.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    45. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American, I am sick and tired of being lumped into the idiocracy I live in. Not every American is a Trump loving idiot. I am embarrassed every single day to be an American. I may have been born here, but I promise, this country is a money grubbing, back stabbing, gun loving, hell hole. And I weep for the fact that our government considers itself a world leader. America is a sad pathetic shit hole of a country. - Signed... An embarrassed American.

    46. Re: Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not if having to agree on eula before starting engine

    47. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by plopez · · Score: 1

      You don't get it. Once we get driverless cars etc. a EULA can easily become part of a car buying process. Which could involve things such as turning off tracking violating warranties. Or you pay an extra 15K use to get the "extended" warranty.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    48. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these are features aimed for after the cars becoming selfdriving
      so distraction the driver is gonna be a non-issue

    49. Re: Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Billboards in the UK are allowed in towns and cities but are illegal on high speed Motorways (highways) and dual carriageways for obvious reasons. They are also banned in green countryside areas in the UK too as they are classed as an eyesore.

      This is one of the many reasons why driving in the UK is such a pleasure compared to driving in the US or Australia. You aren't constantly bombarded with advertising blocking the scenery.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    50. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Technically, it is a minor safety issue. My car has an SOS button on the ceiling. (They ran out of other places to put buttons.) If I get into a crash, the car will notify someone who will call 911 if I don't respond. Having the car know where it is at all times does improve my safety to some extent.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    51. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ones for ladies substitute the beer holding for putting on makeup i the car... But hey, its easier than it used to be when you had to do all that AND shirt the manual transmission

      You joke but I've seen plenty of women in the UK doing their makeup and "adjusting" their hair while driving, and UK drivers almost exclusively drive manual. It's fucking annoying because they are usually stopping at green lights or rolling with the handbrake or drifting lanes etc. Of course it's still more common to see people driving like idiots because they are on their smart phones. UK might have stricter driving laws and regulations but the people are still obsessed with distractions.

    52. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you in the UK are so distracted by a simple ad, how in the hell do you drive while fiddling with [everything]

      Driving while distracted will already get you spanked. It's reasonable to assume that something explicitly intended to distract you will not be looked on kindly by the powers that be.

      Not enough, I encounter at least one person on my short commute to work every day, usually more. The problem is there are just too many of them, they can't all be arrested and they can't all end in serious accidents, so they carry on just being potential accidents and pissing everyone off around them.

    53. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      I see a post by AmiJo that says you guys have billboards in the UK. In fact, here is how to do it along with examples:
      http://www.ukmedia.co.uk/index...

      So what are you talking about?

    54. Re:Maybe the Amiricans won't mind by The123king · · Score: 1

      We have none next to motorways Sorry, i should have been clearer.

      I know billboards are a thing, just not on high-speed roads (ie anything over 30MPH)

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  2. Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Telenav is betting you won't mind much

    I'll take that bet.

    1. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by sinij · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Telenav is betting you won't mind much

      I'll take that bet.

      Me too. Especially after insurance companies realize they can compel release of this data to dispute coverage or increase rates.

      For example: You go through drive-through every morning - you must be eating breakfast while driving to work. This leads to distracted driving. Congratulations! You win 20% higher premium.

    2. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already turned the wifi off in my car system. ET can't phone home.

    3. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You obviously have something to hide. Congrats! You've just won 100% higher premiums and a referral to local law enforcement.

    4. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not unless there's a law requiring said wifi. Don't be hysterical. Then again, this *is* /.

    5. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm reminded of the OBD devices some insurance companies offer so you have a discount. I tried that, but because I commute on a busy highway (I-35 in Austin), coupled with cretins who swing in a lane, freak out because traffic is stopped, then slam the brakes on, forcing me to do 60-0s fast, no matter how much following distance I leave that gets logged... My premiums went up by 25%, so I switched insurance companies.

    6. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example: You go through drive-through every morning - you must be eating breakfast while driving to work. This leads to distracted driving. Congratulations! You win 20% higher premium.

      They already do it, with the smartphone you carry with you in your car.

    7. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by eth1 · · Score: 2

      Me too. Especially after insurance companies realize they can compel release of this data to dispute coverage or increase rates.

      For example: You go through drive-through every morning - you must be eating breakfast while driving to work. This leads to distracted driving. Congratulations! You win 20% higher premium.

      Even better: "Congratulations! You bought a car with a built-in distraction device! You win a 20% higher premium!"

    8. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Congratulations! You win 20% higher premium.

      This is a small overshoot in a good trend. The higher premium may make you to skip the breakfast in paper wrapper in the drive through in the morning. Your insurance rate will go down. You'll also be healthier. Your health insurance rate will go down.

      Seriously what world do we live in where people eat in their cars.

    9. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by nmb3000 · · Score: 2

      And I'm betting there will be class-action lawsuits if this really does happen. In what possible way does buying a car grant a third part the right to collect and sell any data gathered from it? Ignoring the privacy implications - the data is not theirs to take! I genuinely don't understand the mentality behind these sociopathic advertising asshats which makes them think they have any sort of right to do something like this.

      If they want to install this bullshit in the car then they had better give owners the ability to shut it completely off. I only hope that whatever judge this ends up in front of is a rational person and not some right wing nut who just wants to fuck over the American public and hand them over to his corporate overlords.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    10. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by nwf · · Score: 2

      Telenav is betting you won't mind much

      I'll take that bet.

      No kidding. I will never buy a car that serves me ads. I'd debate driving one even for free. Any manufacturer that ops into this will lose me as a customer, too, even if the car I wanted didn't have the ads (yet).)

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    11. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by plopez · · Score: 1

      Not. If your car insurance company says you have to have tracking turned on or they will not take your business. There is nothing illegal about that.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    12. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Cederic · · Score: 2

      you must be eating breakfast while driving

      False assumption. Could be buying food to eat at work, could be buying a drink, could be flirting with the staff, could get lost on the way to work every day and pull in for directions, could be a Russian spy attending a dead-drop to exchange messages with the FBI.

      Luckily insurance companies have intelligent people working for them and wont be that bloody silly. To go with your assumption, I mean.

    13. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by taustin · · Score: 1

      And most states have an assigned risk program. That's where the state says "If you want to sell insurance in this state, you will accept high risk drivers that we assign to you."

      Nothing illegal about that, either.

      (The prices are controlled, generally, too, by the state, but are much higher than most people pay.)

    14. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will never buy a car that serves me ads.

      Oh, fine. I won't either.

      You know what? There are dozens of us!

      But we don't matter, because there are billions who will buy them. Just look at what happened with computing. And phones.

      People will buy any level of spyware you want. They simply don't care.

    15. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by sinij · · Score: 1

      My premiums went up by 25%, so I switched insurance companies.

      This is working as intended. Insurance companies are not there to cover you, but to use any pretext to increase premiums and deny coverage. Giving them any data is against your self-interest.

    16. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by sinij · · Score: 1

      For example: You go through drive-through every morning - you must be eating breakfast while driving to work. This leads to distracted driving. Congratulations! You win 20% higher premium.

      They already do it, with the smartphone you carry with you in your car.

      If my insurance asks me to install a tracking app, I will dust off my old Palm Pilot and ask for Palm OS app.

    17. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by sinij · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! You win 20% higher premium.

      This is a small overshoot in a good trend. The higher premium may make you to skip the breakfast in paper wrapper in the drive through in the morning. Your insurance rate will go down. You'll also be healthier. Your health insurance rate will go down.

      Seriously what world do we live in where people eat in their cars.

      The kid of free world where people can still choose to abuse their bodies and make all kinds of bad personal decisions. The authoritarian alternative may offer better nutrition but is much worse for your mental health. Especially if you are not the 100% conforming type of person.

