Slashdot Mirror


deCSS Listed On Download.com

Abscissa writes "I just discovered that Download.com has listed the hottest illegal utility for "bypassing" DVD copy protection. It won't be long before they get contacted by the motion picture association!" And deCSS is also mirrored on many other, lower-profile Web sites. There's simply no way it can be stopped.

235 comments

  1. Ha! Stick it to the man. by Daffy+Duck · · Score: 4
    I'm sure lots of people who don't even have DVD-ROM drives are downloading this thing just to keep it in the Net's collective memory.

    Shades of Fahrenheit 451 :)

    1. Re:Ha! Stick it to the man. by nickelodeon · · Score: 1

      *sticks hand up*

    2. Re:Ha! Stick it to the man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehehe...

      RIAA can kiss my ass-key~

    3. Re:Ha! Stick it to the man. by Spooky+Possum · · Score: 1

      Cryptome seems to be keeping a running list of mirrors for this, LiVid and the like :


      http://cryptome.org/dvd-free.htm


      The last update was a few days ago though.

    4. Re:Ha! Stick it to the man. by sporri · · Score: 1

      I for one downloaded it even though I am not buying a DVD for the next year. Just the thought that I can not copy something I pay for and own makes me mad.

      And BTW people have been copying music for years and years on tapes and other media and the music industry is still there pushing out mountains of junk I cant legally preview in my own home. I just hope I can soon get shareware albums straight from the artists instead of paying Warner Brothers for their work

    5. Re:Ha! Stick it to the man. by Coolfish · · Score: 2

      Now, if only someone could write a utility to pirate popcorn and soda, we wouldn't be paying those atrociously high prices at the movie theaters....

    6. Re:Ha! Stick it to the man. by bagel · · Score: 1

      That's pretty true. I haven't got a DVD player or a single DVD movie but I still downloaded the app. Just as a kind of protest I think.

    7. Re:Ha! Stick it to the man. by Danse · · Score: 1

      Yep. No going back now. It's basically everywhere. Lawsuits won't change that.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  2. Yeah! Download.com DARE to mirror it!!! by Baddog+Abel · · Score: 1

    This has already been covered in Hackernews. Btw, download.com has the guts to mirror it, I *really* can't believe it. Cool!!!

  3. Once the genie is out... by CormacJ · · Score: 2

    Once the genies is out of the bottle it's very hard to put it back in.

    I'm sure we'll see a concerted effort to sue the planet though.

    1. Re:Once the genie is out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's just like the Bugs Bunny Cartoon, where Daffy's walking along in a cave full of treasure and he finds a rusty lamp. He picks it up and tries to shine it a bit. A genie pops out and Daffy starts jumping on it and trying to shove the Genie back in because he thinks that the Genie is after his treasure. But instead the Genie gets pissed off and shoots Daffy with lightening. Hehehehe...

      Now seriously, this is the exact same thing. The genie's out of the bottle, and the MIAA (or whatever that motion picture group is) is going to do whatever they can to stomp out the sites carrying the software. But all that's going to happen to them is they are going to be shot with lightening (metaphorically) when everyone and his dog starts putting the software up on their oversea's website.

    2. Re:Once the genie is out... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Man, I wish WB would release their absolutely huge collection of shorts on DVD. What I wouldn't give to have a good copy of Duck Amuck or something.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  4. illegal ? by imr · · Score: 1

    is it already illegal ???
    or is it just fear of lawsuit(cost) that moves everyone to remove it from their download lists ???

    1. Re:illegal ? by Sfuerst · · Score: 2

      It is "illegal" in very few countrys. The web is world wide - so they are just threatening everyone elsewhere with lawsuits to keep this under wraps. These are just threats though - in Austrailia for example, reverse enginering for interoperability is explicitly allowed - so any files there are "safe". This won't stop them trying of course. However cutting off heads of an exponentially growing hydra is a very boring (and expensive) task...

      --
      "Would you like a cold drink with that Sir? Yes, yes, for the sake, of the future, of all mankind, I will have, a sm
    2. Re:illegal ? by imr · · Score: 1

      wich country is it illegal in ? besides USA ?
      i read they decypherd it because a key wasn t crypted...is that reverse engeenering ???
      excuse me , i know nothing...

    3. Re:illegal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is legal in the USA. The only country that I know of where it might be illegal is England, but the UK law is somewhat unclear on the matter.

  5. Remember CD music? by SEWilco · · Score: 3

    Remember when CDs and DAT came out? The Music Industry tried to restrict copying by legislation. Now we're using $200 CD writers for portable data, and Panasonic is running commercials for their CD copiers. And the Music Industry still sells a lot of CDs.

    1. Re:Remember CD music? by Caspian · · Score: 2

      No one in the music "industry" (isn't it sad when arts and sciences become "industries"? Computer "science" --> computer "industry"... musical "arts" --> music "industry"... medical "arts and sciences" --> medical "industry"...) gives a crap about that.

      American capitalism isn't about making money. It's about making more money. And more. And more. And still more.

      It's, in a nutshell, about squeezing as much money as possible out of the system without getting yourself sued for "unfair pricing" or whatnot. These record company execs, they already sit behind expensive desks made of exotic woods in plush offices, they already drive expensive cars, they already feed their little kids caviar. But that's never been enough in America.

      Every time this happens, the reaction of the music industry and those who support them is essentially "It's OURS! It's OUR PROPERTY! It's all about PROPERTY!"

      But it's not. It's not all about property.

      It's all about money...

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    2. Re:Remember CD music? by JimmyJ · · Score: 1

      Look at me, I'm Caspian, listen to me spout of nonsensical garbage for the length of my post. He wasn' talking about the people who make the music idiot, he was talking about the people who sell/produce the cds, and that has always been an industry.

    3. Re:Remember CD music? by TheQ · · Score: 1

      Yea, but you can't tell me that the music industry isn't being change by the Cd burners and MP3's. This technolgy is still in it's infantcy. It will take years to see the full effect this will have. I have friends that have very large CD collections that won't buy another music CD. They'll just download the mp3's and rip them onto a CD. Over time this will take a toll and you'll see CD sales decline. We've just seen the beginning.

      --
      TheQ
      My comments are the direct effect of your comments or lack there of.
    4. Re:Remember CD music? by haggar · · Score: 1

      However, there are many that will still buy CDs. For example, my motivations are:
      1. I prefere the quality of the CDs tothe MP3. I don't know for pop music, but I like classical music (abot 400 CDs) and there I really hear a difference in quality.

      2. With a legal copy of the CD I get the nice covers and the booklet.

      3. this ought to be at the 1st place: I think it's illegal to have copies of musical CDs, when you don't own the original.





      --
      Sigged!
    5. Re:Remember CD music? by voop · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that "The Music Industry" have influenced taxation of CD-recordables (i.e. the blank discs). Those taxes should then be distributed to "The Music Industry" in a way similar to when a radio station plays a piece of music.

      So basically, whenever I write a Linux CD or archieves one of my own projects on a CD, the music industry will benefit from that......pretty, yes?

      Exactly how the details are escapes me. But I know for sure that this was/is an issue in (at least) Denmark.

      Anyone with more details on this?

      --
      -- "Life is a bitch - and she hates me..."
    6. Re:Remember CD music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree with 2 and 3 but dont agree with 1. if you rip cd to mp3 with cdparanoia (scratch detection enabled) and bladeenc or lame/gogo (256kbits), you probably wont notice any difference in quality at least i dont.... also most of the ppl that listen to mp3's end with buying cd's because they want to support artists

    7. Re:Remember CD music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However, there are many that will still buy CDs. For example, my motivations are: 1. I prefere the quality of the CDs tothe MP3. I don't know for pop music, but I like classical music (abot 400 CDs) and there I really hear a difference in quality.

      ...snip...

      Exactly. Did the VC(R) with the recording option mean the end of videos? Did sales "drop to the point where no one would make videos anymore"? No. VCRs have been around at least the 16 years I have :). I dont think that CD burners will mean the end of the CD business. Why? There's too many honest people to do that. Serious.

    8. Re:Remember CD music? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      However, there are many that will still buy CDs. For example, my motivations are:
      1. I prefere the quality of the CDs tothe MP3. I don't know for pop music, but I like classical music (abot 400 CDs) and there I really hear a difference in quality.

      2. With a legal copy of the CD I get the nice covers and the booklet.

      3. this ought to be at the 1st place: I think it's illegal to have copies of musical CDs, when you don't own the original



      If it is illegal to own a copy of a CD without the original, would it also be illegal to own a CD of say... Das Cantenwerks (Spelling optional) by Bach, that you had not purchased, but instead synthesized by feeding the notes into a music generator? Or even just making copies of someone elses CD of Bach music? Why should this be illegal? Shouldn't the music of such masters be free to be distributed to everyone? I think that once the artists/creator of a work of art is dead their property should enter the public domain. Up until their death they can do anything they want with that property, sell it to companies whatever. But when they die, no matter WHO owns the work, it enters to the public domain.

      Wouldn't that be a perfect solution?

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    9. Re:Remember CD music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? There's too many honest people to do that. Serious.

      Scary thought: If this is your definition of honest people, I don't know a single honest person... including myself of course.
      ;-)

    10. Re:Remember CD music? by cwilson · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. It's not Bach's Das Cantenerks that you're buying. You're purchasing the London Symphony Orchestra's performance of Das Cantenwerks. THEY paid for the rights to perform/record/sell their performance -- by purchasing the sheet music, paying the sheet music publisher for redistribution rights, etc. etc.

      I believe that the works of the great past composers are public domain -- but only the composition itself. Not any given orchestra's performance of it.

    11. Re:Remember CD music? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      You're missing the point. It's not Bach's Das Cantenerks that you're buying. You're purchasing the London Symphony Orchestra's performance of Das Cantenwerks. THEY paid for the rights to perform/record/sell their performance -- by purchasing the sheet music, paying the sheet music publisher for redistribution rights, etc. etc.

      I believe that the works of the great past composers are public domain -- but only the composition itself. Not any given orchestra's performance of it.



      So, feeding the musical notes into a generation program and producing Das Cantenwerks would be legal, what if I did the same thing with some random Backstreet Boys song? They are 90% synthesized anyways. I bet I could recreate it in in minutes, sythesize the voices of me and/or a few of my friends and voila! My very own copy of some new crap pop music song. Is it legal for me to have that? Destribute it? Sell it? Should it be? Would it become so if the BS Boys died?

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    12. Re:Remember CD music? by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      So, feeding the musical notes into a generation program and producing Das Cantenwerks would be legal, what if I did the same thing with some random Backstreet Boys song? They are 90% synthesized anyways. I bet I could recreate it in in minutes, sythesize the voices of me and/or a few of my friends and voila! My very own copy of some new crap pop music song. Is it legal for me to have that? Destribute it? Sell it? Should it be? Would it become so if the BS Boys died?

      It almost certainly would be legal. See this Straight Dope column for details on recording other people's songs. Basically once a song's been recorded, anyone else can record it with or without permission.

    13. Re:Remember CD music? by artg · · Score: 1

      I think you have to pay for performing rights, at least in the UK. Copyright has expired on most of the great classical composers, but it hasn't expired on modern works (including the famously-protected ones like Happy Birthday).

      Therefore, you can't make a recording of a copyright-protected work without paying a license fee.

    14. Re:Remember CD music? by Caspian · · Score: 1

      Uhh... why don't you read my comment a little closer, fool... I was talking about the RECORD COMPANY EXECS. Those ARE the people who sell/produce the CDs. :PPP

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    15. Re:Remember CD music? by FigWig · · Score: 1

      >It's all about PROPERTY!

      Have you read "The Thin Red Line?" You sound like Welsh.

      --
      Scuttlemonkey is a troll
  6. The RIAA gets what it gives by waddgodd · · Score: 2

    Well, it happened, The RIAA found out the hard way that you can't bolt the barn door once the Horse has run. The only thing that threats have done on the Internet, in my experience, has added coverage to what would have been a boring topic, and to strengthen resolve to do exactly what the plaintiffs don't want. The RIAA played rough, they found that netizens can get very rough indeed, and if they want any sympathy from me, Merriam-Webster comes to mind.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
  7. Not really hosting it by vectro · · Score: 3

    It seems that download.com is not really hosting it themselves, but in fact linking to a site in Denmark. It also seems that said site has taken down this software.

    1. Re:Not really hosting it by waddgodd · · Score: 2

      There's four hosts on the download page--maybe you just got unlucky on the redirect?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
    2. Re:Not really hosting it by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 2

      download.com doesn't host almost all of the software they offer. Its all just links, with the exception of CNet branded browsers and such. They have multiple links for DeCSS, and the one at capital.net is up as of the time of this post (just tested it).

    3. Re:Not really hosting it by Digital_Fiend · · Score: 2

      In a few seconds it autodownloads the one from Denmark.. just hit stop on the page that says "Contacting downloading site, please wait...". You can choose from three sites besides the one in Denmark:
      (Click shift when you click on these to download)

      www.capital.net
      www.dvd-copy.com
      perso.libertysurf.fr I think maybe the guy's ISP deleted the file after "discovering" what was on there.. :)

      -Warren

    4. Re:Not really hosting it by jaclu · · Score: 1

      Don't you remember that case in Sweden, a kid that only linked to mp3s on the net, he still ended up in court, although he got of in the end. It seems that "only linking" doesn't count as an excuse...

    5. Re:Not really hosting it by bungalow · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just downloaded it.

      CNet linked me to www. capital.net

      [No name] (CAPIT4-HST)
      CAPITAL.NET 204.97.168.17
      CapitalNET Ltd
      (CAPITAL3-DOM) CAPITAL.NET



      _______________________________

  8. Not the Source. by Blitzkopf · · Score: 2

    This is just the binary windows program, it can descramble the CSS but that is OK becouse it will not run on Linux.

    OTOH Derec Fawcus posted the source to CSS decryption and that might be used to watch DVD on Linux so he must be stopped at all costs.

  9. Yeah, but... by DragoonAK · · Score: 2
    The response from the internet community is certainly nice to see, and the fact that download.com would have the corporate guts to do this is pretty kewl, but be serious! Do you honestly believe the DVD-owning companies think they'll be able to totally eradicate DeCSS from the Internet? No way. Don't set up straw men - as stupid as companies can be, they're not entirely filled with idiots.

    However, if they can intimidate its programmers and prevent any future development or related programs, they're happy. This especially goes for the LinuxDVD project - if you really want to stick it to The Man, rather than provide another mirror of DeCSS, which ain't going away any time soon, find some way of helping the LinuxDVD project.

    Programs are ephemeral. Source code is forever.

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Foogle · · Score: 2
      The corporate guts? Are you kidding? Do you think download.com goes over every stupid shareware/freeware application that get's put on their site? Of course not. They probably didn't even know it was there, for crying out loud.

      They do now, of course.

      -----------

      "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you honestly believe the DVD-owning companies think they'll be able to totally eradicate DeCSS from the Internet?

      ...snip...

      No, no I don't. I know that they'll never get my copy because it's on a Zip disk. And I happen to have lost that zip disk :(. But it's around here somewhere, I hope...

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do now, of course.

      And it's still there, so his point holds.

    4. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think download.com goes over every stupid shareware/freeware application that get's put on their site?

      Actually, they do. From their submission form (emphasis added):

      CNET Download.com lists Macintosh, Windows, BeOS, Palm OS, Windows CE, Linux, and DOS software. You must be the developer or publisher of the software, or an authorized agent, in order to submit a title. Programs that do not meet the following minimum requirements will not be considered:

      * The program must have at least one reliable download link. (More than one download link makes it even easier for users to download your software; click here to find out how to upload your file for free to create additional download links.)
      * At least a limited set of the program's features must be available to the user immediately upon download.
      * The program must not infringe on any copyrights.
      * The program and its documentation must be in English.
      * Your program cannot have been declined by CNET Download.com within the last 60 days.

      To submit a software title for evaluation, please fill out the form below and click the Submit Title button. Required information is indicated in red.
      Completed forms will be reviewed by our staff. CNET Download.com reserves the right to decline submissions for any reason.

      ---

      I know some people who work at download.com: they do review submissions, otherwise, what would stop someone from submitting a trojan horse/virus infected code/etc?

  10. Euh.. is it the real thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can anybody confirm that this is the real DeCSS? My anti-virus software claims it contains an unknown virus. I run F-prot 4.03.

    1. Re:Euh.. is it the real thing? by Avoiderman · · Score: 1

      What antivirus software are you using? Latest DAT files for NAI's Netshield & Vshield, also Trend's Interscan, have no problem with my copy....

    2. Re:Euh.. is it the real thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you got the same version I did, then it's because the author used a PE encryptor called PESheild on it which can confuse some virus scanners. I know AVP will spend about 10 times as long scanning that file than any others. Kind of ironic though isn't it? The program that decrypts DVD files is encrypted...

    3. Re:Euh.. is it the real thing? by Avoiderman · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for AVP... Sounds like it's heuristic scanning going overtime :)

      I had decss_12b.zip - 58kb

      I can send you a copy if you want...
      ... also the LiVid.tgz & cssauth.tar.gz files, if needed/for mirror...

  11. Another Mirror by Ventilator · · Score: 2

    Just in case, there is another mirror here: http://killer.discordia.ch/Politics/Copyprotection .phtml

    It's a friends website. I bet he will get a letter from those boneheads in the movie-industries. But hey, mirror that tool at all costs! When they want to send out dead trees to anyone, they have to write not 100 but 100'000 letters!

    Information should be free!

    --
    --- If OS were buildings, then the first woodpecker to come around would erase 95 % of civilization.
    1. Re:Another Mirror by Troed · · Score: 2
      Well, I got a letter.

      I hosted DeCSS.zip for 13 hours in total, from when I first heard there was a need for mirrors, until the first Slashdot article which made me see that this was exactly the kind of thing that wouldn't be looked lightheartedly upon.

      5 days later, a New York lawyer mailed root at that server. I'm part of the root group, so I took care of answering his mails myself. Basically what they say is that anyone who's hosted DeCSS.zip has "offered to sell illegaly copied DVD movies" and "offered to give out information on how to bypass DVD copy protection" (quotations might not be 100%, but close to it ... I still have the MS Word attachment they send somewhere).

      When I answered that the server was in Sweden, and that US law luckily don't apply here, they didn't seem to understant what I was talking about ... they did however understand that the link hadn't been up for days, so I hope they won't bother us anymore. (I asked if everything was settled, but they didn't bother to reply).

      I hope someone else in Sweden will do the legal battle - copying what you own for your own backup purposes is 100% legal here. There might be a new law coming through 00/01/01 that tries to prevent decryption of encrypted information (targets pirating satellite and cabel channels) - if that's so then it might be used to make tools like DeCSS.zip illegal also.


      BTW, someone should educate the lawyer firm in how to send Emails. They send empty mails, no subject, no body, with a MS Word document as attachment that contains the actual letter ...


      If you host DeCSS.zip, and they see the link, they _will_ come after you to. They _will_ target your provider, they _will_ ask for your real name and address. Just a little FYI ...

  12. Oh no... by Nichen · · Score: 5

    no more movies are going to be made, since everyone is going to download this app and become a hardcore pirate, thereby breaking the motion picture industry. Woe is us. I myself have already put out of business a couple of studios by making illegal copies of my massive DVD collection. The MPAA needs to hurry up and sue download.com, cnet and affiliate sites, and everyone that visits them to protect the fragile movie industry.

    Sheesh. I can only imagine the witchhunts that will follow once this lil' app gets around now.

    Off topic, but I wonder if napster can be configured to transfer *.vob's now? ;)

    --
    Demona's Law - "User data expands to exceed available bandwidth." ("User data" being pr0n, mp3's, vob's,
    1. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CuteMX allows you to use whatever filetypes you want, and the interface doesn't suck ass like Napster's does.

      ( it's from the idjits that make CuteFTP, fyi )

    2. Re:Oh no... by Demona · · Score: 1
      There oughtta be a law (like Moore's or Godwin's, not in the legislative sense) to the effect of, "User data expands to exceed available bandwidth."

      ("User data" being pr0n, mp3's, vob's, whatever.)

      --
      Fuck Slashdot
    3. Re:Oh no... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      CuteMX always gives me an error about the beta being too old and that I need to download a new one... which I can't do obviously.. how do I get around this?

  13. Since when is it illegal? by unco · · Score: 1

    Robin, get your facts straight. In many countries, Australia for one, this program is not illegal.

  14. sure thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://frodo.campus.luth.se/~iocc/tip.html

    1. Re:sure thing! by escher · · Score: 1

      I've also put this up as well:

      Both linux and Windoze versions

      Happy downloading!

  15. Re:DARE? Actually... by webslacker · · Score: 1

    I wonder if download.com as an entity is as responsible for this as one lone employee working unsupervised at CNet who thought to himself, gee this is kewl, maybe I should post it...

  16. #DVDs on EFNet yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long will it be until the DVD is as big as the current VCD scene on EFNet today?

