Slashdot Mirror


'The Supremacy of Japanese Cars Has Been 40-Plus Years In the Making' (bloomberg.com)

American business journalist Joe Nocera writes in a Bloomberg article about "how badly things have deteriorated for the U.S. car makers," after the recent news that both General Motors and Ford will soon be exiting the sedan market in the country. Slashdot reader gollum123 shares the report: Much of the analysis about Ford and GM's exit from the sedan market stressed that sedan sales have lost ground in recent years "as consumers have gravitated toward pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles," as the New York Times put it. If you look at the historical sales figures of the top Japanese sedans, you'll see a small decline in recent years, but nothing like the big drop-off in sales that have hammered the American companies. So in addition to the overall decline in sedan sales, there is a second, largely overlooked, dynamic taking place: Americans have only stopped buying American sedans, not Japanese sedans. The American car companies now say they are going to count on profits from trucks and SUVs while moving toward autonomous and all-electric vehicles. They had better hope that transition takes place quickly.

I couldn't help noticing that while the top three selling vehicles in the U.S. are, indeed, American-made trucks, No. 4 on the list is Nissan's top SUV, the Rogue, the sales of which have gone from 18,000 in 2007 to 403,000 last year. No. 5 is a Toyota SUV, the Rav4 (407,000 in 2017). No. 6 is the Honda CR-V (378,000). And the leading American SUV? It's the Chevy Equinox. Last year, Chevrolet sold 290,000 of them -- 100,000 fewer than the Toyota Camry.

293 comments

  1. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Honda just hit 300k miles. You'd be lucky to get 80k from a GM or Chrysler

    1. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Honda" isn't a vehicle, that's a company. You can't measure a company in anecdotes anyway. No points awarded.

    2. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A Tesla Model S has already gone over 400,000 miles.

    3. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you're talking about.

    4. Re: duh by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Troll

      Honda was awesome, up until recently. When they knowingly installed defective transmissions in hundreds of thousands of Accords and Odysseys, and then lied about it for years, they demonstrated to the world that we're obviously past peak Honda.

    5. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link??

    6. Re:duh by Sir+Lurkalot · · Score: 1

      Honda just hit 300k miles. You'd be lucky to get 80k from a GM or Chrysler

      Maybe with GM and FCA, but our Fords have easily hit the 200,000 mile limit ,
      with more on the clock, for the second owners.

    7. Re:duh by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Troll

      Make sure you buy a Nissan with a CVT. You deserve it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. I had a 2000 Lexus ES that made it to over 200K. I'm sure I could have nursed it along for another 50K, but it was too painful really? I had two Toyota 4Runners, a 96 and a 2000, neither one made it to 150K before they became too much trouble to keep running.

      How does that go? Oh yeah, YMMV

      And I like to think that I take care of my cars. Time will tell how the replacements hold up.

    9. Re:duh by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hondas are good, just avoid the Renaults sold as Japanese cars (Nissans). They're just as bad as the Fiats sold as Chryslers.

      My leaf SL is a fine car.
      The 350Z that preceded it was a fine car

      Bad ones I've had - Plymouth breeze: Just crap. Ford F350: a Dinosaur with a flaky FICM. Ford Ranger: At no point did everything work at the same time.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    10. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You don't know what you're talking about, your advocacy is worthless in every direction.

    11. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modern gm is better than modern ford. ford was good with their standard auto, the crappy DSG they put in the focus though was another story. in any case any modern american car will last for 100k , the issue is just that the interior falls apart and afterwards no guarentee unlike the japanese brands

    12. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t knock it until youâ(TM)ve tried it.

    13. Re:duh by jrumney · · Score: 1

      modern gm is better than modern ford.

      That's probably because modern GM is Daewoo. Ford ended their partnership with Mazda years ago.

    14. Re:duh by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      and my 1998 f150 has 330k miles -- whose anecdote wins here?

    15. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Nissan works great. Never had any problems with it.

    16. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With its battery replaced twice according to the same website.

    17. Re:duh by viperidaenz · · Score: 2, Informative

      And it's on it's 3rd battery, after only 3 years.

    18. Re: duh by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Was really disappointed this wasnt a link to the distance Musks Tesla that he shot into space has gone

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    19. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a mistake on Ford's part. The Gen 1 Fusion (Based partly on the Mazda 6 platform) is a great car.

    20. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My GM vehicles were pieces of shit. Although the engines held up, the trim, the window actuators, the seat adjusters, everything that wasn't part of the engine broke or fell apart. Except my Cadillac Catera. Even the engine fell apart in that after 18,000 miles.

    21. Re: duh by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Informative
      Googling-up Honda+defective+transmissions clearly exceeds to the capacity of your intellect. The sixth resultsixth result was more than relevant.

      Dumb, lazy fuck.

    22. Re:duh by dryeo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which is usually when the trannies go. I've got one with a 5 speed and 420,000 kms on it. I've also known of quite a few, including my last one that lost their capability to move at just under 300,000 kms due to tranny problems, and like so many modern cars, replacing the tranny is an unreasonably large job, as in the first step is remove cab.
      After driving Japanese trucks, having something that dies at 300,000 kms is quite a let down, and having worked on both, all I can say is "what the fuck were those Ford engineers smoking?".
      First F150 I owned kept blowing its brake light fuse, finally traced it down to the brake light wire running up the steering column, through the little u-joint, where turning the wheels rubbed the insulation off. Fixing that was fun, steps like remove the plug from this wiring harness, keeping track of which of the 20 odd wires went to which pin, then pull the wires through the column. Couldn't even wrap them all into one bundle either.

      Attempting to work on any new vehicle has become insane, between the computer buses being overloaded with stuff causing a bad radio to stop the vehicle running to spark plugs that need the engine pulled to replace or just read about the latest Toyota Truck where you had to remove the top of the engine to replace the starter. Even that F150 I had that lost its tranny, had the rear plugs so far under the cab that they were almost impossible to work on and you really needed a $500 tool around for when the plugs broke when removing (carbon with plugs longer then the threads).

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    23. Re:duh by dryeo · · Score: 1

      5 speed? That's what my '98 has, along with the V6 so avoiding the usual problems at 200,000 (actually 300,000 km here) of failing tranny and blown head gasket, besides the fun of doing a simple tuneup on the V8's (and plugs blowing out of the 5.4l). A few also came with the E104D or whatever the number was, tranny. That one would last forever if you stopped before putting it in reverse (adding the OD weakened the reverse).
      Also watch those brake lines, Ford uses crap metal in them, or did.
      The Japanese trucks I owned usually rusted out at about 400,000 kms.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    24. Re:duh by ISnortFatCashews · · Score: 0

      The article borders on racist and doesn't cover some of the things Honda has going it like a clean/pro-work culture and not having to deal with the UAW nearly as much as Ford/GM/Chrysler. Trump's tariffs effectively mean more money into the hands of UAW workers.

    25. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet
       

      Last year, Chevrolet sold 290,000 of them -- 100,000 fewer than the Toyota Camry.

      That's funny. I didn't know Chevrolet is in the business of selling Camries.

    26. Re:duh by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And really, if someone is going to buy a new Sedan, who wouldn't want to get a Japanese model or maybe a German one if you've got some extra cash? Of course, there are some die-hard buy-only-American fans but some of those foreign cars may have more US made parts than the Ford has. The US auto industry knows how to make big gas guzzlers, workhorse trucks that people buy to commute in, but they really do suck at making a good economy car.

    27. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miles towed doesn't count.

      Former Ford owner here.

    28. Re:duh by atherophage · · Score: 2

      Let us not forget newer players: The Koreans. My Korean built $9K 2005 Chevy Aveo is still going strong after 230K + miles. Always a delight, while in the Aveo, to follow a new-ish Cadillac or Lincoln, and just can't help but notice that fancy new car has a defective or dead tail light. Yes, small potatoes. but for a $60-$70-$80K vehicle one would expect the tail light to work... it's just that I see it all the time in rush hour traffic.

    29. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t knock it until youâ(TM)ve tried it.

      Oh look, someone who's tried Musk, Jobs and Cook cock

    30. Re:duh by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your average ICE doesn't even reach the distance that Tesla did one one battery without some very expensive maintenance, so waht are you moaning about?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    31. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: I was modded-down by either:

      A) A Honda shill.

      B) A borderline-illiterate twenty-something with a cardboard wing glued to the trunk and a Maxwell House coffee can soldered onto the end of the tailpipe...

      I actually modded you down because as I was scrolling through reading the comments, saw that you're being a dick and calling people names. I'll pretty much always mod down dick behavior. Don't be a cunt, don't get modded down. Life is that easy.

      And I'm not a twenty-something you little shit; respect the greybeards.

    32. Re:duh by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I loved my two Mazda MX5s, one NA in the UK and one NB in the US.
      I also liked, but didn't love the Subaru impreza, which came in handy when we were driving around some rougher terrain.

      My next car will probably be a Tesla once I've got sufficient wonga together.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    33. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed the light thing, too.

      I think I've replaced the headlight bulbs on my '05 Kia once in 13yrs/240,000 miles. The poor thing is showing its age with a bit of piston slap and a puff of smoke on startup, but I don't want to let it go.

      When the time comes I may just buy another engine and drop it in.

    34. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hondas are very good indeed. Especially in F1. Broke the idiotmeter a few times in the past decade.

    35. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why has Slashdot been beset by so many angry, barely-closeted gay America-haters? Surely they can't all work for Soros-funded NGO troll factories?!

    36. Re:duh by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      "Much of the analysis about Ford and GM's exit from the sedan market stressed that sedan sales have lost ground in recent years "as consumers have gravitated toward pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles," as the New York Times put it. If you look at the historical sales figures of the top Japanese sedans, you'll see a small decline in recent years, but nothing like the big drop-off in sales that have hammered the American companies. So in addition to the overall decline in sedan sales, there is a second, largely overlooked, dynamic taking place: Americans have only stopped buying American sedans, not Japanese sedans."

      I remember hearing the exact same thing just before the oil price jump from $40 to $80. Then it went over $100 a barrel. All of a sudden all the SUVs in the world wouldn't sell.

      Also GM are goddamned liars. If the wanted electrics and self-driving vehicles why did they remove those from production?

    37. Re: duh by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Virtually all cars have a defect at some time in their lives - google Ford+defective+transmissions and you get https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/0...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    38. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro you can't compare an electric car to a gasoline car. Gas cars will absolutely have more maintenance and in many cases big automakers put their best foot forward on new power train technology so reluctant customers don't get burned by a shit box and blame the new power train AND the brand.

    39. Re:duh by SDF-7 · · Score: 1

      2003 Monte Carlo SS -- 560,000 miles.

      Yadda yadda, plural of anecdote is not data, yadda.

    40. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, motor sport prowess and road car decency rarely correlate.

    41. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why care about modding? its not preventing you from communicating your opinion.

    42. Re:duh by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      Didn't Honda settle a claim that it built over a million cars with oil consumption problems?

      My take is mostly that the Japanese cars were vastly superior to Americans in reliability up to maybe the early 2000s when the American brands mostly recovered through revised engines, power trains and basic quality control.

      I think a big problem for American car brands isn't the engineering or build quality per se, it's the business culture of Big 3 car dealers. Japanese cars seemed to have much more streamlined trim lines which made the buying process better (and probably contributed to reliability, too). American car dealers liked complex trim lines and options because it enables a ton of pricing confusion and dealer-installation profit opportunities.

      Not that Japanese car dealers don't have sleaze opportunities, too -- most are owned by regional dealership groups which sell all major brands -- but I think the influence of their parent companies made for less general business-as-usual.

    43. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important thing about Renault-Nissan is that they did not inherent any of Renault's terrible engineering. Still using the good ole VQ engines that have powered nearly every V6 Nissan for the past 20+ years.

    44. Re: duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, No.

      I had one of those Odysseys with the defective transmissions. Honda knew there was a problem. Even with the problems, I put 200,000 miles on that car. It was on transmission number 5 when I traded it in (yes 5). I paid for half of one transmission in all of that time. Honda paid for the rest. They even paid for rental cars.

      On the other hand, I had a Chrysler with a bad transmission and they wouldn't pay squat.

      I would definitely buy another Honda. I will never buy another Chrysler product.

    45. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is wrong, there are a lot of old American vehicles around with 200+ miles on them. Old Jeeps and other trucks, Crown Vics, etc. without all the electronics.