    18. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      10 years from now, you won't own your car. It'll be self-driving and on lease from the company -- basically, same policy as Adobe Illustrator today. You stop paying, you stop having a car show up for you. You won't have car insurance, just a permanent car service payment... one for each member of the family capable of requesting a car, probably starting at age 5 so the kid can go across town to grandparents. Child locks ensure the car doors don't open until grandparent checks in on the other end.

    19. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make a coffee and my own breakfast sandwich for the commute. fuck you.

    20. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      By all means fuck up your body any way you like. But seriously man, eat for the love of food, don't eat shit to get fat.

    21. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you referring to SR22 insurance like DUI people have to get? No fucking way! That shit is like 2500$ every six months. The state can fuck itself.

    22. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by plopez · · Score: 1

      So if tracking is on, you are measured as low risk. If it is off you are high risk and have to pay more. Easy peasy!

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    23. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be eating breakfast while driving

      False assumption. Could be buying food to eat at work, could be buying a drink, could be flirting with the staff, could get lost on the way to work every day and pull in for directions, could be a Russian spy attending a dead-drop to exchange messages with the FBI.

      Luckily insurance companies have intelligent people working for them and wont be that bloody silly. To go with your assumption, I mean.

      True assumption, actually, and it's far worse than you know. They combine this data with information on g-forces and steering-wheel position, concluding that inexplicably, cars tend to have greater issues with lane-position control for about 10 minutes after going through the drive-through. They know you're eating, dude. Other indicators could easily be gleaned when combined with other cars' info. For example; when you are stopped near a red light, once the light turns green let's say you have a .7 second average delay before your foot starts to let up pressure on the brake pedal. HOWEVER, when you're within 6 miles, say, of the place where you went through the drive-through, that increases to an average of 1.8 seconds. Hmmm... could it be because you're stuffing your face? What about the fact that though you tend to be distracted by your meal, you also increase following distance, (again, becomes obvious when they have data from other vehicles to correlate with data from yours,) and you also tend to drive 3-5 mph slower? Maybe more? All the fiddly little changes in how you drive form a pattern that is a GIANT goddamned give-away regarding what you're doing, and if you think you don't drive any differently when you're eating while driving, you probably shouldn't be allowed to drive. Everything has at least a tiny effect, and when you total up all those tiny effects, you'll find a REALLY clear, stark and easily-picked-up on pattern emerges.

    24. Re: Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not. If your car insurance company says you have to have tracking turned on or they will not take your business. There is nothing illegal about that.

      Car insurance companies that do that will rapidly find they don't have any customers. Your insurance company doesn't actually want to know that damned badly what you're doing, unless every other company does it. As soon as ONE doesn't, they get all the business of people like us who DON'T want to be spied upon by the insurance company. If ALL started requiring it, if for example the government mandated it, I think you'd find revolts in the streets, lawsuits by the thousands against jack-booted government thugs effectively watching every single thing we do, (VIA the info collected by insurance companies which would amount to just having video cameras everywhere,) etc., and quite possibly a lot of people starting to form the car-insurance equivalent of credit unions... come to think of it, why the hell aren't there any of those? Or are there? Need to check, because I'm pretty tired of making other people rich at my own expense.

    25. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In the US, the car is sometimes the only private place someone has. Others won't trust a clean car to arrive in time. There will be a demand for buying cars for a long time to come. The only way to prevent that would be to pass a law against it. You thought people with guns fought hard against gun law changes? There's lots more car owners than gun owners.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      My wager is that there just won't be cars available for private sale. Long-term lease, probably, but it still won't be *your* car, merely the one that you use.

    27. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That can't be enforced without a law. There are lots of car manufacturers. If most of them don't sell cars for private use, the ones who do will get a lot of business.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    28. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      I think the law will come indirectly by the safety backdoor. Auto-drive cars become more prevalent, rates rise for non-self-driving cars, pushing those to be niche market. Then comes the liability of maintaining a self-driving car, and a law saying that all the self-driving cars on the road use the same standards for navigation rules, and a manufacturer needing to make sure that a patch is applied in a timely manner to avoid lawsuits. Quickly, someone in a meeting will point out how much more reliable they can make their cars -- and how much more money they can make from a permanent income stream -- and they'll move to a leasing model where they retain ownership. They'll price the specialty manufacturers out of the mass market.

      I suppose I should rephrase -- my bet is that normal people won't own cars. The 1% probably still will. I'm not saying this is the future I want... it's the future I'm betting will occur given the trends I've seen in my life in other domains.

    29. Re:Telenav is betting you won't mind much by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Insurance rates will not go up all that much for human-driven cars. They're at the point, right now, where the premiums cover the costs. The only way they'd go up is if human-driven cars started causing more damage. Rates for self-driving cars are likely to go down. Auto insurance is a competitive market. If one insurance company offers reasonable premiums, and another offers higher rates, drivers will flock to the one with reasonable premiums.

      It may become a lot cheaper not to own a car, which would mean lots of people wouldn't spend the money, but I'm predicting it will still be affordable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. Ad blocker for the car? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    So now ad blockers and no script will be needed for a new car?
    The more a car networks and spies on its users, the more car privacy tools will be needed.
    Recall unsafe at any speed?
    The car brand will be unsafe on any network. The Designed-In Data Trade of the Networked American Automobile

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Ad blocker for the car? by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      And if the car detects an ad blocker, will it shut the car off? Will the ignition system be using a script that you have to have enabled?

    2. Re:Ad blocker for the car? by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
      Ad blocker? Why not just a sheet of black card over the screen and the volume turned off?

      Or even easier: ignore it. People are exposed to so many advertisements now (like we are exposed to germs) that I would expect most of us are simply immune to them.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    3. Re:Ad blocker for the car? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I prefer wire cutters myself....

  4. This feature will be a non-starter for me by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This in car advertising feature will be non-starer for me. I will avoid buying cars equipped with one, if all cars go this way I will pull the fuse on infotaiment system.

    One aspect people fail to consider is that if your car reports your location to advertisers, it also can be compelled to report your location to law enforcement, creditors, lawyers.

    1. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by The123king · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good luck, the infotainment system will most likely be tied into the EMC

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    2. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will put the infotainment inline with fuel control or the computer will refuse to start the engine if you tamper with it.

    3. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by sinij · · Score: 2

      Remove GPS antenna and cell modem SIM card. Yes, these would require some disassembly, but there will be step-by-step Youtube video how to do it in 2 weeks after it comes out.

    4. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Goglu · · Score: 1

      ... insurers?

    5. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Warranty void. Insurance likewise.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by sinij · · Score: 2

      In US Magnuson-Moss would limit warranty-voiding to modified features.

    7. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, they won't.

      OFC this is a feature that is being considered by General Motors ... the textbook example of design-by-committe that pumps out product after product that feels like the coach section of a budget airline -- a product that is utterly tone deaf to the wants and needs of consumers time after time again. How many times now have they gone bankrupt or nearly gone bankrupt in the last 30 years?

      Toyota, Honda, FHI and all the other asian manufacturers will quickly dismiss this feature as just more gee-whiz bullcrap that people think they want, but really don't. But of course GM executives have had their heads up their asses since the eighties so all shit smells sweet to them. They lose the forest for the trees on every new car they design and miss the mark by more miles than the crappy powertrain of their cars can get them to. "What do you mean people want cars that aren't gonna utterly fail in every conceivable way possible by 80,000 miles? All of our focus group committees are all saying that people want digital coupons to come in through the radio!"

