Slashdot Mirror


As Google Maps Renames Neighborhoods, Residents Fume (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: For decades, the district south of downtown and alongside San Francisco Bay here was known as either Rincon Hill, South Beach or South of Market. This spring, it was suddenly rebranded on Google Maps to a name few had heard: the East Cut. The peculiar moniker immediately spread digitally, from hotel sites to dating apps to Uber, which all use Google's map data. The name soon spilled over into the physical world, too. Real-estate listings beckoned prospective tenants to the East Cut. And news organizations referred to the vicinity by that term.

"It's degrading to the reputation of our area," said Tad Bogdan, who has lived in the neighborhood for 14 years. In a survey of 271 neighbors that he organized recently, he said, 90 percent disliked the name. The swift rebranding of the roughly 170-year-old district is just one example of how Google Maps has now become the primary arbiter of place names. With decisions made by a few Google cartographers, the identity of a city, town or neighborhood can be reshaped, illustrating the outsize influence that Silicon Valley increasingly has in the real world.

97 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    Are they "official" names for neighborhoods?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by bhcompy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In many large and medium sized cities they are official names, and the neighborhoods can have local councils for things like events, signage/decorations, historic building management, etc. Example from San Diego CA

    2. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by mattyj · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. There are official districts (Sunset, Richmond, etc.) but then they're broken down into what I think are more traditional names.

      This is like if Google just suddenly started calling Hell's Kitchen something else. Or renamed SOHO for no reason.

    3. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by Berkyjay · · Score: 2

      There are no "official" neighborhood names within the city. The names are just a result of a certain name gaining critical mass where everyone just starts using it. That's part of the problem. Google being the large force that it is, can vault a name to that critical mass point pretty easily.

    4. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No. Real estate agents try to "name" neighborhoods in order to create enclaves of pricing. There are no real names of neighborhoods. Completely made up. Even in the summary it said the neighborhood had THREE names.

    5. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by xfade551 · · Score: 2

      I've seen this in my area as well, which is substantially less populous than San Francisco. I'm pretty sure they are taking names off official survey/plot maps, but often these names have fallen in disuse for a century or more. For example, the Google Maps "neighborhood" name nearest my home is in the description on the deed to my home, but is nowhere else: not my housing development, post office branch, census tract, voting precinct, street signs, school district, "common knowledge" neighborhood name, nor anything like that.

    6. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by mattyj · · Score: 3, Informative

      This wikipedia page has a pretty accurate/traditional listing of neighborhoods (for now.) Hopefully whoever maintains it won't start adding BS made up neighborhoods:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_neighborhoods_in_San_Francisco

      The neighborhood namings are helpful when navigating the city. We have three major street grids here, two of which are askew and converge along Market street. We also have two separate grids of numbered streets, one going by Avenue and one going by Street. If you didn't know any better and put the wrong one in to get to, say, '9th', you could end up near beach instead of near Twitter HQ.

      We have a lot of very long streets here, too, relative to the size of the city. Saying you live or work on California Street is useless as it crosses a dozen or more neighborhoods. But if you talk to a local and say you live in Pacific Heights (I wish), that's a much more specific place.

    7. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's better here in Texas (like everything)

      ...except the weather, unless you're comparing to Oklahoma or something. The only thing I really miss from Texas, though, is the BBQ. Finding a BBQ place in California that knows anything about anything is a terrible chore. In Texas, you can't hardly drive after the first rain of the season without crashing into one. Hmm, the drivers are worse in Texas, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is like if Google just suddenly started calling Hell's Kitchen something else.

      Gordon Ramsay would not be amused.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's better here in Texas (like everything) ...

