Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft is Interrupting Chrome and Firefox Installations To Promote Its Edge Browser in the Newest Windows 10 Build (betanews.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: If you open Edge and search for "Chrome" or "Firefox" using Bing, Edge's default search engine, you'll be presented with a massive banner informing you that "Microsoft Edge is the faster, safer browser on Windows 10 and is already installed on your PC." Four boxes below then show you how Edge lets you browse longer, and faster, offers built-in protection and built-in assistance. If that doesn't stop you, then Microsoft has a new, much nastier trick up its sleeve -- when you go to install Firefox or Chrome it intercepts the action and pops up a window promoting Edge with the same line about how its browser is faster and safer. It then gives you a blue button to click to open Edge, or a grey one you can click to install the browser you actually want to use. Oh, and this window will keep appearing, unless you go into Settings and stop Windows 10 from offering you app "recommendations."
UPDATE (9/15/18): "After massive backlash by users against this move, Microsoft has finally decided to eliminate the warning message," reports Neowin.

Further reading: Creator of Opera Says Google Deliberately Undermined His New Vivaldi Web Browser.

139 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Whooptie doo by emho24 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Chrome does the same thing when you open IE/Edge and navigate to google.com.

    --
    You must gather your party before venturing forth.
    1. Re:Whooptie doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes that is annoying. However, even after bypassing all that

      It then gives you a blue button to click to open Edge, or a grey one you can click to install the browser you actually want to use.

      That's a new low.

    2. Re:Whooptie doo by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Chrome does the same thing when you open IE/Edge and navigate to google.com.

      No, Google the search engine gives you an ad for their product when you search for a competitor. I have no problem with Bing doing that either.

      The operating system itself giving you an ad for a competing product when you try to install something, however, is a different animal entirely.

    3. Re:Whooptie doo by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is Google.com doing that not Chrome.
      That is an issue of a web page detecting your browser that you connect to its site and decided to show additional content.

      What this seems to be doing, is intercepting particular OS CALLS AND ASKING YOU NOT TO RUN A COMPATIBLE PROGRAM

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Whooptie doo by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Chrome does the same thing when you open IE/Edge and navigate to google.com.

      No, Google the search engine gives you an ad for their product when you search for a competitor. I have no problem with Bing doing that either.

      The operating system itself giving you an ad for a competing product when you try to install something, however, is a different animal entirely.

      Speaking of different animal entirely, your mistake was confusing Windows 10 for an operating system.

      In reality, pushing Edge is nothing more than the vendor pushing an ad for their product. The entire neutered "OS" has turned into little more than a marketing tool.

    5. Re:Whooptie doo by aaronb1138 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hell, multiple Chrome ads and web applications actively *force* installation. They even intentionally circumvent centrally managed applications by installing directly into the USER's PROFILE when rights to install to SYSTEM are not allowed. It used to be a huge shitshow when I managed Citrix Metaframe and ZenApp infrastructure because of the combination of circumvention and Chrome's 10,000's of nested folders cache killed roaming profile performance.

    6. Re:Whooptie doo by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Chrome does the same thing when you open IE/Edge and navigate to google.com.

      No, Google the search engine gives you an ad for their product when you search for a competitor. I have no problem with Bing doing that either.

      The operating system itself giving you an ad for a competing product when you try to install something, however, is a different animal entirely.

      Yeah it's not like the app store on Android, does anything like this or just excludes products entirely.

    7. Re:Whooptie doo by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Shut up Edge! Your purpose is to pass the butter ^W^W^W install Chrome.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    8. Re:Whooptie doo by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      by installing directly into the USER's PROFILE when rights to install to SYSTEM are not allowed.

      This is why Chrome is malware and not a web browser. It can install without admin privileges and, as you found out, goes around security measures.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    9. Re:Whooptie doo by avandesande · · Score: 1

      is it blue-pill shaped?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    10. Re:Whooptie doo by dwillden · · Score: 1

      And this is Bing doing it on the first response. Interfering with the installer is a problem but the initial banner is just the Bing results exactly like Google does with Chrome.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    11. Re:Whooptie doo by ichthus · · Score: 2

      I'm a long time Linux user, and an avid Microsoft HATER, and even I think that saying Windows 10 is not an operating system is just asinine.

      --
      sig: sauer
    12. Re:Whooptie doo by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      And you are mistaking comparing Windows to Google Play as that is entirely optional and still doesn't do what you claim minus excluded some products

      You have to use Edge to install Chrome ? who knew ?

    13. Re:Whooptie doo by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      They even do this on my Surface 2 with WIndows RT which can't even run Chrome.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    14. Re: Whooptie doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using the level of available permissions is going around permissions?

      What?

    15. Re:Whooptie doo by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 2

      It's a steaming pile of spyware built on top of an arguably otherwise acceptable operating system. If we could have the latter without the former, I'd have very few complaints. But, since we can't, I remain completely uninterested in switching from desktop Linux (Gentoo + XFCE).

    16. Re:Whooptie doo by Calydor · · Score: 1

      So you haven't gotten the latest 'Critical Security Patch' yet.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    17. Re:Whooptie doo by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Well, on a completely fresh Windows install you need to use SOMETHING to download the web browser you actually want. How does a command prompt GET command sound? Do YOU remember/know the exact file path to where the latest Chrome installer is located?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    18. Re:Whooptie doo by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And some other apps push hard for you to install Chrome when you install that app.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    19. Re:Whooptie doo by Guybrush_T · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope. When you go to bing/google, the offered service is free. That's why Ads are OK.

      Here, basically you pay for an OS that still gives you ads (compared to a free OS that doesn't ... really no question which one to install), but not only Ads, it also gets in the way when you try to install competing products. This is way nastier than having an ad in the corner of a web page because it means that Adware has ways to look at everything you are doing, vastly escaping the browser. This is a huge security issue.