    1. Re:#DVDs on EFNet yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huge already, efnet/dalnet, LOTS of chans full of 300+ people per channel with tradings ;)

  17. perhaps not _illegal_ by adraken · · Score: 3

    this utility is probably not illegal in many countries, but cnet.com is definetely posed with civil legal action by the MPAA or some other lawyers. (even more so, now that it's been posted on hackernews and slashdot) it's obvious that DeCSS, the Livid stuff, and articles explaining how it was done will live forever. the question is: will the MPAA give up and just forget about it? or will the MPAA go on a 30 year hunt to try to discourage all DVD pirating and ultimately destroy itself and the format well before a more viable solution comes along? or will they come up with a different format and screw everyone over?

    --
    -- adraken
  18. Don't call it Illegal. by maroberts · · Score: 5

    I do wish people would be more careful with the posting on Slashdot. Calling DeCSS an 'illegal' utility immediately gets motion picture lawyers backs up and will possibly have a negative impact on when/if you can happily view DVDs in Linux. This slashdot article is almost as bad as the initial Wired article that seemed to started the problems with Linux DVD development in the first place.

    AFAIK, DeCSS is *not* an illegal tool - the development of DeCSS was perfectly legal in the country in which it was developed and it would have been legal to develop it in the US and most other countries [possibly till the Digital Millenium Copyright act comes into force]

    DeCSS, at least in its Linux form, is not intended as an aid to making illegal copies, hopefully it is just a means of assisting you in viewing DVDs under Linux.

    Even the use of DeCSS in the UK, where there are specific provisions that appear to block it, is in doubt - there are a number of hurdles that someone taking the case to court would need to overcome.

    P.S. IANAL, if you are please feel free to correct any mishtakes....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Don't call it Illegal. by hasse · · Score: 1

      Actually I think norwegian lawyers are looking into the matter right now. That's what the major norwegian newspapers said when the program was released anyway.

    2. Re:Don't call it Illegal. by substrate · · Score: 1

      Thanks for a well written and insightful post. If DeCSS relied on leaked or stolen code and if the company had a US based presense then the utility itself is in question in the US though.

      It's not (or shouldn't be) illegal just because it enables people to make copies of a DVD, even if those copies are accurate down to the last bit. Making personal copies is allowed under the Fair Use Act (or a string of words similar to that, don't have anything that mentions it near to me). So even though as a module DeCSS can be used either to make a Linux based DVD player or a copy machine, that in itself doesn't make it illegal (or restore its legal status if there is any basis to the ip infringement issues)

      If DeCSS is free of any infringement and is a valid example of reverse engineeering then there is legal precedent. The use of the DeCSS module in a Linux based DVD viewer would then be legal as would the use of the DeCSS module in a Linux based copier.

      What would be illegal would be the use of the copier to produce copies and redistribute them whether for free or for profit. This is where in a fair world the motion picture industry would focus its legal muscle.

    3. Re:Don't call it Illegal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DeCSS is not an illegal tool in lots of other country (not sure about the US). In New Zealand, it's illegal to copy a video even if you own it. But the ownership of a copying device is not illegal itself. If it is, then even the VCR is illegal then.

    4. Re:Don't call it Illegal. by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      This got me thinking... Macrovision filters aren't
      illegal, right? (where Macrovision is a copy
      protection method used in videotapes and other
      NTSC-based stuff) So what makes DeCSS special?

  19. Copy protection. by Rob+the+Roadie · · Score: 5

    Since copy protection was invented, there have been ways around it.

    With DAT there was some sort of digital signature (i forget the TLA) that was written to the tape that ment that the tape had to copied by the machine that produced the master. A box of tricks costing £100 (ish) got rid of that and you could freely copy DATs.

    The duplication of CD's used to be protected by the high cost of CD writters but we just copied them to tape and all was fine. CD writters now cost around £180 and everyone is freely coping CD's (either audio or MP3) and distributing copywritted material.

    The MP3 audio format was one of the final nails in the coffin. Fast, high quality and small audio files distributed freely are rapidly killing off sales of CD's. Well, so we are lead to believe by the music industry.

    All this little application does is break the current encryption/protection method used. I'm sure that within a few months a new format will come out and all the DVD hardware/software/content vendors will adopt it and proclaim it to be secure. A few months later someone will break it and announce who easy it was and how stupid the industry is for using such a weak encryption/protection method. Repeat the cycle. Do until end.


    1. Re:Copy protection. by Baz+Quux · · Score: 3
      "With DAT there was some sort of digital signature (i forget the TLA) that was written to the tape that ment that the tape had to copied by the machine that produced the master. A box of tricks costing £100 (ish) got rid of
      that and you could freely copy DATs."

      Ahh, that would be SCMS -- Serial Copying Management System. *ptooey* This depended on the hardware to check for a couple of flags on the recording - the L bit (0 for original recordings, and 1 for a first-generation copy) and the copyright bit - to determine whether to allow or disallow copying. Not really encryption, just a control check, and only consumer-level DAT machines bothered obeying. Pro DAT players typically ignore it, or can easily be set to ignore it, and nowadays, pro DAT decks are about the only ones in use. Any wonder why? (Well, there were plenty of other reasons consumer DAT sucked, but that's getting off topic.)


      The MP3 audio format was one of the final nails in the coffin. Fast, high quality and small audio files distributed freely are rapidly killing off sales of CD's. Well, so we are lead to believe by the music industry.

      Yep. They're damned fools for not seeing the forest through the trees. Capitalism isn't about saying "No, you can't have that (i.e. no decrypting DVD's, no distributing mp3's)". It's about saying "Yes, you can have that, and only for the low low price of $X." Those who oppose secondhand and thirdhand distribution of digital media are missing out, and wasting a lot of time, effort, and money in trying to stifle technology.


      Before long, we're going to have unencrypted, high-fidelity digital compression formats for any video or audio you want, and more importantly, the bandwidth to handle it. There is no stopping this. There is only the choice to embrace it and look for ways to make a buck from it, or continue dragging one's knuckes trying to stop it.


      --
    2. Re:Copy protection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im at the point now that I have too much mp3s/music, more hours than I can possibly listen.

      AT the same time im getting more and more movies... more hours than I have free time...

      Its coming to a point where we might have 100000hrs of content to copy, but WE DONT have the time to view it.

      If EVERYTHING was free, then the industry STILL has to fight to get their songs or movies viewed because everyone has so much time to view so much content.

      The key in future will be getting heard, NOT selling the content. Imagine 100000000 radio stations... how do you get heard?

  20. Look at the Company! :) by TyFoN · · Score: 1

    They've listed MoRE as the company hehe.
    Actually this is the norwegian reverse enginering
    group that the guy who produced deCSS is member
    of. It stands for Masters of Reverse Enginering.

  21. Re:DARE? Actually... by arivanov · · Score: 2

    Does not matter. Even if the employee has done it jumping across his terms of employment this still leaves CNET with this material on the web site.

    And there is noting wrong about it:

    Selling guns is not illegal. Firing them at people is.

    Distributing tools for commiting a crime is (mostly) not illegal. Using them is.

    Distributing software that breaks copy protection is (usually) not illegal. Using it for breaking copy protection is.

    The exemptions to these rules are listed in the laws of each country but they usually very old and do not include any computer related equipment (mostly the restrictions deal with specific tools for picking locks and stuff, tools usable for copying bank notes, etc).

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  22. Re:DARE? Actually... by Caspian · · Score: 1

    They probably are. US law, from what I know of it, tends to follow a very old-fashioned notion of heirarchy-- that is, if you're the "supervisor" or "employer" of a given person, you're responsible for anything they screw up. It's a scary thought, but you can very easily find yourself held responsible for what someone else did-- even against your will.

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  23. Good news for us Europeans then. by Cigs · · Score: 1
    I welcome anything that gets me cheaper movies, everthing over here is more expensive than in the US (Movies, DVDs, Games, Books etc). Maybe they will do the decent thing seeing as this download is out there, and scrap regionalisation completely, the real reason it exists is to allow them to charge different prices in different locations.

    But I would say they are even more worried about all those nice sites where you can download complete movies. The whole office (almost 100 of us)where I work watched TPM two months before it was released over here in Europe.

  24. where is the source? by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

    i don't own a dvd player, but i would like to get the source so i could mirror that. where can i find it; what website is the project for linux dvd support at? don't moderate this up, but please moderate up answers!

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:where is the source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can still get it here. Both css-auth and the full code for LiVid, in .ZIP format:

      www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Po rt/3224

      The CSS code was pulled from the CVS the day the news broke; the LiVid code posted is the package Bruce Perens downloaded and posted a short time later. The only change made to either one is the .ZIP format change from the original tarball.

  25. Another mirror: by AftanGustur · · Score: 2



    Are there *realy* people still out there that haven't gotten a copy yet ???



    Since the download.com has stopped working, go grab yours here :


    --
    Why pay for drugs when you can get Linux for free ?

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    1. Re:Another mirror: by phil+reed · · Score: 2

      As of 7:50 eastern time, you could still get the file from download.com.


      ...phil

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  26. Good Luck by Commie · · Score: 1

    Of course there's no way to stop this thing from being widely distributed, just like there is no way to prevent mp3 distribution or commercial software distribution. Sheesh.

    However, I do have a brlliant solution (borrowed from the epitome of corporate brillance, Microsoft). How about someone sets up a table somewhere, and asks for people to bring in pirated DVD's to be replaced by non-pirated DVDs, NO QUESTIONS ASKED.

    1. Re:Good Luck by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Is it actually possible (for somebody without an industrial-grade pressing machine...) to burn a movie-length DVD?

      I was under the impression that there were some consumer-targetted RW DVD methods, but that they didn't have the full capacity of the pressed ones for whatever reason... and that thus, the industry doesn't (yet) have to worry about people distributing unlicensed DVD disks so much as online methods...

      ?

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Good Luck by dufke · · Score: 2

      I was under the impression that there were some consumer-targetted RW DVD methods, but that they didn't have the full capacity of the pressed ones for whatever reason... and that thus, the industry doesn't (yet) have to worry about people distributing unlicensed DVD disks so much as online methods...

      No, not YET. I think the DVD-R (orwhatever) are missing a GB or two, but the writeable DVD media are still in development, no single standard has 'won' yet. Somehow I think the winner will have large capacity. After all, that is the point of upgrading from CD-R...
      -

      --
      __
      Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
    3. Re:Good Luck by Commie · · Score: 1

      You're correct that consumer burners are still short, although after following a recent discussion on this, it appears an "industrial" grade copier runs you 5 grand currently. So for the very brief momemt it's not really a home-user problem. I don't know how much a blank movie-sized DVD disc costs, so I don't know if it's cost effective yet to try and burn movies for sale. If it is however, I imagine there are plenty of folks out there already on the bandwagon (or planning to be), like all those folks in the Hong Kong night market I used to haunt.

  27. Re:DeCSS source (Linux version) by maroberts · · Score: 4

    ...can be downloaded from the CVS server [instructions on the web site] at: http://livid.on.openprojects.net

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  28. Looks like a job for ... REDHAT by nyet · · Score: 1

    I would like to see RedHat take on this one.. hell, its a good use of investor $$$. Put up a CVS repository, hire 1000 laywers, and let the seige begin.

    Are you listening Redhat? Here's a good way for you to use all that dough. While you are at it, throw a couple mil towards lobbying against the truely bletcherous Digital Millenium Bug^H^H^H Act, which is going to single handedly cripple software innovation for decades.

    1. Re:Looks like a job for ... REDHAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red Hat can't touch it. They're a publicly traded company now -- which means their #1 priority is to maximize shareholder value. A lengthy legal battle between them and the MPAA wouldn't meet that goal, but just the opposite.

    2. Re:Looks like a job for ... REDHAT by DragoonAK · · Score: 4
      I'm going to have to disagree on both counts. First off, RedHat doesn't have that much money. They may have a sky-high market valuation, but it's not like they have that much cash, or can even turn it into anywhere near that much cash. Furthermore, why should they? If RedHat really wanted to make DVDs work under Linux at any cost, they'd go to the DVD companies, *co-operate* and give incentives, not start a fight they'd probably lose no matter how many lawyers they had. Going into bankruptcy is not a good use of money. RedHat's small compared to the media conglomerates - same deal with the fight against the DMA. If RedHat can spend X million dollars against, just imagine how many millions they can use.

      Don't expect companies to perform civil disobedience or be the revolution - that's what individuals are for.

    3. Re:Looks like a job for ... REDHAT by bholmberg · · Score: 1

      Interesting perspective, but Red Hat *actually has* a more reliable source of income, . Although it isn't piles of money, it is definitly helping their value on Wall Street. Think if Amazon were to make a few hundred million dollar investment into a profitable company (Cygnus), I'd bet my bottom dollar that their stock price would sky-rocket.

      This is a very smart move for Red Hat, and although this has nothing to do with DVD, I'm trying to show that Red Hat does have money, and if they ever did decide to tackle it, they always could issue more shares!

  29. mirror list by rbb · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the site at http://rhythm.cx/dvd/ has also taken down its list of sites mirroring both DeCSS and the source.

    Since when is it also illegal to link to sites containing illegal software?

    --
    In God We Trust, Others We Monitor
    1. Re:mirror list by arivanov · · Score: 1

      It is not (in most countries). Unless you count this as the obscure notion of promoting crime... Which actually exists in some country's laws...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:mirror list by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

      rhythm.cx was also hosting mirrors of the DeCSS zips, so that's how they were taken down.

      Here are a couple of places where the rhythm.cx mirror list has been transplanted and continually updated:

      humpin.org
      lemuria.org

  30. The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's the RIAA?

    1. Re:The RIAA? by linuxonceleron · · Score: 1
      Who's the RIAA?
      It's the Recording Industry Association of America. Needless to say they enjoy cracking down on mp3s to "preserve the intrests of the artists involved" They will probably be like the BSA Real Soon and crack down on mp3 trading irc rooms and whatnot.

      Do Not Duplex Transparencies

      --

      Shine on, you crazy diamond.
    2. Re:The RIAA? by phil+reed · · Score: 2

      The RIAA used to be a technical standards organization for the recording industry - they would set things like standard equilization curves and provide technical support for studios. Now, they're more of a marketing and lobbying organization, apparently trying to protect the music industry's profits.


      ...phil

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    3. Re:The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, he meant the MPAA.

    4. Re:The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recording Industry Association Army ;)

    5. Re:The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recording Idiots and Assholes of America. I might add they fit right in with America since the American government (a corrupt organization that extorts money and kills it's citizens) is allied with them.

    6. Re:The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      thats gotta be it

  31. DIVX couldn't kill DVD, but deCSS could... by weave · · Score: 2
    Before you start jumping up and down for joy, please remember that movie studios do not have to release movies in DVD format. Not too long ago, many of them were holding off releasing movies in DVD due to these types of fears, and others were hoping DIVX would take off.

    They are not stupid. They know that a few years from now, 6 gigs of disk space won't mean jack and the movie they release today on DVD could wind up everywhere in a few years.

    Fortunately for us, DVD home players are near critical mass. If deCSS happened two years ago, DVD for playing movies would have died a quick death. It still could. At the minimum, I predict, the studios will delay releases of DVD until well after they bleed the VCR market.

    Yeah, it pisses me off that I can't play DVD movies on my DVD-equipped computer with Linux. But imagine if Red Hat or some other distro made a deal to get a license for making a driver to play these disks. We'd all probably crucify them for releasing a proprietary, non-redestributable driver with no source.

    Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it without upchucking the mess at the most inopportune time....

    1. Re:DIVX couldn't kill DVD, but deCSS could... by javilon · · Score: 1

      Well, they don't have many options now...

      The video tape format is becoming obsolete by the minute and it can be copied with a $50 vcr. Image quality is crap and the fabrication costs are high.

      The DVD format is out there now, there are a huge number of drivers already sold, quality is ok, there are more features (multiple languages, surround, etc...) and the fabrication costs are only a fraction of what duplicating a tape costs. Also currently _there_is_no_ easy way to copy them, and if you do, it would be more expensive that buying a new one!

      All toguether, there is no way back for the movie people. They are stuck with DVD's. The only way is forward, maybe creating a better protected format wich would take another two or three years to implement and two or three months for us to crack :)

      Anyway they won't die of starvation, they are doing very well with easyly copiable video tapes. The are just greedy.

      Pirilon

      --


      When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    2. Re:DIVX couldn't kill DVD, but deCSS could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, and its soo much cheeper to make Video Tapes, yeah... good economics there... yep....

      Yeha, just kill that, yeah lets just close the industry down... , because yeah, Video tapes cannot be copied and are impossible to digitize to a computer and upload to a ftp site... yeah... very smart! With PAYTV mpeg2 decode boxes we can now dump the Paytv signal straight to HD without recompression... then upload the files... yeah. DVD is dead, yueah....

      FACE IT, the piracy industry is the grassroots underground that drives the real industry.

      The so called Mainstream just makes the most $$$ legaly.


    3. Re:DIVX couldn't kill DVD, but deCSS could... by gooser23 · · Score: 1

      considering that Canman and S0upaFr0g (the guys that wrote DeCSS) were able to write DeCSS, it probally means they know quite a bit about what all goes on with DVD, and who knows, maybe they will come up with Linux drivers, and who's to stop them from distributing them for free?


      _______________

      --
      "Dying tickles!" -- Ralph Wiggum
  32. Mirrors ... I'm sure there are many more... by Avoiderman · · Score: 5

    http://home.worldonline.dk/~andersa/download/DeCSS .zip
    http://douglas.min.net/~drw/css-auth/
    http://www.devzero.org/freecss.html
    http://home.t-online.de/home/skinner01/decss.zip
    http://www.chello.nl/~f.vanwaveren/css-auth/css- auth.tar.gz
    http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Campus /8877/index.html
    http://www.angelfire.com/mt/popefelix/
    http://www.vexed.net/CSS
    http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~j.vreeken/
    http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/DeCSS.zip and http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/css-auth.tar.g z
    http://www.dvd.eavy.de/css-auth.tar.gz
    http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/DeCSS.zip and http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/css-auth.tar.gz
    http://www.dvd.eavy.de/DeCSS.zip
    http://frozenlinux.com/civ/decss/
    http://www.humpin.org/decss/
    http://www.unitycode.org/
    http://dirtass.beyatch.net/decss.zip
    http://members.tripod.lycos.nl/jvz/
    http://www.free-dvd.org.lu/
    http://www.angelfire.com/in2/mirror/
    http://mclaughlin.orange.ca.us/~andrew/
    http://batman.jytol.fi/~vuori/dvd/
    http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/deCSS/CSS.html
    http://plato.nebulanet.net:88/css/
    ftp://alma.dhs.org/pub/DVD/
    http://www.d.umn.edu/~dchan/css/
    http://www.logorrhea.com/main.html
    http://people.delphi.com/salfter/LiVid.tar.gz
    http://www.theresistance.net/files.html
    ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVid.CVS-11.06.tar. gz and ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVid.CVS-11.06.css-st uff-only.tar.gz
    http://merlin.keble.ox.ac.uk/~adrian/css/index.h tml
    http://www.dvd-copy.com/
    http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css/css-auth.tar.g z and http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css/DeCSS.zip
    http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/DeCSS.zip
    ftp://ftp.firehead.org/pub/ (very slow - 33.6 line)
    http://members.tripod.co.uk/bap/css/css.html
    http://www.tasam.com/~fenkt/dvd/
    ftp://eris.giga.or.at/pub/hacker/crypt/DVD/
    http://therapy.endorphin.org/DVD/
    http://www.discordia.de/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.discordia.de/decss/css-auth_tar.gz and http://www.discordia.de/decss/LiVid.tgz

    1. Re:Mirrors ... I'm sure there are many more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  33. Not a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's garbage. There's no way they are going to forsake the market because of some issue like this. Fact of the matter is, there is money to be made in selling DVDs. And as more people adopt DVD, it will pull in more money than VHS (think about production costs compared to VHS). Besides, people have been able to make near perfect copies of VHS tapes since VCRs first came out and it never killed the market. It's all hype and paranoia on the MPAA's part and I can't see why, because it will be the best thing that's happened to them since VHS.

  34. Sue RealNetworks!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if RealNetworks is sued, they are the owners of Xing who 'let the cat out of the bag'.

    The worst thing that could happen is that they will change the DVD standard so that old players need new decoder chips and newer ones can be reprogrammed with new, stronger encryption.

    -TheScream TheScream.org
    1. Re:Sue RealNetworks!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahah, sure.

      Its like making all Analogue tvs obselete and you have to buy digital, like that will take overnight.

    2. Re:Sue RealNetworks!?! by Flower · · Score: 1
      So why haven't they been served? Response to the people making the software was near immediate but we haven't heard one thing re: legal action against the company who allegedly broke their agreement with the DVD consortium and left a key unencrypted.

