Slashdot Mirror


End of Flash? Its Usage Among Chrome Users Has Declined From 80% in 2014 to Under 8% as of Early 2018 (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The percentage of daily Chrome users who've loaded at least one page containing Flash content per day has gone down from around 80% in 2014 to under 8% in early 2018. These statistics on Flash's declining numbers were shared with the public by Parisa Tabriz, Director of Engineering at Google, one of the Google bigwigs in charge of Chrome's security. Google plans to ship Flash disabled-by-default with Chrome 76 (July 2019) and remove it completely in Chrome 87 (December 2020).

65 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. And get rid of java and other popups fer reelzies by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good. Now put throttles on Javascript so it won't lock up my browser because idiots don't want their java implementation to be 0.4% slower than somebody else's in a consumer testing table done by other idiots equally ignorant of the issues.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. RIP Flash ? by DrTJ · · Score: 1

    Hopefully RIP (FutureWave | ShockWave | Macromedia | Adobe) Flash 1995 - 2018.

    Mourned by few.

    BTW: Did anyone find out whether the ammo Steve used was made out of silver?

    1. Re: RIP Flash ? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      RIP? More like BIH: Burn In Hell

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:RIP Flash ? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Adobe was actually working to phase it out with HTML5 implementation becoming common. Apple and Adobe working closely together. I expect that when Jobs approached Adobe, they were not willing to give a full effort in Flash support for the iPhone, that would meed Jobs standards, because Adobe (and Jobs probably too) knew this technology was on its way out and there is no long term plan with it.
      So Jobs did what jobs does. Talks around limitations on its device and says it is what the future holds.

      However the smartphone market for consumers in general accelerated flashes demise. As average guy would be doing bulk of their browsing on it, and less with a more powerful computer.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:RIP Flash ? by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is that the authors of many beloved classic Flash cartoons and games aren't around to remake them for HTML5.

    4. Re:RIP Flash ? by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Adobe was actually working to phase it out with HTML5 implementation becoming common. Apple and Adobe working closely together. I expect that when Jobs approached Adobe, they were not willing to give a full effort in Flash support for the iPhone, that would meed Jobs standards, because Adobe (and Jobs probably too) knew this technology was on its way out and there is no long term plan with it.
      So Jobs did what jobs does. Talks around limitations on its device and says it is what the future holds.

      However the smartphone market for consumers in general accelerated flashes demise. As average guy would be doing bulk of their browsing on it, and less with a more powerful computer.

      Well, what really helped were two things.

      1) Most legit uses of flash were to watch YouTube videos, and the iPhone came with a YouTube app.

      2) Most other users of flash were ads. iPhones not supporting Flash thus had a small advantage in well, getting a faster web browsing experience. For a time Adobe tried to convince everyone Flash was necessary (it was used on 99% of websites - yes, it was true, since 99% of them had flash ads) and offered an Android version, but while you could use it to view other video websites (great!), it meant you also got all the flash ads and they bogged your phone down.

      By the time the iPhone came out, people were disabling flash to avoid ads

    5. Re:RIP Flash ? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well that's also a good point, how many people *intentionally* access flash content, vs those who access a site that just happens to have unwanted flash content (ads, background trackers etc)...
      Most browsers these days prompt you whenever a site contains flash content, and a surprising number contain content which isnt visible.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:RIP Flash ? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Mourned by few.

      But these few are those who know better.
      The current web stack is barely catching up to what Flash did 20 years ago. And does is less efficiently.
      Flash was awesome tech, killed by Apple, who disliked the idea that it could be used to replace apps, and also by Adobe, who neglected it.

    7. Re:RIP Flash ? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, there is no suitable replacement for Flash. But what about HTML5 and CSS you might say? Surely, that's an option if you want your web app to look and behave at times drastically different in each browser....if it works at all. There is no suitable replacement for Flash yet if consistent user experience across browsers and platforms is important. Flash will stick around until ALL browser vendors are fully compliant with W3C standards. Lately, it is especially Google who pulls an "IE6 only". So before anyone yells "Death to Flash!" go bug the browser vendors for giving us something better to replace it with.