      So you could argue that it's just Microsoft pre-installing Adware on your system to pay for part of the OS (just like Lenovo/Toshiba/... have been always doing). Still, that's the main reason why I started re-advocating for everyone to install Linux -- Windows is just not safe for everyone to use.

    20. Re:Whooptie doo by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      Well, on a completely fresh Windows install you need to use SOMETHING to download the web browser you actually want. How does a command prompt GET command sound? Do YOU remember/know the exact file path to where the latest Chrome installer is located?

      Flash Drive, CD Rom, DVD, Zip Disk, FTP from command line

    21. Re:Whooptie doo by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Now pretend you're the average computer user who went and bought a new computer after the old one in the family room finally died.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    22. Re:Whooptie doo by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      It then gives you a blue button to click to open Edge, or a grey one you can click to install the browser you actually want to use.

      That's a new low.

      Sure about that? Hasn't Microsoft in the past, deliberately caused foreign programs, like browsers to malfunction for no reason?

    23. Re: Whooptie doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows is Microsoft's product. They can build into it what they want, especially since they don't have a monopoly anymore.

      Err, actually they still do have monopoly. Many software used in many big companies can be run under Windows only. Of course, you could run a VM Windows, that still doesn't invalidate how low they did here.

    24. Re:Whooptie doo by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      It's a steaming pile of spyware built on top of an arguably otherwise acceptable operating system. If we could have the latter without the former, I'd have very few complaints. But, since we can't, I remain completely uninterested in switching from desktop Linux (Gentoo + XFCE).

      Regardless Windows 10 is a "steaming pile of spyware," it is still an OS. Without an OS, you can't run a software which is programmed to be run on an OS. It is black and white answer in this case.

    25. Re:Whooptie doo by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Either you missed the point or I didn't state it clearly enough. It isn't that W10 isn't an OS. Apart from hyperbole (great-great-great grandfather post) no one is claiming that. I am saying that it's a steaming pile of privacy-invading garbage piled on top of an OS.

    26. Re:Whooptie doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope. When you go to bing/google, the offered service is free. That's why Ads are OK.

      Here, basically you pay for an OS[...]

      As anyone who had a working Windows 8 installation can tell you, Windows 10 is free, too. Not "free" like in "free speech" but "free" like in "free Herpes".

    27. Re:Whooptie doo by kallisti5 · · Score: 1

      Err.. You do realize the difference between a website and an operating system... right? You're free to use whatever search engine you want.. and google can say whatever they want. Most users don't have an operating system choice.

      There have already been (won) anti-trust lawsuits against Microsoft for this exact behavior.

      https://www.justice.gov/atr/ca...

    28. Re:Whooptie doo by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a steaming pile of spyware built on top of an arguably otherwise acceptable operating system.

      Windows 10 is not first and foremost the spyware. We know this because if you are willing to volume license, you can get the OS without the spyware. Therefore, it's a halfway decent operating system which requires that you go to heroic lengths to avoid getting it with spyware. Still more than enough reason to avoid in general, IMO, but not quite the same thing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:Whooptie doo by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Understood; otherwise, corporate America would never have given up Windows 7. Still, for the ordinary consumer, Windows 10 is a privacy nightmare, and for that reason I still stick with Linux wherever possible and Windows only when absolutely necessary.

    30. Re:Whooptie doo by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Chrome does the same thing when you open IE/Edge and navigate to google.com.

      Not the same thing as the "much nastier trick" referred to in TFA, which is about Windows trying to stop the installation of something. Your example sounds merely like an advert appearing on a web page.

    31. Re:Whooptie doo by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Yes that is annoying. However, even after bypassing all that

      It then gives you a blue button to click to open Edge, or a grey one you can click to install the browser you actually want to use.

      That's a new low.

      No it's not.

      When GWX (Get Windows 10) was first released very first thing it did was to grabbed info from everybody sending it to 157.56.106.185

      157.56.106.185 as it was in my HOSTS file and the file (600K) never got out or sent.

    32. Re:Whooptie doo by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Yep. That's the problem. I wouldn't have any problem if it was free with ads or paid and clean but, no, they can't allow that.
      If I could get Windows 10 without the spying and ads I would use it (despite the IMO horrible UI) as it is I'll stay on Win 7 for as long as I can

    33. Re:Whooptie doo by The-Ixian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AFAIK ChromeOS doesn't allow any other browsers at all!

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    34. Re:Whooptie doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And why the FUCK does that setting even exist? None of those obnoxious Windows 10 placebo "settings" should even exist because Windows 10 shouldn't be doing fucking obnoxious, anti-user things in the first fucking place.

      The only kind of person who would defend behaviour like that is someone with a vested interest or a total moron. Which are you?

    35. Re:Whooptie doo by anegg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try creating a "local" account on a Windows 10 PC (Windows 10 Pro). First, the O/S automatically tries to have you create a "Microsoft" account. Next, after you have figured out where the option to create a local account is hiding and click the button to create a local account, the O/S presents a second "create account" dialog box to create a "Microsoft" account, with a blue glowing "Yes" button (default action) and a grey "No" button. To create the local account, you have to select the non-default "No" even though you just specified that you wanted to create a local account. How on earth a vendor thinks that this kind of manipulative behavior against the users of their product is ok is beyond me.

    36. Re:Whooptie doo by najajomo · · Score: 1

      > Chrome does the same thing when you open IE/Edge and navigate to google.com

      Except, you have a choice whether to navigate to Google and Microsoft sabatages the Chrome/Firefox install process to nag you to use Edge.

    37. Re:Whooptie doo by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      I want my grandpa's Microsoft back.

    38. Re:Whooptie doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh? Have you looked at what else is in there?

      Would you rather it just install into a different location under your home directory?

