Slashdot Mirror


XFree86 3.3.5 released

DirkHohndel writes "The XFree86 Project has released XFree86-3.3.5. The release notes should be a good first place to start. It might take the mirrors a while to get updated, distribution specific packages for SuSE, Red Hat and Debian should be available at their web sites, soon. Dirk " Dirk was also kind enough to include a short list of importat features which can be viewed below.
  • Support for S3 Savage4 and Savage3D. Limited to Linux/x86 at this point.
  • Support for S3 Trio3D/2X.
  • Support for DGux.
  • Support for QNX.
  • Fix bug in Mach64 server on Rage LT and Rage LT Pro.
  • Fix SiS driver for 530 and 620.
  • Fix the spurious underline problem on NVidia Riva TNT cards.
  • Fix the PS/2 mouse problem with later Linux kernels.
  • Misc updates and bugfixes in Rendition driver.
  • Updates from SuSE and Red Hat, including more keyboards, PAM support, ARM and AXP fixes, security fixes.

101 comments

  1. Re:2 stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3.3.4 was out the same time as the first pre 4.0 snapshot (3.9.15 more correctly. Now there is a 3.9.16 for the bold and experimental) 3.3.5 was suppose to be out in a couple of weeks. Now a month and ten days (who's counting) later .5 shows it face. Wheeeeeeee!

  2. Riva TNT2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if TNT*2* is supported by XFree86? Tx.

    1. Re:Riva TNT2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can down load a patched X-Server from nvidia's website.

    2. Re:Riva TNT2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting the same thing with my Diamond V550 TNT card. Yes, it's annoying. I've taken to writing my code thus: cat - > foo.c // code here ^D :-)

    3. Re:Riva TNT2? by Gleef · · Score: 2

      Yes it is, and that's in the FAQ:

      XFree86 Faq, Q.F12.

      ----

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    4. Re:Riva TNT2? by BrianS · · Score: 1

      I have heard that people are having problems with X recognizing all the memory on the some video cards. Try adding a VideoRam line to your Device section with the correct amount of memory.

      --
      -- I can't say enough in 120 chars!
    5. Re:Riva TNT2? by Foxpaw · · Score: 1
      Yes, I believe starting with 3.3.4, the TNT2 is supported using the SVGA server. In fact, I have it running at home on my Creative Labs 3D Blaster TNT2 Ultra. Although it does still have some problems, like I can't get any resolution better than 1024x768.

      All I need now is to get Mesa working correctly so I can get Quake3 to run! Woo hoo!

    6. Re:Riva TNT2? by Foxpaw · · Score: 1
      Could be, could be... although under Windows it does 1280x1024 without a problem.

      I only have a 15" monitor, so getting those higher resolutions isn't *really* a problem anyway. I can play Civ:CTP just fine at 1024x768. :)

    7. Re:Riva TNT2? by Foxpaw · · Score: 1
      What I've noticed it do a couple of times, is actually put the VideoRam line in, but it comments it. So it has the correct amount, it's just commented out. That could be what my problem is, unfortunately I'm at work, not at home so I can't check it out :)

      I usually check to make sure that it hasn't done this, but I might have forgotten this time. If this is the problem then I'm going to feel really stupid :)

    8. Re:Riva TNT2? by Axe · · Score: 1

      For some reason, on my TNT Vanta card, cursor --not the hardware one: I already used Option "sw_cursor" -- but the regular rectangular cursor in Emacs, does not show up over the plain (black) text. I have identical configuration with a machine using Matrox card, and that box shows cursor just fine.
      Running emacs with -cr Red option, chaneges the color of the selected letter, but does not show cursor over white space. I tried all emacs configurations from working setups to no success.
      I am puzzled and annoyed.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    9. Re:Riva TNT2? by Axe · · Score: 1

      For some reason Xconfigurator does not offer 1600x1200. Going into XF86Config and adding it
      manually works just fine.
      xf86config selects the 1600x1200 mode, but screws up font server and wheel mouse configuration.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    10. Re:Riva TNT2? by Axe · · Score: 1

      Edit XF86Config manually...

