Slashdot Mirror


Laptops With 128GB of RAM Are Here (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Brace yourself for laptops with 128GB of RAM because they're coming. Today, Lenovo announced its ThinkPad P52, which, along with that massive amount of memory, also features up to 6TB of storage, up to a 4K, 15.6-inch display, an eighth-gen Intel hexacore processor, and an Nvidia Quadro P3200 graphics card. The ThinkPad also includes two Thunderbolt three ports, HDMI 2.0, a mini DisplayPort, three USB Type-A ports, a headphone jack, and an Ethernet port. The company hasn't announced pricing yet, but it's likely going to try to compete with Dell's new 128GB-compatible workstation laptops. The Dell workstation laptops in question are the Precision 7730 and 7530, which are billed as "ready for VR" mobile workstations. According to TechRadar, "These again run with either 8th-gen Intel CPUs or Xeon processors, AMD Radeon WX or Nvidia Quadro graphics, and the potential to specify a whopping 128GB of 3200MHz system memory."

364 comments

  1. For what use? by DogDude · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't have any use for something like this, either personally, or in my work. What's the point of something like this? What kind of software needs this kind of juice?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      VirtualBox

    2. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Modern web browser with multiple tabs.

    3. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To run chrome.

    4. Re:For what use? by tk77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Think of these kinda of machines less like laptops and more like portable workstations. Its easier to transport one of these around then it is having to transport everything needed to run a similar desktop. More "on-location" work can be done rather then having to wait to get back to a studio, for example. The battery in heavy use cases can be thought of as giving the ability to move the machine from outlet to outlet without having to shut down/power off.

    5. Re:For what use? by dryriver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Precisely this. In fact, in my segment we'd actually buy 8, 10 or 12 Core laptops or even more if we could actually get them. The battery is indeed used mostly to move the laptop about without having to switch it off. Kind of like an Uninterruptable Power Supply for those 20 - 30 minutes where you might not have power coming out of a wall socket, or where you are moving location.

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    6. Re:For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I don't have any use for something like this, either personally, or in my work. What's the point of something like this? What kind of software needs this kind of juice?

      Surely none that also requires portability.

    7. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have to ask, it ain't for you.

    8. Re:For what use? by dryriver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The biggest CAD/3D models these days are for 3D buildings - like a new factory, airport or shopping center. Those CAD files can very easily become bigger than 64GB and not fit in RAM anymore. If you need to go to the construction site with a 98GB CAD model that can be inspected, how do you do that without a laptop that has 128GB RAM? Do you take a 35,000 USD dual Xeon CAD workstation with 3 GPUs that weighs 40 to 50 lbs and carry it to the construction site in a van? That's what these new laptops are for. Opening huge 3D CAD files away from the office desk - and very likely at a construction site.

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    9. Re:For what use? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lots:

      Vagrant.
      Virtualbox.
      Developer tools.
      Photo/video editing.
      Sound editing.

      A 128 GB machine will be ideal for a developer who has it for his/her daily driver, and who has to show that their code works on some test VM bases via Vagrant. This gets rid of the "it works on my machine, but not in production" type of bugs.

      Even if the RAM is not needed, it works as a cache, making I/O faster.

    10. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can run a Beowulf cluster of Linux VMs running docker, of course!

    11. Re:For what use? by gameboyhippo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I felt the same when 1G ram became a thing...

    12. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electron "applications"

    13. Re:For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      I do quite a bit of hard-core engineering: electrical and mechanical. A lot of FEA analysis as well for EMI, mechanical, and acoustical output. I currently have a P71 with 64 GB of RAM and I will often push that limit on more advanced FEA runs. I would love to get this new laptop provided it has a 17" (or better yet, 18") screen.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    14. Re:For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1, Troll

      The biggest CAD/3D models these days are for 3D buildings - like a new factory, airport or shopping center. Those CAD files can very easily become bigger than 64GB and not fit in RAM anymore. If you need to go to the construction site with a 98GB CAD model that can be inspected, how do you do that without a laptop that has 128GB RAM? Do you take a 35,000 USD dual Xeon CAD workstation with 3 GPUs that weighs 40 to 50 lbs and carry it to the construction site in a van? That's what these new laptops are for. Opening huge 3D CAD files away from the office desk - and very likely at a construction site.

      No. You throw your 128 GB iMac Pro in the back of your car.

      Done. And a big enough display that is is actually USABLE.

      Next question?

    15. Re:For what use? by admin7087 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Composers who use large orchestral sample libraries, for instance.

    16. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kind of software that will help you take over the world!

    17. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't have any use for something like this, either personally, or in my work. What's the point of something like this? What kind of software needs this kind of juice?

      Well you see, last year all the people wanting to learn to work with and code for massively parallel systems would throw together a bunch of nodes into a cluster, typically something cheap like Raspberry Pi or Intel NUCs.

      Their accomplishments get posted to Slashdot, and technology haters all came out to say what they did was stupid, just virtualize it!

      Now hardware comes out with the resources to virtualize 128 nodes at 1GB ram each, and naturally the same people say that is just as stupid.

      I presume because you personally don't use or run such systems, due to your opening comments, you feel the rest of the world doesn't need such things to exist.

      You'd probably live a much happier and less confusing life if you could only grasp the concept that no one else is exactly like you.
      You might also want to do something about the person with a gun to your head forcing you to purchase one of these things you don't want. Do you need our help? That's the only reason I can think of that would make it so impossible for you to just not buy the things you don't want to buy...

    18. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL right. Nothing "Pro" about anything apple puts out.

    19. Re:For what use? by sexconker · · Score: 2

      Sounds to me like the CAD and modeling people need to optimize their shit.

    20. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For PRO users. That should put the macbook pro into perspective. I bet they are as expensibe as a max spec MBP.

    21. Re:For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      False. I travel extensively and have a monster laptop (P71 with 64 GB RAM, 17" screen, etc) so that I have my workstation whenever I am on-site with clients. I don't have to worry about maintaining two systems, sharing/transferring SW licenses (most real CAD programs have licensing systems), etc. Last week I was in China, doing work - and engineering. This week is Los Angeles. Next week is the Bay area. I take my workstation with me, because it IS portable, and it CAN replace a desktop.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    22. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And these laptops are? Ram means shit up to a certain point. Give me multiple GPUs and CPUs over this any day.

    23. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Exactly right. I was doing CAD in 2010 on workstations with 16gb of ram.

    24. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you have a point other than being a condescending dick head?

      Answer his question or stfu. You didn't even answer it. You just threw a bunch of buzzwords at the guy.

      You are a fucking tool. Goober.

    25. Re:For what use? by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds to me like the CAD and modeling people need to optimize their shit.

      Alternatively, this seems like a great use for a thin client, i.e. use your laptop to VNC into a beefier computer.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    26. Re:For what use? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

      The new Windows version coming soon. You'll need at least 128GB for it.

    27. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10ME, (It's) Personal Edition.

      CAP === 'expert'

    28. Re:For what use? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The ThinkPad P series are more of a mobile workstation then a laptop or a notebook computer.
      I can use up 128 gigs of RAM easily. I do so at work all the time, (Normally for the first pass proof of concept, then I optimize it down).
      With million record databases trying to forecast future probabilities, so to make a business decision on to hire more, or find problems to fix.

      I normally have a server for this that I will remote connect to with my laptop. But If I/my place of work could afford a laptop like that, I would happily max the sucker out.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    29. Re:For what use? by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      Our "dev db" is 10 GB, down to 7GB if you take a chainsaw to it. And then each of my java containers/microservices uses 512mb so that's 16GB right there and we haven't even touched my OS or dev tools' memory requirements.
       
      I do all my dev work in AWS and remote in because my "pro" macbook is limited to just 16GB memory. I can't even standup my dev stack on my laptop anymore.
       
      Heaven forbid Chrome is running on a system in the same timezone as my laptop. I'm glad 640K is enough for you, but I regularly bump in to memory problems.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    30. Re:For what use? by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      I use a 5 YO Lenovo W530 as a replacement for a desktop machine at home. It has a quad core i7, 32 GB of RAM, and 2GB Quadro graphics board built in. I use it for CAD and 3D mesh manipulation, among the usual things. I plug in an external keyboard, 3D mouse, regular mouse, 32" display, and speakers. It literally replaced an aging desktop that had so many fans it sounded like a vacuum cleaner. Now it's quiet, and having a battery is great if there's a power failure. I spent about $350 on the W530 and all the stuff to put in it.

      Most (all?) CAD uses only a single core. Fusion 360 will use all available cores, but only for renderings. I think a lot of video editing software will use multiple cores.

    31. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And I was doing CAD in 1987 on an IBM XT (of course it was only 2D lines and arcs). The capabilities (solid modeling) and size of models/amount of detail (ever opened a BIM model of an 88 story building?) far exceed what was being done previously.

    32. Re:For what use? by Xord · · Score: 1

      Seismic survey processing applications would use it. Those guys had 256GB RAM in their workstations as the software could process data more quickly with more RAM. To have that in a portable system to take onto ships would be a use case for this.

    33. Re:For what use? by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most developers I know have a single laptop as their primary workstation. We were complaining about the 16GB limit on macbook "pro" laptops in 2015 as the on-premise software appliance we were developing at the time used about 10GB memory, which quickly ballooned to 17GB by mid-2016.
       
      The product we were using was also designed to scan other machines, which meant that you would likely have between .2 and 8 VMs running on your local machine to dev/test the entire product.
       
      So yes this is absolutely supposed to replace your personal workstation. I do about half my work from home these days, the 2-3 days a week I am in the office I still probably do 4 hours of work at home. Splitting your work between two machines is a real bear. Here we are three years later and the best "professional" macbook offering still only offers 16GB memory, where Lenovo and Dell have been offering 32GB memory in laptops for two+ years now. Will I need 128 GB? No probably not tomorrow but 64GB would be a reasonable ask for someone in my line of work. There's something like half a million software developers in the Bay area, I'm sure more than 5% of them are running in to memory problems at least monthly.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    34. Re:For what use? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      What's the point of something like this?

      I don't know but the following words were probably well-chosen:

      Brace yourself for laptops with 128GB of RAM...

      My asshole's quivering already.

    35. Re:For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      False. I travel extensively and have a monster laptop (P71 with 64 GB RAM, 17" screen, etc) so that I have my workstation whenever I am on-site with clients. I don't have to worry about maintaining two systems, sharing/transferring SW licenses (most real CAD programs have licensing systems), etc. Last week I was in China, doing work - and engineering. This week is Los Angeles. Next week is the Bay area. I take my workstation with me, because it IS portable, and it CAN replace a desktop.

      Ok, I can see that use-case. But you still have to have additional displays wherever you go. ..and still, a pretty narrow market-segment.

    36. Re:For what use? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      A 128 GB machine will be ideal for a developer who has it for his/her daily driver

      640GB should be enough for anybody.

      I bet the chintzy bastages didn't even allow for upgrading the RAM either. At a piddly 128GB one might as well haul out the abacus. /s

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    37. Re:For what use? by naris · · Score: 1

      Because no one would ever need more than 640MB of memory!

    38. Re:For what use? by Nothing2Chere · · Score: 1

      Even if the RAM is not needed, it works as a cache, making I/O faster.

      The only thing that makes I/O faster is faster I/O. Everything else is just delayed or asynchronous I/O. n2ch

    39. Re: For what use? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Fuck the cloud. Some people work on confidential data that doesn't need to be on "someone else's computer."

    40. Re:For what use? by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      I'm in to machine learning, and this thing is right up my alley. It would be great to take my workstation with me to conferences rather than trying to VPN and remote into a rig, considering how bad the latency can get. I doubt I can personally field the cost though, so I'll not be having one any time soon. My current personal portable rig is (sadly) almost exactly 1/10 the specs of this in terms of RAM, GPU, and hard disk capacity. I would imagine that travel bloggers would love encoding video on a rig like this, and architects would love doing on-site design work with advanced CAD models with a rig like this too. Basically, anybody who has a hard-core workstation type workload who also needs to work while traveling is the target market for a system like this.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    41. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you have a point other than being a condescending dick head?

      Nope, just to be a condescending dick head. Just like the person asking the question.

      Answer his question or stfu.

      He already gave an answer to his own question, one which I repeated.
      He asked what does he need it for. He answered that he doesn't. I said the same.

      If he wanted any more serious of an answer, he would have formulated an even slightly serious question. But he didn't, so clearly that standard is OK with him. Who are you to complain when he and I are both fine with it?

    42. Re:For what use? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "I don't have any use for something like this, either personally, or in my work. "

      Just like a SUV, but you got one anyway.

    43. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, let me know how well that works for you from a job site where you may not always have useful cell or wifi due to conditions of the site.