    8. Re:RIP Flash ? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      So what about all the "Chrome only" stuff Google is pumping out lately? More and more of their apps do not work right in any other browser. Google is pure evil, Flash is just shoddy programming.

  3. Well, of course by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Chrome now makes you jump through hoops to enable Flash for a site - so of course usage has declined precipitously. When it was enabled by default, all those Flash objects an any random web page would load. Now it's only going to be when a person actually wants access to Flash.

    It's slightly annoying for me simply because I only use Chrome when I specifically need to access a site which still uses Flash. But for people who routinely enjoy giving Google all their - er, I mean, prefer to use Chrome as their daily driver - this is a good thing.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Well, of course by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1, Interesting

      (..) I only use Chrome when I specifically need to access a site which still uses Flash.

      No such use case here. If a site 'needs' Flash, I don't 'need' that site.

    2. Re:Well, of course by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Does nobody find this objectionable? How come that one vendor (Google) can abuse its market position (majority browser share) to essentially kill off a product and technology from a different company (Adobe)? Flash sucking or not aside, what Google does is borderline criminal. They just happen to sell it as service to users and security improvement.

  4. Re:And get rid of java and other popups fer reelzi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good. Now put throttles on Javascript so it won't lock up my browser because idiots don't want their java implementation to be 0.4% slower than somebody else's in a consumer testing table done by other idiots equally ignorant of the issues.

    Calls people idiots. Doesn't know the difference between Java and Javascript.

  5. Re: VCenter Web Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're using the legacy URL. The HTML5 version doesn't seem to need it.

  6. Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had my last Flash project back in 2011. Never did anything with Flash since.

    To be clear: Flash is super-dead.

    Which is a crying shame. And please spare me the Flash banner ad whining. ... Flash was *at* *least* 15 years ahead technology wise. You could do many things with Flash that JS/WebGL/CSS still struggle to achieve today on computers orders of magnitude faster than anything we had back then.

    Adobe screwed this up big time. Flash could've been the brave new resolution-independent vector graphic world of retina displays and mobile devices. What do we have instead? React and React Native and awkward SVG and canvas hacks using transpiled JS and whatnot. Laughable compared to even the simplest Flash/AS client/server setup and way more difficult to handle. With Flash/AS you could whip up an interactive map or some other gadget in a coffee break, async data with the server included. Adobe screwed it up big time. They should've FOSSed it when the touch-mobile revolution started - that was their last chance. Flash is dead and Adobe alone is to blame.

    I don't use Adobe products anymore. Flash was the only proprietary tech I used and it will remain the only one. Flash was worth it. Very neat tech. Hope we get there once again sometime in the future. Until then it's HTML canvas, TypeScript, WebGL and Web Asssembly. ... Yeah, just great.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Flash was *at* *least* 15 years ahead technology wise.

      Except apparently in security.

      Good riddance.

    2. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If they FOSSed it, how would they make money off of it. More profitable for a slow death, then just giving it away.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Adobe screwed it up big time. They should've FOSSed it when the touch-mobile revolution started - that was their last chance. Flash is dead and Adobe alone is to blame.

      Yeah.. on the other hand, Adobe didn't really have a business model to go with it. It's a bit like Java, you can say that OpenJDK is what makes Java still relevant but Sun is dead. When it comes down to it most companies aren't that concerned with the greater good and leaving a legacy if they won't be around to benefit from it. Not making any moral judgement but economically they seem to be quite profitable with their proprietary cloud-ware, so I don't think Adobe regrets the horse they bet on.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


      Flash was *at* *least* 15 years ahead technology wise. You could do many things with Flash that JS/WebGL/CSS still struggle to achieve today on computers orders of magnitude faster than anything we had back then.

      Flash and Microsoft CREATED that environment where nothing else could penetrate the marketplace. There's nothing magical about Flash that couldn't be replaced with something far better. It took the death of Flash and IE do to Adobe and Microsoft screwing it all up to create the viable replacements we have today.

      I also worked with Flash, and I hated it. It was all based on awful Javascipt, and the frameworks you used to work with it were horrendous. Sure, if you were a very talented developer you could make cool stuff. But for the average developer, you wound up creating a horrible mess. Believe me, I saw the average devs create the massive mess.

