It was a shot at the ignorant view that Islamic terrorists will be responsible for nuclear attacks. You know who I suspect are going to carry out nuclear attacks- PEOPLE WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
Could you be more of an apple troll, how the hell can Apple be content and style? They don't have a product! They don't compete in that market in anyway shape or form. If you are talking about in general, then yoiu're still wrong, because sony doesn't lack copntent in it's other products, and microsoft deosn't lack style in some of it's other products.
Yes, the apology and refudnd was good, but as far as I am concerned it should never happened anyway, not as an oversight, not as a policy. Google shouldn't be a company that needs to be told that that sort of thing is bad practice, it should know it anyway. However, the people they double refund is a very nice touch which most companies wouldn't have done to make up for a mistake- I just wander what caused the complete round about turn, sounds like they found someone in a position of power who was too money orientated got replaced.
All you need to know is the cost of the fastest connection material per metre, the cost of decoding stations, the cost of laying cable per metre, cost of building decoding stations. Then all that would be need is to take the area you want to rebuild, map out where you want to cover, and it would be prettysimple assuming you just use a simple back bone spidering out to smaller and smaller areas untill it goes to each individual home. Unfortunately, this would only work on smallish scales, because while you could with a bit of work figure out how to rebuild a state, or maybe at a push a small country, in reality you'd be talking about possibly continents rewired. Plus of course you want to be future proof, so would you want to put breaks into the backbone connections, it would cause lsightly more latency, but if you don't, and you need to add a connection onto the backbone, that could severely damage backbone structures for several hours and slow connectivity by huge amounts during the time.
Then of course do you want backups- do you want to protect california for example, against earthquakes, possibly by wireless, or by several backbones running perpendicular to each other.
For the last ~year my biology teacher has been using youtube to show us what happens in the body, it works well too, we see everthing from live cells actively dividing by mitosis, to a video of a the carbon cycle. Really, I didn't think it was too uncommon, its such an obvious idea for a use of this service- and all of the content is already there.
In their media files they're making profit from that, so I see no need to pay for the files- I don't pay to be advertised at, same goes for video games and pay TV channels.
I beleive what she is referring to is the fact that the kazaa software automatically lets people download FROM her, and knowing this, AOL should have blocked ports by default- or sumthing like that.
I don't think this is idea of giving the RIAA other fairer options is going to work. I don't beleive for one second that the RIAA has not looked through all their options- including fair ones, liberal ones and harsh ones and resolved upon this- giving them a strongly worded letter trying to persuade them wont work, they know this isn't fiar. Basically, they want pay per listen because theats what they'd like to do selling their music and is just another step in that direction.
I don't want to sound too much like a troll here, but do we need that many TV channels- rather than hundreds of TV channels running 24/7 with their average uses being low, but of course having very high peeks on popular shows, we should have on demand services as television. This'd cut down bandwith, put up competition and work well. Of course its a good idea to retain "Recommended veiwing times" and "First Showing Times" to retain seasons with patterns, Example- my family likes House M.D, its on every thursday, for the last 7 weeks we've missed it (thursday isn't a good night) but because at the momenet I can pirate them (I don't see this as immoral as we're doing it in place of just watching it on TV and we're simply viewing the same thing at a different time), as a result I get to see the season I like and don't loose bandwith on preset re-runs, we just watch every wednesday night instead.
If you really want to mess with them, either paint white noise or put transluccent plastic 4 foot over your roof all the way across your premisses- either way it looks like they have a malfunction
The BBC is run on the money raised by a television license paid by any person in the UK who has a television in their home, as such you are subsidising it whether you use it or not if you have a television- so it stands to reason it should not be made available only to microsoft customers- these people aren't complaining because they are getting this free, they are complaining because they are subsidising a system being created to be a feather in the cap of microsoft.
Full discoluse could be finding a bug and then posting it onto the first 1337 haxxor forum you can find- which most people would agree is wrong, but full disclosure after giving the software company warning can't do any harm- cos either they'll have fixed it or they wont bother fixing it untill forced or not at all.
Since when do you beleive a company that would get sued over the professional firefighters- it's just commmon sense, then you add the fact that people saw the damn thing. What's m ore interesting is the fact that verizon doesn't claim its not their fault- so they're accepting blame for something but not telling you what....?
THe specialist software that it runs not yet being rewritten for vista- I'm sure it'd work on vista, but in an international event like this you really don't want to get things misbehaving or acting just slightly differently. Of course in 4 years time vista will be standard and they'll be no question of using anything else- or possibly using the next version of Windows.
Untill recently, the clock speed was only 222, now they have upgraded it so it can go to the full speed of 333mhz, however, you can't do this while running the wi-fi. People have not found a floor, just a limit to the extra given in the new update, everything was working fine at 222mhz and no one complained about slowness so you should have no problems on the wi-fi, there just wont be the extra snapiness, sony probably only did this to save battery or something.
Yes, but the ISPs actually tell you, they don't have enough bandwith for you to use an unlimited connection, I mean for gawds sake, my internet connection is sold under the name "Bt UNLIMITED Broadband 8MB Connection" except they clearly are overstretching because they actualy introduce steps to limit you during peak times- the least of which is actually telling you they'll just cut off your connection with no notice if you do overuse your unlimited connection.
Slashdot Mirror
It was a shot at the ignorant view that Islamic terrorists will be responsible for nuclear attacks. You know who I suspect are going to carry out nuclear attacks- PEOPLE WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
HEADLINE: 100th nuke detonated this year
Remember back when we should have taken care of those fundamentalist christian extremists running america?