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    11. Re:Riva TNT2? by Axe · · Score: 1

      : cat - > foo.c // code here ^D :-)

      Still better than vi ;)

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    12. Re:Riva TNT2? by yod@ · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I have a Diamond V770 TNT2 and Mine runs 1600x1200 just dandy..


      maybee it's your monitor?

      --
      Sorry man I don't controll the aliens.
    13. Re:Riva TNT2? by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem. Under Winbloze 95 I can get 1280x1024, but under Linux I get only 1024x768.

  3. Re:mmm potato! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic, but let me add another voice here. And let's not forget the XFree team either!

    Thanks!

  4. Sounds like a personal problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the fonts in your Netscape are screwy, that must be a personal problem. Install one of the available TrueType font servers (Or wait for 4.0 which will, barring patent lawsuits, incorporate TrueType support) and some decent TrueType fonts and you'll immediately notice a HUGE increase in your X font quality.

    1. Re:Sounds like a personal problem by abischof · · Score: 1
      > Install one of the available TrueType font servers (Or wait for 4.0 which will, barring patent lawsuits, incorporate TrueType support) and some decent TrueType fonts and you'll immediately notice a HUGE increase in your X font quality.

      Since MS's TrueType fonts aren't free, does anyone know where I can get free/gpl versions of the common TrueType fonts (arial, times new roman, etc) ?

      Alex Bischoff
      ---

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    2. Re:Sounds like a personal problem by angelo · · Score: 1

      This I agree with, xfstt and others are outstanding in this respect! however, netscape doesn't have truedoc support under linux. I suppose it would be more accurate to say that linux doesn't have a truedoc library..

      Maybe sometime soon then..

  5. Upgrade, "strongly reccomended" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The release notes say the upgrade is strongly reccomended, but not why. It seems strange to reccomend something strongly and not explain why. My card (Matrox G200) works fine so I'm hesitant to change, but it makes me wonder if there is indeed a good reason to upgrade. I guess I'll never know :)

    1. Re:Upgrade, "strongly reccomended" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security fixes, maybe?

    2. Re:Upgrade, "strongly reccomended" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of those "if its not broken don't fix it" hey theres a new kernel out... -kane kane@mnemonic.net

    3. Re:Upgrade, "strongly reccomended" ? by absolute · · Score: 3

      When I upgraded from 3.3.3 to 3.3.4 I noticed a slight speed increase using my V3 3000.

      Using Xengine as a benchmark :), i went from 1000RPM to about 3000RPM...

      Hopefully the debian team will have it out in a day or so in .debs for potato (I love bleeding edge).

  6. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had problems runing SVGAlib progs when gpm was running when I started the program from X.

  7. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well a standard problem with using a PS/2 mouse with xwindows is when you switch from xwindows, to the console and back.. when xwin grabs the mouse its a little buggy... So it ends up sending button press events and whatnot if you move the mouse a little while switching (I cant help it!! hehe) this is a documented bug with PS/2 + xwin, and Ive seen it on both my lil compaq notebook, my desktop system and any system IVe used ps2 mice on. This might or might not be what they fixed. Also, someone is redoing the keyboard/mice handling code in the kernel from scratch and apparently also fixed the problem on that end. But that code wont be merged with the main kernel for a while.

  8. Was it recommended or reccomended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    1. Re:Was it recommended or reccomended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you clever? You found a spelling mistake! Good boy!

  9. Rage 128 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that in there? -bobby

    1. Re:Rage 128 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, that's it there. I can see it too. A faint speck on the horizon. Oh look, it's getting bigger, ohh man .. It's comming at us at an incredible speed! AAAIIYYEEE, Look Out!!

      [CRASH!!]

      That was a close one!...

    2. Re:Rage 128 support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out http://www.Owned.org/~cain/ragefury.htm

    3. Re:Rage 128 support by helopigs · · Score: 1

      i had a rage fury for a while... good card in windows... just traded it to a friend for his old pci-tnt and $70us. i bought a tnt2, and it is very worth it... ati seems very un-interested in getting rage128 working in linux, so screw them, i'm an nvidia man from now on out.

    4. Re:Rage 128 support by SamIIs · · Score: 1

      That was a close one!...

