Slashdot Mirror


First All-Female Spacewalk Canceled Because NASA Doesn't Have Two Suits That Fit (npr.org)

The first all-female spacewalk scheduled for Friday has been cancelled by NASA (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source) because they don't have two spacesuits that fit the female astronauts. According to The New York Times, Anne C. McClain and Christina H. Koch both need to wear a medium-size torso component, but only one is readily available at the International Space Station. From the report: The mission itself is unchanged. On Friday, two astronauts will venture outside of the space station on a six-hour mission to install massive lithium-ion batteries that will help to power the research laboratory. Ms. Koch is still scheduled to participate, along with her fellow astronaut Nick Hague; Ms. McClain did her first spacewalk last week. But the first women-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day. "After consulting with McClain and Hague following the first spacewalk, mission managers decided to adjust the assignments, due in part to spacesuit availability on the station," NASA said in a statement.

Stephanie Schierholz, a spokeswoman for NASA, said in an interview on Monday that there were already two medium-size hard upper torsos -- "essentially the shirt of the spacesuit," according to NASA -- at the space station. But there were a couple of issues. One was that Ms. McClain had thought she would be able to work in a large-size torso, but after her spacewalk last Friday, she wore a medium-size torso and learned that it fit her better. Ms. Koch also uses the same size. And of the two medium-size torsos available, one has yet to be properly configured for a spacewalk. It would take hours of crew labor -- not to mention some additional risk -- to fix that in time for Friday. Instead of doing that, NASA decided to simply switch out the astronauts. In the end, both women will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

181 comments

  1. Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quick! Spend $100Million to send up a second medium torso component so that the United States can claim victory in the area of extra-planetary social justice!!!

    1. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

      They have a second medium torso on the ISS, it would just take 12 hours to bring it up to usable spec for use in this space walk.

      They elected to instead switch to another astronaut who fitted one of the other, already usable torso units.

      This whole thing came about because the astronaut in question was fitted for the large torso, but on orbit determined that the medium torso was a better fit during an earlier spacewalk, and as such NASA errs on the side of caution as the fit contributes significantly to performance.

    2. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very informative indeed and I'm all with you on this.

      One small step for a man and a big step for humanity or something along those lines..

      Next step: NASA will face a much bigger challenge when faced to the logistics of implementing an all creimers space walk.

      CROFLOL!

    3. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole thing came about because the astronaut in question was fitted for the large torso, but on orbit determined that the medium torso was a better fit during an earlier spacewalk, and as such NASA errs on the side of caution as the fit contributes significantly to performance.

      *sigh* women

    4. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* Kendalls

    5. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One small step for a person.

      Ftfy

    6. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "This whole thing came about because the astronaut in question was fitted for the large torso, but on orbit determined that the medium torso was a better fit "

      Fitted or not, with all that training that's needed, NASA couldn't get the size of an astronaut right?

    7. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicks gotta fight for clothes...

      But really, did they not try on two sizes on earth in the pool test? If water pressure on the suit in a test is an issue, just inflate the suit.

    8. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They have a second medium torso on the ISS, it would just take 12 hours to bring it up to usable spec for use in this space walk.

      It pinches right here, and can you take it in a bit there?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      NASA errs on the side of caution as the fit contributes significantly to performance

      Sex also significantly contributes to performance

    10. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, it's not uncommon for astronaut size to change significantly once in space (muscle loss, etc.). In this case, what fitted on the ground, didn't fit sufficiently well in space - simple as that.

    11. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piss Poor Planning.

    12. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So with it being a known thing should they not really make sure say 24hrs in advance what size they need.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    13. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Astronauts change size in orbit. McClain has mentioned that she's grown by about two inches.

      NASA has a *very* detailed fitting procedure for spacesuits, but final fit choice is made by the astronaut herself.

    14. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Why don't they just make it easier....

      Next time, choose the 2nd chick with bigger tits, so she can fit in the larger torso suit, and well hey, as a side benefit, the other male astronauts might enjoy the trip more, and hell....might generate more interest on earth for these missions, more television audience for these space walks.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are the astronauts going that they don't have 12 hours to bring the torso unit up to usable spec? They're hurtling around the Earth in a tin can. They're not going anywhere.

      This was purely a genderist decision on the part of mission control to suppress a female accomplishment. Plain and simple.

    16. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Funny

      "This whole thing came about because the astronaut in question was fitted for the large torso, but on orbit determined that the medium torso was a better fit "

      Fitted or not, with all that training that's needed, NASA couldn't get the size of an astronaut right?

      I've seen plenty of science fiction. I pretty sure that the spandex space suits that female astronauts wear are one size fits all.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    17. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So a woman was about to go out the door and decided that her clothes, which had been perfectly acceptable for multiple previous trips, suddenly didn't fit right?
      Shocking.

    18. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was never a problem during the Star Trek missions, what gives?

    19. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those they just wear for themselves because it makes them feel good. It's not about attention.

      I swear.

      Believe all women.

    20. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by v1s10nary · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just make it easier....

      Next time, choose the 2nd chick with bigger tits, so she can fit in the larger torso suit, and well hey, as a side benefit, the other male astronauts might enjoy the trip more, and hell....might generate more interest on earth for these missions, more television audience for these space walks.

      This type of innovative thinking deserves an award!!!

      --
      "The cause of fear is ignorance."
    21. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by dougdonovan · · Score: 0

      everyone say...yes. i am bored today and nothing else worth while to do except slashdot.

