Slashdot Mirror


Return of the Bubble Car? (reuters.com)

mikeebbbd writes: Back in the 1950s, many European carmakers (some of which are still in operation such as BMW) made tiny cars for one or 2 people that ran on tiny amount of gas. The remaining examples of bubble cars have become sort of a fetish. Now two Swiss brothers, according to Reuters, are trying to resurrect one of the more iconic designs -- the BMW Isetta. One wonders how it could meet any kind of safety standards, but a prototype is shown in the article. Perhaps it might be registered as a Neighborhood Electric Vehicle, which gets it by a few standards? Oliver and Merlin Ouboter have more than 7,200 orders for their Microlino, a modern version of the Isetta which swaps the old single-cylinder petrol engine for a 20 horsepower electric motor but keeps the famous front-opening door. The brothers, whose father Wim made millions from modernized kick-scooters, plan to launch the car in December. "The average modern car is way too big for normal use," said Oliver, the project's 24-year-old operations chief.

278 comments

  1. deathtrap by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    The original opened the whole chassis forwards and had no reverse gear. Presumably all the original drivers starved to death after driving into their garage.

    1. Re:deathtrap by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      I remember them around Nurnberg back when I was a teenager there. Pretty common, seemed to be quite useful. And yes, I remember a driver needing help to push one back from a sloping parking slot along a street :-)

      I also recall them being banned from the Autobahns because they were too slow, but can't swear to that. The little putt-putt engine was quite distinctive, mostly due to its total lack of revs :-)

    2. Re:deathtrap by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Presumably all the original drivers starved to death after driving into their garage.

      Only a quarter of the places I've lived have ever had a garage. Not by coincidence, they were also the only places that I've lived which had a ground floor.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Hilarious by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    “We have stripped a lot of the needless instruments out,” said Oliver. “In modern cars you have so many buttons I honestly don’t know what many of them are for.”

    And yet you think you're qualified to be a car designer?

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Hilarious by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What does an electric car really need? A little OLED screen to show speedometer, battery charge, and warning messages/turn signals/light status.

      A lot of other stuff can be dispensed with. Windows are sliding, so no power needed. Electric chairs in a two-seater are pretty silly. What else? Maybe a USB music player, two dials for fan and air temperature, a reverse/off/forward switch.

    2. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't know about the original Isetta. That fucker didn't even have a fuel gauge! You had a primary tank. When. You ran out of gas you switched to a tiny auxiliary tank that was hopefully enough to get you to a gas station. Heat was optional. Window defroster was optional.

    3. Re: Hilarious by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      I believe it -- old 1950s VW bugs were that way. So are many motorcycles. When you run out of gas, the motor starts to sputter, and you flip a lever that picks fuel up at a lower point in the tank.

    4. Re: Hilarious by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Like a motorcycle. Heck, I can fit quite a lot on my bike and it was only $8,200. I do have a gas gauge though :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:Hilarious by hamburger+lady · · Score: 3, Funny

      Electric chairs in a two-seater are pretty silly.

      you haven't bought a car in texas, i see.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    6. Re:Hilarious by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Are you saying Texas will need an electric bench now that courts are making lethal injection too difficult? Oyyyy, don't mess with Texas.

    7. Re: Hilarious by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe it -- old 1950s VW bugs were that way. So are many motorcycles. When you run out of gas, the motor starts to sputter, and you flip a lever that picks fuel up at a lower point in the tank.

      On a standard motorcycle saddle tank, you can't drain the entire tank out of one hole because it hangs over each side of the bar in the middle. So there was a gas line coming from each side which fed into a valve that could be changed to allow gas to flow from either side. One position was "standard" and the other "reserve", but the reality is that "reserve" was whatever it was set on when the other side of the tank emptied. If your reserve switch broke, the fix was to stop and lean the bike over enough that gas would flow over the top into the other side, and you could then get to the gas station.

    8. Re:Hilarious by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      What does an electric car really need? A little OLED screen to show speedometer, battery charge, and warning messages/turn signals/light status.

      Ever been in a Tesla Model 3? It's design is minimal. but the screen is not "little".

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    9. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit

    10. Re: Hilarious by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      And today, kids would call this a "hack".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re: Hilarious by burningcpu · · Score: 1

      Those are marketers, not kids.

    12. Re:Hilarious by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The screen on a Model 3 is annoyingly big and perfectly placed to be damaged if you (say) stick a pair of skis down the middle. I was thinking more like a 5 or 6 inch OLED screen in front of the driver -- that's all that's really needed if you're not doing navigation and don't have cameras.

    13. Re:Hilarious by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Maybe a USB music player [...]

      Uh, I have one on my phone. Just give me a place to plug it and speakers to connect to and I'm set.

    14. Re:Hilarious by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Anybody that owns a tesla will have the ski rack on the outside of the car, till summer. I case anybody doesn't know he/she skis.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Electric chairs in a two-seater are pretty silly."

      Not in a state that believes in the death penalty.

    16. Re: Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hacked the TV when we were a kid. We had no remote anymore so I used the face buttons!

    17. Re:Hilarious by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      Yes. He designs cars, not profit centres and gadgets on wheels. For one of these, I would need something to measure my remaining charge, speed and distance travelled. Regulations would probably require me to have something to tell me my seat belt is undone. A small subset of the usual coloured lights telling me of problems might be useful - perhaps tyre pressure and engine overheating is enough.

      A socket somewhere to plug in a USB cable to do diagnostics would be nice for the guy maintaining it would be good. That could bring up all sorts of other information onto their laptop that drivers really need to not have.

      12,000 Euros is a bit steep though. Half that would be slightly pricey.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    18. Re:Hilarious by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And yet you think you're qualified to be a car designer?

      Given the buttons I see on my dashboard, yes I think he's qualified.

    19. Re: Hilarious by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. This would be a "lifehack". Normal hacking is for nerds.

    20. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, there'll be an app for that...

    21. Re:Hilarious by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The neat thing is that unlike the original, if he replaces his direction and gearbox with a simple polarity reversing knifeswitch, he'll have a reverse gear!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    22. Re:Hilarious by mjwx · · Score: 1

      What does an electric car really need? A little OLED screen to show speedometer, battery charge, and warning messages/turn signals/light status.

      Way to miss the point of a city car (supermini as you call them on the other side of the pond). They're meant to be small, simple and cheap, like the original Mini. What you need is a simple, reliable dial, many city cars have omitted the rev counter these days and just have a speedometer.

      Renault tried to make a cheap, simple electric car with the Twizy but it's €7,500 which is the same price as a Dacia Sandero which can go more than 100 KM and a lot more than the scooters it competes against. The base model Twizy didn't even come with doors (considered an optional extra). Good on Renault for persisting with it, I think the concept is good but it needs to be cheaper.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:Hilarious by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      No cameras is no longer an option in the US. Backup cameras are mandatory as of May 2018.

    24. Re:Hilarious by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Rev counters, aka tachometers, are useful in a gas-powered car, especially one with a small engine, so you know when to shift. They are useless in an electric car. EVs only have one gear; they don't need more because electric motors don't have a torque curve, they have a torque straight line.

    25. Re:Hilarious by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      A small screen should satisfy the letter of the nanny-law about backup cameras. I think some of the system put in place have 3" screens in the mirror.

    26. Re: Hilarious by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I had a John Deere commercial mower with a setup that was similar in some ways.

    27. Re:Hilarious by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The tire pressure warning is indeed required now in the US. So is the one for seat belts. Not only are the speedometer and odometer required, but there are accuracy regulations for them. I don't believe there is a mandate for any of the other gauges, but the market isn't likely to accept a car without a fuel gauge, and the temperature gauge is a good idea for any car with an engine that uses an aluminum block. (Engine overheating is a more severe problem for aluminum engines than for the old steel block ones, because a single incidence of severe overheating can deform the engine block and instantly turn the engine into a heavy chunk of scrap metal.) Backup cameras are the most recently added instrumentation requirement.

      In a modern car, especially an EV which by necessity is already going to have a lot of electronics, it's probably best to integrate all the information into a single display. That's what the Tesla Model 3 has done, though I'm not convinced they made the right choice of location and size.

      A more serious problem with the user interface of the Model 3 is the elimination of most of the switches and knobs and replacing them with a touchscreen interface. The touchscreen is difficult for the driver to operate because it requires taking eyes off the road. Tesla's plan appears to be to use voice control instead, but most of that isn't ready yet.