    46. Re:duh by NathanWoodruff · · Score: 0

      My 2000 Ford Ranger 3.0L manual transmission will this week turn over 330,000 miles on the original engine. I've replaced the clutch twice and the transmission once at 173 miles short of 300,000 miles, doing it myself.

      I purchased a replacement 3.0L engine out of a 2003 Taurus with less than 30,000 miles for my Ranger when it rolled past 140,000 miles thinking that the 3.0L wouldn't make it to 150,000 miles.

      To my surprise, the Ranger is still rolling fine even this morning on the original engine. I've only replaced the water pump, timing chain, radiator and spark plugs on this vehicle, for engine parts too.

      If you take care of a vehicle, it will take care of you.

    47. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fiction.

    48. Re:duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Either reading comprehension or troll
      You left out the sentence before stating that the best selling American-made SUV is the Chevy Equinox. That's what the "290,000 of them" refers to.

    49. Re:duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      My Honda only lasted 240,000 miles.
      Donated it to the community college auto shop class rather than putting money into figuring out why it kept losing steering fluid and why the battery kept draining. (Electrical problems have been the hardest to figure out, in my experience.)

    50. Re:duh by bobby · · Score: 1

      Battery life is mostly to do with charge-discharge cycles.

      Also, please read TFA- battery was replaced under warranty:

      The Model S has had its high voltage battery replaced twice under warranty at 194,000 and 324,000 miles. Battery degradation over the course of the first 194,000 miles was ~6% with multiple supercharges a day to 95-100%, instead of the recommended 90-95%. Between 194,000 and 324,000 miles Tesloop experienced battery degradation of ~22% (see below for details).

      It goes on to say there have been software updates which corrected some battery (life) problems.

    51. Re: duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      A software problem that was fixed for free in my wife's Honda Odyssey and never caused us a transmission problem for 240,000 miles.
      Compared to the Dodge Caravan which needed a transmission work just before the 70,000 mile warranty was up, but the dealer insisted it didn't. Then it utterly failed just after 70,000 miles, and the dealer insisted it wasn't under warranty. And then the transmission needed to be replaced / repaired a couple more times before we got rid of that minivan at 120,000 miles when it started to give us transmission trouble once again.

    52. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just sold my '82 Mercedes 240D with 573K on it to a fellow mechanic for $3000. It's was getting a little hard to start, probably needs a set of glow plugs.
      Used the cash for a down payment on a new F150. Got to tow a TT around the country . At least it's got the V8 and not an ecotrash engine.

    53. Re:duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      My take is mostly that the Japanese cars were vastly superior to Americans in reliability up to maybe the early 2000s

      My take on it is that the Japanese case were vastly inferior to American cars until up to maybe the '80s.

    54. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ironic thing is that GM imports Chinese made cars under the Buick and Cadillac badges. I wonder if this "functionality" for the Chinese government is still turned on for the cars in the US.

    55. Re:duh by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      yeah, 5 speed manual (triton v8)
      it's not the most aesthetically pleasing vehicle, but it's a great work truck.

      thanks for the tip on the brake line, heh Coincidentally my '14 fusion had a brake line fail just this past summer.

    56. Re: duh by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I can picture Elon sending out a SpaceX Falcon to go change the battery in that Tesla.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    57. Re:duh by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Not true. My old work car (a 2005 Impala) hit over 240k before they semi-retired it as a pool car, and it's still road-worthy.
      Oddly though I think the 2005 Impala models were better built than the 2009 models.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    58. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a coworker with a Saturn that has 356,000 on it and still running well.

    59. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, AC is right. That sentence is written POORLY. There is a difference between "well, you know what they mean" and actually having written something correctly. This is the kind of stuff that used to be taught in elementary school.

    60. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wife's GMC Jimmy currently at 360k and going strong. Not sure why so many idiots think American cars don't last. My Oldes Cutlass is past 200k and also going strong.

    61. Re:duh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Hondas are good, just avoid the Renaults sold as Japanese cars (Nissans). They're just as bad as the Fiats sold as Chryslers.

      A comment brought to you from the 80s. Honestly right now you'd be insane to take many German or Japanese cars over Renault. ... Fiats are still a piece of shit though, and Toyotas will forever be the untouchable kings.

    62. Re:duh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And it's on it's 3rd battery, after only 3 years.

      Yes it was, let's look into it shall we:

      Multiple supercharges per day over the course of its life.
      First battery replaced under warranty when it was ONLY 6% degraded. But the warranty says at 200000 miles it should be less than 5%
      The second battery, replaced under warranty due to a battery fault at 324044 miles.

      If you can get to that mileage without spending a metric shit-ton on maintenance to say nothing of getting stuff replaced under warranty then you must be the world's greatest bullshit artist. And that's before we consider testing if your ICE car is capable of being within 5% of it's original mileage after it has that many miles on it.

    63. Re:duh by Bitbeard · · Score: 1

      I do all scheduled maintenance on my cars. But within 4 years, I had $4,000+ in major unantipated repairs on my new Honda Accord. My new Dodge Charger is under $500 for the same time period. And it has heated and cooled cup holders.

    64. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple supercharges per day over the course of its life.

      It's just too bad Tesla banned commercial operators from using the superchargers since Dec/2017.
      Good on founders Rahul Sonnad & teenage son Haydn Sonnad for persevering through a whole year taking the sting of Elon's 3" meat stick in the ass...just like yourself thegarbz!

      The service record tires replacement indicated tires lasting:
      51,000 miles($194)
      24,135 miles($513)
      20,107 miles($388)
      31,177 miles($389)
      33,229 miles($389)
      71,898 miles($334)
      47,189 miles($666)
      84,086 miles($362)
      23,204 miles($781)

      Any of those 51,000/71,898/47,189/84,086miles tire longevity look authentic to anybody?
      Last time I checked, standard 90D(or is it 85D...both model appear on their propaganda...sorry I mean article) tires (P245/45R19) were ~$200...each (a lot more if they ran 20" or 21").
      Just curious how father/son act Rahul/Haydn were able to....well there's no good word for it, but STEAL tires at 50-75% off retail price?

    65. Re:duh by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Expensive DRIVETRAIN maintenance EVERY YEAR??? What horrific turds have you bought (new) to give you that absurd idea? I've been a mechanic since the late 1970s would love to know the basis for your comment, because either you're a statistical outlier or clueless.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    66. Re:duh by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So because a manufacturer chooses to spend more money on warranty parts than they received in the original transaction, that makes the product more reliable?

    67. Re:duh by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Courier drivers would have something to say about that.

      Your average CAR doesn't drive 130,000 miles per year. People who do drive that far, with regular servicing, achieve similar mileage.

    68. Re: duh by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      are they gay or do they hate gay America?

      --
      bickerdyke
  2. US companies are like France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US companies are like France. When it gets hard they either surrender or run.

    1. Re: US companies are like France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, this is very true. US companies are in a race to the bottom, run by people that don't know anything searching for labor and customers that don't know anything. That's why even the smallest speed bump wrecks them.

      I do my best to buy American cars, coming from a family involved in both the steel and auto industries, but it's very difficult with the willfully limited choices. No Monte Carlo, no Pontiac, no small trucks, WTF is left? Shitty Mexican econo-blobs and $50K trucks bigger than my garage. Well, fuck you, Dad's retired and my uncle's deceased, so I guess my next car will be a Mazda or something.

    2. Re: US companies are like France by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Since everyone is sharing stories..

      Back in 2006 i got a mazda 6, and in 2007 we needed another car. I wanted my GF to get a mazda CX9. She didnt want to drive a japanese car (She's chinese) and went with a chevy uplander. Lets fastforward a number of years.

      Repairs done to the mazda:
      Brakes
      Tires

      Repairs done to the Uplander
      Hub Bearings (3 or 4, i forget).
      Brakes
      tires
      battery
      Traction control almost never works (the wire connecdting the speed sensor keeps getting ripped out??).

      I got rid of the uplander a few months ago as the power stearing pump was failing. Mazda, still runs fine...
      GF now drives a lexus GX 460, i drive a Hyundai Elantra, kids still drive the mazda 6.

      point of the story - I have a huge regret buying that turd of an uplander.

    3. Re: US companies are like France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for Fs sake. The US is the second largest manufacturer in the world. It has 1/4 the work force of #1 (China). Our unemployment rate is well below 10%, a luxury most countries don't have.

      You want to support American, buy Honda! Hondas are more American than any car manufacturer. There are more Hondas in the top 10 American than any other manufacturer. Jeep, Honda, Honda, Ford....

    4. Re: US companies are like France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did the right thing. Always let the lady get her pick. If you had picked the car and something went wrong, life wouldn't be worth living.

    5. Re: US companies are like France by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      I wanted my GF to get a mazda CX9. She didnt want to drive a japanese car (She's chinese) and went with a chevy uplander.

      [...]

      point of the story - I have a huge regret buying that turd of an uplander.

      Did you buy it or did she buy it? When I bought my wife a car I didn't ask her detailed opinion first - it's my money, my car, my responsibility. She got to say what type of car she wanted (hatchback, SUV, whatever) but not which brand or which model.

      of course, when she bought her own car she had full and complete autonomy to spend her money as she saw fit but she *still* asked me things like "Is this a reliable brand? Is this expensive to maintain", etc.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  3. That's a bit of an exageration by toadlife · · Score: 1

    American cars are generally very reliable, but not as reliable as Japanese and Korean makes.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    1. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other reasons as well. My father was interested in buying a Toyota or Honda sedan, but he was too tall to fit in their cars. He ended up buying a Ford Taurus. (Ford might the only American brand worth buying, but I don't have much experience.)

    2. Re: That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, they're not when compared to the competition.

    3. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      When Japan made cheap junk they came up with a plan to "Rule the world" (of business). They imported the tech and business methods from those who had it, and slowly learned how to be good. The only thing preventing American car companies from following this path is they want to offshore the factories.

    4. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a long time Ford owner, and short time Buick owner, I can say the lack of attention to detail is also an issue. I finally got sick of the reliability and overall quality issues after a quarter of a century and bought a Toyota this year. I sometimes wonder if the people who actually design Fords even drive them.

    5. Re: That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of those people was Edward Deming who the US manufacturers laughed out but Japanese ended up proving his theory true.

    6. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For 2018, Taurus has 39 inches front head room compared to 38.3 for Camry and 37.5 for Accord.

      Front leg room, Taurus 41.9 inches compared to 42.1 for Camry and 42.3 for Accord.

      Your father just needed to slouch down a little.

    7. Re: That's a bit of an exageration by longbot · · Score: 1

      Why would they? They can afford to drive cars that are actually good.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    8. Re: That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Test drove a buick encore, made in korea. I was seriously impressed. Is a long way from the hyundai of the 80s and 90s...

    9. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      The Japanese/Koreans learnt how to make good vehicles and they still keep improving them whereas GM/Ford seem to have adopted the " this'll do " attitude and rested on their laurels. Trump doesn't help by reducing the fuel consumption targets which helps them stop innovating. They are going to struggle as EV trucks come to the market in the next few years. Tesla is developing pickups as is Rivian, Workhorse, Bollinger. Innovate or die.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    10. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would Ford or GM innovate when they can rely on fat truck sales margins where foreign products are operating at a 25% disadvantage. The fact is that Ford and GM aren't producing competitive cars because the US government created the laws and taxes to make sure they don't ever have to. It should have been no surprise to anyone paying attention that GM came looking for handouts last time because they cut car production right before the great recession and now history is repeating itself because theft without consequences is always the best financial plan unless you make it illegal. Now that the GOP is back in power they know they can do what ever they want while the republican's look the other way and that means we'll be bailing GM out again proving what is good for GM's board members isn't good for GM or the USA.

    11. Re: That's a bit of an exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to say you are a liar, but how tall is he and did he really test drive or did he just assume it was too small? I am 6' 2" and drive a Honda fit and have had friends claim they were too tall, but then when challenged they said my car was comfortable. One even ended up buying a Fit after trying mine. He is 6' 4".

  4. Japan still HAS car companies. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ford, GM and Chrysler haven't given a shit about selling cars since the 1960s. As far as they're concerned, the car is just a tool for selling you a loan.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re: Japan still HAS car companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why I buy all my cars with pennies.