    22. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just make it easier.... Next time, choose the 2nd chick with bigger tits, so she can fit in the larger torso suit, and well hey, as a side benefit, the other male astronauts might enjoy the trip more, and hell....might generate more interest on earth for these missions, more television audience for these space walks. This type of innovative thinking deserves an award!!!

      Hmm, you know, I might just approach NASA with this idea, maybe it could be the basis of a Kickstarter program to bring more $$ and attention to NASA projects.

      They seem to need all the help they can get, and innovative ideas like this just might help!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I didn't read TFA, but I read a story about this on Ars. and that explained that sometimes the fit and movement in the pool is different than in orbit. probably because of gravity related differences.

    24. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      I moderated the above post funny but it just gave a score of 1.
      :-\
      Posting to remove my mod.

    25. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that might look more economical, consider the cost of sending the extra boob material up to space. At the cost of $10k/lb, we should really only be sanding the flattest girls up there. Boob's souls are too weighed down by gravity. The future is flat.

    26. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but baggy suits on a chic are hot!
      Or, if the suits are too tight in the "right" places...

      CAP === 'scolding'

    27. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " it would just take 12 hours to bring it up to usable spec for use in this space walk."

      not true at all.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    28. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Quick! Spend $100Million to send up a second medium torso component

      No need for new spacesuits. Gender is just a social construct.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    29. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Well now, someone needs to do a special Zero G study on this VERY important subject. The future of Mars exploration is potentially at stake!

    30. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by the_povinator · · Score: 1

      Their suits come in medium, large and extra large. Who manufactures them-- Durex?

      --
      The .sig is dead, and I believe I had a hand in killing it.
    31. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fit the modern SJW opinions of the ideal society. People should be completely sexless. Women should cut off their boobs because they draw unwanted make attention and have extra weight. Men should cut off their penis because it will be used to rape women and weighs extra grams that could be used carrying scientific instruments. Nobody will have sex and climate change will be mitigated.

      SJW of coarse have no problem with Black and Hispanics carrying on tradional gender roles. It is only evil white people that must be completely sexless and self hating

    32. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closer to (potential) reality than you might expect, though:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_counterpressure_suit

    33. Re: Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, kiddo you sure are new. Flat is justice.

    34. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by torkus · · Score: 1

      Aaaaaaand this is the news article that should have been posted.

      Instead, angry masses are going on about how NASA is discriminating against women based purely on a title and not even looking at the article. Can we reboot social media and start over please?

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    35. Re:Quick! Send up another one! NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a few youngsters being indoctrinated with this meme. I actually studied the psychology of gender, at MIT, and the idea that some one's "soul" is a different gender than one's body goes with a lot of other politics *that most transgender people loathe!!!* They work very hard to achieve that change of identity, and to have these distinctions as "purely a social construct" is telling them that their previous discomfort and pain is just imaginary and their change irrelevant.

      It insults them

  2. ProTip: Have a male identify as female by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    BOOM! Problem solved!

    1. Re: ProTip: Have a male identify as female by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started taking dumps in women's bathrooms. Not bad!

    2. Re: ProTip: Have a male identify as female by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just you wait. We can imagine women in space together once the frivolous girls get all the nasty shit of their suits

    3. Re: ProTip: Have a male identify as female by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Two Girls. One Spacesuit.

    4. Re: ProTip: Have a male identify as female by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the worst unvetted candidates are more than welcome lol

    5. Re:ProTip: Have a male identify as female by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BOOM! Problem solved!

      Gender fluid in space

    6. Re:ProTip: Have a male identify as female by zugmeister · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be easier to have her identify as a different size so as to fit in an unused (but ready) suit?

  3. Same reason Trump doesn't spacewalk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And.. diapers.

  4. Real Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Real reason: They refused to go out in public wearing the same outfit!

    1. Re:Real Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Upvote. Came to say this.

    2. Re:Real Reason by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Funny - but predictable

  5. Re: Women can't decide what to wear when they go o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just that. Wear something incredibly revealing

  6. It is a government operation by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    so I just go with "Stuff Happens". Just send one up on the next supply ship.
    You know until they get things to a point where there is a bit of flexibility in operations. Real space work will be left to the private market and the future.

    Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:It is a government operation by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

      Or maybe several countries military's ;)

    2. Re:It is a government operation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gravity is real, so the Titanic must be coming. "There were not enough space suits!!"

  7. Re:Women can't decide what to wear when they go ou by PPH · · Score: 0

    They can't be seen wearing the same outfit as someone else.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  8. Not even wrong. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because they don't have two spacesuits that fit the female astronauts

    These do have two spacesuits that fit the female astronauts, just not ones that are tooled for this particular mission.

    "Two mediums existed on the ISS, but only one was prepped for a spacewalk. Instead of devoting extensive crew time to make the extra medium-sized suit space-worthy by Friday, NASA decided to restaff"

    I think it's equally important to recognize that both NASA and the astronauts are putting the mission first.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Not even wrong. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      This is good.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Not even wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Going by the comments on /. it is all massive sexism. I get it. /. is afraid of women.

    3. Re:Not even wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit dude, your cock sucking is amazing. What a fucking cock sucking queer you are. Is there no end to the cocks you can suck you ass sucking piece of cum swilling swing?

    4. Re:Not even wrong. by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      I think it's equally important to recognize that both NASA and the astronauts are putting the mission first.