    44. Re:For what use? by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's easy - to run Android Developer Studio! (And I thought Eclipse was a dog...)

    45. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely to work on a greenfield site without a really good 4G connection that is stable and will definitely be up.

    46. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtualization is one area. At SAP we have developers that are struggling to run our cloud applications on their laptops. Hana requires 32GB for its own VM. Meanwhile, the MacBook Pro tops out at 16GB. You would have thought after 6 years they would have supported a maximum memory of at least 32GB.

    47. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell and HP have had 64GB workstation class laptops for 3 years.

    48. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. But hey it's slashdot, where the assholes like you think they know everything. Go back to Facebook cretin.

    49. Re:For what use? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      RAM drive.
      Photoshop.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    50. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hold on while I put my computer together"

      Yeah that looks awesome in front of your customer. /s

      I have had to do this. You look like an ass. "lets give them a few mins to get it together" is NOT what you want to hear from your customer.

    51. Re: For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      I want it. Many other consultants and engineers want it. I want a laptop that is as powerful as a "proper box" - and that I can take with me, so I can work at home, at an office, on an airplane, etc. Not all of us are simple bit-flippers, we actually design REAL, TANGIBLE goods and need something more than a basic platform that will simply run a compiler (but I do some of that too, having written commercially sold FEA packages).

      As far as the cloud, when I'm working on models that 60-80 GB each, I have a dozen such models in play at any time, and I need to access them wherever I am (last week I was in China, for example - no way I can get Dropbox or Google Drive over there), the cloud doesn't work. Why rent someone else's computer when I can have my own computer easily host everything - and not have to wait for a 2 Mbps WIFI connection in a hotel room in Akishima, Tokyo trying to download a 40 GB model?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    52. Re:For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Nope. A 17", good quality screen is plenty for 90% of the time. I don't need to have lots of windows open; it can be more convenient to do so, but 90% of the time I'd be on one screen anyway. So why do I need a second monitor? And I would say this is pretty normal for most technical hardware consultants/engineers I know - you can do what you need really on a decent 17" screen. If I'm surfacing a new enclosure, or optimizing the curvature on a molded spring, why would I be bouncing between windows? I'm sitting in CAD. Likewise if I'm laying out a PCB - I'm in the PCB software, I'm not bouncing around to other windows, no need to do that at all.

      Simply put: what YOU think works doesn't apply to lots of other people. There is a need for this kind of laptop - and I (and the 2 dozen or so other technical consulting engineers I know) are the market. There are hundreds of thousands of us out there - we're the market.

      I currently use a P71, fully loaded, and it works well 80% of the time; some models bring it to a crawl, more RAM would help. And I love having a built-in PANTONE screen calibration, so when I am showing my client the current Keyshots of a concept, I can do it in true color - and with a 17" screen, it's actually possible to have two people looking at it as the same time at a desk.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    53. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to my RAM disk.

    54. Re:For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Check the Lenovo P71. I have one of them... Lots of CPU, RAM, SSD, a great 17" screen (quite usable for CAD/CAM), and a 99Whr battery built in. I can get between 5 and 10 hours runtime on it, depending upon how much FEA and heavy-duty rendering I'm doing.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    55. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And im sure you can pick one of those up at the apple store.

    56. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck is editing CAD or need access to a tonne of memory when you're out in a remote location like you describe?

    57. Re:For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      What? You mean I can take my iMac Pro with me on the plane, and use it in the lounge? Or I can take it on BART as I spend a few hours at two different clients each day? Toss it in the top case on my motorcycle and ride on down to Orange County for a 3 hour meeting? Or move easily from upstairs in my office to out in my backyard where the sun is out and it's perfect? How about an actual laptop that is powerful enough on its own - one that will do what is needed.

      Oh, and for those who do CAD, they are most likely running Windows anyway; there really is no 3D parametric CAD for OSX, nor any professional PCB/schematic capture software. So why by an iMac Pro and load Windows on it? Just get a better PC in the first place, for less money, that comes with Windows pre-loaded. Like a solid, workstation-class laptop.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    58. Re:For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Sucks when you're overseas... I'd hate to rely upon a VPN back to the US whilst working in Japan or China, and sit around waiting on a 2 Mbps connection. Or being told in an EU factory that I'm not allowed to connect to the local LAN/WIFI network because of security reasons.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    59. Re: For what use? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Wrong, CAD, CAE, rendering, prototyping, all available on OSX. Why don't you Google?

    60. Re: For what use? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Nope, graphics is the problem that prevents that

    61. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your company is building a sky scrapper they wouldnâ(TM)t have you carry the plans on your laptop. A decent mobile connection, VDI workstation VM and PCoIP will do exactly what you need on a middle of the line laptop or even an iPad and a Bluetooth mouse.

      When CAD files get large itâ(TM)s the servers that get beefy, not workstations. You donâ(TM)t want to have files that large traversing the network in full. And goodness forbid you should make a change and need to sync that with your team.

    62. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have any use for something like this, either personally, or in my work. What's the point of something like this?

      Ah yes you appear to have misread the headline as "Laptops With 128GB of RAM Are Here and Dell has debited DogDude's credit card and is shipping one out to him without his authorization".

      Seriously when did the slashdot audience get so technically illiterate and unimaginative that some of them can't even fathom the existence of a use case for higher capacity machines.

    63. Re: For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      OK, what packages? Pro/E? Solidworks? Altium?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    64. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its just the amount of polygons now, and with presentation walkthrough models becoming the norm ... you need to carry in for presentation ... easily 100 gig models with birds and particle effects and people, even using low poly models, most complete models 10-30k polys per person model and thats low, maybe 120k polys for a high res model

    65. Re:For what use? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the time frame, but Lenovo also sells 64GB laptops at this time.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    66. Re:For what use? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Your limit is actually Apple, not the underlying PC laptop hardware. You are able to buy machines with more memory than 16GB for a while now.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    67. Re:For what use? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Not sure, but maybe it could also help with bringing down the price of laptops with less memory.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    68. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeCAD, QCAD, ARESCommander...
      ...oh you mean professional tools with the features people need.

      Aside from AutoCAD the CAD, CAM, CAE offerings are pretty thin for the Mac and really when you have great tools that work already who really gives a shit what operating system they're running on underneath.

    69. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. 3D models are loaded into GPU RAM, not computer RAM.

    70. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You throw your 128 GB iMac Pro in the back of your car.

      If I'm going to throw a system in the back of the car then it's going to be something a hell of a lot better than an iMac, the maximum GPU spec on the iMac "Pro" is woeful when compared to what you can get out of a much older - nearly a full year - nVidia setup.

      Certainly if you're looking at doing scientific computing and machine learning you're even further behind with the iMac because of it's severely hobbled GPU capabilities, it's not like you can just plug in an TitanV and get access to Tensor core functionality, nope, not on macOS.

    71. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I go to clients I display on projectors or large conference displays, no need to drag my comparatively tiny 27" computer with me.

    72. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At SAP, you also have customers struggling to run your cloud applications on the cloud.

    73. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have any use for something like this, either personally, or in my work. What's the point of something like this? What kind of software needs this kind of juice?

      Surely none that also requires portability.

      Here we see Slashdot's resident Apple shill quickly pouncing on an opportunity to mount a thinly veiled defense of the MacBook "Pro" which has a maximum RAM of a little over 10% of that of these new systems.

    74. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of these kinda of machines less like laptops and more like portable workstations.

      Well, sure, but what I really would like would be a laptop with a docking station that makes it into an external drive for my stationary.
      It would be neat to work on my stationary computer with all its power, hibernate to disk, pick up my laptop and resume work on a less powerful but portable computer.

    75. Re:For what use? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      For CAD, thin clients tend to suck. I use Microsoft RDP at work. As client software goes, this works a lot better than VNC. But (despite being on Gb Ethernet, with the RDP server in the next room) I still get input lag. Trying to drag the edge of a window becomes hit-and-miss. Other accurate mouse manipulations (such as the ones you have to do all the time when drawing) suffer the same fate.

    76. Re:For what use? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Thank you for including the "/s", otherwise we'd have had no chance at identifying the sarcasm.

    77. Re:For what use? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Yeah around that time, memory efficient programming basically became extinct. The resources are there, so hell let's use them all.

      This might be repeating now, but on a much worse scale.

    78. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 7: requires 1GB of RAM.
      Windows 8: requires 1GB of RAM.
      Windows 10: requires 1GB of RAM.

      Windows 11: 128GB of RAM.

      Yeah, right, I guess it makes sense.

    79. Re:For what use? by N1AK · · Score: 1

      If you think about use cases that require PCs with this amount of memory does the non-VPN remote client option really sound appealing though? To take the CAD example, if someone is manipulating an 80GB CAD plan then space to store it locally probably isn't an issue but that plan is now stored on the device (potential security risk), and any changes will either require GBs of data to be communicated to store on a server or the updated version will not be available to other users and would be lost if the individual device was damaged or lost. The bandwidth requirements of a terminal connection are relatively modest.

    80. Re:For what use? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Thank you for including the "/s", otherwise we'd have had no chance at identifying the sarcasm.

      Yes, you and I can usually detect most sarcasm (in this case I understood yours without a tag).

      However keep in mind that this *is* Slashdot, and many here to all appearances were born without the sarcasm-detection gene or at least without it being dominant. I doubt that you could not find at least one serious 'whoosh' of that sort in any 2 consecutive Slashdot story comment sections.

      To mangle a famous quote; "Never underestimate the obliviousness of the average "Slashdotter"."

      I mean, c'mon! Many never read TFS never mind TFA, hell it's almost a tradition here and memed to death, why would anyone expect them to read & comprehend subtleties like sarcasm in posts they reply to or even their own posts?

      Slashdot is one of the reasons behind why the "sarc tag" became a thing.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    81. Re:For what use? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd still prefer a desktop though. If I don't need the portability then the desktop will have superior cooling and be able to maintain performance for longer. Plus it's easier to throw more storage in later, where as with laptops you generally have to replace what you have or go external.

      Laptop screens and keyboards are not very ergonomic either...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    82. Re:For what use? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Future proofing against the bloat of Windows?

      --
      We'll make great pets
    83. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken by someone that doesn't do that job. Guess you can just speak for everyone.

      If you have to ask. Then you don't understand.

    84. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a lot of porn to have open at a time.

    85. Re:For what use? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The battery in heavy use cases can be thought of as giving the ability to move the machine

      It's just a portable UPS, because the typical desktop UPS is too much to carry around, but these are more efficient since they work only on DC power. Because the power grid is almost always less than 99% reliable, and unexpected power outages of an hour or so are common: every computer should be used with an UPS in order to give the user enough time for a graceful shutdown after a power outage --- and to help protect the computer itself; for a laptop the battery provides the UPS, and the replaceable AC to DC power brick provides some surge protection.

    86. Re:For what use? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The biggest CAD/3D models these days are for 3D buildings - like a new factory, airport or shopping center. Those CAD files can very easily become bigger than 64GB and not fit in RAM anymore. If you need to go to the construction site with a 98GB CAD model that can be inspected, how do you do that without a laptop that has 128GB RAM? Do you take a 35,000 USD dual Xeon CAD workstation with 3 GPUs that weighs 40 to 50 lbs and carry it to the construction site in a van? That's what these new laptops are for. Opening huge 3D CAD files away from the office desk - and very likely at a construction site.

      The same way we've been doing it for years. Remote desktop. This was back in the day when having 2GB on your laptop was a lot and 16GB was good for a server. So the GIS applications would be on servers with the data and onsite work would be done remotely.

      Internet is a lot faster today than back then Sonny Jim.

      BTW, RAM was not the problem, GIS required huge map files, so you'd need an array of 120 GB disks to hold it all. Erm... Vacate my ground coverings forthwith.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    87. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use a printer

    88. Re:For what use? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      >VirtualBox

      Possibly. You also have to consider IO contention too. So I would be inclined to concentrate more resources on storage.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    89. Re:For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Nope. A 17", good quality screen is plenty for 90% of the time. I don't need to have lots of windows open; it can be more convenient to do so, but 90% of the time I'd be on one screen anyway. So why do I need a second monitor? And I would say this is pretty normal for most technical hardware consultants/engineers I know - you can do what you need really on a decent 17" screen. If I'm surfacing a new enclosure, or optimizing the curvature on a molded spring, why would I be bouncing between windows? I'm sitting in CAD. Likewise if I'm laying out a PCB - I'm in the PCB software, I'm not bouncing around to other windows, no need to do that at all.

      Simply put: what YOU think works doesn't apply to lots of other people. There is a need for this kind of laptop - and I (and the 2 dozen or so other technical consulting engineers I know) are the market. There are hundreds of thousands of us out there - we're the market.

