Slashdot Mirror
Browser news
Mitchell Baker, Chief Lizard Wrangler for Mozilla, has
denied that Mozilla's development model will change.
In related news, nullspace
wrote in about netomat, a new
"non-linear browser". "It bucks the trends of current browsers by mining random visuals and snippets of sentences from the Web and having it float endlessly across a black backdrop, accompanied by clips of sound, if the user desires.
Users can specify a topic, then retrieve text, images, and/or audio from the Internet on the subject. They navigate by typing keywords into the browser, not by pointing and clicking."
Come back in December when Mozilla --> Netscape 5.0 then we'll here your comments.
If IE5 is great; how come it locks up the machine? GFO !!
No new technology needed. New interest in LEARNING? Now there's a miracle.
The ship sank. Get over it. (This sig was cut out from another's shirt and painstakingly hand-posted)
5) You destroy the work of every web designer ever. Web pages exist to be viewed, not torn apart and trivialized by the client's browser. The web designed sits around and codes large amounts of html and puts together all sorts of snazzy graphics, scripts, applets and whatnot and expects them to be viewed in the way he intended. Your browser pulls out the description meta tag, the first image on the page and floats them around randomly. What happened to the other 99% of the content on the page? With your browser, we'll never know
Am I supposed to be sorry for the HTML designer who spent ages fiddling with getting the pixels *exactly* aligned so they look right in his 800x600 browser window (which then looks appalling in any other resolution)?
The HTML is there to mark up the content of a page, it is then exactly up to the browser to render it in the way the user wants. I have a nice Java applet that sucks in the content of a certain newspaper and then presents it to me in a way *I* want to read it. Way more navigable than the site itself.
I agree with you other than that.
Television is linear, web browsing is non-linear. What they have is not non-linear browsing but pseudo-random browsing. If they think that's of any actual use, then they believe too much in Dirk Gentley's Holistic Detective Agency (Douglas Adams)
Thank you for correcting that point. I was not aware that that was the case.
Alan was quoted saying, "We could move to a model like [the Java Community Process]. We don't have complete control of the process, but we're looking at our options." Sun doesn't have any control of the process, so one wonders what options Alan is referring to. His remarks sounded to me like some sort of power play.
What might make it cooler would have it take random headlines from News websites and replace their articles with random paragraphs from other articles.
For example:
Breast Enlargements at All Time High
Ethnic Albanians are leaving Kosovo at alarming rates as the boarder cities are becoming crowded with refugees.
--Sure, mostly it would be useless, too, and most of the stories wouldn't be funny; but there is potential.
IANAL, but I play one on
So why then virtually nobody comments their code in GPL world ? It is almost like unwritten rule - no comments !
Posted by _DogShu_:
thank goodness for more browsing choices for linux! we need something besides netscape crashigator.
I, of course, probably won't try a browser that doesn't want me to view a web page as it is meant to be displayed. Oh well, just have to wait for opera.
yes, daveo uses blackdown jdk1.2, which seems to be very compliant at this point. now did anyone see an actualy download *link*? dave osaw on the zdnet article links to other sites with non-linear browsers (shredder was decent-looking but useless), but no where to be found was the actual link to the java program? could some one be kind enough to post that, please?
-DAVEO
Bits and pieces of existing programs could have been borrowed to improve Mozilla quickly (the beauty of code re-use)
Of course, if it were GPL'd, these 'bits and pieces' would then be permanently assimilated into the borg-like GPL. The somewhat less beautiful phenomenon of one-time re-use (and the subsequent prevention of further re-use in anything but GPL'd projects.
I really wish people would put a comment at the top of each file explaining what's in it so I can get a grip on the way they divided up the code. Other than that, well written C with descriptive function and variable names is quite readable with very few comments.
C++ on the other hand is a mess. The KDE projects I've looked at have been indecipherable. Without a decent document describing the object model (e.g. and information model, state transition model, event document, or some other non-code view of the framework) it's virtually impossible to figure out where to start reading.
If anybody has a program that can take C++ for an entire program and render a picture showing all the objects, their methods, and how they interact, please let me know where to find it. I don't know if such a thing is even possible.
