High-end components have better margin. Apple sell more high-end phones compared to Samsung, so yes, selling high-end components through Apple is more profitable than selling them through the S and Note lines.
The major flaw in your premise is that nothing says that Samsung Display division must only sell the best displays to one and only one customer.
Well, you did ask "sell a component to Apple that the best instead of using it within the same company"
So you're saying that it would profit Samsung more to sell a component to Apple that the best instead of using it within the same company to drive sales of their smartphones? I just want to be clear that's what you're saying.
High-end components have better margin. Apple sell more high-end phones compared to Samsung, so yes, selling high-end components through Apple is more profitable than selling them through the S and Note lines.
As much as I enjoy using linux as a daily driver, aside from a flurry of publication on popular tech sites between July to August 2017 for their launch in Indonesia, I haven't heard a single thing about Endless being a leading PC platform on any field of computing.
Some of us would rather not remove our motorcycle helmets every time we want to check our phones.
So why couldn't you just use the fingerprint scanner? Or the passcode mechanism? Or disable the passcode completely?
Because obviously he's wearing his riding gloves, so no fingeprint, no typing passcode. Voice? muffled by the fullface helmet. He should have gone for the new Nokia 3310 instead
I have this problem also. Even worse, I receive banks statements, transaction notifications, and bills. Even worse that a bunch of web 2.0 apps used to skip e-mail address verification and I ended up with a couple Twitter and Instagram accounts
After I got a warning email from HBO by my ISP, I just decided to Stream instead of Downloading. I'd like to see them monitor that.
I'd like to get this straightened out: when you torrent, the file divided up into pieces and sent to your computer in more-or-less random order, where it's reassembled and stored. when you stream, the file is divided up into pieces and sent to your computer sequentially, and the pieces are deleted after you see them. Aside from not having the pieces afterwards, how is this different in terms of their tracking you? In both cases the files are sent to you. Do you mean "use a proxy"? Or is the difference that a streaming viewer isn't sending pieces to other viewers and you believe that watching it illegally is less criminal than watching it and distributing it?
>
You are a pirate if you have a hand in making the a pirated content available online. When you leech a torrent content, you are also sending the part that are stored in your local storage to other downloader, which more or less is the same as burning the episode to a disc and sell them.
Streaming on the other hand only make you a consumer of pirated contents, which is not a target of DMCA take down
In a dwindling X86/AMD64 PC market, laptops* is where the volume is... Yet AMD has nothing for the Laptop Market in the Zen Class Architecture.
And in servers, while there may not be as much volume, is where the cream of the profits are.
While Zen Server parts (Epyc) look good on paper, it reamis to be seen if there will be Adoption from server makers, and demand from server purcharsers...
So, no laptop parts, to early for servers, coupled with so so results for enthusiasts desktop PC (great bang for buck, but performance is more or less even depending on workload) and crap processors for enterprise desktop (corporate parts without IGP? Really? I mean, REALLY?!?!?), is to early to be happy for AMD.
I hope they do well, I really do, for this will be good for all of us (even those of us using Apple gear, therefore, tied to Intel)...
But one thing is to hope, and quite another thing is reality, and is to early to know what reality looks like.
Just my two cents.
Don't worry, Opterons has seen plenty of enterprise adoption among cloud providers. Google, Amazon, and Microsoft use a bunch of them on their Data Centers. If you have IAAS cloud account, chances are you are using either a Xeon E3 or an Opterons. With EPYC continues the tradition to provide more cores for the price and with performance improvement over their previous platform, I am quite confident with the outlook. In addition to that, HPE skipped on AMD on their G9 line, but will be introducing some models for their G10 refresh.
I hear that most servers only user 4-core CPUs and don't need more than that, so I guess EPYC will be a niche use-case.
A "server" might only require 4 cores, but nowadays most of them run on hypervisor which runs on top of a cluster of multiple 32 - 80 cores boxes. So yeah, definitely not niche.
What about sls and slackware? LFS and Gentoo? Redhat and Mandrake? Your story is missing large parts of history. Also, Ubuntu was corrupted by the sin of systemd!
It's an open sourced joke, dude, Pull the source, recompile and create your own joke
of course people aren't buying AMD CPU's in the last six months, we've been waiting for the new ones to come out.
And yet the article is about AMD CPU users preferring GeForce over Radeon, not buyers switching over to Intel CPUs, so you might wanna read the summary.
Anyway, to me, in 2016, the only "new" AMD GPU worth your USD is the RX480 8GB which stuck right in the middle of the chart. In contrary, Nvidia releases a full spectrum of GPUs for anyone from any budget class, from the quite affordable 1060 to the new Titan X. AMD CPU users wanting to spend more (or less in the case of 1060) than what the RX480 can offer can only pick the new GTX10 series. Yes, Vulkan and DX12 made the R9 series competitive again, but why buy the R9s when Vega is just around the corner. For me, AMD managing to keep the drop for only about 4% with only a single (or two if you want to include the 470) new GPU is quite an achievement.
Slashdot Mirror
High-end components have better margin. Apple sell more high-end phones compared to Samsung, so yes, selling high-end components through Apple is more profitable than selling them through the S and Note lines.
The major flaw in your premise is that nothing says that Samsung Display division must only sell the best displays to one and only one customer.
Well, you did ask "sell a component to Apple that the best instead of using it within the same company"
So you're saying that it would profit Samsung more to sell a component to Apple that the best instead of using it within the same company to drive sales of their smartphones? I just want to be clear that's what you're saying.
High-end components have better margin. Apple sell more high-end phones compared to Samsung, so yes, selling high-end components through Apple is more profitable than selling them through the S and Note lines.