    2. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so true. I heard an advert for Chevy trucks today (local dealer radio ad, but it described a Chevy/GM factory deal): Basically $10k "off" MSRP for a full size 1/2 ton truck (of course, the one with the options, so that trim package is well over $40k MSRP, so the discount brings it closer to what I consider the realm of what might be reasonable). The caveat: "You must finance with GM financial". Of course, at their rates which are well above what the local credit unions charge, and no doubt plenty of the uneducated crowd who buy their trucks will be suckered to sign to a long term (yes, 84 month now!) loan ensures they make most of that back.

      A scumbaggy, shady, wheeler-dealer move IMO. When gas is $5 a gallon and people stop buying those SUVs and trucks, I will be crying a deep river for GM and the others as they suffer the inevitable fate. So hard to believe they didn't learn when this basically happened to them in 2008.

    3. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Tuqui · · Score: 2

      The most insightful comment this year

    4. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I remember back then, the last time gas prices ramped up. The used-car lots around town started to be used-truck lots, bursting with big, heavy trucks and SUV's. I thought then that if I was going to buy a pickup, that would be a good time -- but who needs to own a pickup, other than people pulling boats and trailers around every weekend? I can rent one any time I need it for hauling. The mileage failings are just not worth it.

    5. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you laugh but my friend got a fully loaded hummer H2 this way because no one could afford it. the model he got gets 17mpg, the average most suv's today gets. he barely drives it but he got it almost 50% off kbb

    6. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The caveat: "You must finance with GM financial". Of course, at their rates which are well above what the local credit unions charge, and no doubt plenty of the uneducated crowd who buy their trucks will be suckered to sign to a long term (yes, 84 month now!) loan ensures they make most of that back.

      The leases are where they make a killing. Now over a quarter of new vehicles are lease.

      That is financial insanity. Yeah, there are a few people who own their business and it makes some kind of legit tax sense to lease the vehicle, but that cannot be more than 5% of the populace.

    7. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I once walked out on a dealer because every time I tried to negotiate the price, he talked about monthly payments. The only time I've financed a car through a dealer is when the interest rate offered was less than inflation.

    8. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with US company cars as compared to those from other nations. GM in particular makes a lot of reliable and good vehicles. FWIW, I would take a US company car over **anything** coming out of Europe as a daily. Overall the Japanese cars are on-average arguably more reliable but they are only "supreme" relative to US carmarkers for a very specific buyer: those for whom cars are strictly about utility and convenience.

      Broadly,

      Japanese cars: "All I care about is going to work, getting groceries, and hailing kids." Lexus has some exceptions.

      American cars: "I'm willing to pay more for some swagger and/or some fun and I'll at least tell myself it's ok to be a bit less reliable as I can do some maintenance myself." Often buyers over-estimate the amount of maintenance they can/will do.

      Euros: Mostly about status. I'm not going to hold the manufacturer to any implied contract of engineering quality, reliability, or re-sale value. It better f-ng look nice though!

    9. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >_ As far as they're concerned, the car is just a tool for selling you a loan.

      I wonder if that's the case for all of them. I'd say GM makes good cars and Ford, first and foremost, has some very interesting offers which aim at pleasing the buyer to a higher degree (this can be seen from their color palette, for instance -- at least in my country).

      And the problem is the same with VW. I lost the count of how many times I went to a car dealer asking for their cars, but their line is quite monotonous and every one of their cars is overpriced. At least they don't charge for entrance... for the moment!

      I just don't buy any American car (and other high-cost products, BTW) for political reasons (since Iraq to be precise -- and I don't even have any Arab relative). But my family buys GM because of the very satisfactory experience I had once.

      About Japanese cars: I'm fed up with Honda's prices. I feel like an idiot just by thinking of acquiring a Honda; I'm scared of how I'd feel after the purchase -- even if the car is great. Toyota over here is more or less the same, but they managed to create a more inexpensive alternative. ...which after a few years has become very expensive, too... what are these guys thinking?

      I tried a Chinese car (can you believe it?) and it was not bad at all. I expected something rated like 5 out of 10, but it was more like 8/10. "Much better than expected."

      The problem is that they think just about selling a car, when we buyers need a support system to keep it working. There was simply no one backing the multi-year warranty they promised. Superfluous items like decorations broke and would never be replaced -- I had to wait some 8 months for one of them. Then I thought: "what if the motor breaks?" "Am I gonna use it as another room in my house?" Moral of the story: another Chinese car will be bought after everyone swears they're good and written documentation about good support becomes a reality.

      I'm going back to French cars. Their design has been excellent, quality is on par with American (if not better) and even if VW is mechanically better, they're ugly and expensive -- two undesired things in cars.

  5. Believe it or not, have had excellent luck with Mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on my third one, a 2013 200 Limited @ 74k miles. Bought with just 25 miles.

    Had a 2004 Dodge Intrepid before that, bought with 60k miles, sold @ 150k. No problems other than with the right rear window regulator.

    First car was a 1997 Chrysler Concorde, bought with 45k miles, totalled at 110k due to being sideswiped. No problems from that car too.

    Just oil changes, tires, brakes, batteries, bulbs and wiper blades, plus the occasional coolant flush and trans drain and fill. All my Chryslers were just as reliable as Honda/Toyota.

  6. Business opportunity... by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once the US automakers have all gone belly-up, someone should buy the rights to their body designs at the bankruptcy auction, and sell vehicles with modern drive trains that look like the classic American designs.

    I'd buy a carbon-fiber version of a 1970 fastback Mustang in a heartbeat. I'm sure plenty of people would go for a '57 Chevy or a '69 Corvette stingray, too.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re: Business opportunity... by chispito · · Score: 1

      They would be huge with no corresponding benefit. At least the smaller cars from today are easier to park.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re: Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t call him that. He only has an Ed.D

    3. Re:Business opportunity... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I said I'd buy one, not build one. Do try to keep up, will you?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the 1978 Ford Granada. That was a beaut.... :-\

    5. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, you can buy kit cars now, Einstein, already built. They exist. You have an idea and you're so old and full of yourself you think you must have had it first, and be generously guiding the internet or something. Clue in genius.

    6. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 1970 fastback Mustang

      Yeah, good luck selling a car with a hood that cuts pedestrians in half these days...

    7. Re:Business opportunity... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I like your idea.

      Look at recent trends for TV reboots like Magnum, PI, Hawaii 5-0, Murphy Brown ...

      Look at the record players (Bluetooth for crying out loud) and the booming vinyl business.

      I'd go for a vintage reboot of Mustang, Impala, Cougar XR7, etc.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a sweet modern blue Camaro today. I thought, if they could make that thing 3000 pounds with electric drive, I'd be mighty interested. As it is now .... no. Not even a little bit.

    9. Re:Business opportunity... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Good idea. I'd happily drive an electric carbon-fiber Charger.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    10. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm, I googled "electric mustang kit car" and got nada. You are thinking maybe he be fine with just ANY car from the 1970's?
      Sure, one can buy kit cars. One can even buy electric cars as kits, and I'm sure there are builders who would put one together for a price.
      I think jcr.mac was thinking of something more specific.

    11. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the designs are outdated. Front bumpers have to be below knee level, encase of pedestrian collision. Also 1 in 8, on the road, will be involved in an accident this year.

    12. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This exists already: https://revologycars.com/

    13. Re: Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The butthurt is strong with this one.

    14. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. I sometimes get nostalgic about my late 1980 VW Golf S. That was a first-generation model, the one sold as the Rabbit in the U.S. That was a fun car to drive, and it looked very elegant.

      I wouldn't drive one now, though, even with 21st century technology under the hood. It's that good-looking body that's that problem: the aerodynamics are terrible. With a Cw of 0.4, that car belongs in a museum, not on the road, and the same is true for most designs until at least the mid-'80s.

    15. Re: Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that, but a 2018 Corolla is only about a foot shorter now than my 70s S-Class Mercedes. An Accord is the same size. They aren't really smaller. Lighter, for sure, but not smaller.

    16. Re:Business opportunity... by kackle · · Score: 1

      You can't. Why? Because the MPG laws today won't allow such sizes; that's why we're stuck with mostly "bubble cars" today.

    17. Re:Business opportunity... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One can even buy electric cars as kits, and I'm sure there are builders who would put one together for a price.
      I think jcr.mac was thinking of something more specific.

      No doubt he was thinking of buying a supported vehicle with a warranty, a service manual, and parts availability.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Business opportunity... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, the designs are outdated. Front bumpers have to be below knee level, encase of pedestrian collision. Also 1 in 8, on the road, will be involved in an accident this year.

      Good work, AC. This is the reason this can't happen. You can have kit cars based on outdated designs and as long as you do some token amount of the assembly work you can register it as a custom vehicle under federal regs. It has to pass emissions testing wherever you register it, but it tests as the donor vehicle so if you put an old motor in it and top it off with your choice of modern fuel injection system you can have no emissions system whatsoever beyond the O2 sensor. But a car sold in volume has to pass all kinds of modern regulations about bumper height, rear deck height, hood crumple area, side rear view mirror breakaway and the like which didn't exist back when those cars were born. The modern shapes of vehicles like the Mustang and Camaro are best-effort attempts to recreate the old body styles while conforming to modern safety (and efficiency) regulations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sign me up for a late 60's lincoln continental! suicide doors and all, with all of that space for a YUGE! battery.

    20. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can already buy licensed steel bodies for many of those popular designs, and many companies will build you a "new" '65 Mustang.

    21. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't. Why? Because the MPG laws today won't allow such sizes; that's why we're stuck with mostly "bubble cars" today.

      Wrong.

      CAFE standards do not disallow design, CAFE promotes fuel efficiency often gained by wind tunnel studies, component weight, etc. Wind tunnel results = just about the same engineering (design) from most, if not all, manufacturers, thus "bubble cars" from all. For some car companies it is just a game .... build enough to satisfy the regs and then sell the hell outta of SUVs. It is what we want after all, right?

      Given that the point of this thread is electric cars, then it is entirely possible that larger "vintage" designs could flourish and meet CAFE standards.

    22. Re:Business opportunity... by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Good idea. I'd happily drive an electric carbon-fiber Charger.

      I see what you did there

    23. Re:Business opportunity... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'm glad someone did :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    24. Re: Business opportunity... by toddestan · · Score: 2

      Not really. Go find a picture of any of the current "retro" muscle cars parked next to one of the original classics - the new models are comically huge in comparison. They don't look big to our modern eyes because everything else has grown in size so much. Even a lot of the land barges from the 1970's aren't even as large compared to modern cars. They may be a bit longer, but the modern car is just as wide and much taller, and weighs more too.

      It's not just the Americans either. The largest Honda from 40 years ago (the Accord Wagon) is smaller than the smallest Honda today (the Fit) in every dimension.

    25. Re:Business opportunity... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      This is possible for classics that have such a huge following and aftermarket support that you can literally buy new aftermarket parts for literally every piece of the car and it's just a matter of putting it all together. The problem is, of course, making it legal to drive on the roads since you don't have a VIN or title.

    26. Re:Business opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would have do it at a scale that the cars didn't need to be crash tested. Compare the waistline of a 60's Camaro to the current Camaro. The difference is not because of aesthetics.

  7. Different story in 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Odd, they don't show the declines for Toyota & Honda sedans each month in 2018 (so far). Seems to have mysteriously ignored that data.

    1. Re: Different story in 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When gas is cheap americans stupidly buy SUVs and trucks. When 2008 crash hit they "learned", but obviously not.

  8. Trump explained it in a tweet by melted · · Score: 0

    Thereâ(TM)s a hefty import tariff on trucks: https://mobile.twitter.com/rea.... A lot of Japanese companies are more American in fact than âoeAmericanâ ones if you consider where they manufacture their cars. Quite often âoeAmericanâ cars are manufactured in Mexico.

    1. Re:Trump explained it in a tweet by tepples · · Score: 1

      The "chicken tax" to which President Trump refers in that Tweet is a remnant of retaliation against hysteria in 1960s Europe about factory farming.

    2. Re:Trump explained it in a tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get over "da boarder, did you??

    3. Re:Trump explained it in a tweet by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Surprise!

      The refinery complex down in Port Arthur, Texas? Owned by Saudi Arabia.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Trump explained it in a tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "hysteria" was justified. Just like we don't like GMO food products, not even for animal feed.

  9. American, if only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These American brands are so full of foreign parts that I stopped caring about "Buying American" as the foreign brands are often more American than the native labels. Then it's just about who is raking in the money at the top, and I don't care about that.

    1. Re:American, if only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. Which is "more American", a Ford assembled in Mexico with parts from all over the world, or a Honda assembled in Ohio with parts from all over the world?

