Slashdot Mirror


'The Supremacy of Japanese Cars Has Been 40-Plus Years In the Making' (bloomberg.com)

American business journalist Joe Nocera writes in a Bloomberg article about "how badly things have deteriorated for the U.S. car makers," after the recent news that both General Motors and Ford will soon be exiting the sedan market in the country. Slashdot reader gollum123 shares the report: Much of the analysis about Ford and GM's exit from the sedan market stressed that sedan sales have lost ground in recent years "as consumers have gravitated toward pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles," as the New York Times put it. If you look at the historical sales figures of the top Japanese sedans, you'll see a small decline in recent years, but nothing like the big drop-off in sales that have hammered the American companies. So in addition to the overall decline in sedan sales, there is a second, largely overlooked, dynamic taking place: Americans have only stopped buying American sedans, not Japanese sedans. The American car companies now say they are going to count on profits from trucks and SUVs while moving toward autonomous and all-electric vehicles. They had better hope that transition takes place quickly.

I couldn't help noticing that while the top three selling vehicles in the U.S. are, indeed, American-made trucks, No. 4 on the list is Nissan's top SUV, the Rogue, the sales of which have gone from 18,000 in 2007 to 403,000 last year. No. 5 is a Toyota SUV, the Rav4 (407,000 in 2017). No. 6 is the Honda CR-V (378,000). And the leading American SUV? It's the Chevy Equinox. Last year, Chevrolet sold 290,000 of them -- 100,000 fewer than the Toyota Camry.

144 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Honda just hit 300k miles. You'd be lucky to get 80k from a GM or Chrysler

    1. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A Tesla Model S has already gone over 400,000 miles.

    2. Re: duh by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Troll

      Honda was awesome, up until recently. When they knowingly installed defective transmissions in hundreds of thousands of Accords and Odysseys, and then lied about it for years, they demonstrated to the world that we're obviously past peak Honda.

    3. Re:duh by Sir+Lurkalot · · Score: 1

      Honda just hit 300k miles. You'd be lucky to get 80k from a GM or Chrysler

      Maybe with GM and FCA, but our Fords have easily hit the 200,000 mile limit ,
      with more on the clock, for the second owners.

    4. Re:duh by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Troll

      Make sure you buy a Nissan with a CVT. You deserve it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:duh by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hondas are good, just avoid the Renaults sold as Japanese cars (Nissans). They're just as bad as the Fiats sold as Chryslers.

      My leaf SL is a fine car.
      The 350Z that preceded it was a fine car

      Bad ones I've had - Plymouth breeze: Just crap. Ford F350: a Dinosaur with a flaky FICM. Ford Ranger: At no point did everything work at the same time.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:duh by jrumney · · Score: 1

      modern gm is better than modern ford.

      That's probably because modern GM is Daewoo. Ford ended their partnership with Mazda years ago.

    7. Re:duh by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      and my 1998 f150 has 330k miles -- whose anecdote wins here?

    8. Re:duh by viperidaenz · · Score: 2, Informative

      And it's on it's 3rd battery, after only 3 years.

    9. Re: duh by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Was really disappointed this wasnt a link to the distance Musks Tesla that he shot into space has gone

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    10. Re: duh by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Informative
      Googling-up Honda+defective+transmissions clearly exceeds to the capacity of your intellect. The sixth resultsixth result was more than relevant.

      Dumb, lazy fuck.

    11. Re:duh by dryeo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which is usually when the trannies go. I've got one with a 5 speed and 420,000 kms on it. I've also known of quite a few, including my last one that lost their capability to move at just under 300,000 kms due to tranny problems, and like so many modern cars, replacing the tranny is an unreasonably large job, as in the first step is remove cab.
      After driving Japanese trucks, having something that dies at 300,000 kms is quite a let down, and having worked on both, all I can say is "what the fuck were those Ford engineers smoking?".
      First F150 I owned kept blowing its brake light fuse, finally traced it down to the brake light wire running up the steering column, through the little u-joint, where turning the wheels rubbed the insulation off. Fixing that was fun, steps like remove the plug from this wiring harness, keeping track of which of the 20 odd wires went to which pin, then pull the wires through the column. Couldn't even wrap them all into one bundle either.

      Attempting to work on any new vehicle has become insane, between the computer buses being overloaded with stuff causing a bad radio to stop the vehicle running to spark plugs that need the engine pulled to replace or just read about the latest Toyota Truck where you had to remove the top of the engine to replace the starter. Even that F150 I had that lost its tranny, had the rear plugs so far under the cab that they were almost impossible to work on and you really needed a $500 tool around for when the plugs broke when removing (carbon with plugs longer then the threads).

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    12. Re:duh by dryeo · · Score: 1

      5 speed? That's what my '98 has, along with the V6 so avoiding the usual problems at 200,000 (actually 300,000 km here) of failing tranny and blown head gasket, besides the fun of doing a simple tuneup on the V8's (and plugs blowing out of the 5.4l). A few also came with the E104D or whatever the number was, tranny. That one would last forever if you stopped before putting it in reverse (adding the OD weakened the reverse).
      Also watch those brake lines, Ford uses crap metal in them, or did.
      The Japanese trucks I owned usually rusted out at about 400,000 kms.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re:duh by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And really, if someone is going to buy a new Sedan, who wouldn't want to get a Japanese model or maybe a German one if you've got some extra cash? Of course, there are some die-hard buy-only-American fans but some of those foreign cars may have more US made parts than the Ford has. The US auto industry knows how to make big gas guzzlers, workhorse trucks that people buy to commute in, but they really do suck at making a good economy car.

    14. Re:duh by atherophage · · Score: 2

      Let us not forget newer players: The Koreans. My Korean built $9K 2005 Chevy Aveo is still going strong after 230K + miles. Always a delight, while in the Aveo, to follow a new-ish Cadillac or Lincoln, and just can't help but notice that fancy new car has a defective or dead tail light. Yes, small potatoes. but for a $60-$70-$80K vehicle one would expect the tail light to work... it's just that I see it all the time in rush hour traffic.

    15. Re:duh by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your average ICE doesn't even reach the distance that Tesla did one one battery without some very expensive maintenance, so waht are you moaning about?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    16. Re:duh by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I loved my two Mazda MX5s, one NA in the UK and one NB in the US.
      I also liked, but didn't love the Subaru impreza, which came in handy when we were driving around some rougher terrain.

      My next car will probably be a Tesla once I've got sufficient wonga together.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    17. Re:duh by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      "Much of the analysis about Ford and GM's exit from the sedan market stressed that sedan sales have lost ground in recent years "as consumers have gravitated toward pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles," as the New York Times put it. If you look at the historical sales figures of the top Japanese sedans, you'll see a small decline in recent years, but nothing like the big drop-off in sales that have hammered the American companies. So in addition to the overall decline in sedan sales, there is a second, largely overlooked, dynamic taking place: Americans have only stopped buying American sedans, not Japanese sedans."

      I remember hearing the exact same thing just before the oil price jump from $40 to $80. Then it went over $100 a barrel. All of a sudden all the SUVs in the world wouldn't sell.

      Also GM are goddamned liars. If the wanted electrics and self-driving vehicles why did they remove those from production?

    18. Re: duh by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Virtually all cars have a defect at some time in their lives - google Ford+defective+transmissions and you get https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/0...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    19. Re:duh by SDF-7 · · Score: 1

      2003 Monte Carlo SS -- 560,000 miles.

      Yadda yadda, plural of anecdote is not data, yadda.