The two projects are entirely separate. Netomat has nothing to do with Mozilla. Where'd you get that idea?
If that's what it is like, them I'm right. It IS disgusting.
1. Attempts to automate searches for you along lines of your interest
Organize the results in a 3d vrml-navigable universe. Like Neuromancer.
Oh yeah, the beta is available for Linux right now, in one simple RPM.
Go here for a miningco.com review, or here for the software.
I'm a big Java fan myself, but if it *is* written in Java, why are there different platform downloads (and esp. not one for *nix)?
Blech.
m.
"Sebastian you're in a mess. They called you King of all the Hipsters, is it true or are you still the Queen?" -- B
Enough of this Open Source stuff. Mozilla was the one project everyone looked to as a shining example of what made Open Source great, and now it is crumbling into a pile of rubble. Many developers, myself included, would not take part in the development of Mozilla due to the sorta-free licensing.
Now if they had gone Gnu GPL I am sure there would have been a much much stronger following. Bits and pieces of existing programs could have been borrowed to improve Mozilla quickly (the beauty of code re-use).
It was a fun idea on the surface, wasn't it? Now that we can see that Open Source is fragmenting our community with pseudo-free licensing, let's get back to FREE software. These Open Source licenses are not creating a level playing field for the users and developers. And the way they are worded, it prevents code re-use in projects running under a different "Open Source" license.
The OSI gave up on their trademark. If that isn't a sure sign that they know they're losing, then what is?
First, non-linear is rapidly becoming one of those psuedo-intellectual words I can't stand, joining the ranks of paradigm, post-modern, and psuedo-anything. Depending on scale and scope, nearly anything can be seen as either linear or non-linear. Euclid brought us non-linear geometry, Orson Welles brought us non-linear cinematography, now we have non-linear web browsing. Oh joy.
Looks interesting. I wouldn't mind if I could use it to create links in pages. For example, I would like every address in any page I browse to be linked to Map Quest (or some such service). Of course I think an "Everything" plugin for Netscape might be fun. Something that would automagically link words and phrases back to the Everything server in all pages that I broswe. Maybe Neomat could do that too. I dunno because there wasn't a linux download.
"netomat(TM) dialogues with the net to retrieve information as unmediated and independent in form."
;)
I read that to a company vice-president. He got a stiffy and asked if I would charge him by the minute to read more.
GPL is a Good Thing (tm).
But having a non-GPL license is most definately not why Mozilla has had a hard time recruiting developers. That is only true in a Linux-centric view. You neglect the tons and tons of Windows, Mac and non-GPL UNIX coders out there. Many of them believe in open source software, and many of them get sick at the mention of the GPL.
The reason Mozilla has had trouble recruiting is because of the choices Netscape made about just what they were going to release to the public. They released a huge mass of code that didnt even compile. That's not very attractive to developers. Developers like to either start something new from the ground up, or enhance something that works. They're not too keen on being handed a bowl of data-spaghetti and asked to clean it up and make it work. It's a daunting task.
I, for instance, probably know enough about programming that I could have contributed, in however small a way, to the effort. I did not contribute because I don't have the skills to understand what's already there. I'd get lost in the code trying to find the one piece I am good enough to work on.
GPL had nothing to do with it. The Linux community may have been put off by that, but the developer community as a whole couldn't give a rat's ass if it's GPL, Artisitic, BSD.. or MPL.
--- Tao
This doesn't make sense to me. It requires a Java interpreter, yet, they are saying that Mac and Unix have to wait until next week for their versions to come out. If it requires a Java interpreter, shouldn't it just be a bunch of Java bytecode that can be run anywhere? (Ack, maybe they used the now-illegal Microsoft Java builder.)
grep -ri 'should work'
It seems that "non-linear" is used in several unrelated ways:
1. mathematically it refers to equations containing terms that are other than first order.
(so they don't graph as straight lines). I think this is a legitimate use.
2. it subsequently has been bastardized to refer to anything that doesn't have a predetermined sequence.
The "non-linear browser" sounds about as useful as a lava lamp.