      Seems they have their scapegoats. I'm almost willing to bet nothing happens to Xing.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    3. Re:Sue RealNetworks!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if it can be proven it was XingDVD that had the unobsfucated player key, then RealNetworks (parent of Xing) is in for some trouble. The licensing requirements for DVD state "software must be designed so no one but a professional, using high-end lab equipment and specialized training would be expected to be able to defeat the software by exposing the CSS algorithms or keys.... CSS licences require ... liquidated damages provision of one million dollars for material breaches of the agreement" and the "ability of the content providers to sue for injunctive relief in case of misuse of the technology."*

      Looks like RealNetworks is in for some tough times ahead.


      *from "Licensing Requirements For The CSS DVD Copy Protection Method" by Michael Moradzadeh, Senior counsel, Intel Corporation.

    4. Re:Sue RealNetworks!?! by artg · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that agreement text mean RIAA has no case ? If they expect that CSS could be broken by 'a professional ..' then they can't reasonably prosecute someone for breaking it, especially since once it's broken it stays broken for everyone (unlike a theft where each unit has to be separately stolen, probably by a different 'professional').

    5. Re:Sue RealNetworks!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't think so. But IANAL. Basically, what I think the agreement is saying is that the licensee must take reasonable measures to safegard the CSS algorithm so no one but the best could get at it. According to the rumours, Xing didn't take those reasonable measures.

      On the other hand, CSS was designed so that if one player key is compromised, it can be revoked and a new, non-compromised key, could be assigned. (The reason there are 409 player/disk keys on every DVD. This is the pool they assign from. If one is compromised, future DVD's wouldn't be pressed with that one key.) However, CSS has several fatal flaws which render it useless. One is that if you have one key, you can brute force the other keys. They probably didn't see that coming. Another is the weakness in the algorithm which cripples that 40 bit key into nothing more than the strenghth of a 16 bit key. Again, they probably didn't see that either -- or at least not until the format was etched in stone, so to speak.

    6. Re:Sue RealNetworks!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If they do get sued, RealNetworks has a fair shot at winning the case. CSS uses weak encryption, subject to brute-force cracking methods. This arguably makes the "must only be breakable by a professional with access to high-falutin' lab equipment" insoluable. It would be akin to suing someone for putting gas in their car because they first signed a contract stating that the gas must be made non-flammable before it can be used.

      -- Guges --

  35. NOT illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    • Reverse engineering IS legal for the purpose of interoperability.
      See the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Section 1201(f)

      Examples of legal reverse engineering:

      • AMD Reverse engineers Intel chips so that Intel Software can run on AMD.
      • WINE Reverse engineers Windows so that Windows Software can run on Wine.
      • Linux Reverse engineers DVD so that DVD Software can run/play on Linux.

    • CSS is NOT copy protection.
      • Hardware DVD copying machines can copy DVD's without knowledge of any CSS infomation.
      • Rather, CSS acts as a mechanism to prevent "fair use" of the DVD media. CSS Authentication software merely removes this inconvenience to allow users to freely used purchaced media as governed by the "fair use" laws regarding copyrighted material.
    1. Re:NOT illegal by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that without the reverse-engineering of the IBM PC BIOS there would be no IBM clones. _that_ would change things.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  36. links dead by funnyguy · · Score: 1

    that whole directory has been removed now....

    1. Re:links dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.dvd-copy.com/

  37. here's another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ftp://ftp.one.net/pub/users/dmahurin/files/softwar e/dvd/

  38. Actually... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3
    ...not all DAT decks have SCMS. My Sony M1 ignores it; I can (in theory) copy DATs to my heart's content without it complaining, or I could, if I had another DAT deck. Most "professional-grade" DAT players ignore SCMS outright or have a means of defeating it, whereas most "consumer" DAT decks willfully obey SCMS. (The lesson to be learned here should be obvious.) - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  39. Actually... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
    ...not all DAT decks have SCMS. My Sony M1 ignores it; I can (in theory) copy DATs to my heart's content without it complaining, or I could, if I had another DAT deck. Most "professional-grade" DAT players ignore SCMS outright or have a means of defeating it, whereas most "consumer" DAT decks willfully obey SCMS. (The lesson to be learned here should be obvious.)

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  40. Still There! Whee! by 1010011010 · · Score: 1
    Here's their little writeup on it:
    Description
    DeCSS is a freeware multimedia utility developed by MoRE (Masters of Reverse Engineering) that can copy DVD video files and save them to your PC as VOB files. Once the files are saved, you can then open and play these video files directly from your hard disk.

    Note: DVD video files are extremely large and will likely require between 5 and 10 gigabytes of hard disk space.
    I haven't unzipped the file yet to see if it actually contains decss, or a subpoena, but cool! They list 3,187 downloads as of now.
    Reliability United States
    best www.capital.net

    best www.dvd-copy.com

    Reliability Denmark
    best home.worldonline.dk

    Reliability France
    best perso.libertysurf.fr

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  41. No utility needed by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Large jacket pockets and/or backpack, combined with supermarket (Or even better, Costco or Sam's or similar wholesale club). Works great. :)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  42. so dum by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    It's sort of funny. People put locks on things so others can't get in. If you have a crappy lock, you can't blame the /theif/ for getting in: you get a new, better, lock so he can't. Duh. If you could prevent the theif from getting in without the lock, why have a lock?

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:so dum by AndyS · · Score: 1

      It's not so much being thieving, it's getting at what is ours (IMO, sod licensing, I brought that DVD and I think I have a right to read it).

      Just my opinion of course :)

      Unfortunately the law (and most companies) don't agree with me, because there is the urge to make as much money as possible, and not to give consumers their "fair use".

    2. Re:so dum by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Is your computer TEMPEST shielded, perchance?

      Do you always speak in code on the phone? Or, if not, would it be fair to say that's an invitation for a wiretap?

      I don't think that's an argument that it's in anyone's long-term interest to use, unless the phrase "Welcome to the fishbowl" excites you.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    3. Re:so dum by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      If somebody was using tempest on me I wouldn't attempt to arrest them. I would get a shield for my monitor/whatever. Second of all, I am not SELLING my monitor emissions. If I were I wouldn't find it strange that somebody would actually use them to reconstruct information. If I were selling my monitor emissions, willfully distributing them, it would be MY responsibility that they were safeguarded in some manner. It would be silly and unproductive for me to attempt to arrest everybody in America who could possibly obtain information from my willfully distributed emissions.

      Also, wiretapping is highly regulated and controlled, and only government agencies are able to do it. If I /were/ sending information that was very important it would only make common sense to safeguard it.

      Since you /can't/ catch all the criminals, the only sensible recourse is to examine your /own/ safeguards.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  43. Music/Non-Music CD-R discs/drives by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    There are no taxes on "data" CD-R drives/discs, as PC equipment does not fall under the AHRA. (Despite the fact that "data" drives work great for audio.)

    There are "music-only" CD-R devices, which will only write to a CD marked as "taxed for music use" - This media is EXPENSIVE.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Music/Non-Music CD-R discs/drives by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Not really. The prices for those have dropped considerably, to about twice that of normal CD-Rs (at least here in Germany).

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    2. Re:Music/Non-Music CD-R discs/drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The prices for those have dropped considerably, to about twice that of normal CD-Rs

      And you think this is not expensive?!? Sure as hell makes a difference when you buy more than one at a time.

    3. Re:Music/Non-Music CD-R discs/drives by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Considering how dirt-cheap CD-Rs have become, no, that is not expensive for normal people.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

  44. Personal Copying. by Christian+Smith · · Score: 1

    Having purchased the right to use/read/view some copyrighted material, don't I have the right to make copies for personal/backup use?

    When you recieve copyrighted material, it is the contents of the material that is copyrighted, and not the medium it arrives on. I should therefore be able to view the contents from any medium I choose.

    By not allowing me to copy the contents from the medium, earn't they blocking my rights?

    Or is this not the case.

    1. Re:Personal Copying. by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Hmmm. Most of the *old* software licenses I remember (especially for products that came out on a single 5.25"...) specified that the user had the right to make *one* copy for archival purposes only. Those that were copy-protected, like "GATO" and "Silent Service", often included a "coupon" for ordering a backup/replacement, usually to the tune of $10.

      OTOH, I don't remember that on any recent software licenses... so that may have only been a custom. I certainly don't remember it popping up in, say, the MS WinNT EULA...

      A Stanford site seems to imply that "fair use" doctrine only covers educational and research purposes. There are also special provisions for libraries...

      Judging from that, the "right" to make a backup may only have been a privilege granted explicitly by the licensing terms -- one which may be increasingly rare nowadays.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Personal Copying. by Gleef · · Score: 2

      If I recall, there was a court ruling that indicated that making copy of software for archive purposes qualified as "fair use", and was therefore legal. Part of the reasoning behind the ruling was the fragility and unreliability of the floppy disks used to distribute software. I'm not sure if the same ruling would hold for software distributed by CD, and I'm pretty sure it would not hold for entertainment distributed by DVD.

      On the other hand, I am not a lawyer, but I feel that the main argument for legality is a strong one. DeCSS is designed to enable private viewing of legally purchased DVD's, and the fact that it can be adapted to enable illegal copying of copyrighted materials is an incidental side effect and does not render the software illegal. Furthermore, it was reverse engineered in a country whose laws explicitly allow reverse engineering for interoperability purposes (i.e. making your DVD-Video work with Linux).

      ----

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    3. Re:Personal Copying. by Danse · · Score: 1

      I would hope that the archive copy provision applies to CDs and DVDs just as it does to floppies. If I break or scratch the hell out of a CD I bought, I'd rather not have to buy the same data again because the storage medium can't handle my lifestyle. :)

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  45. Missing the real lesson here... by MobyDisk · · Score: 3
    With all the sites coming under fire, and the MPAA on a witch hunt, we seem to have forgotten the real cause of this problem.
    • The US Government's arrogance in limiting the keys to 40 bits. MPAA and DVD manufacturers should be in an outcry over this stupidity.
    • Xing for letting go of an unencrypted key, and violating the security standards of the CSS protocol. Where are they owning up to this?
    1. Re:Missing the real lesson here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of those are red herrings, and here is why:

      Xing for letting go of an unencrypted key, and violating the security standards of the CSS protocol. Where are they owning up to this?

      If the key had been encrypted, what would have stopped them from reverse engineering that encryption first? ("It's turtles all the way down!")

      The US Government's arrogance in limiting the keys to 40 bits.

      Would they have been unable to recover that first key had it been 128 bits? 2048 bits? 65536 bits?

      Once one key is known, the others fall into place since you have a known plain text.

      The problem is the method of encryption and distribution is flawed. You can't distribute both a decryption algorithm and a working key together and expect it to stay secure, no matter how many layers of obfuscation are piled on top. It will be broken.

      (This post has ignored the problems with the CSS encryption algorithm itself, which rendered the 40 bit key to something like a 16 bit relative strength.)

  46. why not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the age of million dollar sports signing bonuses and average people working their tails off just to get a quarter raise- the reasoning is that people are entitled to some free stuff. Just do not get caught

  47. Route around the problem: Usenet by Morgaine · · Score: 3

    The artificial barrier erected by studio-led organizations against access to DVD by the free operating systems is not dissimilar to a fault in the (information) network.

    Well, the Internet is good at dealing with network faults, ie. with the classic response of routing around the problem. In this case the problem is that lawyers and other luddites can prosecute website owners. No big deal: just post the sources repeatedly and automatically to appropriate Usenet newsgroups, and automatic news archiving worldwide will ensure that anyone that needs the code will be able to find it without presenting a target for slobbering lawyers.

    [And no, I do not accept that lawyers can get away with "just doing their job" without accepting responsibility for their luddism, just like I do not accept that it is moral for scientists to place tools of destruction in the hands of brainless politicians. If the legal profession wants to be well regarded, it needs to stop washing the blood of its actions off its hands.]

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:Route around the problem: Usenet by Mignon · · Score: 1
      Newsflash: Today lawyers for the MPAA asked a judge to issue a restraining order against the Internet, USENET, and the C programming language claiming the latter were promoting copyright violations.

      The MPAA lawyers were arrested and charged with manslaughter after the judge died laughing.

  48. You'd still miss out... by Croaker · · Score: 2

    Until you programmed a seat-kicking, loud whispering, cell phone and beeper carrying jackass simulation... at least, every time I go to the movies, that's who ends up sitting behind me... Oh, and toss in some surround-sound crying babies belonging to the "we're too cheap to hire a babysitter, so we brought our baby to see the Matrix, I'm sure the gunshots won't upset him/her/it" couple in the front row.

    1. Re:You'd still miss out... by AndyL · · Score: 1

      What about the idiots who for whatever reason feel the need to explain everything to their dates? I sat right in front of one of these during 'The X-Files' and every thirty seconds he'd explain something painfully obviouse to his date ("Thats an Alien." "Oh! The Bee!" "He's gotta find scully")
      This would be dificult to simulate because the information would need to be unique to each movie.

    2. Re:You'd still miss out... by Sorklin · · Score: 1

      I think that's one of the audio options on the DVD of X-files. Its under "Really Obvious Comments from a viewer" section. ;)

    3. Re:You'd still miss out... by Duds · · Score: 1

      This is of course the benefit of the UK not having the "accompanied by parent" clause in the law

      This just meant I got the "15 year old who thinks he's hard" sitting behind me who still managed to scare himself shitless

  49. DeCSS by Fooknut · · Score: 1

    this program is a wonderful one too!
    It's simple, easy to use and fast in what it does. You can't stop progress!

    Fook

    --
    The price we pay for immortality... is death. Narnia The Great Fall
  50. Can't stop downloading, but... by brandonp · · Score: 1
    It seems to me that they can't stop everyone from downloading a copy of DeCSS. But what about the development of DeCSS, is that still going ahead or has most everyone been scared off?

    I would think their real intent would to stop the development.

    Brandon P.
    1. Re:Can't stop downloading, but... by Sorklin · · Score: 1

      In case the development stopped, no prob. Just design the DVD players for linux to use DeCSS as a plugin. That way you get around the legal rangle in the same way MAME did by not packaging the roms with the emu. That way, if it is found that DeCSS does violate either copyright or patent, then it would be up to the individual user to find (easy) and download (easy) the decryptor or use a licenced one. That way the program can't be stopped on the decryption basis.

      My $0.02

  51. Seems to me the DVD consortium should be illegal by slim · · Score: 3
    It seems to me the whole idea of DVD was to create a monopoly. As I understand it, the idea of the DVD protection was not to prevent copying, but to restrict playback on players who have not paid money to the DVD consortium.


    I don't know whether there are any laws forbidding this kind of practice; I'm just saying it's wrong.


    Look at it this way -- *some* form of digital medium for the sneakernet distribution of video will become the single de facto standard, and it's likely that DVD will be the one.


    With the DVD consortium in control of the keys necessary to create disks and read them, a small number of companies effectively become in control of that significant chunk of media. Free speech? Dead. Indie movies? Dead.


    Bah.
    --

  52. VOB Files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does one use (in a Win Environment) to view these VOB files anyway?

    1. Re:VOB Files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XingDVD, of course. :)

  53. Will the same thing happen with Digital TV? by Hugo+Graffiti · · Score: 1

    If it can happen with DVD then presumably it will happen with Digital TV soon. What is going to stop people from downloading illegal decryption software for STB's or TV cards?

    1. Re:Will the same thing happen with Digital TV? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      If it can happen with DVD then presumably it will happen with Digital TV soon. What is going to stop people from downloading illegal decryption software for STB's or TV cards?


      Speaking of this, I got a TV tuner last night and then while looking for better viewer software thant the piece of MS trash that comes with it I stumbled across the semi-german version of a program called FreeTV or MoreTV that descrambled cable PPV channels, but because the most of the docs and the program were in german I wasn't able to get it working, anyone know of an english version of this prog or a similar one? It would be interesting to look at, plus I could watch ALL the 'Wrastlin' PPVs for free! >:)

      Kintanon ---Redneck at heart

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    2. Re:Will the same thing happen with Digital TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're in the US, if not then disregard this message.

      FreeTV works with the european systems which use a different protection method than the US. The european system uses VideoCrypt which actually scrambles the video by transposing and rotating scan lines. The US system just supresses the h-sync in the video. So, FreeTV won't work with the US cable system.

      Theoretically, the US system should be easy to defeat if you have a tuner card which will dump the raw data from the cable. (I think I've figured out how to do this with a bt828 card, but I haven't actually tried it yet.)

    3. Re:Will the same thing happen with Digital TV? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      I assume you're in the US, if not then disregard this message.

      FreeTV works with the european systems which use a different protection method than the US. The european system uses VideoCrypt which actually scrambles the video by transposing and rotating scan lines. The US system just supresses the h-sync in the video. So, FreeTV won't work with the US cable system.

      Theoretically, the US system should be easy to defeat if you have a tuner card which will dump the raw data from the cable. (I think I've figured out how to do this with a bt828 card, but I haven't actually tried it yet.)



      Conceptually I know how to break it, since it's just the scrambled looking thing which is crystal clear, but all swapped around. I just don't have the programming skills to create one. Any idea where I might locate such a program that will work with the US cable system?
      Anyone with info can e-mail me at the above address if you don't want to answer here for some odd reason.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    4. Re:Will the same thing happen with Digital TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! you fool! you got pizza last night! don't you remember? You were on that food run for like 8 hours "KintFOOD" yeah...right...you were actually out screwing the man...I see how it is..


      Dan?

    5. Re:Will the same thing happen with Digital TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Must be someone from #MTG or #MUDS. Shame on you DANJOE! Posting anon to preserve your Karma too.>:)

      Kintanon --- Posting Anon to preserve MY Karma!

  54. try nonags.com by PablosBrain · · Score: 1

    nonags.com had it listed earlier last week.. thats where I downloaded it from.

  55. The Encryption is too ridiculous for words by Edwin+Oostra · · Score: 1

    Since all books are copyright protected, I think the contents of them should be encrypted as well. I think we should write all the books into Navarajo (which the americans used as encryption tool in WWII) and then prosecute and jail the last few people who speak that language.

    After that if anyone should reverse engineering that then dead language, they should be prosecuted and jailed. You're not allowed to copy the contents of books, so learning the Navarajo language is an illegal action.

    Of course, those people who buy books in the right kind of cover, will get their copy along with a Navarajo translator. But you won't get one if you buy the sort of book that falls under the Gnu Publishers License, and that is open cover.

    --
    Beware of Wight Supremacists!
    1. Re:The Encryption is too ridiculous for words by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      That's a bit of a false analogy, unless you include the idea that you can buy the ability to read Navajo.

      After all, if you have a licensed player, they'll let you play DVDs; it's *not* that they've made the product impossible or illegal to use, which is what you're disingenuously implying.

      What it *is* similar to are things like using colored paper to inhibit copying (been done, but not that lately AFAIK; perhaps copying tech has made this obsolete?), and burning a sector 15 on a floppy to make DISKCOPY.EXE fail. In neither case is it impossible, using their licensed method, to actually *use* the product.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  56. Just as well by Improv · · Score: 1

    If DVD dies, and they come out with something
    new, someone will find a way to copy that too.
    There's no such thing as intellectual property,
    and if you put it out there, given enough time
    someone will find a way to copy it. That's a
    *good* thing.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  57. CNet - Download.com by Avoiderman · · Score: 2

    CNet have just listed this in their "download dispatch", with a live link for download from: http://www.dvd-copy.com


    DECSS
    File size: 60K
    License: Freeware
    Minimum requirements: Windows 98/NT 4.0

    DVD owners: Looking for a way to back up movies onto your
    hard drive? This tiny multimedia utility can rip DVD videos
    and save them directly to disk as uncompressed, playable VOB
    files. Keep in mind, however, that DVDs occupy between 5 and
    10 gigabytes of hard disk space each--so be sure to have a
    spare storage device on hand. Let 'er rip:

    http://1.digital.cnet.com/cgi-bin1/flo?x=dEBhoEuKo wggomuY

    1. Re:CNet - Download.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know if the 98/NT version is virus-free? While I can scan it, and even brand new download virus definitions before I scan it, I don't know if it is trojaned or anything. Ideas? Comments? Experiences?

    2. Re:CNet - Download.com by barleyguy · · Score: 1

      From the creators, based on the type of utility it is, I'd almost guarantee it. If you're really paranoid, download about 5 copies from different sites and compare them. Or ask yourself why you're so paranoid.

      --
      --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
    3. Re:CNet - Download.com by Avoiderman · · Score: 1

      It is virus free - I have used strong Heuristic scanning on it & am pretty confident (as much as one can be)...

  58. A thought by snakeyes · · Score: 1

    Just had a thought from surfing through the /. home page. The DeCSS article and Distributed.net article just happend to be within an article of each other. So, why not combine them. Just from figuring out one key, these guys were able to figure out ~120 working keys. Why don't be brute force it, a la Distributed.net, and really put a bug up the MPIA's ass?