    8. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doesn't that law allow warranty to be voided if the user does not carry out reasonable maintenance? Such as having the SIM in place so the firmware can be updated and data on wear & tear can be sent to the dealer for preventive maintenance?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

      I have a feeling it would be more like reducing the horsepower of the vehicle, or forcing a delay at startup until someone watches and interacts with "x" number of ads.

    10. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That would get them sued in a hurry. After all, how do you tell the difference between "someone tampered with it" and "it broke". And an engine that refuses to start because of a non-functioning infotainment system, yeah, that won't end well for them. Remember, fixing it for free isn't good enough, they'd also have to cover for the cost of a rental as well as any time you lost while making arrangements getting it fixed and getting alternative transport.

    11. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      This in car advertising feature will be non-starer for me. I will avoid buying cars equipped with one, if all cars go this way I will pull the fuse on infotaiment system. One aspect people fail to consider is that if your car reports your location to advertisers, it also can be compelled to report your location to law enforcement, creditors, lawyers.

      I'm sure you could probably pay a several thousand dollar premium for the "add free" model. Really, it's most likely that this kind of thing would, at least initially, be used on lower end cars to subsidize the price. Higher end cars like Tesla, BMW, Mercedes, etc won't install this as it would tarnish their brand image. But looking for a cheap little 4 cylinder commuter car? Be ready for ads.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    12. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of all the vehicles, I can see GM being the first with ads popping up, perhaps demanding 30 seconds of interacting with one before the vehicle starts up, or being able to adjust controls on the infotainment system. Honda tends to be conservative in design, and I wouldn't expect them to give a middle finger to customers like this. Other Japanese makers, similar.

      Now, the European car makes are different. I can see VW doing this in a heartbeat. BMW? Probably, except the ads will be high-zoot.

      The only automaker I truly wonder about would be Ford. Will they stay sane and not pull that crap, or try throwing ads, and get smacked around by the GDPR? Ford owns the fleet market in the US, and that crap wouldn't be tolerated (the van fleets would switch to Mercedes Sprinters post-haste). I really don't know what Ford would do in trying to screw people.

    13. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Implying that data needing to be sent for preventative maintenance is "reasonable".

      It's not. This won't make it through the courts, even in the USA or the UK.

    14. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by taustin · · Score: 1

      The more automated cars get, the more insane it is to not keep the firmware up to date with security patches. Especially now that even base model cars are starting to get self driving features (my cheap-ass Toyota has lane departure warnings - with steering correction - and radar controlled cruise control).

      And insurance companies can most certainly charge you more of you don't have a system that monitors your driving. They're been offering discounts on that for years now. The only questions is how much more.

    15. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use a graphite pencil to connect the traces for the GPS antenna on the circuit board. Erase when getting service.

    16. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could also use a micro-GPS spoofer with a range measured in inches. Just locate it near your car's GPS antenna and spoof away. They'll wonder how I drive from continent to continent in minutes every day. Better to pollute their data with garbage than to block it.

    17. Re:This feature will be a non-starter for me by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There are very occasional circumstances when it's a really really good idea to start up the car and get away fast. The first time something bad happens when the driver has to sit through the mandatory ads, there will be not only a lawsuit, but a hue and cry. If car companies try doing this, it will be illegal very soon.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Bad example by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    THe time for the pizza coupon is 15-20 minutes out from the pizza shop so you can order on your cell/smart phone and then pick it up rather than pulling over, ordering, and then sitting and waiting for the pizza.

    Altho personally I find all this advertising abhorrent and am sick to death of constanly being advertised to. I tend to take the more annoying ads as as example of who NOT to do business with.

    1. Re:Bad example by taustin · · Score: 1

      I tend to take the more annoying ads as as example of who NOT to do business with.

      I keep a list.

    2. Re:Bad example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like most people, you underestimate the power of advertising.

      Everybody says ads turn them off. But countless targeted experiments and billions of dollars a year in spending say, they're wrong. What makes you think you're different from the other 80% of the population who also say they don't buy stuff that's advertised?

    3. Re:Bad example by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Studies bought and paid for by the very advertising companies that sell advertising...
      next

  6. Everything by campuscodi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Everything in the future will sell your data. All companies are already looking at user data as cash cows. Chuck in a few lines in the ToS and you're good to go selling customers' data.

    1. Re:Everything by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Everything will have an ad blocker, a no script to port your data. Users will code in a few lines and the big brands get nothing.
      The users then remember the brands who tried to track and push ads onto them.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, thats why the iPhone has been logging your GPS locations, and why Android is probably not far behind. Korea, with floor mounted TV's spewing ads in bus and train - is the world leader, so far.

      The problem is I am not in the car much, but my mobile phone is with me always - and could direct me to a store is a shopping Mall - if they had brains.

      So car makers are at a 10:1 disadvantage, before one considers, fuel, traffic and parking, or being late already. So far, every single push add I see - is not about rock bottom lowest price. So obviously marketeers can't sell to my cheapskate nerve.

    3. Re:Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Car of the Future Will Steal Your Data

      FTFY. It is considered selling only if the consumer willingly gives up the data. This data is obtained by coercion. So the "selling" in the headline is a huge euphemism by the big brother lobby.

    4. Re:Everything by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Soon I expect the size and cost of cellular circuits to be so small and low that even our junk mail will not only have tracking, but also have active audio recording.

      The cost of executing an instruction is exponentially going to zero.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Everything by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      That's bad enough that they're mining data off of me, but I don't want ads flashed in my face 24/7 too. That's just insult to injury. Now we won't even be able to go take a drive to get away from any of it, even in the country. Our lives will be one string of advertisements after another. Television is getting pretty close to 50/50 with program/commercials already. Magazines continue to get thinner while getting crammed with more ad pages. More billboards on the road every year. Ads now on your operating system (well, Windows 10); ads all over every webpage, spam calls on your cell phones. It's gotta stop.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  7. If my driving style is valuable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why don't I get paid for generating the data while driving around like I do?

    1. Re: If my driving style is valuable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cows donâ(TM)t get paid for the milk they produce. Want to make money? Become a farmer.

    2. Re: If my driving style is valuable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to do if you're e.g. in the EU and milk production quotas were abolished, so during recurring overproduction bouts you sell below cost. i.e. every other year you'll risk being wiped out no matter what you do, like an Uber driver earning less than the expenses.
      Ideological deregulation and "free trade" are nefarious and done against the people ; combined with surveillance capitalism, they'll leave you no choice but to be a cow.

      Perhaps both left-wing and right-wing could be against "free trade". Isn't it odd that the right would be against any kind of rules?

  8. No fucking way ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disable it, remove it, or don't expect to sell me the vehicle.

    You don't get a revenue stream from the car once you sell it to me except for the maintenance.

    I'm tired of every fucking company wanting to monetize my life. I sure as hell won't accept this in a car.

  9. Polluting the Mental Landcape has Consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will the statisticians explain away the sudden increase in vehicular homicides and road rage incidents?

  10. Oh, hell no! by cvdwl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we please just keep making cars that have NO built-in screens? If and when I need a navigator, I'll mount my phone, but I generally don't need a bright glowing rectangle blowing out my night vision.

    --
    ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
    1. Re:Oh, hell no! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Can we please just keep making cars that have NO built-in screens? If and when I need a navigator, I'll mount my phone, but I generally don't need a bright glowing rectangle blowing out my night vision.

      Just got a new one last year ... no screen.

      If there's a market, they should stay available. Keep buying them that way. Keep telling the dealers and anyone who will listen why you have that preference.