      Except in Education (ranked 40th) and Healthcare (ranked 38th) in the nation. Also, it's really frelling hot in Texas. Still, not a bad place to fly over on your way to somewhere better. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    10. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by GoTeam · · Score: 1

      Let's not skip over this nonsense from the article "In a survey of 271 neighbors that he organized recently, he said, 90 percent disliked the name." So a random fool who has only lived in the area for 14 years (not very long really) found a group of people who he hand selected, then conducted his "survey"... Was this the only guy home the day the reporter went out there for public comments?

    11. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by lgw · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Education (and largely healthcare) reflect demographics, not anything about the state per se.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by geoskd · · Score: 1, Informative

      Education (and largely healthcare) reflect demographics, not anything about the state per se.

      Cough, Cough, Bullshit, Cough

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    13. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by scammed+a+rich+nib · · Score: 1

      Panicky is the right word

    14. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by larryjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are they "official" names for neighborhoods?

      Most definitely. For example, there were fierce battles in San Jose over whether to call the Vietnamese area Little Saigon, Vietnamese Business District, or Saigon Business District, which led to protests and attempts to recall a city council member. Sometimes these battles are political, as with the naming of the Vietnamese area in San Jose. Sometimes the battles are cultural, as with the Koreatown naming push in Santa Clara. There was pushback from the non-Koreans in the area to calling the entire area Koreatown. In the end, the city decided not to officially designate the area as Korean. However, someone at Google decided to do the opposite, and so Koreatown shows up not only in Google Maps but also in the search results.

      Google has massive power to change language, names, and thinking. For example, a short while ago, Google Maps navigation suddenly started using the term "slip road". From the context, it was obviously talking about on and off ramps to highways, but it would always say slip road. I finally looked up the word and saw that it was a British term. However, Google has broadened the recognition of the word at least to the US.

    15. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 1

      This is like if Google just suddenly started calling Hell's Kitchen something else.

      My sarcasm detector's broken today but I think it's already officially known as Clinton. It's kind of hard to sell development with the moniker "Hell's Kitchen."

      --
      "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    16. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Over 50 yrs is recent? https://www.nytimes.com/2001/0...

    17. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by pthisis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is like if Google just suddenly started calling Hell's Kitchen something else. Or renamed SOHO for no reason.

      Except that as the article notes, the name was actually created a few years ago by a neighborhood nonprofit steering group that residents voted for: The East Cut name originated from a neighborhood nonprofit group in San Francisco that residents voted to create in 2015 to clean and secure the area.

      Google didn't just suddenly rename it for no reason. The issue is more subtle than that; in previous times, the neighborhood council decision would either be ignored or take a long time to spread and catch on. With Google's ubiquity, changing it on Google maps has an immediate effect. Whether that's bad and jarring or good and avoids ambiguity, it's certainly new and different.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    18. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      It's better here in Texas (like everything)

      ...except the weather, unless you're comparing to Oklahoma or something. The only thing I really miss from Texas, though, is the BBQ. Finding a BBQ place in California that knows anything about anything is a terrible chore. In Texas, you can't hardly drive after the first rain of the season without crashing into one. Hmm, the drivers are worse in Texas, too.

      You forgot tacos. South texas or north mexico depending on who you ask :) has some of the best tacos north of the boarder. The closer to the border the better the taco. Best tacos I ever had was from the street vender in mexico [Reynosa/Progresso/Etc] but as an old fart I am too scared to go over the border anymore and have to setting for "nearly' as good. Which is better than anything I have had north of here and by north I mean like San Antonio/Austin/Dallas/ETC. The further north you go the less flavor and heat which is what a good taco has.

    19. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You forgot tacos.

      I didn't. We have plenty of Mexicans here in California, so we have plenty of good tacos. Pretty much any roach coach that isn't some kind of hipster avocado tater tot dispenser is chock-full of 'em, and even some of those have some decent carnitas. California is a lot more friendly to Mexicans than Texas is, so we've long had lots of them here. (I am not a Mexican myself, I am a Mexican-American.) I used to make my own tacos pretty regularly too, but I got rid of the smoker I used to do pork butts in so now I mostly depend on others for my taco fix.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the popular names for neighborhoods change over time, and may not be the same as the official names. Few people head to city hall to inquire about what their neighborhood is actually called.