Could you be more of an apple troll, how the hell can Apple be content and style? They don't have a product! They don't compete in that market in anyway shape or form. If you are talking about in general, then yoiu're still wrong, because sony doesn't lack copntent in it's other products, and microsoft deosn't lack style in some of it's other products.
More like U to the C to the A fo' shizzle!
Yes, the apology and refudnd was good, but as far as I am concerned it should never happened anyway, not as an oversight, not as a policy. Google shouldn't be a company that needs to be told that that sort of thing is bad practice, it should know it anyway. However, the people they double refund is a very nice touch which most companies wouldn't have done to make up for a mistake- I just wander what caused the complete round about turn, sounds like they found someone in a position of power who was too money orientated got replaced.
Fortunately AMD is teaching a horse new tricks rather than a dog, otherwise they'd be screwed!
Does this mean,
A) That part of it is void.
B) None of the document is binding, because part of it is void.
All you need to know is the cost of the fastest connection material per metre, the cost of decoding stations, the cost of laying cable per metre, cost of building decoding stations. Then all that would be need is to take the area you want to rebuild, map out where you want to cover, and it would be prettysimple assuming you just use a simple back bone spidering out to smaller and smaller areas untill it goes to each individual home. Unfortunately, this would only work on smallish scales, because while you could with a bit of work figure out how to rebuild a state, or maybe at a push a small country, in reality you'd be talking about possibly continents rewired. Plus of course you want to be future proof, so would you want to put breaks into the backbone connections, it would cause lsightly more latency, but if you don't, and you need to add a connection onto the backbone, that could severely damage backbone structures for several hours and slow connectivity by huge amounts during the time.
Then of course do you want backups- do you want to protect california for example, against earthquakes, possibly by wireless, or by several backbones running perpendicular to each other.
For the last ~year my biology teacher has been using youtube to show us what happens in the body, it works well too, we see everthing from live cells actively dividing by mitosis, to a video of a the carbon cycle. Really, I didn't think it was too uncommon, its such an obvious idea for a use of this service- and all of the content is already there.
Anti-competitive monopolistic behaviour anyone/
Just shows up the fanboys who still claim that apple wouldn't be microsoft even if the could.
I reserve judgement untill I get my GCSE results next week....
then I'll mock the dumb kids....
or laugh at the nerdy loosers....
In their media files they're making profit from that, so I see no need to pay for the files- I don't pay to be advertised at, same goes for video games and pay TV channels.
I beleive what she is referring to is the fact that the kazaa software automatically lets people download FROM her, and knowing this, AOL should have blocked ports by default- or sumthing like that.
I don't think this is idea of giving the RIAA other fairer options is going to work. I don't beleive for one second that the RIAA has not looked through all their options- including fair ones, liberal ones and harsh ones and resolved upon this- giving them a strongly worded letter trying to persuade them wont work, they know this isn't fiar. Basically, they want pay per listen because theats what they'd like to do selling their music and is just another step in that direction.
I don't want to sound too much like a troll here, but do we need that many TV channels- rather than hundreds of TV channels running 24/7 with their average uses being low, but of course having very high peeks on popular shows, we should have on demand services as television. This'd cut down bandwith, put up competition and work well. Of course its a good idea to retain "Recommended veiwing times" and "First Showing Times" to retain seasons with patterns, Example- my family likes House M.D, its on every thursday, for the last 7 weeks we've missed it (thursday isn't a good night) but because at the momenet I can pirate them (I don't see this as immoral as we're doing it in place of just watching it on TV and we're simply viewing the same thing at a different time), as a result I get to see the season I like and don't loose bandwith on preset re-runs, we just watch every wednesday night instead.
If you really want to mess with them, either paint white noise or put transluccent plastic 4 foot over your roof all the way across your premisses- either way it looks like they have a malfunction
The BBC is run on the money raised by a television license paid by any person in the UK who has a television in their home, as such you are subsidising it whether you use it or not if you have a television- so it stands to reason it should not be made available only to microsoft customers- these people aren't complaining because they are getting this free, they are complaining because they are subsidising a system being created to be a feather in the cap of microsoft.
Full discoluse could be finding a bug and then posting it onto the first 1337 haxxor forum you can find- which most people would agree is wrong, but full disclosure after giving the software company warning can't do any harm- cos either they'll have fixed it or they wont bother fixing it untill forced or not at all.
Since when do you beleive a company that would get sued over the professional firefighters- it's just commmon sense, then you add the fact that people saw the damn thing. What's m ore interesting is the fact that verizon doesn't claim its not their fault- so they're accepting blame for something but not telling you what....?
THe specialist software that it runs not yet being rewritten for vista- I'm sure it'd work on vista, but in an international event like this you really don't want to get things misbehaving or acting just slightly differently. Of course in 4 years time vista will be standard and they'll be no question of using anything else- or possibly using the next version of Windows.
Untill recently, the clock speed was only 222, now they have upgraded it so it can go to the full speed of 333mhz, however, you can't do this while running the wi-fi. People have not found a floor, just a limit to the extra given in the new update, everything was working fine at 222mhz and no one complained about slowness so you should have no problems on the wi-fi, there just wont be the extra snapiness, sony probably only did this to save battery or something.
x.........x.
...........
.....x.....
..........
.....x.....
the aliens have turned up to take it back claiming we store it?!!?! Liers!
(companies that are working with Microsoft) and community Linux (companies that haven't yet partnered with Microsoft)
Yes, but the ISPs actually tell you, they don't have enough bandwith for you to use an unlimited connection, I mean for gawds sake, my internet connection is sold under the name "Bt UNLIMITED Broadband 8MB Connection" except they clearly are overstretching because they actualy introduce steps to limit you during peak times- the least of which is actually telling you they'll just cut off your connection with no notice if you do overuse your unlimited connection.