      I currently use a P71, fully loaded, and it works well 80% of the time; some models bring it to a crawl, more RAM would help. And I love having a built-in PANTONE screen calibration, so when I am showing my client the current Keyshots of a concept, I can do it in true color - and with a 17" screen, it's actually possible to have two people looking at it as the same time at a desk.

      There is study after study that directly correlates efficiency with available screen real-estate. And no, a 17" laptop screen, even a 4k one, doesn't qualify.

      In any engineering and/or software development job I have ever had, a MINIMUM of one external monitor, plus a laptop screen, is necessary to keep my life from becoming little more than an exercise in window-management. And I am no where near alone in that opinion.

      Apple has had the ability to have Pantone screen calibration since before IBM/Lenovo released their first laptop. I agree it is sometimes indispensable when dealing with picky clients.

    90. Re:For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      What? You mean I can take my iMac Pro with me on the plane, and use it in the lounge? Or I can take it on BART as I spend a few hours at two different clients each day? Toss it in the top case on my motorcycle and ride on down to Orange County for a 3 hour meeting? Or move easily from upstairs in my office to out in my backyard where the sun is out and it's perfect? How about an actual laptop that is powerful enough on its own - one that will do what is needed.

      Oh, and for those who do CAD, they are most likely running Windows anyway; there really is no 3D parametric CAD for OSX, nor any professional PCB/schematic capture software. So why by an iMac Pro and load Windows on it? Just get a better PC in the first place, for less money, that comes with Windows pre-loaded. Like a solid, workstation-class laptop.

      First, we've had the discussion about what CAD/CAE tools are available for macOS. But it doesn't matter, because, News Flash! Macs run Windows, too!!!

      As I said, I agree that, for some limited use-cases, having a laptop with "workstation guts" is likely an interesting thing. But it seems like there are too many compromises with cooling, available hardware choices, I/O, and (extreme) lack of battery-life, that make it more of an expensive curiosity than a practical solution for most.

    91. Re: For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Wrong, CAD, CAE, rendering, prototyping, all available on OSX. Why don't you Google?

      I have actually Googled that stuff FOR this moron several times. He will just rebut with "Yeah, but what about [x]?"

      No winning with LynwoodRooster. And for someone who supposedly jets all over the planet, servicing his many and varied engineering clients, he sure has a lot of time to engage in day-long, multi-posting, flamewars on Slashdot.

      I've also caught him on several occasions posting incorrect "proof" of his points.

    92. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just one tab running Slack

    93. Re: For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      FreeCAD, QCAD, ARESCommander... ...oh you mean professional tools with the features people need.

      Aside from AutoCAD the CAD, CAM, CAE offerings are pretty thin for the Mac and really when you have great tools that work already who really gives a shit what operating system they're running on underneath.

      You mean like Siemens NX:

      https://www.tatatechnologies.c...

      https://community.plm.automati...

      Or VectorWorks (which beats the PANTS off of AutoCAD!) :

      http://www.vectorworks.net/en/... ...and, as for PCB/Schematic Capture, now that EaglePCB is owned by AutoDesk, I guess it is "legit", too:

      https://www.autodesk.com/produ... ...and although their website looks like a 8 year-old designed it, the venerable McCAD is still kicking around, and is actually QUITE nice. It's Autorouter, for example, is second-to-none:

      http://www.mccad.com/ ..and there is also the Open Source XCircuit, which I know nothing about:

      http://opencircuitdesign.com/x...

    94. Re: For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Now go and see who does what with NX, or Vectorworks. You'll find that 95% of the industry is either Solidworks or Pro/E. You've locked yourself out from interoperability with your vendors, CMs, and technical consultants. It's like saying you're working with a Mac in a world dominated by Windows. It's a shackled ball to your ankle...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    95. Re:For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      That is a good point, but I usually have Carbonite running on my laptop, so the files tend to get backed up overnight or on the weekends. Pulling data down can be excruciatingly slow. And some have said use a thin client and run CAD back on the server, but hundreds of milliseconds of lag in mouse motion makes that essentially unusable. You'll always miss what you wanted, selections will be incorrect, etc.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    96. Re:For what use? by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      I also don't usually need more than about 8 GB, but there are many ways the extra RAM could be useful,. Others have already mentioned CAD or VMs, AR/VR, better/faster caching, etc. I also don't doubt people will come up with new and clever ways to exploit the extra memory.

      My real concern with this, though, is that in the next year or two we'll wind up with software like Windows 11, Office 2021, and the next versions of Adobe CC applications being released and requiring so much memory that 32 GB will quickly become the minimum needed for a smoothly functioning PC. It's happened over and over and I have no reason to believe things will be different this time around.

      Personally, I'd love to see devs and beta testers work on 5-10 year old hardware (feel free to compile or render on a server) so they know how their stuff will behave on what "normal" users have. It'll never happen.

    97. Re:For what use? by Methadras · · Score: 1

      These are engineering laptops. Relax.

    98. Re: For what use? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Now go and see who does what with NX, or Vectorworks. You'll find that 95% of the industry is either Solidworks or Pro/E. You've locked yourself out from interoperability with your vendors, CMs, and technical consultants. It's like saying you're working with a Mac in a world dominated by Windows. It's a shackled ball to your ankle...

      I have a friend/client who does theatre archtecture/staging consulting. All of the architectural firms he works with run AutoCAD on Windows (or something similar that speaks DXF/DWG). He has used, and still uses, VectorWorks.

      It has been a LONG time since he has had any problem importing/exporting drawings with those people using VectorWorks' DXF/DWG Import/Export support.

      I am not sure about how well that would fare with SolidWorks of Pro/E; but those both support some industry-standard (or at least widely-supported) Protocols that would probably work. It has just been about a decade since I last played in that particular world, though.

    99. Re: For what use? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Sad that the idiotic GP is modded Insightful and this is not.

      Also, what "job site" that would require access to this kind of data set would not have "useful cell or wifi"?

    100. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I can see that use-case. But you still have to have additional displays wherever you go. ..and still, a pretty narrow market-segment.

      How many consultants are out there who do engineering onsite with significant graphic-orient tools, who also use their machine for time recording, billiing, CRM, and ERP? Who also do VirtualBox based demos, test cases, etc.

      I'm one of those 'narrow market-segment' guys. I personally know a few hundred others in the same boat, and am pretty sure they know a few hundred as well.

      You might be right - the current use case might not be 500 million, but even 5 thousand or 50 thousand is not a bad market.

    101. Re: For what use? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Architectural work, fine. What about 3D parametric CAD - which is NOT architectural? NX, Pro/E, Solidworks - you know, programs used to design things like cell phones, cars, motors? That's hardcore engineering, and it's dominated by Solidworks and Pro/E (now called CREO).

      If you live in the world of DXF and DWG, then you're doing 2D work - those are 2D formats. 3D formats would be things like STEP or IGES, but those break all parts trees, assembly constraints, etc. So you see a lot of SLDASM and SLDPRT files, ASM, PRT, etc. 3D parametric data is much more complex than basic 2D DXF/DWG files.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    102. Re:For what use? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like the CAD and modeling people need to optimize their shit.

      They have. The optimum solution is for every tiny detail to exist in CAD. Just because we didn't have the capability to achieve this in the past doesn't mean it was more "optimal".

    103. Re:For what use? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, this seems like a great use for a thin client, i.e. use your laptop to VNC into a beefier computer.

      Oh wow. I see someone who has never tried VNCing an application like this.

    104. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could use it - I do audio production and the more memory and processor speed the better.

    105. Re:For what use? by Contract+Gypsy · · Score: 0

      The hardware companies are being paid by the software companies so they can write crappier and crappier code that still kinda runs fast. Screw the power curve! Okay, I'm stepping off my conspiracy box now. How about Gamers buying the fastest most expensive hardware so they can finally beat their buddies by a femto second!

      --
      Life is in a state of dynamic equilibrium, it both blows and sucks
    106. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Even on LAN environment for 3D apps, the lag is real.

    107. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      32GB memory in laptops since Dec 2009 or earlier (Dell Precision 6500 was released in Dec 2009).

    108. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like the CAD and modeling people need to optimize their shit.

      Yeah, makes me wonder how I'm able to open a 3D model of all piping, vessels, instruments, and wiring trays for an entire damn oil refinery and not come anywhere near using up the 16GB on my work desktop.

    109. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and not have to wait for a 2 Mbps WIFI connection in a hotel room in Akishima, Tokyo trying to download a 40 GB model?

      But cloud will mean you don't need to do that. Cloud is magic, man! /s

      You may not want to use the someone else's storage to hold your models but have you considered using your employer's computer in your employer's office and just remote logging in?

      There are some advantages to that for a road warrior; namely you are now less concerned with the physical security of the machine which contains no confidential data. You can lug a much cheaper, lighter machine with much better battery life. You can ensure that your in-office PC is properly backed up (if downloading a 60G model to work on is problematic then re-syncing it with asymmetric upload speeds would be a deal breaker) and you don't lose any work if your travel PC is lost, stolen or destroyed.

      Some disadvantages too; you need semi-reasonable Internet access wherever you go and latency can be a killer for highly interactive applications if you're literally half way around the globe away from your desktop.

      I haven't found the Internet access to be a problem in the primarily first-world locations I visit (except while airborne where it can get expensive). YMMV.

    110. Re: For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend/client who does theatre archtecture/staging consulting. All of the architectural firms he works with run AutoCAD on Windows

      Yes and a big reason for that is that AutoCAD isn't just an application but a platform, many applications are built atop AutoCAD and most of them, particularly in the architecture and engineering space, are Windows only.

    111. Re:For what use? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Plus the latency of cell data wouldn't make for a great experience.

    112. Re:For what use? by johnsie · · Score: 1

      People with spades said the same about the JCB.

    113. Re:For what use? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Pipe organ emulator software (e.g., Hauptwerk, GrandOrgue, OrganWerx) typically requires a great deal of RAM to hold pipe samples in memory. Spinning rust was never fast enough. As those get slowly displaced by SSDs, and as those get faster, direct-from-disk may become an option. Today, for this particular use case, it's not. CPU requirements for this job are not particularly insane, but RAM requirements still are and will be for some time to come.

    114. Re:For what use? by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Lots:

      Vagrant.
      Virtualbox.
      Developer tools.
      Photo/video editing.
      Sound editing.

      A 128 GB machine will be ideal for a developer who has it for his/her daily driver, and who has to show that their code works on some test VM bases via Vagrant. This gets rid of the "it works on my machine, but not in production" type of bugs.

      Even if the RAM is not needed, it works as a cache, making I/O faster.

      You forgot Crysis and Firefox.

    115. Re:For what use? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I don't have a Facebook account. I do know what I'm talking about.

      Just because you CAN shit up the machine with a heavier workload doesn't mean you should or that you'll actually benefit from it.

      For all the advancements in computing and computer modeling, buildings haven't gotten any more exact in actual construction and weather forecasts haven't gotten any more accurate. People still end up with ridiculous variances that result in the city flagging them for an exterior wall being to close to the curb. People still get rain on their wedding day.

      Learn to prune useless detail. Learn to abstract. As Tim Gunn would say, "Edit, people, edit!".

      You may as well go measure the coastline down to the millimeter.

    116. Re:For what use? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The optimum solution is to detail only meaningful details. Not everything is meaningful. Much of it is noise. When humans deal with things, they filter out the vast majority of details as noise unless they matter.

    117. Re:For what use? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not everything is meaningful right until it is. That's the problem with defining precisely that is meaningful on a 3D model, you will ALWAYS want more information.
      I have plenty of cases where we would have saved some significant project time and money: power sockets, not normally shown on 3D models.
      I have plenty of cases where we actually ended up with massive construction rework: cable trays not being in piping drawings, valves shown without stems only to find they didn't fit in an orientation that was useful.
      I even have a case that cost us well over $5m: Instruments connections shown, but not instruments themselves or the tubing connecting them leading to construction crews to put them on separate platforms leading to performance issues which shutdown the plant.

      As for noise. There's no such thing as noise when you're trying to fit things into a model. There's only detail. If your drafters can afford to draft it, and your model is capable of running it than absolutely any solid object should end up in the model. Hell the best thing we ever did was get a point cloud laser scan of a site I worked at complete with incredibly high resolution 360degree photos from every point source. The amount of money saved by us continuously advancing our model and us being able to see pretty much what was actually on site through the point cloud paid for itself in folds.

    118. Re:For what use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crysis

  2. Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every time you think, /.'s remaining scum can't possibly get any dumber, socially degenerated and psychopathic.

    Nex, they will start resembling the average "voter".

    1. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In practical use gumby in todays world, Yes ,in the future but now it seems overkill, now if this was a server cluster fine but a laptop? Doesn't even make for a good gaming box.