(btw, you seem to have confused "non-linear" with "non-Euclidean geometry", in which the curvature of space is not assumed to be zero)
I think it's really cool that this was [apparently] written in Java...go Java...
ok, i'm done
It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
Arrgg!!!
Anyone who follows the development groups even supperficially, or simply see how one milestone after another are meet, knows that the Mozilla project is progressing _very_ well.
And this isn't some GPL vs. OSI contest. RMS want, just like everybody in the free software community with a clue, the Mozilla project to succede. To decision makers everywhere, Mozilla is _the_ test of whether the free software/open source (no, they don't care about the difference) works.
actually most GPLised code doesnt *need* comments -- its self explanatory. Comments can also be damn annoying..they get in the way and bloat the size of the source. Plus, theres no way of making them disappear..it would be kewl if there was a text editor that hid the comments and displayed a small box rather than a hunk of comments..its neatness.
Of course, im too lazy to code one, and jot works ok for me..:)
FWIW I decided to see just what this "netomat" is all about.
The "interface" consists of a text bar (like the address bar) across the bottom, and the rest of the screen is a big black area with what you could call "links" floating around, mainly text but sometimes pictures, that move contrary to your mouse (if you move your mouse to the right, they all move left, etc.) I typed the first thing that came into my head (Dave Matthews) into the text bar, and I started to see links floating around corresponding with Dave pages I had visited before. If I clicked on one, other links showed up, but no actual content.
Though a five minute test-drive probably isn't a fair evaluation, the conclusion I came to is that it's useless. It seems to be directed at the common population -- a more "intuitive" approach to the internet, but it confused the heck out of me. The links floating around when the browser first opens seem to be completely random, and when clicked on, show things that have nothing to do with what you clicked on.
Like I said, I only got the five-minute version. Maybe the usefulness is in utilizing the "netomatics files" (some kind of script?), but I just don't get it.
Though it does say something for the merits of Java development. The install was very smooth and the program started up without complaint.
There is such a beast, but I can't for the life of me remember exactly what the product names where.. I know that there are several for Visual Studio/Visual C++ as well..
-- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
This sounds more like web art than a new way to browse. What's more is it sounds more arty and neat than a lot of the web art that everyone has been passing off till now.
Reading the five minute impression someone else posted, maybe if they used something like google to determine what's better content to float across your screen, then you could have GOOD randomly selected stuff that was vaguely related to your topic floating past. That might be fun.
Skippy
"False modesty is the refuge of the incompetent." - The Stainless Steel Rat
I like articles that disagree with me. Is the damn thing going to spam me with everything on the net?
The ship sank. Get over it. (This sig was cut out from another's shirt and painstakingly hand-posted)
Yeah, AC obviously just confused the 2 unrelated articles as one. Not a hard mistake to make.
But that brings up an important point. Why were the two articles posted as one? They're pretty different. Yeah, I understand that they can both be lumped into the heading "Browser News," but they're pretty different topics, each of which deserve their own space. I think each have brought out good comments. (The netscape story on a little Mozzilla discussion, and the Netomat on this hippy-crap of a browser.)
I think this *is* an entirely new browser concept. In the past, browsers were designed to be useful tools. This one, on the other hand, strives to be a worthless waste of time. If it is scriptable it might make a neat screensaver, but...
This is what happens when the Visual Art majors figure out how to work a compiler.
#define TONGUE_IN_CHEEK
You know, I've been saying all along that this is what they should do with Lynx. Perhaps the Lynx development team can integrate the non-linear engine with the world's greatest text-only browser? Perhaps, it would herald a new era of ASCII art.
Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs.
Yeah, sort of. It causes a system halt when I try to install it.
As the trend goes, it is difficult to do anything in a sequentially linear fashion. This is what the internet is all about--a universal medium for organizing and reviewing data.
Actually, this reminds me of Thinkmap, which runs as a Java Applet in your browser to implement a navigatable, floating thesaurus.
For those who aren't familiar with the Java2 Swing set, the demo apps that come with the JDK implement a really simple floating graph object set, operating roughly like Thinkmap.