      Because that folder is provided by Microsoft so that apps have a place to put their stuff when they don't need to be somewhere else. Why ask you for permission to install in Program Files if it's not necessary?

    39. Re:Whooptie doo by preflex · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's not like the app store on Android, does anything like this

      Yeah. It really isn't like that at all. If I download the Firefox apk from Mozilla's site, and then install it, the play store does not interfere (assuming I even bother to install GApps).

    40. Re:Whooptie doo by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Installing in the profile folder is officially supported by Microsoft. They encourage it for apps that are per user installs with low permissions.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Whooptie doo by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I know that almost every time I go to visit my mother, the first thing I do on her computer is uninstall Chrome. I don't think this is because the installer is bypassing privileges, but because when updating some software there is a tiny "opt-out" button that will install Chrome if you're not paying attention or aren't a computer expert. It's a pretty shitty way of promoting a product.

    42. Re:Whooptie doo by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's not like the app store on Android, does anything like this

      Yeah. It really isn't like that at all.

      Actually it pretty much is, more explanation follows.

      If I download the Firefox apk from Mozilla's site, and then install it, the play store does not interfere (assuming I even bother to install GApps).

      The same holds true on windows just not edge.

      Now I have 2 android 7 inch tablets, 2 android phones, 2 10 inch android combo devices (tablet with keyboard) 1 11.5 inch combo device

      Everyone of them came preloaded with GApps and none of them was properly configured to just mount a flash drive if attached. In the case of the small devices they didn't even have USB-A sockets so without an adapter it's good luck putting software on them without intermediate steps.

      As I pointed out in another post

      https://www.amazon.com/Perform... this tablet was actually locked down and is either by google or the manufacturer unable to operate any browser other than Chrome and an old version of that. I'm in process of disputing the purchase a task that actually has negative economic value for me.

    43. Re:Whooptie doo by preflex · · Score: 1

      Everyone of them came preloaded with GApps and none of them was properly configured to just mount a flash drive if attached. In the case of the small devices they didn't even have USB-A sockets so without an adapter it's good luck putting software on them without intermediate steps.

      When you visit https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mo... and download the latest Firefox apk (using whatever crappy browser your device came with), does the Play Store pop up, and request that you use Chrome instead when you try to install it?

    44. Re:Whooptie doo by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Everyone of them came preloaded with GApps and none of them was properly configured to just mount a flash drive if attached. In the case of the small devices they didn't even have USB-A sockets so without an adapter it's good luck putting software on them without intermediate steps.

      When you visit https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mo... and download the latest Firefox apk (using whatever crappy browser your device came with), does the Play Store pop up, and request that you use Chrome instead when you try to install it?

      Why do you ask questions if you aren't going to read the answers that were already given let alone the repeats ?

      As I already said

      https://www.amazon.com/Perform... [amazon.com] this tablet was actually locked down and is either by google or the manufacturer unable to operate any browser other than Chrome and an old version of that.

      It's considerably worse.

    45. Re:Whooptie doo by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      So now to install Chrome / Firefox *and* set them as the default browser you have to click two of these grey buttons.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    46. Re:Whooptie doo by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How on earth a vendor thinks that this kind of manipulative behavior against the users of their product is ok is beyond me.

      That's actually the most comprehensible part of the entire situation. They think it's OK because they've been abusive literally for the whole life of the company (if your Microsoft BASIC paper tape broke, they wouldn't replace it) and yet people keep giving them money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:Whooptie doo by anegg · · Score: 1

      Hey - if I were going to watch pron on my computer, I certainly wouldn't want to log on using my Microsoft username.

      Side note; no outrage here. Life is too short. Bemused disgust perhaps, but not outrage.

  2. Just what I want from my OS... by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The cockblocking of competing products.

  3. Because f*ck you, that's why by SIGBUS · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every time I think Windows 10 can't get more insufferable, Microsoft reaches a new low. I guess they solved the malware problem - by baking the malware into the OS.

    While, unfortunately, I have to use one Windows 10 system in my office, fortunately it's the only one, and anything else is either Windows 7 or Linux. None of my personal machines have the misfortune of using 10, and as long as they keep doing things like this, none will.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:Because f*ck you, that's why by houghi · · Score: 2

      If it is at the office, I asume the machine is not yours. So if it really bothers you, find a new job. What I do is just not care about the inefficient way my company wants me to work.

      If I sere an issue, I will tell them and provide a solution. From then on it is THEIR problem, not mine.

      To make a point, the company has a website that I need to use and they made it so it only works in Chrome. The Company, in all their greatness, has also put in placvve a police where I am not allowed to run Chrome. So I am unable to visit that site that I need for my work.

      The fact that I am unable to do certain tasks is THEIR problem, not mine.

      My personal machines all run Linux. I will not use them at work or for work.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Because f*ck you, that's why by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Since I search for a new browser approximately every 3 years, or when I get a new workstation, this isn't much of an imposition. And I know how to click through. I do it on Facebook, Amazon, and a multitude of other services. Notice how YouTube, Pandora, Iheartradio, Google Play, etc. pester you to sign up for their paid services , sometimes even after you have? All annoyances, none fatal or truly any more devious than any other marketing and sales pitch. Feh. Grow thicker skin, you're gonna need it.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:Because f*ck you, that's why by OldMugwump · · Score: 1

      "Just following orders" didn't cut it at Nuremberg. If you're in a big company, your manager doesn't make the rules either, but does expect you to be productive. If you want a successful career, you might do better to focus on getting the job done (despite the rules), instead of slavishly following the rules and saying "not my fault nothing works". In every company, rules don't apply to top performers. Rules are for little people. Which do you want to be?