    2. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      640k is actually a lot of storage, and enough for most (even modern) application to run their core logic. What is filling most of the RAM today is things like pictures, large data sets prefetched data. A lot of the stuff in active RAM may never be used in the application. Being that Unicode data for hello world uses two bytes for character in generals makes strings 50% inefficient.

      For the time where screen resolutions were 320x200 4 color, getting data from a disk took minutes. 640k was enough for anyone. But that was for the programs of the time.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I use UTF8, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by fisted · · Score: 2

      Being that Unicode data for hello world uses two bytes for character in generals makes strings 50% inefficient.

      Wut

    5. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by zifn4b · · Score: 0

      8-bit ASCII requires 1 byte per character because each character value is 0-255. Multi-byte Unicode requires at least 2 bytes to support large character sets, for example Kanji. In an application that only requires use of the English alphabet, using multi-byte Unicode is waste. 1 = 50% of 2. Make sense now?

      --
      We'll make great pets
    6. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by fisted · · Score: 2

      Better not try to explain something you don't really understand in the first place, I guess.

      FWIW you're apparently conflating Unicode and UTF-16 (i.e. your Windows background is showing). The rest of the world tends to use UTF-8, which is a superset of ASCII (which is a 7 bit code BTW), and represents unicode code points using 1-6 bytes.

    7. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I'm amused by how you mindless butt hurt morons have actually avoided answering the question. Back in the day, it was pretty easy to come up with very good reasons why you wanted more RAM than the Borg Cube would allow for.

      Most people don't use laptops as workstation replacements. Even those of us that have workstations and bruiser laptops can find it hard to exploit all of RAM we already have.

      If you've got any actual practical experience (rather than mindless snark), we're all ears.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that? Gets with time granpa, it's UTF64 now.

    9. Re:Obligatory 640k is enough for everybody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      640k is actually a lot of storage, and enough for most (even modern) application to run their core logic. What is filling most of the RAM today is things like pictures, large data sets prefetched data. A lot of the stuff in active RAM may never be used in the application. Being that Unicode data for hello world uses two bytes for character in generals makes strings 50% inefficient.

      For the time where screen resolutions were 320x200 4 color, getting data from a disk took minutes. 640k was enough for anyone. But that was for the programs of the time.

      64k is enough for everybody, my Commodore 64 does not need any more! :-)

  3. Pointless ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    up to a 4K, 15.6-inch display

    Is a 15.6 inch 4K display even usable? I doubt you could see it; I still have to squint at my 17" HD screen on my laptop.

    The 128GB of RAM is cool though. Not sure most people will need that in a laptop, but it is cool.

    1. Re:Pointless ... by dryriver · · Score: 3, Informative

      On a 17 inch laptop, the difference between 1080HD and 4K is immediately visible. Much smaller and finer details in true 4K videos and games, icons and text with no aliasing whatsoever, and even 1080HD video renders slightly better and sharper on a 4K UHD screen. So the difference is there if you have sharp eyesight. On 15 inch you're pushing things a bit, but even there, 4K video should look sharper overall than at 1080HD.

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    2. Re:Pointless ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Informative

      At extremely high DPI you might not need to anti-alias fonts, which tends to make them blurry. Even so I calculated that panel to be only 280 DPI. That's nice but it's not the extreme end of things, and in the ball park of the early Retina displays.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Pointless ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even 1080HD video renders slightly better and sharper on a 4K UHD screen.

      This is the first time I have ever heard someone claim this. Every other time it's been "1080p on a 4k screen looks fuzzy compared to a 1080p screen of the same size". Which makes sense. Yes it scales perfectly, but a 2x2 "pixel" on a 4k screen will have a cross in the middle that a 1x1 pixel on the 1080p screen won't have.

      Now granted in practice they both look identical to me, but my point is, 1080p content looking worse when upscaled on a 4k screen than on a 1080p screen makes sense, but looking better does not.

    4. Re:Pointless ... by Lennie · · Score: 1

      What I do believe is: if you use a 4k camera, you can get better 1080p videos.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    5. Re:Pointless ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that 15" Retina Macbooks have only 2880x1800 right? Much lower than this laptop's screen.

    6. Re:Pointless ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      2012 13" macbook is 2560x1600 and about 226 DPI. the 15" works out to the same DPI.

      When I worked in R&D for an ebook reader we were playing with 300+ DPI eInk/EPD.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Pointless ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      On a 17 inch laptop, the difference between 1080HD and 4K is immediately visible.

      That isn't exactly a good metric. On my desktop with it's 1920x1080 monitor the difference between 1080p and 4K video is also immediately visible. Many thanks to the subcoding schemes used in compression for every the highest quality of video the difference is visible.

      How well does it do on games? Framerate aside you need a metric that doesn't rely on fancy compression to tell the difference on displays. I'm not saying there isn't a difference, just that video isn't a good metric to use to judge.

  4. I still like my first computer... by DrTJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... with 3 kB RAM, 8-colour TV display with 176x184 pixels, and magnetic tape storage.

    I bet it is just as fun as this machine. At least for me.

    1. Re:I still like my first computer... by dr.Flake · · Score: 2

      Colour??? COLOUR???

      2 bit black and white, 1K Ram, 8k ROM, 64x44 plotting resolution.

      oblig " get off my lawn" quote ;-)

      In 5 minutes someone will top this of course with his punch-card machine

      --
      Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
    2. Re:I still like my first computer... by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Funny

      My slide rule laughs at your dependence on electricity! I'd use my abacus, but it's harder to do square roots on it.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    3. Re:I still like my first computer... by DrTJ · · Score: 1

      Black AND white??

      My computer prior to my first one only had black!

      Even worse, it only had zeros - the ones weren't invented yet!

      I'll admit that it was a bit of a challenge to use it.

    4. Re:I still like my first computer... by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      You had an Abacus? We had to carve marks in stone using flint tools!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:I still like my first computer... by doconnor · · Score: 1

      How long did it take you to get the 16K RAM pack? Slippery slop, man.

    6. Re:I still like my first computer... by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck, you guys are all old.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    7. Re:I still like my first computer... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      My amber screen laughs at your black and white!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    8. Re:I still like my first computer... by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You had flint tools? We just had to imagine the numbers in our heads.

    9. Re:I still like my first computer... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      In 5 minutes someone will top this of course with his punch-card machine

      Started to do that before I read the rest of your post...(and yes, my first programming was on punch cards...can't really call it "my first computer", though, since individuals didn't really own those beasts. It was just what I did my first programming course on)

    10. Re:I still like my first computer... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Amber was nicer than green... They both had the advantage of long afterglow, no damn flickering.

      Then first year at university, workstations with 4 "colour" greyscale. Except the monitors were so old that white was only marginally brighter than black.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    11. Re:I still like my first computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Numbers are so overated... We were able to do everything with the concepts of "one" and "many"

    12. Re:I still like my first computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it runs word processing faster than today's 128GB machines as well.

    13. Re:I still like my first computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had imagination? We had to find the right number of similar sized objects.

    14. Re:I still like my first computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this sounds great, until you realize the power supply weighs more than the laptop.

    15. Re:I still like my first computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Punch cards? Phhhbbt. Real computers use wire looms for programming and for data input. Output can be lamps or smoking wires.

    16. Re:I still like my first computer... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      You had a head? Pure luxury! Why we were still dealing with being one-celled organisms!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    17. Re:I still like my first computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yamaha MSX RULES!
      No idea about specs, but it was a lot of fun to code! I learned about computer games only after 2 years of biweekly coding exercises.

    18. Re: I still like my first computer... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      We prototype RNA analogues had to excrete the RNA that made you DNA lifeforms to get these kinds of problems finally solved 4.3 billion years later.

    19. Re: I still like my first computer... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Sure... Bring up the fact we're slooow... You RNA types are all so high and mighty with your "evolved to replicate in 500 million years". You had it easy! You didn't have to deal with getting TWO strands lined up... Leave the hard work to us, while you go and rest after a pittance of time! Pikers, all!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re:I still like my first computer... by antdude · · Score: 1

      But can that old machine play Crysis? :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    21. Re:I still like my first computer... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Your square root doesn't fit into my round hole.

    22. Re:I still like my first computer... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You had a head? Pure luxury! Why we were still dealing with being one-celled organisms!

      Organisms? Pah! I had to coalesce celestial gasses into a star.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:I still like my first computer... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Do you ever miss punch cards? I would like to have a device that punches holes in cards. Such cool tech. Would be great for a bitcoin wallet that can be locked in a safe.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    24. Re:I still like my first computer... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      You had concepts? We had to make do with metaphors of darmok and geland at tanagra

    25. Re:I still like my first computer... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You had imagination? I just work at Microsoft and re-create ideas from the past in less efficient ways necessitating the need for an ever increasing amount of hardware.

  5. CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by dryriver · · Score: 5, Informative

    People doing CAD, 3D/CGI, Scientific Computing, GPGPU/HighPerformanceComputing use monster workstations every day - Dual Xeon 8, 12 or 16 Core, multiple Nvdia Titan GPUs, 64 to 256GB RAM and so on. That's what you need for today's 3D DCC and CAD design workflows. Anything lower, and everything slows down to a crawl and you don't make your deadlines. These new laptops don't even satisfy what is really needed - at least 8 to 12 CPU cores and room for 2+ powerful GPUs - but will be good enough to get work done on the go. That's the segment they are aimed at - the one that cannot get anything much done on quadcore core i7 CPUs and mobile GPUs.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    1. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This should powerful enough to run small tasks. Medium to large tasks, you wold be better off to submit the job to the massive HPC. The most important use would be in reviewing, dissecting, and presenting the completed analysis.

    2. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you need all that for cad, etc, but these laptops don't fit the spec. Not beefy enough.

      Why are people doing CAD, etc on laptops?

      Also I was doing CAD on workstations with 8gb of ram. You do not need 128gb of ram to run cad programs. I'm not sure even the heaviest of duty programs would need this much in a laptop.

      A server or a full fledged workstation, yea. A laptop, no. Because ram isn't the bottleneck. Needing power sucking CPUs and multiple GPUs, this laptop does not solve that problem.

      So again, what's the point?

    3. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      It really depends on the work that you do.
      Some CAD Designs require more power then others. If you are using CAD to design a CPU vs CAD to design a motherboard. or CAD to design a Laptop. There are different resource requirements, just because the complexity is different.

      I don't do much CAD but I do a lot of Database development. Some databases would work fine with systems with under a gig of free ram. Others I really want a Terabyte of RAM. It depends on what I am trying to do with the data, how fast I need to do it, and how many people will be trying to access it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly - my middle kid is an architecture student. A year ago I bought him a Lenvo P51 - it's a portable workstation. Architects and engineers don't do a whole lot of hand drawing - its all CAD, 3d CAD and rendering. I like Lenovo becuase you can customize laptops. Bought at the top of the line for the P51, and am hoping he will get one extra year's use out of it.

    5. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      If you do time dependant analysis on CAD models you can easily use more than 24GB of RAM

    6. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People doing CAD, 3D/CGI, Scientific Computing, GPGPU/HighPerformanceComputing use monster workstations every day - Dual Xeon 8, 12 or 16 Core, ... 64 to 256GB RAM and so on ...

      If I were to built one myself can you recommend me which motherboard I should get?

      Many thanks !

    7. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by exomondo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why are people doing CAD, etc on laptops?

      Because they want/need portable workstations.

      Also I was doing CAD on workstations with 8gb of ram. You do not need 128gb of ram to run cad programs.

      There were a lot of people doing CAD on workstations with 1mb of RAM too, therefore 8gb is massive overkill? You'd think that 640k Bill Gates quote has had enough exposure that people would have got the point of it by now, obviously not.

      Needing power sucking CPUs and multiple GPUs, this laptop does not solve that problem.

      They use desktop-grade CPUs rather than low-power portable ones and if you really need it you can expand the GPU capability with an eGPU for those times that you need it.

      So again, what's the point?

      Oh no you can buy a laptop with 128GB of RAM, what a terrible thing! What's the point of complaining about it? If you don't need it don't buy it, if nobody needs it nobody will buy and it will go away and you can stop whining about the existence of something you don't want or need.

    8. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      its a sad state of affairs when anythning new in technology is greeted with an adenoidal whining of "I dont need this so what's the point?"

    9. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by fisted · · Score: 1

      Yeah have fun getting rid of all that heat in a laptop-sized "monster workstation"

    10. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah. We do a lot of CFD and FEA simulations. Our server has 256GB on each node. Our problem is definitely post processing. Some of these simulation files are so memory intense that we can only post process on the server which makes things very slow and sometimes awkward as we need to use x-forwarding to get a GUI on the server (and then we're graphics limited). Anyway, 128GB RAM can definitely be put to use but obviously a unique use case.

    11. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      I have a few dozen engineers who do all their CAD work on dell laptops that would disagree with you.

