Slashdot Mirror


Bad Math Causes Explosion at CERN Collider

javipas writes "The Large Hadron Collider at the CERN has suffered a big explosion deep inside that has caused a leak of hellium gas and the quick evacuation of everyone working there. The reason: a mathematical mistake that affected the design of the giant superconductive magnets made by Fermilab. Now the company will have to repair and upgrade the 24 magnets that are installed on the 27 km. circunference of one of the most important research centers on Earth." This story might seem strangely familiar to you.

270 comments

  1. Forgetting... by mulvane · · Score: 5, Funny

    To carry the 1 can cost lives! I never believed it in elementary school when my teacher that math could affect my life, but damn, the stuff can kill you!!!! Treat math with respect!

    1. Re:Forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So THAT'S what happens when you divide by zero!

    2. Re:Forgetting... by tuba_ranger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't this the plot behind Half-Life?

    3. Re:Forgetting... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ooh, so thats when you use lim(x->0).

    4. Re:Forgetting... by anilg · · Score: 1

      Well in his defense, he carried the one, only into the helium in TF summary.

      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
    5. Re:Forgetting... by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, those guys need to be sure to have a crowbar handy at all times when working on the system. Those damn headcrabs can get the tiniest spaces...

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    6. Re:Forgetting... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Treat math with respect!

      W0rd, man.
    7. Re:Forgetting... by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, it wasn't a crowbar until it was bent around the magnet.

    8. Re:Forgetting... by S810 · · Score: 1

      Hubble went through this with it's lensing, I am sure every great leap has suffered some setbacks. But we need to remember that when dividing by anything to carry the 1 and make sure it has a safe home. Let this be a lesson to us all!

      --
      "I think you know what I'm talkin' about, Mr. President; We're gonna kill us a mummy!" - Bruce Campbell as Elvis Presley
    9. Re:Forgetting... by gyranthir · · Score: 1

      Lol, those giant magnets are dangerous.

    10. Re:Forgetting... by corifornia · · Score: 0, Troll

      I was listening to an interview with on of the scientists working on this and they were discussing the worst possible scenario, and the guy stated that it could destroy the earth, no big deal right. So the interviewer asked, what could go wrong that would cause that, the scientist laughed and said, nothing would go wrong it would just be the end result of the experiment. Its called an experiment because we don't know what will happen. These bastards can't even build the thing without blowing crap up, I can't believe they are actually going to be allowed to turn it on.

      --
      crap.
    11. Re:Forgetting... by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      But whenever I look for lim as x approaches zero I always get a derivative!

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    12. Re:Forgetting... by Enlightenment · · Score: 1, Informative

      That worst case scenario was only stated because of a strict adherence to the principles of science: since nobody's done it yet, there's technically no way to know what happens. But common sense dictates that the world is probably _not_ going to end as a result of a high-energy collision between two particles. The energies involved aren't great enough to do that by, say, cracking the globe in two, so some weird effects from the collision would be the only way. You really have no cause for concern.

    13. Re:Forgetting... by aeryn_sunn · · Score: 1

      "Bad Math" ???

      When I first glanced at the headline I thought it said "Bad METH" and I was like, WTF!!??, CERN must be driving its scientist to 72 hour work binges, that's odd. Of course, upon closer inspection, I saw it was "math" not "meth" and I thought "damn, this would have been much more interesting from the meth angle".... oh well.

    14. Re:Forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Hubble went through this with it's lensing"

      Every apostrophe should have a safe home. Unfortunately, that wasn't it.

    15. Re:Forgetting... by rubberbandball · · Score: 3, Funny

      im in ur supercollider, making ur gas leak!

      --
      oh marmalade.
    16. Re:Forgetting... by Tesen · · Score: 1

      We need to outlaw math! The terrorists will obviously use this information to make all magnets on the planet explode!!! DAMN THEM! DAMN THEM AND THEIR EVIL PLOTS!

    17. Re:Forgetting... by packeteer · · Score: 1

      The earth is constantly bombarded by energy from the sun that is much stronger than what they will be using in their tests. It is highly unlikely that the tests will cause any problems for the earth.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    18. Re:Forgetting... by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      "So THAT'S what happens when you divide by zero!"

      Soo.. you're saying that Chuck Norris did the math for the CERN Collider?!? :O :D

    19. Re:Forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, no one was killed, or not killed, in the incident.

    20. Re:Forgetting... by Oberoten · · Score: 0

      Gordon! What have you DONE?!

    21. Re:Forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To carry the 1 can cost lives!
      Why do you think they nailed the guy on a plus sign of all things? hmm?
  2. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...

    1. Re:Obligatory... by Eudial · · Score: 4, Funny

      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...


      Don't you mean

      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...
      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...
      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...
      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...
      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...
      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...
      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    2. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, welcome our new accidental parallel universe overlords...

      The good news is, maybe there exists a parallel universe in which someone didn't mess up the magnets. So now all we have to do instead of fixing the magnets is figure out how to open a portal to that universe, and in a year ask THEM if they've seen the Higgs boson.

    3. Re:Obligatory... by kennygraham · · Score: 1

      So now all we have to do instead of fixing the magnets is figure out how to open a portal to that universe

      I found this cardboard box in my basement...

    4. Re:Obligatory... by alienmole · · Score: 1

      In that universe, there is a Higgs boson, and it's pretty, too. But that doesn't mean we have Higgs bosons. Parallel universes aren't that useful except for locating your evil twin.

  3. Zoiks! by forkazoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Forgot to carry the one. Sorry.

  4. Almost success! by AaxelB · · Score: 5, Funny

    The machine, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), aims to recreate the conditions of the Big Bang, when the universe is thought to have exploded into existence about 14 billion years ago.

    "There was a hell of a bang, the tunnel housing the machine filled with helium and dust and we had to call in the fire brigade to evacuate the place"

    Eh, sounds partially successful.
    1. Re:Almost success! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There was a hell of a bang, the tunnel housing the machine filled with helium and dust and we had to call in the fire brigade to evacuate the place"


      Fire brigade phone operator at first taught it was another prank call by those damned kids again!

      BTW, Don't ever mix Nitrogen Suboxide with Helium, especially on parties... ("squirrel laugh" frenzy ... sound of dropping dead choking).
    2. Re:Almost success! by cyphercell · · Score: 4, Funny

      hello operator?
      click!
      Operator, this is not a ...
      click!
      bob - Bill have you called the police?
      bill - Of course bob, they hanging up.
      bob - What? Call again.
      bill - Damnit bob I sound like a chipmunk, you call this time.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    3. Re:Almost success! by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Unlucky they didn't apply enough energy so they could recreate the whole big bang.

      I wouldn't recommend to drink the water from the surroundings, they might drink the emperor!

    4. Re:Almost success! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, sounds partially successful.


      More importantly, everyone who's ever meditated upon, "what is the sound of one superconducting magnet hopping", now knows the answer.
  5. NPR Story missed this one by your_mother_sews_soc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Talk about missed opportunities. I just listened to an NPR story at around 8:20 eastern time (US) about particle physics and the super collider. They mentioned how a particle zooming around in it would have the force of a bus, and colliding two particles would be an enormous crash. They talked about how particle physics has stagnated for the past few decades, about how the collider was built, and oddly enough, about what a breach of the coil would do. But no mention of an "accident." Hmmm. I guess I need to mail my pledge check.

    --
    My user name was a mistake. Input wasn't restricted, my bad.
    1. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Informative

      They mentioned how a particle zooming around in it would have the force of a bus

      Not really. The most powerful cosmic ray particles ever observed, which have are millions of times more energy than anything we can create, each have approximately the force of a thrown baseball. Perhaps *all* of the particles in the ring together have the energy of a moving bus.

    2. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also listened to that story. It seems to me that the whole "bus" analogy breaks down when you realize that they are slamming two busses head on and looking at the peices left by the collision to try and figure out how the busses are assembled.

    3. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      They mentioned how a particle zooming around in it would have the force of a bus
      Not really. The most powerful cosmic ray particles ever observed, which have are millions of times more energy than anything we can create, each have approximately the force of a thrown baseball.
      I'd be willing to bet that a thrown bus accelerates much more slowly than a thrown baseball.

      Seriously, though, F = M*A. Without a discussion of the acceleration of the bus, you can't even guess at the force. If the bus is traveling in a circle at constant velocity, then the acceleration can be calculated; it will depend on the speed of the bus and the diameter of the circle. I have the feeling calculating the acceleration of a thrown baseball is a bit more difficult. Given that a baseball weighs around 145 grams and a bus weighs about 6500kg, the baseball needs to be accelerating around 45000 times as fast as the bus in order for the force to be equivalent.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's the super high rare as we've only ever seen 18 particles that have the energy of a baseball. Normal cosmic rays are hundreds and thousands of times weaker than the OHMYGOD particles.

    5. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you look up "force" on dictionary.com, you'll find 36 different meanings. From the context of the sentence, it was clear that the GP post was using meaning #3 (energy, power), not the formal physics definition #12 (f=ma). I guess that I lazily copied the term assuming the GP post's context, not remembering how literalistic the audience here tends to be. Sorry for any inconvenience.

    6. Re:NPR Story missed this one by SnowZero · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, is the Higgs boson going to become the "OMG LOL" particle? I hope not...

    7. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Threni · · Score: 1

      Is force relevant when discussing particles? I thought force is more applicable to Newtonian physics than to quantum/relativistic?

    8. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      No worries -- but in a discussion of a particle collider, I'll always assume when people are talking about force, they mean the physics term...

      But at any rate, then for definition #3, we're talking about mass and velocity, and the distinction still appplies.

      /Sorry for being such a pedant, but it's Monday morning, compounded by a nasty sugar hangover from Easter candy.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    9. Re:NPR Story missed this one by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      The collider throws objects about the size of a grain of rice around. While each atom in object is far less energetic than a cosmic ray, the sum momentum of the entire lump is higher.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    10. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Oink · · Score: 1

      I worked at CERN a few summers ago. The intended energy in the entire ring at one time is the kinetic energy of a semitruck at some nominal road velocity. So, there's an order of magnitude at least. The energy of a single particle I believe was the kinetic energy of a horse fly, which is still immensely impressive.