      But how does the poor maligned suit feel about that? It's just not good enough without help and is now embarrassed about it. Mission smission, it's only LOOKING GOOD that counts!

      "equally important" -- no, it's MORE important. Who does it is unimportant, that it gets done safely and properly is of prime importance. And that includes the tools and support staff. There's always a slight risk no matter what, but you minimize those to the best of your ability.

      (Challenger, anyone?) Wiki, NASA, UPI

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    5. Re:Not even wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you certainly seem to be enjoying yourself.

    6. Re:Not even wrong. by Kartu · · Score: 1

      I think it's equally important to recognize that both NASA and the astronauts are putting the mission first.

      Do they? This part sounded a bit different to me:

      " McClain had thought she would be able to work in a large-size torso, but after her spacewalk last Friday, she wore a medium-size torso and learned that it fit her better. "

    7. Re:Not even wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to go to the deepest darkest parts of tumblr or to an aggregator that archives radicals to hear someone say it, its not really representative.

    8. Re:Not even wrong. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      "Two mediums existed on the ISS, but only one was prepped for a spacewalk. Instead of devoting extensive crew time to make the extra medium-sized suit space-worthy by Friday, NASA decided to restaff"

      Alright, have you got that announcement ready?

      Yeah. We have made sure we have everything we need for this right?

      I'm sure it will be fine.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:Not even wrong. by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's equally important to recognize that both NASA and the astronauts are putting the mission first.

      So will SJWs when they howl in outrage over invented sexism of this situation.

      The only one's I've heard howling are people howling about how the WSJ's or whatever are allegedly howling...

      We get it, you're afraid that somewhere, someone you don't like is being treated as an equal, but can you just bitch about it in private like you did in the 90's. Fuck I miss that decade.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  9. Cue jokes from Hard Target fame Bruce Willis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hope she floats (tits up).

    not implying NASA fakes all their spacewalks in underwater training sessions like what Flat Earthers proved with Russia & China.

  10. Re: Fake news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want credit bigly for saving American tax dollars on this wasteful boondoggle!

    I personally made sure there was only one suit so NASA couldnt use a zillion dollar space flight to virtue signal!

    I am Donald J. Trump and I support this message! (And I am FULLY EXONERATED!!!)

    OMB

  11. Ghostbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the all-female Ghostbusters could have been avoided so easily.

  12. Even men hate dealing with man bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a cis-male, I am relieved that you're someone else's problem now.

  13. Does this spacesuit make my ass look fat? by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    Hopefully in an emergency, any old suit torso would be ok.

    Wasn't there someBNASA project to re-design the suits?

    I seem to recall SpaceX was working on it too...

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. what do they use the suits for besides spacewalks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they don't use the suits inside the ISS, they don't use those suits for the flight to/from the station (each capsule has it's own suit design, Russia, Spacex, NASA, and Blue Origin have different suit designs)

    so what do they use the suits for besides spacewalks? What is the other torso configured for?

  16. Holy Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I thought the left wing stuff was baloney but here you cock suckers are being so terrified of women doing anything that you have to insult them. /. is full of a bunch of fucking pansy asses. What a bunch of pussy ass bitches you all are.

    1. Re: Holy Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)m afraid of 52% of the population. You pointing it out makes me feel bad. Why do you torment the mentally ill?

  17. Spacewalk like its 1984? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    List of spacewalkers
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Reads down to 1984. Soviet Union and the USA have done that.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Spacewalk like its 1984? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you consider Vladimir Dzhanibekov and David Leestma as women.

    2. Re:Spacewalk like its 1984? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Did you not see Salyut 7 and STS-41-G EVA 1 on that list in 1984 AC?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Spacewalk like its 1984? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the STS-41-G EVA that has both David Leestma and Kathryn Dwyer Sullivan on it?

      That doesn't look like an "all female EVA" to me, unless David is/was identifying as the female gender...

      Or maybe you mean the Salyut 7 EP4 EVA 1 which has both Vladimir Dzhanibekov and Svetlana Savitskaya on it? Again, I'm not judging. This is 2019, so maybe Vladimir was identifying as female gender and it was therefore an "all female EVA".

      Which is, as you know, what the discussion is here as the title says "first all female spacewalk".

    4. Re:Spacewalk like its 1984? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its a female spacewalk. Back in 1984. Been done AC.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Spacewalk like its 1984? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Does light leave your surface? 'Cause you're dense enough to not understand the difference between a spacewalk with one woman, and a spacewalk with only women.

  18. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Does this spacesuit make me look fat?"

  19. Re: Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL depressurization mean dead astronauts and no need for suits at that point

  20. Getting Tired of /. Posting Endless SJW Non Sense by supercell · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This site is getting tiresome really quick. One leftist media story after another about some non SJW issue. Can we keep this site on topic about tech issues?

  21. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

    If there was an emergency evacuation requiring suit usage, they would be pretty dead anyway as the suits are not quick to put on or use. In all emergency circumstances, the fall backs are "go to the Soyuz capsules and prepare for evacuation" and not "go put on bulky suits intended for external use only".

  22. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mentally replaced all references to the feminine with the masculine within the summary while reading it. Amazingly, I found the references to gender suddenly both extremely offensive and still unnecessary.

    The story is sexist bullshit masquerading as social justice pandering.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  23. Technical details of their torsos please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think to have an informed discussion on the matter, we need to know the measurements, including cup sizes... firmness... nipple diameters.

