Slashdot Mirror


EU Polls The Public About Abandoning Daylight Savings Time (europa.eu)

"Following a number of requests from citizens, from the European Parliament, and from certain EU Member States, the Commission has decided to investigate the functioning of the current EU summertime arrangements and to assess whether or not they should be changed."

The EU has launched an official "online consultation" seeking input from the public. Long-time Slashdot reader mitch0 writes: The consultation was started after some member states expressed the opinion that the daylight saving time should be abolished within the EU. There were some local motions in member countries as well, but these cannot really proceed without full coordination with all member states.

So far it seems that most of those wanting to end the daylight-saving change would stick to summer time all-year round, but the questionnaire has a specific question about this issue so a more representative result is expected after the survey is closed in the middle of August...

Citizens can express their opinion about the summer time change by filling out a short online survey.

254 comments

  1. DST by SenseiTim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Daylight Saving Time is a pain in the butt. There is no rational reason why we have to fool around with our clocks twice a year.

    1. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What electricity savings from DST? Studies conclude that if anything, DST costs more electricity to cool/heat a building than it saves in lighting.

    2. Re:DST by JMJimmy · · Score: 2

      They should eliminate it simply based on the increase in heart attacks it causes.

    3. Re:DST by arth1 · · Score: 1, Informative

      They should eliminate it simply based on the increase in heart attacks it causes.

      Triggers, not causes. A heart healthy person will get a heart attack from neither adjusting sleeping/waking preferences nor irritation it may cause.

    4. Re:DST by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a rational reason. It is to make people wake up with the sun, more or less.
      Here: http://gpinzone.blogspot.com/2...

    5. Re:DST by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What electricity savings from DST? Studies conclude that if anything, DST costs more electricity to cool/heat a building than it saves in lighting.

      Yep, and not only that, we see spikes in heart attacks/death every time we fsck with the clocks and having it mess with our internal clocks.

      I wish we could abolish it in the US too.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:DST by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Triggers, not causes. A heart healthy person will get a heart attack from neither adjusting sleeping/waking preferences nor irritation it may cause.

      Congratulations, you win today's "Pedant who added nothing to the conversation" award! Your prize is all the self-administered pats on the back you can manage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Sun comes up hours before I wake up. DST doesn't change that.

    8. Re:DST by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was more predominant in those under 65 and no correlation was noted regarding pre-existing conditions. It did note that women were affected more than men, suggesting that the increased rate of sleep deprivation in women may play a factor.

    9. Re:DST by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't that the one benefit of DST changes? If it wasn't for the clock change, those heart attacks would have happened at random. No way to plan for those. At least with the clock change you can prep for the increased load of patients, right?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    10. Re:DST by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      A heart healthy person will get a heart attack from neither adjusting sleeping/waking preferences nor irritation it may cause.

      . . . which excludes about a third of the folks in the US . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    11. Re:DST by Joce640k · · Score: 1
      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:DST by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      Yep, we should definitely plan this around YOU.

      --
      No sig today...
    13. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which is not part the EU.

    14. Re:DST by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      If only there was a way to cheat death by getting up a bit later on that Sunday.

      --
      No sig today...
    15. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no savings from DST. You are a liar.

    16. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daylight Saving Time is a pain in the butt. There is no rational reason why we have to fool around with our clocks twice a year.

      I guess I must be irrational then. I like having long summer evenings, instead of having stupid early sunrise, AND I like not having to get up two hours before dawn in winter. That is absolutely worth changing the clocks for twice a year -- not to mention that all my clocks, except for the one in my car, make the change automatically anyway.

    17. Re:DST by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yep, and not only that, we see spikes in heart attacks/death every time we fsck with the clocks and having it mess with our internal clocks.

      I wish we could abolish it in the US too.

      Nah, we should change the clocks 4 times a year to weed out even more of the weak from the gene pool.

    18. Re:DST by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Why stop at 4? The sun rises at a different time every day of the year!

    19. Re:DST by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no rational reason why we have to fool around with our clocks twice a year.

      No rational reason? Mid-northern latitudes (~40-50 degrees) have about 16 hours sunlight in summer, and only 8 in winter. In summer, 1 hour is added to the clock, so that the sunrise is not at 5am (6 instead), and people benefit from late sunlight since this is a holiday season. In winter with no hour added sunrises happens at an earlier time, otherwise people would go to work in total darkness.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    20. Re:DST by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      *(true also in the south hemisphere, of course...)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    21. Re: DST by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I click that link, the very first thing I see on the page is this:

      In 2008, Energy Department experts studied the impact of the extended Daylight Saving Time on energy consumption in the U.S. and found that the extra four weeks of Daylight Saving Time saved about 0.5 percent in total electricity per day.

      When I click on that link I go to this government page: https://www.energy.gov/article...

      On that page it says:

      While this might not sound like a lot, it adds up to electricity savings of 1.3 billion kilowatt-hours -- or the amount of electricity used by more than 100,000 households for an entire year.

      So... I'm not sure who's the liar here. Maybe you're just lying to yourself.

      --
      No sig today...
    22. Re:DST by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I thought this was a joke but it's modded insightful.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't have to mess with the clock to do that. Just make a law that all shops and jobs have to adjust their open hours twice a year. This will make things so much easier than repeating the same hour again. Do you know how difficult that is for computers? How much work it takes to cope with that?

    24. Re: DST by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      ...which is not part the EU.

      DST was framed. No wait, that was DSK.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    25. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change when you go to work instead.

    26. Re:DST by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      It's not where I live, because having the wintertime in the summer here in Southern Europe would be a major bummer - people here want longer sunlight in the evenings. I voted for not changing the time and have summertime the whole year.

    27. Re:DST by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      I've been reading Slashdot for a while now and I thought that pedant remarks is what the whole Slashdot comment section is about...

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    28. Re:DST by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      You forgot the sarcasm tag.

    29. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move to Iceland then.

    30. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should eliminate it simply based on the increase in heart attacks it causes.

      Duh. DST 1 hour shift is as stressful as one hour jet lag, what most people don't even notice while traveling. The event causes about same amount stress as when you watch TV-programming one hour later Saturday evening and then need to wake up ordinary time Sunday morning. That's what the actual event causes. But some people make it in their mind worse by worrying it beforehand and apparently enjoy being drama queens whole next week.

      BTW, I haven't heard nobody complain during fall shift when you get the one spring hour saved back. What would possibly explain that?

      So it's only the spring that riles people. The people which are so darn dump that they can't plan a bit ahead few days worth. Let me give you advise:

      1) three days before spring DST shift, get to sleep 20 minutes earlier each consecutive evening, there you have a nice and smooth way no need to crash it all at once if you that 1 hour jet lag too bad.

      2) adjust your clocks that doesn't change automatically evening before to DST already just before getting to sleep, so that you have the correct time in the morning and try to get up ordinary time according to clock.

      There are real benefits the clock being nearer to 12 noon, but besides that there is a real benefit to business that there is one light hour more after each workday. People are more active evening time and it shows at the cash registers. I was too lazy to calculate for this conversation how many hours DST provides more light hours during each year, but in EU this year it's 183 hours, which is 7 days, 6 hours and 24 minutes total.

      That is not insignificant amount time for shops and other businesses make profit and keep economy ticking. I suppose that connection is well understood and there is no need to get into that further.

      Captcha: brutally, har har har :)

    31. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here on the US East coast, sunrise would be at 4:46 AM this morning - who wants that?

    32. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

      Generally everyone gets their time from a central source, usually the one feeding their cell phone or their network connection.
      We should adjust time every day, but just a minute or so. For some central location in each timezone, sunrise would be held constant. This would:

          - maximize the number of daylight hours after work, at least for folks with an ~8-5 job.
          - remove the impact of changing time by a single large block, which is what causes all the problems.

      --XYZZY--

    33. Re:DST by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      ... and the ability for people to go outdoors and work early in the morning.

      Wait! What? I wasn't aware that I wasn't allowed outside early w/o messing with my clocks.

      (Personally, I wouldn't mind everyone just using GMT and the time is the time.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    34. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely with you, DST is great anyone living south. I live now in north but having spent few years consulting quite far south (KSA) I know it very well how much that one extra light hour matters. People are more active active and even businesses benefit from it. I voiced my opinion, keeping DST as it is, today. Wish you do also if you didn't already.

      Let's hope more populous southern EU countries make their voices heard and those who don't up here north duly understand value of it to majority of people living with EU countries.