      I think these are correct.

      --
      ----------------- Oink. Moo. rarr! -----------------
    11. Re:NPR Story missed this one by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 4, Informative
      The relevant quotation from the story on NPR:

      "It's the energy of a bus moving at a normal velocity," De Rujula says. So imagine a bus rolling along -- which has something like 10,000 trillion, trillion particles -- but transfer all that energy into one single particle. There will actually be a beam of protons; a whole fleet of subatomic particles, each carrying the energy of a bus.
      In other words, the grandparent just mis-remembered the story, or didn't realize how important the distinction could be when talking physics . . .
    12. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Moofie · · Score: 1

      When you're talking about physics, and you're not very persnickety about your definitions (Energy and force are NOT at ALL interchangeable concepts), your large hadron collider explodes.

      So, yeah. When discussing science, it's a good idea to be as careful with your terms as possible. Saves confusion.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:NPR Story missed this one by LiquidEdge · · Score: 1

      Sweet, cuz there's this guy down at The Wharf that will write my name on a grain of rice. I wonder if we can sponsor the LHC by getting our names on the particle?

      --
      Saving the World: One Drink at a Time
    14. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      de Rujula would hardly count as a grandparent in physics! He can probably outdo anyone in physics calculations still and knows his stuff -- but how are the best of physicists supposed to explain themselves to the public when the public freaks out when the physicist uses the word "momentum"?

      the point here shouldn't be to bash physicsts but to increase the awareness of the public so that we physicists no longer have to "water down" every single factoid.

    15. Re:NPR Story missed this one by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      The most powerful cosmic ray particles ever observed, which have are millions of times more energy than anything we can create, each have approximately the force of a thrown baseball. It might be worth noting that these ultra-high-energy cosmic rays are not exactly common.
    16. Re:NPR Story missed this one by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That's a busload of energy, all right: guess they must be using the newly-discovered "greyhoundon" particles. Well, we did beat the aliens in the first Independence Day movie, it's true, but it would be wise to get the collider up and running as soon as possible. That way, we'll have something to shoot back with when the really big ships come.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  6. Not a Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Isn't this the same story as from a week or two ago?
    While it may have the same message to you (Big Ass Magnet Fails on Fermilab's Collider at CERN), it's actually the result of an investigation.

    From one of the articles in your link:

    Fermilab will appoint an external review committee to analyze how this problem occurred and determine root causes and lessons learned.
    The old story was that stuff blew up. The new story is why it blew up so we don't make the same mistakes. Turns out it, was just bad math. It wasn't that we didn't understand some physics, it wasn't the gods being mad, it was just plan old avoidable bad math.

    A somber and depressing article for the /. community considering how many people have been posting about the huge leaps in physics this machine was supposed to bring us ... hopefully another country will come up with something similar to keep this research rolling while CERN awaits repairs.
    1. Re:Not a Dupe by fontkick · · Score: 2, Funny

      It wasn't that we didn't understand some physics, it wasn't the gods being mad, it was just plan old avoidable bad math.

      In theory, all mistakes are avoidable. The problem is avoiding them.,

    2. Re:Not a Dupe by bockelboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work on the LHC (although not a particle physicist, I talk to ones every day).

      If you had to explain it at an 8th grade level (as newspapers aim for these days), you'd say "bad math". If you are on a nerd site like Slashdot, I'd hope we wouldn't need to make that simplification. The story is a dupe. It is still the same as before - the assymmetrical load was not put into the requirements for the magnets and overlooked during four internal and *external* reviews. CERN had all the right data, and they overlooked that specific test too.

      There is a committee reviewing the case, and their findings will be released April 24 (tentatively). FNAL's goal is to have this not delay turn-on at all, although it'll cost some amount of money to fix. They hope the repairs can be made in-ground. The absolute worst-case would be if they have to take the magnets up to the surface to fix them; that will certainly cause a time delay.

      Right now, they suspect it's an additional cost, but not a delay for the November turn-on. That picture could get worse, but we won't know until around May.

      Lots of the world's top particle physicists have been on this project for many years; any country capable of doign "other" research is certainly already heavily involved with the LHC. The only possible project which will benefit from the delay is the Tevatron at FNAL, but we're probably 18 months from running the LCG at Tevatron levels (it will take *at least* a year to begin to get all the bugs worked out and tunings done to a multi-billion dollar system).

      One delay will be noise compared to the amount of effort needed to prove the existence of the Higgs.

    3. Re:Not a Dupe by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      The real trick is finding mistakes before they happen ;-)

    4. Re:Not a Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the really real trick is to avoid soviet russia... because in sovie..... never mind... ... ... ... ...

    5. Re:Not a Dupe by Enlightenment · · Score: 0

      I would say that's not true, unless you too strictly define a 'mistake' to be something that is demonstrably a bad idea using _known information. What if it turns out this thing is a black hole generator? The prospect doesn't worry me and it shouldn't worry you, because it's fantastically unlikely, but in that event we will know most definitely that turning it on was quite a big mistake, albeit one we didn't know about at the time.

    6. Re:Not a Dupe by bockelboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess I should cover my ass and point out that none of that post is priveleged information; beyond my meandering speculations, you can read the press release yourself:

      The goal at CERN and Fermilab is now to redesign and repair the inner triplet magnets and, if necessary, the DFBX without affecting the LHC start-up schedule. Teams at CERN and Fermilab have identified potential repairs that could be carried out expeditiously without removing undamaged triplet magnets from the tunnel.. All three of the pressure-tested triplet magnets at Point 5, plus the associated DFBX, will be removed from the tunnel for inspection and, if necessary, repair. CERN will manage the redesign and repair effort and has scheduled a review for April 24-25 to validate the selected method. Fermilab will take part in the review. Repair of the triplet magnets would begin after validation by the reviewers. The immediate goal is to have a repaired triplet in another sector of the accelerator ready to participate in a pressure test scheduled for June 1.
      Primary sources are always better than some guy commenting.

    7. Re:Not a Dupe by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Thank you bockelboy for posting this. I have been keeping tabs on the CERN for a very long time, from the groundbreaking to today - and I really really really want to see this become a success. I really hope that it's not derailed. *snerk* I made a funny. :P I studied particle physics, but could never afford to go to school for it, so I became an IT GeekGrrrl instead. Something I could do without school anyways. :P But after the *horrible* SA blog here: http://blog.sciam.com/ - it's good to see some positive and ACCURATE information out there. I'm waiting for the 24th with baited breath! :)

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    8. Re:Not a Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work on the LHC (although not a particle physicist, I talk to ones every day).


      'Fries or mash?'
    9. Re:Not a Dupe by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      hopefully another country will come up with something similar to keep this research rolling while CERN awaits repairs. Tell me you don't seriously think "another country" could design and build one of these things before they install the new magnets at CERN.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  7. The real reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fermilab outsourced magnet design to Sony

    1. Re:The real reason... by brunos · · Score: 1

      you might be onto something: the fermilab statement says: "Fermilab also assembled into cryostats and shipped to CERN 18 similar KEK-designed magnets that were built in industry in Japan and cold-tested at KEK"

    2. Re:The real reason... by DBCubix · · Score: 1, Troll

      It was the Vista DRM... 'A large explosion is about to happen, Cancel, Allow?'

      --
      I called it a mighty Sperm Whale, she called it Finding Nemo.
    3. Re:The real reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, the designers were using Windoze Workstations with Intel chips. Oooops.

    4. Re:The real reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fermilab is just upset that they weren't able to have and/or play with the new toy that is being built.

  8. The Great Mistake of '08 was no accident by TheHornedOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haven't these guys read their Dan Simmons?

    1. Re:The Great Mistake of '08 was no accident by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Just finished rereading all four.... it's the "Big Mistake of '08", not the "Great Mistake".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:The Great Mistake of '08 was no accident by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Funny

      some of them did, but then the Shrike grabbed and impaled them.

    3. Re:The Great Mistake of '08 was no accident by Cragen · · Score: 1

      Um, sorry. Not the Shrike, it was that Brain-with-hundreds-of-hands thingy. Can't remember the name, and my head hurts, for some reason...

    4. Re:The Great Mistake of '08 was no accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Setebos, the "many-handed as a cuttlefish." Different story.

  9. Well, there's your problem! by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 3, Funny

    What do you expect when using hellium?

    1. Re:Well, there's your problem! by fusion9290991 · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for an obligatory 'Doom' quote, myself :)

      --
      remember to loot and pillage before you burn!
  10. It's Sabotage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Coincidentally, Fermilab stands to gain most from delays at Cern. Its researchers also operate a rival but less powerful particle accelerator, the Tevatron. Fermilab staff are pushing the Tevatron to ever-higher energies hoping that they might find the Higgs boson before the LHC switches on. An LHC researcher said: "Ironically, this delay could be all they need." Gasp! Sabotage! A divide by zero here, a drop of the carry there...who would notice!? :)
    1. Re:It's Sabotage! by Verte · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is why you never let Physicists do mathematics.

      --
      We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
  11. Helium leak? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's so bad about that? Are they just afraid no one will take them seriously if they sound like the chipmunks when they report their findings? I mean, it's not like it's spraying O2 in the direction of the pilot light of their oven.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    1. Re:Helium leak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you're just ignorant, rather than trying to be funny; suffocation.

    2. Re:Helium leak? by delt0r · · Score: 1

      The large volume of helium, which is at about 4K IIRC. Can freeze parts of your body, and asphyxiate you. The whole things is deep underground in an "enclosed" space.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    3. Re:Helium leak? by radtea · · Score: 1, Redundant

      What's so bad about that?