While I have your attention: good VR browsing won't be around until affordable HMDs allow true 3D viewing, which won't be until about the time when microdisplays and video horsepower are up to task. I bet most will find these new "browsers" boring in the meantime. Consider them testing ground for the future--if you haven't already thought about it, you're way behind! Google, XML, etc. are part of the, what now, 10th generation of the "internet?" There's probably been more than 10, but I can't count higher than that.
You mean that there's a feature that's not in emacs? Holy crap! Alert the media!
-- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
Anti-neopostmodernism or.something.like.that. Whatever.
Me, I'll stick with good ol' fashioned Destroy Humanity 3.2 [click click]
-- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
it's called "webcollage" and it's a module in xscreensaver. The only difference between it and this neomat thing is that webcollage is completely random.
but from what i've read, so is neomat.
--
Posted with Mozilla
You mean that there's a feature that's not in emacs? Holy crap! Alert the media!
It's a damn good idea though. I'm going to add the feature to emacs.
Wee-aa-ll... I still like playing 1/2 life even though it's only on a 2d monitor --is that so wrong?
Ok, the 2dozen self-contained internets sound pretty cool too. Need fat, persistent pipe. Also, a fast internet connection.
The subject of this posting could also be I downloaded the JRE for this?... but I digress:
I strongly agree with CoughDropAddict (can I call you CDA?) that this is pretty much useless.
I'll go a step further and tell you that it takes the words you enter and goes to two search engines (perhaps more, but two were all I identified), namely AltaVista and something called Scour.Net. I guess it then takes the titles of the documents it finds and swirls them about.
If you see one that interests you, tough! Because clicking on it will not necessarily bring up that phrase in the text box. If you click long enough, I guess it cycles through them. Eventually, you'll see the one you wanted. You hit and it goes out and does another search, this time using the page's title as keywords.
Wait a minute... what about the content of the page that I saw that had such an interesting title? What if I want to read it? I guess I'll have to go open a real browser to do that. I'll just copy'n'paste the URL of the page that I saw... no, wait. Netomat doesn't give you the URL either. OK, I'll just start over with a browser, by going to friggin' AltaVista my own self and doing a search. WAIT! That's what I already do!!!
Again, I installed the JRE for this?
yeah pretty lame looking...maybe it'd be cool as a screen saver or something...
Looks like they think that someone pressing a button is the same as their signature. Sorry Charlie, but that's not how it works in the real world.
I posted the Netomat story twice, once when it was announced and once when it was actually available. Now it gets on?
Eh, anyway, I don't care, its really a useless piece of software. I don't know what people are talking about up there, how its somehow great, I'm guessing they haven't tried it.
Oh, and its supposed to be open-source and available for Linux soon.
It really just floats random text and images around the screen depending on what keyword you enter into the text bar. I have no idea how this guy could actually think this is some kind of innovation.
At first, I thought "Wow, cool, I guess I could wade through search results quickly" So I tried to click on a link. Not only does it not open a browser or something of that sort to view the actual content of the page, but it doesn't even use the word I clicked on as a search suggestion. Instead, each mouse click revolves through all the headlines that are floating around. Really bad UI anyone? You can't do anything useful with it, you can't read any articles with it, basically its kind of a neat screensaver.
I mean, the idea is neat, but how do you expect to read an article about a subject with its words floating aimlessly throughout the screen.
This guy seriously overhyped his product. I wasn't expecting much, just a new way to look through the web (like hyperbolictree.com 's cool java thingy). But all I got was a weird app that is kind of a cross between a screensaver and a search engine.
Oh, another thing that's bad about it: It depends on servers for most of its functions. So if they go down, what are you going to do?
You think that any software in development should be 100% bug free? This is why it's in development and not being called 'complete'.
So I look at the comments that are rated as a 2 or higher (10 of them at the moment) and 6 of them are about the GPL license! Can we say "moderate on topic?" I knew you could!
Removing comments is EASY, ac. Brush up on your regular expressions...