      However, Google seems to be giving nicknames to some very tiny areas, some smaller than a city block, named after a major street or intersection. It clutters up the map to see these names in largest font on the map. They weren't there a few months ago when I looked. These aren't "neighborhoods" and some are so small no one would have named them (seriously, one by me encompasses only a single set of condo units with only one entrance). I don't think these are "neighborhoods" at all but just quick search short cuts, since you can type in the name to google maps and zoom there quickly. Ie, you can type in "east cut" to zoom to the San Francisco area mentioned in the summary.

    21. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They're naming things with a much smaller area than SOHO, even a single block sometimes gets a name. I'm not sure what these are supposed to be.

    22. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      I guess that makes DC the crooked treason politician shithole Capitol, eh?

      Sounds about right. All cities are terrible.

    23. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      culture ... is to blame. I know you lefties ...

      Perhaps you should have paid more attention when they were defining 'irony' in class.

      Change the culture of the poor neighborhoods, and the kids in the schools will start to do better

      Addressing the poverty tends to do that, but then that becomes a wider problem and that makes it harder to dismiss the poor with a 'change your culture' judgement.

      Here's a link to a wikipedia article that sumamrises a meta study that looks at correlations of criminal behaviour, which I'm using as a proxy for your 'horrific culture'.

      I note the following, referring to socioeconomic status - "Crime rates and inequality are positively correlated within countries and, particularly, between countries, and this correlation reflects causation from inequality to crime rates, even after controlling for other crime determinants."

      The loony left are every bit as bad as the nutjobs on the right. Neither are representative of the majority of people who lean or identify in either direction, but they make convenient punching bags for when people prefer simplistic answers that feed their preconceptions and prejudices. Please, be better than that.

    24. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by terrycarlino · · Score: 4, Funny

      The difference between Europeans and Americans is that Europeans think 200 miles is a long way and Americans think 200 years is a long time.

    25. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by alexo · · Score: 1

      The difference between Europeans and Americans is that Europeans think 200 miles is a long way and Americans think 200 years is a long time.

      Actually, most Europeans think that 200 miles is (roughly) 322 kilometers.

    26. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by MaXMC · · Score: 1

      I think he meant that 1 mile (for Swedes at least) are 10 km and thus 200 miles is a long way

    27. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      Even if 1 mile equals 1,6 kms, 322 kilometers is still a long way (enough to pass through several large historical cities).

      Alexo's post was stressing that Europeans (other than from UK) would express this saying in kilometers, not miles.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    28. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      Heck, even 200 kms would be quite a long stretch in Europe.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    29. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I live next to a neighborhood called Hoes Heights.

    30. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Are you really claiming that fluency in English has no statistical effect on educational outcome?

      Are you really claiming that 1 vs 2 parents in the home has no statistical effect on educational outcome?

      Are you really claiming that attitude of parents towards the value of education has no statistical effect on educational outcome?

      You certainly have me questioning your own educational outcome.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      -1 huh? Must be a few San Francisco people in this thread...

      https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea...

      You do realise your city is known for scenic beauty, trolleys, needles, and faeces?

    32. Re: Renaming Neighborhood is bad? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Even if 1 mile equals 1,6 kms, 322 kilometers is still a long way

      It's not really that far, just a bit further than the distance from Berlin to Warsaw. Most Germans could do that in one tank.

  2. Had something similar happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They randomly changed Mystreet Street to Mystreet Ave. You don't realize the amount of services that rely on Google for address verification until it starts throwing you errors about an invalid address. Fuck you Google, it still says Street on the signs and even on your goddamn streetview images.