    2. Re:Oh, hell no! by enjar · · Score: 1

      My current car's instrument panel and infotainment are both screens and have the same ability to be dimmed/brightened in the same manner as the instrument panels of previous vehicles. Just as the mechanical speedo/tach/oil pressure/coolant temp/volts/boost gauges were replaced by a wire and got much better (no more lubing up the cable to keep the speedo needle from jumping around), I can't imagine auto manufacturers are going to go back from using screens (touch or not). You can do a lot more with a screen than you can with a dedicated instrument. You can display climate controls, audio controls, vehicle configuration menus, diagnostics, let the end user pick what they want to display, and so on, and it requires zero moving parts, just a data and power connection.

    3. Re:Oh, hell no! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      just keep making cars that have NO built-in screens

      Keep making cars? I don't think you know what that phrase means. It typically implies that we are currently making cars without built in screens.

    4. Re:Oh, hell no! by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Acuras since 2014 have a separate dimming setting for the screen than the rest of the console. This lets me make it significantly dimmer than the rest of the console.

      Though, I miss the color change of my RSX. In the day it light up white to be seen, at night it lit up red so it doesn't fuck up night vision. Newer ones do the same color but dim, and it isn't as pleasant.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    5. Re:Oh, hell no! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      just keep making cars that have NO built-in screens

      Keep making cars? I don't think you know what that phrase means. It typically implies that we are currently making cars without built in screens.

      We are; I bought one new last year without a screen.

    6. Re:Oh, hell no! by kevmeister · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but the requirement for back-up cameras that goes into effect next year will also mean that all cars will have a screen. All cars, light trucks, SUVs, etc built after May 1 of this year must have them.

      --
      Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
    7. Re:Oh, hell no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, just because you can't see that you're being tracked, it does not mean you are not being tracked. The screen has nothing to do with commoditizing you.

    8. Re:Oh, hell no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't buy one this year, 2018 was the model year that backup cameras became a legal requirement.

    9. Re:Oh, hell no! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      We are; I bought one new last year without a screen.

      Wow, you must have been really scraping the bottom of the barrel. My 5 year old bottom of the line compact hatch has a touchscreen control.

    10. Re:Oh, hell no! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've seen some vehicles that hide the backup camera screen in the (partially silvered) rearview mirror. Seems like a good solution - you can't see the screen when its not on, and when it is on it's actually located in a decent spot - as opposed to the middle of the dashboard which is stupid.

      With that said, I'm guessing almost everyone is going to have bright glowing rectangle in the center of car now.

  11. you wont have a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll put those things in the car without you knowing about it and if you find out, it'll be tough shit.

    And they'll probably make it so that if you disable the crap, the car won't work and violate the warranty.

    And they'll charge us for the privilege for being tracked. They're not going to put all that shit in the car at their cost.

    It's like all that worthless dashboard electronics that's in every car these days. It's expensive, flaky and you have no choice whether you want it.

  12. AI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it has any form of intelligence, it'll know my wife will have dinner on the table for me arriving home. Fortunately for her, she managed to suck off her personal trainer a bit longer due to knowing I'm stuck in traffic as this Internet of Car shit tells her my every move.

  13. I don't want to live in the future any more by enjar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was a kid it seemed like it had so much promise. Nowadays it's just pretty much advertising.

    1. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid it seemed like it had so much promise. Nowadays it's just pretty much advertising.

      The Unabomber was right on that one

    2. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you know why children under 18 should not vote.

    3. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid it seemed like it had so much promise. Nowadays it's just pretty much advertising.

      One the bright side, it seems like we are one step closer to Futurama. If we get spaceships and robots and an amusement park on the Moon, it might be worth putting up with the ads in your dreams or the suicide booths.

      And don't forget hypnotoad! All glory to the hypnotoad!

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Now you know why children under 18 should not vote.

      Maybe we need to raise the voting age back up to 21, eh?

      We compelled states to raise the drinking age up to 21, why not rescind the voting age change not that long back and make it 21 again too?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All these home assistants would be cool to play with if they weren't owned and operated by scummy companies that want to mine the data I create. I know I'm boring, but that's not the point. Who I am is nobody's business. If you don't understand this, please kindly fuck off.

    6. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      I always imagined in the future, we'd have sweet mechs. We've gone down the dark path of automated robots that will follow us with ads.

    7. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by enjar · · Score: 1

      The Zentradi will be repelled by Lockeed-Martin Gundams powered by Monster Energy Drink, live streaming will be powered by GoPro and YouTube, and the pilots will be fueled by RedBull. Protoculture will be refined by ExxonMobil developed in partnership GMO Flower of Life modified and patented by Monsanto. Minmei will have a special presentation exclusively on Apple Music, and all hair gel and color is provided by the Revlon, the official grooming partner of the United Earth Forces.

    8. Re:I don't want to live in the future any more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I always liked my futures utopian, so this distopia really stings!

  14. Tesla already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They log your locations, acceleration/deceleration data. Every time you bring your vehicle for routine maintenance, some of that data gets copied during service.

  15. Spoofing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll spoof the data.

    Expect my Cars GPS to show me driving on the Nascar track, 24x7.

    Higher insurance rates?

    Prove that's *MY* car going 200km/hr+ on the track. I've got video showing it's NOT me.

    1. Re:Spoofing by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Just include the GPS track from the occasional crash.

      "You're telling me the GPS shows my car and I both scattered across Talledega, yet I haven't made a claim, you think the car is still insurable and you think I'm alive to pay the premium. You clearly don't believe that GPS track yourself!"

  16. Good luck by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I will avoid buying cars equipped with one, if all cars go this way I will pull the fuse on infotaiment system.

    Which in all likelihood will result in a car that does not start. I work with these sorts of system in my day job because my company provides wiring for them. These are (generally speaking) not well designed modular systems that can be easily disabled piecemeal. Car companies have virtually zero concept of modularity or security and all the systems tend to be tied into all the others WAY too closely. CAN bus is a hot mess. The way wiring is done in most vehicles would make the head of most slashdot readers explode with rage. It's the most scatterbrained ad-hoc thing you can imagine.

    We just did a set of harnesses for a vehicle being prototyped right now and the notion that you could disable the infotainment system on that vehicle with no further problems is laughable. You'd basically have to reprogram the whole thing and possibly replace a lot of the ECUs which for all practical purposes would be nigh impossible.

    One aspect people fail to consider is that if your car reports your location to advertisers, it also can be compelled to report your location to law enforcement, creditors, lawyers.

    Yep. Scary ain't it?

    1. Re:Good luck by Miser · · Score: 2

      Two words: chip tuners

      If there's anything on my car(s) I don't want, my guess is my local to me chip tuner will have a way around it.

      I usually drive my cars till the wheels fall off anyway, so that removes the "what if you sell it" argument.

    2. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We just did a set of harnesses for a vehicle being prototyped right now and the notion that you could disable the infotainment system on that vehicle with no further problems is laughable. You'd basically have to reprogram the whole thing and possibly replace a lot of the ECUs which for all practical purposes would be nigh impossible."

      you provide wiring, you do not actually see the work being done witin the modules. So your opinions on the wiring hold weight but I can tell that you have no idea how the modules actually send packets and interact on the network. I am already replacing certain modules in high end cars and replacing them with small SOC's that talk on the canbus, it is not impossible it just takes time and effort. Thankfully manufacturers are not that good at security so once you figure out how one manufacturer does things then typically all the models from them become game. Also just like reprogramming the fuel and spark maps that most cars are able to do from the OBD2 port, there are other modules that can be reprogrammed to work with out the others. I mean its a thing right now to flash your ecu over OBD2 for extra power and functionality, which happens over CANbus. Anyways, your defeatist attitude is mostlikely because you do not understand how canbus actually works on the protocol layer as yopu are only exposed to the physical wiring layer. I can tell you that removing and/or reprogramming modules from a car is not impossible and is already done. All it is is a cat and mouse game that the automotive manufacturers could only win if they cripple their cars at the smallest component failure and none of them will do that because their ratings and sales would drop like a stone. Plus they will all have to have a failure mode where the car will still have to work even if no communications network exists, otherwise people out in the country are going to be pissed due to their spotty reception, not to mention that all tunnels would become pretty much useless to any automotive traffic, or the mass anger that would happen if there was ever a technical problem that took down the communications network.