I see acid has already been mentioned; that seems incredibly appropriate. The image I get of this thing is one of those "color organs" - remember those? Taking typed words and pgrases as cues, the NetOrgan scrapes random colors fromt he web, slices them, dices them, slips them free of the context that gave them meaning, and throws them across your screen as a mind-numbing wash of randomness.
Yeah, I can see it now. This will be more boring than the various "art" movements that gave up on having any meaningful role for the artist and used randomness to dictate what they produced. Oh, sure, the jargon-filled waste of words in this gizmo's announcement tries to imply that it will act intelligently, but that's just so much hype. Cheap effect, worth the hot air it was spoken with, maybe.
This is Yet Another Misplaced April First item. Is it just me or have there been a lot of these this year?
Binary-only? Proprietary? Sheesh, even his licensing is a throwback to the seventies. Like, hey, man, I lived the seventies the first time around, and, like, they weren't so groovy, really. A few good bands, a lot of bad drugs, and the computers were all locked up in data centers. Why would we want to do that trip again?
No, but really, the brain-damaged jargon was piled on so thinckly it was almost funny. In spots. Except that it kept on and on and on, rather like a Monty Python episode where they're using one mediocre joke repeated endlessly.
And lets not forget non-linear editing and non-linear books (a la Choose Your Own Adventure (TM))
I hereby invent the non-linear line! (TM)
2^5
I won't get into the pseudo-intellectual tripe that netomat was introduced with. Others, far more sarcastic than I, have already slashed it to ribbons.
I guess I instantly identify myself as part of the pre-1990 crowd with my reaction to netomat: if it becomes popular, how much bandwidth will it waste? I remember when doing something stupid like streaming video would have gotten your network privileges revoked. Granted, we've got (nearly) adequate bandwidth now, so it's not as much of an issue, but still --- we finally get to the point that we have oodles of bandwidth, and we end up with some useless screensaver specifically designed to waste it.
Yeah, the net is changing the world, but not the way we thought it would in the old days. We've just provided an almost unlimited forum for endless garbage. Silly me, I thought that was what TV was for.
Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
Get a hair cut ya hippie.
my other penis is a vagina
Netomat is potentially the key that your parents give you at the ripe old age of 21. It is the symbol of the shift into a new paradigm.
There's far too much focus on technology in the industry, an obsession with bandwidth and the browser universe. They are merely tools, we're the drivers. Netomat heralds the enablement of technology -- creating a complete interactive experience. We wield the force Luke. Things are just starting to get a little more interesting.
"What we are talking about now is a communications revolution. That is exciting because communication is the basis of culture. We are amplifying and enhancing the foundations of culture and society with this communications revolution. All the dynamic and revolutionary effects we are going to see will come from these tiny chips being used in a commiunication mode." Kevin Kelly.
Sure beats joinin' the dots which was virtually where we were before. No matter how hard I try I can't see in black and white. Sure it's just a tool but I prefer to use a screwdriver over my fingernail anyday.
BLAMMO shaken not stirred
You don't retrieve information, you retrieve "rich content"! *thwap* Bad marketer, bad!
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
If it were licensed under the GPL or BSD I think there would be more people working on it.
Neither Mac nor *nix has Java 1.2 support (JVM) yet (AFAIK)
It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
Mozilla was the one project
Sorry. That's just not true.
But here we go again. People with *no* direct knowledge of the project will launch into rambling speculations about 'why it has failed', inevitably leading to '... but jwz said so.'
A wide number of people will chime in with their varied (and often hollow) reasons for why they haven't participated. However, they will feel emminently qualified to discuss the project's "failure" with great authority.
And the people who have taken the time to look for themselves, make up their own minds, and, heavens, perhaps even have made an *effort*, will have to waste their time writing "no, that's not true; please look at the facts".
Of course, this pattern will repeat, until sometime late this fall, when Mozilla begins to enter beta.
At this time, I'm sure it will be the naysayers who will be first in line to congratulate themselves on "what a great job I did to make Mozilla a great piece of code."
Is this an example of a "non-linear" Slashdot post?
Hah! That's the biggest joke of the day. Any code more complicated than hello_world.c ALWAYS needs comments.