      Thank goodness it hasn't hit us yet. Grrrrr.

    5. Re:Rage 128 support by SamIIs · · Score: 1

      ati seems very un-interested in getting rage128 working in linux

      I worked for a long ass time getting my ATIRage Fury to play nicely in Windows and let other cards act as secondary displays. While I waited and waited for my Windows to reboot over and over, I chatted with the techie about linux and device support. He said he was surpised that the driver wasn't out yet, and that the linux support was growing.

      I don't know if he was force-feeding me horse-shit or not, but I liked what I heard.

      Course, the guy couldn't fix my card, either...

    6. Re:Rage 128 support by DirkHohndel · · Score: 2
      We will have an XFCom_Rage128 server next week.

      It should show up at the XSuSE website around Sept. 7 or so.


      Dirk

  10. Not really, it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude? I have a matrox g200, 8mb ram, and it doesn't work that well under x. I mean, I get 1280x1024@24bit, but the scrolling and moving windows sucks ass man! TNT(16mb) is pretty good, and the TNT2 kicks even more ass! I'm trying to sell my video card system (8mb g200, two Voodoo2's 12 meg each, SLI'ed for 24 megs).. to get a TNT2 (or should I wait for the GeFORCE?)

    1. Re:Not really, it sucks by GlowStars · · Score: 1

      Well, the PCI G200 (I have one) works fine too.

    2. Re:Not really, it sucks by norton_I · · Score: 1

      Do you have the PCI or AGP G200? I have the AGP and it works fine at 1600x1200x32bit.

  11. Re:Anti-Alias Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I find anti-aliasing of large fonts _extremely_ useful, especially when doing graphic design work.

    I suspect your point is really that Windows doesn't anti-alias small fonts. If so, that's not an OS limitation, it's up to the app to decide whether it wants a particular sized font to be anti-aliased.

    As to anti-aliased fonts being a tick-box feature -- well, I for one wouldn't want to be without them (even on my 1600x1200 display).

    --
    djn@araxis.com

  12. Re:Where's my cursor? (Workaround) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cursor shows up if you tell emacs to use a bold font.

  13. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the exact same problem that happens to me... of course, it started happening when i moved into my dorm, which is when i started using almost solely linux, and dropped my mouse rather badly on the way in. so maybe it is one of them silly hardware problems... =]

  14. Re:Anti-Alias Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anti-aliased fonts are more of a "tick-box" feature than a real advance.

    AA Truetype fonts are nice to have for daily English use, but are absolutely essential for more complex writing systems like Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Bitmapped or non-AA Chinese fonts are butt ugly and give me major eyestrain =(...

  15. Re:TNT & Emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    word on the street is that it's a problem with the nvidia driver, but emacs 20.4 has a change in the cursor display code that bypasses the problem.

  16. A different TNT2 problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can get 1600x1280 working on my ASUS V3800, but when I run OpenGL stuff the screen splits diagonally between the top-left and bottom-right corners, and flickers between grey and black... Anyone else have this problem ??

  17. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A trick to fix this problem is to switch to a VC or two and back to X. -b

  18. Re:Anti-Alias Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my understanding is that windows does anti-alias small fonts, so that even 7pt text remains readable. the TrueType font smoothing can be defined in individual fonts, like kearning, so that different amounts (or none at all) of smoothing will be used depending on the size of the font being displayed.

    there's an enhanced font properties download somewhere on microsoft.com which displays the specific nitty-gritty truetype details of individual fonts..

    as for the uselessness of anti-aliasing large-text.. that's simply ignorant. until computer displays approach resolustions ~300dpi anti-aliasing is highly necessary.

  19. AccelX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded a copy of AccelX, from www.xig.com and its at least twice as fast as XFree86. It starts up quicker, mpegs play with hardly any skips. Fonts are readable in the netscape location bar. XFree86 is a piece of shit compared with this. I only have a 4 meg S3 Virge card also.

    1. Re:AccelX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I know something that will make it go
      even faster. It's called Windows.

      What's the point of running a Freeware
      OS, if you have to actually BUY your
      video driver...

