Slashdot Mirror


VW Says China To Become Global Software Development Hub For Autonomous Tech (reuters.com)

Volkswagen will use Chinese software developers to help design a global autonomous vehicle architecture thanks to the prevalence of qualified programmers which carmakers are struggling to hire elsewhere, senior executives said on Monday. Reuters reports: As carmakers scramble to develop advanced driver assistance systems and autonomous driving functions, carmakers are struggling to find qualified engineers to build the software algorithms needed to teach cars the right reflexes. Volkswagen has 4,000 engineers in China, with an average age of 29, spread over five research and development sites and a rapidly growing number of software engineers. "In a short period from now they will be able to do 15 to 20 million lines of programming code on an annual basis," Volkswagen China's passenger cars chief Stephan Woellenstein said in Shanghai on Monday.

The prevalence of software engineers, combined with the country's willingness to roll out the infrastructure for connected and self-driving cars, will make China one of the first markets in which autonomous cars gain widespread acceptance, VW managers said. As a result, Chinese suppliers will help Volkswagen Group to design a global autonomous vehicle architecture, he said.

186 comments

  1. Don't think I'd trust the software by melted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't think I'd trust the software developed under a sweatshop-like 12 hours a day 6 days a week regime, sorry VW. Software made in the us by foremost experts in the field is bad enough to run into firetrucks as it is, this shit will explode when you press the engine start button.

    1. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " thanks to the prevalence of qualified programmers which carmakers are struggling to hire elsewhere" is the key phrase.

    2. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think I'd trust the software developed under a sweatshop-like 12 hours a day 6 days a week regime, sorry VW. Software made in the us by foremost experts in the field is bad enough to run into firetrucks as it is, this shit will explode when you press the engine start button.

      20,000,000 lines of code divided by 4,000 engineers is only 5,000 lines of code per year for each engineer, or 100 lines of code per week per engineer. That's hardly anything, let alone requiring "sweatshop-like" policies.

      The only question is whether they can get the entire code base written by those engineers to work together coherently -- that requires a really good architect.

    3. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd never trust yank software developed under sweatshop-like 12 hours a day 6 days a week regime, with no universal healthcare or workers rights, sorry Boeing.

      Also your "engineers" crashed that Mars orbiter because you couldn't tell inches in cm.

    4. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think I'd trust the software developed under a sweatshop-like 12 hours a day 6 days a week regime

      Where have you been, boy?

      For the past 2 decades, you have been using software developed in Hindustani sweatshops.

      What makes the Boeing planes falling from the sky? Hindustani sweatshops, of course !

    5. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't think I'd trust the software developed under a sweatshop-like 12 hours a day 6 days a week regime, sorry VW.

      Are you talking about China or a Silicon Valley startup?

      Besides, that ship sales long ago. Geely and Tata software is already in millions of cars, many of them old Western brands that they bought up.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " thanks to the prevalence of qualified programmers which carmakers are struggling to hire elsewhere" is the key phrase.

      This shortage is thanks to a long sequence of governments in the US and Europe who have put in tireless work over several decades to disassemble their education systems and stultify their populations so that they'll cheer when the money previously spent on educating them is spent to tax breaks to finance stock buybacks and CEO bonuses. You get what you vote for, especially if you allow yourself to be distracted from what really matters by non issues like immigrant caravans/flotillas supposedly coming to destroy your christian conservative civilisation. Meanwhile the Chinese put tons of money into universities and incentives for young people to go there. Is anybody surprised that their method worked better than the asinine political circus we are currently obsessing over at the expense of everything else except tax breaks for the fabulously rich?

    7. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software made in the US by Indians. FTFY. I'd hire an Indian developer over an American developer any day. Indians are better coders.

    8. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well said.

    9. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As official Mar a Lago security, I'd like to see if you have any thumb drives I can please plug into official Secret Service biznezz, ya? The codeword is Drumpftards.

    10. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The breakthroughs needed to solve shit like autonomous driving requires eureka moments by many highly intelligent, creative people who have probably been spending a lot of their time considering the various problems. Humanity is dragged kicking and screaming into the future by the innovations of an extremely small percentage of the population.
      I don't think it's a case of just having some brilliant architect who knows how to manage large development projects using x number of plebs. It's a case of having some brilliant hardware and software developers that can come up with ingenious solutions to solve the problems with the computing power that's available with the given budget.
       

    11. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill yourself, stupid monkey buttfucker

    12. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Very well said.

      The whole entire anti-education agenda of these right wing populists just pisses me off. My great great grandfather was a serf, a cottager. He made sure his son got educated as a carpenter. My great grandfather decided that the way to an even better life was to educate his sons and daughters so he taught them to read by himself. My grandfather became a sailor, his sisters all got good positions that allowed them to live a better life. My grandparents also educated all of their kids to the best of their financial ability. That is why I could go to University and get a CS degree. I recommend people watch the below clip because this is where we have ended up:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      This is not just an American story, it's just worse there than it is in many other places. Every singe one of those people are going somewhere else to work where they'll be better paid and have an actual budget to get their job done. If you can move to China and get paid 3 times a US teacher's wage teaching Chinese high school students English in preparation for their university studies and a career as a highly skilled worker something is seriously wrong. Meanwhile the US is still busy arguing over asinine crap like whether the 'Kansas experiment', where they completely de-funded all of their schools in a quest for small government, was actually a good idea that was not given long enough to work out. Just watching that debate you begin to understand what the problem is. Being uneducated is nothing to be ashamed of, it is something you should strive to fix, not celebrate.

    13. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      15 to 25 million lines of it.
      Are we sure proper thought is being given to the bugs, in particular security on these?

    14. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That's how crunch has worked since I can remember it. If that's your criteria for not trusting software, no major software package in existence can be trusted.

    15. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile in actual reality the United States spends more on education than most countries. The problem is a top-heavy educational administration, but these people usually have the 'right' D party allegiance so we can't talk about that.

    16. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My great great grandfather was a serf, a cottager.

      Perhaps alternate phrasing next time?
      https://www.urbandictionary.co...

    17. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by gtall · · Score: 1

      While I agree with what you said, I do not have a high opinion of the Chinese education system. My experience is that the product that system produces is big on replication, not education. I wouldn't trust software produced by that lot.

    18. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh please. China has a higher population than North America and Europe combined.

      When you're looking for cheap programmers it's hardly a fucking surprise that you'll find some there.

      Chinese put tons of money into universities and incentives for young people to go there

      ..and yet despite the higher population China has less than 4/5 the number of students at university that America and the EU have, even without counting the rest of North America and Europe.

      Is anybody surprised that their method worked better than the asinine political circus we are currently obsessing over at the expense of everything else except tax breaks for the fabulously rich?

      Yes, I'm completely fucking amazed you claim their method worked better.

    19. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I think you need both. That insanely brilliant algorithm needs a shit-ton of scaffolding.

    20. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My personal experience is exactly the opposite.

      I have met good Indian programmers. They do actually exist. It's just bloody hard to find them.

    21. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Funny

      My great great grandfather was a serf, a cottager.

      Perhaps alternate phrasing next time? https://www.urbandictionary.co...

      Cottager is one of the levels of serfdom in feudal societies, I can't help it that your mind is a sewer.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    22. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " thanks to the prevalence of qualified programmers which carmakers are struggling to hire elsewhere" is the key phrase.

      This shortage is thanks to a long sequence of governments in the US .. who have put in tireless work over several decades to disassemble their education systems and stultify their populations by replacing mathematics with LBGTQ indoctrination, replacing writing with cultural Marxism, and replacing history with an intersectional contest to claim biggest victim status, and otherwise replacing achievement with FEELZ.

      And then blaming whitey.

      FTFY.

      How the hell else do we wind up with new-face-of-the-Democratic-Party Marxist bae, donkey-chompereed, bug-eyed Chiquita Kruschev graduate cum laude from Boston University with a degree in economics coupled with a demonstrated inability to understand unemployment?

    23. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. China has a higher population than North America and Europe combined.

      When you're looking for cheap programmers it's hardly a fucking surprise that you'll find some there.

      ...

      Nor has China destroyed their education system by replacing achievement with "progressive" intersectional indoctrination.

      Next time you see jobs you could do go to China, remember to place a lot of the blame on those "progressive" Feelz Studies Departments that replaced useful degree fields and destroyed the value of your education.

    24. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only question is whether they can get the entire code base written by those engineers to work together coherently -- that requires a really good architect.

      Good luck with that.

      Oracle has spent billions proving just how fucking impossible that task is.

    25. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it was so cheap!

    26. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd hire an Indian developer over an American developer any day. Indians are cheap and obedient."

      FTFY

    27. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Don't think I'd trust the software developed under a sweatshop-like 12 hours a day 6 days a week regime, sorry VW. Software made in the us by foremost experts in the field is bad enough to run into firetrucks as it is, this shit will explode when you press the engine start button.

      That is what I was thinking. Lack of qualified developers, or lack of developers willing to sacrifice quality for cost and time?

    28. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Your great great grandfather was a faggot!

    29. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      It sounds like a grade of cheese to me. Between cottage and cottagest.

    30. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your great great grandfather was a faggot!

      I doubt it, at the time people were executed for homosexuality and it was a small community, he lived to be a very old man.

      Incidentally, back then people were also heavily fined (or flogged if they could not pay) for begin a potty mouth like you.

    31. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 2

      It sounds like a grade of cheese to me. Between cottage and cottagest.

      That is because cottage cheese is literally what it says on the tin. Cottage cheese is cheese curds and whey. It was eaten by poor people for the most part. In really hard times they'd strain out the whey, dissolve bones in the whey and eat it like a soup. I tasted that dish once and never felt any desire to do so again.

    32. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, the sjws' are harvesting now, all those feel good, kumbaya, political correctness, gender neutral education policies are very effective in turning out parrots that can't think critically, just follow diversity as long as it's in the approved list and what's in on social media.

    33. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work at a chinese owned car company, a big one, but we don't yet have a sales presence in the US.

      we have thousands in china and a few hundred in the bay area.

      I often can see the difference in approach and code quality between east and west.

      all I will say is: code and design from china mostly sucks. they are STILL windows-based (in thoughts and machinery) and while e-cars are all going qnx and linux (and android), the windows people still are the majority of the so-called programmers over there.

      they can throw 10x as many people at a project and it will still suck.

      there is a REASON software is done here in the US, for complex projects. china simply cannot do it; if they could, they would not ALL have local bay area offices where the real design is done.

      the bay area engineers are more skilled and experienced, but being a chinese owned company, we are a little too, uhm, 'thrifty' and this is going to hurt us, long-term.

      we also don't pay for performance and we don't reward top performers. the china way is: burn people out and hope they leave on their own, soon.

      this is NO WAY to do business. but sadly, its how it is, right now.

      (perhaps hold off buying chinese-made cars for a while, is my advice)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    34. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that wasn't yank, more like indians contractors

    35. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      As official Mar a Lago security, I'd like to see if you have any thumb drives I can please plug into official Secret Service biznezz, ya? The codeword is Drumpftards.