Absolutely! Instead of Seattle, they should have taken their money and job opportunity to Bangalore
As much as I enjoy using linux as a daily driver, aside from a flurry of publication on popular tech sites between July to August 2017 for their launch in Indonesia, I haven't heard a single thing about Endless being a leading PC platform on any field of computing.
There's also 44 frames of a PPT, in low resolution, with so much jpeg that you cannot read them properly.
You can switch to full screen view to get a better look at them
So it's a kind of Day-One DLC?
IRC (which allows private messaging) was in 1988 ICQ was in 1996. XMPP was round in 1999.
If "web-based messaging" is just normal instant messaging, it's been around a long time before WebOS (or smartphones).
My assumption is that the "integrated text and Web messaging" is referring to iMessage, which was released in 2011
...Wryyyyyyy
it's pretty rare
With the advent of Azure, that's no longer the case
Some of us would rather not remove our motorcycle helmets every time we want to check our phones.
So why couldn't you just use the fingerprint scanner? Or the passcode mechanism? Or disable the passcode completely?
Because obviously he's wearing his riding gloves, so no fingeprint, no typing passcode. Voice? muffled by the fullface helmet. He should have gone for the new Nokia 3310 instead
I had the old sidewinder gamepad, and my Sidewinder X4 keyboard is still running nicely
Introduce them to the wonderful world of book reading
I have this problem also. Even worse, I receive banks statements, transaction notifications, and bills. Even worse that a bunch of web 2.0 apps used to skip e-mail address verification and I ended up with a couple Twitter and Instagram accounts
After I got a warning email from HBO by my ISP, I just decided to Stream instead of Downloading. I'd like to see them monitor that.
I'd like to get this straightened out: when you torrent, the file divided up into pieces and sent to your computer in more-or-less random order, where it's reassembled and stored. when you stream, the file is divided up into pieces and sent to your computer sequentially, and the pieces are deleted after you see them. Aside from not having the pieces afterwards, how is this different in terms of their tracking you? In both cases the files are sent to you. Do you mean "use a proxy"? Or is the difference that a streaming viewer isn't sending pieces to other viewers and you believe that watching it illegally is less criminal than watching it and distributing it?
>
You are a pirate if you have a hand in making the a pirated content available online. When you leech a torrent content, you are also sending the part that are stored in your local storage to other downloader, which more or less is the same as burning the episode to a disc and sell them. Streaming on the other hand only make you a consumer of pirated contents, which is not a target of DMCA take down
In a dwindling X86/AMD64 PC market, laptops* is where the volume is... Yet AMD has nothing for the Laptop Market in the Zen Class Architecture.
And in servers, while there may not be as much volume, is where the cream of the profits are.
While Zen Server parts (Epyc) look good on paper, it reamis to be seen if there will be Adoption from server makers, and demand from server purcharsers...
So, no laptop parts, to early for servers, coupled with so so results for enthusiasts desktop PC (great bang for buck, but performance is more or less even depending on workload) and crap processors for enterprise desktop (corporate parts without IGP? Really? I mean, REALLY?!?!?), is to early to be happy for AMD.
I hope they do well, I really do, for this will be good for all of us (even those of us using Apple gear, therefore, tied to Intel)...
But one thing is to hope, and quite another thing is reality, and is to early to know what reality looks like.
Just my two cents.
Don't worry, Opterons has seen plenty of enterprise adoption among cloud providers. Google, Amazon, and Microsoft use a bunch of them on their Data Centers. If you have IAAS cloud account, chances are you are using either a Xeon E3 or an Opterons. With EPYC continues the tradition to provide more cores for the price and with performance improvement over their previous platform, I am quite confident with the outlook. In addition to that, HPE skipped on AMD on their G9 line, but will be introducing some models for their G10 refresh.
.. For Showy McShowFace!
It's 15 on top of layoffs that has been previously announced adding up the total to 22. It's in the summary
Security? The article is implying that you can crack the laptop open, It's just that you can't put it back together once it's opened
...and courageous!
It's a 7th generation Intel Core i series
I hear that most servers only user 4-core CPUs and don't need more than that, so I guess EPYC will be a niche use-case.
A "server" might only require 4 cores, but nowadays most of them run on hypervisor which runs on top of a cluster of multiple 32 - 80 cores boxes. So yeah, definitely not niche.
"The desk is just a desk"
Twice's Sana
Now, had he had a Nokia with him, the bullet would have been bounced back to the shooter, and he would have been hailed as a hero!
What about sls and slackware? LFS and Gentoo? Redhat and Mandrake? Your story is missing large parts of history. Also, Ubuntu was corrupted by the sin of systemd!
It's an open sourced joke, dude, Pull the source, recompile and create your own joke
of course people aren't buying AMD CPU's in the last six months, we've been waiting for the new ones to come out.
And yet the article is about AMD CPU users preferring GeForce over Radeon, not buyers switching over to Intel CPUs, so you might wanna read the summary. Anyway, to me, in 2016, the only "new" AMD GPU worth your USD is the RX480 8GB which stuck right in the middle of the chart. In contrary, Nvidia releases a full spectrum of GPUs for anyone from any budget class, from the quite affordable 1060 to the new Titan X. AMD CPU users wanting to spend more (or less in the case of 1060) than what the RX480 can offer can only pick the new GTX10 series. Yes, Vulkan and DX12 made the R9 series competitive again, but why buy the R9s when Vega is just around the corner. For me, AMD managing to keep the drop for only about 4% with only a single (or two if you want to include the 470) new GPU is quite an achievement.