      (I don't actually believe Windows is faster,
      but I'm just trying to make a point)

    2. Re:AccelX by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Because the equivalent function in WTS costs even more? Thank you drive through.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  20. Rather stick with xfree86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It costs $100 (US) not open source is highly commercialized through marketing and demeans other competition in this case xfree86. No thank you, I'll wait.

  21. Sync on Green working on G200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has anyone gotten Sync on Green working on
    a Matrox G200?

    I have a RedHat 6.0 system on an AMD K6-2,
    and I was counting on having the Matrox
    output Sync on Green. When I set the
    Sync on Green option I get Combined Sync :(

    I've tried 3.3.3.4 to no avail...

    Any suggestions welcome

    Michiel Toneman
    toneman@phil.uu.nl

  22. Re:Anti-Alias Update by Gleef · · Score: 2

    The latest skinny is the same as the old skinny. The X Window System, and applications that use it, assume that a rendered font will be in monochrome (one bit per pixel). Anti-aliasing requires multiple bits per pixel. Implementing anti-aliased fonts at the X Windows level is unmanagably difficult.

    There are widget libraries that do their own text rendering with anti-aliasing, and Berlin does anti-aliasing for fonts. I don't see X11 ever supporting it directly.

    ----

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
  23. Mirror: by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
    Don't all go at once, now...

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  24. Turn off font scaling. by J4 · · Score: 1

    It makes fonts look scary-ugly crappy.
    Turn it off and things look an order of
    magnitude better.

  25. Re:Anti-Alias Update by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    I'd have to disagree with that assessment. I've found anti-alised fonts to be extremely useful, especially when you want to incorporate fonts into graphic design work. 9 point Verdana on my 800x600 monitor looks fine when anti-aliased =)

  26. Keyboards by smartin · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if the new keyboard support includes the Logitech Internet Keyboard?

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:Keyboards by smartin · · Score: 1

      Any of the special buttons in the upper right corner.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    2. Re:Keyboards by smartin · · Score: 1

      Do you mean xmodmap? Does it have some sort of interactive mode? I've tried xev, and nothing shows up when I press the keys.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    3. Re:Keyboards by RinkRat · · Score: 1

      Try running Xmodmap and see what the keys show up as when pressed. Try and map them to something useful then...

      --
      RinkRat
    4. Re:Keyboards by pop1280 · · Score: 1

      The problem is probably that the keys generate 2-byte sequences. The special keys on my HP Pavilion do. X won't recognize them at all. Read the Keyboard HOWTO. You can probably get them to work at the console, but I haven't gotten them to work in X. I'm hoping for a little more documentation on XKB in the new release so I can figure out how to use them in X.

    5. Re:Keyboards by The+Salamander · · Score: 1

      What doesn't work about it?

  27. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by ninjaz · · Score: 1
    every now and then when I switched from X to the console and back, the console would freeze and I would only be able to get back in via telnet.

    If this sort of thing happens, you may benefit from the Magic SysRq kernel feature. Read about it at /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysrq.txt

    Quoth the text file:

    * Okay, so what can I use them for?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Well, un'R'aw is very handy when your X server or a svgalib program crashes.

    And, there's lots more listed where came from. :)

  28. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

    When I used a PS/2 mouse, every now and then when I switched from X to the console and back, the console would freeze and I would only be able to get back in via telnet. I've got my fingers crossed hoping that's the bug they fixed :-)

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  29. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

    Damn, and I thought I knew a lot about Linux... I always wondered what that kernel option did. :-)

    --
    * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  30. Re:mmm potato! by Evangelion · · Score: 1

    Here, here!

    The work that those guys do is very, very appreciated.

    Thank you. And I mean that, dammit.

  31. Re:Anti-Alias Update by Sneakums · · Score: 2

    Well, if you want anti-aliased fonts under X, you can use something like GNOME's Canvas to draw using anti-aliasing.

    It's worth pointing out that they way MS has anti-aliased fonts in Windows is totally wrong. What's the point of anti-aliasing a 72-point font? It's small fonts that have the most to gain from anti-aliasing. For an example, look at how Acorn's RISC OS implemented anti-aliased fonts: they applied it to small ones, making it perfectly possible to edit 10-point Times on a 640x256 screen.