      I wrote a bit longer reply to another comment, you may like to read that as well too :)

    35. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly the kind of thinking we need to Make America Great Again

    36. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is about the EU but your point is valid. Where I live people don't get up at 5 AM, but stay up until midnight. Wintertime essentially wastes one hour of daylight that people like to enjoy in the evening. The solution is summertime for the whole year.

    37. Re: DST by mlyle · · Score: 1

      There's been numerous studies. Yes, there's (probably) a tiny electric savings. There's also a loss from increased heating expenses, which are not usually electric. Overall studies have struggled to find a benefit and some have even shown an overall net loss. But we know people die in traffic accidents and from heart attacks at an increased rate afterwards--- the cost of the extra death exceeds a (doubtful) couple hundred million dollars in energy savings per annum.

    38. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There have been a couple of referenda and it appears that most europeans are willing to keep the Daylight Saving Time and abandon the EU.

    39. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I'm a bit skeptical about this EU online poll. There was an earlier discussion on Slashdot when this was discussed for California and it turned out that at least half of the sometimes very opinionated posters had no idea how DST worked, confused effects of summertime and wintertime, or made all kinds of 1-off errors and simple astronomical mistakes ... and I believe that Slashdotters are above average in such matters. It's one of those topics where voting might only make sense if people are required to pass a basic understanding test before. (To be fair, in this thread more people seem to get the facts right.)

    40. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't be the only one who hopes you're next on that list you whiny bitch cayenne, fuck your weak shit if the clock change bothers you lol. Die.

    41. Re:DST by sjames · · Score: 2

      Clock change happens on Sunday morning, the heart attacks happen on Monday morning, so the problem is work. Mandate no critical meetings in the morning and mandatory grace for being a few minutes late and we'll eliminate those and many more heart attacks.

    42. Re: DST by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So... I'm not sure who's the liar here. Maybe you're just lying to yourself.

      From the looks of it the effect varies with the local climate:

      But does daylight time still save energy? Not really, according to most research on the subject. Lighting has become a smaller part of overall energy consumption, and extending the use of daylight hours encourages people to use more air conditioning and heating. A 2017 analysis of 44 different papers on the subject found that, on average, the policy helped save 0.34 percent of electricity use. Places farther from the Equator (with mild summers and lower cooling demands) might save energy, but places closer to the Equator used more energy during daylight time, the researchers found.

      I did find another study (PDF) from Europe though that showed that really far north like Scandinavia it didn't actually help much at all. So it looks to be a Goldilocks zone, if you can extend the number of temperate days where there's no major need for warming/cooling then you can save a bit. And if we're moving towards EVs then it'll be an even smaller fraction of total power usage. But it's still zero point something percent.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    43. Re:DST by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Then it should be done based on longitude, not latitude? That seems like a problem for people living in the far north. The rest of the planet super doesn't care what happens above 50 degrees north. Forcing 85% of the world population to change clocks for no apparent reason, to appease the 15% that live where this matters seems like a non-starter for me. Hard pass.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    44. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roughly half of Europe lives north of the 50 degree line.

    45. Re:DST by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      otherwise people would go to work in total darkness

      so instead we go home in total darkness.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    46. Re:DST by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      so the problem is work

      Hell yeah. Sounds like an easy fix... Let's extend it to the rest of the year, just to be safe.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    47. Re:DST by Teun · · Score: 1

      You are so right, that hour of difference y is very little compared to the differences people already experience like during the weekend or others days off, different shifts etc.
      Like I've never heard of people suffering because they travel a to/fro an adjacent time zone.
      Yes I like DST and have NO sympathy for the whiners.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    48. Re:DST by Teun · · Score: 0

      What a crock, very few want to abandon the EU.
      Even the Brits are slowly starting to see the obvious problems of their impending Brexit.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    49. Re:DST by Teun · · Score: 1

      UTC please.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    50. Re:DST by Teun · · Score: 1

      They should eliminate it simply based on the increase in heart attacks it causes.

      Duh. DST 1 hour shift is as stressful as one hour jet lag, what most people don't even notice while traveling. The event causes about same amount stress as when you watch TV-programming one hour later Saturday evening and then need to wake up ordinary time Sunday morning. That's what the actual event causes. But some people make it in their mind worse by worrying it beforehand and apparently enjoy being drama queens whole next week.

      Amen!
      That one hour difference is totally insignificant.
      So many EU people fly for holidays to Greece or the Canary Isles and Brits go to France or the Spanish Costa's and they wouldn't even know the difference.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    51. Re:DST by Teun · · Score: 1

      Summertime the whole year is a bit of a problem, where I live it means in mid-winter the sun would only rise after 10:00 in the morning...

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    52. Re:DST by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      That makes two of us.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    53. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I conclude that, if anything, it likely makes fuck all difference to power consumption.

    54. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just fear of change. You only need to look at how many "employees" are suckling from the Government teat in the UK to know that fear of change would always come to pass. If it works out long term then I don't see a future for the EU in its current dictatorial form.

    55. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daylight Saving Time is a pain in the butt. There is no rational reason why we have to fool around with our clocks twice a year.

      The goal is to extend daylight in the summer as late as possible, to allow female LEA decoys to troll the barrios for males that mistakenly point their eyeballs in the wrong direction.

    56. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heart attacks would occur randomly, but later in the lives of the affected. The additional stress triggers the attack earlier. D'oh!

    57. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that only works for a relatively narrow range of longitudes. You don't have to go very far north before the sun rises at 4am in summer and 10am in winter. Fucking around with the clocks make no difference when your day is that short

    58. Re:DST by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I see where you're going with this.

      By your logic we should have the occasional mass shooting because that is much easier for emergency responders to deal with than individual shootings peppered across the country.

      Got it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    59. Re:DST by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I take it that you've seen The Purge. Seems like it should work pretty well.

      What real issue do you have with this sort of efficiency? It will make us better as a country. Dare I say, this sort of forward thinking could make America great again.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    60. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should adopt the Russian system of threats and corruption.

    61. Re:DST by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Generally everyone gets their time from a central source, usually the one feeding their cell phone or their network connection.

      Generally people shouldn't generalise. My wristwatch doesn't get time from a central source. There's not an electrical component in it, let alone a network based one.

    62. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it make more sense for region influenced by drastic change in sunrise/sunset time to adjust their work/school hours etc instead? eg. instead of banks being opened at 9-5, make it 10-6 for some months. That way you get the sunlight you needed, but don't have to worry about switching your clocks when communicating internationally with people who don't use daylight saving hours.

    63. Re:DST by hnwombat · · Score: 2

      In fact, there are a number of rational reasons *not* to make a change. I am a research professor, and time is my field, including chronobiology. I see that someone has already mentioned the heart attacks thing. But there are a number of other effects. Similar to the heart attacks, there is a spike in automobile accidents during time changes. More generally, and probably of more impact, every single person experiences increased stress, and reduced time and quality of sleep due to the change. So it's not only those unlucky enough to be in an accident or have a heart attack that are harmed, it is every single person. (In fact, the increase in heart attacks is almost certainly in large part due to the increased stress, and the increase in accidents is probably due to the sleep disruption).

      So, yes, do away with the change. And businesses should not change their operating hours unless they have a direct link to sunrise/sunset. If you're working in an office, there is no need to ever change. If you're working at a park, there probably are good reasons to change. :-)

    64. Re:DST by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      In winter with no hour added sunrises happens at an earlier time, otherwise people would go to work in total darkness.

      Only people in suburban Detroit. The rest of us have working streetlights.

    65. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no. You've still not thinking big enough. We need to set our clocks forward 24 hours to get all of the heart attacks for the next month out of the way. We can flip flop this every month and cut out ALL unplanned heart attacks!

    66. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live at 58 degrees N. Still don't see any benefit at all. Do not know a single person that would like to keep DST.

    67. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worked in Stockholm, I went to and from work in total darkness during winter. Having permanent summertime wouldnâ(TM)t change that. During summer it is bright during morning and evening anyway, also independent on summer / winter time.

    68. Re:DST by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. It has a biological computer that keeps it synchronised to some authoritative source, unless you are claiming you have never adjusted the time it shows.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    69. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandpa, why are you wearing a toy watch? How can you tell time with three lines?

    70. Re:DST by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      It's an important distinction. It's one thing to cause a heart attack in a healthy individual and it's something else to trigger a heart attack in an overweight person who smokes and drinks and is going to have one anyway triggered by something, if not the DST change.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    71. Re: DST by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      If you're that close to having a heart attack that clock-changing pushes you over the edge, what's the chances you would have had it in the next few days anyway? Sounds like when they count the # of folks who had heart attacks shoveling snow in the "Death-from-winter-snow" stats. Makes good news, adding some to the body count, but is it a true picture?