      --
      "Shoot, a fella could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff."
    4. Re:Because f*ck you, that's why by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat, but I have to wonder what I'll decide to do when the windows 7 patches stop in a year or so. At this point using windows 10 is a non-starter so my options are to keep using windows 7 unpatched or go mac or linux. Guess I'll cross that bridge when I come to it, but I am certain I have no interest in windows 10 unless they completely change their hostility to their Customers.

    5. Re:Because f*ck you, that's why by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Every time I think Windows 10 can't get more insufferable, Microsoft reaches a new low.

      Ahhh but is it? Asking the user a question is a new low? And before you answer remember this "feature" is tied to the same setting that controls the Play Store's ability to just randomly install shit on your computer silently without asking and have it magically appear in your start menu.

  4. Hmm... This feels familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Almost as if MS was slapped down for ... anti-competitive behavior under this same topic: browser integration into the OS.

    Nah. I must be having deja-vu again...

    1. Re:Hmm... This feels familiar... by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Almost as if MS was slapped down for ... anti-competitive behavior under this same topic: browser integration into the OS.

      Nah. I must be having deja-vu again...

      Exactly what I'm thinking.. Um, You M$ guys/gals, you may not be old enough to remember, but M$ got slapped pretty hard for anti-competitive behavior with IE in the past in multiple countries. I suggest you tread lightly here.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Hmm... This feels familiar... by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      Yes, but back then they had fewer lobbyists. They know better now. They have bought the politicians to make it legal!

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    3. Re:Hmm... This feels familiar... by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does. But if the EU complains now, Microsoft claims copyright on the misbehaviour under the new rules and sues the EU. Even a link to the previous eviction is forbidden!

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    4. Re:Hmm... This feels familiar... by darkain · · Score: 1

      But, since companies are people too, doesn't Microsoft have the right to be forgotten!? That case never existed if nobody remembers!

    5. Re:Hmm... This feels familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      got slapped hard? in what world do you live in?

      these companies need to be split up, a decade ago.

      MSFT / Google / AMZN / FB / -- there are a dozen others, their size make them unaccountable. there is no consumer choice -- there is only what is forced down the masses throats.

      I'm guilty, I've used MS products as well, and i just want to use a commodity PC, so apple is no option.

      I will be reviewing where linux sits, but for a laptop, im certain its still 'not there'.

    6. Re:Hmm... This feels familiar... by iampiti · · Score: 1

      If the EU got on Google for anticompetitive practices regarding Android they could surely look into this too.
      I'm European and I for once think that would be a good use of my money

  5. Are you sure you want to discuss this on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Commenting on reddit is so much faster and safer.

  6. Very easily fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is easy to fix once you understand the malware's vector. Almost all of Microsoft's malware (and it realy is true for this particular one) requires that you run Windows, or else the malware doesn't actually get executed. If you don't run Windows, none of these problems actually exist for you.

  7. YOU are the problem. by gavron · · Score: 1, Troll

    *shrug* I install Chrome[cast] and FireFox and have never seen anything interrupting from Microsoft. But then, I use Linux... and don't use Microsoft. That's my choice.

    This thing described above is only a problem for those who have chosen Microsoft or failed-to-choose-otherwise.

    If you chose Microsoft, go look in the mirror -- that person there is the reason you're getting these messages.

    If you want to blame Microsoft after YOU WENT AND CHOSE THEM and STUCK WITH THEM and now are MAKING EXCUSES FOR WHY YOU MUST STICK WITH THEM... you're the problem.

    Enjoy.

    E

    1. Re: YOU are the problem. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      What kind of tortured, twisted logic is that?

    2. Re: YOU are the problem. by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> What kind of tortured, twisted logic is that?
      it's called "Reality".

      Choose the malware, die by the malware.
      W10 seems to be the evolving kind of sneaky malware

      --
      aaaaaaa
  8. Cliche, but true.. by sqorbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I made the switch to Linux completely because of the recent updates to Windows. I finally got frustrated enough with dealing with it that both work and home are now completely Linux based, even for my kids. I've in some way been using Linux for years but kept Windows on my work laptops since we entirely based on Active Directory, Exchange and Sharepoint. I always kept Windows at home because a majority of my time was spent either gaming or just watching Netflix so there was never really any motivation to change. Windows 10 gave me the push to change though. A majority of the games I get from Steam are on linux. I play Minecraft with my daughters without issue. Netflix runs fine. RDP works fine for any server work I need to accomplish at work. I know it's cliche and no one really cares that a few users switch, but I was somewhat of a "fan" of Microsoft for awhile. Windows 10 completely destroyed that. Microsoft will continue to hold the market share and there's no worry that they are pissing off their users because they don't have to care. I just wonder if they will ever piss enough people off that someone will step up with a truly viable alternative. For now I'll happily keep Manjaro running (yes, flame on Arch users!)

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
    1. Re:Cliche, but true.. by Akili · · Score: 1

      My experience was very similar, except s/Windows 10/Windows 2000.

      It wasn't until XP started including DRM as part of Media Player, and began degrading functions (like searching for files), and the whole Windows ME debacle that I finally understood why there wasn't a Windows Tech Edition. I was not their customer, and never would be.

      I finally made it my New Year's Resolution in 2008 to cease using Windows and ended up switching to Gentoo Linux, and have been satisfied with that decision ever since. Sure, I missed out on a lot of gaming options, and Gentoo can be/is often a headache, but having a desktop that worked sanely in ways I either understood or could figure out was worth every trade. Gentoo made me understand how Linux worked better than any other distribution that simply got me up and running, with little knowledge of what it took under the hood to get there.

      It is sad to me that it always seems to take another version of Windows to finally persuade folks to turn away. If I thought Windows XP was bad enough to make the switch....