      Flash is also, sadly, not dead. There's still a lot of (smaller) websites out there that rely on flash. It may only be 8%, but when you're on one of those 8% websites and want to do something (buy tickets, etc) you're still going to be upset that the site doesn't work. Worse, that 8% are exactly the sites least likely to every pay someone to fix it. If you've ever lived in a foreign country that's still stuck in about 2005 as far as the Internet is concerned (Italy comes to mind) you know what I'm talking about.

      Chrome should STILL disable Flash, but the point is it's not going to be painless.

    5. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by gorehog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you kidding? How does RedHat remain a billion dollar business seeling FOSS software? Adobe would've done fine as the industry leader in Flash tools.

    6. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by gorehog · · Score: 1

      I genuinely feel that their big mistake was shoehorning a streaming video codec into the Flash player. As you said it was a great idea to have an interactive, cross-platform, scriptable, vector graphics player with server side support. Adobe screwed up by overreaching the plugin's scope and not focusing on the server.

    7. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Informative

      They should've FOSSed... Flash was the only proprietary tech I used and it will remain the only one.

      Point of fact, Adobe offered w3c control of Flash as a successor/extension to Javascript. To that end, they opensourced AS3 a long, long time ago. Possibly even pre-iPhone 1. There are GPL implementations of the Flash engine and everything.

      Flash died because Steve Jobs wanted a walled garden on the cell phone. If HTML5 had been as far along then, he would have killed that too.

      But I too morn Flash. And, possibly most obnoxiously, because of banner ads. When Flash was based on a specific type of object (plugin or not), I could whitelist it easily. Flash died, and as a result the obnoxious things moved out of the sandbox and into the browser proper.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember when people said the iPhone was shit because it didn't support flash?

      Yeah, that was everyone here on Slashdot.

      No wifi, less space than a nomad, lame.

    9. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by glenebob · · Score: 1

      Printers are about as dead to me as Flash.

    10. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by dabadab · · Score: 1

      on the other hand, Adobe didn't really have a business model to go with it.

      AFAIK Adobe's business model with Flash was always to sell authoring tools - opensourcing the player would have not affected that model.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    11. Re:Former professional Flash/AS developer here ... by sad_ · · Score: 1

      the money would have been in great tools to create flash content.
      content tools is something adobe is supposably good at.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  7. Moving on up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe because the latest HTML already has support for what Flash use to do.

    1. Re:Moving on up. by acroyear · · Score: 1

      it still takes a complete and total rewrite to get there. most corporations don't have the money to afford that, esp for a service that was generally free (like the friv game platform).

      --
      "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
      -- Joe
  8. Re:Flash is dead since 2007 by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Maybe he was a douche, but I'm sure glad he did that.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  9. Flash vs Java by testman3 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the only issue I see with Flash beeing deprecated is accessing to some legacy site. I was more concerned with Java applet beeing deprecated, because there are usecases where applet have no replacement solution. For instance, if you need access to smartcard to get decent two form factor identity level for signature. Web crypto is not moving much and not covering those areas AFAIK. And alternative such as WebUSB are limited to Chrome only. Applet were working on all the desktop browsers.

  10. Still required by public schools in the US by Kazymyr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My daughter's assignments (public middle school) are on a website that requires flash. Cannot be used in recent Firefox builds. Flash will not go away while it's required by the public school system.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    1. Re:Still required by public schools in the US by acroyear · · Score: 5, Informative

      We're hitting the same issue, where the schools are currently dependent on learning games written in flash. Also my kid's favorite "safe" game platform is Friv, and they run on flash as well.

      Then there's the entire kids programming language Scratch from MIT, which still does not have a non-flash version online (a download, yeah, but it uses adobe air I think, so there we go - still has a flash-based runtime).

      So there's still work to go to get rid of it, and unfortunately these types of sites don't have the financial resources to go and rewrite everything they have, as opposed to some huge corporate website that just needed to replace their splash screen with something less obnoxious.