    72. Re:DST by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      zulu time, or just plane "z"

    73. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This entire problem comes from having noon placed at the center of the workday instead of when we are awake.
      Place noon at the end of the workday and you will have equal amount of daylight reserved for work and for leisure regardless of how much daylight you get that particular day.

      Yes, I am fully aware that not everyone works the same hours, but you should be capable at getting the idea anyway.
      With 16 hours sunlight there is no point in having 4 of them when most people are sleeping. If you place them when people are awake then they will get the 8 sun hours when they are awake in the winter too.
      An extra benefit from having sunlight at a later time is that the population spends more time doing physical activities outdoors which improves the general health.

    74. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Summertime the whole year is a bit of a problem, where I live it means in mid-winter the sun would only rise after 10:00 in the morning...

      How is that a problem? That means that you might even have some sunlight left when you get home.
      No matter how you move the time back and forth in the winter you won't get more hours of sunlight.
      The way I see it it is better to get it a bit later.

      If we adjust the clock to get some light when we are going to work then it will only be useful for a couple of days anyway. Then we are either wasting sunlight by having it before we go up or we get it a bit too late.

      It's better to place it so that all the light is when we are awake and if we want some sunlight for commuting we get it on our way home instead of our way there when the day is too short to give us both.
      That way we might even get an hour or two of daylight left after we get home in the spring and autumn.

    75. Re:DST by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's a senseless distinction which is only relevant if you only care about yourself and it's irrelevant to you how many other people will die. It's also a dumb one because the deaths are not all due directly to stress, they are in the minority. It's due mostly to accidents of various types which are caused by people running late and hurrying, being tired and therefore making mistakes, etc. The traffic deaths alone are substantial.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    76. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because unanimous decisions, opinion polls, and parliament decisions are dictatorial...

    77. Re:DST by Danathar · · Score: 1

      YES! UTC for everybody.

    78. Re:DST by mjwx · · Score: 1

      There is a rational reason. It is to make people wake up with the sun, more or less.
      Here: http://gpinzone.blogspot.com/2...

      This... For the love of Crom, this.

      I live in lovely Barkshire in England. Its mid summer here, the sun came up at 4:12 this morning and wont go down until 22:05. Without DST, the sun would come up at 3:12.

      "B-B-B-B-But why not just use DST the whole year round then" I hear a droll and dreary voice say... Because in winter it is dark by 17:00 and having it dark at 16:00 will be a whole lot worse.

      BTW, the heatwave here is killing all the grass and it's making me depressed because it reminds me of Perth... I want my verdant hills of England damn it.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    79. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But more than 50% of that 50% live far enough north that it's irrelevant, it's dark when they get up, it's dark when they go home. Moving the 4 hours of daylight a day back or forward an hour doesn't matter when its around lunchtime anyway.

    80. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the one benefit of DST changes? If it wasn't for the clock change, those heart attacks would have happened at random. No way to plan for those. At least with the clock change you can prep for the increased load of patients, right?

      By your logic, why wait until accidents occur? Let's just initiate World War III and get those deaths on a regular schedule already.

    81. Re:DST by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...Yep, and not only that, we see spikes in heart attacks/death every time we fsck with the clocks and having it mess with our internal clocks.

      Internal clock? Give me a break. It's an hour. Changed twice a year. On a weekend. I've owned pet fish that caused more stress and anxiety than that minor bullshit.

      I would like to abolish it too, but if your body clock is screwed up so bad that it triggers a heart attack after such a nothing event, then your body is incompatible with humanity and this planet. I don't often point at Survival of the Fittest, but in this case...

    82. Re: DST by mlyle · · Score: 1

      Yah, that's a fair point-- you were maybe about to die anyways. Or maybe not.

      The traffic accident increase ---- not so much.

      Studies looking at the US have found a 10-20% increase in traffic fatalities the Monday after the time shift (both directions), only fully settling to normal a week later. If you consider just the Monday, that's 30 extra deaths per year.

      So in column A, we have something that saves between -$300M and $300M in energy per year, unknown-- and in column B, we know that it kills at least 30 people a year. Doesn't seem like a great policy to me.

    83. Re:DST by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      Better yet, only change once per year, but make it a big change - like six hours ahead.

    84. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to have dst all year round. I am in Montreal, roughly the same sunrise/sunset as New York city or Plattsburg NY.
      In summer, daylight comes at 4:30am and darkness at 9:30pm.
      In winter (standard time)
      dailylight comes at 7:15a, and darkness arrives just after 4pm.
      Staying on DST would mean that kids go to school just as daylight arrives (8:15am) and darkness arrives just after 5pm.
      The latter advantages/benefits humans, and children, who can be in sunshine for an hour or so after school. Children can play in sunshine from the time school is out for a good 1.5 hrs.
      With continuous standard time, some border cases would move a location from gmt-5 to gmt-6 or the like.

      The reason why I would not want to have a change? My atomic "weather" clocks have built-in dates that are used to switch from std to dst . My linux distribution would not need dst/std software switching, --- simplifying the system.

       

    85. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...
      Are you sure the systems aren't just double-counting the heart attacks during the switchover?

      catpcha: doubter

    86. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize you don't actually get an "extra hour" of sunlight, right?

      Moving the clocks forward and backwards is little different than going to bed and waking up one hour earlier or later. People who need the "extra hour" of light can just do that.

      Also, as someone who lives at around 47d North, having an "extra hour" of light doesn't help me. In the winter, I go to work in the dark and come home in the dark. That's just the nature of life in the North.

      Do you suggest that we remove July, August, and September from the calendar in order to "spare" the Caribbean from hurricane season?

    87. Re: DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are making no distinction whatsoever by using âoetriggerâ as a verb, because it is synonymous with cause.

      What you mean to say is âoecontributeâ, rather than âoetriggerâ.

    88. Re:DST by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Why don't we just abolish all the months that use standard time? Problem solved - no winter!

    89. Re:DST by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      If only there was a way to cheat death by getting up a bit later on that Sunday.

      You may die later, however you will die either way.

      Two things are for sure in life. Death and taxes. Unless you're Al Sharpton. Then you get away with not paying your taxes somehow.

    90. Re:DST by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Of course there's a rational reason. You're just one of these people stupid enough to think it's about trying to make one day longer each year to increase productivity or something.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    91. Re:DST by aybiss · · Score: 1

      And clearly you aren't forced to go outside for work, or some fresh air might have woken your brain up a little more.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    92. Re:DST by aybiss · · Score: 1

      I bet you every single one of those effects would go away if you stopped railing against the idea of changing your clocks and just fucking did it.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    93. Re:DST by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      I live at 60 degrees north.

      The summer time switch happens so that there is clear effect for maybe two weeks (i.e. there is sunlight longer), and once those two weeks have passed, it doesn't matter since the sun is up for so long anyway.

      The increase in sunlight is really rapid, summer time or no summer time.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    94. Re:DST by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      It seems the psychological effect of going outside to work, while it's still dark -- meaning before work -- has a more negative impact than going back home in the evening -- it's dark but it's *after* work...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    95. Re:DST by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      It seems the psychological effect of going outside to work, while it's still dark -- meaning before work -- has a more negative impact than going back home in the evening -- it's dark but it's *after* work...

      Got some published proof for that?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    96. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I haven't heard nobody complain"

      Wut?

    97. Re: DST by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      So in column A, we have something that saves between -$300M and $300M in energy per year, unknown-- and in column B, we know that it kills at least 30 people a year. Doesn't seem like a great policy to me.

      So in column A, we have something that saves between -$300M and $300M in energy per year, unknown-- and in column B, we know that it kills at least 30 people a year. Doesn't seem like a great policy to me.

      Hmmm, so those people are worth about $10 million each. That's considerably higher than the normal estimate, which is between $1 and $2 million per death (comprised of fines and costs of avoiding a repeat).

      Why are your Monday morning victims so valuable?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    98. Re:DST by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Forcing 85% of the world population to change clocks for no apparent reason, to appease the 15% that live where this matters

      Living in Scotland, and having lived almost on the Arctic Circle and on both sides of the Equator, I'm perfectly happy dealing with DST. A 1 hour change every 6 months is pretty trivial compared to a 6, 8 or 12 hour time shift every week or two, which is what you get if you're working in 24x7 operations.