  24. Re: Women can't decide what to wear when they go o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let your tits get in the way

  25. Re: Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA has, due to budget cuts, been a bad joke for many years now. They are likely a front to hide the actual black budget space program

  26. Re:Getting Tired of /. Posting Endless SJW Non Sen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site is getting tiresome really quick. One leftist media story after another about some non SJW issue. Can we keep this site on topic about tech issues?

    NASA's next stunt gonna be two colored female handicapped astronaut doing The First Handicapped Minority non-male Spacewalk and you can betcha ass that /. will give it the full coverage !!

  27. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Enigma2175 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are redundant suits of each size but the secondary medium suit would need to be configured and loaded for the specific spacewalk. They are around 40 years old and you need to be sure everything works correctly before putting it on and going into vacuum - that takes time.

    These are EVA suits and are not the same as flight suits and likely would not be used in an emergency since they are difficult to put on and require assistance to do so.

    --

    Enigma

  28. Re:Double Standards by novakyu · · Score: 1

    Well, to be fair, that's every other spacewalk. They just don't bother highlighting the fact that it's all-male.

  29. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In an emergency she'd simply wear the mis-sized suit. Much ado about nothing. +2 lol.

    As in, she'd wear the one that's too awkward to use for a long demanding EVA with no margin for error, which is fine since there IS one in her size, just not two at the same time, so they'll simply rotate. They're engineers who see a solved math problem here, not a need for ado.

    Goat, empty, lettuce, goat, wolf, empty, goat. No one spewing headlines about goats being persecuted by wolves.

  30. Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems to me that lack of preparation is an issue here.

    Even the blurb explains that the issue was that there was a planned spacewalk and although there are 6 astronauts on board the ISS at this time and there has been some time to make the decision to prepare the space suits, no one saw fit to ... well... to fit the suits appropriately.

    Who gives a shit about the gender of the astronauts beyond ensuring there is appropriate necessities in the ISS to facilitate their gender specific needs? This could have easily been a similar problem if one of the astronauts was a smaller male. They are basically two nerds, one a mechanical and aerospace engineer and the other, a physicist and electrical engineer.

    This past year has been one whole year of :
      - First female to win Abel award... yeh... she won it because she's a she... not because she is one of the most brilliant mathematicians of the last 70 years
      - All female spacewalk cancelled... yeh, they're astronauts because they're girls, not because they both achieved top marks from top schools in areas of science and engineering.
      - all female..
      - first woman...

    I mean seriously... what's the f-ing point here? Exceptional people are exceptional people... and moron journalists are moron journalists... done.

    1. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      There was a strong political desire to have two women do a spacewalk together. I'd be concerned that such political desires do not encourage NASA to take unnecessary risks. I was very suspicious, when Challenger failed at lunch time in poor weather, that they'd been under strong political pressure to launch as scheduled to meet political demands for the flight of the "civilian", the teacher Christa McAuliffe. That's a disaster NASA is wise to avoid, and refitting either space suit is time and work and risk that aren't strictly needed.

    2. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      achieved top marks from top schools in areas of science and engineering

      Don't think they do much science outside, it's manual labor. A female only team is an important milestone as it shows political correctness dominating rationality even in space, though they weren't able to change the ending of The Emperor's New Clothes this time

    3. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that lack of preparation is an issue here.

      Even the blurb explains that the issue was that there was a planned spacewalk and although there are 6 astronauts on board the ISS at this time and there has been some time to make the decision to prepare the space suits, no one saw fit to ... well... to fit the suits appropriately.

      Who gives a shit about the gender of the astronauts beyond ensuring there is appropriate necessities in the ISS to facilitate their gender specific needs? This could have easily been a similar problem if one of the astronauts was a smaller male. They are basically two nerds, one a mechanical and aerospace engineer and the other, a physicist and electrical engineer.

      This past year has been one whole year of :

        - First female to win Abel award... yeh... she won it because she's a she... not because she is one of the most brilliant mathematicians of the last 70 years

        - All female spacewalk cancelled... yeh, they're astronauts because they're girls, not because they both achieved top marks from top schools in areas of science and engineering.

        - all female..

        - first woman...

      I mean seriously... what's the f-ing point here? Exceptional people are exceptional people... and moron journalists are moron journalists... done.

      When will they learn that it is would be more impressive if these things were not treated as exceptional happenings and just as everyday occurrences?

    4. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Kind of. NASA has said they didn't plan an all-female spacewalk, it just happened in the schedule. It then got hyped, probably when the PR department noticed it. I'm sure there was a bunch of discussion at NASA about political impact and whether it was worth preflighting a second medium or sending McClean back out in a large.

      To their immense credit, NASA and the astronauts made the right decision. Now that they've experienced the wrath of the twit-verse, they may not the next time.

    5. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's notable because the ratio of men and women in the world is more or less 50:50, and the first spacewalk with two men was decades ago, so statistically if selection was completely random it would be surprising that there still has not been a case of two women outside at the same time.

      That makes it interesting to note the historical reasons why and the fact that even today, after all the progress we have made, it was only just about to happen but was scuppered at the last minute. As you say, it should be about exceptional people, but there are other factors.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah there's nothing wrong with an all female spacewalk to get women more interested in space.
      Everyone did what they could and clearly put the mission 100% first. So I say good on them and hope they get another chance.