    20. Re:duh by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      Didn't Honda settle a claim that it built over a million cars with oil consumption problems?

      My take is mostly that the Japanese cars were vastly superior to Americans in reliability up to maybe the early 2000s when the American brands mostly recovered through revised engines, power trains and basic quality control.

      I think a big problem for American car brands isn't the engineering or build quality per se, it's the business culture of Big 3 car dealers. Japanese cars seemed to have much more streamlined trim lines which made the buying process better (and probably contributed to reliability, too). American car dealers liked complex trim lines and options because it enables a ton of pricing confusion and dealer-installation profit opportunities.

      Not that Japanese car dealers don't have sleaze opportunities, too -- most are owned by regional dealership groups which sell all major brands -- but I think the influence of their parent companies made for less general business-as-usual.

    21. Re:duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Either reading comprehension or troll
      You left out the sentence before stating that the best selling American-made SUV is the Chevy Equinox. That's what the "290,000 of them" refers to.

    22. Re:duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      My Honda only lasted 240,000 miles.
      Donated it to the community college auto shop class rather than putting money into figuring out why it kept losing steering fluid and why the battery kept draining. (Electrical problems have been the hardest to figure out, in my experience.)

    23. Re:duh by bobby · · Score: 1

      Battery life is mostly to do with charge-discharge cycles.

      Also, please read TFA- battery was replaced under warranty:

      The Model S has had its high voltage battery replaced twice under warranty at 194,000 and 324,000 miles. Battery degradation over the course of the first 194,000 miles was ~6% with multiple supercharges a day to 95-100%, instead of the recommended 90-95%. Between 194,000 and 324,000 miles Tesloop experienced battery degradation of ~22% (see below for details).

      It goes on to say there have been software updates which corrected some battery (life) problems.

    24. Re: duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      A software problem that was fixed for free in my wife's Honda Odyssey and never caused us a transmission problem for 240,000 miles.
      Compared to the Dodge Caravan which needed a transmission work just before the 70,000 mile warranty was up, but the dealer insisted it didn't. Then it utterly failed just after 70,000 miles, and the dealer insisted it wasn't under warranty. And then the transmission needed to be replaced / repaired a couple more times before we got rid of that minivan at 120,000 miles when it started to give us transmission trouble once again.

    25. Re:duh by jbengt · · Score: 1

      My take is mostly that the Japanese cars were vastly superior to Americans in reliability up to maybe the early 2000s

      My take on it is that the Japanese case were vastly inferior to American cars until up to maybe the '80s.

    26. Re:duh by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      yeah, 5 speed manual (triton v8)
      it's not the most aesthetically pleasing vehicle, but it's a great work truck.

      thanks for the tip on the brake line, heh Coincidentally my '14 fusion had a brake line fail just this past summer.

    27. Re: duh by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I can picture Elon sending out a SpaceX Falcon to go change the battery in that Tesla.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    28. Re:duh by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Not true. My old work car (a 2005 Impala) hit over 240k before they semi-retired it as a pool car, and it's still road-worthy.
      Oddly though I think the 2005 Impala models were better built than the 2009 models.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    29. Re:duh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Hondas are good, just avoid the Renaults sold as Japanese cars (Nissans). They're just as bad as the Fiats sold as Chryslers.

      A comment brought to you from the 80s. Honestly right now you'd be insane to take many German or Japanese cars over Renault. ... Fiats are still a piece of shit though, and Toyotas will forever be the untouchable kings.

    30. Re:duh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And it's on it's 3rd battery, after only 3 years.

      Yes it was, let's look into it shall we:

      Multiple supercharges per day over the course of its life.
      First battery replaced under warranty when it was ONLY 6% degraded. But the warranty says at 200000 miles it should be less than 5%
      The second battery, replaced under warranty due to a battery fault at 324044 miles.

      If you can get to that mileage without spending a metric shit-ton on maintenance to say nothing of getting stuff replaced under warranty then you must be the world's greatest bullshit artist. And that's before we consider testing if your ICE car is capable of being within 5% of it's original mileage after it has that many miles on it.

    31. Re:duh by Bitbeard · · Score: 1

      I do all scheduled maintenance on my cars. But within 4 years, I had $4,000+ in major unantipated repairs on my new Honda Accord. My new Dodge Charger is under $500 for the same time period. And it has heated and cooled cup holders.

    32. Re:duh by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Expensive DRIVETRAIN maintenance EVERY YEAR??? What horrific turds have you bought (new) to give you that absurd idea? I've been a mechanic since the late 1970s would love to know the basis for your comment, because either you're a statistical outlier or clueless.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    33. Re:duh by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So because a manufacturer chooses to spend more money on warranty parts than they received in the original transaction, that makes the product more reliable?

    34. Re:duh by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Courier drivers would have something to say about that.

      Your average CAR doesn't drive 130,000 miles per year. People who do drive that far, with regular servicing, achieve similar mileage.

    35. Re: duh by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      are they gay or do they hate gay America?

      --
      bickerdyke
  2. That's a bit of an exageration by toadlife · · Score: 1

    American cars are generally very reliable, but not as reliable as Japanese and Korean makes.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    1. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      When Japan made cheap junk they came up with a plan to "Rule the world" (of business). They imported the tech and business methods from those who had it, and slowly learned how to be good. The only thing preventing American car companies from following this path is they want to offshore the factories.

    2. Re: That's a bit of an exageration by longbot · · Score: 1

      Why would they? They can afford to drive cars that are actually good.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    3. Re:That's a bit of an exageration by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      The Japanese/Koreans learnt how to make good vehicles and they still keep improving them whereas GM/Ford seem to have adopted the " this'll do " attitude and rested on their laurels. Trump doesn't help by reducing the fuel consumption targets which helps them stop innovating. They are going to struggle as EV trucks come to the market in the next few years. Tesla is developing pickups as is Rivian, Workhorse, Bollinger. Innovate or die.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  3. Japan still HAS car companies. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ford, GM and Chrysler haven't given a shit about selling cars since the 1960s. As far as they're concerned, the car is just a tool for selling you a loan.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re: Japan still HAS car companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why I buy all my cars with pennies.

    2. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Tuqui · · Score: 2

      The most insightful comment this year

    3. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The caveat: "You must finance with GM financial". Of course, at their rates which are well above what the local credit unions charge, and no doubt plenty of the uneducated crowd who buy their trucks will be suckered to sign to a long term (yes, 84 month now!) loan ensures they make most of that back.

      The leases are where they make a killing. Now over a quarter of new vehicles are lease.

      That is financial insanity. Yeah, there are a few people who own their business and it makes some kind of legit tax sense to lease the vehicle, but that cannot be more than 5% of the populace.

    4. Re:Japan still HAS car companies. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I once walked out on a dealer because every time I tried to negotiate the price, he talked about monthly payments. The only time I've financed a car through a dealer is when the interest rate offered was less than inflation.

  4. Business opportunity... by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once the US automakers have all gone belly-up, someone should buy the rights to their body designs at the bankruptcy auction, and sell vehicles with modern drive trains that look like the classic American designs.

    I'd buy a carbon-fiber version of a 1970 fastback Mustang in a heartbeat. I'm sure plenty of people would go for a '57 Chevy or a '69 Corvette stingray, too.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re: Business opportunity... by chispito · · Score: 1

      They would be huge with no corresponding benefit. At least the smaller cars from today are easier to park.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Business opportunity... by jcr · · Score: 1

      I said I'd buy one, not build one. Do try to keep up, will you?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Business opportunity... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I like your idea.