      Aren't you way too busy chasing Chinese grannies and tossing the Donalds' golf balls out of sand pits?

    36. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cuz you don't know how to read them, eg. shaking head means yes.

    37. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh please. China has a higher population than North America and Europe combined.

      When you're looking for cheap programmers it's hardly a fucking surprise that you'll find some there.

      Chinese put tons of money into universities and incentives for young people to go there

      ..and yet despite the higher population China has less than 4/5 the number of students at university that America and the EU have, even without counting the rest of North America and Europe.

      Is anybody surprised that their method worked better than the asinine political circus we are currently obsessing over at the expense of everything else except tax breaks for the fabulously rich?

      Yes, I'm completely fucking amazed you claim their method worked better.

      They have an adequate supply of qualified developers and engineers, the EU and US in particular don't. That speaks louder than any words and has so far resulted in Huawei managing to research their way to owning 1529 "standard-essential" 5G patents, the most of any company, and Xiaomi, Huawei, Oppo, and VIVO lead the list after Samsung and Apple on the list over the biggest smartphone manufacturers. Underestimating your opponent is the mother of all defeats.

      P.S. Inserting a colloquial term for sexual intercourse into your sentences does nothing to make your argument more convincing.

    38. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Oh please. China has a higher population than North America and Europe combined.

      When you're looking for cheap programmers it's hardly a fucking surprise that you'll find some there.

      ...

      Nor has China destroyed their education system by replacing achievement with "progressive" intersectional indoctrination.

      Next time you see jobs you could do go to China, remember to place a lot of the blame on those "progressive" Feelz Studies Departments that replaced useful degree fields and destroyed the value of your education.

      We'll have to agree to disagree then. I blame for profit schools, the expense of education, truing student loans into a debt slavery scheme and a right wing political culture that glorifies ignorance.

    39. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd hire an Indian developer over an American developer any day. Indians are cheap and obedient."

      FTFY

      You mean those motherfuckers that are on stackexchange all day long asking for working code they themselves are unable to come up with ? Those types of Indian programmers ?

      Incompetent rogrammers that cheat are all over the place. It's just that most of them come from India.

    40. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 0

      They have an adequate supply of qualified developers and engineers, the EU and US in particular don't

      That's got fuck all to do with investment in education and far more to do with Europe and the US outsourcing much of their IT to low cost locations.

      Like China.

      Underestimating your opponent is the mother of all defeats.

      Being pragmatic and realistic about China's position in the world doesn't require underestimating them. It's actually possible to acknowledge their progress without attacking the education system in other countries.

      You should try it.

      PS: There's nowt wrong w' fucking

    41. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      please, the chinese education system is hot garbage. source, my chinese wife, who went through it.

    42. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add political correctness in education. We don’t wanna hurt any feelings so we strive for mediocrity that way people don’t feel bad when somebody else does exemplary. Everybody gets a fucking metal for merely showing up. We no longer have contest to decide a winner, unless it’s sports. Some schools are even giving out the perfect attendance award even if the kid missed a day or two for a medical appointment or something along those lines. When you water down your reward system and make it have no merit, you are throwing away the carrot and that just leaves you with a damn stick. A lot of kids aren’t even motivated now. They no longer teach people cursive, handwriting is not even important, they don’t know how to address an envelope, or even write a letter. Everybody thought this no Child left behind program was going to be great. It was an impossible goal with severe penalties for not meeting them. So what did they do? They lowered all the standard so that everybody would magically qualify for being on “grade level“. No Child left behind really means no child gets ahead. Common core is the next iteration of the stupidity. Try to help your kid with math sometime. That scene from Incredibles 2 is 100% real, I have had that argument multiple times.

    43. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, is clearly those right wing anti union teachers. You ignorant fool. The NEA is the most politically powerful union in the US, and they're strongly leftist. They deliberately keep teachers underpaid to maintain political power.

      As to islam, you of course deny that in the 20th century, Muslims conquered and exterminated in Armenia, the Celebes, East Timor, South Sudan, and several other African tribes that you don't care about.

    44. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are delusional if you think this is a right wing problem. The vast majority of the kids I see going to private schools come from right wing families. I’m not even talking about super rich elite private schools. I am sure that they could find better ways to spend that $15,000 per year on tuition if they thought they had a choice. They are doing it so that their children have a decent shot at succeeding later in life. Three of the four largest and most successful private schools in my city (not even tier 3 in size) are religious in some sort of charter. Lexington Catholic, Lexington Christian Academy, Christ the King, etc. their academic program is far from substandard. They have the highest percentage of high school graduates qualifying for and in rolling into college.

        So I do not think they are anti-education. Some do not like the anti-religious aspect of school, but a vast majority are doing it because of the substandard education that’s being offered up in public school that’s now deemed “good enough“. My daughter goes to public school. She’s finishing up her sophomore year. For the last four years I have been telling her that her writing skills are shit. I am constantly complaining about the quality of homework she hands him. Sometime she answers questions and doesn’t even use a complete sentence. Of course, she would argue back that the teacher said she doesn’t have to. Thinking I’m being lied to I reach out and ask the teachers. Guess what? She didn’t fucking have to! I am far from religious, but I’m starting to develop an anti-public education attitude based on these shitty reduced standards. In the early 80s, when I was in junior high, they didn’t call it middle school back then, you are not allowed to turn in any work that did not contain complete sentences. I do believe that the damn Scan-tron Machines that instantly graded those fill in the circle multiple choice test were the beginning of the stupidity. Sure it made it easy for the teachers, but recognizing the correct answer when told is not the same thing is actually knowing the correct answer.

    45. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by parkinglot777 · · Score: 0

      While I agree with what you said, I do not have a high opinion of the Chinese education system. My experience is that the product that system produces is big on replication, not education. I wouldn't trust software produced by that lot.

      It is just a different (extreme) way of teaching education. In western countries, schools tend to teach kids to be more expressive of what they think. These kids will try to broad their knowledge but at the same time rarely want to dig very deep in a certain area. Furthermore, teachers are more like friends to them due to the laws and their parents' involvements, so some kids have no respect to their teachers at all.

      On the other hand, Asian countries (not only China) tend to teach their kids to dig deep into a certain area but not broad. They are also taught to be very respectful to their teachers (as their bosses or authorities), and they will respect their teachers regardless what they want (punishment can be harsh). As a result, they are much less expressive of their opinion (being suppressive), which is what westerners look at as a replication, because they don't dare to (or give) any opinions but rather follow the orders.

      Both education systems, to me, are extreme. I wish there is a way to find the middle ground of both systems.

    46. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it’s also due to how engineering careers are perceived here. In countries like China or India, engineers are (somewhat) respected and engineering is perceived as a good and profitable career path. Over here, engineering is perceived as a long and difficult study with an iffy and poorly paid career at the end of it. “You could have been an engineer”, said no dad to his son in any movie, ever. The line is: “You could have been a doctor or a lawyer”. Science and engineering are no longer popular studies, many students are from abroad (India and China) and there are hardly any local PhD students left.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    47. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This shortage is thanks to a long sequence of governments in the US and Europe who have put in tireless work over several decades to disassemble their education systems

      Not in the UK.

      During the last Labour government a lot of money was put into education, and results improved quite a lot. The problem is that tech is very broad and while there are plenty of Javascript developers there are not many with more specialist skills, and companies are unwilling to train them.

      If you have those skills you can see that there definitely is a shortage - high salaries, recruiting overseas, all the usual signs... Except for training. Companies aren't willing to take someone and invest in a few years of training, probably because once that person can put "5 years experience" on their CV they will notice that their salary has not kept pace with market rates and leave.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    48. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      @Freischutz, I'm pretty sure the populists in your country have little in common with conservatives in the US, connecting the two is a non-sequitur. Don't make that mistake like so many of the ignorant, angry masses.
      In the US, conservatives generally support school choice programs to allow children to get out of underperforming schools, charter schools which bring STEM education to underserved urban populations, and accountability for teachers and curricula that underperform.
      Liberals, on the other hand, support whatever teachers' unions deem to be in their best interests; want to insert Art studies into the STEM- further siphoning away resources from a curriculum that would give us top-shelf coders, engineers, and scientists; and support teaching revisionist history so as not to offend or make any ethnic group uncomfortable.
      Can you imagine if, say in Europe, they decided to never cover Napoleon, Hitler or Stalin in school because it made people "uncomfortable"? How long would it be before the world made those mistakes again?
      How many more hours per week should each student put into social pseudo-science classes, knowing they will come at the expense of math, science and technology since unions will not allow for the expansion of the school day or year?
      How do we force underperforming educators out of critical roles to give new, better-equipped STEM teachers a proper role and a livable wage when union-backed tenure arrangements prohibit chronic underperformers from being fired?
      Thanks for playing, please do come back again sometime.

    49. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of a funny statement form VW since the "European automakers", whoever those are, are hopeful at getting some results from the European chip projects (EPI) for trust and supply chain reliability reasons. Maybe the automakers are actually weapons manufacturers after all, or the VW statement is a generalization over the whole global industry.

    50. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That first paragraph was sarcasm, right?
      I'm pretty sure there's no political indoctrination being done in the schools, home, businesses or media there.
      -now that's how you do sarcasm-

    51. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent AC who posted this is an actual troll who is trying to insert false info to excite those who already don't like "hindu" (or implication of muslim). Watch out!

    52. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by DrSpock11 · · Score: 1

      Yet the actual data says the number of computer science graduates in the US is higher than its ever been. (Though it did dip for a decade following the dot-com bubble).

      https://docs.google.com/spread...
      Source: NCES

    53. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Occam's razor: education for the plebs doesn't matter, as long as my kids get a good one.

    54. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I still want to know how they're going to deal with snow on the lenses.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    55. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      They have an adequate supply of qualified developers and engineers, the EU and US in particular don't

      That's got fuck all to do with investment in education and far more to do with Europe and the US outsourcing much of their IT to low cost locations.

      Like China.

      Underestimating your opponent is the mother of all defeats.

      Being pragmatic and realistic about China's position in the world doesn't require underestimating them. It's actually possible to acknowledge their progress without attacking the education system in other countries.

      You should try it.

      PS: There's nowt wrong w' fucking

      Automation has killed way more jobs than outsourcing has. In a world where automation is everywhere you need a high level of education in your workforce. The cleaning lady of the future is probably going to be a women running a fleet of cleaning robots with an tablet computer. You don't get there with a workforce trained in schools where the teachers are massively underpaid and there isn't even enough money to buy textbooks or put doors on the toilets. People were 'pragmatic' and 'realistic' about China (read: sat on their laurels confident in their god given right to be a tech leader) 20 years ago, now China is a threat. Give the Chinese another 20 years of reform and a sensible education policy and they'll surpass the US on every level. You can choose to underestimate your opponent but don't get to complain when your idleness bites you in the butt.