    28. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good catch. By the way the rev meter was often omitted in small gasoline cars, I didn't miss it since the noise and driving feel tell everything you need (and the shaking when I went to the top speed in a tiny 50 HP car on highway! limited by the four-speed transmission)
      Today's car are so quiet and neutered it's probably more useful.
      I have to not forget to check for cars, because low speed gasoline cars are so quiet. I do get surprised in town in some places (do you know the "shared space" bullshit where you can't tell road vs sidewalk apart?). Like, cars should have a forward-facing noise generator.

    29. Re: Hilarious by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Typically tanks like that with a reserve switch just had two tubes, one lower than the other. I had a Jet Ski that actually had both the standard and reserve fuel lines on the same structure, with the "reserve" side at the bottom of the tank and the "standard" side an inch or two higher.

  3. Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "The average modern car is way too big for normal use"

    I'm sure he'll get a huge following making statements like that.

    Who gets to define what "normal use" is? Him?

    1. Re:Size... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who gets to define what "normal use" is?

      Anyone with eyeballs. Just watch cars go by. 70-80% have a single occupant. That is "normal use".

    2. Re: Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only works if everybody drives small cars. You get hit by the average F150 in something like an Isetta and they'll need the dental records for a positive identification of the body.

    3. Re: Size... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ever see a F150 get hit by a dump truck? That's why I drive one! My average Dump Truck is way bigger. Finding parking though is a bitch.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re: Size... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It only works if everybody drives small cars.

      This car is for driving on neighborhood streets at low speed. It is also focused on the non-American market, where people drive slower, shorter distances, and in smaller cars.

      A car like this could work well in China, India, South-East Asia, Japan, and much of Europe.

      If they are made available on-demand, like Ofo and Mobike do with electric scooters, this could be a really big deal.

    5. Re: Size... by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for the Russian videos where someone in a bubble car brake checks a semi.

      "What was that Ivan? Did you feel a bump?"

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    6. Re:Size... by Calydor · · Score: 0

      So I should have one car for when I go grocery shopping alone, another car for when I'm just picking up a friend at the train station, and a third car for taking the whole family to the movies?

      I can see how that is totally a reasonable thing to do and not at all cost prohibitive.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re:Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go for a drive in peak hour.
      Observe all of the SUVs carrying a single occupant in a nice suit from their suburban home to their cushy office.
      Ask yourself: what tiny fraction of that total weight is person+luggage?

      A honking big SUV is great fun for the bare handful of times a year you want to take the family up a mountain somewhere, but for most people 99% of the time it's just a petrol guzzling dead weight you drag around for no reason. It's inconvenient to park, expensive to run, and less manouverable in traffic than a clapped-out, 20 year old hatchback.

    8. Re: Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many F150s does Ford sell in Switzerland each year? Not everyone around the world believes that driving around in a big truck (95% of the time with an empty flatbed) tricks others into thinking that you have a huge man-sausage...

    9. Re:Size... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Even a hatchback or small wagon works fine for going up a mountain. You can even tow a light camping or utility trailer with many cars. Besides, how much "stuff" do you need for a camping trip anyway? If you're going to be hiking, may as well stick to what you can carry in a backpack without your spine failing.

    10. Re:Size... by westlake · · Score: 1

      Anyone with eyeballs. Just watch cars go by. 70-80% have a single occupant. That is "normal use".

      That car will be quite usable, quite comfortable, to drive under all conditions, save the occasional wildfire fire, flood, earthquake, blizzard and so on. When you need passenger or cargo space, it will be there. When you need range, speed or acceleration, it will be there.

    11. Re:Size... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      No, you do not need to OWN different cars for different uses. You just need to USE different cars.

      You don't need to drive an F150 to drop off an envelope at the post office. Nor do you need to own a four ton truck just in case you may need to haul something someday.

      When I am in Shanghai, and I need to go to a local shop, I can grab a bicycle for one RMB (about 12 cents) or hop on an electric scooter for 10 RMB ($1.20). It takes about 2 seconds to scan the QR code, and then I am ready to go. I see no reason these cars can't work the same way.

      They may not work for you, but not everyone thinks like you do. For the 95% of the world that are not Americans, these cars could be useful.

    12. Re:Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why most people don't buy a "honking big" SUV for typical daily use. The top 5 best-selling SUVs in the US are all compact SUVs. They get decent fuel economy (about the same as a larger sedan), are easy to park, are not particularly expensive to run, and work well in traffic. They can also handle well in most road conditions, surfaces, and inclines, can easily switch between carrying passengers and cargo, and can just generally do practically everything most people will ever need. They are essentially the modern equivalent of that 20 year old hatchback, only more capable.

    13. Re: Size... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      In Manila something like this would be wonderful if they can get the price down a bit. Nobody goes over 30-40 MPH, anyway, and the roads are terribly crowded. As it is, motorcycles rule, but not everybody wants to ride one.

    14. Re:Size... by Calydor · · Score: 0

      They may not work for you, but not everyone thinks like you do. For the 95% of the world that are not Americans, these cars could be useful.

      1) I live in Germany.

      2) The American population is not 95% of the world's population. Check your math.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    15. Re: Size... by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      If they are made available on-demand, like Ofo and Mobike do with electric scooters, this could be a really big deal.

      Exactly what I was thinking. This fits right in with bike / e-bike / electric scooter sharing when people 1. want to be covered from the rain/cold and/or 2. need to transport a couple bags of groceries or similar.

    16. Re: Size... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Too many drive F150s for commuting who don't need to. People should stop choosing cars based upon which one makes them look manly. The argument that you might be killed unless you surround yourself by two tons of wasted steel is a stupid argument. May as well say that you should not even walk or ride a bike in your neighborhood because you might be hit by a mini.

    17. Re:Size... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Check your math.

      Check your reading.

    18. Re:Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you check your reading comprehension.

      And whilst I suspect the original "95% who are NOT American" was just meant to be a way of saying "most", it turns out that the number actually is surprisingly close to 95%.

    19. Re:Size... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, a lot of people used to do that. My grandparents had trucks for the ranch but they didn't take the truck to the grocery store instead they took the car. Of course, this was in the days when trucks were bought to do actual work and weren't silly status symbols for wannabe cowboys. I know people who have a big SUV because they might someday need to carry something heavy, even though they've never needed to do that. You may as well rent a truck for the 1 day a year you need it, the gasoline savings would pay for several rentals.

      Get the small car that does 99.9% of the stuff you need it to.

    20. Re:Size... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Even better, the small car...with the truck engine. An aluminium version of the truck engine anyhow.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    21. Re: Size... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Ever seen a regular dump truck get hit by a Belaz 75710? That's why I drive one! Finding parking is fucking easy, I just run over everything and just stop wherever I want.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    22. Re:Size... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Check and mate.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    23. Re:Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shake and bake.

    24. Re: Size... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      A car like this could work well in China, India, South-East Asia, Japan, and much of Europe. If they are made available on-demand, like Ofo and Mobike do with electric scooters, this could be a really big deal.

      Actually I was thinking quite the opposite, this could be good enough for my daily commute that I'd probably prefer to own. What I need is for Google to get their self-driving car to my area so I have hassle-free access to a big rental car. It doesn't even need coverage where I want to go, as long as it can deliver itself and drop off itself after I'm done because that's usually the annoying part. Particularly if you have a lot of luggage you have to take public transport to the rental place, drive home, load it up and then on the return drive home, unload it, drive to the rental place, then take public transport home. Of course if it could drive autonomously part or all the way that'd be a bonus.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    25. Re: Size... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Solution: carry less luggage. Most people don't actually use even 50% of the crap they pack on a trip. Unless you're a salesman with samples or are hauling tools, you probably don't need it.

    26. Re: Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F150s are for poseurs. Real men drive a 250/350, and even that is just on the way to their Abrahams, which they take to their hunnreT coal dump truck.

    27. Re: Size... by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't need to find a parking spot with a dump truck. Just bring some traffic cones and block off an area like it is going to be under construction. Bonus points for bringing one of the construction barriers with the blinking orange light. No cop is going to give a ticket when they think someone is doing emergency road repair.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    28. Re: Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By 95% he is obviously not referring to number of people, but overall biomass gross weight.

      #MAGA
      Make Another Gallon of Ass

    29. Re: Size... by quanminoan · · Score: 1

      The "Smart" car and many like it are effectively crumple zones on wheels, with a high alloy steel cage around the driver. Modern safety standards make just about any vehicle pretty safe. Repair after a fender bender is another story...

    30. Re: Size... by yorgasor · · Score: 1

      My dream car in high school was a big snow plow. I figured if I ran a red light and someone hit me, that was their problem. Plus, I could convert the dump portion of the truck into a sweet mancave. I still want one.