      Look at recent trends for TV reboots like Magnum, PI, Hawaii 5-0, Murphy Brown ...

      Look at the record players (Bluetooth for crying out loud) and the booming vinyl business.

      I'd go for a vintage reboot of Mustang, Impala, Cougar XR7, etc.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Business opportunity... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Good idea. I'd happily drive an electric carbon-fiber Charger.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    5. Re:Business opportunity... by kackle · · Score: 1

      You can't. Why? Because the MPG laws today won't allow such sizes; that's why we're stuck with mostly "bubble cars" today.

    6. Re:Business opportunity... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      One can even buy electric cars as kits, and I'm sure there are builders who would put one together for a price.
      I think jcr.mac was thinking of something more specific.

      No doubt he was thinking of buying a supported vehicle with a warranty, a service manual, and parts availability.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Business opportunity... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, the designs are outdated. Front bumpers have to be below knee level, encase of pedestrian collision. Also 1 in 8, on the road, will be involved in an accident this year.

      Good work, AC. This is the reason this can't happen. You can have kit cars based on outdated designs and as long as you do some token amount of the assembly work you can register it as a custom vehicle under federal regs. It has to pass emissions testing wherever you register it, but it tests as the donor vehicle so if you put an old motor in it and top it off with your choice of modern fuel injection system you can have no emissions system whatsoever beyond the O2 sensor. But a car sold in volume has to pass all kinds of modern regulations about bumper height, rear deck height, hood crumple area, side rear view mirror breakaway and the like which didn't exist back when those cars were born. The modern shapes of vehicles like the Mustang and Camaro are best-effort attempts to recreate the old body styles while conforming to modern safety (and efficiency) regulations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Business opportunity... by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Good idea. I'd happily drive an electric carbon-fiber Charger.

      I see what you did there

    9. Re:Business opportunity... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'm glad someone did :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    10. Re: Business opportunity... by toddestan · · Score: 2

      Not really. Go find a picture of any of the current "retro" muscle cars parked next to one of the original classics - the new models are comically huge in comparison. They don't look big to our modern eyes because everything else has grown in size so much. Even a lot of the land barges from the 1970's aren't even as large compared to modern cars. They may be a bit longer, but the modern car is just as wide and much taller, and weighs more too.

      It's not just the Americans either. The largest Honda from 40 years ago (the Accord Wagon) is smaller than the smallest Honda today (the Fit) in every dimension.

    11. Re:Business opportunity... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      This is possible for classics that have such a huge following and aftermarket support that you can literally buy new aftermarket parts for literally every piece of the car and it's just a matter of putting it all together. The problem is, of course, making it legal to drive on the roads since you don't have a VIN or title.

  5. American, if only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These American brands are so full of foreign parts that I stopped caring about "Buying American" as the foreign brands are often more American than the native labels. Then it's just about who is raking in the money at the top, and I don't care about that.

  6. Re:Trump explained it in a tweet by tepples · · Score: 1

    The "chicken tax" to which President Trump refers in that Tweet is a remnant of retaliation against hysteria in 1960s Europe about factory farming.

  7. Meh by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given how the modern automotive industry works, I'm not sure if it matters. Japan manufacturers a lot of the cars that it sells in the U.S., in the U.S. so I don't think there's much worry over jobs being lost. Also, all of the Japanese companies are publicly traded, with a few of the largest shareholders being American companies, American banks, or other foreign firms that are in turn partially owned by Americans. If it gets American companies to invest in electric vehicles in the hope of regaining market share, I don't see how anyone could really complain.

  8. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    He knows that. He doesn't care. He just copy and pastes what they pay him to. Don't confuse this guy for a US citizen so angry and dedicated that he simply can't help but troll every single article with off-topic drivel. He's just another paid Russian troll. Over there, they're just called "human bots." But it's actually cheaper than writing software to do this. How this helps the Russians exactly is unclear to me, unless they just pettily see making both sides angrier as a goal in and of itself, like some old 90's era internet meme about the Satanic Bavarian Illuminati playing both the winning and losing side so that no matter which side wins they win.

  9. the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    cars.

    Rust was the worst issue, but when Japanese and Korean cars started flooding the market for less money and lasting about 30-50% better (in terms of mileage and gas economy)
    it seemed to be a wake-up call for US car makers. This was hubris on the part of Ford, Chevrolet, Chrysler... They had their cheaply manufactured, planned obsolescence system and they were going to stick with it.

    I'm guessing at this point, more US vehicles are produced in Canada and places like the Toyota factory in South Carolina build more vehicles than Detroit.

    New technology (self driving cars, electric cars...) eventually mean that people don't need to buy a vehicle unless it's for work. Need a ride someplace, just order a car...

    1. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by nwf · · Score: 1

      Many non-American brands make vehicles in the US, e.g. Honda, BMW, Toyota, etc. For SUVs they can get around some tariffs by doing so, plus it costs more to ship huge SUVs across the Pacific. I just got an Acura SUV that was made in Ohio.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Xylantiel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this is why tariffs are mostly bad. Frequently foreign competition wins because it is making a BETTER PRODUCT. This means by slapping a tariff on it you are hurting the competitiveness of all users of that product to reward the poor management of those that make it domestically. Sounds a lot like the government choosing winners, and particularly bad because it only works by artificially turning losers into winners. This is a long way of saying that protectionist trade policy is nearly always, in the end, self-defeating. There are reasonable interim measures to prevent dumping and market shocks (including the labor market), but straight up protectionism is basically a bad idea from an economic and security standpoint. We want interdependent economies because they increase efficiency, prevent wars, and make the world more equal.

    3. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, and it proves that American workers can make good cars for a reasonable price, but they're generally not union workers.

      That's the story behind Detroit's problems that nobody wants to admit -- union workers making tons of money, union workers hard to fire for substandard work, and a shitload of substandard work.

      Want to buy a good American-made car? Come to Alabama; we make thousands of them. And before somebody says something about the workers making low wages here, they need to talk to those happy workers.

    4. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      It was a one-way street. Japanese could sell their cars in America, but Americans were blocked - by tariffs - from selling in Japan. How could there have been any other outcome? It was unfair from the beginning.

      Tariffs - great for every other country but America, but God forbid if we want to protect our workers by raising the cost of foreign goods. It's just bizarre how these tariffs work spectacularly well for Japan, Germany, China, Canada, etc.

      Import tariffs are necessary to protect US quality of life. Our minimum wage and other worker protections make us fundamentally noncompetitive with countries that can exploit slave labor (or something close). Without trade protections, either our workers have to work for peanuts, or our economy will eventually tank. Import tariffs (and the related topic of export subsidies) generally protect our comparatively strong social policy.

      Now riddle me this: If global warming is such an existential threat that we need need to get as much clean energy online as quickly as possible, why did the Obama administration put steep tariffs on Chinese solar panels?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re: the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be willing to bet in a decade or so, Ford will start making small cars again......At a nonunion plant in Alabama.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re: the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a lively UK TV car show called Top Gear which has quite a following. When they want to do something for laughs, they road test a US designed-and-made vehicle.