  59. I got a copy by Jimhotep · · Score: 1

    thanks for the links
    I'm looking at /css-auth/css-auth.c

    I feel so dirty

  60. Electronic Age - Products Tend Towards Free by Sorklin · · Score: 5
    I read an excellent article in Wired Magazine that partially explains what is happening here. As we enter the electronic age (sheesh what a hokey statement) leaving the industrial age behind, we have a new set of rules that naturally start to govern this new economy. My favorite new 'rule' is Follow the Free which assigns the most value to those things that are given away. Such is one of the principals in which the Open Source community operates (consciously or unconsciously).

    But we still have many businesses (including the motion picture industry) which are still operating under the old industrial age rules. Those rules favor protecting property to preserve scarcity to help assign higher product value. That we can copy movies with no real overhead, threatens the scarcity, which in turns lowers the assigned value of the product. They see the need to try to protect their property, so that they can continue to retain value assigned to it. A great example of the extreme of this mindset was Disney (until recently) which not only protected their IP, but actually would take products off the market for extended periods of time to drive up the 'value' (by making the product more scarce).

    The Electronic world compensates. Its just the beginning of the new economy, and what we are seeing is that the wired folks are starting to act in a new way. Notice the increase of attention regarding issues of intellectual property and privacy. Both of these issues have to transition to a new set of rules in this new economy and we have a conflict of the old-economy businesses and the new-economy public. Expect to see more of this for the next few years.

    The popularity of DeCSS (in our community) and the proliferations of MP3s are just two examples of the new rules in action. DeCSS is a correction to the old rules, and MP3 is the principals of the new economy in action. Not that most people have any idea that this is going on. Like rules of any economy, they 'just make sense.' We like MP3s cause it just makes sense to distribute and collect music this way.

    Of course, I could be just blowing smoke.

    1. Re:Electronic Age - Products Tend Towards Free by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      Well put. I think the internet is connecting people in such a way that its bringing down these barriers that we threw up in the old days to protect our property but now its be shared by everyone when you put in on the net, I dont mind it. I hope we can somehow come to terms with this, i guess.

  61. Eye is much more sensitive than the ear by Sleepy · · Score: 2

    DVD for Linux is good, and encrypting content is bad, however...

    I think the media is going to overblow this, aided by drooling w@r=z d00dz who think this is the Holy Grail or something.

    I tried this out myself. Yep it rips movies flawlessly. But then what? Do I RE-compress the movie - further degrading quality? As it is I can see DEFECTS in the ORIGINAL DVD... compressing will only make it worse. True, I tried a Windows software DVD player which accounts for most of the defects, but this is a respectable playback platform (Voodoo3, AMD K62/450 128 MB RAM).

    I don't remember all of biology, but I recall the human eye is much more sensitive than the human ear, so defects are much more obvious than say frequency clipping in an MP3... especially if you look for these things. I still grab the occasional MP3, but mostly they suck like car factory speakers suck and Microsoft ASF sucks .

    I encode my own MP3's not because I want to be legal, but because that's the opnly way for me to get 320/44 kbps which tends to preserve the upper frequencies.

    With compressing video, we're talking inter-frame compression which takes 100% of your CPU for (I'm guessing) 8 hours or more. What a sorry way to avoid $19 for a movie.

    Don't get me wrong - I think the freedom to copy content you own is a GOOD THING, and I rank encrypting content right up there with evils like sterile plant seeds (designed to make addicts of the third world). I'm sure the music industry makes a KILLING of scratched and discarded audio CD's... backing up is your right.

    1. Re:Eye is much more sensitive than the ear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ripped video is still compressed. The files are under 10 gigs, but think how big it would be at 24-bit color, 24fps, approx 640x480, for 90 minutes - the files would be about 111 gigs if they were decompressed.

    2. Re:Eye is much more sensitive than the ear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about 10 movies, thats $190

      what bout 30, thats $600

      get the picture...

      plus the CPU is doing nothing at night while we sleep and soon we will have >4gig backup devices at our leasure, the industry isnt gona stall technology and leave us with 650meg CDR in 2005, are they.

      by 2005 we will have HDs of sizes of 1000GIGS, yet our CDR will it be still lame ass 650meg?

  62. If you've got one, send responses to DVDutils.com by holloway · · Score: 1
    On DVDutils.com there's an email address asking for responses to the form letter being sent around to sites to take down deCSS content. The link to the site (in english) is here (temporary mirror while dvdutils scamper from server to server... ie:may not be available/may be out of date by the time you get to it/check the dot com for current schtuff).

    And, if you're particularly bored, my letter. It's wanky and tame, but that's what they're supposed to be ;)

    ====

    Hi you crazy kids, you

    We both know there isn't a legal standpoint for doing what you're doing when it comes to legal action about taking down the information pertaining to decoding DVDs on dvdutils.com. There are perfectly legal reasons for decoding legally purchased DVDs so as to view them on other operating systems not supported by vendors. You have no legal right - and in my eyes no moral right - to threaten these websites with legal action. These are small sites largely run by passionate unpaid people for the benefit of others. They probably haven't the resources to stand against your false claims - and with the cost involved are forced (albeit in a defacto kinda way) to bow under your legal weight of faulty claims. Discussing the merits and flaws in DVD encryption is not illegal and your actions degrace the legal profession.

    Come on now, that's not cricket.

    Matthew Cruickshank

    http://www.holloway.co.nz/book/3/

  63. Re:Seems to me the DVD consortium should be illega by Rombuu · · Score: 2

    No, you are wrong.

    The idea was to prevent the wholesale copying of DVDs like the CD problem they have in Asia.

    There are some patent issues if you wanted to manufacture a DVD player and didn't license the appropriate patents, but itwould be far easier to just sue you, rather than going through this encryption stuff.

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
  64. Re:Looks like a job for ... GNU by bfree · · Score: 1

    RedHat cannot take this on. However, I would suggest that GNU could, if this isn't an issue of software freedom I don't know what is!

    GNU also does not have the financial risks of Redhat or any other true commercial organisation, and I would suggest that if required monetary support would be far easier for them to organise than any other body. It would certainly be an interesting test of both the principles of software freedom and the support of the FSF by the commercial linux interests.

    Use the Source Luke

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  65. Digital Millenium Slap in the Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will continue to pirate just to spite the DMCA and the RIAA, MPAA, . Why make laws that make people more violent?

  66. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... And really it's for the best.

    Don't fuck with me and I won't fuck with you.

  67. Just wondering.. by redhog · · Score: 1

    ..but how can possibly an encryption protect against copying? Copying, from what I know, works on a bit-to-bit level, and doesn't care about encryption - the copied version will be as encrypted and as original as the original. So this is just to screw it up for people wanting to implement a software player!

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
  68. Registering displeasure with MPAA by Avoiderman · · Score: 1

    Anyone got any email addresses of Lawyers firms representing MPAA in this? Or MPAA themselves? Here are some email addresses & links to web-forms of some members of the MPAA, that are freely publicised (I haven't found many ... yet): info@pde.paramount.com motionpictures@pde.paramount.com http://www.mgmua.com/cgi-bin/cgi/email.html&type=b ody&from=&V=2?subject=MGM+DVD&x=55&y=5 http://disney.go.com/mail/movies/index.html http://www.mca.com/fp/contact_form.html

    1. Re:Registering displeasure with MPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hshapiro@sargoy.com

  69. Demona's Law by Nichen · · Score: 1

    Well unless there is one already, you just made it up. My new .sig, Demona's Law =)

    --
    Demona's Law - "User data expands to exceed available bandwidth." ("User data" being pr0n, mp3's, vob's,
  70. Re:Mirrors ... Add another ftp site by quasimoto · · Score: 1

    ftp://ftp.charm.net/pub/usr/home/dutch/ or http://www.charm.net/~dutch/ Nothing like having plenty of stuff -d

  71. Re:VOB Files - DVD Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some software based DVD players can play directly from a .vob file, or you can copy the navigation files (.ifo) from the dvd into a video_ts directory on your hard drive and point the player to that drive as your DVD drive. An example of a sofware DVD player would be InterVideo's WinDVD. It can be purchased for about $50.00, and is bundled in with some graphics cards as well. I got my copy from 3DFx when I bought a Voodoo3. I believe PowerDVD has this capability as well, but it requires a lot more CPU than WinDVD. The Mad Duke

  72. Re:Seems to me the DVD consortium should be illega by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commercial DVD mastering equipment isn't burdened by the first layer of CSS encryption: the player/drive authentication handshake. Commercial mastering equipment can read all contents of DVDs, including the 409 player/disk keys and the disk key hash, and duplicate them exactly. This is required in order to read all of the disk to verify it was pressed correctly (quality assurance.)

    CSS can not stop the commercial pirates, its purpose is to stop the casual user.

  73. Damn man by Uruk · · Score: 2

    Where did you get all of those links? Were you in contact with the authors that maybe knew where it had been distributed?

    2 links would have been good. 5 links would have been great. This is just awesome. Already got the binary and the source. Thanks a lot.

    --
    -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
  74. Wouldn't work by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    > I think that once the artists/creator of a work of art is dead their property should enter the public domain.

    Unfortunately this wouldn't work as everyone could become a 'corporate sole' i.e. a legal entity with perpuitity.

    From the things that make you go hmmmm:
    Why is the Queen of England a corporate sole?

    If you're interested, snag a copy of Black's Law Dictionary, and read what it has to say.

    IANAL

    Cheers

  75. Mirror list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    Oh yeah

    Visit Humpin! (No, it's not what you think!)

    Explanation on legality of this information:

    The software (source as well as binaries) offered on this site can be freely redistributed. It was written by authors who expressly permitted and encourage the redistribution of this software and information. The purpose of this software is not, I repeat not illegal copying of DVD disks. It is meant to provide information necessary to be able to program a DVD player for Linux. To do this, the CSS system needs to be incorporated in the player. Recently the (very weak) content scrambling system was deciphered, freeing the way for a Linux DVD player. The CSS system is not a copy protection system, since it does not prevent copying of the disk. Writing information about the way an encryption scheme functions is completely legal. The source code and binaries on this site are completely legal too, since they contain no code from the DVD consortium or its members. The sources and programs on this site are purely written by 3rd parties using clean-room reverse engineering methods, which is, again, completely legal. This software and information below make it possible for people who legally obtained their DVD movies to view them on their Linux systems.

    Attention

    www.rhythm.cx was hosting a list of mirrors for these files. That list of mirrors has been replaced with a page reading "This site has been taken down for legal reasons." Here's what the maintainer put on the site the day it was shut down:

    NOTE (Thu, Nov 11, 12:17pm EST): I've recently been informed that a law firm which is likely to be one that would try get these mirrors taken down has been visiting this mirror site as well as others. With that said, there is a possibility that I may have to remove this site in the near future because like everyone else, I can't afford to go to court to fight it. Luckly, it seems fairly unlikely that any law firm will ever be able to get rid of all these mirrors at this point (there are currently 41 in 8 different countries and this list is growing every day). However, I have only seen very few mirror _lists_ like this one anyplace. If anyone has the resources, it might be wise to mirror this list of mirrors as well so that the right people will still know that these mirrors exist.

    UPDATE: Here is a 2600 story with more details on how rhythm.cx was shut down.

    I have taken it upon myself to mirror the mirrors. So until such time as the hounds of hell come a-knocking at my door, I present for you this list:


    Page last updated: Tue, Nov 16, 2:19pm EST

    Current Mirrors
    (Numbers are only for the maintainer's convenience)

    1. http://www.humpin.org/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.humpin.org/decss/decss.tar.gz

    2. http://home.worldonline.dk/~ andersa/download/DeCSS.zip
    3. http://douglas.min.net/~drw/css-auth/
    4. http://www.devzero.org/freecss.html
    5. http://home.t-online.de/home/skinn er01/decss.zip
    6. http://www.chello.nl/~f .vanwaveren/css-auth/css-auth.tar.gz
    7. http://www.geociti es.com/ResearchTriangle/Campus/8877/index.html
    8. http://www.angelfire.com/mt/popefelix/
    9. http://www.vexed.net/CSS
    10. http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~j.vr eeken/
    11. http://www.dvd.eavy.de/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.dvd.eavy.de/DeCSS.zip
    12. http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/css-aut h.tar.gz and http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    13. http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/DeCSS.zip
    14. http://frozenlinux.com/civ/decss/
    15. http://www.unitycode.org/
    16. http://dirtass.beyatch.net/decss.zip
    17. http://sharedlib.org/decss.zip
    18. http://decss.tripod.com/index.html
    19. http://www.free-dvd.org.lu/
    20. http://www.angelfire.com/in2/mirror/
    21. http://mclaughlin.orange.ca.us/~andrew/
    22. http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/css -auth.tar.gz
    23. http://batman.jytol.fi/~vuori/dvd/
    24. http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/deCSS/CSS.ht ml
    25. http://plato.nebulanet.net:88/css/
    26. ftp://alma.dhs.org/pub/DVD/
    27. http://www.d.umn.edu/~dchan/css/
    28. http://www.logorrhea.com/main.html
    29. http://people.delphi.com/salfter/LiVi d.tar.gz
    30. http://www.theresistance.net/files.html
    31. ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVi d.CVS-11.06.tar.gz and ftp://193.219.56. 32/pub/dvd/LiVid.CVS-11.06.css-stuff-only.tar.gz
    32. http://merlin.keble.ox.ac.uk/~a drian/css/index.html
    33. http://www.dvd-copy.com/
    34. http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css /css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css/DeCSS .zip
    35. http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/css -auth.tar.gz and http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/DeCSS.zip
    36. http://members.tripod.lycos.nl/jvz/
    37. http://joe.to/storage/files/decss.zip
    38. ftp://ftp.firehead.org/pub/
    39. http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/
    40. http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderm an/dvd.htm
    41. http://remco.xgov.net/dvd/
    42. http://www.able-towers.com/~flow/
    43. ftp://dvd:dvd@206.98.63.136
    44. http://www.twistedlogic.com/htm l/tl_archive_map.htm
    45. ftp://mikpos.dyndns.org/pub/cssdvd.zip
    46. http://mu nitions.vipul.net/software/algorithms/streamcipher s/decss.tar.gz
    47. http:/ /munitions.polkaroo.net/software/algorithms/stream ciphers/decss.tar.gz
    48. http://muni tions.dyn.org/software/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    49. http://mun itions.cifs.org/software/algorithms/streamciphers/ decss.tar.gz
    50. http://uk1. munitions.net/software/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    51. http://209.68.37.134/decss/
    52. http://muni tions.firenze.linux.it/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    53. http://www.tasam.com/~fenkt/dvd/
    54. ftp://eris.giga.or.at/pub/hacker/crypt/ DVD/
    55. http://therapy.endorphin.org/DVD/
    56. http://www.discordia.de/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.discordia.de/decss/css-aut h_tar.gz and http://www.discordia.de/decss/LiVid.tgz

    This site contains some good technical documentation as well as more source code that the DVD consorium's lawyers would rather you not see:
    http://crypto.gq.nu/


    Semi-broken Mirrors
    (These mirrors sometimes work and sometimes don't)
    ftp://134.173.94.44/

    Broken Mirrors
    (These are listed here for the notification of the people who run them)
    http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderman/css-auth.ta r.gz http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/DeCSS.zip and http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/css-auth.tar.g z


    Mirrors shut down by The Man
    (A moment of silence, please.)
    http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    http://dvdcracked.tvheaven.com/index.html
  76. DeCSS Download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    download it at http://www.capital.net/~wooly

  77. Think about this one for a second. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any data on a hard drive can always be analyzed to the bone until someone figures a way to crack/decrypt it.

    Eventually anything can be cracked. The only true security is not having ANY access to the data/CD/DVD at all. That means physical access too.

  78. It only takes one... by mixy1plik · · Score: 1

    Software is like a pair of rabbits...give it time.

  79. Re:Seems to me the DVD consortium should be illega by FreeUser · · Score: 5

    No, you are wrong.

    The idea was to prevent the wholesale copying of DVDs like the CD problem they have in Asia.


    No, you are wrong.

    Wholesale pirates have access to commercial grade DVD copying and pressing equipment, which as another poster noted is not affected by CSS at all.

    Furthermore, wholesale DVD pirates have the option of recording from the analog output, redigitizing the result with only a small loss in quality, and pressing as many unencrypted DVDs as they wish. Minimal effort, minimal cost. Given the kinds of pirated movies that have been sold in the past (taken with a video camera in front of a screen for crying out loud!), quality is not a very important issue to pirates.

    CSS is designed to restrict playback and limit fair use as provided for under the law, including but not limited to making backup copies or moving the data to a more convenient medium.

    The MPAA has plenty of legal recourse, and muscle, to go after wholesale pirates. CSS is an effort to make an end-run around laws permitting individuals fair use, something the MPAA and movie studios can't stand, but have absolutely no LEGAL method of stopping (except by encryption and excersizing the draconian new rights they have been granted in the US through the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, which was snuck through on a voice vote during the height of the Clinton/Monica sex scandal.)

    As I noted in another post, I will not be giving any money, directly or indirectly, to Hollywood until such a time as DVD is supported under Linux and their witch hunts stop. Yes, this means I'm making allot of use of the public library, local book stores, and local theaters and comedy clubs. Now that I'm hooked on the latter, I will probably be much less inclined to watch movies again even after the MPAA cleans up their act (should that optomistic expectation actually ever happen), as plays and comedy acts have actually turned out to be much more entertaining than any movie I've seen in the last several years. But that's another story altogether ...

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  80. Actually, isn't this kind of like stealing cable.. by mattz · · Score: 1

    ..service? There are all kinds of devices for illegally descrambling cable signals, and If you consider dvd as a 'information source' transmitted by sneaker net with the ability to use a device to view it infinitely, but only a 'licenced' device provided by the service provider--as in cable--then we are in violation of federal laws or something. I think it really comes down to the licencing schema that each dvd datafile is covered by.

    --
    Remember this...no eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn....(jim morrison)
  81. Link is broken by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

    File not found...
    Well, that didn't last long.

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    1. Re:Link is broken by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of drugs you're on, but I just checked download.com and all three or four of the links they have -- everything is working fine.

      If you're having trouble finding a mirror though you should definitly click this sentence.

  82. CD vs. MP3: it depends by Bishop · · Score: 1

    The difference in quality depends on the type of music. MP3s work well for pop music that tend to have most of the sound in a fairly narrow band at any given time. The sound band moves around, but generally there is one dominant sound. Of course pop is also written to sound decent on low end comsumer electronics. Other kinds of music can have a lot of sound all over the spectrum. I imagine that a lot of classical is like that (I haven't really listened to much). You are meant to hear both the continueing echo of the kettle drums as well as the delicate sound of the flutes. In most pop music you only need to hear the initial thump of the bass or drum while you concentrate on the voice or guitar. MP3 does not encode the broad spectrum stuff very well. When I tried to encode some new age stuff I found that it dumped in a lot of high frequency noise while muting the bass. It didn't really matter what encoder I used or which bitrate they all sounded pretty awfull. Anything less then 196kbits/s actually started giving me a head ache.

    I am still encodeing much of my CD collection into mp3. Even 128kbit/s MP3s aren't bad for some music.

  83. People won't like deCSS when it's all over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as it will very likely result in the loss of DVD support on PCs or the loss of DVD support in its current form from the movie industry.

  84. CNet to fight a lwasuit? by gregbaker · · Score: 2
    This seems like an odd move for CNet--big companies tend to shy away from such controversy.

    Is it possible that when CNet gets the inevitible Cease and Desist letter from the RIAA, they plan on fighting for their right to distribute the software? That would be interesting.

    Does anyone know of CNet's previous responses to such threats?

    Greg

  85. Somewhat Offtopic -- ZDNet Story by Sorklin · · Score: 1
    Just saw this on ZDnet, but there is an article about the deCSS and strangely enough they are calling it "A Good Thing." Never expected ZDNet to jump on the hack er... Crack er... HRACK(?) bandwagon.

    It is a bit wishy washy though. But since the average ZDNet reader only reads the headline and any applicable "Berst-I-Told-You-So" Links, they'll probably miss the part where the author says: "What is learned here can be applied to making future systems stronger."

    --cringe--

  86. hell, here's a list o' mirrors by emmons · · Score: 1

    http://frozenlinux.com/civ/decss/mirr ors.html

    and if you want to see my own special little mirror, click here.

    Ps. if you have server space somewhere, make your own mirror. piss off the laywers, by now there are too many mirrors for them be effective.

    -----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  87. Re:Seems to me the DVD consortium should be illega by Rombuu · · Score: 2

    You didn't read the question I was responding to. My point is that the encryption scheme did not exist to get companies to join the DVD consortium, but to provide copy protection.

    Yes, this means I'm making allot of use of the public library, local book stores, and local theaters and comedy clubs.

    I just flew in from Cleveland, and boy are my arms tired. Thank you! Tip your waitresses! I'll be at the Funny Bone in Omaha next week! Drive safely...