      --
      Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    31. Re: Size... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      No cop is going to give a ticket when they think someone is doing emergency road repair.

      You obviously don't live in London.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    32. Re: Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thst would be normal use if 70-80% of cars ALLWAYS have one person in them, and some other 30% of cars travel with more occupants. If all cars have one person 70-80% of journeys and the same cars 4-5 persons 30% of the time, then those cars need to have 4-5 seats for obvious reasons.

      If you have kids, then it is reasonable that you need to be able to take them along sometimes, and some times you donâ(TM)t.

    33. Re: Size... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I can see two of these from my office window sitting in our company carpark: https://www.renault.de/modellp...

    34. Re:Size... by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      He said that 95% of the world population are not from the US. I make it nearly 95.7% but 95% is close enough. The population is not globally significant in most matters - certainly not when discussing future vehicle engineering.

      A side note. You live in Germany so

      Check your math.

      Needs adjusting. Outside the USA, mathematics is known to be plural so "Check your maths makes more sense.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    35. Re:Size... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Yes, in a state of sleep deprivation I misread a comment on Slashdot. I'm sure there'll be an article about it soon.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    36. Re:Size... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Anyone with eyeballs. Just watch cars go by. 70-80% have a single occupant. That is "normal use".

      That car will be quite usable, quite comfortable, to drive under all conditions, save the occasional wildfire fire, flood, earthquake, blizzard and so on. When you need passenger or cargo space, it will be there. When you need range, speed or acceleration, it will be there.

      That is assuming the current model of owning one vehicle to do everything. The point is that if it was economically and technically possible, it would make much more sense to have a one-seater with a lunchbox-carrying capacity for your solo commute, a two-seater with some luggage capacity for taking your partner shopping and a six-seater with a trailer for taking the whole family camping once a year.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    37. Re: Size... by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Can you say camping trip? I knew you could. Lots more stuff you need to carry. You can get the carry weight down by buying the right gear, but that involves serious expense. Just as with bicycles and laptop computers, less weight equals more money.

      Or how about a trip where you are going to DO something and need the equipment for the activity? Or a visit to family when you are carrying presents? A trip to a formal event where you need fancy clothes for the occasion? Or just a trip to a place where the weather is highly variable, so you need cold weather and rain gear that you may or may not use? (On that camping trip you probably WILL need them; if you're up in the mountains it's not unheard of to have 90 degree temperatures at midday and 40 at night.

      And we haven't even addressed the question of special needs. If you need to transport any adaptive or medical equipment, the weight can add up quickly.

      My personal goal is to use at least 80% of what I pack. I'll never reach 100% because I pack a spare change of clothes for anything longer than an overnight, and because I may have things for weather contingencies. And I always overpack socks and underwear because things can happen.

    38. Re: Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory comment about how you can transport a couple bag of groceries on a bicycle.
      But not any bicycle or any luggage carrier, some minimal care about weight distribution.
      Obviously the microcar will most likely be more convenient (unless the bicycle allows to bypass stopped traffic, go both ways on streets that are one-way for cars, etc.) but it's funny how much more engineering and parts must go into a microcar. It's like using a Raspberry Pi for an Arduino project. A hundred megabytes of operating system, a hundred million transistors, etc.

      When I have to move stuff, I wonder why there aren't hand drawn carts available for purchase or rent. Makes moving furniture a kilometer away a complicated affair.

    39. Re:Size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe the station wagons were popular for that, mostly on 4-cylinder engine. In the 90s they made smaller ones so for example VW Golf station wagon has been a thing since then. In the 2000s we had the Peugeot 206 SW which might seem absurdly small.
      Renault Kangoo might seem absurd but was a good success : you take a small car, convert it to a panel van (utility vehicle for professionals somewhat tall with rear double door), then convert that again to a passenger vehicle.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_Kangoo

  4. Pity about the Volkswagen 1L by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Informative

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_1-litre_car

    It was a modern version of exactly this concept that would go 100KM on a litre of diesel, hence the name - Euro "mileage" is expressed as liters of fuel used per 100km so 1l/100km. This is an equivalent US mileage of 240mpg.

    The car itself had modern safety standards and good visibility, but was never mass produced, due in no small part to the cost, though the per unit costs would have fallen considerably if it was mass produced.

    1. Re:Pity about the Volkswagen 1L by chronoglass · · Score: 1

      Volkswagen - "diesel-powered plug-in hybrid" - 2015 - "and produces emissions of 21 g/km of CO2" - $146,000

      my guess is that they realized they couldn't sell that particular lie at that cost.

    2. Re:Pity about the Volkswagen 1L by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Actually that was truthful. The emissions scandal if you recall focused on NOx emissions being greatly under-reported, not CO2.

    3. Re:Pity about the Volkswagen 1L by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_1-litre_car

      Why would you need an engine size suitable for a normal car for charging the battery? Surely a 500cc engine could be more efficient for a hybrid like this...

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    4. Re:Pity about the Volkswagen 1L by samwichse · · Score: 1

      It's not. It's an 800cc diesel supplemented with an electric motor.

      800cc diesel alone would be pretty glacial, but with the electrics, it went 0-60 in 12s, which isn't fast by modern standards, but will keep you up with traffic (my current car is 12.6s!).

      Sam

  5. Re:deathtrap (HEAVY METAL UMLAT!) by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Give it only three wheels, you can sail by NHTSA with anything.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  6. Easy by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    " One wonders how it could meet any kind of safety standards, "

    Easy, no side windows and it's a Quad. Just like the electric Renault Twizy.

    1. Re:Easy by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      It's defined as a quadricycle -- a light 4-wheel car for street use in the EU that has to adhere to lower safety standards than larger cars.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Easy by XXongo · · Score: 1

      It's defined as a quadricycle -- a light 4-wheel car for street use in the EU ...

      except, from the image, this one is a 3-wheeler.

      It's cute. I'd get one for bopping around town. Most of the time I don't need the big five-seater sedan.

    3. Re:Easy by magarity · · Score: 1

      " One wonders how it could meet any kind of safety standards, "

      Easy, no side windows and it's a Quad. Just like the electric Renault Twizy.

      And the driver's legs are the impact crumple zone.

    4. Re:Easy by Local+ID10T · · Score: 2

      " One wonders how it could meet any kind of safety standards, "

      Easy, no side windows and it's a Quad. Just like the electric Renault Twizy.

      And the driver's legs are the impact crumple zone.

      Consider it motivation to drive defensively instead of like a rage-aholic asshole.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    5. Re:Easy by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      So if this is unsafe, I assume you are thoroughly opposed to motorcycles going faster than 15mph?

    6. Re:Easy by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Who does the pedaling, the driver or the passenger?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    7. Re:Easy by Sique · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you count the backwheels. Yes, there are two of them, close together, like in the original Isetta.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the rage-aholic asshole in the Tesla next to you.

  7. Safety standards... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Informative

    As to how safety standards can be met: EU has a safety category for light 4-wheel vehicles known as "quadricycles." They have to meet the same (lax) safety standards as three-wheel motorbikes.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:Safety standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume those those standards are basically: HEadlights ...and they call it a Heavy Quad in your link , not Light

      I am already scared enough to drive my old Opel around town. No bumpers, no air bags, sketchy shoulder belts. Taking away my 5 feet of hood space and reducing it to 6 inches and the front window almost touching my nose doesn't add a feeling of safety :O

      NO bumpers, no airbags, no crumple zones, I assume seatbelts still required.
      I'll drive it when everyone else does too

    2. Re:Safety standards... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The solution is to make the crumple zones and bumpers "virtual" by encouraging installation of auto-braking systems on new cars. The best kind of accident is one that never actually occurs.

    3. Re:Safety standards... by swell · · Score: 2

      It appears to be a 3 wheeler.

      In many US states it would qualify as a motorcycle. Few safety standards apply. Personally I think that certain 3 wheeled bikes are much sportier, sexier, more fun--and who cares about fuel consumption in that case? OTOH, shy persons may prefer this wimpy ride.

      The MP3 SPORT 500 HPE is one example: http://www.piaggio.com/us_EN/m...

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
    4. Re:Safety standards... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they could use external airbags. Cars rely on crumple zones, but if it could reliably sense an impending collision maybe an airbag would work

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Safety standards... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Think how much fun kids would have throwing snowballs at that car!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Safety standards... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Or replace all vehicles in cities with autonomous ones. You could save hundreds of kilograms of moving mass per passenger if you replaced passive safety with active control. At city speeds at least (we're limited to 50 km/h around here, for example), this should be feasible.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re:Safety standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad most of the cars on the road are old cars...