    2. Re:American, if only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't car if the cars themselves are American-designed (or the company is American run), but trade abhors a vacuum, so at least some of the work needs to be done in the U.S. Japanese automakers have opened plants in the US, so it's not the worst thing in the world (thought it would be better if more of the supply chain were in the U.S.).

      Contrast this with China whose trade policies are completely one sided and mercantile. On top of that, they're going to try to take Taiwan and some other islands one of these days.

  10. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are both delusional.

  11. It's all because of the metric system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame the demise of the American car companies on the metric system. Once the world went metric, American companies were left in a bind. On the one hand, they wanted to stay on American standards, but then third party components only come in metric, forcing them to make vehicles that incorporate mostly American standard nuts and bolts, but with the occassional metric one thrown in here and there just to make life miserable for people trying to actually work on their vehicle. Eventually, people got sick and tired of this and decided to always buy Japanese or European cars in the future because then you'd be 100% certain that EVERYTHING is metric and thus only have to lug around one set of METRIC tools instead of carrying around two sets of everything for no good reason.

    1. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      Is that you, Sarah Huckabee?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by dk20 · · Score: 1

      what about japanese cars made in the USA?

    3. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      First time I've heard someone claim that new car buyers are concerned about having to buy two sets of spanners to work on their car.

    4. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I doubt enough people work on their own cars to affect sales in that way.

    5. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Friend of mine has a '87 Nissan truck, one of the first built in the USA. It's all metric accepting perhaps the wheel lug nuts. At that, my '98 Ford seems to be all metric accepting once again, the wheel nuts.
      Still the Americans screw it up, my Japanese trucks only used a few common sizes, 8,10,12,14,17,19mm basically covered most everything. My Ford uses, 7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,18 at least. Some of these sizes I didn't even own such as the 16 which wasn't in many sets.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      I had an 80s chevrolet and what was the most used socket? 10mm. Like every other car.

      You don't know what you are talking about. All cars have been metric for a while, and even a basic 30$ socket set has sae and metric for the odd sae time.

      I have a kia and i love it. So much leg room which is kind of unexpected, but it had more leg room than any american car in the same segment i sat in. And reliability and performance are excellent.

      --
      -
    7. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I had an 80s chevrolet and what was the most used socket? 10mm. Like every other car.

      In the 80s Chevrolet was using basically every goddamned drive for fasteners that mankind has envisioned. Powertrain components were overwhelmingly SAE, but the bodies were generally metric. Screws were a mix of philips, torx, hex, and even so help me god clutch-tip screws. What a bunch of wankers.

      On the other hand, I doubt a statistically significant number of people refused to buy American because they might need more tools. Almost nobody works on their own cars. More people did it in the 80s, but it was pretty well dead already by then.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Meh by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given how the modern automotive industry works, I'm not sure if it matters. Japan manufacturers a lot of the cars that it sells in the U.S., in the U.S. so I don't think there's much worry over jobs being lost. Also, all of the Japanese companies are publicly traded, with a few of the largest shareholders being American companies, American banks, or other foreign firms that are in turn partially owned by Americans. If it gets American companies to invest in electric vehicles in the hope of regaining market share, I don't see how anyone could really complain.

  13. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    He knows that. He doesn't care. He just copy and pastes what they pay him to. Don't confuse this guy for a US citizen so angry and dedicated that he simply can't help but troll every single article with off-topic drivel. He's just another paid Russian troll. Over there, they're just called "human bots." But it's actually cheaper than writing software to do this. How this helps the Russians exactly is unclear to me, unless they just pettily see making both sides angrier as a goal in and of itself, like some old 90's era internet meme about the Satanic Bavarian Illuminati playing both the winning and losing side so that no matter which side wins they win.

  14. What's the deal with trucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90% of the country lives in an urban environment and work at white color jobs. What a bunch a phonies.

    1. Re:What's the deal with trucks? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Brother-in-law lives and works in the city. So he bought a sedan. Sorry state of city streets has messed up his car's suspension several times in the past decade. He keeps looking at my 40 year old Landcruiser (no mechanical problems), thinking about what he should by next.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:What's the deal with trucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what i wonder aswell. Why do they keep buying trucks, when 99% of them never really need one. If you want space then SUV, but many would be fine with a station wagon. If you need to get bigger stuff moved, get a trailer with the station wagon.

    3. Re:What's the deal with trucks? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      He keeps looking at my 40 year old Landcruiser (no mechanical problems), thinking about what he should by next.

      Probably not one of those, in case he has a problem with it. Definitely something with AWD, lots of sidewall, and fully independent suspension. I'd go for a Subaru with steelies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    cars.

    Rust was the worst issue, but when Japanese and Korean cars started flooding the market for less money and lasting about 30-50% better (in terms of mileage and gas economy)
    it seemed to be a wake-up call for US car makers. This was hubris on the part of Ford, Chevrolet, Chrysler... They had their cheaply manufactured, planned obsolescence system and they were going to stick with it.

    I'm guessing at this point, more US vehicles are produced in Canada and places like the Toyota factory in South Carolina build more vehicles than Detroit.

    New technology (self driving cars, electric cars...) eventually mean that people don't need to buy a vehicle unless it's for work. Need a ride someplace, just order a car...

    1. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by nwf · · Score: 1

      Many non-American brands make vehicles in the US, e.g. Honda, BMW, Toyota, etc. For SUVs they can get around some tariffs by doing so, plus it costs more to ship huge SUVs across the Pacific. I just got an Acura SUV that was made in Ohio.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Xylantiel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this is why tariffs are mostly bad. Frequently foreign competition wins because it is making a BETTER PRODUCT. This means by slapping a tariff on it you are hurting the competitiveness of all users of that product to reward the poor management of those that make it domestically. Sounds a lot like the government choosing winners, and particularly bad because it only works by artificially turning losers into winners. This is a long way of saying that protectionist trade policy is nearly always, in the end, self-defeating. There are reasonable interim measures to prevent dumping and market shocks (including the labor market), but straight up protectionism is basically a bad idea from an economic and security standpoint. We want interdependent economies because they increase efficiency, prevent wars, and make the world more equal.

    3. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, and it proves that American workers can make good cars for a reasonable price, but they're generally not union workers.

      That's the story behind Detroit's problems that nobody wants to admit -- union workers making tons of money, union workers hard to fire for substandard work, and a shitload of substandard work.

      Want to buy a good American-made car? Come to Alabama; we make thousands of them. And before somebody says something about the workers making low wages here, they need to talk to those happy workers.

    4. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Toyota factory in South Carolina)

      Sorry, we (South Carolina) do NOT have a Toyota car factory here that I know of, Toyota makes their cars in Texas I believe . We DO have BMW and Volvo. Just saying. Regards.

    5. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      It was a one-way street. Japanese could sell their cars in America, but Americans were blocked - by tariffs - from selling in Japan. How could there have been any other outcome? It was unfair from the beginning.

      Tariffs - great for every other country but America, but God forbid if we want to protect our workers by raising the cost of foreign goods. It's just bizarre how these tariffs work spectacularly well for Japan, Germany, China, Canada, etc.

      Import tariffs are necessary to protect US quality of life. Our minimum wage and other worker protections make us fundamentally noncompetitive with countries that can exploit slave labor (or something close). Without trade protections, either our workers have to work for peanuts, or our economy will eventually tank. Import tariffs (and the related topic of export subsidies) generally protect our comparatively strong social policy.

      Now riddle me this: If global warming is such an existential threat that we need need to get as much clean energy online as quickly as possible, why did the Obama administration put steep tariffs on Chinese solar panels?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re: the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be willing to bet in a decade or so, Ford will start making small cars again......At a nonunion plant in Alabama.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re: the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a lively UK TV car show called Top Gear which has quite a following. When they want to do something for laughs, they road test a US designed-and-made vehicle.

    8. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Chinese government was illegally supporting the solar panel manufacturers, allowing them to undercut US manufactured panels. It wasn't a free market.

    9. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep spouting that neoliberal mantra, maybe that'll make it true someday!

      Free trade provides a temporary benefit at a severe long term cost.

    10. Re: the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn skippy. Nothing like working for slave wages (even with several years of experience), working shit hours, and knowing there is no advancement unless you speak Korean. I would get another job but I have a couple months left on my relocation deal. I am already looking to get out of automotive. (85% of the elantra, sonata and Santa fe come out of my plant and I am the quality engineer for most of it)

    11. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 2

      And this is why tariffs are mostly bad. Frequently foreign competition wins because it is making a BETTER PRODUCT. This means by slapping a tariff on it you are hurting the competitiveness of all users of that product to reward the poor management of those that make it domestically.

      Somehow lost in the debate is that before the income tax tariffs were a key, maybe even primary, form of paying for government. If the tariff debate were re-framed as applying to all imported goods (no exceptions!!) and the income tax being abolished for example that would be a great trade that most people could get behind.

      We want interdependent economies because they increase efficiency, prevent wars, and make the world more equal.

      That was the thinking behind the world not having WW1. It wasn't true then and still isn't true now.

    12. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why tariffs are mostly bad. Frequently foreign competition wins because it is making a BETTER PRODUCT. This means by slapping a tariff on it you are hurting the competitiveness of all users of that product to reward the poor management of those that make it domestically.

      Ha. Do you know which company currently is the #1 car exporter from the USA? BMW. They make lots of cars in Spartanburg, South Carolina, and ship them everywhere.

      Of course, with Trump's tariffs and other countries counter-tarifs, building cars in the USA for export to other countries is much more expensive. I'm sure many US jobs will be lost.

    13. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We (the US) don't sell cars in Japan because we make large vehicles compared to what they buy and use in Japan. While tariffs exist, they are the last reason that American cars don't sell in Japan. Same goes for most of Europe as well.

      The US brands sell plenty of cars in China, and are profiting from it. The difference is to operate there, they have to work with a local company. Is it fair? The corporations think so or they wouldn't be there.

      Source for Obama putting the tariffs on the solar panels? As I recall, it was one of Trumps first initiatives.

    14. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just bizarre how these tariffs work spectacularly well for Japan, Germany, China, Canada, etc.
      [snip]
      Our minimum wage and other worker protections make us fundamentally noncompetitive with countries that can exploit slave labor (or something close).

      I really doubt Japan, Germany & Canada have slave labor (or something close).

      Further, the cost of labor as a percentage of total car cost isn't that big. Even if you reduce your labor costs by 70% the total cost doesn't drop that much.

      Import tariffs (and the related topic of export subsidies) generally protect our comparatively strong social policy.

      I doubt people from Japan, Germany & Canada would say the USA has a strong social policy.

      Further, import tariffs protect some industries at the expense of others. Take steel as an example. If you have big tariffs on steel, you raise steel prices which does help US steel producers. However, increased steel prices are bad for US steel consumers (which includes the auto industry).

      And US steel consumers employ far, far more people than US steel producers (approximately 70 to 1).

      So, if you are going to favor one industry over the other, which one should you choose? (clearly, the industry that pays the biggest bribes. Or makes bigger campaign contributions.)

      Further, Trump has classified Canadian steel as a national security threat, in the same category as Iran:

      https://www.wgrz.com/article/n...

      https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/0...

      1. That's pathetic. Canada is like Iran? Seriously?
      2. That's insulting. How many Canadians have fought & died side-by-side with Americans in WWI, WWII, Afghanistan and many others?
      3. Canada is a large country with a small population and a small military. A US invasion would be over in about a week.

    15. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Zuato · · Score: 1

      American companies could sell their cars in Japan, but tariffs were the last of the reasons they never took off there. Look at the cars sold there compared to here - they require considerably smaller cars for their cities and roads than we do. Same goes for a lot of areas in Europe. US cars are gigantic compared to most cars sold in Europe and Japan.

      China is a whole different story. The US manufacturers are selling cars there, but they have to partner with a local company. Is it fair? Ford and GM think so, as it's been profitable for them.

      The solar panel tariffs were increased even more by Trump, so I'm unsure what you're going for here.

    16. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by trawg · · Score: 1

      That is a bit different to the picture painted by this other comment here: https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

    17. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you should go and find out the NUMMI story. Unionised workers before and after, but what changed was management attitude to workers and hence workers attitude to work.

      Union bashing is a tool of the elite - those who have and want to continue to run things (koch et al).

    18. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those tarrifs apply to local vehicles in Japan too, it isn't anything to do with them being from the US, it is a size thing, Japan tarrifs/taxes massively increase by the size of the engine and the car. They have very little space and shit tons of people, big cars CANNOT succeed there.