      Key thing for them was 64 GB RAM and SSD, because when it came to their designs, the CPU was not the bottleneck, it was the RAM and disk speed.

      Now, these laptops are quad core w/ HT, and have a gaming graphics card in them. My monitoring software shows they average 30-35 GB RAM dedicated just to autocad 2018.

    12. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by zifn4b · · Score: 0

      My grandma is always complaining about how her laptop never has enough RAM for the CAD design she does. She just goes on and on and on about it. Complain complain complain. I think we'll all chip in and get her one of these new fangled 128GB RAM laptops this year for Christmas. Maybe that will shut her up for awhile. *crossing fingers*

      --
      We'll make great pets
    13. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are people doing CAD, etc on laptops?

      Because they want/need portable workstations.

      This also serves to hide the fact their employers *expect* them to work anywhere, all the time. But go ahead and gild the lily, this will cause prices to drop.

    14. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its a pretty accurate commentary on the world at large. One where people are too concerned with their own self needs that they are unable to accept that there are use cases outside their own. Its plain narcissism that leads this trend, where people think that everyone else is exactly like they are and that there is no one that could have different needs/wants.

      I do CAD work, and i hate doing it on laptops, that being said i can see two major use cases where a laptop would be preferable. The first being on the job site checking and verifying of measurements/design and the second being 3d scanning and other CMM work. 128GB of ram is super nice and absolutely needed now a days due to software bloat. the CAD programs take a couple GB before you even start to load any files, on top of that you also have to consider running other applications beside the CAD programs such as communication programs, web browsers and enterprise operating systems. Each of which has experienced their own level of bloat over the years, which means that requirements will balloon exponentially as the years go by. I find it amusing that almost all of the use cases presented on this story assume that the user will be running one and only one program.

    15. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose the other 104gb is for OS overhead if you're using Windows.

    16. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you also taught him that daddy budgets aren't the norm in the real world.

    17. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > its a sad state of affairs when anythning new in technology is greeted with an adenoidal whining of "I dont need this so what's the point?"

      So you've got wrapped stacks of cash you can just throw into a fire pit and burn?

      If not, then you have to consider how you are going to benefit from this overpriced monstrosity. The guys shouting out "CAD" at least have a reasonable answer beyond "It's new and shiny you fucking Luddite."

      My old bruiser still crushes most laptops (both literally and figuratively). That doesn't mean I am going to be sanctimonious ass to people who think it's a bit much.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    18. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....good enough to get work done on the go....

      Agreed, but you are not going to go too far. What is the battery life, 45 minutes?

    19. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Because they want/need portable workstations.

      Because at some point those CAD Models/ 3D CG/ Scientific Models need to be presented to the bosses/customers. Reality is, you can have the fanciest models in the world, but if you can't show them to other people, they are basically worthless.

      Example:
      Boss: Johnson! What have you been working on?
      Johnson: This really important CAD model.
      Boss: This will be the perfect thing to impress the board of directors. Have it ready to show them in an hour. Meet me in the board room.
      Johnson: I can't get my massive computer to the board room.
      Boss: That's too bad. Smith! What have you been working on?
      Smith: An equally impressive CAD Model.
      Boss: Can you show it to the board of directors in an hour?
      Smith: My super spiffy laptop and I will have a presentation that will blow their minds!
      Boss: Perfect! If we impress them enough I'll ask for a raise.
      Smith: If you get a raise, can I have one too?
      Boss: Absolutely!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    20. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      As someone (several) pointed out, you don't do that kind of work on a laptop, certainly not the the type that will use 128GB of RAM. You have a stationary workstation, or a server off someplace else that does that kind of crunching.

      As someone that has done this kind of work, 128GB of RAM doesn't generally make you finish your job faster. It just means you can do more in a single job without running out of memory, having a failure and then having to restart the job from scratch again. The type of jobs that might eat up 128GB of ram isn't something you do in minutes, or hours, but days of processing. Which for a mobile laptop makes very little sense in all but a very few very specific situations... i.e. you need to set up a temporary mobile processing center for some natural emergency or something where dragging containers of workstations isn't ideal, and connections to offsite are not feasible...

      Though I suppose having a internal battery would be a nice bonus if 2 days into your 3 days of processing the lights go out. Then again those types of systems tend to have their own UPS. Though I guess it could serve as an additional couple hours of backup, backup power source. Still for the likely cost, not worth it, just buy more UPS would be more reasonable.

      Anyway in many cases for truly large runs, users will break it down into more manageable chunks, not only in terms for memory usage, but also to mitigate risk of losing the whole job to some other error, or power, or whatever.

      Having said all that I do have a laptop workstation, however I only use it for small jobs, at most several hours of processing time. However even it only has 8GB of RAM I think, and if I had larger jobs to do I don't think my preference would be to use my own machine for the work. Multitasking and multiprocessor and whatever, but your computer isn't going to be all that usable while it is crunching, and if you ever unplug the thing you're battery isn't going to last that long either so what's the point?

    21. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Smith: If you get a raise, can I have one too?
      Boss: Absolutely!

      Said no boss ever.

      But I have to ask: is this Smith, Winston, or Smith, Matrix?

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    22. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: I can't afford to buy it, so can't everyone else.

      What an envious attitude you have there...

    23. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by exomondo · · Score: 1

      This also serves to hide the fact their employers *expect* them to work anywhere, all the time.

      Sounds like you're working for the wrong company.

    24. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've got wrapped stacks of cash you can just throw into a fire pit and burn?

      No! I dont have a need for it therefore I wont buy it. I guess you need to be educated that the fact that it exists doesnt mean you *have* to go and buy it just because other people might buy it also doesnt mean you have to go and buy it because youre jealous.

      I dont need it, I dont want it and Im not going to buy it and im certainly not going to start bitching and whining about the fact that others might. If anything it's a good thing that it exists so people that do need it will buy it which means it drives down the cost for the day if/when i may need it.

      My old bruiser still crushes most laptops (both literally and figuratively).

      So what are you complaining about? How is this even of any concern to you whatsoever?

    25. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by exomondo · · Score: 1

      So what do people use portable workstations like this - which have been around for decades - for? If not CAD/CAM/CAE, video editing, audio editing, scientific computing, etc... then what are they used for?

    26. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Yep, I do scientific computing... my DDs are desktop with 32 threads (one DP with 16 Xeon cores, one DP with 32 AMD cores) and 128GB of RAM.

      I've been looking at the new EPYC processors for our next upgrade. On the other hand, this machine isn't so much a laptop as a luggable...

    27. Re: CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      its a sad state of affairs when anythning new in technology is greeted with an adenoidal whining of "I dont need this so what's the point?"

      YMBNH.

      Slashdot has been like that for as long as I can remember. Look at any story about mobile phones. Half the posts are on the lines of "I want a physical keyboard, no camera, and a removable battery that is three inches thick and lasts for two months. And a full size 1/4 inch headphone jack. If I can't have that, I'm not interested and so nor will anyone else be."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    28. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So what do people use portable workstations like this - which have been around for decades - for? If not CAD/CAM/CAE, video editing, audio editing, scientific computing, etc... then what are they used for?

      Professional gaming.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    29. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by exomondo · · Score: 1

      So what do people use portable workstations like this - which have been around for decades - for? If not CAD/CAM/CAE, video editing, audio editing, scientific computing, etc... then what are they used for?

      Professional gaming.

      On these portable workstations with Quadro GPUs? No.

    30. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      As I said I have a portable workstation, and do use it *occasionally* for process intensive type work. All I am saying is that the amount of RAM included on this thing isn't the amount you need for occasionally doing some slightly intensive work. I've got 8GB in mine which is a couple years old now.

      What is 128GB being used for in a portable workstation? Well the answer is: probably nothing. The same reason someone buy a corvette, bragging rights and little else.

      Perhaps there is some small niche it might be useful. However even in my work, while I have a nice discrete workstation type GPU, much of the work done now is less GPU intensive than it is CPU really which has changed over the years.

    31. Re:CAD, 3D CG, Scientific, GPGPU, HPC Needs It by exomondo · · Score: 1

      As I said I have a portable workstation, and do use it *occasionally* for process intensive type work.

      Yeah but what I was asking is what do you think people use these machines for? Are you saying you think everybody uses them the same as you do? If they aren't used for CAD/CAM/CAD, video editing, audio composition, scientific computing, etc... then why would anybody buy these horrendous things and lug them around instead of a more appropriate machine? The answer is they are used for those tasks, that's why they exist, they're bought more by companies than by individuals and they're the goto machine in industries like the mining industry where you're dealing with massive datasets on site.

      Perhaps there is some small niche it might be useful.

      Yes and that is the point. The fact that it exists doesn't mean you have to buy it, if anything it means it drives down the cost of lower end machines that suit your work so that's a good thing. Even if there were people buying 128GB for "bragging rights" I'm not sure why you're so impressed or offended by that, who gives a shit?! You actually believe companies are bragging about how much RAM is in their employees' laptops? Get real.

  6. Not for Apple users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will be stuck in 16GB land forever, all in the name of thin and light and no ports and jacks.

    1. Re:Not for Apple users by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Buying Apple is getting more and more courageous every day.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  7. We will never need more than 640 GB of RAM by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    By the way, we use laptops with lots of TB of data storage and our blade servers have a lot more RAM than that, so some of our datasets can't be loaded and processed on laptops.

    We would love better laptops.

    One of my colleagues is starting a lab soon, and one of the conditions of his startup package was a top of the line laptop suite and blade servers.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  8. 64gb for the dells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just checked the dell configurator. What you get is impressive for the price. But the memory tops out at 64gb ecc memory. There are no 128gb options.

    1. Re:64gb for the dells by cmeans · · Score: 1

      Until this week, their 64GB non-ecc option was actually cheaper than the 32GB option. Also, still no 3200MHz options.

    2. Re:64gb for the dells by symes · · Score: 1

      I would think you would want the ecc option - if you are loading that much data into ram to work on it will probably be a task that takes a while and requires accuracy and stability.

    3. Re:64gb for the dells by cmeans · · Score: 1

      We went with the i9 CPU, and Non-ECC memory was the only option.

  9. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by kaka.mala.vachva · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Call it a portable workstation, if you like that. I need my "laptops" to move around with me - so I have a properly specced computer with me wherever I work. I don't necessarily need a lot of battery life. Just because you CAN'T see a usecase, doesn't mean there ISN"T one.

  10. Large today but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    few years from now, this will be seen as ridiculously low...

  11. Oh, goodie. by forkfail · · Score: 1

    That's a whole lotta spy and bloatware that we are now going to be further expected to have the RAM to maintain.

    --
    Check your premises.
  12. Not Going To Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a LOT of VR porn.

  13. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by dryriver · · Score: 2

    CAD and 3D models are getting really huge these days. Particularly in architectural visualization. So if you need to load the 3D CAD model of an entire car engine, or the highly complex 3D model of an entire shopping center, you may very well run out of RAM if you only have 64GB. In architectural visualization, you may be loading a building model that has dozens of rooms or hundreds of windows and other details. 128GB is not unusual to work on such monster scenes, and it has never been available in mobile form until today. So there are real world uses for that much RAM.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  14. Apple, have courage by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dear Apple,

    Please have some courage and release a pro version of your laptop. If IBM and Dell can do this, you can do the same. It's the year 2018, 16 GB should be a base, not the maximum.

    1. Re:Apple, have courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has the absolutely worst laptops for the price a large margin. Their current laptops cost about $1000 and are comparible to $150 laptops. If they made a pro version by relative price it would cost like $10,000 for the consumer.

    2. Re:Apple, have courage by Graymalkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dear Intel,

      Release a mobile chipset that supports LPDDR4 so vendors can support more than 16GB of RAM without using a memory controller using 2-3x the power of the low power chips. Lots of RAM in laptops would be great but not at the cost of battery life.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    3. Re:Apple, have courage by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      It's all about the use case. Just because I need a portable computer, doesn't mean I need to sit at a cafe all day.

      Most people that use laptops for work leave them plugged in most of the time. While I appreciate a long battery life, I need the ability to perform my work to begin with.

    4. Re:Apple, have courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I honestly wonder who these people are, who flit around from place to place, using their laptop 30 minutes at a time. Sip of battery here, sip of battery there. Oops! Battery almost out, I'll just take smaller sips. I don't use my laptop like that, and I don't think most people do.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:Apple, have courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Intel,

      Release a mobile chipset that supports LPDDR4 so vendors can support more than 16GB of RAM without using a memory controller using 2-3x the power of the low power chips. Lots of RAM in laptops would be great but not at the cost of battery life.

      Doesn't matter. I have 32GB of memory in my laptop. It consumes and enormous amount of power at 1W.

      Apple just like cheap slow memory and blaming others for their laziness and greed.