      P.S. I don't really think you Americans fully understand just how asinine you sound to other people with your f**ing this, and f**ing that but there is a way you can find out. Try saying "Jesus' butt-plug" instead of 'fuck' for a few days. You will soon learn the virtues of not having a toilet for a mouth.

    56. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Have you looked into the working conditions of Silicon Valley?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    57. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has anyone seen the videos of "drivers" in china?

    58. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 0

      Holy Jesus' butt-plug you're a cock.

      1 - automation creates jobs as well as replacing them
      2 - outsourcing to low cost countries has replaced jobs irrespective of automation
      3 - teachers are among the highest paid earners in the US
      4 - the Chinese are less than 20 years of reform away from another revolution
      5 - I've already told you I'm not underestimating anybody, but frankly China isn't my opponent. I'm not a nation state

      PS - 7 - I don't use the term f**ing, I use the terms fuck and fucking. You may not like them but that's your fucking choice, stop trying to impose it on me
      PS - 8 - I don't have a toilet for a mouth. Saying words does not equate to consuming bodily wastes, although I guess based on your other arguments I shouldn't be surprised that you're stupid enough to think it does
      PS - 9 - I'm not fucking American. I'm also not Chinese and I'm also capable of objectively assessing both nations. You clearly are not.

    59. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are delusional if you think this is a right wing problem. The vast majority of the kids I see going to private schools come from right wing families. I’m not even talking about super rich elite private schools. I am sure that they could find better ways to spend that $15,000 per year on tuition if they thought they had a choice. They are doing it so that their children have a decent shot at succeeding later in life. Three of the four largest and most successful private schools in my city (not even tier 3 in size) are religious in some sort of charter. Lexington Catholic, Lexington Christian Academy, Christ the King, etc. their academic program is far from substandard. They have the highest percentage of high school graduates qualifying for and in rolling into college.

      So I do not think they are anti-education. Some do not like the anti-religious aspect of school, but a vast majority are doing it because of the substandard education that’s being offered up in public school that’s now deemed “good enough“. My daughter goes to public school. She’s finishing up her sophomore year. For the last four years I have been telling her that her writing skills are shit. I am constantly complaining about the quality of homework she hands him. Sometime she answers questions and doesn’t even use a complete sentence. Of course, she would argue back that the teacher said she doesn’t have to. Thinking I’m being lied to I reach out and ask the teachers. Guess what? She didn’t fucking have to! I am far from religious, but I’m starting to develop an anti-public education attitude based on these shitty reduced standards. In the early 80s, when I was in junior high, they didn’t call it middle school back then, you are not allowed to turn in any work that did not contain complete sentences. I do believe that the damn Scan-tron Machines that instantly graded those fill in the circle multiple choice test were the beginning of the stupidity. Sure it made it easy for the teachers, but recognizing the correct answer when told is not the same thing is actually knowing the correct answer.

      The right-wing elite is not completely anti-education, they just encourage it in their political followers. It is the right-wing that energetically courts the evangelical movement that agitates against provable scientific facts like evolution. I have never seen a modern mainstream left wing movement in the US or EU declare a multi front war on science. The most impressive thing that the right wing has accomplished in the last 30 years is to convince about a third of America's working poor that their best friends looking out for the interests of the working poor are a bunch of trust fund babies who shit into golden toilets. They go to Trump rallies, give speeches about how you should hate and scorn the 'intellectual elite' ... "We golden toilet shitting billionaires who pay no taxes aren't the Elite!!! the college professors are the elite and must be destroyed!!! .... then they turn around and spend $2.5 million to get their idiot son (Jared Kushner in this example) into a university. It is a quite interesting hypocrisy but for some reason they feel they'll benefit from turning the broad masses of the poor into a bunch of illiterates by defunding education. Ill give the Chinese quite a lot of credit for spending large amounts of money to do the opposite.

    60. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derp...NON-SOCIALIST MAN BAD!

    61. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Bradac_55 · · Score: 1

      What does student loans have to do with anything? Student loans was taken over by the federal government in 2010 when President Obama signed it into law.

    62. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derp...NON-SOCIALIST MAN BAD!

      See? You are learning. Good knuckle dragging fascist! ... here's a doggy treat.

    63. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Say the right wing is anti-education
      > Gets examples of the right wing not being anti-education
      "Well of course those specific guys aren't!!! But everyone else is!!! I'm not wrong! I'm not wrong!"

    64. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Holy Jesus' butt-plug you're a cock.

      Not good enough, now go to the 1st reformed church of the AR-15 and repeat that sentence.

      1 - automation creates jobs as well as replacing them

      Yes, but those jobs also require a higher level of worker education so your case that defunding education has no effect has now acquired yet another dent.

      2 - outsourcing to low cost countries has replaced jobs irrespective of automation

      Quoting the financial Times (yuk, I feel dirty): https://www.ft.com/content/dec... The US did indeed lose about 5.6m manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2010. But according to a study by the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University, 85 per cent of these jobs losses are actually attributable to technological change — largely automation — rather than international trade.

      The lesson here is that if you want to be a player in the automated economy you better have a well educated workforce.

      3 - teachers are among the highest paid earners in the US

      That depends entirely upon where you are and how seriously your state takes education: https://www.forbes.com/sites/n... ... also, the teacher's complaint is not just pay most of it is actually a total lack of resources and funding to do their job properly. Because their state leadership (usually Republican) has decided to experiment with small government.

      4 - the Chinese are less than 20 years of reform away from another revolution

      They have managed to create a telecommunications industry that owns 1500 standards essential 5G patents and four of the leading smartphone manufacturers in those 20 years. I look forward to seeing what they'll accomplish in the next 20 years while you sit on your hands and assume they'll never have the temerity to threaten America's technological lead.

      5 - I've already told you I'm not underestimating anybody, but frankly China isn't my opponent. I'm not a nation state

      You do a good job of sounding like you are determined to underestimate the Chinese.

      PS - 7 - I don't use the term f**ing, I use the terms fuck and fucking. You may not like them but that's your fucking choice, stop trying to impose it on me

      And you still sound like somebody who thinks that inserting some form of the word 'fuck' into every sentence makes their argument stronger.

      PS - 8 - I don't have a toilet for a mouth.

      Yes you do.

      PS - 9 - I'm not fucking American. I'm also not Chinese and I'm also capable of objectively assessing both nations. You clearly are not.

      So I am incapable of accessing both nations and you are because ..... no proof?

    65. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 2

      > Say the right wing is anti-education
      > Gets examples of the right wing not being anti-education
      "Well of course those specific guys aren't!!! But everyone else is!!! I'm not wrong! I'm not wrong!"

      Are you really unable to understand the concept of hypocrisy? ... As in: some right-wingnut spends money to get their idiot kids into a university and then goes to a Trump rally and rages against the educated. That's hypocrisy. Let me help you educate yourself on hypocrisy: https://www.google.com/search?...

    66. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Fuck you very much.

      1.) I have mod points but both your excellent posts are at 5.

      2.) I can't comment and mod.

      3.) I am stealing your remarks in a plagiaristic grab because I could not have said it better.

      4.) I will be taking full credit because that's the kind of weenie I am.

      Well said.

        (Score:6, Interesting)

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    67. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      I should caution that throwing money at the problem doesn't solve it. Yes spending is needed, but spending wisely is needed more. I got really tired of reading /. articles about decade ago where high schools in california were installing $5k cappuccino machines for the spoiled little snowflakes. Buying a $5k cappuccino machine is not a wise expense. China has a cultural problem they are struggling to overcome. On my last cruise I met, at one of those veteran meet-and-greets, a couple that became professors and spent time in China teaching students how to think for themselves. This was literally their description of what China was trying to achieve. The biggest problem there is the desire to just copy someone else's work, design, program, etc is ingrained into their society. As a practitioner of traditional Taijiquan for 10yrs, I can see this in hindsight. Even their decades old method of teaching, by way of exact and precise copying the movements, epitomizes this issue. In order to change an entire society, for the goal to become a world leader in all things STEM, it will take an enormous amount of expense and I have no doubt meet a lot of resistance. Not everyone wants to be a wold leader in all things STEM.

      Our education system not only gets underfunded, but they spend the funds they have on most things NOT STEM. They spend 3x the amount of time on social issues, social justice, whatever you want to call it, than they do teaching the topics that nearly everyone agree on. Math is pretty universal. I've never been called a heretic by suggesting 2+2=4, or that log10 scientific notation makes really big numbers easy to write, or that gravitational acceleration is 32ft/sec^2 (9.8m/sec^2). Teach someone that the build up to the separation of the Confederacy was based on the idea of State Sovereignty over Federalism and suddenly the revisionists want to beat you over the head about slavery as if all Confederate states were fighting to own slaves, we'll just ignore the part of the confederate constitution that actually prohibited the African slave trade.

      Society is also hugely to blame for our education problem. Who gets the most notoriety in the US? Sports Atheletes, Actors, Actors that pretend to give a shit about people (we call them politicians), Music performers, and now YouTubers. We now have a fucking bunch of millennial and GenZ that think college is a waste of time. They just want to become rich playing Minecraft all day and recording it for Youtube so they can collect the millions of dollars they feel they are owed. That's a one-trick pony that, IMO, wont last forever. The testing standards keep lowering. I think they are lowering to cover up the fact that we are suddenly producing young adults that are mostly underachievers. What is now required is but a small subset of what used to be required. Sure new things come about they have to cover, so they push out the old requirements (physical ed for example, so now we have staggering obesity rates among teens). However if you mention year round school with some spring-break-like gaps 4 times a year; well, you could have suggested Auschwitz was justifiable and gotten less of a reaction. The push-back is insane despite countless studies that prove that the 2.5mo break every summer creates a back-slide of 30% of the previous years worth of training. In other words they spend 30% of the new year re-learning what they forgot over summer. And I am so tired of hearing this shit that the teachers are underpaid. That's such bullshit. Their salary is based on the 9.5mos a year they work. I can quote numbers but this is location subjective. In my area, a first year teacher right out of college with no experience makes about $42k a year salary for teaching 187 days. If you took a person working at a hospital, who held a position that does not require college education regardless whether or not they have it, they make between $15 and $19/hr depending on the years of experience. They earn 0.038hrs of vacation time for every hour worked (10 days per

    68. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does student loans have to do with anything? Student loans was taken over by the federal government in 2010 when President Obama signed it into law.

      And the fact that it was taken over by the Federal Government is the problem. Since it's a loan from the Federal Government, you can't get rid of it by declaring bankruptcy. And they make it reaaaaaall easy to get. So the collages jack up their tuition because they know the students can get easy money from the government. So their is no pressure to keep college tuition down. So college tuition prices have went through the roof, the government makes money off of the loans, and the students are saddled with huge tuition costs for their degree. The students get screwed and they have to pay off large sums of money at the current rate of 5.5% (which is ludicrously large. I had student loans and they were in range of 2-3%). And note that because these students have such high tuition bills, this stops them from doing things like making down payments on homes or purchasing cars and such. So the large tuition bills ultimately have a drag on the economy.