      Others have detailed what's so bad about this, but it is worth pointing out that experimental science is in general a dangerous enterprise.

      Experimental physicists routinely handle dangerous materials (a colleague once worked on a project where he was using hydrofluoric acid, which has to be one of the nastiest substances known.) We also deal with pressure vessels (another colleague working on high pressure proportional counters considered explosions a routine part of his testing protocol). We deal with high voltage sources that are the kind of thing you might find connected to an electric chair in less civilized countries. And the list goes on...

      The number of things that can go wrong with any new machine is large, and we are very fortunate that relatively few experimentalists are killed each year from the risks they expose themselves to in the name of greater knowledge.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    4. Re:Helium leak? by koletimo · · Score: 1

      Helium is used as a liquid in physics research to keep parts of the beamline or the magnets cold. When it leaks out at 4K, it expands 600 times to a gas, and cools the crap out of everything around it, which can be somewhat of a problem. Not to mention it's not cheap refilling the tanks at CERN after a big leak.

  12. OOPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This story has been brought to you by erasers. Don't make a mistake without one.

    1. Re:OOPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Square One!

      I thought I was the only person with that saying permanently embedded in their brain.

  13. Some real information by gvc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's Fermilab's statment. Of course they are an interested party, but at least their statement contains information, unlike the snide popular press article.

    http://user.web.cern.ch/user/QuickLinks/Announceme nts/2007/LHCInnerTriplet.html

    1. Re:Some real information by photomic · · Score: 3, Funny

      "On Tuesday, March 27, there was a serious failure in a high-pressure test at CERN of a Fermilab-built "inner-triplet" series of three quadrupole magnets in the tunnel of the Large Hadron Collider. The magnets focus the particle beams prior to collision at each of four interaction points around the accelerator. Safety precautions were followed during the test, and no one was injured."


      May I pass along my congratulations for your great interdimensional breakthrough. I am sure, in the miserable annals of the Earth, you will be duly enshrined.
    2. Re:Some real information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another statement from Fermilab.

      Last Tuesday we took a pratfall on the world stage: the high pressure test of the Fermilab-built inner triplet failed dramatically in the LHC tunnel with a loud "bang" and a cloud of dust. It was the first time that the three magnets together with the associated interface box (DFBX) that supplies them with the cryogenic and electrical connections had been tested as an assembly. The high pressure test simulated conditions that can occur in a quench of an LHC sector. Teams at CERN and Fermilab have quickly determined the reason for the failure and are in the process of designing a solution to the problem. (See the article in this issue of Fermilab Today.)

      What the analysis shows so far is that something extraordinarily simple was missed in the design: the obvious imbalance of axial forces that can occur under the conditions represented by the test or by a quench in the LHC. We do many very complex engineering projects successfully that require sophisticated engineering skills and advanced computing tools. We test the complex features we design thoroughly. In this case we are dumbfounded that we missed some very simple balance of forces. Not only was it missed in the engineering design but also in the four engineering reviews carried out between 1998 and 2002 before launching the construction of the magnets. Furthermore even though every magnet was thoroughly tested individually, they were never tested with the exact configuration that they would have when installed at CERN--thus missing the opportunity to discover the problem sooner.

      It is very important for our institution that while we are on the world stage we also demonstrate how we deal with adversity. We have given the top priority in our laboratory to helping CERN fix the problem; we will do everything that is necessary to minimize the impact to the LHC schedule. We also appreciate the offers of assistance that we have received from our partner laboratories KEK, BNL, LBNL and ANL.

      Beyond the immediate fix we must reflect on how we got into this mess. To have the benefit of independent eyes we will have an external review of the events that transpired from the beginning of the design. We need and want to make sure that we find the root causes of the problem and from the lessons learned build a stronger institution. Beyond that, there is no substitute for the commitment each of us makes to excellence, to critical thinking and to sweating every detail.

      - Pier Oddone

    3. Re:Some real information by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Beyond the immediate fix we must reflect on how we got into this mess. To have the benefit of independent eyes we will have an external review of the events that transpired from the beginning of the design. They say that "many eyes make all imbalanced forces shallow." Seriously though, this sounds a lot like a common problem in programming: Checking the common, operating case, and neglecting to think about a corner case which is untested. The design reviews probably focused on proper operation, and not so much on startup/shutdown. Engineering is engineering I guess :)
    4. Re:Some real information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those interested in the engineering details, you can read some of the original design papers here:

      LHC Interaction Region Quadrupole Cryostat Design and Fabrication
      http://tdserver1.fnal.gov/nicol/lhc_irq_cryostat/c h_darve/public/publi/MT-17.pdf

      And some viewgraphs of the relevant "spyder" supports in cross-section here:

      Conceptual Design Review slides:
      http://tdpc02.fnal.gov/nicol/lhc_irq_cryostat/cdr/ cdr_viewgraphs/sld009.htm

      And some details on strength measurement and alignment procedures:

      Alignment and Strength Measurements of the LHC Interaction Region Quadrupole Magnets
      http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2006/conf/fermilab-con f-06-303-td.pdf

      For those that want to see what this stuff looks like in pictures:

      (US-DOE LHC Progress Report 1QFY02)
      http://www.ch.doe.gov/offices/FAO/projects/uslhc/p ictures/acc1picqtr02.pdf

  14. on the upside by stwf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    due to the helium leak everyone in the vicinity of the lab will be talking in very humorous high pitched voices for at least a week!

  15. Question. by pionzypher · · Score: 1

    Did the poster mean helium gas? Or Hellium? Figured it was a typo at first.

    --
    I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    1. Re:Question. by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1
      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  16. John Titor delayed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a result of the explosion, the creation of microsingularities for time-travel has been delayed.

    1. Re:John Titor delayed by Bohnanza · · Score: 1

      At least 'till they can travel back in time and do the math correctly the first time.

      --

      -----

      Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    2. Re:John Titor delayed by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a result of the creation of microsingularities, the explosion has been delayed about a week while it time travels...which explains why the original article failed to mention an explosion.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:John Titor delayed by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's no physics more advanced than Newton involved in this explosion. Somebody miscalculated the forces and didn't build the structure strong enough. Mechanical engineers don't work with relativistic velocities or quantum dimensions. :)

  17. Re:Proton? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Funny
    Gaw-damn, what are we doin' paying those hare-brained scientists to look at pro-tons for?


    Just think how much money they'd be saving if they were looking at amateur-tons.

    (With my apologies to Piers Anthony)

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  18. Re:Proton? by Dara+Hazeghi · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you have your own prejudices and to worry about.

    --
    Left 404: Why the RIGHT is WRONG
  19. It is not about what you know it is who you know" by r4g3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is a typical example of things than can go bad is the It is not about what you know it is who you know" theory kicks in reality. Yet the knowledge guy is still a security guy somewhere and the managers son keeps coming in to work!

  20. Units? by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fermilab - USA. CERN - Europe. You guys did use metric units this time, right? ;)

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Units? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, so "circunference" is metric for "circumference"?

    2. Re:Units? by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      Thats why they call it a "Royale with cheese".

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    3. Re:Units? by TopherC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately, the US also has "egg on their face" from other goings-on in particle physics. Another fairly recent disaster was the cancellation of BTeV. This was most unfortunate because European collaborators were completely disenfranchised. By not having a system in place that can effectively fund a multi-year research project, we've lost valuable collaborators and lost international credibility. In addition to this, we've lost enormous amounts of funding for particle physics over the past decade, and as of now there are no major new experiments being built in the US, and everything that's running will pretty much shut down by 2008 (Fermilab, SLAC, Brookhaven, CESR/CLEO). All Fermilab has going for it after 2008 is that they can build magnets, and now with these issues maybe even that is suspect. As particle physics tends to thrive only on relatively large experiments that take well over a decade to go from proposal to construction and finally operation, it's hard to imagine that basic science in the US will even be relevant any more to the worldwide community for at least the next few decades, if ever again. What's just as frustrating as this was the complete lack of media coverage as the US accomplished its "exit strategy" in particle physics, beginning in about 1993 and ending just about now.

    4. Re:Units? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Let me check my conversion chart:

      c (speed of light in a vacuum) = 1.8 * 10^12 furlongs per fortnight. Got it.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Units? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ok. We were never that impressed by American physics anyway. Your scientists never had any deep insights which advanced the cause of knowledge, they just used to shout 'YeeHarrr' and bolt another large but inefficient engine on the back of whatever equipment we gave them.

      Then, when it crashed, they used to sit in the bar complaining "It never happened like that to Tom Cruise".

  21. They should have listened by aalu.paneer · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
    1. Re:They should have listened by captaincucumber · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hope Fermilab doesn't lose it's funding like the super monkey collider did: http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30420

  22. Old story. Duplicate. Or was there a time slip? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Funny
    It is a duplicate, a week old accident/failure whatever. See slashdot story of last week and new scientist story last week

    Or it could be that the news that it failed on April 07 was sent back in time and appeared on April 02. They should not be messing with fundamental physics like this.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Old story. Duplicate. Or was there a time slip? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1

      See! There was a rift caused in the space-time continuium! The time between stories (5 days, 2 days) is slowly coming back into phase. It should appear again tomorrow, then in 6 hours be back in sync with the normal flow of time.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  23. Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the Higgs Boson is a theoretical particle which both the LHC and the Tevatron are trying to prove the existance of and determine its mass. It is important because it could be an elementary particle that could explain the origin of mass of other elementary particles and differentiate between the massless proton and the heavy W and Z Bosons, indicating where the differentiation between electromagnetism and weak force arises. Better understanding these fundamental forces could affect better understanding aspects of microstructures and the univ... Ah hell, I have no idea what this is all about! This one's over my head, I think I'll go back to Soviet Russia jokes now.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll make it simple: whatever the standard theory says, root for it to be wrong as wrong can be, and for the entire theoretical physics community to go on a rampage, ripping out and replacing things we've long held to so certain they were hardly worth questioning.

      It's bound to be more fun that way.