I've been writing/maintaining code for 14 years and have noticed that the folks who trumpet "It's self-explanitory" usually write the most muddled code of all.
I once dealt with an arrogant bastard who _refused_ to put comments in his code. His reasoning was "if you can't figure it out, you shouldn't be making changes to it". Which sounds cute and 3l33t3 and all, but when he "got bored" and moved his candy ass off to a simpler project, I was given the task of deciphering the #define macros used to create initializers for arrays of ptr to functions. I did it. I fixed the problems AND I commented the damn code -- but it wasn't pretty.
Don't get me wrong, this guy was smart. He just didn't know how to code for ease of maintenance. His entire goal was "See how smart I am" programming.
To this day, that attitude really torques me. Code NEEDS comments. The don't (shouldn't) fall out of date like a manual or a spec. And they're a real Godsend when you need an overview of a complicated algorithm to hunt down a problem.
So don't go spreading the lie that GPL code doesn't need comments. It may be good; it may be solid; but it's still code. And --if it is going to thrive-- it still needs to be commented well.
[end soapbox]
Anonymous Kevin
The Gestapo Public License is anything but free. You're living in denial--Mozilla's development has been a fantastic success so far. What makes you think it'll be any different in the future?
Betaware coming from some places is usually stable just not finished.
VRML is cool on its own, but maybe I don't buy the flashmarketing because eventually it is still displayed on a 2D monitor.
Here's a development. A client that implements distributed caching, posting, hosting, and viewing.
say good-bye to DNS, NSI, registration, Echelon, blah and more blah. There are at least 2 dozen in development now.
Some handle a copyright future some a copyleft future. They all work to gether quite well.
The ship sank. Get over it. (This sig was cut out from another's shirt and painstakingly hand-posted)
What's wrong with Lava Lamps? Lava Lamps are cool.
Obviously, there is no merit in the slur you have chosen for the GNU General Public License.
I note though (because perhaps it does need saying) that the similarities between the GPL and the MPL/NPL greatly outweigh any differences.
If I assume that is your honest but misguided opinion about the GPL, then I feel sorry for you. However, I have a small suspicion that you posted that message with intent -- you feel threatened by free software (or your employer does) and you wanted to portray the license "debate" as some sort of fundamental schism -- "it's Mozilla vs. the GPL".
Sorry, not so.
And I consider it to be one of the worst pieces of software in the history of computing, so I just had to write them. Here's the email I sent:
Netomat Development Team:
I tried out your "non-linear" browser this morning and was not at all disappointed with what I got. That's not to say I liked it or found it useful, I was expecting it to be fundamentally useless and your browser performed beautifully in that respect. The following email message contains criticism which you may or may not enjoy.
I agree that the web is in need of a new browsing method, but this is not it. Your browser falls down on a couple points, in my mind:
1) You can't actually get specific information on any given topic
example: I typed in "news" and got 10 "turkish daily news online" pieces of news floating around. I fail to see how this is providing me with the information I want. I tried refining my search to "today's news" and got a number of floating pieces of text that had "today's news" in them. I ask you: how am I actually supposed to get the news in a browsing environment such as this?
2) The images don't seem relevant for some searches.
example: I searched for "netomat sucks" and was presented with some images of some musicians and dancers (nobody famous), none of which looked relevant to any of the text floating around. And if they were, how would I know?
example 2: I searched for "britney spears" and got poorly-drawn images of the characters from that classic cartoon, Ducktales. As far as I can tell there's no connection here.
3) The animation is slow. Don't even try to argue that Java is fundamentally slow, I've seen a lot of impressive graphics work done in Java and you've got a lot of work to do.
4) There's no method by which to save content. There's tons of software, music, video, and information out there that cannot be accessed by your browser. Perhaps the text and images thing
5) You destroy the work of every web designer ever. Web pages exist to be viewed, not torn apart and trivialized by the client's browser. The web designed sits around and codes large amounts of html and puts together all sorts of snazzy graphics, scripts, applets and whatnot and expects them to be viewed in the way he intended. Your browser pulls out the description meta tag, the first image on the page and floats them around randomly. What happened to the other 99% of the content on the page? With your browser, we'll never know.