      It's so bad for students in the US now that German colleges are advertising that good US students can attend the German college FOR FREE (just have to pay the living costs) and get a far cheaper degree. And the German Government is fine with it, because they know that a certain number of students will choose to stay in Germany after getting educated.

      Please note that I am just scratching the surface of how bad the student loan issue is. It's going to get worse.

      Gordon

    69. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      @Freischutz, I'm pretty sure the populists in your country have little in common with conservatives in the US, connecting the two is a non-sequitur. Don't make that mistake like so many of the ignorant, angry masses. In the US, conservatives generally support school choice programs to allow children to get out of underperforming schools, charter schools which bring STEM education to underserved urban populations, and accountability for teachers and curricula that underperform. Liberals, on the other hand, support whatever teachers' unions deem to be in their best interests; want to insert Art studies into the STEM- further siphoning away resources from a curriculum that would give us top-shelf coders, engineers, and scientists; and support teaching revisionist history so as not to offend or make any ethnic group uncomfortable. Can you imagine if, say in Europe, they decided to never cover Napoleon, Hitler or Stalin in school because it made people "uncomfortable"? How long would it be before the world made those mistakes again? How many more hours per week should each student put into social pseudo-science classes, knowing they will come at the expense of math, science and technology since unions will not allow for the expansion of the school day or year? How do we force underperforming educators out of critical roles to give new, better-equipped STEM teachers a proper role and a livable wage when union-backed tenure arrangements prohibit chronic underperformers from being fired? Thanks for playing, please do come back again sometime.

      I think there is a bit of semantic hijacking that has gone on here. Conservatives used to mean rational people who believed climate change is happening and that spending money on education, that providing people with health insurance is a good thing and that going to war with science over evolution was akin to being a flat-earther. At some point the word 'conservative' got hijacked in the US by a bunch of far right lunatics. I draw no parallels between the people calling themselves 'conservative' in the US and those doing so elsewhere. It seems to me American conservatives should find a new word for their social philosophy because 'conservative' has become synonymous with something else. The thing is that what passes for 'conservative' in Europe is called 'extreme far-left terrorism' in the US. Much of what passes for 'conservative' in the US is called 'fascism' in Europe, even by European conservatives.

    70. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 1

      so your case that defunding education has no effect

      I'm arguing against your unhinged foaming about stock buybacks and politics you disagree with. I've made no comments about defunding education.

      But since you do want to go there: The US spend more per child on education than any other country on the planet.

      Total US spending on education is down a little from its peak but so were birth rates 15 years ago. I'll help you out here: Fewer children means less total cost.

      The lesson here is that if you want to be a player in the automated economy you better have a well educated workforce.

      The IT industry (which is the one we're discussing here) is the educated workforce that's actually responsible for much of the last couple of decades of automation.

      While IT isn't immune from automation nobody working in the industry for the last couple of decades has failed to observe the constant outsourcing and offshoring of jobs, roles and entire departments.

      I didn't move out of programming roles because I was worried about automation. I did move out of programming roles because I could do other interesting work that was at far less risk of being undercut by an Indian body shop.

      while you sit on your hands and assume

      You keep making assumptions about me and my own assumptions. You keep accusing me of specific views towards the Chinese. Stop it. You're wrong. You're a fucking idiot. Stop projecting your own inadequacies onto others.

      You do a good job of sounding like you are determined to underestimate the Chinese.

      You do a fucking amazing job of failing miserably to understand the simple things I'm saying.

      And you still sound like somebody who thinks that inserting some form of the word 'fuck' into every sentence makes their argument stronger.

      You sound like the sort of cunt that thinks using word A instead of word B is material to the argument they're making. I use the term 'fuck' a lot, along with 'bugger', 'arse', 'bloody' and 'cunt'. At least my other words make fucking sense.

      So I am incapable of accessing both nations and you are because ..... no proof?

      You're posting diatribe, false accusations, poor ungrounded assumptions and continual idiocy.

      I'm posting factual responses based on things like actual demographics, GDP and spending.

      So yes, you're incapable and I'm succeeding. Deal with it.

    71. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      " In the early 80s, when I was in junior high, they didnâ(TM)t call it middle school back then"

      Those are different things. Junior high is 7th and 8th, middle School also includes 6th.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 2

      I think we are engaged on a couple of threads here now btw. Im pretty anti-religion, so I can see how the evolution topic can seem like a war on science. It is, and it isnt. It goes back to Neitzsche's remark about convictions and ignoring a truth that conflicts with a conviction. Nothing about evolution is contradictory to anything in the bible. Evolution does not, by itself, disprove god. The only thing it does is imply that the world did not get made in just 6 earth days, and organisms did not manifest out of thin air like magic. My favorite thing to tell someone who gets hung up over this is that if God made the laws of the universe, then being a perfect being (they love it when you build it up like this), he would be bound to follow the laws he created. One universal law is that energy/matter always takes the path of least resistance, and evolution, whether it be divinely guided or otherwise, is clearly that path of least resistance.

      However, to refute your statement that you have never seen a multi-front war on science from the left is disingenuous. There have been /. articles about that very topic. Perhaps your definition of science and mine differ. To me the scientific process, peer review, the challenges that arise from your conclusion, are all science. Without that, its not science, its simply statements. There was a time, and in some parts it still exists, a broad left-wing cultural belief that it is OK to use money, power, and influence to push one scientific viewpoint over another. I am speaking of climate debate. Not the put-your-head-in-the-sand, earth is flat, type debate. I am talking about the scientists that have competing theories as to WHY things are going the way they are going and can the wrong correction potentially make a problem worse by overcorrecting. There are a large group that think its OK to fire them, defund any means they can use to speak to others, to silence them in the media and on social media. That is censorship. It is also a war on science. Because science is not about picking the right side. Its about encouraging criticism. To call anything 'settle science' when its constantly revealed that certain numbers were 'adjusted' to make the result fit with the theory. THAT also is a war on science. Its no different than declaring Adam appeared out of thin air 5k years ago, and someone saying 'but what about these humanoid fossils were radiologically dated to be 50k years old'? and then condemning all radiological dating to a specific problem Carbon dating has for things less than 20k years old. They are both a war on Science. Both sides think they are right and both sides are willing to abandon the fundamentals of science to get their THEORY to be accepted. I got news for you, sometimes its ALWAYS going to be a theory. In the navy I was a nuclear engineer. To this date, the idea that an unstable U-235 atom can absorb a thermal neutron, become unstable, and divide, releasing energy and imparting kinetic energy into its surrounding coolant, its still very much still THEORY. We build warships day in and day out relying heavily on this theory. Hell they still teach it using Bohrs model of the atom in the navy. IT doesnt mean that how it works cannot one day be better explained and theorized. It would be unfortunate if there were die-hard holdouts that still insist that the Bohrs model is the only true and accurate one.

      Climatology was a soft science to begin with because there were too many moving parts that people barely understood in isolation let alone as part of a giant ecosystem. It stopped being science entirely when people who are not scientists turned it into a completely political type debate and the scientists, who also have lives outside of science and have their own political views, allowed it to happen. They themselves now sponsor censorship of any disagreement. What happens when the same behavior starts happening to other forms of science? We opened the door and justified it this one time as being OK. Thats called precedence and the imp

    73. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      especially if you allow yourself to be distracted from what really matters by non issues like immigrant caravans/flotillas supposedly coming to destroy your christian conservative civilisation.

      I like your projection: totally original; not at all derived from echo-chamber talking points...

    74. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The vast majority of the kids I see going to private schools come from right wing families.

      Right, the ones who can afford it are just anti-free-education, and push the anti-intellectual angle to get the ones who can't afford it to be the same.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    75. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > provable scientific facts like evolution

      Comical. You're even more anti-science than you claim I am. Evolution as provable scientific fact? It is ENTIRELY unprovable. Go ahead - recreate a 5 billion year experiment to replicate the results. Oh wait, you can't? Go ahead - tell me how everything came from nothing. Oh wait, you can't? Go ahead - tell me how organic material came from inorganic material. Oh wait, you can't? Go ahead - tell me how more complex life forms came from less complex life forms and scientifically replicate the process w/o any external intervention. Oh wait, you can't? How about the mathematical chance for a single protien to properly "evolve?" https://www.unmaskingevolution... The mathematical chances are so outstandingly large that even if you threw trillions of years at it, it wouldn't happen. Every facet of evolution flies in the face of what we plainly observe in the world around us. The evolutionists are anti-science, not the Christians.

    76. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "left" has to do a better job at courting the masses. Telling them they are deplorable, uneducated flyover hicks who deserve to get replaced by mexican immigrants because of their white privilege and they need to have their guns taken away just pushes them into the arms of the right.
      Filling hollywood full of weak men and faggots isn't helping either.

    77. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by gtall · · Score: 1

      Just finishing Karen Armstrong's The History of G-d. Your argument about G-d being forced to follow the physical laws will get shot full of bullet holes by any competent theologian. G-d is, to put it bluntly, necessarily outside of time and space lest S/He become just another Being. Mind you, I think most of the theologians' "theories" (if you could call them that) are merely existential gas, but so is your argument.

    78. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the term 'intellectual elite' has nothing to do with education or a condemnation of education. I hope you haven't somehow derived that people at trump rallys are anti-education. The term implies something entirely different. Elitism is a new way to saying looking down your nose at someone (I used to hear that expression a lot as a child, I rarely hear it now). The expression draws the image of someone with their nose up in the air because they are too good to be associating with the likes of you. It dates back to aristocracy. There are many ways someone can think they are better than you

      1) race - some people think they belong to a superior race and that trait makes them better than others

      2) money - nothing divides the world into clasism or caste based society more so than money. Merely having money causes those who came by it without working for it to often acquire a sense of superiority. The paid staff that wait on your every beckon call feeds this and amplifies it.

      3) religion - the belief in whether you burn in hell or not has caused many to feel that they are superior because they are among those that are 'right' and will be vindicated when those that picked 'wrong' are unmercifully punished for it.

      4) Intelligence - people can begin to act like a complete douche when they think they are significantly smarter than some other person or group.