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
  88. hehehehe by emmons · · Score: 1

    Here's a nice big 'ol list o' mirrors for ya'll out there in cyberland!

    http://home.worldonline.dk/~ andersa/download/DeCSS.zip
    http://douglas.min.net/~drw/css-auth/
    http://www.devzero.org/freecss.html
    http://home.t-online.de/home/skinn er01/decss.zip
    http://www.chello.nl/~f .vanwaveren/css-auth/css-auth.tar.gz
    http://www.geociti es.com/ResearchTriangle/Campus/8877/index.html
    http://www.angelfire.com/mt/popefelix/ http://www.vexed.net/CSS
    http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~j.vr eeken/
    http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/D eCSS.zip and http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/f iles/css-auth.tar.gz
    http://www.dvd.eavy.de/css-auth.tar.gz http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/css-aut h.tar.gz and http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/DeCSS.zip
    http://www.dvd.eavy.de/DeCSS.zip
    http://frozenlinux.com/civ/decss/
    http://www.humpin.org/decss/
    http://www.unitycode.org/
    http://dirtass.beyatch.net/decss.zip
    http://sharedlib.org/decss.zip
    http://decss.tripod.com/index.html
    http://www.free-dvd.org.lu/
    ftp://134.173.94.44/
    http://www.angelfire.com/in2/mirror/
    http://mclaughlin.orange.ca.us/~andrew/
    http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/css -auth.tar.gz
    http://batman.jytol.fi/~vuori/dvd/
    http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/deCSS/CSS.ht ml
    http://plato.nebulanet.net:88/css/
    ftp://alma.dhs.org/pub/DVD/
    http://www.d.umn.edu/~dchan/css/
    http://www.logorrhea.com/main.html
    http://people.delphi.com/salfter/LiVi d.tar.gz
    http://www.theresistance.net/files.html
    ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVi d.CVS-11.06.tar.gz ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVid.CVS-11.06.css-st uff-only.tar.gz
    http://merlin.keble.ox.ac.uk/~a drian/css/index.html
    http://www.dvd-copy.com/
    http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css /css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css/DeCSS .zip
    http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/css -auth.tar.gz and http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/DeCSS.zip
    http://members.tripod.lycos.nl/jvz/
    http://joe.to/storage/files/decss.zip
    ftp://ftp.firehead.org/pub/
    http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/
    http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderm an/dvd.htm
    http://remco.xgov.net/dvd/
    http://www.able-towers.com/~flow/
    ftp://dvd:dvd@206.98.63.136/
    http://www.twistedlogic.com/htm l/tl_archive_map.htm
    http://dvdcracked.tvheaven.com/index.html

    -----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  89. DeCSS has very limited use right now. by dgp · · Score: 1

    Lets say you have a DVD Drive in your system and a DVD. You can copy the .VOB files from the DVD to the hard drive and now you have unencrypted VOB files.

    The funny part is that only the commercial software DVD decoders (WinDVD, etc) can play VOB files. This software already has DeCSS code in it!

    It seems to me that any video piraters could just distribute the encrypted VOB files along with pirated playback software. This makes DeCSS pretty useless untill freeware VOB players emerge. Or a VOB --> Quicktime converter?

    Don

    1. Re:DeCSS has very limited use right now. by Spire · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that any video piraters could just distribute the encrypted VOB files along with pirated playback software.

      It's impossible to copy the encrypted .VOB file straight off a DVD-ROM. Go ahead and try to do it (using Windows Explorer or whatever file manager you normally use): you'll get an error message, because the file is encrypted, and the drive itself is designed to refuse you access if you don't have the key.

      --
      begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
    2. Re:DeCSS has very limited use right now. by dgp · · Score: 1

      I just tried it. I inserted a DVD into the drive, went to explorer, dragged d:\video_ts\vts_01_0.vob to c:\temp, and it copied fine as far as I can tell.

      I have read how a key retlating to the CSS is on the DVD and it is up to the drive to read this key from a special place on the disk. That is the only special function of the DVD drive that I know of. and I dont even know how that really works. :)

      Don

    3. Re:DeCSS has very limited use right now. by Spire · · Score: 1

      I just tried it. I inserted a DVD into the drive, went to explorer, dragged d:\video_ts\vts_01_0.vob to c:\temp, and it copied fine as far as I can tell.

      Did you run DeCSS before doing this? If so, the copy operation succeeded probably because DeCSS left the drive "unlocked".

      --
      begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
  90. Mirrors - Now more than 70!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Oh yeah

    Visit Humpin! (No, it's not what you think!)

    Explanation on legality of this information:

    The software (source as well as binaries) offered on this site can be freely redistributed because it was published under the GNU General Public License. The purpose of this software is not illegal copying of DVD disks. It is meant to provide information necessary to be able to program a DVD player for Linux. To do this, the CSS system needs to be incorporated in the player. Recently the (very weak) DVD content scrambling system was deciphered, freeing the way for a Linux DVD player. The CSS system is not a copy protection system, since it does not prevent copying of the disk. Writing information about the way an encryption scheme functions is completely legal. The source code and binaries on this site are completely legal too, since they contain no code from the DVD consortium or its members. The sources and programs on this site were written by third parties using clean-room reverse engineering methods which are (ready?) completly legal.

    Attention

    www.rhythm.cx was hosting a list of mirrors for these files. That list of mirrors has been replaced with a page reading "This site has been taken down for legal reasons." Here's what the maintainer put on the site the day it was shut down:

    NOTE (Thu, Nov 11, 12:17pm EST): I've recently been informed that a law firm which is likely to be one that would try get these mirrors taken down has been visiting this mirror site as well as others. With that said, there is a possibility that I may have to remove this site in the near future because like everyone else, I can't afford to go to court to fight it. Luckly, it seems fairly unlikely that any law firm will ever be able to get rid of all these mirrors at this point (there are currently 41 in 8 different countries and this list is growing every day). However, I have only seen very few mirror _lists_ like this one anyplace. If anyone has the resources, it might be wise to mirror this list of mirrors as well so that the right people will still know that these mirrors exist.

    UPDATE: Here is a 2600 story with more details on how rhythm.cx was shut down.

    I have taken it upon myself to mirror the mirrors. So until such time as the hounds of hell come a-knocking at my door, I present for you this list:


    Page last updated: Wed, Nov 17, 2:33pm EST

    Current Mirrors
    (Numbers are only for the maintainer's convenience)

    1. http://www.humpin.org/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.humpin.org/decss/decss.tar.gz

    2. http://home.worldonline.dk/~ andersa/download/DeCSS.zip
    3. http://douglas.min.net/~drw/css-auth/
    4. http://www.devzero.org/freecss.html
    5. http://home.t-online.de/home/skinn er01/decss.zip
    6. http://www.chello.nl/~f .vanwaveren/css-auth/css-auth.tar.gz
    7. http://www.geociti es.com/ResearchTriangle/Campus/8877/index.html
    8. http://www.angelfire.com/mt/popefelix/
    9. http://www.vexed.net/CSS
    10. http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~j.vr eeken/
    11. http://www.dvd.eavy.de/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.dvd.eavy.de/DeCSS.zip
    12. http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/css-aut h.tar.gz and http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    13. http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/DeCSS.zip
    14. http://frozenlinux.com/civ/decss/
    15. http://www.unitycode.org/
    16. http://dirtass.beyatch.net/decss.zip
    17. http://sharedlib.org/decss.zip
    18. http://decss.tripod.com/index.html
    19. http://www.free-dvd.org.lu/
    20. http://www.angelfire.com/in2/mirror/
    21. http://mclaughlin.orange.ca.us/~andrew/
    22. http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/css -auth.tar.gz
    23. http://batman.jytol.fi/~vuori/dvd/
    24. http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/deCSS/CSS.ht ml
    25. http://plato.nebulanet.net:88/css/
    26. ftp://alma.dhs.org/pub/DVD/
    27. http://www.d.umn.edu/~dchan/css/
    28. http://www.logorrhea.com/main.html
    29. http://people.delphi.com/salfter/LiVi d.tar.gz
    30. http://www.theresistance.net/files.html
    31. ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVi d.CVS-11.06.tar.gz and ftp://193.219.56. 32/pub/dvd/LiVid.CVS-11.06.css-stuff-only.tar.gz
    32. http://merlin.keble.ox.ac.uk/~a drian/css/index.html
    33. http://www.dvd-copy.com/
    34. http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css /css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css/DeCSS .zip
    35. http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/css -auth.tar.gz and http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/DeCSS.zip
    36. http://members.tripod.lycos.nl/jvz/
    37. http://joe.to/storage/files/decss.zip
    38. ftp://ftp.firehead.org/pub/
    39. http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/
    40. http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderm an/dvd.htm
    41. http://remco.xgov.net/dvd/
    42. http://www.able-towers.com/~flow/
    43. ftp://dvd:dvd@206.98.63.136
    44. http://www.twistedlogic.com/htm l/tl_archive_map.htm
    45. ftp://mikpos.dyndns.org/pub/cssdvd.zip
    46. http://mu nitions.vipul.net/software/algorithms/streamcipher s/decss.tar.gz
    47. http:/ /munitions.polkaroo.net/software/algorithms/stream ciphers/decss.tar.gz
    48. http://muni tions.dyn.org/software/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    49. http://mun itions.cifs.org/software/algorithms/streamciphers/ decss.tar.gz
    50. http://uk1. munitions.net/software/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    51. http://209.68.37.134/decss/
    52. http://muni tions.firenze.linux.it/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    53. http://www.tasam.com/~fenkt/dvd/
    54. ftp://eris.giga.or.at/pub/hacker/crypt/ DVD/
    55. http://therapy.endorphin.org/DVD/
    56. http://www.discordia.de/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.discordia.de/decss/css-aut h_tar.gz and http://www.discordia.de/decss/LiVid.tgz
    57. http://download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10079-100-143 3209.html?tag=st.dl.10001 _104_3.lst.titledetail
    58. http://killer.discordia.ch /Politics/Copyprotection.phtml
    59. http://livid.on.openprojects.net
    60. www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Port/322 4/
    61. ftp://195.115.63.44/pub/DeCSS.zip
    62. ftp://ftp.one.net/pub/user s/dmahurin/files/software/dvd/
    63. ftp://ftp.charm.net/pub/usr/home/dutch/ or http://www.charm.net/~dutch/
    64. http://www.capital.net/~wooly/
    65. http://home.c2i.net/buddha9/
    66. http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/D eCSS.zip and http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/f iles/css-auth.tar.gz
    67. http://dsl129.drizzle.com:2001/downlo ads/DVD/
    68. http://frodo.campus.luth.se/~iocc/tip.h tml
    69. http://cryptome.org/dvd-free.htm
    70. http://perso.libertysurf. fr/ortal98/dvd_rip/decss_12b.zip
    71. http://www.jonhanson.com/dvd/

    This site contains some good technical documentation as well as more source code that the DVD consorium's lawyers would rather you not see:
    http://crypto.gq.nu/


    Semi-broken Mirrors
    (These mirrors sometimes work and sometimes don't)
    ftp://134.173.94.44/

    Broken Mirrors
    (These are listed here for the notification of the people who run them)
    http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderman/css-auth.ta r.gz

    Mirrors shut down by The Man
    (A moment of silence, please.)
    http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    http://dvdcracked.tvheaven.com/index.html
  91. Mirrors again ooops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. http://www.humpin.org/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.humpin.org/decss/decss.tar.gz

    2. http://home.worldonline.dk/~ andersa/download/DeCSS.zip
    3. http://douglas.min.net/~drw/css-auth/
    4. http://www.devzero.org/freecss.html
    5. http://home.t-online.de/home/skinn er01/decss.zip
    6. http://www.chello.nl/~f .vanwaveren/css-auth/css-auth.tar.gz
    7. http://www.geociti es.com/ResearchTriangle/Campus/8877/index.html
    8. http://www.angelfire.com/mt/popefelix/
    9. http://www.vexed.net/CSS
    10. http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~j.vr eeken/
    11. http://www.dvd.eavy.de/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.dvd.eavy.de/DeCSS.zip
    12. http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/css-aut h.tar.gz and http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    13. http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/DeCSS.zip
    14. http://frozenlinux.com/civ/decss/
    15. http://www.unitycode.org/
    16. http://dirtass.beyatch.net/decss.zip
    17. http://sharedlib.org/decss.zip
    18. http://decss.tripod.com/index.html
    19. http://www.free-dvd.org.lu/
    20. http://www.angelfire.com/in2/mirror/
    21. http://mclaughlin.orange.ca.us/~andrew/
    22. http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/css -auth.tar.gz
    23. http://batman.jytol.fi/~vuori/dvd/
    24. http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/deCSS/CSS.ht ml
    25. http://plato.nebulanet.net:88/css/
    26. ftp://alma.dhs.org/pub/DVD/
    27. http://www.d.umn.edu/~dchan/css/
    28. http://www.logorrhea.com/main.html
    29. http://people.delphi.com/salfter/LiVi d.tar.gz
    30. http://www.theresistance.net/files.html
    31. ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVi d.CVS-11.06.tar.gz and ftp://193.219.56. 32/pub/dvd/LiVid.CVS-11.06.css-stuff-only.tar.gz
    32. http://merlin.keble.ox.ac.uk/~a drian/css/index.html
    33. http://www.dvd-copy.com/
    34. http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css /css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css/DeCSS .zip
    35. http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/css -auth.tar.gz and http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/DeCSS.zip
    36. http://members.tripod.lycos.nl/jvz/
    37. http://joe.to/storage/files/decss.zip
    38. ftp://ftp.firehead.org/pub/
    39. http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/
    40. http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderm an/dvd.htm
    41. http://remco.xgov.net/dvd/
    42. http://www.able-towers.com/~flow/
    43. ftp://dvd:dvd@206.98.63.136
    44. http://www.twistedlogic.com/htm l/tl_archive_map.htm
    45. ftp://mikpos.dyndns.org/pub/cssdvd.zip
    46. http://mu nitions.vipul.net/software/algorithms/streamcipher s/decss.tar.gz
    47. http:/ /munitions.polkaroo.net/software/algorithms/stream ciphers/decss.tar.gz
    48. http://muni tions.dyn.org/software/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    49. http://mun itions.cifs.org/software/algorithms/streamciphers/ decss.tar.gz
    50. http://uk1. munitions.net/software/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    51. http://209.68.37.134/decss/
    52. http://muni tions.firenze.linux.it/algorithms/streamciphers/de css.tar.gz
    53. http://www.tasam.com/~fenkt/dvd/
    54. ftp://eris.giga.or.at/pub/hacker/crypt/ DVD/
    55. http://therapy.endorphin.org/DVD/
    56. http://www.discordia.de/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.discordia.de/decss/css-aut h_tar.gz and http://www.discordia.de/decss/LiVid.tgz
    57. http://download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10079-100-143 3209.html?tag=st.dl.10001 _104_3.lst.titledetail
    58. http://killer.discordia.ch /Politics/Copyprotection.phtml
    59. http://livid.on.openprojects.net
    60. www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Port/322 4/
    61. ftp://195.115.63.44/pub/DeCSS.zip
    62. ftp://ftp.one.net/pub/user s/dmahurin/files/software/dvd/
    63. ftp://ftp.charm.net/pub/usr/home/dutch/ or http://www.charm.net/~dutch/
    64. http://www.capital.net/~wooly/
    65. http://home.c2i.net/buddha9/
    66. http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/D eCSS.zip and http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/f iles/css-auth.tar.gz
    67. http://dsl129.drizzle.com:2001/downlo ads/DVD/
    68. http://frodo.campus.luth.se/~iocc/tip.h tml
    69. http://cryptome.org/dvd-free.htm
    70. http://perso.libertysurf. fr/ortal98/dvd_rip/decss_12b.zip
    71. http://www.jonhanson.com/dvd/

    This site contains some good technical documentation as well as more source code that the DVD consorium's lawyers would rather you not see:
    http://crypto.gq.nu/


    Semi-broken Mirrors
    (These mirrors sometimes work and sometimes don't)
    ftp://134.173.94.44/

    Broken Mirrors
    (These are listed here for the notification of the people who run them)
    http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderman/css-auth.ta r.gz

    Mirrors shut down by The Man
    (A moment of silence, please.)
    http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    http://dvdcracked.tvheaven.com/index.html
  92. A different list of mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here is the most recent version of the css-auth CVS code as well as DeCSS. Please mirror & redistribute.
    This page was originally a mirror of http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/, but then rhythm.cx was forced down.
    So I've taken it on myself to keep a list of mirrors. I try to update and check the status of the listed sites at least once per day. If you know of any mirrors not in my list, if you wish to mirror this page, or if you find that any of the listed sites went down, then contact me.

    you can download the following three files from here:
    DeCSS.zip - DeCSS
    css-auth.tar.gz - CSS authentication source
    LiVid.tgz - Linux DVD Code

    MD5 Sums:
    d0aff684327a5c7bf110951e42ec3cae DeCSS.zip 8653090161e8f287d365132acb098581 css-auth.tar.gz a940de43a3c20895cf56bbca75c6d7a7 LiVid.tgz

    Known Mirrors (as of 17/Nov/1999, 08:30 GMT):

    Sites that copied this site (lemuria.org): http://josefine.ben.tuwien.ac.at/~davi d/dvd/
    http://www.c0ke.com/DVD/
    http://209.68.37.134/decss/
    http://rockme.virtualave.net/
    http://caspian.twu.net/dv d/mirrors/www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/

    http://www.homestead.com/avoid erman/files/index.html
    http://www.angelfire.com/jazz/avoiderman/
    http://freeweb.digiweb.com/business /avoiderman/
    http://www.intelcities.com/Main_ Street/Avoiderman/
    http://members.theglobe.com/avoiderm an/dvd.htm
    http://members.xoom.com/lkjhgfdsa2/

    Other sites where DeCSS, css-auth and/or LiVid are mirrored: http://home.worldonline.dk/~ andersa/download/DeCSS.zip
    http://douglas.min.net/~drw/css-auth/
    http://www.devzero.org/freecss.html
    http://home.t-online.de/home/skinn er01/decss.zip
    http://www.chello.nl/~f .vanwaveren/css-auth/css-auth.tar.gz
    http://www.vexed.net/CSS
    http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~j.vr eeken/
    http://www.dvd.eavy.de/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.dvd.eavy.de/DeCSS.zip
    http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/css-aut h.tar.gz and http://www.eavy.net/stuff/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/DeCSS.zip and http://www.dynamsol.com/satanix/css -auth.tar.gz
    http://frozenlinux.com/civ/decss/
    http://www.humpin.org/decss/
    http://www.unitycode.org/
    http://dirtass.beyatch.net/decss.zip
    http://www.free-dvd.org.lu/
    http://mclaughlin.orange.ca.us/~andrew/
    http://batman.jytol.fi/~vuori/dvd/
    http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/deCSS/CSS.ht ml
    http://plato.nebulanet.net:88/css/
    http://www.d.umn.edu/~dchan/css/
    http://www.logorrhea.com/main.html
    http://people.delphi.com/salfter/LiVi d.tar.gz
    http://www.theresistance.net/files.html
    ftp://193.219.56.32/pub/dvd/LiVi d.CVS-11.06.tar.gz and ftp://193.219.56. 32/pub/dvd/LiVid.CVS-11.06.css-stuff-only.tar.gz
    http://merlin.keble.ox.ac.uk/~a drian/css/index.html
    http://www.dvd-copy.com/
    http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css /css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/dvd/css/DeCSS .zip
    ftp://ftp.firehead.org/pub/ (very slow - 33.6 line)
    http://members.tripod.co.uk/bap/css/cs s.html
    http://www.tasam.com/~fenkt/dvd/
    ftp://eris.giga.or.at/pub/hacker/crypt/ DVD/
    http://therapy.endorphin.org/DVD/
    http://www.discordia.de/decss/DeCSS.zip and http://www.discordia.de/decss/css-aut h_tar.gz and http://www.discordia.de/decss/LiVid.tgz
    http://www.dvdlinks.co.uk/css/
    http://caspian.twu.net/dvd/
    http://www.twistedlogic.com/htm l/tl_archive_map.htm
    http://www.jonhanson.com/dvd/

    http://www.geociti es.com/ResearchTriangle/Campus/8877/index.html
    http://www.angelfire.com/mt/popefelix/ http://members.tripod.lycos.nl/jvz/
    http://www.angelfire.com/in2/mirror/
    http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/css -auth.tar.gz and http://www.sent.freeserve.co.uk/DeCSS.zip

    Mirrors that appear have gone down since 12/Nov/1999: http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/css-auth.tar.gz and http://www.rhythm.cx/dvd/DeCSS.zip
    http://www.xs4all.nl/~predator/freecss/freecss.htm l
    http://sharedlib.org/decss.zip
    http://decss.tripod.com/index.html
    ftp://134.173.94.44/
    http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/DeCSS.zip and http://gullii.stu.rpi.edu/dvd/files/css-auth.tar.g z ftp://alma.dhs.org/pub/DVD/ http://home.worldonline.dk/~andersa/download/DeCSS .zip

    The following site contains some good technical documentation as well as more source code that the DVD consortium's lawyers would rather you not see:
    http://crypto.gq.nu/
    Local Mirror: /DeCSS/crypto.gq.nu

    You can contact me at tom@lemuria.org if you have any questions regarding mirroring, or want your mirror added here.