    19. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's not a one way street, Trump wants US companies to build cars in the US and export them to Japan. Japanese companies built factories in the US.

      US companies could build factories in Japan if they wanted to, but US cars aren't really suited to the Japanese market. US cars are too inefficient, too large, don't have the features and localization that Japanese people expect. The US is claiming that it's strict Japanese emissions standards that are to blame, but even if those were relaxed they wouldn't sell many over there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Sique · · Score: 1
      I know the story of the alleged German tariffs on imported cars, the infamous 19%. But what never got into the heads of the U.S.: German manufacturers have to pay them too! Every car sold in Germany has 19% taxes on it. It's called VAT, and it applies to most goods.

      When I heard that the U.S. government complained that German customers have to pay VAT on U.S. cars, I was wondering if I was in some bizarro parallel world like Alice in Wonderland.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    21. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by aolsheepdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A great interesting story. You are looking for This American Life #403 - https://www.thisamericanlife.o...

      It is well worth a listen. We drover a Chevy Nova (later Geo Prism) built at the Nummi plant and it was outstanding. Actually ruined us since we knew it was really a Toyota. I've never bought anything but Japanese since.

    22. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      National Security threat does not mean they are hostile to us. It means that their underselling our producers, puts our producers out of business. And the loss of our own producers of critical products like Steel does in deed threaten our national security.

      The threat is that as that Canadian steel belongs to another country, means that it is possible for us to lose access to that supply at a critical time when we might need to produce a lot of steel based products for national defense purposes. Very unlikely but still a risk and thus a threat.

      It is in our national interest to keep some ability to produce steel available in this country. We can do this two ways. Use tax money to subsidize the local industry keeping them afloat by buying their higher priced product. Or generate tax revenue by taxing the foreign sourced product with a Tariff that increases the cost to on par with the local product. This is particularly necessary when foreign nations subsidize their product with the specific intention of underselling our producers.

    23. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Union workers don't run companies. Management does. Management taking an adversarial position against their own workers creates the us vs them attitude that unions have. Don't get me wrong--union leadership aren't exactly saints. They got that way because it was necessary to be tough when dealing with leadership that hates you.

      Walmart will close profitable stores rather than allow a pro-union vote to succeed. They hate their workers. Management in this country has always taken the contradictory position that capital organizing is just fine but labor doing so is somehow the root of all evil, and the results show it. Then that same management ends up signing bad deals that cost their companies too much money. Everybody forgets that part--a deal that's bad can't be unilaterally imposed. They have to agree with it.

      As to your 'happy workers', I'm glad for them. Strategically a company with unions in one area and not in another has an economic incentive to treat the non-union workers better for a little while. It's a cynical move designed to further weaken unions. If unions are no longer a factor, then there's no need of treating workers better. Also, let your 'happy workers' start making demands or even suggestions about how things could be better for them and watch what happens.

      Finally, Boeing makes airplanes in union and non-union states. The quality of the non-union ones are such that some buyers actually have clauses in their sales contracts that they won't accept planes manufactured in the non-union areas. I'm sure those workers are happy too.

    24. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Therefore, was the 737 MAX made in a non-union state?

    25. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our minimum wage and other worker protections make us fundamentally noncompetitive

      Because it's too low relative to what the cost of living is in the U.S., and your "worker protections" of at-will employment are already paltry.
       
      The non-competitiveness is borne out of your stupid healthcare system, which relies of exorbitant costs to the end user. Your health insurance companies are quite literally loan sharks. The Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) alleviated that, making it possible for a large number of people not to get bankrupt or even die because of a health issue that would otherwise get fixed in a developed economy.

      either our workers have to work for peanuts

      Your workers already work for peanuts, as does the labor in other emerging markets. See Amazon warehouses, Wal-Mart, etc.

    26. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you explain those union workers in Japan and Germany making cars?

      Let me ask you, what is it like living with shit for brains?

  16. Japanese are more "American" then Ford/GM anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hard to mourn the end of the "American" car maker.

    In a perverse and odd turn of events, Japanese cars are made in America, and Ford/GM are frequently made in Mexico, Canadian, Germany, China, or elsewhere.

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/classified/automotive/sc-auto-cover-0628-most-american-made-cars-20180621-story.html

    So, if you want a car made by an American car company, buy a Honda.

    So this story is not about American car companies, its about multinationals that started life in the US but are more multinational rather then American.

  17. Destroying our planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess normal sized cars don't burn up enough resources and churn out enough pollution for 'Muricans. Need to drive trucks to the office and supermarket instead. Well, I'm gonna go one better and buy me a fire truck to drive. Bet I can park it anywhere I like too.

    1. Re:Destroying our planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern SUVs and Trucks get better gas mileage then most sedans and cars made 10 years ago. Also you can own a Truck or and SUV and have very little carbon footprint if you put less miles on it then say someone who has a very long commute. It's subjective.

    2. Re: Destroying our planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Of course thatâ(TM)s only true if talking about crossovers. Sure a crv gets 35mpg, but itâ(TM)s basically a Honda Civic. Truck based suvs still get like 22mpg.

  18. How to make good car. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Study US and UK weather conditions.
    Listen to what people who buy and sell cars say about local conditions.
    Cold morning in winter? Car has to start to get car owner to work on time. Test car during design until it can start in cold weather conditions.
    Understand normal people have jobs and have to get to work on time. Having a car that can start without needing repair work is important.
    Understand the politics of pollution. Have something like CVCC ready for political winning.
    Make car look great every year.
    Car should drive well for size.
    Understand reliability in different harsh export markets. Find smart engineers who understand engine design for dust, heat, cold.
    Have spare parts. Have support network for parts all over nations car is exported to. Support should be easy for any skilled mechanic.
    Make good marketing in nation for a good car.
    Have car inspected before it is sold to ensure all parts work and are in good condition on a new car.
    No strange gaps and missing parts on a new car.
    Keep up with advancements in engine technology in years not over decades.
    Dont test new robots on a production line. Select only the best skilled workers.
    Use robots and skilled workers selected on merit to ensure quality car production every year.
    Make car size people want with very different technology to support new car deign weight and size.
    Dont design decades old heavy engine into every new car. Think about power and weight in a new way.
    Dont meet pollution standards by altering a decades old heavy engine. Have the advanced engineering skills to have a new engine ready.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:How to make good car. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to add "Lock car in a room full of mice with an open jar of peanut butter on the dash."

      When you've finally designed the car so that the peanut butter can sit for a week without being eaten, it's ready to send to production.
      Bonus points if all of the wiring is still insulated. (Looking at you, Honda.)

    2. Re:How to make good car. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, cold weather starting. Had a couple of "old school" 60s American cars. These cars all had carburetors. Most American cars did. It had something called an "automatic" choke to help start in cold weather. Of course it was just a crude bimetallic flap on the carburetor that was supposed to activate in cold weather. But like all that stuff it was CRUDE inprecise, clunky wortheless. The first thing I always did on my cars in those days was install a manual choke cable so that I would be the one to decide when and how much to activate the choke. Then get a can of ether aeorsol spray "starter fluid". Spray up the air intake with a lot of ether vapor. Pull on the manual choke all the way. Turn the key and . . .VAVAVAVOOOOM! Started everytime.

      My favorite vehciles were my 50s vehicles with the starter switch on the floor. Turn the ignition swich, then stomp on the starter switch to spin the starter. Cool beans!

    3. Re:How to make good car. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, I remember my dad's old Ford, which my brother eventually bought. Starting that up in cold weather meant opening the hood, sticking a hairbrush handle in to hold open the choke, getting in and starting it, getting back out and removing the hair brush and closing the hood.

  19. Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese cars are less reliable than before, and they're slow to adapt to BEV vehicles, and for some reason they're pushing Hydrogen.

    In 20 years it will be all American and Chinese battery operated cars.

  20. by by forever by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I wanted to buy a Chevy Cruise back in 2012, but then I remembered how much "fun" my GM Alero had been. Also, I was still stinging from the $1000s I lost in stock when GM got its bailout. I bought a Mazda 3i and I love it. By by American cars forever.

  21. Doom and gloom by PGaries · · Score: 1, Informative

    According to https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-gm-plant-closing-restructuring-20181126-story.html, six models were scrapped at GM: the Buick LaCrosse, the Cadillac CT6/XTS, and the Chevrolet Cruze/Volt (but not the similarly-named all-electric Chevrolet Bolt).

    There are still a number of other sedans listed at https://www.gmfleet.com/overview/cars.html including the Buick Regal/Verano, Cadillact ATS/CTS, Chevrolet Bolt/Impala/Malibu/Sonic/Spark, so "exiting the sedan market" seems to be a bit of an exaggeration unless more model cancellations are planned.

    The real story here is the job losses and a man in the White House who sold people on the idea that he alone could wave a wand and magically fix them (which means we also get to credit him with a failure to do so).

    1. Re: Doom and gloom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason American cars like the F150 work is because of the 25% chicken tax.

  22. Suburbans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honda just hit 300k miles. You'd be lucky to get 80k from a GM or Chrysler

    Maybe with GM and FCA, but our Fords have easily hit the 200,000 mile limit ,
    with more on the clock, for the second owners.

    I've seen suburbans hit 300k+ if they're taken care of. At some point it's more reliable to buy a new (well, a slightly used) car than to keep an old one running, but it takes a long time.

    Buying a new car, of course, is just throwing money away.

  23. IQ of factory workers by Newton+IV · · Score: 0, Troll

    Despite the effort of the ideologues of the 60s, the IQ of the typical American factory workers is below the IQ of Japanese assembly workers. These ideologues would rather ruin the economy than prove themselves wrong. This is what we are observing currently.

    1. Re:IQ of factory workers by nwf · · Score: 1

      I think it's more that trucks and SUVs are protected by tariffs, so the Japanese brands make them in the US competing with the other US brands. But they can do it cheaper without all the legacy stuff. Cars aren't protected, so it's cheaper to import and US brands can't compete. Sure they tried making them in Mexico, but quality dropped and people stopped buying them.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:IQ of factory workers by PPH · · Score: 1
      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:IQ of factory workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the IQ of the typical American factory workers is below the IQ of Japanese assembly workers.

      so the Lexus and Toyota's built in the US are crap like Dodge cars?

    4. Re:IQ of factory workers by dk20 · · Score: 1

      what about all the japanese cars made in the USA? how are they still better vs a "american" car company?

      My mazda 6 was like 80% "domestic" and even has a UAW sticker on the door.

    5. Re: IQ of factory workers by Newton+IV · · Score: 0

      Those are different workers: they are not Union members.

    6. Re:IQ of factory workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have owned both assembled-in-Japan and assembled-in-Ohio Hondas. I found no difference in build quality. The difference between US and Japanese vehicles is in design. I believe it is because the US design must minimize cost, due to the higher cost of unionized labor, whereas the Japanese design can emphasize quality.

    7. Re: IQ of factory workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. So you're an anti-union shill. Nice to know.

      Let me guess.... You've got yours, so screw everybody else?

    8. Re: IQ of factory workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buuuuuut... labor costs are higher up n Japan.

  24. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Russians paid themselves to expose their own attack on America?

    Sounds like something a treason-cuck would cling to instead of accepting reality.

  25. Toyota, reliability, made in Kentucky by movdqa · · Score: 1

    My last three care were Toyotas. The first I traded in with 250K miles - it still ran fine. The other two I still have, one with 100K and the other with 8K. I've taken the factory tour and there were a lot of US employees working seemingly happily there. I would be happy to buy a Ford or GM if they were as reliable as the Toyotas are.

  26. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Hillary's campaign manager fell for an obvious, Apple-themed phishing email and gave up his iCloud credentials which were then leveraged to get more shit.

    Over 2 years later, that's all we have any actual evidence of.

  27. https://lmgtfy.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://lmgtfy.com/

  28. They lost sales because they aren't trying to sell by m00sh · · Score: 1

    They lost sales because they cost too much.

    They can aggressively price their cars, offer incentives and it will sell.

    Those cars sold more in the previous years because they got the dealerships to sell more with financial incentives.

    Go out buying a car and the prices of cars are all over the place. There are leases being offered that are hundreds of dollars different between the same class of cars. Even the same car can be leased for $300 one year and it's $550 the next year.

    I've noticed that east and west coast don't have many American cars. When I was in California, the most prevalent American car was Tesla. Since I don't live there I don't what's going on there.