      Of course governments will be freaked that they spent so much money to prove something and failed to do it, but that entirely misses the point. What makes trying to prove our basic assumptions about the universe worthwhile is the small possibility that they're wrong in some fundamental and important way. I for one look forward to the day when some big shot physicists hold a press conference and announce, "You know what we've been telling all along about [perpetual motion/faster than light travel/anti-gravity/time travel]? Well, it turns out not to be entirely, precisely true." How cool would that be?

      It'll be a big ho-hum if they announce that they've found the Higgs Boson exactly the way they expected with exactly the observations they predicted.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      The universe, being rather on the largish-side, probably already contains at least two of everything possible within it, formed naturally through one way or another (such as the evolution of a species which is obsessed with lunch, and so designs and constructs the Free Sandwich button).

      However, of the many infinite realities which do not exist, those in which Free Sandwich buttons were possible became filled with sandwiches soon after their initial springing-forth, nilling the potential for all other life, and so clearly the Anthropic principle takes over.

      Of course, this is a flawed argument anyway, since as far as we know, and free sandwich button could probably not produce sandwiches at a rate which would cause a sandwich queue to expand at faster than the speed of light, and would probably collapse into a delicious but deadly black hole before expanding to reality-threatening magnitudes. I think the argument's concept is clear and reasonable, however.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    3. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if we allow for the existence of imaginary sandwiches? Or at least sandwiches of imaginary mass?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      not imaginary mass, negative mass.

      the button, when pressed creates one sandwich and one antisandwich

      you can only eat one kind of sandwich or you will get horrible heartburn.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 1

      wow, It's kind of sad, but I somehow feel like I know what you mean...

    6. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case you can dispense with the button. Wouldn't sandwich/anti-sandwich pairs simply arise spontaneously?

      What's more, it can be demonstrated in a universe with negative mass sandwiches, information can travel backwards in time by the following argument:

      (1) The sandwiches will have mustard or mayo.
      (2) The mustard/mayoness of a sandwich will initially be in an indeterminate state.
      (3) When you bite into the sandwich the wave function will collapse into mustard or mayo
      (4) By Murphy's Law, you will get the opposite of whatever you ordered.
      (5) (4) is inconsistent with (2) unless information travels backward in time.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the purpose of the button is to attract such spontanious sandwich pairs to a useful time and location

      if you are hungry now you don't want to wait 50 billion years and travel 16 light millenia due north to get a sandwich, you want it now, and a couple feet in front of you, on the desk

      you also need the button to be sure they don't form too close and explode

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      YES! Eat the antisandwich, lose weight! THAT'S what the LHC is all about! It's going to make it's money selling weight-loss products!

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    9. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by hey! · · Score: 1

      If the negative mass of the anti-sandwich equals the mass of the sandwich, then there should be no reason to wait fifty billion years.

      True story. As you can tell I'm not a physicist. A buddy of mine in college (who was a mech e, not a physicist) called his grandmother in Florida, and she said "Oh, I'm sorry dear, I can't talk I have my friend Mrs. Dirac and her husband over."

      "Dirac?" he replied without thinking. "You mean like Dirac Delta Function?"

      "Yes, that's right dear. Would you like to speak with him?"

      "NO!"

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      I for one look forward to the day when some big shot physicists hold a press conference and..

      It will not happen. Physics is based on axioms(postulates) and mathematics. The axioms cannot be proved, unless they mathematically follow from other axioms, in which case the former become theories and only the latter are axiomatic. They can only be disproved, reducto ad absurdum, when their implications contradict(or seem to contradict) reality i.e experimental result. It can be argued that this way of doing physics (which hasn't really changed from Newton's day) combined with what we know of mathematical incompleteness (Kurt Godel) leads to the disturbing thought that even if we have a perfect self-sustaining model, we will not be able to prove it. The physicists you talk about will only be able to show the lack of evidence against it, and they will have to live with that sad realization.

      Hey, don't blame me.. blame Godel!

    11. Re:Ah, it's All about the Higgs Boson by alienmole · · Score: 1

      It'll be a big ho-hum if they announce that they've found the Higgs Boson exactly the way they expected with exactly the observations they predicted.
      Luckily for all of us, this is super-unlikely to happen. Most physicists who don't completely drink all their own koolaid know that.

      However, when it comes to perpetual motion/FTL travel/time travel, dream on. Sorry, there's just too much arguing against those. As for antigrav, it's conceivable that some unusual ways of interacting with gravity could be found, but I wouldn't hold out any hopes for antigrav flying cars anytime soon.
  24. summary: this story is a dupe by yoyoq · · Score: 1, Funny

    why is it still posted if the summary itself acknoledges this story is a dupe?

  25. Gadzooks! by Control+Group · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've lost containment of the hellium! Quick, we need a goateed doctor and a musclebound space marine from Phobos!

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    1. Re:Gadzooks! by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      we need a goateed doctor

      Am I the only person who misread that as "...we need a goatse'd doctor..."?
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    2. Re:Gadzooks! by metalcup · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person who misread that as "...we need a goatse'd doctor..."?
      No..but do you want everyone who misread it to start replying to your question? :)
      --
      "Laziness is an optimisation protocol"
    3. Re:Gadzooks! by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      No..but do you want everyone who misread it to start replying to your question? :)

      Good point... but then again, this is /. and some AC out there is bound to respond anyways. :-P
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    4. Re:Gadzooks! by Scoldog · · Score: 1

      No, but I read your post and instantly thought "What do we need with a proctologist"

      Damn, I need some sleep.

      --
      This space for rent
    5. Re:Gadzooks! by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      No, but I read your post and instantly thought "What do we need with a proctologist"


      Well, after rereading the original story post, one answer came to mind to your question...

      ...has suffered a big explosion deep inside that has caused a leak of ... gas and the quick evacuation of everyone working there.
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  26. measure twice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...supercollide once.

  27. suffocation by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative

    What's so bad about that?

    What's bad is that it displaces all the oxygen in the area. This was a common cause of occupational deaths in MRI rooms- not flying metal objects attracted to the magnet (though a very small number of people have been killed by oxygen tanks and such.) An MRI repair tech was killed because of a slow helium leak that lowered the oxygen percentage enough that he passed out. That's why most if not all MRI facilities have gas monitors that monitor oxygen, nitrogen, and helium levels (liquid nitrogen is also used.)

    MRI machines have vents for this sort of thing. Also because if the magnet quenches, a LARGE amount of liquid helium will boil off; all the electrical energy used to generate the field, which is constantly running in the magnet, turns very quickly into thermal energy. If the vent wasn't there, the room would pressurize, preventing one from opening doors (even an outward opening door- enough force would make it impossible to overcome friction on the bolt.) Magnet quenches are done only in situations where someone's life is in immediate danger (say, they're trapped by a ferrous object and about to bleed out) because of the danger (and the fact that there's a 1:4 chance of destroying the multi-million-dollar magnet and boiling off thousands of gallons of very expensive liquid hydrogen.)

    It's been reported in vent failures when a magnet quenched that it rained oxygen; liquid helium is substantially colder than liquid oxygen. Shit happens: vent valves fail, birds nest in stuff, someone says "hey, what's that big empty pipe for" 6 rooms over and cuts it/blocks it off, etc. I think the MRI tech was killed because of a leaking o-ring.

    Are they just afraid no one will take them seriously if they sound like the chipmunks when they report their findings?

    Picture one guy yelling "Run, run! We'll all suffocate!" in a chipmunk voice, and everyone else laughing at how funny he sounds, and passing out. And dying.

    I mean, it's not like it's spraying O2 in the direction of the pilot light of their oven.

    Oxygen spraying in the direction of a pilot light in an oven will do nothing except make the pilot light burn at a higher temperature. It will not cause an explosion, because there's nothing else combustible in the oven, unless it's REALLY greasy.

    What is not a joking matter is smoking in high-oxygen environments or fires in spacecraft, because they do have lots of flammable stuff, like wire insulation (which is fire-resistant, not necessarily fire-proof.)

    1. Re:suffocation by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      LOX saturating some organic materials can create an explosive. Asphalt is one such material, although you need some percussion to get it going. Just lighting it up won't make it go bang. I wonder if you had some LOX and a 55 gallon drum of leftover pizza grease, and hit it with a blasting cap, could you make it go bang?

      Homeland Security is looking at regulating pizza drivers now.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:suffocation by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Dammit. I knew I shouldn't have put that oxygen condenser on my delivery van.

    3. Re:suffocation by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1

      and the fact that there's a 1:4 chance of destroying the multi-million-dollar magnet and boiling off thousands of gallons of very expensive liquid hydrogen
      I'm sure you meant helium.
    4. Re:suffocation by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is not a joking matter is smoking in high-oxygen environments or fires in spacecraft, because they do have lots of flammable stuff, like wire insulation (which is fire-resistant, not necessarily fire-proof.)

      That sounds very familiar.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:suffocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that other things are put into party helium so that the common man doesnt die when enhaling helium from balloons. Enhaling pure helium would kill you.

    6. Re:suffocation by Frohboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's been reported in vent failures when a magnet quenched that it rained oxygen; liquid helium is substantially colder than liquid oxygen.

      On a somewhat lighter note (since no one was hurt), an MR tech colleague of mine recounted the story (which I may be mangling a bit) of an intentional quench of an MRI at the facility where she worked previously. (I believe the magnet was either being decommissioned, or at least being moved to a different building -- regardless, they needed to release the helium).

      Apparently, they put out an announcement that morning (and earlier in the week), notifying everyone at the facility that the quench would be occurring at some specified time, and not to be alarmed. One of the senior researchers had been away at a conference for a few days, and arrived just as the quench was occurring. As they opened the vents to the roof and released the liquid helium, the suddenly-expanding cold gas shot up in column for a bit, condensing moisture in the air around it, before expanding out, and forming a wider ball.