    8. Re:Safety standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think that certain 3 wheeled bikes are much sportier, sexier...

      I've got bad news for you -- you'll never be either of those sitting on a tricycle.

    9. Re:Safety standards... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      A tricycle with one wheel in the front and two wheels in the back? Lame.
      A tricycle with two wheels in the front and one wheel in the back? Kickass.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:Safety standards... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Personally I think that certain 3 wheeled bikes are much sportier, sexier...

      I've got bad news for you -- you'll never be either of those sitting on a tricycle.

      Eeyup. Sounds like someone forgot all about that entity to whom this was a holy icon yea back in the 80s and 90s... Steve Urkel.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    11. Re:Safety standards... by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Simple, install Takata air bags. Problem solved.

    12. Re:Safety standards... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A tricycle with two wheels in the front and one wheel in the back? Kickass.

      Destroying it in every way with a LS-swapped Miata? Priceless

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Safety standards... by p4nther2004 · · Score: 2

      Sure, sure....

      No one has ever designed a sexy, sporty tricycle.

      Honest.

      http://www.indycycle.net/media...

    14. Re:Safety standards... by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      OTOH, shy persons may prefer this wimpy ride.

      OTOH, thinking persons may prefer this adequate ride.

      FTFY

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  8. Why not just put a cover on a go-cart or golfcart? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    No need for a complex design. Hell, retirees down in Florida have crazy pimped-out golfcarts already. No need to reinvent the wheel.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. Want to address gridlock? by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Charge everybody a hefty fee for driving large personal gas guzzlers downtown in major cities. Provide exemptions for cars like this, electrics and delivery vehicles. They do a limited version of the tax in London already, but it's more of a money grab than a real control on traffic. Even so, it's had an effect.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Want to address gridlock? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      If you provide exemptions for cars like this, you've still got gridlock. Just provide free public transit with free parking just outside the congestion fee zone.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Want to address gridlock? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      How statist of you...

    3. Re:Want to address gridlock? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      There's no need for any new, "driving a huge vehicle" tax because that kind of control is already in place: a national gas tax.

      Just raise that $0.18 tax up to $1.00-$2.00. After millions of us pissed off and angry Americans try getting around that social engineering by getting larger electric cars (which would surely appear to fill that newly minted market segment), just slap a new federal vehicle registration fee on all trucks, vans, and full-sized SUVs - regardless of propulsion method - to be collected by the states and accounted for in terms of federal aid.

      Done. Of course your political career (and possibly your life) would also be Done.

      (IMO, driverless cars on an A.I.-managed grid of inner city streets are the far better solution for almost all traffic and pollution issues today, but my generation will have to die off before that big of a social and technological change can take full effect.)

    4. Re:Want to address gridlock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that you can drive two or three of these in the space occupied by a single Humvee, you'd have a serious impact on gridlock.

    5. Re: Want to address gridlock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just add a weight fee to the annual vehicle registration, which is optional for anyone not authorized to drive on federal interstates. Say a half penny per pound squared.
      Hundred pound ultra light? .5*100*100 pennies or $50 a year.
      500#? $1250 a year.
      4000#? $16,000

      Trailers can be metered separately at their net weight.

      I'm sure the Trump tax cuts will off set those fees, which is how you still get a government that builds roads. So either Trump is a liar about the huge tax break people will get, or this policy is a fair way to maintain our roads.

      This way

    6. Re:Want to address gridlock? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Depends on if the HumVee high centers while driving over them.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  10. Only in Europe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my average trip is closer to 80 kliometers

    1. Re:Only in Europe.. by XXongo · · Score: 1

      my average trip is closer to 80 kliometers

      You ever hear the phrase "different strokes for different folks"?

      Well: different cars for different people.

  11. We had one by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Interesting
    My family had a Heinkel in the 60's, which looks very similar to the Isetta.

    It was great fun. The front opening door was really practical - you drove up to the kerb, front on, and us kids got out safely. Visibility was great - although large trucks might find it hard to see you. Mostly it was driven under the same rules as a motor bike. Had a motorbike type gear change as well, but the Heinkel had a reverse gear, I believe the Isetta did not. I think they should not be allowed on motorways though.

    A friend of mine had a Messerschmidtt (the car, not the fighter) - not nearly as good, and much less safe. Electric is definitely preferable to a 1950's 2-stroke engine in almost any way you can imagine.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    1. Re:We had one by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You'll get my two stroke lawnmower from my cold dead fingers. You will have to fight my heirs for it. Bring a weapon if you want it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:We had one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll get my two stroke lawnmower from my cold dead fingers. You will have to fight my heirs for it. Bring a weapon if you want it.

      There will be no fight for it. My 4 stroke engines actually start, are quieter, and don't smoke.
      You can keep dumping oil in your gas all you want.

    3. Re:We had one by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The 2 strokes in from 50's had longer range than this car, so not worse in all ways.

    4. Re:We had one by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Mine took two pulls to start once.

      Yamaha motor, it will live practically forever and weighs half what the 'equivalent' new mower does.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re: We had one by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I have a 1959 (yellow) Lawnboy 2 cycle that you'd probably like.

    6. Re:We had one by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      (the car, not the fighter)

      Should we infer from the fact that you didn't make the same distinction with respect to the Heinkel that your family vehicle in the 60s was an He 112?

    7. Re: We had one by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      But you're not selling it...can't blame you.

      My Toro is going to last my lifetime anyhow.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:We had one by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      You'll get my two stroke lawnmower from my cold dead fingers. You will have to fight my heirs for it. Bring a weapon if you want it.

      Hah! You expect to keep a two-stroke engine that long? I have a bridge to sell you!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    9. Re:We had one by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how long 2 stroke engines last? If you did, you would want one.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:We had one by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Small engine two-stroke engines are not as durable as small 4-stroke engines.

      Yes, it's possible to build a durable 2-stroke engine, but they don't put that type of engine in lawnmowers.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    11. Re:We had one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they still have the Me bubble car? Collectors would mess themselves if offered the ability to get one now. That one was a *real* bubble car, with a clear canopy that appeared to be from a fighter plane and 2 seats in tandem rather than across. Basically a motorcycle with a body of sorts and training wheels.

    12. Re:We had one by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Not anybody's experience but yours.

      Last time I had to get a carb prime button for my 25 year old 2 stroke mower, the guy at the mower shop offered me $600 for it. When lawn guys drive by and I'm mowing they slow down. I have to lock it up.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:We had one by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      No chance

      It was my school friend that had it (or rather, his elder brother). Given that they crashed it almost every week in the early 1960's, no chance it is still in one piece.

      My grandmother wrote off our Heinkel in the winter of 1964 - going too fast on an icy bend. She and my father were probably drunk. Neither was harmed in the accident. The car had a steel roll cage. Even the car was not very badly damaged - it drove home after a truck drive helped them right it, but was "beyond economic repair" according to the lying fucks who run insurance companies. (My Mercedes A160* was "written off" when hit by a huge pickup three years a go. A few months later, the new owners phone me and asked for the service record book).

      * not much bigger than a bubble car - economical, easy to park in London, but with an engine about 5 times the size of the Heinkel's.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    14. Re:We had one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily, pulling..... is a Wumpus specialty.

    15. Re:We had one by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, the He111 was more like a bubble car.

    16. Re:We had one by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Not anybody's experience but yours.

      Last time I had to get a carb prime button for my 25 year old 2 stroke mower, the guy at the mower shop offered me $600 for it. When lawn guys drive by and I'm mowing they slow down. I have to lock it up.

      You guys sure are competitive about your garden implements.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:We had one by tedcloak · · Score: 1

      Anybody here old enough to remember the King Midget four-wheeler? Tom McCahill reviewed it for Mechanics Illustrated. To back up, you simply opened the door, stuck your foot out, and pushed. You can Google it. Me, I drive a 2012 Mitsubishi i-Miev. A four-passenger BEV, cost me $7000 from Carmax. Sun-powered by the 6 kw on my garage roof. A full-functioning automobile, great for getting around town and just fine on the interstate highway.

    18. Re:We had one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to lock it up if you were my neighbor, not because I'd want to take it, but because I'd want to destroy your noisy smoky mower.

    19. Re:We had one by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      If you did that, they'd have to lock me up for blowing your damned head off.

  12. Won't work in the US. by dasunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've noticed that US auto buyers are quite good at justifying the car they want.

    I predict most buyers will consider this car to be too unsafe, or too small, or too under-powered.