6) Your web page is ugly (I'm not saying mine isn't). For the love of god, add some color.
As far as I can tell, there was only one redeeming feature of your browser: I typed in porn, got some nice pictures without any passwords and wasn't flooded with popup windows.
You've got a good idea, but I think you went about it all wrong. The floating text and images thing isn't very fun to watch, nor does it present information well to the user. This is akin to having the text and images in a magazine float around when I'm trying to read it -- it's annoying and a pain to follow.
I can only suggest that you add some real functionality and allow the user to actually see some amount of content pertaining to a topic.
Hope you find this helpful.
Debates about the terms of the Netscape Public License are worthwhile. However, the premise of your "point" is simply not correct. Mozilla is Free Software . But don't take my word for it. Please consider the following article, written by Richard Stallman (last updated Feb 12 1999):
'On the Netscape Public License'
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/netsc ape-npl.html.
First line of the article: "The Netscape Public License, or NPL, as it was ultimately designed in 1998, is a free software license -- but it has three major flaws."
Later on in the text: "NPL-covered software is also free software without being copylefted, and this by itself does not make the NPL worse than other non-copyleft free software license."
You can see that I am not downplaying Stallman's criticism or advice on this issue (the quotes are hardly endorsements). In particular, Stallman says: "Because of these flaws, we urge that you not use the NPL or the MPL for your free software."
However, Richard Stallman has stated, publically and in writing, that the Netscape Public License qualifies as a free software license. What special knowledge do you have that allows you to argue otherwise?
Please, next time you wish to criticize Mozilla or Netscape or whomever, try to do so on substantive grounds. And check your facts before SHOUTING.
"Yes, there probably is room for a new paradigm, but it should be Human Factors people doing it, not artists..."
Well, looking at the Netomat page, I'm figuring the people who attempted to code it are wannabes of this "artist" type you speak of--psychobabblers that wear only bright purple or orange spandex and eye makeup and paint things like pink elephant dung...*shudder*
But--my offtopic $.02--not all artists are like that. I believe that anyone who uses a medium of some sort to convey something, is an artist. I draw and paint, and play several instruments, but I also find artistry in the practicality of computers, their protocols, their interactions. The human eye is drawn to some things, such as tastefully designed windowing environments, well-made webpages, and the like.
But yeah, you're right. The Netomat people are crazy.
Can't sleep, the clowns will eat me...
It's illegal,wrong,or obscene to confuse work/play in Totalitaria (Oops this isn't the year 2999 is it?)
Reading is like music. Print is not photography.
Point and click equals transporter beam.
The ship sank. Get over it. (This sig was cut out from another's shirt and painstakingly hand-posted)
...easy make it a bookmarklet ie javascript, in a url: that sits in you bookmarks... errr just look at the site you'll get it.
nmarshall
#include "standard_disclaimer.h"
R.U. SIRIUS: THE ONLY POSSIBLE RESPONSE
nmarshall
The law is that which it boldly asserted and plausibly maintained..
--Colonel Burr 1783
Please don't snort cocaine and post on Slashdot. Save that stuff for the brainstorming sessions with the marketing department.
Solaris does, as does Linux x86 (beta, but works pretty well)
What has happened to the SSL'ed version of Mozilla.
All of the web pages seem to not have been updated for more than a year.
Cleaning speghetti code is never fun. It one of the least fun things of programming. I know I hate spending hours, days, weeks, trying to figure out somebody else's mess of code when I should be getting work done.
Here is one area Open Sourced code usually kicks the butt of closed source. Clean code. You have to write clean code because people can't walk across the building to ask you what you were thinking when you wrote it.
--
?
Great distributed marketroid kitschery.
:P
I'll do the fucking reading between th lines myself.
Parallel learning not withstanding, this sucks.
I know what he's saying. It ain't what this is doing.
A browser that gives me a collage instead of documentation about a particular subject.
A better idea. Stick headlines at the top of a page. Stick Newspaper Masteads under them to allow easy juxtaposing comparing and processing of information.