    Note to lawyers and other scum:
    This information is widely available by now, and no matter what you do, you will not be able to supress it. It was the DVD consortium that f***ed up, and now you're trying to solve a technological problem with threats and legal action?
    If there were fines on stupidity, yours would cover the national debts of most western countries.

  93. This was always expected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My friend who works at a hardware company that makes dvd players, etc, let me know something... The hardware companies, in his opinion, always expected that the encryption would be broken.

    The only reason the hardware manufacturers wanted it was to appease the music industry, and since the music industry isn't really up on encryption, they went for it.

    This allowed the hardware companies to move forward with the standard, and know that in the future, when the encryption was broken, the standard would be solidified.......

    Interesting, eh?? ;)

  94. Doesn't matter; won't change anything either way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get video capture cards for less than the cost of a DVD drive, so copying over the internet is going to happen whether the companies release on DVD or not. And people copied movies like the Matrix and TPM from film before any DVDs or tapes were made.

    DVD or no DVD will have ZERO effect on online trading, so if studios don't release on DVD then they are stupid and will lose money, but that won't have any effect on illegal copying.

  95. .VOB's outrageously impractical by drougie · · Score: 1

    At the moment, the feared use of VOB's of ripping them and trading them around the internet, is pretty far-fetched. On today's modems, it would take you around 28 days to transfer a full DVD. However, it will not be long until the average user can store 100's of gigs easily, and also, transfering a DVD will be as easy as an MP3.

    My question is how far are we away from the AVERAGE websurfer, with this DeCSS tool, being reasonably capable of bootlegging DVDs? A year? Also, what can GZIP to do these suckers?
    Thanks!

  96. css-auth.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    /*
    * Copyright (C) 1999 Derek Fawcus
    *
    * This code may be used under the terms of Version 2 of the GPL,
    * read the file COPYING for details.
    *
    */

    /*
    * These routines do some reordering of the supplied data before
    * calling engine() to do the main work.
    *
    * The reordering seems similar to that done by the initial stages of
    * the DES algorithm, in that it looks like it's just been done to
    * try and make software decoding slower. I'm not sure that it
    * actually adds anything to the security.
    *
    * The nature of the shuffling is that the bits of the supplied
    * parameter 'varient' are reorganised (and some inverted), and
    * the bytes of the parameter 'challenge' are reorganised.
    *
    * The reorganisation in each routine is different, and the first
    * (CryptKey1) does not bother of play with the 'varient' parameter.
    *
    * Since this code is only run once per disk change, I've made the
    * code table driven in order to improve readability.
    *
    * Since these routines are so similar to each other, one could even
    * abstract them all to one routine supplied a parameter determining
    * the nature of the reordering it has to do.
    */

    #include "css-auth.h"

    typedef unsigned long u32;

    static void engine(int varient, byte const *input, struct block *output);

    void CryptKey1(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key)
    {
    static byte perm_challenge[] = {1,3,0,7,5, 2,9,6,4,8};

    byte scratch[10];
    int i;

    for (i = 9; i >= 0; --i)
    scratch[i] = challenge[perm_challenge[i]];

    engine(varient, scratch, key);
    }

    /* This shuffles the bits in varient to make perm_varient such that
    * 4 -> !3
    * 3 -> 4
    * varient bits: 2 -> 0 perm_varient bits
    * 1 -> 2
    * 0 -> !1
    */
    void CryptKey2(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key)
    {
    static byte perm_challenge[] = {6,1,9,3,8, 5,7,4,0,2};

    static byte perm_varient[] = {
    0x0a, 0x08, 0x0e, 0x0c, 0x0b, 0x09, 0x0f, 0x0d,
    0x1a, 0x18, 0x1e, 0x1c, 0x1b, 0x19, 0x1f, 0x1d,
    0x02, 0x00, 0x06, 0x04, 0x03, 0x01, 0x07, 0x05,
    0x12, 0x10, 0x16, 0x14, 0x13, 0x11, 0x17, 0x15};

    byte scratch[10];
    int i;

    for (i = 9; i >= 0; --i)
    scratch[i] = challenge[perm_challenge[i]];

    engine(perm_varient[varient], scratch, key);
    }

    /* This shuffles the bits in varient to make perm_varient such that
    * 4 -> 0
    * 3 -> !1
    * varient bits: 2 -> !4 perm_varient bits
    * 1 -> 2
    * 0 -> 3
    */
    void CryptBusKey(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key)
    {
    static byte perm_challenge[] = {4,0,3,5,7, 2,8,6,1,9};
    static byte perm_varient[] = {
    0x12, 0x1a, 0x16, 0x1e, 0x02, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x0e,
    0x10, 0x18, 0x14, 0x1c, 0x00, 0x08, 0x04, 0x0c,
    0x13, 0x1b, 0x17, 0x1f, 0x03, 0x0b, 0x07, 0x0f,
    0x11, 0x19, 0x15, 0x1d, 0x01, 0x09, 0x05, 0x0d};

    byte scratch[10];
    int i;

    for (i = 9; i >= 0; --i)
    scratch[i] = challenge[perm_challenge[i]];

    engine(perm_varient[varient], scratch, key);
    }

    /*
    * We use two LFSR's (seeded from some of the input data bytes) to
    * generate two streams of pseudo-random bits. These two bit streams
    * are then combined by simply adding with carry to generate a final
    * sequence of pseudo-random bits which is stored in the buffer that
    * 'output' points to the end of - len is the size of this buffer.
    *
    * The first LFSR is of degree 25, and has a polynomial of:
    * x^13 + x^5 + x^4 + x^1 + 1
    *
    * The second LSFR is of degree 17, and has a (primitive) polynomial of:
    * x^15 + x^1 + 1
    *
    * I don't know if these polynomials are primitive modulo 2, and thus
    * represent maximal-period LFSR's.
    *
    *
    * Note that we take the output of each LFSR from the new shifted in
    * bit, not the old shifted out bit. Thus for ease of use the LFSR's
    * are implemented in bit reversed order.
    *
    */
    static void generate_bits(byte *output, int len, struct block const *s)
    {
    u32 lfsr0, lfsr1;
    byte carry;

    /* In order to ensure that the LFSR works we need to ensure that the
    * initial values are non-zero. Thus when we initialise them from
    * the seed, we ensure that a bit is set.
    */
    lfsr0 = (s->b[0] b[1] b[2] & ~7) b[2] & 7);
    lfsr1 = (s->b[3] b[4];

    ++output;

    carry = 0;
    do {
    int bit;
    byte val;

    for (bit = 0, val = 0; bit > 24) ^ (lfsr0 >> 21) ^ (lfsr0 >> 20) ^ (lfsr0 >> 12)) & 1;
    lfsr0 = (lfsr0 > 16) ^ (lfsr1 >> 2)) & 1;
    lfsr1 = (lfsr1 > 1) & 1)

    combined = !o_lfsr1 + carry + !o_lfsr0;
    carry = BIT1(combined);
    val |= BIT0(combined) 0);
    }

    static byte Secret[];
    static byte Varients[];
    static byte Table0[];
    static byte Table1[];
    static byte Table2[];
    static byte Table3[];

    /*
    * This encryption engine implements one of 32 variations
    * one the same theme depending upon the choice in the
    * varient parameter (0 - 31).
    *
    * The algorithm itself manipulates a 40 bit input into
    * a 40 bit output.
    * The parameter 'input' is 80 bits. It consists of
    * the 40 bit input value that is to be encrypted followed
    * by a 40 bit seed value for the pseudo random number
    * generators.
    */
    static void engine(int varient, byte const *input, struct block *output)
    {
    byte cse, term, index;
    struct block temp1;
    struct block temp2;
    byte bits[30];

    int i;

    /* Feed the secret into the input values such that
    * we alter the seed to the LFSR's used above, then
    * generate the bits to play with.
    */
    for (i = 5; --i >= 0; )
    temp1.b[i] = input[5 + i] ^ Secret[i] ^ Table2[i];

    generate_bits(&bits[29], sizeof bits, &temp1);

    /* This term is used throughout the following to
    * select one of 32 different variations on the
    * algorithm.
    */
    cse = Varients[varient] ^ Table2[varient];

    /* Now the actual blocks doing the encryption. Each
    * of these works on 40 bits at a time and are quite
    * similar.
    */
    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = input[i]) {
    index = bits[25 + i] ^ input[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    temp1.b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    temp1.b[4] ^= temp1.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp1.b[i]) {
    index = bits[20 + i] ^ temp1.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    temp2.b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    temp2.b[4] ^= temp2.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp2.b[i]) {
    index = bits[15 + i] ^ temp2.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;
    index = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;

    temp1.b[i] = Table0[index] ^ Table2[index];
    }
    temp1.b[4] ^= temp1.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp1.b[i]) {
    index = bits[10 + i] ^ temp1.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    index = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;

    temp2.b[i] = Table0[index] ^ Table2[index];
    }
    temp2.b[4] ^= temp2.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp2.b[i]) {
    index = bits[5 + i] ^ temp2.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    temp1.b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    temp1.b[4] ^= temp1.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp1.b[i]) {
    index = bits[i] ^ temp1.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    output->b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    }

    static byte Varients[] = {
    0xB7, 0x74, 0x85, 0xD0, 0xCC, 0xDB, 0xCA, 0x73,
    0x03, 0xFE, 0x31, 0x03, 0x52, 0xE0, 0xB7, 0x42,
    0x63, 0x16, 0xF2, 0x2A, 0x79, 0x52, 0xFF, 0x1B,
    0x7A, 0x11, 0xCA, 0x1A, 0x9B, 0x40, 0xAD, 0x01};

    static byte Secret[] = {0x55, 0xD6, 0xC4, 0xC5, 0x28};

    static byte Table0[] = {
    0xB7, 0xF4, 0x82, 0x57, 0xDA, 0x4D, 0xDB, 0xE2,
    0x2F, 0x52, 0x1A, 0xA8, 0x68, 0x5A, 0x8A, 0xFF,
    0xFB, 0x0E, 0x6D, 0x35, 0xF7, 0x5C, 0x76, 0x12,
    0xCE, 0x25, 0x79, 0x29, 0x39, 0x62, 0x08, 0x24,
    0xA5, 0x85, 0x7B, 0x56, 0x01, 0x23, 0x68, 0xCF,
    0x0A, 0xE2, 0x5A, 0xED, 0x3D, 0x59, 0xB0, 0xA9,
    0xB0, 0x2C, 0xF2, 0xB8, 0xEF, 0x32, 0xA9, 0x40,
    0x80, 0x71, 0xAF, 0x1E, 0xDE, 0x8F, 0x58, 0x88,
    0xB8, 0x3A, 0xD0, 0xFC, 0xC4, 0x1E, 0xB5, 0xA0,
    0xBB, 0x3B, 0x0F, 0x01, 0x7E, 0x1F, 0x9F, 0xD9,
    0xAA, 0xB8, 0x3D, 0x9D, 0x74, 0x1E, 0x25, 0xDB,
    0x37, 0x56, 0x8F, 0x16, 0xBA, 0x49, 0x2B, 0xAC,
    0xD0, 0xBD, 0x95, 0x20, 0xBE, 0x7A, 0x28, 0xD0,
    0x51, 0x64, 0x63, 0x1C, 0x7F, 0x66, 0x10, 0xBB,
    0xC4, 0x56, 0x1A, 0x04, 0x6E, 0x0A, 0xEC, 0x9C,
    0xD6, 0xE8, 0x9A, 0x7A, 0xCF, 0x8C, 0xDB, 0xB1,
    0xEF, 0x71, 0xDE, 0x31, 0xFF, 0x54, 0x3E, 0x5E,
    0x07, 0x69, 0x96, 0xB0, 0xCF, 0xDD, 0x9E, 0x47,
    0xC7, 0x96, 0x8F, 0xE4, 0x2B, 0x59, 0xC6, 0xEE,
    0xB9, 0x86, 0x9A, 0x64, 0x84, 0x72, 0xE2, 0x5B,
    0xA2, 0x96, 0x58, 0x99, 0x50, 0x03, 0xF5, 0x38,
    0x4D, 0x02, 0x7D, 0xE7, 0x7D, 0x75, 0xA7, 0xB8,
    0x67, 0x87, 0x84, 0x3F, 0x1D, 0x11, 0xE5, 0xFC,
    0x1E, 0xD3, 0x83, 0x16, 0xA5, 0x29, 0xF6, 0xC7,
    0x15, 0x61, 0x29, 0x1A, 0x43, 0x4F, 0x9B, 0xAF,
    0xC5, 0x87, 0x34, 0x6C, 0x0F, 0x3B, 0xA8, 0x1D,
    0x45, 0x58, 0x25, 0xDC, 0xA8, 0xA3, 0x3B, 0xD1,
    0x79, 0x1B, 0x48, 0xF2, 0xE9, 0x93, 0x1F, 0xFC,
    0xDB, 0x2A, 0x90, 0xA9, 0x8A, 0x3D, 0x39, 0x18,
    0xA3, 0x8E, 0x58, 0x6C, 0xE0, 0x12, 0xBB, 0x25,
    0xCD, 0x71, 0x22, 0xA2, 0x64, 0xC6, 0xE7, 0xFB,
    0xAD, 0x94, 0x77, 0x04, 0x9A, 0x39, 0xCF, 0x7C};

    static byte Table1[] = {
    0x8C, 0x47, 0xB0, 0xE1, 0xEB, 0xFC, 0xEB, 0x56,
    0x10, 0xE5, 0x2C, 0x1A, 0x5D, 0xEF, 0xBE, 0x4F,
    0x08, 0x75, 0x97, 0x4B, 0x0E, 0x25, 0x8E, 0x6E,
    0x39, 0x5A, 0x87, 0x53, 0xC4, 0x1F, 0xF4, 0x5C,
    0x4E, 0xE6, 0x99, 0x30, 0xE0, 0x42, 0x88, 0xAB,
    0xE5, 0x85, 0xBC, 0x8F, 0xD8, 0x3C, 0x54, 0xC9,
    0x53, 0x47, 0x18, 0xD6, 0x06, 0x5B, 0x41, 0x2C,
    0x67, 0x1E, 0x41, 0x74, 0x33, 0xE2, 0xB4, 0xE0,
    0x23, 0x29, 0x42, 0xEA, 0x55, 0x0F, 0x25, 0xB4,
    0x24, 0x2C, 0x99, 0x13, 0xEB, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0xC9,
    0xF9, 0x63, 0x67, 0x43, 0x2D, 0xC7, 0x7D, 0x07,
    0x60, 0x89, 0xD1, 0xCC, 0xE7, 0x94, 0x77, 0x74,
    0x9B, 0x7E, 0xD7, 0xE6, 0xFF, 0xBB, 0x68, 0x14,
    0x1E, 0xA3, 0x25, 0xDE, 0x3A, 0xA3, 0x54, 0x7B,
    0x87, 0x9D, 0x50, 0xCA, 0x27, 0xC3, 0xA4, 0x50,
    0x91, 0x27, 0xD4, 0xB0, 0x82, 0x41, 0x97, 0x79,
    0x94, 0x82, 0xAC, 0xC7, 0x8E, 0xA5, 0x4E, 0xAA,
    0x78, 0x9E, 0xE0, 0x42, 0xBA, 0x28, 0xEA, 0xB7,
    0x74, 0xAD, 0x35, 0xDA, 0x92, 0x60, 0x7E, 0xD2,
    0x0E, 0xB9, 0x24, 0x5E, 0x39, 0x4F, 0x5E, 0x63,
    0x09, 0xB5, 0xFA, 0xBF, 0xF1, 0x22, 0x55, 0x1C,
    0xE2, 0x25, 0xDB, 0xC5, 0xD8, 0x50, 0x03, 0x98,
    0xC4, 0xAC, 0x2E, 0x11, 0xB4, 0x38, 0x4D, 0xD0,
    0xB9, 0xFC, 0x2D, 0x3C, 0x08, 0x04, 0x5A, 0xEF,
    0xCE, 0x32, 0xFB, 0x4C, 0x92, 0x1E, 0x4B, 0xFB,
    0x1A, 0xD0, 0xE2, 0x3E, 0xDA, 0x6E, 0x7C, 0x4D,
    0x56, 0xC3, 0x3F, 0x42, 0xB1, 0x3A, 0x23, 0x4D,
    0x6E, 0x84, 0x56, 0x68, 0xF4, 0x0E, 0x03, 0x64,
    0xD0, 0xA9, 0x92, 0x2F, 0x8B, 0xBC, 0x39, 0x9C,
    0xAC, 0x09, 0x5E, 0xEE, 0xE5, 0x97, 0xBF, 0xA5,
    0xCE, 0xFA, 0x28, 0x2C, 0x6D, 0x4F, 0xEF, 0x77,
    0xAA, 0x1B, 0x79, 0x8E, 0x97, 0xB4, 0xC3, 0xF4};

    static byte Table2[] = {
    0xB7, 0x75, 0x81, 0xD5, 0xDC, 0xCA, 0xDE, 0x66,
    0x23, 0xDF, 0x15, 0x26, 0x62, 0xD1, 0x83, 0x77,
    0xE3, 0x97, 0x76, 0xAF, 0xE9, 0xC3, 0x6B, 0x8E,
    0xDA, 0xB0, 0x6E, 0xBF, 0x2B, 0xF1, 0x19, 0xB4,
    0x95, 0x34, 0x48, 0xE4, 0x37, 0x94, 0x5D, 0x7B,
    0x36, 0x5F, 0x65, 0x53, 0x07, 0xE2, 0x89, 0x11,
    0x98, 0x85, 0xD9, 0x12, 0xC1, 0x9D, 0x84, 0xEC,
    0xA4, 0xD4, 0x88, 0xB8, 0xFC, 0x2C, 0x79, 0x28,
    0xD8, 0xDB, 0xB3, 0x1E, 0xA2, 0xF9, 0xD0, 0x44,
    0xD7, 0xD6, 0x60, 0xEF, 0x14, 0xF4, 0xF6, 0x31,
    0xD2, 0x41, 0x46, 0x67, 0x0A, 0xE1, 0x58, 0x27,
    0x43, 0xA3, 0xF8, 0xE0, 0xC8, 0xBA, 0x5A, 0x5C,
    0x80, 0x6C, 0xC6, 0xF2, 0xE8, 0xAD, 0x7D, 0x04,
    0x0D, 0xB9, 0x3C, 0xC2, 0x25, 0xBD, 0x49, 0x63,
    0x8C, 0x9F, 0x51, 0xCE, 0x20, 0xC5, 0xA1, 0x50,
    0x92, 0x2D, 0xDD, 0xBC, 0x8D, 0x4F, 0x9A, 0x71,
    0x2F, 0x30, 0x1D, 0x73, 0x39, 0x13, 0xFB, 0x1A,
    0xCB, 0x24, 0x59, 0xFE, 0x05, 0x96, 0x57, 0x0F,
    0x1F, 0xCF, 0x54, 0xBE, 0xF5, 0x06, 0x1B, 0xB2,
    0x6D, 0xD3, 0x4D, 0x32, 0x56, 0x21, 0x33, 0x0B,
    0x52, 0xE7, 0xAB, 0xEB, 0xA6, 0x74, 0x00, 0x4C,
    0xB1, 0x7F, 0x82, 0x99, 0x87, 0x0E, 0x5E, 0xC0,
    0x8F, 0xEE, 0x6F, 0x55, 0xF3, 0x7E, 0x08, 0x90,
    0xFA, 0xB6, 0x64, 0x70, 0x47, 0x4A, 0x17, 0xA7,
    0xB5, 0x40, 0x8A, 0x38, 0xE5, 0x68, 0x3E, 0x8B,
    0x69, 0xAA, 0x9B, 0x42, 0xA5, 0x10, 0x01, 0x35,
    0xFD, 0x61, 0x9E, 0xE6, 0x16, 0x9C, 0x86, 0xED,
    0xCD, 0x2E, 0xFF, 0xC4, 0x5B, 0xA0, 0xAE, 0xCC,
    0x4B, 0x3B, 0x03, 0xBB, 0x1C, 0x2A, 0xAC, 0x0C,
    0x3F, 0x93, 0xC7, 0x72, 0x7A, 0x09, 0x22, 0x3D,
    0x45, 0x78, 0xA9, 0xA8, 0xEA, 0xC9, 0x6A, 0xF7,
    0x29, 0x91, 0xF0, 0x02, 0x18, 0x3A, 0x4E, 0x7C};