    1. Re: Had something similar happen by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      What did they say when you brought the error to their attention?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Had something similar happen by geoskd · · Score: 1

      They randomly changed Mystreet Street to Mystreet Ave. You don't realize the amount of services that rely on Google for address verification until it starts throwing you errors about an invalid address. Fuck you Google, it still says Street on the signs and even on your goddamn streetview images.

      If you think thats bad, you should see what happens when the 911 database (yes they keep their own address database based on the US postmaster postal standard) is wrong. At least with google you have some idea of whom to send an e-mail to. With 911, there is literally 1 person in the entire country who has the knowledge, the access and the authority to actually fix that problem for any given location, and good luck finding them. You can't even be sure what state they work in or what agency they work for. The collective group of them don't even know how to contact each other.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    3. Re:Had something similar happen by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Try living somewhere which has two official languages and recently renamed a load of streets which were previously named after people linked to a former dictatorship. That means four different names, and Google Maps will switch between them arbitrarily for different sections of the same street.

    4. Re:Had something similar happen by omnichad · · Score: 1

      All street signage in the US (at least in the midwest) is in English. That doesn't stop Google Maps from showing "Illinois Route 155" as "Ruta de Illinois 155" (Spanish). It did this for multiple years, but I think it's working now.

    5. Re:Had something similar happen by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If you think thats bad, you should see what happens when the 911 database is wrong.

      I don't think it's THAT hard. When I was with an interconnected VoIP provider, we had some contacts who could make corrections to customers' location and other details in the database --- didn't really seem like it was a "1 Guy in the world" type situation.

    6. Re:Had something similar happen by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Nah. As someone on the database side, there are quite a few people from the phone companies to our own staff that can make updates. We recently (like a year ago recently) deployed software to help our customers make changes even easier. Obviously if you’re with a small phone company, there might be one person, but absolutely there are quite a few people who can and do make corrections.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    7. Re: Had something similar happen by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      I've got to personally say that I don't find that to be true. I have three times sent feedback to Google maps about errors that I have found in my local area while using the application to navigate. In all three cases not only did I get a response from Google (probably a bot, I admit) but the discrepancies were quickly fixed, within a month or so.

    8. Re:Had something similar happen by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      All street signage in the US (at least in the midwest) is in English

      Huh? It's Spanish all over the southwest, and French in Louisiana. Next thing you'll tell me the US has an official language.

    9. Re: Had something similar happen by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Google doesn't care about fixing anything. My address is on a small street, and Google maps always shows it at the end of a dead end road, facing a hill, about half a mile away.
      Only google.
      All other map services get it correct, including many ancient GPS devices.
      If I call for a ride, I have to explicitly tell them that google maps is wrong. And half the time, they'll call me saying they can't find the place, they're facing an hill.
      It's been this way for, oh, four years now.

  3. It's degrading to the reputation of our area... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's degrading to the reputation of our area," said Tad Bogdan, who has lived in the neighborhood for 14 years.

    He should be happy they didn't decide to call it Poop Map!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:It's degrading to the reputation of our area... by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

      He should be happy they didn't decide to call it Poop Map!

      Well, the "Here" powered geolocation map on Flickr describes the location of photos I've taken by Fremont Street in Las Vegas as "Homeless Corridor, Las Vegas, Nevada".

      --

      ~~~~~~~
      "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    2. Re:It's degrading to the reputation of our area... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Are there more of these? What about LA? :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:It's degrading to the reputation of our area... by Daralantan · · Score: 2

      I'm confused as to why they are so offended and say it is some kind of personal offense against them. Is there some hidden horrid offense in "east cut"? It's not like they called it some racial term, some other word for crap, etc.

  4. Finally, a way to make housing in SF affordable! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google can just give every SF neighborhood a really awful name. West gash, Buttfungus grove, Trashpile drive, Stank avenue, etc, lowering property values until housing is affordable for mere mortals again!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  5. It's the real-estate agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Rincon Hill, South Beach and SOMA are all distinct neighborhoods, not different names for the same area as the article insinuates.