    7. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by pavon · · Score: 2

      It wasn't lack of preparation. It isn't possible to do an exact fit of suit on earth as body proportions change in weightlessness, and the ISS doesn't have a ton of room for full spare suits. So they keep two full suits and some spare parts.

      After using both the large and medium torso in training exercises on earth, McClain believed that the large torso would work better. Your spine elongates and your internal organs shift further up in your torso when weightless, so erring on the side of larger torso make sense. However, after her first real spacewalk, she determined that the large torso was too bulky and made an already laborious activity even harder, and that she should use medium torso for future spacewalks.

    8. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's notable because the ratio of men and women in the world is more or less 50:50, and the first spacewalk with two men was decades ago, so statistically if selection was completely random it would be surprising that there still has not been a case of two women outside at the same time.

      Today I learned that NASA is supposed to be randomly selecting from the entire population of Earth who goes on spacewalks, instead of selecting people based on their abilities.

      "So you're saying that women are not as capable as men?"

      Not at all. I am saying you need to look at the pool of individuals with the right skill sets, I made no comment on the proportional representation of particular demographics within that pool. For all I know, the pool of individuals with the right skill sets is also 50:50. Not that I expect you to ever look at this rationally. You're the type of person who, once they see sexism, can never be convinced that sexism was not somehow involved.

    9. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by prunus.avium · · Score: 1

      Read it again. One of the female astronauts thought she could use the large suit but after her first space walk decided the medium fit better. She is the one who is not going on the next one.

    10. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      no one saw fit to ... well... to fit the suits appropriately.

      People change size when exposed to a zero-G environment for a while. What fit on Earth is not fitting well in space. So instead of jeopardizing the mission for a political stunt, they're going to use another astronaut.

      So, what's the problem here? They're doing exactly what you want them to do.

    11. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that next time they will tell the PR people where to go.

  31. Re: Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed not knowing beforehand is ridiculous. But not knowing the right size is even crazier.

  32. Re:Double Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could highlight the 100th all-male spacewalk.

  33. Re: Getting Tired of /. Posting Endless SJW Non Se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, we got it already. Weâ(TM)re afraid of women. Weâ(TM)re pussy ass bitches. We heard you the first 3 times, but the fact that nobody cares seems to have you upset somI didnâ(TM)t want you to feel too badly. Thanks for the feedback.

  34. Re:Getting Tired of /. Posting Endless SJW Non Sen by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The historic space walks (EVA) got done in 1984.
    Both by the Soviet Union and the USA.
    Why is this a story?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  35. Firting of Suits by HannethCom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With their lack of budget and who creates some of there products dictated by which State voted "correctly", fitting is very difficult for NASA.
    They have their template suites on Earth that they use for fitting. The problem is the materials act differently that high up. The other problem is each suite is slightly different.
    These suites where built between 1982 and 1986. Originally they were pretty much the same, but all hand made. Now they sometimes are repair on Earth, but other times are repaired in space with the materials available. The templates, and even the various suites just don't match anymore. Some suites they've had to bring back because they are disintegrating.
    There has been a program in place to create new suites, but it has been taking a long time, particularly due to who they can work with changing every 2 years with elections, partially due to government budgets dictating what money will be spent on.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
    1. Re:Firting of Suits by Cederic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Suit. It's a fucking suit. Your post was pretty much unreadable because fitting someone in a suite is pretty fucking easy: You open the door, they walk in, they choose whether to sit on the bed or the sofa.

      Now firt off and buy a fucking keyboard.

  36. Switch to skinsuits by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Long ago, there was a proposal for "skinsuits", very tightly fitted suits much like wetsuits that were completely form fitting and much lighter. The suits were also not airtight. Air (or oxygen) was fed in through the helmet, which was quite rigid, and leaked into the suit and leaked out for cooling. They relied on the strength of the fabric, and of the skin of the astronaut, to provide the mechanical support to keep the astronaut intact in vacuum. The design was much lighter than NASA and Soviet designs, and much less expensive. The operational difference was like that between a scuba diver and a the old dry suits with brass helmets and hoses. The design was lighter, took less space, and was much easier to maintain.

    I do not know what has held up development for this kind of suit. The difference in weight of the suit, alone, should have saved enough fuel costs at launch time to justify research. I don't understand why the astronauts themselves have not demanded it, to improve mobility.

    1. Re:Switch to skinsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not know what has held up development for this kind of suit. The difference in weight of the suit, alone, should have saved enough fuel costs at launch time to justify research.

      Considering the suits in use are from the 80s, I'd say it's the fact that NASA has sucked for the last 30 years.

    2. Re:Switch to skinsuits by twosat · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are probably thinking about Professor Dava Newman's BioSuit: https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/61704...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    3. Re:Switch to skinsuits by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the basic design, yes. Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle referred to them as "skintights" in their fiction. Their asteroid miners typically wore the suits 24x7 in their very small space craft. The idea was researched at as far back as the 1950's, shortly after the invention of the modern wet suit, and tested for the Mercury program, and has some verifiable research from the 1970's as well. The ideas are not new: materials and manufacture with those new materials have improved.

    4. Re:Switch to skinsuits by J05H · · Score: 1

      Skinsuits are a great idea, if they can be made to work in full vacuum. Dr. Webb's SAS tests were only to 38,000' in a vac chamber. A more current option would be something lighter based on Final Frontier's suit or the old Apollo Extension Suit from Elkins. One thing to consider with any lighter suit is the opposite need, that these are suits used in heavy construction and need to be built tough. NASA almost went with the AX5 hardsuit for station.