      Needless to say, this researcher was quite shocked to get back to work in time to see a mushroom cloud over the building. :)
    7. Re:suffocation by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's more that pure helium is far more expensive than "helium-rich air", which is sufficient for inflating some balloons for junior's party. There are plenty of things on the market that can kill you if inhaled, I don't see why they'd be protecting us from helium.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    8. Re:suffocation by Dr_Mic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not that the Helium in and of itself is dangerous (it is an inert gas, after all) but rather that it isn't oxygen. Inhaling the helium from a helium balloon will make you light headed (lack of oxygen) but the real danger is if you keep breathing helium w/out oxygen, you don't realize you're suffocating because the carbon dioxide is still being cleared from you lungs and its the CO2 that triggers the sensation of suffocation.

    9. Re:suffocation by AJWM · · Score: 1

      fires in spacecraft, because they do have lots of flammable stuff, like wire insulation (which is fire-resistant, not necessarily fire-proof.)

      The only spacecraft that used a pure O2 environment were the US Mercury through Apollo-Skylab series. It's worth noting that even the pre-fire Apollo spacecraft materials were fire-resistant in the designed-for pure O2 atmosphere -- because the designed-for atmosphere was 3 PSI, not the 16 PSI (pure O2!) that they were using in the pre-launch plugs out test where the Apollo 1 fire occurred.

      There have been minor in-orbit wiring fires aboard Shuttle, which uses standard air.

      --
      -- Alastair
    10. Re:suffocation by AJWM · · Score: 1

      LOX saturating some organic materials can create an explosive.

      I haven't tried it, but a couple of folks I know well enough to believe they probably have, report that soaking a charcoal briquette (as for a barbecue) in LOX and then throwing it against something hard can be pretty impressive, in the "stick of dynamite" range. A LOX-soaked charcoal briquette doesn't sound like something I'd want to pick up, myself.

      I have seen someone light a cigarette that had been briefly dipped in LOX (it was in a clamp, he wasn't trying to smoke it!). More impressive than a magnesium fire.

      --
      -- Alastair
    11. Re:suffocation by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      lots of flammable stuff, like wire insulation

      At high oxygen concentrations, People will burn. Sorry to be so morbid, but there it is.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    12. Re:suffocation by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      There have been minor in-orbit wiring fires aboard Shuttle, which uses standard air.

      Did they manage to redirect the result to standard out?

    13. Re:suffocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needless to say... As my English teacher used to say. "If it's needless to say, why say it?"
    14. Re:suffocation by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. Did teacher also not use articles and pronouns when context was sufficient?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    15. Re:suffocation by tj2 · · Score: 1

      At high oxygen concentrations, People will burn. Sorry to be so morbid, but there it is. Reminds me of firefighting training when I was in the Navy. Class "A" (pronounced Alpha) fires are any fire that leaves an ash. People on fire were referred to as "screaming alphas". How's that for morbid?
    16. Re:suffocation by Frohboy · · Score: 1

      As my English teacher used to say. "If it's needless to say, why say it?"


      One day, that same English teacher may teach you about irony and how it can be used to reinforce a story or anecdote, and make it more colourful and interesting to the reader. I believe this is how the fragment "Needless to say ..." is most properly used in modern writing.

      (For those of you, like the parent, who are a little slow, or are just tuning in, the idea is that the part which was "needless to say", is the "punchline", or more interesting part of the story, and hence is actually quite essential, contrary to what the phrase may suggest. It's subtle, I know.)
  28. oo, er.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was I the only one who read that as "The Large HARDON Collider". Sounds like something you would want to stay clear of in case of explosions.

  29. Helium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can almost hear the squeaking scientists running from the clouds of helium like a pack of chipmunks. Helium while a little dangerous can be alot of fun too ;)

    1. Re:Helium by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >I can almost hear the squeaking scientists running from the clouds of helium like a pack of chipmunks. Helium while a little dangerous
      >can be alot of fun too ;)

      The amount of helium in an MRI magnet, together with its location in a confined space, makes this no laughing matter.

      Here's a fun experiment: You go in the server room while we lock the door from the outside and set off the halon system.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  30. Hellium? No wonder there was an explosion! by dummkopf · · Score: 1, Funny

    If it were Helium, then, since Helium is an inert gas, things would have been less dangerous. But Hellium, let me tell you, that is another baby. It's the gas straight from Hell, you know? Basically a satanic fart. Oh wait, I guess that could be a typo. Anyhow. I hope things get better at CERN...

  31. Super Conducting Super Collider by kad77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thanks to democrats (neo-luddites?), the US doesn't already have this technology. Know your (recent) history.

    http://www.rootsweb.com/~txecm/super_collider.htm

    http://motls.blogspot.com/2006/03/ssc-and-clinton- administration.html

    1. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Calling the democrats neoluddites while the republicans are still around?

      Sorry, you are in the wrong place, parallel universe is the next thread down.

    2. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mr. Tubes is a Republican. You can't get much worse than him.

    3. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how did democrats balloon the cost of the project from $4.4 billion to $12 billion (in 1993 dollars)? I notice that the Large Hadron Collider has only cost around $3 billion in current dollars including cost overruns. The SSC seems to have a similar track record to the International Space Station (which was formed about the same time, started also with an initial cost of $4 billion and eventually grew to over $40 billion). So IMHO it's likely that it wouldn't have stopped at just $12 billion. The LHC cost overruns appear to be less than 50% of the initial project cost. At some point, you have to recognize that the SSC was poorly run with heavy pork and out of control costs associated with it. If the SSC has maintained some sort of financial discipline, we'd probably be using it today.

    4. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by kad77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, a government funded project was not run efficiently in regards to cost. Stop the presses! An alternate plan was not introduced-- the whole project was simply killed and the $2b already spent was laid to waste. The point remains, unrefuted, that the democrats in power decided to score some political points rather than advance important scientific research.

      Are you saying the advances provided by having the SSC online for at least the last 5 years wouldn't have been worth $20 billion? $30b? Oh, and why haven't we built a nuclear power plant in a few decades? Hmmm...

    5. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by khallow · · Score: 1

      Yes, a government funded project was not run efficiently in regards to cost. Stop the presses! An alternate plan was not introduced-- the whole project was simply killed and the $2b already spent was laid to waste. The point remains, unrefuted, that the democrats in power decided to score some political points rather than advance important scientific research.

      Motives aside, what was wrong with the decision? The costs had ballooned a lot. And letting these people have a second chance? They already wasted $2 billion.

      Are you saying the advances provided by having the SSC online for at least the last 5 years wouldn't have been worth $20 billion? $30b? Oh, and why haven't we built a nuclear power plant in a few decades? Hmmm...

      You don't want to go here. Commercially that research was probably worth a few hundred million dollars at best.
    6. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by kad77 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you are dodging my points:

      A. An alternative plan was not introduced -- this does not automatically infer the exact same group ("these people"?) needed a second chance.

      B. Value of research -- oh, the total research value was worth less than a billion USD. Sure. Where is your response about nuclear technology in relation to this? Advancing the movement away from fossil fuel dependency is not worth the short term costs? Ok.

      I'll respond briefly to your points:

      The $2b was not entirely "wasted" until the project was canceled. The infrastructure could still have been used if the project was reorganized. Duh.

      I'm not going to entertain your premise of canceling important scientific research simply for political gain. It's insipid, and their political points from this certainly were not apparent in the 1994 elections.

    7. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by fmackay · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind that the LHC is going in the tunnel previously used for LEP - a large part of the LEP budget went on digging holes.

      Funny story relating to earth-moving at CERN (possibly apocryphal); an experiment resulted in a neutrino beam passing through a nearby village. The locals, with a poor grasp of particle physics, were up in arms about radiation etc. Attempts to persuade them that the beam was harmless were to no avail. Eventually a solution was found - a large earth berm was constructed to "block" the neutrinos - and everybody was happy.

    8. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by khallow · · Score: 1

      A. As far as I can tell, any new proposals would be presented by the same group as the original SSC. It's not a formal structure or a conspiracy, there just aren't that many high energy physicists who work on these big projects and have administrative or design experience.

      B. I think it's reasonable point to conclude that cutting edge particle physics isn't that valuable. For example, the particle energies exploited in the SSC were far beyond those present in a fission or fusion reactor. So that science wouldn't be very relevant to nuclear technology. The real work on nuclear technology could be done with a far more prudent effort than the big projects like the SSC or ITER.

      I'm not going to entertain your premise of canceling important scientific research simply for political gain. It's insipid, and their political points from this certainly were not apparent in the 1994 elections.

      Politicians usually have ulterior motives when they do anything. What makes this decision a bad decision? My take is that even a revised, small scale accelerator would be a case of throwing good money after bad. It would be thoroughly corrupted by special interests just as the SSC was.
    9. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by khallow · · Score: 1

      Good point. Looks like the initial costs for LEP were under a billion 1981 swiss francs.

    10. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by kad77 · · Score: 1

      "A. As far as I can tell, any new proposals would be presented by the same group as the original SSC"
      "B. I think it's reasonable point to conclude that cutting edge particle physics isn't that valuable."

      I think we're done here. Thanks for your thoughts.

    11. Re:Super Conducting Super Collider by khallow · · Score: 1

      Not really. If the SSC had kept its costs under control, as CERN projects have, then neither point A or point B would have mattered. Point A is just the outcome of a small population in the field while point B is subjective opinion (we cook up numbers between around $0.5 and $30 billion after all) in the absence of a market in scientific knowledge. Congress effectively decreed that the actual value of that science was more than $4.4 billion but less than $10 billion (ie, the remainder to finish up the project when it was known to be over budget). But as long as the ISS wasn't severely over budget, then I doubt there would be any serious effort to stall or stop it. People can still contend that the scientific output was a small fraction of its cost, but no one would have listened to them.

      That's the thing that bothers me about your argument. It never really takes into account that the SSC went horribly wrong nor that the mechanisms that made it so were still in place. Once it ran a factor of almost three over budget, then the opponents of the SSC had opportunity to kill the project.