      You may work for an automotive supplier, but that doesn't mean that you understand automotive engineering.

    3. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the notion that you could disable the infotainment system on that vehicle with no further problems is laughable. You'd basically have to reprogram the whole thing and possibly replace a lot of the ECUs which for all practical purposes would be nigh impossible.

      Or just clip the power cable to the LCD

    4. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why I bought the only brand new car being advertised as having a shitty 90s stereo, shitty 90s manual HVAC controls, and shitty manual seats.

      Guess what? I ripped the stereo out without even thinking about if it would affect any other functions. It didn't. I had a look at the HVAC controls. At least they're no longer vacuum actuated, but rather, cable actuated. No brains at all in there. Did I mention the only items in the radio harness were a resistance sense to the wheel controls, direct to speaker wiring, 12v battery, 12v accessory (from the key... that actually turns to start), and ground. And, apparently a speed sense wire. That's it. No CANbus bullshit. CANbus is for the cluster. Not the transmission, it's manual, cluster has a spot to show the gear but that doesn't light up for the manual as there's not even a sensor in it to figure that out.

      And since the wiring harnesses are standardized so that there's connectors for all the features of the top model tucked up in the dash, I just had to plug in the appropriate missing pieces to enable cruise control (clutch switch, brake switch with backup cruise switch, and the cruise control pad for the wheel). Tell the car that it had cruise and boom, done.

      Opened up the doors to put in new speakers and was pleasantly surprised that there's NO WIRES in the rear doors except for the pair for the speaker. Why? Manual windows and manual locks.

      They still make cars that aren't all sorts of fucked up for wiring, just most consumers laugh at people like me for buying a base model Mitsubishi Mirage. I'm laughing all the way to the bank since there's basically nothing to break.

    5. Re:Good luck by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      One aspect people fail to consider is that if your car reports your location to advertisers, it also can be compelled to report your location to law enforcement, creditors, lawyers.

      Yep. Scary ain't it?

      Not really. I'm far more scared of my data being reported to advertisers (people trying to manipulate me) and their associated big data tracking than creditors (I pay my bills, and don't really mind skiptracers finding deadbeats), law enforcement (I have no illusions about avoiding a manhunt) or lawyers (because this sounds like general lawyerbashing so I'm ignoring it). In other words, from that list only advertisers fall into the union of: "These assholes tracking you is unreasonable" and "These assholes tracking you can be stopped by reasonable measures"

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re: Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of curiosity, whatâ(TM)s the make and model?

    7. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, car wiring is bad and getting worse. Older models were pretty modular. Now? Had the pleasure of talking to my father on law who was trying to replace the radio in his jag (yeah I know: balding old geezers and their penis mobiles, but not the point). The effort required now is 100x bigger than back in the 90s when I did a brief stint for a place that installed zillion watt, cd stacker on the boot, woofer bigger than a dinner plate type systems. Back then: rip out the old one, shoehorn in the new one, bit of creative metalwork, done. Now? Don't ask...

    8. Re: Good luck by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It would have to be something that's basically unchanged since the 90's and comes in a very low spec.

      My guess is a Chevy Express cargo van.

  17. I will never buy from a forced advert. Simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's start that backlash now. Call your rep. We need consumer protection / Privacy laws pretty quick. I'm tired of being data-raped by data-pervs. User-hostile companies need to think about customer-data-rape. Windows 10, Roomba, shit even the samsung TV has a terrifying privacy policy. Your phone? haha.

    Let's start this now.

  18. If you use Google or Apple or Facebook... by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're using a Google or an Apple product, you are already giving away all of your data anyway. Gmail users give it away to save $2/month on real email. Apple users give it away for shiny shiny marketing. Facebook users give it away for god knows what. 99.99% of all people, at least in the US, have already voluntarily given one of these three big companies all of their information, anyway. It's all over. People are too fucking stupid and/or lazy.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:If you use Google or Apple or Facebook... by Kurrelgyre · · Score: 1

      One of Apple's selling points is the privacy of its customers' data. Do you know something to the contrary?

    2. Re:If you use Google or Apple or Facebook... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Apple never fought against a National Security Letter, yet has admitted to receiving them, ergo they complied.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:If you use Google or Apple or Facebook... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      My guess is even if you pay the Google privacy ransom, they will sell your info anyhow since they can claim they collected it through non-gmail means.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:If you use Google or Apple or Facebook... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Or answered with "we are technically unable to do this". Apple's whole thing is "we won't keep data on you to turn over.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:If you use Google or Apple or Facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, you would leave out Microsoft and Amazon.

  19. Screens are invevitable by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Can we please just keep making cars that have NO built-in screens?

    Short answer? Probably not. Not in the long run anyway. The cost savings from doing as much as possible with a touch screen are probably going to overwhelm any other options not required by law. This despite the fact that touch screens are a terrible interface for many things.

    If and when I need a navigator, I'll mount my phone, but I generally don't need a bright glowing rectangle blowing out my night vision.

    Since that doesn't really happen I'm not sure what your complaint there is. I can turn the screen off in my truck if I want to but even when it is on it isn't all that bright unless I want it to be.

    1. Re:Screens are invevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the sun is blinding the screen? I'm sure they thought of that, but I wonder how well it works.

  20. I don't care by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The car of the future will drive by itself while I'll have my AR-Goggles and my headphones on, so they can show whatever the fuck they want.

  21. Demoed at Salesforce in 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Salesforce demoed this exact thing and how it was already functional in Vehicles at the Chicago World Tour in 2016.

  22. This car of the future... by hazardPPP · · Score: 2

    ...I will not drive. Or at least not own. I'll take public transit, a taxi or some "ride-sharing" (stupid name) service, walk, or cycle. In cases that I really need to drive, I'll rent or use a car-sharing service, which will rather limit the amount of data that can be collected from me in that context.

    Note to car manufacturers: sell me a car that drives from point A to point B efficiently. Make a profit doing that. If you can't, then gtfo.

  23. It's become more dystopian than the dystopian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fiction.

    Seriously, the closest I can come is Paranoia, if you added on multi-level marketing schemes and hourly credit checks that could result in the sale of your clones, ala Altered Carbon.

    We've truly reach a nightmarish pseudo-capitalist authoritarian future where people have returned to being the product. Just because they no longer have physical chains binding you to keep you from running away doesn't mean the intellectual, social, and emotional chains haven't become that much more oppressive.

  24. no one is really suprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But as a car guy and an electronics nerd then i cant wait for my new business to flourish! I will be offering my services to remove all connectivity from these cars of the future. And before anyone says that i wont be able to do it, I use the argument that there are roads that go many places where there isn't connectivity. Therefor the lack of connectivity must be a failure mode that manufacturers must build into their systems, no one wants a car that stops working when the communication system doesn't exist or fails completely. It might be as simple as disconnecting an antenna or pulling an entire module and replacing it with a CAN bus spoofer (which is really just a raspberry pi or arduino and some R&D). the can bus protocol is not that hard to decode in cars and realistically automotive manufacturers suck at security so as long as i have access to the hardware it shouldn't be too hard and will be worth the cost to the right people.