      Intellectual Elite actually implies someone THINKS they are so much better than everyone else because they THINK they are so much smarter. They arent ACTUALLY smarter, the merely assume they are. Because anyone who does not agree with 100% of everything they say MUST be less intelligent and therefore not worthy to vote because they are just too stupid to have that right/responsibility. Its not a condemnation of education. Its a condemnation of Elitism. The reality is that most of the people that fall into this critisism are actually NOT overly intellectual in nature. For the most part they actually do not do independent thought very well at all. They rely heavily on GroupThink and will tow the GroupThink line on every topic despite how poor their understanding of it actually is. Nothing could exemplify how dangerous GroupThink is better than those youtube videos where some guy goes around campus and interviews students. They will take some hot political topic and then read some quotes and claim Trump said them. Then these Intellectual Elite get on their soap box and talk about how bad trump is for saying that etc etc. Then the interviewer lets them know that those were actually statements by hillary, or barack, etc. Until that moment they were SURE... so SURE they were right and they were so much smarter than everyone else. Its elitism and thats what that derogatory term actually means. Its not intelligence if all you can do is parrot someone else's opinion. Anyone can memorize an encyclopedia. Pascals Law: A pressure applied to the surface of an enclosed fluid at rest, will be transmitted equally, and undiminished, throughout the fluid and to the walls of its container. I had to memorize that in nuclear power school. But until you actually understand it, and understand it so well you see it in everything fluid-dynamics, it is just words. Reciting them did not make me intellectual, it merely got me an A.

         

    79. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOC

    80. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      i guess that depends on if god lives inside or outside this universe, or if he is the universe itself. If he lives outside the universe then sure. But if he lives inside it, or is the universe, then he is bound to live by the rules he created. Only an imperfect person born into sin would see it as a right to get to break your own laws. A perfect being is simply incapable. The term sin literally means to miss the mark, ie imperfect. For if god were to break his own rules, he would be guilty of sin, something he is incapable of. God, being the perfect being he is, will always do things the most efficient, non wasteful method possible. To an eternal being 1 day, 5 billion years, it does not matter as long as its the best way.

      thats usually how i respond to that answer. Most of the time they at least concede its possible, and a lack of understanding does not equate to absolute faith over alleged fact. After all, they did ex-communicate Galileo for suggesting the earth revolved around the sun. Burned him alive in fact. To put it in perspective they didnt ex-communicate Hitler despite the atrocities. If you asked the same people their view of the earth orbiting the sun they would agree we all have the same understanding and suggesting the sun revolves around the earth seems silly. What changed over the past 500 years? It used to be as much heresy as evolutionary steps are today. Yet today they have accepted that the earth, does in fact, orbit around the sun. Neither either prove or disprove god. What happened and why it happened are not the same topic. Science only looks at the what, and sometimes theorizes about the why, but without observation, the why is often a guess.

    81. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      so your case that defunding education has no effect

      I'm arguing against your unhinged foaming about stock buybacks and politics you disagree with. I've made no comments about defunding education.

      But since you do want to go there: The US spend more per child on education than any other country on the planet.

      Total US spending on education is down a little from its peak but so were birth rates 15 years ago. I'll help you out here: Fewer children means less total cost.

      Actually the US is behind Luxembourg in that comparison so you are wrong. Also, spending per student varies wildly by state in the US so depending on where you are you get either good or completely shitty education. If you are in New York and ruled by a bunch of hippies socialists you get a pretty good education, if you are in Kansas and ruled by a bunch of Republicans you get a shitty education because they de-funded the school system. Amazingly Kansas isn't even at the bottom of the list of states that spend the least per child and where you subsequently get the crappiest education. The picture of per-child education in the US is massively skewed by a few very populous (usually Democratic governed) states that provide excellent education, many more (usually Republican governed) states provide quite shitty education. Not that the degree of per-child funding of schools is the only metric for education quality but in view of the degree to which many red states have de-funded education it must be having a major effect.

      The lesson here is that if you want to be a player in the automated economy you better have a well educated workforce.

      The IT industry (which is the one we're discussing here) is the educated workforce that's actually responsible for much of the last couple of decades of automation.

      While IT isn't immune from automation nobody working in the industry for the last couple of decades has failed to observe the constant outsourcing and offshoring of jobs, roles and entire departments.

      I didn't move out of programming roles because I was worried about automation. I did move out of programming roles because I could do other interesting work that was at far less risk of being undercut by an Indian body shop.

      And part of this story is that China has enough IT workers but the west does. This is because many US states in particular de-funded their education system. If you want to replace cleaning ladies with a bunch of robots you are going to have to give the job of running those robots to somebody. That person is going to have to have a higher level of education than a cleaning lady does today. De-funding your schools and stultifying the masses is not likely to produce workers with the level of education needed to run and repair a bunch of automated assets.

      while you sit on your hands and assume

      You keep making assumptions about me and my own assumptions. You keep accusing me of specific views towards the Chinese. Stop it. You're wrong. You're a fucking idiot. Stop projecting your own inadequacies onto others.

      No I won't stop contradicting you and I'm not an idiot, I'm just unwilling to fall to my knees and kowtow to you like some god of truth ... and you are still the same old potty mouth.

      And you still sound like somebody who thinks that inserting some form of the word 'fuck' into every sentence makes their argument stronger.

      You sound like the sort of cunt that thinks using word A instead of word B is material to the argument they're making. I use the term 'fuck' a lot, along with 'bugger', 'arse', 'bloody' and 'cunt'. At least my other words make fucking sense.

      So I am incapable of accessing both nations and you are because ..... no proof?

      You're posting diatribe, false accu

    82. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      my first run-in with the words conservative vs liberal had nothing to do with anything other than government spending. A conservative would not spend money on 'research' to learn if chimpanzees can become addicted to nicotine or if primates get depressed after masturbating 3 times a week. A liberal actually did spend money on both those studies. Money that could be used, instead, on lowering the cost of healthcare or lowering the cost of childcare for lower income earners through some sort of subsidy. It is only because most conservatives were voting republican (not all), and most liberals were voting democrat (not all), and because we, for some reason, have to have a 2 party system that we feel the need to divide everyone into, that this term means nothing about spending other people's money willy-nilly. It used to be possible to be conservative and be a democrat (they used to be called blue-dog democrats). They stood for what they saw as workers rights over corporate abuses, but at the same time didnt think it was the governments job to be a nanny state. At some point they started drawing a line in the sand and demanded people be on one side or the other. Whats your stance on abortion? You cant be for womens rights and be against the government telling you what you can and cannot do in your free time.. that sort of thing. This polarization started in the mid 90s and, like a snowball, it just keeps getting more dangerous.

    83. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      from what I've read, S Korea is the exception. They are starting to get a large problem of teens/young adults that are so addicted to their online lives they forget to do things like -- feed their baby for 6 days. Sadly I am starting to see some of those coming out of highschool going down this path as well. Throwing their lives away just to jack into the matrix.

    84. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get what you vote for, especially if you allow yourself to be distracted from what really matters by non issues like immigrant caravans/flotillas supposedly coming to destroy your christian conservative civilisation.

      While certainly not the biggest problem by a moon shot, having ~3% of your population being illegal is certainly an issue, regardless of your religious affiliation or lack thereof.

      Your framing of the issue is rather suspect as well.

    85. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by melted · · Score: 1

      Tax breaks? In Europe? Please.

    86. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People spend money on private schools because:

      1) Private schools can kick kids out. We have a serious problem in our school district with kids who are extremely disruptive yet are not aided/placed/etc so that their disruptions to the classroom continue year-round. There are two children in a single elementary school where every child in a room with one of them can leave if they feel unsafe around them. I don't have a quality private school near me, so one of my children are in this kid's class, and I get to hear stories every day, but... it's seriously impacting their learning.

      2) Public schools are a continual societal experiment. They just started teaching phonics (*phonics*!!!! they stopped teaching it!!!) again after teaching sight words for a few years. Why sight words? Because according to research, kids learning from and tested against sight words showed less differentiation in the outcomes between the haves and the have nots. What this means? They are less interesting in teach actual stuff to kids than making sure that all the kids are more equal. These kids are hamstrung for life because of that.

    87. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the term 'intellectual elite' has nothing to do with education or a condemnation of education. I hope you haven't somehow derived that people at trump rallys are anti-education. The term implies something entirely different. Elitism is a new way to saying looking down your nose at someone (I used to hear that expression a lot as a child, I rarely hear it now). The expression draws the image of someone with their nose up in the air because they are too good to be associating with the likes of you. It dates back to aristocracy. There are many ways someone can think they are better than you

      1) race - some people think they belong to a superior race and that trait makes them better than others

      2) money - nothing divides the world into clasism or caste based society more so than money. Merely having money causes those who came by it without working for it to often acquire a sense of superiority. The paid staff that wait on your every beckon call feeds this and amplifies it.

      3) religion - the belief in whether you burn in hell or not has caused many to feel that they are superior because they are among those that are 'right' and will be vindicated when those that picked 'wrong' are unmercifully punished for it.

      4) Intelligence - people can begin to act like a complete douche when they think they are significantly smarter than some other person or group.

      Intellectual Elite actually implies someone THINKS they are so much better than everyone else because they THINK they are so much smarter. They arent ACTUALLY smarter, the merely assume they are. Because anyone who does not agree with 100% of everything they say MUST be less intelligent and therefore not worthy to vote because they are just too stupid to have that right/responsibility. Its not a condemnation of education. Its a condemnation of Elitism. The reality is that most of the people that fall into this critisism are actually NOT overly intellectual in nature. For the most part they actually do not do independent thought very well at all. They rely heavily on GroupThink and will tow the GroupThink line on every topic despite how poor their understanding of it actually is. Nothing could exemplify how dangerous GroupThink is better than those youtube videos where some guy goes around campus and interviews students. They will take some hot political topic and then read some quotes and claim Trump said them. Then these Intellectual Elite get on their soap box and talk about how bad trump is for saying that etc etc. Then the interviewer lets them know that those were actually statements by hillary, or barack, etc. Until that moment they were SURE... so SURE they were right and they were so much smarter than everyone else. Its elitism and thats what that derogatory term actually means. Its not intelligence if all you can do is parrot someone else's opinion. Anyone can memorize an encyclopedia. Pascals Law: A pressure applied to the surface of an enclosed fluid at rest, will be transmitted equally, and undiminished, throughout the fluid and to the walls of its container. I had to memorize that in nuclear power school. But until you actually understand it, and understand it so well you see it in everything fluid-dynamics, it is just words. Reciting them did not make me intellectual, it merely got me an A.

      The term 'intellectual elite' only has nothing to do with education or a condemnation of education at a Trump rally. Everywhere else the word intellectual describes an intelligent, learned person who engages in critical thinking, research, and reflection about society, proposes solutions for its normative problems and gains authority as a public figure. Somebody who values quantifiable facts over emotionally triggered knee-jerk reactions. Whatever they think, when Trump supporters start agitating against evolution, claim climate change is a hoax and talk about doing 'something' about the 'intellectual elite' it conjures up Trump's quote about '2nd amendment people' doing something about Hillary

    88. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Ok, looks like there's conflicting data. In 2014 Switzerland and Luxembourg had higher per-student spend than the US.

      I can't be arsed tracking down whether the US is 1st or 4th on the list for 2018, so instead lets compare China and the US.

      China's total spend is less than the US total spend, despite having many more students. China spends less on education than the US.

      Chinese numbers: http://en.moe.gov.cn/News/Top_...
      US numbers: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/...

      Oh look, I can provide references. You're still talking shit. Now fuck off.