    Furthermore, I don't believe that anti-aliasing is much use, except for intricate fonts such as Zapf Chancery. I use Verdana and xfsft for pretty much everything. Verdana is wonderfully readable down to about 9 points on my 1152x896 display, mainly because of the hinting logic that is in most Truetype fonts, as opposed to Type1 fonts, which have to rely on the generic hinting logic in the rasteriser.

    Anti-aliased fonts are more of a "tick-box" feature than a real advance.

    Paul.

  32. DG/UX support? by Tet · · Score: 1
    Does anyone have more info about the DG/UX support? Is this for Intel based DG/UX machines only (which tend to use Cirrus chips)? I'm more interested in the old m88k based machines, 'coz I've got two of them! They're stuck with the standard Xdg server, which deosn't support MITSHM, for example (although it does have a DG-specific DG-SHM extension).

    On a completely different note, my G400 works just fine with the XSVGA server from 3.3.4, but hangs completely when using the VGA16 server (e.g., when trying to use XF86Setup). Still, I managed to hand tweak the config file (reminds me of the good old days!), and it works just fine now -- 1600x1200 at 32bpp :-)

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  33. mmm potato! by glo-worm · · Score: 1
    i would like to take this opportunity to publically thank Branden Robinson, Adam Heath, and others for their diligent, super-fast work in creating .debs for the new releases of XFree. great work, everyone, and keep it up! it is much appreciated. 8)

    Debian X Strike Force

    1. Re:mmm potato! by glo-worm · · Score: 1
      Where are the debs for this?

      oh, i'm sorry, i didn't mean to imply that they were already out! i was just showing my appreciation for the promptness in the past. i am sure new .debs'll be arriving soon enough.. i'd guess if they do they'll first show up in

      http://samosa.debian.org/~bran den/xfree86-334-slink/

      but if you really want to know i suggest you ask someone who's actually an authority on the subject.. 8)

    2. Re:mmm potato! by biafra · · Score: 1

      Where are the debs for this? They're not on my local mirror, ftp.debian.org, or ftp.us.debian.org. I mean I can probably wait a day or two, but when I ran apt-get upgrade I was hoping for the new Xserver.

      --
      :wq
  34. Anti-Alias Update by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

    What's the latest skinny on anti-aliased screen fonts under X?

    thx,
    kent

    --
    **>>BELCH
    1. Re:Anti-Alias Update by adimarco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pity it's still the most horribly designed, bug ridden, crash prone piece of shit ever called an operating system and spoon fed to an unsuspecting unknowing computer illiterate populace so used to it that they don't even suspect there could be something better...

      er, was that out loud? :)

      seriously 'though, linux is still quite lacking in that respect, imho. the fonts in my Netscape are always screwy.

      i've heard word that XFree86 will be handling fonts differently in later releases. anyone have any info on that? i'm probably talking out my ass

      i must need coffee.

      anthony

      --

      "I think any time you expose vulnerabilities it's a good thing." -Attorney General Janet Reno
    2. Re:Anti-Alias Update by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Another reason why X should die. C'mon folk, do we need compatibility with a 15 year old protocol? XBill is cool and all that, but it could easily be ported to a new window system!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  35. There is a HOWTO for this. by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    Check it out first though.

    LINUX stands for: Linux Inux Nux Ux X

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  36. Ditto... by luge · · Score: 2

    The X group, despite having one of the most complex support tasks of any debian maintainer, is also consistently one of the fastest to respond when upstream upgrades. More power to them... (and, of course, more power to the upstream guys who provide stuff to keep the Debian maintainers busy...)
    -luge

    --

    IAAL,BIANLY

  37. TNT & Emacs by drig · · Score: 1

    The release notes say that this fixes a spurious underline problem with the TNT cards. Has anyone tried it out yet? Does it fix the emacs problem where you can't see the cursor?

    --
    Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
    1. Re:TNT & Emacs by drig · · Score: 1

      I got it installed last night. You only need the server. And, yes, it fixed the emacs problem for me.

      --
      Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
    2. Re:TNT & Emacs by Oirad · · Score: 1

      You mean it's not a problem with emacs? I've been trying to fix that in my emacs settings for a long time now....Do you have any more information on that?