    I get the feeling that most of my customers will be of the unsavory types who do nefarious things, but that doesn't bother me as they are no less of a person than the people who are trying to collect all of that data and use it to control the masses. The cat and mouse game will continue until the cat(corporation) gives up or all of the mice(those of us who value our privacy) are dead.

  25. Waze by Big+Nemo+'60 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Waze has been doing this for some time, but only when I stop at red lights. As soon as I move the ad goes away.

    I guess automakers would like a slice of the pie. I only wish they would be as self-constrained...

    --
    In the long run we are all dead. - John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)
    1. Re:Waze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Waze offers you something in return, that is useful. That is up to date traffic information. You also have the option of simply not starting up Waze. If its built into the car itself, doesn't sound like you have an opt-out.

    2. Re:Waze by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Really? The one time it's safe for you to look at the map, get an idea of the road and any turnings ahead, so that you can focus on actually driving when moving, and they obscure it with a fucking ad?

      This doesn't entice me to try it out.

    3. Re:Waze by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Waze is basically designed to facilitate distracted driving. by encouraging people to click on shit while driving. Showing ads is just an extension of this purpose.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Waze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found the ads to be quite unobtrusive, they're in the top 20% of the screen. If you go and do anything else on the screen it clears the ad. Also it doesn't take away the map view while showing the ad and it clears automatically as well when you start driving again. They don't always show up when you're stopped either, seems to be an occasional thing.

  26. Question - who owns the car? by ripvlan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see more and more of this coming up in the industry and it opens a question for me - who owns the car?

    It may make a difference if the car is leased. But thinking about how Tesla batteries software limited capacity/range - if I buy the car with a giant battery in it cannot I not defeat that?

    Or is it like Sat radio - where I have to have a subscription to continue using it? Is the "fuel" in my car available only through subscription? What prevents me from strapping a bigger battery to my roof and plugging it in through the charge-port (ala battery packs for cell phones).

    So the car manufacture is going to install advertising software in my car? And may I defeat it or otherwise alter the vehicle as I see fit. And perform repairs on it too!!!

    1. Re:Question - who owns the car? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      I see more and more of this coming up in the industry and it opens a question for me - who owns the car?

      It may make a difference if the car is leased. But thinking about how Tesla batteries software limited capacity/range - if I buy the car with a giant battery in it cannot I not defeat that?

      Or is it like Sat radio - where I have to have a subscription to continue using it? Is the "fuel" in my car available only through subscription? What prevents me from strapping a bigger battery to my roof and plugging it in through the charge-port (ala battery packs for cell phones).

      So the car manufacture is going to install advertising software in my car? And may I defeat it or otherwise alter the vehicle as I see fit. And perform repairs on it too!!!

      Leases/rentals are probably different as you say. I think there's plenty of case law on the books saying you can do whatever the heck you want with your own car. I don't see the difference in adding an engine modification to a gas car or adding the battery pack you talk about. In the case of the artificial battery limiter I would liken it to the existing performance limiters built into gas cars today. They exist in the electronic control unit computer and are easy to change with some plug-in parts from amazon on most cars. Just as modifying the settings on a gas car might damage the car, so might changing the battery usage stuff on the electric. If you own it, you can try it. I would not hesitate if I had one and was interested. Outside the USA, probably different.

    2. Re:Question - who owns the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read your purchase agreement? You don't own the software that your car runs on, nor do you have the right to reverse engineer it.

    3. Re:Question - who owns the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What prevents me from strapping a bigger battery to my roof and plugging it in through the charge-port (ala battery packs for cell phones).

      Common sense, hopefully.

    4. Re:Question - who owns the car? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      cannot I not defeat that?

      I am honestly not sure.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  27. The future was always about advertising by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what did you think were all those coloured lights in Blade Runner?

  28. If I ever buy this car by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    If I ever buy this car I will have to kick my own ass. It's the right thing to do.

    1. Re:If I ever buy this car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true, so true

  29. Dear marketing cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This goes to you sales people, you idiots at the mall, and people who put litter through my mailbox.

    I approach YOU, not the other way around. YOU sit in your shitty rented office, and YOU wait for ME. If YOU approach ME, then YOU will get mouthfuls of abuse, complaints to authorities, and I will NEVER do business with you, and neither will anyone who believes the slander I slap your shitty company with.

    Learn your goddamn place.

  30. Here Comes Idiocracy by zifn4b · · Score: 1
    --
    We'll make great pets
  31. I will just keep driving my 20 year old car by magzteel · · Score: 2

    284,000 miles and still going strong.

    It will not be possible to just disable the display. Cars already come with a single display that integrates many functions like GPS, climate control, entertainment, maintenance. No way to just shut it off.

    1. Re:I will just keep driving my 20 year old car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or one can just tape something over the display - that should "disable" it.

  32. I knew there was a bright side by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    to 40 years of declining wages. My 1994 Accord is completely untraceable. Even if you bolt something onto it the constant vibrations from the knocking engine and iffy transmission are just going to make it fall off.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I knew there was a bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say it, but they might install plate-reading cameras everywhere. Some cheap and tiny 1 watt CPU will do (inference accelerators already exist in cell phones)

  33. Malware on Wheels by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Given sticker price of vehicles I can't imagine it taking all that much more than a few people walking off the lot in disgust before dealers demanded change.

  34. I wonder if we'll get rated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ultimately advertising has to drive sales. If I'm one of those people who never respond to ads, will advertisers demands that whoever they are paying to do the advertising stop showing them to my unresponsive eyeballs? Somewhere in the advertising matrix will I be given an advertising favorability rating that will drive advertising away from me? My lifetime goal of becoming the perfect curmudgeon may pay off yet!

  35. What are you providing for my eyeballs? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Seems people are a lot more tolerant of advertising, if they get something from it. You can advertise on TV or in magazines with only minor complaints, because you're helping fund the medium. Even then, people are cutting the cord because they prefer streaming services that don't.

    Telenav suggests $30 annually per vehicle. Personally, even if all that goes into driver perks, I don't think an effective $300 reduction over a 10 year car lifetime is going to persuade many people to accept this feature.

  36. No thanks by Xarius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sort of crap is exactly why 1. I'm really glad that legislation like the GDPR in the EU is coming along to begin to allow us to take control of our data. Might not be perfect but a good start. As I read it, this wouldn't be allowed without explicit consent between the owner of the car and whatever advertising company ran this (burying it in an EULA doesn't count)

    but simultaneously I'm 2. really annoyed that my dipshit government and uninformed co-citizens voted to take my country out of the EU :-( at least we'll get a few years of the GDPR to see how that works out.

    --
    C17H21NO4
    1. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like us asshats here in America, you did not get the leader you needed, you got the leader you deserved. #FuckTrump #FuckMay

  37. They Do Already by Luthair · · Score: 3, Informative

    And we discussed it a month ago. Onstar in fact has been doing this for a decade even if you aren't a subscriber.

  38. Reality by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you provide wiring, you do not actually see the work being done witin the modules.

    Sigh.... Actually I do see quite a lot of it because we don't just do the wiring but thank's for the insult. We also do a lot of engineering for the ECUs and for several of our customers we provide program management for the entire electrical system of a vehicle. But you go ahead with being condescending to someone you know nothing about.

    So your opinions on the wiring hold weight but I can tell that you have no idea how the modules actually send packets and interact on the network

    Since I've told you virtually nothing beyond the fact that my company makes wiring products that's quite a leap you made there. Maybe you should find out what I actually do before telling me what I know?

    Anyways, your defeatist attitude is mostlikely because you do not understand how canbus actually works on the protocol layer as yopu are only exposed to the physical wiring layer. I can tell you that removing and/or reprogramming modules from a car is not impossible and is already done.