    It doesn't matter if none of this is true for the driver's purpose. Cars are an extension of the self for Americans, and few people would feel secure enough to drive this.

    1. Re: Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a first gen Honda Insight for many years. No problem, fine car. (Small, but that is the point.)

    2. Re:Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed that US auto buyers are quite good at justifying the car they want.

      I predict most buyers will consider this car to be too unsafe, or too small, or too under-powered.

      It doesn't matter if none of this is true for the driver's purpose. Cars are an extension of the self for Americans, and few people would feel secure enough to drive this.

      It can work as a niche product, which is what this kind of car always was.
      To be fair, it probably is a deathtrap if someone hits you, too small for a family, and I doubt it will accelerate fast enough to pull into traffic easily.
      But, someone that wants to buy this won't be that concerned with those things.
      People still ride motorcycles.

    3. Re:Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just label the bubble of these connected cars as the Safety Bubble(r), with an AI assisted selection of political news personalized to the driver's tastes and the customers fill flow in.

    4. Re:Won't work in the US. by Tailhook · · Score: 2

      To be fair, it probably is a deathtrap if someone hits you

      It is. It's a death trap if someone hits you, it's a death trap if you hit someone else, it's a death trap if you crash into anything with enough velocity. There is a direct correlation between the mass ratio of passenger to vehicle and the rate of injury and fatalities clearly evident in the actuarial record of insurance companies; smaller vehicles injure more severely and kill more frequently than large vehicles.

      The only credible rational for polices that drive people into smaller vehicles is that the energy savings and pollution reduction are worth the added deaths and crippling. Every other argument is bullshit and the people that offer them liars or ignoramuses.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    5. Re:Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's small and there's too small. It depends on the environment. When these things were first made after WW2, Europe had no money, no gas, and few working big cars. These things (with tiny one-pot motors) were the only thing an ordinary mortal could afford to drive. By the 1960s, things had normalized and these things (in their original form) went away in favor of more traditional small cars. It may be a comment on how bad things appear to be getting regarding embodied energy and fuel economy (electric in this case) that they're making even this token reappearance.

    6. Re: Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that reasoning, the crash in Seattle shouldn't have injured the vehicle operator. You know the one, where the commercial vehicle the guy stole crashed. He was maybe 100kg, roughly, and the vehicle was what 20 tons?

      I'm sure you can revise your statement to somehow exclude pilots, truck drivers, train conductors, etc to completely undermine your points while pretending to be internally consistent. How many tens of thousands of people die each year riding light weight ice skates and roller skates? And inner tubes! Millions must die each day while traversing lazy river tube rides at water parks...

    7. Re: Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remind me, please, how many Gen1 Insights were sold? Must have been a small number. I drove them when they were pool cars one place I worked, but they didn't get much use because: 1) stick shift (in effectively a rental car?) - that got fixed after the first year; 2) size - they really were too small at the time, when the average Corolla looked like a small SUV next to an Insight; 3) interior space - 2 people, period, and little luggage; 4) load capacity - initial production had a total load capacity of 400 lb., which meant that 2 standard-sized US adults would overload it; and 5) price - the only small car comparable in price at the time was the Gen1 Prius, the rest were much cheaper. Given all that, they were fun to drive, even though they had little power, poor brakes, and a very rough ride. You could push them to the limit and have fun doing it, without attracting much external attention. Much like the early diesels. I routinely got 60+ mph out of them on mostly-freeway runs, sometimes over 70 if there was bad traffic that let the hybrid system actually do some work.

    8. Re: Won't work in the US. by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you can revise your statement to somehow exclude pilots, truck drivers, train conductors, etc to completely undermine your points while pretending to be internally consistent.

      That's not necessary. Your inability to distinguish anecdote from data make any revision unnecessary.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    9. Re:Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only credible rational for polices that drive people into smaller vehicles is that the energy savings and pollution reduction are worth the added deaths and crippling. Every other argument is bullshit and the people that offer them liars or ignoramuses.

      I know you are but what am I?

      Historical data has shown that even as cars got lighter they have gotten safer... so why you need to proactively disparage those who would cite that data is a bit strange, unless you know that data is out there and want to proactively discourage people from pointing out a reality that disagrees with your preconceived narrative...

      Good luck in your world of imagination.

    10. Re:Won't work in the US. by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      First, cars haven't gotten lighter. The average passenger vehicle weight is over 4000 lbs today, whereas it was around 3300 lbs in 1979. Second, all passenger vehicles have "gotten safer," not just small cars; this evolution is orthogonal and irrelevant to the discussion. The simple, painful, cognitive dissonance inducing reality remains; people die more frequently and suffer more severe injuries during collisions in smaller cars than those in larger cars.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    11. Re: Won't work in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I've looked up the Insight which I'm not familiar with at all and it's funny, the first one looks like an old Citroën. Like a shorter three-door Citroën GS tps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citro%C3%ABn_GS

      The other guy complains of load capacity, well the auto version (CVT) is 39 kg heavier than the manual.
      I think it's nice but such class of car need to be a 3-door four-seater.

  13. Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    Even if you made the whole thing out of a carbon fiber bathtub, like an F1 cockpit. Getting hit by a 3000lb car would send it flying down the road, like a ping pong ball...

    1. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Solutions: better collision avoidance (autobrake) tech on cars, and better driver training. And don't be so cowardly -- it's still safer than a bicycle or motor-scooter. Driving need not be an arms race, unless you want suburbanite hausfraus getting Unimogs because OMG, an 18-wheeler might hit you and think about the cheeeeeeldren.

    2. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      18 wheeler? What about getting hit by a Camry? These things are so small it would be hard to see them from anything other than a low rider.

    3. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Unimogs are cool! I want two. An old one and a new one. I'll daily drive the new one.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      It's about the height of a normal car -- if you can't see it from a Camry, you won't see a child crossing the street either. Turn in your license until you can go for an eye exam. Or at least turn off the cell phone and stop browsing Facebook while driving.

    5. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they kind of are. Bad example. How about a Hummer H2, or a GMC Yuck-one?

    6. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Those would both be downgrades of my current 4x4.

      If it ain't going up the Rubicon trail, I'm not interested.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's plenty of blindspots in even a crossover/mid-size SUV for small cars to hide in. I personally am not worried about my ability to see these small cars, but I am concerned about the 1000s of cars that the driver of this car would hope to be seen by.

      -Motorcyclist.

    8. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the few cars small enough to be in a motorcyclists blind spot. A fully-dressed Harley or big BMW would probably total one of these cars while needing, at most, a new front wheel. Though the car might weigh more than it looks if it has enough battery to run for more than a block or 2.

    9. Re: Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a heavier vehicle approaches and you are fearful, just stand your ground and shoot it. Once we get autonomous cars, you can just have your car AI target anything that approaches with a turret mounted minigun. Optionally have you pull the trigger so the autonaker isnt at risk.

    10. Re:Suffers from the same problem as Smartcars. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Solutions: better collision avoidance (autobrake) tech on cars, and better driver training. And don't be so cowardly -- it's still safer than a bicycle or motor-scooter. Driving need not be an arms race, unless you want suburbanite hausfraus getting Unimogs because OMG, an 18-wheeler might hit you and think about the cheeeeeeldren.

      Ah yes, mockery, the universal persuasion tool.

      You have a fine future in marketing!

  14. My 2016 Fiesta ST by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    is already a bubble car with 200hp. No need for smaller as it serves both as a tiny car and easy parking and I can drive it comfortably for 1000km and have power to have fun.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:My 2016 Fiesta ST by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Needs a small block chevy.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:My 2016 Fiesta ST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they also stopped making them

    3. Re:My 2016 Fiesta ST by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      is already a bubble car with 200hp. No need for smaller as it serves both as a tiny car and easy parking and I can drive it comfortably for 1000km and have power to have fun.

      26MPG. Abysmal. Give me something smaller with an electric engine over your mass produced toy anyday.

    4. Re:My 2016 Fiesta ST by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Well then I'll come and pick you up in my 7mpg Bronco which I enjoy driving now get off my highway with your electric box, there's a min 60km/h speed limit.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    5. Re:My 2016 Fiesta ST by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      there's a min 60km/h speed limit.

      Something which has never been a problem for even the smallest of electric cars.

  15. Calling Steve Urkel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should be given the first one off the production line.

  16. That price tag! by Whorhay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    12,000 euro's or about $13,600, you might as well buy a real car for that much.

    1. Re:That price tag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Nissan Versa is $1300 cheaper. The Mitsubishi Mirage is ~$300 cheaper. The UK has the Dacia Sandero for 7000 pounds (~$8900). It's from Romania, so I guess it's available elsewhere in Europe.