      Thanks...

    3. Re:TNT & Emacs by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

      The release notes say that this fixes a spurious underline problem with the TNT cards. Has anyone tried it out yet? Does it fix the emacs problem where you can't see the cursor?

      YES! Finally, it does. I'm getting sick of using emacs -nw in order to run it in an xterm... I hate not being able to use my mouse :-p

      On another note, does anybody know if I need to download all the files on the mirror, or can I just download the server? I just downloaded the server, and it seems to be working fine, but I don't know for sure. Please let me know at spong@glue.umd.edu

      thanks
      Matt

      "Software is like sex- the best is for free"

    4. Re:TNT & Emacs by wct · · Score: 1

      Hi. I had this problem with Emacs too, but found it only affected text written in the foreground text colour (I use RedHat's default colour scheme). To fix it, just change the colour setting for normal text to a similar colour, but different name (I think I settled on Peach or something like that) - that might save a big download.

      The spurious underline problem is still there, if that means occasionally single characters have a black underline...

      Daniel.

  38. Libre or Gratis? by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2

    Since MS's TrueType fonts aren't free, does anyone know where I can get free/gpl versions of the common TrueType fonts (arial, times new roman, etc)?

    If you mean free as in beer, then you ought to check out http://www.microsoft.com/t ypography/fontpack/default.htm. You can use infozip on the self-extracting archives. Work quite nicely with xfstt.


    Berlin-- http://www.berlin-consortium.org
    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  39. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by John+Fulmer · · Score: 2

    I have a problem where the cursor occasionally gets 'stuck' in the upper right hand corner of the screen and I have to kill X to get it back. This started happening right after the PS/2 code was merged with the keyboard driver.

    I HOPE this is what they fixed... :)

    jf

  40. by lattice · · Score: 0
  41. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by PD · · Score: 1

    I'll second that question.

    I've got a Thinkpad i1450 (an AWESOME Linux machine by the way. 11th commandment: Thou shalt lust after no other laptop other than a Thinkpad - heh heh.

    Anyway, the Track Point stopped working for me, even when I don't run X (plain old gpm). Under Windows it works perfectly. I've been using Linux with an external mouse. That's OK, but I prefer the Track Point.

    Is this the bug that this version of X fixes? I sure hope so. I was going to send my laptop in to have the hardware checked.

  42. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by tnl · · Score: 1

    I have a problem with the built-in PS/2 mouse / touchpad of my laptop as well, with all the 2.2.x and 2.3.x kernels. The mouse just plain doesn't work: the kernel refuses to detect it.

    However, there's a workaround for that by modifying a line in your kernel source code to fake the detection of the mouse; if you don't feel like editing the kernel code and recompiling it you have to fall back on the 2.0.x kernel for now.

    I have seen other mouse problems like the ones mentioned here, but not anymore since I started using gpm for the mouse, and set up X to use the gpmdata device instead of the straight mouse device. Since gpm manages all my mouse stuff now in both console and X, there's no problems and no conflicts, and gpm is better at getting my 3 button mouse to actually be 3 button :-)

    Anyway, the patch to the 2.2 kernel to get your PS/2 mouse working if it doesn't work at all, is:

    --- drivers/char/pc_keyb.c~ Tue Aug 10 22:17:55 1999
    +++ drivers/char/pc_keyb.c Wed Aug 18 21:52:22 1999
    @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@

    static int __init psaux_init(void)
    {
    - if (!detect_auxiliary_port())
    + if (1 || !detect_auxiliary_port())
    return -EIO;

    misc_register(&psaux_mouse);


    This should work against all 2.2 kernels.

    --Tim

  43. Not good enough. by Axe · · Score: 1

    Colored as well. That plenty sucks. Is it a TNT server problem? Bad bug: should be fixed..

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  44. Tried.. by Axe · · Score: 1

    ..still do not show over white space.. ;(

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  45. And also.. by Axe · · Score: 1

    .. it breaks in all different modes, when it uses mode-default faces.
    If 3.3.5 does not fix it, I am trading in my TNT...