      Microsoft's marketing message may be that they're trying to change, but not in ways that are ever likely to re-earn my trust or confidence. I'll work with the platform if I have to in order to keep a job, but I will no longer give the company any more of my personal money, or use their platform for any purpose short of those for which I have no say.

    2. Re:Cliche, but true.. by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      I've used windows since win3.1 and I will not being using windows 10. microsoft may eventually care after the mass exodus dam has broken and they cannot fix it, but it does not look good for them.

    3. Re:Cliche, but true.. by Dr.Saeuerlich · · Score: 1

      similar story. After win 10 getting more stupid and also more unstable I switched to macOS. Mostly because it has better support for 2D and 3D software and I don't want to use a Win VM. I keep a Win 10 box purely for streaming games to my Mac via Steam.

    4. Re:Cliche, but true.. by iampiti · · Score: 1

      There isn't (and never will be) a complete alternative but at least Valve are paying the guys at Wine to make improvements to the compatibility of games so there's money (and good progress) being put into that.
      To this day Linux (in particular desktop environments) feels brittler to me than Windows. Many times there's updates that won't go smoothly or for some reason the X server stops working and I have to troubleshoot it but there may arrive the day when I feel that's better than Windows.

  9. Re:And then I'll chortle... by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The issue isn't What Microsoft did, but how they did it. Microsoft has the right to advertise their browser, however to intercept a on call to run a program and do a particular action because it is a competitors product is just bad form.

    That would be like Linux putting an alert because you ran some non-gpl code in the OS. and you are getting a lecture on how Closed Source Software is so bad.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  10. I see your mistake right here. by PPH · · Score: 1

    If you open Edge and search ..... using Bing

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  11. Re:Windows 10... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that os is the nastiest one that the human race ever used, lets just hope that this shit will be written in history books as the big turn over for the computer field in general - microsoft - no one wants your crappy code - go die already

  12. Is it true or Fake information? by ripvlan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Edge really faster/better/cheaper? Or is that statement fake propaganda?

    1. Re:Is it true or Fake information? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is Edge really faster/better/cheaper? Or is that statement fake propaganda?

      It's fake. Edge is faster at some things, but not at all things. It's provably not better. And they both cost $0 so it's not cheaper.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Is it true or Fake information? by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Is Edge really faster/better/cheaper? Or is that statement fake propaganda?

      The real question is, are claims like this legally binding.

      Probably faster to go after Microsoft for false statements like this to curb bullshit featurecreep rather than try and go the anti-trust route (again)...

    3. Re:Is it true or Fake information? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's dubious, and it's also unfinished and as a result inferior to the browsers its trying to replace. I'm surprised Microsoft is doing this, people who use Edge, in my experience, don't use it for very long because they recognize it quickly as the latest version of IE.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Is it true or Fake information? by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      yes and, if they use their dominance to make it more difficult to find the competition, via confusing statements or tedious steps, are they back into the antitrust bucket?

      It's one thing to list Edge as the top choice (or even a link to a propaganda article touting the wonderfulness of Edge) in the search results. But injecting into the flow of a webpage feels like everything we don't want ISPs doing.

    5. Re:Is it true or Fake information? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's really power efficient at hardware-offload video playback. Which has little to nothing to do with Edge. That's what I remember from their earlier ads anyway.

  13. Re:And then I'll chortle... by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

    ... and close the window. No reason for a freakout here.

    It's just one more fucking straw on the anitconsumer camel's back. This is bad behaviour - admit it as such. They've made the OS more of a pain to use specifically to promote their own product, and who's to say it will stop here? How many popups do you want? Because if we *don't* make a fuss then you can be damn sure they will try other shit too and make everyone's lives just that bit worse.

  14. Just another example by no-body · · Score: 1

    As corporations have more and more rights to roll over individuals rights of privacy and freedom of harassment with impunity and politicians are in their pocket!
    Will there ever be an end to this trend?

  15. Re:Uninstall Windows 10, install Linux by jareth-0205 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Problem solved.

    2. Give up games and a whole host of creativity / specialist software that isn't available for Linux. I love Linux, but no, problem not fucking solved.

    You have a choice of only 2 operating systems for generic PCs, and that is hardly a healthy place to exercise your power as a consumer.

  16. Microsoft Disruption by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Sort of OT But it really annoys me when I get pop-ups on Windows 10 asking me to rate their Calculator App. Seriously .. this happens.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  17. Seriously, people! by thedarb · · Score: 1

    How much shit are willing to put up with before you are willing to leave Windows? FFS!

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  18. Re:And then I'll chortle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, that's you. Good for you! But there are lots of users who aren't you, and who will take Microsoft's word for it. This kind of tactic works. Very very well. It has worked for Google, it has worked for Safari, and it will work for Edge. Even if it doesn't work on you.

  19. Re:And then I'll chortle... by unrtst · · Score: 1

    That would be like Linux putting an alert because you ran some non-gpl code in the OS. and you are getting a lecture on how Closed Source Software is so bad.

    $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/tainted
    12288

    While it's not as blatant, Linux (actual Linux, the kernel) does alert users when using non-gpl code in the kernel. It also prints a message during boot, which can be seen via dmesg after boot.

  20. Re:Uninstall Windows 10, install Linux by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

    So how do I then bill my client for the Windows 10 based work that they want me to do? And no, there are no FOSS equivalents for the work I do and there never will be - so don't even think about trying that argument out on me.

    Saying the solution is to simply uninstall MS software is naive and immature.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  21. Microsoft Edge is evil. by xack · · Score: 1

    There is currently only one Google result for "microsoft edge is evil". Time to correct that "problem". Edge is a failed browser, people remember IE, and don't want its new "incarnation" so are ignoring it droves. If only Mozilla wasn't evil either by murdering XUL. Luckily the hoarde of basilisks and waterfoxes have saved XUL.