      --
      "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
      -- Joe
    2. Re:Still required by public schools in the US by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well those companies should have thought about that before they got locked in to a proprietary technology...
      As that technology dies they will look dated and insecure, and once it's dead they will have no choice but to spend the money to replace it. They made the decision to get locked in to a proprietary technology not considering the long term impact of doing so, and now its coming back to bite them. Hopefully they will consider properly in future.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Still required by public schools in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes except:

      Well those companies should have thought about that before they got locked in to a proprietary technology...

      We're not talking about companies but schools in this thread. If you've ever dealt with school IT you'll know its a best-effort, lowest-budget, mandated-from-the-school-district-software lifestyle. As parents, you MUST deal with it or vote in a new school board at the district level and convince them to change software for all the schools. At least in the US its like this.

  11. Irony: Google Hangouts by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    I can't drop flash in Chrome until Google Hangouts doesn't require it for camera/mic access on OSX.

    1. Re:Irony: Google Hangouts by sanf780 · · Score: 1

      Being Google, do assume Hangouts will be dropped before Flash is removed. I hope you have an alternative for the day Google tells you Hangouts is only for paying customers. It is a shame that Duo and Allo do not fit the bill.

  12. Got a stock annual report recently - all in Flash by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    I got an annual report for an upcoming stockholders' meeting for a stock I own. I was really surprised that the whole thing was in Flash. Not PDF but ail in Flash. This is a company in the top 250 of the Fortune 500. While it's not an IT company, let's just say that you would think they have a good enough handle on technology to not make their annual report be only in Flash, but nope. I'm not going to name the company lest doing so hurt the stock value, but it just shows you how even people who you might have thought were way past using Flash are in fact still using it.

  13. Re:And get rid of java and other popups fer reelzi by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    However Javascript+HTML5 has became the replacement for Actionscript+Flash. The real difference is the fact that Javascript and HTTML5 are open standards, while Flash is under the domain of Adobe.

    However Adobe knows it had a good run with it, and has been implementing a gradual exit strategy for a while. But in terms of functionality and bad developers doing bad things. There isn't much you can do about it. Any throttles will need to be done by the browser, and may cause problems for some applications.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  14. Some medical continuing ed still requires flash by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

    Spouse had to re-install Flash on Chrome to complete mandatory continuing ed coursework for job as RN. Chrome put up some resistance but we were able to beat it down and install Flash. I doubt the release of an html5 version is imminent.

  15. Re:likely .... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Been there already. I was out in the field, my laptop wouldn't open Vcenter because of the Flash BS.
    Fortunately I could do what I needed to do (shut down VMs) with the HTML5 version, which is still quite limited.

    Death to Flash, and Death to Java too, while we're at it.
    Java is like the new DLL hell with compatibility/security issues.
    I hate how the industry forced us into using browsers as management utilities, and got rid of the solidly working dedicated applications that worked well before under the guise of, "Now you can easily manage xyz from any workstation and no installation necessary!!". Used car salesmen are more truthful.
    Hopefully HTML5 actually backs up some of this promise.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  16. Remove it completely in Chrome 87 (December 2020) by eminencja · · Score: 1

    Will this Google startup still exist by then?

  17. ADP by gorehog · · Score: 1

    And now we know how many people use ADP for payroll, 8% of Chrome users...

  18. Re:Got a stock annual report recently - all in Fla by eminencja · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to name the company lest doing so hurt the stock value.

    Buy short options and then make it public. The stock will plummet and you will get rich.

  19. It was easy to block by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    Flash was self contained and easy to block. I think that when HTML5 will be misused, we might end up missing it.

    1. Re:It was easy to block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isnt html5 used already by cryptominers? That already makes it hard to block because without it the rest of the site doesnt load.

    2. Re:It was easy to block by dizzy8578 · · Score: 1

      I always felt google was targeting flash mainly because ad block plus had a 99% block rate for flash ads. Now I can't stop national geographic and every other news site from auto-playing their videos. Click no longer stops them and if you scroll down they follow you. I fore see an added fee for advertisers that want to force you to see their ad on a google system.

      --
      *"Cogito Ergo Liberalis"*
    3. Re:It was easy to block by hawk · · Score: 1

      this is why Safari is now my primary browser.