  32. tag "oshits" plz by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 1

    100 internets to whoever tags this story "oshits" or "ohshitson"

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
  33. What kind of leak? by ewhenn · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...a leak of hellium gas and....

    Jesus christ! ... oh wait.....

  34. Good thing no one was hurt by caffiend666 · · Score: 1

    Good thing no one was hurt! Would hate to think that someone was once again killed by theoretical physics and bad calculus. Please tell me this wasn't another traditional to metric conversion problem.... What's with runnimg from the cloud of Helium, were they scared of sounding funny while describing on TV what the explosion sounded like? Would be funny to hear the chipmunks describing an accident at the nuclear/quantum research facility. I know I know, nothing quite like a cloud of radiactive, potentially cryogenic or super-heated to scare the living daylight out of you.

    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
    1. Re:Good thing no one was hurt by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >.... What's with runnimg from the cloud of Helium

      Think of it more in terms of running *toward* a source of breathable air. (Sucking He and N2O is all fun and games until you don't get to take a breath of air in between, and you drown -- if you're lucky.)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Good thing no one was hurt by arcade · · Score: 1

      Please tell me this wasn't another traditional to metric conversion problem...

      What's this "traditional" you're talking about? Metric is the tradition in most of the world. But I agree. Let's hope it's not "idiotic US substandards" vs "rest of the world" conversion problems _this_ time.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  35. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must've put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. Shit, I always do that. I always mess up some mundane detail. Lol, nice Office Space quotation.
  36. Re:Proton? by cyphercell · · Score: 1

    I hate to think of how this kind of a mix up just convinces certain people even more of their anti-science prejudices.

    People with "anti-science" prejudices, are generally not the type that will appreciate a replication of the big-bang. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton more importantly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_Boson the Higgs boson particle is being sought in order to prove large portions of string theory.

    --
    Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  37. Free! by Presidential · · Score: 1

    And the people within a 200km radius all enjoyed a free MRI that day, too!

    --
    Whenever Mrs. Fitch breaks wind, we beat the dog.
  38. Deja boom by Chairboy · · Score: 1

    There is the theory of the moebius, a twist in the fabric of space where time becomes a loop, where time becomes a loop, where time becomes a loop...

  39. Any missing physicists? by lexarius · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder if any of them ended up on Another World?

  40. Re:It is not about what you know it is who you kno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the mod "incoherent" selection when you really need it?

  41. Time to get the eyes checked by jalefkowit · · Score: 4, Funny

    On my first scan of the /. home page this morning, I read this headline as "Bad Meth Causes Explosion at CERN Collider". Needless to say, the actual story turned out to be a lot less interesting than I thought it would be :-D

    1. Re:Time to get the eyes checked by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing--and was going to write about it until I saw your comment. Thanks.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
  42. I think I'm partially responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did help with the calculations by running LHC@Home.

  43. Aren't these the same guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who swear they can create black holes in their collider without swallowing up the whole earth? I mean, they PROVED mathematically that it's safe, right?

    1. Re:Aren't these the same guys... by alisson · · Score: 1

      I suppose technically, a mini-black hole could eventually suck all the air off the planet... but not before exploding...

    2. Re:Aren't these the same guys... by nuelo · · Score: 1

      I find it disturbing that these guys are allowed to practice instantaneous molecular combustion, or whatever the heck they do, when there is a possibility of them blowing up the universe. They should shutdown this operation until someone perfects time travel...

    3. Re:Aren't these the same guys... by alisson · · Score: 1

      Eh, The universe wasn't the best idea :D

  44. Out of this world by snemarch · · Score: 1

    Man, that's just out of this world...

    --
    Coffee-driven development.
  45. Bad Math Causes Explosion at CERN Collider by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    A bunch of Mathheads cook up a bad batch in their laboratory and it explodes. I think we've seen this story on the news before.

  46. Reminds me of George Goble by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1
    Some of us who were born before the Internet remember that about 10 years ago a guy named George Goble posted a video of himself pouring LOX on lit charcoal. He claimed that a pre-saturated charcoal briquette had the equivalent explosive power of a stick of dynamite.

    That was our YouTube. And we liked it.

    1. Re:Reminds me of George Goble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Some of us who were born before the Internet remember that about 10 years ago a guy named George Goble posted a video of himself pouring LOX on lit charcoal.

      Some of us born even earlier than you did a double take on this thread, because we couldn't figure out why George Gobel , the guy who asked Johnny Carson, after following Bob Hope and Dean Martin on The Tonight Show, "Did you ever get the feeling that the world was a tuxedo and you were a pair of brown shoes?" would pull a stunt like that, let alone have a license plate that said "UNIX"

  47. I knew it! by alisson · · Score: 1

    I always knew math was out to get me :(

  48. Re:DUPE by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, a week ago the accident propelled the collider into the future, and that's why it's being reported today. Sheesh, do we have to explain **everything ** to ya?

  49. Re:Units vs "Freefall" by Hoffer by pg--az · · Score: 0

    Googling on (( FREEFALL HOFFER )), you are led to a TRUE STORY which can be had used for a penny from Amazon Marketplace. It *WAS* an English-Metric issue, which led to the 767 running out of fuel in mid-flight, finding an airfield only by luck.

  50. Helium is not friendly! by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you're working with liquid nitrogen and liquid helium (as coolants for superconducting magnets) it's easy to assume they're harmless because they're chemically inert. However a small volume of liquid boils into a huge volume of gas, which will exclude the air - and precious oxygen - from the vicinity. A big helium leak is no laughing matter because of the asphyxiation risk.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  51. Something smells fishy by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So Fermilab, CERN's competition, designed the magnets that happened to have a basic design flaw? Hmmmm, cue The Beastie Boys tune "Sabotage"!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Something smells fishy by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fermilab and CERN are only competitors under a quite loose definition of the word. ATLAS and CMS are competitors, CDF and D0 are competitors, Fermilab and CERN are not really. Actually, most of the people working at CERN either also work at or have worked at Fermilab (or one of the other accelerator labs). Most of the people at Fermilab are anticipating working at CERN in the next few years. I myself have been working at Fermilab for the last few years, but I am starting work at CERN this summer.

      CERN is a continuation of what Fermilab has been working on, not a rival.

      The CAPTCHA is "footstep". Appropriate. CERN is following in Fermilab's footsteps (and then going quite a bit further).

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    2. Re:Something smells fishy by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      So Fermilab, CERN's competition, designed the magnets that happened to have a basic design flaw? Hmmmm, cue The Beastie Boys tune "Sabotage"!

      Once could equally easily invert this; CERN, Fermilab's competition and responsible for reviewing and approving the design, managed to miss a fundemental flaw in the design. Plenty of blame to go around here on both sides of the Atlantic.
    3. Re:Something smells fishy by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I'm quite jealous that you work at Fermilab, simply due to the design of the large office space there =) I was there a couple of weeks ago for an FAA safety meeting for pilots, and it was the first time I got to visit Fermilab. I fell in love with the atrium area.

    4. Re:Something smells fishy by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Weeeeellllll, Wilson Hall is all well and good. Quite nice, I agree. I work at CDF, though, and so most of my time is spent in the CDF trailers. Pretty much all the physicists (as opposed to engineers and technicians and such) work in aging portable building offices, with usually two, sometimes three people in one fairly small space. Even the CDF spokespeople have their offices in the trailers.

      Of course, when I was working on a hardware upgrade for Run IIb, I did spend a significant amount of time on the 14th floor of the high rise (Wilson Hall), but that was actually worse. There was a window just behind my flickery CRT monitor (the brightness contrasted with the crappy monitor made for terrible eyestrain), there were one and sometimes two or three other people working in the same small space, and I was working at a teststand (plus another two teststands, all running at once), which meant that I had to contend with the noise of around a hundred large cooling fans.

      The atrium is amazing, though. Also, did you see the buffalo herd?

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    5. Re:Something smells fishy by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I did not get to see the buffalo herd, as this seminar was in the evening. My feeling always was that Fermilab and the associated research there was always valuable but underfunded. Hopefully someone will wake up and move some more money your way.

  52. Obligatory Office Space by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I must've....put a decimal in the wrong place. DAMMIT! I always do that!"

  53. What the HELL is HELLium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helium?

    Mikey

    1. Re:What the HELL is HELLium? by Elvis+Parsley · · Score: 1

      No, hellium. It's what Maxwell's demon is made out of.

  54. Re:Proton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    > the Higgs boson particle is being sought in order to prove large portions of string theory.

    Actually, it is parts of the standard model that it is proving. String theory would probably just be tweaked a little if something unexpected happened with the Higgs boson and the standard model.

  55. When Physicists screw up... by Temkin · · Score: 2, Interesting


    When physicists screw up, they certainly do it spectacularly. Though I don't think this quite rises to the level of the Castle Bravo "oops" :-)

    1. Re:When Physicists screw up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Regarding screw-ups: If it involves the chemistry department, you can stop running after a few blocks. If it involves the physics department, keep running!"

    2. Re:When Physicists screw up... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      You can run, but you'll just die tired.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  56. Sounds strangely familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they have a Gordan Freeman working for them.

  57. Hmmm by dpaton.net · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who saw that headline in an RSS feed and read it as "Bad Meth Causes Explosion at CERN Collider", and laughed out loud at the office before realizing I'd misread it and feeling like a fool?

    Or is it just too early in the morning for me to be posting?

    --
    This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
  58. I think we found out... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    where the last of those Pentiums with the divide error ended up!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  59. MOD PARENT UP by icedcool · · Score: 0, Troll

    Funny half-life reference. Whoever modded it troll is a loser.

    --
    Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
  60. Bad Math Causes Explosion at CERN Collider by Mathness · · Score: 1

    Waaah? I wasn't even near that place. Besides nobody saw me there, so you can't prove anything. :P

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  61. need more math and science in schools. by cheap.computer · · Score: 0

    This is why the president stressed the need for math and science in schools.