    Defeatist? Not at all. Just realist. I know exactly what is involved, how hard it is, and how expensive because I'd done it. If you think it is trivial you either lack perspective or you are utterly clueless because you've never really done it. I also know how ad hoc much of the programming that goes into a lot of it is because I work directly with the engineers doing it.

    I am already replacing certain modules in high end cars and replacing them with small SOC's that talk on the canbus, it is not impossible it just takes time and effort.

    It is impossible for most people. Yes you can reprogram all this stuff. Doing so is expensive, time consuming and requires specific technical expertise. You aren't going to get a CANbus for Dummies book from Amazon and start reprogramming ECUs over a weekend. You can hire people to do it for you but they don't come cheap.

    You may work for an automotive supplier, but that doesn't mean that you understand automotive engineering.

    Really? Glad you set me straight. I thought the fact that I AM automotive engineer with over 20 years in the industry might have given me some insight but clearly an AC on slashdot knows all.

    1. Re:Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is slashdot, the AC always knows all and is always condescending, you must be new here.

      Most defeatists claim them selves realists because they have just accepted that they are part of the problem and not the solution.

      It is only impossible for most people at the moment because the tools have yet to be created to help make it easier for laymen. But that does not mean that they will not be available or the process will not become easier, simple economics pretty much determines that. The demand will bring upon the supply because while yes CAN-bus is not easy for most people to understand, it is easy for most people who have a working knowledge of electronics, and hardware design (you know, like quite a few readers of this site).

      like other posters have said on this article, what we have is a cat and mouse game between the people who want to own the vehicles, by saying that the consumers should just accept that this is going to happen you are predicting a future, and where people just accept that its going to happen. sounds like a textbook defeatist to me. plus, you seem like a twat as you complain about the other AC making assumptions about you yet in one paragraph you tell them that they haven't done it and in the next reply to the statement that its already been done. lol Plus if it is impossible then why are people already hacking cars remotely to either steal them or activate subsystems that lie on CAN-bus?

  39. Fuck ads in cars by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    Fuck them fuck them and fuck them some more. That shit has no right to be there distracting and killing people. And the privacy issues are 10 times worse than browsing. Even the government might have enough sense to block this shit.

  40. Ugh by Holi · · Score: 1

    I would drive right to the dealer and return it.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  41. In my lifetrim by forkfail · · Score: 1

    I was born a free citizen.

    Then I was a consumer.

    Today, I'm a product. [1]

    [1] And somehow, a bad guy now by default of my demographics. Perhaps that makes me a better product, or, more likely, it makes other products more valuable to the "store" selling them.

    --
    Check your premises.
  42. Re:In my LIFETIME, even. Sigh. by forkfail · · Score: 1

    Fixed title.

    --
    Check your premises.
  43. Waze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Waze already does this shit.

    No I do not want to go to the goddamn donut shop, you retarded fucking robot. I just want to get home.

  44. This more than justifies my desire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to pony up and buy something from Japanese Classics

    One can obtain a Nissan Skyline in very good condition for about $15. Plenty of others to choose from as well.

  45. Adblock all the time, everywhere by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    This is the level of ethics that advertisers have. Block them all the time, everywhere. They are absolute scum.

    If a site fails to make ad revenue, it is not my problem, blame the scamming scum advertisers.

    We even helped block them in real life in my city. A new zoning regulation bans all light up LED billboards.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Adblock all the time, everywhere by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Just say NO to a data connection to your car at all.

  46. screens GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As for screens, DUCK tape. I think GPS depends on electromagnetic waves. Build a interference. In the 60's the people in the room next to me would wake up to some of the most god offal music about 1hour before I needed to. I used my radio to interfere with theirs

  47. Not worried yet... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's why I remain skeptical about conspiracies around this:

    I've been an active Facebook user since 2010. I probably post 2 or 3 times per day. Facebook knows where I live, what I like, how old I am, who my friends are, what my politics are, what TV shows and movies I like, where I've travelled, what airlines I fly... On and on.

    I don't run ad blockers.

    Nevertheless, in eight years, other than the odd T-Shirt company, Facebook has never once served up an ad for something I'm interested in. Never. Once. They have no clue. All they do is serve up ads for things I've already searched elsewhere, like Timberland shoes or random nonsense they think a 50-year-old male might be interested in.

    My Android phone knows everywhere I go. Again, nothing I'm interested in. Nothing.

    Ditto Twitter.

    I'm not going to stress about this until one day I truly have a Keanu "whoa" moment. And that hasn't happened yet...

    1. Re:Not worried yet... by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      That Keanu moment was when I got ads for products on a device that had no known linkages (wife's ipad with only her account on it) to the one I had actually had done a search from. The ability to track me for ad purposes is amazingly aggressive and persistent. I find that creepy as hell.

      How would you feel if a clerk at the local supermarket randomly walked up and addressed you by your full name and asked if they could help you find an oddly specific and correct product? I'd probably grab tin foil and run out of their scared out of my mind.

      But that is exactly the state of digital advertising, it is their stated goal to know you and serve up the exact right products at the exact right time.

    2. Re:Not worried yet... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      If you use Facebook on mobile (not the app, just the website), you will get advertisements on pretty much any product you have viewed on Amazon or done a google search for.

      Though, they must not get info on what I have purchased, because most of the ads are for things I already bought.

      No idea if it does this on a computer browser, though, for obvious reasons.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Not worried yet... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same here. The only thing I get ads for is MILF porn. And ....

      Never mind. Gotta go now.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Not worried yet... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      If you use Facebook on mobile (not the app, just the website), you will get advertisements on pretty much any product you have viewed on Amazon or done a google search for.

      Well sure.

      ...but what I'm talking about is Facebook mining the data it knows about who I am, what I like, and where I am to serve up *new* content they think I might be interested in. They fail terribly at this.

    5. Re:Not worried yet... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      After the Target teen pregnancy detection event, Target didn't stop collecting data and advertising accordingly. They obscured the "correct" advertisement in between a lot of other advertisement. It is important to lull people into a false sense of advertiser stupidity.

      Facebook have succeeded terribly at obscuring their spying on you.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  48. NO THANK YOU by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    I really despise aggressive marketing. If Telenav is betting that carowners wouldn't object, they are very very wrong. I eliminated cable TV and broadcast radio since 2000 because the advertising was getting more and more intrusive. I stopped purchasing fuel at gas stations where the screens on the pumps are blasting advertisements at loud volume. I stopped visiting websites with highly intrusive ads. The last thing I want in my car is a damn billboard on my dashboard.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  49. Plan B is a sledgehammer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plan B is a sledgehammer.

    CAPTCHA: lockouts

  50. Cut the antennas, turn it all off by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    There's no way in hell I'd tolerate any of this shit in any vehicle I owned.
    o Radio
    o Climate control
    o Maybe electric door locks and electric windows
    o Intermittent wipers
    o Cruise control
    o Preferably a light pickup truck, with a stick-shift
    That's all I need in a vehicle. It's transportation, not a lifestyle choice.
    Maybe if more people stopped thinking of it as a lifestyle choice and more like transportation, paid attention to the road and being a decent driver, we wouldn't have many of the problems we currently have -- and wouldn't need self-driving cars, either.

    1. Re:Cut the antennas, turn it all off by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      If you think intermittent wipers are some kind of government conspiracy to distract you, perhaps you should go back to your cabin and never venture out.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:Cut the antennas, turn it all off by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      There are precisely 100 words in my comment, and in that short amount of text, you managed to come away thinking I don't like intermittent windshield wipers on my vehicles? Seriously, your reading comprehension is so terrible that you got it exactly backwards? Is English not your native language or something?