    6. Re:Apple, have courage by Graymalkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because I need a portable computer, doesn't mean I need to sit at a cafe all day.

      Wanting good battery life is not about sitting in a cafe all day. I want a portable computer that I can use places away from my office/desk for long periods of time without hunting for a power outlet. I also want to use my laptop and not have it throttle way down on the battery. It would also really nice for it to be light so it doesn't weigh down my bag.

      Portables have aspects with inverse proportions. Intel dropping the ball after Skylake has meant any manufacturers wanting high performance parts in a small envelope can't pack a lot of RAM unless they sacrifice battery life by using much higher power draw DDR4.

      A higher power draw means lower battery life (for the same sized battery) and likely a lot of thermal throttling issues. DDR4 uses several times as much power as LPDDR3E used in the MacBook lines. Even if you are willing to sacrifice the battery life, the thermals would be a major issue even on AC power. The higher power RAM/controller would eat up the thermal budget for the CPU meaning it would enter TurboBoost mode less often or worst case actually stay throttled down.

      The ThinkPad in the story is a brick. This means thermals and battery life probably aren't major concerns. From the looks of it actual portability isn't much of a concern either.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    7. Re:Apple, have courage by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I honestly wonder who these people are, who flit around from place to place, using their laptop 30 minutes at a time. Sip of battery here, sip of battery there. Oops! Battery almost out, I'll just take smaller sips. I don't use my laptop like that, and I don't think most people do.

      Most of the time, my work laptop is at my desk on AC power.

      But I do go to meetings, and I carry it in, and the meetings can lasts anywhere from 30 minutes to 2 hours.

      I think last week was the worst when I literally was flitting from meeting to meeting. No, I didn't bother bringing the adapter, if I needed it, I could run to my desk and fetch it.

    8. Re:Apple, have courage by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But the point is you could plug in for every meeting, so you lose a bit of convenience at best.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:Apple, have courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly wonder who these people are, who flit around from place to place, using their laptop 30 minutes at a time

      Hipsters. Checking their email. In Starbucks. In between selfies. Doing whatever it is that hipsters actually do to pay for all that beard oil and tattoos.

      That usage profile isn't likely to be tech professionals, but anything where you have a series of destinations and gaps in between ... like real estate for instance.

      It's the quick emails and sending of documents between appointments that use their battery like that.

    10. Re:Apple, have courage by junk · · Score: 2

      I honestly wonder who these people are, who flit around from place to place, using their laptop 30 minutes at a time. Sip of battery here, sip of battery there. Oops! Battery almost out, I'll just take smaller sips. I don't use my laptop like that, and I don't think most people do.

      I don't think most people take their laptops everywhere with them any more. There was a time in the 2000s where coffee shops were filled with people showing off their overpriced fruit machines but that seems to have passed. I'd prefer a desktop but companies buy laptops for... reasons that I don't quite understand. Probably because so many more of us work remotely and/or from home, that it's the only sane thing to do.

      I honestly wonder who these people are, who flit around from place to place, using their laptop. Full stop. Who does that?

    11. Re:Apple, have courage by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      DDR4 only uses more power if you go for the higher clocks. At equivalent clocks, DDR4 is supposed to use 40% less power than DDR3. Its the whole reason why they can clock DDR4 higher before running into a burdensome heat issue.

      The real issue may be that at equivalent clocks, DDR4 has meaningfully higher latencies than DDR3 does. Mobile processors generally dont have large caches, so memory latency could potentially be beyond an inflection point until CPU's get even faster.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    12. Re:Apple, have courage by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Apple laptops come standard with 128 gig. Of storage space. It takes real courage to buy from Apple.

    13. Re:Apple, have courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs have supported up to 64GB RAM since the March 2017 revision.

      That's not 128GB though. And it's been over a year since that last revision. Ah, Apple...

  15. Almost there... by bunyip · · Score: 4, Funny

    Call me when they have 640 GB of RAM, thought ought to be enough for anybody !!!

    A.

    1. Re:Almost there... by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      I remember arguing with a guy back in the early 1990s about a 20 meg hard drive. He said you can put stuff on floppies, no one needs anything bigger than a 20 meg drive. I thought that was funny then, crazy foolish now. I told him I had an 80 meg drive. Full height 5.25" drive. He thought that was a big waste of money.

  16. AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they sold a model with Ryzen processor and AMD GPU with that much RAM, I would buy it.

    1. Re:AMD by dryriver · · Score: 1

      I'd love a Dual AMD EPYC 2 X 32 Core laptop. =)

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    2. Re:AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you buy a suitcase for it?

  17. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Call it a portable workstation, if you like that. I need my "laptops" to move around with me - so I have a properly specced computer with me wherever I work. I don't necessarily need a lot of battery life. Just because you CAN'T see a usecase, doesn't mean there ISN"T one.

    The problem is that something that needs that much horsepower almost always needs multiple displays. and those just don't "port" as easily as a laptop; so again, if you have to lug around your environment to be efficient, then why not at least port around a high-end All-In-One, like an iMac Pro. it is available with up to 128 GB RAM, 18-Core Xeons, multiple TB3 ports, built-in 5k display that is large enough to actually SEE things on, etc...

  18. Pictures by cerberusss · · Score: 2

    I was curious to see how this beast looked like. I can't find pics on Lenovo's own site, but notebookcheck.net has an article. Pics from the article:

    Image 1
    Image 2

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Pictures by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      If that's an actual pic, it has REAL buttons at the bottom of the trackpad. I'd love to know how to get them, I can't find one without the awful "buttons integrated into trackpad" design these days.

    2. Re:Pictures by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Pics explain the need for 128GB.... It's running Windows 10

      [ducks]

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make one with no camera, no mic and no gyro, and I'm sold.

    4. Re:Pictures by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Check the Lenovo P71. A great keyboard (with around 8mm of actual travel), and REAL BUTTONS on the trackpad. And it has a bigger 17.3" screen that you can do actual work on.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have Lenovo P50 series laptop. It had 32 GB of ram and 2 TB SSD drive and mobile Xeon processor. It was a very nice machine, probably the best I have ever had. I expect this one is even nicer.

    6. Re:Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I am used to the "self-clicking" trackpad, I'm peeved when using a regular one with buttons too.
      e.g. I'm using a "self-clicking" or integrated right now. As it's very recent I mostly notice how it's amazingly sensitive, reactive, precise, swift. Only drag'n'drop is a bit of a hassle or accidental taps of links when reading a page.

      What I always miss is the third button.
      Lack of right "Fn" key is fairly annoying when it forces you doing a two-hand combo.
      This makes me not hate the keypad in fact. Keypad with num lock off == one digit access to useful keys in a consistent manner.

  19. Re:Pointless by dryriver · · Score: 1

    Lots of applications require large datasets to be loaded - for example, architectural CAD, where you may have a 3D model of a shopping center with 92 different shops and 400 different windows in it. Until now, those datasets could only be opened on expensive desktop CAD workstations that weigh 40 lbs and that you cannot easily take to a construction site or to a client meeting. So these 128GB laptops are aimed at that - going to a construction site or a client's office and opening and manipulating very large CAD or scientific data sets. 6 CPU cores is a bit low for that, but its mostly the GPU that gets used, and its a lot better than having to move a large desktop workstation to a presentation or construction site.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  20. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    CAD and 3D models are getting really huge these days. Particularly in architectural visualization. So if you need to load the 3D CAD model of an entire car engine, or the highly complex 3D model of an entire shopping center, you may very well run out of RAM if you only have 64GB. In architectural visualization, you may be loading a building model that has dozens of rooms or hundreds of windows and other details. 128GB is not unusual to work on such monster scenes, and it has never been available in mobile form until today. So there are real world uses for that much RAM.

    But not supported by a single 15" laptop display, unless you are TRULY desperate.

  21. Re:Pointless by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Loading and viewing large data sets in science and industry. Maybe you'd do calculations on the data sets on some big network of servers, but at the site you might want to browse the results of your oil and gas survey without access to a network.

    And for many of us we only have laptops at work and no longer get powerful desktop workstations. I now have to remotely access the real processing power as it is shared by multiple employees over multiple timezones. I will admit that while inconvenient our new environment is a lot faster than my old 12-core workstation.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  22. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong, the new memory chips are less power hungry, so either you'll get a significant power reduction with a 64GB laptop versus existing 64GB laptops, or a manageable power increase using 128GB.

    http://www.hexus.net/tech/news/ram/118634-samsung-10nm-class-32gb-ddr4-sodimms-mass-production/

    So, Samsung says the new RAM uses about 4.6W if using 64GB at 2666 speed. So, 9.2W for the 128GB.
    lol, I've noticed your user handle. Why get so defensive. Next year you'll be telling us how great the new macintosh is for supporting high density LPDDR4.

  23. Great! by mark_reh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll buy one for $300 in about 5 years!

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll buy one for $300 in about 5 years!

      Not the way Trump's trade "negotiations" are going. We may not be getting those cheap Asian components ......

    2. Re:Great! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It's cheap steel you wont be getting. I hear the price of a Toyota may be going up by as much as $400.

    3. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you on the $300 laptop, but as someone who has purchased $300 laptops exclusively for the past decade, I think you mean 20 years.

    4. Re:Great! by halivar · · Score: 1

      Tell them to leave off the flimsy trunk liner. That's your $400 right there.

    5. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't that deaden the sound? Otherwise your trunk acts like a big old resonant bass tube thumpa thumpa thumpa.

    6. Re:Great! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      I'll buy one for $300 in about 5 years!

      I was about to say it will take a long time for it to get to $300, but yeah 5 years might do it. It is the price for a used W530 now after all.

    7. Re:Great! by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      My 15" Retina MacBook Pro that I bought for $4,200 maxed out in 2012 goes for around $1,099 on eBay, so maybe not for $300, but for cheaper.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    8. Re:Great! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      My 15" Retina MacBook Pro that I bought for $4,200 maxed out in 2012 goes for around $1,099 on eBay, so maybe not for $300, but for cheaper.

      I was talking a nominal model with a new price around $2000. I have no idea what a fully maxed out workstation thinkpad sells for, but I could imagine it is a lot, many people love the old keyboards they last used around 2012.

  24. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asus makes battery powered 15.6" displays, such that they sit next to the laptop on a kickstand.

    Some users need high RAM and only a bunch of command lines, not only devs but e.g. statisticians.
    You can lug an iMac Pro maybe but don't forget to wrap it in a kilometer of bubble wrap.

  25. imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and storag by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and storage locked on MB Starting at only $4999

  26. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    So at your home office you have your multi-monitor setup, and at your on-site office you have your multimonitor setup, and now you have a 'portable' workstation that you can more easily lug between the two.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  27. Look at your mouse too... by kackle · · Score: 1

    Did you know optical mice use ~ 5 times the power of roller-ball mice?

    1. Re:Look at your mouse too... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Did you know optical mice use ~ 5 times the power of roller-ball mice?

      What about capactive touchpads?

    2. Re:Look at your mouse too... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Unusable for CAD. A space mouse is almost always . And even if you're working with a normal mouse, it's nice to have a LARGE area that you can do decent drag modes. Can you set up your touch pad to do click-and-drag over an entire screen width AND still have very fine resolution? I've tried it (yes, even on a Macbook) and it simply isn't realistic. It's really slow. Get at least a regular mouse...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  28. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the non-linked Lenovo blog post, they call it a mobile workstation. The word laptop is not used. Only in "the verge" article do they call it a laptop. I guess the anonymous reader works for "the verge".

    http://blog.lenovo.com/en/blog/the-new-thinkpad-p52/

  29. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    why even call something like this a Laptop?

    It's a typographical error. They meant "cell phones".

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    You can buy a few monitors to leave on the various desks you'd use something like this on. Much cheaper than entire workstations at each location and you always have your data with you.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you cant understand the need for it; then its not for you.

  34. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    It appears to have a "longer battery life" than the P51, which has a 9-hour battery life.

  35. The real news is the new DIMMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you wondered, these are regular laptops with four So-DIMM slots but you can get 32GB regular So-DIMMs.
    http://www.hexus.net/tech/news/ram/118634-samsung-10nm-class-32gb-ddr4-sodimms-mass-production/

    This is good news and means the potential max memory of every system using DDR4 has doubled. So e.g. a $400 laptop with two So-DIMMs that comes with only 4GB memory may have its max capacity doubled from 32GB to 64GB, if the BIOS/firmware is updated or if it's a new model starting from now.
    This should expend to desktops, perhaps your desktop will support 128GB up from the old 64GB (or 64GB if it only has two DIMM slots). At least on Coffee Lake, perhaps on older systems as well. Maybe on Zen desktops, we'll be able to know in a few weeks/months.
    Small trivia, Core i7 920, i7 980, Xeon variants when not using registered memory have an official max memory capacity of 24GB, but support 48GB in fact. Ditto i5 750, i7 870 which have official max 16GB memory, effective 32GB. This is because 8GB DDR3 DIMMs came out after they launched.