  62. Oblig. YouTube link to the video by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Man, Goble rocks. He drives a car with the license plate UNIX.

    Here's a YouTube link to the video. I don't think barbecue is the right word...try incinerate.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBLr_XrooLs

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  63. Not seeing why this is a math error by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    I see nothing here that was not known from the story of one week ago. I cannot find a point in the original article or today's articles where someone misread their slide rule, or a napkin got wet and someone mistransfered some figures. The consistent message from the start has been that all groups neglected to consider some basic forces involved when the device is in use.

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  64. Inaccurate article by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    No, the problem was not bad math. The problem was that the engineering design specification did not take into account torsion forces acting upon the magnets. Bad engineering, if anything.

  65. "Bad Meth Causes Expolosion at CERN Collider" by peterjhill · · Score: 1

    LOL, I just read a 5 page story about a 72 hour meth binge, so when I read the title of this article, I read it as, "Bad Meth Causes Expolosion at CERN Collider"

    Now that would be a great story... a bunch of scientists building a meth lab at a collider.

  66. What's Getting Cancelled To Pay to Fix This? by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So what science is going to get canned to pay for this fix?

    This reminds me of the accident at the Princeton TFTR when it was being installed. The fusion reactor used huge flywheels to store sufficient power to operate the tokamak (without pulling down the electric grid). During installation, a contractor dropped one of the flywheels from an overhead crane.

    To fix the flywheel, congress cancelled almost every other fusion research project in the country. This was when, for example, the EFBT project at NASA was cancelled - despite having results as or more promising than tokamak research.

    (My plasma sciences professor at college had previously led the EFBT project; the story is repeated from him.)

    I wonder what dozen other less-well-known research projects are going to get canned to fix this high-profile mistake, and what breakthroughs we'll lose because of it.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  67. Metric conversion by RageOfReason · · Score: 1
    From the Fermilab directoes comment, "Fermilab has designed, built, assembled and delivered nine 43-foot (13-meter) quadrupole magnet assemblies to CERN"

    No, 43 feet is 13.10644098438738472930 meters, give or take.

  68. CERN Collider explosion pros and cons by robson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pros: Finally get to field-test that cool Tau Cannon.

    Cons: Headcrabs everywhere.

  69. Spelling by paulywog · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing that spelling doesn't risk lives, though!!

    "the 27 km. circunference"

  70. "that has caused a leak of hellium gas " by Quila · · Score: 1

    Who else here would have loved to have been the emergency operator when people started calling in?

  71. Nothing smells fishy by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Presumably this was supposed to be a joke, but just in case...

    If you read Fermilab's press release, you'll note that Fermi and CERN followed proper procedures, with Fermi running reviews including both CERN and third party labs. NOBODY seems to have caught this. So if someone does want to propagate conspiracy theories, they'll need a wider net than merely inter-lab rivalry.

    [Egging them on dept: I suggest watching _National Treasure_ a few times; there are lots of hidden clues in there. Good thing people foresaw this coming in a supercollider centuries ago!]

  72. Re:WTF? by Das+Auge · · Score: 0, Troll

    My point exactly.

  73. All the makings of a conspiracy theory by srujan1.1beta · · Score: 1

    Wow.. This has all the makings of a conspiracy theory. Hell, it may even be true.LOL.. Anyways lets see if Fermilab beats them to it. Then the Europeans will never ever trust the Americans again. Remember HIV and the Internet.

  74. Bad math causes explosions? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Neat! Where do I sign up for Bad Math 101?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  75. Re:Units vs "Freefall" by Hoffer by drew · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia also has a shorter and much less dramatic description of the 767 in question, which includes a description of the conversion problems:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  76. Information? by fm6 · · Score: 1

    While the full cause of the problem is not yet known, failure to account for the asymmetric loads in the engineering design of the magnet appears to be a likely cause. The test configuration corresponds to conditions that occur during a magnet quench, when a superconducting magnet suddenly "goes normal," releasing large amounts of energy. They may also occur during magnet cooldown and during certain other conditions such as refrigerator failure. I consider myself reasonably technical, but I find this "information" pretty fucking opaque. Did somebody forget to plug in the refrigerator? You can hardly blame the "popular press" for failing to penetrate this kind of clunkspeak.
  77. Re:DUPE by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    Yes. It is.

    The magnet's failure created ripples that extended through time. We are seeing the first one coinciding with us. Expect to read the same post next week as the second ripple reaches us.

    Also, you will remember the ripple that also propagated into your past, about a week before the accident. Next week, you will remember the second one, two weeks before the accident.

  78. Fluff piece? by raddan · · Score: 1

    I heard the lead-in for the story you mention this morning, over breakfast, but I did not hear the story myself (left to catch the train to work). But I remember wondering if they were going to mention the accident, and if not, then maybe NPR was running a fluff piece for CERN. You know, essentially recycling a positive press release that CERN may have put out in light of their recent embarrassment. The fact that you say they didn't makes me suspicious that this may be the case.

    After a minute of searching, here's the NPR piece that ran this morning.

  79. Hand-of-God effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently god does not like Higgs Boson particles!
    Is this a hint of gods existence?

    http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1126-6708/2006/03/05 7/jhep032006057.pdf

  80. The OSHA oversight committee reports by br0d · · Score: 1

    detecting evidence of a similar nitrous leak approximately two years ago. Strangely, no leak was ever reported.

  81. Physicists by smithcl8 · · Score: 1

    I was a mathematics major in college. I'll never forget my only college physics class, I found one answer to have pi in it, so I left it in there. Lost 1/2 credit because I didn't take the right number of "significant digits of pi." Next day, dropped the class and picked up a biology course for my science credit.

    Maybe, just maybe, all of the digits are significant.

    1. Re:Physicists by holomorph · · Score: 1

      In a physics class? I surprised (having majored in physics myself, we left pi in the answer all the time). Now an engineering-physics I'd be less surprised. . . hmm, seemed to have strayed well off topic here :p

    2. Re:Physicists by smithcl8 · · Score: 1

      Yep. Real physics class. The professor may have been an engineer for all I know. Either way, I didn't last long there. I considered myself to be too right for him.

    3. Re:Physicists by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I can't help but think that the "significant digits" issue would be important where your measured values are only of a certain precision and accuracy.

      Let's say you've got a measurement of distance to the closest 10cm. You could multiply that number by pi to a million decimal places, but you're going to be getting junk data after a certain point. The measurement simply doesn't have the precision for pi to a million digits to be meaningful.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  82. Coincidence? by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

    Coincidentally, Fermilab stands to gain most from delays at Cern. Its researchers also operate a rival but less powerful particle accelerator, the Tevatron.

    I think not...

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
  83. T-Shirts now on sale by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

    I survived the first Big Bang at CERN and all I got was this lousy t-shirt...

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:T-Shirts now on sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Bangs - R - Us

  84. Actually, it does sound strangely familiar. by BubbaFett · · Score: 1

    The accelerator is designed to smash together protons, a kind of sub-atomic particle, at near light speed.

    The LHC itself comprises two pipes, each containing a beam of protons traveling at near-light speed that are steered around the circular tunnel by powerful magnets.

    No wonder there was an explosion! We have seen this before:

    Dr. Egon Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: What?
    Dr. Egon Spengler: Don't cross the streams.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: Why?
    Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?
    Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
    Dr Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal.
    Dr. Peter Venkman: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

  85. Something to worry about: CERN Physicists Plan To by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
    CERN Physicists Plan To Make Mini Black Holes!

    Also this has been covered in some way on /. here

    Boy, CERN is just 720km away from me... Not that beeing on the other side of the planet would be of much help if the produce a "mini" black hole by using bad math.

    /me is worried

  86. Re:WTF? by Das+Auge · · Score: 0, Troll

    Every day the gap between Slashdot and Digg grows smaller.

  87. Bad reporting causes temper explosion at my PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12 paragraphs and the closest he gets to what went wrong is something to do with balance of forces. We read these stories to know WHAT HAPPENED, not what Dr Kinsey Mc Kinsey of Whatever institute thinks about how some other nobody might feel upset or surprised or whatever about this UNKNOWN but obviously BAD event.

    Damn already.

  88. Translation by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The linked article, which has more useful information in each paragraph than the entire original article from the story submission, is a little technical. Lemme try and simplify the important parts:

    preliminary indications are that structures supporting the inner "cold mass" of one of the three magnets within its enclosing cryostat broke at a pressure of 20 atmospheres, in response to asymmetric forces applied during the test.

    The magnets are chilled with liquid helium to keep the temperature near absolute 0. Some of the support framework which holds one of the magnets inside the coolant pipes ("cryostat") failed at 300 psi because the loads did not line up in a way the framework was designed to hold.

    Such forces are expected on occasion during normal operation of the LHC. The failure does not concern the magnets or the cold masses themselves, but rather their assembly in the cryostat.

    These conditions do not happen often, but they were known and were apparently overlooked by the engineers. Fortunately, the functional design of the system appears sound, it's just the design of physical supports that needs to be modified.

    While the full cause of the problem is not yet known, failure to account for the asymmetric loads in the engineering design of the magnet appears to be a likely cause.

    Contrary to what the submission and article imply, the math was probably fine, but they engineered the design for a less stressful load than it actually experiences in the worst anticipated case.

    From 1998 to 2002, Fermilab conducted four engineering reviews of the magnets by experts from Fermilab, other US national laboratories and CERN. The reviews do not appear to have addressed these asymmetric loads. Tests at Fermilab were done on single magnets where such loads do not develop.

    Per common practice in large projects, other professionals checked their work, including the customer (CERN). Nobody else thought to account for this case, either. Internal tests did not naturally replicate the failure conditiosn.

    Large teams at Fermilab and at CERN are working on understanding and addressing the problem. They are reviewing the documentation, redoing calculations, performing mechanical tests and analyzing the damage to the magnet triplet at CERN.