    7. Re: the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn skippy. Nothing like working for slave wages (even with several years of experience), working shit hours, and knowing there is no advancement unless you speak Korean. I would get another job but I have a couple months left on my relocation deal. I am already looking to get out of automotive. (85% of the elantra, sonata and Santa fe come out of my plant and I am the quality engineer for most of it)

    8. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 2

      And this is why tariffs are mostly bad. Frequently foreign competition wins because it is making a BETTER PRODUCT. This means by slapping a tariff on it you are hurting the competitiveness of all users of that product to reward the poor management of those that make it domestically.

      Somehow lost in the debate is that before the income tax tariffs were a key, maybe even primary, form of paying for government. If the tariff debate were re-framed as applying to all imported goods (no exceptions!!) and the income tax being abolished for example that would be a great trade that most people could get behind.

      We want interdependent economies because they increase efficiency, prevent wars, and make the world more equal.

      That was the thinking behind the world not having WW1. It wasn't true then and still isn't true now.

    9. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Zuato · · Score: 1

      American companies could sell their cars in Japan, but tariffs were the last of the reasons they never took off there. Look at the cars sold there compared to here - they require considerably smaller cars for their cities and roads than we do. Same goes for a lot of areas in Europe. US cars are gigantic compared to most cars sold in Europe and Japan.

      China is a whole different story. The US manufacturers are selling cars there, but they have to partner with a local company. Is it fair? Ford and GM think so, as it's been profitable for them.

      The solar panel tariffs were increased even more by Trump, so I'm unsure what you're going for here.

    10. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by trawg · · Score: 1

      That is a bit different to the picture painted by this other comment here: https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

    11. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you should go and find out the NUMMI story. Unionised workers before and after, but what changed was management attitude to workers and hence workers attitude to work.

      Union bashing is a tool of the elite - those who have and want to continue to run things (koch et al).

    12. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's not a one way street, Trump wants US companies to build cars in the US and export them to Japan. Japanese companies built factories in the US.

      US companies could build factories in Japan if they wanted to, but US cars aren't really suited to the Japanese market. US cars are too inefficient, too large, don't have the features and localization that Japanese people expect. The US is claiming that it's strict Japanese emissions standards that are to blame, but even if those were relaxed they wouldn't sell many over there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Sique · · Score: 1
      I know the story of the alleged German tariffs on imported cars, the infamous 19%. But what never got into the heads of the U.S.: German manufacturers have to pay them too! Every car sold in Germany has 19% taxes on it. It's called VAT, and it applies to most goods.

      When I heard that the U.S. government complained that German customers have to pay VAT on U.S. cars, I was wondering if I was in some bizarro parallel world like Alice in Wonderland.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    14. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by aolsheepdog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A great interesting story. You are looking for This American Life #403 - https://www.thisamericanlife.o...

      It is well worth a listen. We drover a Chevy Nova (later Geo Prism) built at the Nummi plant and it was outstanding. Actually ruined us since we knew it was really a Toyota. I've never bought anything but Japanese since.

    15. Re:the 70's and beyond were horrible for american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Union workers don't run companies. Management does. Management taking an adversarial position against their own workers creates the us vs them attitude that unions have. Don't get me wrong--union leadership aren't exactly saints. They got that way because it was necessary to be tough when dealing with leadership that hates you.

      Walmart will close profitable stores rather than allow a pro-union vote to succeed. They hate their workers. Management in this country has always taken the contradictory position that capital organizing is just fine but labor doing so is somehow the root of all evil, and the results show it. Then that same management ends up signing bad deals that cost their companies too much money. Everybody forgets that part--a deal that's bad can't be unilaterally imposed. They have to agree with it.

      As to your 'happy workers', I'm glad for them. Strategically a company with unions in one area and not in another has an economic incentive to treat the non-union workers better for a little while. It's a cynical move designed to further weaken unions. If unions are no longer a factor, then there's no need of treating workers better. Also, let your 'happy workers' start making demands or even suggestions about how things could be better for them and watch what happens.

      Finally, Boeing makes airplanes in union and non-union states. The quality of the non-union ones are such that some buyers actually have clauses in their sales contracts that they won't accept planes manufactured in the non-union areas. I'm sure those workers are happy too.

  10. Japanese are more "American" then Ford/GM anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hard to mourn the end of the "American" car maker.

    In a perverse and odd turn of events, Japanese cars are made in America, and Ford/GM are frequently made in Mexico, Canadian, Germany, China, or elsewhere.

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/classified/automotive/sc-auto-cover-0628-most-american-made-cars-20180621-story.html

    So, if you want a car made by an American car company, buy a Honda.

    So this story is not about American car companies, its about multinationals that started life in the US but are more multinational rather then American.

  11. How to make good car. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Study US and UK weather conditions.
    Listen to what people who buy and sell cars say about local conditions.
    Cold morning in winter? Car has to start to get car owner to work on time. Test car during design until it can start in cold weather conditions.
    Understand normal people have jobs and have to get to work on time. Having a car that can start without needing repair work is important.
    Understand the politics of pollution. Have something like CVCC ready for political winning.
    Make car look great every year.
    Car should drive well for size.
    Understand reliability in different harsh export markets. Find smart engineers who understand engine design for dust, heat, cold.
    Have spare parts. Have support network for parts all over nations car is exported to. Support should be easy for any skilled mechanic.
    Make good marketing in nation for a good car.
    Have car inspected before it is sold to ensure all parts work and are in good condition on a new car.
    No strange gaps and missing parts on a new car.
    Keep up with advancements in engine technology in years not over decades.
    Dont test new robots on a production line. Select only the best skilled workers.
    Use robots and skilled workers selected on merit to ensure quality car production every year.
    Make car size people want with very different technology to support new car deign weight and size.
    Dont design decades old heavy engine into every new car. Think about power and weight in a new way.
    Dont meet pollution standards by altering a decades old heavy engine. Have the advanced engineering skills to have a new engine ready.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:How to make good car. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, I remember my dad's old Ford, which my brother eventually bought. Starting that up in cold weather meant opening the hood, sticking a hairbrush handle in to hold open the choke, getting in and starting it, getting back out and removing the hair brush and closing the hood.

  12. by by forever by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I wanted to buy a Chevy Cruise back in 2012, but then I remembered how much "fun" my GM Alero had been. Also, I was still stinging from the $1000s I lost in stock when GM got its bailout. I bought a Mazda 3i and I love it. By by American cars forever.

  13. Doom and gloom by PGaries · · Score: 1, Informative

    According to https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-gm-plant-closing-restructuring-20181126-story.html, six models were scrapped at GM: the Buick LaCrosse, the Cadillac CT6/XTS, and the Chevrolet Cruze/Volt (but not the similarly-named all-electric Chevrolet Bolt).

    There are still a number of other sedans listed at https://www.gmfleet.com/overview/cars.html including the Buick Regal/Verano, Cadillact ATS/CTS, Chevrolet Bolt/Impala/Malibu/Sonic/Spark, so "exiting the sedan market" seems to be a bit of an exaggeration unless more model cancellations are planned.

    The real story here is the job losses and a man in the White House who sold people on the idea that he alone could wave a wand and magically fix them (which means we also get to credit him with a failure to do so).

  14. Re:IQ of factory workers by nwf · · Score: 1

    I think it's more that trucks and SUVs are protected by tariffs, so the Japanese brands make them in the US competing with the other US brands. But they can do it cheaper without all the legacy stuff. Cars aren't protected, so it's cheaper to import and US brands can't compete. Sure they tried making them in Mexico, but quality dropped and people stopped buying them.