    2. Re:That price tag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BINGO.

    3. Re:That price tag! by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      And that is the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about. Cars aren't cheap.

    4. Re:That price tag! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      12,000 euro's or about $13,600, you might as well buy a real car for that much.

      Implying that it's not a real car despite the ability to transport people and their belongings from A to B?

      What is a real car? Does it need balls dangling from the towball (tow hitch, or whatever Americans call it)? Does it need to belch black soot? Does a real car need a ladder to get in? Or maybe it's not a real car unless it doesn't fit in a standard European parking spot?

    5. Re:That price tag! by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Touche!

      My primary objection to classifying it as a "real" car is that there is no way it meets the safety standards for a car. It is likely being classified as some other vehicle type with weaker safety standards. Despite that it is being sold for the same price as an actual full function car. I in general like the idea of having a tiny, enclosed, and efficient vehicle for commuting and such, being electric is a nice bonus. But I'm not going to pay a price premium to give up so much safety and functionality. This is essentially the same problem the Corbin Sparrow had, while the price here is lower it's still exorbitant.

    6. Re:That price tag! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      there is no way it meets the safety standards for a car. It is likely being classified as some other vehicle type

      Define a car. Each car has different safety standards. A truck has different ones from sedans, has different ones from hatchbacks, has different ones from whatever. Mind you in the EU there is already a NCAP classification called "Quadricycle" and it has vehicles in it far smaller than what is being proposed here, and yet far safer than an car you drove 15 years ago.

      By the way what do you need all this safety for? Do you intend to drive a bubble down the german autobahn weaving between giant trucks? The thing is, cars serve a purpose, the type of purpose served by bubble cars or e.g. the two Renault Twizys parked in my office carpark is typically small short commutes. You're not competing with Volvo S90s for safety. You're not competing with 5 series BMWs or Ford F150s. You're competing with mopeds, motorbikes, trikes, and similar class cars. You're buying something you're unlikely to ever take on an interstate or into an industrial area. Hell chances are you'll never leave a 50km/h zone in one of these, and for those purposes it's safe enough.

      Now I understand the thought of a scenario like this may be foreign to Americans, but it is very real in Europe. My nextdoor neighbours are close to retirement and never even got driver's licenses, and that's not actually uncommon where I live. So there's a very large range of use cases between people who never need to drive and people who must own a tank to get around safely.

  17. The good thing about it is by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

    If the car breaks down, you can carry it home.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:The good thing about it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or roll it home. A non-rollable bubble car is a law of nature violating abomination.

  18. Steve Urkle! by SumDog · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's Steve Urkel's clown car!

    1. Re:Steve Urkle! by antdude · · Score: 1

      "Did I do that?"

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. The spot for golf clubs in the back by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Tiny "neighborhood cars" with electric motors, for driving around the neighborhood, are common in many areas. They are called "golf carts".

    1. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by myth24601 · · Score: 2

      Sounds a tad more than just a golf cart since it can go close to 60MPH. Wouldn't want to go on the interstate but it could be used around town where the speed limit isn't above 45 I suppose (well, I wouldn't want to be in one at all but that is just me).

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    2. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't want to go on the interstate but it could be used around town where the speed limit isn't above 45 I suppose (well, I wouldn't want to be in one at all but that is just me).

      I"d just be afraid of a car THIS small on hwy OR regular streets.

      You get in a wreck with a SUV or just a regular pickup truck and they'll be cleaning you up with a spatula.

      And even on most streets with "default" speeds of 35mph posted, you'll get run over around here doing 45mph.....

      I've been thinking the same thing every time I see one of the SmartCars.......

      Might work in EU where they have old narrow streets and crowded urban areas, but that's not the case with most of the US.

      I figure with something like this bubble car, you might as well just jump on a motorcycle and have the outdoors fun on it, as that I think the risk to life and limb are about the same if on the road with other current vehicles.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the unlikely event this thing is offered for sale in the IS, it will be classed as a Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) at which point, it will be electronically governed to a 25 MPH top speed. At which point, it will likely fail, as the (artificially limited) top speed severely limits potential use cases relative to a "conventional" automobile, without a commensurate reduction in purchase price. Meanwhile, people who can abide the 25 MPH limitations of such a vehicle can already buy a 50cc scooter, which, in most parts of the US, can be operated without any kind of license, and are available, new, for less than $1,000. If offered in the US, this thing will sell like hot-cakes, relatively speaking, for the first six months, then the party will be over.

    4. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Solution, quietly leak the non-US firmware that "unlocks" the speed limiter. A lot of jurisdictions would not care, since once the car is sold, the jurisdiction over it is primarily state, not Feddle-meddle.

    5. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curious, except for the opening in the front, how are these any different than Fortwo?

    6. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by Falconhell · · Score: 2

      This is still a lot safer than a motor bike or scooter, which are currently allowed.
      If you had a point, it missed the mark.

    7. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      It's smaller than the Fortwo. It has a smaller motor and its speed is more limited. Unlike the Fortwo it's not likely to meet current safety standards for a car in the US. Finally, it's cheaper. The price translates to about $15,000 without any tax credits; if it's ever allowed to be sold here the price after incentives will be quite low.

    8. Re:The spot for golf clubs in the back by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The advantage is if you live in a rainy climate where motorbikes only make sense a few months out of the year.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  20. Not going to happen by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the sort of people who pay that fee would also vote against it. They're also not terribly inconvenienced by gridlock. For a lot it's the only time to themselves they get before going home to the wife/hubby & kids. And they usually live outside the city where pollution isn't an issue.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not going to happen by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you'll have to explain how London's Congestion Charge came to be, then. It's about $25 US per day, which isn't trivial.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re:Not going to happen by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If it keeps the roads free of broke scumbags and saves any professional 30 minutes it's a huge net profit.

      Raise it more.

      They should make the Oakland bay bridge toll $50 during rush 3/4 of day. I don't have to drive across it often, when I do, the time is always more important.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  21. Reminds of of an old sit-com by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    with a nerdy kid named Urkele. He wanted to impress a girl by showing off his BMW so he bought one of these.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  22. Top speed 90 km/h... by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

    I understand it is not a sports car but 90 km/h is ridiculous for a grownup's car today. A good portion of my daily commute is done on road with a 110 km/h speed limit. And I am not even talking about highways, where that car may not even be legal.
    A car like the Smart Fortwo is barely larger but it is at least capable of highway speeds, which means it can be used to access any kind of road safely.

    1. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I can get up to 90 Mph at times (150 in Metric)

    2. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand it is not a sports car but 90 km/h is ridiculous for a grownup's car today. A good portion of my daily commute is done on road with a 110 km/h speed limit. And I am not even talking about highways, where that car may not even be legal.
      A car like the Smart Fortwo is barely larger but it is at least capable of highway speeds, which means it can be used to access any kind of road safely.

      The 90km/h top speed and the 120km range would make this impractical for anything but city driving anyway.

      But not to worry, there is no way in hell this would ever be road legal in my country (US) anyway.

    3. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If it's a 3-wheeler, it bypasses a lot of NHTSA standards, so it may very well be legal, even in the over-regulated USA.

    4. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      Honest question: Where do you live that has a posted limit of 110Km/hr and *isn't* a controlled access highway like the US Interstate or the Ontario 400 series highways? As far as I know, throughout the Anglosphere, highways allowing more than 80km/hr or the equivalent in mph are all controlled access, with on/off ramps, fencing along key portions and so on.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    5. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      55 or 65 mph (90 or 110 km/h) on uncontrolled-access roads is very common in parts of the US. There are highways with warning blinkers for at-grade crossings (rather than ramps) posted at those speeds.

    6. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      As to where -- go to Arizona, rural California, parts of New Mexico, and West Virginia. Even roads in rural New Jersey are sometimes that way. Part of the road from Long Beach Island to Philadelphia (Hwy 72) is two lanes, uncontrolled access, posted at 55 mph.

    7. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I hadn't known that.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    8. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      A good portion of my daily commute is done on road with a 110 km/h speed limit.

      Cool story. 100% of my partner's commute doesn't exceed 50km/h
      It's almost like there's different use cases for different people.

      Side note: My doctor is 65 years old and has never had a drivers license. He commutes to work just fine too.

    9. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the midwest and at least in my state any paved rural road with marked lanes and a shoulder that wasn't otherwise posted, was 55mph limit.