      I honestly don't know how many equatorial to tropical to temperate countries (ones below 45 degrees of latitude, or whatever number you choose) just don't bother with a DST, But I bet quite a number don't. If that number includes even one of India, China, the Philippines or Brazil, then your 85% dog being wagged by a 15% tail becomes pretty dubious.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Structural problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd imagine there's going to be quite a marked geographic divide on this. Southern Europe probably DGAF as they don't get the sort of seasonal variation in daylight hours you get in the north, and the very far north of Europe they have such extremes of variation in daylight hours that fudging the clocks by an hour makes no real difference. However there's going to be a band across the middle (UK, France, Germany, etc) where there exists the right balance between having a problem, and being able to somewhat remedy it by moving your clocks for a few months.

    The problem of course is that whatever is decided is going to be foist onto everyone regardless of need or want, because that's how the EU rolls

    1. Re:Structural problems by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Southern Europe probably DGAF as they don't get the sort of seasonal variation in daylight hours

      Plus they sleep all day anyway.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Structural problems by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Southern Europe probably DGAF as they don't get the sort of seasonal variation in daylight hours

      Plus they sleep all day anyway.

      . . . and the Southern Europeans respond with a chorus of:

      "Only mad dogs, and Englishmen, go out in the noonday sun."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re: Structural problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they work more than Northern Europe.

    4. Re: Structural problems by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      They spend more time at work.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Structural problems by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Except it doesn't make things better, it makes them worse.

      The sun comes up an hour later March through November (US dates), that's sucks. It means wake up time is dark in March, maybe April (I forget), late September and October.

      I'm in your alleged perfect band, and it's perfect in the sense that it makes my life worse in a way in the band where it'd be irrelevant in other parts.

      A chart that shows its impact (in the US, but it'll be vaguely similar in other places too) at this article.

      http://andywoodruff.com/blog/w...

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re: Structural problems by magarity · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      They spend more time at work.

      Well, yeah, the office has AC.

    7. Re: Structural problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope there is no 'zone' where the time change makes sense. I mean, seasonal schedules are already a thing, that's the right solution to any such issue. Oh, we don't like the schedule we'll change the time - makes no fucking sense.

    8. Re:Structural problems by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Taking a nap at lunchtime would be good for the rest of us too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Structural problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say to the people depending on light: adapt to the season and leave the rest of the population in peace. There are about 25 million people in the northern part (anything above Denmark) on a total of nearly 500 million.

      But the most important part is that all countries either do or don't observe DST.

    10. Re:Structural problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Changing clocks is a very impractical way of dealing with this problem. Changing opening hours, office hours and school hours to mathc the season would be a much better solution.

    11. Re:Structural problems by Teun · · Score: 2

      . . . and the Southern Europeans respond with a chorus of:

      "Only mad dogs, and Englishmen, go out in the noonday sun."

      Uhh, it is:
      Only mad dogs and other Englishman go out in the noonday sun.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  3. Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So far it seems that most of those wanting to end the daylight-saving change would stick to summer time all-year round

    This has already been tried several times over the years and always with the same result: People discover that they don't like it being dark longer in the morning during the winter.

    Here's a better idea. Why don't we pass a law requiring the earth to change its orbit, so that we always have the same number of hours of daylight year round.

    That makes just as much sense as the constant bitching and complaining about daylight saving time.

    1. Re:Been there, tried that by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      People discover that they don't like it being dark longer in the morning during the winter.

      I'm not a historian, but I've heard theories that the reason it was introduced in the first place was because of something like that. Crazy talk, I know.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? You fudging with the clock doesn't solve anything.

      If things are inconvenient because it's dark, we should agree on changing the time which we do the activity, not playing with the clock. And let me tell you, as someone living pretty far north in Europe, "DST" is probably the most pointless and annoying exercise ever. In October, we change the clocks because it's dark outside. Guess what? It's still dark outside after messing with the clock! Same thing but in reverse in March.

      All it does is bring all kinds of complications for literally no gain. It's absolutely idiotic.

    3. Re:Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People discover that they don't like it being dark longer in the morning during the winter.

      I'm not a historian, but I've heard theories that the reason it was introduced in the first place was because of something like that. Crazy talk, I know.

      id rather have more light at the end of the day and not waste my time going to work in alittle bit of light.

    4. Re: Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as someone living more to the south - it does make a difference here.

    5. Re:Been there, tried that by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      Originally it was to save on candles. I solved it a different way:I installed electricity.

    6. Re:Been there, tried that by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      All it does is bring all kinds of complications

      Like what? People don't even have to set clocks these days, it's all Internet-sync this, auto-adjust that.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re: Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we need to do away with it. If more southern hicks justboffed themselves due to depression, world would be better off.

    8. Re:Been there, tried that by GrBear · · Score: 1

      People don't even have to set clocks these days, it's all Internet-sync this, auto-adjust that.

      Tell that to the clock on my microwave, oven, wall clocks and alarm clock.

      Who the hell wants all that Internet enabled?

    9. Re:Been there, tried that by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the clock on my microwave, oven, wall clocks and alarm clock.

      People still have clocks? I use my phone for all my timekeeping & alarm needs....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    10. Re:Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How awful for you. I suffer no such dependence. I have an analog watch that isn't prone to services being available. It can also tell me the time when I don't have my phone with me, because, well, there's no reason to have my phone with me all the time. You have my pity.

    11. Re: Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are ways to do things wirelessly without the internet protocol. (WWVB).

    12. Re: Been there, tried that by umghhh · · Score: 1

      does not work in Africa but I guess there they do not have this nonsense either or?

    13. Re:Been there, tried that by umghhh · · Score: 1

      In the neo-marxist lands of Germany we still have working systems from the capitalist times - the radio telling my clock what time it should show. The clocks reset in the middle of these two nights of the year. It still does not make any sense but the clocks are doing that w/o interwebs. I suppose some time in not all that distant future it may become illegal to be off grid because such deviations help in spread thoughtcrime.

    14. Re:Been there, tried that by GrBear · · Score: 1

      I use my phone for all my timekeeping & alarm needs...

      Oh wise guru, please tell me how to start my oven at 3pm when I'm at work from my phone.

    15. Re: Been there, tried that by silverdirk · · Score: 1

      The primary reason in the US was lobbying from golf courses. They wanted more commerce in the evening.

      --
      Mark of the Coder fades from you. You perform Opening on World of Warcraft. Warcraft crits GPA for 4. GPA dies.
    16. Re: Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that you don't know what this debate is about. Why do you post then?

    17. Re:Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far it seems that most of those wanting to end the daylight-saving change would stick to summer time all-year round

      Wait what? Having not read the article I was nodding along thinking "brilliant! No more being forced out of bed an hour earlier just because it's summer" and they are actually arguing that rather than eliminating this torture (getting up earlier in summer) we should keep it all year round? No, no, a thousand times no! I hate the clock-adjusting, jetlag inducing mess, but this proposal would make it infinitely worse!

      Damnit morning people, we are not all happy morning campers like you freaks!

    18. Re:Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find it easier to stick with constant times for activities and just change the frame of reference. Tit.

    19. Re: Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open the samsung smart oven app and tell it to turn on, duh!

    20. Re: Been there, tried that by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Duh, you get a smart oven which runs an outdated version on busybox and some simple cgi scripts that don't validate input properly, allowing hackers to gain root access to a device inside your home network.

    21. Re: Been there, tried that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really a bad idea.
      Well, golf in particular is fairly irrelevant, but still having sunlight when people get off work means that more people will go out and run or do other forms of healthy activities.

    22. Re:Been there, tried that by flex941 · · Score: 1

      I've never given a f about the morning darkness or brightness because it's darkish or outright dark anyway when I go to work (in the winter). What I give a f about is the inconvenience of turning the clock and adjusting to the change twice a year ... and the missing hour of daylight at the end of the day. It gets dark 3PM already in the middle of winter .. and that's SUPER annoying. So; I would prefer not switching and would prefer all-year summertime and not going back not wintertime never again.

  4. since it is summer by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    they should just split the difference by moving the clocks back 30 minutes and abolish daylight savings time, the USA should too

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:since it is summer by mitch0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sun is already up too early during summer, another half hour would make it a lot worse...
      We should just accept that winter sucks, the nights are long no matter how we play with the clocks...
      Just stick to summer time, that way at least the change to the sucky part of the year is gradual, and not a sudden one-hour shift a lot of people hate.

      Not to mention that the one hour shift this way and that still causes issues in most IT systems that need to be cleaned up each year after the change... (mostly when the same time "repeats").

      --
      // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips,
      // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
    2. Re:since it is summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why stick to summer time? Why not just change your operating hours?

      I am a city boy, having grown up with clocks all round me, still I have an innate sense of time when looking at the position of the sun. When a couple of colleagues and I was out on an island years ago, I had looked at the maps and could correctly point in the compass directions. One mocked me and said it couldn't be correct since they sun was wrong. But it wasn't, it was our clocks that was set to summer time and suddenly the old "the sun is in the south at noon" no longer holds.

