Don't forget that some people have vehicles mostly dedicated to off road excursions. To tax them for road usage based on odometer would be incorrect unless one provides a method of exemption or the lawmakers decide that wear and tear on the environment is just as costly to the public as road usage.
They rise incredibly early in the morning, wear beards and suspenders as part of their uniform, and fight while breaking ground with a horse strapped to a plow. They do, however, refuse to use modern firearms, preferring fisticuffs and the cutlass.
They are like land pirates, but without the eye patches, skull-and-crossbones, and hard liquor.
Never....for one moment...think in terms of a company giving a rat's ass about anything except THE BENJAMINS. (that's money for those who don't speak my lang.)
Dell has competition and believes they have to cut everything to the bone to survive. They're right, but they need to tone down their promises to match the reality of their economic decisions.
You want native english speaking customer support. OK. You will pay for it one way or the other...through higher computer costs or higher support contract costs.
From the lowest note to the highest aria, I fought him, the Lawyer of L.A and Nashville. Until at last, I threw down my enemy and rubbed his nose upon his mountain of money, crying "Bad Dog!". Dark fiber took me. And my lip-synching became like Milli-Vanilli. Stars wheeled overhead in their Cadillac Escalades and each day was as long as Mick Jagger's career or a Moody Blues song. But it was not the coda. I felt another refrain. I've been hired to do another gig and guard against the flaming one's brother...MPAA.
In general, all the technology for EVs is there except for the fuel cells or energy-dense batteries.
The other elephant in the room is cost. Car companies like GM, Ford, and DCX don't want to risk making EVs or hybrids available that are much above existing vehicle costs. Parts manufacturers can't or don't want to afford to sell them the specialized, low-volume, EV/hybrid-only parts at high-volume commodity prices.
Toyota bit the bullet and paid to commoditize their technology to some degree. They are very vertically integrated as owners of Denso, a huge and diverse car parts manufacturer.
I applaud your argument. It is cogent and concise.
But the anger from both sides (producer and consumer) is misdirected.
Consumers are angry because we can now envision and want a world where top quality information is dirt cheap and the information producers still make a living. Info producers are angry because the consumers are forcing this to occur, but over correcting by forcing the cost to zero. And the middle-men are angry because dirt cheap information leaves no room for them.
We're all just angry because the world is changing and it is making things uncomfortable for us. We all want to be the ones for whom the change benefits and when we see that the rules aren't keeping up with change and causing imbalance, we cry foul and point fingers.
If you were first or biggest in the market, sometimes your trade name gets suborned by the general public. Using a suborned trade name is not bona fide proof of any negative personality or intelligence trait.
You are simply pointing out that there is nothing new under the sun. People enjoy twists on familiar stories. That way they are comfortable relating to the characters with minimal risk.
It's the same principle behind people having favorite actors and stars drawing people to the box office, even when everyone knows the movie premise is crappy.
DISCLAIMER: Do not construe the following as legal advice. The claims (at least in the reissued patent) are narrower than simple time-to-frequency transforms. To infringe, an invention must possess the qualities or features of one or more of the claims of a patent. The claim that contains the reference to the transforms (claim 1) also has other requirements that must be met by an invention before it should be found to be infringing that particular claim.
As much as I would like to bestow upon the **AA the singular honor of viewing my clenched fists with middle-fingers protruding, my conscience bothers me too much to significantly raise the Jolly Roger.
The issue is not that the laws of the United States do not apply to the Internet. The laws of the United States apply to citizens of the United States and to the States, territories, and territorial waters of the United States (caveat: there is presently uncertainty in what governmental branch has jurisdiction and what laws apply to military personnel and held geography outside the traditional States and territories, e.g. Guantanamo Bay)
Even if Carpenter did his hacking in outer space, he is subject to the laws of the United States as a US citizen.
What is not really valid is your emotionally charged and biased statement that Japan has a superior culture. This is not a statement of fact and is instead a highly arguable hot-button issue. It can, in fact, be dismissed by looking at suicide rates as though they were some form of social commentary reflecting just how superior those who suicided thought their culture really is.
Slashdot Mirror
The thought of simulated wood paneling is indeed compelling.
Don't forget that some people have vehicles mostly dedicated to off road excursions. To tax them for road usage based on odometer would be incorrect unless one provides a method of exemption or the lawmakers decide that wear and tear on the environment is just as costly to the public as road usage.
They rise incredibly early in the morning, wear beards and suspenders as part of their uniform, and fight while breaking ground with a horse strapped to a plow. They do, however, refuse to use modern firearms, preferring fisticuffs and the cutlass.