    10. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by houghi · · Score: 1

      What are Highway speeds? Probably you are talking about the maximum speed. What you need to look at is the minimal speed allowed (if there is any where you live)

      Say you live in a country where the maximum speed is 130 KMH. That does not mean you HAVE to drive that fast. Could be that the minimal speed is 80 KMH. So if you drive 90 KMH, you are fast enough. (Yes, I am aware of hills.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Top speed 90 km/h... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many rural areas in the US the default speed limit is 55 mph unless there's a reason for it not to be, like a section where it passes through a town. Sometimes these roads don't even have center-line markings.

  23. Re:Bubble Cars are for cows. by XXongo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I am so happy to see the offtopic cows say moo posts are back!

    These is so much nicer than the offtopic trump-bashing and democrat-bashing posts we've been getting.

  24. Horns by slipped_bit · · Score: 1

    As long as it has lots of horns. You can never find a horn when you're angry.

    1. Re:Horns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I miss water bottle cages that attach to bicycle handlebars. Perfect place to put one of those handheld boat horns. Gets a lot more attention than a little dingely bell!

  25. Moo, say the cows. [Re:We had one] by XXongo · · Score: 1

    You'll get my two stroke lawnmower from my cold dead fingers. You will have to fight my heirs for it. Bring a weapon if you want it.

    You can have my lawnmower for free. I hate it. Ick. Noisy and dangerous.

    Who the heck invented the idea of lawns that need to be mowed, anyway?

    1. Re:Moo, say the cows. [Re:We had one] by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      That would probably UK/European nobility who had large expanses they wanted clear sight lines for (for castles and later mansions/palaces) and happened to have a few handy peasants with their sheep. Adding golf courses to the mix only enhanced the notion of large areas of neatly trimmed grass being a sign of wealth and/or leisure.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    2. Re:Moo, say the cows. [Re:We had one] by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to invent the emo lawn. Then it would cut itself.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Moo, say the cows. [Re:We had one] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did read the wikipedia article on lawn. They were originally completely extravagant, they were for showing you could put good land to unproductive use and they were cut by hand (!) because even push lawnmowers weren't invented yet. Imagine mowing the lawn with a pair of scissors and then starving because you don't have vegetables.

    4. Re:Moo, say the cows. [Re:We had one] by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Imagine mowing the lawn with a pair of scissors

      I don't have to imagine. I once did it. I live in England. A lot of our lawns are not much bigger than an American double bed.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Moo, say the cows. [Re:We had one] by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      cutting by hand in the context of a big mansions lawn in that time period almost certainly meant scythes (or possibly sheep) not scissors.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  26. It's huge by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Looks about the same length as a Smart Fortwo
    Massive compared to a BMW Isetta

    Isetta: 2.29m
    This thing: 2.4m
    Smart fortwo: 2.5m

  27. Niche markets are still markets Re:Won't work ...] by XXongo · · Score: 2

    ...I predict most buyers will consider this car to be too unsafe, or too small, or too under-powered.

    If 95% of Americans agree and won't buy one ... that's still sales over 300,000 per year. Which is the sales of the Honda Accord.

  28. No way you are getting laid driving that car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not even sure you can fit a date in there

    1. Re:No way you are getting laid driving that car by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      It's a good way to test your date -- show up on a bicycle, on foot, or in a bubble-car. If they aren't interested because you don't drive a Range Rover, might as well know sooner rather than later.

    2. Re:No way you are getting laid driving that car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically show up without your penis?

  29. Re:deathtrap (HEAVY METAL UMLAT!) by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Put on your cynic hat!

    Once giant car companies slam their fists about safety features, and useful idiots who have no concerns of regulatory costs, and congressmen looking for political donations start raging threateningly, this already overpriced 12k Euro car goes to 20.

    "Three wheels = motorcycle = get away with a lot less? No! The car companies cannot be allowed to slack on safety blah blah blah!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  30. like we need the "The Homer" who should I short by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    like we need the "The Homer" who should I short be for they roll it out.

  31. AMC Pacer. by Zorro · · Score: 1

    So they are bringing back the Pacer?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMC_Pacer

  32. What is this gas you go on about? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    Only a fool pays for fossil fuel cars anymore. Electric cars use 1/2th the maintenance expense, and in most of the West cost 1/10th the cost to fuel.

    There's your bubble. It's a bubble caused by reliance on grandpa's kerosene fueled Model T.

    Wake up and smell the clean green 2020 world that gave up on your carbon intensive and expensive tax-subsidized lifestyle, gramps!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Maybe a leaf. Teslas aren't going to live past the end of their warranties. _Insane_ repair costs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the electric car eventually breaks down you just throw it away and get another, like a Mac computer.

    3. Re: What is this gas you go on about? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay for my truck? The last payment was over five years ago.

      Wait and we'll see how the battery disposal problem grows.

    4. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandatory XKCD: https://xkcd.com/2033/

    5. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The reduced cost of maintenance and fuel doesn't cover the difference in purchase price.

    6. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      This sort of hectoring, accusative attitude is precisely why electric cars are such a hard sell. People just get turned off by all the hostility of the community. It's toxic and people don't want anything to do with it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Hybrids initially gave off smug too (not they just mostly give off suck). The problem is assholes. At least electric cars have potential.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a gas car recently. Although an electric could cover my normal use, I live in Florida so being able to evacuate for hurricanes is a big deal that would be impossible with an EV. Hell evacuating during Irma was difficult with a gas car to do lack of gas.

    9. Re:What is this gas you go on about? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      personally I like that commercial where Katherine Hahn is chowing down on a burger in her plug-in electric hybrid, but hey, whatever

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. My high school friend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...his dad had a little dirt/gravel hauling business with a dump truck as his main piece of equipment. Come weekend my friend, guess what he drove for going out? The dump truck.

  34. Still one more current year by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    with the 3 cylinder which is faster than the 4 cylinder model but does't look as good.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  35. "All the SUVs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is, I barely see any SUVs. Most of them are CUVs, also know as crossovers, which basically are tall hatchbacks.

    SUV = Suburban, Expedition, Sequoia

    CUV = RAV4, CX-3, CRV

    1. Re:"All the SUVs" by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Tall hatchbacks = real cars crippled in the name of style. Taller cars are more tippy, handle more poorly, and are less fun to drive. Give me the damn hatchback it's based on, already. Except this is America, so they don't sell them, because Americans are too vain to be seen in a "cheap" car.

    2. Re:"All the SUVs" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Mall Utility Vehicles in 4x4er parlance.

      Junk, not even the parts are useful.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:"All the SUVs" by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Mom's don't 'like to drive', they just need all the seats within easy smacking reach.

      These 'cars' are just restyled minivans. No ground clearance, open diffs, AWD at best.

      How many hatches do you want? The real hot hatch is what's hard to come by. I miss CRXs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:"All the SUVs" by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I'd like more things like a standard Golf or Polo. 100-150hp, hatchback, as bog-simple as possible. Don't care about 250hp and AWD, frankly. I want a boring, almost third-world car that will run for 15 years.

    5. Re:"All the SUVs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing about SUVs, those smaller than a Humvee/Hummer anyway : they always get all the hate but nothing is said about what we call large cars in Europe i.e. plain long sedans like BMW, Mercedes, the typical US sedan that doesn't try at being compact or the highest end offerings from French manufacturers, etc.
      They have the same issues of weight, fuel economy, big engine as the SUVs. Well, ignoring the supermassive SUVs perhaps (then I will raise Audi A8 with the biggest engine or Mercedes S600 Pullman etc.)

      So, I cut SUVs some slack. Or alternatively, ban them but also ban BMW 5-series, Mercedes E-class, your average Lincoln or Buick and so on :)

    6. Re:"All the SUVs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not old but I remember when 150hp were a sports car, lol.
      Like, Golf 2 GTI was in your range.

      As for third-world cars I remember reading about the relative failure of Dacia in India. Dacia makes purposefully bland cars popular with families who want less not more, but big enough for the family. It all started with the Dacia Logan. Well in India they would rather have a car that'd be a low end one for us, but with gold linings, high end seats and finish. Yes right they want gold and precious wood panels in a 5-door economy car, the one showed in the web article was a Peugeot 206 I think.

      I am sorry to be an AC (I should get a new handle, using a new email account to register it) and having read many of your posts for a year or so.
      One car that amuses me is the Fiat Panda 4x4. More in the Polo class than the Golf class. It's got a 2-cylinder engine for Chris's sake, it's 875cc. But it's also absurdly powerful, 84 hp. It's a 2010s engine and has a turbo. It's technically both an "econobox" and an SUV at the same time so perfect for trolling people.