    Real estate agents here try to rename areas all the time into 'micro neighborhoods' for out of towners who would, for example, rather move to 'Eureka Valley' than 'The Castro'. This isn't anything new and I would question whether Google did this and real estate agents followed, or if it's the other way around.

    People that actually live here now and have lived here for any mount of time would never deign to utter the words "South Cut". That's just a stupid name in and of itself and has no meaning.

    1. Re:It's the real-estate agents by linuxwrangler · · Score: 1

      Indeed. There are real estate listings that don't mention Richmond, California at all preferring "Carriage Hills", "Brickyard Cove", "Marina Bay", "Hilltop Green", etc.

      --

      ~~~~~~~
      "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    2. Re:It's the real-estate agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is because Richmond is notorious for poverty and crime. The city has the highest rate (70%) for unsolved murders in the SF Bay Area. Its schools are a disaster with low graduation rates and subject proficiency in the single digits. And you have the Chevron Refinery which has not been a good neighbor.

    3. Re:It's the real-estate agents by keltor · · Score: 4, Informative

      East Cut is the huge renaming project for the area. There's almost no possible way locals wouldn't know what the fuck is up unless they just avoid the freaking signs everywhere. Google didn't invent this shit, the City and local Business Owners did. It even has a website: https://theeastcut.org/

    4. Re:It's the real-estate agents by amacbride · · Score: 2

      I've lived here for 20+ years (including 5 in the area in question), and had never heard "The East Cut" until today.

    5. Re:It's the real-estate agents by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Could have been worse.

    6. Re:It's the real-estate agents by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Not surprising. Lots of zombies actually don't give a shit about anything that happens where they live. I fall into this category too. Didn't realise there was a festival in the park opposite my house and my wife pointed out that the signs have been up in our street for the past month.

    7. Re:It's the real-estate agents by Xochil · · Score: 1

      The area known as The Castro was called Eureka Valley long before it was called The Castro.

  6. It could be worse by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    Residents Fume?

    They should be glad it's not worse. I can imagine much worse names than East Cut which Google could give to a neighborhood.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:It could be worse by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      People get angry over every stupid little thing.
      What Cell Phone someone uses.
      The particular food they choose in their diets.
      Being a fan of a rival local sports team.
      Condiments used on a hotdog.
      Thickness of crust on a pizza.
      Toppings on such pizza.
      Using a fork to eat such pizza.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:It could be worse by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Is (or was) there a canal or other artificial waterway in that neighborhood? Does this neighborhood ajoin a similar one to the west?

      "Cut" is an archaic British colloquialism for canal, but still well enough known this side of the pond. I was unaware it was used in US.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    3. Re:It could be worse by SandorZoo · · Score: 1

      "Cut" refers to cutting through hills to make streets flatter: http://www.foundsf.org/index.p...

  7. Re:Identity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because other dickweed outsiders are going to start calling it what google maps calls it, which is incorrect.

  8. Next Rename by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    s/Cupertino/Fruit Market/

  9. sadly, not a new thing by circusboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    google renamed the street I grew up on by eliding a t. some time later, when the city went to remake the street signs, I'm guessing they checked google maps for the spelling rather than the records and suddenly Patterson became Paterson. At one point my mother had collected a 19th century city registrar book that had all the properties delineated, (and the street name correctly spelled...)

    there was even a short period of time when you could use street view to look at an old and new street sign within a block of each other and see both spellings in the wild.

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    1. Re:sadly, not a new thing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing they checked google maps

      I'm guessing Google checked with the council and they renamed the street and just because Google is a tech company that isn't dependent on labourers you misattributed the cause of the street name change because Google is faster.

      I found a typo in Google maps once. I hit the send feedback button, reported the error and 2 weeks later the spelling mistake was gone.