  29. It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason the US car makers favor trucks is that the japanese trucks have a 25% tarrif since 1973. It's much more profitable for US automakers so they emphasize this category over the thin margins on sedans. Additionally one has to consider the labor and material costs. For some cost structures it's much better to sell one high ticket item over two smaller ticket items, favoring the production of trucks over cars.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Isn't this the "chicken tax"? Weird how these things can last half a century.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Today a Japanese car will have just as many US made components as a US car, and parts will have gone through factories in multiple countries. Some Japanese cars have final assembly in the US as well.

    3. Re: It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But their quality control processes are drastically different

    4. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      It IS about build quality. And tariffs. And weird loopholes in American law that allow massive SUVs and pickups to be really cheap because they are classified as trucks, not cars which meant Detroit could get away with building low-quality, unsafe, fuel-guzzling vehicles that were cheap to design and build.

    5. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason the US car makers favor trucks is that the japanese trucks have a 25% tarrif since 1973.

      No. Every time I get an american car for a rental car, I appreciate my Toyotas more. American car makers can't get the smallest things right. I got an Impala rental car last year. I thought it was a nice looking car. I sat down and adjusted the seat so I was comfortable and had good visibility. Then I could not get the rear view mirror angled high enough that I could see out the back window. I had to lower the seat instead. This is ridiculous. There were many other irritations too.

      The next rental car was a Hyundai Sonata. It was very much like the Impala except it was quieter, drove better and everything about it was perfect. Every control was perfectly placed. Every display was perfectly readable. Absolutely no frustrations.

      The imports are selling. American cars would be selling (and would be profitable) if they would get serious about quality. Toyota and Honda don't have to give their cars away. They are worth paying for. If and when I look for a SUV or a truck, it will be a Toyota, Honda or maybe a Hyundai. Even if it is more expensive, in the long run they are worth it.

    6. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the Pennsylvania tax on alcohol to go toward rebuilding after the Johnstown Flood? /me is sure that there are plenty of even older taxes on the books

    7. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by necro81 · · Score: 2

      For more background on the "chicken tax" and how it relates to the paucity of Japanese-made trucks in the US, see Planet Money podcast episode 632

    8. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      american trucks are like american cars - shit and wouldn't not sell without the high tarridfs on Japanese models

      Whilst you merkins all say buy made in merkin land wrapped in the cheap made in China stars and bars you all buy lowiest cost at Walmart.

    9. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by strikethree · · Score: 1

      To reword what you have said:

      American Manufacturers have conceded defeat in the sedan arena because they are too greedy and the only way to make HUGE profits is to bilk customers out of 25% of their money through a tariff introduced in 1973 on trucks.

      TL;DR, American auto manufacturers admit that buying Japanese is smarter for the consumer because American auto manufacturers are unable to provide the quality that the Japanese can provide at a lower cost to the consumer.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    10. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How often does a government introduce a new tax/tariff and later rescind it? It's very rare, which is why western economies have steadily become high tax economies, which makes them extremely uncompetitive compared to other economies. Instead of money being reinvested in the productive part of the economy, more and more is being wasted by the government on ever more bizarre policies that usually do more harm than good.

    11. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Normally I agree, but this particular tax is a tariff from the 1960s that has somehow survived numerous multi- and bilateral trade agreements. And it's a significant tariff at that.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Agripa · · Score: 1

      It IS about build quality. And tariffs. And weird loopholes in American law that allow massive SUVs and pickups to be really cheap because they are classified as trucks, not cars which meant Detroit could get away with building low-quality, unsafe, fuel-guzzling vehicles that were cheap to design and build.

      It is almost as if the laws encouraged the things which politicians said the laws were meant to prevent. Who could imagine such an unintended consequence?

      The real life example I have in my garage is a 2002 GMC Sonoma. GMC discontinued the Sonoma after 2003 and replaced it with an identical truck which is slightly *heavier* to meet additional restrictions imposed by law. The law made the lighter and more fuel efficient vehicle illegal.

  30. Re:Doesn't matter the source country by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? The "tailpipes," are vibrators now.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  31. Out with the old, by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    in with the new.

    America is stuck in the present and too goddam greedy to be farsighted (just look up Gary Larson).

    The old Capitalism was, "If you don't have to change, then fon't spend the money."

    Long-term planners see around corners and are flexible and welcome the capital advantage of change.

    The American automobile manufacturing plants are going the way of textiles, shoes, toys, etc.

    Every goddam time David Muir presents the "Made in America," snippet, the fucking stuff is mom & pop and useless as tits on a boar hog.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  32. What became of Saturn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Saturn Corporation, also known as Saturn LLC, was an American automobile manufacturer, a registered trademark established on January 7, 1985. .... was GM's attempt to compete with Japanese automakers.
    Following the withdrawal of a bid by Penske Automotive to acquire Saturn in September 2009, General Motors discontinued the Saturn brand and ended its outstanding franchises on October 31, 2010.[3][4]
    All new production was halted on October 7, 2009

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_Corporation

    1. Re:What became of Saturn? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I loved my Saturn. Though late in Saturn's life it was clear that they abandoned the original concept of being an autonomous entity and were back to using generic GM frames and parts.

    2. Re:What became of Saturn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still on my second Saturn, an '02 (the last of the 'SL' series) I bought used in early 2007 with 37k miles. It now has 179k miles and still runs as well as it did the day I bought it. Hope to have it another 12 years. I have a really good mechanic. I imagine parts will only get harder to find but so far it hasn't been a problem.

    3. Re:What became of Saturn? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Sounds like management SOP.

      Create a business unit sopposed to make things better by doing them different, then limit them to the same parts and designs as before.

      --
      bickerdyke
  33. First car I bought new was an 87 Escort by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    It was the 4th car I'd owned, first one bought new. Biggest pile of shit I've ever driven. Remember, this was the days of "Quality is Job 1". Within a year I'd replaced every light bulb in the car. At 2 years I went out to go somewhere, dead battery. No warning, just dead one day. Fortunately it was a stick so I could push start it (by myself, yay me!) to get a new battery. The fucking seat broke. This was when I was still a skinny ass, maybe 170 lbs fully dressed with full pockets. Took it to the dealer (it was still under warranty), basically got told lose weight. The cruise control, well, the nut holding the cruise control on the steering column loosened up during normal driving and went from the 11 oclock position to the 6 oclock position. Every time I drove it. Even after using Loc-tite. The floorpan rusted through within 5 years, and I live in San Diego (that is, no salt and not much rain).

    The final insult? Had issues with sending payments so for the last year or so I'd been driving to a Ford place in Mission Valley to pay my monthly payment. Made my final payment. Driving back to work I ran over something and flattened a front tire. I realize this wasn't Ford's fault, but it perfectly summed up my previous 4 years of owning the car.

    When did I sell it? After about 6 years and 70,000 miles a belt started to squeak. Took it to a mechanic, the crankshaft pulley was wobbling. This meant either a complete engine rebuild RSN, or stranded somewhere RSN. I sold the car and bought an import.

    Oh, that broken seat? Was a recall, about the time I sold the PoS.

    I'm on my third car since then, bought new. I haven't looked at a domestic car in 30 years, they've all been imports (1 BMW, 2 Infinities).

    1. Re:First car I bought new was an 87 Escort by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      First car I bought was an 86 Mercury Lynx. It was used and was about 6 years old when I bought it so I was able to pay in cash, about $1,800 at the time.

      I too had the battery slowly die but it had a manual transmission so it just needed a push. The worst part that I experienced was when the computer died. I had to get it towed to get the part replaced. But it was about 10 years old at that point. The one problem that I did run into was that sill under the hood rusted through, which dripped water into the cabin floor.. They were known for that. It wasn't until I went to sell it, after buying a 95 Mustang, that I found where it was leaking.

      Overall, it was a reliable little car. It was front-wheel drive and had no problems in the snow. I drove home from college one year in a really bad snow storm and never had any problem with traction.
       

  34. Reversing bad carma by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To put it another way, the American car companies have never been able to shed the reputation they gained in the 1970s for making lousy sedans. [Even though newer sedans are comparable]

    Once you get a bad broad reputation, it's hard to kick. Your newer stuff has to be better than the competition to correct the reputation. "Equal" is not strong enough. That's just human psychology in action.

    It's like somebody with a notorious reputation for lying. To clean their reputation, they'd have to lie less than average for a good while to get back in good graces. Lying the same amount would supply enough lies to reinforce their existing reputation.

    You hear that Microsoft, Oracle, Comcast, and IBM?

  35. Demographics by shaksys · · Score: 0, Troll

    Interesting what a low crime rate and a high graduation rate caused by a strong nuclear family can do for a nation.

    1. Re:Demographics by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the data disagrees.

      Interesting how a collectivist society that works its people to death fails to keep up with a society built on freedom and innovation.

  36. Self-contradictory numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Camry outsold the Equinox (290,000) by 100,000, then 390,000 Camrys were sold, more than the CR-V (378,000), ranked #6. But Camry is not one of the top six listed. If the basic facts are wrong, why should I believe the conclusions in this article?

    1. Re:Self-contradictory numbers by jdschulteis · · Score: 1

      If Camry outsold the Equinox (290,000) by 100,000, then 390,000 Camrys were sold, more than the CR-V (378,000), ranked #6. But Camry is not one of the top six listed. If the basic facts are wrong, why should I believe the conclusions in this article?

      I think the author mixed sales numbers for the full year 2017 with a list of top sellers for the first half of 2018.

      I found a page that has 2017's top sellers as
      1. Ford F-Series 896,764
      2. Chevy Silverado 585,864
      3. Ram Truck 500,723
      4. Toyota RAV4 407,594
      5. Nissan Rogue 403,465
      6. Toyota Camry 387,081
      7. Honda CR-V 377,895
      8. Honda Civic 377,286
      9. Toyota Corolla 329,196
      10. Honda Accord 322,655
      11. Ford Escape 308,296
      12. Chevy Equinox 290,458

      Those numbers match the ones on http://carsalesbase.com/us-car..., cited as the source of numbers in the article.

      According to that list, the "leading American SUV" is the Ford Escape (not the Chevy Equinox). In 2017 Ford (not Chevy) sold 79,000 (not 100,000) fewer than Toyota sold Camrys. To me, that doesn't change the gist of the article. Ford and GM are dropping cars from their lineups to focus on more profitable trucks and SUVs, while Toyota and Honda are still selling plenty of cars, while the Nissan Rogue, Toyota RAV4, and Honda CR-V are handily outselling Ford Escape and Chevy Equinox.

      Next time the price of gas goes up it'll be bailout time once more for Detroit.

  37. In 10 to 20 years... by williamyf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... from now we will be reading an article saying that "The supremacy of *Korean* cars has been 40 years in the making", and in 30 to 40 years from now, we will be reading an article titled "The supremacy of Chinese cars has been 40 years in the making"

    that is the cycle of such things. Happened with cars, consumer electronics, tvs and monitors, computer components, appliances, the works.

    I was born in late 1972, and I do remember a lot of things...

    Remember the the 70's when japan was the place were cheapo-low-quality plastic toys and shoody appliances were made? everyone wanted a Zenith or GE, or RCA TV. No stinking toshibas, or Hitachis! And cars, everyone wanted a chevy or a ford (or a european). Japanese cars were a synonym of cheapo-low quality.

    Remember the 80s when having a "Samtron" monitor in your computer was a sign of low quality? Rember in the 80's, when no one in their right mind would buy a Hyundai car? Nope, everyone wanted a toyota then, and a trinitron TV, or a NEC monitor. Samsung and Lucky Goldstar TVs were for loosers!

    Remember the '90s and early 00's, when no one in their right mind would buy a Chery or a Geely car? Or a Haier TV or appliance? What now, GE appliances is a wholy owned subsidiary of Haier, which is the bigest Appliance manufacturer worldwide, while Geely owns both volvo and Lotus, and chery is assembling jaguars and land rovers for the chinese market.

    So, countries upend other countries. do not dismiss them on the base of "percieived" quality (it will improve) or "perceived lack of innovation" (for they will innovate). Just take solace in that, just like in Japan, the chinese juggernaut will stop, and be upended by someone else...

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:In 10 to 20 years... by djinn6 · · Score: 2

      I think what you're describing is the result of a cycle that all countries go through:

      1. The beginning:

      A country has sensible laws, lots of unsatisfied demand and few established players. The public is engaged and investment in infrastructure, education and research is high. This leads to low costs, easy access to skilled labor and untapped technology. Countless individuals rise up to take advantage of the opportunities, creating numerous small businesses.