      So why mess with our natural systems? If it is more convenient to start working at 07:00 instead of 08:00, why not?

      My mother worked at a place that changed operating hours during the summer months to allow the employees to get off "earlier".

    3. Re: since it is summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is too much common sense for slashtards and the internet.

      You are hereby banned.

    4. Re:since it is summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, this sounds just like some whacky compromise you would expect from politicians. Make sure everyone is unhappy.

    5. Re:since it is summer by arth1 · · Score: 1

      But it wasn't, it was our clocks that was set to summer time and suddenly the old "the sun is in the south at noon" no longer holds.

      It usually doesn't anyhow, due to most people not being at the meridian for their time zone. In some cases, that has a much bigger impact than the one hour offset of DST. Almost all of Alaska, for example is more than one hour off already, and so is Western parts of Argentina. Western parts of China are tree hours off.

      The solution that would solve a lot of problems in the modern world is to decouple time from the sun position. Have everyone use UTC, and adjust working/opening hours to what makes the most sense for any business. There would be no more problems with lazy developers using zulu time and aggregating data from different parts of the world. "Can we meet at 17:00" would be unambiguous without either part having to adjust to the other person's time zone and DST.

    6. Re:since it is summer by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      I've been saying this same thing for years.

      It all started when I was doing astronomy for a bit. Everything was in UT, and once I wrapped my head around that, everything time-related was so much easier.

      If you work 9 till 17, and I work 15 till 23, it's damn easy to figure out when to schedule a conference call. If you work 9 to 5 and I work 8 till 4 and we're 5 timezones apart and you're on DST and I'm not, it becomes a hell of a lot harder to to figure out when we can do business.

      But we can't even get the US to fully adopt the metric system, so I can't imagine people being OK getting up at 12 and heading to work at 14.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    7. Re:since it is summer by arth1 · · Score: 2

      If you work 9 till 17, and I work 15 till 23, it's damn easy to figure out when to schedule a conference call.

      My former boss would have said 4, because that's the time that will inconvenience both the same amount...

    8. Re:since it is summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not going to work at different hours with UTC. It is going to work on Monday at 2000 and getting home at Tuesday at 0800.

      Having the day change in the middle of the day would be very confusing. What does "see you tomorrow" mean then?

      The Trans Siberian Railroad runs on Moscow time. It was very confusing to eat breakfast at 1330. And it changed every day.

    9. Re:since it is summer by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Its not going to work at different hours with UTC. It is going to work on Monday at 2000 and getting home at Tuesday at 0800.

      Having the day change in the middle of the day would be very confusing. What does "see you tomorrow" mean then?

      What it always has meant. When you decouple the date and day, you are free to use one without interference from the other. Solar position is local, but time is global.

    10. Re:since it is summer by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      Summertime the whole year round is the right way to go for most countries. People stay up longer in the evenings than they used to.

    11. Re: since it is summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not common sense at all. The purpose of time is not to organize your personal schedule but to synchronize social activities. The alternative to time zone changes or DST are total overhauls of all of a society's schedules public transport, work shifts, TV and radio programs, hospitals, schools, kindergartens, churches, etc., which is, of course, not an alternative at all. That's what the discussion is about.

    12. Re:since it is summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why stick to summer time? Why not just change your operating hours?

      Because the only thing more immovable than government bureacracy is corporate bureacracy. It is literally easier to change time itself than change working hour norms, and enforcing working hours by law wouldn't work as there are too many different needs in different companies.

    13. Re:since it is summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This problem doesn't exist in the EU anyway. If the whole EU did decide to switch to UTC, "tomorrow" would be some time after 00:00 for "normal" day times. No more problems than today, when watching a late-night show on TV "tomorrow" is already today. It just shifts a little.

      I can see where it could get confusing in other parts of the world. But for the EU there would be no real issue using UTC.

    14. Re:since it is summer by Teun · · Score: 1

      Not so easy if your company uses Outlook for calendaring.
      My colleague in the UK sets up a meeting and the mail says it was set up at UTC time which sound logic.
      Only after accepting it shows they actually meant UTC+1 where I am.
      Yes I know, Outlook is Microsoft.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    15. Re:since it is summer by 3247 · · Score: 1

      Have everyone use UTC, and adjust working/opening hours to what makes the most sense for any business. There would be no more problems with lazy developers using zulu time and aggregating data from different parts of the world. "Can we meet at 17:00" would be unambiguous without either part having to adjust to the other person's time zone and DST.

      Having the date and day of week change during working hours in some parts of the world (East Asia, Australia/Oceania, America) might be a little bit inconvenient.

      --
      Claus
    16. Re:since it is summer by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Having the date and day of week change during working hours in some parts of the world (East Asia, Australia/Oceania, America) might be a little bit inconvenient.

      Only until you can mentally decouple the sun from the time. On the plus side, it causes less confusions when dealing with people who are far away, because then the sun position won't come into the equation, because you just have to deal with time, not date and sun position.
      For people in the far North (or South), it will be relatively easy, because near polar latitudes, people are well used to sun position varying widely compared to the clock anyhow.

      The US South is going to be the problem. But then again, isn't it always?

  5. Not DST by DalM · · Score: 1

    I know DST is generally stupid and bad, but that's the wrong time to end. DST is the good time where you get home from work and can still actually see the sun. Humans still primarily do stuff in the daytime.

    Let's make everything DST. Abandon "StandardTime" or whatever it is called in the sucky months.

    1. Re:Not DST by mitch0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The submission may have been a bit misleading, but it is not DST that is proposed to get abolished, but the DST change. So, each country is free to chose the timezone they'd like to remain in after the DST change is ended. There is a specific question for this in the poll as well (keep summer time, keep winter time or "don't care").

      I sure as hell hope the DST change will be ended, and we'll stick to summer time.

      --
      // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips,
      // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect
    2. Re:Not DST by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It really depends on the number of daylight hours you have. That hour change in countries with more hours of daylight, means not getting up in the dark in winter, nor wasting daylight in summer. Oh my god the horror of adjusting a clock twice a year, oh wait I don't, all my computerised gear does it automatically. I still have an old clock radio going, for no real apparent reason and I don't bother to adjust the time on that, just doing it my head as appropriate to the season.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still no. You can move your ass an hour earlier out of the bed, no reason why the whole world has to do it! There *is* a reason for time, and it's not "buttbuttbutt that's the way i'd like it!".

    4. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Congratulations to having your brain firmly stuck in the box. You know what? The numbers on the watch are completely arbitrary.

      9-5 is just a convention. 8-4 works just as well, as does 10-6. "Summer time" or "winter time" doesn't matter, we can adjust just fine either way.

      Just stop screwing with the clock.

    5. Re:Not DST by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can move your ass an hour earlier out of the bed, no reason why the whole world has to do it!

      There's little point in me getting to school an hour before the prof, or to the supermarket before the staff.

      And I hear there are these things called jobs where it's sometimes necessary for several people to be there together.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I hear there are these things called jobs where it's sometimes necessary for several people to be there together.

      *Exacty* my point! Just because YOU wish to get out of bed earlier (and no, it's not "too late" in non-DST), *everyone* has to...

    7. Re:Not DST by Misagon · · Score: 5, Informative

      How much light you have on a day depends on how close to a pole you live, and if it is summer or winter.
      Judging from your username I suppose you are in Southern USA. Well, southern Europe is about as far north as northern USA.

      For me in Stockholm in Northern Europe, the sun sets today at 10 pm and rises at 03:47 am CET. One hour forwards or backwards would not matter because it is TOO BRIGHT anyway.

      BTW, in the middle of winter, if the day is cloudy it may only get as bright as the summer nights are darkest. But then we don't have DST.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    8. Re: Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you just continue to "do it in your head" rather than ask everyone else to pretend they can change the amount of available daylight by messing with their clocks?

      Not enough light in the morning? Start later. Not enough light in the evening? Start earlier.

    9. Re: Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we say "you" we are actually referring to the collective "you" that includes everyone who thinks we actually have the ability to alter the Earth's rotation twice a year. This includes your prof and your employer.

    10. Re: Not DST by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Not enough light in the morning? Start later. Not enough light in the evening? Start earlier.

      Yeah, the farm animals will be totally OK with being fed/milked late every day.

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re: Not DST by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That means every company, school, transport system and whatever has to have two timetables.