  10. Here/Navteq Maps by Thelasko · · Score: 2

    Here/Navteq maps have been using township names in my area. Not towns, townships. The township I live in has an obscure name that is completely unrelated to the town name. If it wasn't on my tax bill, I would have no idea it existed. However, Navteq uses that instead of the town name.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Here/Navteq Maps by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      Google does the same thing, including hamlets. In my case, they mis-drew the line for the end of the hamlet to include about 50 homes that aren't a part of it. Results in a ton of confusion for local delivery drivers who aren't regulars, yet Google refuses to fix the issue.

  11. Another example of "journalism" by the ny times by will_die · · Score: 5, Informative

    If they had done any research they would have found out that the community benefit district for that area, a local government agency, had renamed the area to the East Cut over a year ago.
    They spend tax money on advertising it and probably went to google to get the name to reflect what the city wanted.
    This was not some sudden change caused by google, nor an example of how google is a final arbitrator of names.
    it is just another daily example of how the new york times is worth for journalism and its only value is in wiping down the street of San Francisco.

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/ba...

    1. Re:Another example of "journalism" by the ny times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you'd take a moment to RTFA and climb down off of your soapbox, you'd see they clearly explained that:

      The East Cut name originated from a neighborhood nonprofit group in San Francisco that residents voted to create in 2015 to clean and secure the area. The nonprofit paid $68,000 to a “brand experience design company” to rebrand the district.

      But "the East Cut" wasn't really the focus of the article in the first place. The article is more about how rapid any renaming of a neighborhood spreads nowadays, due to Google's proliferation. The "why" it got renamed is not the point. It's the speed at which the new name spreads.

      But at least you got to tear the media a new one, like Dad.

    2. Re:Another example of "journalism" by the ny times by will_die · · Score: 1

      It got spread because the city of San Fransico through that nonprofit group decided to change the name and pay tax money on advertising and changing official designations to reflect that name changed.
      The article did nothing to show that google did it.

    3. Re:Another example of "journalism" by the ny times by will_die · · Score: 1

      They got authority through the city government. If that is the first time they saw it then they missed all the sign changes, the uniform changes, and the advertisement signs that when up with the change.

    4. Re:Another example of "journalism" by the ny times by g01d4 · · Score: 1
      From your link:

      San Francisco has seen its share of ill-fated efforts to slap a new name on an old part of town.

      One has to wonder had it not been for Google whether East Cut would have been yet another one of those ill-fated efforts.

    5. Re:Another example of "journalism" by the ny times by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      /. and RTFA

      the East Cut name originated from a neighborhood nonprofit group that residents voted to create in 2015 to clean and secure the area. The nonprofit paid $68,000 to a "brand experience design company" to rebrand the district.

      But it wasn't until Google Maps adopted the name this spring that it got attention -- and mockery.

      "The East Cut sounds like a 17 dollar sandwich," Menotti Minutillo, an Uber engineer who works on the neighborhood's border, said on Twitter in May.

      Mr. Robinson said his team asked Google to add the East Cut to its maps. A Google spokeswoman said employees manually inserted the name after verifying it through public sources. The company's San Francisco offices are in the neighborhood (as is The New York Times bureau), and one of the East Cut nonprofit's board members is a Google employee.

    6. Re:Another example of "journalism" by the ny times by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Menotti Minutillo sounds like a fancy coffee

  12. Re:Three names for one place by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    So you can find the Local vs the Neighbor vs the Foreigner.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  13. Re:Dystopia by mikael · · Score: 2

    They are trying to improve things. They want to increase the value of neighbourhoods and drive out everything that attracts the homeless.
    First thing incomers do is Google up on the neighbourhood reviews and take a stroll through StreetView. If the area looks post-apocalyptic they'll go elsewhere. So they rebrand the neighbourhood with new names so no-one knows any better - Tenderloin becomes SunnyValley.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  14. Re:Identity by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Well stop making stupid names for your neighborhood.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  15. Re:Finally, a way to make housing in SF affordable by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    If you've ever been to SFO quite frankly a number of those names wouldn't be descriptively inaccurate, either.