    89. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, massive emphasis on recruiting sportsball players to college on full rides whilst National Merit Scholars with 11 APs can somehow find it $15k a year cheaper to dump their US scholarships and paying full cost in the UK for a 4 year Masters instead.)

      Maybe if we started caring more about academics than sports, hard work over popularity, and promoting engineers to management instead of snake oil sales folk, we'd have the engineers we need here.

    90. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Mod funny.

    91. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You believe the numbers they post? China wouldn't have any reason to lie right? I was always told you can't trust numbers that Chinese govt tells you. Take it all with a grain of salt.

    92. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Blame the immigrants. For what? Who knows just do it.

    93. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heated lenses

    94. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 1

      Never mind the concern about lousy sweatshop quality; we should worry more about the security of software from a country that is known to participate in state-sponsored hacking. It's like hiring the Taliban to build a Baptist church.

    95. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Ok, looks like there's conflicting data. In 2014 Switzerland and Luxembourg had higher per-student spend than the US.

      I can't be arsed tracking down whether the US is 1st or 4th on the list for 2018, so instead lets compare China and the US.

      China's total spend is less than the US total spend, despite having many more students. China spends less on education than the US.

      Chinese numbers: http://en.moe.gov.cn/News/Top_... US numbers: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/...

      Oh look, I can provide references. You're still talking shit. Now fuck off.

      Well if you are using your arse to do your research small wonder you can't get your facts right. China contains way more people than the US and the US has for-profit schools so I'm not exactly surprised that the Chinese get more quality graduates out of each dollar they spend. And, no, I am disinclined to acquiesce to our request that I sexual intercourse off you arrogant arse buggering bloody cunt of a toilet-mouthed muppet (that was just for you since you don't seem to understand sentences that do not contain obscenities).

    96. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 1

      o I'm not exactly surprised that the Chinese get more quality graduates out of each dollar they spend

      Ok, I'm out. That's just blatant trolling.

      I am disinclined to acquiesce to our request

      Here's how many fucks I give: 0

    97. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      However, to refute your statement that you have never seen a multi-front war on science from the left is disingenuous. There have been /. articles about that very topic. Perhaps your definition of science and mine differ. To me the scientific process, peer review, the challenges that arise from your conclusion, are all science. Without that, its not science, its simply statements. There was a time, and in some parts it still exists, a broad left-wing cultural belief that it is OK to use money, power, and influence to push one scientific viewpoint over another. I am speaking of climate debate....

      Climatology was a soft science to begin with because there were too many moving parts that people barely understood in isolation let alone as part of a giant ecosystem. It stopped being science entirely when people who are not scientists turned it into a completely political type debate and the scientists, who also have lives outside of science and have their own political views, allowed it to happen. They themselves now sponsor censorship of any disagreement. What happens when the same behavior starts happening to other forms of science? We opened the door and justified it this one time as being OK. Thats called precedence and the impact is often damning. What happens if Nutrition follows this example and starts banning anything that suggests low-carb is the way to go? I mean how often does nutrition have to go back to the drawing board and start all over? Do you know how many times Eggs have been on both sides of the good/bad debate in my lifetime? I've lost count now. Eggs aren't 'settled science' and they are frigging EGGS! Not something as complex with as many moving parts as how the climate equilibrium equation might shift by altering just one of many of its variables. Its imperative to continue the critisims, its the only way to keep going back and getting it right. And STOP altering the goddamn records. That makes it impossible to come to a clearer understanding later on.

      We are adding about 120 ppm of greenhouse gasses per degree the temperature rises and that is not accounting for feedback loops. We know for a fact what happened the last time the amount of greenhouse gasses in the air reached 2000 ppm, it's called the Great Permian Extinction and it killed off 96% of all life in the oceans and every terrestrial life form over 5 kg. If we get a rise of 4 degrees over pre industrial levels we get ~800 ppm of green house gases, if the worst case of 8 degrees over the pre industrial levels happens we'll get greenhouse gas levels of around 1200 ppm and we're still not accounting for feedback loops. I don't need intricate climate models to know that is bad and it is pretty clear to any thinking person that continuing carbon de-sequestration with wild abandon is not going to end well, it may not be Permian Extinction bad but it won't be very nice. As for the war on Science, I have seen left wingers get their panties in a knot over some professor or guest speaker, and I have seen right wingers do that too. However, I have never seen anybody but the right wing go to full scale war with entire disciplines of science because their donors didn't like what the scientists had to say. The right wing has gone so far as to defund research, forbid the use of the word 'climate change' and are practically persecuting climate scientists. Then there is the whole war on evolution bullshit which I'm not even going to get into. I have never seen a modern mainstream left-wing movement do anything like that, scream at professors or speakers they didn't agree with, yes, but never try to muzzle an several entire branches of science because what those scientists had to say didn't agree with the dogma of their religion or were harmful to the profit margins of their political donors. And for the record, apart from AOC, Bernie and a few others I do not consider the American Democrats to be 'left-wing'. In my world they are at best moderate right wing, basically what the Republicans used to be before they went nuts.

    98. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      o I'm not exactly surprised that the Chinese get more quality graduates out of each dollar they spend

      Ok, I'm out. That's just blatant trolling.

      Ditto and you are a rather poor troll, probably because you do lots for research with your arse.

      I am disinclined to acquiesce to our request

      Here's how many fucks I give: 0

      Poor you, I get laid all the time.

    99. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are delusional if you think this is a right wing problem.

      The tax cuts at all costs thinking is the right wing problem. How long as the Right been pushing for school vouchers?

      Because the plutocrats can afford to throw in cash on top of the voucher, while the poor (read: black) will be stuck with only the voucher. Whereas if the rich currently want to send their kids to private schools, that's fine, but as it is their tax dollars still go towards the social contract of public education.

    100. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. This is accurate. People arenâ(TM)t anti-education, they are anti-the-current state of education and want more options than the lowest common denominator system we have now.

      Call me crazy, but I happen to think the professionally trained educators (aka - teachers) should be running schools. All of the centralized management and administration that dictates how they do their jobs is the problem that I want out of the way.

      That is why my kids go to a private school. I looked at options and I liked the approach that they took to the entire process. I liked that the teachers loved their jobs. I liked how they worked with parents. I liked how behavior and character was included as part of education.

      Iâ(TM)m not anti-education. The current state of education is awful and I simply want a decentralized model that puts the teachers in charge and gives the same choices that I have to people who canâ(TM)t currently afford it.

      Yet if you say that, the FIRST response will be some junk about how school choice or vouchers is some racist, corporate, hateful, church conspiracy.

    101. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty accurate picture

    102. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hot garbage now, but give the Chinese a generation of students to learn from the European and American model (i.e., bring their current brightest students back from Western universities) and they will finally figure out the best parts of our educational methods and apply them. Eventually, we will be using Chinese terms to describe our technology instead of the other way around.

      We are much better off reinvesting our money into our domestic students and incentivizing industry to hire domestic instead of importing workers. Or only import workers as long as they naturalize and give up their current citizenship. If industry is gung-ho about hiring foreign workers, and the shortage of domestic workers is very poorly documented, then most likely there isn't a shortage of domestic workers, but rather domestic workers willing to work at the low wage the industry is offering. In this case, government should butt out and let capitalism work its magic by forcing industry to increase the offered wage rather than allow industry to bring in cheap labor.

    103. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Buying a $5k cappuccino machine is not a wise expense.
      So you would rather buy every 2 years one for $500?

      Your interesting calculation of teachers pay clearly shows: they are under paid. No idea why you disagree.

      6h teaching per day is still an +8h day, or do you think they do classes "unprepared", never correct tests etc.?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    104. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by balbeir · · Score: 1
      From what I learned from being exposed to software written in China is that they don't seem to have a lot of good devs out there.

      Rampant amateurism and all comments and debug statements are in Chinese.

    105. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +10

    106. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very much like Pol Pot's regime in Cambodia

    107. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Give the Chinese another 20 years of reform and a sensible education policy and they'll surpass the US on every level.
      China basically already has surpassed the US on every level. They only lack carriers.
      I don't agree with the argument that their education system is not good. But I have no deep insights. China sends many students to study in Europe. My town Karlsruhe is full with Chinese students.
      Yes full! You are in the queue for the cashier in a supermarket and you always see one or ore in your queue.

      P.S. I don't really think you Americans fully understand just how asinine you sound to other people with your f**ing this, and f**ing that but there is a way you can find out. Try saying "Jesus' butt-plug" instead of 'fuck' for a few days. You will soon learn the virtues of not having a toilet for a mouth.
      I actually wanted to answer something like this to your parent but you beat me to it. I once said "shit" on teamspeak with lots of americans online, they freaked out. But their "fuck this" and "fuck that" they did not mind.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    108. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      But since you do want to go there: The US spend more per child on education than any other country on the planet.
      I doubt that is true. Even if it is, why are there schools that have no working equipment, overworked teachers with oversized classes?
      Obviously the amount of money spent is no indication of quality of education.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    109. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      China's total spend is less than the US total spend, despite having many more students. China spends less on education than the US.
      Only if you count it in dollars ... which is pretty stupid :P

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    110. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The fool was bitching about inadequate investment, so I merely highlighted that the US invests heavily in education.

      How wisely that money is spent is a more complex question. I do recall teachers bitching throughout my entire life, so it's hard to give the current crop much credence. Easier to upset them by pointing out how much time they get off each summer.

    111. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      their salary for only working 187 days per year is significantly higher than average for my area. Thats why I gave a comparison. To pay a teacher with only 10yrs experience $59k, only work 187 days (ok add at MOST 15 more days) instead of the 250 work days out of the year the average person works. The University here puts out want ads for jobs. They want someone with a Masters degree in Mechanical Engineering and they are only willing to pay $58k a year; and that job expects, at a minimum, a 60hr week commitment. So YES, teachers are over paid by comparison to the rest of everyone else. There is no reason why they should be special. For the record a decent 2500 sq ft house costs less than $225k in this area. The problem with education has nothing to do with salary, and if you think by merely doubling their salary will fix the problems in education, you will have squandered millions. The original poster of this thread made a comparison to china. Yet in all their supposed superiority, their teachers, even accounting for the differences in currency, and average salary, make a fraction of what our teachers make. So no, teachers actually do NOT need a raise to solve our problem in education. I would NOT feel bad making them put in 50hrs per week for 47 weeks out of the year for the exact same salary (roughly 235 days minus a couple holidays and elections that fell outside those weeks off). I refuse to accept an argument where I am told my salary is OK in the same breath that a teacher is considered 'underpaid' for working HALF of the time I put into work. When you find a way to double my salary, then fine, I'll give you the argument about teachers being underpaid.

    112. Re: Don't think I'd trust the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that you are quite deluded. Please, get back on your medication.

    113. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Your salary is probably not ok, too.

      But hacking on teachers, is probably the worst thing to do.

      60h per week are illegal in Europe, illegal as in jail time for the boss. Especially if a worker has an accident to or from work. The boss is basically already in jail in such a case.