      Or they could just open at three fingers after sunrise, like they did before railways were invented.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. DST is the right time to end. I don't need it being light until fucking 11 PM.
      What the hell are you doing outside that you need light for at that time?

    13. Re: Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense intended but you DO realize that animals don't have watches, right? Just because you fool yourself by adjusting your clock doesn't mean that the animals do. You're still feeding them late.

    14. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      School/college is one case where you really can't accomodate different personal schedules. The research shows that teenagers and young adults are less able to learn earlier in the day, so really schools should operate later than they do.

      In work, unless you do shift work or your management just needs a bunch of mindless drones there's no reason to work fixed hours.

      Meetings are scheduled ahead of time, so if you want to work 10-6 or 8-4 or work from home one day a week really isn't an issue; you book meetings based on when everyone is available, and if you've got a meeting booked in you need to be in the office or ready to teleconference in.

    15. Re: Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No offense intended but you DO realize that animals don't have watches, right?

      I feel your pain and have the utmost lack of respect for people like the one you're responding to.

      A guy will eat at 12 o'clock one day and then, after DST kicks in, have lunch at 12 o'clock -- not realizing he's eating one hour earlier... and I pity the poor fellow who tries to explain to that harebrained fool that he's having lunch 1 hour earlier.

    16. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can ask your school, supermarket and job to start working an hour earlier or later. It is a lot easier that way. Let me explain why:
      - iPhone alarm bug, caused by DST change
      - Google calendar bug, caused by DST change
      - Hotel room robbery with the help of missing log files, caused by DST change

      These are just a couple of famous bugs that are caused by DST change. Creating applications that work despite of DST change is extremely hard, I know this because I have been in a meeting with about 20 leading engineers who were trying to solve one such problem in very time critical application. It doesn't help that commonly used libraries also have DST change related bugs. Everyone will suffer due to these bugs and it also costs a lot of money to try to fix these issues.

      But the biggest problem is that when ever we talk about DST change related problems, this issue doesn't even come up. I thought that iPhone alarm bug would make people more aware, but no.

    17. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In work, unless you do shift work or your management just needs a bunch of mindless drones there's no reason to work fixed hours.

      Careful you don't melt, snowflake.

      Those people should have just been smarter, like you. Then they could turn up as, when, and if they want.

    18. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST won't bring you any more light to day, but adjusts (shifts) clock accordingly to make best use of light.

      I live couple of hundred more north than you in Finland and we hardly have sunlight during days at all during winter, but then at summers we get plenty. DST matters most here during August - May and then September - October.

      For those living in southern Europe this decision what they are about to take will matter most. For them it's question about whether they like to have about 180 more light hours total per year in evenings or mornings. It's not hard to ques that businesses would like it to be evenings as then it's better for them when people tend to be more active if its not too dark. 180 hours is over 7 days worth more time to earn more money.

    19. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weren't each country already free to decide these matters already? Idea of EU was about free trade, like Hansa - not about building empire with united rules and measures for everyone and taking control on matters where EU should not have any.

    20. Re: Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which is exactly what a summer time/winter time system accomplishes if the farmer doesn't compensate.

    21. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure as hell hope the DST change will be ended, and we'll stick to summer time.

      Agree.

    22. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stick to summer time

      Not me. I hope they choose standard time. I live on the east coast of Florida and it's completely unnatural to go to bed in the daylight and wake up in the dark.

    23. Re:Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be one of those who misunderstand what the discussion is about, so let me lay out the options for you. The purpose of clock time of the day is primarily to synchronize social activities, not organize someone's personal schedule. There are 3 positions: (a) Keep DST and change twice a year. (b) Keep DST (summertime) for the whole year and do not change the time during the year. (c) Abolish DST = have wintertime during the whole year and not change the time during the year. For (a) you have to argue that the status quo is beneficial as a whole to society as a whole across all EU, i.e., continue to change between wintertime and DST. For (b) you have to argue that society as a whole across all EU states would benefit from having one more clock hour of sunlight every day in the evening, while the sun rises one clock hour later (e.g. the sun rises at 6 o'clock instead of 5 AM and goes down at 22:00 instead of 21:00). For (c) you should argue that it is beneficial for society as a whole across all EU states to have one more clock time hour of sunlight in the morning but one less clock time hour of sunlight in the evening (e.g. the sun rises at 5 o'clock instead of 6 o'clock and nightfall starts at 21:00 instead of 22:00).

      In none of the cases somone's personal schedule matters, it's about what benefits society as a whole without making massive changes to all schedules (work, hospitals, transports, TV, radio, etc.). If you opt for the status quo or wintertime for the whole year, you have to argue that it is beneficial for society just as much as if you opt for DST for the whole year, since the DST and time zones are arbitrary conventions. You're imposing your schedule just as much on others no mater which option a-c you choose. What should matter for the decision in the end is at which clock time of the day people overall benefit from one more hour of sunlight, in the evening or in the morning, and why.

      An option that is outright silly is to say "keep the current time but change all schedules". That would be prohibitively expensive and orders of magnitudes more complicated than just changing the time (zone or DST), which is of course the reason why changing the time is discussed.

    24. Re: Not DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. Wether they have a DST or not is up to the individual countries, but if they do it has to be a change of one hour, on the same days as everyone else that does it. That way we don't end up with weird drifts of being an extra hour apart for a few days/weeks

  6. half an hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in stead of an hour back and forth, let's just settle in the middle and get this thing over with FFS !ç

  7. Most posters here are American by AbRASiON · · Score: 0

    And unfortunately as much as I love these guys,....
    I would say, almost every American I've encountered that complains about dst, has actually been complaining about normal time.

    Seriously.... Once I've asked a few in these very threads each year on slashdot.

    At the end of the day, we should change our business hours, but we won't.

    Until then, I like being able to get home with sunlight available, thanks. I just wish we'd double it, not halve it, in winter.

    1. Re:Most posters here are American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And unfortunately as much as I love these guys,....
      I would say, almost every American I've encountered that complains about dst, has actually been complaining about normal time.

      I don't know about anyone else, but what I object to the most is the switch.

      Pick one – either stay on Standard Time, or switch to Daylight "Savings" Time – and stay on it. Forever.

    2. Re:Most posters here are American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know - it confuses me every time I hear a USian talk about DST. DST happens over summer where for some crazy reason* we force ourselves out of bed an hour, not the other way around.

      *apparently so we can "enjoy" that extra hour of daylight at night... when we have to go to bed anyway so we can get up early the next morning.

      Captcha: whimper. An appropriate sentiment when discussing DST.

  8. Oh look, a government that listens to its people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike this one, i.e. the US.

    Over here people say keep Net Neutrality. Ajit Pai says nope, and hacks the survey.

    Over here people say we want a clean environment. Scott Pruitt says nope, and relaxes regulations allowing polluters to do more of what they do.

    Over here people say we want to protect more of our land and expand our national parks and monuments. Ryan Zinke says nope, and reverses all the Obama era expansions.

    That's MAGA for you.

  9. Get rid of this shit once and for all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it just messes with your biological clocks.

  10. YES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the hood is open get rid of the arbitrary time zone divisions and have a single time. Planck time since the big bang would be best, but since everyone knows what UTC is and it was hopefully the public in Europe would support standardizing on it.

  11. get up earlier in the morning then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if the problem is the boss won't let you, then how about getting the work day chaged so that the middle of the work day is in the middle of the actual day? SHOCK! HORROR! NEW IDEA ALERT!

  12. Wish! by markdavis · · Score: 1

    I wish they were polling and seriously considering it here, in the USA. I 100% want to abandon time changing and stay on DTS (summer time) year-round. Almost everyone I know wants it, too. It is ridiculous that we don't just act and do it.

    1. Re:Wish! by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Reply to self on typo, that is DST, not DTS.

      The DTS vs. Dolby Digital arguments can start somewhere else :)

  13. Go full French by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Really make the EU return to its origins.
    Decimal time.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re: Go full French by tsa · · Score: 1

      We tried that and it didnâ(TM)t work. So letâ(TM)s not try it again.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  14. It already crashed their servers, ..! by ReneR · · Score: 2

    When they started the questionnaire their servers where quickly hammered, and not reachable anymore. Probably says a thing or two, ...

    1. Re:It already crashed their servers, ..! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Probably says a thing or two, ...

      Opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one?

    2. Re:It already crashed their servers, ..! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they started the questionnaire their servers where quickly hammered, and not reachable anymore. Probably says a thing or two, ...

      Well, the EU doesn't do polls about other topics that people actually care about, so why buy a bigger server.

  15. Barbaric practice from a barbaric time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should have been stopped decades ago.