    1. Re:Microsoft Edge is evil. by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      Now I see two results. :)

  22. Just use Internet Explorer by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    It's still part of Windows 10, and is considered the best browser to use to download a better browser.

  23. What the what? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't understand. I thought the purpose in edge was just to provide users a tool to download the web browser they actually wanted to use. Has something changed?

    1. Re:What the what? by omnichad · · Score: 2

      They're just adding new features for their most popular use case. That's where most companies add new features.

    2. Re:What the what? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not really. But MS hopes for more clueless users...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  24. Valve's Steam by DrYak · · Score: 1

    2. Give up games and

    In recent news : Valve is integrating Wine capability into their Steam linux client in order to handle exactly *this* specific problem.

    Over time, the problem will get lesser.
    (Valve indeed needs it, if they want SteamOS to be anything more than a glorified remote streamcasting device and to be instead worthy of a good SteamBox)

    (And until then, my extremely subjective suggestion would be to try picking up an out-door hobby and/or a significant other : both could be healthier way to spend leisure time :-P )

    a whole host of creativity / specialist software that isn't available for Linux.

    Depends on your reliance on specific software.
    For some users, a combo of VirtualBox and/or Wine might fill the gap to run *those few applications* while at the same time constricting the mess that is Microsoft Windows to a very small danger level.
    (I am lucky enough that this happens to be my case. Might not be everyone's though)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  25. Not enough annoyance, go further by bettodavis · · Score: 1

    Make the ungrateful users hunt the moving Chrome icon across the screen!

    Or better, hide it somewhere unspecified, under another name and make the user play hide-n-seek with it.

    That will surely make them love Edge more.

  26. Re:Uninstall Windows 10, install Linux by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Continually letting Microsoft violate your anus because you won't take a stand is naive immature and shows what a coward you are. You won't put yourself out to stand up against this sort of bullshit, you're no example for anyone to follow. So just keep swallowing what they're forcing down your throat and they'll never change a goddamned thing. Be sure to enjoy a world where you pay for a computer that you have zero control over and no say in how it's actually used because shit companies like Microsoft take more and more end-user rights away.

  27. Re:And then I'll chortle... by jythie · · Score: 1

    And on the tool end this means they have something built into their loader now capable of detecting what application an installer is associated with and consulting a table of actions to take based off that. Once that capability is there, it is gonna be hard to resist adding more cases to it.

  28. Doesn't surprise me by KaylaMarie81 · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why I go out of my way to have anything but Windows 10 on my computers. I recently reinstalled my Dell Venue tablet and put Windows 8 on it instead of 10, I would have gone with 7 but it's not as tablet-friendly as 8. I really hate 8, but at least it's not bitching at me for having my own preference on a browser not made by Microsoft. All my other computers are either Windows 7 or Linux.

  29. Microsoft employees: Get a better job? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Microsoft employees: Instead of moderating my comment down, I suggest you get a better job.

  30. Edge by beep54 · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason to avoid using Edge. Also, it turns out that you can actually get rid of IE now, but, of course, not Edge.

  31. desperation by emil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A company with competitive products in the target markets would not have any need to resort to this kind of advertising. The fact that these ads exist is Microsoft's tacit admission that Windows as a consumer product has failed to compete with Google Android and Chrome OS.

    I needed a cheap Windows system recently, and I was pleasantly surprised that an old corporate desktop with a Win7 Pro license key still activates under Windows 10. This would never have been allowed when Windows was the primary consumer OS, but those days are long gone.

    Microsoft has one choice, and only one, to achieve significant penetration with Edge: open the source. There is nothing else that will help - nothing.

    1. Re:desperation by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I needed a cheap Windows system recently, and I was pleasantly surprised that an old corporate desktop with a Win7 Pro license key still activates under Windows 10.

      Will you be equally surprised when Windows 10 switches to a monthly payment model?

      Because that's the long term plan for still allowing "upgrades" from Windows 7 machines.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:desperation by emil · · Score: 1

      Will you be equally surprised when Windows 10 switches to a monthly payment model?

      Win7 is still the dominant desktop OS, and Microsoft seems desperate for Win10 to supplant it. Attempts to levy new fees will drive systems away, either to Linux (likely ChromiumOS or Ubuntu) or to reinstalled Win7.

      M$ may be foolish enough to try new fees, but that will stop when a 5% market share drop occurs, which would be relatively quick.

    3. Re:desperation by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Why do they need significant penetration with Edge? They're not going to parlay Edge into success in Mobile - or, as they tried with IE, to prevent web-based applications from replacing Windows native apps. So what are they getting for their investment in Edge?

      Perhaps the ability to compete with ChromeOS? Even so, why not just build another wrapper around Webkit? And in that case, why care whether users select it or not? Just fooling - I assume the reason is that they want to track your web usage - and/or steer you to Bing and other Microsoft (potential) revenue generators. Still, why build their own engine for that when a free one is available?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    4. Re:desperation by emil · · Score: 1

      It seems that Microsoft wants to stay relevant on the new platforms, and I have found them useful. I flew on Spirit airlines recently, and gmail doesn't properly show the QR on the boarding pass email. Outlook for Android does, so it's on my phone.

      Outlook likely bundles the Edge rendering engine (Trident?), and I'll tolerate it for my use case. I will not consider it for a stand-alone browser until, like Apple and Google, the code opens. The security community seems to agree on that.

    5. Re:desperation by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Outlook likely does ship with Trident, since that is the embeddable browser component from Internet Explorer, but Edge really is a separate project

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    6. Re:desperation by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      It's all about search and ads. IE / Edge failing so fucking hard is why we (win10 users) have ads in the start menu now.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    7. Re:desperation by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

      Microsoft has one choice, and only one, to achieve significant penetration with Edge: open the source. There is nothing else that will help - nothing.