      I have ghosterty and adblock without a default list (I block anything that moves manually. i still see almost no ads)

      hawk

  20. at least it's just flash and not som IE only stuff by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    at least it's just flash and not some IE only stuff or other stuff like quicktime or real. There are a few other EDU plugins from the past as well. That Worked in IE and firefox and also had MAC as well.

  21. it may take an lawsuit say someone fails an class by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    it may take an lawsuit say someone fails an class when they can't take there flash based class work and the school lab does not have flash on there systems.

  22. Re:aww... but I like that show. by bondsbw · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, he always finds his way back from the speed force or whatever.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  23. Printers by darkain · · Score: 1

    While others are saying vSphere "web" client, there are other legacy administration consoles that require it too. I have a few network printers which use Flash for their admin interface. I also have security web cameras that can optionally work with flash and IE... but if you use Edge, Chrome, FF, it thinks you're on a mobile browser and gives you 10% functionality with a bullshit UI designed for phones.

    Flash is still around because most of this shit cannot be updated, only replaced, which is often times out of the question for budget reasons.

  24. 8%??? by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    These poor bastards that are still forced to use websites with Flash...

  25. Re:And get rid of java and other popups fer reelzi by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    Huh? How is Javascript a java implementation?

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
  26. Re:Zombo.com still uses flash by theweatherelectric · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

  27. Re:sites still use flash by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Fake your user agent as safari on mac?

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  28. Re:Flash is dead since 2007 by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Steve is dead too.

    Whether this is coincidence or conspiracy is a question left for the reader.

  29. Re:likely .... by mdhoover · · Score: 1

    Or HP Blade Chassis administrators doing network/storage config (VirtualConnect Web Admin interface still uses flash) Or HDS storage admins (Command Suite/HiCommand is still flash)

  30. Re:likely .... by sad_ · · Score: 1

    I hate how the industry forced us into using browsers as management utilities, and got rid of the solidly working dedicated applications that worked well before under the guise of, "Now you can easily manage xyz from any workstation and no installation necessary!!".

    i don't, the problem is that so many were using flash, or active x, or IE specific bs, or a crazy browser plugin only for this thing that works only on windows xp, or java 1.5.something, or a combination of all of these.
    if they were REAL web application, there wouldn't be a problem. Now they were just the same as before - all different, badly written, applications with way to specific requirements, so it never worked for everybody.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  31. Re:likely .... by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Same boat here. None of the browsers work for vCenter and the desktop client is too inept to upload files to a datastore.

  32. Re:RIP Dial-up. by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    You make it sound as if nobody uses dial-up anymore. Go outside the metro areas in the US and that is typically all you get...aside from ridiculously overpriced and quite slow cell connections. As far as Internet infrastructure goes, the US is a digital third world country with a Monaco style price tag. Any place in Europe gets faster Internet connections for a fraction of the price and many ISPs to chose from.

  33. Silverlight by stooo · · Score: 1

    >> BTW: Did anyone find out whether the ammo Steve used was made out of silver?
    Nearly. It was made of Silverlight :)

    It was nicer with flash, but so much insecure :
    https://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-c...

    --
    aaaaaaa
  34. Re: VCenter Web Client by stooo · · Score: 1

    That's true. it's more effort to write good malware in HTML5 compared to flash, coz it has less "features"

    --
    aaaaaaa
  35. If Flash is dead by jethr0211 · · Score: 1

    What are /.'ers using for interactive video conferencing to replace Adobe Connect?

  36. Re:sites still use flash by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    This Chrome extension implements an HTML5 player for Crunchyroll. It works much better than their Flash player (smoother playback with no stuttering, no issues with seeking):

    https://chrome.google.com/webs...

    There is one caveat: it relies on the same HLS video streams that Crunchyroll's app-based players use. Those video streams have the subtitles burned into the video as hardsubs, and some of their catalog titles have an issue with the hardsubs where some lines don't show up on screen long enough. There's no workaround for it, the problem affects Crunchyroll's own apps too. Crunchyroll has said they'd re-encode the back catalog to fix it, but as usual it takes them years to get around to doing stuff like that.