      Less than 28 (depending of country) paid holiday are illegal, too.

      You are not fixing your society by letting teachers work more in your eyes. In most eyes they are overworked, regardless how you see it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    114. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      here in the US there have been nurses who have been sued for malpractice and thrown under the bus by the hospital for making a mistake after being made to work back-to-back 12hr shifts. Another thing about vacation time here, is something called PTO (paid time off) and they give you a bank of days (sometimes 16) where both vacation and sick time is deducted from. If your sick more than 5 or 6 days in a year that can really trash your vacation time.

      They just recently passed a law for overime compensation for salary employees but only if they make less than $47,476 annually. That doesnt keep them from working you 60hrs a week it just means they have to pay you. There is no limit how many hours they can make you work. Salary based jobs are usually goal based or project based. Meaning how many hours you work is dependent on how long it takes you to complete the tasks. Its not uncommon to find ones self working well past 40hrs to get all the tasks completed. Normally, these things are handled through the markets because people leave for better jobs. However, when the economy takes a shit, the employers do not get that sort of adjustment as there isnt an abundance of better jobs. It also does nothing for the shitty job itself, they seem to still exist, they just end up with a ton of turnover and for whatever reason the employer does not self-examine that its them thats the problem.

    115. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by strikethree · · Score: 1

      It isn't a Right or Left issue. It is an issue with Power not wanting to be challenged. If we must remain in a two dimensional world, then reworded: This is a bi-partisan issue.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    116. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by j-beda · · Score: 1

      After all, they did ex-communicate Galileo for suggesting the earth revolved around the sun. Burned him alive in fact. .

      Galileo died in Arcetri, near Florence, Italy, on January 8, 1642, after suffering from a fever and heart palpitations. I don't believe he was excommunicated, though he was placed under house arrest.

    117. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1
    118. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by j-beda · · Score: 1

      https://www.nytimes.com/1992/1...

      Yeah, sure. I was aware. I was pointing out that he was not "burned alive", and like Hitler, was not excommunicated. The NYTimes article does imply that being burned at the stake was one possible outcome, but does not mention excommunication at all.

    119. Re:Don't think I'd trust the software by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      umm did you read the whole article? it said had he not recanted he would have been burned alive. I think it would be interesting, if we ever get time travel, to go back and see these events first hand. I am thinking it got a lot closer than current history wants to admit. Like maybe stuck on a pile of wood and doused with oil, with the guy with the torch coming, kind of close. At one time it was taught he did get burned. So is it revisionist history or was the first version false? I cant say. I certainly cant look it up for the same reason I am having a hard time looking up articles we debated 12 yrs ago on slashdot seem to disappear. now that everything is digital it makes it pretty convenient to just change things without notice. The days of finding microfish articles are a thing of the past.

  2. That code will by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    be for use in cars in China.
    Then for use in cars that China will export.
    German brands are tolerated for the crypto keys to EU academic support.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:That code will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      before use in carzhen China
      Silly talk for my own internal reasons.
      German brands are tolerated for the crypto keys to EU academic support.

  3. "Cheat Device" in Chinese is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering products from Volkswagen group do not function as advertise, why do they need 4,000 engineers to produce fake results?

    Also, producing 15 to 20 million lines of code per year sounds like a clear attempt to make sure regulators can't keep up with auditing the code. It should be really easy for a "rogue engineer" to hide another "cheat device" in such a large haystack.

    1. Re:"Cheat Device" in Chinese is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, producing 15 to 20 million lines of code per year sounds like a clear attempt to make sure regulators can't keep up with auditing the code. It should be really easy for a "rogue engineer" to hide another "cheat device" in such a large haystack.

      I'm most concerned about software that records your voice and the locations of where you drive. And that software is buried in the "15 to 20 million lines of programming code" that they'll put out each year.

    2. Re:"Cheat Device" in Chinese is by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Is that the worrying part? This has been reality of life for most people in the entire world outside Africa for quite a few years now, now that smartphones running Android have become ubiquitous.

  4. Ya But... by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Who'd want to live there :| Sry

    --
    [($)]
  5. Still counting lines of code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After all these years, nay, decades of writing software, after all the evidence to the fact that the number of lines of code have absolutely no positive correlation to the software's quality (on the contrary) they still use it as a metric. metric of what? their ability to hit the keyboard?

    1. Re:Still counting lines of code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to freetardism - managements new tool in the race to the bottom, where unskilled labor, cheap, unsupervised and don't do it if it creates details is the new norm.

      Light simple elegant code should be the goal.With that many people - the result will be a rats nest of goto's and infinite recursion. If more lines of code than the neurons in a dragonfly - then they have failed.

  6. Confucious say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Beware chinaman bearing gifts. He clean out IP while you no looking.

  7. dumb and lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man i dont know the advertisment department does it.
    in reality the push for autonomous driving cars is a slap in the face of each buyer.
    it implies that car makers think customers are lazy and dumb.
    lazy because they dont want to druve themselfs and dumb because, really a computer can drive better then you.
    so, there you go ... soon you wont even be able to own a car anymore. cars are just taxis owned, manufactured and operated by one company. good luck getting a ride if your "chinese social score" isnt up to snuff not to mention execution by car crash after judgment in absentia...

    1. Re:dumb and lazy by dehachel12 · · Score: 2

      accident statistics prove that humans can't be trusted to steer cars.

    2. Re: dumb and lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics are great thing except

      They do not correlate to individual..

    3. Re:dumb and lazy by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      accident statistics prove that humans can't be trusted to steer cars.

      Yep. More than a thousand times as many fatal auto accidents so far this year** as nuclear power has killed in all of history....

      ** number of automobile fatalities estimated from last year's number. But last year's numbers would have hit that 1000x figure by the beginning of March, so it's a pretty safe bet....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:dumb and lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      accident statistics prove that humans can't be trusted to steer cars.

      Yep. More than a thousand times as many fatal auto accidents so far this year** as nuclear power has killed in all of history....

      ** number of automobile fatalities estimated from last year's number. But last year's numbers would have hit that 1000x figure by the beginning of March, so it's a pretty safe bet....

      What a meaningless comparison. Take something you know has a low death rate, compare it to automobiles and get upset about the disparity. I can do that too: Nuclear power has killed many orders of magnitude more people than the tie making industry has killed in all of history....

  8. Re:Dry by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Ya they haven't got that yet :/

    --
    [($)]
  9. struggling to hire (with insufficient wages) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW, every piece of an autonomous driving system is safety critical and should have actual engineering sing-offs.

  10. Classic VW move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relying on slave labour after all is in their genes, there's a reason the company is called "Volkswagen". I guess you can take Volkswagen out of the third Reich, but you can't take the third Reich out of Volkswagen.

    1. Re:Classic VW move by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Human life in China is cheap, and there is lots of it too. So safety won't be a priority.

  11. Can't find devs? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wonder why. Speaking as someone who keeps getting turned down for embedded dev jobs despite having PIC and arduino programming experience along with my 20+ years of system level C,C++ and x86 assembler programming, I suspect its the usual case of a company wanting high grade skills but only wanting to pay low grade wages.

    1. Re:Can't find devs? by monkeyxpress · · Score: 2

      I wonder why. Speaking as someone who keeps getting turned down for embedded dev jobs despite having PIC and arduino programming experience along with my 20+ years of system level C,C++ and x86 assembler programming, I suspect its the usual case of a company wanting high grade skills but only wanting to pay low grade wages.

      FYI, if you are applying for a serious embedded dev job NEVER say you have Arduino experience. To an embedded dev an Ardiuno is a hobbyist kit stuck on top of an Atmel AVR (which itself is a very dated chip now). My advice would be to get an STM32 dev kit and learn how to build a program for the platform and run a few peripherals (without the libraries). An embedded dev who hasn't dipped into the world of ARM Cortex by now is looking pretty dated these days, which is fine if you have huge amounts of experience in a particular platform and want to do contract work maintaining a legacy PIC or Atmel project, but they won't hire an Arduino person for that sort of work.

    2. Re: Can't find devs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that's a myopic, philistine outlook.

    3. Re: Can't find devs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree, not to mention how it completely manages to miss the point of the Arduino. It's not a toy, it's for rapid prototyping and experimentation. It just happens to be cheap and easy enough for hobbyists to use.

      Also, WTF? Who cares if it's ancient? It does the job, it's well documented and understood. That's far more important for embedded stuff than it being the latest and the greatest. It's not like the Z80 which is such a common chip is the latest thing on the market...

    4. Re:Can't find devs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all they have is arduino experience, I'd mark that as an issue, but toss everything else and I'd have no problem if somebody said they were familiar with arduino. Hell, I've played with them enough, they work well enough for what they do.

    5. Re:Can't find devs? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Might be worth taking Arduino off your CV and replacing it with AVR, and making sure you have some sample code showing you can do low level work. Unfortunately when trying to recruit embedded developers you get a lot of people who played with an Arduino and think they can do the job (not saying you can't), and it's got to the point where having it on your CV is a warning sign.

      Also a lot of automotive stuff is ARM based and they will want experience of RTOS. FreeRTOS and CMSIS are popular. It sounds like your system programming skills may be suited to those.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: Can't find devs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn a real, stable, performant language designed for hardware (ladder logic), then maybe you'll start to appear competent.

    7. Re: Can't find devs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because PIC and arduino arenâ(TM)t automotive grade..

    8. Re: Can't find devs? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      No one without a pointy head ever says "performant" with a straight face.

    9. Re:Can't find devs? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      8 bit is still huge and very well paid if you have real skills (not Arduino), because it's still unbeatable for some applications (low power being a big one).

      ARM is often using an RTOS and the peripheral libraries so it's opened up to many more developers who can't handle hitting the hardware directly. Often ARM is selected because it makes the developers cheaper, and facilitates the use of contractors to write individual tasks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  12. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have stolen tesla tech and now we can catch up.

  13. Let me translate from the German by n0nsensical · · Score: 0

    Now that the war is over and we at Volkswagen don't have a sufficient supply of slave labor we're packing up and going someplace that does

    1. Re:Let me translate from the German by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that the war is over and we at Volkswagen don't have a sufficient supply of slave labor we're packing up and going someplace that does

      Look forward to being greeted by hundreds of American corporations who did that 20 years ago.

  14. Can't find cheap/slave labour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not about them not being able to find good devs, it is a matter of them not wanting to pay decent salaries and cheap/slave labour being available in China.

  15. VW already down the drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why the Germans are trying to run this shell of a company today.

    Needs better management.

  16. Rise of Chinese Engineering by monkeyxpress · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an engineer this stuff makes me a bit concerned. I don't really see any reason why China is not going to take the bulk of the engineering jobs from western countries over the next ten years in the same way they took all the manufacturing jobs. I work a lot with Chinese suppliers. Over the last 10 years there has been a real shift. Sure you can still get your 'classic chinese experience' in Shenzhen, where you rock on up, expect to beat every supplier into the ground with cheap prices, then struggle with quality issues for the next 12 months. But if you go there and pay reasonable prices for stuff, then you get great service, great quality and good support. This part of the market seems to be growing rapidly over there.