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  15. Toyota, reliability, made in Kentucky by movdqa · · Score: 1

    My last three care were Toyotas. The first I traded in with 250K miles - it still ran fine. The other two I still have, one with 100K and the other with 8K. I've taken the factory tour and there were a lot of US employees working seemingly happily there. I would be happy to buy a Ford or GM if they were as reliable as the Toyotas are.

  16. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Hillary's campaign manager fell for an obvious, Apple-themed phishing email and gave up his iCloud credentials which were then leveraged to get more shit.

    Over 2 years later, that's all we have any actual evidence of.

  17. https://lmgtfy.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    https://lmgtfy.com/

  18. They lost sales because they aren't trying to sell by m00sh · · Score: 1

    They lost sales because they cost too much.

    They can aggressively price their cars, offer incentives and it will sell.

    Those cars sold more in the previous years because they got the dealerships to sell more with financial incentives.

    Go out buying a car and the prices of cars are all over the place. There are leases being offered that are hundreds of dollars different between the same class of cars. Even the same car can be leased for $300 one year and it's $550 the next year.

    I've noticed that east and west coast don't have many American cars. When I was in California, the most prevalent American car was Tesla. Since I don't live there I don't what's going on there.

  19. Re:IQ of factory workers by PPH · · Score: 1
    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  20. Re:What's the deal with trucks? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Brother-in-law lives and works in the city. So he bought a sedan. Sorry state of city streets has messed up his car's suspension several times in the past decade. He keeps looking at my 40 year old Landcruiser (no mechanical problems), thinking about what he should by next.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Re:Trump explained it in a tweet by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Surprise!

    The refinery complex down in Port Arthur, Texas? Owned by Saudi Arabia.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  22. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    Is that you, Sarah Huckabee?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  23. It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason the US car makers favor trucks is that the japanese trucks have a 25% tarrif since 1973. It's much more profitable for US automakers so they emphasize this category over the thin margins on sedans. Additionally one has to consider the labor and material costs. For some cost structures it's much better to sell one high ticket item over two smaller ticket items, favoring the production of trucks over cars.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Isn't this the "chicken tax"? Weird how these things can last half a century.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Today a Japanese car will have just as many US made components as a US car, and parts will have gone through factories in multiple countries. Some Japanese cars have final assembly in the US as well.

    3. Re: It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But their quality control processes are drastically different

    4. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      It IS about build quality. And tariffs. And weird loopholes in American law that allow massive SUVs and pickups to be really cheap because they are classified as trucks, not cars which meant Detroit could get away with building low-quality, unsafe, fuel-guzzling vehicles that were cheap to design and build.

    5. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by necro81 · · Score: 2

      For more background on the "chicken tax" and how it relates to the paucity of Japanese-made trucks in the US, see Planet Money podcast episode 632

    6. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by strikethree · · Score: 1

      To reword what you have said:

      American Manufacturers have conceded defeat in the sedan arena because they are too greedy and the only way to make HUGE profits is to bilk customers out of 25% of their money through a tariff introduced in 1973 on trucks.

      TL;DR, American auto manufacturers admit that buying Japanese is smarter for the consumer because American auto manufacturers are unable to provide the quality that the Japanese can provide at a lower cost to the consumer.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    7. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Normally I agree, but this particular tax is a tariff from the 1960s that has somehow survived numerous multi- and bilateral trade agreements. And it's a significant tariff at that.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:It's 100% about tarrifs not build quality by Agripa · · Score: 1

      It IS about build quality. And tariffs. And weird loopholes in American law that allow massive SUVs and pickups to be really cheap because they are classified as trucks, not cars which meant Detroit could get away with building low-quality, unsafe, fuel-guzzling vehicles that were cheap to design and build.

      It is almost as if the laws encouraged the things which politicians said the laws were meant to prevent. Who could imagine such an unintended consequence?

      The real life example I have in my garage is a 2002 GMC Sonoma. GMC discontinued the Sonoma after 2003 and replaced it with an identical truck which is slightly *heavier* to meet additional restrictions imposed by law. The law made the lighter and more fuel efficient vehicle illegal.

  24. Re:Doesn't matter the source country by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? The "tailpipes," are vibrators now.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  25. Re: US companies are like France by dk20 · · Score: 1

    Since everyone is sharing stories..

    Back in 2006 i got a mazda 6, and in 2007 we needed another car. I wanted my GF to get a mazda CX9. She didnt want to drive a japanese car (She's chinese) and went with a chevy uplander. Lets fastforward a number of years.

    Repairs done to the mazda:
    Brakes
    Tires

    Repairs done to the Uplander
    Hub Bearings (3 or 4, i forget).
    Brakes
    tires
    battery
    Traction control almost never works (the wire connecdting the speed sensor keeps getting ripped out??).

    I got rid of the uplander a few months ago as the power stearing pump was failing. Mazda, still runs fine...
    GF now drives a lexus GX 460, i drive a Hyundai Elantra, kids still drive the mazda 6.

    point of the story - I have a huge regret buying that turd of an uplander.

  26. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by dk20 · · Score: 1

    what about japanese cars made in the USA?

  27. Out with the old, by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    in with the new.

    America is stuck in the present and too goddam greedy to be farsighted (just look up Gary Larson).

    The old Capitalism was, "If you don't have to change, then fon't spend the money."

    Long-term planners see around corners and are flexible and welcome the capital advantage of change.

    The American automobile manufacturing plants are going the way of textiles, shoes, toys, etc.

    Every goddam time David Muir presents the "Made in America," snippet, the fucking stuff is mom & pop and useless as tits on a boar hog.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  28. Re:IQ of factory workers by dk20 · · Score: 1

    what about all the japanese cars made in the USA? how are they still better vs a "american" car company?

    My mazda 6 was like 80% "domestic" and even has a UAW sticker on the door.

  29. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    First time I've heard someone claim that new car buyers are concerned about having to buy two sets of spanners to work on their car.

  30. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    I doubt enough people work on their own cars to affect sales in that way.

  31. First car I bought new was an 87 Escort by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    It was the 4th car I'd owned, first one bought new. Biggest pile of shit I've ever driven. Remember, this was the days of "Quality is Job 1". Within a year I'd replaced every light bulb in the car. At 2 years I went out to go somewhere, dead battery. No warning, just dead one day. Fortunately it was a stick so I could push start it (by myself, yay me!) to get a new battery. The fucking seat broke. This was when I was still a skinny ass, maybe 170 lbs fully dressed with full pockets. Took it to the dealer (it was still under warranty), basically got told lose weight. The cruise control, well, the nut holding the cruise control on the steering column loosened up during normal driving and went from the 11 oclock position to the 6 oclock position. Every time I drove it. Even after using Loc-tite. The floorpan rusted through within 5 years, and I live in San Diego (that is, no salt and not much rain).

    The final insult? Had issues with sending payments so for the last year or so I'd been driving to a Ford place in Mission Valley to pay my monthly payment. Made my final payment. Driving back to work I ran over something and flattened a front tire. I realize this wasn't Ford's fault, but it perfectly summed up my previous 4 years of owning the car.

    When did I sell it? After about 6 years and 70,000 miles a belt started to squeak. Took it to a mechanic, the crankshaft pulley was wobbling. This meant either a complete engine rebuild RSN, or stranded somewhere RSN. I sold the car and bought an import.

    Oh, that broken seat? Was a recall, about the time I sold the PoS.

    I'm on my third car since then, bought new. I haven't looked at a domestic car in 30 years, they've all been imports (1 BMW, 2 Infinities).