They are like land pirates, but without the eye patches, skull-and-crossbones, and hard liquor.
'nuff said.
Never....for one moment...think in terms of a company giving a rat's ass about anything except THE BENJAMINS. (that's money for those who don't speak my lang.)
Dell has competition and believes they have to cut everything to the bone to survive. They're right, but they need to tone down their promises to match the reality of their economic decisions.
You want native english speaking customer support. OK. You will pay for it one way or the other...through higher computer costs or higher support contract costs.
Well.....??? K'Lyre?
Oxygenation....reformulated gas is all about the O2.
Nope, they want respect. They would rather be alone and abandoned than disrespected.
From the lowest note to the highest aria, I fought him, the Lawyer of L.A and Nashville.
Until at last, I threw down my enemy and rubbed his nose upon his mountain of money, crying "Bad Dog!". Dark fiber took me. And my lip-synching became like Milli-Vanilli. Stars wheeled overhead in their Cadillac Escalades and each day was as long as Mick Jagger's career or a Moody Blues song. But it was not the coda. I felt another refrain. I've been hired to do another gig and guard against the flaming one's brother...MPAA.
I applaud you. It takes self-control and compassion to apologize in a public forum.
In general, all the technology for EVs is there except for the fuel cells or energy-dense batteries.
The other elephant in the room is cost. Car companies like GM, Ford, and DCX don't want to risk making EVs or hybrids available that are much above existing vehicle costs. Parts manufacturers can't or don't want to afford to sell them the specialized, low-volume, EV/hybrid-only parts at high-volume commodity prices.
Toyota bit the bullet and paid to commoditize their technology to some degree. They are very vertically integrated as owners of Denso, a huge and diverse car parts manufacturer.
I nearly peed myself laughing so hard.
I applaud your argument. It is cogent and concise.
But the anger from both sides (producer and consumer) is misdirected.
Consumers are angry because we can now envision and want a world where top quality information is dirt cheap and the information producers still make a living. Info producers are angry because the consumers are forcing this to occur, but over correcting by forcing the cost to zero. And the middle-men are angry because dirt cheap information leaves no room for them.
We're all just angry because the world is changing and it is making things uncomfortable for us. We all want to be the ones for whom the change benefits and when we see that the rules aren't keeping up with change and causing imbalance, we cry foul and point fingers.
Our real enemy is greed. Think about it.
Coke, Kleenex, Pampers, Google etc.....
If you were first or biggest in the market, sometimes your trade name gets suborned by the general public. Using a suborned trade name is not bona fide proof of any negative personality or intelligence trait.
You are simply pointing out that there is nothing new under the sun. People enjoy twists on familiar stories. That way they are comfortable relating to the characters with minimal risk.
It's the same principle behind people having favorite actors and stars drawing people to the box office, even when everyone knows the movie premise is crappy.
DISCLAIMER: Do not construe the following as legal advice.
The claims (at least in the reissued patent) are narrower than simple time-to-frequency transforms. To infringe, an invention must possess the qualities or features of one or more of the claims of a patent. The claim that contains the reference to the transforms (claim 1) also has other requirements that must be met by an invention before it should be found to be infringing that particular claim.
As much as I would like to bestow upon the **AA the singular honor of viewing my clenched fists with middle-fingers protruding, my conscience bothers me too much to significantly raise the Jolly Roger.
Perhaps only if it were illegal to have copies of songs by any means.
The issue is not that the laws of the United States do not apply to the Internet. The laws of the United States apply to citizens of the United States and to the States, territories, and territorial waters of the United States (caveat: there is presently uncertainty in what governmental branch has jurisdiction and what laws apply to military personnel and held geography outside the traditional States and territories, e.g. Guantanamo Bay)
Even if Carpenter did his hacking in outer space, he is subject to the laws of the United States as a US citizen.
Where's your stalker?
The only "ad" that seems to work is "ad hominem".
...limited life of motor brushes... "Alex, I'll take 'Motor Technology' for $100.""Here's the answer:...DC Brushless."
BZZZZZTTT!!!
"What's the prevailing DC motor technology?, ALex."
DING DING DING!
"Correct....for $100."
[cue applause]
What is not really valid is your emotionally charged and biased statement that Japan has a superior culture. This is not a statement of fact and is instead a highly arguable hot-button issue. It can, in fact, be dismissed by looking at suicide rates as though they were some form of social commentary reflecting just how superior those who suicided thought their culture really is.
My wife would say "Yes."
(But please don't tell her)