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  46. Trio3D. by saturated · · Score: 1


    all i gotta say is about F'N TIME!

    now i can convert my network over..

    --
    ' god damn this is one wacky game show ' ~ jay in mallrats
  47. URL correction by UnkyHerb · · Score: 1

    The correct url is http://www.0wned.org/~cain/ragefury.htm thats a zero ( 0 ) not an oh ( o )

    --
    Your Momma's so fat she makes emacs look like nano!
  48. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by Helge+Hafting · · Score: 1

    When I switch from X to console and back I get mouse trouble in X. The first mouse movement after this typically makes it jump to a corner and execute some randome keypresses while doing this. Then it becomes normal until the next console switch.

    Not so fun when it ends up pasting 60 lines into a root xterm. Trouble is avoidable by pressing a mouse butten 3-4 times before attempting any movement.

  49. 2 stories by AmirS · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this out at the same time as the Pre 4.0 snapshot? It was on the XFree86 web page when I first saw the 3.9.16 story ...

  50. its about time i think... by Boolean · · Score: 1

    its about time for me to upgrade, I think. I've been running whichever version of XF comes with RedHat 5.2. Hasn't given me any problems. But maybe now is the time. I never had a problem with my PS/2 mouse but I don't want to, either.

    --

    If you think you know what the hell is going on you're probably full of shit. -- Robert Anton Wilson
    jdube is who
  51. What PS/2 mouse problem? by zenophile · · Score: 1

    Can someone please clue me in about the "PS/2 mouse problem in later Linux kernels" that is fixed in this release?

    --
    "Half of this game is 90% mental."
    1. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by angelo · · Score: 1

      11th commandment: Thou shalt lust after no other laptop other than a Thinkpad - heh heh.


      have been since they first came out in 1994 or so.

    2. Re:What PS/2 mouse problem? by BigFig · · Score: 1

      I've had similar problems on a Gateway Solo 2300 laptop. After I added an external PS/2 trackball (I absolutely HATE the touchpad!!!), the pointer would freeze up at random intervals. Most of the time I was able to get control back by toggling to a virtual console, but sometimes not. Once I totally disabled the (built-in) touchpad via the BIOS, I have never lost pointer control.

  52. Potato ETA? by garyrich · · Score: 1

    apt still gives 3.3.4 as someone else said.
    Are we expecting it in a day or so? If so, I'll
    wait for the .deb rather than compile from source.
    Work computer has a Trio 3D card that's practically
    worthless 'til I get this installed

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  53. Re:free truetype fonts not from MS by poopie · · Score: 1

    I just downloaded intlfonts-1.2, and it includes some nice free ttf fonts in the distro. Go search filewatcher for it. I've always said that the one thing that Micros~1 did well was fonts (must be their Mac group...), but their font license sucks rocks. Good thing we have free alternatives.

    actually that would be a good free project to package and enhance 100% free ttf fonts that are hinted better than the Micros~1 fonts. Someone @ xfree86 is probably already on it...


    Next dependency on Micros~1 that we can eliminate...?

  54. Voodoo 3! by wishiwascool · · Score: 1

    Lets go 4.0!!!
    The beta server sucks for playing Q3

  55. RTFM by PaulFred · · Score: 1

    There are FAQs because people don't read. If they read anything at all there would be no need for FAQs. FAQs are just more documentation which people cheerfully ignore. I think it's a prefectly airtight system. Imagine the confusion there would be if tomorrow everyone instead of just being stupid actually became informed! I'd sure confuse the heck out of me if suddenly people began sounding like they actually knew what was really going on. What a nightmare.

  56. Where's my cursor? by FunkyMonkey · · Score: 1

    I'm having the same problem. I've set up RH 6.0 on about 6 machines with V770 TNT2 cards in the last month and have had the same problem on each of them. I've tried all kinds of things to no avail.

    I'm also having problems with XEmacs. The buttons don't have the correct graphics (they are black and white) and most of them (along with some of the menu functions) don't work. Missing library perhaps?

    I'm getting tired of pico.

  57. Just a filler till 4... by toshiro · · Score: 1

    Looks like they're just trying to fill the time until 4 comes out so the masses don't get too adjitated.

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---------