    3. Re:Cut the antennas, turn it all off by DethLok · · Score: 1

      Rick, you said there was no way you'd tolerate certain stuff in a vehicle you owned - and then you supply a list of stuff.

      At first read it seems as though that's the stuff you don't want in your vehicle, but a second read indicates that the list is the stuff you DO want.

      I'd not be blaming reading comprehension, but writing ability :)

      I agree with you, I have no use for an internet connected car, or those internet speakers, a smart TV or smart device of any kind, really. Not yet, certainly, and probably not ever.

      Oh, actually I do have a use for a smartphone, with wifi, bluetooth and GPS turned off until needed. They are handy cameras and with free national calls & texts are quite convenient ways to keep in touch.

      [and now I can't mod anything on this thread, oh well]

    4. Re:Cut the antennas, turn it all off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I pay 2 euros for two hours calls and unlimited texts, and you pay $0/month for both unlimited?

  51. I turned it all off on mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I find it turned back on I will sue. Building a lawyer fund now.
    I might never buy a new car again.
    Soon I will be phone, TV and Internet free.
    Savings 240.00 a month.

    I will restore an old car.

  52. You've won a brand new car! by plopez · · Score: 1

    Free! Just sign this agreement allowing all your information to be harvested and sold.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  53. $5 Pepperoni Pie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck is that?

    I know the bit about "the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie" but who the heck says "pie" when they mean "pizza" in real life? No one I know, except maybe The Mooch. It's like some dimwit decided that "pizza" means "pie" in Italian (which it doesn't). It's like the wackos who think it's more authentic to call spaghetti sauce "gravy".

    1. Re:$5 Pepperoni Pie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a regionalism?
      I'm far more concerned by "pepperoni". It's Italian for bell pepper!, not something made of 3rd grade US meats.
      Besides, there's lack of a cut off for what's a "pizza" or not. Some stuff made in factories or at Domino's etc. somewhat look like a pizza. Some argue a pizzas come out of a wood-fired oven.

  54. They better have a big budget to pay out lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of lawyers getting rich off of this. What will they do when the inevitable accidents happen? I see a lot of "I was distracted by the in car ads" lawsuits.

  55. Uh... Yeah... by MBaldelli · · Score: 1

    ...How can you sell MY data when I haven't driven since 1993? And you kids wonder why I don't own a car.

    --
    "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
  56. AI for stomach growling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm building a system to detect stomach growing to show relevant advertising to hungry people.

  57. Sensor data by PPH · · Score: 1

    We have detected a significant spring sag on your driver's side. How about skipping that pizza and stopping by the gym?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  58. How to kill advertising. by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    This is how it's done. Nice job, Telenav. You're paving that yellow brick road to the emerald city that is the death of advertising. We'll all click our heels and be back to rural, disconnected, black-and-white Kansas in no time. People will be leaving the Internet and all sorts of media outlets after this move. We'll wake up and realize there's a world around us and then perhaps small businesses will flourish.

  59. Boot steppin on a human face, 4ever, imagine no mo by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I don't mind picking up "nearby" advertising, but don't want people knowing I, myself, am driving by.

    I don't really care, but don't want that info feeding into a government panopticon which can be used without a warrant.

    BTW, it currently is as there are companies which install cams and face and license plate readers for cities, with an agreement it all gets fed into a national database they then feed to, I wonder who...?

    And you can request live tracking from it.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  60. I dont want your connected car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have plenty of ways to connect today. I don't need my car connected. I will not buy or support any car manufacturer that attempts to or enables a 3rd party to sell me shit while I'm driving.

  61. This can only end badly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We going to have annoying ads or malware / Java mining ads. This will be prone to security flaws. Either build two embedded systems with hardern security or don't do it. Last thing we need is some malware that turns the radio all the way up . Then flashes the screen to make you black out / panic.

  62. Telenav, burn in hell by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    And take your obnoxious ad things with you.

  63. Mercedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mercedes GLC has a nav system that always shows the location of Starbucks, Dennys, and other big name brands as you are navigating. You canâ(TM)t shut that off. One of the reasons I got rid of mine.

  64. The future is now and it is horrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone that spent more of his life in the 20th century than the 21st, you can keep this century. Every wonderful thing I believed technology could be was exploited by Americans for profit. This a nasty time to be alive. No one is making anything to improve our lives. Only to make themselves rich. The human race is a flawed selfish nasty species.

  65. Your privacy exposed to your passengers as well by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    The car won't know if that person in the passenger seat is your wife, mistress, child, a co-worker or a friend and the types of ads it serves could reveal things about you as well.

  66. How's that medicine taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't feel good does it? You're usually the one being a condescending prick on here.

    I agree with the AC above. It isn't difficult at all. For those of us who race our cars, there are already complete ECU replacements that require minimal tuning and even a couple with rudimentary self tuning. I'm currently building one myself out of an Arduino. If you rip your factory radio out, there are already plug and chug CAN boxes to make the steering controls, Onstar, and whatever else function without the original unit. You claim you know what you're talking about, but you ignore modern products available. You also fail to account for the fuck you factor and you claim to be an engineer. You should know that people fuck with stuff, many times for no reason other than you said not to. When I began my drag racing hobby, we had mandatory government vehicle inspections in Japan every 2 years. These basically made you have to keep the car stock. Even painting the car a different color involved a whole mess of red tape. There was zero chance of getting a modded racer certified. You know what myself and dozens of fellow racers did? We kept the entire stock engine on the stock subframe and swapped it back in to get the JCI certification. And then 3 hours later, we'd have our 450hp turbo monster back in there just in time for the races. You can't stop us no matter what technology you try. It's the same fight as piracy, comsec, and drugs. I'll take your locked down cpu and shitcan it.

  67. Data is VERRRY Useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone wants to know when a driver has jock itch and gas.

  68. Ahhhh, NO, NO, NO and did I say NO! by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    1) In this day and age were Netflix exists and we are watching TV without commercials, Netflix has figure it out and is adding more and more TV shows, one can assume we are extremely tired of all the commercials. I have Netflix's for that very reason NO commercials. There is no-way in hell I am buying a car with commercials on a screen! I can't stand the commercials now, 80% of them are for something I don't want and 15% are for something I don't need and the leftover, well maybe. 2) I agree with the other comments isn't this a driving distraction? We have cell phone laws that prohibit looking at the screen, but now it is OK to look at my screen because it is built into the car?? 3) Does everyone remember when Samsung did this to their TVs??? It was about 4 years ago all their smart TVs started displaying text based commercials with no way to turn them off. There was such a public outrage that 3 months later there was a hidden way to turn them off if you call support. Then 6 months later there was an option to turn it off and now the options does not exist (or at least on my TVs the option is completely gone). These text commercials were extremely annoying and always popping up at the most annoying times. Worst 3 months of watching TV!

  69. who are these people? by sad_ · · Score: 1

    Do they believe what they say? This guy would like to drive a car like that himself? Really?
    And what is worse, they manage to sell this idea and it get mass adapted, because everybody thinks it is awesome?

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  70. DO. NOT. FCUKING. WANT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject line kinda says it all. I will not buy a car that has this feature; in fact, I think my next car is going to be a an old jeep, something maneuverable and fun to drive and designed to take a lot of abuse, and not one that can show me ads. I don't think I'll even have a radio in it. No little black box, no GPS, none of that snit. Funk that.

  71. Bad examples so far by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    So you've just been to the Gym. The car knows that because it took you there. So on the way home you could see an advertisement for Smoothie King, McDonalds, etc. Just imagine it - "You've worked out hard. Looks like you've been at it for an hour. Make sure you're hydrated and replenish your fluids, stop at smoothie king, just 1 mile ahead on the right." This is on your HUD. What? You don't have a HUD in your car yet?