    --
    -Styopa
  16. Better than nonexistent death traps. by X-Dopple · · Score: 1

    Better than naming places which flat out don't exist. There's a piece of land in eastern Utah called Big Park which is not referenced on any state databases or on any other mapping service. It is located out in truly desolate country with no services for miles. Going out there without adequate preparations is likely to get someone stranded or killed.

    Google Maps is accountable to no one. That is the problem with these corporations.

  17. Re:Finally, a way to make housing in SF affordable by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Needle Row and Gangland Heights.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  18. Re:Lobstertarianism? by Topwiz · · Score: 2

    In the US official place names are tracked by the Census Bureau and the Postal Service.

  19. Traffic by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    Many of Google’s decisions have far-reaching consequences, with the maps driving increased traffic to quiet neighborhoods

    Too bad. It isn't creating traffic it's a redistribution. Public streets are public.

  20. I've noticed this too by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Pull up Google Maps and zoom in on any neighborhood and you see all sorts of names of 'areas' that don't seem to have anything to do with anything. Where the heck are they even coming up with these?

    1. Re:I've noticed this too by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Most likely the Federal Government or Local Government, they keep track of these things typically in some form of GIS and that is established through documents (eg. deeds). My original deed has the name of some 1800's guy on there that developed the area, so they named it the "developer name" tract and that has changed over time, to a $number ward now and probably many other names (you find things on old maps when you go to city hall for some permit and your name of the area doesn't match their name).

      In bigger city, things get renamed whenever a philantropist or developer gets some money in the pockets of the local politicians, in some cases local politicians will change things for like a year or two because of some sort of remembrance or politically correct reason too.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  21. Old name maybe? by DewDude · · Score: 1

    One thing I've noticed about Google...especially lately...is they are adding some historical names to areas. A prime example is a spot out in California I go to which doesn't really have a mailing address, but Google assigns it location name. That name is based off a long-defunct stop on a railroad on a long defunct rail line.

    I've seen this locally too. I've noticed some really old names for areas that I've only seen on maps made before the 1920s. I have to wonder if Google is acquiring really old maps in whatever it's licensing and someone had the idea to toss these names in here. There's one place near me that shows up as "[something] Post Office" when the post office has been gone for well over 100 years. Most people have no clue why this name is showing up till I unroll an antique map and show them.

    I know where I live..most neighborhoods "advertise" somehow...they'll have nice name markers. IT came as a lot of neighbors' surprise when they started seeing the name of a place they'd never heard of. "Check your tax maps; that entire area was organized as a sub-division in the 70s before it was built and the name is probably on your deed." Pretty much everyone that lives back there has moved in within the last 20 years and actually never bothered looking over the details of their deeds to see "[redacted] Mills Lot [whatever]" on there.

    As someone who is fascinated with maps, it makes perfect sense to me.

  22. RTFA will_die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The NYT article clearly states this if you had bothered to read it instead of just bashing. From the New York Times
    "In San Francisco, the East Cut name originated from a neighborhood nonprofit group that residents voted to create in 2015 to clean and secure the area. The nonprofit paid $68,000 to a “brand experience design company” to rebrand the district."

  23. Re:Finally, a way to make housing in SF affordable by mikael · · Score: 1
    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  24. Re:Identity by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need to get a life if your identity hinges on the correct naming of your residence.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  25. They can't even get towns right by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    Google Maps shows a town about a mile from where I live. Click on the name and no information about the town shows up. Nobody has ever heard of it and few people live within that area. The area is actually part of the city I live in, so it can't be a city or town of its own. Maybe Google found the name in an old history book where there may have been a community by that name a hundred or more years ago.

    That's not the only case. I see it repeated all over the state. These are not "dead towns". I'm familiar with dead towns. I have a book that lists every dead town in the state. They may be old communities that Google "thinks" are towns.