    1. Re:The real news is the new DIMMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 16gb DDR3 SO-DIMMs too. You can have 32gb is two slots with an i5 or i7 processor

    2. Re:The real news is the new DIMMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey seemed very rare and with specific hardware support.

  36. 6-row keyboard by XanC · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Still waiting them out on my x220, waiting for real keyboards to return.

  37. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly this.
    Blind apple worshipers cant see a use-case until apple copies something.
    Then its all "OMG apple apple apple"

  38. Yo Mamma by spacemky · · Score: 1

    Now I can finally open a pic of yo mamma!

    *badum-ching

    --
    640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
  39. Re: Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you are rendering the screen is totally irrelevant. And when you are not. Modelling in quad view feela ancient, one big view to work shows up all the detail you may need.

  40. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CAD models are often detailed down the pitch of the nuts and bolts of large structures.

  41. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    I have a 64 GB, 1 TB Lenovo P71 with a 17.3" screen - and a 99 Whr battery, stock. I get a solid 7-8 hours on battery from it - enough for about a full day of work (a few hours of meetings, lunch - and that leaves 7-8 hours of run time). Sure, it's 8 pounds - but it can actually be used to design something like a Macbook, whereas a Macbook - can't.

    Oh, it also has 4 USB type A connectors, HDMI (great so I can plug into just about any projector without the need for a flaky dongle that is always forgotten), Ethernet (some clients will let me use wired, but it's a big hassle to get WIFI - so I go wired), DisplayPort, SD card reader. Essentially everything I need to not only design stuff, but install a lot of higher end test equipment that is USB connected.

    Just because YOU don't need something, doesn't mean someone else doesn't need it. Some of us do real engineering work - like designing the toys and products for companies like Apple, Microsoft Google, and others. And that takes real workstation power. Having it portable means I can work anywhere in the world.

    And yeah, it's 8 pounds (just over 10 with the power supply), but if a person cannot carry a 10 pound laptop through an airport, they need to cut back on the Cheetos and Mountain Dew.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  42. Re: Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't explain a valid use case; nobody needs it.

    And thus far, no one has stated a purpose or problem this solves. I heard someone say vagrant. Lul. Then someone said CAD. Another lul. I do cad using 16gb of ram all day. No issues. Designing skyscrapers. Oh and someone said 128 1gb VMs. Yea because that's a valid use case for a laptop.

    You people suck at the corporate tit. You need to realize that we have markets for a reason. And if a lot of people are saying "what's the point?" Then that trumps the 2 people standing up and yelling "but I need one for CAD".

    Lul.

  43. Re:Pointless by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

    Do some heavy graphics processing. I regularly use over 70GB of ram when working with images on my computer. Just because you can't use that much doesn't mean others of us can't. It takes a lot of memory and processing power to make images that are in the multiple gigapixel range that have 16bpc color depth.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  44. AMD laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow that's amazing a single 128GB stick on one channel for AMD laptops!!!

    1. Re: AMD laptops by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      My netbook is an AMD laptop. It has the max 8gb of ram, too. An Acer Aspire One. Perfect use case for an AMD processor.

  45. Re: Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol this.

    The same guy keeps posting "cad" whenever someone asks who needs this much ram. He is clueless as fuck. If he needs that much ram for his cad program that something is wrong in his workflow.

    Shopping centers LOL. Yea we've had those being designed since forever. But these new ones require 128gb of ram because...well because they are bigger.

    This whole thread is people saying "don't want" followed by the same 2 people replying "but but but cad"

    It's a big fucking joke.

  46. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I mean, why

    Because people have use cases for portable workstations with a built-in screen and are smart enough to understand that more power requires a lower battery life, and they're willing to make that trade-off. This is how every market-based purchasing decision anywhere and everywhere is made.

    It's probably not the same person you see at Starbucks with a MacBook Air sipping a flat white while being outraged on Twitter.

    That's actually OK.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  47. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick any other type of large building then.

    Stadium, hospital, airport etc.

  48. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and 30 minutes of battery-life, are here!!!

    I mean, why even call something like this a Laptop? It is about as able to work without being tethered to an AC power source as is a Cray-1.

    Integrated UPS.

  49. And a battery life measured in minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That much âoepowerâ has to be sourced from somewhere.

  50. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

    imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and storage locked on MB Starting at only $4999

    whatever.

    You actually think this laptop will be significantly less than that?

  51. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    So at your home office you have your multi-monitor setup, and at your on-site office you have your multimonitor setup, and now you have a 'portable' workstation that you can more easily lug between the two.

    Meh.

  52. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    why even call something like this a Laptop?

    It's a typographical error. They meant "cell phones".

    LOL!

  53. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    You can buy a few monitors to leave on the various desks you'd use something like this on. Much cheaper than entire workstations at each location and you always have your data with you.

    As I said above: "Meh".

  54. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    It appears to have a "longer battery life" than the P51, which has a 9-hour battery life.

    Unpossible. Not with that much RAM, GPU, CPU.

  55. No Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It still has a headphone port. Not courageous enough to remove that?

  56. That seems like overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still on 4GB RAM and not even straining, I understand some people need more but I wonder what the use case for 128GB is!

  57. Arm announce ... by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    Arm processor as good that the i5. So laptop urge to grow better than your next phone... but then who need a 128gb laptop ?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:Arm announce ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arm processor as good that the i5. So laptop urge to grow better than your next phone...

      No, get out more and get a job.

      but then who need a 128gb laptop ?

      People with a job.

    2. Re:Arm announce ... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      but then who need a 128gb laptop ?

      Someone using their laptop as a workstation. Apple has certainly made a market for this with their Pro laptops so people like this must not actually be rare.

      Personally I too seek a lot of power in a small form factor for my desk (seriously considering building my own mini-itx case), but not a god damned laptop.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  58. to compete agains them self by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    Arm processor as good that the i5. So laptop urge to grow better than your next lenovo/moto phone...

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  59. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    I mean, why

    Because people have use cases for portable workstations with a built-in screen and are smart enough to understand that more power requires a lower battery life, and they're willing to make that trade-off. This is how every market-based purchasing decision anywhere and everywhere is made.

    It's probably not the same person you see at Starbucks with a MacBook Air sipping a flat white while being outraged on Twitter.

    That's actually OK.

    Really? Are you SURE?!?

    Well, it does appear there may be some limited use-cases for this kind of laptop; but they are pretty rare, methinks.

  60. Porn aficionados rejoice! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    My laptop only has 32GB of SSD, thank you.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  61. Well, that's a real panty-dropper, isn't it? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Too bad chick aren't impressed with the size of your RAM...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Well, that's a real panty-dropper, isn't it? by ruir · · Score: 1

      I am not impressed with your command of "Engrish"

  62. up to by h4x0t · · Score: 1

    Max out all the sliders and get ready to drop 10k....

    1. Re:up to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy it with 8GB and order the four 32GB sticks on ebay or something...

  63. "The company hasn't announced pricing yet" by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Considering the level of illegal price fixing in DDR4 right now, I can safely say it definitely costs more than the average house.

  64. Malware ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    128 GB is bare minimum to properly run all the malware included with your new laptop.

  65. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and storage locked on MB Starting at only $4999

    whatever.

    You actually think this laptop will be significantly less than that?

    No slightly less in price not significantly less, but an order of magnitude or two more powerful.

  66. Looks like a regular boring laptop. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Nothing to see here. Then again, this is 2018 where you can get .5 TB MicroSD Cards for real so go figure.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re: Looks like a regular boring laptop. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I 'only' have a .125TB sd card in my phone, because I'm cheap.

    2. Re:Looks like a regular boring laptop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also get a 20TB SSD for your desktop computer but there's not quite a prowess in that beside paying like $10K for an SSD.

      I wish there still were 1.8" hard drives or something half way like 2.0".

  67. That's a HUGE difference between high and low end. by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    I sell second hand devices (laptops, tablets and occasionally desktops) and people are still bringing in brand new windows 10 devices with only 2GB of ram but most now have 4GB. 8GB is rare and I haven't even seen one with more than 16GB yet and i've only seen two of those.
    The ones that I have seen were maxed out and didn't support any larger amount of memory. Like the laptop i'm using right now is maxed out with 8GB and the one I use at home is maxed out at 16GB.

    Windows needs least 4GB of ram to not page to disk when installing windows updates by itself! It's infuriating that they still sell them with less.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  68. Re: Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes I am desperate. I'm on site, the manager is going ballistic because the builders fucked up, and he wants to know if the mistake was in the drawing (ours) or theirs.

  69. Relevant McGonagall Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we agree [Lenovo's] actions were heroic. The question is, why were they necessary?

  70. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is because you are ignorant about the enterprise space.

    The standard memory for a developer laptop working on cloud products at SAP is 64GB. If you use Hana, you most likely want a local VM and that means 32GB for the database itself. If you need to use XSA/SAC for an integration project, that bumps the VM memory requirements to 64GB.

    Desktops are dead here at SAP. My laptop is plugged into the wall most of the time but I need portability. Sometimes I am on battery power while in a conference room or sitting on my couch.

  71. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    order of magnitude

    You keep using those words, I do not think they mean what you think they mean.

  72. But Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... said only 16 Gigs of RAM was possible in a portible computer.

  73. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What like the pitch of the threading?
    Gtfo I need you to post a screenshot of this because while I'm able to find screenshots of screws in cad, I'm unable to find any renderings that indicate there is detail down to screw pitch when people autocad buildings.

  74. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How and why would you design buildings precisely in simulation down the the pitch of the threads in a bolt when the construction workers aren't going to be able to follow the same level of precision constructing the building?
    I know shit about architecture but I've seen enough modeling across disciplines to know you should be building your model at different scales

  75. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, now we can model the air molecules so that the rendered walkthrough shows you a mirage due to the airconditioning eddies and the grease motes floating out of the food court.

    It's also way more realistic in modeling a Cessna crashing through the roof and torching the holiday crowd.

  76. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone spending more than ~$400 on a laptop is getting played.

  77. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are probably better off with your VTech inspired macbook.

  78. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe impossible for apple.

  79. Laptops aren't really designed by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    for power hungry applications as they don't really handle thermal dissipation as well as their full size workstation brethren.
    Not to mention the high end hardware that can deliver the power you need will eat a battery so fast it's shocking.

    Since the damn thing is going to have to be plugged in at all times anyway ( with the added bonus of that tiny ass screen ) why
    get a laptop for this sort of work ? ( I use CAD and DCC software and I'm sure as hell not going to do it on a 17" monitor on a road trip )

    Additionally, I've never really liked laptops as their upgrade possibilities are extremely limited ( if they exist at all ).

    1. Re:Laptops aren't really designed by ledow · · Score: 1

      I bought a high-end laptop about 8-9 years ago.

      It's still going.

      It literally runs every game on my Steam account (1000+) still.

      It has a bundle of virtual machines on it with VMWare, and I regularly develop on one OS inside another to let me test the code compiles/runs on both.

      It's always plugged in, except for when I take it on a plane (i.e. leisure, not business). Then you put it in low-power mode and it's still a laptop with a bunch of RAM and an SSD which means that it gets everything done REALLY quick and doesn't have to spin anything up to do so, which means its power requirements are low (but bursty). Just because you have to plug it in, doesn't mean it's not portable, and it doesn't mean that you run it full-whack when it's not plugged in. I always get a full-movie out of it on the plane, at least. And it's a big screen.

      The "gaming laptop" is really the ideal machine. Portable enough. Fast enough to do ANYTHING. Works in low-power when you need. Survives power cuts. Does everything your work will require, plus your entertainment.

      CAD - I'm not sure, but anything that has a decent enough card to run modern games will likely do most of the CAD you require. If it doesn't, sure, it's not for you. But CAD usage is niche. A laptop that people can game, browse, work and travel on isn't.

      Upgrades? I bought it with maxed RAM. Apart from changing one of the two drive bays to an SSD, I've never needed to upgrade. The SSD upgrade literally doubled the speed of the thing.

      Thermals? Sure, if I play GTA V for hours and hours on end, it gets hot underneath. It may even ramp a core down (visible in the Windows event log as a firmware event). I don't notice in-game because it "just works".

      Nobody is saying such laptops are the absolute best thing for everyone and every purpose. But I wouldn't be interested in a machine that was the best machine for CAD.
        Or one that was the best machine for gaming. Or one that was the best machine for portability. But they are EASILY the most comfortable medium, without compromising heavily in any particular area.