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    5. Re:Switch to skinsuits by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Physical protection is important. But how much is used, or needed, even on a normal construction site? Safety glasses, helmet, gloves and boots would be needed, though gloves are a trade-off between protection and dexterity. Incidental rips are a risk, but are they more avoidable if the suit is flexible and helps the astronaut be more agile and complete their task more quickly? These are fascinating questions.

    6. Re:Switch to skinsuits by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I do not know what has held up development for this kind of suit.

      The same thing that holds up the development of many things - making a skinsuit has turned out to a Very Hard Task and the slender advantages aren't worth the amount of money it would take to solve the engineering issues.

    7. Re:Switch to skinsuits by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > making a skinsuit has turned out to a Very Hard Task

      But what, precisely, makes it a "Very Hard Task"? The Wikipedia article on the MIT "BioSuit" is interesting and describes some of the progress. It doesn't indicate what the researchers think are the most difficult remaining issues, or if there are any that have really never been addressed. I, for one, would like to know.

    8. Re:Switch to skinsuits by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Here's a longer article on the NASA-funded work being done by MIT. Short answer: Making a BioSuit is a Very Hard Task with a lot of engineering issues.

  37. Who gives a fuck? by skovnymfe · · Score: 2

    Really? Who gives a fuck?

    1. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody with a brain cares.

      I'm just waiting for the "all blacks spacewalk", then the "all asians spacewalk", then "all old people", "all children", "all handicapped", "all blind", "all IQ below 50". (Did I miss any minorities?)

      Hell, I don't know steep this slope will go, but I can't wait to see how stupid it becomes.

  38. Re:Getting Tired of /. Posting Endless SJW Non Sen by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    Space suit design and the difficulty of fitting them is a fundamental tech issue. Two women doing a space walk together is history. On reflection, wouldn't you agree that it is news for nerds?

  39. Re:Getting Tired of /. Posting Endless SJW Non Sen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it very interesting that all these feminists both despise men talking about sex and men who don't have sex.

  40. Suits made their butts look big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know that's what they mean by "fit."

  41. Re: Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just did that. Replaced Ms with Mr. Medium with ex-large. Her with his.

    I guess I'm missing your point, as it read a little silly (two men don't simultaneously spacewalk) but wasn't sexist.

  42. It's Essential by rv6502 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Women need to be shown other women doing things.
    Because they have no initiative, no imagination, complete herd mentality.
    The only way to kickstart women doing anything is being told to by a man. /sarcasm

    It's like the special Olympics but with their genitals as the handicap.
    Gotta love all that progressive crypto-chauvinism.

  43. Because "the first all female space walk" is stupid. If we're equal, then who cares?

    But I'm sure this will be spun as being horribly unfair, how dare we not have enough woman-sized suits around, etc.

  44. Re:Just a PR stunt... by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    They are around 40 years old

    The design is 40 years old (well, 38), but the suits in use now were not produced 40 years ago. New ones were produced for the ISS, so that puts the maximum age closer to 20 years. I suspect the suits are regularly swapped as components reach end-of-life.

  45. Re:Fake news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure Donald, now take your medicine and play some golf. And yes, the joke was hilarious, we're just very good at controlling ourselves.

  46. This is not feminist progress by es330td · · Score: 2

    If feminists actually wanted progress they would want nothing said at all about this. True equality means the best person does the job without consideration of gender, ethnicity or any other personal factor. Pointing out that a task was completed only by women makes it seems as though there was some question whether it could be completed without a man. Long gone are the days when the prevailing thought is that women are incapable of technical or mechanical tasks. The battery will not be installed any differently because of the gender of the people are doing it. Concrete progress in social justice will be measured by the day when an article can say "Astronauts Shannon Miller and Marion Cruz completed a spacewalk" and we don't even know the genders of the people involved.

  47. IOW by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    She couldn't go out because she didn't have a thing to wear.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re: IOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they need a man to plan their spacewalk

      They spent too much time talking about it and forgot to pack the right gear.

  48. astronauts needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, apparently NASA desperately needs astronauts with biger bra size

  49. stop doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one cares. I thought the point of treating people equally was that you didn't do stuff like "all female team does something that's been done before"

    Why not just treat women like normal people, instead of special children that need to be placed on a pedestal?

    You realize this is a worse form of objectification right?

  50. Re:Just a PR stunt... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What kind of twisted, self-flagellating logic is required to see this story as sexist?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  51. Re:Just a PR stunt... by tomhath · · Score: 1

    But the first women-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both women will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

    You don't see that as sexist? Let's use another demographic to make it clearer for you:

    But the first middle-aged white men-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both middle-aged white men will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

  52. Re:Just a PR stunt... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Neither seems sexist, they are just noting the first time a particular demographic is doing something that other demographics have been doing for decades.

    You are being over-sensitive.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  53. Also because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 12 year-old SJWs or their emotional equivalent think the notion is anything but absurd. Nobody else cares about this. People are people. You are a joke, millennials, and you just keep getting funnier. Thank you for supplanting the now mediocre field of comedy with your antics, we need our clowns.

  54. Re:Just a PR stunt... by LordAba · · Score: 1

    Not sexist. Stupid and virtue signaling, yes. Sexist, no.

    Plus the "reverse the genders" thing only really works when people are complaining about too many of one thing: "there are too many white males in computer science" turns into "there are too many black females in computer science".