  16. Surprised to hear they took a poll by Kohath · · Score: 0

    Does the EU leadership actually pay attention to what the people of the EU want? I would expect them to issue ruling decrees regardless of what the poll says. But perhaps that impression of EU leaders is incorrect.

    1. Re:Surprised to hear they took a poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU usually cares far more about what citizens actually want than the member state governments.

    2. Re:Surprised to hear they took a poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, was surprised about this poll.

      But on the radio a speaker for the EU commission quickly clarified that the poll was neither binding nor advisory. It was just that, a poll.

      In the end, the EU commission will do as it damn pleases. No hint of direct democracy here, just smoke screens.

  17. Openning hours by DrYak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This has already been tried several times over the years and always with the same result: People discover that they don't like it being dark longer in the morning during the winter.

    ...which you can also compensate by changing working hours.

    And several business have different opening hours during the seasons anyway (e.g.: due to reduced work force due to vacations in summer).
    So giving summer-specific opening hours that also happen to take into account the variation of sun time isn't that far fetched.

    (E.g.: public transport has different time tables at different time of the year, public services tend to have reduced opening hours due to lots of them going into vacations, hospitals emergencies work in shifts around the clock anyway, movie schedule change each week with new release, work-from-home and artists put their own work hours anyway, university research team tend to have the most WTF work hours specially for PhD students (except for that guy who has Eukaryotik cell cultures. He needs to feed them every 32 hours no matter how out of sync it gets with any rational work schedule), etc. Shops are about the only things which seem to open at a constant timetable.)

    It used to make sense to shift clocks back in the industrial era when most of the activities were dictated by fixed time schedules and nearly everybody needed to be in sync (factory working ours).
    Nowadays, in our mostly service-sector-based type of work, you need to check (e.g.: online on your smartphone) the opening hours and time schedule for probably around 7 out of 10 business. Supressing DST will simply make you check for the last remaining 3 too, instead of relying on fixed clock times.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Openning hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "public transport has different time tables at different time of the year"

      Maybe in your place, but in my place it is the same time table for years.

    2. Re:Openning hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except twice a year, when everything is either late by 1 hour, or everything is stopped for 1 hour.

    3. Re:Openning hours by Teun · · Score: 1

      This has already been tried several times over the years and always with the same result: People discover that they don't like it being dark longer in the morning during the winter.

      ...which you can also compensate by changing working hours.

      And several business have different opening hours during the seasons anyway (e.g.: due to reduced work force due to vacations in summer).

      Next time think before you post.
      In the economically significant parts of the EU in winter the sun comes up after 09:00 and sets before 17:00.
      Already virtually everyone goes to work or school and returns in the dark, making the sun come up after 10:00 is just not acceptable.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  18. Half an hour by Going_Digital · · Score: 1

    Just set the time half way between summer and winter and leave it there like Sri Lanka.

  19. Questions aren't clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it so hard for them to just ask "Do you like daylight saving time? Yes/No"
    Nope, instead they ask you convoluted questions that you may easily misinterpret.

  20. Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are so far into the hole supporting DST that its like Y2K to correct all the equipment that has it now: real time SCADA devices, event logs, etc

    1. Re:Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are so far into the hole supporting DST that its like Y2K to correct all the equipment that has it now: real time SCADA devices, event logs, etc

      You're smoking crack. It's a simple update to the TZ info. TZ info gets updated pretty frequently in my experience.

      Basically you're saying we should keep doing stupid shit because there are a relative few systems out there that can't or won't get updated. That's just silly. By your logic we should have stayed with ox carts and walking.

      Dinosaur.

    2. Re:Costs by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Buy shit made after Y2K.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  21. Re:Let's do Metric Time Instead! by magarity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No more need for time zones, or the dreaded DST, at all! One time zone to rule them all!

    You're trying to be funny but actually in China this is exactly what they do. The whole country is on Beijing Time despite being what would normally be a 4 time zone wide country. And they don't bother with DST either.

  22. Just stop messing with clocks! by dhaen · · Score: 1

    Whatever it is now - just leave it alone, I'll adjust to it, permanently.

    1. Re:Just stop messing with clocks! by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Stalin, it that you?

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  23. No reason to have it anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never understood it to begin with. Days are shorter in Winter months longer in Summer in Northern hemisphere and the opposite in Southern. It is what it is and one hour never made much difference but create a adjustment for human's twice a year.

  24. Many bussinesses by evanh · · Score: 1

    individually have different start times. 6 AM starts exist and 7 AM is reasonably common.

    Try bringing the idea up at work.

  25. How not to post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I downmodded you because your post adds nothing to the conversation, while I upmodded the post you responded to because it does in fact add to the conversation. Way to go, you must be 'merkin.

  26. Saving, saving, saving ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    ... not saving s .

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  27. Americans be like ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... will it be a hard DSTXIT?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  28. End DST Didn't they already do that? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Didn't they already do that?

    Or is it just the FIA

    I have noticed that all of the European Formula 1 races this season start at 8am Central Daylight Time or later, previously they started at 7am CDT

    which is goof for me since I work every other weekend until 7am

    1. Re:End DST Didn't they already do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia ended DST. They're not (yet) part of the EU...

    2. Re:End DST Didn't they already do that? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You mean the EU isn't yet part of Russia.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  29. Old Native American saying by mschuyler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only the White Man would cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it on the bottom, and proclaim he had a longer blanket.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  30. submitted and hoping for a swift DST death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST = Deprivation of Sleep Time

  31. The Sun rupees without your clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get your ass outt off bed. It's really that simple.

  32. Should abandon CET by starless · · Score: 4, Informative

    A lot of the western European countries (e.g. Spain, France) should abandon Central European Time (CET) of any type.
    It doesn't make any sense since since they're in western and not central Europe.
    That's one reason people eat so late in Spain, as they're to the west of England.

    Instead they should use WET (Western European Time), i.e. essentially follow the UK....

    1. Re:Should abandon CET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you think you are to tell us what to do?
      Having sunrise at 6 and sunset at 23 is absolutely great, if we abolish summer time and we go back to the local time (WET) it means we will have sunrise at 4 and sunset at 21.00.

      I lived four years in locations were they used their local time and it sucks, you leave work and it's dark, and you have extremely bright sunlight at 05.00. So you wake up to go to work at 08.00 and arrive home with an hour left of sunlight. It's hideous.

      In Barcelona, IT companies have reduced time, 8.00 to 15.00. By using the "correct" local time, you diminish the sunlight during leisure time after work by moving two hours of that light before work when everybody is sleeping.

      You may argue that we should also move our schedule, but that's an even more difficult change, what should we do? start working at 06.00 am? and What benefit would that bring, if the change in timezone is compensated by a change in schedule? So much work for nothing.

  33. DST? by umghhh · · Score: 0

    They did not bother to ask anybody about CETA and other allegedly freetrade agreements, nor did they ask us if we want Dublin IV or open borders in the south, they did not ask anybody when they agreed on forced relocation (thanx to the bloody nationalists in Poland and Hungary for making it fail), they did not ask us if we want to punish Brits for seeing EU commission for the bunch of asshats they actually are. These few cases where national assemblies actually asked some important questions and the answers were not to EU liking they were ignored or the q. was asked again till it was 'correct'. So now they ask us a q. that makes not much difference to majority of us. What for? To give us impression that we matter? Or is there some other sinister plan behind it? For me it just increases the tension I have every 14 of July - I like to think that people of this continent rise up, march to EU commission, pull these bastards out of it, and after applying tar and feathers rush them through the streets beyond the city limits. 14 July seems a good date for that. Every year I am disappointed. But I am sure that time will come. I hope to take part in this. Time to depose Junkers, Asselborn, Merkels etc of this world. Not that it changes situation sufficiently or for long. It just has to be done once in a while or else these people think they are the brilliant essence of what everybody wants.

    1. Re:DST? by Kiwikwi · · Score: 1

      The EU has Public Consultations regularly, even if they only occasionally get Slashdot coverage. There are 21 open consultations this very moment, if you feel that you have something to offer.

      As for other matters... well, you're asked to select your representatives every 5 years for the EU Parliament and (I suspect) every 4 years for your national assembly and thus also the EU Council of Ministers. You can reach out to your representatives at any time, or work to replace them at the next election. And if you have a problem with the fact that idiots and criminals keep getting elected (and don't we all?), I'm afraid the only real solution is to convince your fellow EU citizens to vote for someone else. Personally I've put my vote behind the European United Left for EU parliament, along with supporting similar reform parties nationally, but you can pick your own poison. ;-)

    2. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The local legislator requires a majority in the local parliament. The EU commission works for the individual governments, i.e., the executive branch. Whatever the local governments cannot get an agreement for with the local legislator, they simply push through as EU regulations, and the local legislator has to abide to the EU regulations.
      Last changes in the EU were strengthening the EU parliament, but there's still too much power for the government (executive) driven impact on EU regulations (legislative). Separation of power is lost.