      I'm looking at another now as, after 9 years, my battery is starting to wither. A double-capacity battery is GBP50 on Amazon. An equivalent laptop (in terms of what this was when I bought it) is about 1000-1500GBP. But I need NO other machine. Per hour of usage, that easily drops it into the fractions-of-a-penny range.

      The only reason I don't is that I'll probably have to buy a new version of VMWare.

    2. Re:Laptops aren't really designed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a discussion on Hacker News were some hipster were complaning about high performance/gaming laptops dying prematurely after they switched to a trendy open space office and replaced workstation with laptops so the could move them around, they tried 3 or 4 different models and they all sucked.

  80. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Nope. CAD is almost always done on a single screen - you don't need dual screens. I have an extra one at home, it's nice to toss up Outlook and a music player on the laptop and use the bigger screen for CAD, but I'm essentially working in a single screen. Same as when I'm on the road.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  81. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Yes. A Lenovo P71, fully loaded with 64 GB of RAM, 2 TB of SSD, and the 17.3" 4K screen, comes in at $4166. I wouldn't expect this new unit, with more memory, SSD, but a smaller screen, to be significantly more cost, certainly no more than $5000.

    And of course an iMac Pro is by NO means a "portable" solution. I can toss my P71, power supply, mouse, 4 days of clothes, toiletries, and UE Boom 2 and cables into an Everki Titan backpack and go anywhere. I did just that last week, spending 8 days in Asia at 3 factories and 2 hotels. Can't do that with an iMac, no way no how. I can pick up my laptop and run between floors in buildings, hard to do that with an iMac Pro - even to move just a desk or two over.

    Now, you CAN use an iMac (running Windows, of course, if you're doing any serious hardware engineering) Pro to do everything, and rely upon a second laptop to remote in to your iMac Pro. But I dare you to try to do 3D CAD with 100-200 msec of latency - good luck getting the right surfaces or reference points selected! And that is a LOW latency for many situations, such as a Starbucks, an airport lounge - or overseas.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  82. Re: Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Wow. I have a 14 GB Pro/E file for a mid-sized product I'm working on right now. Running that on a 16 GB machine is like running through frozen molasses. Having my 64 GB machine right now at least allows me to spin it as I'm working on surfaces, in something close to real time, rather than "move mouse and wait 5 seconds for first move; 5 seconds for second move; 5 seconds for 3rd move"... And don't even get me started on an FEA impact analysis of an ABS enclosure hitting a concrete floor from a 1.5 meter fall...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  83. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Versus the option of not even being able to SEE the file because you do not have a suitable portable computer on site? I'll take "it's a bit small but workable on a 15.6 inch display for $200, Alex" any day...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  84. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    So if it doesn't work for you, and there isn't an Apple alternative, the case must not exist and be tiny? Do you realize that iPhones make up about 15% of the market, they must be tiny so should be ignored and dropped. After all, if 7 out of 8 people use Android, then why does iOS even exist? Clearly it's pretty rare...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  85. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone care?

  86. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Between 1 and 10 hours for the P71, a bigger version of this. In real-world use, I see about 5-8 hours on a charge, doing a mix of CAD, surfing, and e-mail. Apparently you can watch around 14 hours of video on a charge... So plenty of battery life. Of course, it's not "courageously" thin, but then this is a real man's computer, not something for a limp-wristed pantywaist who traipses around with skinny jeans raving about saving 0.1m thickness on the latest phone because COURAGE!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  87. Cool... by doom · · Score: 1

    That's almost enough memory to run Firefox.

  88. Waht about macs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Macs have had 128 gig for the past few years and still do.....wait that's SSD. Damn Apple.

  89. Databases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some large 100gb databases that i store with redis. It would be nice to keep a local copy on a laptop for when i'm without internet access, and use them at full speed.

  90. 128GB Desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My desktop doesn't do 128GB. Why the hell does a crappy laptop come first?

    1. Re:128GB Desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I've said in another post this new RAM will likely be available for desktop. I expect it'd work with cheap CPUs like Ryzen 2200G, Celeron G4900.

      There have been desktops with 8 RAM slots for years. Intel calls it "High End Desktop" (HEDT), AMD calls it Threadripper.
      Intel also has single socket "Xeon" versions like this slightly older one, a lot more than 128GB are supported because it runs with Registered ECC DDR4 memory. So a couple years ago you could assemble a 256GB machine for cheap enough (eight sticks of 32GB on a $300 CPU and maybe $300/400-ish motherboard ; cheap graphics card like GT610 or Radeon 5450)
      https://ark.intel.com/products/82763/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-1620-v3-10M-Cache-3_50-GHz

  91. price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I probably don't want to see the price of these things...

  92. 128 or not, they still freeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares, they still freeze when they decide to update right in the middle when I want to use them.

  93. Brace myself by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    Why am I bracing myself for a laptop?

  94. Upgrade your Kontakt 3.0, grandpa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That version does not have direct from disk streaming.

  95. Re: Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you tried taking an iMac on a plane? I guarantee you it is more cumbersome than one of these laptops. Screens are readily available at some sites to borrow if necessary. Workstations with licensed cad software matching your exact version, not so much. These laptops are a god send for certain people

  96. Yeah but how THIN is it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decent specs but they don't mention how thin it is! Will I look cool using this laptop or not?

  97. Apple Philosphy by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    There’s some logic in doing this kind of work in the cloud. It doesn’t save much money or effort in the long run having a development environment on your workstation.

    If it’s not the RAM limiting you, it’s the data sets, storage, or shared environments, or even just leaving it running when you head home, or having another set of eyes collaborate on your problem.

    That said, it is stupid Apple doesn’t have beefy pro laptops as an option, but running a dev environment on your laptop should not be the reason.

  98. Sometimes a laptop is all you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anywhere you don't have net access but do have biggish data and a need for number crunching. Medical in the field comes to mind.

  99. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and storage locked on MB Starting at only $4999

    whatever.

    You actually think this laptop will be significantly less than that?

    No slightly less in price not significantly less, but an order of magnitude or two more powerful.

    I'd truly like to see something that is an order or two of magnitude more powerful than an 18 core iMac Pro, that didn't also require a rack.

  100. How heavy? by cormandy · · Score: 1

    The power supply will no doubt weigh 1kg.

  101. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Nope. CAD is almost always done on a single screen - you don't need dual screens. I have an extra one at home, it's nice to toss up Outlook and a music player on the laptop and use the bigger screen for CAD, but I'm essentially working in a single screen. Same as when I'm on the road.

    Maybe that's the way you prefer to work; but not me.

  102. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Between 1 and 10 hours for the P71, a bigger version of this. In real-world use, I see about 5-8 hours on a charge, doing a mix of CAD, surfing, and e-mail. Apparently you can watch around 14 hours of video on a charge... So plenty of battery life. Of course, it's not "courageously" thin, but then this is a real man's computer, not something for a limp-wristed pantywaist who traipses around with skinny jeans raving about saving 0.1m thickness on the latest phone because COURAGE!

    A "Real Man's Computer"

    Now I KNOW you've got issues...

  103. Displays Aren't Portable, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't need to be. At least in my line of work.

    Here's what I've found. Getting access to external displays is relatively easy, and even if you can't, well you've at least got the laptop's internal display. The key thing you need is an array of display cables. Then if the remote worksite can supply a display you can connect to it (for some reason, I've found that the commonly available displays in my company only come with DVI cables. I need DisplayPort). I bought DP and HDMI cables for my laptop bag for just this purpose.

    Same goes for external mice and keyboards. I pack an external mouse because that's a no-brainer. External KB, I rely upon the remote site to supply or I do without. But again, gaining access to external keyboards is trivially easy. Therefore I rarely have to do without.

  104. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by ahodgson · · Score: 1

    I've been doing this for 10 years. It works great. And I have a very functional laptop when I do travel or work in odd locations. Even in airports I can usually find an A/C outlet when I need to work for more than an hour.

  105. Hex chipsets RAM "sweet spot" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the lastet intel architecture work best with RAM amounts divisible by 3 due to the CPUs being in blocks of 3. Wont 128GB will be inefficient and if your going big you want maximum efficiency.

  106. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Why, because I actually want something that works, has the connectors pretty much needed (no dongle hell!), and lasts for a day? Are you so fragile that an extra 6 pounds will hurt you?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  107. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    What CAD do you do? What mechanical team do you work with?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  108. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NVIDIA Quadro P3200 only has 6 GB max. 128GB described above is computer memory, not GPU memory, so you don't know what you're talking about.

  109. I'll Buy That... by maxbuzz · · Score: 1

    For a dollar!

  110. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Why, because I actually want something that works, has the connectors pretty much needed (no dongle hell!), and lasts for a day? Are you so fragile that an extra 6 pounds will hurt you?

    No, not at all.

    It's because you feel the need to bolster your argument, and hardware choice, by impugning the manhood of those who choose to work another way.

    Oh, and what about the millions of female engineers? Are they less "manly" if they don't work the same way you do?

  111. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    What CAD do you do? What mechanical team do you work with?

    Not any for about the last decade, unfortunately. The 2008 economic crash nicely put an end to THAT career-path, unfortunately.

    Now I just write stupid Windows business software. So I am already spending my time in Hell; hoping to get "time served" when I die.

  112. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    How about those same folks who said I don't need 128 GB of RAM, and that if I was "serious" about it I should just pack an iMac Pro around... Sound familiar?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  113. Optane Hype for intel by Kuruk · · Score: 1

    fake news. Optane aint memory

  114. Whao This is Huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, This is Huge.... 128GB of Ram .... Back in days laptops used to come in 128 of storage.,..

    Pre wedding photoshoot cost

  115. Optimizing The Wrong Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, RAM is so cheap now that to optimize for it misses the point. You know what is expensive? People's time. That's where the cost is. If you have to optimize for something, optimize the use of people's time.

    Optimizing for RAM, CPU or disk space is optimizing some of the cheapest resources we have. That's just dumb. Don't be dumb.

    1. Re:Optimizing The Wrong Thing by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Uh, RAM is very expensive right now, and there are hard caps to the amount of RAM given platforms support.

      Yes, it is cheaper than in the past, but the growth of the workload has outpaced the price increase (and outright availability) of the hardware it runs out.
      All without meaningful improvement into getting shit done or doing it better!

      Sure, you can model and render the bumps on chicken skin for some background prop in a 3D scene. Or you can use a decent texture.

  116. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So forgive me if I'm wrong, but what you're saying is you had a two-monitor use case over a decade ago and you no longer use it because you're now writing 'stupid Windows business software'.

    Much as I called Rooster a buffoon in a thread the other day, I think he has more of a valid point than you do.

  117. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more a desktop that you can pick up and take with you. The battery is more a built-in UPS. All I really care for the battery is that let keep the computer sleep without being plugged in while I'm taking it somewhere. And generally speaking, Lenovo has done a pretty good job with the thermal solutions. Yes, you can hear the fans, and yes it will shoot hot air out the sides and/or back. But unlike some poorly designed laptops *cough* Apple *cough* it won't burn your balls and throttle the CPU if you actually try to use the computational power you bought. Yes, that means it's a bit thicker. And has some unsightly vents. And yes, the case is plastic. Boo-fucking-hoo.

    Hey, lets play the favorite Apple fanboy game - build the equivalent Mac. Oh wait, YOU CAN'T. Not at any price. So the next Apple fanboy game - you don't need something like this. Because Apple doesn't make anything like this. So you don't need it, by definition. Of course, if Apple announced something this tomorrow, then the Macfags would go on and on about how wonderful it is and how Apple "invented" the mobile workstation market and blah blah blah.

    Hey, why don't you go take your Apple toy computers and sit in the corner so the real engineers can do some actual work? Thanks.

  118. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and storage locked on MB Starting at only $4999

    whatever.

    You actually think this laptop will be significantly less than that?

    No slightly less in price not significantly less, but an order of magnitude or two more powerful.

    I'd truly like to see something that is an order or two of magnitude more powerful than an 18 core iMac Pro, that didn't also require a rack.

    You mean something an order of magnitude faster than a overheating unupgradable tin can from 5 years ago? Have you tried wallmart?

  119. Re:imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and sto by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    imac pro no repair over priced upgrades and storage locked on MB Starting at only $4999

    whatever.

    You actually think this laptop will be significantly less than that?

    No slightly less in price not significantly less, but an order of magnitude or two more powerful.

    I'd truly like to see something that is an order or two of magnitude more powerful than an 18 core iMac Pro, that didn't also require a rack.

    You mean something an order of magnitude faster than a overheating unupgradable tin can from 5 years ago? Have you tried wallmart?

    We were talking about the iMac Pro, you dolt.

  120. Re:Laptops with 128 GB of RAM... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    You obviously haven't seen how much power a 33MHz 486SX consumes. One would think these 8-core 2.1GHz monsters would kill the battery in your phone in 14 seconds, yet here we are sucking 1W at peak.