    static byte Table3[] = {
    0x73, 0x51, 0x95, 0xE1, 0x12, 0xE4, 0xC0, 0x58,
    0xEE, 0xF2, 0x08, 0x1B, 0xA9, 0xFA, 0x98, 0x4C,
    0xA7, 0x33, 0xE2, 0x1B, 0xA7, 0x6D, 0xF5, 0x30,
    0x97, 0x1D, 0xF3, 0x02, 0x60, 0x5A, 0x82, 0x0F,
    0x91, 0xD0, 0x9C, 0x10, 0x39, 0x7A, 0x83, 0x85,
    0x3B, 0xB2, 0xB8, 0xAE, 0x0C, 0x09, 0x52, 0xEA,
    0x1C, 0xE1, 0x8D, 0x66, 0x4F, 0xF3, 0xDA, 0x92,
    0x29, 0xB9, 0xD5, 0xC5, 0x77, 0x47, 0x22, 0x53,
    0x14, 0xF7, 0xAF, 0x22, 0x64, 0xDF, 0xC6, 0x72,
    0x12, 0xF3, 0x75, 0xDA, 0xD7, 0xD7, 0xE5, 0x02,
    0x9E, 0xED, 0xDA, 0xDB, 0x4C, 0x47, 0xCE, 0x91,
    0x06, 0x06, 0x6D, 0x55, 0x8B, 0x19, 0xC9, 0xEF,
    0x8C, 0x80, 0x1A, 0x0E, 0xEE, 0x4B, 0xAB, 0xF2,
    0x08, 0x5C, 0xE9, 0x37, 0x26, 0x5E, 0x9A, 0x90,
    0x00, 0xF3, 0x0D, 0xB2, 0xA6, 0xA3, 0xF7, 0x26,
    0x17, 0x48, 0x88, 0xC9, 0x0E, 0x2C, 0xC9, 0x02,
    0xE7, 0x18, 0x05, 0x4B, 0xF3, 0x39, 0xE1, 0x20,
    0x02, 0x0D, 0x40, 0xC7, 0xCA, 0xB9, 0x48, 0x30,
    0x57, 0x67, 0xCC, 0x06, 0xBF, 0xAC, 0x81, 0x08,
    0x24, 0x7A, 0xD4, 0x8B, 0x19, 0x8E, 0xAC, 0xB4,
    0x5A, 0x0F, 0x73, 0x13, 0xAC, 0x9E, 0xDA, 0xB6,
    0xB8, 0x96, 0x5B, 0x60, 0x88, 0xE1, 0x81, 0x3F,
    0x07, 0x86, 0x37, 0x2D, 0x79, 0x14, 0x52, 0xEA,
    0x73, 0xDF, 0x3D, 0x09, 0xC8, 0x25, 0x48, 0xD8,
    0x75, 0x60, 0x9A, 0x08, 0x27, 0x4A, 0x2C, 0xB9,
    0xA8, 0x8B, 0x8A, 0x73, 0x62, 0x37, 0x16, 0x02,
    0xBD, 0xC1, 0x0E, 0x56, 0x54, 0x3E, 0x14, 0x5F,
    0x8C, 0x8F, 0x6E, 0x75, 0x1C, 0x07, 0x39, 0x7B,
    0x4B, 0xDB, 0xD3, 0x4B, 0x1E, 0xC8, 0x7E, 0xFE,
    0x3E, 0x72, 0x16, 0x83, 0x7D, 0xEE, 0xF5, 0xCA,
    0xC5, 0x18, 0xF9, 0xD8, 0x68, 0xAB, 0x38, 0x85,
    0xA8, 0xF0, 0xA1, 0x73, 0x9F, 0x5D, 0x19, 0x0B,
    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
    0x33, 0x72, 0x39, 0x25, 0x67, 0x26, 0x6D, 0x71,
    0x36, 0x77, 0x3C, 0x20, 0x62, 0x23, 0x68, 0x74,
    0xC3, 0x82, 0xC9, 0x15, 0x57, 0x16, 0x5D, 0x81};

  97. css-auth.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    typedef unsigned char byte;
    struct block {
    byte b[5];
    };

    extern void CryptKey1(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key);
    extern void CryptKey2(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key);
    extern void CryptBusKey(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key);

  98. dvdinfo.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * A noddy program for getting and printing some info from the
    * DVD-ROM drive.
    */

    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__OpenBSD__)
    # include
    #elif defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #else
    # error "Need the DVD ioctls"
    #endif
    #include
    #include

    #define DVD "/dev/cdrom"

    int GetASF(int fd)
    {
    dvd_authinfo ai;

    ai.type = DVD_LU_SEND_ASF;
    ai.lsasf.agid = 0;
    ai.lsasf.asf = 0;

    if (ioctl(fd, DVD_AUTH, &ai)) {
    printf("GetASF failed\n");
    return 0;
    }

    printf("%sAuthenticated\n", (ai.lsasf.asf) ? "" : "not ");

    return 1;
    }

    int GetPhysical(int fd)
    {
    dvd_struct d;
    int layer = 0, layers = 4;

    d.physical.type = DVD_STRUCT_PHYSICAL;
    while (layer 1)
    device = av[1];

    fd = open(device, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);

    if (fd 0) {
    printf("unable to open dvd drive (%s).\n", device);
    return 1;
    }

    GetASF(fd);

    GetPhysical(fd);
    GetCopyright(fd);

    return 0;
    }

  99. Pissing in the pool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie industry is about to learn the following great truth:

    You can't take something off of the Internet.
    That's like trying to get pee out of a pool.

    -from "News Radio"

  100. css-cat.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * css-cat.c
    *
    * Copyright 1999 Derek Fawcus.
    *
    * Released under version 2 of the GPL.
    *
    * Decode selected sector types from a CSS encoded DVD to stdout. Use as a
    * filter on the input to mpeg2player or ac3dec.
    *
    */

    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #endif /* __linux__ */
    #include
    #include
    #include

    #include "css-descramble.h"

    static struct playkey pkey1a1 = {0x36b, {0x51,0x67,0x67,0xc5,0xe0}};
    static struct playkey pkey2a1 = {0x762, {0x2c,0xb2,0xc1,0x09,0xee}};
    static struct playkey pkey1b1 = {0x36b, {0x90,0xc1,0xd7,0x84,0x48}};

    static struct playkey pkey1a2 = {0x2f3, {0x51,0x67,0x67,0xc5,0xe0}};
    static struct playkey pkey2a2 = {0x730, {0x2c,0xb2,0xc1,0x09,0xee}};
    static struct playkey pkey1b2 = {0x2f3, {0x90,0xc1,0xd7,0x84,0x48}};

    static struct playkey pkey1a3 = {0x235, {0x51,0x67,0x67,0xc5,0xe0}};
    static struct playkey pkey1b3 = {0x235, {0x90,0xc1,0xd7,0x84,0x48}};

    static struct playkey pkey3a1 = {0x249, {0xb7,0x3f,0xd4,0xaa,0x14}}; /* DVD specific ? */
    static struct playkey pkey4a1 = {0x028, {0x53,0xd4,0xf7,0xd9,0x8f}}; /* DVD specific ? */


    static struct playkey *playkeys[] = {
    &pkey1a1, &pkey2a1, &pkey1b1,
    &pkey1a2, &pkey2a2, &pkey1b2,
    &pkey1a3, &pkey1b3,
    &pkey3a1, &pkey4a1,
    NULL};

    static unsigned char disk_key[2048];
    static unsigned char title_key[5];

    static unsigned char sector[2048];

    unsigned long sectors = 0;
    unsigned long crypted = 0;
    unsigned long skipped = 0;

    int do_all = 0;
    int do_video = 0;
    int do_ac3 = 0;
    int do_mpg = 0;
    int verbose = 0;
    int keep_pack = 0;
    int keep_pes = -1;

    #define STCODE(p,a,b,c,d) ((p)[0] == a && (p)[1] == b && (p)[2] == c && (p)[3] == d)

    static void un_css(int fdi, int fdo)
    {
    unsigned char *sp, *pes;
    int writen, wr, peslen, hdrlen;

    while (read(fdi, sector, 2048) == 2048) {
    ++sectors;
    if (!STCODE(sector,0x00,0x00,0x01,0xba)) {
    fputs("Not Pack start code\n", stderr);
    ++skipped; continue;
    }

    if (do_all)
    goto write_it;

    pes = sector + 14 + (sector[13] & 0x07);
    if (STCODE(pes,0x00,0x00,0x01,0xbb)) {/* System Header Pack Layer */
    peslen = (pes[0x04] 0 && writen 32)
    usage_exit();
    ++keep_pes;
    break;
    case '1': case '2': case '3': case '4':
    case '5': case '6': case '7': case '8':
    do_ac3 = c - '0';
    ++keep_pes;
    break;
    case EOF:
    goto got_args;
    default:
    usage_exit();
    break;
    }

    got_args:
    keep_pes = (keep_pes > 0) ? 1 : 0;

    return optind;
    }

    int main(int ac, char **av)
    {
    int ai, fd;
    char titlef[12];

    if ((fd = open("disk-key", O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
    perror("can't open disk-key");
    exit(1);
    }
    if (read(fd, disk_key, 2048) != 2048) {
    perror("can't read disk-key");
    close(fd);
    exit(1);
    }
    close(fd);

    if ((ai = parse_args(ac, av)) >= ac)
    usage_exit();

    strcpy(titlef, "title");
    strcat(titlef, title);
    strcat(titlef, "-key");

    if ((fd = open(titlef, O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
    perror("can't open title-key");
    exit(1);
    }
    if (read(fd, title_key, 5) != 5) {
    perror("can't read title-key");
    close(fd);
    exit(1);
    }
    close(fd);

    if (strcmp(av[ai], "-") == 0)
    fd = 0;
    else if ((fd = open(av[ai], O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
    fputs("can't open VOB file ", stderr);
    fputs(av[ai], stderr);
    perror("");
    exit(1);
    }

    if (!css_decrypttitlekey(title_key, disk_key, playkeys)) {
    close(fd);
    return 3;
    }

    un_css(fd, 1);

    fprintf(stderr, "Total %lu, skipped %lu, crvid %lu\n",
    sectors, skipped, crypted);

    close(fd);

    return 0;
    }

  101. Indie movies still okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can put a movie on DVD *without* encrypting it or putting on region encoding or macrovision. This means no key is needed and anyone with access to a DVD-R and some MPEG2 encoding equipment/software can make their own movies that can be played back on any player. In fact, there are a few commercial movies that are not encrypted.

  102. reset.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * A noddy program which tries to reset all AGID's on the DVD-ROM drive.
    */

    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__OpenBSD__)
    # include
    #elif defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #else
    # error "Need the DVD ioctls"
    #endif
    #include
    #include

    static int fd;

    #define DVD "/dev/cdrom"

    int main(int ac, char **av)
    {
    dvd_authinfo ai;
    char *device = DVD;
    int i;

    if (ac > 1)
    device = av[1];

    fd = open(device, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);

    if (fd 0) {
    printf("unable to open dvd drive (%s).\n", device);
    return 1;
    }

    for (i = 0; i 4; i++) {
    memset(&ai, 0, sizeof(ai));
    ai.type = DVD_INVALIDATE_AGID;
    ai.lsa.agid = i;
    ioctl(fd, DVD_AUTH, &ai);
    }

    return 0;
    }

  103. tstdvd.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * tstdvd.c
    *
    * Example program showing usage of DVD CSS ioctls
    *
    * Copyright (C) 1999 Andrew T. Veliath
    * See http://www.rpi.edu/~veliaa/linux-dvd for more info.
    */

    /* Hacked about by Derek Fawcus such that
    * it can be used as a simple program to authenticate the
    * computer with the DVD-ROM drive.
    *
    * If supplied with one parameter it gets the disk key and
    * saves it to a file. If supplied with a second parameter
    * (a LBA) then it gets the title key for the supplied LBA.
    *
    * When getting the disk key, only the first 10 bytes of it
    * are printed. The whole key is written to the file.
    */

    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__OpenBSD__)
    # include
    #elif defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #else
    # error "Need the DVD ioctls"
    #endif
    #include "css-auth.h"

    byte Challenge[10];
    struct block Key1;
    struct block Key2;
    struct block KeyCheck;
    byte DiscKey[10];
    int varient = -1;

    void print_challenge(const byte *chal)
    {
    int i;

    for (i = 0; i type) {
    /* Host data receive (host changes state) */
    case DVD_LU_SEND_AGID:
    printf("AGID %d\n", ai->lsa.agid);
    ai->type = DVD_HOST_SEND_CHALLENGE;
    break;

    case DVD_LU_SEND_KEY1:
    printf("LU sent key1: "); print_key(ai->lsk.key); printf("\n");
    if (!authenticate_drive(ai->lsk.key)) {
    ai->type = DVD_AUTH_FAILURE;
    return -EINVAL;
    }
    ai->type = DVD_LU_SEND_CHALLENGE;
    break;

    case DVD_LU_SEND_CHALLENGE:
    for (i = 0; i hsc.chal[9-i];
    printf("LU sent challenge: "); print_challenge(Challenge); printf("\n");
    CryptKey2(varient, Challenge, &Key2);
    ai->type = DVD_HOST_SEND_KEY2;
    break;

    /* Host data send */
    case DVD_HOST_SEND_CHALLENGE:
    for (i = 0; i hsc.chal[9-i] = Challenge[i];
    printf("Host sending challenge: "); print_challenge(Challenge); printf("\n");
    /* Returning data, let LU change state */
    break;

    case DVD_HOST_SEND_KEY2:
    for (i = 0; i hsk.key[4-i] = Key2.b[i];
    printf("Host sending key 2: "); print_key(Key2.b); printf("\n");
    /* Returning data, let LU change state */
    break;

    default:
    printf("Got invalid state %d\n", ai->type);
    return -EINVAL;
    }

    return 0;
    }

    int authenticate(int fd, int title, int lba)
    {
    dvd_authinfo ai;
    dvd_struct dvds;
    int i, rv, tries, agid;

    memset(&ai, 0, sizeof (ai));
    memset(&dvds, 0, sizeof (dvds));

    GetASF(fd);

    /* Init sequence, request AGID */
    for (tries = 1, rv = -1; rv == -1 && tries [title_path]\n");
    exit (1);
    }
    device = av[1];
    fd = open(device, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
    if (fd 0) {
    perror(device);
    exit(1);
    }
    if (ac == 3) {
    lba = path_to_lba(av[2]);
    title = 1;
    }
    authenticate(fd, title, lba);
    close(fd);

    return 0;
    }

  104. css-descramble.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    /*
    * css_descramble.c
    *
    * Released under the version 2 of the GPL.
    *
    * Copyright 1999 Derek Fawcus
    *
    * This file contains functions to descramble CSS encrypted DVD content
    *
    */

    /*
    * Still in progress: Remove the use of the bit_reverse[] table by recoding
    * the generation of LFSR1. Finish combining this with
    * the css authentication code.
    *
    */

    #include
    #include
    #include "css-descramble.h"

    typedef unsigned char byte;

    /*
    *
    * some tables used for descrambling sectors and/or decrypting title keys
    *
    */

    static byte csstab1[256]=
    {
    0x33,0x73,0x3b,0x26,0x63,0x23,0x6b,0x76,0x3e,0x7e, 0x36,0x2b,0x6e,0x2e,0x66,0x7b,
    0xd3,0x93,0xdb,0x06,0x43,0x03,0x4b,0x96,0xde,0x9e, 0xd6,0x0b,0x4e,0x0e,0x46,0x9b,
    0x57,0x17,0x5f,0x82,0xc7,0x87,0xcf,0x12,0x5a,0x1a, 0x52,0x8f,0xca,0x8a,0xc2,0x1f,
    0xd9,0x99,0xd1,0x00,0x49,0x09,0x41,0x90,0xd8,0x98, 0xd0,0x01,0x48,0x08,0x40,0x91,
    0x3d,0x7d,0x35,0x24,0x6d,0x2d,0x65,0x74,0x3c,0x7c, 0x34,0x25,0x6c,0x2c,0x64,0x75,
    0xdd,0x9d,0xd5,0x04,0x4d,0x0d,0x45,0x94,0xdc,0x9c, 0xd4,0x05,0x4c,0x0c,0x44,0x95,
    0x59,0x19,0x51,0x80,0xc9,0x89,0xc1,0x10,0x58,0x18, 0x50,0x81,0xc8,0x88,0xc0,0x11,
    0xd7,0x97,0xdf,0x02,0x47,0x07,0x4f,0x92,0xda,0x9a, 0xd2,0x0f,0x4a,0x0a,0x42,0x9f,
    0x53,0x13,0x5b,0x86,0xc3,0x83,0xcb,0x16,0x5e,0x1e, 0x56,0x8b,0xce,0x8e,0xc6,0x1b,
    0xb3,0xf3,0xbb,0xa6,0xe3,0xa3,0xeb,0xf6,0xbe,0xfe, 0xb6,0xab,0xee,0xae,0xe6,0xfb,
    0x37,0x77,0x3f,0x22,0x67,0x27,0x6f,0x72,0x3a,0x7a, 0x32,0x2f,0x6a,0x2a,0x62,0x7f,
    0xb9,0xf9,0xb1,0xa0,0xe9,0xa9,0xe1,0xf0,0xb8,0xf8, 0xb0,0xa1,0xe8,0xa8,0xe0,0xf1,
    0x5d,0x1d,0x55,0x84,0xcd,0x8d,0xc5,0x14,0x5c,0x1c, 0x54,0x85,0xcc,0x8c,0xc4,0x15,
    0xbd,0xfd,0xb5,0xa4,0xed,0xad,0xe5,0xf4,0xbc,0xfc, 0xb4,0xa5,0xec,0xac,0xe4,0xf5,
    0x39,0x79,0x31,0x20,0x69,0x29,0x61,0x70,0x38,0x78, 0x30,0x21,0x68,0x28,0x60,0x71,
    0xb7,0xf7,0xbf,0xa2,0xe7,0xa7,0xef,0xf2,0xba,0xfa, 0xb2,0xaf,0xea,0xaa,0xe2,0xff
    };

    static byte lfsr1_bits0[256]=
    {
    0x00,0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x09,0x08, 0x0b,0x0a,0x0d,0x0c,0x0f,0x0e,
    0x12,0x13,0x10,0x11,0x16,0x17,0x14,0x15,0x1b,0x1a, 0x19,0x18,0x1f,0x1e,0x1d,0x1c,
    0x24,0x25,0x26,0x27,0x20,0x21,0x22,0x23,0x2d,0x2c, 0x2f,0x2e,0x29,0x28,0x2b,0x2a,
    0x36,0x37,0x34,0x35,0x32,0x33,0x30,0x31,0x3f,0x3e, 0x3d,0x3c,0x3b,0x3a,0x39,0x38,
    0x49,0x48,0x4b,0x4a,0x4d,0x4c,0x4f,0x4e,0x40,0x41, 0x42,0x43,0x44,0x45,0x46,0x47,
    0x5b,0x5a,0x59,0x58,0x5f,0x5e,0x5d,0x5c,0x52,0x53, 0x50,0x51,0x56,0x57,0x54,0x55,
    0x6d,0x6c,0x6f,0x6e,0x69,0x68,0x6b,0x6a,0x64,0x65, 0x66,0x67,0x60,0x61,0x62,0x63,
    0x7f,0x7e,0x7d,0x7c,0x7b,0x7a,0x79,0x78,0x76,0x77, 0x74,0x75,0x72,0x73,0x70,0x71,
    0x92,0x93,0x90,0x91,0x96,0x97,0x94,0x95,0x9b,0x9a, 0x99,0x98,0x9f,0x9e,0x9d,0x9c,
    0x80,0x81,0x82,0x83,0x84,0x85,0x86,0x87,0x89,0x88, 0x8b,0x8a,0x8d,0x8c,0x8f,0x8e,
    0xb6,0xb7,0xb4,0xb5,0xb2,0xb3,0xb0,0xb1,0xbf,0xbe, 0xbd,0xbc,0xbb,0xba,0xb9,0xb8,
    0xa4,0xa5,0xa6,0xa7,0xa0,0xa1,0xa2,0xa3,0xad,0xac, 0xaf,0xae,0xa9,0xa8,0xab,0xaa,
    0xdb,0xda,0xd9,0xd8,0xdf,0xde,0xdd,0xdc,0xd2,0xd3, 0xd0,0xd1,0xd6,0xd7,0xd4,0xd5,
    0xc9,0xc8,0xcb,0xca,0xcd,0xcc,0xcf,0xce,0xc0,0xc1, 0xc2,0xc3,0xc4,0xc5,0xc6,0xc7,
    0xff,0xfe,0xfd,0xfc,0xfb,0xfa,0xf9,0xf8,0xf6,0xf7, 0xf4,0xf5,0xf2,0xf3,0xf0,0xf1,
    0xed,0xec,0xef,0xee,0xe9,0xe8,0xeb,0xea,0xe4,0xe5, 0xe6,0xe7,0xe0,0xe1,0xe2,0xe3
    };

    static byte lfsr1_bits1[512]=
    {
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff
    };