    7. Re:"All the SUVs" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You don't want a VW. Terrible cars, maintenance nightmares.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:"All the SUVs" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      One car that amuses me is the Fiat Panda 4x4. More in the Polo class than the Golf class. It's got a 2-cylinder engine for Chris's sake, it's 875cc.

      Needs a small block chevy!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  36. It would if it had an Apple logo on the hood by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    With the right marketing, I think this vehicle could be very successful.

  37. I wouldn't be caught dead by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Driving one of these, which, is what would happen if you were silly enough to take one out of a small town environment. On the highway, you'd get squished like a bug!

    1. Re:I wouldn't be caught dead by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      A lot of people drive Smart cars or even motorcycles on highways, and relatively few of them die from the experience. It's more dangerous, but stop exaggerating the danger.

  38. Re:Bubble Cars are for cows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My first thought on seeing the headline was that they were bringing back the AMC Pacer!

  39. This car has 4 wheels, not 3 by Guillermito · · Score: 4, Informative

    Like the original Isetta this car has four wheels. The wheels in the rear axle are more closely spaced than in the front axle. That's why it looks like a three wheeler in some of the pictures. See a diagram here: https://www.micro-mobility.com...

    1. Re:This car has 4 wheels, not 3 by Mittengrabber · · Score: 1

      The original BMW was available in the UK as a three wheeled variant, allowing people with motorcycle only licenses to drive it. http://www.microcarmuseum.com/...

    2. Re:This car has 4 wheels, not 3 by thomn8r · · Score: 1

      The rear wheels were closely spaced because it used a solid axle with no differential (source: Isetta owner)

  40. This is the future of cars by rapjr · · Score: 1

    Cheap, small, electric, and eventually self driving also. After they become self driving if you need more cargo or passenger space you just rent a second or third one and it follows yours around. The car you rent might be your neighbors.

  41. Happy Thursday from the Golden Girls! by sexconker · · Score: 0

    Thank you for being a friend
    Traveled down the road and back again
    Your heart is true, you're a pal and a cosmonaut.

    And if you threw a party
    Invited everyone you ever knew
    You would see the biggest gift would be from me
    And the card attached would say, thank you for being a friend.

  42. Oh.. *that* kind of bubble car by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    When I hear "Bubble Car" I think of the wonderful, mad, mad mad cars Japan built in their economic bubble.

    The 90's Rx-7. The 90's Supra. The Autozam AZ1. The Mitsu 3000GT.

    *sniff* Ahh, the good old days.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  43. Re:deathtrap (HEAVY METAL UMLAT!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Three wheels isn't considered a motorcycle. That's why you can drive a trike without a motorcycle license.

  44. They reminded me these 3 passangers motorcycles by blackorzar · · Score: 1

    In South america you can see lots of 3 passengers motorcycles which come in this bubble form factor.
    They are priced in 1700-2000 USD.
    https://www.alibaba.com/produc...
    and it looks like the electric ones are coming too.

  45. Re:Bubble Cars are for cows. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

    Completely useless post. Score: -1
    Not a post about Trump. Score: +1

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  46. Or be carried away by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Does it need to be chained to a tree?

    1. Re:Or be carried away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly, if the car radio is tuned to a typical radio talk show. The elevated position on the road will reduce any collision problems with the passing SUVs.

  47. The Smart car! by schweini · · Score: 1

    IIRC, the original requirements for the Smart Car (build by Mercedes) was "has to fit two adults and a case of beer".
    It managed to do this, and at the same time be quite secure car, crash-test-wise (although there were many jokes about it tipping over - the passenger cell still holds).
    That car is/was by no means cheap - but many people also bought it because it is small, which can be a good thing on the cramped streets of Europe. There were also special parking spaces for small cars like this.

    1. Re:The Smart car! by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Nothing wrong with a smart car a Hayabusa engine doesn't fix!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  48. Pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have pedals?

  49. Skip this and get an Arcimoto by they_call_me_quag · · Score: 1

    The price tag for this tiny, Italian vapor-car is $13,990, which is $2000 more than the Arcimoto.

    If you are smart, skip the Microlino and get an Arcimoto instead. The Arcimoto FUV is faster, safer, cheaper and a lot more fun. It's been in development for about a decade and is not beginning to ramp up to mass production in Eugene, OR.

    www.arcimoto.com

  50. Saw this is in Zurich by Corbets · · Score: 1

    I saw this on display in the Zurich main station a few weeks ago. It’s tiny - but honestly, I didn’t realize that it was something special, because we have so many odd, tiny cars on the streets here. I’ve seen a variety of single-seater vehicles, most of which I presume are electric, cruising around the streets.

    It’s not like they’re a majority or anything, or even all that popular, but they’re definitely around. Still, looking at the spec sheet, this seems like it’d be a significant step up for that market, and I could very much see it being useful for people who need to commute short distances (though I personally take the train - parking my Model X or even the S5 in the heart of the city would be expensive and painful).

  51. Tax Gas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tax the hell out of it. Best -- start softly, increase every year on a pre-determined schedule, so that everyone has time to prepare.

    Invest proceeds into a more equitable world.

  52. Price is an issue by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Works out at around £10,000 for which you could get a safer 4-seated Citroen C1, Hyundai i10, Kia Picanto, small cars or the slightly larger Dacha Sandero and have some change! All of the above are motorway-capable too. I've probably missed a few

  53. Re:deathtrap (HEAVY METAL UMLAT!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked my home state and that isn't exactly true. You don't need a full on motorcycle license but you do need an motorcycle endorsement.

  54. Re:deathtrap (HEAVY METAL UMLAT!) by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Three wheels isn't considered a motorcycle. That's why you can drive a trike without a motorcycle license.

    At least here in the UK, bubble cars, Reliants and trikes were only really ever a thing precisely because you COULD drive them on a motorcycle license. Back in the 1950s/60s car licenses were relatively unusual and it was extremely easy to get a motorcycle license.

    Once you have a car license there are no obvious advantages of a 3 wheeler over 4.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  55. Not in the USA at least by CharlieG · · Score: 1

    When you add the Federally required airbags (front and side), stability controls, ABS, etc, the same thing will happen that happened to the European version of the SMART when it came to the USA - they weight will nearly double, and all the benefits go away

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  56. "Return"? by jdharm · · Score: 1

    Don't call it a comeback. They've been here for years, rocking their peers and putting drivers in fear.

  57. Re: Bubble Cars are for cows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, no. Try again. ~ CaptainDork

  58. Car Saftey by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    So I have a legitimate question (I think).

    I know here in Canada (and the US) there are many cars that we do not have access to because they basically don't (and cannot) meet modern safety standards. I know over the years some which were available needed to leave because of that (Land Rover Defender is one example). There are a lot of cool cars out there in the world that we never have the opportunity to own because of this (or even import).

    That said, there are exemptions for classic cars, of which there are tons on the road. In addition, things like legal motorcycles have nothing like the required safety standards of cars, just seeming they exist just fine. The latest is electronic scooters and the like that all share the same roads... Why is this the case? How is it that a car for example that doesn't have an airbag is seemingly too dangerous for the public to drive on roads, but a motorcycle is?

  59. Re:Bubble Cars are for cows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to take up a collection for FCLM. He lost his shit since creimer stopped trolling him. Sad.

  60. Neighborhood Electric Vehicle? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    Where does it say Neighborhood Electric Vehicle? A Neighborhood Electric Vehicle is basically a golf cart, capable of up to 25mph. Article says up to 90km/h (55mph) and 90km (75 mile) range so I don't know where this "Neighborhood Electric Vehicle" suggestion in the description came from.

    12,000 euros is only $13,700 which is a great price point, $10,000 less than the next cheapest electric car, the smart fortwo ED, but I really think it needs at least a 70mph top speed so it can attempt to drive safely on US highways. Even if the range decreases some, the greatly increased usability is worth it.

    Also, after seeing that the smart fortwo ED has a 80hp electric motor, are they sure that 20hp electric motor they're planning on using can reach 55mph? They look roughly the same size and that's 1/4th the power, 55mph might be optimistic, or it might take a very long time to reach 55.

    And maybe $13,700 isn't that great, considering you can get a 4 door Fiesta for the same price, but it's nice seeing EVs drop to the prices of the cheapest ICE vehicles even if they aren't quite as practical.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  61. Re:deathtrap (HEAVY METAL UMLAT!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the safety of a motorcycle, with none of the cool factor.

  62. The Strangest BMW of All Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0dEzY-xld8&t=604

  63. Not a safe car :-) by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Looks like a roller skate!

  64. Aptera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wish Aptera stuck to their original plan for the tadpole design. Cool car.