    1. Re:First car I bought new was an 87 Escort by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      First car I bought was an 86 Mercury Lynx. It was used and was about 6 years old when I bought it so I was able to pay in cash, about $1,800 at the time.

      I too had the battery slowly die but it had a manual transmission so it just needed a push. The worst part that I experienced was when the computer died. I had to get it towed to get the part replaced. But it was about 10 years old at that point. The one problem that I did run into was that sill under the hood rusted through, which dripped water into the cabin floor.. They were known for that. It wasn't until I went to sell it, after buying a 95 Mustang, that I found where it was leaking.

      Overall, it was a reliable little car. It was front-wheel drive and had no problems in the snow. I drove home from college one year in a really bad snow storm and never had any problem with traction.
       

  32. Reversing bad carma by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To put it another way, the American car companies have never been able to shed the reputation they gained in the 1970s for making lousy sedans. [Even though newer sedans are comparable]

    Once you get a bad broad reputation, it's hard to kick. Your newer stuff has to be better than the competition to correct the reputation. "Equal" is not strong enough. That's just human psychology in action.

    It's like somebody with a notorious reputation for lying. To clean their reputation, they'd have to lie less than average for a good while to get back in good graces. Lying the same amount would supply enough lies to reinforce their existing reputation.

    You hear that Microsoft, Oracle, Comcast, and IBM?

  33. In 10 to 20 years... by williamyf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... from now we will be reading an article saying that "The supremacy of *Korean* cars has been 40 years in the making", and in 30 to 40 years from now, we will be reading an article titled "The supremacy of Chinese cars has been 40 years in the making"

    that is the cycle of such things. Happened with cars, consumer electronics, tvs and monitors, computer components, appliances, the works.

    I was born in late 1972, and I do remember a lot of things...

    Remember the the 70's when japan was the place were cheapo-low-quality plastic toys and shoody appliances were made? everyone wanted a Zenith or GE, or RCA TV. No stinking toshibas, or Hitachis! And cars, everyone wanted a chevy or a ford (or a european). Japanese cars were a synonym of cheapo-low quality.

    Remember the 80s when having a "Samtron" monitor in your computer was a sign of low quality? Rember in the 80's, when no one in their right mind would buy a Hyundai car? Nope, everyone wanted a toyota then, and a trinitron TV, or a NEC monitor. Samsung and Lucky Goldstar TVs were for loosers!

    Remember the '90s and early 00's, when no one in their right mind would buy a Chery or a Geely car? Or a Haier TV or appliance? What now, GE appliances is a wholy owned subsidiary of Haier, which is the bigest Appliance manufacturer worldwide, while Geely owns both volvo and Lotus, and chery is assembling jaguars and land rovers for the chinese market.

    So, countries upend other countries. do not dismiss them on the base of "percieived" quality (it will improve) or "perceived lack of innovation" (for they will innovate). Just take solace in that, just like in Japan, the chinese juggernaut will stop, and be upended by someone else...

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:In 10 to 20 years... by djinn6 · · Score: 2

      I think what you're describing is the result of a cycle that all countries go through:

      1. The beginning:

      A country has sensible laws, lots of unsatisfied demand and few established players. The public is engaged and investment in infrastructure, education and research is high. This leads to low costs, easy access to skilled labor and untapped technology. Countless individuals rise up to take advantage of the opportunities, creating numerous small businesses.

      2. The rise:

      The most effective small businesses experience high growth and enters a positive feedback cycle. People find it easy to get jobs and make money. More talented people starts immigrating to the country. Tax income rises, leading to even more public investment. The most competitive businesses starts exporting to other countries.

      3. The plateau:

      The domestic market is saturated. Businesses starts to consolidate, becoming even more efficient by laying off workers. Local labor is sufficient to satisfy labor demands and wages begins to stagnate. People turn their focus to enjoying life rather than working to improve it. Inefficiency sets in for the government as the public becomes less engaged. Public policy becomes more aspirational and less practical. Business opportunities still exist in new and niche areas but fewer people start new businesses.

      4. The decline:

      Big businesses stamps out almost all of the competition and stops innovating. Laws are written to keep them profitable. Public investments decline as any money that does get spent is taken by corruption or is wasted. Infrastructure starts crumbling, education becomes difficult to get, public research is cut. Opportunities become scarce and red tape prevents people from improving anything. Talented individuals starts to seek better opportunity elsewhere.

      5. Death:

      All wealth and power becomes consolidated in the hands of the few and they become increasingly good at maintaining their status. Life becomes miserable for ordinary people as neither the government nor the business behemoths are able to provide the necessary services. Anyone who is able to leave, leaves.

      6. Rebirth:

      War, revolution or massive political upheaval upends those in power and the old businesses are put to rest. A new, less corrupt government is created. The country is now open to new businesses and talented individuals, and the cycle starts again.

  34. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    They wanted to get caught because it is the best way to improve their public image while damaging the public image of the US, I guess?

  35. Ford, GM decided they were going to suck at cars.. by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

    And they succeeded. But they had to work at it some because over the years they accidentally put out some perfectly fine cars.

    I drove a Pontiac Grand Am (with the aluminum 4-cylinder, not the iron V6 boat anchor, up front) all over the country for more than a decade, my brother drives it still. And I bought it used. The Ford Fusion of recent years was my preferred flavor of rental car, vastly better than getting stuck with a Kia on trips. I always thought that it would be nicer if it stuck out a little less front and back and didn't force you to sit so low. Turns out there was a car exactly like that: the Mazda 6 that Ford stretched and otherwise over-complicated to make the Fusion. Guess what I drive now?

  36. Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    Our Honda Civic Hybrid was a dog. Lots of transmission trouble and other weird issues. I've owned Nissans and Toyotas and after 5 or 6 years they start falling apart and turn into beaters.

    Our 2008 Mercury Mariner has been trouble free for over 10 years. Our 2013 Tesla Model S has also been pretty much trouble free.

    In my experience, the supremacy of Japanese cars is a myth. They are not more reliable. Don't get me started on Jaguar and Volkswagon... If you wisely select the right models, American cars are better.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      Just like you, I am only speaking from personal experience.
      I have owned a RAV4, Highlander, and two Tacomas.
      All have lasted 10 years with 150,000+ miles, when I traded them in for a good chunk of $ to buy a new one (Highlander is on year 6 right now). Never had any issues other than normal wear and tear.
      I did have the misfortune to own a Dodge Durango. It lasted just past it's 3 year warranty when major repair jobs started happening with frequency. After thousands of dollars I dumped that POS and got the Highlander. Lesson learned -- always buy Toyota.

    2. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I had to get a replacement daily driver in 2009 and found a 1990 Toyota Corolla with working A/C for $3,000. I drove it for around a year before replacing it with my Wife's 2004 model, she started driving a minivan. The only two things that I could find that didn't work or weren't quite right was the cassette deck that was jammed, and nobody had a battery with terminals of the same dimensions as the original, so I had to replace the clamps on the wiring. That was the first car I've ever owned that I bought the Hanes manual for, and then never ended up needing to open.

      The 2004 Corolla I drive now, has been a joy to own. The Battery has been replaced a couple times now I think. And the transmission needed tightening up once early on. Otherwise it's been nothing but smooth sailing replacing worn out tires, wiper blades, and changing the oil. I don't take it to the track or anything, but I stomp the throttle a good bit. I expect that it'll last another 10 years or so, and at that point I'll hopefully replace it with a Tesla.