    /* Reverse the order of the bits within a byte.
    */
    static byte bit_reverse[256]=
    {
    0x00,0x80,0x40,0xc0,0x20,0xa0,0x60,0xe0,0x10,0x90, 0x50,0xd0,0x30,0xb0,0x70,0xf0,
    0x08,0x88,0x48,0xc8,0x28,0xa8,0x68,0xe8,0x18,0x98, 0x58,0xd8,0x38,0xb8,0x78,0xf8,
    0x04,0x84,0x44,0xc4,0x24,0xa4,0x64,0xe4,0x14,0x94, 0x54,0xd4,0x34,0xb4,0x74,0xf4,
    0x0c,0x8c,0x4c,0xcc,0x2c,0xac,0x6c,0xec,0x1c,0x9c, 0x5c,0xdc,0x3c,0xbc,0x7c,0xfc,
    0x02,0x82,0x42,0xc2,0x22,0xa2,0x62,0xe2,0x12,0x92, 0x52,0xd2,0x32,0xb2,0x72,0xf2,
    0x0a,0x8a,0x4a,0xca,0x2a,0xaa,0x6a,0xea,0x1a,0x9a, 0x5a,0xda,0x3a,0xba,0x7a,0xfa,
    0x06,0x86,0x46,0xc6,0x26,0xa6,0x66,0xe6,0x16,0x96, 0x56,0xd6,0x36,0xb6,0x76,0xf6,
    0x0e,0x8e,0x4e,0xce,0x2e,0xae,0x6e,0xee,0x1e,0x9e, 0x5e,0xde,0x3e,0xbe,0x7e,0xfe,
    0x01,0x81,0x41,0xc1,0x21,0xa1,0x61,0xe1,0x11,0x91, 0x51,0xd1,0x31,0xb1,0x71,0xf1,
    0x09,0x89,0x49,0xc9,0x29,0xa9,0x69,0xe9,0x19,0x99, 0x59,0xd9,0x39,0xb9,0x79,0xf9,
    0x05,0x85,0x45,0xc5,0x25,0xa5,0x65,0xe5,0x15,0x95, 0x55,0xd5,0x35,0xb5,0x75,0xf5,
    0x0d,0x8d,0x4d,0xcd,0x2d,0xad,0x6d,0xed,0x1d,0x9d, 0x5d,0xdd,0x3d,0xbd,0x7d,0xfd,
    0x03,0x83,0x43,0xc3,0x23,0xa3,0x63,0xe3,0x13,0x93, 0x53,0xd3,0x33,0xb3,0x73,0xf3,
    0x0b,0x8b,0x4b,0xcb,0x2b,0xab,0x6b,0xeb,0x1b,0x9b, 0x5b,0xdb,0x3b,0xbb,0x7b,0xfb,
    0x07,0x87,0x47,0xc7,0x27,0xa7,0x67,0xe7,0x17,0x97, 0x57,0xd7,0x37,0xb7,0x77,0xf7,
    0x0f,0x8f,0x4f,0xcf,0x2f,0xaf,0x6f,0xef,0x1f,0x9f, 0x5f,0xdf,0x3f,0xbf,0x7f,0xff
    };

    /*
    *
    * this function is only used internally when decrypting title key
    *
    */
    static void css_titlekey(byte *key, byte *im, byte invert)
    {
    unsigned int lfsr1_lo,lfsr1_hi,lfsr0,combined;
    byte o_lfsr0, o_lfsr1;
    byte k[5];
    int i;

    lfsr1_lo = im[0] | 0x100;
    lfsr1_hi = im[1];

    lfsr0 = ((im[4] >8)&0xff] >16)&0xff]>24)&0xff];

    combined = 0;
    for (i = 0; i >1;
    lfsr1_lo = ((lfsr1_lo&1)>7)^(lfsr0>>10)^(lfsr0>>11)^(lfsr0>>1 9);*/
    o_lfsr0 = (((((((lfsr0>>8)^lfsr0)>>1)^lfsr0)>>3)^lfsr0)>>7);
    lfsr0 = (lfsr0>>8)|(o_lfsr0>= 8;
    }

    key[4]=k[4]^csstab1[key[4]]^key[3];
    key[3]=k[3]^csstab1[key[3]]^key[2];
    key[2]=k[2]^csstab1[key[2]]^key[1];
    key[1]=k[1]^csstab1[key[1]]^key[0];
    key[0]=k[0]^csstab1[key[0]]^key[4];

    key[4]=k[4]^csstab1[key[4]]^key[3];
    key[3]=k[3]^csstab1[key[3]]^key[2];
    key[2]=k[2]^csstab1[key[2]]^key[1];
    key[1]=k[1]^csstab1[key[1]]^key[0];
    key[0]=k[0]^csstab1[key[0]];
    }

    /*
    *
    * this function decrypts a title key with the specified disk key
    *
    * tkey: the unobfuscated title key (XORed with BusKey)
    * dkey: the unobfuscated disk key (XORed with BusKey)
    * 2048 bytes in length (though only 5 bytes are needed, see below)
    * pkey: array of pointers to player keys and disk key offsets
    *
    *
    * use the result returned in tkey with css_descramble
    *
    */

    int css_decrypttitlekey(byte *tkey, byte *dkey, struct playkey **pkey)
    {
    byte test[5], pretkey[5];
    int i = 0;

    for (; *pkey; ++pkey, ++i) {
    memcpy(pretkey, dkey + (*pkey)->offset, 5);
    css_titlekey(pretkey, (*pkey)->key, 0);

    memcpy(test, dkey, 5);
    css_titlekey(test, pretkey, 0);

    if (memcmp(test, pretkey, 5) == 0) {
    fprintf(stderr, "Using Key %d\n", i+1);
    break;
    }
    }

    if (!*pkey) {
    fprintf(stderr, "Shit - Need Key %d\n", i+1);
    return 0;
    }

    css_titlekey(tkey, pretkey, 0xff);

    return 1;
    }

    /*
    *
    * this function does the actual descrambling
    *
    * sec: encrypted sector (2048 bytes)
    * key: decrypted title key obtained from css_decrypttitlekey
    *
    */
    void css_descramble(byte *sec,byte *key)
    {
    unsigned int lfsr1_lo,lfsr1_hi,lfsr0,combined;
    unsigned char o_lfsr0, o_lfsr1;
    unsigned char *end = sec + 0x800;
    #define SALTED(i) (key[i] ^ sec[0x54 + (i)])

    lfsr1_lo = SALTED(0) | 0x100;
    lfsr1_hi = SALTED(1);

    lfsr0 = ((SALTED(4) >8)&0xff] >16)&0xff]>24)&0xff];

    sec+=0x80;
    combined = 0;
    while (sec != end) {
    o_lfsr1 = lfsr1_bits0[lfsr1_hi] ^ lfsr1_bits1[lfsr1_lo];
    lfsr1_hi = lfsr1_lo>>1;
    lfsr1_lo = ((lfsr1_lo&1)>7)^(lfsr0>>10)^(lfsr0>>11)^(lfsr0>>1 9);*/
    o_lfsr0 = (((((((lfsr0>>8)^lfsr0)>>1)^lfsr0)>>3)^lfsr0)>>7);
    lfsr0 = (lfsr0>>8)|(o_lfsr0>= 8;
    }
    }

  105. css-descramble.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #ifndef __css_descramble_h_
    #define __css_descramble_h_

    struct playkey {
    int offset;
    unsigned char key[5];
    };

    extern int css_decrypttitlekey(unsigned char *tkey, unsigned char *dkey, struct playkey **pkey);
    extern void css_descramble(unsigned char *sec,unsigned char *key);

    #endif

  106. Makefile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    headers = css-auth.h
    tstdvd_objs = tstdvd.o css-auth.o
    validate_objs = validate.o css-auth.o
    cat_objs = css-cat.o css-descramble.o

    all: tstdvd reset dvdinfo css-cat

    tstdvd: $(tstdvd_objs) $(headers)
    gcc $(tstdvd_objs) -o $@

    css-cat: $(cat_objs) css-descramble.h
    gcc $(cat_objs) -o $@

    validate: $(validate_objs) $(headers)
    gcc $(validate_objs) -o $@

    clean:
    -rm -f *.o tstdvd validate reset dvdinfo

    dist-files = css-auth/COPYING css-auth/README css-auth/Makefile \
    css-auth/css-auth.h css-auth/css-auth.c \
    css-auth/tstdvd.c css-auth/dvdinfo.c css-auth/reset.c \
    css-auth/css-cat.c css-auth/css-descramble.c \
    css-auth/css-descramble.h

    dist:
    (cd ..;tar cvf css-auth.tar $(dist-files) )

  107. Readme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This source package does two things.

    a) It contains code to perform the css authentication protocol,
    allowing locked sectors on the DVD disc to be accessed.

    This also allows us to read the disc key and title keys.

    b) It contains an implementation of the css decryption algorithm,
    so that we can watch DVD's.

    Also included are some test programs to wrarp around the above code
    blocks so that something usefule can be performed.

    The programs included are tstdvd, reset, dvdinfo and css-cat.

    tstdvd can be used to unlock the disc (saving the disk key) and
    to extract the title keys. usage is:

    reset /path/to/dvd/device

    This will reset all AGIDs that the drive has given out. This
    can sometimes be useful when something goes wrong.

    tstdvd /path/to/dvd/device

    This will authenticate the device and save the disk key into
    a file in the current directory called "disk-key".

    (mount the dvd somewhere)

    tstdvd /path/to/dvd/device /mount/path/video_ts/vts_01_1.vob

    This will reauthenticate and then read the title key for
    the chosen vob file, saving it in a file in the current
    directoy called "title-key".

    Do the above title key extraction for each title on the disc,
    renaming the title-key files to title1-key, title2-key etc.

    dvdinfo /path/to/dvd/device

    Displays some info from the physical and copyright pages. This
    includes the region limits on the disc, its encryption status,
    and the authentication status.

    css-cat [-t title-no] [-m mpeg-audio-no ] [-vPpm12345678] vob_file

    This will decrypt the selected vob file and send to stdout. It
    needs the files "disk-key" and "titleX-key" to be in the current
    directory. The default title-no is one, so by default it will look
    for "title1-key".

    The options select what will be sent to stdout. By default, nothing
    will. The m option is not yet coded, the v option selects video, the
    numbers select the appropriate AC3 stream.
    It will normally extract the selected stream from the enclosing
    Program stream, thus giving an elemental stream. However if the K option
    (or more than one stream) is selected then the data will be left inside
    the PES packets, allowing a subsequent demux program to determine the
    data type.

    I tend to use:

    cat /dvd/video_ts/vts_01_[1-9].vob|css-cat -v1P -|mpeg2player -vob -f -

    NOTE: To use the above you need to have a kernel which incorporates the
    DVD ioctls. This can either be the original patch by Andrew Veliath
    or Jens Axboe's patches. If using Andrews versio of the patches,
    you'll have to change the use of .key in the sources to .key1/.key2
    (the places are quite easy to find).

    Jens site is www.kernel.dk

    Changes:
    Patches have been applied to use the OpenBSD headers, so maybe it'll
    work.

    There a some more keys included. It should now be able to decrypt
    all titles currently on the market. I think the last two keys can
    be removed. Someone with 'The Matrix' please test and get back to
    me.

    Mpeg audio streams should now be extractable when filtering, this is
    untested.

    It now copes with System headers in the Pack layer (those 0x000001bb
    start codes).

    The command line options have changed between the last version and
    this one - pay attention.

    DF 1999/11/05

  108. COPYING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
    Version 2, June 1991

    Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
    59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
    Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
    of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

    Preamble

    The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
    freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public
    License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free
    software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This
    General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
    Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to
    using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by
    the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to
    your programs, too.

    When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
    price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
    have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
    this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it
    if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it
    in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.

    To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid
    anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights.
    These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you
    distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.

    For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
    gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that
    you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the
    source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their
    rights.

    We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and
    (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy,
    distribute and/or modify the software.

    Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain
    that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free
    software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we
    want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so
    that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original
    authors' reputations.

    Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software
    patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free
    program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the
    program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any
    patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.

    The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
    modification follow.

    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
    TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION

    0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains
    a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed
    under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below,
    refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program"
    means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law:
    that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it,
    either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another
    language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in
    the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you".

    Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not
    covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of
    running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program
    is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the
    Program (independent of having been made by running the Program).
    Whether that is true depends on what the Program does.

    1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
    source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you
    conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate
    copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the
    notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty;
    and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License
    along with the Program.

    You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and
    you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee.

    2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
    of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
    distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
    above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

    a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
    stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.

    b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
    whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
    part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
    parties under the terms of this License.

    c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively
    when run, you must cause it, when started running for such
    interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an
    announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a
    notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide
    a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under
    these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this
    License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but
    does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on
    the Program is not required to print an announcement.)

    These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If
    identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
    and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
    themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
    sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you
    distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
    on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
    this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
    entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.

    Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest
    your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to
    exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or
    collective works based on the Program.

    In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program
    with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of
    a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under
    the scope of this License.

    3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it,
    under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of
    Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following:

    a) Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable
    source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections
    1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,

    b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
    years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
    cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
    machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
    distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
    customarily used for software interchange; or,

    c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
    to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is
    allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you
    received the program in object code or executable form with such
    an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.)

    The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
    making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source
    code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any
    associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to
    control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a
    special exception, the source code distributed need not include
    anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
    form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the
    operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
    itself accompanies the executable.

    If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering
    access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent
    access to copy the source code from the same place counts as
    distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not
    compelled to copy the source along with the object code.

    4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program
    except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt
    otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is
    void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
    However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under
    this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such
    parties remain in full compliance.

    5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not
    signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or
    distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are
    prohibited by law if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by
    modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the
    Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and
    all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying
    the Program or works based on it.

    6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
    Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
    original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
    these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further
    restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein.
    You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to
    this License.

    7. If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent
    infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues),
    conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or
    otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not
    excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot
    distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this
    License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you
    may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent
    license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by
    all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then
    the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to
    refrain entirely from distribution of the Program.

    If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under
    any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to
    apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other
    circumstances.

    It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any
    patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any
    such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the
    integrity of the free software distribution system, which is
    implemented by public license practices. Many people have made
    generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed
    through that system in reliance on consistent application of that
    system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing
    to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot
    impose that choice.

    This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to
    be a consequence of the rest of this License.

    8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in
    certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the
    original copyright holder who places the Program under this License
    may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding
    those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among
    countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates
    the limitation as if written in the body of this License.

    9. The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions
    of the General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will
    be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to
    address new problems or concerns.

    Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program
    specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any
    later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions
    either of that version or of any later version published by the Free
    Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of
    this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software
    Foundation.

    10. If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free
    programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author
    to ask for permission. For software which is copyrighted by the Free
    Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes
    make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals
    of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and
    of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally.

    NO WARRANTY

    11. BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY
    FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN
    OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES
    PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED
    OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
    MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS
    TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE
    PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING,
    REPAIR OR CORRECTION.

    12. IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING
    WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR
    REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES,
    INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING
    OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
    TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY
    YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER
    PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
    POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

    END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS

    How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs

    If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
    possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
    free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.

    To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest
    to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
    convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least
    the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.


    Copyright (C) 19yy

    This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
    it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
    the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
    (at your option) any later version.

    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
    GNU General Public License for more details.

    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
    along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
    Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA


    Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.

    If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this
    when it starts in an interactive mode:

    Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) 19yy name of author
    Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
    This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
    under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.

    The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate
    parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands you use may
    be called something other than `show w' and `show c'; they could even be
    mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program.

    You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your
    school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if
    necessary. Here is a sample; alter the names:

    Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program
    `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker.

    , 1 April 1989
    Ty Coon, President of Vice

    This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into
    proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may
    consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the
    library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Library General
    Public License instead of this License.

  109. AFAIK, Fair use is not a God-given right by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1


    I understand fair use as something of an exception to copyright law, ALLOWING the users to make backup copies, media transfers and use short segments in reviews / parodies / etc.

    It is not guaranteed, and companies are not required to make copying easy. In many cases, defeating copy protections to make backup copies / personal transfers is legal. The defeating part is possibly always legal for your own equipment and as long as you don't distribute copies.

    I am not a lawyer, so don't take my word too heavily.

    Your little boycott is interesting. I suppose no one has to watch Hollywood trash. Good stuff does come through occassionally, but then it gets plaigurized to heck.

    1. Re:AFAIK, Fair use is not a God-given right by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      Nor, for that matter is IP. Both are endowed by the lawmaking bodies of the nations where they exist.

      --
      It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  110. Here's yet another mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    css-auth (for Linux): http://users.drak.net/bemann/software/css/css-auth .tar.gz DeCSS (for Win32): http://users.drak.net/bemann/software/css/DeCSS.zi p

  111. Try this one... by Danse · · Score: 1

    Say I buy a CD. Now, if I don't have a CD player, I can have a friend record the CD onto a cassette tape which I have a player for. This would be considered fair use. Now, if I buy a DVD, they are trying to say that I can't convert it into a format that I can use on my Linux machine. That would be considered BS.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  112. Re:Seems to me the DVD consortium should be illega by FigWig · · Score: 1

    You're still wrong about this one.

    Even with CSS in place pirates can do bit-for-bit copies of the DVD. The only thing that is affected by breaking CSS is that pirates will be able to remove the region code so that they can get American movies early in HK and other places.

    --
    Scuttlemonkey is a troll
  113. Re:Dead composers' works PD by ElecCham · · Score: 1
    Shouldn't the music of such masters be free to be distributed to everyone? I think that once the artists/creator of a work of art is dead their property should enter the public domain. Up until their death they can do anything they want with that property, sell it to companies whatever. But when they die, no matter WHO owns the work, it enters to the public domain.

    First problem with this is, there's a difference between their work (which is already in the PD) and someone's recording of their work. You're proposing to make the latter forbidden to sell, as I understand it. This would remove the primary source of income that struggling young classical musicians have - potential record contracts. As it is now, they're already struggling for it. If you're not Luciano Pavarotti or Yitzhak Perlman, you don't generally get picked up. This, in turn, appears to be a partial cause of a waning interest in orchestras and the like - after all, would you go to see someone that you've never heard of?

    Yes, it's clear that the music "industry" - and not just the record execs - need to do some adapting. But with music, like with code, free.open != free.beer; you're proposing the latter, which would put a lot of people out of a job.

    --
    Sig broken, watch for .finger
  114. Manslaughter charge after judge dies laughing by Morgaine · · Score: 2

    Hahaha, nice one! :-)

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  115. Re:If you've got one, send responses to DVDutils.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it legal to copy rip sell software to copy AUDIO CDS, yet DVds are such a NONO!?!?!?

    Double standards, MPPA = NAZI Fuckers!

  116. ITS GONE -- THE LAWYERS GOT 'EM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The file isn't on download.com anymore so it looks like they got one of those stupid letters. Oh well, I am more interested in the css-auth.tar.gz file anyway and that is still mirrored all over. I wonder if that one will show up in Freshmeat or Linuxberg eventually.

  117. FightClub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like inthe movie FightClub, perhaps the targeted buildings should have been lawyers and holywood, not credit card companies.

    What a good movie btw too, so anti holywood too.

  118. Playing DVDs sans Drive by polypropylene · · Score: 1

    One thing people haven't mentioned is the fact that now .vob files can be played on computers without any DVD drives at all. My freind ripped the Matrix a few days ago and sent it to me overnight. Now I can watch the DVD without even buying a drive, let alone the actual disk. I just don't see how copyrights can hold out against this kind of thing.

  119. Re:If you've got one, send responses to DVDutils.c by blackwizard · · Score: 1

    I don't think it should be any different under the law, but the motion picture industry seems to have more money and lawyers than the music industry. Plus, the whole reason they decided to go with the DVD standard was because it was "secure", or so they thought. So now they've got their panites in a bunch..

  120. professional mastering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Professional DVD duplication systems don't work like a DVD-RAM drive. Instead, you first make a glass master. This is a reverse image of the DVD etched onto glass. You need a seperate glass for each layer/side. (A single-sided DVD would have one glass, a double-layered DVD would have two glasses, and a double-layered double-sided would have four glasses.) These are used in a press mold for the plastic which makes up the DVD. Each plastic layer is then evaporation coated on one side with a thin metal layer to make it reflective, and chemically bonded to the other layers/sides for each disk.

  121. Download.com has taken down deCSS by esjewett · · Score: 1

    Or rather, has taken down their link to it. The Download Dispatch newsletter stated that Download.com had been contacted by the MPAA and informed that it was illegal to post deCSS and download.com's lawyers concured that it must be taken down.

    This brings up a couple of issues. Is deCSS really illegal and, maybe more importantly, is it illegal to link to illegal data on another server?

  122. DeCSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download.com does not have it on their site anymore. Anyone else have it?