  55. Re:Just a PR stunt... by jeff4747 · · Score: 3

    I suspect the suits are regularly swapped as components reach end-of-life.

    You'd be wrong. Makeshift repairs are done on the suits.

    Some rich folks only had 8 mansions, so we had to give them a tax cut. So, we had to break out the duct tape and bailing wire for the space suits.

  56. Re: Just a PR stunt... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    People change size after spending time in zero-G environments.

  57. Re:Just a PR stunt... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    What if there was an event on the station and some of the suits were damaged?

    The crew would flee to the docked Soyuz capsule and abandon the station.

    What if there was an emergency evacuation where the station was depressurized

    The suits take about 30 minutes to put on, and require the help of another astronaut. So, they're not what would be used in a depressurization scenario. Instead, the crew would flee to the docked Soyuz capsule and abandon the station.

    or have an environmental control failure resulting in the need for all astronauts to be in suits?

    Then the crew would flee to the docked Soyuz capsule and abandon the station.

    (Have you noticed a trend yet?)

    The space program is supposed to be all about safety and redundancy and yet the bread and butter of the astronaut's garb isn't even available in DUPLICATE onboard?

    Have you enjoyed your tax cuts? 'Cause not building new space suits since the 1980s is one of the effects of those tax cuts.

  58. Re:Just a PR stunt... by tomhath · · Score: 2

    It's sexist *because* they are noting it for no reason other than the sex of the astronauts.

  59. Re:Just a PR stunt... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For something to be sexist it has to have some negative repercussion for one gender. Since the notability here comes from the fact that it is something which men have been doing for decades but women have still not had the opportunity to do, it doesn't create disadvantage or have any negative effects, and thus is not sexist.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  60. Enough with the laser focus on gender! by Pyramid · · Score: 1

    Space is unforgiving. Gender is absolutely irrelevant compared to safety and skill. I'm sure both women are skilled at their jobs, but safety dictated they both can't walk at the same time (for now). If that's is upsetting, get over it.

    PR stunts have zero value compared to this.

    --
    ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  61. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Pyramid · · Score: 2

    There already is a negative repercussion. They're focusing on gender as if that's some kind of accomplishment instead of the skill of the crew members. Gender is irrelevant unless you have the unspoken assumption that they aren't equal.

    --
    ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  62. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit being obtuse, moron.

  63. Re:Just a PR stunt... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    If it was not two women this story would not have appeared on Slashdot or in most of the other places it was mentioned. Space walks happen all the time and are not reported this widely. Thus, nothing has been lost.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  64. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the underlying even is that NASA changed what astronaut they assigned to a mission because they didn't have the equipment they needed for the original assignment on hand. The mission as not canceled, nobody was put in danger. It's a complete non story.

    The only reason this is "news" is because of the sex of the astronauts involved.

  65. Re:Just a PR stunt... by strikethree · · Score: 1

    You don't see that as sexist? Let's use another demographic to make it clearer for you:

    For clarity purposes, let's do it with lots of categories:

    But the first black-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both black people will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

    or

    But the first Jewish-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both Jewish people will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

    or

    But the first Disabled-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both disabled people will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

    or

    But the first dog-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both dog people will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

    You should not be surprised that AmiMoJo sees it as not sexist. Women have been held back forever! This is their time to shine! ... which is sexist, just "reverse" sexist. Which is still sexist. But of course he can't see it. He is enabling women! How could that be sexist? But it is.

    People. lol. So funny. What is even more amazing is that he has a brain that works. He just has too many "rigidities" that prevent him from seeing certain things. Attack all axioms. Keep that which survives. Even if it survived before, it needs to be tested again. And again.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  66. Re:Just a PR stunt... by udachny · · Score: 0

    If I only had 8 mansions I also wouldn't want my money to be wasted by any government program.

  67. How, exactly, are their genitals relevant? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > Two women doing a space walk together is history. On reflection, wouldn't you agree that it is news for nerds?

    How, precisely, are their genitals relevant to the job?

    Obviously their genitalia isn't involved in any way.

    Beethoven composing his greatest works after he became deaf is interesting because you might think a deaf person couldn't compose great music. Women doing spacewalks is interesting only if you're thinking "even women can do it". It's patronizing sexism, and it's infuriating to me because my four year old daughter picks up on that. She hears that it's special when a woman manages to do something, and understands your implicit reason you think it's special when a woman accomplishes something - because in general women can't accomplish anything. That's the unspoken assumption.

    1. Re:How, exactly, are their genitals relevant? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > How, precisely, are their genitals relevant to the job?

      Toilet facilities for space suits are more awkward for women than for men. Men wear what is basically a condom with a tube leading to a bag. I'm personally curious if the women wore catheters, or diapers. The hormonal differences of women from men especially concerning menstruation, and the need for hand and arm strength in spacewalks all seem interesting factors. If spacewalks always include at least one man, as they have so far, then women have had backup available for tasks of manual strength. And the lengths they'd have had to go for both women to spacewalk at the same time is a reminder of how limited the reserve of equipment is for our astronauts. Rather than launching in spacesuits, they only have a few suits on the station.

      The "assumption" is that women in space are still unusual, and that they are more present now as a matter of course. That's an interesting historical shift.

  68. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was not two women this story would not have appeared on Slashdot

    In other words, time and effort has been lost to produce this story that could have been directed towards something else more productive.