    3. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      Could be luck of the draw. Maybe I just picked the wrong models...

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    4. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I think there probably is a lot of misplaced hype in brand names. I count Corollas as being exceptionally reliable. But I have a few friends that have owned 4runners and had lots of problems with them.

      In part that is why I plan to get a Tesla in a decade or so. By then the Model S and 3 should be well established enough that they should be nearly bullet proof. That is of course provided that they don't completely revamp the designs multiple times between now and then.

    5. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      Our model s is coming up on 6 years and it has been amazing. I'll buy another Tesla when this one hits 8 years. I still recommend the extended warranty though for the peace of mind. Electric cars are way more reliable, but when something goes wrong it can be pricey to fix. So far I would be ahead without the extended warranty but I'm glad I have it. My $.02

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    6. Re:Japanese Auto Quality is a Myth by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Their parts availability is garbage, too, even on flagships. They've discontinued half the consumables for the Audi D2 A8 now, like diff mount bushes. I will never buy another German car. They haven't been worth shit since the eighties anyway, that's when they decided that it was okay if engine rebuilds cost tens of thousands of currency units. Trucks are another matter, but the only German vehicle which is built like a pickup and even vaguely affordable is the Sprinter van. And those have basically no corrosion protection...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  37. Re:What became of Saturn? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I loved my Saturn. Though late in Saturn's life it was clear that they abandoned the original concept of being an autonomous entity and were back to using generic GM frames and parts.

  38. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Friend of mine has a '87 Nissan truck, one of the first built in the USA. It's all metric accepting perhaps the wheel lug nuts. At that, my '98 Ford seems to be all metric accepting once again, the wheel nuts.
    Still the Americans screw it up, my Japanese trucks only used a few common sizes, 8,10,12,14,17,19mm basically covered most everything. My Ford uses, 7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,18 at least. Some of these sizes I didn't even own such as the 16 which wasn't in many sets.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  39. Re:Self-contradictory numbers by jdschulteis · · Score: 1

    If Camry outsold the Equinox (290,000) by 100,000, then 390,000 Camrys were sold, more than the CR-V (378,000), ranked #6. But Camry is not one of the top six listed. If the basic facts are wrong, why should I believe the conclusions in this article?

    I think the author mixed sales numbers for the full year 2017 with a list of top sellers for the first half of 2018.

    I found a page that has 2017's top sellers as
    1. Ford F-Series 896,764
    2. Chevy Silverado 585,864
    3. Ram Truck 500,723
    4. Toyota RAV4 407,594
    5. Nissan Rogue 403,465
    6. Toyota Camry 387,081
    7. Honda CR-V 377,895
    8. Honda Civic 377,286
    9. Toyota Corolla 329,196
    10. Honda Accord 322,655
    11. Ford Escape 308,296
    12. Chevy Equinox 290,458

    Those numbers match the ones on http://carsalesbase.com/us-car..., cited as the source of numbers in the article.

    According to that list, the "leading American SUV" is the Ford Escape (not the Chevy Equinox). In 2017 Ford (not Chevy) sold 79,000 (not 100,000) fewer than Toyota sold Camrys. To me, that doesn't change the gist of the article. Ford and GM are dropping cars from their lineups to focus on more profitable trucks and SUVs, while Toyota and Honda are still selling plenty of cars, while the Nissan Rogue, Toyota RAV4, and Honda CR-V are handily outselling Ford Escape and Chevy Equinox.

    Next time the price of gas goes up it'll be bailout time once more for Detroit.

  40. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    I had an 80s chevrolet and what was the most used socket? 10mm. Like every other car.

    You don't know what you are talking about. All cars have been metric for a while, and even a basic 30$ socket set has sae and metric for the odd sae time.

    I have a kia and i love it. So much leg room which is kind of unexpected, but it had more leg room than any american car in the same segment i sat in. And reliability and performance are excellent.

    --
    -
  41. Senge by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    That summary reads like a case study straight out of Peter Senge's The Fifth Discipline... Detroit making all the wrong decisions for short term gain (and long term demise). Don't they read Senge in Detroit?

    For that matter, the software industry with their Agile fad should also read it.

    Anyway, my 19-year-old Toyota pickup truck with 230 000 miles on the clock still goes like a rocket (as far as diesels CAN go like rockets...). And despite all the scratches and dents (but without rust), not a week goes by without an offer to buy from some entrepreneur that wants some transport to start up/expand his building or transport or garden service business (I'm outside of the US though).

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:Senge by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Anyway, my 19-year-old Toyota pickup truck with 230 000 miles on the clock still goes like a rocket (as far as diesels CAN go like rockets...) [...] (I'm outside of the US though).

      We know. 19 years ago you couldn't buy a Toyota pickup with a diesel in the USA. And we still don't get the HiLux, and the Taco has only shared parts with it for a few years now so most of those suck too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  42. Re: US companies are like France by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    I wanted my GF to get a mazda CX9. She didnt want to drive a japanese car (She's chinese) and went with a chevy uplander.

    [...]

    point of the story - I have a huge regret buying that turd of an uplander.

    Did you buy it or did she buy it? When I bought my wife a car I didn't ask her detailed opinion first - it's my money, my car, my responsibility. She got to say what type of car she wanted (hatchback, SUV, whatever) but not which brand or which model.

    of course, when she bought her own car she had full and complete autonomy to spend her money as she saw fit but she *still* asked me things like "Is this a reliable brand? Is this expensive to maintain", etc.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  43. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wit by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Counter anecdote: In college, my friend had a Chrysler Lazer which was the uptrim sibling of the Dodge Daytona. Biggest piece of shit ever. Something was always breaking or else the engine was burning up.

    I enjoyed poking fun at it until I wrecked my car and my pop got me another used car as a "surprise". Boy my heart sank when I saw it was the same piece of shit Chrysler model my friend had. So many things broke on that thing: steering wheel almost came off in my lap, brake cable snapped at an intersection so I had to stop by driving it into a ditch, gear shift kept popping out so I drove the last 100 miles until home forcefully holding the lever in place and destroyed the transmission, in my first job post-college, I saw flames coming out from under the hood as I drove into the parking building so I coasted it into a spot, opened the hood, and beat the flames out with my coat. Then I walked to my office. I left the car there sitting there and so wanted to just abandon the fucking thing, but they don't let you do that, so I donated it to the high school auto shop. They had that thing running in days, and the kids working on it told me, "Cool car!" It was like passing a psychotic ex-girlfriend off onto someone else.

    Guess how we know that you're lying?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  44. Re:Demographics by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but the data disagrees.

    Interesting how a collectivist society that works its people to death fails to keep up with a society built on freedom and innovation.

  45. Nissan Rogue - nice design if you get a good one by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    I had a 2014 Nissan Rogue. It's actually a rather nicely designed vehicle with a good layout, nice controls, and a lot of functionality. It is also one of the few mid-sized vehicles with a 3rd row seat. This is essentially, a modern station wagon with AWD.

    However, I encountered two issues with my Nissan Rogue AWD.

    ISSUE 1) Fuel Economy - It never came close to the estimated EPA mileage - not even in the ballpark. In fact if you review

    RATED: 25 City, 31 Highway, 27 Combined.

    Over the life of the vehicle I averaged 23.5 MPG. Now I drove nearly a 100 miles a day, mostly highway. And if you look at FuelEconomy.gov, you'll see my mileage was the norm.
    https://www.fueleconomy.gov/fe...