  26. Phoenix Area? by ffejie · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that the Phoenix area seems a bit over the top with the neighborhood names? I live in NYC and don't know Phoenix well, but it seems like every 30 - 100 houses have their own name. People can't really use these, right? Just take a look Pueblo Hermoso, for instance, looks like it's about one building, and appears to be some kind of a strip mall. I'm used to NYC, where even a small ("newer," some would say fictional) neighborhood like NoHo might have 5,000 residents, and 100+ buildings, with stores and restaurants in it. Obviously, this is because of the density of Manhattan. However, in Phoenix, are people even using these names? Would a local even know where "Henry Leo Place" is? Would love to have a local weigh in.

    --
    Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
    1. Re:Phoenix Area? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Nobody who doesn't live there in that exact spot would know or use any of those. They look like housing development or apartment complex names.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:Phoenix Area? by azcoyote · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're right. I'm from Phoenix and nobody uses those names at all. They probably represent housing development names that were used to market the houses way back when, but which quickly fell into disuse. And those development names are always goofy and arbitrary, adding nice-sounding things like "creek" and "vista," when in reality before they built it was all just flat dirt like the rest of the valley.

      The only names we do use represent very large districts. I'm from South Phoenix, which is traditionally Mexican and sits on the north side of South Mountain. On the south side of South Mountain is Ahwatukee. These are all parts of Phoenix, but most other area names are simply suburbs.

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    3. Re:Phoenix Area? by ffejie · · Score: 1

      Thanks for taking a look. I wish Google would apply some level of logic to this. It's incredibly distracting when using the map. I understand that they may be "official names" that someone applied for and got granted by the city, and therefore in the official record, but it should be possible to correlate these names with some kind of culture significance to filter our the housing development names (as you say) from legitimate cultural districts.

      The risk in not doing this is that you lose all context. For instance, South Mountain you called out definitely appears to be a real identifiable place - bounded by a river on the north, a mountain range on the south, and S 28th and S 47th on the west and east. However, the moment you zoom into the neighborhood, you get ~100 (!) additional neighborhood names. "South Mountain Village" (apparently the village center of South Mountain) is still on the map, but it's given no significance vs "Knox Ranch" which appears to be one street of 14 houses.

      --
      Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
  27. Re:Finally, a way to make housing in SF affordable by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I think this would just build up demand amongst hipsters to live in a place with a cool name.

    And West Gash is a real place. Well, real in a game anyway.

  28. racists gonna race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey guy, what you did there was say a bunch of racist shit, and then throw in an almost racist thing so that you could then tell us it isn't and blame us for being racists. Racism was on YOUR mind. YOU had to "explain" your own damned post. That's a pretty good indictaor that you are being racist. Just like when someone starts a sentence with "I'm not racist but...". If you respond, you'll claim it was a joke, like most racists do, but it wasn't even remotely funny. AND fixating on Bronies seems to indicate that not only do you have some racial resentment, but you apparently don't care for gay or girly guys either. Furthermore, you're bitching about them thar furriners not speaking engish. That alone shows what's really on your mind. Why are YOU thinking about race all the time? Why are you jealous of the sparkles?

  29. Rename SF to Frisco by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    They should rename SF to Frisco.

  30. Nextdoor does this too by azcoyote · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly annoyed that Nextdoor has given my neighborhood a random name based on one of the minor roads on the other side of the highway. It's a traditionally black neighborhood with a distinctive official name, and clearly Nextdoor didn't do any research before renaming it.

    --
    Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    1. Re:Nextdoor does this too by MirthScout · · Score: 1

      Nextdoor doesn't name any of the "neighborhoods" they list. When a person that doesn't live in one of their existing "neighborhoods" creates an account, that person can name the area they live in and define its borders.They become the Lead and/or founding member of that "neighborhood". It makes for crazy "neighborhood" names and boundaries but at least it is zero work for Nextdoor.com.