  34. Re:Let's do Metric Time Instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And AFAIK the people far away from Beijing hate the current practice.

  35. Tyranny of the Majority by InfiniteZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am an extreme night owl by nature. It's something generic according to the latest research. I try my best to fit in with "normal" people's schedule, and get by OK for most part with a painstakingly maintained bedtime. But twice a year, the time switch throws me off for weeks at a time. It has been a struggle of a lifetime.

    If there is one textbook example of the tyranny of the majority, this is it. We need to get rid of it in the states too.

    1. Re:Tyranny of the Majority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't a democracy where the majorty rules by definition a tyranny of the minorty?

      What you're proposing is the equal but opposing 'tyranny of the minority', where the lesser proportion of a population make a decision that impacts the majority.

      And by definition, if the EC takes a poll and finds the majority wants this changed, and they remove it, and a few farmers complain, isn't that STILL tyranny of the majority?

      What is your point anyway?

    2. Re:Tyranny of the Majority by InfiniteZero · · Score: 1

      Tyranny of the majority is a well known term, and my point is perfectly clear. What's yours, argue for the sake of arguing?

      Not all democratic rules are tyrannic. For example speed limits don't harm anyone and benefit the society in general. The DST rule of time change, on the other hand, is something completely artificial that people have lived perfectly fine without for thousands of years. It causes significant harm including death in a minority group of people. You can't be more tyrannic than that.

      For normal people the time change is a minor annoyance. You have to be someone with a major case of DSPD to fully appreciate its negative impact on your life.

      P.S. Typo in my original post. Should be "genetic" instead of "generic".

  36. Re:Let's do Metric Time Instead! by InfiniteZero · · Score: 1

    They tried DST for a few years, found no benefit, and promptly ended it. Something to be said about an authoritarian style government.

  37. Re:Old Native American saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The analogy, while quaint, is incomplete.

    Given the daily schedule of most people that is fixed or at least correlated “clock” times, in many geographical locations, culture and climates, taking from the “top” (evening sunlight”) to give to the “bottom” (morning sunlight) effects net increase in overall quality when integrated over a large number of people using an appropriate metric, due to a variety of hopefully obvious factors (enjoyment, quality of life, depression due to low light, traffic accidents, etc).

    I’m not sure if the Native Americans ever had the analytical prowess, obversational skills or exploratory acumen to reach the ideas or locations described, but certainly in the modern world the benefits of having sunlight adjusted to schedule should be self evident.

  38. Re:Old Native American saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In summer, would you prefer sunlight from 3am to 4am, or would you prefer sunlight from 8am to 9pm?

    Most people that aren’t Native Americans or live in a tent, would prefer to have the extra sunlight added in the evening. Whereas people that are socially awkward or prefer a foolish consistency over practicality prefer to have the clocks unchanged.

  39. Re:Let's do Metric Time Instead! by erwin6502 · · Score: 0

    The European Commission is not authoritarian?

  40. Re:Old Native American saying by mschuyler · · Score: 2

    You are an excellent candidate for my sig.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  41. Re: Let's do Metric Time Instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, and that's why they're doing a public consultation rather than just telling everyone what's best! I know you Americans love to criticise the EU, but you really should educate yourself on how it works first.

  42. You stupid idiots! Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Summer time all year round"? WTeverlivingF?

    There is ONE way to do this. Just ONE way.

    Get it right you IDIOTS!

  43. Stop this madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That article has several logical flaws. While there may be benefits to *being on* DST, there are also significant drawbacks to *switching* to and from DST, as mentioned above. The article never admits those, or compares their relative risks.

    Assuming it's true that changing clocks twice a year helps match "our modern clockwork-driven world adjust to our ancestral sleep and wake patterns", then wouldn't changing clocks 4 times a year be even better? Or every month? Why not every day? And instead of doing it per-state/country, why not adjust it exactly as optimal per latitude? We've got computers and satellites now.

    If you think that the cost of changing clocks is zero, then you should want to change them every day. If you admit that changing clocks has a nonzero cost, then you need to measure and compare the costs and benefits. The current implementation of DST is the worst of both worlds. It's like saying that 60mph is too fast for city driving, therefore everyone exiting the freeway should slam on the brakes as hard as possible. Maybe the premise is true, but this solution is terrible.

    > Well, it’s pretty simple: wake up with the sun like our ancestors did.

    Great idea, but that's not what DST is. If you're using a daylight alarm clock (or actual daylight), DST is irrelevant at best.

    > Congratulations; you just reinvented DST...poorly. Now instead of turning the clock back or forward, you have to add or subtract to the operating hours of every place you do business with twice a year.

    I already have to do plenty of mental arithmetic with clocks every year. The public clocks in every transit station in my city don't get set for DST for about a month after each DST change. Half the stores in my city have separate "winter hours" and "summer hours", because even DST isn't good enough for them. Is your goal to stop people from needing to add/subtract times? DST is worse at that, too.

    1. Re:Stop this madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live, fucking Narnia?

  44. DST work by DrYak · · Score: 1

    In the economically significant parts of the EU in winter the sun comes up after 09:00 and sets before 17:00.

    Already virtually everyone goes to work or school and returns in the dark, making the sun come up after 10:00 is just not acceptable.

    This is not how DST works.
    DST isn't active in the winter to begin with.

    If the sun is up between 09:00 and 17:00, that is still going to be 09:00 and 17:00 wether DST exists or not.

    DST is active in summer.
    The same place would have sun in summer between 05:00 and 21:00 in the summer.
    DST would shift by (+1) in the summer, corresponding to 06:00 and 22:00.
    So somebody working 09:00 to 17:00, will only start working 3 hours after the sun rise, and will still get 5 hours of sun after the end of work ( <- that's where the more light happens), and could spend these 5 hours outside, e.g.: spending deutschmarks at the beer garten ( <- which was one of the *economic* reasons to introduce DST in the industrial age).

    My long argument is that the exact same thing is functionally achieved, instead of applying DST in the summer, to shift working hours to 08:00 to 16:00 (Still the same distribution of light before / after work). The worker will still have 5 hours to spend their Euros in hipster Cafés.
    It would not have made sens back in the industrial era (every single place setting completely different random hours! chaos !)
    But today, when 7 out 10 business have varying work hours anyway, asking the last three to shift hours instead of shifting clocks isn't far fetched.

    --

    Now to go back to parent poster : what the DST achieves *extremely crudely* is having the start of the work day follow the start of the light.
    e.g.: If you kept the start of the work day at 08.00 (working hours or DST or whatever), in the winter you would have to start working a whole 1 hour before the sunrise, given your example.

    Suppressing DST without any other adjustement would make you lose this "work day *(very) approximater* follows light".
    I'm simply arguing that adjusting working hours also enables you to follow light, and nowadays, you need to check opening hours for lots of services you're contacting/using/visiting anyway.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  45. Re:Let's do Metric Time Instead! by Danathar · · Score: 1

    People hate UTC because then they would have to track what time for instance breakfast is when going somewhere else. My response to that..is that the time is different because PEOPLE EAT AT A DIFFERENT TIME THAN WHERE YOU ARE FROM!

  46. Re: Let's do Metric Time Instead! by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    In northern parts of Europe such as Finland, DST is a 2 hour jump.

    Some southern countries don't bother with it at all.

  47. Re:Old Native American saying by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's more like shifting the thing so your feet aren't cold and it doesn't suffocate you, but thatnks for playing.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  48. line up Solar Noon and Clock Noon by AdmNaismith · · Score: 1

    Better yet, move the clocks forward a other hour from DST so that solar noon and clock noon line up. After that, we can adjust it every five years or so to keep the Noons lined up, which is likely to be only @ 5 min. The days will grow and shrink and everything is fine.

  49. Make the change. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Then we'll have everyone saying how stupid it is to have ever changed it in the first place. Bring it back.

  50. Re:Old Native American saying by aybiss · · Score: 1

    Please tell me there aren't still people stupid enough to believe this is what DST is for... [keeps scrolling down] [facepalm]

    --
    It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
  51. I liked DST never! by Xman73x · · Score: 0

    I think itâ(TM)s time they ban dst because for one it never helped anyone! Heck not even the farmers think that it should be allowed nope! So I think ðY" the government should stop with Day light savings time!