    The chinese understand quality as well as most western people. It is just that many companies only go to china for cost reasons, so the chinese attempt to meet those cost expectations by cutting corners. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. If you go to the cheapest car repair shop you should expect that it is more likely they will try to rip you off.

    The trouble is that the Chinese have all the supply chain at the moment and this gives them a foot in the door of western companies. I know of a number of companies here in the UK where manufacturing was moved to china, and the chinese contractor offered to do the mech design on the company's next product for free. They did a good job and soon enough management was downsizing the engineering department and shipping that work offshore.

    They can do good mech engineering now, and electronics design, so why does anyone believe they won't be able to do software as well? I think it is just a matter of time.

    The problem for western countries is that their governments still believe they have some sort of inherent superiority; that just because they are 'developed' they will always be rich. So rather than taking china head on by investing in modern manufacturing and STEMS they invest in financial innovations that will apparently make us all rich despite producing no real value. It is a dangerous game, and in my opinion, at some point all this financial innovation will be show to be the fraud that it is, and the west will quickly discover that a bunch of engineers (or construction grunts for that matter) in a room is much more useful that a stadium full of lawyers when the real world infrastructure that supports western standards of living has fallen apart.

    Realistically the best hope for the west is that China gets taken over by lawyers and bean counters as well. What a sad state of affairs.

    1. Re:Rise of Chinese Engineering by aberglas · · Score: 1

      > Realistically the best hope for the west is that China gets taken over by lawyers and bean counters as well.

      So you are saying there is nothing to worry about?

      (And labor aint that cheap any more in China. And certainly for India, there are some very good S/W engineers, but they aint cheap. And the cheap ones are terrible.)

    2. Re:Rise of Chinese Engineering by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      their educations is rote memorization trash. their companies only succeed because they steal from the west and block the west from competing. they are a no face country, and will be so until they remove their oligarchs.

    3. Re:Rise of Chinese Engineering by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      For services China has some big issues. The timezone difference between China and Europe/America is one. Language and culture are another. Japanese companies often open local subsidiaries with local staff running them for that reason.

      The company I work for uses an electronics designer in Germany. He flies over a couple of times a year for face-to-face discussions. He's very good, he responds to email fast, and we have a great working relationship. Doubtless we could get the same work done in China much cheaper, but probably not as easily.

      And even in manufacturing it's possible to compete. Last time I checked Germany exported more by value than China did. It still has a massive, well paid manufacturing sector, because people are willing to pay for German quality and service (insert anecdotes about their cars here).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Rise of Chinese Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cheap relative to where? I traveled to China recently, and it was like spending monopoly money. One thing that stood out to me was that many more people than necessary would be employed in almost every establishment. There were so many superfluous employees; some men's bathrooms would have an assigned janitor that literally waits inside a closet in the bathroom all day, just to step out and clean it every time the last person steps out. Hilarious, it startled me the first few times I saw some dude teleport into the previously empty bathroom I was leaving.

    5. Re:Rise of Chinese Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we do need to hope for a level playing field. How much longer will the rest of the world tolerate China and India polluting the environment at a much higher rate than anyone else? How can we compete with companies that pay slave wages and shrug off major safety lapses as no big deal? When someone plays the same game with a different set of rules that give them major advantages over the other players, they pretty much win by default.

    6. Re: Rise of Chinese Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always remember, more than 2 pumps is considered cheating.

  17. Well, first they gotta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until someone here develops it so they can steal the IP (their biggest industry). It's funny/not funny seeing devices my group and I designed that, after building a manufacturing plant in China (because you can't sell in China unless you build it in China) are being sold, pretty much unchanged other than branding, in China and elsewhere. Not much in China that wasn't stolen from somewhere else. They're great at the manufacturing stuff (drones) but Communism pretty much kills creativity. China is nothing but idea thieves and slave labor.

  18. And in related news... by e3m4n · · Score: 3, Funny

    VW owners have been complaining that when they are in their car and make negative comments about various members of government, the vehicle abruptly changes course and drives them to the nearest police station while requesting intervention by the assigned political officer.

  19. Schools are not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    US schools have long been a destination for international students. Those students don't come here because our universities stink.

    I have a CS degree and have been involved in IT/Technology for over 20 years. During that 20 years, IT jobs have become far less desirable than they used to be. Long hours and the fear of being replaced by foreign labor has made a new generation of kids look elsewhere for career paths.

    During my time in school, anyone with a brain went into STEM. Now that I have kids, I see the different education choices being made by them. Kids with a brain are once again considering the trades instead of a career in a cubicle.

    You can blame government and the school system if it makes you feel better, but it won't change the fact that the industry and employers made this line of work less desirable - and now there is a shortage of qualified software professionals.

    If you want to fix this problem - let the market do its thing. Limit guest worker labor to only very high-end specialized positions. Allow wages to rise - and eventually smart people will again go into those fields.

  20. One thing missing by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

    The prevalence of software engineers, combined with the country's willingness to roll out the infrastructure for connected and self-driving cars, will make China one of the first markets in which autonomous cars gain widespread acceptance, VW managers said.

    Also, China's blatant disregard for individual well-being will help with the roll out. If a few people get killed during testing, no biggie.

  21. know-how in exchange for immunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple...

    Communist Party in exchange for know-how transfer will allow VW to test the cars on their citizens without legal risk.

    In 20 years Chinese companie will dominate car market and VW will be as popular as Ericson in cell phone now...

  22. Would neither disagree with that sentiment. by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

    No translation needed "Now that we in the United States have killed off all the natives and passed the thirteenth amendment and a minimum wage, we are pleased to announce the outsourcing of our corporate slave labor to the lowest bidder of a wide variety of developing Nations"

  23. Anyone that thinks lines of code is a good metric. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does not know a lot about software development. Time to short VW IMHO.

  24. The caravans are very much an issue by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    non issues like immigrant caravans/flotillas supposedly coming to destroy your christian conservative civilisation.

    Right, because immigration and outsourcing have done nothing to assault wages and the incentive structure for the working and middle classes. You are a racist who hates aspiring potential True Americans if you notice that adding a few million workers in a few year period goes a long way to ensure that supply always meets or exceeds demand. You are practically Hitler if you notice that the explosion in immigration over the last 30 years is probably the main reason why we've seen only about 14% real wage growth over two generations.

    1. Re:The caravans are very much an issue by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Not many True Americans left after close to 500 years of immigrants doing genocide on them.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    2. Re: The caravans are very much an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that like a no true Scotsman?

      Also what do the immigrants have to do with stagnant wages?

      Why are you always blaming them? You know who else blamed outsiders? Yeaaaaaaa let's not go there.

  25. In China killing people in cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the simple fact.

    Uber is the only autonomous car dev that has a confirmed kill and it was a very expensive setback.

    In China the AI can literally run over dozens of people a day and the government backed enterprise would simply laugh it off and try again.

    Actually in China they would probably modify the code to back up and run them over again... the cost of a dead Chinese is cheaper than an injured one.

  26. Where is German pride? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm flabbergasted that a German company has sunken to the level of becoming a propaganda tool for Winnie The Pooh. There must be something desperate going on at the German Gesellschaft. What happened to German engineering and German Stolz over their engineering skills?

    1. Re:Where is German pride? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      It ended with West Germany.
      The generation that gave people in West Germany the "economic miracle" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is long past.
      Now its just another nation in the EU looking for the lowest cost of workers globally.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  27. "Lines" of code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are supposed to be systems where safety, reliability and performance are most important. You can't achieve these goals without an appropriate language (ladder logic) and an appropriate platform (PLC). Any effort that tries otherwise is bound to cause crashes and casualties, regardless of where it was developed.

  28. Small wonder by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "thanks to the prevalence of qualified programmers which carmakers are struggling to hire elsewhere, "

    VW's software developer were (are?) busy developing cheating software to get around the emission laws, thereby accepting willingly the death of additional thousands of people just for greed.

    1. Re: Small wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they outsourced that job to Bosch.

  29. VW is trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another great reason to stick with BMW

  30. Rise of the Chinese Empire by v1s10nary · · Score: 1

    First GLOBAL cellular infrastructure development (Huawei's 5G), and now GLOBAL autonomous vehicle architecture development. In all seriousness, China is making some very scary moves. This is the first point in history where the US has a serious contender to the "global superpower" throne... the next decade will undoubtedly decide the fate of this title.

    --
    "The cause of fear is ignorance."
  31. Small correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    qualified programmers WILLING TO WORK 996 for less than a living wage, and who won't complain, or blow whistles about cheating emission standards, for fear of damaging their social credit and being put into a death camp

    fuck the chinese and fuck hitler's car company

  32. what could go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lolol

  33. Over my dead body by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    I didn't want to have anything to do with so-called 'autonomous cars' before, and I sure as fuck won't want to have anything to do with it if one of the biggest enemies of the West is going to have this much to do with it. I sure hope for Volkswagens' sake they audit every single line of code that comes out of China.

  34. Dumbstruck by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    One would think that the German's would know better.
    There was a German engineering firm that outsourced the manufacturing of a revolutionary new type of lathe design to a company in the PRC to try and cut costs.
    At a manufacturing convention attendees from the same company noticed at least a dozen Chinese copies of their new lathe.
    Soon after that the same company was out of business, unable to compete with cheap copies of their products flowing into the EU from the PRC.

    Corporations in the PRC are extensions of the CPC.
    The potential economic damage that could be caused by a trade war was secondary to the CPC.
    The loss of access to IP was considered far more critical to them.

    1. Re:Dumbstruck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a German engineering firm...Soon after that the same company was out of business

      Sorry to hear that. What was the company name?

      a revolutionary new type of lathe design

      Interesting, what's it called?
      I thought lathe design hasn't changed in 200 years.

  35. Don't think I'd trust Tesla software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at a chinese owned car company, a big one, but we don't yet have a sales presence in the US.

    we have thousands in china and a few hundred in the bay area.

    I often can see the difference in approach and code quality between east and west.

    all I will say is: code and design from china mostly sucks.

    Sucks even worse than Tesla "Autopilot" code?

  36. China makes sense by larryjoe · · Score: 1

    It actually makes sense to develop these cars in China. It's not that there are more qualified software developers in China, more than say in India, the US, or Europe. Part of the reason is that the wages are lower, although not lower than in other countries. The main reason is that China will be the largest market for autonomous vehicles due to several reasons. There is a push to electrify cars, which means new a lot of new cars bought in the future. There are huge emerging classes of workers will have or will soon have the money to buy these cars. The government is pushing these new cars and autonomous vehicles for economic, environmental, and competitive reasons. And China has the governmental structure to ensure that laws and lawsuits do not derail autonomous vehicle adoption. It's this last reason that is perhaps the most important.