      Even that is not guaranteed. Open source Edge would have to compete against the equally open source Firefox.
      With people who only care about "free as in beer", the competition is Chrome. These people seem to be the majority. Chrome is based on open source Chromium, and there is a privacy-oriented fork of that called Iron. Sounds good but has little market share (I have not tried it out myself yet, so far I'm content with SeaMonkey ;)

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    8. Re:desperation by emil · · Score: 2

      Firefox's Gecko really had performance problems until recently.

      Microsoft can write tight, fast code, and Gecko might be able to outright take, or at least be inspired by, innovations in Edge that they could see.

      When Ballmer called the GPL a virus, this is likely his chief fear.

    9. Re:desperation by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      M$ may be foolish enough to try new fees, but that will stop when a 5% market share drop occurs, which would be relatively quick.

      M$ is angling to provide windows services through cloud accounts. That's when they'll go for the monthly fees. What you won't have access to, when the cutoff takes place, is a working, standalone Windows 10 (consumer) license. Any drop in standalone Windows will be irrelevant. If you want to run Windows, you'll have to have an azure account, and run your machine like a chromebook. If not, the consumer will eventually not be able to buy a machine with a standalone Windows OS license.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    10. Re:desperation by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      This doesn't seem practical. I could see them going this way moving forward but they won't be able to force all windows 10 users to start subscribing or else lose their computer. If they do this it would be best to use a different name (Windows 365?) to avoid confusion. Yes, over time they'll see fewer and fewer updates, that's normal as Microsoft hates supporting paying customers (which includes those who paid for a product more than a month prior).

      The standard for the home has been "it costs nothing as it comes with your new computer" for a very long time. If they move to requiring subscriptions there will either be mass movement to pirating, a mass movement to installing old Windows versions, or a mass movement off of Windows (which will be hard for most people). Or to be clearer, it will kill the home Windows market outright.

      For the enterprise, I could see a lot of corporations following along, there are a lot of sheep like IT people out there who follow along with Microsoft no matter where they go. There are major fortune 500 companies that starting upgrading to Windows 10 the first month it was possible despite the large amount of controvesies in the press. When you got your job by going to a Microsoft class and paying for a Microsoft certificate, and you keep your job by recommending Microsoft, you tend not to be critical of Microsoft...

      But there will be some of the better enterprises who will crunch the numbers and realize they're spending more for less quality with Windows on the desktop. For the backoffice there's already been the shift towards alternatives to Windows, so I expect that to just accelerate.

      Compare to the competition, all the other operating systems are free or fixed price. If you pay for support for other operating systems, you get actual support. You can call up the customer support department. With Microsoft there is no direct customer support, you only get the fixes that come out with the general customer updates.

    11. Re:desperation by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But how do they monetize that? With IE the monetization was easy to see, too many web sites only working with IE means customers are going to keep buy new versions of Windows instead of going to alternatives. Is Edge going to do the same thing? Are there enough web site owners who haven't learned that it was a bad idea to not be portable across the major browsers?

      My guess is that some department in Microsoft wanted a better browser and managed to push it through, rather than this being a long term strategy at high levels of Microsoft management.

    12. Re:desperation by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what I suspect too. But in order to deliver targeted ads based on your browsing habits, all they need is for you to use any browser they control. I.e., it doesn't need to have its own implementation of HTML, CSS, etc. It could just be a Microsoft wrapper around Webkit - like Chrome and Safari. So why invest in a Microsoft rendering engine? Seems like a remnant of MS's attitude that "if it's software, we need to at least try to dominate it", rather than any true business need.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  32. Poor Windows Users by Joshs922 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone needs to open a shelter for battered Windows users where they can begin to heal and realize that they don't have to stay in an abusive relationship.

  33. Why is Microsoft starting to look desperate? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Is that really the perception Microsoft wants to convey here?

  34. Re:Uninstall Windows 10, install Linux by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Continually letting Microsoft violate your anus because you won't take a stand is naive immature and shows what a coward you are. You won't put yourself out to stand up against this sort of bullshit, you're no example for anyone to follow. So just keep swallowing what they're forcing down your throat and they'll never change a goddamned thing. Be sure to enjoy a world where you pay for a computer that you have zero control over and no say in how it's actually used because shit companies like Microsoft take more and more end-user rights away.

    Ahh I see .. abuse only and no attempt at a rational argument - the epitome of immature.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  35. Wait, I know this one and how it ends by Space+Grrrl · · Score: 1

    I was at the big M during the anti-trust days. Even though I was "them" at the time I thought what that did deserved at least the slap they got. Looking back they should have been broken up and I think these days Google and a host of other tech companies need to be similarly carved up.

    But bringing back basically trying to prevent the installation of a 3rd party browser, that is just too funny. How quickly the past is forgotten. All I can say is good luck with that Microsoft! Maybe start to claim it is for "security", oh, then follow it with an "opt in" to allow Microsoft to have all your PC's data sent to them "to improve your experience!". Yeah, folks will buy that!

  36. Stop nagging! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    I really wish Google and Microsoft would stop one-upping each other on how obnoxiously they can nag users to try the other guys offerings. GO AWAY.

    I will choose my browser. You don't get a say. Make the better browser and people will use it. Nag us, and we're likely to turn away from BOTH of them. People don't like to be nagged. Stop it. Offer it, and let it sit there, people will decide on their own.

    At the end of the day, does this bull even matter? There's very little difference between the three main browsers in use today: Firefox, Edge, and Chrome.