The ship sank. Get over it. (This sig was cut out from another's shirt and painstakingly hand-posted)
Its basically an artistic thing. No real purpose but something neat to show your friends. Basically you type in a word/phrase and it looks it up in a search engine and then pulls sentences with those words and some random images and places them randomly on the screen and lets them float around. Its just for artistic sake nothing else. When trying to picture it, think of floating text screensaver, which pulls its data from random places on the net.
But they wouldn't be able to take contributions from third parties, without those third parties explicitly allowing them to relicense it. And that is basically what the NPL requires you to do.
Modifications to NPL-covered code are themselves covered by the NPL.
However, independent work that is combined with NPL-covered work is not covered by the NPL or any other license (other than one you choose).
In order for Mozilla to use any code as part of the mozilla code base, it must either be licensed under the NPL or the MozPL.
A third party can license their original code under the MozPL for original (not-derived) work. (If you modify an NPL file, then those changes are subject to the NPL; however, code that is not a modification may be licensed under the MozPL). More info is at http://www.mozilla.org/NPL.
As an example of this in practice, take a look at the contribution of the expat XML parser by James Clark. It is licensed under the MPL. In this case, Netscape has no special rights.
One interesting aspect of the expat contribution is that Clark grants the option to alternatively (although not concurrently) use expat under the GPL.
I hope that's clear. (And thank god I am not a lawyer, and if I was, thank god I am Anonymous, and, by the way, I am not part of Mozilla.org, nor an employee of Netscape ... just a random reader/writer, etc. ...)
I think that while this may be a rediculus example of computer art, it got me thinking about the whole topic. And I was wondering, just how should a computer artist sell his art. I mean realistically is someone can make endless copies of an artwork, they can't charge much for it. For example prints, while they are sellable, still generally cheap unless they are of a limited quantity. So I was thinking, what about software could be limited, the true ownership. What if the artist made a limited number of versions of a program, say 5. They programs had absolutly no difference in them cept the version numbers reported in the corner of the screen. Could the artist then turn around and sell the copyright ownership for each version seperatly. Thereby keeping limited quantities (of true ownerships, owners can lincense out copies oviously) and keeping the price high?
After reading that stuff, I'm inclined to dismiss it as a publicity grab. Non-linear this and I'm-a-rebel that and the-whole-computer-industry-just-doesn'-get-it. On the other hand, having faithfully read Jakob Nielsen's useit.com website about web usability issues, I can certainly see that the browser/page model is hardly without flaw. There aren't any screenshots that I can find on their page, and I'm living (blissfully I might add) in unix-only land right now. Since they only have a windows version available now, could someone comment on it?
Does this seem a little like the "code" in the matrix, the top-to-bottom-scrolling green characters which apparently represent anything in the matrix. Actually, in all seriousness, at the risk of sounding rather cliche I think we are ready for new browser/UI paradigm. The mouse point a click GUI is nearing the limit of its potential to provide interaction between a human and a computer. I envision this project being integrated with voice recognition technologies within 5-10 years. At least for experimental purposes. Then you just ask your computer to find information for you. I can imagine it now, "Computer, play me Vivaldi's 4 seasons, preferably a recording by the London Symphony Orchestra". The computer responds by searching the internet for recordings to stream across your 100mbps connection. Damn RIAA, I suppose they would have to figure out some way to charge you, maybe some kind of music subscription service, like pay-per-view television. Anyway, I'm getting carried away with this. Back to the idea of this being released in an art forum. I think this really indicates how much *more* design is going to be a part of computers. One could conceivably argue that Microsoft is so sucessful with its Office suite because it employs designers to integrate the "look-and-feel" with the GUI in their OS. I'm not saying other companies don't do it, but not as well. I think you have to agree that office does *look* rather nice when compared to, say an application using Motif in X. Engineers brought us the command prompt, designers the GUI, and now artists the "non-linear" UI.
Wow, I wrote a lot more then I intended, hope it makes sense
Spyky
Seems you forgot about quasi. As in this quasi-futuristic suit I'm sporting ;-)
MWAHAHAHAHA