    Frankly, I believe that Nissan used a computer algorithm to put the vehicle in a more efficient low-power fuel economy mode for testing. I believe you only enter this mode if you are driving like 50 MPH. It is one thing, to expect EPA estimates to be off. But usually, when you buy a vehicle, you at least expect your HWY mileage to be better than the CTY rating. And considering my prior vehicle was a Nissan Versa, rated at 30CTY, 37HWY, 33C, in which on the same commute I averaged around 36.5MPG. So yes, I felt very deceived.

    ISSUE 2) 36K/3YR warranty - so I added the extended warranty at purchase as well. I had an intermittent issue with the AC they told me to bring it in when it was occurring. However, when it finally did and completely failed. The vehicle was at 37,000 miles and 13 months of age. Took them a week to diagnose and fix the problem. Which they claimed was the blower motor fuse, and that the blower motor was fine. Nissan refused to cover it under warranty. A 13 month old vehicle that had the problems in it's first year. Fuses are considered replaceables, so the extended warranty didn't cover it. $700+ to fix a brand new car. I fought with Nissan national, and they finally covered half the cost. Within 6 months, the problem was back. Nissan wanted more money to diagnose.

    Driving a 100 miles a day in summer heat sweating while going thru a nasty divorce and battling depression is NO FUN. There were days I damn near wanted to drive the thing off the road, or into a showroom. Finally, I gave up, why fight to struggle and pay for a vehicle that wasn't working. It needed a set of four new tires - runflats so about double the price. And I gave up and let the bank take it.

    Thanks Nissan...

    Love the car, but the fact Nissan wouldn't stand behind their product when it was only a year old. NOT COOL!!!!

    (And without a doubt they are cheating on the EPA mileage and need to be penalized on it like Kia was.)

  46. Re:Trump won't last his entire Federal Prison term by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    A divided, distracted enemy is weaker, so yeah, this is exactly what they, and other unfriendly nation states are doing.
    It's also easier to believe a Russian troll is a concerned US citizen when they point fingers back at Russia, so the ROI is worth it for them.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  47. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Uh, not all these things happened on the same day.

    Engage brain, dear reader.

    You should do the same. Brakes don't work with cables, and transmissions don't get more damaged than they already are by holding it in when it pops out.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  48. Re:Tesla-Musk cocksuckers goes into hiding en mass by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Trying to keep Tesla (panel quality rivaling that of 90's era Kia according to Sandy Munro) from being associated as yet another American manufacturing disaster.

    Panel fit and finish are important, because they're the first thing people notice. But they're actually one of the least important things about the vehicle when it comes to function and safety. What's important in the unibody is how many of the welds and other fastenings are successful, and whether the corrosion protection functions. Everything else is gravy. Back in the 80s Hondas used to have premature paint failure, but it wasn't catastrophic failure — they didn't rust away. Today, almost nobody remembers Honda's crappy paint.

    What of these well lubed Musk boypussies?
    Rei
    WindBourne
    K. S. Kyosuke
    drinkypoo

    Woo, I'm boypussy #4! Yeah baby! If I get to #1, will Elon mail me a Tesla? Any model will do, they're all better than anything I've ever owned or driven. Best not to be an original roadster, though, because I'm fat and tall.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. Re:What's the deal with trucks? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    He keeps looking at my 40 year old Landcruiser (no mechanical problems), thinking about what he should by next.

    Probably not one of those, in case he has a problem with it. Definitely something with AWD, lots of sidewall, and fully independent suspension. I'd go for a Subaru with steelies.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  50. Re:It's all because of the metric system... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I had an 80s chevrolet and what was the most used socket? 10mm. Like every other car.

    In the 80s Chevrolet was using basically every goddamned drive for fasteners that mankind has envisioned. Powertrain components were overwhelmingly SAE, but the bodies were generally metric. Screws were a mix of philips, torx, hex, and even so help me god clutch-tip screws. What a bunch of wankers.

    On the other hand, I doubt a statistically significant number of people refused to buy American because they might need more tools. Almost nobody works on their own cars. More people did it in the 80s, but it was pretty well dead already by then.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You should do the same. Brakes don't work with cables,

    What? Yes they do. They're called parking brakes.

    and transmissions don't get more damaged than they already are by holding it in when it pops out.

    They said the shift lever popped out, and they held it in. That had nothing to do with the brakes.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  52. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    You should do the same. Brakes don't work with cables,

    What? Yes they do. They're called parking brakes.

    You should read more carefully - loss of parking brakes don't result in "driving into a ditch to stop the car". That's how we know he is lying.

    and transmissions don't get more damaged than they already are by holding it in when it pops out.

    They said the shift lever popped out, and they held it in. That had nothing to do with the brakes.

    You really should read more carefully - poster claims that the transmission was destroyed when they held in the lever after it popped out. Neither he nor I claimed that had anything to do with the brakes. I only claimed that poster is lying because he thinks that holding the stick in a gear when it pops out destroys the transmission.

    It's obviously clear that he's lying about these things: a brake cable snapping doesn't mean you have to stop by driving in a ditch and holding a gear in place doesn't destroy the transmission.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  53. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I only claimed that poster is lying because he thinks that holding the stick in a gear when it pops out destroys the transmission.

    Eh, if you damaged the shift mechanism badly enough it could require a transmission out to repair, which is functionally the same as destroying the transmission for the average owner.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  54. Re: Believe it or not, have had excellent luck wi by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    I only claimed that poster is lying because he thinks that holding the stick in a gear when it pops out destroys the transmission.

    Eh, if you damaged the shift mechanism badly enough it could require a transmission out to repair, which is functionally the same as destroying the transmission for the average owner.

    Maybe, possibly ... but taken in context with his other blatant lie about driving into a ditch to stop the car after a cable broke, I doubt it.

    That's the thing about including one lie in with a whole bunch of other statements - you lose your credibility.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  55. Re:Thought it was 1967 or so? by toddestan · · Score: 1

    The Subaru Brat (what I assume you are thinking of) got around it by literally bolting seats into bed.

    The way to get around it now is to build your pickups in the US, since it only applies to trucks that are actually imported, not the "import" brands. So it really only serves to keep out more niche vehicles that are sold overseas that wouldn't be sold in the numbers worth building in the US, but possibly worth importing in smallish numbers if they weren't slapped with a 25% tax.

  56. Re:Nissan Rogue - nice design if you get a good on by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I used to be a total Nissan fanboy. But then the alliance with Renault happened and I knew they would go straight down the tubes. I had a 1989 240SX which is probably the best car I ever owned or will own. It got amazing mileage (~30 mpg @ 65mph) and it was trivial to work on. But those days are long, long gone.

    In spite of mileage cheating, Korean is probably the kind of car to have today. They are still trying to fight the image that they are not as good as the Japanese, so they're still trying

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  57. Re:Ford, GM decided they were going to suck at car by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Turns out there was a car exactly like that: the Mazda 6 that Ford stretched and otherwise over-complicated to make the Fusion. Guess what I drive now?

    Yes, this is something that Ford has long done that I have never understood. Take Mazda, make it uglier, sell it. What? The worst example was the Ford Probe. Not only was it spectacularly ugly, but it was spectacularly uglier than the MX-6.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  58. Re:What became of Saturn? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Sounds like management SOP.

    Create a business unit sopposed to make things better by doing them different, then limit them to the same parts and designs as before.

    --
    bickerdyke