      2. The rise:

      The most effective small businesses experience high growth and enters a positive feedback cycle. People find it easy to get jobs and make money. More talented people starts immigrating to the country. Tax income rises, leading to even more public investment. The most competitive businesses starts exporting to other countries.

      3. The plateau:

      The domestic market is saturated. Businesses starts to consolidate, becoming even more efficient by laying off workers. Local labor is sufficient to satisfy labor demands and wages begins to stagnate. People turn their focus to enjoying life rather than working to improve it. Inefficiency sets in for the government as the public becomes less engaged. Public policy becomes more aspirational and less practical. Business opportunities still exist in new and niche areas but fewer people start new businesses.

      4. The decline:

      Big businesses stamps out almost all of the competition and stops innovating. Laws are written to keep them profitable. Public investments decline as any money that does get spent is taken by corruption or is wasted. Infrastructure starts crumbling, education becomes difficult to get, public research is cut. Opportunities become scarce and red tape prevents people from improving anything. Talented individuals starts to seek better opportunity elsewhere.

      5. Death:

      All wealth and power becomes consolidated in the hands of the few and they become increasingly good at maintaining their status. Life becomes miserable for ordinary people as neither the government nor the business behemoths are able to provide the necessary services. Anyone who is able to leave, leaves.

      6. Rebirth:

      War, revolution or massive political upheaval upends those in power and the old businesses are put to rest. A new, less corrupt government is created. The country is now open to new businesses and talented individuals, and the cycle starts again.

    2. Re:In 10 to 20 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The European Union: 2; United States: 3-4; Russia: 4; Venezuela and Syria: 5 (Death). Tunisia, Ukraine: at, or have already passed 6 (Rebirth towards The Beginning).

  38. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Counter anecdote: In college, my friend had a Chrysler Lazer which was the uptrim sibling of the Dodge Daytona. Biggest piece of shit ever. Something was always breaking or else the engine was burning up.

    I enjoyed poking fun at it until I wrecked my car and my pop got me another used car as a "surprise". Boy my heart sank when I saw it was the same piece of shit Chrysler model my friend had. So many things broke on that thing: steering wheel almost came off in my lap, brake cable snapped at an intersection so I had to stop by driving it into a ditch, gear shift kept popping out so I drove the last 100 miles until home forcefully holding the lever in place and destroyed the transmission, in my first job post-college, I saw flames coming out from under the hood as I drove into the parking building so I coasted it into a spot, opened the hood, and beat the flames out with my coat. Then I walked to my office. I left the car there sitting there and so wanted to just abandon the fucking thing, but they don't let you do that, so I donated it to the high school auto shop. They had that thing running in days, and the kids working on it told me, "Cool car!" It was like passing a psychotic ex-girlfriend off onto someone else.

  39. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    They wanted to get caught because it is the best way to improve their public image while damaging the public image of the US, I guess?

  40. Ford, GM decided they were going to suck at cars.. by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

    And they succeeded. But they had to work at it some because over the years they accidentally put out some perfectly fine cars.

    I drove a Pontiac Grand Am (with the aluminum 4-cylinder, not the iron V6 boat anchor, up front) all over the country for more than a decade, my brother drives it still. And I bought it used. The Ford Fusion of recent years was my preferred flavor of rental car, vastly better than getting stuck with a Kia on trips. I always thought that it would be nicer if it stuck out a little less front and back and didn't force you to sit so low. Turns out there was a car exactly like that: the Mazda 6 that Ford stretched and otherwise over-complicated to make the Fusion. Guess what I drive now?

  41. V70 owner here. 250.000 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    V70 owner here. 250.000 miles, and all I do is change the tires, the oil, windshield wipers... I am still on the original clutch, gearbox, radiator, diesel-injectors, exhaust. Nothing ever broke...

    1. Re:V70 owner here. 250.000 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it didn't come with blinkers and it always moves either a lot over the speed limit or a lot under the speed limit.

  42. anus anus anus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poop for everyone! Llama love session at 5!

  43. Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    Our Honda Civic Hybrid was a dog. Lots of transmission trouble and other weird issues. I've owned Nissans and Toyotas and after 5 or 6 years they start falling apart and turn into beaters.

    Our 2008 Mercury Mariner has been trouble free for over 10 years. Our 2013 Tesla Model S has also been pretty much trouble free.

    In my experience, the supremacy of Japanese cars is a myth. They are not more reliable. Don't get me started on Jaguar and Volkswagon... If you wisely select the right models, American cars are better.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe recent, made in america for the Japanese label cars have turned to shit? For well over 20 years the Japanese car was fantastic compared to the crap from Detroit. Around 2008 was probably the sweet spot for Detroit getting their priorities straightened out a bit. There's probably some kind of sine-wave to describe the ebb and flow of Detroit doing a bad job, getting creamed, and rediscovering it's religion.

    2. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get me started on Jaguar and Volkswagon

      Amen to that on Volkswagon. Will never buy another one in my life. It's generally not had a lot of problems, but the problems that it has had were literally life threatening (brakes stopped functioning while I was driving it), and they just don't give a damn.

    3. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      Just like you, I am only speaking from personal experience.
      I have owned a RAV4, Highlander, and two Tacomas.
      All have lasted 10 years with 150,000+ miles, when I traded them in for a good chunk of $ to buy a new one (Highlander is on year 6 right now). Never had any issues other than normal wear and tear.
      I did have the misfortune to own a Dodge Durango. It lasted just past it's 3 year warranty when major repair jobs started happening with frequency. After thousands of dollars I dumped that POS and got the Highlander. Lesson learned -- always buy Toyota.

    4. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I had to get a replacement daily driver in 2009 and found a 1990 Toyota Corolla with working A/C for $3,000. I drove it for around a year before replacing it with my Wife's 2004 model, she started driving a minivan. The only two things that I could find that didn't work or weren't quite right was the cassette deck that was jammed, and nobody had a battery with terminals of the same dimensions as the original, so I had to replace the clamps on the wiring. That was the first car I've ever owned that I bought the Hanes manual for, and then never ended up needing to open.

      The 2004 Corolla I drive now, has been a joy to own. The Battery has been replaced a couple times now I think. And the transmission needed tightening up once early on. Otherwise it's been nothing but smooth sailing replacing worn out tires, wiper blades, and changing the oil. I don't take it to the track or anything, but I stomp the throttle a good bit. I expect that it'll last another 10 years or so, and at that point I'll hopefully replace it with a Tesla.

    5. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      Could be luck of the draw. Maybe I just picked the wrong models...

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    6. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I think there probably is a lot of misplaced hype in brand names. I count Corollas as being exceptionally reliable. But I have a few friends that have owned 4runners and had lots of problems with them.

      In part that is why I plan to get a Tesla in a decade or so. By then the Model S and 3 should be well established enough that they should be nearly bullet proof. That is of course provided that they don't completely revamp the designs multiple times between now and then.

    7. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      Our model s is coming up on 6 years and it has been amazing. I'll buy another Tesla when this one hits 8 years. I still recommend the extended warranty though for the peace of mind. Electric cars are way more reliable, but when something goes wrong it can be pricey to fix. So far I would be ahead without the extended warranty but I'm glad I have it. My $.02

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    8. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If one wisely selects the right model, then any car is better. The U.S. car market is oversaturated, just like a lot of the U.S. smartphone market. Growth is from people who seek to renew stuff when necessary (that's for most people), but not when buying new just for the sake of it.

    9. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our model s is coming up on 6 years and it has been amazing.

      Hey Tommy, I notice you're not posting over at teslamotorsclub.com
      If I paid $100,000k for a car, I'd be posting a lot more on the enthusiast site rather than on slashdot.org no? My $.02

    10. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are right on this one. In my experience its pretty much luck of the draw for any car manufacturers. I know people that are very happy with a Dodge Caravan and other for whom it was a POS. I owned a Nissan Versa and had problems after 3 years but I know people who love theirs. I now have 2 Kia's (Rio and Sportage) 4 and 5 years old and I don't have any issues.

    11. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep crying, brokeass. Your tears sustain me.

    12. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Their parts availability is garbage, too, even on flagships. They've discontinued half the consumables for the Audi D2 A8 now, like diff mount bushes. I will never buy another German car. They haven't been worth shit since the eighties anyway, that's when they decided that it was okay if engine rebuilds cost tens of thousands of currency units. Trucks are another matter, but the only German vehicle which is built like a pickup and even vaguely affordable is the Sprinter van. And those have basically no corrosion protection...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Smart move by GM, Ford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 90s, the USA, Europe, and Japan were the rich nations of the world. Europe has taxes, which add $4/gallon onto the price of gasoline. Japan has special regulations which push small cars. So, small cars sell well in those nations. Japan is home to Toyota, Honda, Subaru, Mazda, Nissan, Suzuki, and Daihatsu. Europe is home to VW, BMW, Renault, Fiat, and Peugeot. South Korea is home to Hyundai/KIA. That is over 10 companies. ALL of those companies make small cars. Some are good. Others are not. Ford and GM have decided to retreat to a couple of platforms for SUVs and trucks. It is worth noting that GM decided they could just import and rebrand foreign small cars for the USA. Recently, the Smart Fortwo, and Fiat 500 have failed to become popular in the USA.

    In the USA, if you care about fuel economy, you buy a Prius, instead of a small car.

  45. 25% tariff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there a 25% tariff on the import of light trucks into the USA? So basically, the US manufacturers only exist because they are protected from competition.

  46. Tesla-Musk cocksuckers goes into hiding en masse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to keep Tesla (panel quality rivaling that of 90's era Kia according to Sandy Munro) from being associated as yet another American manufacturing disaster.
    The odd Tesla queer like Type44Q attempts contrarian Honda bashing.

    What of these well lubed Musk boypussies?
    Rei
    WindBourne
    K. S. Kyosuke
    drinkypoo
    MachineShedFred
    Bruce Perens
    apoc.famine
    Aighearach
    140Mandak262Jamuna
    Gravis Zero
    Immerman
    c6gunner
    SuperKendall
    Joce640k
    Gavagai80
    Applehu Akbar
    dgatwood
    aaarrrgggh
    bgarcia
    thegarbz
    Oakian Warrior
    AlanObject
    Barsteward
    haruchai
    JoshuaZ ...

  47. Thought it was 1967 or so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That tariff on light duty trucks is also the reason you can't find VW kombivans, but you can find regular VW busses everywhere. The tax on light duty trucks didn't apply to the vans, leading to VW exiting that entire market segment in the US. The rabbit/subaru justy(imp, whatever it was called) got around that by being unibody pickup trucks which somehow fell under car instead of light duty truck due to technicalities.

    America has some of the lamest protectionist policies on the planet, despite claiming to be for a free market and capitalism, it never has been about either. Just ask the members of the Whiskey Rebellion.

    1. Re:Thought it was 1967 or so? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The Subaru Brat (what I assume you are thinking of) got around it by literally bolting seats into bed.

      The way to get around it now is to build your pickups in the US, since it only applies to trucks that are actually imported, not the "import" brands. So it really only serves to keep out more niche vehicles that are sold overseas that wouldn't be sold in the numbers worth building in the US, but possibly worth importing in smallish numbers if they weren't slapped with a 25% tax.

  48. American cars only get sold in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of people here talking about *American* cars. It's interesting, because absolutely none of those cars get sold here (in the UK), except for some Fords. And Hyundais and Toyotas are generally better than those anyway.

    1. Re:American cars only get sold in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it's worth pointing out that that article is very American-centric, as are many of the comments here. It's strange that a population of 70,000,000 (compared to 300,000,000 for the US) isn't well-represented here.

  49. Senge by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    That summary reads like a case study straight out of Peter Senge's The Fifth Discipline... Detroit making all the wrong decisions for short term gain (and long term demise). Don't they read Senge in Detroit?

    For that matter, the software industry with their Agile fad should also read it.

    Anyway, my 19-year-old Toyota pickup truck with 230 000 miles on the clock still goes like a rocket (as far as diesels CAN go like rockets...). And despite all the scratches and dents (but without rust), not a week goes by without an offer to buy from some entrepreneur that wants some transport to start up/expand his building or transport or garden service business (I'm outside of the US though).

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:Senge by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Anyway, my 19-year-old Toyota pickup truck with 230 000 miles on the clock still goes like a rocket (as far as diesels CAN go like rockets...) [...] (I'm outside of the US though).