    Is anyone really surprised Microsoft can get the final word in the nag-war, since nearly everyone uses Windows? And what the hell is the point? All the browsers are free, who the fuck cares which one you use, be thankful a person is browsing your website AT ALL. Is there any actual point to nagging users to switch? Browsers themselves don't have ads or anything like that, it's not like there's any special advantage you get from having users use your browser.

    1. Re:Stop nagging! by Joshs922 · · Score: 1

      Chrome is spyware so it gets all of your web-browsing data, so there is an advantage to them. Edge probably is spyware like Chrome, I assume not having ever used it.

  37. Wait... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    "If you open Edge and search for "Chrome" or "Firefox" using Bing,"
    Well that's ok then, pretty much nobody will see it.

    --
    -Styopa
  38. Re:Uninstall Windows 10, install Linux by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    . Be sure to enjoy a world where you pay for a computer that you have zero control over and no say in how it's actually used because shit companies like Microsoft take more and more end-user rights away.

    Guess your reading comprehension is garbage and/or you just conveniently skipped over that. Go fuck yourself, troll.

  39. Windows 10 is malware. by stooo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Windows 10 is malware.That fact has been known for a few years.
    The remedy is simple : Just use Linux.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  40. What can you expect? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    This is Microsoft we are talking about - the epitome of despicable when it comes to for-profit organizations.

  41. Re:Uninstall Windows 10, install Linux by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    . Be sure to enjoy a world where you pay for a computer that you have zero control over and no say in how it's actually used because shit companies like Microsoft take more and more end-user rights away.

    Guess your reading comprehension is garbage and/or you just conveniently skipped over that. Go fuck yourself, troll.

    Doubling up on the abuse I see .. so classy!

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  42. The consent decree expired in 2011 by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    The consent decree shackling Microsoft after the IE bundling case expired in 2011. At the time it was made, a lot of us complained about it only lasting 9 years, when a similar consent decree against IBM was in place for 40 years.

    Anyhow, bottom line is that stopping Microsoft's behavior this time around will require a new DoJ investigation, which if history is any guide will take more than a decade. Given the history, hopefully it'll be done quickly enough or the judges will be willing to grant restraining orders to prevent Edge's market share rising up to 90% as IE did.

    I still maintain that the best solution back in the 1990s would've been to break apart Microsoft into two companies - an OS company and an applications company. Then there would've been no reason for the OS (Windows) to favor Edge or Office (ever notice a trial starter version comes with Win 10?) or any other Microsoft application.

  43. Ok, I admit it. by jd · · Score: 1

    The new Microsoft isn't your father's Microsoft. They lied in court, illegally bundled and sought to undermine rival technology. The new Microsoft does all that and spams you too. Definitely not the same. The old Microsoft never stopped that low.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  44. Relevant motivational quote by schweini · · Score: 1

    "If Internet Explorer is brave enough to ask to be your default browser, you can be brave enough to ask that girl out!".

  45. Voting with my dollars and walking away from MS by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    My family is still on Windows 7 until 2020. I have about 90% of my regularly played games and apps working on Linux either natively or with wine. Aiming to never have a Windows 10 computer in my house.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Voting with my dollars and walking away from MS by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I use Windows 10 at work. It likes to blow away my keyboard remapping and layout settings on some updates. So that's not very nice of it.

      The new notification area does not appear to have any option to filter out unwanted applications or even disable it. About all I can do is snooze the notification popups for a while, but it resets if I reboot or even wake from suspend.

      I figure if you're going to be a little bitch and upend your Windows ecosystem just because you can't deal with a few little changes, I might as well provide the contrary opinion.

      I'm an embedded developer, so "Windows ecosystem" is an overly dramatic description of what I have. Most of my tools are Linux only. With a handful on Windows. To go completely to the Linux side is not as big of a step for me as it would be for someone in a different career.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  46. LibreOffice? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Does the same thing happen if you go to install other application that Microsoft has applications for such as LibreOffice?

  47. Re: Mock, mock. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    When I first posted I was turning off updates for Windows 7 Ultimate because of the forced updates, I said I was doing it because other things would be coming down the pike. I was mocked as paranoid right here. I was told I was leaving myself open for system takeover, 'Who wouldn't want the latest protection?", etc, etc.

    I have none of the problems incessantly being talked about with 10 and it is I who now mock.

    You mean "we who now mock", because I got into your unpatched system ages ago.

    Thanks, btw.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  48. Time for another $500M fine by gweihir · · Score: 1

    If this is not in violation of the respective EU laws, I don't know what is.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  49. "recommendations" by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Ooooh. Before reading TFA I didn't realize there was a way to turn off this obnoxious behavior. Thanks, OP!

    Of course, in some future build, I fully expect there to not be a way to turn off M$ product promotion. But at least for now, I can get a little peace.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  50. Re:And then I'll chortle... by strikethree · · Score: 1

    That would be like Linux putting an alert because you ran some non-gpl code in the OS. and you are getting a lecture on how Closed Source Software is so bad.

    You mean like how the dmesg output on a system with nvidia drivers whines about the kernel being tainted? ;)

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  51. Re:And then I'll chortle... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You mean like how the dmesg output on a system with nvidia drivers whines about the kernel being tainted? ;)

    You mean that thing that doesn't pop up when you try to launch an application, that most users will never even notice? No. Nothing like that.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. Re:Uninstall Windows 10, install Linux by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you really proved him wrong there. But maybe he likes his anus violating. Perhaps he actually wants some of the value adding features that Microsoft offer. Perhaps there's a balance to be sought.

    You aren't helping find it. You're just being abusive.

  53. what's MS strategy? by sad_ · · Score: 1

    there must be a bigger plan here, you are already on their OS, why would they care about the browser you use.
    the browser is not the main product of MS; it's windows, office(365) and azure.
    which browser you use for 365 or azure shouldn't matter one bit.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.