    Stay tuned for more news, while they confirm their failure theory and come up with a fix.

  89. Gaa! More crackpot science! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times do I have to say it? Antisandwiches do not have negative mass. They simply have opposite charge. Negative mass makes no more sense than negative energy or negative bread.

    Typically what happens during spontaneous sandwich creation is you get one meat and one vegetarian sandwich. This is a result of the Jared Uncertainty Principle, discovered at Subway. However, it is inevitable that the sandwiches will encounter each other and be anihiliated.

    There's an interesting side affect whereby one of these sandwich/antisandwich pairs can form near a blubber-butt, where the shear mass pulls only one of the sandwiches in and consumes it. Because of conservation of matter/energy, since the other sandwich is not consumed, the blubber-butt actually experiences a net loss of weight.

  90. Familiar indeed by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    Only the way I remember it, it was called the Black Mesa Incident.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  91. Sloppy Thinking by kad77 · · Score: 1

    If you wish to continue this cost argument, check out:

    http://www.sunshinecable.com/~eisehan/V80-10en.htm

    The initial costs of the LEP (say $1b, because your link requires registration) are close to the initial costs of the SCC at the time of its cancellation if you translate the 1981 Swiss Franc's purchasing power to that of USD say in 1990-93. Bzzzzzzzzt, thanks for playing.

    1. Re:Sloppy Thinking by khallow · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the link registration. I accessed it from my university (University of California at Davis) which has transparent access to a lot of these sites. It was a PDF reprint of a page out of an article, LEP: A Historical Introduction [and Discussion], Herwig Schopper; C. H. Llewellyn Smith. Philosophical Transactions: Physical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 336, No. 1642, Results from the Large Electron Positron Collider at CERN. (Aug. 15, 1991), pp. 179-189. They were claiming it was 910 billion in 1981 "MSF" which I believe is the Swiss Franc since CERN values everything in that currency.

      The overall cost of LHC plus LEP isn't out of line with the $12 billion that was attributed to SSC (which as I gather had around 6 times higher energies).
  92. NPR visited before accident by jmiles · · Score: 1
    Actually, the NPR reporter visited the LHC in February (he interviewed one of our professors), so the accident wouldn't have been part of the original piece. Of course, they could have said something about it...

    From Fermilab Today:

    Today: NPR reports on LHC progress In late February, National Public Radio reporter (and former Fermilab Public Affairs intern) David Kestenbaum visited CERN and took a tour of the LHC. NPR will broadcast his report on All Things Considered this afternoon. You can catch the program on WBEZ 91.5 FM between 3:00 and 6:30 p.m. Fermilab Todaywill publish a link to the audio on Tuesday.


    Fermilab Today has been full of PR spin about the lab's mistake lately...
    --
    Anecdotal evidence! I'm sold!
  93. Miniature black holes? by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    Aren't these the same guys that are determined to create miniature black holes to study them, and they guarantee that these black holes won't suck the earth into them? That's pretty scary if if they're suffering from math errors.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  94. Old Pentium processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must have used that batch of old Pentium 586 that were doing screwed up math in the 1990's.
    Isn't strange that no one bother to check another persons math on this? Something this big I would definitely have someone or several people would check it before I make it and start it.

  95. Re:Units vs "Freefall" vs Wikipedia by pg--az · · Score: 0

    That's an excellent summary. The historic four-letter word response to "all engines out" did not make it into the book, nice to know that. Although I won't go back and reread the book, I do not remember the book explicitly mentioning that "all engines out" was missing from their training scenarios - by analogy to the CERN issue we are discussing, it's glaring in hindsight, yes that's what WILL happen if you run out of fuel, but (apart from human error) indeed running-out-of-fuel might never happen, so let's just give it a zero probability ! Given today's CAD/simulation excellence this is where Murphy must hide - once something makes it into calculations it will be covered, so what's "unthinkable" ?

  96. will this parallel universe be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the one where spock has a beard and everyone wants to kill william shatner's character as much as everyone wanted to kill him (following the release of his "music" album)?

  97. Dupe by barakn · · Score: 1

    The reason that "[t]his story might seem strangely familiar to you" is that both stories refer to the same event.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  98. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what gap? seriously... i think we've reached the cross-over point and it is widening...

  99. Not a Dupe, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am a physicist working at CERN, but have nothing to do with the superconducting magnets. I work on the detectors. From my standpoint, if CERN admitted to the fact that there will be a delay and set some reasonable amount of time for said delay, then it would make the life of others who are trying to play catch-up constantly, a lot easier. There is a huge amount of pressure on those constructing the detectors, getting the computing infrastructure ready, etc. to be ready for data taking by summer 07. Such a pressure cooker is a good incubator for problems to come. Some breathing room would be most welcome!

    Indeed, a delay of a few weeks is nothing compared to ~20 years some physicists have been working on the project. (I am considered a newbie, after 3 years on it!) The director general (DG) of CERN has "promised" to the funding agencies to deliver the beam by the end of 2007 and right now, with the current schedule, that would be Dec 07. A few weeks makes that 08, which would make CERN look like it did not live up its promises. Also remember that the LHC has mostly been built with loans. The sooner it starts up, the sooner CERN can pay the money. Most of the cost is construction. Although the electricity bill is so high that CERN will not be able to afford running in winter again after the first startup. (Electricity prices in France change on a daily basis -- often dictating what happens when.)

    The former DGs of CERN had been physicists for the last 50 years. But this DG is actually an engineer. This decision was a concious and good decision as the biggest challenge for the *start* of the LHC is an engineering challenge -- not a physics challenge. The physicists have a lot of say in the design of the LHC, the construction of the detectors and the analysis of the data -- but *not* in the construction of the LHC, which is the biggest cost. So all those making fun of physicists, well, remember, the LHC is an *engineering* project, not a physics project. Any chance you are an engineer?? ;)

    (For those who are wondering why I said that everything needs to be ready by summer 07. Before the LHC collisions with two beams colliding head-on every 25 nanoseconds, with ~20 interactions in every bunchcrossing and a resulting animal zoo of 200 or more particles spewing out of the interaction point, the LHC will have single beams going around the ring, probably summer/fall 07. Although having single beams in the collider sounds like "no fun" -- actually it is. Because the beampipe will not (can not) be at total vacuum so there will be interactions between the gas in the beam and the single beam going around the ring. We will not find ths Higgs in the data, but is crucial for calibrating the detectors... )

  100. Misspelled "helium" by johncadengo · · Score: 1

    ...has caused a leak of hellium gas and...

    It's helium.

    --
    My page.
  101. Obligatory Use of the Word Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God, you people make me sick.

  102. Four engeneering reviews and sinulations... by drolli · · Score: 1

    Sometime, too much sharing of responsibility is not good. You can save the money for the third and fourth review - at least if you tell them that they are the third and fourth. Also alwas check any design first by your pocket calculator (or emacs calc, or python command line if you wish) before inputting it to the fancy simulation. Having a paper with five lines (or 10) it is easiert to figure out which questions need to be asked.

  103. errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how the article about a math error has a spelling error in it!

  104. ugh ? Another world ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Noooo ... They were on this world.

    An explosion happened and all those scientists got running around the room laughing like chipmunks; if that isn't a national threat to our chipmunks?

    who modded parent interesting anyways, should be funny or fascinating but not interesting ..

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  105. Reminds of which? by spindizzy · · Score: 1

    First of course there was this; Another World (known as out of this world in the States) which comfortably pre-dates Half-Life. http://www.idlethumbs.net/display.php?id=13

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  106. Re:WTF? by alienmole · · Score: 1

    Yeah. It's the users with IDs over half a million that are the problem, because they'll reply to themselves three times in the same subthread because of some confusion on their part about how moderation works.

  107. Re:Proton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People with "anti-science" prejudices, are generally not the type that will appreciate a replication of the big-bang


    Not so! I'm sure they eagerly anticipate it.

    Of course, you have to take into account that their idea of the "Big Bang" involves a cheerleader named Shiela and most of the football, basketball and hockey teams.
  108. Tin Foil Hat Club Member Replies by docwatson223 · · Score: 0

    It does seem kind of odd that the two most powerful devices have had the same flaw introduced to them. Makes some of us wonder what effort is being expended in discouraging us from discovering something.

  109. Some good news... at last! by perturbed1 · · Score: 1

    A new CERN press release today reports that the first sector (1/8 of the LHC or 3.3km of it) has now reached the operational temperature of 1.9K. Afterall, it is the world's largest cryogenic system and contains 800,000 litres of helium. 12,000,000 litres of liquid nitrogen will have been vaporized to achieve the full cool-down of 31,000 tons of material. Cheers!

  110. I swear it wasn't us by adamp3 · · Score: 1
  111. Re:WTF? by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    There's no confusion, there are a lot of the mods on Slashdot, probably people like you, that are petty and lack a sense of humor.

    Oh, and this is your cue to tell me that I can leave.

  112. Re:WTF? by alienmole · · Score: 1

    Oh, you half-millioners are so cute. Can't even detect an old /. curmudgeon having fun with you without a smiley face to clue you in.

    FWIW, your confusion about the mod system is simply that the moderators and the posters are the same people, so why would you somehow expect moderation to work any better than comments themselves? I mean, here you are, replying to yourself three times in a row about something utterly trivial about which no-one cares. I can only imagine what you do when you have mod points!

  113. Re:WTF? by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I guess I did react a bit too harshly to your post. For that I apologize. But I was in a foul mindset towards Slashdot.

    Truth be told, I'm really quite tenacious. Which can be good or bad.

    It's just that sometimes the mods do things that make no sense. Like modding a perfectly good joke, that's non-offensive, as "troll."

  114. Re:WTF? by jwo7777777 · · Score: 1

    I applaud you. It takes self-control and compassion to apologize in a public forum.

  115. Re:WTF? by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    I blame my mother. :)