      We know. 19 years ago you couldn't buy a Toyota pickup with a diesel in the USA. And we still don't get the HiLux, and the Taco has only shared parts with it for a few years now so most of those suck too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  50. Why not African cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any AFRICAN car manufacturers? Or computer chip manufacturers? Or ANYTHING high tech?

    How could that possibly be? It must be 'the legacy of slavery'...

    It couldn't be anything to do with REALITY, like African IQ being an average of only 70...

  51. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wit by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Counter anecdote: In college, my friend had a Chrysler Lazer which was the uptrim sibling of the Dodge Daytona. Biggest piece of shit ever. Something was always breaking or else the engine was burning up.

    I enjoyed poking fun at it until I wrecked my car and my pop got me another used car as a "surprise". Boy my heart sank when I saw it was the same piece of shit Chrysler model my friend had. So many things broke on that thing: steering wheel almost came off in my lap, brake cable snapped at an intersection so I had to stop by driving it into a ditch, gear shift kept popping out so I drove the last 100 miles until home forcefully holding the lever in place and destroyed the transmission, in my first job post-college, I saw flames coming out from under the hood as I drove into the parking building so I coasted it into a spot, opened the hood, and beat the flames out with my coat. Then I walked to my office. I left the car there sitting there and so wanted to just abandon the fucking thing, but they don't let you do that, so I donated it to the high school auto shop. They had that thing running in days, and the kids working on it told me, "Cool car!" It was like passing a psychotic ex-girlfriend off onto someone else.

    Guess how we know that you're lying?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  52. eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 250k miles on my 1986 Ford escort L. Have you actually ridden in a Honda civic? It's like a tinfoil box. Loud, vibrations, thin. Good motors but the car itself? Garbage. Love my Honda motorcycles though.

  53. Why go all the way to Alabama? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why go all the way to Alabama to buy an American made car?

    My Honda Civic and my wife's Honda Civic were both made in South Carolina, and the dealer was nice enough to ship them to New Jersey for us. That was nearly 600K miles ago between them

    Strangely enough, Subaru was even nice enough to deliver her Subaru Forrester to New Jersey, all they way from where it was manufactured in Indiana. I almost shit my pants when Subaru repeated this amazing feat when I bought my Outback.

    The only American car I ever owned (my first car) was a Plymouth Arrow bought used. I actually loved that car. But really, who doesn't love their first? Oh yeah, and a Ford EXP - also used. That turned out to be an oil-burning piece of shit. Volkswagen Fox - used. My first new car was Toyota Tercel. Not sure where it was made at the time, though.

  54. If you make shit products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and shit products is what you make in America, because you think there's more money in that, then customers will eventually turn to quality products, and the Japanese were always meticulous about quality.

    No surprise really.

  55. Nissan Rogue - nice design if you get a good one by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    I had a 2014 Nissan Rogue. It's actually a rather nicely designed vehicle with a good layout, nice controls, and a lot of functionality. It is also one of the few mid-sized vehicles with a 3rd row seat. This is essentially, a modern station wagon with AWD.

    However, I encountered two issues with my Nissan Rogue AWD.

    ISSUE 1) Fuel Economy - It never came close to the estimated EPA mileage - not even in the ballpark. In fact if you review

    RATED: 25 City, 31 Highway, 27 Combined.

    Over the life of the vehicle I averaged 23.5 MPG. Now I drove nearly a 100 miles a day, mostly highway. And if you look at FuelEconomy.gov, you'll see my mileage was the norm.
    https://www.fueleconomy.gov/fe...

    Frankly, I believe that Nissan used a computer algorithm to put the vehicle in a more efficient low-power fuel economy mode for testing. I believe you only enter this mode if you are driving like 50 MPH. It is one thing, to expect EPA estimates to be off. But usually, when you buy a vehicle, you at least expect your HWY mileage to be better than the CTY rating. And considering my prior vehicle was a Nissan Versa, rated at 30CTY, 37HWY, 33C, in which on the same commute I averaged around 36.5MPG. So yes, I felt very deceived.

    ISSUE 2) 36K/3YR warranty - so I added the extended warranty at purchase as well. I had an intermittent issue with the AC they told me to bring it in when it was occurring. However, when it finally did and completely failed. The vehicle was at 37,000 miles and 13 months of age. Took them a week to diagnose and fix the problem. Which they claimed was the blower motor fuse, and that the blower motor was fine. Nissan refused to cover it under warranty. A 13 month old vehicle that had the problems in it's first year. Fuses are considered replaceables, so the extended warranty didn't cover it. $700+ to fix a brand new car. I fought with Nissan national, and they finally covered half the cost. Within 6 months, the problem was back. Nissan wanted more money to diagnose.

    Driving a 100 miles a day in summer heat sweating while going thru a nasty divorce and battling depression is NO FUN. There were days I damn near wanted to drive the thing off the road, or into a showroom. Finally, I gave up, why fight to struggle and pay for a vehicle that wasn't working. It needed a set of four new tires - runflats so about double the price. And I gave up and let the bank take it.

    Thanks Nissan...

    Love the car, but the fact Nissan wouldn't stand behind their product when it was only a year old. NOT COOL!!!!

    (And without a doubt they are cheating on the EPA mileage and need to be penalized on it like Kia was.)

  56. Tanaka Steel Not So Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Threw a rod clear THROUGH THE BLOCK in my '01 Civic @ highway speed with zero warning. THROUGH the block. Superior to what??

    Great fucking steel nips! /s

  57. 1970's deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan got it's foot in the door when Detroit was caught flat footed by the 1970's oil crisis. Sooner or later history will repeat and oil prices will rise. No doubt the tax payers will be expected to bail them out.

    Not to mention, the Trump administration's relaxed mileage standards will exacerbate the problem.

  58. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, not all these things happened on the same day.

    Engage brain, dear reader.

  59. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    A divided, distracted enemy is weaker, so yeah, this is exactly what they, and other unfriendly nation states are doing.
    It's also easier to believe a Russian troll is a concerned US citizen when they point fingers back at Russia, so the ROI is worth it for them.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  60. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Uh, not all these things happened on the same day.

    Engage brain, dear reader.

    You should do the same. Brakes don't work with cables, and transmissions don't get more damaged than they already are by holding it in when it pops out.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  61. Re:Nissan Rogue - nice design if you get a good on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tests are pretty much run at 50mph on a flat surface, no AC, no heat and no wind :P Nowhere near close to real-world usage.

  62. Imports are just better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't own a car, I live in a dense city so owning a car is an expense I can do without because of public transport. I do however rent and have a car share membership for the times I do need a car and I've been doing this for a while so I have a good amount of experience with alot of different cars. American made cars are comparatively terrible. I always try to get a Korean or Japanese cars because they're better drives and as well built better. The American cars I've driven always have some problem with their electronics. Simply pairing my phone to them is a problem, never works well so I have to use the radio. In the Hyundais, Toyotas and Hondas they work flawlessly. My friend worked for Enterprise and I asked him why they had so many Hyundais for rent all the time and he said they found that Hyundais lasted longer and broke down far less than American cars so while they do have some American brands on the lot, they have significantly more Hyundais because they were more reliable

  63. Re:Tesla-Musk cocksuckers goes into hiding en mass by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Trying to keep Tesla (panel quality rivaling that of 90's era Kia according to Sandy Munro) from being associated as yet another American manufacturing disaster.

    Panel fit and finish are important, because they're the first thing people notice. But they're actually one of the least important things about the vehicle when it comes to function and safety. What's important in the unibody is how many of the welds and other fastenings are successful, and whether the corrosion protection functions. Everything else is gravy. Back in the 80s Hondas used to have premature paint failure, but it wasn't catastrophic failure — they didn't rust away. Today, almost nobody remembers Honda's crappy paint.

    What of these well lubed Musk boypussies?
    Rei
    WindBourne
    K. S. Kyosuke
    drinkypoo

    Woo, I'm boypussy #4! Yeah baby! If I get to #1, will Elon mail me a Tesla? Any model will do, they're all better than anything I've ever owned or driven. Best not to be an original roadster, though, because I'm fat and tall.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  64. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You should do the same. Brakes don't work with cables,

    What? Yes they do. They're called parking brakes.

    and transmissions don't get more damaged than they already are by holding it in when it pops out.

    They said the shift lever popped out, and they held it in. That had nothing to do with the brakes.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  65. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    You should do the same. Brakes don't work with cables,

    What? Yes they do. They're called parking brakes.

    You should read more carefully - loss of parking brakes don't result in "driving into a ditch to stop the car". That's how we know he is lying.

    and transmissions don't get more damaged than they already are by holding it in when it pops out.

    They said the shift lever popped out, and they held it in. That had nothing to do with the brakes.

    You really should read more carefully - poster claims that the transmission was destroyed when they held in the lever after it popped out. Neither he nor I claimed that had anything to do with the brakes. I only claimed that poster is lying because he thinks that holding the stick in a gear when it pops out destroys the transmission.

    It's obviously clear that he's lying about these things: a brake cable snapping doesn't mean you have to stop by driving in a ditch and holding a gear in place doesn't destroy the transmission.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  66. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I only claimed that poster is lying because he thinks that holding the stick in a gear when it pops out destroys the transmission.

    Eh, if you damaged the shift mechanism badly enough it could require a transmission out to repair, which is functionally the same as destroying the transmission for the average owner.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  67. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    I only claimed that poster is lying because he thinks that holding the stick in a gear when it pops out destroys the transmission.

    Eh, if you damaged the shift mechanism badly enough it could require a transmission out to repair, which is functionally the same as destroying the transmission for the average owner.

    Maybe, possibly ... but taken in context with his other blatant lie about driving into a ditch to stop the car after a cable broke, I doubt it.

    That's the thing about including one lie in with a whole bunch of other statements - you lose your credibility.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  68. Massa feeds us da good meats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bein a slave ain't so bad. Massa gives us dat good steak and dem pig tenderloins. No chitlins and pig knuckles for us, no siree. Massa good ta us. Y'all needs ta be thankful for whatcha have.

    Ummm hmm hmm hmmmmmmmm, oh lawdy!

  69. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am glad you are trying to educate this gooseshit-for-brains character on automotive matters, drinkypoo. I don't know what his fucking problem is, but you have corrected him on everything.
    Maybe he can't believe that someone made a car as crappy as that? I probably would have too until I got that car, may it rust in piece. I left out some other minor body related problems like exterior pieces simply falling off and other hilarity because the post was already long. Junkyards and epoxy for the win!

  70. Re:Nissan Rogue - nice design if you get a good on by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I used to be a total Nissan fanboy. But then the alliance with Renault happened and I knew they would go straight down the tubes. I had a 1989 240SX which is probably the best car I ever owned or will own. It got amazing mileage (~30 mpg @ 65mph) and it was trivial to work on. But those days are long, long gone.

    In spite of mileage cheating, Korean is probably the kind of car to have today. They are still trying to fight the image that they are not as good as the Japanese, so they're still trying

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  71. Re:Ford, GM decided they were going to suck at car by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Turns out there was a car exactly like that: the Mazda 6 that Ford stretched and otherwise over-complicated to make the Fusion. Guess what I drive now?

    Yes, this is something that Ford has long done that I have never understood. Take Mazda, make it uglier, sell it. What? The worst example was the Ford Probe. Not only was it spectacularly ugly, but it was spectacularly uglier than the MX-6.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  72. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is, goose, you are still dead wrong.

    Apparently you can't imagine how the scenario could have happened, so I have to spell it out for you in excrutiating detail:

    1/ Approaching an intersection at slow speed (4 way stop)
    2/ Press brake pedal, main brakes fail, pedal goes all the way to the floor (brake cylinder failure, I found out later)
    3/ Use emergency brake. Brake cable snaps.
    4/ Drive car into ditch on side of road to avoid entering the intersection itself, i.e. avoid going past stop sign.

    You will probably retort that I didn't put all this info in my original post. As I said in a previous post, it was already a long one. I didn't anticipate I'd get some reader with a grudge against the Internet-at-Large looking to pick a post apart that was meant to entertain.

    Merry Christmas everyone.

  73. Dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I simply hate SUV and trucks. Also sedans.

    My beach is the 5-door Hatch Premium cars, such as Golf, Opel Astra 2019 and so on. Smaller and with more than reasonable trunks, usually good engine performance and high HPs, they're better for moving around the city.

    Can't understand this stupid trend towards bulky SUVs, bigger is not better.