    Instead of hearing about things of actual substance done by/for women, we get drama baiting crap like this. This creates a false signals that a) society has lower expectations for women, and b) women and girls are not welcomed in these fields

  69. Soft bigotry of low expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is soft bigotry of low expectations.
    Why is it such a big deal if women are "walking" in space?
    Is it because certain people didn't expect them to be able to do so? Who are these "certain people"? Why, it's NASA and the politically correct crowd.
    It seems that, hypocritically, they don't think women are as capable as men are.

  70. She just had to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There we were, all set and ready to go, sunlight reflecting off one of the transparent panels. I saw her shoulders sag, thought What now? She spins around, lifts her visor, and asks, Does this suit make me look fat?

    I replied Now that's NASA ass!

    1. Re:She just had to ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There we were, all set and ready to go, sunlight reflecting off one of the transparent panels. I saw her shoulders sag, thought What now? She spins around, lifts her visor, and asks, Does this suit make me look fat?

      I replied Now that's NASA ass!

      +10

  71. Golfclap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to 1960, douchenozzle.

  72. F**K ME, I'm preordering NOW by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    2019 NASA Spacewalkers Pinup Calendar

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  73. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the first women-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both women will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

    But the first negro-only venture outside the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day... In the end, both negro's will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

  74. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging an event based on the sex of the participants is not sexist?

    And this mindset got 9 modpoints in this thread alone.

    Amazing.

  75. Maxxed Tonnage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has extra armor plates instead of extra heat sinks and a small pulse laser. It's already at max tonnage and they didn't have anywhere to store the extra plates because the cargo bay is full after SpaceX delivered a new Long Tom cannon no one asked for.

  76. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You realize that Trump's SALT tax deduction reduction, which has the Democrats so furious, is exactly the opposite of what you are complaining about?

    Those rich people with 8 mansions will now be required to pay MORE Federal taxes, because of Trump.

    Any wonder the Democrats hate it?

  77. women will never progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not progress because women won't do what they have to do to get shit done. She already went on one EVA with the large suit and had no problem but now all of sudden she wants a different size? If she gave a shit, she'd shut the fuck up, put the large suit on, and do her fucking job like any man would. My guess is she did this shit on purpose because she didn't want to be the first woman to do anything. She didn't want the fame and the constant interviews and people giving her attention she didn't specifically demand.

    Women won't ever progress. I don't know the word for it but they simply give up at the first sign of something being too hard/uncomfortable/imperfect. They won't get dirty and they won't suffer for what they want. It's pathetic.

  78. Can women be Astronauts? by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

    Here is a fantastic video addressing this Question!

    (Worth the time)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video...

  79. Where Is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The crazy post from APK that claims his/their software will fix this problem? It seems to fix everything else!

  80. Re: Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately it doesnâ(TM)t seem to be possible to do that anymore. The PR people tell you where to go, how to stand, and you better smile.

  81. Re:Just a PR stunt... by spitzak · · Score: 1

    Sorry I see nothing wrong with your rewording that you seem to think will sound "offensive". I think we can identify exactly who is being offended unnecessarily here, and it is YOU.

  82. Re:Just a PR stunt... by fenrif · · Score: 1

    Sexism doesn't require negative repercussions. It just required prejudice against a sex. Prejudice is defined as being a "preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience." For someone who has a faux dictionary definition in their sig I would suggest you try looking up the words you are talking about before you pretend to be an expert next time. SJW, n: "Someone who makes up definitions for words to suit their own prejudices."

  83. Re:Just a PR stunt... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    You realize that space suits designed in the 1980s and built around 2000 have existed for more than one president's tax cuts, right?

    Also:

    Those rich people with 8 mansions will now be required to pay MORE Federal taxes, because of Trump.

    Only if they're morons. Or more precisely, their accountants are morons.

    One of the benefits of having 9+ mansions is you essentially get to pick which state you "live" in for tax purposes. So you can pick a state with low/no income tax in which you receive your income.

    The people fucked by removing the deduction for state and local taxes is the middle class. The rich, as usual, have a work-around.

  84. Shouldn't first priority be FUNCTIONING EQUIPMENT? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    If there is a suit on board the ISS that is not ready for use, then it might as well not be there. OTOH if it's really a matter of only 12 hours of work to get it ready and usable, rearrange the schedule to get that lifeboat ship-shape. Shouldn't the first priority on any vessel be to ensure that all operational equipment is in working order, especially life-safety equipment? If the first act of a "Babylon 5" or "Battlestar Galactica" episode showed a suit still in its bubble-wrap, you could bet that by the end of the episode someone would be dead because that suit was not ready. ("Star Trek" would have had someone manage to get it ready JUST IN TIME, because "failure is not an option", but that's not always how the real world works in an emergency.)

  85. What did she wear Friday? by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    Ms. McClain had thought she would be able to work in a large-size torso, but after her spacewalk last Friday, she wore a medium-size torso and learned that it fit her better.

    I'm confused by the wording here. Is it saying she wore a large one on Friday, but then found out afterwards that a medium fit her better? Or it saying that she thought a large would fit, but instead tried a medium. Then afterwards she determined the medium fit and the large wouldn't?

  86. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh, yes. The "male feminist" approach, seeking to be supportive of the self-empowered "damsels in destriess" by "showing your sensitivity" to get laid.

    How's that working out for you?

  87. You can't blame a girl ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...about to be in a televised all-female premiere before the nation that she dieted a bit so that the world gets told she needs a smaller space-suit.